News

Rand Paul Uncovers Private Messages Showing COVID Paper Authors Quietly Questioned Their Own Claims [WATCH]
News

Rand Paul Uncovers Private Messages Showing COVID Paper Authors Quietly Questioned Their Own Claims [WATCH]

/

Newly released internal Slack messages made public by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., are renewing scrutiny over one of the most influential scientific papers published during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the communications indicating that several authors privately expressed greater uncertainty about the virus’s origins than was reflected in their published conclusions, as reported by Fox News.

Paul released the messages Tuesday involving the authors of the March 2020 Nature Medicine paper, “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2.”

The paper, written by Kristian Andersen, Robert Garry, Eddie Holmes and Andrew Rambaut, became one of the most frequently cited scientific publications addressing the origins of COVID-19 and was widely referenced by public health officials and news organizations as evidence against a laboratory origin.

According to the released messages, however, some of the paper’s authors privately acknowledged that they could not eliminate the possibility that the virus originated from a laboratory.

“The idea that it came from a lab is implausible, and yet, privately they’re saying the opposite. … This level of dishonesty, I think, needs to be exposed,” Paul told Fox News.

“These are people who get large, multimillion-dollar grants from our country, and we shouldn’t be giving money to people who lied to us.”

The internal discussions show Andersen assigning a 30% probability to a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2, while Holmes estimated the likelihood at 20% before later reducing that estimate to 10%.

Those assessments differed from the paper’s public conclusion that the virus had not been manipulated.

In one Slack message dated June 11, 2020, Andersen wrote:

“The part I’m really struggling with is that, at the end of the day, we really don’t have any hard evidence one way or the other — and especially given some of the recent evidence, we also can’t rule out that somebody actually put it in there.”

He continued:

“That’s obviously not to say that somebody did, but we can’t rule it out. Our paper was pretty strong in saying ‘there’s no way,’ but I have less confidence in that statement at this stage.”

The newly released documents also detail internal discussions surrounding the virus’s furin cleavage site, a genetic feature that has remained central to debate over whether the virus emerged naturally or from laboratory research.

According to a news release from Paul’s office, Andersen at one point told colleagues that “some smoking(ish) guns” had emerged, leaving him “not comfortable” and with “less confidence … at this stage.”

The communications further indicate that the authors coordinated with officials from the National Institutes of Health and members of the U.S. intelligence community while publicly defending the paper’s conclusions.

Another subject discussed in the messages involved coronavirus researcher Ralph Baric.

While acknowledging his scientific expertise, the authors described a contentious professional relationship with Baric and expressed suspicions that he was the anonymous source they referred to as “Deep Throat,” whom they believed leaked confidential peer-review information to a journalist.

According to the documents, the leaked material suggested the authors initially considered a laboratory origin before ultimately publishing different conclusions.

The release of the Slack messages follows another document disclosure by Paul on Monday.

Those records indicated that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents had prepared to question British zoologist Peter Daszak after he returned from the World Health Organization’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

According to the documents released by Paul, the FBI instructed CBP agents to stand down before questioning could take place.

The debate over COVID-19’s origins has continued years after the pandemic began.

Last year, a scientific advisory group organized by the World Health Organization concluded that the pandemic most likely resulted from “zoonotic spillover,” either directly from bats or through an intermediate host.

Meanwhile, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who led much of the federal government’s public health response during the pandemic, is scheduled to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee later this month after Paul, who chairs the committee, issued a subpoena.

Fauci has been accused by some of manipulating intelligence concerning the origins of COVID-19 and of lying to Congress regarding allegations tied to the pandemic’s origins.

The upcoming hearing is expected to examine those issues alongside newly released records and other evidence gathered during the committee’s investigation.

CNN Analyst Shreds New York Mayor’s Absurd Plan To Arrest Netanyahu [WATCH]
News

CNN Analyst Shreds New York Mayor’s Absurd Plan To Arrest Netanyahu [WATCH]

/

CNN’s own legal analyst had to step in and clean up a political mess after New York City’s far-left Mayor Zohran Mamdani floated the jaw-dropping idea that the city might have the power to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits for the United Nations General Assembly.

Yes, you read that correctly.

The socialist mayor publicly claimed his administration was “exploring” whether such an arrest could happen.

During a segment on CNN, Brianna Keilar asked legal analyst Elie Honig about Mamdani’s outrageous suggestion.

Honig did not hold back. “Absolutely not,” he replied bluntly.

“It is utterly ridiculous for the mayor of New York City to even suggest that he might have the authority to order the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu or any visiting foreign head of state.”

Honig went on to explain a basic civics lesson that apparently escaped Mamdani’s attention.

“The mayor of New York City has zero law enforcement authority. He does not tell the Manhattan D.A. or the NYPD who to arrest or prosecute,” Honig said.

He added that the United States is not a party to the International Criminal Court, meaning any so-called “arrest warrant” from the ICC has no legal effect here.

Honig made clear the United States even has a law on the books that allows the president to send in the military to extract any American or ally from ICC custody if they were ever detained under its orders. “So, that warrant has zero impact,” Honig said plainly.

Then came another dose of constitutional education.

“The Constitution is quite clear that the conduct of foreign diplomacy and foreign affairs is entirely up to the federal government. It is not up to local or county governments in New York City or elsewhere.”

In other words, Mamdani’s “best lawyers” can stop wasting taxpayer time.

He has no authority to arrest anyone on behalf of the global left’s political crusade against Israel.

“Let me save them some time,” Honig concluded.

“You do not have the authority to do this.”

WATCH:

Despite this scathing legal smackdown, Mamdani has doubled down.

He called Netanyahu a “war criminal” who “belongs in The Hague” and said his administration is in “active conversation” with the city’s Law Department to see what can be done if the Israeli leader visits.

“Whatever the law allows me to do in New York City, that’s what we will do,” Mamdani vowed.

As if he needed to solidify his radical reputation, Mamdani repeated his inflammatory claim that Netanyahu is the “architect of the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.”

He insisted that the ICC arrest warrants “should be taken seriously,” adding that when someone is charged by the ICC, “that’s something that should be honored.”

The only problem for Mamdani is that the ICC’s reach stops where American sovereignty begins.

The ICC issued warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant last November over alleged war crimes during Israel’s campaign against Hamas in Gaza.

The United States never joined the ICC for good reason. The court has long been accused of targeting Western and democratic nations while giving brutal dictatorships a pass.

But that nuance seems lost on Mamdani, whose politics appear guided more by activist slogans than by law.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz sharply criticized Mamdani’s floating of arrest fantasies.

Waltz called the mayor’s statements “pure political theater” and reminded him that under international agreements, visiting heads of state are protected.

“Federal authority trumps any local mayor’s wishes,” Waltz wrote on X.

The episode highlights just how extreme the new left in America has become.

The modern progressive movement cannot resist using city offices as soapboxes for anti-Israel theatrics.

It is one thing to express an opinion. It is another to pretend to wield federal-level foreign policy powers from a city hall podium.

Even CNN, which rarely restrains Democrat excess, found Mamdani’s behavior too absurd to defend.

For a network that usually protects its ideological allies, this moment stood out.

That should tell Americans just how out-of-bounds this mayor’s comments truly were.

It is increasingly obvious that far-left politicians like Mamdani care more about grandstanding than governing.

While New York struggles with crime, housing, and a spiraling migrant crisis, Mamdani is worried about what to do if a foreign prime minister visits town.

It is yet another reminder of what happens when ideological activism replaces common sense leadership.

New York voters deserve better than political vanity projects dressed up as moral crusades.

Honig’s rebuke serves as a rare moment of sanity coming from inside CNN.

The rest of the media class should take note when even their own experts say the emperor has no clothes.

RFK Jr. Freezes Over $1 Billion in Medicaid Payments to Two Deep Blue States, Citing Major Misuse [WATCH]
News

RFK Jr. Freezes Over $1 Billion in Medicaid Payments to Two Deep Blue States, Citing Major Misuse [WATCH]

/

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sent shockwaves through blue-state capitals on Tuesday by halting more than $1 billion in federal Medicaid payments to California and Minnesota. His reason was simple yet explosive.

He accused the Democratic leaders of those states of failing to safeguard taxpayer money and allowing rampant misuse of federal healthcare funds.

Kennedy, who was appointed under the Trump administration, announced the decision with blunt force.

“We are not sending Medicaid dollars out the door until we have confidence that they are being spent lawfully and appropriately,” he said.

It was a direct challenge to Governors Gavin Newsom of California and Tim Walz of Minnesota, both of whom have prided themselves on expansive social welfare spending.

Kennedy laid responsibility squarely at the feet of those two governors and the broader Democratic establishment.

He charged that their lax administration of federal Medicaid dollars had turned vital programs into cash cows for fraudsters.

“Instead of protecting your money, they open the floodgates to theft,” Kennedy declared.

“They dismantle basic program integrity and oversight.”

For years, conservatives have warned that Democratic-run states treat federal programs as bottomless slush funds.

The Medicaid crackdown appears to be part of a larger effort by the Trump administration to finally bring some accountability to Washington’s spending machine.

Kennedy’s move signals that the era of endless checks for mismanaged blue states may be coming to an end.

The timing was not accidental.

Just a month earlier, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that 455 people had been charged in connection with $6.5 billion in healthcare fraud schemes.

The Department of Justice called it the largest coordinated federal and state action against healthcare fraud in the nation’s history.

Those charged were accused of using government-funded programs to bankroll luxury lifestyles with the taxpayers left holding the bill.

That announcement laid the groundwork for Kennedy’s decisive step.

His message was clear.

Accountability is back on the table. And states that treat federal funds as political play money will face consequences.

The suspension of over $1 billion will immediately hit healthcare bureaucracies in Sacramento and St. Paul, both of which rely heavily on federal dollars to keep their expansive Medicaid systems afloat.

Critics on the left are already portraying the move as cruel and politically motivated. But Kennedy argues that the freeze is about lawfulness and stewardship, not politics.

“If California and Minnesota want the money to fund low-income healthcare, they need to provide documentation that these payments are legitimate,” he said.

WATCH:

It is a challenge that puts the burden of proof squarely on Democratic governors who have long demanded more funding while resisting oversight.

For conservatives, Kennedy’s stand looks like a long overdue correction to a system riddled with abuse.

Medicaid spending has soared over the past decade, and investigative reports have repeatedly uncovered fraudulent billing schemes that siphon billions away from the needy and into the pockets of crooks.

The Biden administration chose to look the other way, preferring to brag about expanding access while ignoring how much waste that expansion invited.

California has been notorious for loose oversight of Medicaid contractors, particularly in Los Angeles County where fraud prosecutions have become routine.

Minnesota, meanwhile, has battled its own scandals involving nonprofit networks that bill the state for phantom healthcare services, often tied to politically connected operators.

When Kennedy talks about the “floodgates to theft,” conservatives across the country nod in recognition.

The symbolic impact is almost as important as the fiscal one.

Washington bureaucrats have finally drawn a line in the sand.

If states want access to federal health dollars, they will have to clean up their books.

Kennedy’s direct and unapologetic tone evokes an era of management that Washington has sorely missed, one where taxpayer protection is not treated as optional.

As of Tuesday, both California and Minnesota had offered no detailed response beyond the usual partisan outrage.

Expect the rhetoric to escalate in the coming days as Newsom and Walz scramble to explain how they lost over a billion dollars in promised Medicaid funding.

Their allies in the media will surely frame this as another Trump administration overreach.

But for middle America, Kennedy’s decision may feel like a rare act of fiscal sanity.

There will be more developments as audits proceed, but the message has already landed.

Federal programs are not piggy banks for the politically connected.

Accountability is back, and the days of casual corruption in blue-state bureaucracies are being challenged at the highest levels.

Transgender Maine Democrat Senate Candidate Mocked After Bizarre “Mucus” Period Claim Goes Viral [WATCH]
News

Transgender Maine Democrat Senate Candidate Mocked After Bizarre “Mucus” Period Claim Goes Viral [WATCH]

/

A transgender Democrat running for the United States Senate out of Maine is facing nationwide ridicule after making a jaw dropping claim on a podcast about having “ovaries,” “a uterus,” and even getting what he described as a monthly “mucus leak.”

The candidate, Ashley Webb, has once again exposed the depths of the far left’s gender delusion, and Americans are not buying it.

During a discussion with transgender podcaster Amethysta Herrick released Sunday, Webb claimed that he experiences menstrual cycles complete with mood changes and mysterious secretions.

“During that time, like I also leak like a mucus, which they can’t really explain,” he said, apparently serious.

It seems even the interviewer was skeptical, responding cautiously, “Oh, interesting, interesting.”

The clip spread online within hours, drawing widespread mockery.

Conservative commentators and social media users described Webb’s comments as “insane” and “deeply disturbed.”

Former collegiate swimming star and women’s sports advocate Riley Gaines chimed in with the line that summed up what everyone was thinking: “If you’re a man leaking mucus from your genitals, I’d highly recommend seeking medical attention asap.”

Webb, who claims that “transparency” makes him qualified to represent Maine in the Senate, had already attracted attention from Democrats for his campaign appearances dressed as a woman.

He insists that voters should trust him precisely because he would “never lie” or “deceive” the public.

That statement rings a little hollow when paired with biological claims that defy every basic fact of science.

The conversation took an even stranger turn when Webb claimed he had discovered he was “intersex” due to alleged discrepancies in old medical and birth records.

He told a long and rambling story about “destroyed” documents, faulty scans, and misunderstood test results, all supposedly pointing to him having reproductive organs that no doctor could ever seem to find.

“I thought I had ovaries and possibly a uterus,” Webb insisted.

“And I was asking them like, ‘I have these CAT scans. Can you take a look?’ and you know, tell me what you think. And I guess it annoyed them, so they kicked me out.”

The remark seemed to confirm what many viewers already suspected, that this is less a matter of medicine and more of mental confusion mixed with attention seeking.

WATCH:

Webb’s statements quickly reignited debate online about the extent of transgender ideology’s reach into mainstream politics.

Many commenters compared his remarks to other absurd claims from the radical gender movement, suggesting this episode was a perfect illustration of how far detached from reality some members of the modern left have become.

Social media reacted with predictable speed.

“We have reached the point where Democrats are running candidates who think mucus makes them mothers,” one user wrote.

Others simply questioned whether this was parody, wondering aloud if Webb might actually be trolling the entire system.

Unfortunately for the Democratic Party, Webb’s campaign appears very real.

The Gateway Pundit highlighted that resurfaced online postings from Webb dating years back describe similarly bizarre “period” theories.

In those posts, Webb reportedly wrote that during his “monthly cycle” he bleeds out of his anus or genital area, adding, “When you don’t have the proper hole, it finds one of two exits.”

Those comments, mixed with the new podcast interview, have left even some liberal observers shaking their heads.

During the debate that helped launch his campaign into viral territory, Webb complained about “dehumanization” and claimed that members of the trans community are unfairly accused of wanting to harm others.

“I don’t want to hurt anybody,” he said, “I just want to use the bathroom.”

WATCH:

Conservatives see those statements as a smokescreen to gain sympathy and distract from the deeper issue, which is this growing denial of biological reality being treated like credible policy.

On the right, political strategists are already using Webb’s viral moment as further proof that the Democratic Party’s activist base has overtaken its reason.

The idea that a candidate could run on the notion of male menstruation and still expect serious consideration says a lot about the cultural decay creeping into progressive circles.

Democrats have tried for years to normalize gender confusion and silence anyone who questions it.

Yet incidents like this prove that the American public still recognizes absurdity when it sees it.

Webb might call himself “courageous” for talking about his alleged “female” functions, but the overwhelming response shows most voters simply see a confused man and a party that has completely lost touch with reality.

For conservatives, the viral clip is just another reminder of what happens when ideology overrules truth.

Voters concerned about moral sanity and biological fact should take note.

Webb’s campaign may be imploding under laughter, but the ideology he represents still enjoys shelter from mainstream Democrats who cannot bring themselves to say two simple truths: men are not women, and biology is not a matter of feelings.

Every election cycle seems to surface at least one Democratic hopeful who takes progressive identity theatrics to new heights.

Ashley Webb might be this year’s most unintentionally revealing example.

His mucus talk might have gone viral as comedy, but the underlying issue is deadly serious.

It is a symptom of a culture where confusion is celebrated and truth is politically incorrect.

The left may call this “progress,” but for many Americans, it looks more like collapse.

And judging by the outrage and laughter flooding social media, voters are ready to reject the delusion at the ballot box.

Biden Border Failure Leads to Slaughter of Air Force Veteran Caught on Doorbell Video [WATCH]
News

Biden Border Failure Leads to Slaughter of Air Force Veteran Caught on Doorbell Video [WATCH]

/

A 71 year old Air Force veteran was murdered in broad daylight on his own front porch, and the gruesome crime was caught on his Ring doorbell camera.

Randy Witten, a highly decorated veteran who served his country faithfully across multiple wars, was gunned down while hanging decorations outside his home in West Point, Utah.

His killer turned out to be an illegal alien who should never have been allowed to set foot in this country in the first place.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, the alleged murderer, Axel Eduardo Chavez Marroquin, is a Salvadoran national who first crossed the border illegally in 2021.

Instead of being deported, he was released into the United States by the Biden administration.

The administration’s reckless policies effectively put this violent criminal into the same communities that law abiding Americans call home.

DHS reports show Chavez Marroquin was arrested twice in California for domestic violence incidents, and both times he was turned loose by so called sanctuary officials who ignored repeated detainers filed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Their decisions, celebrated as compassionate by left wing activists, paved the path for this horrific tragedy.

“Following his release, he went on to commit this heinous murder,” said Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis.

“This illegal alien should’ve never been allowed on our streets, and James Witten should still be alive today.” Her words pierce through the bureaucratic doublespeak that often hides the devastating cost of Biden’s border chaos.

The details are chilling.

On May 30, a maroon Honda Civic pulled up across from Witten’s home.

Chavez Marroquin allegedly stepped out, walked toward the unsuspecting veteran, and opened fire at point blank range.

Reports say he fired at least ten shots into Witten’s back.

The camera on Witten’s front door captured the entire sequence, including the killer’s calm return to the car as if he had done nothing out of the ordinary.

Police in Las Vegas arrested Chavez Marroquin and charged him with multiple crimes, including murder with a dangerous weapon, discharge of a firearm causing serious injury, and obstruction of justice.

He has since been transferred to Davis County Jail in Utah where ICE has again lodged an official detainer.

WATCH:

Federal agents are urging Utah authorities to cooperate so this criminal can finally be removed from the country for good.

“ICE is now asking officials in Utah to commit to not releasing this criminal from jail and to work with ICE so that we can remove him from our country,” said Bis.

“Reckless sanctuary policies in states like California are putting American lives at risk.”

That line cuts to the heart of the issue. This tragedy was not random. It was preventable.

Randy Witten’s life story reads like that of any American hero who quietly served his nation with honor.

Over a twenty year military career, he served in Vietnam, Desert Storm, and Grenada.

He was stationed in Germany, Sicily, Texas, and Kansas.

His dedication earned him the Meritorious Service Medal, the Air Force Commendation Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal with five devices.

Yet after facing danger overseas, he ended up murdered on his own porch by someone who should have never been in his neighborhood.

Americans are tired of hearing political elites claim that their open border policies are somehow humane.

There is nothing humane about the murder of a decorated veteran.

There is nothing just about ignoring federal immigration detainers.

And there is nothing compassionate about protecting criminal illegals while citizens pay with their lives.

The left continues to champion sanctuary laws and lenient immigration enforcement as moral victories.

Meanwhile families like the Wittens are left to mourn the loss of loved ones killed by violent offenders who slip through a broken system deliberately weakened by political ideology.

If a nation cannot defend its citizens within its own borders, then public safety becomes an illusion.

This case is more than another crime story. It is a symbol of the disastrous consequences of Biden’s willful negligence on immigration.

Every time an illegal alien repeat offender walks free despite ICE detainers, another American life hangs in the balance.

Witten’s execution, caught on camera, is a haunting reminder that the consequences are deadly and deeply personal.

Grassroots Americans are not asking for miracles.

They are demanding competence.

They are demanding justice.

They are demanding that their government place citizens above criminals and secure the border now, before more innocent people like Randy Witten fall victim to preventable crimes.

Elite Media’s Nightmare: AI Matches Their ‘Quality’ for Pennies and Steals Their Audience [WATCH]
News

Elite Media’s Nightmare: AI Matches Their ‘Quality’ for Pennies and Steals Their Audience [WATCH]

/

Economist Peter St. Onge, Ph.D., said the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence is reshaping the news industry and could cut the audience for traditional media outlets in half over the next several years, arguing that readers are increasingly turning to AI-powered tools and independent creators instead of legacy news organizations.

In a recent commentary, St. Onge said artificial intelligence is changing how people consume information by providing direct summaries of news topics without requiring users to visit the original articles.

“Legacy media could lose half its audience as people go to AI instead. Can journalists learn how to walk a dog?” St. Onge said.

He continued by criticizing traditional news organizations and their role in public discourse.

“For a century, the media has told us they are democracy’s immune system when it turned out they are democracy’s cancer, and AI is the chemo,” he said.

St. Onge cited a recent Pew Research study examining Google’s AI-generated search summaries.

“According to a new Pew study, when Google puts an AI summary at the top of search, it gobbles up 92% of the audience, leaving just 8% to visit CNN,” he said.

He argued that Google’s AI summaries are only one part of a broader shift in how consumers access information.

“Now, keep in mind that’s just Google’s AI toss in people who just go direct to ChatGPT or Grok instead of wading through a 1,200-word New Yorker hit piece on Trump’s helipad,” St. Onge said.

According to St. Onge, some major news organizations have begun removing themselves from Google search in an effort to limit the use of their content for AI-generated summaries.

“So bad, major sites are now delisting from Google, throwing away their main audience source to stop Google scraping their content,” he said.

St. Onge contrasted the previous business model for online journalism with what he believes is emerging in the AI era.

“So the background is: before AI media was simple, write the story, optimize for Google clicks, sell ads. Google would scrape your content, sure, but they paid you in eyeballs,” he said.

“With AI, you get the summary and punchline for free. The actual articles got to sing for its supper, and turns out not many articles can sing for their supper,” St. Onge added.

He also referenced projections that search traffic to news organizations will continue declining.

“With Reuters projecting search traffic to news sites will fall nearly half in three years with no end in sight,” he said.

St. Onge argued that declining trust in traditional news organizations has contributed to the migration toward alternative news sources.

“Of course, it’s not just the AI media shot itself in the foot, throwing away credibility and authority for nakedly partisan reporting, trust in traditional media is down to just one in four Americans and one in seven Republicans,” he said.

According to St. Onge, consumers are increasingly obtaining news through social media platforms and AI chatbots rather than television networks or newspapers.

“That’s hit media consumption to the point most Americans get their news from social media and AI chatbots already, not traditional media,” he said.

He pointed to independent creators as evidence of that trend.

“That’s where it gets interesting because the eyeballs are not going away, they are migrating. Joe Rogan famously is the most popular podcast in the world. Substack has grown fivefold since 2021. Hundreds of YouTubers you have never heard of get more views than the entire CNN universe,” St. Onge said.

He also cited the audience for Tucker Carlson’s interview with President Donald Trump.

“Tucker’s interview with Donald Trump got nearly a quarter billion views, which is roughly 80 times his Fox audience,” he said.

St. Onge argued that artificial intelligence is accelerating the transition toward independent media.

“AI accelerates all of this because it replaces left-wing media slop with multiple points of view, and often by people who know the topic much better than journalism majors who are experts in literally nothing,” he said.

He said the internet had already reduced the dominance of traditional news organizations before the emergence of AI.

“That was already driving mass layoffs and consolidation with the number of journalists in America, newspapers down nearly three-quarters, and even TV laying off in the face of YouTubers and independents,” St. Onge said.

He also cited estimates of ongoing job losses within the news industry.

“Layoff analyst Challenger Gray estimates media layoffs are now running 20,000 a year, which is about one in 10 remaining journalists every year, while independent creators, of course, explode,” he said.

Looking ahead, St. Onge predicted continued contraction among legacy news organizations as AI adoption expands.

“So as next brought to you by the Bitcoin way, aside from their corruption, our supposed intellectual elite is characterized by a kind of ideological DEI, where the people on top are surprisingly second rate for the authority they command. You probably noticed this during COVID. Now that AI can replace second rate in about three sentences, that elite is running on fumes. Give it another 10 years, and we will not have a legacy media,” St. Onge said.

WATCH:

Trump Is Waging a Three-Front War for the Future of Our Republic [WATCH]
News

Trump Is Waging a Three-Front War for the Future of Our Republic [WATCH]

/

Political commentator Barbara Boyd said President Donald Trump is pursuing what she described as a three-front campaign involving U.S. policy toward Iran, election security, and opposition from the media and political establishment, arguing that each effort is connected to the administration’s broader agenda.

Boyd opened her commentary by outlining what she believes are the administration’s primary objectives.

“President Trump is waging a three-front war for the future of our republic. Now the media will tell you these fronts are unrelated, but the media was captured long ago and it’s on the other side,” Boyd said.

She said the first front involves U.S. policy toward Iran, the second centers on election integrity, and the third concerns criticism directed at Vice President J.D. Vance and the administration’s economic agenda.

Boyd also referenced Vance’s recent remarks describing what he sees as a shift in Republican economic policy.

“The president has already completely reoriented the conversation towards what you might call an American developmentalist approach. American economic policy on the right is now much more Alexander Hamilton than it is Milton Friedman,” Vance said.

According to Boyd, Vance has become a target of criticism because of that economic philosophy.

“Vance has now joined Trump as a target of the massive psyops being run by the Democrats, establishment Republicans, and the media,” Boyd said.

Turning to the administration’s policy toward Iran, Boyd argued that the objective extends beyond military operations and is focused on protecting international shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

She cited remarks from Energy Secretary Chris Wright regarding the administration’s strategy.

“We did a pause to try to get an agreement with the Iranian people to allow oil to flow without them attacking it. They’ve proven unwilling to do that, and we’ve pivoted. Now, what we’re doing is assuring that oil and gas and other products can flow through the Strait of Hormuz, with or without Iranian cooperation,” Wright said.

Boyd said the administration views freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz as an important component of international energy security.

She also argued that Trump’s long-term strategy differs from previous U.S. policy in the Middle East by emphasizing American energy production and expanded international investment.

“Donald Trump wants advanced energy, not just to grow our economy. He wants to build real sovereign trading partners for our future goods and services,” Boyd said.

According to Boyd, increased stability in the Gulf region would support broader investment opportunities beyond traditional oil and gas production.

The commentator then shifted to election integrity, arguing that Trump’s recent address on election security was intended to draw attention to intelligence and vulnerabilities that she believes had not previously received sufficient public attention.

She referenced commentary posted on social media suggesting the administration is releasing information incrementally, while arguing that the president’s objective is broader than revisiting previous elections.

“The president wasn’t addressing people like me,” Boyd said. “I can tell you all about the coup that ran from 2015 to 2024.”

Boyd argued that Trump’s focus is on upcoming elections rather than past contests.

“On Thursday, Trump didn’t relitigate any of that. His target is disengaged midterm voters, pessimistic members of his own coalition, and persuadable people on the other side ahead of the midterms, he’s running a live fire drama about protecting the most sacred right of this republic, the right to vote and to have that vote count,” she said.

She also discussed allegations involving election systems, voter registration rolls, and intelligence agencies, saying the administration intends to continue releasing additional information while encouraging states to update voter registration records before the next federal election.

Boyd then referenced comments from former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino regarding investigations into government agencies.

“Folks, there was an organized internal government effort between intelligence community actors, law enforcement actors, DNI actors to just destroy President Trump completely by whatever means necessary,” Bongino said.

“During my tenure here as your deputy, I’ve relayed to you things that are happening that might not be immediately visible, but they are happening. What I’ve learned in the course of our properly predicated and necessary investigations into these aforementioned matters has shocked me down to my core,” he continued.

Boyd argued that public reaction to Trump following the 2024 assassination attempt influenced the presidential election.

“That’s why Trump standing up after being shot and mouthing ‘fight, fight, fight’ dictated the result of the 2024 election,” she said.

Returning to economic policy, Boyd said the administration’s embrace of what Vance described as an Alexander Hamilton approach reflects a broader effort to promote domestic production and long-term economic development.

She contrasted that philosophy with economist Milton Friedman, arguing that the administration favors policies centered on manufacturing, infrastructure, and productive investment.

Boyd concluded by discussing what she described as the leadership qualities required during periods of conflict.

Referring to the military concept of “Schlossenheit,” she argued that President Trump has demonstrated a willingness to make difficult decisions under uncertain circumstances.

“The great German military theorist Karl Clausewitz called Trump’s special form of courage and determination ‘Schlossenheit.’ It is a habitual determination to act and most often act correctly without knowing all the facts,” Boyd said.

She concluded by saying that additional leaders within the administration will need to demonstrate similar resolve.

“If we’re going to win, J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, and many of us must find that kind of talent and toughness in ourselves,” Boyd said.

WATCH:

Brandon Gill Serves Up a Brutal Congressional Beatdown to Smithsonian Director’s Face
News

Brandon Gill Serves Up a Brutal Congressional Beatdown to Smithsonian Director’s Face

/

The House Oversight Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) held a hearing Tuesday titled “Rewriting American History: Examining the Smithsonian’s Efforts to Reshape the Past,” focusing on exhibits and educational materials at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History, as reported by Red State.

The hearing followed the release of a 162-page report by the White House Domestic Policy Council on July 4 that criticized the museum’s presentation of American history and alleged that political ideology had influenced exhibits and programming.

During the hearing, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, questioned Dr. Anthea Hartig, director of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History, about several museum initiatives, including a “Mass Action Tool Kit” that had been promoted during her tenure.

Gill repeatedly questioned Hartig about the museum’s exhibits, educational resources, and mission, while Hartig responded to members’ questions throughout the hearing.

The White House report identified four principal findings regarding the museum’s presentation of American history:

NMAH Fails to Substantively Present America’s Founders and Founding.
NMAH Has “Problematized” the 250th Anniversary of America’s Founding.
NMAH Removed “American History” from Its Mission Statement to “Get Out of the ‘America First’ Mentality.”
NMAH Has Abandoned Historical Scholarship for Political Activism.

The report also criticized exhibits and programming related to race, immigration and gender identity, concluding that there had been what it described as “ideological capture at the museum.”

According to the report, the concerns extend beyond individual exhibits and reflect broader questions about how American history is presented at one of the nation’s largest museums.

“The serious concerns raised in this report are not about a few exhibits or a few controversial labels. They concern whether America’s premier history museum still presents America as a coherent nation and heritage worth teaching with gratitude and honesty. The Museum can broaden the story without dissolving the story. It can and should acknowledge slavery, injustice, mistreatment of Native peoples, and other grave wrongs without encouraging citizens to view their country mainly through suspicion, resentment, and division. But that is not what the National Museum of American History is doing. As it stands today, it would benefit most Americans, especially parents bringing their children for a tour, if the Smithsonian’s flagship history museum had a label at every entrance that reads: ‘Warning: the exhibits in this museum were prepared by people who don’t want you to love your country.'”

The report continued by arguing that the museum’s approach has implications beyond its exhibits.

“The findings of this report matter beyond the museum world. Not all Americans follow academic theories or curatorial fashions, but they do understand when a revered public institution has traded settled truths and basic history for political activism and division. They do notice when the heroes, principles, and events that formed the country are pushed to the margins. They notice when their children are introduced to inappropriate sexual and ideological content under the guise of civic education. And they object when their children and grandchildren are being indoctrinated to regard their country primarily as a source of oppression and unresolved grievance.”

The hearing comes after actions taken by the Trump administration regarding federal museums and historical institutions.

In March 2025, President Donald Trump signed the executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

The order stated that “museums in our Nation’s capital should be places where individuals go to learn — not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history.”

The executive order also included a section titled “Saving Our Smithsonian,” directing the vice president, in consultation with White House officials, to work through the Smithsonian Board of Regents to implement the administration’s policies.

The order called for efforts to remove what it described as improper ideology from Smithsonian museums, education and research centers and the National Zoo, while recommending additional actions if necessary.

Several months later, the administration directed a comprehensive review of Smithsonian museums ahead of events commemorating America’s 250th anniversary.

Tuesday’s hearing marked the latest stage in congressional oversight of the Smithsonian Institution as lawmakers continue examining how American history is presented in federally supported museums and educational programs.

The hearing also highlighted the broader debate over historical interpretation, museum exhibits and the role of public institutions in presenting the nation’s history.

Pentagon Confirms Names of Two U.S. Soldiers Killed in Iranian Strike on Jordan Base
News

Pentagon Confirms Names of Two U.S. Soldiers Killed in Iranian Strike on Jordan Base

/

The War Department has confirmed the identities of two of the three U.S. service members killed in last week’s deadly Iranian drone strike on an American base in Jordan.

The attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base is the latest blow in a string of Iranian provocations targeting U.S. troops across the Middle East.

Nineteen-year-old Pvt. Isabella Gonzales and 25-year-old 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan were killed when Iranian drones and missiles struck the base on July 17.

The Pentagon stated that Feehan, a native of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, served with the 2nd Battalion, 55th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 32nd Army Air Missile Defense Command, based at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Pvt. Gonzales, from Carrollton, Texas, served with the 1st Battalion, 57th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52nd Air Defense Artillery Brigade under the 10th Army Air Missile Defense Command in Ansbach, Germany.

Both soldiers were stationed in Jordan in support of coalition operations countering Iran-backed aggression in the region.

Officials reported that a third service member remains unaccounted for, with U.S. Central Command confirming that remains found on Sunday are being examined to determine if they belong to the missing soldier. Four other troops were injured in the strike but have since been treated and released.

The coordinated Iranian attack marks another escalation in Tehran’s ongoing efforts to test American resolve and drive U.S. forces out of the Middle East.

While the Biden administration has publicly condemned the strike, few in uniform believe these condemnations carry any weight with Iran’s leadership. When the enemy sees hesitation, they push harder—and that’s exactly what’s happening.

The recent fatalities follow a tragic series of U.S. military losses linked to Iran and its proxies. Earlier this month, the commander of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 5 died in a crash in the Arabian Sea.

In March, thirteen more troops were killed during operations against Iranian forces and their affiliates, including six airmen whose LC-135 refueling plane went down in western Iraq.

According to War Department records, a total of 18 American service members have lost their lives since the U.S. operations against Iranian aggression commenced on February 28.

Each loss serves as a grim reminder of the dangerous mission our troops undertake daily in regions where Biden’s foreign policy has left vacuums filled by chaos.

This particular strike underscores the weakness of Washington’s current deterrence strategy.

Despite clear threats from Iranian forces and their Hezbollah partners, U.S. installations continue to face drone and missile attacks without a decisive response. Strong words aren’t enough; America’s enemies are watching what we do, not what we say.

Officials within the War Department have remained tight-lipped regarding potential responses to this attack. However, many in the military community, including veterans and lawmakers aligned with President Trump’s policies, are calling for stronger measures. They argue that deterrence means nothing if Tehran doesn’t fear consequences.

The deaths of Gonzales and Feehan have rattled their respective units, both composed of top-tier missile defense specialists trained to intercept the same type of threats that took their lives.

Fellow soldiers describe both as dedicated warriors who embodied duty and honor—young Americans who believed in protecting their country wherever the mission required.

At Fort Bragg, flags flew at half-staff this week as a tribute to Feehan’s service.

In Texas, Gonzales’s hometown honored her memory with a candlelight vigil attended by family, friends, and veterans who saluted her sacrifice. Their names now join the growing list of young Americans who gave everything under an administration unwilling to confront our enemies with strength.

The attack in Jordan also raises questions about troop posture and base security across the region.

With Iran continuing to arm its proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, U.S. troops remain on high alert. Commanders are reevaluating air defense readiness and internal communication protocols to prevent Iranian drones from slipping through again.

At a time when America’s warrior class bears the cost of weak policy in Washington, voices across the military community are reminding the nation that deterrence requires strength—not speeches.

The sacrifices of Pvt. Isabella Gonzales and 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan will not be forgotten, but their loss demands accountability and action.

Our troops deserve more than hollow promises. They deserve leadership willing to defend them with the full might of American power.

Until that happens, the risk of another headline like this one remains far too real.

Hero Soldier Killed While Neutralizing Iranian Drone Threat in Iraq Identified
News

Hero Soldier Killed While Neutralizing Iranian Drone Threat in Iraq Identified

/

The War Department has confirmed the identity of Sgt. Michael Emmanuel Swinton, the American soldier tragically killed on July 19 during a controlled detonation of ordnance from a downed Iranian one-way attack drone in Erbil, Iraq.

Swinton, just 30 years old, was a dedicated warrior serving with D Battery, 2nd Battalion, 55th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 108th Air Defense Artillery Brigade out of Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Lt. Gen. John L. Rafferty, commanding general of U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command, described Sgt. Swinton as the embodiment of duty and courage. “His service will not be forgotten, and his sacrifice is not in vain. We will support Sgt. Swinton’s family and his unit during this difficult period.

His loss will inspire his fellow Soldiers to continue the mission,” Rafferty said.

The incident, which also left another service member with minor injuries, is still under investigation by U.S. Central Command. Despite the tragedy, CENTCOM reported that the wounded soldier received prompt medical care and is expected to recover fully.

Sgt. Swinton paid the ultimate price while carrying out one of the military’s most dangerous tasks—safely detonating hostile ordnance. His actions likely prevented further casualties and destruction, showcasing precisely the type of quiet heroism that defines America’s fighting men and women.

The Army announced that Sgt. Swinton will be posthumously promoted to staff sergeant and awarded the Bronze Star, Purple Heart, and Combat Action Badge for his valor and sacrifice in the line of duty.

The recognition reflects a soldier who embodied the best of America—fearless, loyal, and relentlessly dedicated to the mission.

Brig. Gen. John L. Dawber, commanding general of the 32nd Army Air and Missile Defense Command, paid tribute to Swinton’s leadership and professionalism.

“Sgt. Swinton was an experienced noncommissioned officer who took great pride in his work and the people around him. He answered the call to duty with courage, honor, and selfless dedication,” Dawber said.

This loss comes just days after the deaths of three other U.S. troops in Jordan, who were killed on July 17 in an Iranian-backed attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base.

Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, and 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, were among those killed. A third soldier, still not publicly identified, was initially missing but is now believed to be among the remains discovered at the scene.

These tragic events highlight how Iran and its proxies continue targeting American service members in the region, testing Washington’s resolve.

Despite the Biden administration’s obvious hesitancy to respond decisively, U.S. warriors remain on the front lines, handling lethal threats daily with unmatched professionalism.

According to the War Department, a total of 18 American service members have been killed supporting operations against Iranian aggression since February 28.

Nearly 100 more have suffered various levels of injury, with the vast majority having already returned to duty. It’s a reminder that this is no “low-risk” deployment—our troops face hostile actions nearly every week.

Swinton’s sacrifice further underscores the reality that America’s service members continue to stand between our homeland and those who would bring chaos to the free world. While Washington bureaucrats debate politics, these soldiers act, often in silence and without fanfare.

Back home, many are asking the hard questions: Why are our troops still engaged in reactive operations against an enemy that knows no boundaries? And when will Washington stop tiptoeing around Tehran’s provocations and let our forces deliver real consequences?

These aren’t political talking points—they’re the life-and-death realities faced by men like Sgt. Swinton every day.

For now, the Army community mourns one of its own. Sgt. Swinton’s courage echoes through every artillery crew and every soldier who continues to serve under the flag.

As America reflects on this loss, we are reminded once again that freedom isn’t free—and brave patriots like Swinton continue to pay its price with honor.

His name and his service will live on through those he trained, those he led, and the country he gave his life to protect. America salutes you, Staff Sgt. Michael Swinton. Mission accomplished, warrior.


Scroll to Top