News

Marco Rubio Has State Department in Stitches Over White House UFC Event [WATCH]
News

Marco Rubio Has State Department in Stitches Over White House UFC Event [WATCH]

/

Secretary of State Marco Rubio drew laughter from an audience at the State Department this week while discussing growing international interest in the upcoming UFC Freedom 250 event scheduled to take place at the White House, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The event, which is expected to be held next week, has generated significant attention both in the United States and abroad.

While some critics have objected to the idea of hosting a UFC event on White House grounds, Rubio indicated that interest from foreign leaders has been far greater than many expected.

Speaking before a crowd at the State Department, Rubio joked that the popularity of the event could create diplomatic challenges for the administration.

“I can tell you this is true, and I can tell you about your global reach because the president and I have another job and spend a lot of time at the White House…” Rubio said.

“The number of foreign leaders that want to come to this is unbelievable!”

Rubio continued by suggesting that the demand for invitations has become so high that officials may have difficulty accommodating everyone interested in attending.

“It’s to the point where we may have a diplomatic crisis…”

The comment drew laughter from the audience.

“Because it’s like we can’t bring everybody…and some of them don’t even have a fighter in the fight from their country.”

“They just want to come because they’re fans of the sport and they follow it.”

The remarks come as the UFC continues to expand its global audience. The promotion has become one of the most internationally recognized sports brands, attracting fans and athletes from dozens of countries.

The Freedom 250 event is expected to draw political figures, foreign dignitaries, athletes, and other guests to Washington, D.C.

Rubio also reflected on recent developments at the White House and joked about future uses for the venue.

“We’re never going to see anything like that again, guys, ever… What they’ve built out there is phenomenal. We’ll never see it again.”

The secretary then referenced comments from President Donald Trump about the possibility of keeping certain event infrastructure in place.

“Although the president’s threatening to leave it permanently…”

Rubio followed that remark with another joke that generated laughter from those in attendance.

“Maybe we’ll just host weekly fights between people in politics and settle our scores that way.”

The crowd again responded with laughter.

The upcoming UFC event has become a topic of debate in political circles.

Critics have questioned the appropriateness of hosting a mixed martial arts event at the White House, while supporters have pointed to the sport’s popularity and its broad appeal among American and international audiences.

According to reports, some opponents of the event have explored legal efforts aimed at preventing it from moving forward. Despite those objections, preparations for the event have continued.

The White House has not indicated any plans to alter the schedule, and anticipation continues to build as the event date approaches.

Rubio’s comments highlighted how much attention the event has attracted overseas. His remarks suggested that demand for tickets among foreign officials may be nearly as intense as interest among American fans.

With the event drawing attention from world leaders, sports fans, and political observers alike, UFC Freedom 250 is shaping up to be one of the most unusual sporting events ever associated with the White House.

Trump Erupts In Fury at These Two RINO Senators Stalling The SAVE America Act [WATCH]
News

Trump Erupts In Fury at These Two RINO Senators Stalling The SAVE America Act [WATCH]

/

President Trump did not mince words from the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon, slamming Mitch McConnell and Lisa Murkowski for blocking the SAVE America Act, a major Republican effort to restore election integrity and cut government waste.

The president spoke with the confidence and frustration of a man who has seen this show before, calling out long-entrenched senators who seem far more comfortable cozying up to the Washington establishment than fighting for the people who sent them there.

Independent journalist Nick Sortor caught the moment on camera as Trump went after the two Republicans for what he called a betrayal of the America First movement.

“Murkowski’s terrible. Terrible to us, terrible to the country,” Trump said, his tone unmistakably disgusted.

“Mitch McConnell is a bad guy. I thought he was lousy at his job. Lousy at his job.”

Trump reminded the crowd that McConnell had aided Democrats during his time leading the Senate.

“I disagreed with him a lot because Mitch McConnell gave so much money to Democrats,” Trump said.

“He gave them money. I had to go get the wall money from the military because that guy wouldn’t do anything.”

The president’s ire showed how tired he is of spineless leadership that buckles when the real work begins.

In no uncertain terms, Trump also ridiculed the political self-preservation game that Murkowski has perfected in Alaska.

“I’ve done so much for Murkowski,” he said.

“We have the governor right here. Governor, have I done a lot for Alaska?” That prompted Governor Mike Dunleavy to affirm, “You have been the best president for Alaska in our history, Mr. President.”

With that, Trump turned back to the senator with characteristic bluntness.

“She’s just an impediment. But she’s there. She will probably be a negative vote.”

Murkowski’s opposition to the SAVE America Act, which includes strong provisions for voter ID and funding for national defense, seems rooted in the left’s tired excuse that rural or poorer Americans somehow cannot obtain identification.

Trump was unimpressed with that line of reasoning.

“Guess what,” he said.

“Rural people are capable of doing things.”

WATCH:

He was right, of course.

Everyday Americans manage to get ID to cash checks, buy groceries, and travel.

Yet when it comes to voting, the Democrat talking points suddenly shift to helplessness.

It’s not only Democrats causing the obstruction.

The Republican old guard, represented by McConnell and Murkowski, appear more worried about protecting their fragile alliances and staying in the good graces of D.C. donors than in advancing real conservative priorities.

McConnell’s pending retirement is barely enough to cover the stench of years spent trading power instead of wielding it boldly for reform.

The president’s outrage makes sense in the context of the SAVE America Act’s importance.

This legislation aims to prevent voter fraud, enhance transparency in elections, and secure the ballot box from leftist manipulation.

For many conservatives, it represents the clearest test yet of whether the Republican Party actually believes in restoring trust in the electoral process or simply talks about it during campaign season.

Trump’s political instincts, honed over years of battling both Democrats and his own party insiders, remain sharp.

He knows what the base wants, and it is not compromise with senators who talk like conservatives in campaign ads but govern like Democrats once elected.

He also knows that Americans are tired of excuses for why simple common-sense measures like requiring ID to vote are suddenly too complicated.

Murkowski’s political career is a study in establishment survival. Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system handed her another lifeline after she lost the Republican primary in 2010.

Instead of accepting defeat, she launched a write-in campaign that prevailed, keeping her seat by defying her own party’s voters.

That stubborn streak has continued to make her a thorn in Trump’s side and a reliable lifeline for Senate moderates who hate accountability.

McConnell’s record speaks for itself as well. Under his leadership, the Senate missed opportunity after opportunity to push forward meaningful conservative reforms.

While the establishment praises him for shepherding judicial appointments, even Trump reminded everyone that he was the one who made those appointments possible by winning the presidency in the first place. Without Trump, McConnell would have had no judges at all.

Trump’s tone on Thursday carried a mix of anger and purpose.

It was the sound of a man who has fought too long to watch RINOs throw away the future out of personal pride.

He is demanding action from a Congress that still fears upsetting the swamp’s delicate equilibrium, and his base hears him loud and clear.

For average conservatives across America, the message was simple. The fight is not only against Democrats.

It is also against the weak Republicans who cave when strength is needed most.

The SAVE America Act is more than a bill; it is a litmus test for whether this Congress still represents the people or only itself.

Trump’s eruption signaled that the time for polite disagreement has passed.

With McConnell soon gone and Murkowski still clinging to the status quo, the president is making it clear that the America First agenda will move forward, with or without them.

The swamp’s grip may be strong, but Trump reminded the nation yet again that he is stronger.

And so are the Americans who stand with him.

Trump Halts Strikes On Iran And Declares Breakthrough Deal Is Sealed [WATCH]
News

Trump Halts Strikes On Iran And Declares Breakthrough Deal Is Sealed [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump canceled planned military strikes on Iran late Thursday, telling The Post that an agreement between Washington and Tehran had been reached to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and begin nuclear negotiations.

The commander in chief called the understanding “all wrapped up,” while hinting that a formal signing could take place soon.

Trump shared the update on Truth Social, saying discussions with Iran’s top leadership had reached full approval.

“Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” he wrote.

Trump added that not only the United States, but partners across the Middle East and beyond, had backed the terms.

The deal appears to include a promise by Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and discuss the fate of its enriched uranium program.

In return, the United States would lift its blockade on Iranian ports, which was put in place two months ago after escalating missile attacks in the region.

Trump said those restrictions would remain “in full force” until the agreement was signed and implemented.

WATCH:

A U.S. official familiar with the mediation process described the emerging deal as “all-inclusive” and said it built on prior drafts brought forward by Qatar and Pakistan.

The key point of contention, that source said, was sequencing, meaning which side would act first in unlocking funds, lifting restrictions, or beginning disarmament steps.

Even as Trump celebrated progress, Secretary of State Marco Rubio reminded Congress that easing sanctions would come only if Tehran made real nuclear concessions.

“No rewards for promises,” he told reporters last week, emphasizing that Iran’s commitment must go beyond rhetoric.

Trump, meanwhile, has refused to release billions in frozen Iranian funds unless inspectors can confirm Tehran’s nuclear compliance.

Regional sources told The Post that Iran’s latest draft of the agreement was sent to mediators in Doha Wednesday night.

“The text of the agreement was completed and finalized on Wednesday evening,” one regional contact said.

They added that Qatari and Pakistani intermediaries had maintained direct communication with both Washington and Tehran to finalize details.

This apparent breakthrough came after a tense 48 hours.

WATCH:

Earlier this week, Iran downed an American Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, prompting overnight U.S. strikes on Iranian radar and missile sites.

Those retaliatory strikes lasted four hours and targeted critical military surveillance and communication systems across Iran’s southern coast.

Sources at U.S. Central Command said the precision strikes concluded by dawn and had inflicted heavy damage on Iranian defenses.

Just hours before announcing the deal, Trump had warned Iran that the United States was prepared to strike “VERY HARD TONIGHT.”

He also threatened to seize Iran’s Kharg Island, a major oil export hub that produces roughly 90 percent of the regime’s crude output.

“At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island,” he posted on Truth Social, adding that he preferred direct control over Iranian energy assets, similar to the U.S. approach in Venezuela.

In an interview with Fox and Friends, Trump remarked that he has long believed taking Kharg Island would be the cleanest way to end Iran’s leverage in the region.

“My preference has always been, take Kharg Island. My preference would be that,” he said.

He added that he doubts Americans have the stomach for a full invasion but left that possibility open depending on Iran’s cooperation.

Inside Iran, regime-aligned media were quick to push back on Trump’s claim.

Fars News Agency said no agreement had been finalized, citing an unnamed government insider.

Still, Qatari officials confirmed that discussions were ongoing at the highest levels and that implementation could begin “if final approval is granted.”

Iranian officials appear wary that the deal might face pressure from Israel, whose leaders have not publicly commented.

An Iranian source told The Post that “the Israelis and the Zionist lobby will not let him sign an agreement.”

Yet Trump has told allies he expects Israel to “go along with it” once the final arrangements are sealed. “I call the shots,” he reportedly said of Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Despite conflicting reports, markets reacted instantly to Trump’s announcement.

The Dow Jones soared nearly 800 points as investors bet that the standoff with Iran could be easing.

Energy prices fell on expectations that shipping lanes might soon reopen.

The White House described the rally as a vote of confidence in Trump’s negotiation strategy.

Trump also hinted that a signing ceremony could take place in Pakistan, praising the country’s top military leader, Field Marshal Asim Munir, for facilitating communication between Tehran and Washington.

Other options floated include Switzerland, Turkey, or Qatar, all of which have served as neutral mediators at various stages of the discussions.

For now, both sides appear to be testing each other’s seriousness.

The Iranian regime has endured punishing U.S. sanctions under Trump’s administration, while Washington has had no interest in repeating the Obama-era policy of concession without enforcement.

Trump’s approach has been simple: maximum pressure until Tehran is ready to bargain in good faith.

Whether this deal truly marks the end of confrontation or simply another chapter in a long standoff remains to be seen.

What is clear is that Trump has once again managed to pull the world back from the brink, blending toughness with negotiation to protect American interests while leaving Iran’s mullahs wondering what he might do next.

CBS Lets Father Spread False ‘All-White’ Jury Claim In Teen Murder Case Without Challenge [WATCH]
News

CBS Lets Father Spread False ‘All-White’ Jury Claim In Teen Murder Case Without Challenge [WATCH]

/

CBS News once again demonstrated why millions of Americans have written off the legacy media as hopelessly biased.

In an interview following the conviction of Karmelo Anthony, a black teenager found guilty of murdering white teen Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet, the network allowed Anthony’s father to spread a flat-out falsehood about the jury’s racial makeup, and nobody on set dared correct him.

Andrew Anthony told CBS that what stood out to him during the trial was “the all-white jury.”

That soundbite aired nationwide with no effort from CBS to clarify that the jury was not, in fact, entirely white.

Court records and local reporting show the panel had minority members among the alternates, including individuals of Asian and Indian backgrounds.

But those facts did not fit the preferred narrative, so the network simply let the misleading claim stand.

WATCH:

The case in Frisco, Texas drew intense social media attention from the moment it began.

Critics accused local authorities and jurors of bias before a single piece of evidence was ever presented.

Yet testimony and surveillance footage convinced the jury that Anthony, despite being young, acted with clear intent in the killing of Austin Metcalf.

The verdict was unanimous. Still, the left and its media allies have treated Anthony as some kind of folk hero for a “racial injustice” that does not exist.

The road to the final jury had already been controversial.

Nearly six hundred citizens were called as potential jurors.

After standard vetting, several black prospective jurors were struck, including one who openly admitted he would “have a hard time putting a brother in jail.”

The defense cried foul, arguing through a Batson challenge that prosecutors removed African American candidates due to race.

The judge disagreed, ruling that the stated reasons for dismissal were legitimate, such as personal bias, local connections, and media exposure.

Those facts were public record by the time CBS sat down with the Anthony family.

Even so, the network let Andrew Anthony’s “all-white jury” remark pass without correction or context.

The interviewer did not challenge him, did not mention that Asian and Indian jurors were present as alternates, and certainly did not note that the court had already examined and rejected claims of illegal racial exclusion.

This pattern is familiar.

The leftwing media repeatedly amplifies false stories that feed a desired racial narrative, then quietly moves on when the facts prove inconvenient.

Stories like Ferguson, Jussie Smollett, and countless “police brutality” hoaxes follow the same playbook. Once again, racial grievance sells, while truth takes a back seat.

The fallout has been ugly. Radical activists and anti-white agitators flooded social media celebrating Metcalf’s death.

One former Dallas lawmaker even suggested exhuming Metcalf’s body to “stab it again.”

The comment racked up thousands of approving reactions online. That silence from the same media figures who pretend to care about peaceful social dialogue speaks volumes.

Meanwhile, black nationalist figures such as Charleston White are openly raising money for Anthony’s appeal, promising a one million dollar war chest.

White’s rhetoric has been nothing short of vile, calling on supporters to “kill both them peckerwoods,” referring to Austin Metcalf and his twin brother Hunter.

WATCH:

CBS has yet to condemn or even report on those threats, choosing instead to highlight the Anthony family’s “grief and hope” narrative.

Andrew Anthony’s interview was a perfect example of how legacy media manufactures division.

Rather than fact checking, CBS preferred a clip that painted the justice system as racist.

The truth, that due process worked and that a violent act resulted in a lawful conviction, offers no emotional value to a newsroom conditioned to chase outrage over accuracy.

Conservatives have long warned about this. It is not just about one misleading interview.

It is about a cultural ecosystem in which mainstream outlets selectively elevate voices that advance one racial narrative while ignoring any story that challenges it.

The people who still trust CBS and its peers are being misled not by error but by deliberate editorial choice.

If facts mattered at CBS News, producers would issue a correction acknowledging the jury’s true makeup and the legitimacy of the court’s handling of jury selection.

But that would mean telling viewers that a sensational claim was false, and sensationalism, not truth, is what drives viewership. The network chose activism over integrity.

This episode serves as another reminder that Americans cannot count on the old press to report facts free of political bias.

Whenever race enters a story, the script is already written before the cameras roll. Until the public refuses to play along, expect more lies dressed up as journalism.

Family of Slain Teen Austin Metcalf Faces Terrifying Death Threats as Karmelo Anthony Supporters Turn Violent [WATCH]
News

Family of Slain Teen Austin Metcalf Faces Terrifying Death Threats as Karmelo Anthony Supporters Turn Violent [WATCH]

/

The family of Texas teenager Austin Metcalf is continuing to receive threats following the conviction of Karmelo Anthony, while law enforcement agencies are also reviewing allegations involving supporters of Anthony after videos surfaced online claiming to show acts of intimidation and violence, as reported by Fox News.

Anthony was convicted of murder on Tuesday and sentenced to 35 years in prison for the killing of Metcalf during a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, in April 2025. Both teenagers were 17 years old at the time of the incident.

Following the verdict, Anthony filed a notice of appeal seeking to challenge his conviction.

In the days after the sentencing, reports began circulating online alleging that some supporters of Anthony had made threats directed at the Metcalf family.

Authorities are also investigating a separate video that allegedly depicts an assault connected to the case.

One video posted on X appeared to show a bicyclist confronting and allegedly attacking a man in Jacksonville, Florida. The footage was recorded from the perspective of the rider.

According to reports, the individual recording the video questioned the man about whether he had participated in jury selection connected to Anthony’s trial.

A woman’s voice can also be heard in the recording, identifying the alleged victim as a military veteran.

The Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office confirmed it is reviewing the matter.

“We are aware of this video circulating on social media and are actively looking into the video’s origin and parties involved,” the department said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

The controversy surrounding the case also extended to online fundraising efforts.

A GoFundMe campaign established on behalf of Anthony briefly raised several hundred dollars before it was removed from the platform. According to GoFundMe, the fundraiser collected $726 before being shut down and refunded.

The company cited its longstanding policies prohibiting legal-defense fundraising for individuals charged with violent crimes.

“GoFundMe’s Terms of Service explicitly prohibit fundraisers that raise money for the legal defense of anyone formally charged with a violent crime,” the company said.

“Consistent with this long-standing policy, any fundraising campaigns for the legal defense of someone charged with murder are removed from the platform and fully refunded. As such, the fundraiser has been removed from the platform, and the $726 raised has been refunded.”

Meanwhile, family members of Austin Metcalf say they continue to face harassment and threats following the verdict.

According to reports cited by TMZ, one family member received a text message that read, “He [Austin] —— around and found out.”

Another message reportedly stated, “Should’ve stabbed hunter too.”

Hunter Metcalf is Austin’s twin brother.

TMZ also reported that individuals had allegedly threatened to appear at family residences and made comments regarding Austin’s gravesite.

The identities of the individuals responsible for the messages have not been publicly identified, and it remains unclear which specific family members received the communications.

Austin’s father, Jeff Metcalf, previously told CBS that he had continued receiving threats and harassment related to the case.

Jeff Metcalf also reported that his personal information had previously been exposed online.

According to CBS, a separate incident last August resulted in a SWAT response to the family’s Frisco home after authorities received emergency calls that prompted officers to respond with weapons drawn.

Jurors involved in Anthony’s trial have not publicly commented on the verdict or sentencing.

The case has drawn national attention since the fatal confrontation at the Frisco track meet and has continued to generate intense reactions online throughout the legal proceedings.

Fox News Digital reported that requests for comment were sent to the Metcalf family and the Frisco Police Department regarding the reported threats.

As Anthony’s appeal process moves forward, law enforcement agencies continue reviewing allegations involving online threats and potential acts of intimidation connected to the case.

Homeless Voters Claim Cash Handouts for Backing LA Mayor Karen Bass and Councilwoman Nithya Raman [WATCH]
News

Homeless Voters Claim Cash Handouts for Backing LA Mayor Karen Bass and Councilwoman Nithya Raman [WATCH]

/

Videos circulating online have prompted questions about voter outreach efforts in Los Angeles after several homeless residents on Skid Row claimed they received small cash payments connected to voting activities during recent elections, as reported by The New York Post.

The videos, obtained by The California Post after appearing on the TikTok account LaneNeedsSpencerPratt, were recorded Tuesday morning near 7th Street and Flower Street in downtown Los Angeles.

According to the outlet, copies of the footage were later provided to the Department of Justice.

The recordings feature several individuals living in or around Skid Row who alleged they were offered money in connection with voting or election-related activities involving Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and City Councilwoman Nithya Raman.

The California Post reported that the claims surfaced amid broader scrutiny over voter registration activity involving homeless populations in Los Angeles.

The outlet also reported that thousands of homeless voters had been registered at shelters where they allegedly did not reside.

In one video, a man identifying himself as Kevin Shepherd claimed he received money after voting for Bass.

When asked whether he was also encouraged to vote for Raman, Shepherd replied, “Yes.”

According to Shepherd, he was initially offered $2, negotiated for a higher amount, and ultimately received $4.

He further claimed he completed a mail-in ballot for Bass and deposited it into a ballot collection box.

Another Skid Row resident, 39-year-old Rene Johnson, said groups frequently visited the area, asking people to complete paperwork.

Johnson claimed she received $5 after being told to vote for Bass.

While Johnson said she supported Bass, she also stated that she did not fully understand some of the paperwork involved at the time.

“But, you know, at the time, I didn’t know that that was going on,” Johnson said.

“I was just trying to make five bucks, you know? But I didn’t do the fraud.”

When asked whether she believed the activity was improper, Johnson described it as “fraudulent behavior.”

She also said she believed vulnerable people were being taken advantage of.

A third woman, who said she was living on the street, claimed she also accepted money connected to voting for Bass.

“It was like two bucks,” she said, adding that “yeah, they come out here all the time.”

The individual who recorded the videos said he visited the area after hearing reports from a nearby worker who allegedly observed political volunteers operating around Skid Row before the election.

“Everybody said it was normal,” the content creator told The California Post.

“They said people came through all the time.”

According to the creator, numerous residents described voter-registration and outreach efforts as a regular occurrence in the neighborhood.

Several individuals interviewed claimed organizations visited the area multiple times each week, leading up to Election Day. Some residents acknowledged they did not fully understand all of the paperwork they signed.

Another resident, identified as Mark Sanchez, alleged he had repeatedly been approached by political canvassers.

“To sign a petition for the mayor or different things in office, and they paid me $4 or $5 in different accounts,” Sanchez claimed.

“It happened more than four or five times,” he added.

The California Post stated it could not independently verify the claims made in the videos.

However, the outlet reported that it spoke with nearly 20 individuals at locations containing large concentrations of registered voters.

According to the report, many said they knew they were registered but could not recall who registered them, whether they had recently voted, or what became of their ballots.

Don Garza, a disabled military veteran who has lived on Skid Row since 1999, said voter-registration drives are common in the area.

“We are tired of it. We don’t want people coming in and deciding elections and taking advantage of us,” Garza said.

“Every one of them thinks they have claim to our voice. They think they speak for us.”

The report also highlighted guidance published by the Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America regarding ballot collection efforts.

The organization’s publicly available “How To: Ballot Delivery” guide instructs volunteers on collecting completed mail ballots and encouraging voters to submit them immediately.

Ballot harvesting, the practice of collecting completed ballots for delivery, is legal under California law but remains the subject of ongoing political debate.

The California Post reported that requests for comment were sent to the Bass and Raman campaigns, but that no responses had been received at the time of publication.

President Trump Has Crowd Laughing While Backing Susan Collins [WATCH]
News

President Trump Has Crowd Laughing While Backing Susan Collins [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump formally endorsed Maine Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday, praising the longtime Republican lawmaker while sharply criticizing her Democratic challenger during remarks about the 2026 Senate race, as reported by Red State.

Trump addressed the contest while responding to questions about whether he was fully backing Collins in her bid for another term representing Maine in the U.S. Senate.

Despite acknowledging past disagreements with Collins on certain votes, the president made clear that she has his support heading into the election.

“She does because she’s a sane woman. She’s not my best friend at all,” Trump said.

The president went on to praise Collins’ attendance record and service in the Senate.

“But she’s a sane person. She’s a person that’s never missed a vote in many years. I mean, she’s like 10,000 votes. She had 10,000 votes. She never missed a vote. Unfortunately, because sometimes she voted against me!”

Trump also described Collins as a respected figure despite ideological differences between the two Republicans.

“You know, look, she’s a sane woman, and she’s a respected person. Maybe a little different ideology than me.”

The president then turned his attention to Collins’ Democratic opponent, Graham Platner, offering a series of criticisms while reiterating his support for the Maine senator.

“But this guy is a thug. He’s a fake thug. He’s a phony. I made a lot of money picking out phonies. He’s a real phony. He’s a bad person.”

The endorsement comes as the Maine Senate race continues to attract national attention. Collins has represented Maine in the Senate since 1997 and has frequently won statewide elections despite Maine’s reputation as a competitive political battleground.

The senator has often been viewed as one of the more moderate Republicans in Congress and has occasionally broken with Republican leadership on major votes.

Those differences have sometimes put her at odds with Trump during both of his administrations.

However, Trump’s comments indicate that those disagreements are not preventing him from backing Collins as Republicans seek to maintain control of the Senate.

The president specifically highlighted Collins’ voting record and reliability as reasons for his endorsement.

The race is expected to be closely watched by both parties because Senate control could once again hinge on a small number of competitive contests across the country.

Collins recently supported the original version of the SAVE America Act, a vote that drew attention among conservatives and became part of the broader debate surrounding election and immigration policy.

Meanwhile, Democrats view the Maine contest as one of several opportunities to challenge Republican-held Senate seats in the 2026 cycle.

Political observers have noted that Collins has repeatedly outperformed polling expectations in previous elections, winning statewide races even when Democratic candidates carried Maine in presidential contests.

With several months remaining before Election Day, both parties are expected to devote significant resources to the race.

Trump’s endorsement now places him squarely behind Collins as she prepares for another statewide campaign, while the president’s criticism of her Democratic opponent is likely to become part of the broader political debate surrounding one of the most closely watched Senate contests in the country.

Trump Says Downed Apache Crew ‘Got Very Lucky’ After Iranian Attack
News

Trump Says Downed Apache Crew ‘Got Very Lucky’ After Iranian Attack

/

President Donald Trump didn’t mince words Wednesday when he described the near miss involving two U.S. Army aviators whose AH-64 Apache helicopter was knocked out of the sky by Iranian aggression over the Strait of Hormuz.

“They got very lucky,” he said from the Oval Office, adding that retaliation against Tehran is “not over.”

Trump made it clear America had already punched back hard and wasn’t about to stop. “We hit them hard yesterday and we’re going to hit them hard again today,” he told reporters, his tone a mix of confidence and warning.

The message to Iran was unmistakable: hit American forces and expect a swift, fierce response.

Initial reports suggested the Apache had been shot down outright. Trump clarified later that the aircraft was struck by an Iranian ordnance that failed to explode, narrowly sparing the lives of the two pilots.

“That bomb was lodged in the helicopter, it didn’t explode,” he explained. “It was on fire but it didn’t explode. Those two guys, they knew how to fly, but they got very lucky.”

The President, never short on candor, added a touch of levity about the dramatic rescue that followed, saying, “You won’t believe the rescue, how cool it was.” For good reason—the operation marked a notable first in U.S. military history.

Apache Aces Down Drones in Daring Sky Duel Using Proximity 30mm Rounds
U.S. Army soldiers, assigned to 12th Combat Aviation Brigade, support 1st Squadron, 91st Cavalry Regiment, 173rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), in an AH-64 Apache Helicopter during an air assault operation at the 7th Army Joint Multinational Readiness Command’s Hohenfels Training Area, Germany, March 19, 2014. (U.S. Army photo by Visual Information Specialist Gertrud Zach/released)

The two downed aviators were pulled from the sea by a remotely piloted Navy surface drone, part of the War Department’s expanding array of unmanned technologies under U.S. 5th Fleet’s Task Force 59.

It was the first time one of these surface systems was used in a rescue operation. As military innovation continues to evolve, this event may signal a new era of unmanned battlefield support that saves lives and delivers results.

Capt. Tim Hawkins, spokesman for U.S. Central Command, told Military Times that the Corsair unmanned surface vessel retrieved the aviators and brought them to a rendezvous point offshore where they were airlifted to safety.

“The surface drone that assisted in [Monday’s] rescue of the Apache crew off the coast of Oman was a U.S. Navy Corsair unmanned surface vessel operated by U.S. 5th Fleet’s Task Force 59,” Hawkins said.

Built by Texas-based Saronic Technologies, the 24-foot Corsair can carry payloads of up to 1,000 pounds over 1,000 nautical miles and reach speeds of 35 knots. It’s fast, efficient, and exactly the kind of forward-thinking tool the War Department is leaning on to gain the upper hand. It’s also a strong reminder that American ingenuity remains light-years ahead of Iran’s clunky, copycat war machines.

Apache Becomes Drone Hunter as Army Tests Airburst Rounds to Take Down Drones

The encounter showed the asymmetrical nature of modern conflict. A low-cost Iranian Shahed-136 drone, estimated at just $20,000, managed to strike a U.S. Army Apache valued at around $35–40 million.

While the math might seem lopsided, it reveals how Tehran’s tactics favor cheap, expendable assets intended more for provocation than dominance. The fact the U.S. crew survived—and was swiftly rescued—sends the opposite message: technology and toughness still win the day.

Iranian officials, of course, wasted no time blustering in retaliation. After American forces launched precise counterstrikes Tuesday night, Iran’s foreign minister threatened that “our powerful armed forces will leave no attack or threat unanswered.”

The Revolutionary Guard then boasted of attacking 21 U.S. sites across the region, including bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan. As usual, Iranian propaganda claimed “victories” without a shred of evidence to back them up.

Yet even as tensions simmer, Trump indicated room remains for diplomacy—but only if Iran stops playing games.

U.S. Army Apaches and Navy Seahawks Obliterate Iranian Boats Blocking the Strait of Hormuz
Army AH-64 Apache attack helicopters sunk several Iranian boats, U.S. officials said, as the first day of the operation to escort commercial ships through the Straits of Hormuz resulted in combat. U.S. Army photo.

“We’ll see what happens with the deal,” Trump said. “We were really close to a deal but they keep tapping us along, they keep playing us for suckers. All they have to do is they have to start signing a paper, it’s fully negotiated.”

His remarks signaled that while he remains open to negotiation, he’s not interested in another endless cycle of empty promises from Tehran. The President’s blunt style—equal parts deterrence and directness—has kept adversaries guessing and allies alert.

For the War Department, the Apache incident illustrates both the peril and preparedness inherent in the region. Despite enemy escalation, U.S. forces are operating with cutting-edge technology, decisive leadership, and unwavering resolve from Washington.

America doesn’t back down when its people are attacked—it strikes back stronger.

The downing of the Apache may have been Iran’s latest provocation, but the rescue that followed sent a clearer signal: under President Trump’s leadership and with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth driving a renewed focus on strength, the U.S. warfighter remains unstoppable.

And for Iran, that’s the real warning shot.

ActBlue CEO Pleads the 5th More Than Twenty Times During House Hearing [WATCH]
News

ActBlue CEO Pleads the 5th More Than Twenty Times During House Hearing [WATCH]

/

ActBlue’s embattled CEO Regina Wallace Jones refused to answer a single question this week during a House Administration Committee hearing focused on the Democrat fundraising giant’s alleged mishandling of foreign donations and fraudulent contributions.

Instead, she invoked her Fifth Amendment privilege 22 separate times, a move that sent shockwaves through Washington and raised even more suspicion about what exactly the left’s favorite donation machine has to hide.

The hearing, titled “Preventing Fraudulent Donations: Transparency, Verification, and Accountability,” was anything but transparent when Wallace Jones took her seat.

Republican lawmakers, armed with evidence and direct questions, pressed her over a 2023 letter she had sent to Congress that now appears filled with misleading claims about ActBlue’s practices.

Her legal counsel clearly advised her to stay silent, but her repeated refusal to respond only deepened concerns that ActBlue has knowingly facilitated illegal foreign money into American elections.

Chairman Bryan Steil led the questioning with sharp inquiries about whether Wallace Jones knowingly provided false information to Congress regarding ActBlue’s donor verification systems.

He outlined numerous examples where ActBlue allegedly accepted contributions from foreign sources and where donor information did not match real individuals, sometimes using so-called “smurfs,” whose identities are used without their knowledge.

When Steil asked if she stood by her previous sworn statements, Wallace Jones again invoked her constitutional right to remain silent.

According to reports, ActBlue has processed tens of millions of suspicious donations.

The New York Times recently quoted internal sources who revealed that up to 38 million contributions in 2024 alone may have shown signs of foreign origin.

That staggering number should alarm anyone who cares about election integrity, though Democrats at the hearing seemed content to look the other way.

Instead of grilling Wallace Jones, they used their time to attack WinRed, the Republican fundraising platform, and to criticize Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for investigating ActBlue.

Republicans on multiple committees are not letting this matter rest.

In the past week, Chairman Steil, Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, and Oversight Chairman James Comer sent letters to ActBlue’s board demanding documentation, internal communications, and testimony.

The letters allege a willful cover-up and point to potential criminal misrepresentations made to Congress.

The letters also referenced internal emails in which ActBlue’s own staff, and even its labor union, raised alarms about fraudulent donations, internal retaliation, and mass resignations.

Many former ActBlue legal and compliance staff either quit, were terminated, or went on leave in 2025—another troubling sign for a company responsible for billions in political cash flow.

When questioned by Representative Jim Jordan, Wallace Jones simply sat back and refused to answer.

Jordan pressed her on whether ActBlue weakened its fraud prevention standards after internal assessments warned that doing so would lead to more fraudulent donations.

Again, silence.

He asked directly whether she personally approved those changes to boost donations for Democrat candidates. Once more, the Fifth Amendment.

Greg Murphy of North Carolina pressed even harder, asking how much money had come from Russia or other foreign countries.

He asked bluntly if ActBlue lowered its fraud screening to help Democrats raise more money.

Wallace Jones gave no response.

Her silence was deafening.

WATCH:

The fact that not one Democrat on the committee asked a single question of the ActBlue CEO speaks volumes about the left’s priorities.

They appear far more interested in protecting their cash pipeline than protecting the integrity of U.S. elections.

Instead of demanding answers from an executive whose organization may have helped funnel foreign money into political campaigns, they went on the offensive against Republican oversight efforts.

Fox reported that Republican committee leaders accused ActBlue of refusing to release subpoenaed documents and stonewalling the investigation.

The platform is under mounting pressure as questions multiply about its “knowing and willful” acceptance of illegal contributions and its failure to verify the legitimacy of donors using third-party apps like PayPal and Venmo.

In one particularly damning allegation, internal records show that ActBlue weakened its security standards twice in 2024 despite internal warnings that the changes would make it easier for fraudulent donations to slip through.

That decision, combined with subsequent staff departures, paints a picture of an organization more concerned with political gain than compliance with the law.

Wallace Jones’s avoidance of accountability only adds fuel to the fire. Republicans on the committees are now considering next steps that could include subpoenas, contempt votes, or criminal referrals if they find that ActBlue has obstructed Congress.

Voters across the country watching the hearing saw a CEO unwilling or unable to defend her company’s actions.

As ActBlue continues to hide behind silence and legal posturing, conservative lawmakers are vowing that this will not go away.

With tens of millions of potentially tainted dollars flowing through a major political fundraising platform, Americans deserve to know the truth.

The hearing may have ended, but the political and legal fallout for ActBlue is just beginning.

Democrat Congressman Attacks GOP as Fascists, Targets Trump at Charity Baseball Game [WATCH]
News

Democrat Congressman Attacks GOP as Fascists, Targets Trump at Charity Baseball Game [WATCH]

/

Comments made by a Texas Democrat during the annual Congressional Baseball Game drew attention Wednesday night after he referred to Republicans as fascists and joked about running over President Donald Trump during a conversation with reporters, as reported by Townhall.

The remarks came during the annual Congressional Baseball Game, a bipartisan charity event that has been held since 1909 and raises money for charitable causes.

According to an interview conducted by Townhall, Rep. Christian Menefee, a Democrat representing Texas’ 18th Congressional District, discussed the matchup between Democrats and Republicans before taking the field.

When asked about facing Republican lawmakers during the game, Menefee expressed confidence in his team’s chances and suggested political disagreements would provide additional motivation.

The conversation turned to Republican lawmakers and President Donald Trump, who was not participating in the game.

Asked whether he viewed Republicans as fascists, Menefee replied, “A lot of them, yeah. Certainly, the President is. I wish he was  out here playing, hopefully run him over when I’m sliding home.”

The comment quickly drew attention on social media as clips and reports from the interview circulated online during the game.

Townhall followed up by asking the congressman what it was like competing against individuals he described as fascists.

Menefee responded, “There’s a deep-seated anger that makes us want to win, so we gotta go get this dub.”

The Congressional Baseball Game has long served as one of Washington’s most visible bipartisan traditions. Members of Congress from both parties participate each year, with proceeds benefiting a variety of charitable organizations.

The event has frequently provided lawmakers with an opportunity to set aside legislative battles for a night of friendly competition on the baseball field.

This year’s game drew significant attention due to the current political climate and the growing tensions between Democrats and Republicans on a range of issues, including immigration, spending, national security, and the upcoming midterm election cycle.

While political rivalries often spill into pregame interviews and media appearances, the game itself has traditionally focused on fundraising and supporting charitable causes.

Menefee’s comments stood out because they directly referenced President Trump and characterized Republican lawmakers in strongly negative terms.

The Texas congressman was elected to represent the Houston-area district and has been one of several Democratic lawmakers critical of the Trump administration’s policies.

Neither the White House nor Republican congressional leaders immediately responded publicly to the remarks during the game.

As the contest unfolded Wednesday evening, Republicans built a commanding lead over Democrats. According to reports from the event, Republicans held an 11-0 advantage as of approximately 8:23 p.m. Eastern Time.

The Congressional Baseball Game has become a major annual fundraising event, attracting lawmakers, staff members, lobbyists, journalists, and supporters from both political parties.

Despite the political rhetoric surrounding the game, organizers have continued to emphasize its charitable mission and its role in bringing members of Congress together outside the legislative arena.

The latest controversy, however, ensured that some of the most talked-about moments of the evening occurred away from home plate and instead came during pregame interviews discussing the increasingly heated political divide in Washington.


Scroll to Top