News

Trump’s SAVE America Act Gains Major Momentum After Stunning Senate Turnaround
News

Trump’s SAVE America Act Gains Major Momentum After Stunning Senate Turnaround

/

Senate Republicans breathed fresh life into President Donald Trump’s SAVE America Act this week after a surprising late-night shift from one key senator revived hopes for the nation’s cornerstone election integrity measure.

The move came after months of frustration, partisan blockades, and hand-wringing over whether the bill would ever see daylight in the deeply divided upper chamber.

The action unfolded during a marathon Senate “vote-a-rama” tied to the Republicans’ 70 billion dollar immigration enforcement package.

Lawmakers seized the opportunity to attach the SAVE America Act, a House-passed measure led by Trump allies requiring proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections.

It is a simple and overwhelmingly popular concept with voters, but one Democrats have fought tooth and nail because it threatens their ability to exploit loose election laws.

The first attempt, championed by Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, included several additions Trump himself had championed, among them a ban on biological men competing in women’s sports.

Predictably, a handful of Senate Republicans sided with Democrats.

Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, and Thom Tillis joined the opposition and blocked the proposal before it could gain traction.

That betrayal left the GOP short even of the basic 50 votes needed to begin the kind of talking filibuster conservatives had hoped could put pressure on the chamber.

For a brief stretch, it looked like the SAVE America Act was dead again.

Then, in the hours that followed, something unexpected happened.

Senator Mike Lee of Utah reintroduced a clean version of the SAVE America Act without the extra policy riders.

As the second round of votes began, Collins flipped her vote to support the measure.

That single switch gave the bill 50 votes, tying the chamber and putting Vice President JD Vance in position to cast a decisive tiebreaker if Senate rules allowed it.

Lee celebrated the progress on X, making clear what every conservative was thinking.

“That means that but for the Zombie Filibuster, the House-passed SAVE America Act would now be on its way to the White House for President Trump’s signature,” Lee wrote.

His point hit home with grassroots activists who have grown impatient watching straightforward election security measures get tripped up by Senate technicalities.

For months, conservatives have begged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to push Democrats into a talking filibuster rather than accepting stalemate.

They argue that forcing Democrats to hold the floor night after night while defending their opposition to voter ID laws would expose the absurdity of the left’s arguments.

Passing the Act, they insist, is worth the political fight.

Thune, a cautious institutionalist, continues to hesitate.

He has warned that forcing such a showdown could allow Democrats to flood the chamber with poison pill amendments targeting Trump’s broader agenda.

That caution has frustrated Trump allies, who believe the GOP needs to play hardball and use every available tool to protect election integrity nationwide.

McConnell’s vote against the Graham amendment did little to endear him to the conservative base.

Many view his opposition as symbolic of the old guard Republican resistance to Trump’s reforms, even when those reforms address issues like voter verification that poll overwhelmingly in favor of common sense.

Trump himself has grown more vocal on the issue as the Senate impasse dragged on.

When the parliamentarian ruled that the SAVE America Act could not be folded into the immigration package under reconciliation rules, the president directed his frustration toward Elizabeth MacDonough, demanding that Majority Leader Thune remove her from the position.

“We have every right to change her, and should do so, IMMEDIATELY,” Trump posted on Truth Social, calling her decision a barrier against the will of the American people.

Thune, once again playing the procedural defender, brushed aside the suggestion, noting that rulings from the parliamentarian have cut both ways throughout administrations.

His cool response did little to quiet criticism from the base, which sees too many GOP leaders regularly surrendering procedural turf to Democrats.

Despite the walkbacks and internal clashes, many conservatives took Monday night’s vote as the surest sign yet that the SAVE America Act has real momentum.

Even Senate staffers admitted privately that support for the bill is stronger now than at any point since it reached the chamber from the House.

One senior aide said the 50-vote mark was “the kind of lightning jolt” leadership could not ignore forever.

The aide added that even moderate Republicans are feeling heat from constituents who cannot fathom why proof of citizenship to vote is controversial at all.

Elsewhere, conservative media and grassroots activists seized on the significance of the moment.

Some framed it as a vivid demonstration that persistence pays off, giving Trump’s agenda renewed vitality in a body that too often stalls anything branded with his name.

For now, procedural hurdles remain, and the Senate’s outdated rules have once again kept a majority-backed measure from advancing.

Yet, the revival of the SAVE America Act showed that Trump’s policies and his political movement are still setting the pace on Capitol Hill, no matter how hard establishment lawmakers try to resist.

The bill may not yet be law, but it is very much alive.

SPLC Chief Crumbles as Jim Jordan Exposes Hollow Defenses in Fiery Judiciary Showdown [WATCH]
News

SPLC Chief Crumbles as Jim Jordan Exposes Hollow Defenses in Fiery Judiciary Showdown [WATCH]

/

There are few things more satisfying to watch in Washington than a powerful liberal institution finally squirming under tough questioning, and that is exactly what happened during this week’s House Judiciary Committee hearing when Chairman Jim Jordan took the Southern Poverty Law Center’s interim boss to task.

Bryan K. Fair, the man temporarily holding the SPLC’s crumbling helm, found himself sweating and visibly uncomfortable as Jordan fired off one question after another about the organization’s alleged secret funding of racist groups.

Fair seemed completely unprepared to face simple questions about how a self-styled civil rights group ends up bankrolling bigotry.

The hearing opened with powerful testimony from Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who spoke with grace and conviction about the SPLC’s betrayal of its original moral mission.

Her remarks moved the room and reminded everyone what the real fight against hate is supposed to look like, rooted in truth and faith, not deceit and stolen donations.

Then it was Fair’s turn, and the contrast could not have been starker.

Instead of clarity, lawmakers got murky excuses. Instead of accountability, they got evasion.

Fair’s repeated trips to his water glass became almost comedic as Jordan pressed for answers that never came.

Jordan asked whether the SPLC had funneled money to extremist groups while raising millions by claiming to oppose them.

Each time, Fair hid behind the same robotic response: “Those issues will be resolved in the pending allegations against the SPLC.” It became his favorite shield.

The exchange took a sharper turn when Jordan challenged Fair on whether the group’s actions were motivated by greed. “Did you do it all for the money?” the chairman asked.

Fair insisted, “We did it to protect our staff and to protect the public.”

The excuse fell flat.

Protecting staff by funding the very hate groups you claim to fight?

That explanation might fly in left-wing fantasyland but not in front of Congress.

The allegations laid out by prosecutors are damning.

A federal grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama, accuses the SPLC of secretly funneling millions in donor money to individuals tied to white supremacist and extremist networks while publicly pretending to wage a crusade against them.

It is the sort of hypocrisy that has become the left’s calling card.

The superseding indictment lists eleven criminal counts including wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering.

Prosecutors detailed how over four million dollars between 2014 and 2023 financed travel to extremist rallies, recruitment efforts, the creation of new chapters, and even materials for cross burnings and Ku Klux Klan regalia.

That is not just unethical, it is sickening.

WATCH:

Despite that mountain of accusations, Fair chose to lecture the committee on the SPLC’s so-called legacy of fighting hate.

He claimed that critics had “misrepresented” their work and accused them of spreading “false allegations.”

The self-righteousness was almost painful to watch.

The man leading an organization accused of secretly funding the very monsters it publicly condemns had the gall to play the victim card.

That tired routine might earn applause from progressive donors, but it did not resonate with lawmakers or the American people watching the hearing.

Jordan kept his cool as Fair dodged questions with long pauses and vague talk about “confidential informant programs.”

The evasive style was familiar to anyone who has watched liberal elites crumble when confronted by facts.

Observers noted that Fair’s performance looked less like confident leadership and more like someone caught completely off guard by his own record.

Viewers at home could see it too.

The stammering, the nervous laughter, the repeated claim that his lawyers would handle things later.

It was a case study in how not to testify before Congress.

As the questioning wrapped up, Jordan delivered a pointed reminder about accountability in taxpayer-supported nonprofits.

“You can call it whatever you want, but the facts do not lie,” he told Fair.

WATCH:

The SPLC, once viewed as a powerhouse of civil rights litigation, has now become a punchline in the fight against hypocrisy.

Conservatives have been warning for years that the SPLC operates as a partisan hit machine disguised as a charity.

The hearing made that clearer than ever.

Perhaps the most striking part of the day was not Fair’s fumbling answers but the symbolism of it all.

Here was the so-called authority on hate groups being grilled for allegedly funding the same kind of hate it pretends to oppose.

The irony could not be richer.

The SPLC’s loyal allies in the media will likely continue to portray it as the victim of a right-wing smear campaign, but the facts and indictments tell another story.

When the grand jury lays out paper trails involving millions in donor money tied to extremist causes, it becomes impossible to hide behind buzzwords about “justice” and “equity.”

Jim Jordan’s grilling showcased exactly why the left despises accountability.

They can dish out accusations all day but freeze the moment someone calls them to explain their own conduct.

Unfortunately for Bryan Fair, there is no clever legal statement that can wash away what Americans saw with their own eyes.

The SPLC once claimed to be a moral compass. After this hearing, it looks more like a cautionary tale of corruption wrapped in virtue signaling.

If Fair’s goal was to inspire confidence, his time under the spotlight did the opposite.

It revealed a house of cards trembling under the weight of its own deceit.

CNN Melts Down as Dem Graham Platner’s Nazi Tattoo and “Believe All Women” Collide in Maine Race [WATCH]
News

CNN Melts Down as Dem Graham Platner’s Nazi Tattoo and “Believe All Women” Collide in Maine Race [WATCH]

/

CNN’s Dana Bash decided to explore the latest Democrat disaster brewing in Maine, and it is not a pretty picture for the left.

The conversation centered on Graham Platner, the man the Democratic Party hoped would be their clean ticket to unseat Senator Susan Collins.

Instead, Platner has turned into a walking headline of everything Democrats claim to reject, complete with a Nazi tattoo, explicit Reddit posts, sexting scandals, and swirling domestic abuse allegations.

Even CNN could not sugarcoat this political catastrophe.

Bash brought in Abby Livingston from Puck and Shane Goldmacher of the New York Times to discuss how Platner’s campaign has turned from hopeful to humiliating in record time.

It should have been an easy matchup given that Maine liberals have been desperate to take down Collins for years.

Yet Democrats now find themselves stuck defending a candidate whose “baggage” looks more like an overstuffed cargo plane.

According to Bash, Platner’s argument that his past is being “weaponized” simply does not hold up.

The damaging material came from Democrats themselves, not Republican opposition research.

That means the GOP has not even begun to unload on him, and already Maine Democrats are ducking for cover.

The state party is reportedly “bracing for trouble,” aware that any additional revelations could sink what was supposed to be one of their most strategic Senate races.

Adding insult to injury, even anti-Trump voters in Maine are not rallying behind Platner.

CNN’s data showed a brutal gap between those who dislike Donald Trump and those who actually plan to vote for Platner.

Among women, 70 percent disapprove of Trump, yet only 54 percent back Platner.

That is a problem that no amount of spin can fix.

The math is clear, to win, Platner needs to peel away a chunk of Collins’ supporters, but how can he do that when he cannot even unite his own side?

Livingston made the obvious point that this could be a replay of the Democrats’ 2010 midterm nightmare.

Back then, Republicans had their own problem candidates, and it cost them control of the Senate despite massive House victories.

WATCH:

Now Democrats face that same trap, talking a big game about flipping the Senate but propping up candidates riddled with scandals and inexperience.

For a party that constantly preaches about vetting and “protecting democracy,” their candidate decisions have been jaw dropping.

The infighting within the Democratic Party is now unavoidable.

On one side stands the establishment, which sees Platner as a colossal liability.

On the other are the progressive activists who claim moral high ground but keep nominating people who cannot pass the most basic background check.

Both factions are now blaming each other while Maine Republicans quietly watch the meltdown unfold.

Goldmacher added that if Platner somehow pulls off a win, Democrats will have a whole new problem in 2028 with another round of inexperienced, scandal-plagued candidates looking for promotions.

On the other hand, if Platner loses, the Democrat establishment will see it as proof that the activist wing must be reined in.

Either way, the party loses.

The left’s civil war will only grow more chaotic.

Meanwhile, Senator Collins has to be smiling.

She has weathered relentless attacks from national Democrats for years, yet the best opponent they could muster may now be one of the most damaged figures in modern campaign history.

Maine voters tend to appreciate maturity and restraint, qualities Platner sorely lacks.

One Republican consultant even joked that Democrats may have handed Collins her easiest campaign yet.

Of course, the bigger picture is what this means for the national landscape.

Democrats desperately need to hold the Senate, and losing Maine would make that far harder.

Every minute they spend defending Platner is time lost in battleground states.

Even sympathetic media figures like Bash seemed to acknowledge that reality, though she tried to keep the conversation polite.

The facts could not be ignored, Democrats are cleaning up a scandal of their own making.

That leaves the GOP with an opportunity, not just to defend Collins, but to show voters that Democrats cannot govern their own nomination process, much less the country.

When your candidate comes prepackaged with tattoos glorifying atrocities and a digital trail of filth, you cannot blame the opposition for your own reckless choices.

Maine Democrats wanted a fresh face.

What they got was a headline risk, a liability, and possibly the biggest unforced error of the campaign cycle.

While CNN hosts try to talk through the fallout, conservatives can sit back and say what Mainers already know, character still matters, and the left has completely lost its grip on what that means.

California OnlyFans Escort Breaks Down as Judge Hands Out Her Sentence in Fatal Sex Game Case
News

California OnlyFans Escort Breaks Down as Judge Hands Out Her Sentence in Fatal Sex Game Case

/

A California escort who built her image as an “upscale and classy creation” completely unraveled in court on Monday as a judge sentenced her to four years behind bars for killing a client during a twisted sex act.

Michaela Rylaarsdam, 32, who performed under the alias “Ashley SinCal,” dissolved in tears while apologizing to the victim’s family in San Diego Superior Court.

Rylaarsdam pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter after a 55-year-old Michael Dale died from asphyxiation in a bizarre paid encounter.

During the session, which was recorded, she placed duct tape over Dale’s mouth and wrapped his head in plastic wrap and a bag.

His limbs were bound, leaving him no chance to free himself.

The chilling details captured how Dale remained trapped in the bag for roughly eight minutes before losing consciousness.

He was declared brain dead the next day.

According to prosecutors, the death was the inevitable result of an extreme act gone wrong, despite the woman’s insistence that she had not intended harm.

Through sobs, Rylaarsdam stood behind a courtroom barrier and cried out, “It needs to be said, there are no words. ‘I’m sorry’ is not enough, and I have a million emotions, but I would say the desire to go back and undo this would be at the top. If I could change this…”

The statement drew little sympathy from the grieving family seated behind her.

Investigators said Rylaarsdam, who operated as an escort and OnlyFans performer for about ten years, was based in Menifee, Riverside County.

Her website boasted of “intoxicating and provocative performances” and “naughty games.”

It also listed prices ranging from $200 to $1,500 for various sessions.

The site featured photos and promotions that portrayed her as a “chameleon of this industry.”

For the fatal session, Dale reportedly paid an astounding $11,000.

The transaction was handled with the same precision as her other bookings, with detailed payment options through mainstream apps like Venmo and Zelle.

Her so-called “Ultimate Incall” service was her most expensive and apparently the most dangerous.

Rylaarsdam, a married mother of three, operated her side business with her husband Brandon’s knowledge and help.

Her online profile described her double life with a touch of arrogance, declaring herself the best in the business.

She even bragged online about incorporating acrobatics into her lap dances.

She told the court she had called 911 immediately after realizing Dale was unresponsive.

But for prosecutors and the victim’s heartbroken relatives, that action came too late.

The judge reminded her that her claim of no intent to kill did not erase the reckless decisions that cost a man his life.

Defense attorney Dan Cohen argued that his client’s remorse was genuine and that the case was complicated by the fact that the victim allegedly consented to the dangerous acts.

“I think there was no intent to kill and no attempt to cover this up,” Cohen said.

“And she acted appropriately when she realized this was a problem.”

He added that “there is definitely a consensual element, not only something he consented to, something he was actively seeking.”

The argument sought to reduce her responsibility, though many in court viewed it as tone deaf given the violent and entirely unnecessary methods used.

The spectacle of an OnlyFans performer being sentenced for a death during a sexual stunt underscores the seedy truth about the digital prostitution economy that progressives like to rebrand as “empowerment.”

It is the darker side of an industry glamorized by influencers and defended by leftist activists who call it “choice.”

Here, the illusion of control ended with duct tape, a plastic bag, and a body in a morgue.

Rylaarsdam’s double life as a suburban housewife and online escort paints a troubling picture of cultural decay in modern California.

Her story reads like a cautionary tale of a society that celebrates self promotion and sexual exhibitionism over morals and marriage.

The normalization of these “industries” fuels more tragedies while politicians look the other way.

In the end, the judge’s sentence reflected a desire for accountability, if not outright justice.

Four years in prison for such a careless death may seem light to some.

Yet for many observers, the image of the convicted woman sobbing through her mascara on the stand was a haunting snapshot of a culture spinning wildly out of control.

Her courtroom meltdown was broadcast far and wide as another infamous moment in California’s descent into moral chaos.

The woman who once bragged that she was a “professional” who offered “high class” service now faces the cold reality that no amount of money, glamour, or online followers can cover the cost of a human life.

Maine Democrats Nominate Tattooed Extremist Graham Platner to Challenge Susan Collins [WATCH]
News

Maine Democrats Nominate Tattooed Extremist Graham Platner to Challenge Susan Collins [WATCH]

/

Graham Platner will be the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Maine after winning the party’s primary election on June 9, setting up a general election contest against incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins, as reported by Townhall.

The result was widely expected, with both Platner and Collins securing their respective party nominations. Collins, who was first elected to the Senate in 1996, ran unopposed for Republican renomination as she seeks a sixth six-year term.

NBC News projected that Collins and Platner would advance to the November election, which is expected to become one of the most closely watched Senate races in the country.

The Maine contest carries national significance as both parties compete for control of the Senate. Democrats currently hold 47 seats and would need a net gain of four seats to win a majority.

Collins is considered a key target because she is the only Republican senator representing a state that President Donald Trump lost in the 2024 election.

While the primary outcomes were largely anticipated, attention is now shifting to the general election campaign and the issues that could shape voter decisions in the months ahead.

Platner enters the race with several controversies already drawing scrutiny.

Reports have highlighted allegations and disputes involving his past conduct, including a sexting scandal, graphic social media posts, allegations of domestic abuse, and questions surrounding a tattoo that has generated public criticism.

Those issues are expected to become part of the broader campaign as Republicans and Democrats battle over one of the nation’s most competitive Senate seats.

NBC News noted that the race is likely to become a major test of Democratic messaging and voter priorities, particularly as Platner’s past conduct continues to attract attention.

According to the report, the election has already emerged as a broader political battleground that could offer insight into the direction of the Democratic Party while also testing the strength of Collins’ long-standing support among Maine voters.

Collins has repeatedly demonstrated political resilience during her Senate career.

Since first winning election nearly three decades ago, she has maintained a reputation as one of Maine’s most durable political figures and has survived multiple competitive reelection campaigns.

Platner, meanwhile, has built support among Democratic voters and raised significant campaign funds during the election cycle.

His victory gives Democrats a nominee who has energized portions of the party’s base as they seek to flip a seat that could play an important role in determining Senate control.

The campaign between Collins and Platner is expected to intensify in the coming weeks as both candidates begin focusing on the general election.

With national attention, significant fundraising, and Senate control potentially at stake, Maine is likely to remain one of the most closely watched political battlegrounds heading into November.

Voters will decide the race this fall when Collins seeks another term, and Platner attempts to deliver Democrats one of their most important Senate pickups of the election cycle.

Nancy Mace Crashes Out, Concedes as Trump-Backed Pamela Evette Surges Ahead
News

Nancy Mace Crashes Out, Concedes as Trump-Backed Pamela Evette Surges Ahead

/

Rep. Nancy Mace conceded defeat in South Carolina’s Republican gubernatorial primary Tuesday night after early returns showed her trailing well behind Trump-backed Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, as reported by The New York Post.

Less than two hours after polls closed, Mace acknowledged the outcome and threw her support behind South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who advanced to a runoff election against Evette.

“This isn’t the end of the fight, but it is the end of a chapter,” Mace said during her concession speech.

With votes still being counted, Mace held just 11.3% of the vote, placing fifth in the Republican field. Evette led with roughly 29%, while Wilson received about 26%, securing the two runoff spots.

Shortly after conceding, Mace posted a message to X thanking supporters and reflecting on her time in office.

“Serving South Carolina has been the greatest honor of my life,” Mace wrote. “Every vote I cast, every hearing I called, every fight I picked — it was always for you.”

Mace also suggested that some of the issues she championed may have contributed to her defeat.

She pointed to her efforts involving the release of government records related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as well as her work highlighting congressional sexual harassment settlements.

“As a survivor, I chose to stand on principle and stand against the Epstein cover-up,” Mace wrote. “I chose to expose the names hidden in the sexual harassment slush fund. I chose to expose DEI judges. I chose to expose the abusers of children.

“And apparently, I chose wrong if the goal was winning an election.”

The race was largely shaped by the competition for President Donald Trump’s endorsement. On May 29, Trump formally endorsed Evette, a move widely viewed as a major development in the contest to replace term-limited Gov. Henry McMaster.

Before the endorsement, both Mace and Evette worked to present themselves as strong supporters of Trump and prominently featured him in campaign materials.

In one of the earliest advertisements of the race, Evette emphasized her support for Trump.

“It’s good to have President Trump’s back,” Evette said. “I’ve backed him from Day One.”

Mace pushed back on those claims at the time, arguing Evette was overstating her relationship with the president.

“Pamela Evette is NOT ENDORSED by DONALD TRUMP. Do not believe her LIES,” Mace wrote in an X post.

Hours later, Trump officially endorsed Evette.

In his endorsement announcement, Trump praised the lieutenant governor’s loyalty and early support.

“Highly Respected and very popular Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina, Pam Evette, is an America First Patriot who has been with me from the very beginning,” Trump wrote.

“She never wavered, never let me down, and was the only South Carolina Gubernatorial Candidate to Endorse me as soon as I launched my 2024 Presidential Campaign,” he added.

 

 

 

“She crisscrossed South Carolina and other States for me, and I said, at the time, that this is truly something which I cannot forget!”

Trump reinforced that support during an election eve tele-rally, where he described Evette’s opponents as “not serious” and again highlighted her early endorsement of his presidential campaign.

During the same event, Evette told Trump that others in the race were attempting to “take credit for being one of your favorites.”

Following Trump’s endorsement, Mace argued that her support for releasing Epstein-related documents may have cost her valuable political support.

“I know I put the likelihood of an endorsement on the line when I demanded transparency on the Epstein files,” Mace wrote. “I demanded it because you deserved the truth – ALL OF IT – and as a survivor of a corrupt and broken court system, I will always pursue justice for those who deserve it.”

“If sacrificing my values is the price of an endorsement, I will never pay it.”

Mace has been one of the most high-profile members of Congress since winning election to the House in 2020.

The first woman to graduate from The Citadel’s Corps of Cadets, she has frequently drawn national attention through her legislative battles, public disputes, and outspoken political style.

Her relationship with Wilson has also been contentious. Mace previously accused the attorney general of failing to act on allegations she raised against her former fiancé and others. Wilson rejected those claims, calling them “categorically false.”

Despite their differences, Mace announced during her concession speech that she and Wilson had “buried the hatchet” and urged supporters to back him in the runoff.

The June 23 runoff between Evette and Wilson will determine the Republican nominee for governor. Given South Carolina’s recent electoral history, the GOP nominee will enter the general election as the clear favorite.

The state has not elected a Democrat as governor since 1998.

Lara Logan Drops a Bombshell on the Real Reason Trump Went After Maduro [WATCH]
News

Lara Logan Drops a Bombshell on the Real Reason Trump Went After Maduro [WATCH]

/

Investigative journalist Lara Logan argued that a range of domestic and international issues are interconnected, pointing to Venezuela, election integrity concerns, illegal immigration, organized crime, and political movements she believes are influencing events in the United States.

Logan said the Trump administration took action against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro because of what she described as Venezuela’s involvement in the 2020 election.

“With all due respect, I say this. The Trump administration went after Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela because they rightly knew they had worked for 12 years on an indictment on Nicholas Maduro,” Logan said.

She further alleged that Venezuela played a direct role in the 2020 election and claimed other foreign actors were involved.

“Right, Venezuela was involved directly involved in the theft of the 2020 election. They stole that election from President Trump working with Iran, working with the CCP, working with others,” Logan said.

Logan claimed that a senior Venezuelan official currently in prison provided information about those events.

“We know a lot of the details because there is a Venezuelan, very senior Venezuelan sitting in prison who was actually a witness, an eyewitness to the theft,” Logan said.

According to Logan, the administration focused on Maduro but did not pursue other members of his government whom she believes were involved.

“But what President Trump’s administration did not do is they did not go after all the other people in Maduro’s administration who were involved in the theft of the 2020 election,” Logan said.

Logan specifically referenced Delcy Rodríguez and Jorge Rodríguez, claiming they played a broader role in election-related activities around the world.

“Delci Rodriguez and her brother, Jorge Rodriguez, who presided over the theft of the 2020 election, are 100% complicit in the theft of elections in 72 countries worldwide,” Logan said.

She also alleged that Venezuelan criminal organizations exert influence beyond their own borders.

“You want to know why President Trump doesn’t get the support that he needs from a country like Spain? Because the cartel in Venezuela, the cartel that runs the country, Cartel de la Souls, they selected the Spanish Prime Minister,” Logan said.

Logan argued that multiple political and criminal organizations operate together and should not be viewed as separate threats.

“Why does America get all this heat all over the world? Because the globalist Marxist Islamist alliance that that has these cartels as their army, they all work together, so we don’t face one enemy,” Logan said.

Turning to California, Logan connected local political controversies to broader national and international concerns.

“The election in LA, the corruption there, the corruption in the system, this isn’t about one enemy, this is about all of America’s enemies working together,” Logan said.

She also criticized the impact of illegal immigration on representation and the justice system.

“And all of those illegal immigrants in that sanctuary state of California, who not only distort California’s representation in the house, but who also get their own jury, so they’re involved in the criminal justice system,” Logan said.

Logan argued that the ultimate goal of these forces is to weaken both individual and national sovereignty.

“I mean, all of these people, what they’re doing is they are diminishing citizenship, they want to take your individual sovereignty and your national sovereignty, and they want to make it mean nothing,” Logan said.

She also claimed violent criminal organizations from Venezuela have been imported into the United States.

“They imported the most violent people from Venezuela’s prisons,” Logan said.

Referring to Tren de Aragua, Logan described the group as a violent organization created through prison recruitment.

“They literally, they were created by going into Venezuela’s prisons and recruiting the most violent people and creating this organization that is a paramilitary force. It is a violent, armed, trained paramilitary force that was infiltrated into our towns and cities,” Logan said.

Logan further claimed that members of the group have been involved in demonstrations surrounding immigration enforcement.

“And these are the people that are in front of the ICE detention centers and helping to fuel the protests, so you have them, they fight on every single front. Elections is one front, it’s only one,” Logan said.

She concluded by criticizing Marxism and arguing that California serves as a testing ground for ideas that later spread nationwide.

“And the idea that you could have a Marxist, when Marxism has forced out 8 million Venezuelans, has failed people worldwide, has been responsible for the death of how many people worldwide, and we are still glorifying it and glamorizing it,” Logan said.

“So these things are tied together, and you can’t fight on one front, you have to fight on every front, and you can’t pretend that LA is just a city in the West, on the West Coast. No, what happens in the state of California is actually tested there, and then it’s proliferated all over the country,” Logan said.

WATCH:

NBA Commissioner Shreds Hakeem Jeffries’ Trump Knicks Smear [WATCH]
News

NBA Commissioner Shreds Hakeem Jeffries’ Trump Knicks Smear [WATCH]

/

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver pushed back Monday against criticism surrounding President Donald Trump’s attendance at a New York Knicks playoff game, saying the president has been a longtime supporter of the franchise and a familiar presence at Madison Square Garden for decades.

Silver made the remarks before Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden, where he was interviewed by ESPN’s broadcast crew.

His comments came after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries questioned Trump’s appearance at the game and suggested the president was using the event to draw attention to himself, as reported by Red State.

According to Silver, Trump’s history with the Knicks and Madison Square Garden is well established.

“He was a fixture at Madison Square Garden,” Silver said during the broadcast.

“You guys remember – all of you – when you played here back in the old days, he had courtside seats. He was here all the time. He was at drafts, so he’s a genuine Knicks fan.”

Silver’s comments were widely circulated on social media as debate continued over Trump’s appearance at the game.

The commissioner also used the opportunity to discuss the broader role of sports in public life, arguing that sporting events should bring people together rather than deepen political divisions.

“The arena is packed. People got through extra security,” Silver said. “I think we should be using sports to create more of a sense of community with people, not less.”

The discussion followed comments made earlier in the day by Jeffries during a press conference on Capitol Hill. The New York Democrat questioned whether Trump was genuinely a fan of the Knicks and criticized the president’s attendance at the game.

“It also is not clear to me that Donald Trump is a big Knicks fan. I mean, does this guy even know the difference between Karl Rove and Karl-Anthony Towns?!? I don’t think so. He’s just injecting himself into the NBA Finals because he always has to bring the MAGA circus into town, and that’s unfortunate,” Jeffries said.

The exchange added another political dimension to a high-profile sporting event that drew national attention.

Trump, who grew up in New York City, has attended Knicks games for many years and has frequently appeared at major sporting events during his time in public life.

Neither Trump nor the White House immediately responded to Jeffries’ remarks. However, Silver’s comments provided a direct response to questions surrounding the president’s connection to the team.

The controversy emerged as the Knicks continue their postseason run and as political figures from both parties increasingly use major sporting events as opportunities to connect with voters and supporters.

Silver did not address the political aspects of the dispute beyond his comments about sports serving as a unifying force. Instead, he focused on the president’s long history of attending games and participating in events associated with the franchise.

The episode underscores how major sporting events continue to intersect with politics, particularly when high-profile elected officials attend nationally televised games.

In this case, the debate centered not on the action on the court but on whether a longtime public figure’s ties to the team were genuine.

As attention remained focused on the NBA Finals, Silver’s remarks shifted the discussion back toward the league and the game itself, emphasizing what he described as the value of sports in bringing communities together.

Platner Melts Down, Calls Fetterman an ‘A–hole’ in Explosive Town Hall Rant [WATCH]
News

Platner Melts Down, Calls Fetterman an ‘A–hole’ in Explosive Town Hall Rant [WATCH]

/

Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner escalated his ongoing dispute with Sen. John Fetterman during a town hall event in Portland, Maine, on Sunday, using a profanity to describe the Pennsylvania Democrat while discussing how he would approach relationships in Washington if elected, as reported by Fox News.

The exchange came just days before Maine Democrats head to the polls in a closely watched Senate primary that will determine who challenges incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins in November.

During the town hall, Platner was asked by a supporter about lawmakers he hoped to work with if elected to the Senate. While discussing the importance of building relationships in Congress, Platner took aim at Fetterman, who has become one of his most vocal Democratic critics.

“The Senate really is a place of, it’s a lot about relationships, and I-I don’t want to go down there and simply be nonfunctional,” Platner said.

“I mean, as you can all probably tell, we got a lot of criticisms about the way this government functions. But in order for us to make it functional, we’re going to have to do stuff. And you can’t just go down there and be John Fetterman and just and just kind of just sort of be an a–hole.”

Platner then added, “He’s said mean things about me, I’m allowed to say that.”

The comments marked the latest development in a growing public feud between the two Democrats. In recent days, Fetterman has repeatedly criticized Platner over several controversies that have surrounded the Maine candidate’s campaign.

During an appearance with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Fetterman criticized Platner and referenced reports regarding an online Kik account linked to the candidate.

“This is a guy that had a problem with me, how I dress, but he seemed to have no problem posing in a towel at a disgusting website that consistently had serious problems about that kinds of depravity,” Fetterman said.

The Pennsylvania senator also challenged Platner to release messages reportedly exchanged with women through the platform.

“Let me make a deal. I’ll tell P-Hustle, I’ll wear a suit every day, if he releases all those texts and messages that he’s had… [with] the dozen women,” Fetterman continued, referring to Platner’s reported username.

Platner responded over the weekend in a post on X.

“John Fetterman seems to genuinely think that the reason no one likes him is because he refuses to wear a suit.”

“It’s not the hoodie, dude. It’s because you’ve become a stooge for AIPAC and the Republican Party.”

The dispute has unfolded as Platner’s Senate campaign continues to face scrutiny over a series of controversies that have received national attention. Reports have focused on allegations involving sexually explicit messages sent during his marriage, an active Kik profile, past social media posts, and claims made by a former girlfriend regarding his behavior. Platner has denied allegations of abusive conduct and has described criticism of his campaign as politically motivated.

Despite the controversies, Platner focused much of Sunday’s event on his campaign message, emphasizing economic issues and what he described as growing concentrations of power in American politics.

“We must understand that we have entered a new phase in the American political story,” Platner told supporters.

“We have entered an era that I think looks a lot more like the 1880s or the 1930s or the 1960s than the last 40 years. We have entered an age of a politics of power, and we need to start acting like it.”

Earlier in the event, Platner described himself as an unlikely candidate seeking higher office.

“I am very much just some random guy from Sullivan, Maine,” he told the crowd before receiving a standing ovation after predicting that “we are going to beat Susan Collins” in November.

Platner enters Tuesday’s Democratic primary as one of the leading candidates in the race. Democratic Gov. Janet Mills and former senior government official David Costello are also on the ballot.

If he secures the nomination, Platner will face Collins in the general election this fall.

Mamdani Ally’s Adviser Exposed for Questionable Nude Photo Past as Platner Scandal Widens [WATCH]
News

Mamdani Ally’s Adviser Exposed for Questionable Nude Photo Past as Platner Scandal Widens [WATCH]

/

A Democratic political strategist credited with helping New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani secure a major electoral victory is facing increased scrutiny in Maine after old writings resurfaced while he assists Senate candidate Graham Platner as the campaign confronts a series of controversies ahead of a key Democratic primary, as reported by Fox News.

Morris Katz, a New York-based Democratic strategist, has drawn attention from Maine Republicans over comments he made in past writings and his role advising Platner as the candidate responds to reports about his personal conduct and campaign-related controversies.

Katz, who has been widely credited with helping Mamdani’s successful mayoral campaign, wrote in a 2019 post on the Medium blogging platform that he had both “sent” and “received nudes.”

He also authored a puberty guide for boys in 2020 that included a footnote stating he had initially considered using “images of my penis” to illustrate portions of the publication before being told by a publisher that such content would be inappropriate.

The resurfaced writings have become a new point of criticism from Republicans as Platner’s campaign continues to address questions surrounding reports that he exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women during the early years of his marriage through the messaging platform Kik.

Republicans in Maine have argued that Katz’s background raises additional questions about judgment as he works to help Platner navigate the fallout from the controversy.

Jason Savage, executive director of the Maine Republican Party, criticized Katz’s actions and alleged attempts to pressure individuals connected to the controversy.

“Morris Katz thinking that he was going to call up and intimidate Genevieve McDonald shows how bad his judgment is — he was never going to succeed at that, and the fact he didn’t have the instincts to know better is just the first red flag of many for him,” Savage told Fox News Digital.

Savage continued by criticizing both Katz and Platner.

“The combination of Morris Katz and Graham Platner is this weird horror story where neither one of them really understands the guardrails on decency. Neither one of them can recognize when there is a boundary,” he said.

An anonymous Republican strategist from rural Maine also criticized Katz’s involvement in the race and argued that national political operatives were attempting to influence a contest with significant implications for the state.

“This guy [Katz], who is unbelievably strange, comes in from out of state and tries to get this horribly flawed guy, like limping, pleading across the finish line. That is so arrogant,” the strategist told Fox News Digital.

“The arrogance that it takes to come in and say, ‘I’m an out-of-state progressive socialist here to make some money off a flawed candidate bleeding in the polls,’ and then try to take that away from the people who really need it, you’re going to take away what Susan Collins has done and will be able to do for these people.”

Platner is challenging incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins in one of the most closely watched Senate races in the country.

His campaign has faced a series of controversies in recent months. Reports have alleged that Platner exchanged sexually explicit messages with multiple women while married.

According to reports, Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, disclosed the messages during an internal campaign vetting process. The campaign has acknowledged the messages existed while maintaining that the matter was handled privately between the couple.

Additional scrutiny followed reports that Platner maintained an active Kik profile. The profile reportedly featured a shirtless mirror selfie with a towel around his waist.

The image later became the subject of a protest outside Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., where Republican staffers appeared wearing towels in an effort to mock the reported profile photo.

Platner has also faced criticism over a tattoo that critics identified as having links to Nazi symbolism. He has stated that he was unaware of the symbol’s meaning when he received the tattoo years earlier and later covered it up.

Genevieve McDonald has disputed his account and argued he was aware of the symbol’s meaning.

The candidate previously apologized after old Reddit posts resurfaced containing inflammatory comments regarding race, political violence, police officers, rural Americans, military veterans, and other subjects.

Platner has said his views changed over time and that some of the posts reflected a difficult period following his military service.

Most recently, Platner denied allegations from a former girlfriend who accused him of abusive behavior. He described those allegations as politically motivated.

His campaign has argued that critics and media coverage have focused heavily on personal controversies rather than policy issues affecting Maine voters.

Fox News Digital reported that requests for comment were sent to Katz, the Platner campaign, Fight Agency, Mamdani’s team, and McDonald.


Scroll to Top