News

News

Dad of Three Dies After Midair Brawl With Jet2 Crew and Passenger

A 35-year-old father of three died after being restrained by passengers and cabin crew during a disturbance aboard a Jet2 flight traveling from Cyprus to the United Kingdom, prompting an ongoing investigation by Greater Manchester Police and an independent police watchdog, as reported by The New York Post.

The incident occurred aboard a Jet2 flight that departed Larnaca, Cyprus, and landed at Manchester Airport on Monday morning.

Police said they were called to the aircraft after receiving reports that a passenger had assaulted another traveler and a member of the airline’s cabin crew during the flight.

According to Greater Manchester Police, the passenger, identified as Callum Kerr, was allegedly “acting aggressively” toward both airline staff and other passengers before the aircraft landed.

When officers boarded the plane after it arrived in Manchester, they found Kerr restrained by passengers and members of the cabin crew at the rear of the aircraft. Police said he was unresponsive when officers placed him in handcuffs.

Emergency medical personnel transported Kerr to a hospital, where he died the following day.

Authorities have launched an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident and the events that unfolded during the flight.

Witnesses who spoke to the Warrington Guardian said Kerr had been arguing with his girlfriend during the trip before flight attendants moved her to a different seat.

The witnesses also claimed that Kerr, who competed as a bare-knuckle fighter, headbutted another passenger before fellow travelers intervened and helped restrain him.

Those witness accounts have not been independently confirmed by investigators.

Greater Manchester Police said detectives are working to establish a complete timeline of events aboard the aircraft.

Because officers had contact with Kerr before his death, the force also made a mandatory referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), which routinely reviews incidents involving deaths following police contact.

Police emphasized that the referral is required under established procedures whenever officers interact with an individual before a death occurs.

Chief Superintendent Mike Allen said investigators are continuing to gather evidence from those who were on board the aircraft.

“An investigation is now under way to establish what happened during the flight, and our specialist officers have been keeping them updated with all the information we know so far,” Allen said.

The chief superintendent acknowledged that many passengers witnessed the disturbance before officers boarded the aircraft.

“I know there were many people on the flight who witnessed the violence and disruption prior to officers’ arrival,” Allen added.

He also noted that investigators are examining the actions taken by passengers and airline personnel who intervened during the incident.

“We know passengers and aircrew worked to detain the man to bring the incident to an end. Our detectives are investigating this to understand the full circumstances.”

The Independent Office for Police Conduct said the officers who boarded the aircraft are currently being treated as witnesses rather than subjects of its investigation.

Kerr’s family released a statement following his death, remembering him as a devoted father.

“Callum was a family man, father to three beautiful young children, a lover of sport, and with a heart of gold,” the family said.

The investigation remains active as detectives continue interviewing witnesses, reviewing available evidence, and determining the sequence of events that led to Kerr’s death following the midair disturbance.

Neither Greater Manchester Police nor the Independent Office for Police Conduct has announced any findings regarding the cause of Kerr’s death, and authorities have indicated that the investigation is ongoing.

News

Ukraine’s Drone Giant Expands Into Missile Defense in Bid to Dominate Both Air and Strike Wars

Ukraine’s top drone manufacturer, Fire Point, the brains behind the country’s deep-strike drone campaign against Russia, is now setting its sights on ballistic missile defense.

In a move signaling growing ambitions inside Kyiv’s fast-growing weapons industry, Fire Point has teamed up with German defense firm Hensoldt to develop a low-cost interceptor system called “Freyja” — a shift that could reshape Europe’s air defense landscape.

Fire Point isn’t some dusty Soviet-era factory churning out recycled tech. The company was born after Russia’s 2022 invasion and quickly transformed from a film casting agency into one of Ukraine’s biggest war contractors.

Today, its precision-guided drones account for roughly 60 percent of Ukraine’s long-range strikes inside Russia, hitting oil refineries, ammo depots, and supply networks far behind enemy lines.

Those airborne attacks, dubbed “long-range sanctions” by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, have inflicted real pain on Moscow. Strikes on Russian fuel infrastructure have disrupted refinery production and forced the Kremlin to limit domestic fuel sales — a rare admission of economic vulnerability that Ukraine’s leadership is eager to amplify.

Fire Point’s CEO and chief designer, Denys Shtilerman, didn’t mince words during the Eurosatory weapons expo in France. “These are the drones responsible for what you see burning on your TV screens on the territory of Russia,” he said proudly, confirming what the Kremlin’s censors prefer to hide.

With its growing reputation as a producer of long-range strike drones like the FP-1, FP-2, and FP-5 “Flamingo” cruise missile, Fire Point is now expanding its reach — literally — in both directions.

On one hand, its new FP drones can reportedly fly nearly 1,700 miles while carrying sizable payloads. On the other, the firm plans to shoot down ballistic missiles for less than $1 million per intercept, a fraction of what pricey U.S.-made Patriot systems cost.

Shtilerman told Reuters that the goal is to make interception truly affordable. “If we can decrease it to less than $1 million, it will be a game changer in air defense,” he stated, explaining the company’s plan to intercept its first incoming ballistic missile by late 2027. For perspective, a single Patriot PAC-3 can cost $3.8 million to fire — not counting the launcher or supporting systems.

Trump Strengthens Support for Ukraine, Calls Russia a “Paper Tiger”

The proposed FP-7.X interceptor, which successfully completed a controlled test flight in June, is designed to hit targets at an altitude of 15 miles for about $700,000 per shot.

And while Washington and its European allies argue over aid packages and weapons shipments, Ukraine’s private sector is quietly becoming a weapons supplier in its own right. Shtilerman made this point clear: “Ukraine is now not only a consumer of aid but a provider of security solutions for Europe — and perhaps for the whole world.”

President Zelenskyy has leaned heavily on Fire Point’s innovations as part of his continued push for self-reliance in wartime production. He recently hailed the company’s new long-range drones that can now strike as far as 3,000 kilometers — enough reach to hit deep inside Russia’s industrial backbone.

“I am grateful to the Fire Point engineers,” he said during his June 20 evening address.

But Fire Point’s stunning rise hasn’t escaped scrutiny. The firm’s meteoric growth from a casting agency to a billion-dollar arms maker has landed it in Ukraine’s ongoing anti-corruption dragnet. Investigators have linked it to leaked conversations involving businessman Timur Mindich, a Zelenskyy associate now accused of corruption in the energy sector.

Putin Agrees to Ceasefire on Energy and Infrastructure Targets in Ukraine

Fire Point has denied any ties, maintaining that ownership rests solely with its co-founders. No formal charges have been filed.

Still, the optics are tricky in a country where battles against both Russian missiles and internal graft are fought daily.

Fire Point’s rapid government contracts — reportedly worth more than $1 billion this year — have raised questions among Western partners even as they applaud Ukraine’s newfound industrial prowess.

To help reassure foreign investors, Fire Point added former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to its advisory board in November, a move clearly designed to add Western credibility and strategic weight to its growing portfolio.

Pompeo’s involvement signals that major American figures see value in Ukraine becoming a robust European manufacturer of modern warfare technology — not merely a consumer of American handouts.

Beyond weapons, Fire Point’s success also carries a symbolic punch. It represents Ukraine’s determination to move from dependency on NATO donations toward self-sustaining production that matches — or undercuts — leading Western systems in cost and capability. For U.S. policymakers and military observers tracking the global arms race, this is no small shift.

Ukraine “Well Prepared” for Potential Russian Retaliation After Daring Drone Strikes [WATCH]

As of June, Ukraine has carried out nearly 30 long-range strikes on Russian fuel sites, causing visible disruption to Russia’s internal logistics.

With Fire Point preparing to mass-produce its FP-7.X interceptors at a rate of three per day starting in August, the firm is positioning itself to become Europe’s go-to hub for low-cost air and missile defense hardware.

For Ukraine, that combination — a cheap offensive strike capability paired with an affordable missile shield — could change its strategic fortunes. For Moscow, it’s a nightmare scenario: a resourceful neighbor capable of both hitting deep into Russian territory and neutralizing retaliation on a budget.

In the global context, Fire Point’s emergence shows that the future of warfare may belong to smaller, faster, and more flexible innovators rather than sprawling, bureaucratic defense complexes.

With a little Western oversight and less political interference, Ukraine’s new war-tech machine might just outpace the lumbering systems of its supposed allies.

News

House Approves $1.55 Billion Revival for E-7 Wedgetail, Restores Navy’s Hawkeye Funds

The House of Representatives is giving the Air Force’s E-7 Wedgetail program a second life, approving a $1.55 billion funding shift to pull the airborne battle management aircraft back from the scrap heap.

After bureaucrats at the White House budget office tried to cannibalize the Navy’s E-2D Hawkeye funds to make it happen, lawmakers put their foot down, steering money toward the E-7 while refusing to gut a critical Navy radar platform.

The funding maneuver emerged from the House Appropriations Committee’s fiscal year 2027 War Department bill, which reroutes existing funds but restores vital naval capabilities that the Biden administration had tried to raid.

In a June 17 budget amendment to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., the White House’s Office of Management and Budget asked to push more than $1.55 billion into the Air Force’s R&D coffers to continue development of the E-7.

The program had been shelved by Pentagon leadership just last year, citing rising costs and uncertainty about survivability in contested airspace.

To make it happen, OMB sought to slash $651 million from the Navy’s E-2D Hawkeye radar aircraft account and another $899 million from a classified Air Force program.

The administration’s proposal would have effectively robbed Peter to pay Paul, gutting one critical platform to save another.

House appropriators didn’t take kindly to that kind of gamesmanship. While they approved the E-7 realignment, they rejected the Biden team’s raid on the Navy budget, restoring the $651 million meant for the carrier-based Hawkeye program.

The committee made clear both aircraft are essential to U.S. warfighting readiness—particularly with the war raging in Iran underscoring just how thin America’s airborne command and control capabilities have become.

“The conflict in Iran has reinforced the need for the Air Force to maintain a credible airborne battle management capability,” the report said, pointing out that the aging E-3 AWACS and the Navy’s E-2D Hawkeye remain the backbone of current theater operations. “As the E-3 is set to retire, the E-7 Wedgetail will serve as modern replacement for lost battle management capability.”

The current $1.55 billion will fund two prototype E-7 Wedgetails and continued engineering, manufacturing, and development work. While the Air Force already has seven aircraft on contract—two as rapid prototypes and five more under a modification agreement from March—none are production-ready.

These are developmental assets designed to prove the U.S.-specific configuration before moving to full-scale manufacture.

Lawmakers, however, are not content with rosy PowerPoint timelines. They’ve ordered the Air Force Secretary to brief both House and Senate appropriations subcommittees alongside the fiscal year 2028 request.

That briefing must include full program details: planned quantities, long-term funding requirements, and schedules for both development and eventual production.

The House report shows frustration with what many see as endless bureaucratic flip-flopping from the Pentagon. Just last year, Air Force brass wanted to scrap the Wedgetail entirely, citing ballooning per-aircraft costs from $588 million to $724 million.

The plan was to rely on additional Hawkeyes and theoretical space-based sensors. Then came the war in Iran—an unmistakable reality check exposing serious gaps in America’s airborne command network.

Faced with coalition air coordination demands and depleted AWACS fleets, the Pentagon reversed course this spring, admitting that satellites can’t yet replace a capable airborne battle management system.

The committee’s renewed commitment shows that at least some in Congress recognize the danger of chasing fantasy tech at the expense of real, in-the-sky capability.

The House decision also sends a strong signal to America’s allies. The Wedgetail already serves with U.S. partners including Australia and the United Kingdom, both of whom have made major investments in the aircraft’s proven platform.

Bringing the U.S. version to life strengthens interoperability while reaffirming American air dominance at a time when adversaries are watching every move.

Meanwhile, the Navy’s E-2D Hawkeye program—spared from OMB’s knife—remains a critical component of carrier battle group defense and joint operations. Lawmakers reaffirmed its importance, stating that “more aircraft, not fewer, are necessary to support our warfighters now and in the future.”

That’s a direct rebuke to administration budget planners who continue to treat combat readiness like a spreadsheet exercise.

For now, the restored funding means both services will keep moving forward: the Navy maintaining its eyes in the sky, and the Air Force working to revive a long-delayed, desperately needed command and control aircraft.

It’s a solid win for readiness, common sense, and for maintaining America’s edge in an increasingly volatile world.

If the Pentagon follows through this time, the E-7 Wedgetail could enter U.S. service later this decade—potentially just in time to replace a fleet of aging AWACS aircraft that have been flying since the 1970s.

Until then, Congress remains watchful to ensure the War Department doesn’t try another budget sleight of hand to cover its own strategic whiplash.

News

Pentagon Research Backbone Crumbling as Military Priorities Shift Away from Innovation

A newly released report paints a troubling picture of the War Department’s research backbone, warning that the infrastructure supporting America’s technological edge is rapidly deteriorating.

The assessment, delivered by the Office of the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering, bluntly states that years of diverted funds, bureaucratic obstacles, and organizational decay have left our nation’s defense technology enterprise on shaky ground.

According to the report, money meant for modernization and research has routinely been siphoned off to plug operational shortfalls.

Authorized construction projects to upgrade key research and testing facilities continue to be delayed or canceled outright, as the services scramble to reprioritize limited budgets. In plain terms, the War Department keeps robbing innovation to fund maintenance.

That’s a dangerous game in an age where America’s adversaries, particularly China, are investing nonstop in military research and harnessing commercial technology for warfighting advantage.

Beijing has fused its civilian and military sectors into a hyper-efficient machine—while Washington can’t even agree on how to label its research programs.

Investigators examined 30 government labs and research centers—roughly a third of the total network—in what the report called “unprecedented data collection.”

What they found isn’t exactly confidence-inspiring. The Department’s vast research, development, testing, and evaluation ecosystem remains “fundamentally sound” in structure but seriously outdated in execution.

The bureaucrats’ own words are damning: “The Department’s ability to maintain a technically advanced warfighting capability is weakening.” And ironically, the study isn’t calling for closures or cost-cutting—it’s calling for serious reform and renewed investment.

A major concern is the slow and frustrating hiring process for new researchers. Young scientists and engineers are walking away from government opportunities due to endless paperwork, low flexibility, and backlogged security clearances.

And while commercial firms can onboard talent in weeks, Pentagon labs sometimes take months just to start a background check.

Adding insult to injury, the War Department doesn’t even have a clear inventory of its research facilities.

The report notes that the Pentagon “does not possess a comprehensive, authoritative list” of specialized test sites, meaning billions of dollars’ worth of infrastructure may be underutilized or forgotten. It’s government inefficiency at its finest.

The absurdity runs deeper: research domains are so inconsistently categorized that no one can even tell who is working on what. One lab might label its work as “Human-Machine Teaming,” another “Autonomy and Teaming,” and another “AI Agent Development.” The result is a fragmented maze of disconnected projects and wasted synergy.

Meanwhile, the Department’s own intellectual property—the crown jewels of its innovation portfolio—sits largely unused.

The report blasts the “passive marketing” and lack of a centralized mechanism for industry access, saying startups often abandon projects because Pentagon bureaucracy kills momentum. “Administrative burdens often exceed funding timelines,” it warns. Translation: Washington’s red tape is driving away the very innovators we need most.

Even when breakthroughs are made, getting them from lab benches to battlefield gear has become painfully slow.

The report attributes this to “bureaucratic stovepipes, fragmented funding, and misaligned incentives”—a polite way of saying the bureaucracy is strangling itself. Technologies that should reach warfighters in months are often delayed for years.

Notably, the report praises China’s civil-military fusion approach, acknowledging its success in creating a unified strategy between government, academia, and industry.

The message is clear, even if Washington won’t admit it: our adversaries are outpacing us because they take innovation seriously.

To remedy the decline, the study lists several fixes—use artificial intelligence to speed clearance reviews, loosen funding restrictions for lab renovations, and create a searchable tool for intellectual property.

Each recommendation points to the same underlying truth: the current system is too rigid and too complacent to meet modern threats.

The conclusion is blunt and urgent: without a robust, agile, and properly funded research enterprise, the Department cannot equip warfighters with the advanced capabilities needed to deter or defeat tomorrow’s adversaries.

In an era of geopolitical rivalry, that’s more than a bureaucratic problem—it’s a national security crisis.

News

Ro Khanna is ‘100% Clown’: His Birthright Citizenship ‘Racism’ Attack Blows Up in His Face [WATCH]

It was supposed to be another grandstanding moment for California Democrat Ro Khanna.

Instead, it became an embarrassing demonstration of political immaturity and ignorance broadcast live for the world to see.

During a House Select Committee on China hearing meant to address serious threats from the Chinese Communist Party, Khanna decided to attack a witness personally and accuse him of racism.

Unfortunately for Khanna, the “racist” he targeted turned out to be married to a Chinese woman and the father of four half-Chinese children.

The witness in question, Michael Lucci, is the CEO and founder of State Armor, a group that focuses on protecting national, cyber, and economic security.

Lucci testified before the committee about the risks of Chinese espionage, subnational influence, and the phenomenon known as birth tourism used by CCP-linked individuals.

This issue involves Chinese nationals giving birth in U.S. territories to secure American citizenship for their children.

Instead of discussing policy, Khanna launched into a bizarre, politically charged line of questioning, digging up one of Lucci’s old tweets to claim that criticizing the CCP’s birth tourism scheme was racist.

It was the type of shallow accusation that plays well on MSNBC panels but completely collapses under scrutiny. And collapse it did.

When Lucci pointed out that he is married to a Chinese immigrant who became an American citizen in 2019 and that his four children are half Chinese, Khanna’s race-card crusade came to a screeching halt.

The hearing exposed what happens when identity politics meets the hard facts of reality.

Khanna’s attempt to smear an expert witness backfired spectacularly.

WATCH:

Lucci later explained his response in detail, posting a blistering statement on social media that called Khanna’s behavior “self-immolation in committee.”

He wrote, “Ro Khanna owes the American people an apology. I have testified in 20 state capitols across the country. I have never seen a lawmaker embarrass himself like Ro Khanna did today.”

He further noted that Khanna had ignored real issues of Chinese interference, harassment of lawmakers, and threats against critical infrastructure, all to pursue a cheap headline.

Lucci was right to be frustrated.

The Select Committee on China is one of the most important panels in Congress, dedicated to addressing growing threats from the CCP. Instead of taking those threats seriously, Khanna hijacked the hearing to cry racism over a policy discussion that 75 percent of Americans actually agree with.

Polling shows a vast majority of voters oppose automatic citizenship for children of foreign tourists who come specifically to exploit our birthright laws.

Apparently, by Khanna’s definition, three-quarters of America are racists too.

The absurdity of the moment is amplified by context. Lucci’s testimony warned that Chinese-connected actors have been threatening state officials and targeting military sites.

He detailed specific concerns about birth tourism being exploited by CCP-linked elites as a tool of political warfare.

For Khanna to dismiss those concerns by playing racial politics proves exactly why Americans have lost faith in Democratic leadership on security matters.

It is also worth noting the sheer hypocrisy on display.

Khanna and his party often accuse Republicans of ignoring national security in favor of politics.

Yet here was Khanna, ignoring CCP interference in American life to chase imaginary racist conspiracies.

It was the kind of political theater that Democrats so often mistake for governance.

Lucci summed up the problem perfectly when he said, “Calling someone an anti-Chinese racist for opposing the CCP is like calling someone anti-Italian for opposing the mafia.”

WATCH:

That line resonated because it captured exactly how ridiculous the left’s race obsession has become.

Everything is racism, even opposition to a hostile foreign government that openly seeks to undermine the United States.

Instead of engaging with substance, Khanna chose spectacle.

His angry rant not only insulted Lucci but also cheapened an important discussion about CCP aggression that threatens both Democrats and Republicans alike

. It was an act of self-destruction that could only come from a politician so insulated by media flattery that he thinks every argument can be ended by shouting “racist.”

Thursday’s exchange was proof that when Democrats are faced with real policy experts, their ideological scripts fall apart.

Lucci, who came prepared to talk facts and national security, ended up calmly dismantling Khanna’s talking points while maintaining composure.

Meanwhile, Khanna’s performance will go down as another example of the modern left’s addiction to victimhood politics.

At a time when America’s enemies are getting bolder, voters deserve leaders who focus on results, not cheap moral grandstanding.

The CCP’s economic and ideological war against our country is real, and it demands bipartisan seriousness.

What it does not need are politicians like Ro Khanna who turn every hearing into a circus.

Khanna’s instinct to attack rather than understand, to accuse rather than investigate, is exactly what keeps Washington from tackling the real threats we face.

His meltdown in committee might have earned him a few applause emojis online, but to anyone paying attention, it was an embarrassing display of misplaced priorities.

For once, the insult hurled at him during the hearing fits perfectly.

He behaved like a clown.

And America has seen enough clown shows from the left in Congress to last a lifetime.

News

House Panel Pushes Spending Bill Slashing Air Force Flight Hours and Key Programs

The House Appropriations Committee has advanced a fiscal year 2027 spending bill that trims the Air Force’s budget, dialing back flying hours and several other major programs.

Republican lawmakers say the Pentagon’s request is bloated, while others warn that hamstringing key mission areas could jeopardize readiness at a time when America’s adversaries are on the move.

The Air Force’s Flying Hour Program is at the center of the clash.

The Department of the Air Force had requested roughly $9.9 billion this spring to boost pilot flying hours to over one million – a 22 percent increase aimed at rebuilding readiness levels that suffered during years of budget stagnation.

Lawmakers, however, shaved that down, part of a broader push to hold the Pentagon’s record request for $1.5 trillion in check.

Congressional critics argue that too much of the proposed funding is directed toward the Iran conflict and other foreign operations, diverting resources from domestic stability and fiscal sanity.

For top brass in the War Department, that reasoning rings hollow, since combat readiness can’t be turned on and off like a light switch.

Senator John Kennedy, the sharp-tongued Republican from Louisiana, fired a warning shot at a recent hearing. He noted that partisan gridlock over military funding levels could trigger yet another government shutdown if leadership doesn’t find consensus soon.

His frustration echoed throughout the room as he pressed Air Force Secretary Troy Meink on contingency plans.

Meanwhile, deep slashes to other Air Force accounts accompanied the flying-hour reductions. The Working Capital Fund – which handles maintenance, logistics, and supply-chain operations across key installations – took the heaviest blow.

Lawmakers cut its budget from $4.4 billion to just $1.7 billion, an eye-popping 60 percent reduction.

Procurement lines didn’t escape either. Funding for aircraft, missiles, and ammunition purchases was reduced by $1.5 billion, leaving the Air Force with just over $72 billion for those critical assets.

For a service already juggling fifth-generation fighters, hypersonics development, and expanding space missions, these cuts could create a lasting ripple effect.

Operations and maintenance funding dropped by another $726 million, bringing that category down to $73 billion. The Space Force, which falls under the Department of the Air Force, didn’t fare much better.

Its budget shrank by $465 million to $8.8 billion. Those numbers are striking when measured against the rhetoric of “strategic modernization” that Washington elites like to throw around while our enemies build arsenals at breakneck speed.

Critics on the right point out that while bureaucrats posture over “fiscal discipline,” the real issue is Congress’s habit of playing politics with national security. Cutting the very programs that generate skilled aviators, maintain equipment, and supply warfighters sends the wrong message to both allies and adversaries.

Supporters of the current bill insist that the Pentagon must learn to do more with less. They argue that U.S. defense operations have become plagued by inefficiency, and that trimming certain accounts will force better prioritization.

Yet, as anyone who’s ever put on a uniform knows, “doing more with less” only works until the next mission failure or aircraft accident hits the headlines.

The bill now moves to the full House floor for debate, where conservative lawmakers are expected to push for adjustments to restore readiness-related funding.

The Senate Appropriations Committee still hasn’t unveiled its counterpart bill, setting the stage for another Capitol Hill standoff.

Inside the War Department, there’s growing unease that all this political jockeying could disrupt planning cycles and readiness efforts intended to prepare for Chinese and Russian aggression.

Restoring flying hours and sustainment funds isn’t pork—it’s essential to keeping the world’s most powerful air force lethal, trained, and ready to win.

If this Congress fails to grasp that basic truth, America’s warfighters will pay the price while bureaucrats pat themselves on the back for “balancing” the budget.

A smart fiscal policy should strengthen deterrence, not second-guess it. The coming months will show whether the House and Senate have the backbone—and the foresight—to deliver on that principle.

News

FBI Touts Massive Crackdown as Thousands of Predators Locked Up and 7200 Kids Rescued [WATCH]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation released a retro crime film-style video on June 25 highlighting recent enforcement efforts targeting child exploitation, human trafficking, and child predators, presenting statistics the bureau says demonstrate increased investigative activity and arrests, as reported by PJ Media.

The video, shared by FBI Director Kash Patel on X, features a narrator describing the agency’s recent enforcement results while comparing them with those of the previous administration.

According to the video, the FBI has rescued approximately 7,200 children and arrested more than 3,500 individuals identified as child predators or human traffickers.

Patel’s post accompanying the video stated:

“7,200 children rescued. A 42% increase from the previous administration.

3,500 predators/traffickers locked up. A 102% increase from the previous administration.

If you mean to bring harm to the most precious and innocent among us (our children), WE WILL FIND YOU!”

The video itself provides slightly different percentage comparisons, describing the increase in rescued children as nearly 50% and the increase in arrests as more than 100% over the previous administration.

Using a narration styled after classic detective films, the video describes the FBI’s strategy of coordinating investigations with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

“The FBI is leading the charge. The monsters preying on our kids have become the prey. By launching massive task forces across federal and local lines, they’re kicking down doors and shattering trafficking networks from the inside out. Thanks to that relentless pressure, they’ve successfully located and rescued over 7,200 child victims. That’s right, 7,200 innocent young lives saved. That’s an absolutely staggering 49% increase.”

The narrator continues by emphasizing the bureau’s arrest totals.

“Such rescues,” the narrator says, mean “fewer broken families and a real wall of protection built around our homes. And they didn’t stop at the rescues. They tracked down and locked up over 3,500 child predators and human traffickers. That’s a 108% spike in arrests on our watch. It means you can sleep soundly at night, knowing the absolute worst of society are off our streets and behind bars.”

The video also highlights progress involving the FBI’s Most Wanted list.

“They’re even hunting the worst of the worst, apprehending eight of the Bureau’s ten most wanted fugitives in a 17-month blitz. That’s twice as many as the previous administration. There’s nowhere left for these predators to hide. People can argue all they want, but the numbers don’t lie.”

In addition to the enforcement statistics, the production credits joint operations involving multiple law enforcement agencies.

The FBI routinely works alongside state, local, tribal, territorial, and international partners during investigations involving child exploitation and human trafficking, with those partnerships assisting in identifying victims, executing search and arrest warrants, and dismantling criminal organizations.

The bureau’s video presents the reported increases in rescues and arrests as the result of expanded investigative efforts and coordinated task forces.

It also underscores the agency’s stated commitment to pursuing offenders involved in crimes against children.

The FBI has not indicated that these operations are complete, and investigations into child exploitation and human trafficking continue nationwide as federal authorities work with law enforcement partners to identify victims and apprehend suspects.

News

Democrat Senator Calls for Schumer and Jeffries to Step Aside After Party Implosion [WATCH]

Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin suggested Thursday that Democratic congressional leadership should consider making way for new leaders if they are unable to adapt following the party’s losses in the 2024 election, as reported by the New York Post.

Slotkin made the remarks during an appearance on SiriusXM’s Straight Shooter with Stephen A, where she argued that Democrats have not fully recovered from their defeat in the last presidential election and continue to struggle with defining a clear direction for the party.

According to Slotkin, Democrats lost focus by attempting to appeal to too many constituencies instead of presenting voters with a simple, unified message.

“To me, the lesson was simple. Democrats had too many priorities. They tried to make everyone happy and answer every question. When you prioritize everything, no one knows what you actually stand for,” Slotkin told Stephen A. Smith.

She contrasted that approach with President Donald Trump’s campaign message during the 2024 election.

In contrast, “Donald Trump came in with one clear message. He said, ‘I’m going to make your life more affordable. I’m going to put more money in your pocket’. … He won because he kept his message simple and focused on the issue Americans cared most about.”

Slotkin argued that the Democratic Party continues to debate its future instead of settling on a consistent message for voters.

She said that even more than a year after Trump’s election victory, “every day there’s a debate within the party about the path forward.”

The Michigan senator said the party requires substantial changes in leadership and strategy if it hopes to regain political momentum.

“That’s why I believe we need significant new leadership,” she said. “The old models are no longer working, and that includes the Democratic Party.”

Slotkin also described what she sees as an internal problem within her party’s leadership structure.

The senator likened Democrats to a “circular firing squad,” where “everyone is reacting to the crisis, but too few people are talking about what they actually want to accomplish.”

“To me, that’s a fundamental failure of leadership,” she urged.

Host Stephen A. Smith later asked Slotkin whether her comments were directed specifically at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York.

New York, NY – September 7, 2020: Congressman Hakeem Jeffries speaks at US Senator Chuck Schumer and members of NY House delegation media briefing on 3rd avenue in Manhattan

Rather than directly calling for either leader to step down, Slotkin said leadership positions should be available to those who can respond to changing political conditions.

“I’m saying that if people can’t recognize that the game has fundamentally changed and can’t adapt, then they need to make room for others who can,” she responded.

Her remarks came as Democrats continue to assess the party’s direction following the 2024 election and amid ongoing discussion about leadership in both chambers of Congress.

Questions surrounding House Democratic leadership have also increased following primary election losses by two incumbent Democrats in New York City to challengers backed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, prompting renewed attention on the influence of Jeffries within the party.

Meanwhile, Schumer has maintained that Democrats remain focused on regaining control of the Senate, saying the party is “united in the mission to take back the Senate and defeat Trump.”

Representatives for Schumer and Jeffries did not immediately respond to requests for comment following Slotkin’s interview.

The comments add to an ongoing conversation within the Democratic Party over its leadership, messaging, and electoral strategy as lawmakers prepare for upcoming elections.

News

Hochul’s Painful Attempt To Lead Bills Chant Falls Flat At New Stadium Celebration [WATCH]

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul’s attempt to energize Buffalo Bills fans during the ribbon-cutting ceremony for the team’s new stadium drew attention after multiple efforts to lead a crowd chant received little response, as reported by Fox News.

The Buffalo Bills officially celebrated the opening of their new stadium this week after years of playing home games at the original Highmark Stadium.

The ceremony in Orchard Park, New York, featured remarks from several prominent figures connected to the franchise, including Bills owner Terry Pegula and Mary Wilson, the wife of the late former owner Ralph Wilson.

Hochul also addressed attendees during the June 23 event, wearing a Buffalo Bills hat and clothing in the team’s colors as she took the stage before the assembled crowd.

She opened her remarks by attempting to rally those in attendance, saying, “Alright, let’s get this party started, let’s go!” The response from the audience appeared limited.

The governor then made another effort to encourage crowd participation.

“Buffalo, let’s go!” Hochul shouted while attempting to start a call-and-response chant. She pointed toward different sections of the audience in an effort to get fans involved, but the response remained subdued.

After the crowd did not join in, Hochul acknowledged the lack of enthusiasm.

“Alright, seriously? You want to win a championship season with that kind of enthusiasm? Men and women of labor, you know what I’m talking about,” she said before trying once more to start a chant.

Her second attempt also received little response from those attending the ceremony.

“We gotta give this place some good karma, right?” Hochul then said while referring to the Bills’ new stadium.

Video clips of the exchange quickly circulated online following the event, with many social media users commenting on the governor’s unsuccessful attempts to generate excitement from the audience.

The ribbon-cutting ceremony marked a significant milestone for the Bills organization as construction nears completion on the team’s new home.

The stadium carries a reported construction cost of approximately $2.1 billion and will seat roughly 60,000 fans when it opens for regular use.

According to Bill’s Senior Vice President of Design and Stadium Operations, Frank Cravotta, the stadium is 99.75% complete.

The Bills are scheduled to officially welcome fans into the facility on Aug. 8 with the “Return of the Blue & Red” training camp practice.

The venue incorporates several features designed specifically for Western New York’s winter climate.

Stadium architects Populous installed underground heating coils beneath the natural-grass playing surface to help prevent freezing temperatures from damaging the field.

The stadium also features specialized lighting systems designed to promote healthy grass growth throughout the season.

Additional weather-related features include a snow-melt system and a canopy intended to reduce wind inside the stadium, providing a more comfortable experience for fans during Buffalo’s cold-weather games.

The new facility replaces the original Highmark Stadium, which served as the Bills’ home for decades.

The ribbon-cutting ceremony brought together team officials, community leaders, and invited guests to celebrate the completion of one of the NFL’s newest venues ahead of the 2026 season.

While much of the event focused on the stadium’s completion and the Bills’ future in Western New York, Hochul’s unsuccessful efforts to lead chants from the stage became one of the most widely discussed moments from the ceremony after video of the exchange spread across social media.

News

Gutfeld Shreds Democrats With Brutal Truth About Socialist Takeover In NYC Primaries [WATCH]

New York City Democrats have officially taken a hard turn toward radicalism, tossing out three incumbent members of Congress and replacing them with socialist firebrands who proudly campaign to abolish ICE, erase prisons, and open the southern border.

Every one of them carries the endorsement of the Democratic Socialists of America and the blessing of far-left New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

To anyone watching closely, this was not a random political shakeup but a warning shot about where the Democratic Party is barreling full-speed ahead.

Greg Gutfeld captured the situation perfectly on Fox News’ The Five.

While most networks offered soft reactions about voter enthusiasm or demographic shifts, Gutfeld zeroed in on the actual crisis.

“The saddest reaction is that in that montage we heard Democrats more worried about the politics than the reality,” he said.

“You know, they’re worried, what will Republicans do with this? Instead of what could happen to America if this spreads?”

His point was brutal and right on target. Democrats care more about optics than outcomes, party prestige over national stability.

That, Gutfeld argued, is the rot at the core of modern liberalism.

Democrats are not asking whether socialism is dangerous for America.

They are asking whether socialism polls badly.

It is always about branding, never about consequences.

It is the same political disease that turns genuine concern for the country into an endless PR exercise.

Gutfeld went on to unpack why this cycle keeps repeating itself.

“We normies are burdened with this radical phenomenon like every 10, 15 years,” he said.

“Usually we have to wait it out until some of the younger people grow out of it when they see that their beliefs are tethered to failure.”

Unfortunately, as he noted, the pipeline never stops.

As one starry-eyed socialist wakes up and grows out of the fantasy, another one steps out of a college lecture hall and into Congress.

The reason, according to Gutfeld, is that the cultural machinery continues to churn out radicals nonstop.

“The left owns the soft power, which is the media, the schools, and the arts,” he said.

“So it’s like Doritos. You know, we crush them, they make more of them, and it’s because they just romance radicalism.”

The analogy was funny but also entirely accurate.

The left keeps packaging and selling its failed ideology with a fresh coat of marketing gloss.

Liberal institutions do not teach solutions; they teach resentment and utopian fantasies.

Gutfeld also highlighted something the mainstream crowd refuses to say aloud.

“It is really chilling how emboldened they are. They’re not hiding this behind helping the poor. They’re just saying, we want power. These are wolves in wolves clothing.”

That line hit like a punch.

The modern Democratic socialist movement is not disguising its intentions anymore.

They say the quiet part out loud because they believe the institutions have their back.

The establishment Democrats still think they can tame these radicals, a mistake that keeps backfiring.

“The Dems saw them as just other Democrats,” Gutfeld explained.

“They thought it was nonsense and it wouldn’t get anywhere. They’ll fall into line just like Bernie did, but they’re not.”

The party of Pelosi and Schumer is learning too late that the monster they fed is now running the show.

Gutfeld’s final point might be the most vital lesson of the night.

Too many Americans still treat this as an odd foreign fever or a fringe student movement.

It is not. “It’s not third world, it’s white elite intelligentsia, the 7%, who, as history has shown, they will call you fascist, but then when they get into power, oh, man, are they bloodthirsty,” he said.

“Because the whole point of this, it’s not to get power to help the country. They say they hate the country. It’s power to overturn the country and punish the people they hate.”

That is exactly the danger.

The American left no longer hides its contempt for the nation or for ordinary citizens.

It does not want to fix America.

It wants to dismantle it and rebuild it into something entirely different, something unrecognizable to the people who built it.

WATCH:

The three far-left victories in New York City are not isolated political upsets.

They are a snapshot of what is brewing inside the Democratic Party.

These candidates are not outliers; they are the logical product of an ideology that rewards grievance, demonizes success, and glorifies government control.

Democrats had their chance to distance themselves from the fringe.

Instead, they opened the door and handed them the keys.

The radicals are now behind the wheel, steering the entire party toward the cliff.

Gutfeld just had the honesty to point out what nearly every mainstream pundit refuses to admit.

Republicans watching this unfold would do well to note the lesson. The left is no longer fighting to persuade Americans.

They are fighting to transform America entirely.

And as Gutfeld reminded everyone, once they get power, they never give it back willingly.

That is not just a problem for New York City Democrats.

It is a problem for the entire country.


Scroll to Top