News

News

Trump Lays Out America’s Fork in the Road in the 2026 Midterm Elections [WATCH]

President Donald Trump used his keynote address at the Republican National Convention in Dallas on Wednesday to frame the November midterm elections as a choice between two sharply different directions for the country, as reported by Breitbart.

Speaking at the American Airlines Center on September 9, Trump argued that maintaining Republican control of Congress would allow his administration to continue pursuing its economic and policy agenda, while a Democratic takeover would lead the country in a different direction.

Trump Unveils Aggressive Final 30 Days Blitz to Elect Republicans in 35 Crucial Races

The convention, which runs September 9 and 10, is the first Republican National Convention specifically organized around a midterm election.

Historically, national party conventions have been associated with presidential election years and the formal nomination of presidential candidates.

Lee Greenwood performed “God Bless the USA” before Trump took the stage at the home of the Dallas Mavericks and Dallas Stars.

Trump immediately focused his remarks on the approaching election.

“In 55 days, Americans will be going to the polls in one of the most important elections in our country’s history. Your vote will decide whether our country stumbles at the starting gate of the next 250 years or surges forward and never ever looks back,” he said.

“We hand America’s future to the radical left Democrats, and our nation will spend the next decade just getting back on its feet. It will be a tragedy. Vote Republican, and we will leave the world in our dust for generations to come. There’ll be nothing like it,” he added.

Trump said 35 closely contested congressional races would be particularly important to determining control of Congress.

Republicans currently hold a 53-seat Senate majority, while the House is also narrowly divided between the two parties. Senate records list 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents for the 119th Congress.

The president said he plans to campaign in states with competitive congressional races.

“We have a very short period of time, and we really have 35 races. They all count, but we have 35 races that are, I guess you’d call swings, right? Like we had seven swing states; we won all seven, right? Yeah. So I said, not that I’m looking for the work. You know, I said the other day I got so much of a schedule. I said, ‘I thought I won. What do I have to do? I’m campaigning,’ But I am. We’re campaigning to make it incredible,” he said.

“The ones that are very close—they might be winning by a little, or losing by a little, or tied—we can win every one of those races,” he said.

“But I’m going to go to every one of those states for congressmen and Senators… and we’re going to have rallies just like this.”

Trump also addressed the economy and the issue of affordability, which Democrats have emphasized as a central issue heading into the midterms.

He criticized spending and energy policies from the Biden administration and argued that those policies contributed to higher prices.

“Our predecessors killed and buried the American dream with trillions of dollars in waste and green energy scams—the greatest scams in American history—green energy… Most of them had no idea what it was; they just said, ‘Let’s go green,’ And every country that’s gone green is down the tubes, you do know that, but it caused prices to skyrocket,” Trump said.

“They used the word affordability, right? They are so fake, because it was them that caused the affordability, to use their word, crisis, and I’m bringing the prices way down, way way down…We’re fixing it. We’re fixing it,” he added.

Trump also discussed the conflict involving Iran and predicted that the situation would change following the November 3 election.

He said the Iranian government was waiting in hopes that Democrats would gain power.

“And prices right after this very important election on November 3 will be plummeting. The war will be over very shortly after the election. They’re hanging on for dear life, hoping that we lose, so they can deal with dumb, weak Democrats, and they can have their bomb,” he said.

“We’re not going to let that happen.”

“So they’re going to be quitting or dropping out or who knows what the hell, whatever it is, right after Election Day, because they…. desperately want to deal with Democrats like Obama, Barack Hussein Obama,” he added.

Trump’s remarks come as Republicans seek to maintain their congressional majorities during a midterm cycle that historically presents challenges for the party occupying the White House.

The House has changed majority parties 19 times since 1856, with more than three-quarters of those changes occurring during midterm elections, according to the House historian.

Trump’s own party faces the additional challenge of trying to maintain both chambers simultaneously.

According to congressional records, only a small number of previous administrations have entered a midterm election with control of the White House, House and Senate and retained both congressional majorities afterward.

The most recent example was 2002, when Republicans retained both chambers during President George W. Bush’s first term.

Democrats expanded their congressional majorities in 1934 while Franklin Delano Roosevelt was president.

Trump has made the midterms a central focus of his political schedule, telling reporters before traveling to Dallas that Republicans should continue making their case to voters.

“Just keep fighting and just keep explaining how well we’re doing as a country. We’re doing better now as a country than we’ve ever done before,” Trump said.

The November 3 election will determine the composition of Congress for the next session and provide the first nationwide congressional test of Trump’s second administration.

News

Shirtless Daredevil Dances and Leaps on Speeding Truck Across George Washington Bridge [WATCH]

A 28-year-old Fort Lee, New Jersey, man was arrested after he was filmed dancing and jumping on the back of a moving flatbed truck as it crossed the George Washington Bridge, according to reports.

Arnesia Crawford was seen riding on the trailer as the truck traveled across the upper level of the bridge and into New Jersey on September 3. The incident occurred at approximately 11 a.m., with video of the stunt later posted to TikTok.

The footage was recorded from inside the cab of another truck and showed Crawford moving around the flatbed while traffic continued across the busy bridge.

At various points, Crawford jumped up and down and appeared to perform for people traveling nearby. He also moved toward the front portion of the trailer before returning to the main section.

Other motorists and truck drivers appeared to recognize that something unusual was happening and attempted to alert the driver of the flatbed.

“There’s a guy!” the person recording the video could be heard shouting toward the truck driver.

Several vehicles were visible behind the truck as Crawford continued his impromptu performance. Drivers also honked their horns in an apparent effort to get the trucker’s attention.

The video was posted by TikTok user John Ortiz, who captioned the footage, “Only in NYC… WILD.”

The video quickly drew attention because of the unusual circumstances. Crawford was traveling on an elevated section of the George Washington Bridge, which spans the Hudson River and connects New York City with Fort Lee, New Jersey.

It remains unclear how Crawford initially got onto the flatbed trailer. It was also not immediately known whether the truck driver realized that Crawford was riding on the vehicle.

Port Authority Police officers arrested Crawford after the truck crossed the bridge. Authorities subsequently charged him with aggravated assault, resisting arrest, and disorderly conduct.

@johnortizzzz24 Only in NYC … WILD …. #GWBRIDGE #NY #NJ #mentalhealthawareness ♬ Saxophones getting louder – Sped Up – AntonioVivald

Following the arrest, Crawford was taken to a hospital for further evaluation, according to the report.

Officials did not immediately provide additional information about the circumstances surrounding the incident.

It was also not immediately clear whether Crawford was experiencing a mental health issue or whether any substance use was involved.

The Port Authority had not provided additional information about the case at the time of the report.

The incident took place during a busy period on one of the region’s most heavily traveled transportation routes.

The George Washington Bridge carries traffic between Manhattan and New Jersey and is operated by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

The video showed Crawford remaining on the moving trailer while surrounding traffic continued at highway speeds.

His movements included walking and jumping across portions of the flatbed before he moved closer to the truck’s cab.

The footage also showed the man continuing to dance as another vehicle passed the truck. The person recording appeared to be attempting to warn the truck driver about Crawford’s presence.

Authorities ultimately removed Crawford from the trailer following the vehicle’s crossing of the bridge.

The arrest brought an end to the unusual incident, although several questions remained unanswered, including how Crawford gained access to the trailer and how long he had been aboard the truck before motorists noticed him.

The case comes as authorities continue to deal with safety concerns involving pedestrians and unauthorized individuals on major bridges and highways.

The Port Authority has not indicated whether additional charges could be filed as the investigation continues.

Crawford’s next court proceedings and any additional information about the charges were not immediately available in the report.

For now, the available video provides a striking account of what motorists encountered on the George Washington Bridge on September 3, when a man unexpectedly turned the back of a moving truck into a stage while traffic continued around him.

News

Trump’s Deportation Push Is Wrecking Democrats’ ‘Demographic Destiny’ Plan [WATCH]

Dan Bongino said the illegal population in the United States has fallen significantly since January 2025, arguing that the decline is disrupting what he described as a Democratic strategy to use immigration to increase political power.

Bongino pointed to an estimate from the Center for Immigration Studies as he discussed the change in the illegal population under President Donald Trump.

“So we’ve got the workforce booming, manufacturing returning, the border closed, the streets are being cleaned up dramatically, crime rates dropping. You got some more? Hell yeah, I got some more,” Bongino said.

He then turned specifically to illegal immigration and accused Democrats of viewing the issue through the lens of political influence.

“What about the illegal population of the United States that was being used by the Democrats to create a massive welfare state? They talk about it all the time. How they use demographic destiny to change the demographics of the country. The Democrats talk about this all the time,” Bongino said.

Bongino cited a reported decline of 2.3 million since January 2025.

He acknowledged that the figure does not mean every person in the country illegally has left or that immigration enforcement is finished.

“Rapid Response 47, again, according to cis.org or cis_org on X, the net change in the overall size of the illegal population in the United States is a quote extraordinary decline of 2.3 million since January of 2025. Is that every illegal gone? No. Is there more work to do? Yes. That’s a pretty dramatic decline,” Bongino said.

Bongino then connected the population change to congressional representation and the Electoral College.

He argued that the size of the illegal population has political consequences because congressional districts are based on population.

“There’s about 700,000, roughly, people in a congressional district. If you get rid of 2.3 million illegals who do not belong here and broke the law to get here, the Democrats demographic destiny argument that they talk about all the time, look it up, you start to massively lose Electoral College and congressional representation you garnered by illicit and illegal means,” Bongino said.

He also referenced a New York Times headline, “We Can Replace Them,” by Michelle Goldberg while making his case that demographic changes have been openly discussed.

Bongino argued that Democrats’ position on illegal immigration is ultimately about political power rather than concern for immigrants.

“This is the only reason they want illegals in the country for political power. They don’t care about illegals at all. They care about political power. Using illegal aliens are just a tool for them. I promise you,” Bongino said.

He offered a hypothetical scenario in which illegal immigrants suddenly supported Republicans, arguing that Democrats would immediately reverse their approach to immigration enforcement.

“If illegal aliens were somehow like mind wiped into all voting for Republicans tomorrow, the Democrats would be like, Shut the wall. Build a wall. Shut it down. Ship everybody out. They would be like, We need to give ICE, CBP 2 trillion in funding. They don’t care about illegals. They care about using them for political power. They’ve talked about it over and over,” Bongino said.

Bongino closed by praising the Trump administration’s deportation campaign and describing its purpose as enforcing the requirement that people enter the United States legally.

“Donald Trump and the Trump administration and his law enforcement and DOJ folks have engaged in an unprecedented deportation effort to send a message that you can come here, but you have to come here legally. And if you don’t, you’ve got to go. And the Democrats are losing their minds,” Bongino said.

WATCH:

News

Reports Surface That Elon Musk is About To Drop Massive Midterm Funds to Keep Texas Red [WATCH]

Mark Halperin said Elon Musk is preparing to spend heavily in Texas politics, reporting that multiple sources have told him Musk and his political operation are discussing a major financial commitment that could affect the state’s U.S. Senate race.

Halperin said his reporting began with a tip about Musk’s plans in Texas.

He has since spoken with additional sources as he attempts to determine how much Musk could ultimately spend and where that money would go.

“I got a tip from a source about Elon Musk and what he’s going to spend in Texas, and since then, through preparations for the show and doing the interview with Tucker and some other stuff, I’ve been reporting on this question because if my source with the most extraordinary story is true, this is what Krista Davidson would call a game changer,” Halperin said.

Musk’s potential involvement comes as Republican Ken Paxton and Democrat James Talarico compete for the Texas Senate seat.

Halperin said Musk had previously been expected to spend money nationally and in Texas, including on voter registration and get-out-the-vote operations.

Halperin pointed to Musk’s involvement in voter registration efforts during the 2024 election and said Republicans have increasingly focused on those operations.

“So, voter registration, get out the vote, is something that since the Obama years ended, Republicans have taken the lead. It’s a hard thing to quantify, but spending money on that is very useful. And Musk, of course, has unlimited money to spend and has proven he’s willing to spend a lot,” Halperin said.

The bigger development, according to Halperin, is that Musk may expand beyond those ground operations and finance television advertising in Texas.

Halperin said political professionals believe tens of millions of dollars in television spending will be required to help Paxton compete against Talarico.

He described Texas as an expensive media market where $10 million would not go particularly far, especially when advertising is purchased by outside organizations rather than candidates receiving lower advertising rates.

“It takes a lot of money to saturate Texas TV for the next two months,” Halperin said.

Halperin said he now has four sources pointing in the same general direction about Musk’s intentions.

“I’ve now got four sources on this story, all leaning in the same direction, that Musk plans to spend a great deal of money in Texas,” he said.

Halperin tied the discussions to the Republican convention in Dallas, where campaigns, party committees, super PACs, wealthy Republican supporters and political advisers were gathered.

He said the convention involved more than speeches, with political organizations making decisions about fundraising, advertising and campaign operations as the election approaches.

“Four sources familiar with this situation say that Musk and his people are now talking about spending a lot of money in Texas, a lot of money, including a figure from one of my sources that is the number that Republicans have said repeatedly, if Paxton’s to have a chance to win, this much must be put in,” Halperin said.

That figure, according to one of Halperin’s sources, is $100 million.

“That figure is $100 million, ladies and gentlemen. Not all on television, some of it for organizing,” Halperin said.

Halperin was careful to distinguish what his different sources had told him. He said he did not have three sources independently confirming the $100 million figure.

Instead, one source provided that number, while another described a potentially substantial amount of spending during September alone.

“I’m not here to tell you I’ve got three sources saying 100 million. I have one source saying that. I’ve got another source saying 50 this month, just this month, and other sources saying that Musk has transitioned from saying he wants to support the Texas ticket primarily through ground game and that he’s also going to spend to buy television. Okay?” Halperin said.

Halperin said he was continuing to report on the developing situation and had additional inquiries pending.

He also said people involved in Texas Republican politics who had been concerned about the Senate contest were increasingly hearing about Musk’s plans.

According to Halperin, they viewed the possible scale of Musk’s spending as potentially significant because it could reduce the amount other Republican organizations would need to commit to Texas.

Halperin said that could allow those organizations to devote more resources to other Senate contests rather than putting an outsized share of their money into Texas.

“Many people in Texas party politics who have been concerned about salvaging that seat have heard about Musk’s plans and feel that the amount he’s putting in is a game changer, that it will allow the rest of the funding apparatus to not have to face this choice about putting money in Texas, the most expensive of the Senate battleground states by far, and can focus on places like Michigan and Iowa and Maine and New Hampshire, etc.,” Halperin said.

WATCH:

News

‘Mainstream vs. Extreme’: Gill Exposes Democrats’ War on America and Common Sense [WATCH]

Rep. Brandon Gill used his address at the Republican National Convention in Texas to frame the upcoming midterm election as a choice between what he called mainstream American values and an increasingly extreme Democratic Party.

Gill opened with his own version of a land acknowledgement, focusing on the Americans who built and defended the country.

“I’d like to acknowledge that we stand here today in the great state of Texas and the United States of America, the ancestral homeland of great American patriots, pioneers, and explorers who put down roots, fought for freedom all over the globe, and bled and died to build the greatest civilization ever known to man,” Gill said.

Gill said Republicans were using the midterm convention to present their record and President Donald Trump’s accomplishments directly to voters.

His central theme was that the November election represented “the mainstream versus the extreme,” a characterization also reported from his convention address.

Gill directed much of his speech at Democratic candidates and their positions on America, Christianity, capitalism and gender.

“They sometimes call themselves socialists, some even call themselves communists, but most of them simply go by Democrats,” Gill said.

“They’re the ones who will tell you that your love for America is nothing but bigotry, that our heritage is rooted in white supremacy, and that your Christian faith is patriarchal and needs to be dismantled. That’s extreme.”

Gill singled out Democratic congressional nominees Daria Liza Chevalier and Claire Valdez before turning to Texas Democrat James Talarico.

He also criticized Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed as the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks approaches.

“Now we have to admit that every party has their crazies. The difference is that the Democrat Party is nominating theirs for Congress,” Gill said.

“How can people who have such a transparent disdain for this country be trusted to govern it?”

Gill then shifted to the Biden administration, criticizing its handling of immigration, inflation and cultural issues.

He argued that the previous administration’s policies had left Americans questioning the direction of their country.

“The last time Democrats were in power with Joe Biden in the White House, inflation hit 9% and we had a government that cared more about the color of your skin than the content of your character,” Gill said.

He also took a shot at Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez while warning about what he labeled “Woke 2.0.”

“Well, AOC, you were finally right about one thing: woke one was crazy, and we’re not going to let you get your hands on woke two,” Gill said.

Gill said political disagreements have expanded far beyond the traditional debates over taxes and spending.

“I think we can all remember the good old days when political debates were about marginal tax rates and government spending. Now we’re debating whether toddlers can become transgender, whether men can get pregnant, and whether your daughter should have to share a locker room with grown men,” Gill said.

Gill contrasted those issues with the policies pursued by Trump and congressional Republicans, pointing to border enforcement, tax relief and energy.

“By contrast, President Trump and Republicans in Congress lead with mainstream values. The president has secured the border, and Republican policies protect American citizens against dangerous criminal illegals,” Gill said.

Gill highlighted the Working Families Tax Cut, saying it included no tax on tips, overtime or Social Security, along with an expanded child tax credit and tax breaks for small businesses.

“Under President Trump, America has achieved energy independence,” Gill said.

“If Democrats have their way, we would be dependent on our biggest foreign adversaries, and our gas prices would just keep ticking up perpetually.”

He also said Republicans recently attempted to prohibit members of Congress from trading stocks, blaming Democrats and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for preventing the effort.

Gill closed by returning to the theme he established at the beginning of his address.

“This November, Americans have a very clear choice: it’s the mainstream versus the extreme,” Gill said.

“Our country will not go back to Democrats woke insanity. We will not go back to divisive, racialized politics. We will not go back to 9% Biden inflation, and we absolutely will not go back to open borders.”

Gill said his motivation was preserving the country and its values for his children.

“But we will go back to common sense, because this country is our home, and I want my children to grow up in a country that they actually recognize,” Gill said.

“I want them to grow up in the same America that I grew up in, and I want them to grow up with the same values that my parents taught me and that my my grandparents taught them, because we love this country, and America is worth preserving.”

WATCH:

News

Pilot Warned Amazon Cargo Jet Was “Too Fast” Before Deadly Miami Runway Disaster [WATCH]

New information from the National Transportation Safety Board is shedding more light on the final moments before an Amazon cargo plane overran a runway at Miami International Airport, revealing that one pilot repeatedly warned the other that the aircraft was “too fast.”

As Fox News reported, the Boeing 767, operated by cargo airline 21 Air, crashed at Miami International Airport on Sunday, Sept. 6, 2026. Five people on the ground were killed when the aircraft traveled beyond the runway and struck a van.

The pilots were identified as Capt. Joseph Carroll, 55, and First Officer Jaime Felipe Silva Molina, 37. Both pilots were employed by 21 Air.

According to an NTSB summary of the cockpit voice recorder, one of the pilots repeatedly warned that the aircraft was “too fast” during the final approach and after the plane touched down.

The NTSB has not said which pilot issued the warnings or which pilot was receiving them.

The warnings continued for nearly two minutes, according to investigators. The pilot receiving the warnings did not provide “a consistent verbal response,” the NTSB said in its summary of the cockpit voice recording.

The newly released information adds to investigators’ understanding of what happened as the aircraft approached Miami International Airport in difficult conditions.

Flight data showed that the aircraft made an unstable approach while dealing with strong winds.

The cockpit voice recorder also captured automated warnings during the descent, including repeated “sink rate” and “too low terrain” alerts.

After the aircraft touched down, the pilots briefly attempted to take off again.

According to the NTSB, they advanced the throttles and released the brakes before abandoning the maneuver approximately four seconds later.

The plane then resumed braking, but there was not enough runway remaining to bring the aircraft to a stop.

Data from FlightRadar24 indicated that the Amazon cargo aircraft initially touched down nearly 5,000 feet into Runway 30.

The runway measures 9,360 feet in total, meaning less than half of its length remained after touchdown.

The aircraft ultimately traveled approximately 1,300 feet beyond the end of the runway before striking a van.

The five people inside the van were members of a crew that cleaned aircraft at Miami International Airport, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said Tuesday.

Five additional people were injured in the crash. Two of those injured were in critical condition as of Tuesday, according to the report.

The pilots were also injured in the incident. They were treated and released before meeting with investigators Wednesday, according to The Associated Press.

The NTSB has not yet released a complete transcript of the cockpit conversation.

Investigators are continuing to examine the flight data recorder, cockpit voice recorder and other evidence as they work to determine exactly what caused the crash.

The latest findings provide additional information about the aircraft’s approach and the communications between the two pilots, but investigators have not yet issued a final determination on the cause of the accident.

The repeated warnings about the aircraft’s speed are among the details investigators are examining.

The NTSB’s summary indicates that the warnings continued through a critical portion of the flight, including the final approach and period after touchdown.

The aircraft’s unstable approach, the strong winds, its touchdown location on the runway, and the brief attempt to go around will all be part of the investigation.

Officials have been examining the aircraft and runway area since the crash. On Tuesday, Sept. 8, investigators were photographed inspecting the Amazon cargo plane at Miami International Airport.

The incident prompted a major emergency response at the airport and has raised additional questions about the sequence of events leading up to the runway overrun.

For now, the NTSB is continuing its investigation, and the complete cockpit recording has not been made public.

Investigators are expected to use that recording, along with flight data and other evidence, to reconstruct the aircraft’s final approach and determine what happened before the crash.

The latest information makes clear that speed warnings were repeatedly heard in the cockpit, but the NTSB has not assigned responsibility for the warnings or established whether they directly contributed to the accident.

The investigation remains ongoing.

News

Remembering Charlie Kirk

There is something strange about trying to explain the impact of someone you’ve never met.

Charlie Kirk never knew my name. I never sat across from him or had a conversation with him. I knew him the way millions of young people did: through a screen and through his speeches. But what I remember most is not one particular argument he made or one particular thing he said, rather it was the way he treated young people. He believed we were capable of more than we often gave ourselves credit for.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t until the tragedy on September 10th that I seriously considered acting on my own beliefs. That was when I joined Helena in her mission to create a Club America chapter at our school.

Many doubts circulated after that. Could we actually make a difference? Would anyone listen? Was there really a place for young people like us to stand publicly for what we believed? Charlie’s example was what made me question whether I had to accept those doubts.

Charlie started his journey like the thousands of teens across America have now started theirs. He had nothing but supportive parents and an unyielding drive for a just and prosperous society. He never saw how big his mission would become until it did.

Neither did I.

I did not know what that first decision would lead to. I only knew that I wanted to do something. So I picked myself back up, held fast to my beliefs, built connections, and chose to see it through.

Since then, I have found myself doing things I never expected. I began conducting street interviews for Common Ground Campus and writing monthly articles. I have met people I once only knew through a screen and found myself in rooms I never imagined entering. Looking back, it is strange to realize how much can come from one decision that, at the time, seemed so small.

That is what Charlie understood about young people. He did not tell us that we had to wait until we were older, more experienced, or more important before our voices mattered. He treated young people as people capable of doing something now.

His death left behind an absence that cannot simply be filled. But his life left behind an example that can be followed.

I may have never known Charlie Kirk, but he reminded me that influence does not always begin with knowing exactly what you are doing. Sometimes it begins with simply deciding to do something.

And sometimes, you never get to see how far that decision will go.

News

Trump Honors Charlie Kirk With Powerful RNC Tribute on One Year Anniversary Eve [WATCH]

The Republican National Committee honored Charlie Kirk in Dallas on Wednesday night, remembering the conservative leader one day before the first anniversary of his assassination.

President Donald Trump delivered the emotional centerpiece, paying tribute to a trusted friend whose work transformed conservative youth organizing.

Kirk was assassinated on Sept. 10, 2025, while debating students at Utah Valley University.

The RNC also scheduled a formal tribute for Thursday evening, placing the remembrance exactly one year after he was killed while doing the work that defined his public life.

As founder of Turning Point USA, Kirk spent years organizing young conservatives on college campuses where liberal politics had long gone largely unchallenged.

He embraced the difficult work that many establishment figures avoided, building a national network and giving young Americans a place inside the conservative movement.

Kirk also campaigned relentlessly for Trump and Republican candidates during the 2024 election.

Along the way, he developed genuine friendships with Trump and Vice President JD Vance, relationships rooted in shared political goals rather than the usual Washington convenience.

Trump waited until late in his Wednesday address before speaking about Kirk.

When the president reached that moment, he confronted both the horror of the assassination and the disturbing reaction from corners of the radical left.

“Exactly one year ago tomorrow, a far left extremist assassinated my great friend and conservative voice, Charlie Kirk, because Charlie Kirk spoke the truth. What shocked millions of Americans was not only the fact that Charlie was murdered, as bad as it was, but also how many people made an excuse for it or cheered for it?”

Those words captured an ugly reality that polite political circles would rather forget.

Kirk was not merely attacked for his ideas, but murdered for voicing them, and some leftist activists responded with excuses, mockery, or outright celebration.

Trump made clear that the reaction was not some irrelevant online spectacle.

He connected it directly to the November election, warning Republicans that the people who revealed their contempt after Kirk’s death still want control over the nation and its institutions.

“For a brief moment, the mask came off the radical left, and you saw what they were really all about. And now those same people are trying to get power over you in this election, and they are all voting Democrat. Okay, they’re all voting every one of them, and you can’t let it happen. We will not let them win.”

The warning gave the tribute a political urgency fitting for Kirk’s legacy.

He understood that elections determine who controls the government, but he also recognized that lasting victories require persuading young people, challenging hostile institutions, and refusing to surrender the culture without a fight.

Trump then set politics aside and addressed his fallen friend in direct, personal terms. “In Charlie’s honor, I just want to say we love you, Charlie,” Trump said.

The president also recognized Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, who attended the convention and sat in the VIP section. “And Erika is here someplace,” Trump said before thanking her.

“She’s put up with something, boy. Oh boy, what she’s had to go through, and the most beautiful family. It’s just terrible.”

WATCH:

After her husband’s murder, Erika Kirk assumed leadership of Turning Point USA and continued the mission he began.

In the year since the assassination, she has kept the organization moving forward as a major force in Republican politics and conservative outreach to younger voters.

That responsibility would test anyone, especially while grieving a husband and raising a family under intense public scrutiny.

Yet Erika has displayed remarkable strength, ensuring that violence did not silence Charlie’s message or dismantle the movement he spent years constructing.

The timing made Trump’s remarks especially powerful, since he delivered them only hours before the calendar turned to Sept. 10.

Kirk had died speaking directly to young Americans about politics, conservatism, and the country he believed was worth defending.

WATCH:

The formal RNC tribute was scheduled for Thursday between 6 and 7 PM.

The convention’s decision to reserve that time on the anniversary reflected the depth of Kirk’s influence throughout the Republican Party and across the grassroots conservative movement.

Kirk helped build the political energy that filled the Dallas convention, and his absence remained impossible to ignore.

One year after his assassination, Trump and the RNC made clear that Charlie Kirk has not been forgotten and that his cause remains part of the fight Republicans are carrying into November.

News

Gavin Newsom Giddily Imagines Presidential Podcast Wardrobe as CA Record Haunts Him [WATCH]

California Gov. Gavin Newsom was asked during a recent PBS interview whether he would continue his podcast if he became president, prompting him to consider what a presidential version of the program might look like, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The exchange came as Newsom faces increased attention over his political future and speculation about whether he will seek the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

Newsom has not formally announced a presidential campaign, but his recent political activity has fueled discussion about a possible White House bid.

During the interview with PBS NewsHour host Amna Nawaz, the conversation turned to Newsom’s podcast and whether he would maintain the format if he eventually entered the White House.

Newsom initially appeared to consider the possibility before responding that a presidential podcast would represent something different from the traditional presidential radio address.

“As president, a presidential podcast, that’s kind of a little different, a little different than a fireside chat. It’s kind of a modern version,” Newsom said.

Nawaz then asked whether such a podcast would be a good idea.

Newsom responded by turning his attention toward the presentation of the program, including what he would wear.

“I’m sitting back. I’m thinking. I’m thinking about what I would what I wear. Is it a sweater? Is it more a relaxing, approachable look?” Newsom said.

Nawaz replied, “Depends on the season, I think.”

Newsom continued, “I don’t know. I just — I feel my physiology changed when you said that.”

He ultimately said he believed the format could be useful for a president.

“I think it’s a fantastic one,” Newsom said. “I think you have to meet people where they are, and the reason I’m doing a podcast is I’m trying to iterate.”

Newsom has used his podcast and other media appearances as part of a broader effort to communicate directly with voters. During the PBS interview, he said Democrats needed to experiment with different approaches after suffering political setbacks.

“And after we got shellacked last year, I just felt like we needed to do different things,” Newsom said.

The governor also referenced changes he has made to his social media presence and other efforts designed to reach audiences outside traditional political channels.

The discussion comes as Newsom has increasingly positioned himself in national Democratic politics. PBS reported that he has been traveling in North and South Carolina while raising money and working to help Democrats win state-level elections.

The activity has coincided with speculation about his own potential presidential campaign.

Recent reporting has also focused on Newsom’s appearances in South Carolina, which is scheduled to host the Democrats’ first presidential primary in 2028.

The Associated Press reported that “Gavin 2028” buttons were being sold outside some of his events and that people close to Newsom have discussed a potential White House campaign.

The AP also reported that Newsom’s connection to California could become an issue in a national campaign, particularly because California’s political identity is viewed differently across various parts of the country.

For now, Newsom remains California’s governor and has not formally entered the 2028 presidential race.

But his comments about maintaining a podcast from the White House add another glimpse into how he is thinking about modern presidential communication while his national political profile continues to grow.

The possibility of a presidential podcast would represent a significant expansion of the direct-to-voter format that Newsom has already embraced as governor.

For Newsom, the PBS exchange also showed that the question of how a future presidential podcast would look, right down to whether the host would wear a sweater, is already part of the conversation surrounding his potential national ambitions.

News

Marine Corps Offers Up to $15,000 to Recruit Cyber and Electronic Warfare Talent

The Marine Corps is putting serious money behind its drive to recruit Americans for electronic warfare and cyber specialties, offering enlistment bonuses worth as much as $15,000.

The incentives reflect a broader effort to build a force capable of fighting across increasingly contested digital battlefields.

Service leaders describe the Enlistment Bonus Program as a tool to “enable the Marine Corps to remain competitive in the war for talent.”

That competition is only becoming more intense as private companies and federal agencies chase applicants with valuable technical skills.

According to the Marine administrative message announcing the program, incentive amounts could change during the fiscal year based on “recruiting environment conditions.”

In plain English, the Corps is keeping enough flexibility to respond when the recruiting market shifts.

Some enlistees can also receive an additional “shipping” bonus by allowing the Marine Corps to select when they leave for training.

That incentive can add either $5,000 or $10,000, giving qualified recruits another reason to move quickly and remain flexible.

The Marine Corps said the bonus program “facilitates the market expansion required to achieve annual shipping goals, skill channeling of talent into Force Design priorities, and to support service-level efforts to increase return on personnel investment.”

It is bureaucratic language, but the mission is straightforward: find capable people, place them in critical specialties and keep them in uniform.

Electronic warfare and cyber operations have become central to Marine Corps planning as adversaries expand their own digital, drone and information warfare capabilities.

Future conflicts will demand Marines who can disrupt enemy networks, protect friendly systems and help commanders make decisions faster than the opposition.

Earlier this year, the Corps deployed its Multi Domain Task Unit to a NATO exercise. The unit focuses on information and cyber warfare, providing a glimpse of how Marines could operate alongside allies in a heavily contested communications environment.

The service’s Force Design initiative calls for stronger capabilities in electronic warfare, cyber operations and countering hostile drones.

Those priorities recognize that tomorrow’s Marines will need more than rifles and artillery when enemy forces can attack networks, communications and sensors before conventional shooting even begins.

At the beginning of September, the Marine Corps announced plans to expand the force by 6,500 billets by 2031. The growth is intended to support modernization while ensuring the service has enough trained personnel to operate new systems and execute emerging tactics.

Plans include greater investment in artificial intelligence, unmanned aircraft, electronic warfare and cyber capabilities.

The expansion is expected to provide “the specialized personnel required to generate decision advantage and deliver scalable effects across all domains.”

That decision advantage could prove decisive when Marines are dispersed across large operating areas and facing sophisticated enemy surveillance.

Reliable data, protected communications and the ability to disrupt hostile systems can give small units the edge against a numerically larger force.

Recruits who add one year to their contracts may qualify for $7,000, while those adding two years can receive $15,000.

Active duty applicants are limited to one enlistment bonus, so recruits will need to consider which available incentive best fits their qualifications and commitment.

The Corps introduced similar bonuses last year as part of an “invest and retain” model. Rather than constantly replacing trained Marines who walk out the door, the approach seeks to develop a more experienced force and protect the taxpayer’s investment in specialized training.

That strategy matters most in technical occupations, where producing a fully capable Marine can require considerable time, instruction and resources.

Losing skilled cyber or electronic warfare personnel after a short enlistment would force the service to restart an expensive training cycle.

The Marine Corps has already posted strong recruiting results, reaching its annual goal of 26,600 new recruits this year.

The other military branches also achieved their respective recruiting goals, marking welcome progress after years of concern about whether the armed forces could attract enough qualified Americans.

Retention has been another bright spot for the Corps, which reached its retention goal in only one month.

That performance suggests the combination of incentives, career opportunities and renewed mission focus is giving Marines solid reasons to continue serving.

Cash bonuses alone cannot build an effective cyber force, but they can help the Corps reach talented Americans who have plenty of civilian options.

By investing in those recruits now, the Marine Corps is preparing for battlefields where code, signals, drones and electronic disruption will be every bit as important as conventional firepower.


Scroll to Top