Author name: LifeZette

Fauci Confronted Outside His D.C. Home, Watch Him ‘Social Distance’ with a Quickness [WATCH]
News

Fauci Confronted Outside His D.C. Home, Watch Him ‘Social Distance’ with a Quickness [WATCH]

/

Anthony Fauci apparently has discovered a brand new public health protocol, sprint away when a reporter asks basic questions.

The former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director was caught on camera outside his home after his recent appearance before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, where he reportedly invoked the Fifth Amendment more than one hundred times.

Fox News Digital correspondent Nicholas Ballasy tried to ask Fauci whether he had any regrets about his COVID decisions and whether he had anything to say about refusing to answer lawmakers under oath.

Fauci did not exactly launch into one of those polished television sermons Americans endured for years.

Instead, he made a quick retreat, reminding the country that the man who once seemed addicted to cameras suddenly cannot find the courage to face one.

WATCH:

That is quite a transformation for the same bureaucrat who spent the pandemic lecturing families, churches, schools, businesses, and anyone else within microphone range about what they were allowed to do.

For years, Fauci occupied the national stage like a celebrity with a lab coat, popping up on friendly media outlets to explain why ordinary Americans needed to obey.

WATCH:

Now that the questions are less flattering, the performance has changed.

He once fancied himself “tHe sCIeNcE.” That branding always looked more like Washington ego than scientific humility, and the country is still paying the price.

The point of “The Science,” at least before the pandemic priesthood got hold of it, was supposed to be chasing truth and testing claims.

It was not supposed to mean hiding behind lawyers, dodging lawmakers, and rushing indoors when a reporter asks about regrets.

Normally, staking out someone at home is not the kind of press tactic conservatives should celebrate without hesitation.

But Fauci is not some private citizen who wandered into a controversy by accident.

He was one of the most powerful public health figures in America during one of the most disruptive periods in modern history.

WATCH:

He helped shape policies that touched nearly every home, school, church, workplace, and hospital in the country.

Millions of Americans were told to mask up, shut down, stay home, miss funerals, skip holidays, lose jobs, take shots, and stop asking impertinent questions.

WATCH:

Fauci was there, often with that familiar tone suggesting disagreement was not merely wrong, but almost immoral.

So yes, when a reporter asks him whether he has regrets, the public has every right to hear an answer.

If he can help justify sweeping restrictions on normal life, he can manage a few sentences on a sidewalk.

The scene became even more curious because Fauci appeared to be speaking with law enforcement near a Metropolitan Police D.C. SUV.

That raises a fair question about whether he is receiving official protection, and if so, who is footing the bill.

Fauci has done rather well for himself in public life and in the fame machine that followed.

If he wants private security, he can surely find a way to cover it without leaning on the same public he seems so eager to avoid.

The episode followed his Senate “testimony” this week, where reports indicate he was not exactly pleased with how things went.

RedState’s Nick Arama noted that Fauci was overheard complaining about being “shouted at” during the hearing.

That tells you plenty about the bubble these people inhabit.

After years of ordinary citizens being scolded, censored, shamed, and smeared, Fauci seems wounded that lawmakers raised their voices while pressing him for answers.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul was not moved by the display.

His message to Fauci was simple, ” Walk it off .”

Paul has also scheduled a contempt vote before the committee next week, which could put Fauci back in a seat he plainly would rather avoid.

WATCH:

That is where this belongs, not buried under media nostalgia for pandemic celebrities.

There is also renewed scrutiny from Robert F Kennedy Jr and others over what Fauci knew, what he said publicly, and what was kept from the American people.

One related charge summed up the frustration with the phrase ‘He Never Told Anybody’.

WATCH:

The American people do not need another sanctimonious lecture from the man who became the face of pandemic control.

They need answers about decisions that upended lives, damaged trust, and handed enormous power to unelected experts.

Fauci can run back inside, but he cannot run from the record forever.

The country remembers the lectures, the mandates, the smug media tours, and now the sudden silence when accountability comes knocking.

Chris Cuomo Explodes on Camera Defending Fauci After Capitol Hill Firestorm [WATCH]
News

Chris Cuomo Explodes on Camera Defending Fauci After Capitol Hill Firestorm [WATCH]

/

Chris Cuomo is once again putting on a clinic in cable news theatrics, this time over criticism aimed at Dr. Anthony Fauci after a heated Capitol Hill hearing put the former pandemic czar back under the microscope.

Cuomo, who has never been shy about lecturing the public when cameras are rolling, appeared visibly agitated as he defended Fauci and blasted Republicans for daring to question the man who became the face of America’s COVID response.

The problem, of course, is that millions of Americans have very real questions about Fauci’s record, his public statements, his shifting guidance, and the heavy hand of pandemic policy that crushed families, churches, schools, and small businesses.

Rather than engage those concerns directly, Cuomo went straight for emotional outrage, as if volume and profanity could somehow erase the memory of what the country lived through.

“I don’t know who needs to hear this but if you were forced by a situation where people were coming after you to plead the 5th and everything that comes with that, what would you be doing right now? I would be in the fetal position, or hiding. Tony Fauci is seeing patients. Why? Because he’s a real one. And because what they’re doing going after him, is bullsh*t and everybody knows it,” Cuomo said in a video where he was clearly upset and emotional.

That was not a policy argument. That was a televised therapy session with studio lighting.

Cuomo’s defense centered on portraying Fauci as a noble elderly physician under siege, rather than a powerful federal figure whose words carried enormous consequences for the American people.

For years, Fauci was treated by the corporate press as untouchable, a kind of lab coat saint whose guidance was above question, even when that guidance changed, contradicted prior claims, or conveniently lined up with the political needs of the moment.

Cuomo then reached for the familiar strawman, pretending critics are accusing Fauci of personally creating COVID rather than challenging his conduct, his testimony, his influence, and the bureaucratic empire that helped drive lockdown culture.

“You want to find out who started Covid? That’s great, are you saying Tony Fauci did? Are you saying America did? Then what are we talking about. If you didn’t like masks, if you didn’t like mandates, then go after admins that were okay with it. Tony Fauci was foisted into a position because they didn’t want to take the smoke. Trump did it first and then the Biden administration. But you’re just going after one 80 year old man. This is not about the truth, its about bullsh*t and everybody sees it. And the American people still side with what they know is reasonable and not just this bullsh*t. It’s disgraceful whats happening.”

WATCH:

There it is, the old media maneuver.

If the public asks why children were masked, why schools were closed, why dissenting scientists were smeared, or why federal health officials kept changing the story, the answer is apparently to accuse them of picking on an old man.

That may play well in green rooms, but out in the real country, people remember what happened.

Parents remember kids falling behind, workers remember mandates threatening their jobs, and business owners remember watching government officials decide who was essential and who was expendable.

Cuomo wants Americans to aim their frustration only at administrations, not Fauci, even though Fauci was one of the most visible and influential voices during the entire pandemic period.

That is a neat little escape hatch for the expert class, but regular voters are not required to climb through it.

The media spent years demanding that Americans trust the experts, then seemed shocked when citizens wanted those experts questioned under oath.

WATCH:

Accountability is not persecution, no matter how many times Cuomo drops profanity into a camera lens.

The fury from Cuomo also says something larger about the political class and its media defenders.

They still cannot tolerate the idea that the American people have a right to revisit the pandemic years and demand answers from the officials who helped shape them.

Fauci can see patients, give interviews, and defend his record all he wants.

But none of that means Congress, voters, or critics should quietly move along because a news anchor got emotional on video.

If Cuomo thinks cursing enough times makes his point stronger, he may want to try a new strategy.

The public has already heard plenty of scolding from the COVID era elites, and many Americans are in no mood to be lectured again by the same crowd that told them questioning authority was dangerous.

WATCH:

Terrifying Video Shows Rogue Tire Obliterating Car on Philadelphia Highway [WATCH]
News

Terrifying Video Shows Rogue Tire Obliterating Car on Philadelphia Highway [WATCH]

/

A wild and frightening scene unfolded on Philadelphia’s I-76 this week when a loose tire came barreling down the highway and slammed directly into a moving vehicle.

The whole thing was captured by a Tesla camera, giving drivers yet another reminder that danger on the road can appear out of nowhere, even in broad daylight.

The video shows the tire bouncing along the highway median before it suddenly veers into traffic and strikes a Nissan SUV traveling in the left lane.

The impact was violent, immediate, and shocking, crushing the front end of the vehicle and smashing the windshield as traffic continued moving around it.

The tire did not simply drop to the pavement after the collision.

Instead, the force of the crash launched it straight into the air, creating the kind of scene most drivers would expect from an action movie rather than a normal afternoon commute.

The incident happened just after noon near Girard Avenue in West Philadelphia, according to the report.

That is a busy stretch of highway where motorists already have enough to deal with between heavy traffic, aggressive driving, and the usual big city road chaos.

Authorities have not yet made clear where the tire came from.

That unanswered question matters, because a runaway tire does not magically appear on a major highway without something going very wrong somewhere.

It is also unknown whether anyone was injured in the wreck.

Given the condition of the Nissan’s hood and windshield after the impact, it is easy to see how this could have ended in tragedy.

The Tesla driver reportedly heard the crash but did not realize what had happened until reviewing the footage later.

That detail says plenty about how fast the incident unfolded, since even a nearby driver could not immediately make sense of the sudden violence on the roadway.

WATCH:

For the driver of the Nissan, there was no warning and no time to react.

One second the SUV was moving with traffic, and the next it was taking a direct hit from a tire that had become a flying weapon.

Scenes like this raise obvious questions about vehicle maintenance, commercial traffic, roadway safety, and basic accountability.

Someone’s wheel or tire assembly likely failed, and everyone else on the highway was forced to gamble with the consequences.

The footage also shows why cameras in vehicles have become so important.

Without video, this might have sounded like an exaggerated highway story, but the clip leaves no room for doubt about the severity of the crash.

Philadelphia drivers are no strangers to rough roads and unpredictable traffic, but this incident stands out even by big city standards.

A loose tire flying across lanes at highway speed is not a minor inconvenience, it is a deadly hazard.

Officials have not released additional details about possible citations, an investigation, or whether the source vehicle has been identified.

The public deserves answers, especially if the tire came from a vehicle that should not have been on the road in that condition.

Too often, dangerous incidents are treated like random accidents and quickly forgotten once traffic starts moving again.

But when a tire tears through a windshield on a major highway, that is not just bad luck, it is a warning sign.

Drivers already pay taxes, tolls, fees, insurance premiums, and every other charge the system can dream up.

At the very least, they should be able to expect that basic safety rules are enforced and that obvious hazards are taken seriously.

The video is disturbing because it captures how thin the line can be between an ordinary drive and a life changing disaster.

No dramatic build up, no time to prepare, just a tire bouncing out of nowhere and a car taking the full force of the impact.

For now, the origin of the tire remains unclear, and the condition of anyone involved has not been publicly confirmed.

What is clear is that the footage has struck a nerve because every driver understands exactly how helpless that Nissan driver must have been in that moment.

The clip is a brutal reminder that the road can turn dangerous in an instant.

And in a city where public safety already feels like an afterthought far too often, this runaway tire delivered one more reason for motorists to keep their eyes open and their heads on a swivel.

Cuomo, Fauci, and the COVID Clowns: How the Left’s Media Turned Lies Into Lockdowns [WATCH]
News

Cuomo, Fauci, and the COVID Clowns: How the Left’s Media Turned Lies Into Lockdowns [WATCH]

/

Newsmax host Carl Higbie criticized the national media’s coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, arguing that major news organizations prioritized political narratives over facts and helped elevate public officials whose guidance has since come under renewed scrutiny.

Higbie also pointed to remarks from Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who reflected on how partisanship influenced his own views during the pandemic.

Higbie began by questioning why many media organizations continue to retain public trust.

“Why does the media have any credibility at all today?” Higbie asked.

He said he believes viewers who continue watching certain outlets are motivated more by politics than facts.

“My only conclusion, again, I’m going on data here, is that people watching them, the few that are still watching them, they don’t actually care about facts or anything that might make any sense.”

Instead, Higbie argued, “They just want to see things that make Trump look bad.”

According to Higbie, that approach is inconsistent with journalism.

“That’s not journalism. That’s actually a cult.”

He added, “Congratulations, Libs, but I was right and they were wrong.”

Higbie acknowledged that television ratings have declined for several networks but questioned why any audience remains.

“A lot of people are turning them off. The ratings have cratered on a lot of these left-leaning networks.”

He continued, “However, how did they retain any viewers at all at this point?”

Higbie argued that media organizations embraced sensationalism during the pandemic.

“You see these networks; they cut their teeth in the mantra that if it bleeds, it leads.”

He said that once COVID-19 emerged, networks focused on the most alarming aspects of the pandemic.

“So when COVID happened, they found the most sensationalized aspects of Covid, which were in part coming from Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx and all these other nut jobs and proponents of lockdowns.”

According to Higbie, those reports were used to damage President Donald Trump politically.

“And they sensationalized it like this: CNN, pow, death count for the first months when it was on screen.”

He added, “How many people were dying when Trump was in office? And then the second Biden got in, boom! They turned that thing right off.”

Higbie also claimed reported death figures were later overstated.

“And we now know that they overinflated those numbers.”

He continued, “Even Deborah Birx was like, ‘Oh yeah, we had to like lock her up too.'”

Higbie argued that the media elevated Fauci’s public profile throughout the pandemic.

“They placated Fauci’s ego too, putting Anthony Fauci on the cover of any magazine they could get their hands on, giving him more credibility.”

He also criticized messaging directed toward parents.

“They convinced millions of people that oh, your children will die if you go to school, even though we had the data at the time and they ignored it.”

According to Higbie, “Children were almost not even susceptible to COVID in any serious matter at all.”

He also argued that health officials ignored obesity as a significant risk factor.

“We knew being fat was a massive risk factor, and yet anybody who said anything about that, oh, you’re fat phobic and you can’t do that and you’re discriminated against.”

Higbie added, “No, I’m just trying to make people not die. Get on a treadmill.”

He also criticized media coverage surrounding podcast host Joe Rogan.

“They changed Joe Rogan’s skin color through a filter on CNN to make it look like he was sick when he was talking about ivermectin working.”

Higbie argued that media organizations also promoted vaccine messaging through public campaigns.

“They got kids and even adults to sing just the craziest videos about the vaccine.”

He continued with another example.

“A bunch of high octane, high octave men social distancing to a point of basically neutering themselves, singing in a parking lot with pride flags.”

Higbie said those campaigns had the opposite effect on him.

“That made me want to get the vaccine even less because I didn’t want to end up like those people.”

He also criticized the media’s treatment of former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“The media was so interested in rushing to make people that they approved of into heroes that they never stopped to think that maybe those people might have been wrong.”

Higbie continued, “A perfect example is Andrew Cuomo as governor.”

“He was the next coming of Christ, according to the liberal media.”

According to Higbie, “Headline after headline” portrayed Cuomo as “a rising star.”

He argued that later developments contradicted that image.

“Then it turns out he was actually a horrible person and wrong about all of it, and his policies ended up getting a bunch of old people killed that he rammed into old folks’ homes.”

Higbie also criticized former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s vaccine promotion efforts.

“Bill DeBlasio offered free French fries for vaccines. I mean, what a nerd!”

Turning to Sen. John Fetterman, Higbie said even Democrats have begun acknowledging mistakes made during the pandemic.

“And even rational Democrats like John Fetterman regret that he even believed the narrative.”

Fetterman reflected on how partisanship influenced his thinking.

“I think that the next time our nation’s facing something like this, we are not become, you know, as I might have been, blinded by the partisan idea that maybe the truth might come from a side that’s different than than you are.”

Higbie concluded by arguing that many media organizations have refused to acknowledge errors in their pandemic coverage.

“And the guy recovering from a stroke becomes more rational than the rest of his entire party.”

He added, “But the media today still can’t admit that they were wrong.”

“They know they were wrong, which is why they omitted the coverage of it yesterday.”

Higbie concluded by saying, “They were so self-absorbed that, despite all the facts now, they still believe that they can just say whatever they want, and that somehow we at home aren’t laughing at them.”

WATCH:

WATCH:

WATCH:

This Woman Just Destroyed the “Democratic Socialist” Myth in Under Three Minutes [WATCH]
News

This Woman Just Destroyed the “Democratic Socialist” Myth in Under Three Minutes [WATCH]

/

Political commentator Nick Shirley spoke with activist Chloe Cole about the growing visibility of socialist and communist ideas in American politics, with Cole arguing that those ideologies continue to attract support despite what she described as repeated historical failures.

Shirley opened the conversation by asking Cole for her thoughts on communism.

“Is on the rise, and what do you think about communism?” he asked.

Cole said she believes the ideology appeals to many people because of its simple promises.

“I think communism sells. It’s such a simple idea and message.”

She argued that although the concept is attractive on the surface, history has shown it does not succeed in practice.

“It obviously doesn’t work at all, but it’s something that you could so easily say to a young, naive college person or young person in general.”

Cole said supporters often promote policies by emphasizing free benefits.

“You can say everything should be free, and healthcare should be free, and universal, and education should be free, but people don’t really understand the ramifications behind that statement.”

According to Cole, these arguments are not new.

“So I mean, this is nothing new. People have been trying to sell the idea of socialism and communism for years and years and years.”

She pointed to political movements in Russia before the Soviet Union as an example.

“I mean, obviously, in pre-Soviet Russia, you had communism.”

Cole discussed the differences between the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks, comparing them to factions within modern American politics.

“That’s where a lot of it started. You had the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks, and the Mensheviks were kind of like your mainstream, run-of-the-mill Democrat, and then you had the Bolsheviks.”

She continued, “This was way back in like the 1800s, 1900s, and the Bolsheviks came in.”

Cole compared the Bolsheviks to what she described as today’s Democratic Socialists of America activists.

“They were kind of like the DSA activists of today.”

According to Cole, the Bolsheviks distinguished themselves by promising more expansive government benefits.

“They said, ‘Well, the Mensheviks and the Democrats aren’t being radical enough, and they aren’t promising you all the things that we’re promising you. We can give you free education and universal health care and all of these great things,’ and then they never deliver.”

Cole argued that the same pattern continues today.

“So that happened back in the day. It’s just like a recurring ideology.”

She added, “History is a big fat circle, and it’s happening again because it’s such an easy thing to sell.”

Cole pointed to several countries as evidence that communism has repeatedly failed.

“But it’s never worked.”

She continued, “Didn’t work in Russia or the Soviet Union or China or Venezuela.”

“Communism never works, but it’s such an easy idea to try to convince people to vote others in with.”

Cole concluded that understanding history is critical to preventing similar outcomes.

“So I hope that people read because those who know history do not repeat it.”

She added, “So we just have to teach kids why it doesn’t work.”

Shirley then asked Cole about the Democratic Socialists of America and what membership in the organization represents.

“What does it mean to be a part of a DSA and be a Democrat socialist? What’s that actually mean?”

Cole described the organization as distinct from traditional Democrats.

“So DSA is the Democratic Socialist of America, and it’s very, very scary.”

She argued that the group advances its goals through the Democratic Party.

“And the Democratic Socialists of America-they are using the Democratic wing of politics to Trojan horse all of their ideas through.”

Cole emphasized that she believes the organization differs substantially from mainstream Democratic politics.

“But they’re very different than mainstream Democrats.”

According to Cole, the group’s ultimate objective is much broader than ordinary policy disagreements.

“What these Democratic Socialists of America want to do is usher in communism and destroy America from within.”

She said she believes those views are openly expressed by some supporters.

“And I’m not being dramatic when I say that because there are many DSA members who are online all over X.”

Cole continued, “You can look it up, saying we want to take down the American Empire from within. We want to destroy Western civilization.”

She argued that the organization seeks to dismantle longstanding American institutions.

“They’re vastly they’re vastly different from the left.”

“They want to destroy all of the institutions that we hold near and dear here in America.”

Cole concluded by comparing those goals to the historical Bolshevik movement.

“They basically want to root out everything that our founders worked so hard to build and start again, just like the Bolsheviks did way back in the day.”

Her final warning was brief.

“Repeating cycles.”

WATCH:

Trump’s FBI Just Hit Global Scammers Where It Hurts Most, Patel Says [WATCH]
News

Trump’s FBI Just Hit Global Scammers Where It Hurts Most, Patel Says [WATCH]

/

FBI Director Kash Patel outlined the bureau’s recent efforts to combat violent crime and international fraud, pointing to large-scale operations targeting criminal organizations that he said have stolen billions of dollars from Americans while trafficking thousands of victims.

Patel credited President Donald Trump’s administration with providing the resources and support needed to expand law enforcement operations both domestically and overseas.

“We’re attacking criminals everywhere,” Patel said.

He argued that recent crime statistics reflect the bureau’s enforcement efforts.

“When you have 1.1 million fewer violent incidences in one year, that’s because this FBI has arrested twice as many violent offenders around the world in that same time period.”

Patel attributed those results to leadership from the White House.

“It’s not an accident, Sean. It’s President Trump’s leadership in law enforcement and resourcing us and protecting our elderly and protecting our kids and making sure their life savings and college tuitions don’t get wiped out by these criminal syndicates from around the world.”

According to Patel, the FBI’s international partners have played a significant role in those efforts.

“Our partners around the world are in on it with us,” he said. “They’re fighting with us because they’re being deprived and defrauded as well.”

He noted that dozens of countries joined the bureau’s latest initiative.

“That’s why our partners in Southeast Asia showed up. Twenty-four nations showed up, 400 law enforcement officers showed up.”

Patel said the operation was coordinated through the FBI’s Operation Blackout initiative.

“This is the FBI leading through Operation Blackout the mission to annihilate global scam compounds.”

He added, “We’re going to do it, and we’re going to keep doing it, and we’re going to keep reaching out to Americans.”

WATCH:

Patel later expanded on Operation Blackout, describing it as a coordinated international effort to dismantle large criminal organizations engaged in financial fraud.

“How we’re going to get after the scam compound frauds that are depriving Americans of billions and billions of dollars?”

He said the FBI worked alongside international partners throughout Southeast Asia and the Middle East.

“So the FBI launched Operation Blackout, which we conducted with our partners across the world, including in Southeast Asia and the Middle East.”

According to Patel, the operation dismantled several major scam centers.

“We took down four of the largest scam compounds in the world, and we freed 1000s of traffic workers.”

He also highlighted the financial impact of the operation.

“Sean, we seized over 15 billion dollars worth of fraud that was being deprived and stolen from American citizens, and we annihilated these compounds.”

Patel said the long-term objective extends beyond individual arrests.

“The main goal is to disrupt, dismantle, and then fully annihilate them with our partners in Southeast Asia, like the Cambodians, the Thais, and the Indians.”

He described the involvement of Thailand’s national police force during one of the operations.

“And we had the Royal Thai police go in there and literally scuttle a compound.”

Patel said law enforcement also relied on private-sector technology partners to disrupt the criminal organizations’ communications infrastructure.

“We also use technology with our private sector to suffocate the lifeline of these compounds and shut off 8,000 internet terminals.”

He explained that many of the scam operations occupied large compounds rather than traditional office settings.

“These are villages; they’re not buildings and offices and a guy behind a desk.”

Because of their size and international reach, Patel said dismantling them requires cooperation among multiple governments.

“It requires a global effort, and that’s what we did.”

Patel also announced the completion of what he described as the first Scam Center Summit involving international partners.

“And just last week, we completed this first ever Scam Center summit with our partners in Southeast Asia.”

Beyond enforcement operations, Patel highlighted a separate FBI initiative designed to prevent Americans from becoming fraud victims before money is lost.

“And on top of that, we’re proactive with Operation Level Up.”

According to Patel, FBI personnel have directly contacted thousands of Americans believed to be targeted by scammers.

“We have literally had 10,000 Americans saved.”

He said those outreach efforts prevented significant financial losses.

“We saved their life savings and literally their lives because we proactively went to them and said, ‘We think you’re being scammed.'”

Patel added that those individuals responded to the warnings, allowing authorities to prevent additional losses.

“They responded, and we saved over half a billion dollars worth of life savings from being defrauded by Americans.”

Concluding his remarks, Patel again credited President Trump for emphasizing fraud prevention as a national priority.

“President Trump’s leading out of the fight on fraud all over the place.”

WATCH:

Body Language Expert: Fauci Looked Terrified, Fake, and Completely Busted Under Oath [WATCH]
News

Body Language Expert: Fauci Looked Terrified, Fake, and Completely Busted Under Oath [WATCH]

/

Newsmax host Greg Kelly and body language expert Lena Sisco analyzed Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Senate testimony, arguing that his posture, facial expressions, and physical movements revealed fear, stress, and what Sisco described as a lack of respect for those questioning him.

Kelly opened the discussion by reflecting on Fauci’s appearance before senators.

“Man, what a difference the truth makes!” Kelly said. “He was at times petrified, at times contemptuous, at times well.”

Introducing Sisco, Kelly asked for her overall assessment.

“Welcome back, Lena. I want to show you some specific clips, but do me a favor. Overall, just give us a quick snapshot. What kind of man did you see today testifying?”

Sisco did not hesitate.

“A liar.”

She referenced comments made during the hearing by Sen. Josh Hawley.

“I think Senator Awley. I hope I’m pronouncing his name right. He couldn’t have said it better. He said nothing says honesty more than taking the fifth.”

According to Sisco, refusing to answer questions can reflect concern about revealing deception.

“Listen, liars don’t want to talk because they’re so afraid that they’re going to give away the truth in their body language or words, so they say nothing.”

She added, “And that was the big elephant in the room today.”

Kelly then played footage showing Fauci repeatedly placing his fingertips together during the hearing.

“I found this to be I don’t know, I don’t know what the hell. What do you make of that? It says something.”

Sisco identified the gesture as a “steeple.”

“It does, and you’re right. So it’s a steeple, and it’s a power pose.”

She said the gesture often followed visible nervous behavior.

“But the funny thing is, is that he did it after he was fidgeting?”

According to Sisco, Fauci alternated between playing with his pen out of boredom and nervousness.

“So if you watched him play with his pen often, there were some times he played with it out of complete boredom, as though he wanted to leave, and other times out of nervous energy.”

She concluded that the hand gesture appeared calculated.

“Whenever he didn’t know what to do with his hands, he would go right to here to say, ‘Nope, I have to regain power and authority.’ But it was all contrived.”

Kelly also pointed to Fauci’s posture throughout the hearing.

“I found him. He was slouching a little bit.”

He added, “You know, if you were a nine-year-old kid at dinner, your mom would tell you to sit up a little bit.”

Sisco interpreted the body position as a subconscious response to fear.

“When the body curls up like balls in, his chin would tuck. He’d look down. He’d close his shoulders in. That is a subconscious reaction to fear.”

She explained that people instinctively protect vulnerable areas of the body when experiencing fear.

“So when we have fear, we will tend to protect our body. This is the most vulnerable spot of the body, the neck.”

Rather than touching his neck directly, Sisco said Fauci protected it by changing his posture.

“And you can see him by covering it up this way. And some people may touch their neck, but he doesn’t. He just tips and kind of curls over and avoids eye contact.”

Kelly next played video from Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), who challenged Fauci during the hearing.

Moreno urged Fauci to acknowledge people who he said had been criticized for expressing views that later proved accurate.

“If you thought closing schools was catastrophically stupid, and that you thought that during these times saying these things made you somehow a lesser human being, Dr. Fauci, you just turn around and look at the people Behind you,” Moreno said.

“You’re not willing to do that. That’s not a question. It’s not a question to your lawyers. Not a question. It’s a request.”

Moreno continued, “All you have to do is look up from your lawyers and look at the people who were absolutely shamed for saying what we know now to be the truth. You can’t even look at him.”

After the clip, Kelly asked Sisco for her reaction.

“Wow! Did he want to? He looked a little scared there.”

Sisco said she noticed something different.

“He, but he also had a little smile on his face.”

She said Fauci displayed similar expressions several times during the hearing.

“And a couple times after he would be asked a question and gave us his canned response. He would smile.”

According to Sisco, that expression communicated confidence rather than concern.

“And that smile is, ‘I’m getting one over on you. I won this.'”

She concluded that Fauci showed little respect toward those addressing him.

“So for me, I really don’t think he cares at all.”

She added, “If he did, he would have turned around and looked at them out of respect. He has no respect.”

Kelly then turned to questioning by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who discussed scientific debate over natural immunity.

“My favorite quote from that is from Martin Koldor from from Harvard,” Paul said. “You called him one of the people that you had to take down, the fringe epidemiologist.”

Paul continued, “He jokingly said on Twitter, he said, ‘Yeah, we knew about natural immunity from 486 BC, from the time of the Athenian plague, we lost all knowledge of it in 2020. The good news is it’s slowly coming back, 24 to 2025. We’re beginning to understand what natural immunity is again-not something perfect, but a useful tool that could have been used, but also something that could have helped people.'”

Kelly then asked Sisco what she observed.

“What’s going on?”

Sisco said Fauci appeared significantly more stressed during Paul’s questioning.

“This topic stressed him out.”

She explained that several physical reactions suggested elevated stress.

“So I can tell that cortisol spiked in his system for two reasons.”

“Number one, he did this eye blink flutter, and when cortisol releases in the body, and it’s our stress hormone, it dries us out in our mouth and in our eyes.”

She also pointed to repeated face touching.

“And the next thing he started doing was touching his face a lot.”

Sisco concluded that the movements were consistent with someone experiencing heightened stress.

“Right, he’s scratching and touching. When cortisol releases in the body, we go into fight or flight. The blood goes to our head; it makes the surface of our skin itchy.”

She added, “So he’s scratching intensely during this question. That tells me it is very stressful for him.”

Kelly ended the segment with a joke directed at Sisco.

“Damn! I think I’m gonna just put my hands in my pockets, if I ever see you.”

Sisco quickly replied, “No, don’t do that. That’s not good.”

WATCH:

Knife Wielding Maniac Meets Deadly Reality After Attacking LA County Deputies [WATCH]
News

Knife Wielding Maniac Meets Deadly Reality After Attacking LA County Deputies [WATCH]

/

A violent confrontation in Lancaster, California, ended exactly the way sane people would expect when a man allegedly armed with a knife attacked Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies in a parking lot.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department released body camera footage Tuesday showing the June 20 incident, which began after a concerned citizen reported a man swinging knives in public. That call brought deputies to the scene, and the situation escalated fast.

According to KABC, the man was identified as Robert Castro. Surveillance footage shows three sheriff’s patrol vehicles arriving as deputies moved to confront him in the parking lot.

Castro is seen walking away at first, but that changed when the first deputy drove up.

Instead of complying or stopping, Castro turned toward the patrol vehicle and rushed in the deputy’s direction.

As the deputy exited his vehicle, Castro attacked him with a knife.

The deputy, facing a direct threat to his life, fired several rounds and Castro fell to the ground.

The Sheriff’s Department described the encounter plainly, without the usual activist fog machine that so often appears whenever officers are forced to make split-second decisions.

“Before Deputy #1’s patrol vehicle came to a stop, Castro turned and rapidly walked in the deputy’s direction.

Castro then ran at Deputy #1, drew a knife, stabbed the deputy, and Deputy #1 discharged his service weapon.”

A second deputy arrived moments later to assist his wounded partner.

When Castro moved toward the knife on the ground, that deputy ordered him not to reach for it and then opened fire when the danger continued.

“Don’t move, don’t move!” Stop reaching!” the deputy repeatedly yelled during the encounter.

Castro eventually stopped moving.

WATCH:

He was later transported to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead, according to KABC.

The wounded deputy was also taken to a hospital for treatment.

Physicians treated him for a stab wound, a detail that should matter to anyone still pretending these calls are harmless misunderstandings.

The Sheriff’s Department also released another portion of its account explaining the second deputy’s response.

It stated, “When Castro moves his hand, Deputy #2 commands him to ‘Stop reaching.’ The second deputy then opens fire.”

This is the kind of footage that cuts through the usual noise.

A citizen saw a man swinging knives, deputies responded, and one of those deputies was stabbed before deadly force was used.

In a healthier country, the lesson would be simple.

Do not charge police officers with a knife, do not stab them, and do not reach again once you are on the ground beside the weapon.

But in today’s political climate, especially in places dominated by soft on crime talking points, even obvious cases can get dragged into the familiar circus.

The public gets lectures from people who were nowhere near the scene, while deputies are expected to absorb chaos and somehow make everyone happy.

Body camera footage matters because it lets the public see what officers actually faced.

In this case, deputies were not dealing with a paperwork dispute or a peaceful passerby, but an armed man who reportedly turned a public parking lot into a danger zone.

The incident is another reminder that law enforcement officers are asked to walk straight into situations most critics would flee from in a heartbeat.

When they survive those encounters, the same armchair experts often show up to second guess every second.

Castro made a deadly choice, and the deputies responded to a deadly threat.

That is not complicated, no matter how hard the professional excuse makers may try to make it.

CNN Analyst Says Fauci Made Legal Mess Worse with Fifth Amendment Stonewalling [WATCH]
News

CNN Analyst Says Fauci Made Legal Mess Worse with Fifth Amendment Stonewalling [WATCH]

/

Dr. Anthony Fauci walked into a Senate hearing this week facing tough questions about COVID origins, federal research funding, and pandemic accountability.

He walked out having handed Republicans a made for television moment that even a CNN legal analyst admitted may have deepened his legal trouble.

The hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee was chaired by Sen. Rand Paul, one of Fauci’s most persistent critics.

Paul and other Republicans pressed the former federal health official on National Institutes of Health funding, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and whether Americans were misled during the pandemic years.

Fauci’s response was not exactly a master class in transparency. Again and again, he invoked the Fifth Amendment rather than answer direct questions under oath.

“On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.”

That line reportedly came more than 100 times during a hearing that lasted nearly three hours.

For a man once treated by the corporate press as the unquestionable voice of science, the optics were brutal.

Republicans did not get many answers, but they did get something politically powerful.

They got a public record of Fauci refusing to answer while sitting before a Senate panel examining one of the most consequential government failures in modern American history.

Later on CNN’s “OutFront,” host Erin Burnett asked legal analyst Ryan Goodman whether Fauci’s strategy would actually protect him or make his situation worse.

Goodman, a professor at NYU School of Law, did not exactly deliver the answer Fauci’s fan club wanted.

“I think it makes it worse,” Goodman replied.

That admission stood out because it came on CNN, not from some conservative backbench podcast or a Rand Paul press release.

When even a legal analyst on that network is saying Fauci may have stepped in it, the old media protection racket starts looking a little less sturdy.

Goodman pointed to Joe Biden’s pardon of Fauci, which covered actions before January 2025.

According to Goodman, that pardon may have removed much of Fauci’s criminal exposure for past conduct, but it also may have weakened his ability to refuse testimony.

“It’s even a curious way in which you wonder what his legal advice was, why they decided to do that, because he does not face criminal jeopardy for the pardon, in all likelihood, he’s pardoned for all actions before January 2025.”

In plain English, the very pardon meant to shield Fauci could now create a different problem.

If he cannot be prosecuted for the covered conduct, Republicans argue he has less basis to clam up when lawmakers ask what happened during the COVID era.

“But that also means that you’re forced to testify,” Goodman continued, explaining that prosecutors often rely on immunity or pardons to compel testimony.

Goodman added that Fauci could theoretically face contempt if a Justice Department decided to pursue the matter.

That is the kind of legal twist that turns a defensive maneuver into a flashing red light.

Burnett also noted that Fauci’s explanation about avoiding perjury traps may not be persuasive to ordinary Americans.

“Then, of course, again, to the layperson, it’s the saying, well, why wouldn’t you just say the truth? What would be the problem in that?” she said.

“I understand that’s a layperson thing, but it doesn’t sound good.”

No, it does not sound good.

WATCH:

Most Americans who lived through lockdowns, mandates, school closures, censorship campaigns, and endless lectures from the expert class probably have a few questions of their own.

Fauci accused Paul of trying to lure him into statements that could be used against him later.

Paul, meanwhile, has spent years challenging Fauci over federal funding connected to research in Wuhan and whether officials were honest about the possible origins of the virus.

Fauci has repeatedly denied that NIH funded research that created the virus responsible for the pandemic.

Still, the origins debate remains unresolved, with American intelligence agencies split between natural transmission and a possible lab incident.

For years, Fauci’s defenders brushed off Republican scrutiny as theater.

Yet this hearing placed his credibility back under a national spotlight, and his answer was basically the same refusal repeated until the room ran out of oxygen.

Republicans may not have gotten the testimony they wanted Wednesday.

But if Goodman is right, Fauci may have given them something else, a fresh legal argument and a very ugly public record.

The man who once told America to trust the experts now appears unwilling to answer the questions.

That is not exactly the accountability tour the public was promised.

Cuomo, Fauci, and the COVID Clowns: How the Left’s Media Turned Lies Into Lockdowns [WATCH]
News

Fauci’s Own Words Come Back to Haunt Him After Pleading the Fifth Over a Hundred Times [WATCH]

/

Dr. Anthony Fauci is discovering that old television clips have a nasty habit of surviving, especially when they collide with new testimony on Capitol Hill.

His 2022 promise that he had nothing to hide is now looking like one of Washington’s more spectacular about faces.

Back then, Fauci sounded eager, almost cheerful, about the prospect of congressional scrutiny.

“I am very happy to testify before any congressional oversight committee,” he told CNN in 2022.

He did not stop there. “I have nothing to hide. I can explain and validate everything that I’ve done… I’m going to do what I need to do, and that is cooperate fully, because we have nothing to hide at all,” he added.

WATCH:

Fast forward to Wednesday, and the former face of the federal Covid response had a very different message for the Senate.

Rather than explain and validate everything, Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times.

Under the guidance of his attorneys, Fauci declined to answer questions from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and others on the committee.

The subjects included his role in the pandemic response and questions surrounding gain of function research.

The contrast was impossible to miss. In 2022, Fauci sounded like a man eager to clear the air, but in the hearing room, he sounded like a man whose lawyers had replaced the old media script with a much shorter one.

Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to Fauci for comment about his earlier statement.

The silence around that request only added more fuel to a story already loaded with political dynamite.

Fauci argued during the hearing that Paul has an “obvious obsession” with trying to see him prosecuted.

That is a familiar Washington move, when pressed on substance, question the motives of the person asking the questions.

He also claimed Paul’s release of more than 1,000 pages from his personal diaries was designed to “get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, behind bars, unquote.”

Fauci told the committee that he respected the legislative branch and had a long record of cooperating with Congress.

Then, following his attorneys’ advice, he invoked his constitutional right not to answer the committee’s questions.

Paul, who has led the push to scrutinize Fauci’s conduct, is not treating the Fifth Amendment pleas as the end of the matter.

He is now raising a sharp legal question tied to Fauci’s reported presidential pardon.

“The legal question is, if you’re pardoned, can you really claim the Fifth?” Paul asked during an appearance on “The Will Cain Show.”

That question matters because the Fifth Amendment is designed to protect witnesses from incriminating themselves.

Paul’s point is that if a pardon already removes criminal exposure, then the legal ground beneath Fauci’s refusal may not be as solid as his attorneys would like.

For years, Fauci enjoyed a level of media protection usually reserved for liberal icons and endangered Democratic talking points.

He was presented as the voice of science, while Americans who questioned school closures, mandates, origins theories, or federal guidance were treated like troublemakers.

Now the same man who repeatedly assured the public that he could explain everything has chosen not to answer anything.

WATCH:

That is a remarkable development for someone who became one of the most powerful unelected officials in America during the pandemic.

The newly released diary materials have also intensified scrutiny of Fauci’s mindset during the crisis.

Critics say they reveal a public health official deeply aware of his celebrity status while the country was still reeling from deaths, lockdowns, and economic chaos.

Paul is seeking a vote to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after the former public health official refused to answer questions 111 times.

That effort sets up another major fight over accountability for the decisions made during the pandemic years.

Millions of Americans remember the closed classrooms, ruined businesses, forced masking, shifting guidance, and smug lectures from the expert class.

They were told to stop asking questions and trust the science, and now the man most associated with that command is leaning on the Fifth.

Fauci may have had plenty to say on CNN when friendly cameras were rolling.

But under oath, before a Senate committee, his famous confidence suddenly gave way to silence, and that silence is now the story.


Scroll to Top