News

Iranian Strikes Kill Two American Service Members in Jordan as Tehran Escalates Regional Aggression [WATCH]
News

Iranian Strikes Kill Two American Service Members in Jordan as Tehran Escalates Regional Aggression [WATCH]

/

Two American service members were killed in Jordan after Iranian forces launched missile and drone strikes on a United States base Friday, a chilling reminder that Tehran’s aggression is far from contained. U.S. Central Command confirmed the deaths Saturday, along with news that one additional service member is still missing.

CENTCOM’s statement on X said, “On July 17, two U.S. service members in Jordan were killed in action as U.S. Central Command and partner forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks. Additionally, one service member is currently missing.”

The command added that four wounded service members had been treated and released from Jordanian hospitals, while others with minor injuries had returned to duty.

The Pentagon has withheld the identities of the fallen until their families are notified, a solemn protocol that reminds Americans of the human cost behind the headlines.

“Out of respect for the families, CENTCOM will withhold additional information, including the identities of the fallen warriors, until 24 hours after the next of kin have been notified,” the statement read.

War Secretary Pete Hegseth offered words of tribute on X, saying, “Godspeed, heroes. Their sacrifice only stiffens our resolve.”

Congressional leaders from both parties expressed grief, though their messages revealed deep partisan divides over U.S. policy in the region.

Republicans were quick to focus on the bravery of America’s military and the growing threat of Iran’s network of terror across the Middle East.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Senator Rick Scott and Governor Tim Walz each called for prayers for the families and for the safe return of the missing service member.

Representative Abe Hamadeh of Arizona wrote that he was “heartbroken” over the deaths of “two American soldiers who heroically defended our nation and partner forces against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks in Jordan.”

Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina described the report as “devastating,” urging Americans to rally behind the troops and their loved ones in prayer and reflection.

Meanwhile, several Democrats used the tragedy to critique American involvement and call for troop withdrawals.

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey paired his condolences with a demand to “bring American troops out of harm’s way.”

Representative Melanie Stansbury from New Mexico took an even harsher tone, declaring that the service members died “in a war that never should have happened in the first place.”

That sentiment, while politically convenient, does little to address the fact that Iran continues to attack Americans and our allies.

Tehran’s regime has stepped up its hostility in the wake of the collapsed ceasefire in June, when a memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran was shattered by renewed hostilities.

These two deaths mark the first American combat fatalities since fighting resumed, bringing the total number of U.S. military deaths in the Iran war to sixteen.

Iran’s latest assault on the Jordan base mirrors a larger campaign of aggression across the region.

The Islamic Republic has launched missiles and drones at U.S. partners in Kuwait and Qatar, destabilizing an already volatile region and once again proving that appeasement only emboldens the enemy.

Military analysts say Tehran’s latest attack was likely retaliation for the six-day American operation in early March that targeted Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps positions.

WATCH:

That campaign, known as Operation Epic Fury, followed Iran’s brazen assaults on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

U.S. forces struck back hard, but as history often shows, deterrence in the Middle East requires persistence, not half measures.

President Donald Trump was seen at the White House monitoring the situation when Operation Epic Fury commenced, confirming that the administration remains directly engaged in overseeing military responses.

Images released by the White House show the president seated at a command table reviewing live updates from CENTCOM officials.

The Iranian regime, deeply unpopular at home, is facing its own wave of unrest.

Leaked reports describe record levels of public anger over economic hardship and political suppression, even as the regime focuses on clinging to power at any cost.

That instability has left Tehran doubling down on hostility toward the United States, a dangerous distraction from its crumbling economy and growing domestic resistance.

For American families who have loved ones deployed overseas, Friday’s attack is a stark reminder that Iran remains one of the world’s most volatile threats.

Every missile and drone strike launched by the regime is another test of American resolve.

The soldiers who stood their post in Jordan faced that test with courage, defending both our nation and our allies with honor.

What happens next could define the course of this war.

With Iran’s attacks escalating across the Gulf and new targets emerging daily, the administration faces growing calls from Congress to respond with strength.

The fallen deserve nothing less than a clear, unapologetic demonstration that the United States will not bow to Tehran’s terror.

RFK Jr. Exposes $100B Medicare Heist: Crooks Bribing Poor Folks for Endless Taxpayer Payouts [WATCH]
News

RFK Jr. Exposes $100B Medicare Heist: Crooks Bribing Poor Folks for Endless Taxpayer Payouts [WATCH]

/

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said his department loses approximately $100 billion each year to fraud, describing several schemes that he said diverted taxpayer-funded healthcare dollars through fraudulent hospice operations and medical equipment companies.

Kennedy discussed the issue during a conversation with Detroit hip-hop artist Trick Trick, outlining what he described as widespread abuse of Medicaid reimbursement programs and recent enforcement actions taken by the Department of Health and Human Services.

“You know, my agency loses about $100 billion a year to theft, people stealing,” Kennedy said.

Trick Trick responded by asking, “HHS?”

Kennedy replied by describing how investigators uncovered fraudulent hospice operations, particularly in the Los Angeles area.

“Typically, if you go to a hospice, you leave within 18 days because you’re dying. It’s terminal. Right. Right. We started looking at these hospices in Los Angeles, and the people never died. They were there, or two or three years later, they were there, and we’re paying $6,000 a month,” Kennedy said.

According to Kennedy, investigators discovered that many of the listed hospice providers did not actually operate legitimate medical facilities.

“So those hospices, when we went and looked for them, they were yeah, we found a hotel room with 29 hospices in it. I mean, a hotel, every room was a hospice, and none of them had any patients. They were just addresses,” he said.

Kennedy alleged that the individuals operating the businesses were using stolen patient information to bill Medicaid for services that were never provided.

“And the guys who owned them were, you know, they were Estonians and Armenians and people from Eastern Europe who were getting the patient numbers. They were stealing them from doctors’ offices,” Kennedy said.

He also described another alleged method used to obtain patient information.

“They were also going into poor neighborhoods in Los Angeles, and they’d say to the people, ‘We’ll give you this $375 flat screen TV. You give us your patient number, and we’re going to enroll you in this hospice. You don’t ever have to go. We’re just going to enroll you, and then we’ll charge Medicaid $6,000 a month forever, and the guy never dies, of course, because he he was never sick,’” Kennedy said.

Kennedy said similar fraud schemes were uncovered in South Florida involving durable medical equipment companies.

“Another way there was Cubans in Miami who were selling durable medical equipment. This is like wheelchairs, knee braces, you know, these kinds of things. They never had any durable medical equipment?” Kennedy said.

According to Kennedy, investigators again found businesses that existed only on paper.

“Again, we found hotels that every room in it was a durable medical equipment company. Like about a fifth of the durable medical equipment companies in the country were in South Florida, and none of them were selling durable medical equipment. But we were paying for it,” he said.

Kennedy said the department has taken action against those operations.

“But we were paying for it, and we’re shutting down all that,” he said.

He added that HHS closed hundreds of hospice providers in Los Angeles without disrupting legitimate patient care.

“We shut down 800 hospices in Los Angeles, we didn’t get a single call from a congressman or from a business owner saying, ‘Oh, you shut down my hospice, you know, and all these patients are on the street.’ None of them, because they were all crooked and they knew they were crooked,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy also said the department has targeted fraudulent activity involving autism-related services in Minnesota.

“So you know, and then we shut down Minnesota, all of the autism fraud in Minnesota, and those people were stealing money from kids who actually need it,” he said.

WATCH:

Nikki and the Deep State Crew: Why Weren’t Any of These People Perp-Walked Already? [WATCH]
News

Nikki and the Deep State Crew: Why Weren’t Any of These People Perp-Walked Already? [WATCH]

/

Retired Air Force Col. Rob Maness called for criminal accountability for government officials he believes concealed intelligence related to Chinese election interference, arguing during an interview with Steve Gruber that internal threats pose a greater danger than foreign adversaries.

The discussion centered on allegations involving FBI agent Nikki Flores and claims that officials within the federal government withheld information regarding Chinese activities affecting the United States.

Gruber opened the conversation by asking Maness for his assessment of the issue.

“220 million in the United States apparently is of no concern. Your thoughts on this Friday?” Gruber asked.

Maness responded by acknowledging China as a significant national security concern but argued that the greater danger comes from individuals working within the U.S. government.

“I tell you what, Steve. You know the Chinese are a threat, absolutely a threat. But the biggest threat is internal,” Maness said.

He referenced allegations involving FBI agent Nikki Flores and said an email attributed to her raised serious concerns.

“If Nikki Flores, FBI agent, is a leader in the FBI, and in an email says she’s effectively running a shadow government, and nobody thinks about this. 1000s of people had to know about that,” Maness said.

According to Maness, government monitoring systems should have identified language of that nature.

“Every electronic monitoring system in the United States government is monitoring emails for phrasing like that to make sure there’s not real seditionists that work inside our government, and nobody reported on it,” he said.

Maness added that while there may have been whistleblowers, he believes the matter should have received far broader attention.

“There may have been one whistleblower or two that we don’t know about, but that should have been mass reported, Steve,” he said.

The retired Air Force officer also discussed what he described as broader counterintelligence concerns involving China.

“And when you combine that with what the Chinese have done with the voter rolls and what they are doing with fake ballots, with fake driver’s license, all of those things together, we have a major problem. It’s a counterintelligence problem,” Maness said.

He also questioned how many Chinese nationals may currently be inside the United States.

“We do not know how many CCP agents are either in this country as college students. 600,000 strike you as a familiar number. People that have come across the border illegally in the Biden administration. 100,000 estimated for Chinese military age males, strike you as a familiar number,” he said.

Maness argued that officials concealed information from the president.

“Now, proof, absolute proof that people inside the United States government were running a shadow government, and what were they doing? They were hiding from the sitting president of the United States the fact that China was actually doing this,” he said.

Gruber said he believed there was a specific term for the conduct being described.

“There is a word for that, Colonel. There’s a word for that. The word is espionage, and it’s pretty clear: subverting the will of the people, subverting the sitting president, keeping information, lying by omission,” Gruber said.

He also referenced White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s recent briefing, noting a question from reporter Kaitlan Collins regarding potential criminal charges.

“Caitlin Collins yesterday during the briefing with Caroline Leavitt asked a question that was important. Actually, if you have this information, why has nobody been arrested? And Caroline pointed out because we’re just making this public. We’re told that people will be losing their jobs, people will be getting fired, and then prosecutions could and should follow,” Gruber said.

He added that accountability should extend beyond personnel actions.

“If no prosecutions follow here, Colonel. I don’t see the point of it. There better be consequences is my point,” Gruber said.

Maness responded by calling for immediate arrests if the allegations are substantiated.

“Steve, Nikki Flores wrote that email, and the 1000s of Americans working inside the United States government that had anything to do with seeing that email should have all been arrested in pre-dawn raids this morning,” he said.

He contrasted the allegations with the prosecution of Enrique Tarrio.

“We put Enrique Terrio, sentenced him to 20 plus years in prison, had him in solitary confinement for over three years on fake seditious conspiracy charges. Think about that,” Maness said.

He argued that the current allegations involve far more serious conduct.

“This is actual sedition, actual espionage. It’s a combination of spying for the Chinese Communists and acting on it in order to subvert a presidency of the United States of America,” Maness said.

According to Maness, the issue extends beyond any individual president.

“It’s not about Donald Trump, Steve. This is about subverting the will of the American people and subverting the Constitution of the United States, and every person working for the U.S. government, every single one working for the U.S. government as our employees, has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution, and they did this,” he said.

Maness concluded by calling for a full accounting of everyone involved.

“Who told them to do this? Who were the leaders involved? Who were the actors involved? Every person down the line, from the person that gave the order to massage the presidential daily briefs, so it wasn’t talking about elections or Chinese involvement trying to influence our elections. Every one of them was conducting sedition and espionage, at least tangentially, for the communist Chinese. That is a fact now. It’s documented,” Maness said.

WATCH:

Trump Moves To Cut Off Banking Access For Illegal Aliens In Bold Crackdown [WATCH]
News

Trump Moves To Cut Off Banking Access For Illegal Aliens In Bold Crackdown [WATCH]

/

The Trump administration is turning up the pressure on illegal aliens with its latest policy move, taking direct aim at their access to American financial institutions.

Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller confirmed that the Treasury Department has issued new guidance to banks nationwide, instructing them to comply with tighter verification and residency standards.

The goal, according to administration insiders, is clear: encourage illegal aliens to self-deport by removing incentives that make life in the United States easier for those who broke the law to get here.

This development marks the most aggressive financial enforcement step taken by the Trump team since returning to the White House.

For years, progressives pushed policies that expanded financial access for undocumented individuals, defending it as “inclusion.”

Conservatives have long argued that such leniency only normalizes and rewards illegal entry while undermining American citizens and legal immigrants who follow the law.

The new Treasury directive effectively disrupts accounts or banking privileges for those who cannot prove lawful residence status.

It also instructs banks to monitor compliance using existing federal immigration databases.

This creates a nationwide coordination system linking financial institutions with immigration enforcement, something that has been talked about for years but never fully implemented.

Miller described the move as part of a broader strategy to restore integrity to federal systems that were “abused” under prior administrations.

“The Treasury Department just issued new guidance to financial institutions to banks,” he announced, highlighting how the previous government allowed undocumented populations to enjoy privileges “meant for American citizens.”

WATCH:

Critics on the left immediately lashed out, claiming the policy was “inhumane” and “xenophobic.”

Their usual outrage filled social media, predicting hardship for illegal immigrants and accusing Trump officials of cruelty.

But for many on the right, especially those frustrated by years of Washington’s open-border debacles, this is a common-sense effort to end taxpayer-subsidized perks that never should have existed in the first place.

Supporters point out that when illegal immigrants lose access to bank accounts, loans, and financial networks, it creates significant motivation to either fix their legal status or voluntarily return home.

For decades, financial comfort has been a major pull factor keeping illegal immigrants firmly planted in American life.

Removing that comfort is the exact type of structural change required to address the crisis rationally.

Republican lawmakers have applauded the Treasury’s decision, calling it a long overdue use of the government’s regulatory role to uphold immigration law.

Many conservatives see it as part of a larger Trump agenda that rewards citizenship and punishes law-breaking, restoring fairness to Americans who shoulder the economic burden of illegal immigration through overstressed schools, hospitals, and welfare programs.

On the other side, Democrat leaders are scrambling to respond.

Expect lawsuits, public protests, and a new wave of emotional storytelling from the corporate media.

The same networks that have ignored the consequences of mass illegal migration will undoubtedly feature segments on “families losing access to accounts” or “banks pressured to discriminate.”

Yet what is really happening is basic law enforcement and order being reestablished in a sector that has been politicized for too long.

Economically, the policy is likely to send ripples through certain industries dependent on illegal labor.

Cash-heavy employment and informal remittances could once again become the norm as undocumented migrants lose ties to formal financial systems.

While the Left will call that a crisis, many argue it exposes the unsustainable reality that existed under decades of bipartisan neglect.

Miller and treasury officials have framed the policy as a necessary security measure that protects the American financial system from abuse, money laundering, and fraud.

The move reflects a broader agenda of building structural deterrents across every sector to reduce illegal presence, from limiting jobs to cutting off benefits and government services.

In essence, every part of the system that makes unlawful presence easier is being dismantled.

The administration’s tone leaves no room for doubt.

Trump is proving that he intends to use every tool of federal power to secure the border from within.

By choking off access to financial networks, the White House is sending a clear message that breaking U.S. immigration law has real, life-altering consequences.

Grassroots conservatives across the country have long demanded action of this nature.

They have grown tired of promises and symbolic wall funding while illegal immigration continued unimpeded.

This new financial enforcement plan is being hailed as one of the most meaningful steps yet, precisely because it hits where it matters most… the incentives that keep illegal immigration thriving in the first place.

As the new policy gets implemented nationwide, the political divide will only sharpen.

One side sees law, order, and sovereignty being restored; the other sees yet another reason to scream “racism.”

But as the enforcement begins to bite and bank accounts close, reality will set in for those who thought living illegally inside America could remain consequence-free.

Key House Democrats Caught Flat Footed When Asked About Democratic Socialists’ Plan for America [WATCH]
News

Key House Democrats Caught Flat Footed When Asked About Democratic Socialists’ Plan for America [WATCH]

/

Key House Democrats including Ilhan Omar, Ro Khanna, and Pete Aguilar were left fumbling this week when asked to comment on the latest radical proposal from the Democratic Socialists of America.

The DSA’s platform, called “Workers Deserve More,” openly calls for abolishing core pillars of the American government including the Senate, the presidency, and even the Supreme Court.

The plan would replace those institutions with a single legislature controlling both an elected executive branch and a judiciary directly answerable to Congress.

When questioned by Fox News Digital, Rep. Khanna quickly distanced himself from the proposal, saying, “I don’t support that. I haven’t read the proposal.”

It was an unsurprising response for a lawmaker trying to play both sides of the ideological split within his own party.

The socialist plan does not stop at dismantling the federal system.

It also seeks to erase U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, pardon all aliens regardless of criminal behavior, and defund the Department of War, the historical term for the Department of Defense.

To top it off, the DSA platform calls for granting full voting rights to felons and even noncitizens, while ending all deportations entirely.

It is a wish list straight from the far left’s fever dream, but the uncomfortable truth for Democrats is that this fringe agenda is creeping closer to the party’s center of gravity.

Several DSA-endorsed candidates have been unseating more moderate Democrats in primary races this year, showing that the socialist movement is not just symbolic anymore.

When asked about that trend, Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar tried to shrug it off.

“I look forward to working with all our colleagues who run as Democrats,” he told Fox News Digital.

But his carefully chosen words could not hide the unease hanging over the Democratic establishment as the socialist surge gains traction.

Ilhan Omar, one of the House’s leading progressives and a chronic lightning rod for controversy, dodged outright when asked to weigh in.

WATCH:

Her refusal to comment speaks volumes about how deep the DSA’s influence runs.

Publicly, many Democrats claim they are not members of the DSA, but privately they adopt many of its policies when it comes time to placate their activist base.

The DSA’s official magazine, Democratic Left, published the organization’s formal endorsement rules last Friday.

Any candidate hoping for socialist backing must “accept and promote DSA’s program, and align their own campaign platforms with its contents to the best of their ability.”

That means the “Workers Deserve More” platform is not some loose talking point. It is a binding set of principles that DSA candidates are expected to campaign and govern by.

The goals laid out in the document’s final section are the most extreme.

It explicitly calls for a unicameral proportional legislature, effectively dissolving the Senate, and a parliamentary system that would abolish the presidency altogether.

In other words, the DSA wants to rewrite the Constitution and replace it with a socialist parliament. If that sounds like something out of a Bernie Sanders fan club fantasy, that is because it is.

For years, the Democratic Socialists of America have made noise about abolishing ICE and gutting border enforcement.

This new platform, though, takes their anti-American campaign a step further.

By targeting the foundations of the federal government itself, the movement reveals its true goal: to transform the United States beyond recognition.

Khanna, Omar, and Aguilar’s cautious statements show that Democrats understand how toxic this agenda is to most voters.

Yet, as more socialists notch victories in primaries, the party leadership will face growing pressure to embrace these radical reforms.

It is a political dilemma of their own making.

After years of pandering to the far left, establishment Democrats now find themselves unable to rein it in.

WATCH:

The mainstream media has largely ignored the DSA’s newest platform, pretending that its calls to abolish entire branches of government are just meaningless rhetoric.

But the endorsements and campaign money flowing from DSA tell another story.

Their candidates are being groomed for office with the expectation that they will help dismantle the constitutional order piece by piece.

Voters still clinging to the notion of a moderate Democratic Party should take note.

The socialist movement is not operating in the shadows anymore.

It is writing policy plans, running candidates, and dragging Democrats further left with every election.

And every time a lawmaker like Omar or Khanna dodges a question, that silence signals consent to the radicals waiting in the wings.

Unless moderate Democrats find the courage to denounce these anti-American ideas outright, the DSA has little reason to stop.

The next election cycles may not just be about policy differences but about whether the United States keeps the government our founders built or trades it for a socialist experiment that has never worked anywhere else.

Newsom’s Wife Stumbles Badly When Confronted About Biden’s DOJ in Painful Interview [WATCH]
News

Newsom’s Wife Stumbles Badly When Confronted About Biden’s DOJ in Painful Interview [WATCH]

/

Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California Governor Gavin Newsom, faced an uncomfortably revealing moment during a recent appearance on MNOW.

In what was supposed to be a friendly interview, she melted down when asked a question that cut straight through the talking points: did the federal investigation into her husband actually begin under President Joe Biden?

Her reaction was a sight to behold for anyone paying attention.

Caught completely off guard, she stammered repeatedly with a chorus of “uh” and “umm” before trying to steer the conversation toward President Donald Trump.

Unfortunately for her, that pivot fell flat. Even liberal host Stephanie Ruhle was left visibly puzzled by the response.

The exchange offered a rare window into how uncomfortable things have become for the Newsom family as the federal probe gains attention.

The First Lady of California accused the Department of Justice investigation of being a “fishing expedition,” a term often used by politicians caught in the early stages of a possible scandal.

It was her first extended comment on the issue since the story broke in June when the Democratic governor tried to downplay the news of a federal inquiry into his office’s dealings.

When Ruhle pressed her again about whether the investigation began under Biden’s administration, Siebel Newsom froze.

After a long pause, she muttered, “I don’t know the details.”

She continued with a confusing attempt to tie the entire ordeal to Donald Trump, saying, “I do know that Trump was coming after my husband when…back when Biden was president and Biden was running for the presidency.”

WATCH:

The bizarre timeline left many viewers scratching their heads.

The bizarre interview spread quickly online, with many conservatives pointing out that Siebel Newsom’s inability to answer such a simple question spoke volumes.

If the probe began under Biden, as multiple sources have confirmed, the narrative of “Trump’s political revenge” clearly falls apart.

Even MSNBC, a network rarely known for asking Democrats tough questions, gave her an opportunity to clear the air and she failed to deliver.

The greater question hanging over this mess is what it means for Gavin Newsom’s ambitions beyond California.

The governor is widely believed to be positioning himself for a White House run in 2028.

Lately, he has been traveling the country, sparring with conservative governors like Florida’s Ron DeSantis, and trying to build a national image as a progressive champion.

Yet, if his wife cannot defend him in an interview with a sympathetic liberal host, it does not exactly inspire confidence among potential donors or party insiders.

Adding fuel to speculation, another question from Ruhle touched on whether Newsom is planning to run for president.

Once again, Siebel Newsom dodged. “We are focused on California,” she replied, but her hesitant delivery suggested she was walking an invisible line between denial and confirmation.

WATCH:

Her struggle only reinforced what many observers already suspect: the Newsoms have presidential dreams but know a federal investigation could sink them before the race even begins.

Critics are noting that the very network chosen for the interview is part of what makes the debacle so interesting.

For the left-leaning media to draw attention to the federal probe against one of their own suggests that the tide might be turning inside the Democratic establishment.

Perhaps the insiders who once saw Newsom as the next savior are rethinking that endorsement.

After all, California’s record under his leadership is far from inspiring, with rampant homelessness, sky-high taxes, and mass exodus of residents to red states.

The Biden administration’s Department of Justice already faces serious credibility problems among everyday Americans.

If it turns out that they initiated the Newsom probe on their watch, yet Newsom and his wife continue to blame Trump, that narrative will crumble completely.

The dodging and stuttering suggest that even they realize how shaky their story sounds.

Republicans were quick to seize on the moment.

Social media lit up with clips of Siebel Newsom’s confused answers, while conservative commentators called it the “interview that launched a thousand campaign ads.”

To voters who already mistrust elite Democrats, her inability to explain the basic timeline of events is more evidence that the party of “transparency” cannot keep its own story straight.

The entire episode highlights a growing problem for Democrats who think they can skate by on media protection.

The days when networks automatically shield their favorite politicians are fading fast.

When even MSNBC anchors start asking mildly tough questions, it spells trouble for those trying to keep a lid on controversy.

At the end of the day, Gavin Newsom may have bigger problems than a delayed answer from his wife.

The probe is ongoing, the facts are trickling out, and California’s first couple has made it clear they cannot handle scrutiny without finger-pointing and confusion.

If this is how they perform under a few mild questions, one can only imagine what happens when investigators start asking harder ones under oath.

Maine Democrat Senate Hopeful Claims He Has Monthly Period Through His Rectum [WATCH]
News

Maine Democrat Senate Hopeful Claims He Has Monthly Period Through His Rectum [WATCH]

/

A Democrat Senate candidate in Maine has become the latest example of the absurd extremes in identity politics, after admitting on Reddit that he believes he has a “monthly period” that comes from his rectum.

The candidate, Ashley Webb, identifies as a transgender and intersex “woman” and is running to replace disgraced former contender Graham Platner, who withdrew from the race following serious allegations of sexual assault.

Webb’s statements, buried on internet forums but resurfacing as he campaigns for higher office, reveal a concerning mixture of biological confusion and unfiltered self-diagnosis shared publicly for all to see.

He described experiencing what he calls “monthly period pain” and claims that internal bleeding escapes through his colon, not in the usual way one might expect of a person claiming to menstruate.

WATCH:

During the Democratic primary debates, Webb framed his run as a fight for “basic dignity” for the transgender community.

“If they want me to use the men’s room, I will, but I don’t want to be assaulted,” he said, framing restroom use as a matter of safety.

WATCH:

Yet the discussion has since shifted from bathrooms to biology after his strange Reddit confessions made their way into the headlines.

Posting under the username sparky603, Webb introduced himself online as “a trans and intersex woman from Farmington” who is running his campaign without major donors or organizational backing.

He admitted he is a “long shot in a crowded field,” but has shown no hesitation in sharing the personal minutiae of his alleged medical condition.

His Reddit posts read more like a stream of consciousness than a political platform.

At one point, Webb claimed, “My testosterone is at 429ng/dl and estrogen is at 285 pg/ml. The estrogen is not effecting my male parts. Male parts are normal size. I grew breasts and wider hips during puberty.”

It is a statement that might leave many doctors scratching their heads, not to mention voters wondering just what kind of candidate the Maine Democrats have placed on the ballot.

He went on to assert he experiences ovulation cycles and monthly bleeding despite lacking a uterus or ovaries.

“When the monthly pain is real bad, I am feeling something in both my right and left side and above my bladder,” he wrote.

The self-proclaimed Democrat hopeful then detailed how this supposed “menstrual blood” exits through his colon, because, to use his own words, he does not have “the proper hole.”

Webb even cited what he called “a guy in China” with a similar situation as though that provided some kind of scientific backing.

The candidate lamented that American doctors were too “incompetent” to diagnose him correctly, claiming they preferred to prescribe painkillers instead of addressing what he feels inside his abdomen.

His frustration stemmed from repeated colonoscopies and scans that found no trace of female organs, something he blamed on medical records listing him as male.

Despite the increasingly bizarre medical claims, Webb insists his bid for the Maine Senate is not centered on his gender identity.

“My platform is healthcare accountability, rural infrastructure investment, corporate accountability, government transparency, and where I stand on foreign policy,” he wrote in another message.

“Representation matters, but I’m not asking anyone to vote for me just because of who I am.”

The trouble is, that is precisely what his campaign has become known for.

The contrast could not be sharper. While Republican candidates across the country are talking about economic revival, energy independence, and parental rights, Democrats in Maine are rallying behind a man who believes in “monthly rectal menstruation.”

It is the perfect reflection of a political party that treats biology as optional and substitutes science with self-identification.

What makes this more troubling is how mainstream media outlets will likely tiptoe around Webb’s claims, careful not to “offend” activists.

Yet most Americans, including many moderate Democrats, see through this delusion.

The idea that someone can publicly claim to ovulate from their colon and still be taken seriously as a Senate candidate speaks volumes about the state of the modern Democratic Party.

That does not mean Webb will gain traction at the polls.

In a crowded primary field, his odds are slim, and his peculiar medical tales are unlikely to charm rural Maine voters concerned about inflation, crime, and failing infrastructure.

However, his campaign reflects something larger happening in Democratic politics. Increasingly, personal identity matters more than competence, and fantasy replaces fact.

WATCH:

If there is a silver lining, it is that this spectacle gives voters a preview of what would happen if such candidates ever reached Washington.

Instead of tackling issues like border enforcement, veterans’ care, or fiscal responsibility, the conversation would revolve around personal pronouns, feelings, and speculative “female cycles” in male bodies.

For anyone still wondering how far detached the modern left has become from reality, Ashley Webb’s campaign serves as Exhibit A.

Olive Garden Becomes Unlikely Hero in the Fight for Voter ID [WATCH]
News

Olive Garden Becomes Unlikely Hero in the Fight for Voter ID [WATCH]

/

Conservatives across social media are having a field day after one of America’s favorite Italian chain restaurants proved a point that liberals have spent years denying.

Olive Garden, in promoting its popular Pasta Pass, accidentally highlighted the pure logic behind requiring identification to vote. And the irony could not be more delicious.

It all began when Olive Garden rolled out its limited edition Never Ending Pasta Pass, giving customers thirteen weeks of unlimited pasta, soup, salad, and breadsticks for a hundred dollars.

The offer sparked a frenzy online with tens of thousands rushing to the website to snag one of the passes before they sold out.

As fans clamored for more details about how to use the coveted card, one user asked an innocent enough question about whether they could share their pasta privileges with family members.

Olive Garden’s official account shut that idea down faster than a Biden press secretary ends a tough question.

No, they explained, the Pasta Pass is strictly for the person whose name is on it, and customers must present both the pass and a valid photo ID when using it at the restaurant.

That simple response unleashed a wave of conservative snark memeing itself into legend.

Commenters pointed out that Olive Garden manages tighter security for a plate of spaghetti than Democrats want for our entire electoral system.

One user joked that the restaurant should be in charge of running national elections, since apparently unlimited breadsticks are safeguarded better than voter rolls in some blue states.

The timing only added to the comedy.

WATCH:

On the same day President Trump released new findings related to election integrity and the SAVE America Act gained renewed attention in Congress, Olive Garden casually dropped an explainer on why proving your identity is common sense.

WATCH:

You could not have scripted a better advertisement for voter ID laws.

Many on the right quickly tied the restaurant’s photo ID requirement to the principle behind the SAVE America Act.

The legislation would require states to verify citizenship and identity before issuing a ballot, something liberals label “voter suppression.”

WATCH:

Yet the same liberal activists likely keep their driver’s licenses handy when they want another round of fettuccine Alfredo.

Even more amusing was the sheer common sense displayed by ordinary Americans reacting online.

Everyday users asked why anyone would resist proving who they are to vote when even Olive Garden demands proof of identity before unlimited pasta privileges.

It was a moment of clarity wrapped in marinara sauce and served with a side of logic.

Beyond the laughs, there was a serious point conservatives have made for years.

Secure elections are the cornerstone of a functioning republic.

Nobody is asked to show ID to suppress them.

They are asked to show ID to protect legitimate votes from being cancelled by illegitimate ones.

That concept apparently lands better when people picture it in terms of dinner.

WATCH:

Some social media voices even suggested that the Senate take note and finally pass the SAVE America Act.

After all, if Olive Garden can verify who gets to enjoy bottomless pasta bowls, surely the United States government can verify who votes.

The comparison may be tongue in cheek, but the principle remains entirely serious.

Critics of voter ID laws insist they place an unfair burden on minorities, despite every poll showing massive majorities of Americans, including minorities, support them.

Meanwhile, Olive Garden expects everyone equally to show ID, and nobody cries discrimination when proving they are the official Pasta Pass holder.

Perhaps equality only applies when salad dressing is involved.

While the Pasta Pass sold out in minutes, the political moment it created will likely linger far longer.

Conservatives seized it as yet another example of liberal double standards, where showing ID for the smallest purchases is normal, but doing so to secure democracy itself is treated as tyranny.

The irony is thick, much like that Alfredo sauce Americans apparently value more than ballot integrity.

As the Senate stalls on taking real action to restore election confidence, this lighthearted story unintentionally exposed a deeper truth.

If a national restaurant chain can uphold rules and verify customers without endless lawsuits or activist outrage, a country claiming to be the beacon of freedom can surely do the same at the ballot box.

In the end, Olive Garden likely did not mean to start a political firestorm over lasagna and linguine.

Yet by enforcing sensible rules, it accidentally reminded millions of Americans why the phrase “trust but verify” matters.

If unlimited pasta deserves safeguards, then unlimited voting rights surely deserve the same respect.

America should expect at least as much integrity in its elections as Olive Garden requires for another plate of spaghetti.

Buon appetito and bring your ID.

CNN’s Censorship Panic Over Trump’s Election Speech Exposes Media Fear of Truth [WATCH]
News

CNN’s Censorship Panic Over Trump’s Election Speech Exposes Media Fear of Truth [WATCH]

/

CNN, ABC, and NBC all turned their cameras away from President Donald Trump’s election interference speech, pretending it never happened.

The reason, they tell us, is that it was “too dangerous” to air unedited, a phrase that has become the left’s favorite excuse for censoring whatever they do not want Americans to hear.

It was never about danger.

It was about control.

Trump’s address focused on a national security problem the corporate media refuses to confront.

He highlighted America’s fragile election system and the serious threats of foreign influence, especially from China.

Trump pointed out that the personal data of over 220 million American voters had likely been compromised, connecting the breach to Chinese hackers.

WATCH:

Even more explosive was his claim that Beijing had paid American reporters during his first term to spread negative stories about him.

Rather than giving the public the chance to hear the president’s concerns and evaluate the evidence, CNN decided the American people needed protection from words.

Network executives apparently think viewers are too fragile to handle a live speech from a man who once ran the country.

Former CNN host Brian Stelter seemed proud of that editorial decision, actually admitting, “Some network executives felt it would be dangerous to just air Trump’s speech live, in full, unedited without knowing what he was going to say ahead of time.”

WATCH:

That might sound like something out of a communist state-run broadcaster, but it came right from CNN’s own playbook.

They do not want you to hear from Trump directly because that would interfere with their officially approved narrative.

In other words, you only get the “truth” after it is filtered, scrubbed, and spoon-fed by their pundits.

For a network that spent years pushing the fraudulent Russian collusion story, this claim about “dangerous misinformation” is a laughable act of hypocrisy.

Trump’s critics were happy to let endless conspiracy theories flow when they damaged him politically.

But when Trump talks about foreign meddling that might make Democrats look bad, suddenly, they hide behind the guise of “responsibility.”

CNN still has not apologized for its years of coverage that painted a sitting president as a Kremlin agent.

That fake storyline ripped the country apart, cost taxpayers millions, and poisoned public trust.

Yet they see nothing “dangerous” about that.

What they fear most is accountability, and Trump’s speech was full of it.

The network’s behavior exposes a deeper truth about America’s information ecosystem.

The same people who claim to champion democracy now treat open discussion as a threat.

They seem convinced that voters can no longer think for themselves, that information must be processed and approved before reaching your ears.

This is how elites maintain control, by defining what is “safe” to hear.

Trump simply reminded viewers that election irregularities and foreign interference are not partisan issues but legitimate concerns that demand transparency.

Yet every time he opens his mouth on the subject, the press behaves as though a nuclear secret has been leaked.

They label his statements “disinformation” before even checking a single fact.

This pattern of censorship becomes even clearer when compared to how the media treats Joe Biden.

Biden has made countless false or misleading claims in public, yet not one major network ever pulled his statements off the air mid-speech.

The difference is political allegiance.

The media protects its own, while any word from Trump is treated as radioactive.

The networks’ blackout of Trump’s remarks was not journalism.

It was an act of partisan obedience masquerading as editorial judgment.

They have been doing this for years, from suppressing stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop to rewriting the narrative on border security and inflation.

WATCH:

Whenever information threatens Democratic power, they label it a “danger.”

Ironically, by refusing to air the speech, CNN and its peers proved Trump’s point.

Their actions confirm that media elites collude to silence dissenting viewpoints and guard their chosen political side.

They are the self-appointed referees of discourse, declaring which truths are permissible and which ones are not.

Those are not journalists.

They are political operatives with press credentials.

Viewers are waking up.

Millions have turned away from traditional media for precisely this reason.

They are tired of being told what they are “allowed” to think.

The American people do not need CNN to protect them from the truth.

What they need is honesty, transparency, and courage from the institutions that once claimed to defend free speech.

Trump’s address described a system in crisis, one riddled with vulnerabilities that foreign actors can exploit.

WATCH:

The fact that the networks hid it only adds fuel to the argument that something very wrong is happening behind the curtains of our democracy.

The left-wing media can ignore him all they want, but ignoring reality does not erase it.

In the end, censorship always reveals fear.

CNN’s refusal to air Trump’s remarks tells us exactly what they are afraid of: Americans hearing the truth and deciding for themselves.

That is what threatens their control most of all.

Gavin Newsom Goes ‘Tinfoil’ During ‘Election Rigging’ Rant Against Trump [WATCH]
News

Gavin Newsom Goes ‘Tinfoil’ During ‘Election Rigging’ Rant Against Trump [WATCH]

/

California Governor Gavin Newsom tried to reignite Democrat panic on Thursday night, calling for the 25th Amendment to be used against President Donald Trump after his national address on election integrity.

The move blew up on him fast, as conservatives across the country pointed out that the same man spent years defending Joe Biden’s obvious mental decline.

Newsom mocked Trump’s remarks, sneering, “The only thing missing in Donald Trump’s speech was tin foil. This was a legitimate 25th Amendment moment, the rambling of a mad king.”

WATCH:

The line was meant to go viral, and it did, but not for the reason he hoped.

Republicans and even some moderates slammed the governor for his own track record of ignoring Biden’s condition while insisting Trump be removed from office.

The 25th Amendment, written in 1967, allows for the removal of a president if he is declared “unfit for duty” by either the Cabinet or a special review body established by Congress.

Democrats have long toyed with the idea when it suits them politically.

Under Biden, they laughed off every concern as “right-wing talking points.” Now, the same voices are shouting “fitness” again because the target has changed.

The Republican National Committee sharply criticized Newsom, firing off a post that summed up the disgust many conservatives feel.

“You literally propped up a vegetable and lied to the American people about his cognitive decline for four years and never mentioned the 25th amendment once.”

That single post captured the hypocrisy perfectly.

Fox News contributor Joe Concha also blasted the governor’s double talk.

“Given Newsom’s defense to this day of President Biden, calling him one of the greatest presidents ever, there’s a saying around sitting this one out that applies here,” Concha quipped.

His point resonated widely because even Democrats know Biden’s best days are long gone.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton piled on, noting that Newsom wants Trump removed for exposing vulnerabilities in California’s voter rolls and highlighting foreign threats to U.S. elections.

“Gavin Newsom wants to remove Trump from office for disclosing California could have tens of thousands of aliens illegally registered to vote and that China attacked 220 million voters,” Fitton said.

That, of course, cuts right to the heart of the Democrat fear: Trump talking election integrity again.

During his address, Trump said newly declassified documents revealed foreign meddling and U.S. government awareness of election flaws that had been quietly ignored.

He accused establishment bureaucrats of misleading voters.

Democrats, naturally, rushed to question his motives instead of addressing the substance, acting as if pointing to corruption was proof of insanity.

Newsom attempted to dismiss it all as a desperate act, saying, “He wants to rig the election in 2026. He knows he is going to lose. That’s what that whole thing was about.”

In other words, when Trump raises real questions about election systems, Democrats accuse him of plotting.

It is the same tired playbook that has worn thin with the public.

Predictably, the left-wing internet chorus echoed Newsom.

Influencer Harry Sisson gushed, “Boom. Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for the 25th Amendment to be invoked after Trump’s unhinged speech tonight. He’s right! Trump is mentally deranged and unfit to be president.”

Rep. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona followed up, declaring that Trump “lies with every breath he takes” and demanding swift action.

The far-left faction of the Democrat caucus was more than happy to join a new witch hunt.

Ansari and Maryland’s Jamie Raskin have become the face of a congressional push to form a standing body capable of evaluating a president’s mental state.

In practice, it would mean Democrats get to pick a panel that can oust any president who defies their agenda.

Conservatives were quick to point out the danger.

If the 25th becomes a partisan weapon, no elected president will ever be safe from political sabotage.

For many on the right, this entire episode is a flashing neon sign of Democrat insecurity.

Biden’s slow public appearances, repeated confusion, and nearly constant absences have eroded any claim that Democrats are the party of stability.

It’s why Newsom is trying to project strength, even as his own record in California remains a disaster of crime, homelessness, and mass exodus.

Assemblyman Joe Patterson, a California Republican, did not mince words in response.

“Does anyone else think it’s weird that as he talks about Trump rigging an election, he simultaneously asks for the president’s cabinet to remove a duly elected president? Yeah, Gavin, that would pose no risk to our democracy at all. Get real!”

That summed up what most Americans outside the liberal bubble are thinking.

There is also a bit of irony in Newsom’s timing.

Only days before, First Lady Jill Biden had given an update on Joe Biden’s ongoing cancer treatment, acknowledging that the 83-year-old would be living with the disease permanently.

The same week that Democrats paraded Biden before cameras to prove his vitality, his loyal surrogates were calling Trump “unfit.”

It takes mental gymnastics only Washington insiders could perform.

Conservatives see the Newsom spectacle for what it is: posturing.

The California governor may have White House dreams of his own, but his selective concern about “fitness for office” reveals everything about the current Democrat playbook.

When power is at risk, invoke the Constitution as a political tool. When your own side stumbles, pretend everything is fine.

The uproar following his comments shows that Americans are not so easily fooled.

The 25th Amendment was designed for constitutional crises, not political theater.

Yet to Democrats like Newsom, it is just another lever to pull when elections don’t go their way.


Scroll to Top