News

News

Trump Orders ICE to Revive Traffic Stops in Crackdown on Illegal Aliens [WATCH]

President Donald Trump has directed the Department of Homeland Security to bring back one of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s most effective enforcement tools.

The return of traffic stop arrests marks a renewed push to enforce immigration law after two controversial shootings of illegal migrants drew heavy media attention and pressure from left leaning politicians.

Trump’s message to ICE was loud and clear during his announcement on Truth Social.

He declared, “We must be strong, tough, and smart, and we CANNOT give up one of I.C.E.’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!”

He urged agents to “be judicious, fair and smart,” while reminding them they are “loved and respected in America.”

The move came after ICE officers fatally shot two migrants during separate encounters in Maine and Texas.

These incidents quickly became political fuel for pro migration advocacy groups and their media allies, who spun the events as examples of U.S. enforcement gone too far.

The narrative ignored a crucial fact, that the individuals were in the country illegally and had chosen to violate American law.

WATCH:

For years, traffic stops have been one of ICE’s most strategic methods for enforcement.

Officers can quietly and efficiently make arrests away from areas where activists typically stage protests.

The tactic minimizes chaos while keeping officers and bystanders safer than in large scale street detentions.

Officials within the agency argue that it is one of the most controlled and predictable ways to apprehend lawbreakers.

However, activists on the left see it differently.

Pro migration groups thrive on spectacle, using images of confrontations and protests to generate emotional outrage that clouds the debate.

They depend on television coverage to pressure politicians and weaken public support for deportations.

Their agenda relies on keeping borders open and turning enforcement into a villainous act.

After the second shooting, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin temporarily paused vehicle stops at the urging of several lawmakers, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine.

The pause was meant to “review procedures,” but many within law enforcement saw it as bowing to political optics rather than focusing on security.

Trump’s directive ends that pause and reaffirms one of his strongest campaign promises, to restore law and order when it comes to immigration.

During his campaign and presidency, Trump has emphasized that illegal migration is not simply a border issue.

It is an economic crisis that hits working class Americans hardest by depressing wages, increasing housing costs, and shifting wealth to corporations and foreign nationals.

Trump’s critics portray his measures as harsh or inflammatory, but they refuse to confront the costs of unchecked migration.

Every year, millions of Americans compete for jobs and housing against individuals who entered the country illegally.

Communities face added strain on schools, hospitals, and law enforcement.

Yet the political class in Washington continues to protect its donor base, which profits immensely from the cheap labor pipeline.

The president’s order comes as the administration looks to sharpen immigration enforcement ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Trump’s demand for results speaks to his recognition that border security remains one of the most consequential issues to American voters.

His message also draws a clear contrast between a Republican agenda focused on rule of law and a Democrat platform that prioritizes appeasing activist groups over public safety.

Many Border Patrol veterans view this move as a sign of renewed confidence in frontline officers.

One former ICE supervisor told Breitbart News that the decision “sends a message to agents that the president has their back.”

He added that traffic stops “save lives on both sides because they are controlled and targeted.”

Meanwhile, activists immediately decried the policy as dangerous, ignoring the basic principle that entering the country illegally carries consequences.

What they frame as compassion often translates into chaos across local communities.

Cities and towns far from the border are dealing with overcrowded shelters, overwhelmed local clinics, and rising crime rates tied to illegal migration.

For working class Americans who have watched their wages stagnate while housing becomes unaffordable, Trump’s move will likely resonate.

It represents a call to reclaim lawful order over the border and restore credibility to immigration policy that has long been abandoned by establishment politicians.

The push to reinstate traffic stops signals a larger shift back to enforcing the law without apology.

Trump has made clear that no political pressure from media pundits or leftist activists will deter him from using the full range of tools available to protect Americans.

The message is unmistakable, the days of timid enforcement are over.

News

President Trump Says Nightly Iran Strikes Continue Until Regime Starts Negotiating Seriously [WATCH]

President Donald Trump said the United States will continue conducting nightly military strikes against Iran and warned that Iranian power plants and bridges could become targets next week if Tehran does not agree to negotiate with the United States, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Trump made the remarks during an interview with Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst that aired Tuesday.

During the interview, Yingst asked whether the president was still considering striking Iranian energy infrastructure and expanding military operations deeper inside the country following a five-hour U.S. mission on Monday.

Trump’s Laugh-Out-Loud Endorsement of Susan Collins Wrecks Leftist Opponent

According to the interview, U.S. forces carried out strikes Monday against targets across Iran, including Bushehr, Chah Bahar, Jask, Konarak, Abu Musa, and Bandar Abbas.

During the interview, Trump said additional military operations are planned before any strikes on energy infrastructure.

“I’ll save the energy targets for last, but ultimately we’ll hit energy targets,” Trump said.

The president indicated the United States intends to continue operations over several consecutive nights before expanding the list of targets.

“We’re going to hit them very hard tonight, we’re going to hit them very hard tomorrow night, we’re going to hit them very hard the night after, and then next week it gets really bad for them because next week comes the power plants. Next week comes the bridges.”

Trump added that future strikes could be avoided if Iran agrees to negotiate.

“We’re going to knock out all their power plants, we’re going to knock out all their bridges unless they get to the table and negotiate.”

When Yingst asked whether he believes Iran is serious about reaching an agreement to end the conflict, Trump said the country has little alternative.

“I think if I didn’t do the way I’m doing, they would never make a deal,” he said.

The president also criticized the nuclear agreement negotiated during the Obama administration, arguing it failed to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“They would have never made a deal with Obama. That deal was the worst deal. What they did sign was a worthless piece of paper. What they signed, what they signed with Obama, was a worthless piece of paper that was a road to a nuclear weapon. And what I have is a wall. There will be no nuclear weapon.”

Trump said preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon remains the central objective of any agreement between the two countries, describing that issue as “by far the most important” term of a potential deal.

The latest comments follow previous warnings from Trump that Iranian infrastructure, including power plants and bridges, could be targeted during the conflict.

In April, Trump highlighted one such strike by posting a video on Truth Social showing Iran’s B1 Bridge in Karaj, described as the tallest bridge in the Middle East, being destroyed in an airstrike.

After that strike, Trump wrote on Truth Social:

“The biggest bridge in Iran comes tumbling down, never to be used again — Much more to follow! IT IS TIME FOR IRAN TO MAKE A DEAL BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE, AND THERE IS NOTHING LEFT OF WHAT STILL COULD BECOME A GREAT COUNTRY! President DONALD J. TRUMP,” Trump said.

Tuesday’s interview marked Trump’s latest warning that the military campaign will continue unless Iran agrees to negotiate with the United States.

According to the president, nightly attacks are expected to continue in the coming days, with Iranian energy infrastructure and transportation networks remaining potential targets if negotiations do not occur.

News

Horror Unleashed Near Alcatraz As Fishermen Save People From Sinking Boat [WATCH]

Commercial fishermen who rushed to assist passengers after a boat sank near Alcatraz Island described a desperate rescue effort as they pulled people from the cold waters of San Francisco Bay on Tuesday, while authorities continued searching on Wednesday for three missing passengers, as reported by the New York Post.

According to the San Francisco Police Department, 20 people were aboard the 49-foot cabin cruiser Volare when it sank Tuesday afternoon.

As of Wednesday morning, one person had died, three people remained missing, and 17 others had been rescued.

Commercial fishermen Mike Montoya and Justin Marceline told NBC Bay Area they were among the first civilians to reach the scene after the vessel began going under.

“There was even people banging at the windows as they were like filing out, and as soon as people were hitting the water, we were just trying to pick them up as fast as we can,” they said.

“Some people didn’t even have life vests on, and they were drowning.”

Authorities also confirmed that a dog aboard the vessel died in the incident.

The U.S. Coast Guard and the San Francisco Fire Department continued searching for the three missing passengers on Wednesday, using thermal imaging, tide prediction, and modeling to guide search operations.

Marceline said the experience is something he will not soon forget.

“You don’t know the feeling until you see it and it happens first-hand, but it’s….nothing I’d like to experience again,” Marceline said.

Officials said the Volare was approximately 600 yards off Alcatraz Island, between the former prison island and the Golden Gate Bridge, when it began taking on water and sank beneath the bay’s cold waters.

Authorities initially received reports of smoke coming from the vessel.

However, officials said the San Francisco Police Department’s Marine 3 vessel, which was the first public safety boat to arrive, determined that what witnesses believed was smoke was actually steam coming from the boat.

Emergency responders rescued 17 people from the water. Officials said one individual required life-saving measures but later died.

Three other passengers were transported to hospitals for treatment.

Investigators described the vessel as a pontoon boat and believe it launched from the St. Francis Yacht Club before the incident.

San Francisco Fire Chief Dean Crispen said Tuesday evening that emergency crews remained focused on locating survivors.

“Right now we are in full rescue mode,” Crispen said Tuesday night.

San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said the operation involved numerous agencies working together in what he described as an extensive emergency response.

The rescue effort is a massive, multi-agency response and an “all-hands-on-deck search and hopefully rescue,” Lurie said.

Authorities said personnel from the San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Fire Department, United States Coast Guard, Oakland Police Department, Tiburon Fire Department, Southern Marin Fire Protection District, along with commercial and recreational vessels already on the bay, joined the rescue operation.

James Smith of Berkeley, a charter fishing boat captain with more than three decades of experience on the water, said tragedies of this kind remain difficult to witness despite his years of experience.

“I’ve been a charter operator for 35-plus years, and it’s pretty horrific anytime you see an accident like this,” Smith told NBC Bay Area.

Officials have not yet determined what caused the Volare to sink. The investigation remains ongoing as search crews continue efforts to locate the three missing passengers.

News

Maine ICE Shooting Draws Response From Kamala Harris, X Users Obliterate Her [WATCH]

Former Vice President Kamala Harris called Tuesday for an independent investigation into the fatal shooting of a Colombian national during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation in Maine, prompting widespread responses on social media and renewed attention to the circumstances surrounding the incident, as reported by the New York Post.

Harris commented on the death of 26-year-old Joan Sebastian Guerrero, whom the Department of Homeland Security identified as an illegal immigrant.

According to DHS, Guerrero was killed during an ICE enforcement operation in Biddeford, Maine, on Monday after allegedly attempting to flee in a vehicle.

“Joan Sebastian Guerrero should still be alive,” Harris wrote on X.

She continued, “This is the second time in a week that ICE agents have killed someone who — by their own admission — was not the subject of their operation. Now Sebastian is dead, his killing witnessed by his three-year-old daughter wearing her Bluey pajamas.”

“This cannot be acceptable in America.”

Harris also called for “an immediate, independent, and transparent investigation” into the shooting.

“Anyone responsible for wrongdoing must be held accountable,” she wrote.

Her comments drew immediate responses online, including criticism from users who referenced her role overseeing aspects of the Biden administration’s response to migration at the southern border.

One user wrote, “I will start giving a f–k” about illegal immigrants killed by ICE “when Democrats start giving a f–k about Americans killed by illegals.”

Another wrote, “Someone needs to be investigated – namely the two individuals who opened our borders up for 4 YEARS, allowing the worst of the worst in here to rob, and k*ll us. Where is the accountability for THAT? You and ol’ Joey should be in prison.”

A third user commented, “As border czar, you are responsible for all the deaths caused by illegals crossing the border during your time as VP.”

During the Biden administration, an average of approximately 2.4 million migrants entered the United States each year, according to the source article, which states that the period represented the largest migrant surge in the nation’s history and included many illegal border crossings.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, ICE officers had been conducting surveillance Monday morning at the last known address of an illegal immigrant with a deportation order in Biddeford, Maine.

DHS said Guerrero left the residence in a vehicle and refused to stop when federal officers attempted to detain him.

“The vehicle attempted to flee the scene and, fearing for public safety, an officer discharged his weapon,” DHS said in a statement.

“The driver of the vehicle was struck, and emergency services were immediately contacted. He passed away from his injuries.”

An eyewitness also described the encounter.

Lucas Scott, 18, told the Portland Press Herald that officers wearing green vests surrounded the vehicle and drew their weapons. Scott said the driver then appeared to drive toward the officers.

“The car was put into drive and was trying to hit the ICE officer,” Scott said, adding that an agent fired roughly four shots.

According to Presente! Maine, a Portland-based aid organization, Guerrero had authorization to work in the United States and had been issued a Social Security number.

The Department of Homeland Security said its Office of Inspector General will investigate the shooting. The incident has also prompted protests in Maine.

The Maine shooting followed another fatal ICE-related shooting in Houston the previous week that also prompted comments from Harris.

“Lorenzo Salgado Araujo’s family called him ‘El mundo entero’ — the whole world,” Harris wrote on X.

Referring to that incident, she said Araujo was “shot and killed by ICE agents on his way to work,” adding that she was “outraged by the horrific and cruel actions of ICE under the Trump Administration.”

“Doug and my prayers are with Lorenzo’s wife, his three sons, and all those who loved and knew him,” Harris wrote.

“I join his son Ronaldo in calling for an immediate, independent, and transparent investigation.”

News

Billionaire Podcast Host Explains Why He Says Media Misled Him, Americans About Trump [WATCH]

Billionaire investor and “All In” podcast co-host Chamath Palihapitiya said this week that his opinion of President Donald Trump changed after he reviewed original source material rather than relying on media coverage, telling a CNBC audience that he believes earlier reporting had misrepresented the president, as reported by the Gateway Pundit.

Palihapitiya, who manages an investment portfolio worth billions of dollars and co-hosts the “All In” podcast with David Sacks, made the remarks during a CNBC appearance while discussing political polarization and media coverage.

Trump Declares America Back in Fiery 250th Celebration Kickoff

Although he has worked alongside Sacks, who serves as President Trump’s Bitcoin Czar, Palihapitiya said he was previously critical of Trump and now believes his earlier views were based on inaccurate information.

“There are enough people that I hear who are lazy and reductive, and they’re going to end up where they’re supposed to end up—in a little cul-de-sac of their own making,” Palihapitiya said.

He continued by explaining why he believes Americans should examine original statements and events for themselves.

“The reality is that most of us were lied to by the media about President Trump. If you just go back to the source material, you should take away two things.”

“One, he didn’t say half the things they said he said.”

“Two, why did these other people just fabricate what they wanted to say so that they could essentially assassinate his character?”

Palihapitiya said he believes the issue extends beyond politics and raises broader concerns about public trust.

“I think that second thing is completely unacceptable in America, and there have still been no repercussions, really.”

The investor said he eventually decided to examine the underlying material himself rather than relying on commentary about it.

“I took the time to learn about it. I admitted on the pod—which has millions of viewers—that I got it totally wrong, because I went and watched Charlottesville.”

According to Palihapitiya, that process ultimately led to a conversation with President Trump.

“The first person to call me was President Trump. I got to know him, and when I put the phone down, I called my wife and said, ‘We got it totally, totally wrong. We were lied to.'”

He added, “Then I got to know him, and he is fantastic.”

Video of the CNBC interview circulated widely on social media following the appearance, with several users highlighting Palihapitiya’s comments about reviewing original source material before forming conclusions.

Another clip from the same interview focused on political reactions to financial products associated with President Trump.

Palihapitiya criticized the idea of refusing to open a savings account for a child solely because it carries Trump’s name.

According to the video posted online, he described that decision as “INSANE!”

Palihapitiya’s comments come as debates over media credibility, political polarization, and public confidence in news coverage continue to be discussed ahead of the 2028 election cycle.

Best known for his work in venture capital and technology investing, Palihapitiya has frequently commented on public policy, economics, and politics through the “All In” podcast.

His latest remarks represent one of his strongest public statements regarding his changed opinion of President Trump, crediting his shift to reviewing original material and personal interactions with the president rather than relying on secondary reporting.

The CNBC interview generated widespread attention online, with supporters and critics alike sharing excerpts of Palihapitiya’s remarks across social media platforms following the broadcast.

News

Hillary Insider Turns On Democrats, Slams Radical Leftists As Un-American [WATCH]

Longtime Democratic strategist and Hillary Clinton ally Al Mottur is raising concerns about the direction of the Democratic Party, arguing that its increasing embrace of socialist-aligned candidates could hurt the party’s chances in future national elections, as reported by Trending Politics News.

Speaking with MS-NOW, Mottur said Democrats must return to the political center if they hope to remain competitive nationwide, particularly as attention begins to shift toward the 2028 presidential election.

“We need centrists to win nationally,” Mottur said.

He also questioned whether several policy positions promoted by candidates winning Democratic primaries would appeal to voters in a general election.

“I think that some of these positions are so extreme that they will be rejected when we head to a national climate, which is what 2028 will be,” Mottur told the outlet.

Mottur’s comments come after several high-profile Democratic primary races during the 2026 election cycle in which candidates associated with the Democratic Socialists of America defeated or mounted successful challenges against longtime Democratic incumbents.

Among the most notable races was Colorado’s 1st Congressional District, where 29-year-old Melat Kiros defeated longtime Rep. Diana DeGette.

In New York’s 13th Congressional District, 32-year-old Darializa Avila Chevalier defeated Rep. Adriano Espaillat.

Both candidates have previously drawn attention for controversial statements and actions.

According to the report, Kiros has argued that America essentially deserved the September 11 terrorist attacks, while Chevalier has publicly boasted about using the American flag as a napkin.

Other Democratic primary victories cited in the report include Claire Valdez and Mark Lander, who each defeated incumbent Democrats in heavily Democratic districts, along with Chris Rabb, who unseated an incumbent in a deep-blue Philadelphia district.

According to the report, those candidates have supported policies including mass amnesty, abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and substantial tax increases.

Mottur said he believes there is a growing disconnect between the priorities emphasized by some successful primary candidates and the concerns of many voters, particularly those dealing with economic challenges.

“The voter who’s in the place where they can’t afford something, to be honest, I think they’re more sensible voters,” he observed.

He argued that many lower-income voters place greater importance on issues such as crime and public safety than some of the activists and candidates shaping Democratic primary contests.

Mottur contrasted those concerns with positions he associates with portions of the party’s progressive wing.

Referring to opposition to incarceration, Mottur described the position “I don’t believe in prisons” as “crazy talk.”

He also characterized the broader political trend as “amusing.”

Mottur has long been associated with Democratic politics and was a surrogate for Hillary Clinton.

His public criticism comes as the party continues to debate its direction following a series of closely watched primary contests that have elevated younger, more progressive candidates in several congressional districts.

His remarks underscore an ongoing discussion within Democratic circles over whether candidates who succeed in heavily Democratic primaries can appeal to a broader national electorate in future elections.

With the 2026 primary season continuing and attention beginning to turn toward the 2028 election cycle, Mottur’s comments add to the internal debate over whether the party should continue moving left or nominate candidates with more centrist positions in an effort to broaden its appeal among general election voters.

News

Nearly 12,000 Military Tricare Members Hit by Major Data Breach

Nearly 12,000 Tricare beneficiaries in the West Region were notified this month that their personal and health information may have been exposed following a data breach involving TriWest Healthcare Alliance.

The incident, which occurred in mid-April, raises fresh concerns about cybersecurity within the federal systems that handle sensitive data for America’s service members and their families.

According to letters sent to affected beneficiaries, an unauthorized individual gained access to TriWest’s systems on April 16 and downloaded limited information.

That breach included names, Department of War Benefits Numbers, and ZIP codes associated with Tricare members. In a handful of cases, additional data such as Social Security numbers, addresses, and dates of birth were also taken.

Officials said the company was unaware of any misuse of the compromised information, but the potential for abuse remains real. To ease concerns, TriWest is offering those affected a free 24-month credit monitoring plan through Experian.

It’s a standard corporate response, but hardly one that calms fears among families already trained to secure their data while serving their country.

TriWest, which serves roughly four million beneficiaries in the Tricare West Region, handles care for active duty, retired, National Guard and Reserve members, their families, survivors, and certain former spouses.

Eligibility for Tricare is verified through the government’s centralized database known as the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System, or DEERS—a repository that has long been a prime target for hackers.

The company insists it acted swiftly once the intrusion was discovered. Officials say they took “immediate action” to block further unauthorized access and cooperated with government agencies to begin the notification process.

Yet, some letters to beneficiaries were dated July 2—more than two months after the breach occurred. For many military households used to timely communication from their chain of command, that delay adds insult to injury.

A TriWest spokesperson claimed the timeline was consistent with “applicable law and notification requirements.”

That’s bureaucratic speak for “we got around to it when we had to,” and it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence among those whose personal information is now potentially floating in cyberspace.

TriWest has since brought in third-party forensic experts to analyze the data breach and determine precisely what information was accessed.

Officials also claim to have tightened system controls, implemented new password reset safeguards, and expanded monitoring tools to better detect unauthorized activity in the future.

Additionally, employees have been given “further training” to recognize cyber threats—a measure that should have been in place well before April.

The breach comes as the military and its private contractors face an escalating wave of cyber attacks from foreign adversaries and criminal outfits.

Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea have all targeted U.S. systems before, and the Department of War continues to flag cybersecurity as a vital front in modern defense.

When personal data tied to military families is exposed, it isn’t just a privacy issue—it becomes a matter of national security.

Experts point out that hackers often use stolen personal data to attempt social engineering, phishing, and espionage operations.

For a network linked to U.S. forces and their dependents, even a “limited” compromise poses long-term risks that extend beyond damaged credit. Identity theft can be repaired; infiltrations of critical systems cannot.

Those affected have been urged to monitor their credit reports closely and contact TriWest’s designated hotline if they notice suspicious activity.

Beneficiaries can also report potential identity theft through the Federal Trade Commission at identitytheft.gov, though that process can be tedious and time-consuming.

While TriWest deserves credit for offering credit monitoring, the fact remains that this is yet another instance where contractors entrusted with military data failed to adequately protect it.

It is not the first time, and unless priorities change, it won’t be the last. Bureaucratic complacency and slow accountability have become chronic ailments across the enterprise that supports the uniformed services.

For years, Washington’s political class has poured billions into expanding digital networks yet failed to ensure they’re properly armored.

Under President Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth’s leadership, the emphasis has rightly returned to real security—military readiness, hardened infrastructure, and cyber defense that actually deters adversaries rather than excuses mistakes.

Incidents like this reinforce why the War Department’s modernization programs must continue full speed ahead. Protecting the data of America’s warriors and their families should not be a back-office afterthought—it should be treated as a frontline mission. If a contractor can’t keep our heroes’ information safe, they shouldn’t be getting paid with taxpayer dollars, period.

For now, TriWest says the leak has been contained and “steps have been taken” to prevent future occurrences. But military families know the familiar refrain: trust, verify, and stay vigilant.

Cyber defense in today’s world takes more than talking points—it demands constant action and accountability that matches the gravity of the threat.

News

Treasury Honors Trump with His Signature on New $100 Bill and Coin [WATCH]

The U.S. Treasury Department has unveiled a redesigned $100 bill bearing President Donald Trump’s signature alongside that of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, as well as a new commemorative dollar coin featuring the president’s portrait as part of the nation’s upcoming 250th anniversary celebration, as reported by Breitbart.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed the new currency during a tour of the department with Fox News host Jesse Watters, explaining that Trump’s signature will appear on all denominations of U.S. paper currency issued for the anniversary observance.

According to Bessent, the addition makes Trump the first president whose signature will appear on U.S. paper currency while serving in office.

“As Treasury secretary, I only have two mandates — the currency has to say ‘In God we trust’ somewhere on it, and we cannot have an image of a living person,” Bessent said.

He then explained why the president’s signature could still appear on the redesigned bills.

“But we have the president’s signature,” the secretary continued. “Which, again, I think is appropriate for the 250th.”

While federal law prohibits the image of a living person from appearing on circulating U.S. paper currency, Bessent noted that the restriction does not apply to signatures. He also clarified that the department can place living individuals on certain commemorative coins.

“The president’s also going to have a coin coming out with his image on it,” Bessent said as Fox News cameras showed a preview of the commemorative dollar coin.

White House photographer Daniel Torok later shared a side-by-side image comparing the new Trump dollar coin with the president’s official portrait taken in June of last year.

Although the Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005 requires that a president must have been deceased for at least two years before appearing on a circulating dollar coin, the new Trump coin is classified as a commemorative, non-circulating issue.

The Treasury Department noted that commemorative coins are governed under different rules than standard circulating currency.

The department also pointed to historical precedent. During the nation’s 150th anniversary celebration in 1926, a commemorative half-dollar featuring President Calvin Coolidge was released, marking the first time a sitting president appeared on a U.S. coin during his lifetime.

Bessent also addressed the financial impact of the redesigned currency, saying the updated bills will not require any additional taxpayer spending.

“I think people are going to want to hold the president’s signature,” the secretary remarked.

According to Bessent, the redesigned currency is scheduled to be released to the public this fall. Treasury Department footage released to Breitbart News provided a closer look at the production process for the new bills.

The Treasury Department first announced plans for the redesigned currency in March.

At the time, Bessent said there is “no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name.”

U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach also praised the decision in a statement.

Trump’s “mark on history as the architect of America’s Golden Age economic revival is undeniable,” Beach said.

“Printing his signature on the American currency is not only appropriate, but also well deserved,” he added.

Bessent also confirmed in May that the Treasury Department had prepared a prototype $250 bill featuring Trump’s portrait.

He noted, however, that creating such a denomination would require an act of Congress before it could become official U.S. currency.

Legislation proposing a $250 bill bearing Trump’s image was introduced last year by Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C. The measure was referred to the House Financial Services Committee but did not receive a hearing.

The redesigned $100 bills and commemorative Trump dollar coin are part of the Treasury Department’s plans to recognize the United States’ 250th anniversary, with the new paper currency expected to enter circulation later this fall.

News

Med School Deans Flounder After Being Asked If Men Can Have Babies [WATCH]

A House Education and Workforce Committee hearing examining the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at medical schools featured a series of exchanges Tuesday as Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., questioned university medical leaders about biological sex, pregnancy, and gender identity, as reported by Fox News.

The July 14 hearing, titled “Training Activists, Not Physicians: The Impact of DEI on Medical Schools,” examined whether DEI programs at medical schools, including the University of California, Los Angeles, the University of California, San Francisco, and the University of Illinois, have affected admissions policies, contributed to antisemitism, and influenced medical school curricula.

During the hearing, Miller questioned Dr. Sam Hawgood, chancellor of the University of California, San Francisco, about classroom guidance related to gender terminology.

“Doctor (Sam) Hawgood, you see UCSF’s Classroom Guide, titled ‘Framework for Gender and Sex Concepts in Teaching,’ advises against using the term pregnant women,” Miller said.

“Instead, it says to use pregnant people. Who are pregnant people compared to pregnant women? Just curious.”

Hawgood replied that the terminology was “part of a curriculum to help our students who are facing a wide diversity of patients” before adding that the “vast majority of pregnancies are in women” and that he has “absolutely no problem with the term pregnant women.”

Miller then shifted the discussion to biological sex.

“Has a non-biological woman ever had a baby?” she asked.

Hawgood answered that a “transgender person can.”

Miller responded, “That’s not a biological woman. Has a non-biological woman ever had a baby?”

Hawgood began responding by saying, “I would reiterate,” before Miller interrupted, saying, “It’s ridiculous.”

The Illinois congresswoman later directed her questions to Dr. Steve Dubinett, dean of the UCLA School of Medicine.

“Lastly, Dr. Dubinett, a required course at UCLA medical school, advises ob-gyn students not to, and, I quote, ‘assume gender identity,'” Miller said.

“OK, from another class in May of 2026. It included a disclaimer that while it uses the term she and women, it does not intend to exclude, and I quote, ‘those who have a uterus but do not identify with these terms.’ What does that even mean?”

Dubinett responded, “I’m not familiar with that announcement that I’d have to read the entire thing.”

Miller followed up by asking, “Can someone have a uterus but not be a woman? Because it seems like your school is promoting that ridiculous idea?”

Dubinett did not directly answer the question. Instead, he said UCLA is “treating transgender people,” but added that “we’re doing that in compliance with state and federal law.”

Miller continued pressing the issue.

“This is curious,” she said. “So, I’m going to ask you again, can someone have a uterus and not be a woman? Just say yes or no. Can they?”

Dubinett began replying, “Again, I would,” before the committee chairman interrupted because Miller’s allotted time had expired.

As the exchange concluded, Miller said, “That’s what your medical school is promoting. Chairman, it’s clear these medical schools are hiding DEI curriculum under the guise of medical access.”

Following the hearing, Miller issued a statement to Fox News Digital criticizing what she described as the influence of political ideology on medical education.

“It shouldn’t take a medical degree to answer a basic biology question. This hearing exposed that our medical schools have become consumed by political ideology that they’re losing sight of reality. Patients just want doctors grounded in common sense. Medical schools that abandon scientific truth should lose their accreditation.”

Fox News Digital reported that it contacted both Hawgood and Dubinett for comment following the hearing.

The committee hearing focused broadly on the role of DEI initiatives in medical education, with lawmakers examining curriculum, admissions practices, and institutional policies at several medical schools across the country.

News

Grassley Says DOJ Records Blow Hole in Jack Smith’s Sworn Testimony [WATCH]

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley announced Tuesday that Department of Justice records indicate former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigative team reviewed the contents of text messages belonging to 44 members of Congress, contradicting Smith’s previous sworn testimony that investigators did not examine the content of congressional text messages.

Grassley made the announcement on July 14, saying he was among the lawmakers whose messages were reviewed during the investigation, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The Iowa Republican also said he plans to release the records with Sen. Ron Johnson so the public can review the documentation.

Earlier reports indicated that Smith had obtained congressional “toll records,” commonly described as call logs, as part of his investigation.

Grassley now says newly obtained DOJ records show investigators went beyond obtaining metadata and examined the contents of text messages.

“I received records frm DOJ confirming Jack Smith’s investigative team reviewed the contents of text msgs sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Im 1 of the 44,” Grassley wrote on X.

He added, “I’m alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records w Sen Johnson so American ppl can see the evidence.”

According to Grassley, the records identify 44 members of Congress whose communications were reviewed during the investigation. Grassley’s office released a list of the lawmakers he says were affected.

The allegations stem from the Justice Department’s investigation known as “Operation Arctic Frost.”

According to documents released earlier this year, the FBI and DOJ conducted the investigation after questions surrounding the 2020 Trump alternate electors.

Grassley said the investigation began in April 2022 and included the seizure of government-issued cell phones belonging to President Donald Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence.

Investigators also conducted interviews across the country as part of the probe.

The senator sharply criticized the investigation and the methods used by prosecutors and investigators.

“Jack Smith’s criminal investigation of President Trump was a runaway train that had no brakes,” Grassley said Tuesday.

He also accused investigators of exceeding the scope of the investigation by reviewing communications involving lawmakers who were not the focus of the probe.

“Based on the information that’s been produced to me and Senator Johnson, Biden DOJ and FBI investigators apparently ignored their own routine investigative protocols to obtain and review work-related messages from me and dozens of my Republican and Democrat colleagues who were outside the scope of the government’s investigation,” Grassley said.

Grassley called on lawmakers from both parties to take the allegations seriously.

“I hope my Democrat colleagues, several of whom had their own texts swept up, finally put partisanship aside and recognize the severity of these actions. Smith’s team ran roughshod over the Constitution even after repeated warnings,” Grassley added.

The Judiciary Committee chairman also said he intends to question Smith publicly.

“Jack Smith has answering to do, and I intend to have him before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the coming months to hold him accountable,” Grassley said.

Grassley’s announcement also focused on testimony Smith gave during a deposition last December, when members of Congress questioned him under oath about the Arctic Frost investigation.

According to Grassley, Smith denied that investigators had obtained or reviewed the contents of lawmakers’ communications.

A congressional investigator asked Smith, “Did the toll records that you requested from the Senators – did they include the content of the phone calls?”

Smith responded, “No.”

The investigator then asked, “Did the records that you requested – the toll records from the members of Congress include the content of text messages?”

Smith again answered, “No.”

Grassley now contends that DOJ records contradict those sworn statements.

He said the records he plans to release with Johnson will provide evidence supporting his allegations that investigators reviewed congressional text messages despite Smith’s testimony denying that they did so.

The allegations add to ongoing scrutiny surrounding Operation Arctic Frost and the Justice Department’s investigative practices. Grassley indicated he intends to pursue additional oversight through the Senate Judiciary Committee as more records become public.


Scroll to Top