News

Walz Doubles Down After Trump Team Deports His Pardoned Child Rapist [WATCH]
News

Walz Doubles Down After Trump Team Deports His Pardoned Child Rapist [WATCH]

/

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz defended his decision after the Trump administration deported an illegal migrant whose criminal conviction had been pardoned by the Minnesota Board of Pardons last month, prompting renewed debate over immigration enforcement and executive clemency, as reported by The New York Post.

Walz commented Tuesday after Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the legal status of Tou Lue Vang, a 42-year-old native of Laos, had been revoked before he was removed from the United States.

“Did that make us any safer? Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable?” Walz asked, according to KTTC.

He continued, “Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day? And I want to be very clear, these are horrific crimes. They often are.”

The Department of Homeland Security announced Friday that Vang had been deported after his legal status was terminated.

In a statement, the White House confirmed Rubio’s action and defended the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.

“Under President Trump, criminal illegal aliens who rape children will be found, arrested, and removed—and Democrat politicians will not stand in the way,” the statement read.

According to DHS, Vang entered the United States in 1994 and was granted legal status during the Clinton administration.

In 2006, he was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a 10-year-old girl after repeated assaults that prosecutors said occurred between 2002 and 2004.

DHS said Vang later claimed during a police interview that his actions were “a cultural thing” and argued that the child victim shared responsibility for what occurred.

Following his conviction, a Department of Justice immigration judge issued a final order of removal in October 2006.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested Vang on Dec. 10, 2025. A judge in the District of Minnesota later ordered his release from ICE custody in February 2026.

On June 10, the Minnesota Board of Pardons granted Vang a pardon. The board consists of Walz, Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson, and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

During the pardon hearing, Vang accepted responsibility for his crime.

“What I did was wrong. It was a serious crime. She was a child,” Vang told the board.

He also appealed to the board on behalf of his family.

“If I am sent away, we lose everything. My children will lose their home, and they will lose their education. They will grow up without a father.”

According to KTTC, the victim submitted a letter stating that she had forgiven Vang for his actions.

During the hearing, Walz stated, “Just remember, both were minors,” according to the Daily Mail.

After Vang’s removal from the United States, DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis criticized the decision to pardon him.

“ICE deported Tou Vang, an illegal alien convicted child rapist. This monster repeatedly sexually assaulted a 10-year-old girl,” Bis said.

She added, “Tim Walz pardoned this sex criminal in an attempt to allow him to remain in our country.”

“These are the criminal illegal aliens he and sanctuary politicians are protecting. We will always put the safety of the American people first.”

The deportation has drawn national attention as the Trump administration continues to emphasize the removal of criminal illegal immigrants, while Walz’s comments and the Minnesota pardon have generated renewed scrutiny over the state’s clemency process.

Inmate Ran Brazen VA Scam From Behind Bars Targeting Sick Veterans and Their Families
News

Inmate Ran Brazen VA Scam From Behind Bars Targeting Sick Veterans and Their Families

/

A Washington state inmate pulled off a disgusting and deeply personal con against some of this nation’s most vulnerable heroes, using nothing more than a jail phone and a twisted sense of deceit.

Federal prosecutors say Darryl Lamont Young, 41, ran an elaborate scam from inside King County Jail, making dozens of calls to VA medical centers across the country, pretending to be a legitimate employee. His goal wasn’t patriotism or penance—it was exploitation.

Authorities confirmed that Young used these calls to trick VA staff into revealing the identities and personal details of seriously ill veterans under care, veterans who sacrificed for the flag while this con artist preyed on their suffering.

Once Young obtained the family contact information of the ailing veterans, he and his accomplice, Aqeelah Ngiesha Williams, 29, moved in for the kill. They called relatives pretending to be VA officials offering COVID-era relief payments. What they really wanted were bank details—and what they took was money meant for food, medicine, and dignity.

According to the Justice Department, Young executed this despicable plan more than 60 times between late 2021 and early 2023, ultimately stealing about $8,900. His four-day trial ended with a conviction on 14 counts of aggravated identity theft and wire fraud. Williams was found guilty on 12 similar counts.

“While they did not get a huge amount of money with this scheme, the harm they caused to those already suffering a health crisis is deserving of federal prosecution,” said U.S. Attorney Gorman in a Department of Justice statement. That’s putting it mildly.

This wasn’t some high-tech cybercrime operation. It was old-fashioned scamming, but with a twist of cold-hearted precision. Jail calls in King County are free, and the local VA medical center didn’t receive any notification that the incoming caller was an inmate. That loophole handed Young the anonymity he needed to pose as “Jason in bed control” or “Travis” in “patient registration” at the VA.

Posing as a fellow employee, Young convinced VA staff to transfer him to out-of-state hospitals, where he continued his impersonations. Those hospitals, unaware of the jail origin of the call, treated him as one of their own and complied with his requests.

As the Justice Department pointed out, Young had served in the military himself, giving him valuable insight into VA protocols and operations. This knowledge made the ruse tragically effective.

After obtaining personal details, Williams helped facilitate follow-up calls to the veterans’ family members. Together they would play the parts convincingly, promising a COVID-related “relief payment” for the sick veteran and asking for financial details to process it. Once the information was secured, they siphoned off the funds, conveniently depositing the stolen cash straight into Young’s commissary account.

What’s most infuriating is how easily bureaucratic negligence allowed an inmate to call federal medical institutions without alerting staff to the source of the call. For a government known for its surveillance excesses, it somehow failed to monitor its own sanctioned phone systems effectively.

It’s not simply the theft of dollars that disgusts—it’s the betrayal. Every veteran deserves trust, respect, and the assurance that the systems designed to care for them aren’t being weaponized by criminals hiding behind an orange jumpsuit.

Federal prosecutors got their convictions. But the underlying scandal is that it took more than a year and over 60 successful cons before the system caught up. That’s not vigilance, it’s complacency.

One can’t help but wonder what Secretary of War Pete Hegseth—himself a fierce advocate for accountability inside veterans’ systems—thinks of these embarrassing operational failures. If Washington wants to stop scams like this, it should start by cutting through layers of red tape and demanding real accountability across the War Department’s cooperative agencies.

The betrayal of America’s sick and wounded warriors is the lowest of the low, but this case shows what’s possible when unchecked access meets government incompetence. It should serve as a wake-up call that vigilance is not optional; it’s a duty.

As Young awaits his final sentencing, veterans and their families are left asking the same question they’ve been asking for years: who’s really watching the guardians?

Schiff Tries to Grill AG Nominee Todd Blanche and Gets Schooled on Live TV [WATCH]
News

Schiff Tries to Grill AG Nominee Todd Blanche and Gets Schooled on Live TV [WATCH]

/

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche forcefully defended his record Wednesday during a Senate confirmation hearing after Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., questioned his handling of matters related to former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s classified documents investigation, as reported by Red State.

The exchange occurred during Blanche’s appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee as lawmakers considered his nomination to serve as attorney general.

Blanche has served as acting attorney general since April, following the departure of Pam Bondi.

One of the hearing’s most contentious moments came when Schiff questioned Blanche about Volume II of former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, which concerns the classified documents investigation involving President Donald Trump.

Schiff argued that Blanche should have supported releasing the report and suggested that withholding it presented a conflict of interest because Blanche had previously represented Trump.

“You’ve also refused to release Volume II of the Special Counsel’s report. That was an investigation into the Mar-a-Lago documents case. How is that not an abundant conflict of interest? Refusing to release to the public an investigative report of an investigation into your client?” Schiff asked.

Blanche began responding by noting that decisions regarding the report had involved the courts.

“I am not a judge, a federal judge —”

Schiff interrupted before Blanche could finish.

“No, no, no, no, no. The department’s position under you, Mr. Blanche, the department’s position under you, Mr. Blanche, was to not release the report. But if you went into court asking them to release it, it would be released by now. So how is that not a patent conflict of interest?”

Blanche rejected Schiff’s characterization of the timeline, stating that the decisions Schiff referenced occurred before Blanche assumed his current position.

“What you’re saying happens to not be true. I did not do that. What you’re talking about happened before.”

Schiff then asked Blanche whether he supported releasing Volume II of the report.

“So do you support the release of Volume II?”

Blanche responded that he did not, while also emphasizing that he had recused himself from matters involving the case.

“No, I don’t — but I’m recused and had nothing to do with that case. You can’t accuse me of violating my ethical rules and then lie about what I did.”

The classified documents report became the subject of multiple court proceedings after U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon blocked its release on several occasions.

The hearing also included broader disagreements between Schiff and Blanche over Justice Department personnel decisions and actions taken by the Trump administration.

According to the hearing, the two exchanged views on the dismissal of federal prosecutors, as well as President Donald Trump’s pardons of numerous January 6 defendants.

Blanche defended his conduct throughout the hearing and repeatedly disputed Schiff’s assertions regarding his involvement in decisions surrounding the classified documents investigation.

The exchange marked one of several heated moments during Wednesday’s confirmation hearing, as Democratic senators pressed Blanche on his prior legal representation of Trump and his leadership of the Justice Department.

Blanche maintained that ethical rules required him to recuse himself from matters involving his former client and argued that Schiff’s accusations incorrectly attributed actions to him that occurred before he became acting attorney general.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is continuing its consideration of Blanche’s nomination as lawmakers weigh whether to advance him for a full Senate confirmation vote.

Canadian Karen Arrested After Slapping Teen Wearing Trump and ICE Pants on Jersey Boardwalk [WATCH]
News

Canadian Karen Arrested After Slapping Teen Wearing Trump and ICE Pants on Jersey Boardwalk [WATCH]

/

A Canadian woman living in New Jersey is facing serious charges after she allegedly attacked a teenage girl simply for wearing patriotic clothing featuring the names Trump and ICE.

The incident unfolded on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk during the Fourth of July weekend, and now the alleged assailant has found herself behind bars and in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Authorities identified the woman as Kaitlyn E. Tracey, age thirty three, who was reportedly filming a group of teens before confronting them over their clothing choices.

According to a report from NJ.com, Tracey allegedly slapped the victim across her face and body, an act that police described as unprovoked and aggressive.

The patriotic messaging on the girl’s clothing seems to have been the spark that set Tracey off, which says plenty about today’s climate of political intolerance against conservatives.

Police say surveillance footage backs up the teenage victim’s account of what happened.

The video allegedly shows Tracey striking the young girl once on the body and again on the face before fleeing the scene.

Officers launched an investigation shortly afterward, which led to Tracey’s arrest days later.

It is another example of how heated political emotions can boil over when tolerance is preached but rarely practiced.

Tracey now faces a mountain of charges including endangering the welfare of a child, simple assault, harassment, and obstruction.

For anyone keeping score, she managed to rack up quite the list over what appears to be nothing more than a show of patriotic pride from a teenager on a family outing.

Law enforcement noted that she is a Canadian citizen who came to the United States in 2024 using a passport.

When asked for comment, her attorney, Francis Hodgsen, had nothing to say.

But her husband did.

He appeared in a tearful social media video pleading for sympathy after his wife was detained by ICE. In his words, “Yesterday July 13, my wife was detained by ICE and brought to Delaney Hall in North New Jersey.”

WATCH:

The irony of an anti ICE outburst ending with an ICE detention practically writes itself.

ICE has confirmed through its official detainee locator that Tracey is being held at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark.

That facility has seen plenty of protest activity from the same kind of activists who rail against immigration enforcement while benefiting from the very laws they despise.

When Fox News Digital reached out to ICE for further comment, officials did not immediately respond.

The confrontation reportedly began on July 3, right as crowds gathered for Independence Day celebrations on the Jersey Shore.

Witnesses told officers that Tracey became visibly agitated after spotting the wording on the teens’ brightly colored sweatpants.

It was a simple patriotic outfit featuring the words Trump and ICE in red, white, and blue.

To most Americans celebrating the holiday, it would have blended right in.

But to Tracey, who seemed determined to make a statement, it triggered a physical altercation.

This sort of political hostility directed at anyone who supports Trump or respects law enforcement has become increasingly common in Democrat-run areas.

Conservatives can wear a hat, shirt, or sticker and immediately become a target for harassment from self proclaimed activists who cannot seem to coexist with people who think differently.

The case of Kaitlyn Tracey is a textbook example.

What makes this particular case even more inflamed is that it involves a minor.

Police confirmed that the victim was a juvenile, making the charges far more serious.

Endangering the welfare of a child is not some petty offense.

It shows premeditated recklessness that the justice system will likely treat harshly.

The fact that Tracey is not an American citizen only deepens the legal complications.

The story might sound absurd, but it fits neatly into a pattern of hostility the left often directs toward Trump supporters.

Whether it is restaurant staff refusing service to conservatives, college students physically silencing peers, or attacks like this one, intolerance is alive and well in the same ranks that claim to champion empathy and inclusion.

When the message does not fit their worldview, the response is anger or, in this case, assault.

Point Pleasant Beach police have not released additional information about the victim, citing her age, but they confirmed the investigation remains active.

Prosecutors are expected to review the evidence, including video footage, before the case moves forward.

Community members who witnessed the event were reportedly left stunned that something so trivial could lead to a violent encounter.

While the left continues to shout about hate crimes, a young conservative teenager cannot even walk down a boardwalk in New Jersey wearing an expression of support for a president without being physically attacked.

What happened to tolerance and free expression?

The answer, as it often is, depends on who is wearing what.

As ICE continues to hold Tracey, one thing is clear. Actions have consequences.

Mocking and hitting a child for wearing clothing with patriotic symbols is not “protest,” it is criminal behavior.

And for once, the activist who claimed to oppose ICE will get a closer look at the immigration system from inside the very center she jeered.

Hirono Mocked After Bizarre Question to Trump AG Nominee Todd Blanche Sparks Outrage Online [WATCH]
News

Hirono Mocked After Bizarre Question to Trump AG Nominee Todd Blanche Sparks Outrage Online [WATCH]

/

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday quickly became the focus of criticism after Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, opened her questioning with a series of inquiries about personal misconduct, prompting a sharp response from the White House and widespread reaction on social media, as reported by Fox News.

Blanche appeared before the committee as lawmakers considered his nomination. During her allotted time, Hirono began by asking whether he had ever engaged in inappropriate personal conduct or misconduct during his adult life.

Blanche answered each question with the same response.

“No, senator,” he said.

Hirono then asked whether Blanche had ever faced disciplinary action or entered into any settlement related to that type of conduct.

Again, Blanche replied, “No, senator.”

The White House’s Rapid Response account quickly criticized Hirono’s line of questioning on X.

“Low IQ @maziehirono begins her questioning of @DAGToddBlanche —an esteemed professional with an honorable record in public service—by asking, ‘Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors?’ What a joke,” the account posted.

Hirono has used similar opening questions during previous Senate confirmation hearings. She asked Interior Secretary Doug Burgum comparable questions during his confirmation hearing last year.

According to the report, Hirono first adopted the practice in 2018 following the rise of the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements.

She initially used the questions during the confirmation hearing of judicial nominee Kurt Engelhardt during President Donald Trump’s first administration.

The exchange with Blanche quickly spread across social media, where a number of conservative organizations and commentators criticized Hirono’s approach.

“Raise your hand if you’re tired of @maziehirono’s favorite Senate Judiciary line of questioning,” the Republican National Lawyers Association wrote on X.

Right Line News Chief Content Officer Eric Daugherty also commented on the hearing.

“The White House is RIPPING deranged Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) for demanding AG Todd Blanche answer, ‘have you ever made unwanted requests for s*xual favors’ BLANCHE: ‘…no, senator..,’” Daugherty wrote on X.

He followed with another post that read, “WTF? What a stupid thing to ask out of nowhere.”

Another social media user wrote, “She does it to EVERYONE, SHE IS ABSOLUTELY NUTS.”

Hirono has previously explained why she asks similar questions of nominees appearing before the Senate.

In a 2018 post on X, she wrote that she was “asking nominees to our courts, under oath, whether or not they have a history of sexual assault or harassment.”

She also wrote, “Like in other industries, our judges are in positions of power & #TimesUp.”

The questions have become a recurring feature of Hirono’s participation in confirmation hearings and have repeatedly generated criticism from Republicans and conservative commentators, who argue the inquiries are inappropriate when directed at nominees without public allegations of misconduct.

Wednesday’s hearing continued that pattern, with Blanche firmly denying any history of misconduct and answering each question directly.

The exchange became one of the most widely discussed moments of the hearing, drawing immediate responses from the White House, legal organizations, political commentators, and social media users.

Blanche’s nomination now moves forward as the Senate Judiciary Committee continues its consideration of his confirmation, while the opening exchange with Hirono is likely to remain one of the most closely watched moments from Wednesday’s proceedings.

Florida Candidate Calls Trump ‘Anti Christ’ And Says He ‘Must Be Killed’ In Deranged Video [WATCH]
News

Florida Candidate Calls Trump ‘Anti Christ’ And Says He ‘Must Be Killed’ In Deranged Video [WATCH]

/

A Florida man running for Congress has sparked national outrage after posting a shocking video calling President Donald Trump “the anti Christ” who “must be killed.”

The unhinged rant came from William Upham, a discharged Marine now attempting a write in run for Florida’s 5th District.

Upham recorded the nearly seven minute tirade while dressed in his Marine uniform, a move that drew immediate backlash from the military community.

Despite being medically discharged from the Corps last year, he used his uniform to give an air of credibility to what many are calling an open threat against the life of a president.

In the disturbing clip, Upham declares, “I’ve reached a turning point in my campaign. Why? I’ve come to the realization that our country is broken. We are led by a president who’s the enemy of God, and President Trump will never bring us together like God intended.”

He took his rhetoric even further, claiming, “There is no doubt in my mind that the president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, is the anti Christ. He is a false Messiah, and he is your enemy, and he must be killed.”

The bizarre justification for such statements allegedly came from Trump’s criticism of Pope Leo XIV and an AI image of himself styled after a biblical depiction of Christ.

Upham went on to claim that Trump “will be killed and sent to hell,” adding, “God will prevail against evil.”

Then, in a jarring contradiction, the candidate abruptly stated that “violence should never be used for evil purposes such as vengeance or plunder,” only moments after explicitly calling for the assassination of the 45th president.

The genuinely deranged video immediately drew outrage from all corners, including the military that Upham once served.

The Marine Corps released a statement publicly condemning his remarks, clarifying that Upham was discharged on May 30, 2025, and emphasizing that his words are “a direct violation of the oath he swore to uphold and are not in keeping with the service’s values.”

WATCH:

Hung Cao, who is currently serving as acting Secretary of the Navy, also slammed the rant as “unacceptable,” reminding Americans that Upham does not represent the Marines or their code of honor.

Cao specifically pointed out the seriousness of such rhetoric given recent violence against conservatives, including the assassination of Charlie Kirk last September and three separate attempts on President Trump’s life in the past two years.

The language in Upham’s video has rattled many who see it as more than just political bluster.

After years of left wing radicals painting Trump and his supporters as threats to democracy, this kind of rhetoric from a congressional candidate sounds eerily familiar to the violent tone that has plagued progressive activism in recent years.

What is particularly concerning to many observers is the silence from the usual chorus of Democrats and media commentators who cry “threat to democracy” anytime Trump supporters raise strong language about the administration or policy.

When it comes from their side, calls for violence often get brushed aside as free speech or “misguided passion.”

Upham’s campaign appears to have imploded overnight.

His social media pages have been flooded with condemnation, even from liberals who think his words crossed every moral line.

Federal and state authorities are also reportedly reviewing the video to determine whether a credible threat was made against the president, which could amount to a felony.

This latest episode continues a dark trend in the national conversation.

It is not just celebrities or late night hosts tossing insults at conservatives anymore.

Now, candidates themselves are issuing what sound like direct religious war declarations against political opponents.

Trump supporters see the incident as another glaring example of the left’s growing derangement when it comes to President Trump.

He continues to dominate headlines, rally thousands, and hold commanding support across conservative America.

That level of influence sends some liberals into fits of rage, and Upham’s rant may be the latest, and most disturbing, symptom of that unrelenting obsession.

As the video continues to spread online, the national conversation is once again turning to the political double standard that defines so much of the current era.

When conservatives voice opposition to progressive leadership, they get labeled extremists.

When progressives call for the literal death of a Republican president, they are written off as mentally ill or dismissed altogether.

William Upham has yet to comment publicly on the backlash. His silence speaks volumes.

Voters in Florida’s 5th District are now left to decide whether a man who calls for assassination in God’s name belongs anywhere near public office.

The rest of the country seems to have already decided.

Dash Cam Footage Reveals ESPN Analyst’s Brutal Crash And Mounting Controversy [WATCH]
News

Dash Cam Footage Reveals ESPN Analyst’s Brutal Crash And Mounting Controversy [WATCH]

/

Newly released dashcam footage is providing a clearer look at the June 17 crash that left ESPN NFL draft analyst Matt Miller with life-altering injuries, while a separate investigation involving allegations tied to fantasy football contests and charitable payments remains ongoing, as reported by Trending Politics News.

The video, obtained by The California Post and released Tuesday, shows Miller driving a blue 2023 Ford Bronco on a roadway in Jasper County, Missouri, at approximately 3:50 p.m. on June 17.

According to the footage, the Bronco suddenly crossed the centerline and entered the path of an oncoming semi-truck.

The truck driver appeared to take evasive action in an attempt to avoid the collision, but was unable to prevent the crash.

Photographs from the scene show Miller’s Bronco heavily damaged after leaving the roadway, skidding several yards, and coming to rest in a grassy area.

According to the Missouri State Highway Patrol, Miller was wearing his seat belt properly before the collision.

However, investigators said that “during the crash and due to the extensive damage” to the vehicle, the seat belt was cut, resulting in Miller being ejected from the Bronco.

A witness who was traveling behind Miller described what happened in a statement included in the crash report.

“I was leaving my sister’s house,” the witness said. “I might have been maybe 100 yards behind. I witnessed the Bronco just a hard swerve into the semi’s lane. The semi tried to swerve. It made contact. I haven’t ever seen a car explode like that. I ran to the Bronco, and there was no one in the vehicle. I heard groaning behind me.”

“I saw a man laying in the grass. I called 911.”

Following the collision, Miller suffered multiple serious injuries, according to a GoFundMe campaign established by his family.

The fundraiser stated that Miller sustained “a compound fracture of his left femur, a shattered left kneecap,” and “multiple broken ribs.”

It also stated that he “lost a significant amount of blood” and ultimately underwent an amputation of his left arm.

The Missouri State Highway Patrol identified the probable contributing circumstance in the crash as “improper lane usage/change” by Miller.

The report listed whether alcohol or marijuana played a role as “unknown.”

Investigators also reported that the semi-truck driver was not injured in the collision and was not under the influence of alcohol or marijuana.

Since the accident, Miller has publicly updated supporters on his condition.

On July 10, he announced on X that he had undergone multiple successful surgeries and would be stepping away from ESPN while continuing his recovery.

“Thank you to all for the prayers and thoughts; please keep them coming,” Miller wrote.

While the crash has generated widespread attention because of Miller’s injuries, it has also renewed public interest in separate allegations unrelated to the collision.

According to the report, several social media users have accused Miller of withholding prize money or failing to fully account for charitable funds connected to fantasy football contests and scouting-related payments.

Earlier this month, Awful Announcing reported that the Missouri Attorney General’s Office had opened an investigation into those complaints.

Miller has not publicly responded to the allegations.

The newly released dashcam footage has added additional attention to the June 17 collision as authorities continue documenting the circumstances surrounding the crash.

Meanwhile, Miller remains focused on recovering from his injuries after undergoing multiple surgeries, while the separate investigation involving the reported financial complaints continues.

Biden Brags About New Memoir And Americans Instantly Torch The Announcement [WATCH]
News

Biden Brags About New Memoir And Americans Instantly Torch The Announcement [WATCH]

/

Joe Biden has reentered the public spotlight just in time to remind Americans why they were glad to see him exit the White House.

This week, the former president awkwardly announced that he has “written” a book titled “Promise Me, America,” and, predictably, the internet responded with a torrent of disbelief and ridicule.

For a man who famously struggles to finish coherent sentences, the idea of authoring an entire memoir without a small army of ghostwriters sounds like pure fiction.

In his announcement video, Biden delivered a meandering speech about faith, leadership, and America’s “promise.”

The release is set for November 17, conveniently placed before the midterm elections, in what appears to be an attempt to make himself relevant again.

Americans immediately saw through it. The replies to his announcement online painted a picture of a public not exactly eager for more of Joe’s “wisdom.”

Biden kicked off his message by claiming he has spent his retirement dealing with a cancer diagnosis, undergoing treatment, and reflecting on his “time as president.”

He proudly told viewers, “I’ve written a book about my time as president. It’s called Promise Me, America.”

He promised stories about leading the country through the pandemic, rebuilding the economy, restoring democracy, and ending the war in Afghanistan.

Each of those claims likely raised more eyebrows than applause.

Critics were quick to point out the glaring contradictions.

The so-called rebuilding of the economy left Americans facing crushing inflation, record energy costs, and an ongoing housing crisis.

“Restoring democracy,” according to Biden, meant branding half the country as extremists and weaponizing federal agencies against political opponents.

If that is his idea of faith in America, most Americans will gladly pass.

Social media responses were brutal.

Many users questioned whether Biden even knew he had “written” a book.

“It’s called Autopen and me, how a potato pretended to run a country.” one user quipped.

Others joked about how his publishers must have had to decode his daily mumblings just to get enough coherent lines for a chapter.

A consistent theme across thousands of replies was disbelief that Biden played any real part in the creation of the book.

Plenty of users also mocked his long history of using an auto-pen to sign documents while in office.

“Did you write it with an autopen?” Scott Presler wrote.

To many Americans, Biden’s announcement felt less like a literary effort and more like another manufactured narrative to prop up his legacy after a disastrous presidency.

Biden also used the announcement to revisit the excuses for his decision to seek reelection and then abruptly bow out.

He said his book would explain “why I chose to run for re-election and why I chose to step aside.”

WATCH:

That line alone lit up his critics, who asked which explanation he planned to stick with this week.

Biden’s constant vacillation has become part of his political brand, and this attempt to rewrite recent history seems to fit the pattern perfectly.

Ironically, the title of the book, “Promise Me, America,” sounds like a plea rather than a statement.

Coming from the same administration that promised “unity” while dividing the nation at every turn, it may be the most unintentionally fitting title possible.

Biden spent his term breaking promises, from energy independence to border security and fiscal responsibility, and Americans remember all of it too well.

Democrats, meanwhile, are not thrilled by Biden’s renewed presence.

Party strategists had spent months trying to shift attention away from Biden’s dismal approval ratings and toward their own congressional candidates.

Instead, he announced a memoir that reopens every political wound from his troubled tenure.

You can almost hear the collective sigh from Democratic headquarters as Biden reminds the nation of his presidency’s lowlights.

The release timing also raised eyebrows.

Dropping in mid-November places it squarely between campaign season and the holiday shopping period, practically begging for a CNN book special that no one will watch.

Conservatives online were particularly ruthless, suggesting that the only reason to preorder the book would be for a good laugh or a makeshift doorstop.

For all his talk about faith in America, Biden’s record remains the opposite of hopeful.

He presided over chaos abroad, uncertainty at home, a weaponized federal bureaucracy, and cultural polarization deeper than ever.

His memoir, if anything, will likely serve as a monument to the arrogance of Washington elites who mistake their failures for accomplishments.

Whether the book sells or not, one thing is certain.

The American people did not forget the last few years, and they are not nostalgic for them either.

Judging by the online reaction, Biden’s return to the spotlight might become the most poorly received book tour in modern political memory.

Democrats Vanish From Explosive Senate Fraud Hearing As O’Keefe And Shirley Drop Bombshells [WATCH]
News

Democrats Vanish From Explosive Senate Fraud Hearing As O’Keefe And Shirley Drop Bombshells [WATCH]

/

At a Senate hearing meant to expose massive taxpayer fraud, the empty chairs told the story better than any witness could.

Not a single Democrat bothered to show up when O’Keefe Media Group founder James O’Keefe and independent investigator Nick Shirley appeared before the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to lay out shocking evidence of government waste.

Committee Chairman Rand Paul could not help but observe the obvious absence of interest from across the aisle, while Senator Bernie Moreno flatly pointed out the absurdity of holding a hearing on fraud with zero Democratic participation.

WATCH:

When the issue is taxpayer money being siphoned off through corruption and abuse, Democrats’ priorities are clear, and accountability is not one of them.

O’Keefe, now leading the O’Keefe Media Group, came armed with hard-hitting revelations about rampant abuse within federal and state programs.

He described how his team exposed shady petition circulators caught on hidden camera paying homeless individuals with cash and even drugs to gather voter registrations and signatures.

He revealed evidence of forged signatures using real voter information, and his reports helped trigger a federal criminal indictment.

With calm precision, O’Keefe summarized the heart of America’s corruption problem: “There is money in fraud. There’s no money in exposing the fraud.”

WATCH:

That single sentence captured perfectly why the left avoids the subject like the plague.

Fraud is profitable for those who manipulate the system, and Democrats prefer to protect that grift rather than end it.

Nick Shirley’s appearance should have driven that point home.

Earlier this year, Shirley released a damning three-minute video documenting roughly 170 million dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse in California’s public programs.

Instead of launching an investigation or reform effort, Governor Gavin Newsom’s office stooped to smear tactics, mocking Shirley online and even implying criminal behavior.

It was a shameful, desperate attempt to silence someone doing the investigative work the state refuses to do.

The numbers speak volumes.

Government programs in California and forty other states have lost over ten billion dollars through bogus claims, SNAP overpayments, and fraud that bureaucrats seem all too content to ignore.

When watchdogs show up to expose it, the left sneers instead of acts.

Wednesday’s hearing ought to have been a bipartisan moment of unity against waste and corruption.

Instead, the Democratic Party made a spectacle of its indifference by simply not showing up.

One could almost hear their message: as long as their political allies benefit, the theft of taxpayer money is fine. If a few billion slip away to grifters and fraudulent nonprofits, so what?

Rand Paul’s measured leadership set a serious tone for what could have been a groundbreaking session.

But the lack of Democrats at the table reminded everyone watching that good governance stops where partisan politics begins.

America needs oversight and reform, but Senate Democrats apparently need campaign optics and excuses.

Meanwhile, true investigators like O’Keefe and Shirley press forward.

O’Keefe has invited whistleblowers to contact his team at the O’Keefe Media Group to expose further corruption in programs like Medicaid, SNAP, unemployment benefits, SBA loans, and beyond.

Unlike Washington’s political class, he does not depend on taxpayer dollars or party donations to uncover the truth.

His credibility comes from results, and those results are rattling comfortable elites who profit from the system’s rot.

Grassroots conservatives across the country increasingly recognize that mainstream journalists are not interested in exposing public fraud anymore.

They are too tied to the same bureaucracies they ought to be scrutinizing.

Independent outfits like RedState, O’Keefe Media Group, and others have taken up the mantle of accountability, because someone has to care when the government steals from the people.

This entire debacle reflects how far removed Democratic leaders have become from the daily struggles of American taxpayers.

Families pay record grocery bills while government agencies lose billions to fake claims and fraudulent operations.

Yet the same politicians who claim to fight for the “working class” are nowhere to be seen when it is time to stop the bleeding.

The empty Democratic chairs at this hearing spoke with perfect clarity.

They said that protecting the ruling class comes before protecting the taxpayer.

They said silence is better than facing uncomfortable truths.

And they said that fraud might be bipartisan in its victims, but accountability remains a conservative cause.

Watters Wrecks Liberal Spin as ICE Shooting Sparks Media Meltdown [WATCH]
News

Watters Wrecks Liberal Spin as ICE Shooting Sparks Media Meltdown [WATCH]

/

An immigration enforcement operation in Houston became the focus of a heated television debate after an ICE agent fatally shot an illegal immigrant who authorities say attempted to run over federal officers during a vehicle stop, as reported by PJ Media.

According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, federal agents were conducting a targeted enforcement operation Tuesday morning when Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, attempted to evade arrest.

ICE said Salgado Araujo tried to ram an agency vehicle, ignored multiple verbal commands, and then attempted to run over an agent. The agent responded by firing his weapon in what the agency described as self-defense.

The incident quickly became a topic of discussion on Tuesday’s edition of The Five, where Fox News host Jesse Watters and co-host Jessica Tarlov debated both the shooting and broader immigration policy.

Watters began by discussing images from the scene.

“All right, so the bullet holes are right through the front windshield,” Watters observed.

“So this wasn’t a side shot. The car was coming at the officer, we think, and they’ll do a review. And if he’s, you know, guilty of something negligent, then he’ll face justice. Or if the person drove at him and he was defending his life, then that’s it.”

Watters then questioned why Salgado Araujo had been in the United States.

Tarlov responded, “He’s working.”

Watters immediately rejected that argument.

“He shouldn’t be here, Jessica,” Watters replied.

Watters also noted that Salgado Araujo was not the intended target of the enforcement operation.

“And so, if they say pull over, pull over,” he said.

“Now, this investigation will be over, but we have to grow up. Can we grow up? I mean, there’s going to be fatalities in law enforcement situations, especially when there’s foreign fugitives who are resisting and running away.”

The discussion then shifted from the Houston incident to immigration policy under President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden.

Watters argued that the two administrations took dramatically different approaches to border enforcement.

“Biden didn’t even try. Biden and the Democrats chose to let millions of migrants in here. And then they chose not to deport them.”

He continued by criticizing what he described as Democratic immigration policy.

“You said they should be able to break into the country and stay until they break a law,” he said.

“And then they can get deported. Then we don’t have a border. That’s just an invitation for Latin America to break into the country. And we have to wait for them to commit crimes? That’s not a policy. That’s insanity.”

Watters also criticized sanctuary jurisdictions, arguing they interfere with immigration enforcement after criminal offenses occur.

“So they say they want to get the criminals out,” Watters said. “And then when we try to get the criminals out, they protect them.”

During the discussion, Watters referenced a case in Minnesota involving Gov. Tim Walz.

“Got pardoned by Tampon? I mean, what the hell? So he wouldn’t get deported?”

Watters concluded the segment by arguing that immigration policy has political consequences.

“Why, all of a sudden, we bring in all this foreign-born population, [and] Democrats are all of a sudden competitive?” he asked.

“They just imported everybody that lived outside of the country into the country, and now it’s closer. That’s why they want them here, no matter if they commit crimes or not.”

A video clip from The Five highlighting the exchange was later posted on X with the caption: “We can’t work with these people.” @JesseBWatters breaks down why Dems can’t be reckoned with when it comes to ICE reform.

The Houston shooting remains under review as authorities examine the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Watters acknowledged during the broadcast that investigators will determine whether the agent’s actions were justified based on the evidence collected during the review.


Scroll to Top