News

News

Three Dead After Idaho In N Out Bloodbath as Gunman Opens Fire, Armed Citizen Steps In [WATCH]

A brand new In N Out Burger in Twin Falls, Idaho, became the scene of a sickening Saturday rampage when a gunman opened fire, killing two people and wounding several others before dying himself.

The shooting erupted around 2 p.m. local time, sending families, employees, and customers scrambling for cover in the kind of chaos no community should have to endure.

Police later said the dead included the shooter, whose motive was still under investigation.

Twin Falls Police Chief Matthew Hicks said investigators were still working to confirm the number of people injured.

He also said authorities believed “the threat to the community is over,” a phrase that brought some relief after an afternoon of terror.

Jerome Police Chief Duane Rubink told CNN that early indications pointed to one shooter, who died from a self-inflicted gunshot.

In other words, the coward apparently ended his own life after destroying the lives of innocent people.

Witness Lane Koehn, 34, told the Associated Press he was stopped at a traffic light near the restaurant when he saw the violence unfold.

He described seeing a person carrying what appeared to be an AR style rifle coming from the drive thru area.

Koehn said another man armed with a pistol fired at the suspect.

He also watched an employee rush to help a wounded coworker, dragging the woman across the parking lot after she had reportedly been shot in the chest.

“She was pretty bad off, but I don’t know. I hope she made it,” Koehn told the AP.

He estimated hearing three or four shots and said he could not tell whether the attacker was targeting someone specific.

In N Out President Lynsi Snyder confirmed that one company associate was killed in the attack.

“We lost one of our beautiful Associates tonight,” Snyder said in a statement.

Snyder said the employee had been serving customers when her life was taken by what she called a disgusting person who did not value anyone else’s life or his own.

That is about as plain and accurate as it gets, despite the usual excuse machine always waiting nearby to explain away evil.

Police responded to the restaurant parking lot for what authorities described as an active shooter situation.


Cellphone video from inside a nearby vehicle showed a man in a black T shirt and blue pants standing between two parked Teslas while aiming what looked like a rifle toward a blue vehicle.

Two shots rang out in rapid succession, with muzzle flashes visible on the recording.

The armed man then lowered the weapon, walked away quickly, and broke into a run across the parking lot while still carrying the firearm.

The person recording the video could be heard whispering, “Oh my gosh” just before the shots were fired.

Moments later, as the suspected gunman moved away, the camera dropped as the person appeared to duck, while a panicked voice said, “Get down … I don’t have service.”

Another video taken from a vehicle stopped at a red light on Blue Lakes Boulevard North captured people running across the street as gunfire cracked in the background.

The camera turned toward the In N Out, where a person in dark clothing appeared near a white sedan in the drive thru lane while holding a long firearm.

WATCH:

“He got more in the back,” one occupant said as the armed person leaned into the sedan and later opened its rear hatch.

A witness then said it looked like “something bigger” as the person removed another long object from the vehicle.

As the vehicle sped away, one person shouted out the window, “Hey! Stop shooting! Stop shooting, bitch!”

It was a raw moment of panic, anger, and disbelief in a parking lot that had been packed with ordinary Americans just trying to grab a meal.

Authorities shut down the Perrine Bridge and nearby roads while businesses in a shopping center went into lockdown.

The Magic Valley Mall also locked down, and St. Luke’s Magic Valley urged people not to come to the hospital unless they had an emergency.

The hospital said its emergency department remained open and was working with police and emergency responders while the situation developed.

Investigators were also moving hundreds of witnesses to different locations for interviews, a massive undertaking after a violent attack in a busy public area.

A nearby chicken restaurant closed for the rest of the day out of caution.

Idaho Gov. Brad Little urged residents to “avoid the area and follow directions from law enforcement as they work to keep everyone safe.”

The FBI said it was aware of the shooting and was offering assistance to local law enforcement.

The Twin Falls In N Out had opened only one week earlier, welcoming its first customers on July 25 before this nightmare ripped through the community.

“We are heartbroken,” In N Out COO Denny Warnick said in a statement.

For the victims, their families, and the shaken people of Twin Falls, Saturday will not be remembered as the opening week of a popular restaurant, but as the day a murderous thug turned a normal afternoon into a crime scene.

News

Dana Perino Corners Francesca Hong Over Radical Police Abolition Record [WATCH]

Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong ran into a problem Friday that every radical eventually meets.

Her record followed her onto live television, and Fox News host Dana Perino did not let her simply sprint past it.

Hong appeared on America’s Newsroom as her campaign tries to pitch a softer, more voter-friendly message.

The trouble is that her past comments on police, ICE, and even the United States Senate are not exactly small footnotes.

Perino pressed Hong on old statements backing defunding police, abolishing police, eliminating ICE, and taking aim at core American institutions.

For a candidate now trying to look ready for statewide office, that is a lot of socialist baggage to drag into a governor’s race.

Hong is a state representative and a dues paying member of the Democratic Socialists of America.

She confirmed that she has belonged to the Madison chapter since 2020, which is not ancient history no matter how much campaign consultants may wish it were.

When Perino asked why voters should not take her at her own word on abolishing police, Hong tried to pivot to economics.

“As a Democratic Socialist, what that means is I want to put working class people first,” Hong said.

Perino did not let the talking point float away untouched.

“How does defunding the police put working class people first?” Perino asked, cutting straight to the obvious question many Wisconsin families would probably like answered before handing Hong the keys to the governor’s office.

WATCH:

Hong’s record is not vague.

In a 2020 post first reported by CNN, she wrote that she supported “defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police.”

She went even further in 2021 with rhetoric that sounded like it came straight from an activist meeting rather than a serious public safety debate.

“Police exist to uphold white supremacy,” Hong wrote in 2021.

“Defund then abolish. Reform can’t be an option.”

On Friday, Hong tried to inch away from that record without actually repudiating it.

She told Perino she believes “people can evolve,” which is the kind of phrase politicians reach for when the old posts are too toxic to defend but too ideologically precious to disown.

Hong then offered a carefully worded assurance about what she would do as governor.

“The governor cannot defund the police, and I won’t defund the police,” Hong said.

“But I will invest in the things we know prevent crime.”

That answer may sound neat in a studio, but voters are allowed to notice the maneuver.

Saying a governor lacks the power to defund police is not the same as admitting the original idea was reckless, destructive, and insulting to law abiding communities.

Hong also tried to create distance between herself and some of the Democratic Socialists of America’s more sweeping demands.

She rejected the idea of abolishing the United States Senate as impractical for now and declined to endorse eliminating the Supreme Court.

For conservatives, that is hardly comforting.

When the moderation pitch is that abolishing the Senate is not practical at the moment, the bar has been buried somewhere deep under the Capitol lawn.

Republican Rep. Tom Tiffany, the GOP front runner in the governor’s race, has been hammering Hong over the same record.

His campaign argues that Hong is not being newly reasonable, she is simply trying to clean up a paper trail that does not play well outside the activist left.

Hong currently leads recent polling in the crowded Democrat primary, which is scheduled for August 11.

That says plenty about where the party’s energy is right now, and it is not exactly in the neighborhood of law and order.

The police issue is not the only radical marker on her record.

Hong has called ICE the “enforcers of fascism” and has reportedly floated using the National Guard to arrest federal agents, a position that would make even some hardened leftist strategists reach for the aspirin.

Days before the Fox interview, Hong reportedly dodged repeated questions from a Politico reporter about whether she still supports abolishing police.

Instead, she offered winding answers about building “systems of care,” which sounds lovely until someone calls 911 and needs an officer, not a slogan.

Perino’s interview put the matter in plain view.

Hong wants voters to focus on her polished campaign message, but her own words keep pointing back to a much more radical agenda.

News

Trans Funeral Director Accused in $2.2M Estate Theft Erupts After Organ Bucket Questions [WATCH]

A Houston funeral home director accused in a staggering estate theft case walked into court Friday facing a pile of felony charges, then walked out acting like the cameras were there for a red carpet premiere.

Unique Mica Green Battle is accused of forging a web of documents to seize control of more than $2.2 million from the estate of Lawrence Gammon, a deceased man whose name is now attached to one of the stranger probate scandals in recent memory.

According to reporting from Fox 26, investigators say the paperwork used in the scheme included a fake will, a falsified death certificate, forged probate records, and fraudulent filings designed to make Green Battle appear to be Gammon’s spouse and successor.

That is not a paperwork error. That is the kind of allegation that turns a funeral business into the center of a major fraud investigation.

The case took an even darker turn in November 2025, when police executed a search warrant at Green Battle’s funeral home after families raised accusations that the business was mishandling bodies and committing fraud.

During that search, investigators reportedly found human organs in a bucket, along with boxes of cremated remains.

Even in an era where the public has learned to expect bureaucratic incompetence and institutional rot, that detail lands like something from a nightmare.

Authorities also say Green Battle had been operating the funeral business without a valid license.

The license reportedly expired in 2021 and was revoked in August 2025, yet the business allegedly continued functioning anyway.

For families already grieving loved ones, the idea that a funeral home was operating under those circumstances is not merely disturbing.

It is a betrayal at the most vulnerable possible moment.

Green Battle, described in court records under both male and female listings dating back years, appeared before a judge Friday.

The judge set bond at $800,000, and Green Battle was released after posting it.

If anyone expected humility outside the courtroom, they got the opposite.

Green Battle met reporters with a performance that was equal parts arrogance, deflection, and tabloid chaos.

“I’m on the news. I’m a celebrity. I don’t have anything to say.”

Reporters pressed forward with questions, including the obvious ones that any sane person would ask after allegations involving forged estate documents, mishandled remains, and organs found in a bucket.

Green Battle then snapped, “Get that out of my face b*tch,” before shouting, “I don’t have nothing to say!”

That was followed by insults about a reporter’s fashion choices, because apparently answering basic questions about a multimillion dollar estate case was too much to ask.

The spectacle did not stop there.

Green Battle declared, “I’m such a celebrity. I’m a celebrity,” then fired back at reporters by saying “your mom forged [documents].”

When one reporter asked where the organs allegedly found by investigators came from, the response was as vile as it was bizarre.

“They were for you to eat for lunch. Stupid b*tch, they were for you to eat.”

WATCH:

Police had already been digging into the business before Friday’s court appearance.

Initial reporting from November showed Houston police executing warrants at the property and seizing financial records as well as cremated remains.

Houston Police Department Lt. Larry Crowson said the investigation centered on “identity theft involving the identities of the deceased person,” with authorities examining whether information from funeral contracts was used to defraud families.

That allegation is especially chilling because funeral homes are trusted with intensely personal information at a time when families are least prepared to detect fraud.

If the accusations are proven, the setup would be as predatory as it gets.

The political class loves to lecture Americans about trust, credentials, regulation, and compassion, but ordinary citizens keep seeing cases where the systems supposedly protecting them fail spectacularly.

Here, a revoked license, grieving families, forged documents, and human remains all appear in the same story.

WATCH:

The charges against Green Battle will now proceed through the court system, where prosecutors will have to prove the fraud allegations and the full scope of what happened at the funeral business.

For now, Houston families are left with ugly questions about who had access to their loved ones, what was done with remains, and how a person under this kind of scrutiny could stroll out of court calling himself a celebrity.

News

Denver Jews Sound Alarm as Socialist Melat Kiros Rides Anti Israel Wave [WATCH]

Denver’s Jewish community is sounding the alarm after democratic socialist Melat Kiros pulled off a stunning primary win in Colorado’s 1st Congressional District, knocking off longtime Rep. Diana DeGette and sending another loud message about where the activist left is dragging the Democratic Party.

Kiros, 29, was celebrated by progressive groups after defeating the 15 term incumbent in June.

But for Jewish leaders in Denver, the victory did not feel like some charming grassroots moment. It felt like a warning flare.

Their concern centers on Kiros’ record of inflammatory remarks about Israel and the Oct. 7 terror attacks.

She has described those attacks as “inevitable,” accused Israel of genocide and apartheid, and initially refused to call a deadly Boulder firebombing an antisemitic attack.

Rabbi Menachem Lehrfield, director of the Jewish Outreach Initiative in Denver, said the result left many observant Jews feeling exposed in their own city.

After posting online about his fear, he was met with antisemitic comments, then wrote publicly about how simply wearing a yarmulke in Denver now feels dangerous.

One day later, Lehrfield said that fear became painfully real.

“I was walking down the street right here, right outside this building, and somebody rolled down their window and yelled, ‘dirty Jew,’ to me,” he told Fox News Digital.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen next time. I don’t know if next time, instead of hurling vile words, they’ll be hurling an explosive like the person who killed Karen Diamond in Boulder. I don’t know if they’re going to do something to me or my family or my community. There’s a real fear that we’re living with,” he said.

“What I’m most afraid of is the fact that so many of the people in my community, so many people in the district, voted for her,” Lehrfield added.

That is the uncomfortable part Democrats do not want to discuss while their socialist wing keeps getting treated like the future of the party.

The fear is not theoretical in Colorado.

In June 2025, 82 year old Karen Diamond was killed and a dozen others were injured when prosecutors say Mohamed Sabry Soliman threw Molotov cocktails into a peaceful pro Israel gathering on Boulder’s Pearl Street Mall.

Authorities charged Soliman, an illegal immigrant, with murder and hate crimes.

Prosecutors said he yelled “Free Palestine” and spent a year planning the attack to “kill all Zionist people.”

Yet when Kiros was asked about the Boulder attack during a 9News interview, she condemned the violence but would not call it antisemitic, saying she did not “know what was in the heart of the perpetrator.”

That kind of evasive word salad might play well in left wing activist circles, but Jewish leaders in Denver heard it loud and clear.

Brandon Rattiner, senior director of the Jewish Community Relations Council, said Kiros’ answer deeply wounded the community.

“Kiros’s inability to call the Boulder firebombing an antisemitic attack was extremely frustrating and difficult for our community to hear,” he told Fox News Digital.

“The impact here was pretty clear: A Jewish person was killed, over a dozen were hurt, and it was one of the biggest and most prominent antisemitic attacks on Jews throughout the world,” Rattiner said.

He added that the failure to show basic care and empathy was “incredibly hurtful to hear.”

Rattiner said he met with Kiros before the primary and thought the conversation had been constructive.

Then, he said, she appeared on anti Israel streamer Hasan Piker’s livestream and “did the opposite of everything that we had discussed.”

“I had asked for nuance and she spoke in absolutist positions,” Rattiner said.

“I had asked for empathy and compassion, and she seemed to only allow that for one side of the conflict.”

Susan Rona, regional director for the Anti Defamation League Mountain States Region, warned that political rhetoric has real world consequences.

“When political leaders refuse to name something as a targeted antisemitic attack, it creates some distrust of leadership and causes additional fear because it minimizes and causes dehumanization of Jews, which leads to violence,” she said.

“We’re seeing that pretty clearly in Colorado,” Rona continued.

“There’s a direct line to all this antisemitic rhetoric we’re hearing and violence happening toward the Jewish community.”

WATCH:

According to the ADL, antisemitic incidents in Colorado have surged to the third highest level recorded since the group began tracking them in 1979.

The group counted 167 incidents in 2025, a staggering jump from fewer than 12 in the region a decade earlier.

Kiros’ campaign has been backed by the Democratic Socialists of America, Justice Democrats, and the Working Families Party.

The DSA has embraced Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Israel and has declared Zionism equivalent to racism, which tells voters plenty about the ideological neighborhood we are dealing with here.

A Jewish independent candidate, Dr. Shimon Blau, has now entered the general election race.

He told the Denverite, “I believe in human rights for everyone,” adding, “I am absolutely not a socialist.”

Republican Christy Peterson is also running, though the district remains heavily Democratic.

Still, Kiros’ rise has already exposed a serious rupture inside the left, where anti Israel rhetoric is no longer fringe coffeehouse chatter but an organizing principle for candidates seeking power in Congress.

Kiros, Blau, and the DSA did not return Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.

Funny how the loudest political movements often go quiet when asked to answer for the fear they leave behind.

News

Gavin Newsom’s Sham Tax Return Release Ignites Fury Over Handpicked Media Access [WATCH]

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s long-awaited tax return reveal landed with all the transparency of a locked filing cabinet.

After months of pressure, the governor finally let a select group of media outlets inspect hundreds of pages of documents, but only under rules that looked more like damage control than disclosure.

The California Post reported that Newsom allowed favored outlets to review 718 pages of tax records in Sacramento, while forbidding copies and limiting reporters to pen and paper.

The governor, who loves lecturing everyone else about openness, was not there to answer questions.

That private showing came after Newsom had promised to make four years of tax records public.

Instead, the public got a filtered version through outlets that were given special access while others, including The Post, were left outside the room.

The staged release sparked immediate criticism from Republicans who said Newsom was trying to claim the halo of transparency without actually doing the transparent part.

For a governor with national ambitions, that is not exactly a confidence building exercise.

“If the governor is truly committed to transparency, it makes little sense to pick and choose who that transparency extends to,” US Rep. Kevin Kiley, a former state legislator, told The Post.

Scott Meyers, a GOP candidate for Congress in California’s 30th Congressional District, added The Post: “If you want voters to trust you as a steward of their tax dollars, you should welcome that level of scrutiny.”

The records, according to notes taken by the chosen outlets, show Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, reported hefty annual income while presenting a far more carefully crafted public image.

WATCH:

The couple brought in between 1.7 million dollars and 2 million dollars annually from 2022 through 2024.

The filings also showed the couple paid household staff nearly 200,000 dollars and wrote off Armani clothing that had originally cost about 45,000 dollars.

They later valued the donated clothing at 4,900 dollars when giving it to an Oakland restorative justice nonprofit, according to the Times.

Newsom also reported author income from his recent memoir, “Young Man in a Hurry.”

He collected 70,000 dollars in 2023 and another 75,000 dollars in 2024, not bad for a politician who tries to package himself as the scrappy underdog of California politics.

In 2021, the couple reported 3.5 million dollars in taxable income, boosted by roughly 1 million dollars from the sale of their home in wealthy Marin County.

Newsom’s official governor salary was only a slice of the family’s earnings, with much of the money tied to winery, restaurant and hospitality businesses placed in a blind trust after he took office.

The returns reportedly do not identify which individual businesses produced profits or losses.

That detail matters, especially when the same politician has spent years insisting that public officials should bare their finances for voters to inspect.

The filings also showed Siebel Newsom’s feminist film production company losing money.

Girls Club Entertainment lost about 37,000 dollars in 2022, while she reported just 11,700 dollars in earnings from the business, according to the Times.

At the same time, Siebel Newsom has reportedly collected at least 150,000 dollars per year from her nonprofit, The Representation Project, which promotes her films and related initiatives.

For ordinary Californians crushed by the cost of living, that setup may look a bit different from the glossy moral branding.

Newsom has long sold himself as a champion of financial disclosure.

During his 2018 run for governor, he released years of returns going back to 2011, then signed a 2019 law requiring gubernatorial candidates to disclose five years of federal returns before appearing on California’s primary ballot.

He also promised to keep releasing his own returns each year while in office. Yet until Friday, the public had not received tax records covering the years after 2020.

When The Post asked about the missing returns earlier this month, Newsom sounded surprised.

“I know you love taxes,” the governor joked, before turning to his favorite political security blanket, President Donald Trump.

Newsom insisted he had released his taxes “for decades,” and his office later said the newer filings would be shared by the end of July.

What his office did not say was that certain outlets had already been contacted and allowed to inspect the documents first.

His office tried to wave off the controversy by saying the filings were nothing special.

“They’re unremarkable and entirely consistent with what Californians already know from his annual Form 700 disclosures,” spokesperson Diana Crofts Pelayo previously told The Post.

“The governor publicly released his tax returns while he was on the ballot and is happy to go above and beyond by releasing the remaining years as well.”

The timing only adds to the scrutiny.

Newsom recently disclosed that he and his wife are subjects of a federal investigation, which he claims is politically motivated, while a source previously told The Post that one inquiry is examining Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s taxes.

Federal investigators also separately examined former Newsom chief of staff Dana Williamson, who pleaded guilty in May to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, filing a false tax return and lying to the FBI.

For a governor testing the waters for 2028, this carefully managed tax show may raise more questions than it answers.

News

Kamala Harris Humiliates Herself While Teasing Radical 2028 Power Grab [WATCH]

Kamala Harris is back on the national stage, and somehow the former vice president managed to remind voters why her last presidential run ended in political rubble.

Speaking Friday at the National Urban League Conference in Nashville, Harris offered a preview of what a 2028 campaign could look like if Democrats decide to take another ride on the Kamala roller coaster.

The theme was not subtle. Harris floated a sweeping leftist wish list that would radically reshape American government, including eliminating the Electoral College, packing the Supreme Court, pushing statehood for Washington DC and Puerto Rico, and scrapping the Senate filibuster.

When asked whether she plans to run for president again, Harris did not formally announce a campaign.

Instead, she gave Democrats a warning about the midterms.

“2028 will not matter if we don’t win 2026,” Harris said.

That line may have been intended as a rallying cry, but it also sounded like a reminder that Democrats know their agenda is in deep trouble if voters show up in 2026.

Harris then leaned into the kind of institutional power grab that has become standard fare on the modern left.

If they cannot win under the current rules, they simply demand new rules.

“We need to revisit the point of expanding the court to 13 justices, like we have 13 district courts. We need to revisit, if they so want, statehood for Puerto Rico and DC,” Harris said.

There was just one glaring problem with that statement.

The United States does not have 13 district courts.

America has 89 federal district courts across the 50 states, along with additional district courts in the territories.

WATCH:

The number Harris appeared to be searching for was 13 appellate circuit courts, which is a fairly significant distinction for someone who is a lawyer and was one heartbeat from the presidency.

For most Americans, mixing up the structure of the federal judiciary might be an understandable mistake.

For Kamala Harris, who wants to redesign the Supreme Court because Democrats are angry they do not control it, the blunder was more than a little embarrassing.

The court packing push is not about justice, balance, or democracy, no matter how many times Democrats dress it up with focus group language.

It is about adding seats until the left gets the rulings it wants.

Harris also revived the Democratic dream of eliminating the Electoral College, a move that would require a constitutional amendment.

That inconvenient detail rarely slows down the party that treats constitutional limits as speed bumps on the road to permanent power.

Add statehood for DC and Puerto Rico to the list, and the strategy becomes even clearer.

Democrats want more friendly senators, more electoral votes, and fewer checks on their agenda.

Harris also attacked Tennessee’s congressional map, accusing the state of racism over its redistricting decision.

“They backdoored racism through politics in that decision,” Harris said.

That kind of rhetoric is now the default setting for Democrats when state lawmakers draw maps they do not like.

If Republicans follow the law and win, the left reaches for the racism accusation before anyone can finish the sentence.

Then Harris made another dramatic claim, accusing the Trump Administration of causing mass death by shuttering USAID.

She offered no proof for the staggering figure she cited.

“It’s so unbelievable that they got rid of USAID! As many as 600,000 to 700,000 people have died because of withdrawing American aid for humanitarian purposes!” Harris said.

WATCH:

A claim that massive should come with serious evidence, not just a conference stage and the familiar Kamala delivery.

But in Democratic politics, big numbers and bigger accusations often do the work that facts apparently cannot.

The Nashville appearance gave voters a useful glimpse of what Harris 2028 could mean.

More attacks on American institutions, more demands to rewrite the rules, more racial politics, and more sweeping claims aimed at blaming Trump for every crisis on earth.

For conservatives, the event was less a campaign preview than a warning label.

Kamala Harris may not have announced for 2028, but she certainly showed the country the radical blueprint Democrats are eager to run on if they get the chance.

News

If You Put Socialists in Power, They Will Literally Destroy America [WATCH]

Heritage Foundation senior fellow Nile Gardiner warned that Europe’s immigration policies are contributing to a growing crisis, arguing that recent events in Spain should serve as a warning for both European governments and the United States.

Gardiner made the remarks while discussing reports of a large influx of migrants arriving in Spanish territory.

He argued that the developments reflect the consequences of immigration policies adopted by Spain and other European governments.

“This is an absolute disaster for Europe,” Gardiner said.

He attributed the situation to immigration and domestic policies pursued by Spain’s government.

“And it’s the direct result of open borders, socialist, crazy policies.”

Gardiner also criticized Spain’s immigration enforcement, specifically pointing to the country’s legalization efforts.

“Frankly, including a mass amnesty for illegal immigrants in Spain.”

According to Gardiner, the recent influx is unlikely to remain an isolated event.

“You can be sure that if 50,000 migrants came into Spanish territory in one day yesterday, hundreds of 1000s more will seek to get in in the next few days.”

He predicted that migration pressures would continue to increase over time.

“Millions will seek to get in in the coming weeks and months.”

Gardiner argued that the developments in Spain should be viewed as a warning beyond Europe.

“This is without a doubt.”

“It’s a huge warning to the United States.”

He said Americans should closely watch the outcome of European immigration policies as debate over border security continues in the United States.

Gardiner contended that similar policies implemented in the United States would produce comparable results.

“If you put socialists in power, they will literally destroy America.”

“They will destroy the United States.”

According to Gardiner, an expansion of similar policies would include changes to immigration enforcement.

“They’ll open the borders.”

He concluded by warning that the United States could experience scenes similar to those unfolding in Europe if voters support leaders who advocate those policies.

“And we will see these kinds of disastrous scenes unfolding here in America if the American people allow the socialists to take power.”

WATCH:

Gardiner’s remarks come as immigration remains a major political issue on both sides of the Atlantic, with European governments continuing to debate border security, asylum policy, and enforcement measures while U.S. lawmakers remain divided over immigration reform and border enforcement.

News

You Can Fight for Your Guns Now, or Your Life Later: Europe Chose Wrong, America Beware [WATCH]

Newsmax host Carl Higbie criticized European immigration policies, arguing they have placed financial burdens on taxpayers, weakened national sovereignty, and contributed to what he described as cultural and public safety challenges in several countries.

During his remarks, Higbie also defended free speech protections, the Second Amendment, and what he described as the importance of preserving Western culture.

Higbie began by arguing that people should not face criminal penalties for expressing controversial opinions.

“Now, agree or disagree with what someone is saying outside of physical threats. Nobody should go to jail for hate speech,” Higbie said.

He then criticized European governments for expanding social welfare programs while accepting large numbers of migrants.

“But Europe then raises taxes to pay for these huge social nets that these migrants, many of which have subpar average IQs, no skills. Honestly, many have no will to work, and native Europeans have to pay more in taxes.”

Higbie argued that the burden falls on working taxpayers.

“So the guy praying to Allah in the street who happens to be blocking traffic for the European trying to get to that job for that wage that is taxed that is being stolen to give to that person in the first place, ruining their country, ruining their culture and their customs.”

He added, “I mean, well done, Europe. Really, seriously, guys.”

Higbie also criticized European firearm laws and tax policies.

“You Europeans are now unarmed, then thus able unable to defend yourself, unable to speak out against it, and all their disposable income has been confiscated via taxes to fund the very invasion that they’re now getting destroyed by.”

Turning to the United States, Higbie questioned why he believes some Americans continue to support similar immigration policies.

“You paying attention yet, Libs? Apparently not, because you still don’t get it.”

He referenced comments made on social media by the Krasenstein brothers regarding migrants seeking better lives.

“One of the brain trusts on the left, the Krasenstein brothers, tweeted out today: ‘Well, these people will merely want the best life for themselves and their families, just like everybody on this planet, the fact that so many conservatives, so and so-called Christians, are attacking them is disgusting.'”

Higbie challenged that argument.

“They are. Where are all the women and children, Brian? I didn’t see that in any of those.”

He continued, “If they’re fleeing for a better life, where are their families or their luggage?”

Higbie also referenced recent unrest in Spain.

“They’re not looking for a better life because within the first 24 hours they landed in Spain, they destroyed the city they entered.”

He argued Spain should have taken a different approach at its border.

“Spain should have used lethal force at their border, but now they’re inside the gates. There’s nothing they can do.”

“They aren’t even deporting these people.”

Higbie then pointed to the scale of migration.

“As many as 100,000 in a day. I mean, what would that do to your town?”

He compared those figures to immigration during former President Joe Biden’s administration.

“Some towns in Texas and Arizona actually saw this under Biden, led in 20 million people over his presidency.”

Higbie used those claims to explain his continued support for the Second Amendment.

“This is why I always say any government that wants to take away your guns is probably about to do something that you might consider shooting them over.”

He added, “You can fight your way, you know, even fight for your guns now, or you can fight for your life later when a foreign invader tries to break through your window in the middle of the night, like over in Spain, because your government didn’t keep its promise to protect you.”

Higbie argued that America’s constitutional protections were designed with those concerns in mind.

“It’s almost like our founding fathers came from Europe and knew they would do something stupid like this, then that’s why we have a First Amendment, a Second Amendment, a Fourth Amendment.”

He questioned how much evidence would be needed to change public opinion.

“I mean, how much pain and suffering and I told you so speeches is it going to take to make these people learn that this is not a matter of coexisting?”

“This is a fight for Western culture as we know it.”

Higbie said he believes the cultural values of many migrants conflict with those of Western nations.

“The views these people have who are invading us are antithetical to literally everything we stand for.”

He also expressed concern about long-term demographic trends.

“And when they get in the majority, which they will, because they’re breeding at a rate 4x what the native Europeans and even Americans are, in 100 years there will be no West if we don’t get it.”

Higbie praised Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s immigration policies.

“Italy does. Their prime minister was like, ‘No way, we’re not doing this.'”

“Said we will not yield an inch on this.”

“That’s the only acceptable response.”

He contrasted that with Spain.

“But Spain, Spain’s lost.”

“And since they wouldn’t let us even land our planes there in the Iran campaign, I say you guys are on your own.”

“Shouldn’t get any help from us.”

Higbie concluded by encouraging people to defend their national identity and traditions.

“We should use these as examples to make sure that the message is carried over, that these people understand that what they’re doing is so detrimental to their lifestyle, to their country, to their people, to their culture.”

“It’s okay to fight for your culture, and somehow, in the midst of all this left smokescreen, people stop doing that because they were ashamed of it.”

“Should never be ashamed of your own culture.”

“You should always be proud to fight for it.”

“That’s why I put on the uniform.”

He ended by expressing hope that more people would pay attention to the issue.

“I just hope that these people wake up, and I hope that this is reported loud enough that people understand.”

“Well, stay strapped, America.”

WATCH:

News

Major New Stock Exchange Opens, and It’s Nowhere Near Wall Street [WATCH]

The Texas Stock Exchange officially went live Friday in Dallas, giving America a new major market venue and giving Wall Street another reminder that the center of economic gravity is not glued to Manhattan forever.

The Dallas-based exchange opened trading for all of its listed tickers, marking the first new major stock exchange launch in the United States in decades.

That is no small Texas-sized footnote.

The TXSE is aiming directly at the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Composite, the longtime giants of American listings.

The message from Dallas is simple enough, Texas is open for business, and the old coastal club now has competition.

The exchange is backed by serious financial muscle, including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab.

In other words, this is not some courthouse square publicity stunt, no matter how badly the usual coastal skeptics may want to pretend otherwise.

TXSE plans to begin corporate listings later this year, then move into initial public offerings starting in 2027.

The exchange sees Texas and the broader South as the “center of gravity for American capitalism”, a phrase that sounds less like marketing and more like a plain reading of the map.

The exchange is leaning into what it calls the “Boom Belt”, a fast growing region that has been pulling jobs, capital and people away from states where taxes and regulations seem designed by people allergic to prosperity.

“As the only primary corporate and ETP listings venue built and headquartered in the Boom Belt, TXSE is both a product of the region’s rise and a catalyst to accelerate it,” TXSE explained.

The numbers help explain why Dallas is suddenly looking like more than just a challenger.

According to the exchange, the region has an annualized GDP of $8.9 trillion, larger than every world economy except the United States and China.

WATCH:

The TXSE also says 40 percent of American exports move through the Boom Belt, while 57 percent of United States job growth over the last five years has happened there.

That is the sort of statistic that tends to make California tax planners reach for another committee hearing.

For now, the exchange is operating out of temporary offices in the Uptown neighborhood of Dallas.

A bell ringing ceremony was scheduled for Friday afternoon to mark the official launch, because even Texas knows Wall Street does not own all the theater.

The permanent home will be inside the Bank of America Tower, where TXSE plans to operate the Texas Market Center.

Once completed, the tower is expected to be the tallest building in Uptown Dallas.

The Texas Market Center is set to include executive offices, a Texas business museum and a broadcast studio.

Designer KPF said in May that the exchange will occupy multiple areas of the building, including ground floor space and a 12th floor sky lobby.

The launch comes as Texas keeps attracting companies looking for a better place to locate headquarters or incorporate.

Lower taxes, friendlier rules and a more practical political climate have become a powerful sales pitch, especially compared with California and New York.

The old guard has noticed. The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have both opened exchanges in Texas, offering companies the chance to dual list on the new duplicate venues at no cost.

That reaction tells the real story.

When the giants start planting flags in Texas, it is because they know the money, talent and ambition are moving.

Wall Street is not vanishing tomorrow, but its monopoly on prestige is taking a hit.

Y’all Street is no longer a punchline, it is a live market in Dallas with heavyweight backing and a very Texas sized appetite for growth.

News

Fauci Confronted Outside His D.C. Home, Watch Him ‘Social Distance’ with a Quickness [WATCH]

Anthony Fauci apparently has discovered a brand new public health protocol, sprint away when a reporter asks basic questions.

The former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director was caught on camera outside his home after his recent appearance before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, where he reportedly invoked the Fifth Amendment more than one hundred times.

Fox News Digital correspondent Nicholas Ballasy tried to ask Fauci whether he had any regrets about his COVID decisions and whether he had anything to say about refusing to answer lawmakers under oath.

Fauci did not exactly launch into one of those polished television sermons Americans endured for years.

Instead, he made a quick retreat, reminding the country that the man who once seemed addicted to cameras suddenly cannot find the courage to face one.

WATCH:

That is quite a transformation for the same bureaucrat who spent the pandemic lecturing families, churches, schools, businesses, and anyone else within microphone range about what they were allowed to do.

For years, Fauci occupied the national stage like a celebrity with a lab coat, popping up on friendly media outlets to explain why ordinary Americans needed to obey.

WATCH:

Now that the questions are less flattering, the performance has changed.

He once fancied himself “tHe sCIeNcE.” That branding always looked more like Washington ego than scientific humility, and the country is still paying the price.

The point of “The Science,” at least before the pandemic priesthood got hold of it, was supposed to be chasing truth and testing claims.

It was not supposed to mean hiding behind lawyers, dodging lawmakers, and rushing indoors when a reporter asks about regrets.

Normally, staking out someone at home is not the kind of press tactic conservatives should celebrate without hesitation.

But Fauci is not some private citizen who wandered into a controversy by accident.

He was one of the most powerful public health figures in America during one of the most disruptive periods in modern history.

WATCH:

He helped shape policies that touched nearly every home, school, church, workplace, and hospital in the country.

Millions of Americans were told to mask up, shut down, stay home, miss funerals, skip holidays, lose jobs, take shots, and stop asking impertinent questions.

WATCH:

Fauci was there, often with that familiar tone suggesting disagreement was not merely wrong, but almost immoral.

So yes, when a reporter asks him whether he has regrets, the public has every right to hear an answer.

If he can help justify sweeping restrictions on normal life, he can manage a few sentences on a sidewalk.

The scene became even more curious because Fauci appeared to be speaking with law enforcement near a Metropolitan Police D.C. SUV.

That raises a fair question about whether he is receiving official protection, and if so, who is footing the bill.

Fauci has done rather well for himself in public life and in the fame machine that followed.

If he wants private security, he can surely find a way to cover it without leaning on the same public he seems so eager to avoid.

The episode followed his Senate “testimony” this week, where reports indicate he was not exactly pleased with how things went.

RedState’s Nick Arama noted that Fauci was overheard complaining about being “shouted at” during the hearing.

That tells you plenty about the bubble these people inhabit.

After years of ordinary citizens being scolded, censored, shamed, and smeared, Fauci seems wounded that lawmakers raised their voices while pressing him for answers.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul was not moved by the display.

His message to Fauci was simple, ” Walk it off .”

Paul has also scheduled a contempt vote before the committee next week, which could put Fauci back in a seat he plainly would rather avoid.

WATCH:

That is where this belongs, not buried under media nostalgia for pandemic celebrities.

There is also renewed scrutiny from Robert F Kennedy Jr and others over what Fauci knew, what he said publicly, and what was kept from the American people.

One related charge summed up the frustration with the phrase ‘He Never Told Anybody’.

WATCH:

The American people do not need another sanctimonious lecture from the man who became the face of pandemic control.

They need answers about decisions that upended lives, damaged trust, and handed enormous power to unelected experts.

Fauci can run back inside, but he cannot run from the record forever.

The country remembers the lectures, the mandates, the smug media tours, and now the sudden silence when accountability comes knocking.


Scroll to Top