News

‘No Way. My God, No’: Joe Manchin Torches Democratic Socialist Demands as Crazy Stuff [WATCH]
News

‘No Way. My God, No’: Joe Manchin Torches Democratic Socialist Demands as Crazy Stuff [WATCH]

/

Sunday morning television still has a talent for producing political moments that tell voters more than the polished campaign ads ever could.

On CBS’s Face the Nation, former Senator Joe Manchin said out loud what plenty of Americans already know about the socialist wing of the Democratic Party.

Manchin appeared with his daughter, Americans Together CEO Heather Manchin, for an interview with host Margaret Brennan.

The conversation turned to so called democratic socialism, which is usually just old fashioned big government extremism wearing a fresh coat of marketing paint.

Brennan asked whether Heather Manchin could ever support a candidate who openly calls himself a socialist. Heather gave the obvious answer, “No.”

Manchin added his own reaction, “No way. My God, no.”

That was not exactly the answer the left likes hearing on a Sunday morning platform where bad ideas are often treated like brave new thinking.

Brennan pressed the point by asking whether good ideas could make such a candidate worth supporting.

Manchin responded, “I support the good ideas, but how could you support some of the crazy stuff they’re for? Have you seen their platform?”

That question cuts straight through the fog.

Democrats have spent years pretending the socialist faction is just a quirky youth movement with slogans, tote bags, and a bottomless appetite for other people’s money.

Manchin was not buying it. He said, “They’re for just dismantling everything that we know,” and then pointed to attacks on basic structures of government, law enforcement, and public order.

Then came the line that should be replayed in every battleground district.

Manchin said, “No police, no this, no this, no that. Are you crazy?”

He followed with another bit of common sense that somehow counts as controversial in modern Democratic politics

“We have to have police for that,” Manchin said while discussing the need for safe communities.

WATCH:

That is the heart of the issue.

The socialist left keeps treating police, prisons, national defense, and constitutional guardrails as obstacles to its grand utopian project.

Regular Americans see it differently.

They want safe streets, accountable government, secure borders, affordable groceries, and leaders who do not sound like they are auditioning for a student government revolution.

The radical wish list is not imaginary. Abolish this, defund that, eliminate the other thing, and somehow the result is supposed to be peace, fairness, and prosperity.

We have seen enough of that fantasy already.

When politicians demonize police, criminals get bolder, families get nervous, businesses flee, and the same elites who caused the mess hire private security.

Manchin also discussed why he did not pursue an independent presidential run in 2024.

Brennan noted that he had said he did not want to become a spoiler.

His answer focused on ballot access. “I couldn’t get on all 50 ballots. You put me on 50 ballots, then I have a platform, I can speak.”

Manchin added, “But I have no chance of winning because I’m only on 16 ballots or 20 ballots statewide.”

When Brennan summarized the issue, Manchin made it plain: “It’s ballot access.”

That is the built in wall facing nearly every serious third party or independent contender.

The two party system is not just cultural habit, it is reinforced by rules, money, infrastructure, and ballot hurdles that make a national run nearly impossible.

There is another obvious point Manchin did not need to dwell on.

A credible independent bid from a former Democrat could have carved votes away from the Democratic nominee and made Donald Trump’s path even clearer.

For conservatives, that would not have been a tragedy.

For Democrats, it would have been another self inflicted wound, which is practically their specialty at this point.

The larger lesson is that Manchin represents a type of Democrat that party activists seem determined to drive into extinction.

He talks about police like they matter, governing like it requires math, and socialism like it is a danger rather than a fashion trend.

If Democrats were serious about winning back working class voters, they would study why someone like Manchin still connects with people far from faculty lounges and activist conferences.

Instead, they keep flirting with the politics of Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.

That is excellent news for Republicans who want to defend the America First agenda in 2026 and beyond.

The more Democrats embrace socialist demands as mainstream policy, the easier it becomes for voters to see the choice in front of them.

Manchin may not be a conservative, but on this point he landed the plane.

Calling the socialist wish list “crazy stuff” is not an insult, it is a public service.

Terrifying Video Shows Firefighting Helicopters Collide in Greece as Wildfires Devour Europe [WATCH]
News

Terrifying Video Shows Firefighting Helicopters Collide in Greece as Wildfires Devour Europe [WATCH]

/

A terrifying scene unfolded over Greece on Sunday as two firefighting helicopters collided in midair while crews battled a fierce wildfire west of Athens.

The frightening crash was captured on video obtained by Kefalonia Press, showing the kind of split second disaster that turns an already dangerous emergency into a nightmare in the sky.

In the footage, one helicopter appears to clip the rotor of another aircraft. Moments later, flames erupt and one of the helicopters plunges toward the ground.

The helicopters had been leased by the local fire department to fight a blaze in Psatha, a coastal area west of the Greek capital, BBC News reported.

Officials said both helicopters had two people on board at the time of the collision.

WATCH:

The cause of the crash remains under investigation, and authorities have not yet said whether visibility, wind, equipment trouble, or another factor played a role.

The crash came as Greece and several other European countries continued to battle wildfires fueled by weeks of scorching temperatures.

Europe did not need another reminder that nature does not pause for government paperwork.

Firefighting aircraft are often pushed into dangerous conditions when flames move quickly and ground crews cannot reach threatened areas fast enough.

In that environment, tight maneuvering, heavy smoke, and shifting winds can make every pass a serious gamble.

On the Greek island of Crete, wildfires have burned thousands of acres and forced more than 8,000 people to evacuate temporarily.

The evacuations added another layer of chaos to a summer already defined by smoke, heat, and strained emergency crews.

Another blaze in central Greece forced roughly 500 people, many of them tourists, to be moved out of danger on Friday.

For vacationers expecting beaches and sunshine, the sudden scramble away from flames delivered a brutal dose of reality.

Fires have also broken out on the islands of Paros, Andros, and Kalymnos.

That spread has left Greek authorities trying to contain multiple fronts while residents and visitors watch the skies for aircraft and the hills for smoke.

The collision over Psatha highlights the enormous risk carried by pilots who fly directly into disaster zones to protect communities below.

WATCH:

These crews operate in the kind of conditions most people would flee without needing to be told twice.

Video of the crash shows just how quickly one mistake, one gust, or one unlucky movement can turn a rescue mission into a tragedy.

The aircraft were there to save homes, land, and lives, but the danger in that work is never theoretical.

Local fire officials have not yet released a full account of what happened before the collision.

Investigators will now have to examine flight paths, communication, weather conditions, and the final movements of both helicopters.

The broader wildfire crisis has stretched resources across the region as dry conditions and extreme heat create prime conditions for fast moving flames.

Once fires take hold in rugged terrain or near island communities, response options can narrow quickly.

For residents in affected areas, the sound of helicopters overhead is usually a sign that help has arrived.

On Sunday, that sound gave way to a horrifying impact and a fresh wave of uncertainty.

Search and rescue crews remained focused on the people aboard the aircraft as the investigation moved forward.

Until officials release more details, families, firefighters, and local communities are left waiting for answers.

The disaster is a grim reminder that wildfire response depends not just on courage, but on coordination under intense pressure.

When crews are fighting flames from the air and the ground at the same time, the margin for error can vanish in an instant.

Authorities are expected to provide more information as the developing situation becomes clearer.

For now, Greece is still battling flames on multiple fronts while confronting the aftermath of a shocking crash in the middle of an already punishing wildfire fight.

Dana Bash Panics as RFK Jr. Exposes Media’s COVID Failures Straight to Her Face [WATCH]
News

Dana Bash Panics as RFK Jr. Exposes Media’s COVID Failures Straight to Her Face [WATCH]

/

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. walked straight into CNN territory Sunday and gave viewers a rare sight on legacy television, a Biden era media narrative getting challenged in real time.

The Health and Human Services Secretary appeared on State of the Union with Dana Bash, where a discussion about the COVID response quickly turned into a heated clash over vaccines, censorship, and the media’s role in terrifying Americans.

Before the segment descended into shouting, Kennedy argued that the first duty in any future pandemic must be to protect the rights of citizens, not trample them in the name of bureaucratic panic.

“That is the number one priority. We protect the Constitution,” he said, while accusing Bash of being “part of the problem” and committing “absolute press malpractice.”

Kennedy then turned the spotlight back on the press, which spent years treating dissent like a public health threat and government talking points like gospel.

“Your job is a fierce skepticism toward authority, and you weren’t doing that. You were beating up on people who were dissenting,” he said, as Bash tried to push back.

WATCH:

The exchange intensified when Kennedy pressed Bash on one of the most politically protected claims of the pandemic era.

“Do you think the COVID vaccine protected children?” Kennedy asked, putting the CNN host in the uncomfortable position of having to defend the narrative with actual evidence.

Bash responded by saying she had “talked to scientists and doctors,” which is usually Washington shorthand for trusting the same credentialed class that got plenty wrong and paid no real price for it.

Kennedy kept pressing, asking, “Can you show me one study that shows children were protected by the COVID vaccine?”

He continued the challenge, saying, “That vaccine did more good than harm to children. Can you show me one study that shows that?”

Bash then pivoted to the familiar media script about “vaccine disinformation,” claiming that vast numbers of Americans could have been saved if more people had accepted the shot.

“I can tell you that when it comes to the vaccine, there have been studies that show that because of vaccine disinformation, disinformation, there could have been 100 to 200,000 lives in the U.S. saved. But because people didn’t get the vaccine,” Bash said, before Kennedy interrupted and she snapped, “Let me finish!”

Kennedy was not buying the lecture, especially from a network that spent the pandemic blasting fear driven graphics across the screen while treating government claims as settled truth.

“You are saying nonsense. You are saying something that you cannot show me a single study,” Kennedy said.

“I am not saying nonsense,” Bash replied, while Kennedy added, “You are talking what somebody told you… cite me the study. What study?”

At that point, Bash grew visibly frustrated and shouted back, “What studies are you talking about? You’re talking about studies that actually don’t exist.”

That was a bold move from a host who was making sweeping claims of her own while resisting Kennedy’s demand for specific evidence.

“This is not productive. I am not here to defend all of the practices,” Bash said, and Kennedy answered, “You want to talk about assertions that you can’t support? I’ll get there in a second. Let me just say, for the record, that I am not saying that the entire way that the COVID reaction was accurate. It was a scary time, and people made mistakes. Absolutely,” Bash stammered.

Kennedy cut through the media fog with a blunt charge about what CNN did during those long months of lockdowns, mandates, and social pressure.

“You were scaring people,” he said, as Bash lost control of the exchange.

“Because that was the job of CNN to put the chyrons up about how many people are dying.”

Bash fired back, “We were trying to be. We were listening to the leaders. in this country, including the president who had a daily press conference explaining what was going on and trying to listen.”

Kennedy then asked the question that many Americans wish had been asked by major media outlets years ago.

“Were you reading the science yourself?” he said, as Bash tried to move away from the subject.

WATCH:

The moment captured exactly why trust in corporate media has collapsed.

Americans watched officials, anchors, and approved experts demand obedience, silence critics, and label dissent dangerous.

Now, when someone asks them to show their work, the same crowd suddenly wants to change the subject.

For CNN, it was another reminder that lectures about misinformation land differently when the public remembers who spent years amplifying fear, defending censorship, and sneering at anyone who dared to ask questions.

Watch the ful interview below:

Talarico Claims the Bible Commands Washington to Run Your Health Care [WATCH]
News

Talarico Claims the Bible Commands Washington to Run Your Health Care [WATCH]

/

Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico is now making the case that Scripture does not merely encourage Christians to care for the sick, but demands that government guarantee health coverage.

That was the pitch he delivered to a Texas church crowd, where the Austin Democrat wrapped a public insurance plan in New Testament language.

Talarico made the remarks during a July 20 town hall at a church in DeSoto.

His campaign later posted footage of the event on Saturday under the title “James Talarico Unveils Plan For Black Voters.”

The candidate told the audience that America should “finish the work of President Obama” by passing a public option.

Then he moved from Democrat policy shop talk into the pulpit, arguing that the Gospels point straight toward government backed health insurance.

“Because health care is a human right. It is not a privilege,” Talarico said.

For Talarico, the argument was not only political. He told the crowd he wanted to speak from Scripture because of the church setting, then presented the healing ministry of Jesus as a policy blueprint for Washington and Austin.

“If you read our scriptures, if you read the New Testament, what does Jesus spend most of his time doing? It’s not preaching, it’s not teaching, it is healing. Healing the sick,” Talarico said.

“And in Matthew 25, scripture says that’s how we will be judged and how we will be saved. By healing the sick, by feeding the hungry, by welcoming the stranger, by visiting the prisoner.”

That is quite a leap, even by the normal standards of campaign season theology.

WATCH:

Jesus healed the sick through divine power and personal mercy, while Democrats keep insisting the same moral category includes another government program, another entitlement, and another layer of bureaucrats between patients and doctors.

Talarico’s campaign platform calls for letting every American buy into Medicare through a public option, regardless of age.

It also includes drug price negotiation and caps on out of pocket costs, the familiar progressive checklist dressed up with church language for a receptive crowd.

The Democrat also pointed to his work with Republicans in the Texas state House to cap insulin copays at 25 dollars per prescription.

Still, he argued that Texas has the largest number of uninsured residents in the country and used that statistic to press for a larger government role.

“So this is an emergency across the state of Texas,” Talarico said.

Conservative Christians have not exactly been lining up to applaud the sermon.

Critics on the religious right have accused the seminary trained Democrat of twisting the faith into a campaign brochure and turning salvation language into a sales pitch for progressive policy.

Some writers have called his politics “blasphemous” and described his message as a “works-based” gospel that rewrites the core meaning of Christian salvation.

Other outlets, friendlier to his approach, have noted that his campaign platform can read like the New Testament, which tells voters plenty about the branding effort underway.

The backlash is not difficult to understand.

Christians have long believed that caring for the sick, feeding the hungry, and helping prisoners are personal and church obligations rooted in faith, charity, and obedience to God.

Talarico is taking that spiritual duty and trying to convert it into a mandate for government health coverage.

In other words, the Good Samaritan apparently needed a federal benefits office, a public option, and a campaign consultant.

The political stakes are not small.

Talarico is running close against Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton in a Senate race that could help decide control of the chamber.

His campaign has also pledged 25 million dollars toward black voter outreach.

The DeSoto event, packaged as a plan for black voters, fits neatly into that larger push.

The church health care remarks also fit a broader pattern from Talarico, who has repeatedly used religiously charged language to attack conservatives.

He has described laws restricting gender affirming procedures for minors and Texas abortion restrictions as products of a “Christofascism movement.”

That kind of rhetoric makes his latest appeal to Scripture even more pointed.

When the Bible is useful to sell a Democrat program, Talarico quotes the Gospels, but when Christians defend unborn children or parental rights, he reaches for inflammatory labels.

“Health care is truly a human right for every single person in this state,” Talarico said.

Voters in Texas will now decide whether they see Talarico’s message as sincere faith in action or just another progressive policy agenda wearing a Sunday morning suit.

Either way, the race is becoming a high profile test of whether religious language can make bigger government sound like a biblical command.

RFK Jr. Says Fauci’s Diary Leaves Americans With Serious Questions [WATCH]
News

RFK Jr. Says Fauci’s Diary Leaves Americans With Serious Questions [WATCH]

/

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said newly released diary entries attributed to former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci reveal a significant gap between Fauci’s private discussions and his public statements during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Kennedy made the remarks while discussing recent congressional proceedings involving Fauci and the publication of diary entries that Kennedy argued raise new questions about the government’s handling of the pandemic’s origins.

According to Kennedy, the most significant issue is not simply what was written in the diaries, but what he described as a contradiction between Fauci’s private conclusions and his public messaging.

“Yeah, I mean the most disturbing thing about that hearing was, and about the release of his diaries, was the huge delta between what he was saying privately and what he was telling us publicly,” Kennedy said.

He argued that the differences between Fauci’s private writings and his public comments deserve closer examination because they involve one of the central questions surrounding the pandemic’s origin.

Kennedy pointed to an entry he said was written in January 2020.

“And you know, one of the one of the clear examples, sorry, clear examples of that is that in January of 2020, he says in his diaries that he just met with the 16 scientists and that they all agreed this could not have come from the wet market.”

According to Kennedy, Fauci’s public comments changed immediately afterward.

“Yet the very next day he was telling Americans that it came from the wet market, and that’s the story he continued to spin for the next two years.”

WATCH:

Kennedy argued that the example illustrates what he believes is a broader pattern reflected throughout the diary entries.

“There’s so many examples of that in his diary,” he said.

WATCH:

The comments come as debate over the origins of COVID-19 and the federal government’s response to the pandemic continues years after the initial outbreak.

Congressional investigations, document releases, and testimony from current and former government officials have continued to draw attention to decisions made during the earliest stages of the pandemic.

Kennedy said that restoring public confidence in government institutions requires officials to present consistent information to the public and to be transparent when communicating about issues affecting public health.

Rather than focusing solely on scientific disagreements, Kennedy argued that public trust ultimately depends on whether government officials communicate honestly and consistently.

He said the discrepancies he believes are reflected in Fauci’s diary entries have made that task more difficult.

Kennedy concluded by arguing that rebuilding confidence in public institutions requires credibility from those leading them.

“We need to restore trust,” Kennedy said. “And the way you do that is by being trustworthy.”

WATCH:

WATCH:

Trump Scraps Iran Strike After Iran Agrees to Peace Deal Framework [WATCH]
News

Trump Scraps Iran Strike After Iran Agrees to Peace Deal Framework [WATCH]

/

President Trump said Saturday night that he called off a planned US attack on Iran after Tehran and other Middle Eastern governments agreed to the framework of a potential peace deal. The decision came with a very clear warning attached, because this was not exactly a group hug at the United Nations.

In a Truth Social post, Trump made plain that American forces were not bluffing.

“The U.S.A. is locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II,” he wrote.

Trump said Iran and other governments in the region asked the United States “to hold off any attack” because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”

That is quite a change in tone from Tehran, which has spent years pretending threats and proxy chaos were a winning strategy.

According to the president, the proposed agreement would require the “Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT” and “an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.”

Those are not small asks, and they cut directly to the core of the regime’s favorite leverage points.

For Trump, the message was straightforward. Iran can choose a deal that benefits the region and preserves its own future, or it can test American firepower and find out whether Washington’s patience has truly run out.

“Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack,” Trump wrote.

He added that the decision depends on the parties being able to “rapidly make a DEAL.”

Trump also made clear that Israel is standing with him. “The Country of Israel joins me in this commitment,” he wrote, signaling that Jerusalem is part of the same pressure campaign and not drifting from Washington’s position.

WATCH:

The announcement landed one day after reports that American and Israeli planners were considering strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure.

That possibility would have hit the regime where it hurts, which may explain why the suddenly diplomatic mood appeared in such convenient fashion.

Tehran had already warned that any strike on its energy sector would lead to retaliation against oil and gas facilities in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Israel.

In other words, the regime reached for its usual playbook, threaten everyone else’s stability when its own power structure feels pressure.

The region had been sliding toward a wider confrontation after Iran fired ballistic missiles toward US forces in Jordan earlier this week.

The attack marked a dangerous escalation in a conflict that had already been grinding on for five months.

US air defenses intercepted the missiles before American and Saudi forces answered with strikes on militia targets in Iraq linked to Tehran’s network.

US warplanes also resumed attacks inside Iran, putting the regime on notice that the days of cost free provocation may be over.

The latest fighting followed the collapse of a fragile June memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran.

That arrangement fell apart last month after Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in and around the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global energy markets.

Administration officials have said that any renewed negotiations must begin with Iran agreeing to a ceasefire.

They also want Tehran to stop attacks on US forces, commercial shipping and America’s Gulf allies, which sounds like the bare minimum expected from a government that claims it wants peace.

Trump has continued to insist that the Strait of Hormuz remain open and that Tehran abandon its nuclear ambitions.

Those conditions are likely to remain the test of whether Iran is serious, or merely buying time while hoping the West falls for another round of diplomatic theater.

For a president who campaigned on strength abroad and restraint with American lives, the move fits a familiar Trump pattern.

He put the military option on the table, made sure everyone knew it was real, then paused when adversaries started moving toward terms.

The key question now is whether Iran follows through quickly, as Trump demanded.

If the regime tries to stall, spin or cheat, the president has already told the world that the United States is ready, and this time the mullahs may want to believe him.

From AIDS to COVID: Fauci’s Past Statements Spark Fresh Controversy [WATCH]
News

From AIDS to COVID: Fauci’s Past Statements Spark Fresh Controversy [WATCH]

/

Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow is calling for renewed scrutiny of former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, arguing that the longtime public health official should publicly answer questions about his role in shaping the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

During a recent discussion, Marlow questioned why Fauci has not provided further public explanations for decisions made during the pandemic, despite previously saying he was prepared to defend his actions.

“If Fauci is not a criminal, why wouldn’t he explain himself as a public servant?” Marlow asked.

He argued that Fauci should be “serving the public now by answering these fundamental questions about why the things that controlled our lives-that had paddleboarders arrested off of the coast in California, that had our children locked away from their schools so that they would have mental health crises, learning setbacks, people losing their jobs, people losing their livelihoods over this.”

Marlow said the public deserves accountability because of the widespread impact of pandemic-era policies.

“How come he doesn’t need to be accountable to the public if he was such a great public servant?” he said.

As part of his argument, Marlow pointed to comments Fauci made in 2022, when the former health official said he would continue answering questions about his work.

Marlow quoted Fauci as saying, “I will always answer questions. I’m prepared to defend my positions, I will talk it through with curious minds who are in positions of power and influence.”

Marlow questioned why, in his view, that willingness is no longer evident.

“How come that is not applying now, when he’s already been pardoned by Big Joey Biden and his auto pen?” he said.

“So either the pardon is not legitimate, and that’s why he’s concerned, or the pardon is legitimate, and he needs to answer questions because he’s not going to incriminate himself anyway.”

According to Marlow, obtaining those answers remains important regardless of any legal issues surrounding the pardon.

“We just need to get answers because this can never happen again,” he said.

“People died, people suffered. America became a worse place because of this man, and he needs to be held to account.”

Marlow also argued that Fauci’s tenure before the COVID-19 pandemic deserves renewed examination.

He said the public should revisit Fauci’s handling of the AIDS epidemic during the early 1980s before introducing archival video of Fauci discussing AIDS transmission.

In the clip, Fauci said, “Brings in the implications that there are other ways, just plain close contact, and given the the long incubation period of this disease, we may be starting to see, as we’re seeing virtually as the months go by, other groups that can be involved, and and seeing it in children is really quite disturbing.”

When asked to elaborate, Fauci continued, “Well, for example, if if the close contact of a child as a household contact.

Perhaps there will be a certain number of cases of individuals who are just living with and in close contact with someone with AIDS or at risk of AIDS, who does not necessarily have to have intimate sexual contact or share a needle, but just the ordinary close contact that one sees in normal interpersonal relationships.”

WATCH:

After playing the clip, Marlow argued the comments reflected what he believes was a longstanding pattern in Fauci’s public messaging.

“That’s from 1983, and that’s a precursor to his ability to lie through his teeth about a pandemic, about a virus, because it’s not politically good for him,” Marlow said.

He continued by asserting, “We all know that AIDS tends to spread through gay sex and sharing needles, gay sex between males in particular, and he’s acting as though children could get it through the air and touch. That’s pandering to left-wing political people. It’s always been inside of him; it always has.”

Marlow argued that the issues surrounding Fauci should remain the subject of congressional oversight. He said lawmakers should continue investigating not only Fauci but also officials who worked under him during the pandemic.

“We should have known 40 years ago, but we know now,” Marlow said. “Now he needs to get held to account.”

He also questioned what consequences could follow future congressional proceedings.

“He’s going to be held in contempt of the Senate. Does that mean jail time?” Marlow asked.

“What about all the people who knew who were underneath him that this was the real Anthony Fauci? They need to be hauled in front of the Senate. They need to be held to account.”

Marlow concluded by urging lawmakers not to end their oversight efforts.

“This cannot stop,” he said.

“We need to push harder.”

WATCH:

Peter Navarro Says Hydroxychloroquine Was Ready; Fauci Slammed the Brakes Despite Diary Confession [WATCH]
News

Peter Navarro Says Hydroxychloroquine Was Ready; Fauci Slammed the Brakes Despite Diary Confession [WATCH]

/

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said he believes hydroxychloroquine was an effective early COVID-19 treatment and accused former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci of helping prevent its widespread distribution during the pandemic.

Navarro made the remarks while reflecting on disagreements he said he had with Fauci during the Trump administration’s response to COVID-19.

He began by acknowledging that many people remain skeptical of the medication.

“Is hydroxychloroquine? I would guess, not knowing your views on this, that you think hydroxychloroquine is is a quack medicine.”

Navarro then explained why he disagrees with that assessment.

“But let me tell you this: this is one of the many fights I had with Tony Fauci.”

According to Navarro, later research has reinforced his view of the drug’s safety and usefulness.

“Hydroxychloroquine, we now know going forward with all the studies, is number one, it’s a very safe medicine.”

He also argued that the medication has value as a preventive treatment.

“Number two, it’s particularly effective for prophylaxis, which which helps first responders.”

Navarro added that he believes the drug can provide benefits when administered early in the course of an infection.

“And number three, it has a it has a decent benefit in the first seven days of an infection.”

Navarro said the Trump administration had already acquired a large supply of the medication that he intended to distribute nationwide.

“So, I had a million tablets of hydroxy sitting in warehouses, ready to be dispensed to the American people.”

He argued that the medication could have saved many lives if distribution had moved forward.

“And I take this to the bank peers. If I had been able to do that, 1000’s of Americans would be alive.”

Navarro then explained why he believes the medication was never broadly distributed.

“Now, where does Fauci come into this?” And this is where the blame is.”

According to Navarro, Fauci initially supported the use of hydroxychloroquine during the early weeks of the pandemic.

“In March of 2020, Fauci, in his diary, several diary entries is on record saying that hydroxychloroquine is very very safe.”

Navarro said Fauci initially favored making the drug widely available.

“He wanted it distributed immediately.”

Navarro contrasted that with Fauci’s position on remdesivir.

“He wanted remdesivir to be to go through trials, not the other way around. And he was all for it.”

Navarro argued that Fauci’s position changed after President Donald Trump publicly endorsed hydroxychloroquine.

“The politics changed radically when President Trump said, ‘Hey, let’s try hydroxychloroquine.’ There was like a this just mass insanity in the left wing media.”

Navarro said Fauci changed his position as public debate intensified.

“Fauci flipped with that.”

He also alleged Fauci influenced federal regulators to prevent broader distribution of the medication.

“And he was part of the pressure on the FDA to prevent this administration and me specifically from able being able to do what I did.”

Navarro said he continues to hold Fauci responsible for what he believes was a missed opportunity during the pandemic.

“So when you ask me, do I give any slack to Tony Fauci? I say, absolutely not.”

WATCH:

Florida vs. the Swamp: AG Uthmeier Battles Biden Judge Who Shut Down Citizenship Voting Checks [WATCH]
News

Florida vs. the Swamp: AG Uthmeier Battles Biden Judge Who Shut Down Citizenship Voting Checks [WATCH]

/

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said the state is continuing its legal fight to preserve access to a federal citizenship verification database that he argues is essential for protecting election integrity and prosecuting voter fraud.

Uthmeier made the remarks while discussing a case involving allegations of illegal voting by a non-citizen and the state’s ongoing efforts to maintain access to the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database.

According to Uthmeier, the individual in the case “faces two thirds degree felonies, voting by a non-citizen elector, and false affirmation, and up to 10 years in prison.”

He said the investigation relied on the federal database used to verify citizenship status.

“Building this case was possible because of the Save database, which allows states to look up citizenship data and ensure only Americans vote in our elections.”

Uthmeier noted that Florida reached an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security last year that expanded the state’s access to the database.

“Last year, Florida signed a landmark agreement with the Department of Homeland Security that requires free access to the Save database with improved search capabilities.”

He added that the agreement was intended to provide long-term certainty for the state’s election officials.

“That agreement is judicially enforceable for 20 years.”

“Future administrations cannot walk away from it.”

Uthmeier then criticized a recent court ruling that he said interrupted the state’s ability to use the database.

“Yet Biden-appointed Judge Sparkle Spookanan overstepped her authority and blocked access to the Save database.”

According to Uthmeier, the ruling has made it more difficult for Florida to verify voter eligibility.

“Her activist ruling makes it harder to verify citizenship and slows our ability to hold aliens accountable for stealing votes in Florida elections.”

He said the state is challenging the order in court.

“But no, we will not back down, and we are currently fighting her unlawful order in court to protect the integrity of every American ballot.”

Uthmeier argued that verifying citizenship is a key part of maintaining confidence in the election system and enforcing Florida’s election laws.

He said the state intends to continue pursuing cases involving alleged election fraud and will seek to hold offenders accountable under existing law.

Uthmeier emphasized that Florida’s legal challenge is focused on restoring access to the SAVE database and preserving what he described as an important tool for election officials and law enforcement.

He concluded by reiterating the state’s position on election-related offenses.

“Here in Florida, we do and will always take election fraud seriously, and we will hold violators accountable.”

WATCH:

Useful Idiot Liberal Professor Recoils as Mamdani Tax Machine Comes for His Property [WATCH]
News

Useful Idiot Liberal Professor Recoils as Mamdani Tax Machine Comes for His Property [WATCH]

/

Scott Galloway, the left wing commentator and NYU professor who has made a comfortable brand out of blasting President Trump and nodding along with big government politics, is suddenly discovering something conservatives have warned about for years.

The government machine does not stay aimed only at the people you dislike.

Galloway is now objecting after New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration published a searchable database tied to a proposed pied à terre tax, aimed at owners of valuable second residences in the city.

The irony is thick enough to pave Fifth Avenue.

According to the report, the database was released by the city’s Department of Finance and allows users to search properties while viewing the names and addresses of owners whose non primary residences could fall under the proposed tax.

A department spokesperson reportedly said the publication of the property roll was required by state law, which is the usual bureaucratic shrug when government decides ordinary privacy is optional.

Galloway, who apparently had no problem with aggressive left-wing taxation in theory, sounded a little less enchanted once his own name landed in the government spotlight.

“I’ve been doxed,” the liberal professor announced on the podcast.

He continued, “I don’t know if you’ve heard, but Mayor Mamdani has decided to release a list of the 950,000 residences with addresses and names that might be eligible for his pied à terre tax.”

That is the thing about class warfare politics, it sounds bold and righteous at cocktail parties until the mob starts reading from a list that includes your address.

Co host Kara Swisher, not exactly a voice from the conservative wilderness, also seemed uncomfortable with the move.

“I don’t love this,” Swisher said.

“I can’t say I love this. It feels a little bit like doxing. Just tax them and get on with it is my feeling.”

That comment captures the mindset perfectly.

The problem, in her view, is apparently not the punitive tax grab itself, but the messy public naming part that makes the ruling class feel a little exposed.

For years, the left has sold tax hikes as moral theater, where successful people are cast as villains and politicians ride in as heroes with spreadsheets.

Now Mamdani’s administration appears to have added a public shaming component, and some of the same people who cheered big government are noticing that bureaucrats are not famous for restraint.

Galloway was especially sharp in describing the city’s approach.

“He’s taken a legitimate source of tax revenue, and he’s turning it into a wanted poster,” he said of Mamdani’s tax list.

WATCH:

Galloway also questioned the point of putting names and addresses in front of the public, especially in a political climate where anger can move quickly from online outrage to real world danger.

That concern is not hard to understand, even if it is rich coming from a political universe that routinely treats privacy and due process as inconveniences when the target is on the right.

The Mamdani administration’s database reportedly focuses on owners who may be subject to the proposed tax on valuable second homes.

In practical terms, that means the city is taking a revenue proposal and attaching to it a public list that critics say could invite harassment or worse.

Conservatives have long argued that once government gets addicted to targeting disfavored groups, it rarely stops where its cheerleaders promised.

Today it is wealthy second home owners, tomorrow it can be small landlords, business owners, political donors, or anyone else who becomes useful in the next campaign speech.

There is also a deeper lesson here for blue city voters who keep empowering politicians who see private property as a piggy bank.

When voters hand power to ideologues who believe government should punish success, they should not act shocked when those ideologues start building tools to identify exactly who owns what.

Galloway’s sudden discomfort is revealing because it shows how quickly abstract left wing policy becomes personal when the tax collector turns up at the professor’s own door.

He is not wrong to be alarmed about a government list that can be searched by name and address, but he is late to the party.

The conservative critique has always been simple.

Government power does not become safer just because the person wielding it uses progressive slogans.

Mamdani’s tax push may have been packaged as another hit on the wealthy, but the backlash from Galloway shows that even liberals can recognize a warning flare when it lands on their own lawn.

For New Yorkers already tired of being treated like walking revenue streams, this episode is another reminder that left wing governance always starts with promises of fairness and somehow ends with more taxes, more lists, and less privacy.


Scroll to Top