Author name: WokeSpy

Congress, The Squad

Ilhan Omar’s Daughter “Frantic” After Being Suspended From College

The daughter of Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has been suspended from Columbia University after being arrested during campus-wide pro-Palestinian protests last week.

Isra Hirsi was one of more than 100 students who were arrested last week after a CHAZ-style encampment sprung up on the college green.

The daughter of Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has been suspended from Columbia University after being arrested during campus-wide pro-Palestinian protests last week.

Isra Hirsi was one of more than 100 students who were arrested last week after a CHAZ-style encampment sprung up on the college green.

In response to the news, one Twitter/X user asked the question everyone was wondering; “Is this her daughter or niece?”

And she didn’t find much sympathy from anyone.

CHAZ, short for Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, was an area of downtown Seattle occupied by anti-police “protesters” during the George Floyd riots in the summer of 2020.

Columbia University President Minouche Shafik quickly released a statement condemning the protests, not for their content but for how they were conducted.

“There will be many views across our diverse community about how best to do this and that is as it should be. But we cannot have one group dictate terms and attempt to disrupt important milestones like graduation to advance their point of view.”

All of the students who were arrested have been suspended from the university, Hirsi included.

Hirsi, being by proxy famous, immediately jumped on the mainstream media talk show circuit and declared that she was now homeless and hungry.

Despite Hirsi being among hundreds arrested, she, quite hilariously, attempted to claim on MSNBC that she was singled out for arrest because of her identity. She also said that she’s “a little bit frantic” after being kicked out.

Life comes at you fast.

Congress

Democrat Congressman: “Ukraine’s Border Is Our Border”

As if we needed another example of how backward our politicians’ priorities are, last week we witnessed Americans waving Ukrainian flags in the halls of (American) Congress after voting to send $60 billion more of your tax dollars to fund a foreign war.

Meanwhile, the southern (U.S.) border is wide open, letting terrorists, murderers, drug mules, and who knows what else into our country. Can we finally get some funding for a border wall?

Representative Gerry Connolly (D-VA) went so far as to say that “the Ukraine Border is our border.” (no, it’s not).

“Some say, well, we have to deal with our border first,” Connelly said. “The Ukrainian-Russian border is our border! It’s the border between depraved autocracy and freedom loving people seeking our democratic way of life! Do we have a stake in that outcome? Yes. Undeniably, yes.”

Give it a listen for yourself – it has to be heard to be believed:

Apparently the only border crisis that doesn’t exist to people like Connolly is the only one that actually does exist.

In his speech on the floor of Congress, he acknowledged that his detractors will call for securing the U.S. border before handing billions of dollars to other countries.

People on Twitter/X were quick to tear Connolly a new one:

Both his twisted priorities and “fascinating” perspectives on geography were put on blast:

Just as quickly he dismisses the thought of putting America first, showing that he prefers Americans taking a backseat to Ukrainians.

I’m old enough to remember when Republicans were criticized for wanting to fund endless wars around the world.

American politicians, regardless of party affiliation, should not be waiving the flag of another country in our seat of government.

Trump said it best:

Website, Woke

Woke NPR CEO’s Resurfaced Tweets Proves They’re Really “National Psychotic Radio”

NPR has earned itself a reputation as a far-left outlet decades ago, but it wasn’t until veteran editor Uri Berliner penned an expose in The Free Press last week that we got a first-hand account on just how bad things really were.

As you’d expect from fake news, NPR suspended him without pay for daring to criticize them. Rather than even attempt to debunk his reporting, they further confirmed their political bias, instead blaming Berliner for giving the political right some ammunition against them.

He’s since resigned – but all eyes are now on NPR CEO Katherine Maher, and some of her resurfaced tweets prove that the hackery at NPR isn’t going away any time soon. 

Back during the George Floyd riots of 2020, which killed dozens and caused billions in property damage, Maher was furious that the media would dare report on it. “CNN is talking about the tragedy of damage to iconic retail zones and shoe stores in LA,” Maher complained. “I mean, sure, looting is counterproductive. But it’s hard to be mad about protests not prioritizing the private property of a system of oppression founded on treating people’s ancestors as private property.”

She continued; “Also, reporting on extinguished shoe store fires is just lazy reporting…. (Also to be clear, I am not conflating provocateurs with protestors. Instead, saying this should not be the thing anyone sheds tears over. Cheesecakes are insured; the right to be black and breathe is without measure.)”

Naturally, sane people took issue with her commentary.

And as you’ll read in future articles on Maher, this somehow isn’t even her craziest stance! 

Britain, Cancel Culture, Left-wing extremism

Extremist British MP Laughs At Fellow MP Being “Surrounded” By Police

Brussels police intervened in a conservative conference attended by Brexit icon Nigel Farage on Tuesday, April 16th, at the request of local Mayor Emir Kir. The conference was ordered shut down by local authorities who erroneously cited “public safety concerns” – despite the event being entirely peaceful, and attended by government ministers and officials from across Europe.

Police reportedly prevented people from entering the venue, only allowing guests to leave if they chose. In the days prior, the conference faced venue changes over repeated attempts by the mayor and other local activists to prevent venues from hosting it. And instead of causing universal outrage – the kind of consensus the Western world might one day have expected – Britain’s Labour Party seemed to think it was funny.

So funny, in fact, that when one Member of Parliament mocked the chilling assault on freedom of speech, other Labour MPs visibly chuckled.

Here’s what happened:

Wes Streeting, a far-left Member of Parliament for Britain’s Labour Party, laughed off the entire debacle on Tuesday. Streeting sarcastically bemoaned the absence of the Right Honourable Member for Fareham, the hugely popular Conservative Member of Parliament Suella Braverman, was unable to attend the House of Commons because she was in Brussels, surrounded by police officers who were attempting to shut down the event.

“And of course, a source lose to the right honourable member for Fareham, who couldn’t be here today with us Mr. Deputy Speaker, because she’s currently in Brussels surrounded by the police, who are trying to shut down the event she’s attending with some far-right fanatics with whom she has much in common. She said that she is not a fan of the bill,” Streeting said.

By the way – this is the same Member of Parliament who was recently forced to eat crow and admit that he was, in part, responsible for the popularization of extreme Trans ideology that has caused irreversible harm to thousands of British children.

Last week, Streeting admitted that he was wrong to claim “trans women are women” in the wake of the release of the Cass review – an independent inquiry that confirmed there was “weak evidence” that puberty suppression helped sufferers of gender dysphoria.

Streeting may have abandoned his extreme views on gender, but will he abandon his extreme position on freedom of speech?

National Affairs

Book Reading Event Featuring Benjamin Netanyahu’s Brother Canceled

A non-governmental organization (NGO) that receives funding from Germany’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a reputation for enacting cancel culture on Jews.

As a result, a book reading event starring Dr. Iddo Netanyahu, Benjamin Netanyahu’s brother, has been canceled.

Ironically, the satirical book he was meant to read, “Itamar K.,” deals specifically with the issue of limiting free expression.

Berlin was supposed to host the event last week, courtesy of German-Israeli Society (DIG), an association that promotes German/Israeli relations.

A letter was sent to Netanyahu informing him that the event had to be canceled due to purported affiliations with certain groups across the political spectrum. Netanyahu said the cancelation letter said, “We hope you understand.”

Silencing is a central element in his book. Observers who point out that the DIG’s Berlin-Brandenburg chapter, which is supposed to support Israel, has labeled Netanyahu “persona non grata” have brought attention to the absurdity of the cancellation.

The author’s ties to German political far-right parties were cited as the reason for the cancelation, according to the DIG’s website.

According to Netanyahu, the DIG has been swayed by the left and is averse to hearing from some groups.

Netanyahu has made flawless presentations in many German locations. The renowned author has given speeches at many events, including those in Freiburg, Bavaria, Dresden, and Hanover, as well as to the Jewish community in Bamberg.

Dr. Rafael Korenzecher, publisher of the German-Jewish weekly Jewish Review, met with Netanyahu during the author’s recent book tour across Germany. The publication replied with an angry article, accusing DIG president Volker Beck of blocking the reading because the author isn’t left-wing enough. The post claimed that the group was reluctant to host an associate of the prime minister of Israel.

The way Beck has run the group that is supposedly pro-Israel has drawn criticism in the past.

Beck has been the target of persistent criticism from Likud lawmakers, who support Benjamin Netanyahu’s party and see the propagation of anti-Zionist ideas in him. In 2022, this issue was addressed by Amichai Chikli, who is now the Minister for Diaspora Affairs and for combatting antisemitism.

While discussing Beck and the DIG last year, Ariel Kallner, a legislator from the Likud party, said that having friends like these is not helpful at all.

Cancel Culture, Woke

Even Book Publishers Are Cowering to Cancel Culture Now

Just two weeks after its 2016 publication, Jonah Winter’s children’s book “A Birthday Cake for George Washington” was canceled by Scholastic. Images depicting smiling slaves in the book sparked outrage online and led to a petition calling for its revocation. It was irrelevant that the artist was black or that the editor was a giant in the children’s book industry and also black.

Since its publication on January 5, 2016, the book has been heavily criticized for its images. The drawings are based on an imagined description of Hercule’s afternoon, the enslaved chef of George Washington.

In his editorial, Winters explains that if George Washington had wanted to, he could have brought in the best chefs in the world. Instead, he trusted Hercules to oversee the preparation of the family’s meals, state banquets, and other formal occasions. Hercules had unmatched talent through apprenticeship and self-study.

However, a social-media mob forced a large publisher to stop distributing the book. He explains that progressive activists on social media have been rising and calling for cancellation. Children’s book publishers are constantly on edge because these campaigners may be seen as challenging to their puritanical principles. 

A new social rule is that a book’s subject matter should correspond with the author’s identity. Whites should not write about Blacks. Straight males should not write about gay women, and so forth.

Activists also think certain books are bad for kids and should be removed from shelves. If the goals of the right-wing activists seem suspiciously similar, that’s because they are. The main distinction is that the left-wing version wants the destruction of the texts they oppose, while right-wing activists just seek the removal of certain books from specific schools.

Reading While White is a blog that placed Winter on a blacklist.  There is no proof that Winter or any of the other white writers were racist, but the contributors, liberal whites who condemn other liberal whites for racism, nevertheless made baseless accusations.

Winter believes non-white and gay writers, who have often self-canceled in response to online harassment, are among the many casualties of cancel culture too. Ironically, these are the exact demographics cancel culture’s perpetrators claim to be fighting for. But as is evidenced time and time again by their actions, their main goal is power.

Woke

Dr. Phil Is Taking a Sledgehammer to the Crazy Woke Agenda

Severnty-three-year-old Dr. Phil, whose real name is Phil McGraw, has generously allowed Entertainment Tonight (ET) to get a sneak peek at some exciting things happening in the coming weeks.

The talk show host gave a tour of his network’s Texas studio, Merit Street Media, and discussed his latest book in an exclusive interview with ET’s Kevin Frazier.

According to McGraw, “Merit Street” was not a random selection. He believes in the American ideal of meritocracy, which holds that one should be rewarded for their efforts and contributions. He said there’s a junction where Main Street America and Merit Street converge, and his goals and the enormous studio in which his new program, Dr. Phil Primetime, is filmed are based on that vision.

The new network features well-known hosts on its Merit Street programming, including Steve Harvey, Nancy Grace, and Chris Harrison.

McGraw expressed his deep worry about the current state of affairs in the US. He is concerned that the American family, its values, and the whole idea of truth are under assault. He is hoping for more exposure than what daytime could provide regarding audience size and platform.

Late in February, McGraw published a new book titled We’ve Got Issues: How You Can Stand Strong for America’s Soul and Sanity. The book centers on a simple notion- returning to facts. He lists the oversaturation of cancel culture as one of the country’s most pressing problems.

Dr. Phil made this point in an interview with Jordan Peterson last month.

According to Dr. Phil, the state and federal governments recognized that the schools were a lifeline for those students, yet they shut them down nonetheless when the COVID-19 pandemic hit and threatened or chastised parents and doctors, among others, who disagreed.

He was very critical of the activities taken by the CDC and the Department of Education, claiming that these organizations ignored studies showing that kids were far less vulnerable to COVID-19.

Lockdowns, however, have far-reaching consequences, including adverse effects on children’s mental health and education in addition to societal and economic expenses, as shown in research.

He told ET that the book We’ve Got Issues perfectly describes our situation. People think woke and cancel culture has gone too far and are starting to push back. He believes Dr. Phil Primetime is airing at the perfect moment because folks are now prepared to apply common sense.

Woke

The Big Picture: Why Speaking Truth to Woke Extremism Matters to Everyone

Woke extremism, like many ideologies, holds subjective premises.

Someone aligned around the center will have a different understanding of socialism, for example, as opposed to a liberal or a Classical Liberal; likewise, what constitutes someone as far right depends upon how far left some one happens to be. Ultimately, like Einstein, it’s all about perspective.

That being said, people from from all walks of life tend to agree on woke extremism’s unwanted, unwarranted, and sometimes outright loony ideas designed to enforce a society where the rights of the individual go only so far as whatever group-box they can be placed within.

It’s an issue which is not one-sided, either. Woke extremism is not a part of the political spectrum, rather it is closer to the manner in which views are forced upon others. There are woke extremists on the left and the right, and both should be sternly rejected.

Wokeism at Work

Disney has made itself into a classic example. Throughout the early 2020s, the children’s entertainment corporation has focused heavily on identity politics, much to the frustration of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (whose state is home to Disney’s largest amusement park in North America).

Listing all the woke extremism at Disney would be an entire article itself. Nevertheless, the 2025 adaptation of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves is a notable example. The removal of the latter part of the title is a prelude for the rest of the film, which features only one dwarf rather than the seven iconic personalities of yore.

It’s easy to see why this has been controversial. The removal of an integral part of an historic classic prompts the question, “why bother bringing the film back at all?” Despite all of its efforts to garner the favor of woke extremists the film has inevitably been deemed discriminatory since it has limited potential income for marginalized dwarf actors.

Jason “Wee Man” Acuña, who has dwarfism, addressed the controversy. “You’re replacing jobs that people could have as little people,” said the Jackass star. “It’s for dwarfs – why [is Disney] hiring ‘Snow White and the seven average people’?”

It’s not just Hollywood which is impacted by wokeism in the workplace. Major corporations are continually introducing politically correct language as part of company policy, forcing uncomfortable conversations about whether “guys” refers to all employees or just men as well as allowing men to share private spaces with women.

Beyond conversations at the water cooler, however, there are legitimate concerns over workplace safety, particularly among female employees. The issue has largely stemmed from gender-neutral toilet policies, where men and women are required to share a restroom as companies try to conform to the woke ideology. Feminists on all sides of the political spectrum have expressed concern while sharing their objections to transitioning males to use the female toilets where separate restrooms remain in place.

The Extremist Mindset

One of the most petulant issues with woke extremism is that it will not cease to attack you wherever you are. In everyday life woke culture seeks to suppress the rights of individuals. As mentioned earlier, this impacts conservatives as much as liberals.

It’s fair to argue that woke extremism is a mindset, as opposed to an ideology, to enforce one’s views upon others irregardless of means or circumstance. By this definition it is understandable how liberals feel they have also been subjected to woke extremism.

Examples can be found everywhere. For insistence, how certain words should not be used in the workplace conservative wokeism is just as ludicrous. In April 2023, Governor of Oklahoma Kevin Stitt vetoed a bill to fund the state’s most-watched public service broadcaster which allegedly sought to “indoctrinate kids” by including lesbian characters in certain TV shows.

“Some of the stuff that they’re showing just overly sexualizes our kids,” said Gov. Stitt, referencing episodes of ‘Clifford the Big Red Dog’ and ‘Work it Out Wombats!’.

The Importance of Respectful Debate

A strong counter measure to any attempt to restrict free speech is through promoting respectful debate and constructive dialogue. After all, differing views are vital to a healthy democracy. Cancelling those that aren’t the same, on the contrary, is a totalitarian measure. 

Respectful debate encourages more people to share their views, thus allowing us to have a deeper understanding of the world around us. If the political auditorium is a cesspit of hate, fewer are likely to become engaged leading to polarization and societal strife. 

Likewise, constructive dialogue can be productive in finding common ground. It allows people of different viewpoints to discuss their differences, but also their similarities thereby humanizing instead of “otherizing.” Along with respectful debate, constructive dialogue helps develop a better understanding of different issues facing society.

Of course, the public image of a corporation can reflect its internal thinking. Multinational giant Unilever is a good example of the workplace war on woke, no matter the political ideology.

For corporations it’s hard to conduct business without political implications (the criticism of companies which have not withdrawn from Russia since it’s invasion of Ukraine is an example of that). Woke extremism, however, can be targeted no matter the political stance, with Unilever threatening to pull its services from online platforms Facebook and Google if they did not remove content which “create[s] division in society and promote anger and hate.” The perspective of this action being either good or bad is of course only determined based upon the watcher’s underlying precepts of the world.

Educational Matters

But woke culture doesn’t just stop in Hollywood, at the workplace, or in everyday life. Terrifyingly deciding that it is much easier to target the malleable minds of the youth to achieve its ends.

In one instance a Republicans’ chapter at Northwestern University was defunded using emergency legislation after inviting conservative author James Lindsay to deliver a speech. In another, Californian parents faced the prospect of jail time for disrupting school board meetings until Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill introduced by his own party.

Woke extremism in education is deeply concerning. Schools and universities are fundamental in educating young people who may not have an alternative perception of the world around them. If they become indoctrinated by woke culture, they by definition do not question its underlying presuppositions.

Instead, it’s fair to argue that children should be taught different perspectives on difficult matters. Slavery, for example, is no exception. One would hope in the 21st century that views on slavery are unanimously against it, but it’s important to understand why there were conflicting views in the mid-1800s. If society does not learn about different perspectives, it is bound to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Once young people leave education, they are confronted by the world of work. Larger corporations yield larger paychecks, but they are also subjected to greater cultural pressures. The subsequent effects of mass boycotts tell the tale of what can happen when woke extremism seeks to divide.

The same principles for encouraging respectful debate in one’s political circles apply within their professional network. One of woke extremism’s biggest enemies is collaboration and debate. Through promoting a healthy work environment people from a whole host of backgrounds and upbringings can contribute to an extremely well-run corporation. 

Part of the major growth in large-scale corporations, as well as the rise of woke extremism, has been as a result of technological advancement. The easiness of sharing information has been engulfed by the media, which has transitioned from daily news to on-the-minute updates throughout the 21st century.

The Mindset and the Media

Surprisingly, despite its changing methods of delivery, the tenant that drive media prosperity have largely remained the same. The people look at you, the more money you can charge advertisers. For them it has always been about the bottom line, and maybe a little bit about journalistic integrity. News sells particularly well the more it enrages sensible people.

Woke extremism’s intent on controversy plays right into the media’s hands. When news of a woke policy becomes public, scores flock to media outlets to vent or otherwise “engage” with it. If people are engaging with your story, it means it has added to your bottom line. Naturally, this creates division within communities effectively polarizing moderates. Fortunately for the United States, we have the First Amendment so differing outlets can present different viewpoints. The best media outlets are the ones who present both sides of the debate equally and fairly.

Your Importance to the World

Ultimately, we often forget the bigger picture in life. We’re all living our lives on a planet that is billions of years old. It’s up to each individual in our society to change the world for a better place.

If you’re reading this article, it’s likely you live in a place where freedom of speech is permitted. Woke extremism, as part of its assault on individualism, is seeking to change that. It’s not an issue for the left or the right – it’s an issue for everyone. 

It is our duty as a society to protect the very freedoms we often take for granted. For that, we must battle woke extremism, and shine a light on its devious ways. That can only be achieved through respectful, constructive dialogue to create a welcoming discussion sphere which everyone wants to be a part of. 

There’s an old saying: “If you don’t stand up for your beliefs, who else will?” 

It’s a wise phrase to live by. Be yourself, and share your opinions. The more people we have contributing to civic debate, the more we can develop a greater understanding of the world. It can, and most certainly will be challenging, but it’s vital we all contribute. The archenemy of the woke ideology is individualism, and by portraying our own points of view, we can defeat it once and for all.

Media

Media Machines and Woke Extremism Bias: Navigating Information in the Age of Tyranny by the Minority

Woke extremist ideology makes the blood of many boil.

All too often there are news stories out of the mainstream media of the latest woke measure at a school in Michigan, a retailer in New Jersey, or a movie studio in Orlando. All receive proper criticism but the woke ideology seems to always achieve its goal: publicity.

When six corporations control 90% of the media in America, it’s hard for dissenting voices to be heard. Logic and reason simply doesn’t get bought from the mainstream media; woke extremism, however, flies off the proverbial shelves. A common misconception is that media outlets promote what they want you to know. In reality, the mainstream media promotes stories which it believes will “sell”, even if they do not agree with the content. If readers or viewers are engaging with a story through appraise or outrage, then it’s a success.

Publicity Rules

This suits the desperation of woke extremists to constantly remain relevant. They are dedicated adherents to the concept of “no such thing as bad publicity”; quite simply, they do not care what the response to their extremism is, they just want it to be the center of attention.

Of course, the responses vary from tentative praise to fierce criticism. However, when woke ideologies continually make headlines, journalists and broadcasters often spend more time focusing on attacking woke issues rather than promoting the interests of the vast majority of people.

The very nature of news media is partly responsible for this. In part because of the word “news” itself – if the same old things are happening, it cannot be considered “news.” Hence, woke extremists – so desperate to change anything and everything wherever it is possible – regularly feature within the mainstream media.

That is a very basic explanation, and popular issues stretch far beyond maintaining America as we know – or knew – it. Sadly, many voices are only called upon only to rebuff woke ideologies, leaving them little time to devote to issues which many are interested in.

Alternative Media

Fortunately, technological advancements now mean it’s easier than ever before for all viewpoints to be shared on a mass scale. Events since the turn of the decade have promoted a greater interest in popular ideas such as personal responsibility, objective reality, logic, and reason that offer an alternative to those who want to keep up to date on the news which interests them.

Two recent success stories suggest there is growing demand for current news reporting. In the United Kingdom, the launch of GB News in 2021 has offered an alternative to the centrist broadcast media landscape. Likewise, following his dismissal from Fox News and CNN, Tucker Carlson and Don Lemon have launched their own media companies, one doing traditional news and the other becoming the first western journalist to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin since his country’s invasion of Ukraine two years ago.

Perhaps the secret to success for new media is content over policy. Carlson was Fox’s top broadcaster until his dismissal, and his compelling interviews have scored over hundreds of millions of views on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). GB News has drafted in politicians such as Brexit advocate Nigel Farage and former Prime Minister Boris Johnson to speak on important topics. Don Lemon has also pursued content that he now gets to curate himself instead of being beholden to a network’s agenda.

Ironically, the woke attack weapon of cancel culture is also it’s Achilles heal. Woke activists long to cancel anyone who attacks their ideology, and most broadcasters are no exception. The publicity from its own antics has turned people away from their ideology and had them return their focus on the foundations of their own existence, thus bringing popular viewpoints back into the spotlight. And that is some good news.

Left-wing extremism

Unpacking Woke Extremism and Understanding its Origins

English, like any other actively used language, is always evolving. Words which were once used regularly are constantly being relegated to history books, and this cycle shall continue as long societies evolve. The term “woke” is no exception. Its origins are rooted in African-American Vernacular English, meaning to stay “alert to racial prejudice and discrimination”. It came into prominence in the 1930s, when millions of people were subject to persecution and violence simply because of the color of their skin, but was first used by Jamaican social activist Marcus Garvey in 1923.

One hundred years on and the term has morphed into something which practically contradicts its original meaning. In the 21st century, “woke” has been adopted by extremist groups intent on enforcing their beliefs on others by any means necessary. Extremist views typically found in the margins of society, given that they are “extreme” and not “moderate,” are often yelled loudly and proudly by the smallest of groups. While this is not inherently a bad thing, Martin Luther King and his contemporaries being a prime example, it is of utmost importance to not allow falsehoods to be spread without resistance given by the truth. As the saying goes, “the truth shall set you free.”

One of the major issues with extremism that humanity has seen before, woke extremism being no different, is its determination to snuff out the free exchange of ideas. The woke movement attempts to “cancel” anything which it sees as a threat to its existence, forcing those who disagree, and even those who are amiably questioning their dogma, into silence.

Which leaves no wonder as to why the woke target political figures and other detractors with a large audience. When one’s career is largely built on political debate and public commentary, it’s easy to see why a detractor would be heavily targeted to be “canceled.” Especially those whose job is to seek truth on current topics in the public square, including woke ideology.

Of one of the many reoccurring habits of extremists in modern human societies is the inexplicable predilection to undertake campaigns of force in order to silence or “convince” others. Take for example the famed author of the Harry Potter series of books, J.K. Rowling. For years, Rowling has been attacked for her advocacy of women’s rights for what woke extremists see as a threat to their idea of transgender rights. So angered by her staunch belief that human females deserve their own spaces that some firms are so frightened of woke extremists that journalists have been blocked from asking questions about her at promotional events for the franchise she created.

When engaged in public discourse, instead of arguing for the point they want to convince others of, woke extremists seek blind acceptance from others by any means necessary. By doing this they create a very hostile environment which, for many, is deeply unsettling and runs contrary to peaceful behavior.

Woke extremists should by no means be barred from sharing their views, quite the contrary. They should be allowed and have been allowed to share their thoughts freely. However, their hostile behavior must not be tolerated. As was learned from Europe in the 1900’s, to tolerate those who are intolerable leads only to calamity. Woke extremism must be rigorously and intellectually challenged lest the we share the same fate as those unwilling to fight extremism who came before.

Through respectfully and constantly rebuffing the twisted words of the disturbed, those who are not woke can hopefully show extremists that while they are entitled to have their views, it is not permissible to become violent when others do not share the same ideological dogma. As long as truth prevails, we shall be free.


Scroll to Top