News

Trump’s Election Bombshell Is Only Half the Story, Did You Catch the Rest of It? [WATCH]
News

Trump’s Election Bombshell Is Only Half the Story, Did You Catch the Rest of It? [WATCH]

/

Political commentator Susan Kokinda argued that President Donald Trump’s Thursday night address was designed to expose what she described as a cover-up within the U.S. intelligence community regarding election vulnerabilities, while also pointing to separate remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as part of a broader discussion about election security and political violence.

Kokinda began by arguing that comments from Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan reflected what she believes is at stake in the debate over election legislation.

“Weeks before President Trump gave his Thursday night address, a Democratic senator let slip what was really at stake,” Kokinda said.

She then played remarks from Slotkin discussing the Save Act.

“The other thing that we blocked yesterday was the Save Act, right, which was literally, literally allow this administration to rig our democracy so that it would be hard for any Democrat in any state to win any election,” Slotkin said.

Kokinda argued that Slotkin’s comments underscored Democratic opposition to voter identification requirements.

“There you have Senator Elissa Slotkin, nominally from Michigan, but really channeling her CIA training, admitting that her party can’t win if the U.S. adopts the kind of voter identification laws that most of the other civilized nations in the world use,” Kokinda said.

According to Kokinda, Trump’s address was intended to build support for the Save America Act while also drawing attention to intelligence related to election security.

Trump said during his address that election integrity is fundamental to public confidence.

“No country can be great without fair and honest elections. You have to trust your country because if there can be no trust, there can be no greatness. Unfortunately, the system we have today falls catastrophically short of that standard. Tonight, I’m announcing the immediate declassification and release of critical intelligence, revealing shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure,” Trump said.

Kokinda maintained that the significance of the speech extended beyond the specific intelligence documents.

“Now, the fire hose of details is going to dominate the news about China, 220 million voter files, hack systems, non-citizens on the payroll, and other vulnerabilities,” she said. “People with more time than I have are going to parse every page of the now declassified documents, and that’s important. But don’t get drowned in the details. That wasn’t the president’s main purpose anyway.”

She continued, “The importance of what he did on Thursday was to drag the cover-up into the daylight. That’s what he wants you to see: that officials inside our own intelligence agencies work to keep the China findings away from the president and away from you.”

Kokinda also referenced allegations involving an FBI official.

“One FBI official even boasted that she was running a quote shadow government unquote to keep the intelligence buried. Let that sink in,” she said.

She then pointed to comments from Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin regarding the handling of intelligence under the previous administration.

“There’s no question the intelligence community from the FBI, CIA, and even other places within DHS, not underneath President Trump’s leadership, but that was underneath the Biden administration, kept it from President Trump and the American people in Congress,” Mullin said. “Everybody that purposely misled the American people abused their power and their authority, and decided not to continue doing their job will be held accountable.”

Kokinda argued that there were two methods used to minimize the president’s address: criticism of its contents and limited television coverage.

She later quoted Mullin again as he questioned why major broadcast networks did not carry Trump’s speech.

“So ABC and NBC not carrying that. Why? What are they trying to cover up? Why wouldn’t they want to inform the American people? Why are they calling themselves a news outlet if they’re not actually trying to put the news out there?” Mullin said.

“The president wasn’t trying to relitigate what happened in 2020, although he definitely could at this point. The president was getting facts: what we have exposed, what the Biden administration covered up, what the intelligence community held from with with the from the American people, Congress, and the executive branch, and we’re putting it out there, and yet two major networks didn’t want to cover it. I think the question really should say why.”

Kokinda also discussed a voter registration investigation in Muskegon, Michigan, involving GBI Strategies, describing it as an example of why Trump referenced the state during his address. She recounted allegations that local officials identified thousands of voter registration applications with similar handwriting before the matter was investigated and later transferred to the FBI.

The commentator then shifted to remarks delivered earlier that day by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during a State Department ministerial on political terrorism.

“And before I proceed, I’m going to go off script for a minute, which is always dangerous, but I’m going to remind everyone in this room and all the media that I was the subject of an assassination attempt, February 2024, by a addled left wing activist two hours after being sworn into my jobs. So, any of you who want to report that. This is a fiction and does not exist. Be there for the sentencing this August,” Bessent said.

Kokinda argued that Bessent’s comments represented what she called “the other half of the story,” linking political violence with election integrity concerns.

She then highlighted portions of Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s address discussing historical acts of left-wing political terrorism.

“You remember the machine gun massacres of Italy’s Red Brigades, which held the five-time prime minister captive for 55 days before subjecting him to a revolutionary so-called people’s trial, and executing him in 1978, you remember the Red Army faction’s nearly three-decade campaign of bombings, kidnappings, and assassinations in Germany, murdering dozens and injuring hundreds more,” Rubio said.

Kokinda identified the historical figures referenced by Rubio, including former Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro, Deutsche Bank Chairman Alfred Herrhausen, and Detlev Rohwedder, arguing that each represented leaders pursuing national sovereignty before being assassinated.

Rubio concluded his remarks by describing what he characterized as the motivations behind political terrorism.

“It has always been driven by a hatred, above all else, a hatred for civilization itself. It is a revolt of the worst against the best, a revolt of the weak and the cowardly against the strong, and the good, it is perpetrated by those who cannot build, who cannot create, who cannot achieve great things,” Rubio said.

Kokinda concluded by arguing that the president’s address and the remarks delivered by Rubio and Bessent should be viewed together, contending that one focused on election-related intelligence while the other addressed the historical use of political violence, which she said represented two separate challenges confronting the United States.

WATCH:

California Bureaucrats Chase Jobs Away as Texas Lands Another Major Win [WATCH]
News

California Bureaucrats Chase Jobs Away as Texas Lands Another Major Win [WATCH]

/

It is becoming a familiar story in modern America. Another high-paying industrial project flees California’s tangled bureaucracy and finds a new home deep in the heart of Texas.

The latest example comes from Saronic Technologies, a company specializing in drone ship manufacturing, which initially promised a $3.2 billion investment in Solano County, only to shift course and take its business, jobs, and economic impact to Brownsville, Texas.

WATCH:

The decision reflects a glaring truth about California’s leadership under Governor Gavin Newsom.

The state’s endless regulatory hurdles, uncooperative local leadership, and anti-industry attitude continue to drive away companies that might otherwise invest billions and create generational prosperity for working families.

That kind of blindness has become a hallmark of California politics.

Saronic Technologies had hoped to contribute to President Donald Trump’s initiative to rebuild America’s naval shipbuilding capacity, an objective tied directly to strengthening national security and economic independence.

Yet, despite the strategic importance of such work, California officials, both at the county and state levels, appeared lethargic, even indifferent, toward helping the project move forward.

Vacaville Mayor John Carli was one of the few enthusiastic advocates for the project.

He urged every level of local and state government to fast-track the project, reminding leaders of the region’s historical connection to naval service and shipbuilding at Mare Island.

His pitch was logical and patriotic.

Unfortunately, it was met with silence and bureaucratic caution.

Now, 10,000 jobs and an estimated $264 billion in economic benefits are heading south to Texas.

WATCH:

This is not new.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s announcement of Saronic’s move makes it clear why California lost yet another major investment.

Texas offered what California no longer can: an efficient workforce, modern infrastructure, clear logistics, and an open door to business.

The state also committed to partnering with local colleges and universities to develop workforce training and apprenticeship programs connected to the company’s needs.

That kind of forward thinking is how an economy is built.

While Texas embraces opportunity, California continues to suffocate it.

The Golden State has chosen bureaucracy, environmental extremism, and political ideology over blue-collar prosperity.

It should not surprise anyone that businesses are heading for friendlier territory where they can build, expand, and actually hire.

Brownsville, once just a quiet border town, is fast becoming one of America’s new industrial frontiers.

The arrival of Saronic’s facility only adds to a wave of growth that began when Elon Musk placed SpaceX’s launch site nearby in 2014.

The city and Cameron County have since embraced private enterprise with enthusiasm, turning their region into a success story of how pro-business, pro-growth leadership transforms a local economy.

Texas’s recipe for prosperity is simple and effective. Local and state governments collaborate instead of compete.

They clear red tape rather than create it.

Companies see tax incentives, development zones, and partnerships instead of political lectures.

The results speak for themselves, and Brownsville’s booming port is now a model for industrial renaissance.

The Port of Brownsville is attracting billions in additional investments.

NextDecade Corporation began work there on its massive Rio Grande LNG project in 2024, representing more than $25 billion in capital spending.

The expansion has created a steady stream of high-skill energy jobs and secured Texas’s place in the global energy market.

On top of that, America First Refining has started construction on what will be the nation’s first major refinery built since 1979.

Once that refinery becomes operational around 2028, it will process more than 160,000 barrels per day of light crude from the Eagle Ford Shale and Permian Basin.

These are the kinds of projects that build a middle class and a national economy, yet California regulators seem obsessed with making sure they never happen in their own state.

Governor Newsom may proudly claim that California remains the fifth-largest economy in the world, but that comes despite his leadership, not because of it.

The truth is California’s prosperity still rides on the momentum built decades before his administration.

The private sector continues to fight a daily battle against overregulation, soaring taxes, and suffocating energy policies that drive up costs for families and small businesses alike.

Meanwhile, Governor Abbott’s Texas has surged ahead. He inherited what was the twelfth-largest economy when he took office in 2015.

Less than a decade later, the Lone Star State ranks eighth globally. That kind of leap does not happen by accident.

It happens because Texas welcomes builders, inventors, and risk-takers while California punishes them.

Every time Texas wins another investment that California could have secured, it highlights two competing versions of America’s economic future.

One focuses on practical results, self-reliance, and growth. The other obsesses over politics, regulation, and virtue signaling.

The scorecard speaks for itself, and once again, Texas comes out on top.

California politicians may still believe they are leading the nation, but in the real economy where jobs and innovation live, the action has moved elsewhere.

Brownsville is booming, and Texas is thriving.

The message could not be clearer: if you want to build America’s future, you do it in a place where government helps instead of hinders.

God bless Texas.

Terrifying Video Shows Hikers Staring Down Massive Grizzly On Alaskan Trail [WATCH]
News

Terrifying Video Shows Hikers Staring Down Massive Grizzly On Alaskan Trail [WATCH]

/

Three unsuspecting hikers in Alaska found themselves in a real-life showdown when a massive grizzly bear blocked them on a narrow trail, transforming a peaceful day of wildlife watching into a nerve-shredding confrontation straight out of a survival movie.

The hikers, exploring the rugged terrain of the Anan Creek Wildlife Observatory in southeast Alaska, had been watching black bears fish for salmon earlier in the day before the mood shifted instantly as a full grown grizzly appeared around a sharp bend.

The bear, known locally as Scuba Sue, was searching for salmon at a time when the annual run had yet to begin.

Speaking later on “Fox and Friends Weekend,” the hikers recounted every tense second of the face-to-face standoff.

Dr. Michelle Lynn Thaller explained that their hearts were pounding when the animal suddenly appeared, closing the distance before they could even process what was happening.

“Right around the corner came this grizzly bear,” Thaller recalled, her voice still shaking with the memory.

Video from the moment captures just how close the bear came to the group.

It ambled toward them with heavy steps, seemingly unfazed by their presence as it dominated the narrow trail with nowhere to turn.

The hikers immediately remembered their ranger briefing and relied on it to stay calm under enormous pressure.

Hiker Tanya Thompson admitted she was “definitely terrified,” describing how they struggled to think clearly while remembering the park’s guidance.

“We remembered what the rangers told us, which was what you said, to be big, talk to the bear, keep it calm and get out of its way,” Thompson said, recalling how she tried to steady her voice as the enormous creature inched closer.

“There was no place where we met the bear to get off the path. So we had to back up a little bit in order to get off so she could run forward,” she added.

The group had no real escape route.

Thick brush surrounded them on both sides, and any sudden movement could have triggered a charge.

Their third companion, Tony Cutraro, pointed out that the park rangers had warned them about the area being deep grizzly country.

Signs of bears were everywhere, from deep paw prints in the mud to half-eaten fish bones scattered along the trail. Yet even with that knowledge, no one expected such a heart-stopping encounter at such close range.

For long seconds that felt like hours, the group spoke in firm but calm voices, addressing the bear as it watched them carefully.

The footage shows the animal deciding to move on, sauntering past as if it owned the trail, which, in all honesty, it did.

Once the bear disappeared into the woods, the hikers finally let out the breath they had been holding.

Thaller said one detail made the encounter even more dangerous.

The salmon run, the main event that keeps bears well-fed, had been delayed this year.

“That was something that actually made me a little bit nervous because these bear are here to fish salmon. The salmon were not running yet, and these bears, they’re hungry. They’re waiting for the salmon to come,” she explained.

WATCH:

Hungry bears with fewer food options are more unpredictable and quicker to see humans as threats, or worse, as alternatives.

Although the hikers escaped unharmed, their brush with Scuba Sue underlines why Alaskan wilderness demands both respect and preparation.

Rangers at Anan Creek have long advised visitors that bears there are familiar with people but still wild and powerful predators.

It takes one wrong move, one loud shout, or one person sprinting away for a peaceful viewing to turn into a deadly chase.

According to the National Park Service, anyone who finds themselves too close to a bear should always identify themselves by talking calmly so the animal recognizes a human presence rather than prey.

They urge people to avoid running away because it triggers the bear’s chase instinct.

The key advice, as these hikers illustrated, is to stay calm, back up slowly, and give the bear room to make the next move.

Wildlife rangers also remind tourists that bear country is never for the careless or the unaware.

Every summer, Alaska’s majestic landscape draws thrill seekers, photographers, and hikers who sometimes forget that the wilderness is not a playground.

Those who venture in must understand they are stepping into the home territory of some of the most powerful animals on the continent.

The video from the encounter has quickly spread online, both terrifying and fascinating viewers who marvel at how the hikers managed to keep their composure.

People who have visited Alaska before recognize that moment of fear all too well when the reality of nature’s raw power becomes impossible to ignore.

What the hikers experienced might sound like an adventure story fit for social media, but anyone who has spent time in bear country knows it could have ended much worse.

Their quick thinking, level heads, and attention to safety training likely saved their lives.

The wilderness is breathtaking, but as this story reminds everyone, it commands respect.

Even the most breathtaking views can turn dangerous in a blink when you share them with a hungry grizzly.

Alaska remains one of the last places where raw nature still rules, and Scuba Sue made that point with her silent, lumbering stride down that narrow trail.

Fox News Host Tears Apart Socialist Guest’s Nonsensical Immigration Claim [WATCH]
News

Fox News Host Tears Apart Socialist Guest’s Nonsensical Immigration Claim [WATCH]

/

Martha MacCallum deserves a medal for keeping such composure during one of the more bizarre interviews on Fox News this week.

Her guest, Gustavo Gordillo, co-chair of the New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, ventured onto “The Story” to talk about socialism and immigration.

What he offered instead was an incoherent defense that left viewers shaking their heads in disbelief.

MacCallum began with a straightforward question about Gordillo’s own family background.

They immigrated to the United States from Peru during the bloody Shining Path period of the 1990s, when Maoist guerrillas wreaked havoc across the country.

One might assume his family fled for safety and opportunity, the kind of story that defines the American dream. But Gordillo saw it differently.

According to him, the real reason his family fled Peru was not because of the chaos created by violent communist insurgents.

It was, somehow, the fault of “capitalism” and “American imperialism.”

That imaginative spin had even MacCallum’s famously steady demeanor faltering for a moment as she pressed him to clarify.

“Your family came here from Peru really in the middle of the heat of the Shining Path,” MacCallum said.

“They were Maoist communist guerrillas in Peru. So why did your family come to America?”

Gordillo responded with a carefully rehearsed but empty answer.

“The economic situation in South America and Peru was in a really bad place… much of what we could say was responsible for that actually was the imposition of capitalism and American imperialism,” he declared.

He went on to say, “In many cases, it is actually what brings immigrants to the U.S. coming out of Latin America.”

The host tried to wrap her mind around that logic.

“They come here because they don’t like the imposition of American imperialism in the country that they’re in,” she repeated, trying to confirm.

Gordillo doubled down: “Yes.”

At that moment, MacCallum spoke for millions of Americans watching.

She responded simply, “That doesn’t make much sense.”

Her blunt reaction summed up the mood perfectly.

Because it makes absolutely no sense.

WATCH:

If the United States is supposedly guilty of “imperialism,” why are immigrants from socialist and unstable nations fleeing here by the millions?

No one escapes the failures of socialism just to run toward more socialism.

Yet in leftist logic, America is both the oppressor and the ultimate refuge.

Gordillo’s comments are a textbook example of the warped worldview that dominates the modern left.

They despise America’s influence globally but cannot explain why desperate families choose our nation over the socialist utopias they promise elsewhere.

The contradiction is stunning.

What Gordillo and others like him ignore is that Latin Americans flee because of socialist corruption and economic collapse.

They leave countries riddled with government control, not overrun by capitalism. Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua are perfect examples.

In each case, socialism drove people out by the thousands.

The very ideology Gordillo pushes has destroyed entire economies and crushed hope.

MacCallum managed the moment with her classic calm demeanor. Many hosts would have laughed or ended the interview right then and there.

Instead, she let Gordillo’s logic collapse under its own weight.

It was a small but powerful reminder of why real journalists who ask simple, honest questions can do more to expose absurdity than any shouting match ever could.

The conversation also exposed the intellectual weakness of the Democratic Socialists of America.

This is a movement that rails against the capitalist system while fully enjoying its benefits in the United States.

Its activists rant about oppression from the comfort of American universities, media outlets, and social platforms that exist precisely because freedom allows them to.

Martha MacCallum did not need to humiliate her guest outright. She simply let the facts speak for themselves.

America remains the destination of choice because capitalism, freedom, and opportunity still mean something real.

Even those who claim to hate this country cannot seem to stay away from it.

The exchange quickly went viral, not because it was shocking, but because it perfectly illustrated the divide in political thinking today.

Conservatives love to deal in reality.

The radical left prefers to twist ideology into knots trying to make the impossible sound rational.

For every Gustavo Gordillo spouting Marxist tropes about imperialism, there are millions of immigrants grateful to America for giving them a chance at life, safety, and prosperity.

They know firsthand that the only thing worse than capitalism is life without it.

MacCallum’s measured takedown will likely be remembered as one of those “only on live TV” moments where logic briefly triumphed over nonsense.

It was a small but satisfying win for common sense, captured perfectly in one short phrase that America could use a lot more of these days: “That doesn’t make much sense.”

Randi Weingarten Melts Down at Teachers Convention Screaming About Trump and Vodka [WATCH]
News

Randi Weingarten Melts Down at Teachers Convention Screaming About Trump and Vodka [WATCH]

/

Randi Weingarten, the loud and perpetually agitated president of the American Federation of Teachers, put on a spectacle at the union’s national convention in Washington, D.C., proving once again that few can rival her flair for performative outrage.

Videos from the event show her leaping, shouting, and working herself into a frenzy over former President Donald Trump and what she calls “the power of the people.”

In front of thousands of educators, healthcare workers, and public employees, Weingarten delivered what was billed as her State of the Union address, but it quickly turned into an anti Trump tirade that felt more like a pep rally for the radical left than a professional gathering of educators.

“We will change the trajectory of this nation and secure a better future for all,” she shouted, pounding her fists and hopping around as the crowd cheered.

Weingarten framed her message as a fight against “concentrated wealth and political power,” a favorite trope of left wing activists who love to rail against billionaires while collecting union dues from public employees.

She declared, “Yes, the other side has enormous power. But this is what they don’t have, the power of the people.”

Her self congratulatory sentiment ignored the fact that her union establishment has wielded enormous influence for decades, shaping education policy at every level of government.

What followed was a moral sermon that compared Trump and his supporters to “chaos, cruelty, and corruption,” while presenting her own movement as angelic defenders of good.

She even name dropped Martin Luther King Jr. to paint her crusade as a noble struggle for “an America where hate has no home.”

It was political theater at its finest, complete with the dramatic flair of a woman whose audience thrives on outrage.

She proudly declared, “We use our power for good, against chaos, cruelty and corruption.”

The irony was lost on no one.

Many parents across the country associate her tenure with chaos in the classroom, cruelty toward families who opposed prolonged school lockdowns, and corruption within the teacher union machine that ensures political donations continue to flow into Democrat coffers.

At one point, clearly feeling empowered by her own rhetoric, she blurted out, “Oh, and one more thing, we get sh*t done.”

That line earned raucous applause from the crowd, though it served more as a slogan of entitlement than a statement of accomplishment.

After all, Weingarten’s union presided over years of learning loss, declining test scores, and growing parent frustration.

The convention did not end with her speech. During a panel discussion, Weingarten revealed just how deep her contempt for Trump runs.

She joked that her Trump Derangement Syndrome is so intense that it drives her to drink.

“What Donald Trump does, whether you consider him an authoritarian or not,” she said, “is the throwing out of so much stuff that people just throw up their hands and say, ‘Oh no, what are we going to— all I want to do is stay home,’ and for those of us who drink, have a glass of wine, or for me, some vodka.”

WATCH:

She said it with a smirk, but the comment spoke volumes.

The head of one of the nation’s largest teachers unions admitted on stage that her obsession with Trump pushes her toward the bottle. It was a rare moment of honesty in a day filled with slogans and posturing.

Later, another clip surfaced showing her at a Pride of the Union reception, again red faced and shouting about billionaires as if she was leading a revolutionary brigade.

She gleefully cheered on her fellow union activists and screamed about corporate greed, though no one seemed to point out that the union’s own financial empire is substantial.

Weingarten’s chaotic display quickly spread online, with many Americans shaking their heads at the spectacle.

For parents who endured years of school closures and political indoctrination in classrooms, the sight of the nation’s top teachers union leader melting down over Trump was a perfect illustration of what has gone wrong in public education.

While Weingarten framed her tirade as a rallying cry for democracy, her antics resembled a staged performance meant to keep union members fired up against political opponents rather than focused on student achievement.

After all, test scores are down and trust in education leaders continues to plummet. Yet Weingarten’s answer seems to be more shouting, more politics, and apparently, more vodka.

For those keeping score, it was less a State of the Union address and more a state of alarm from a liberal operative who cannot let go of her hatred for Donald Trump.

To the crowd of true believers, it was thrilling.

To the rest of America, it was just another example of unhinged union leadership turning schools into battlegrounds for left wing politics.

Iranian Strikes Kill Two American Service Members in Jordan as Tehran Escalates Regional Aggression [WATCH]
News

Iranian Strikes Kill Two American Service Members in Jordan as Tehran Escalates Regional Aggression [WATCH]

/

Two American service members were killed in Jordan after Iranian forces launched missile and drone strikes on a United States base Friday, a chilling reminder that Tehran’s aggression is far from contained. U.S. Central Command confirmed the deaths Saturday, along with news that one additional service member is still missing.

CENTCOM’s statement on X said, “On July 17, two U.S. service members in Jordan were killed in action as U.S. Central Command and partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks. Additionally, one service member is currently missing.”

The command added that four wounded service members had been treated and released from Jordanian hospitals, while others with minor injuries had returned to duty.

The Pentagon has withheld the identities of the fallen until their families are notified, a solemn protocol that reminds Americans of the human cost behind the headlines.

“Out of respect for the families, CENTCOM will withhold additional information, including the identities of the fallen warriors, until 24 hours after the next of kin have been notified,” the statement read.

War Secretary Pete Hegseth offered words of tribute on X, saying, “Godspeed, heroes. Their sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.”

Congressional leaders from both parties expressed grief, though their messages revealed deep partisan divides over U.S. policy in the region.

Republicans were quick to focus on the bravery of America’s military and the growing threat of Iran’s network of terror across the Middle East.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Senator Rick Scott and Governor Tim Walz each called for prayers for the families and for the safe return of the missing service member.

Representative Abe Hamadeh of Arizona wrote that he was “heartbroken” over the deaths of “two American soldiers who heroically defended our nation and partner forces against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks in Jordan.”

Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina described the report as “devastating,” urging Americans to rally behind the troops and their loved ones in prayer and reflection.

Meanwhile, several Democrats used the tragedy to critique American involvement and call for troop withdrawals.

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey paired his condolences with a demand to “bring American troops out of harm’s way.”

Representative Melanie Stansbury from New Mexico took an even harsher tone, declaring that the service members died “in a war that never should have happened in the first place.”

That sentiment, while politically convenient, does little to address the fact that Iran continues to attack Americans and our allies.

Tehran’s regime has stepped up its hostility in the wake of the collapsed ceasefire in June, when a memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran was shattered by renewed hostilities.

These two deaths mark the first American combat fatalities since fighting resumed, bringing the total number of U.S. military deaths in the Iran war to sixteen.

Iran’s latest assault on the Jordan base mirrors a larger campaign of aggression across the region.

The Islamic Republic has launched missiles and drones at U.S. partners in Kuwait and Qatar, destabilizing an already volatile region and once again proving that appeasement only emboldens the enemy.

Military analysts say Tehran’s latest attack was likely retaliation for the six-day American operation in early March that targeted Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps positions.

WATCH:

That campaign, known as Operation Epic Fury, followed Iran’s brazen assaults on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

U.S. forces struck back hard, but as history often shows, deterrence in the Middle East requires persistence, not half measures.

President Donald Trump was seen at the White House monitoring the situation when Operation Epic Fury commenced, confirming that the administration remains directly engaged in overseeing military responses.

Images released by the White House show the president seated at a command table reviewing live updates from CENTCOM officials.

The Iranian regime, deeply unpopular at home, is facing its own wave of unrest.

Leaked reports describe record levels of public anger over economic hardship and political suppression, even as the regime focuses on clinging to power at any cost.

That instability has left Tehran doubling down on hostility toward the United States, a dangerous distraction from its crumbling economy and growing domestic resistance.

For American families who have loved ones deployed overseas, Friday’s attack is a stark reminder that Iran remains one of the world’s most volatile threats.

Every missile and drone strike launched by the regime is another test of American resolve.

The soldiers who stood their post in Jordan faced that test with courage, defending both our nation and our allies with honor.

What happens next could define the course of this war.

With Iran’s attacks escalating across the Gulf and new targets emerging daily, the administration faces growing calls from Congress to respond with strength.

The fallen deserve nothing less than a clear, unapologetic demonstration that the United States will not bow to Tehran’s terror.

RFK Jr. Exposes $100B Medicare Heist: Crooks Bribing Poor Folks for Endless Taxpayer Payouts [WATCH]
News

RFK Jr. Exposes $100B Medicare Heist: Crooks Bribing Poor Folks for Endless Taxpayer Payouts [WATCH]

/

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said his department loses approximately $100 billion each year to fraud, describing several schemes that he said diverted taxpayer-funded healthcare dollars through fraudulent hospice operations and medical equipment companies.

Kennedy discussed the issue during a conversation with Detroit hip-hop artist Trick Trick, outlining what he described as widespread abuse of Medicaid reimbursement programs and recent enforcement actions taken by the Department of Health and Human Services.

“You know, my agency loses about $100 billion a year to theft, people stealing,” Kennedy said.

Trick Trick responded by asking, “HHS?”

Kennedy replied by describing how investigators uncovered fraudulent hospice operations, particularly in the Los Angeles area.

“Typically, if you go to a hospice, you leave within 18 days because you’re dying. It’s terminal. Right. Right. We started looking at these hospices in Los Angeles, and the people never died. They were there, or two or three years later, they were there, and we’re paying $6,000 a month,” Kennedy said.

According to Kennedy, investigators discovered that many of the listed hospice providers did not actually operate legitimate medical facilities.

“So those hospices, when we went and looked for them, they were yeah, we found a hotel room with 29 hospices in it. I mean, a hotel, every room was a hospice, and none of them had any patients. They were just addresses,” he said.

Kennedy alleged that the individuals operating the businesses were using stolen patient information to bill Medicaid for services that were never provided.

“And the guys who owned them were, you know, they were Estonians and Armenians and people from Eastern Europe who were getting the patient numbers. They were stealing them from doctors’ offices,” Kennedy said.

He also described another alleged method used to obtain patient information.

“They were also going into poor neighborhoods in Los Angeles, and they’d say to the people, ‘We’ll give you this $375 flat screen TV. You give us your patient number, and we’re going to enroll you in this hospice. You don’t ever have to go. We’re just going to enroll you, and then we’ll charge Medicaid $6,000 a month forever, and the guy never dies, of course, because he he was never sick,’” Kennedy said.

Kennedy said similar fraud schemes were uncovered in South Florida involving durable medical equipment companies.

“Another way there was Cubans in Miami who were selling durable medical equipment. This is like wheelchairs, knee braces, you know, these kinds of things. They never had any durable medical equipment?” Kennedy said.

According to Kennedy, investigators again found businesses that existed only on paper.

“Again, we found hotels that every room in it was a durable medical equipment company. Like about a fifth of the durable medical equipment companies in the country were in South Florida, and none of them were selling durable medical equipment. But we were paying for it,” he said.

Kennedy said the department has taken action against those operations.

“But we were paying for it, and we’re shutting down all that,” he said.

He added that HHS closed hundreds of hospice providers in Los Angeles without disrupting legitimate patient care.

“We shut down 800 hospices in Los Angeles, we didn’t get a single call from a congressman or from a business owner saying, ‘Oh, you shut down my hospice, you know, and all these patients are on the street.’ None of them, because they were all crooked and they knew they were crooked,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy also said the department has targeted fraudulent activity involving autism-related services in Minnesota.

“So you know, and then we shut down Minnesota, all of the autism fraud in Minnesota, and those people were stealing money from kids who actually need it,” he said.

WATCH:

Nikki and the Deep State Crew: Why Weren’t Any of These People Perp-Walked Already? [WATCH]
News

Nikki and the Deep State Crew: Why Weren’t Any of These People Perp-Walked Already? [WATCH]

/

Retired Air Force Col. Rob Maness called for criminal accountability for government officials he believes concealed intelligence related to Chinese election interference, arguing during an interview with Steve Gruber that internal threats pose a greater danger than foreign adversaries.

The discussion centered on allegations involving FBI agent Nikki Flores and claims that officials within the federal government withheld information regarding Chinese activities affecting the United States.

Gruber opened the conversation by asking Maness for his assessment of the issue.

“220 million in the United States apparently is of no concern. Your thoughts on this Friday?” Gruber asked.

Maness responded by acknowledging China as a significant national security concern but argued that the greater danger comes from individuals working within the U.S. government.

“I tell you what, Steve. You know the Chinese are a threat, absolutely a threat. But the biggest threat is internal,” Maness said.

He referenced allegations involving FBI agent Nikki Flores and said an email attributed to her raised serious concerns.

“If Nikki Flores, FBI agent, is a leader in the FBI, and in an email says she’s effectively running a shadow government, and nobody thinks about this. 1000s of people had to know about that,” Maness said.

According to Maness, government monitoring systems should have identified language of that nature.

“Every electronic monitoring system in the United States government is monitoring emails for phrasing like that to make sure there’s not real seditionists that work inside our government, and nobody reported on it,” he said.

Maness added that while there may have been whistleblowers, he believes the matter should have received far broader attention.

“There may have been one whistleblower or two that we don’t know about, but that should have been mass reported, Steve,” he said.

The retired Air Force officer also discussed what he described as broader counterintelligence concerns involving China.

“And when you combine that with what the Chinese have done with the voter rolls and what they are doing with fake ballots, with fake driver’s license, all of those things together, we have a major problem. It’s a counterintelligence problem,” Maness said.

He also questioned how many Chinese nationals may currently be inside the United States.

“We do not know how many CCP agents are either in this country as college students. 600,000 strike you as a familiar number. People that have come across the border illegally in the Biden administration. 100,000 estimated for Chinese military age males, strike you as a familiar number,” he said.

Maness argued that officials concealed information from the president.

“Now, proof, absolute proof that people inside the United States government were running a shadow government, and what were they doing? They were hiding from the sitting president of the United States the fact that China was actually doing this,” he said.

Gruber said he believed there was a specific term for the conduct being described.

“There is a word for that, Colonel. There’s a word for that. The word is espionage, and it’s pretty clear: subverting the will of the people, subverting the sitting president, keeping information, lying by omission,” Gruber said.

He also referenced White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s recent briefing, noting a question from reporter Kaitlan Collins regarding potential criminal charges.

“Caitlin Collins yesterday during the briefing with Caroline Leavitt asked a question that was important. Actually, if you have this information, why has nobody been arrested? And Caroline pointed out because we’re just making this public. We’re told that people will be losing their jobs, people will be getting fired, and then prosecutions could and should follow,” Gruber said.

He added that accountability should extend beyond personnel actions.

“If no prosecutions follow here, Colonel. I don’t see the point of it. There better be consequences is my point,” Gruber said.

Maness responded by calling for immediate arrests if the allegations are substantiated.

“Steve, Nikki Flores wrote that email, and the 1000s of Americans working inside the United States government that had anything to do with seeing that email should have all been arrested in pre-dawn raids this morning,” he said.

He contrasted the allegations with the prosecution of Enrique Tarrio.

“We put Enrique Terrio, sentenced him to 20 plus years in prison, had him in solitary confinement for over three years on fake seditious conspiracy charges. Think about that,” Maness said.

He argued that the current allegations involve far more serious conduct.

“This is actual sedition, actual espionage. It’s a combination of spying for the Chinese Communists and acting on it in order to subvert a presidency of the United States of America,” Maness said.

According to Maness, the issue extends beyond any individual president.

“It’s not about Donald Trump, Steve. This is about subverting the will of the American people and subverting the Constitution of the United States, and every person working for the U.S. government, every single one working for the U.S. government as our employees, has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution, and they did this,” he said.

Maness concluded by calling for a full accounting of everyone involved.

“Who told them to do this? Who were the leaders involved? Who were the actors involved? Every person down the line, from the person that gave the order to massage the presidential daily briefs, so it wasn’t talking about elections or Chinese involvement trying to influence our elections. Every one of them was conducting sedition and espionage, at least tangentially, for the communist Chinese. That is a fact now. It’s documented,” Maness said.

WATCH:

Trump Moves To Cut Off Banking Access For Illegal Aliens In Bold Crackdown [WATCH]
News

Trump Moves To Cut Off Banking Access For Illegal Aliens In Bold Crackdown [WATCH]

/

The Trump administration is turning up the pressure on illegal aliens with its latest policy move, taking direct aim at their access to American financial institutions.

Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller confirmed that the Treasury Department has issued new guidance to banks nationwide, instructing them to comply with tighter verification and residency standards.

The goal, according to administration insiders, is clear: encourage illegal aliens to self-deport by removing incentives that make life in the United States easier for those who broke the law to get here.

This development marks the most aggressive financial enforcement step taken by the Trump team since returning to the White House.

For years, progressives pushed policies that expanded financial access for undocumented individuals, defending it as “inclusion.”

Conservatives have long argued that such leniency only normalizes and rewards illegal entry while undermining American citizens and legal immigrants who follow the law.

The new Treasury directive effectively disrupts accounts or banking privileges for those who cannot prove lawful residence status.

It also instructs banks to monitor compliance using existing federal immigration databases.

This creates a nationwide coordination system linking financial institutions with immigration enforcement, something that has been talked about for years but never fully implemented.

Miller described the move as part of a broader strategy to restore integrity to federal systems that were “abused” under prior administrations.

“The Treasury Department just issued new guidance to financial institutions to banks,” he announced, highlighting how the previous government allowed undocumented populations to enjoy privileges “meant for American citizens.”

WATCH:

Critics on the left immediately lashed out, claiming the policy was “inhumane” and “xenophobic.”

Their usual outrage filled social media, predicting hardship for illegal immigrants and accusing Trump officials of cruelty.

But for many on the right, especially those frustrated by years of Washington’s open-border debacles, this is a common-sense effort to end taxpayer-subsidized perks that never should have existed in the first place.

Supporters point out that when illegal immigrants lose access to bank accounts, loans, and financial networks, it creates significant motivation to either fix their legal status or voluntarily return home.

For decades, financial comfort has been a major pull factor keeping illegal immigrants firmly planted in American life.

Removing that comfort is the exact type of structural change required to address the crisis rationally.

Republican lawmakers have applauded the Treasury’s decision, calling it a long overdue use of the government’s regulatory role to uphold immigration law.

Many conservatives see it as part of a larger Trump agenda that rewards citizenship and punishes law-breaking, restoring fairness to Americans who shoulder the economic burden of illegal immigration through overstressed schools, hospitals, and welfare programs.

On the other side, Democrat leaders are scrambling to respond.

Expect lawsuits, public protests, and a new wave of emotional storytelling from the corporate media.

The same networks that have ignored the consequences of mass illegal migration will undoubtedly feature segments on “families losing access to accounts” or “banks pressured to discriminate.”

Yet what is really happening is basic law enforcement and order being reestablished in a sector that has been politicized for too long.

Economically, the policy is likely to send ripples through certain industries dependent on illegal labor.

Cash-heavy employment and informal remittances could once again become the norm as undocumented migrants lose ties to formal financial systems.

While the Left will call that a crisis, many argue it exposes the unsustainable reality that existed under decades of bipartisan neglect.

Miller and treasury officials have framed the policy as a necessary security measure that protects the American financial system from abuse, money laundering, and fraud.

The move reflects a broader agenda of building structural deterrents across every sector to reduce illegal presence, from limiting jobs to cutting off benefits and government services.

In essence, every part of the system that makes unlawful presence easier is being dismantled.

The administration’s tone leaves no room for doubt.

Trump is proving that he intends to use every tool of federal power to secure the border from within.

By choking off access to financial networks, the White House is sending a clear message that breaking U.S. immigration law has real, life-altering consequences.

Grassroots conservatives across the country have long demanded action of this nature.

They have grown tired of promises and symbolic wall funding while illegal immigration continued unimpeded.

This new financial enforcement plan is being hailed as one of the most meaningful steps yet, precisely because it hits where it matters most… the incentives that keep illegal immigration thriving in the first place.

As the new policy gets implemented nationwide, the political divide will only sharpen.

One side sees law, order, and sovereignty being restored; the other sees yet another reason to scream “racism.”

But as the enforcement begins to bite and bank accounts close, reality will set in for those who thought living illegally inside America could remain consequence-free.

Key House Democrats Caught Flat Footed When Asked About Democratic Socialists’ Plan for America [WATCH]
News

Key House Democrats Caught Flat Footed When Asked About Democratic Socialists’ Plan for America [WATCH]

/

Key House Democrats including Ilhan Omar, Ro Khanna, and Pete Aguilar were left fumbling this week when asked to comment on the latest radical proposal from the Democratic Socialists of America.

The DSA’s platform, called “Workers Deserve More,” openly calls for abolishing core pillars of the American government including the Senate, the presidency, and even the Supreme Court.

The plan would replace those institutions with a single legislature controlling both an elected executive branch and a judiciary directly answerable to Congress.

When questioned by Fox News Digital, Rep. Khanna quickly distanced himself from the proposal, saying, “I don’t support that. I haven’t read the proposal.”

It was an unsurprising response for a lawmaker trying to play both sides of the ideological split within his own party.

The socialist plan does not stop at dismantling the federal system.

It also seeks to erase U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, pardon all aliens regardless of criminal behavior, and defund the Department of War, the historical term for the Department of Defense.

To top it off, the DSA platform calls for granting full voting rights to felons and even noncitizens, while ending all deportations entirely.

It is a wish list straight from the far left’s fever dream, but the uncomfortable truth for Democrats is that this fringe agenda is creeping closer to the party’s center of gravity.

Several DSA-endorsed candidates have been unseating more moderate Democrats in primary races this year, showing that the socialist movement is not just symbolic anymore.

When asked about that trend, Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar tried to shrug it off.

“I look forward to working with all our colleagues who run as Democrats,” he told Fox News Digital.

But his carefully chosen words could not hide the unease hanging over the Democratic establishment as the socialist surge gains traction.

Ilhan Omar, one of the House’s leading progressives and a chronic lightning rod for controversy, dodged outright when asked to weigh in.

WATCH:

Her refusal to comment speaks volumes about how deep the DSA’s influence runs.

Publicly, many Democrats claim they are not members of the DSA, but privately they adopt many of its policies when it comes time to placate their activist base.

The DSA’s official magazine, Democratic Left, published the organization’s formal endorsement rules last Friday.

Any candidate hoping for socialist backing must “accept and promote DSA’s program, and align their own campaign platforms with its contents to the best of their ability.”

That means the “Workers Deserve More” platform is not some loose talking point. It is a binding set of principles that DSA candidates are expected to campaign and govern by.

The goals laid out in the document’s final section are the most extreme.

It explicitly calls for a unicameral proportional legislature, effectively dissolving the Senate, and a parliamentary system that would abolish the presidency altogether.

In other words, the DSA wants to rewrite the Constitution and replace it with a socialist parliament. If that sounds like something out of a Bernie Sanders fan club fantasy, that is because it is.

For years, the Democratic Socialists of America have made noise about abolishing ICE and gutting border enforcement.

This new platform, though, takes their anti-American campaign a step further.

By targeting the foundations of the federal government itself, the movement reveals its true goal: to transform the United States beyond recognition.

Khanna, Omar, and Aguilar’s cautious statements show that Democrats understand how toxic this agenda is to most voters.

Yet, as more socialists notch victories in primaries, the party leadership will face growing pressure to embrace these radical reforms.

It is a political dilemma of their own making.

After years of pandering to the far left, establishment Democrats now find themselves unable to rein it in.

WATCH:

The mainstream media has largely ignored the DSA’s newest platform, pretending that its calls to abolish entire branches of government are just meaningless rhetoric.

But the endorsements and campaign money flowing from DSA tell another story.

Their candidates are being groomed for office with the expectation that they will help dismantle the constitutional order piece by piece.

Voters still clinging to the notion of a moderate Democratic Party should take note.

The socialist movement is not operating in the shadows anymore.

It is writing policy plans, running candidates, and dragging Democrats further left with every election.

And every time a lawmaker like Omar or Khanna dodges a question, that silence signals consent to the radicals waiting in the wings.

Unless moderate Democrats find the courage to denounce these anti-American ideas outright, the DSA has little reason to stop.

The next election cycles may not just be about policy differences but about whether the United States keeps the government our founders built or trades it for a socialist experiment that has never worked anywhere else.


Scroll to Top