News

News

Ohio Dad Poses as 11-Year-Old Daughter in TikTok Trap, Shoots Alleged Rapist Twice [WATCH]

An Ohio father allegedly took justice into his own hands after discovering that his 11-year-old daughter had been sexually assaulted inside the family home. Police say the father posed as the girl on TikTok, lured the suspected attacker back to the residence, and shot him twice.

Malik Chandler, 31, was charged with felony assault following the July shooting at his Grove City home. The wounded man, identified as 20-year-old Diego Montoya Gonzalez, now faces rape and child exploitation charges stemming from a deeply disturbing investigation.

Prosecutors said the shocking chain of events began when the girl’s mother found a video on her daughter’s phone. Authorities allege the recording showed Montoya Gonzalez sexually assaulting the child inside the family’s home.

The discovery is the kind of nightmare that makes any decent parent’s blood boil. According to investigators, Chandler responded the next day by taking control of his daughter’s TikTok account and pretending to be the girl.

Authorities said Chandler used the account to persuade Montoya Gonzalez to return to the home. Once the young man arrived, the confrontation quickly turned violent, leaving him wounded by two gunshots.

Chandler reportedly told investigators that his original plan was to beat Montoya Gonzalez, detain him, and call police. He said the situation escalated when he believed Montoya Gonzalez was reaching into his pocket for a firearm.

The father then grabbed his own gun from a counter and opened fire, according to the account he gave investigators. Police have not indicated that a weapon was recovered from Montoya Gonzalez during the confrontation.

When officers arrived, they reportedly found Montoya Gonzalez sitting in a chair with two gunshot wounds. Emergency personnel transported him to Grant Medical Center in Columbus for treatment.

Chandler was arrested and charged with felony assault, while a judge set his bond at $100,000. The criminal case means the father must now answer for the shooting even as prosecutors pursue serious allegations involving his daughter.

The law does not provide parents with a free pass to arrange violent confrontations, no matter how revolting the underlying accusation may be. Still, the stark difference between the bond amounts in the two cases is certain to raise eyebrows among Americans already frustrated with the justice system.

A grand jury indicted Montoya Gonzalez on Friday on five counts of pandering sexually oriented material, two counts of rape, and one count of obstruction of official business. Those charges substantially widened the case beyond the alleged assault involving Chandler’s daughter.

Prosecutors allege investigators found several videos on Montoya Gonzalez’s phone depicting the sexual abuse of children. One recording allegedly involved an infant or toddler, adding another sickening layer to an already horrifying case.

The girl’s parents attended Montoya Gonzalez’s arraignment Monday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court. A judge imposed a $20,000 recognizance bond along with a $50,000 cash bond, according to local reports.

If Montoya Gonzalez secures his release, he has been ordered to avoid all contact with the girl and her family. The court also barred him from using the internet for anything outside of employment, an especially notable restriction given the allegations surrounding digital videos and TikTok.

The Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office did not immediately provide additional information about the cases. Chandler and Montoya Gonzalez now face separate legal battles arising from one grim episode, with a child and her family left at the center of a case no parent should ever have to endure.

News

Hasan Piker Blasts Democrat Voters as ‘Islamophobic Pieces of Sh*t’ [WATCH]

Political commentator Hasan Piker criticized Democrats who opposed Abdul El-Sayed during Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary, accusing them of Islamophobia and arguing that they should now unite behind the party’s nominee ahead of the general election.

Piker, who has publicly supported El-Sayed, made the remarks during a livestream following the conclusion of the Democratic primary. His comments targeted Democrats who had criticized El-Sayed throughout the campaign and who, according to Piker, were now calling for the nominee to repair divisions within the party.

During the broadcast, Piker rejected the suggestion that El-Sayed bears the responsibility for mending relationships with Democrats who opposed his candidacy.

“Everyone being like, ‘Abdul has a fuck-ton of work to do mending bridges’, here’s the fucking take nuke for you: You are all unbelievably Islamophobic pieces of shit. You literally called the dude a fucking terrorist for months on end and called him a sexist, misogynist, terrorist, bad candidate, fake doctor when he has two fucking degrees. And now you’re going to say sit there and be like, ‘you really gotta come to me now.’ What are you talking about? Do you wanna win or not? LOCK THE FUCK IN.”

The remarks came after El-Sayed secured the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate seat. As the campaign shifts toward the general election, Democrats will be seeking to unify supporters who backed different candidates during the primary contest.

Piker’s comments quickly drew attention online because of both the language he used and his accusation that opposition to El-Sayed was motivated by anti-Muslim bias. His statement focused on what he described as months of criticism directed at El-Sayed during the primary campaign, including accusations that questioned his qualifications and character.

El-Sayed, a physician, has frequently highlighted his educational background during his political career. In his comments, Piker referenced that background while responding to critics who questioned El-Sayed’s credentials.

Following the livestream, Hot Air columnist Ed Morrissey responded to Piker’s comments, arguing that they reflected a broader ideological mindset rather than an effort to persuade skeptical voters.

“The arrogance of Piker is astonishing to behold, and at the same time hardly surprising,” Morrissey wrote.

He continued by addressing what he views as the relationship between socialist politics and Islam, writing:

“Many wonder at how the Left can embrace socialism and Islam at the same time. Piker’s declaration here makes it clear: both socialism and Islam require submission. And that is precisely what Piker is demanding now that the primary is finally over. And in this case, it’s Piker who’s making Islam the issue, not to mention Israel.”

The exchange added another point of debate to an already closely watched Michigan Senate race. El-Sayed’s campaign has attracted support from a number of progressive activists and public figures, while also drawing criticism from political opponents during the primary season.

With the Democratic nomination now decided, attention is expected to shift toward the general election, where party leaders typically seek to consolidate support from voters who backed other candidates during the primary.

Piker’s comments instead focused on those Democrats who opposed El-Sayed during the nomination contest, arguing that they—not the nominee—should be responsible for moving past the divisions created during the campaign.

The discussion also prompted broader commentary about political priorities within progressive circles. Morrissey argued that issues receiving attention from activists have shifted over time, specifically referencing debates surrounding Israel.

As the general election campaign begins, Piker’s remarks and the reaction they generated underscore the continuing divisions that emerged during the Democratic primary and the challenges the party may face as it works to unify its coalition before November.

News

Trump Class Battleship Fleet Could Hit Staggering $275 Billion, CBO Warns

The Navy’s proposed Trump class guided missile battleship program could carry a staggering total price tag of $275 billion, according to a Congressional Budget Office report released Wednesday. The first nuclear powered BBG(X) alone is estimated to cost $23.4 billion.

President Donald Trump’s administration announced plans in December to pursue a new class of large surface combatants bearing the Trump name.

The ambitious proposal would put unmatched firepower at sea, but it would also test a shipbuilding industry already struggling with delays, overruns and workforce limitations.

The envisioned warship would displace approximately 35,000 tons and become the most heavily armed surface vessel ever constructed for the United States Navy.

Its arsenal could include air defense missiles, land attack weapons, anti ship missiles, hypersonic systems, nuclear cruise missiles, powerful lasers and a rail gun.

“If built to those specifications, the ship would be the largest surface combatant in the world and larger than any surface combatant built for the Navy since World War II,” the CBO report stated. That would give the fleet a capital ship with a scale not seen in generations.

“It would be more than three and a half times the size of the Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer and more than twice the size of the Zumwalt-class guided missile destroyer.” In plain English, this would not be another modest procurement experiment cooked up by Pentagon bean counters.

The Navy currently projects that it could build 15 Trump class guided missile battleships between 2028 and 2056.

After the $23.4 billion lead ship, each of the remaining 14 vessels is estimated to cost approximately $18 billion.

For comparison, the USS Gerald R. Ford, America’s premier nuclear powered aircraft carrier, cost about $13.3 billion.

Trump's War Drive Leaves Iran Costs Unclear as White House Pushes Massive Military Budget
A man in a suit with a red tie talks from a lectern indoors as three other men stand behind him.
President Donald J. Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, center right, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, left, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, right, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new Navy battleships at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., Dec. 22, 2025.

That means each Trump class battleship could cost considerably more than the Navy’s newest carrier, even before the usual Washington cost creep starts chewing through taxpayer dollars.

The CBO also warned that the total tonnage of “large surface combatants to be constructed would need to increase by 60 percent,” by 2058.

The report added that such an increase “could be a challenge for the shipbuilding industry.”

That may qualify as bureaucratic understatement. American shipyards would have to dramatically expand output while retaining skilled workers, strengthening strained supply chains and continuing construction of other vessels demanded by the fleet.

The shift toward larger surface combatants would require shipyards to produce 12 percent more tonnage by 2035 under the Navy’s 2027 plan than under its 2025 proposal.

That increase would arrive while the service remains committed to building two DDG 51 destroyers each year.

Democrats Mock Trump-Class Battleships, Demand Drone-First Military

To meet the Trump class schedule, the Navy would need to deliver roughly one battleship every other year from 2028 through 2056. Doing that while sustaining destroyer production would demand the sort of industrial discipline Washington has discussed for years but too rarely delivered.

A Government Accountability Office report released last March documented nearly two decades of disappointing progress across American shipbuilding.

Too few ships have been completed, new vessels have failed to perform as expected and some deliveries have arrived as much as three years late.

Shelby S. Oakley, a GAO director, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that unrealistic assumptions about schedules and costs have drained resources and created additional delays.

She said Navy programs and shipbuilders have been “effectively made to operate in a perpetual state of triage.”

That troubled record does not make the battleship concept unsound, but it does expose the gulf between an impressive weapons blueprint and an operational ship delivered on time.

Trump’s vision is muscular and appropriately focused on restoring American maritime power, yet Congress and Navy leadership will need to keep contractors from treating the program like another open ended federal cash machine.

Democrats Mock Trump-Class Battleships, Demand Drone-First Military

Nuclear propulsion could provide meaningful savings over the ships’ service lives because the Navy would not have to purchase conventional fuel for them.

The GAO, however, did not estimate how much those reduced operating expenses might offset the immense cost of construction.

The projected cost has already moved sharply since the December announcement.

The updated $23.4 billion estimate for the first ship is roughly $6 billion higher than the Navy’s initial projection, making strict oversight essential before steel is cut and invoices begin landing on Capitol Hill.

If the Navy can master the industrial challenge, the Trump class could become a fearsome centerpiece of American sea power and a blunt message to China, Russia and every hostile regime watching the horizon.

If the shipbuilding establishment repeats its old habits, however, the $275 billion program could become a monument to delays, excuses and gold plated procurement.

News

Trump Charms Vegas Crowd After Saving Little Boy and Torching Biden with Perfect Quip [WATCH]

President Donald Trump went to Las Vegas on Wednesday to sell an economic message, rally Republicans, and remind Nevada voters why they sent him back to the White House. Then a little boy nearly stole the entire show, as reported by Red State.

The scene unfolded at the Red Rock Casino in Summerlin, where Trump was touting his agenda ahead of the November midterms. The crowd came for politics, policy, and a little Trump-style entertainment, and they got all three.

A major focus of the event was the president’s “no tax on tips” proposal, the kind of kitchen table issue that resonates in Nevada far more than the usual Beltway lectures. Trump has credited the idea with helping him win the state in 2024, and judging from the Vegas crowd, voters have not forgotten it.

Trump’s Laugh-Out-Loud Endorsement of Susan Collins Wrecks Leftist Opponent

The president signed the policy into law last year as part of his One Big Beautiful Bill. In Las Vegas, where service workers know exactly how much government can take before a paycheck even gets home, the pitch was not exactly hard to understand.

To highlight the impact, Trump brought a local family onto the stage. Sandra, a waitress at a Las Vegas casino, joined him alongside her husband, Brad, a police officer, and their two young children.

The couple spoke about how tax relief on tips and overtime had helped their household. That is the sort of thing working families notice, even if liberal economists on television prefer to pretend the only real economy exists inside a spreadsheet.

Sandra and Brad also thanked Trump for his new Trump Accounts program. The public-private partnership allows families to open investment accounts for minor children, giving parents another way to build a financial foundation for the next generation.

Then Sandra’s little boy decided he had his own contribution to make. As his mother began speaking, looking understandably nervous in front of a packed room and the president of the United States, the child started wandering away from his father.

The boy made a beeline toward the steps and drifted a little too close to the edge of the stage. Trump noticed immediately, stepped in, and gently pulled him back to safety before returning him to his mother.

The moment was quick, but it was pure Trump. He handled the situation like a grandfather, kept the child safe, and then did what Trump does better than any politician alive: he found the punchline.

“I don’t want him to be Biden and fall off the stage.” The crowd did not need a fact check from some liberal media hall monitor to understand the reference.

After years of Americans watching Joe Biden stumble through speeches, stairs, directions, and basic geography, the line landed exactly where it was supposed to land. Trump took a potentially tense second and turned it into a laugh, all while keeping the little boy from taking a tumble.

It was also a tidy little contrast in instincts. Trump saw a child near danger and moved fast, which is more executive action than Washington has seen from plenty of Democrats in years.

The rally itself had plenty of Las Vegas flavor. Retired heavyweight champion Mike Tyson was in attendance, as was Rick Harrison of Pawn Stars, giving the event the kind of celebrity backdrop only Trump seems able to draw without looking like he is begging Hollywood for approval.

Still, even with Tyson and Harrison in the room, the pint-sized wanderer became the unexpected star. The boy’s name was not immediately known, but he managed to create the most replayable moment of the day without saying a word.

Trump did not seem to mind being briefly upstaged. If anything, the exchange gave him exactly the kind of human moment campaigns crave, but consultants can never manufacture.

The event began as a policy pitch about lower taxes, family savings, and relief for working Americans. It ended with a toddler, a quick save, and a Biden joke that practically wrote itself.

That is the Trump formula in full. Serious policy for people who work, a little showmanship for the crowd, and just enough humor to drive the political class absolutely crazy.

Nevada voters heard about tips, overtime, family investment accounts, and the broader economic message Trump is taking into the midterms. They also got a reminder that politics does not have to be delivered in the lifeless language of Washington committees and Democrat talking points.

For the family onstage, the day was about thanking the president for policies that helped them financially. For the audience, it was a memorable rally moment wrapped in classic Trump timing.

And for everyone watching the clip afterward, it was another reminder that the former reality television star turned president still knows exactly how to command a stage, even when a toddler gives him a serious run for his money.

News

Bernie Sanders Spins a Whopper as Socialist Agenda Gets Too Toxic to Defend [WATCH]

Sen. Bernie Sanders appears to have discovered a sudden respect for political moderation, or at least the campaign season version of it, as reported by Townhall.

The Vermont socialist, who has spent decades dragging the Democratic Party toward the fever swamps of the left, now wants voters to believe the radical ideas attached to his movement are somehow imaginary.

During an appearance on Pod Save America, Sanders insisted that “no serious person I know who is running for office believes in defunding the police” or supports open borders.

That line may sound comforting to nervous Democrat strategists watching the midterm map, but it lands with a thud for anyone who has paid attention to the candidates Sanders has championed.

This is not a case of Republicans inventing a scarecrow. The left built the scarecrow, put it on a campaign flyer, raised money from it, and then acted shocked when normal Americans noticed.

Candidates Sanders has supported and appeared with have openly embraced ideas that would have been considered fringe even by old-school liberals not long ago.

Darializa Avila Chevalier and Claire Valdez, both connected to Sanders-style socialist politics, have campaigned on ideas ranging from abolishing prisons to mass amnesty and defunding federal immigration enforcement.

Then there is U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico, who once declared that “prison is violence” during a public appearance.

That is not a law-and-order platform. That is the kind of faculty lounge slogan that makes working families wonder whether anyone on the left has ever had to call 911 after midnight.

Sanders wants to pretend that no serious candidate supports these positions, but the problem for him is that the Democratic Socialists of America have put the radicalism in writing.

The group’s platform calls for abolishing ICE, ending police immunity, and ending “mass incarceration” by “fully abolishing the police and prison system,” along with the “legalization of migration.”

Those are not conservative talking points. Those are their own words, their own agenda, and their own vision for America, served up without the polite packaging Sanders is now trying to slap on it.

The timing of Sanders suddenly playing cleanup man is not exactly mysterious.

Democrats are staring at a midterm electorate that has grown tired of open border chaos, rising crime, and activists who treat police officers like villains while treating illegal immigration as a civil right.

That is a tough sell outside deep blue activist circles, and Sanders seems to know it.

Across New York and other progressive strongholds, Democratic Socialists tied to the Sanders and Mamdani wing of the party have been beating incumbents who were already far to the left by any normal American standard.

In other words, the party is not drifting back to the center. It is being pulled even harder toward socialism, and Sanders is one of the main reasons that happened.

Now that the brand is becoming politically radioactive, he wants to blur the edges and reassure voters that nobody important really means the crazy stuff.

That might work on a podcast friendly to the left, but it is a harder act to pull off in communities dealing with the consequences of soft-on-crime policies and border anarchy.

Americans do not need a lecture from Sanders about what his movement supposedly believes. They can read the platforms, watch the rallies, and listen to the candidates he has helped elevate.

The radical left has told the country exactly what it wants: fewer immigration limits, weaker law enforcement, fewer consequences for criminals, and more government control over everyday life.

Republicans should not let Sanders get away with laundering socialism through soothing campaign season language.

If the Democratic Socialists want to abolish ICE, abolish prisons, and legalize migration, they should own it loudly and let voters decide whether that sounds like a sane country.

The more Sanders insists that no serious candidate believes these things, the more obvious the dodge becomes.

He is not refuting the radical agenda. He is trying to hide it before patriotic Americans send Democrats another message at the ballot box.

The left spent years chanting, marching, and fundraising on these ideas.

Now Bernie Sanders wants voters to believe it was all just a misunderstanding, which is quite a convenient story from the man who helped make socialism fashionable in the modern Democratic Party.

News

Coast Guard Museum Countdown Begins as Historic Opening Draws Near

After decades of planning, setbacks and determined effort, the National Coast Guard Museum is finally approaching the finish line. The long awaited facility is scheduled to open next summer along the Thames River in New London, Connecticut.

The 80,000 square foot museum will honor the maritime service across three floors of exhibits, interactive displays and immersive experiences. More than 5,000 photographs and 600 artifacts will help tell the Coast Guard’s story of courage, readiness and service.

Among the signature pieces will be an MH 60T Jayhawk helicopter and the Medal of Honor awarded to Signalman First Class Douglas Munro. Munro, the Coast Guard’s only Medal of Honor recipient, led the rescue of Marines under enemy fire during the Battle of Guadalcanal in 1942.

Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Kevin Lunday said the institution will go far beyond displaying historic equipment. He said it “will illuminate the hard earned lessons of the sea.”

“This museum is a permanent tribute to the Long Blue Line, the generations of crews who have saved lives, defended our borders and maritime approaches, facilitated vital commerce, and responded to crises with little or no warning,” Lunday said in a Tuesday news release.

Those missions have made the Coast Guard an indispensable part of American national security, even if Washington has not always given the service the recognition it deserves. The new museum aims to correct that oversight by placing generations of sacrifice before the American public.

Supporters have pursued a national museum for the Coast Guard since at least 2001. Officials initially hoped to establish it in New London’s historic Fort Trumbull neighborhood, but the waterfront property was tied up in a bitter eminent domain dispute.

That legal fight reached the Supreme Court, which ruled for the city in 2005, yet the anticipated development never materialized. In 2013, New London donated another waterfront parcel, while Connecticut pledged $20 million to breathe life back into the project.

Congress provided nearly $50 million in 2022, clearing the way for a keel laying ceremony and the beginning of construction on the main building. Then Commandant Adm. Linda Fagan said the museum would allow the service to “share our history and the stories with the American public.”

“Today was a beautiful day in New London and for the Coast Guard,” Fagan said at the time. The federal government followed with another $50 million last year to complete construction of the facility.

Once the Coast Guard museum opens, every armed service except the Space Force, which was established in 2019, will have a national museum. The Navy’s existing museum is currently closed because of aging infrastructure and its location on an active military installation.

The National Museum of the Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, traces its history to 1923 and is the world’s oldest military aviation museum. The National Museum of the Navy opened at the Washington Navy Yard in 1963, although fundraising is underway for a modern and more publicly accessible facility elsewhere in Washington.

The National Museum of the Marine Corps opened in Quantico, Virginia, in 2006, while the National Museum of the United States Army opened at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, in 2020. The Coast Guard’s entry will complete another important chapter in preserving America’s military heritage.

Retired Capt. Wes Pulver, president of the museum association, said completing the project represents “incredible dedication, vision and partnership.” He thanked the Coast Guard and everyone who kept the mission moving despite years of legal, financial and construction hurdles.

“We are deeply grateful for the Coast Guard’s steadfast support throughout this journey and look forward to continuing our collaboration as we build a museum worthy of the remarkable men and women who have served our nation. Together, we are ensuring their stories will inspire generations to come,” Pulver said.

The museum is scheduled to welcome the public on Aug. 2, 2027, followed by a formal dedication on Coast Guard Day, Aug. 4. That date will mark the 237th anniversary of Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton’s establishment of the Revenue Cutter Service, the Coast Guard’s historic predecessor.

“By bridging our rich history with the challenges of tomorrow, we are creating a dynamic foundation to inspire the next generation of leaders ready to answer our nation’s call,” Lunday said. For a service whose crews routinely run toward storms, smugglers and danger, the national tribute has been a long time coming.

News

Detective Ambushed in California Desert While Serving Search Warrant, Suspect Dead [WATCH]

A San Bernardino County sheriff’s detective was shot Wednesday afternoon while serving a search warrant in the high desert community of Littlerock, just east of Palmdale.

The attack triggered a major law enforcement response in a rural stretch of Los Angeles County where the quiet can turn ugly fast.

The detective, described in some reports as a San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department investigator, was hit by gunfire near East Avenue R and 130th Street.

Officials said the shooting happened at about 3:15 p.m., during the execution of a search warrant.

Because the shooting occurred in Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department is handling the investigation.

That means LASD homicide investigators are now working through the scene, the timeline, and the grim question of how a warrant service turned into gunfire.

The wounded detective was airlifted to Antelope Valley Hospital for treatment after being struck in the lower ribcage.

Authorities had not released the detective’s name, and details about the full extent of the injuries remained limited as officials worked the case.

The suspect accused of opening fire died at the scene, according to authorities.

Officials have not released the suspect’s identity or explained exactly how the suspect died, a familiar pause while investigators sort evidence before the public gets the fuller story.

Television news helicopters showed deputies and investigators spread across the desert neighborhood, with yellow tape cutting through the otherwise empty landscape.

Additional law enforcement personnel gathered outside Antelope Valley Hospital while the detective received care, a visible reminder that these incidents ripple through every badge in the region.

WATCH:

Littlerock is not downtown Los Angeles, and that is part of the point.

Once you leave the packed freeways and political theater behind, the desert opens into long roads, scattered homes, and plenty of places where criminals apparently think they can operate without much interference.

That assumption has been taking a beating lately.

Just one day earlier, Los Angeles Port Police and other agencies were involved in a major takedown of an alleged Sinaloa cartel meth operation in a remote desert area, with three suspected gang members arrested.

Two desert law enforcement operations in two days is not exactly the tourism brochure California officials like to print.

While Sacramento polishes slogans and the left lectures the rest of the country about compassion, officers are the ones walking into the ugly places where narcotics, gangs, and guns collide.

Early reports said the detective was serving a narcotics search warrant when gunfire erupted.

One scene account stated the detective was transported to a hospital and was in stable condition, while also noting that the adult male suspect was killed at the location and that no other injuries were reported.

“Thoughts with the detective and his family. Stay safe out there.”

That simple line says what decent people across California and the country are thinking.

The detective went to work, followed a warrant, and ended up being flown to a hospital because someone allegedly answered lawful authority with bullets.

This is the reality behind the polished arguments from the anti police crowd.

Search warrants do not serve themselves, cartel poison does not seize itself, and violent suspects do not politely wait for a social worker with a clipboard to explain community healing.

The high desert has long been used by smugglers, growers, gangs, and assorted lowlifes because isolation gives them room to hide.

When deputies and detectives push into those areas, they are not performing some abstract policy exercise, they are entering terrain where backup may be minutes away and danger can be instant.

The investigation will determine the sequence of events, including who fired, when, and what evidence was recovered during the warrant operation.

Those facts matter, and responsible agencies will be expected to lay them out clearly when the case permits.

What is already clear is that the law and order debate is not theoretical for the men and women sent into places like Littlerock.

While politicians posture, officers keep doing the work that civilized society requires, even when the desert answers with gunfire.

The detective’s condition will be watched closely as the investigation continues under LASD.

For now, one suspected gunman is dead, one detective is recovering, and California has another reminder that public safety collapses fast when criminals decide the law is optional.

News

Rand Paul Says Fauci Contempt Vote Has Votes as DOJ Referral Looms [WATCH]

Sen. Rand Paul is moving quickly to turn Dr. Anthony Fauci’s silent Senate performance into a contempt fight, and the Kentucky Republican says he believes the votes are already lined up.

Paul, who chairs the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, is preparing a committee vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after the former top federal health official refused to answer questions under subpoena, as reported by Fox News.

Fauci appeared before the panel last week for what was expected to be a major confrontation over the federal government’s COVID-19 response, the Wuhan lab leak theory, and the risky research questions that have followed him for years.

Instead, the man who spent the pandemic lecturing Americans from every available television camera invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly and declined to answer lawmakers’ questions.

“I think there is a very good chance that we will win the vote,” Paul told Fox News Digital.

If the committee approves the contempt resolution, Paul said he intends to move fast and send the matter to the Department of Justice.

“The next step will be when we send the referral over directly to the Department of Justice,” he said.

Paul introduced the contempt resolution Tuesday. The measure states that once the committee reports it out, the matter would be referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

That would put the Biden-era health bureaucracy’s most famous face squarely in the hands of federal prosecutors, assuming the Justice Department is willing to treat congressional oversight like something more than an inconvenience.

Paul and Fauci have clashed for years over the origins of COVID 19, federal funding tied to research in China, and the public health decisions that reshaped American life during the pandemic.

For grassroots conservatives, the Paul and Fauci showdowns became one of the few moments in Washington where someone actually pressed the COVID establishment instead of applauding it.

The Kentucky Republican has accused Fauci of misleading the public and has argued that the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director should face serious consequences.

Paul has also sought to force answers on whether the virus emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and whether federal money helped support dangerous research connected to that question.

Last week’s hearing was supposed to be the culmination of that long fight. Instead, Fauci’s lawyers advised him to refuse to answer, and he invoked his constitutional rights more than 100 times.

After making an opening statement explaining that he would not answer questions, Fauci said little beyond repeated invocations of the Fifth Amendment.

The silence immediately escalated the confrontation. Paul responded by preparing a contempt vote designed to compel testimony from a figure who has long been protected by media allies and praised by Democrats.

The issue is further complicated by former President Joe Biden’s pardon of Fauci before leaving office. Biden granted Fauci a full and unconditional pardon for actions taken from Jan. 1, 2014, through Jan. 19, 2025.

Paul suggested at the close of the hearing that the pardon may not settle every question surrounding Fauci’s refusal to testify.

“I think there’s another legal question that the courts may have to decide upon, and that is whether or not a presidential pardon offers you complete immunity,” Paul said as the hearing closed.

When asked to elaborate, Paul did not lay out the full argument publicly, but made clear the matter would be part of the referral.

“It’s a good legal discussion, and we will make those legal points to DOJ in sending the referral over,” Paul said.

Rand Paul Uncovers Private Messages Showing COVID Paper Authors Quietly Questioned Their Own Claims

The contempt push places Fauci back at the center of a debate many in Washington would rather bury. Millions of Americans remember the lockdowns, school closures, mandates, shifting guidance, and smug certainty from officials who rarely admitted error.

Paul’s move signals that Senate Republicans are not finished asking who knew what, who funded what, and why so many questions were treated like conspiracy theories until evidence made them impossible to ignore.

If the committee vote succeeds, the next test will be whether the Justice Department handles the referral seriously. Conservatives will be watching closely, because accountability in Washington has a funny way of disappearing when the target is a favored member of the liberal establishment.

For now, Paul is betting that the votes are there, the record is clear, and Fauci’s refusal to answer has only made the demand for answers louder.

News

Chris Cuomo Shrugs at Kids with COVID Vaccine Heart Damage [WATCH]

Chris Cuomo has a gift for reminding Americans why CNN finally ran out of patience with him.

His latest vaccine commentary did not just flirt with arrogance, it pulled up a chair, grabbed a microphone, and tried to sell heart inflammation in children as a statistical inconvenience.

Cuomo left CNN in 2021 under the kind of cloud that usually prompts a little humility.

Naturally, humility was not on the menu, because the former prime time scold has never seemed especially burdened by self awareness.

The backstory still matters because it explains the messenger.

Cuomo was accused of advising his brother Andrew Cuomo during the sexual harassment scandal that helped end the elder Cuomo’s governorship, all while Chris was still pretending to be an independent journalist on national television.

Then came reports from the New York attorney general’s office that Chris Cuomo had allegedly used media contacts to gather information about women accusing his brother of misconduct.

Even CNN, hardly a monastery of journalistic virtue, eventually decided that was too much.

During the pandemic, Cuomo also turned his own COVID experience into televised melodrama from home.

Americans were already getting a daily fog machine of guidance from Anthony Fauci, the NIH, and the CDC, so Cuomo’s theatrical contribution fit right in with the national confusion.

Now he is back with podcast wisdom, which apparently means defending COVID shots for children by arguing that the most alarming risks were not widespread enough to bother the grown ups in charge.

That is quite a position when the subject is heart damage in kids.

On his Chris Cuomo Project podcast, Cuomo said, “The risks early on are really isolated to young males and for one potential exposure, which is myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart.” He also said, “For girls it was a fraction of that.”

Then came the part that should make every parent sit up straight. Cuomo asked, “Now, did some kids get bad cases? Did some kids get horrible [myocarditis]? Yes. Very, very, very few compared to the number of kids that had lesser symptoms or didn’t get sick and didn’t have any complications from COVID.”

He added, “It’s not even a close call.”

WATCH:

There it is, the familiar expert class shrug, wrapped in numbers, delivered with the confidence of a man who assumes your child will not be the unlucky one.

This is the same old routine from the pandemic era.

First, the risk is dismissed as rare, then when the risk becomes harder to ignore, the public is told the sacrifice was necessary for some noble greater good.

That may sound neat in a studio or basement podcast setup, but it lands differently at the kitchen table of a family whose son developed myocarditis after being told the shot was safe, responsible, and socially required.

For them, the word rare is not a comfort, it is a reminder that their child became part of the fine print.

Cuomo’s argument also leans on the idea that vaccinated children had lesser symptoms or avoided complications because they got the shot.

That claim was repeated endlessly by the same crowd that told Americans to trust the science while treating dissent like thought crime.

The inconvenient reality is that vaccinated people still caught and spread COVID.

The sweeping certainty about reduced illness, especially when comparing broad populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated people, was never as tidy as the public relations campaign made it sound.

There are still serious unanswered questions about how many men, women, and children experienced lasting complications after the vaccine rollout.

Those questions deserve scrutiny, not a Cuomo lecture about how the numbers supposedly make the damage acceptable.

No decent parent evaluates heart inflammation in children like a cable news graphic.

If even a small number of kids suffered serious harm from a medical product pushed with relentless government, media, and corporate pressure, then the public deserves answers without the smug dismissal.

The people who spent years demanding obedience now seem irritated that Americans want accountability.

Funny how the same elites who preached compassion suddenly become cold accountants when the cost is paid by someone else’s child.

Cuomo may think he is playing the voice of reason, but he is really showing how warped the pandemic establishment became.

When heart damage in children can be waved away because it affected “Very, very, very few,” the problem is not just the argument, it is the moral blindness behind it.


Scroll to Top