News

U.S. Drone Boats Smash Iranian Targets in Historic First Strike
News

U.S. Drone Boats Smash Iranian Targets in Historic First Strike

/

For the first time in history, the U.S. military has unleashed autonomous attack sea drones in combat — and the debut was nothing short of devastating.

The strikes targeted Iran directly, marking a bold escalation after weeks of tit-for-tat clashes following Iranian aggression in the Strait of Hormuz.

Central Command confirmed that these sophisticated unmanned boats, called Corsairs, successfully struck Iran’s prized naval repair facility at Bandar Abbas.

According to CENTCOM, “Yesterday, using multiple one-way attack surface drones, CENTCOM forces successfully struck a submarine and ship maintenance facility in Iran.”

The statement went on to confirm that “three Corsair unmanned surface vessels hit the port at Bandar Abbas Naval Base,” dealing a heavy blow to Tehran’s maritime military infrastructure. The impact degraded Iran’s ability to sustain attacks on commercial shipping, a major source of global economic pressure.

Bandar Abbas wasn’t the only Iranian target to feel the sting of American precision. Across the weekend, U.S. forces coordinated air, ground, and sea strikes on dozens of locations across southern Iran, including Qeshm Island.

CENTCOM officials confirmed that over 300 Iranian military-linked targets were destroyed as part of the campaign. The message from Washington was unmistakable: attacks on civilian tankers will not be tolerated.

The deployment of drone boats marks a new chapter in technological warfare for the United States.

The Corsair, designed by Saronic Technologies out of Austin, Texas, operates as a one-way strike system capable of acting like a precision-guided explosive torpedo. These high-speed surface vehicles can navigate independently using artificial intelligence and can be directed toward enemy ships or installations with pinpoint accuracy.

In a statement on Monday, Saronic Technologies echoed CENTCOM’s acknowledgment of the Corsair’s combat debut.

“We’re proud that our technology supported this mission,” the company said. The sense of pride is well-earned — this operation was not merely a tactical victory but a historic leap forward in maritime combat technology.

This was not the first time the Corsair had been used in Middle Eastern operations. Just last month, one of the same sea drones helped rescue the crew of an AH-64 Apache helicopter that crashed off Oman’s coast.

Still, this weekend’s strike marked the first instance of the drones being used as offensive weapons, demonstrating their flexibility and reliability across mission types.

Experts note that Ukraine’s success using unmanned surface vessels against Russian ships likely accelerated the Pentagon’s interest in operational testing.

American capabilities, however, are far more advanced, integrating real-time battlefield intelligence, targeting data, and network coordination through CENTCOM’s regional command nodes. In effect, the U.S. Navy has just deployed the next frontier of unmanned warfare.

The implications of the strike are both tactical and psychological. Iran’s power projection from the Strait of Hormuz to the Arabian Sea relies heavily on maintaining naval and logistics infrastructure at Bandar Abbas.

By hitting that target, CENTCOM didn’t just destroy hardware — it crippled Tehran’s operational confidence. The regime now faces the reality that American forces can strike its critical infrastructure with no risk to U.S. personnel.

While the Left will inevitably whine on cable panels about “escalation risks,” the truth is that deterrence requires strength, not softness.

President Trump’s clear policy of striking back hard when American interests are threatened has given the U.S. operational edge and restored credibility in the Gulf. For years, Iran operated under the belief that Washington would hesitate to respond. That illusion is officially over.

Pentagon sources indicated that the Corsair fleet, fielded earlier this year, is just the beginning. Additional classes of unmanned sea platforms are expected to come online, increasing America’s ability to conduct deep precision strikes with minimal exposure.

In an era where manned naval operations come with high risk, the Corsair offers flexibility, reach, and massive defensive potential.

Inside U.S. military circles, the strike has been viewed as a technological and tactical triumph. Commanders in the War Department have long sought to integrate autonomous warfare into maritime strategy.

The past weekend’s success at Bandar Abbas is now seen as proof that those investments are paying off in a real-world combat environment.

It’s a development long awaited by many veterans and strategists frustrated by bureaucratic hesitation. Under War Secretary Pete Hegseth’s direction, modernization efforts have finally connected to live operational success.

The Corsair attack isn’t just another headline — it’s a statement about American warfighting superiority in the 21st century. When the United States decides to strike, it strikes hard.

If Iran was hoping for hesitation, it got obliteration instead. And for the first time, the Navy’s newest unmanned warriors led the charge — from the sea.

WATCH BELOW:

Trump Allies Revive Birthright Citizenship Battle With Banks’ New ‘Invaders’ Bill [WATCH]
News

Trump Allies Revive Birthright Citizenship Battle With Banks’ New ‘Invaders’ Bill [WATCH]

/

Senator Jim Banks of Indiana is picking up where President Trump left off by reigniting the fight to end birthright citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants and foreign “birth tourists.”

His new bill, the Citizenship Act, takes direct inspiration from a recent Supreme Court ruling and a sharply argued opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

While the Court struck down Trump’s previous executive order, Kavanaugh’s partial dissent offered a roadmap for Congress to take legislative action.

Now Banks is answering that call with a bold plan to define the children of those who unlawfully enter the country as the offspring of “invaders.”

Banks told Fox News Digital he would introduce the legislation the moment the Senate opened on Monday.

The bill’s language aligns squarely with Trump’s own executive order, which had defined illegal border crossings as a literal “invasion.”

Citing the Constitution’s guarantee that the federal government protect every state from invasion, Banks’ proposal directly ties the issue to national sovereignty, much to the outrage of Democrats and left-leaning advocacy groups already labeling it as “extreme.”

The Indiana Republican’s effort comes after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Barbara, where Chief Justice John Roberts joined the Court’s liberal bloc to block Trump’s executive order.

Roberts relied heavily on an 1898 precedent, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which granted citizenship to children born on U.S. soil.

However, Banks argues that the same case actually left the door open for exceptions, including children of those who fall under the legal definition of “invaders” or “alien enemies.”

Justice Kavanaugh’s opinion hinted at this very loophole.

WATCH:

Though he agreed that Trump’s executive action conflicted with current federal law, he made clear that Congress could amend the statute to provide more explicit limits.

Banks took that as a green light. “The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision was an unprecedented assault on American sovereignty,” Banks said.

“We must do whatever it takes to save our country.”

The Citizenship Act would not alter the Constitution nor contest the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Instead, it changes federal law to redefine which noncitizens are covered, explicitly removing children of those entering the United States illegally or for birth tourism.

The bill revokes the automatic citizenship that such children currently receive and reaffirms Congress’s constitutional role in establishing uniform rules of naturalization.

Banks emphasizes that his proposal simply codifies Trump’s constitutional authority to defend the nation’s borders.

“I’m leading the Citizenship Act to reverse the effects of this consequential ruling and ensure the millions of illegal aliens that invaded our country can’t continue to exploit our immigration system,” he declared.

The language deliberately echoes Trump’s “invasion” terminology, which has become a rallying cry among conservatives furious about the border crisis.

The legislation also highlights the growing influence of foreign actors in exploiting birthright citizenship.

It cites how Chinese Communist Party networks encourage “birth tourism” where expectant mothers travel to the United States solely to give birth, securing instant citizenship for their newborns.

In Banks’ view, that practice exemplifies how American generosity has been twisted into a loophole for foreign advantage.

The bill also nods to certain Mexican nationalist narratives that frame mass migration northward as a reclamation of territory lost in the 1840s.

WATCH:

Legal scholars on the right view the Citizenship Act as a strategic response that uses liberal judicial logic against itself.

By relying on the very case Roberts cited against Trump, Banks is daring the Court to reexamine the conditions of who is “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.

Justice Horace Gray’s 1898 ruling excluded diplomats, hostile occupiers, and others not obligated to the government’s authority.

Banks’ bill argues that illegal border crossers fall precisely into that excluded category since they defy the nation’s sovereignty.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a concurrence in a separate 2025 case, U.S. v. CASA, admitted that “children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation” are not entitled to birthright citizenship.

What she carefully stopped short of doing, however, was labeling illegal immigrants as such “invaders.”

Banks’ measure goes that final step. If passed, it would mark a historic shift in how Congress interprets the Fourteenth Amendment and the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The senator also anchors his bill in the Founders’ intent.

James Madison wrote in 1788 that Congress, not the individual states, held the authority to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.

Banks argues that his bill simply restores that original constitutional order.

He says it is both a legislative and moral duty to defend American citizenship from dilution by those who enter unlawfully.

Critics on the left have predictably reacted with hysteria, calling the effort xenophobic and unconstitutional.

Yet much of the conservative base sees it differently. To them, Banks’ proposal is long overdue.

They view it as a chance to restore integrity to a system they believe has been abused for decades by individuals crossing the border, not to contribute, but to collect benefits funded by American taxpayers.

As the Citizenship Act readies for introduction, Trump and his allies are putting pressure on Senate Republicans to act swiftly.

Trump himself has publicly scolded GOP lawmakers for failing to fight hard enough on the issue.

Banks, already seen as one of the most loyal Trump allies in the Senate, seems eager to prove that he is not just talking tough but taking legislative action.

If the bill gains traction, it could mark one of the biggest political fights of the year, testing where each senator stands on the meaning of American citizenship itself.

For conservatives, it is about restoring the essence of national identity.

For Democrats, it will likely become another talking point about “compassion” and “diversity,” words that many Americans now associate with chaos at the border.

ICE Officers Fatally Shoot Man Who Tried To Ram Agents During Maine Immigration Operation [WATCH]
News

ICE Officers Fatally Shoot Man Who Tried To Ram Agents During Maine Immigration Operation [WATCH]

/

Federal immigration officers in Maine were forced to open fire Monday morning when a Colombian national tried to run them down with a car during an active immigration enforcement operation.

The man, later identified by neighbors as 26-year-old Joan Sebastian Guerrero, was struck and died after being rushed from his vehicle, according to local reports.

The situation unfolded in Biddeford during a Department of Homeland Security operation tied to an illegal alien with a deportation order.

WATCH:

Agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement were conducting surveillance when the suspect fled the scene in a car.

Instead of stopping as ordered, the driver attempted to flee and then turned the vehicle in the direction of the officers.

Federal officials confirmed that one ICE officer fired his weapon after fearing for public safety.

DHS said emergency medical personnel were called immediately, but the suspect later died from his injuries.

WATCH:

Video shared online appeared to show the wounded driver being dragged from the car and handcuffed as officers secured the scene.

Witnesses said the suspect appeared to drive straight toward an ICE agent.

Eighteen year old Lucas Scott told reporters he watched the vehicle accelerate as officers shouted commands before hearing multiple gunshots.

He described hearing about four shots, adding that the car was clearly being used as a weapon against law enforcement.

WATCH:

Another witness reported that the driver exited the car bleeding and claimed he had been trying to stop.

Ring camera footage from a nearby residence reportedly captured five or six gunshot sounds.

The windshield of the suspect’s car showed clear bullet holes, and law enforcement officials were seen surrounding the area with weapons drawn.

 

Local police confirmed their only involvement was securing the perimeter after the ICE operation turned violent.

The reaction from Maine’s political establishment came quickly, and predictably, leaned into blaming ICE rather than the illegal driver who created the danger.

Senator Angus King told media outlets that Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin initially informed him the man was the subject of a warrant, before later clarifying that there was no warrant.

The confusion added to the outrage from state officials, eager to criticize federal enforcement efforts.

Maine’s Democrat Governor Janet Mills wasted no time condemning federal officers, calling the event “disturbing and infuriating.”

She accused immigration authorities of recklessness, claiming their operations across the country are “haphazard.”

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows joined the chorus, promising to “remain tough” on immigration enforcement following the shooting.

Bellows told CNN host Jake Tapper that ICE agents and Trump era policies should be held accountable.

As usual, left wing activist groups rushed out statements portraying the suspect as a victim and community member rather than a man who had just attempted to plow through law enforcement personnel.

Organizations like Presente Maine and the Maine Immigrants Rights Coalition released a joint statement lamenting his death and describing him as a neighbor whose “life was cut tragically short.”

The groups framed the shooting as part of a pattern of oppression rather than an act of self defense by federal officers trying to protect the public.

WATCH:

Even New York City’s radical Mayor Zohran Mamdani weighed in from hundreds of miles away, calling ICE “a murderous agency” and repeating the left’s favorite chant to “abolish ICE.”

It is a familiar pattern: every time agents are forced to defend themselves, progressive politicians and activists turn the narrative inside out, suggesting immigration law enforcement is the true villain.

Locals in Biddeford noted that ICE had been active in recent weeks, tracking down illegal migrants with deportation orders.

One resident said he witnessed agents chasing workers off a roof nearby days earlier, describing a scene where several individuals abandoned their tools to escape.

The growing tension between immigration enforcement and local officials mirrors the national divide over border security under the current administration’s approach.

The federal agency confirmed that the DHS Inspector General’s Office will review the shooting.

For now, however, the scene remains another example of the difficulty faced by officers tasked with carrying out immigration laws in an environment where state and local politicians prefer to vilify them rather than support them.

While activists hold rallies and demand ICE’s abolition, the harsh reality remains that immigration enforcement is both lawful and necessary.

WATCH:

When an individual uses a vehicle to endanger citizens and officers, lethal force is a last resort, not a political statement.

WATCH:

The Biddeford incident highlights the increasing hostility directed toward those who put their lives on the line to enforce the nation’s laws.

This case will likely be used by anti enforcement politicians as another talking point against ICE, though the facts tell a much simpler story.

Officers in Maine responded to a direct threat from a suspect trying to use his car as a weapon.

In any other context, that would be recognized as a justified act of self defense.

Instead, the left is turning a violent encounter into another moral crusade against border security.

For the men and women of ICE, this incident is one more reminder of how thankless the job has become.

They are expected to defend the border, arrest criminals, and uphold federal law, all while enduring nonstop political hostility from those who benefit from chaos at the border.

The message from Maine’s leadership sends a chilling signal to law enforcement throughout the country. In today’s political climate, following the law may now be considered a crime.

Steve Hilton Exposes Legal Chaos Blocking Police From Clearing LA Homeless Camps [WATCH]
News

Steve Hilton Exposes Legal Chaos Blocking Police From Clearing LA Homeless Camps [WATCH]

/

The streets of Los Angeles have turned into a living picture of Democrat failure.

GOP candidate Steve Hilton recently took a guided walk through Skid Row, a segment of the city many residents try to ignore.

What he found confirmed what most Californians already know but are rarely allowed to say out loud: bureaucracy, activist lawsuits, and radical nonprofits have tied the hands of police officers who want to restore order.

Los Angeles officials keep claiming they are making progress on homelessness, yet the tents keep multiplying across sidewalks, freeway ramps, and parks.

The city spends nearly one billion dollars a year attempting to “solve” the crisis, but the results make it hard to spot where those tax dollars actually go.

The only thing that seems to grow steadily is the pile of cash spent on experts, consultants, and legal battles.

When Hilton toured Skid Row, he saw police who are literally legally barred from clearing encampments, even when the tents spill into traffic or pose immediate public health hazards.

Officers know these makeshift camps are magnets for drug abuse, violence, and disease, yet the city’s own policies forbid them from enforcing the law.

The reason, he discovered, is as absurd as it is dangerous.

Thanks to a web of activist lawyers and judges sympathetic to “homeless advocates,” encampments are now treated as personal property zones.

That means anyone camping illegally on a public sidewalk can claim their tent and trash pile as “belongings,” giving them legal cover to stay put indefinitely.

It is an extension of radical left ideology that has infected California’s legal system and paralyzed those trying to clean up the mess.

WATCH:

Leading this legal offensive is the Los Angeles Community Network, or LA CAN.

This activist group has made it their mission to sue the city every time it tries to restore a shred of order.

What started as a supposed human rights organization has turned into a powerful blockade against common sense.

They have discovered that endless litigation is more profitable than actually helping people find housing or treatment.

This insanity has been playing out for years.

Another organization, the LA Alliance for Human Rights, actually sued the city to force officials to take action against rampant street camps.

That legal battle has been running since 2020, with the city coming up short time after time.

Instead of following through on cleanups and shelter plans, Los Angeles politicians offer vague statements and more “task forces.”

The irony is thick.

A nonprofit claims to protect the rights of the homeless while blocking any attempt to move them into safer conditions.

Local Democrats like Mayor Karen Bass then hide behind these same organizations, pretending their hands are tied.

Conveniently, the money continues to flow to advocacy groups and city departments, while neighborhoods deteriorate and crime grows.

During Hilton’s tour, residents and workers in the area shared stories of harassment, theft, and public drug use.

Yet the response from the city has been to issue “sensitivity training” instead of enforcement.

Law-abiding citizens have no recourse when their sidewalks are taken over, while criminals and addicts receive taxpayer-funded protection through these activist lawsuits.

LA CAN insists that its crusade is about protecting individual dignity. In reality, it appears motivated by keeping the cash pipeline open.

As one example, the organization runs the “Freedom Singers,” a performance group of formerly homeless members that appears on national television.

The cause certainly looks noble, but the real purpose is fundraising and publicity.

It is the textbook pattern of a nonprofit culture thriving on crisis rather than solving it.

Steve Hilton’s message through all this chaos is clear.

California’s ruling class and their activist friends have constructed a system where failure is rewarded.

Bureaucrats get bigger budgets, while the city becomes less livable. Advocacy groups rake in donations while blocking any policy that could actually reduce homelessness.

It is a perverse incentive loop built by Democrats and sustained by their media allies.

What Hilton exposed is not simply a homeless crisis, but a political racket.

The empty promises from leaders like Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass are not mistakes; they are the design.

Progressivism demands permanent problems to justify permanent spending. That is why Los Angeles remains trapped in an endless cycle of decay, despite having some of the highest taxes in the nation.

Residents of California deserve better than this theater of compassion that produces only misery.

The only way to break it is to cut off the legal lifelines that shield activists from accountability and restore basic law enforcement authority to the police.

Until then, California’s most famous city will continue to drown in tents, needles, and lawsuits, all protected in the name of “justice.”

Steve Hilton’s walk through Skid Row revealed what every voter should know before the next election.

The homeless crisis is not unsolvable; it is simply unallowed to be solved by the very people who created it.

And that is the true madness of life under liberal control in Los Angeles.

Records Show Walz Pardon Board Cited Immigration Concerns Before Convicted Child Abuser Was Deported
News

Records Show Walz Pardon Board Cited Immigration Concerns Before Convicted Child Abuser Was Deported

/

Documents reviewed by Fox News Digital show that members of the Minnesota Clemency Review Commission recommended a full pardon for Laotian national Tue Lue Vang largely because of concerns that he faced deportation, despite his conviction for repeatedly sexually abusing a child over several years, as reported by Fox News.

The commission voted 4-2 to recommend clemency for Vang, a 42-year-old illegal immigrant who had been convicted of criminal sexual conduct.

According to the documents, commissioners supporting the recommendation repeatedly referenced the immigration consequences Vang faced if he was not granted a pardon.

Walz Grants Pardon to Illegal Migrant Who Sexually Assaulted 10-Year-Old Girl

The recommendation was later approved by the Minnesota Board of Pardons, which consists of Gov. Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson.

The board granted Vang a full pardon on June 10, effectively clearing his criminal record as he was facing removal proceedings.

Commissioner Zach Lindstrom acknowledged the difficulty of the case while explaining his support for the recommendation.

“Very tough case, but the kids not having a father is not in the best interest of society,” Lindstrom wrote, referring to Vang’s six children.

Commissioner Artika Roller also cited immigration issues in supporting clemency, writing, “The applicant stated the need for clemency related to immigration issues.”

Vang entered the United States through California in 1994 and later received legal status during the Clinton administration. Court records show that between 2002 and 2004, when Vang was between 18 and 20 years old, he repeatedly had sexual intercourse with a girl beginning when she was 10 years old. The abuse occurred in St. Paul, Minnesota, in Ramsey County.

Fox News Digital reported that documents from the case stated the victim “did not understand what Vang was doing, so she let him.”

As time passed, she confided in friends, who later testified she was “angry and sad” about what had happened. The records also state that Vang once offered the victim $10 to remain silent.

Ramsey County Assistant Attorney Tami McConkey formally opposed the pardon.

While Ramsey County District Court Judge Sara Grewing did not take a position on the request, McConkey argued against granting clemency.

According to her filing, prosecutors had originally offered Vang a dispositional departure because the then-12-year-old victim faced pressure from family members not to cooperate with law enforcement following his arrest.

Vang ultimately received a 12-year prison sentence, but the sentence was stayed in favor of 30 years of supervised probation that included one year of local confinement.

He served approximately eight months at the county correctional workhouse before being released and was discharged from probation early in 2019.

McConkey also cited additional aggravating factors, including that the abuse continued over an extended period, that Vang transported the victim to his residence during one incident, and that no protection was used.

According to a criminal complaint reviewed by Fox News Digital, Vang told investigators after his arrest:

“I made a mistake, but this is a minor thing. It is a cultural thing in Thailand to marry and have sex with girls as young as 12.”

The complaint also states, “Vang stated [the victim] should be arrested also because she was as much at fault.”

McConkey further wrote:

“while Mr. Vang expresses shame and regret about what his children experience when they learn of the offense, he does not share any thoughts or insight about what the victim must have gone through.”

Several commissioners nevertheless cited the victim’s support for clemency as part of their recommendations.

Commissioner Nadine Graves wrote:

“The victim supports this pardon. His [Vang’s] wife stayed and has forgiven. He also has immigration concerns. He has remorse and was discharged from probation.”

Graves also wrote that Vang “retracted his prior statement about this being a result of culture. He admits this was wrong then and will always be wrong.”

Lindstrom likewise noted, “applicant’s wife supports” and “victim supports” a pardon.

Commissioner Perry Moriearty wrote:

“Despite the extraordinary severity of the underlying offense, there is substantial evidence of rehabilitation, remorse, and acceptance of responsibility.”

He also noted that Vang “is facing deportation” and “victim supports.”

In his clemency application, Vang wrote, “I carry deep shame and regret for the harm I caused.”

He explained that he had been detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in December and was subject to a final removal order.

He also wrote that if deported, he “would be sent to a place entirely unfamiliar to me, with no family, no home, and no future.”

Vang added, “My fear is that, if deported, my children will grow up without a father, like I did,” and “I will do all that I can to be here and to protect them from the outcomes of my deportation.”

Following the pardon, Homeland Security Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis criticized the decision.

“Governor Tim Walz’s decision to pardon an illegal alien convicted child rapist so he can remain in our country is disgusting,” Bis said.

“These are the criminal illegal aliens he and his Minnesota sanctuary politicians are protecting.”

Despite the pardon, the Trump administration proceeded with Vang’s removal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Friday that he terminated Vang’s legal status, resulting in his deportation to Laos.

Rubio told Fox News Digital, “Americans should never have to live in fear that foreign sex predators — shielded from deportation by their own elected officials — could endanger them or their children.”

“That’s why I terminated his legal status in the United States,” Rubio continued. “Vang has now been removed from our country and will never pose a threat to any American ever again.”

Democrat House Hopeful’s Campaign Rocked by Sex Offender Brother-in-Law Scandal
News

Democrat House Hopeful’s Campaign Rocked by Sex Offender Brother-in-Law Scandal

/

Democratic congressional candidate Aaron Gies is facing criticism after acknowledging that his brother-in-law, Christopher Nathan White, attended and helped film a campaign event despite being listed as a registered Level 2 sex offender in New York, as reported by The New York Post.

Gies, a theology professor at St. Bonaventure University, is seeking to unseat two-term Republican Rep.

Nick Langworthy in New York’s 23rd Congressional District. The controversy centers on a Dec. 26, 2025, “Polar Plunge” campaign event where participants wearing bathing suits jumped into a cold pond at a private residence.

According to Gies, White attended the event and assisted with filming video footage.

“He was there,” Gies told The Post Sunday when asked about the campaign event.

Gies maintained that White has no formal role in his congressional campaign.

“Chris is not part of my campaign,” he said, while adding that White “did his time” for his crimes.

Gies described the issue as a “distraction” from his campaign platform, which focuses on expanding health care and housing opportunities.

The Democratic candidate also defended himself by stating, “I have not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing and have not covered up criminal wrongdoing on the part of others.”

The issue has drawn attention because Gies recently criticized other political figures over allegations involving sexual misconduct.

Last week, he called on Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner to end his campaign over claims of sexual assault.

He also criticized Langworthy, alleging the congressman had used his position on the House Oversight Committee to block “accountability for people in the Epstein files.”

Those statements came after White had appeared at Gies’ own campaign event.

White previously worked as a teacher in North Carolina before being convicted of one count of second-degree sexual offense and two counts of sex offense involving two teenage students, ages 15 and 17. He served five years in prison before relocating to New York.

Following his release, White moved to Olean, where he now works at a veterinary clinic operated by Gies’ wife and White’s sister.

He is listed as a Level 2 Sex Offender in the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Sex Offender Registry.

Retired Marine Chris Hahn, who attended the Polar Plunge fundraiser with his 15-year-old daughter, said he was surprised after learning who had filmed video during the event.

“I was shocked to see someone like that would be on the campaign trail — brother-in-law or not,” Hahn said.

“Wow. Do people who want to vote for Geis know this?” Hahn told The Post. “You don’t have a leg to stand on. You’re not setting a good example.”

Langworthy also criticized his opponent’s decision to allow White to attend the campaign event.

“To bring a convicted sex offender and someone guilty of 2nd degree rape of a minor to campaign events is deeply, deeply disturbing and shows an alarming lack of judgment for any adult, let alone someone seeking public office,” Langworthy told The Post.

“As members of Congress, we have an enormous responsibility to put in place laws that protect victims and children, not put them at risk.”

Gies is challenging Langworthy in New York’s 23rd Congressional District, which covers a large portion of western New York outside the Buffalo metropolitan area.

According to the latest enrollment figures from the New York State Board of Elections, the district has 209,390 active registered Republicans, 144,342 active registered Democrats, and 132,176 voters who are not affiliated with either major party.

Israeli Ambassador Obliterates Rep Ro Khanna Over False Detention Tale [WATCH]
News

Israeli Ambassador Obliterates Rep Ro Khanna Over False Detention Tale [WATCH]

/

Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna managed to find himself in another embarrassing tangle after spinning a story about being “detained” in the West Bank, as reported by Red State.

The problem for Khanna is that Israel, including its own Defense Force and now its top diplomat in Washington, says that is not what happened at all.

The Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Leiter, has now publicly dismantled Khanna’s account, exposing what appears to be an attempt at political theater dressed up as a victim narrative.

According to Khanna’s version, he and his group were “detained” by the Israeli military while traveling near a Palestinian area. But when the Israeli Defense Force responded to his claims, they made it clear they were not responsible for any detention.

In fact, they said they arrived to help resolve a situation in a restricted zone. Israeli police added that the location in question was a closed military zone, meaning civilians had no business being there to begin with.

Leiter did not hold back after hearing Khanna’s statements circulate through sympathetic media.

He revealed that Israel reached out to Khanna’s office upon learning of his trip, offering briefings, a chance to meet survivors of the October 7 terror attack, and opportunities to understand the nation’s ongoing security challenges.

Khanna, apparently uninterested in that side of the story, “ignored that” and instead toured around the region with Palestinian activists.

“Maybe this would not have happened if he had coordinated properly,” Leiter stated.

According to the ambassador, Khanna’s office did not coordinate anything meaningful with the Israeli government.

All they did was ask a question about visas, which Leiter described as being far from genuine coordination.

Leiter’s criticism quickly took a sharper edge as he pointed out the suspicious timing of Khanna’s “detention” story.

The incident reportedly occurred on a Wednesday, but Khanna did not go public with it until Saturday.

“Maybe this had more something to do with his support of Graham Platner beforehand, and the difficulties he had with that,” Leiter speculated.

“Trying to shift the focus to something else, perhaps? I’m asking a question.” The point was clear, and it hit home.

Adding even more mockery to the mess, Leiter implied that Khanna was using this media moment as a way to test the waters for a possible presidential campaign.

“You know, to declare a presidential run,” Leiter joked, drawing laughter even from CBS host Margaret Brennan.

That idea has been floating around elite Democrat circles recently, with Khanna seemingly hinting at a 2028 run. It looks like Israel is not taking that “threat” particularly seriously.

Khanna had also claimed that “it wasn’t a good idea to detain long-shot presidential candidates” and warned Israel that this was “not how you’re going to build goodwill with the next American president, whoever that is.”

If he was trying to sound presidential, it did not work. Leiter did not flinch and seemed more amused than alarmed.

Instead of letting the story fade quietly into the background, Khanna doubled down.

In response to Leiter’s interview, he posted on social media, insisting that if American officials were “detained illegally by settlers and the military of any other nation, the Ambassador would beg the American people for forgiveness.”

Khanna then called Leiter’s approach “the height of arrogance.” That line only added to the perception that the Congressman is trying much too hard to pick a fight for attention.

The truth is, if what the Israelis are saying is accurate, Khanna and his group wandered into a restricted area without proper coordination, in a nation still on high alert after the horrors of October 7.

For a member of Congress who should know better, that kind of misstep is more reckless than brave. To then play the victim card afterward only makes the situation worse.

Republicans are already pointing out the hypocrisy. Imagine the outrage from Democrats and media pundits if a GOP lawmaker pulled a stunt like this.

But because Khanna belongs to the progressive crowd that loves scolding Israel whenever possible, he gets front-page sympathy coverage from outlets eager to amplify his version of events.

“The height of arrogance” might not describe Israel’s actions here, but it perfectly sums up Khanna’s own behavior.

Praising himself as a “long-shot presidential candidate” while taking shots at an ally fighting to survive in one of the most dangerous parts of the world makes him look less like a leader and more like a headline chaser.

The arrogance is layered thicker than talking points in a CNN green room.

For a man hoping to be seen as a future statesman, Khanna is instead reminding American voters why so many are tired of political posturing and selective outrage.

His version of events has collapsed under scrutiny, and once again, Israel’s own officials had to clean up the mess. The attempt to score political points at Israel’s expense fell completely flat.

Given how poorly this latest play has unfolded, maybe Khanna should spend less time pretending to be an international victim and more time understanding basic rules of diplomacy.

If nothing else, this fiasco serves as a lesson in how not to handle foreign relations, especially when dealing with one of America’s closest allies.

Two Teens Arrested After Five Family Members Gunned Down in Illinois [WATCH]
News

Two Teens Arrested After Five Family Members Gunned Down in Illinois [WATCH]

/

Five members of the same family were killed Sunday in a series of shootings across East St. Louis, Illinois, prompting a multi-agency investigation led by the Illinois State Police and local law enforcement authorities, as reported by Fox 2 Now.

Illinois State Police confirmed that two juvenile suspects, ages 15 and 16, are in custody in connection with the killings.

Authorities initially reported earlier in the day that both suspects were 16 years old, but later clarified their ages in an updated statement.

The two teens were arrested in Frank Holten State Park. Illinois State Police said they are seeking criminal charges through the St. Clair County State’s Attorney’s Office.

According to investigators, the shootings occurred at multiple locations throughout East St. Louis.

One person was killed near the intersection of North 39th Street and Summit Avenue, while three additional victims were found dead at the Samuel Gompers Housing Development.

Another shooting occurred at Jones Park, located across the street from the Jackie Joyner-Kersee Foundation.

Three people were shot there, with one victim later dying. The two surviving victims were transported to a hospital for treatment.

Authorities identified the five people killed as Quentin L. Thompson, 21; Devin D. May, 24; Shania W. Thompson, 25; Cherie L. May, 49; and Patricia A. May, 74.

Illinois State Police also confirmed that one of the juvenile suspects is related to at least one of the victims.

Investigators have not publicly disclosed a motive for the shootings, though officials indicated that the investigation has begun to provide a clearer understanding of what occurred.

Kelly, speaking during a news conference, said the investigation remains active but emphasized there is no ongoing threat to the general public.

“We have Illinois State Police special agents, troopers, and officers from our local partners investigating those questions, and I think that will become apparent over time,” Kelly said.

While describing the violence as unprecedented for the area, Kelly stressed that the attacks should not define the city or overshadow recent progress within the community.

“It will not keep this city down. The progress we have made will not be lost as a result of these terrible acts of violence that have occurred in this community today,” he said.

Kelly also characterized the killings as “terrible” and “evil.”

Residents who live near the crime scenes said the violence came as a shock to a neighborhood they consider close-knit.

“This feels like something that would happen on ‘The First 48’, not right across from you,” Gompers Public Housing resident Keveon Johnson said.

Neighbor Samuel McClain Jr. said the shootings were unlike anything the community typically experiences.

“It’s a peaceful neighborhood, so when everybody got woke up and heard that a female was deceased, that’s a lot because we’re not used to it,” McClain said.

East St. Louis City Councilman Courtney Hoffman also urged residents not to view the incident as a random attack against the broader public.

“This is not a mass shooting where you have to worry about going to the grocery store and someone opening fire,” Hoffman said.

“This is a one-off in a sense, so it’s not something for the whole community to be afraid of.”

Neighbors described the Samuel Gompers Housing Development as a community where residents know one another and regularly look out for each other.

Johnson said the killings have had a profound impact on those who live there.

“We’re brothers and sisters,” Johnson said.

“I don’t like to see my women lose their lives. I don’t like to see anybody lose their lives, especially here. I see connection, brotherhood, and sisterhood. So, to see anything like this, it’s hard for me.”

Authorities have not released additional details regarding the relationship between the suspects and the victims or what investigators believe led to the series of shootings.

The Illinois State Police continues to work alongside local law enforcement agencies as the investigation proceeds.

Officials said the St. Clair County State’s Attorney’s Office will review the case as investigators seek formal charges against the two juvenile suspects. The investigation remains ongoing.

Bystanders Rescue 7-Year-Old Girl After Naked Man Tries to Kidnap Her in Portland Park [WATCH]
News

Bystanders Rescue 7-Year-Old Girl After Naked Man Tries to Kidnap Her in Portland Park [WATCH]

/

A shocking scene unfolded in Portland, Oregon, over the weekend as a naked man attempted to abduct a 7-year-old tourist from her mother at a public park while bystanders rushed in to save the child, as reported by the New York Post.

The disturbing episode added yet another chapter to Portland’s ongoing collapse into disorder and lawlessness.

Police said the incident began shortly before 7 p.m. Saturday when calls came in to report a nude man running around Tom McCall Waterfront Park.

One caller claimed the man tried to punch them in the head, but with officers tied up on other calls, no one was immediately available to respond.

Even as people pleaded for help, Portland’s thinly stretched police force, decimated by political defunding and years of anti-police rhetoric, could not arrive in time.

Just twelve minutes later, a second call came in. The situation had escalated into something every parent dreads.

The suspect had grabbed a young girl and was trying to pull her away from her mother. According to witnesses, the frantic struggle became a tug-of-war over the child’s body as her mother and father fought the attacker with the help of brave passersby.

When police finally arrived, the man was found naked and splashing in the Willamette River, apparently trying to get away.

Officers arrested 31-year-old Daniel Vasey, hauling him to the Multnomah County Detention Center, where he was booked on several serious charges.

Those included first and second degree attempted kidnapping, first degree custodial interference, third degree assault, and harassment.

The young girl was fortunate not to have been seriously hurt. Paramedics treated her at the scene for scratches, and she did not require hospitalization.

That small mercy was owed entirely to her parents’ determination and the courage of ordinary citizens who intervened without hesitation while authorities were nowhere to be found.

Investigators said the man grabbed the child by her arm before the girl’s mother seized her other arm to fight him off.

The struggle was so intense that the girl was lifted off the ground between the two adults.

Her father and bystanders quickly stepped in, punching and slapping the suspect until he let go. One witness deployed pepper spray to prevent him from lunging at anyone else.

The family, visiting Portland from out of state, must have imagined they were taking a simple sightseeing trip near the city’s waterfront.

Instead, they witnessed firsthand what too many locals already know.

Portland’s streets have become a dangerous playground for criminals, vagrants, and the mentally unstable, while law enforcement resources remain stretched to the breaking point under progressive leadership.

The fact that officers did not respond to the first emergency call underscores how much the city’s policing capacity has suffered.

Politicians who once sneered at traditional law enforcement are now presiding over a city where a naked man can run wild in a public park for more than ten minutes before help arrives. The promise of “reimagined” public safety has turned into a grim farce.

Even worse, the spectacle unfolded in a place intended for families and tourists. Tom McCall Waterfront Park is often touted as a crown jewel of downtown, but like much of Portland, it has become a magnet for bizarre displays of disorder that city leaders often try to downplay or excuse.

Visitors rarely hear about the constant stream of disturbances, drug use, and violent outbursts that local residents endure.

It took the instincts of bystanders and a father’s rage to stop the attempted kidnapping before it turned tragic. Their quick thinking saved that little girl’s life.

It is not an exaggeration to say that without them, Portland’s weekend could have ended with an unspeakable headline about a missing child instead of an arrest report.

Daniel Vasey’s motives remain unclear, though the details — naked, violent, unprovoked — suggest serious instability.

Too often, such offenders are quickly released or shuffled through the revolving door of what progressive prosecutors call “restorative justice.”

Portlanders have little faith that real accountability will follow.

For many residents and visitors alike, the story will only deepen doubts about the safety of Portland’s parks and public spaces.

It reflects a city in crisis, one where ordinary families have to rely on their own strength and the courage of strangers because city leadership has rendered law enforcement impotent.

While the immediate danger was stopped, the larger problem remains. Portland’s permissive approach to crime and mental illness has created a breeding ground for chaos.

Until the city admits that reality and fully restores order, parents will continue to look over their shoulders, wondering when the next horror might show up in what used to be a family-friendly park on the river.

Deep Blue NYC: Rent Crisis Hits New Record as Apartments Slip Further Out of Reach [WATCH]
News

Deep Blue NYC: Rent Crisis Hits New Record as Apartments Slip Further Out of Reach [WATCH]

/

Rental prices across New York City have reached new record highs, with Manhattan and Brooklyn posting their highest median rents on record as housing inventory continues to tighten across the five boroughs, as reported by Pix11.

New data released by the real estate firm Corcoran found that the median monthly rent in Manhattan reached $5,295 in June, the highest level ever recorded for the borough.

Brooklyn also set a new record, with median rents climbing to $4,350 per month. Both figures represent an 8% increase compared to June of last year.

The increases are also spreading beyond Manhattan and Brooklyn into other parts of the city.

According to a separate report from real estate firm MNS, rental prices have continued rising in Queens and the Bronx, with several neighborhoods seeing significant year-over-year increases.

Rego Park experienced some of the sharpest increases.

Average rents for one-bedroom apartments rose 12% between May 2025 and May 2026, while studio apartment rents increased by more than 20% during the same period. Two-bedroom apartments provided the only relief, with average rents declining by about 3%.

The higher prices are affecting new residents relocating to New York from less expensive housing markets.

Almo Regazi recently moved from Tampa, Florida, to Rego Park to attend medical school and said the difference in housing costs was immediately noticeable.

“It’s pretty expensive. It’s definitely a premium to live in New York, but it is a very nice city,” Regazi told PIX11 News.

He said his monthly rent increased substantially after relocating.

“It’s probably about a grand more a month. Back in Tampa, it was about $ 1,300; here it’s about $2,300.”

New York City Comptroller Mark Levine said the continued rise in rents comes down to a basic imbalance between supply and demand.

“Rents are going up everywhere for one simple reason: we don’t have enough housing,” Levine said.

“Especially affordable housing. We’re probably short, Derick, by half a million units, so that means we’re seeing bidding wars even on rental apartments.”

Levine said increasing the city’s housing inventory will require additional residential construction as well as continued efforts to convert older commercial buildings into apartments.

His comments came after a construction incident last week at the former Pfizer Building in Midtown Manhattan prompted evacuations and road closures while crews worked to stabilize a leaning structure during an office-to-residential conversion project.

Levine said the incident should be fully investigated, but warned against allowing it to halt similar redevelopment efforts.

“It would be a terrible mistake because of this horrible construction accident, which is serious, which does need to be investigated; we have to look at all the inspections and engineering strategies, etc,” Levine said.

“But if we let this one construction accident stop this very successful conversion strategy to housing, it would be a terrible mistake.”

Supporters of office-to-residential conversions have argued that repurposing vacant commercial buildings could help expand the city’s housing supply at a time when available rental units remain scarce.

Corcoran’s June report underscores that shortage.

The firm found that Manhattan’s vacancy rate continues to decline, with only 1.49% of apartments in the borough currently available for rent.

Such a limited supply has contributed to increased competition among renters, with prospective tenants often facing bidding wars for available units.

The combination of historically low vacancy rates and continued demand has placed additional pressure on renters throughout New York City, extending price increases beyond traditionally expensive neighborhoods into surrounding boroughs.

While Manhattan and Brooklyn continue to command the city’s highest rents, the latest data indicate that rising housing costs are becoming increasingly widespread, affecting neighborhoods throughout Queens and the Bronx as well.

Real estate analysts and city officials continue to point to the lack of available housing as a primary factor behind the city’s record rental prices, with discussions ongoing over expanding housing development and accelerating office-to-residential conversion projects in an effort to increase inventory and ease pressure on renters.


Scroll to Top