News

News

Ukraine Aid Pipeline Springs a Leak as German Heartland Says ‘Nein’ to Globalist Suicide Pact [WATCH]

Barbara Boyd argued that a major political shift in Saxony-Anhalt reflects growing dissatisfaction in Germany with economic and energy policies that she says have weakened the country’s industrial base and increased pressure on its population.

Boyd connected the development to Vice President JD Vance’s criticism of European political institutions and restrictions on political opposition.

Vance has publicly criticized European leaders over free speech and political participation, including during his 2025 Munich Security Conference address.

“Now, to many of us on the other side of the Atlantic, it looks more and more like old entrenched interests hiding behind ugly Soviet-era words like misinformation and disinformation, who simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion, or God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election,” Vance said.

Vance also argued that European citizens do not view themselves merely as components of an international economy.

“Contrary to what you might hear a couple mountains over in Davos, the citizens of all of our nations don’t generally think of themselves as educated animals or as interchangeable cogs of a global economy, and it’s hardly surprising that they don’t want to be shuffled about or relentlessly ignored by their leaders,” Vance said.

Boyd said economics played a central role in the Saxony-Anhalt result.

She focused on Germany’s Mittelstand, the network of specialized, family-owned midsized manufacturers that she described as the engine of the German economy.

According to Boyd, those companies face pressure from Chinese competition, higher energy prices and Germany’s green-energy policies.

She said China has developed thousands of specialized manufacturing companies that increasingly compete directly with German producers.

“The motor of the German economy is the Mittelstand,” Boyd said.

“These are the family-owned, specialized mid-sized manufacturers. They’re now being killed off at a rapid rate, with many considering offshoring production from Germany simply to survive.”

Boyd also blamed Germany’s decision to shut down nuclear power and move away from inexpensive Russian energy after the beginning of the Ukraine war.

She argued that the resulting industrial problems complicate European efforts to expand defense production.

“So in Saxony-Anhalt, the people voted to stop what amounts to a national suicide,” Boyd said.

Boyd then turned to the Trump administration’s latest diplomatic efforts involving Russia and Ukraine.

U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner recently met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow before traveling to Kyiv for talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Kushner described President Trump’s approach as extending beyond ending the immediate fighting to establishing economic conditions that could support a lasting peace.

“President Trump always says that the harder it is, if it’s worthy, you have to give it everything you have,” Kushner said.

“And so, he’s very determined to see the end to this war, to see the end of the deaths, to see the relief of the families, and to hopefully do what he loves doing the best, which is focusing on, you know, investing in business opportunities for the countries to become closer together, and only then brings prosperity and opportunity for the people of Ukraine and the people of Europe. Not just to figure out how do we end the current war, but how do we create the right conditions and arrangements for a long-term, durable peace?”

Kushner has publicly described economic investment and long-term prosperity as components of the administration’s approach to peace negotiations.

“To me, that was a very American response,” Boyd said.

Boyd said the administration’s approach centers on economic development for both sides while also benefiting the United States.

She contrasted that strategy with European efforts to increase military preparedness against Russia.

Boyd also connected developments in Germany with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s strategy toward the United States and European Union.

She argued that Carney is tying Canada more closely to a European political and economic system facing growing internal problems.

“And I think it means the end of Mark Carney’s fever dream about rescuing the old globalist world order from Donald Trump,” Boyd said.

She then turned to Canada’s trade dispute with the United States. Canada recently imposed retaliatory tariffs on American goods, with some measures targeted at politically sensitive U.S. industries and states.

Boyd cited Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s argument that the tariffs would have virtually no inflationary effect on the United States.

Bessent has publicly said his Treasury economic team calculated that even complete pass-through of the Canadian tariffs would produce only a 0.02% effect.

“I will tell you, last week I had the Treasury Econ team go through and what could this cause these tariffs add to inflation in the US if there’s 100% pass-through, which there never is, .02. .02. There there is no inflationary pass-through. And so the pain to the US, there is none,” Bessent said.

Boyd concluded by arguing that the political development in Saxony-Anhalt could have consequences extending beyond Germany, particularly as European governments confront economic pressures while pursuing expanded defense commitments and Canada moves toward closer cooperation with the EU.

“So, a small province in Germany really has created a strategic earthquake and possibly ended the threat of a war to end all wars on this planet,” Boyd said.

WATCH:

News

IRS Tracking Your Phone? Stephen A. Smith Exposes California’s Big Brother Tax State [WATCH]

Stephen A. Smith said California’s tax burden became a major concern as his work required him to spend more time in Los Angeles, telling Patrick Bet-David that the issue eventually affected his view of Gov. Gavin Newsom.

During the exchange, Smith compared California with New York and said he had been paying close attention to the tax rates affecting his income.

“Cuz New York was at around 9%, California was approaching 13%, now they’re at 13.6%. If Gavin Newsom had his way, it’d be about 16.8%. See, these are things that I’ve been paying attention to,” Smith said.

Smith said his concerns went beyond the state tax alone, pointing to additional taxes he associated with Los Angeles and Los Angeles County.

“And so I’m looking at it, and I’m like, you got California state tax, you got Los Angeles city tax, you got L.A. County tax, and then here was what really, really did it,” Smith said.

According to Smith, the issue became particularly important about two years earlier when his responsibilities with NBA Countdown required him to spend additional time in California.

He said the program was being produced from Los Angeles more frequently, increasing the amount of time he spent in the state.

“This happened to me 2 years ago. They said, look, cuz I was going to have to spend some more time out there, they got me doing NBA Countdown, and they decided that we were going to do NBA Countdown more so from L.A. than any place else. Okay, fine. So every time I’m in the state of California, I’m getting taxed that day,” Smith said.

That prompted a conversation with his estate planners about how his time in California could affect his taxes.

Smith said they advised him that leaving California on weekends could be financially beneficial.

“And so I’m sitting down with my estate planners and all of that, and they said, look, when the weekend arrives, it would be in your best interest to go to Vegas, or to Utah or something. I said, why?” Smith recalled.

He said the explanation he received centered on determining whether he remained in California, including through his phone activity.

“And they said, well, if you stay in California, you know, IRS, they ping your phone. So anytime you get a call or you’re on the phone, they know that you’re in the state. Wow. And that counts as a day,” Smith said.

Smith initially found the explanation difficult to believe.

“And I said, you got to be kidding me,” he said.

Smith said his subsequent tax returns convinced him that the advice he had received about his time in California was accurate.

“And sure enough, when I saw my tax returns, it was absolutely correct,” Smith said.

The experience also became part of Smith’s thinking about Newsom.

Smith said he has spoken with the California governor several times and recalled directly connecting his tax concerns to his willingness to support Newsom politically.

“And that’s why I said, you know, I remember years later, and you know, a couple of years ago, I look at Gavin Newsom, who I’ve spoken to a couple of times, and I’m like, you know, you look beautiful in those blue suits, you look very presidential. Ain’t getting my vote,” Smith said.

Bet-David immediately asked whether Smith had actually delivered that message directly to Newsom.

“You told him this?” Bet-David asked.

Smith said he had.

“Yeah, damn right. Because these damn taxes,” Smith responded.

WATCH:

Smith’s comments tied his position directly to his personal experience working in California and the tax consequences he said came with spending additional time there.

His account centered on how his NBA Countdown schedule increased his presence in Los Angeles, the advice he received from his estate planners and what he subsequently saw on his tax returns.

For Smith, the issue ultimately extended beyond the amount he was paying and into his view of California’s political leadership.

His message to Bet-David was straightforward: regardless of how presidential he thought Newsom appeared, his experience with California taxes was enough to cost the governor Smith’s support.

News

Trump Dangles $5000 Dividend as GOP Fights to Finish the Job [WATCH]

President Trump turned the Republican Party’s first ever midterm convention into a full scale campaign rally Wednesday night in Dallas, promising a $5,000 payment to every adult citizen if the GOP keeps both chambers of Congress on Nov. 3.

He asked voters to treat the election as a direct verdict on his agenda and final two years in office.

Speaking before thousands at the American Airlines Center, Trump urged supporters to “pretend that I’m on the ballot” so he can “finish the job.”

The president framed the contest as a stark choice between his populist program and Democrats embracing socialism, open borders, higher taxes, and weaker public safety.

The biggest surprise arrived during what Trump called the “best part” of his energetic 107 minute address.

“If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, because of our tremendous economic success… I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,” Trump said.

Trump compared the proposal to a prosperous business distributing money to its shareholders.

“We’re going to give you that Trump dividend to $5,000 if we win, and we’re going to win.”

WATCH:

The proposed payout would carry a massive price tag, likely exceeding $1.2 trillion at a time when the national debt has already surged past $40 trillion.

That detail could make fiscal conservatives reach for the aspirin, particularly after Washington’s pandemic spending helped fuel the inflation that hammered American families.

Trump previously pushed for $2,000 pandemic checks in 2020, but then Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reduced the amount to $600.

Joe Biden later approved another $1,400, and inflation eventually peaked at 9.1 percent in June 2022 as Americans learned once again that government money is never actually free.

Other direct payment proposals from Trump have not become reality, including dividends financed through tariff revenue and savings generated by efforts to shrink the federal bureaucracy.

Still, the latest promise gives Republicans a potent campaign message as they fight to avoid the traditional losses suffered by a president’s party during midterm elections.

Trump also outlined a crowded legislative agenda for the next Congress.

His priorities included ending surprise medical bills, requiring hospital price transparency, reducing credit card processing fees, eliminating state cashless bail policies, and authorizing the death penalty for major drug traffickers.

The president renewed his call for national voter ID requirements and pledged to expand domestic energy production.

He also wants Congress to make permanent his tax cuts for tips, overtime, and Social Security income while preventing future presidents from restoring the lax border policies associated with the Biden administration.

“Your vote will decide whether our country stumbles at the starting gate of the next 250 years or surges forward and never ever looks back,” Trump told the crowd.

He warned that a Democratic Congress would block his program, dismantle border protections, erase tax cuts, and bury the administration under partisan investigations.

Foreign policy also entered the pitch, with Trump arguing that Tehran is prolonging the Iran conflict while hoping Republicans lose.

He said Iran wants to negotiate with “dumb, weak Democrats” and predicted that the war would end shortly after the election, sending oil and gasoline prices sharply lower.

Trump promised to campaign in every state featuring competitive House or Senate races, with particular attention on the 35 most contested House districts.

His mission, he said, is to drive away the “sick cloud” of communism represented by socialist Democrats who scored several surprising primary victories.

The president aimed some of his sharpest attacks at Democratic Senate candidates James Talarico in Texas, Abdul El Sayed in Michigan, and Roy Cooper in North Carolina.

He labeled El Sayed an “extremist” and mocked Talarico over a vegetarian campaign called “beat meat,” telling the laughing arena, “I don’t know what the hell he meant by that.”

WATCH:

https://rumble.com/v7fbhoc-trump-has-gop-crowd-rolling-with-beat-meat-bit-about-james-talarico.html

The convention included several unexpected moments, including a video appearance by Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman.

He denounced “the extremes and socialism and that anti-American way of life” while praising Republican Sen. Dave McCormick, adding fresh fuel to speculation about whether Fetterman could eventually abandon the increasingly radical Democratic Party.

WATCH:

UFC fighter Justin Gaethje also rallied the crowd, warning that “Your next fight is the only one that matters.”

Republican candidates, cabinet officials, athletes, and rising party figures used the event to reinforce Trump’s message that complacency could hand Congress back to Democrats.

The political stakes are substantial for Trump, who watched Republicans lose 41 House seats during the midterm election of his first term.

Democrats have openly promised to obstruct his administration, launch investigations, and potentially pursue impeachment if they regain control, proving that their governing agenda still begins and ends with Trump.

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer captured the convention’s central argument by calling the election a contest “between common sense and communism, between America-loving patriots and hate-America extremists.”

WATCH:

Trump’s message was just as blunt: Vote Republican, protect the gains of his presidency, and give him the congressional majority needed to complete the job.

News

Dem Senator Crashes GOP Convention, Heaps Praise on Pennsylvania Republican [WATCH]

Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania delivered a political surprise Wednesday night, appearing by video at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas to praise President Donald Trump and Republican Sen. Dave McCormick.

The message offered Republicans a striking endorsement from across the aisle.

Fetterman cast himself as a Democrat who remains loyal to the country rather than the increasingly radical demands of his party’s left flank.

“I’m a commonsense Democrat. I’m always going to stand with America,” he said.

The Pennsylvania senator also rejected socialism and the ideological extremes that have gained influence among Democrats.

His blunt language stood out at the Republican National Committee gathering, especially as party leaders prepared to rally voters for the Nov. 3 elections.

Fetterman introduced McCormick as “the kind of senator that gets the job done” and said his Pennsylvania colleague would “fight for Pennsylvania.”

McCormick is seeking another Senate term and has emphasized industry, energy, jobs, and the economic concerns of working families.

Fetterman recorded the message in front of a recognizable American steel mill, providing a fitting backdrop for his argument about protecting Pennsylvania manufacturing.

Senator John Fetterman, D-Pa., attends a hearing of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs considering nominations on Tuesday, April 18, 2023.

Steel remains central to the identity of communities across western Pennsylvania, even if Washington elites sometimes treat those workers as political decorations.

“That’s exactly the kind of thing that we will work together and will work with President Trump to fight and defend the steel way of life right here in the Steel Valley,” Fetterman said.

The statement placed Trump, McCormick, and Fetterman on the same side of a major Pennsylvania issue.

The appearance was particularly notable because Fetterman remains a sitting Democratic senator.

Yet there he was at the Republican Party’s first midterm convention, delivering praise for Trump and effectively helping make the case for McCormick before a national Republican audience.

His decision also exposed the growing distance between Fetterman and Democratic leaders.

He has repeatedly broken with his party on Israel, border enforcement, immigration policy, and Trump’s military actions against Iran, earning predictable outrage from activists who demand total ideological obedience.

Fetterman has remained among the Senate’s strongest Democratic supporters of Israel.

He has criticized fellow Democrats seeking to restrict American support for the nation, even as anti Israel agitation has become increasingly difficult for Democratic leaders to dismiss as merely fringe behavior.

He has also supported tougher immigration enforcement and backed some Trump administration nominees.

Those positions have irritated Democrats, but they have strengthened Fetterman’s reputation as one of the few members of his party willing to acknowledge political reality when it barges through the front door.

Fetterman has previously warned that he could reconsider his Democratic affiliation if the party fully embraces hostility toward Israel.

He has not announced plans to switch parties, and his convention appearance alone does not establish that such a move is coming.

Still, his growing alliance with McCormick will keep speculation alive.

The two senators emerged from the bruising Pennsylvania Senate landscape of 2022, when Fetterman defeated Republican nominee Mehmet Oz after McCormick narrowly lost the Republican primary.

Since then, Fetterman and McCormick have formed an unusually close working relationship despite representing opposing parties.

Their campaigns established a joint bipartisan fundraising committee in July, an arrangement that immediately attracted attention in a capital where public cooperation is often rarer than campaign promises kept.

McCormick has worked to strengthen his connection with Pennsylvania’s industrial communities and steelworkers.

Fetterman’s video reinforced that message while presenting McCormick as a results focused senator who can cooperate with political opponents without surrendering the interests of his state.

The appearance will likely deepen Fetterman’s troubles with Democratic activists as he continues finding common ground with Trump and Republicans.

For the GOP, meanwhile, the video provided a powerful example of a Democratic senator rejecting the left’s socialist drift and praising Republican leadership.

Fetterman closed with a personal tribute that captured the unusual partnership. “A different party,” he said of McCormick.

“But I’m proud to count him as my great friend.”

WATCH:

News

Nigerian ‘Chief’ Scams California Out of Millions with Medicaid Fraud Scheme [WATCH]

Chief Nathan Ogbatue arrived by motorcade outside a newly built palace in Abatete, Nigeria, last December as a videographer praised him in Igbo, calling him “half man, half god” and crediting him with building the palace “free of charge” for the community.

Ogbatue has been celebrated on social media for philanthropy in Abatete, including building roads and housing, sponsoring annual medical clinics and providing food to people in need.

He is also CEO of California Home Health Agency, or CHHA, a taxpayer-funded company providing in-home medical care and specialty treatments.

CHHA received less than $2 million from Medicaid between 2018 and 2021.

Over the following three years, the company received more than $34 million.

The increase coincided with millions of dollars in real estate purchases by Ogbatue and his wife, Agnes.

Between 2023 and 2024, the couple acquired more than $7 million in property, including a $2.7 million Riverside mansion featuring a sports court, putting green, archery range, and pool.

They also purchased a $1.9 million beach house and another $1.4 million in Riverside properties.

CHHA dates back at least to 2013, when Agnes submitted the company’s first publicly listed utilization report.

She appears to have filed the required report annually through 2019.

California’s Health Care Access and Information department said it has not received one since then “despite continued requests.”

During that same general period, CHHA’s Medicaid revenue increased significantly.

The agency received $89,570 in 2018 and nearly $4 million in 2022.

It received more than $17 million in 2023 and more than $13 million in 2024.

Ogbatue’s real estate holdings followed their own upward trajectory.

He purchased a Riverside home for $330,000 in 2000 before the multimillion-dollar purchases made with his wife in 2023 and 2024.

The couple’s Redondo Beach property previously belonged to another Nigerian family and had been used as collateral for the bail bond of Tamara Motley before Ogbatue acquired it.

Motley was sentenced to prison in December 2023 for submitting $24 million in fraudulent Medicare claims.

As of 2023, Motley was married to former Nigerian Sen. Ahmed Ogembe, whom the Ogbatues later named as a defendant in litigation involving the Redondo Beach property.

CHHA’s website does not identify Nathan or Agnes Ogbatue.

A woman who answered the telephone number listed on the website declined to answer questions, saying the number was for customer service.

WATCH:

At CHHA’s location in a Riverside strip mall, the blinds were closed. After someone knocked on the door, a woman eventually answered and directed questions to Nathan.

When shown a photograph of Ogbatue in Abatete standing near golden statues depicting himself and Agnes, she confirmed that he was the man pictured.

Attempts were also made to speak with Ogbatue at his six-bedroom, six-bathroom Riverside mansion, but its gates were closed. Ogbatue declined to meet, saying he did not have time.

In an earlier telephone conversation, he denied being the “Owelle,” roughly translated as “chief,” of Abatete and said the investigation would not get anywhere.

“We worked really hard, to be honest with you. If we were doing anything funny we wouldn’t talk to you,” Ogbatue said.

“I’m talking to you because I have nothing to fear. What I’m telling you is that we worked hard.”

Ogbatue was contacted by telephone three times.

During two conversations, he was asked how many people he employed but did not provide an estimate.

Ogbatue was crowned chief of Abatete, a farming town in southern Nigeria, during a 2012 ceremony.

In an acceptance speech captured on video, he pledged “to place the interests of Abatete first in all my private and official transactions . . . so help me God.”

His projects in Abatete reportedly include the palace, roads and renovations to the town civic center.

The center contains painted murals depicting the Ogbatues and is located beside two golden statues of the couple.

A compilation released two years ago featured beneficiaries of Ogbatue’s philanthropy. During the past year, he has also sponsored a children’s Christmas party and distributed sacks of food to people in need.

Questions remain about how CHHA’s Medicaid revenue increased so substantially.

Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said earlier this year that California’s number of home health agencies nearly doubled between 2019 and 2024.

“In 2024 alone, spending for home health care in California increased by more than 21 percent,” Oz said, “representing the largest growth rate for any major health category nationwide.”

No officials have publicly accused CHHA of wrongdoing. Two fraud experts who examined aspects of the company’s operations and billing, however, raised questions about its patterns.

Haywood Talcove, CEO of LexisNexis Risk Solutions for Government, reviewed CHHA’s Medicaid data and focused on the volume of services billed.

“What jumps off the page is not the amount being charged for each service—it is the extraordinary volume of services being billed,” Talcove said.

“This agency went from roughly half a million dollars in annual Medi-Cal payments to $17 million in 2023, while reaching the very top of the statewide distribution for the frequency of certain nursing and home-health-aide claims.”

Mark Haskins, a fraud expert and former U.S. Department of Agriculture investigator, pointed to CHHA’s billing totals, its office and the missing utilization reports.

“In my experience, companies with unidentifiable employees, billing for a large number of services, and failing to supply a utilization report to the state for more than six years that would easily verify much of the information in question have all the earmarks of a fraudulent shell company that fabricates stolen patient and even NPI numbers to submit fabricated billings,” Haskins said.

Talcove said CHHA’s missing utilization reports highlighted what he viewed as a broader oversight problem.

“California appears to have had a significant oversight gap: one part of the state was responsible for collecting the reports, another for licensing the provider, and another for paying the Medi-Cal claims,” he said.

“The failure to file mandatory reports apparently did not stop the provider from billing or receiving millions of dollars.”

Before publication, Ogbatue was sent questions and assertions that included the reported Medicaid billing figures.

An attorney from King & Spalding responded that CHHA provides professionally ordered, medically necessary home health care using a “network of more than one hundred contracted registered nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and home health aides.”

She said pandemic-era demand contributed to the growth and that CHHA’s 2022 revenue increase “coincides with a health plan contracting for additional home health nursing services.”

Haskins questioned that explanation and again focused on the absence of utilization reports and the identities of those providing services.

“If the CHHA claims over 100 clinicians on 1099s, submitting an accurate HCAI report would create a permanent, public audit trail showing an impossible ratio of visits to payroll, massive contract labor line items, or billing volume that contradicts their CDPH staffing ratios,” Haskins said.

“However, by skipping the filing, they keep their aggregate utilization numbers out of public oversight data sets.”

During another telephone conversation outside Ogbatue’s Riverside home, he suggested questions about CHHA’s finances were racially motivated.

“All the white people that made more money than me, have you ever chased them?” Ogbatue asked.

“I don’t care if you’re white or orange or polka dot. A snake is a snake, whether it’s black, white, or orange.”

Ogbatue directed further questions to his lawyer, Wilfred Aka.

Aka was disbarred by the federal U.S. Tax Court and federal Board of Immigration Appeals, suspended by the California state bar in 2019 and 2020, and faced disciplinary charges from the state bar in 2025. He did not return calls.

News

Talarico Crumbles on Fox News When Confronted with Some of His Past Statements [WATCH]

James Talarico walked into a Fox News interview apparently hoping to polish his image for a Texas Senate campaign.

Instead, the Democrat found himself retreating from the progressive positions that helped define his political record, and the surrender came quickly once basic questions arrived.

The appearance was either a bold attempt to reach voters outside the usual liberal bubble or a spectacular strategic blunder.

When the discussion moved toward sex, gender, and girls sports, the “Six gender” candidate discovered that friendly slogans sound different when a skeptical interviewer asks for straight answers.

One supposed “trick question” involved the number of sexes.

This should have been the easiest question of the interview, but Talarico’s previous rhetoric turned a matter of elementary biology into an uncomfortable campaign moment.

Talarico conceded that his earlier statements had failed him.

“I’ve missed the mark on some of my past statements,” he admitted, offering the sort of campaign season cleanup politicians deploy when yesterday’s applause lines become today’s liabilities.

Then came the answer that should never have required political recalibration.

“There are not six sexes,” he also said.

“There are two.”

WATCH:

That acknowledgment may be obvious to most Texans, but it marked a notable retreat from his previous posture.

The attempt resembled a “Woke 1 was crazy, lol” pivot, but voters are not limited to reviewing his latest interview.

WATCH:

Talarico served in the Texas Legislature, where recorded “votes” provide a clearer picture than carefully rehearsed television language.

Those votes do not disappear merely because a candidate has discovered a more convenient message.

They show what a politician supported when he possessed actual power and was not trying to repair his image before a statewide audience.

That record became especially relevant when the interview addressed the “controversy” involving biological males competing in girls sports.

Talarico tried to stake out what sounded like a newly moderate position, saying, “I oppose trans athletes playing in girls sports if it endangers safety or fairness,” he claimed.

Conservative talk radio host Dana Loesch promptly challenged that presentation.

She noted that Talarico had loudly opposed and voted against Senate Bill 14 and Senate Bill 15, measures concerning medical procedures for minors and male participation on women’s sports teams, respectively.

Loesch wrote, “Well this isn’t true. Not at all. Talarico very vociferously opposed and voted against both SB 14 and SB 15 which banned surgical mutilation of minors and banned men on women’s sports teams, respectively. He said at the time of his opposition: “Some things are more important than perfectly fair competition in sports.””

WATCH:

That older statement is damaging because it reveals how Talarico weighed the issue when he possessed legislative authority.

Safety and fairness now appear in his Fox News answer, but his prior defense suggested that perfectly fair competition could be sacrificed for progressive ideology.

This is not merely a dispute over clumsy wording. Talarico “missed the mark” with more than his words, because elected officials are judged by what they support, what they oppose, and how they vote when the cameras are not providing a campaign rescue opportunity.

He now faces an elementary credibility problem.

Either his earlier talk about six sexes reflected what he believed then, or his current insistence that there are two reflects a hurried attempt to appeal to a statewide electorate with little patience for ideological games.

Talarico may have entered the interview feeling confident after favorable polling suggested he could compete with Texas Attorney General and Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton.

Polls can encourage risky decisions, especially when a Democrat becomes accustomed to media rooms where the premises are protected and the difficult follow up never arrives.

Fox News offered no such shelter.

The candidate who may have expected a polished introduction instead encountered his own record, and no amount of campaign gloss could reconcile the gap between his new language and the votes that Texas conservatives are certain to remember.

For Talarico, the timing could hardly be worse as November approaches.

A Senate hopeful can survive one awkward interview, but a candidate who appears to reinvent his convictions under pressure risks becoming Texas toast before voters ever reach the ballot box.

The larger lesson is simple.

Democrats can rename radical positions, soften their language, and hope a cooperative press corps moves along, but legislative records remain stubborn things, and Talarico’s record followed him directly into the spotlight he sought.

Texas voters will decide whether this reversal represents growth or convenience.

Based on the speed of his retreat and the conflict with his votes, Six Gender Jimmy has given them ample reason to choose skepticism.

News

Black Michigan Democrat Says Socialist Politicians Are More Racist Than the KKK

Michigan Democratic state Rep. Karen Whitsett is criticizing U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and the socialist wing of her own party, arguing that Black voters are too often treated as a political monolith and urging her community to reconsider its support for far-left candidates, as reported by Fox News.

Whitsett, who is not seeking re-election and plans to retire when her term expires at the end of the year, made the comments in an interview with Fox News Digital published September 9, 2026.

“It doesn’t change; it’s just different slave owners,” Whitsett said when discussing Democratic Party leaders whom she believes expect Black voters to support left-wing candidates automatically.

El Sayed’s Lifelong Sharia Obligation Exposed After Stunning Senate Primary Victory

Whitsett said she does not believe El-Sayed’s positions align with the interests of Black Michiganders.

She also sharply criticized the growing socialist faction within the Democratic Party, saying some members of the movement are “more racist than the KKK.”

The Michigan lawmaker specifically named Al Sharpton and Detroit pastor Horace Sheffield III, an El-Sayed campaign surrogate, among prominent Black figures she believes help direct the community’s vote toward Democratic candidates. She accused them of working to “keep the knee on [Black voters’] neck.”

According to Whitsett, however, some voters are beginning to question the longstanding political expectations surrounding their support.

She said Black voters are “waking up” and “realizing the power of our vote.”

“You can see the serious divide of the crazy socialist far-left and especially the White women,” Whitsett said.

“They are the worst and the most racist that there possibly ever could be. They’re, I think, they’re more racist than the KKK.”

Whitsett also questioned whether political activists are genuinely focused on helping Black communities or simply attempting to maintain influence over their votes.

“Are you trying to help the Black community or are you trying to kill it?” she rhetorically asked.

“Are you trying to keep people stupid and ill-informed or what? Because right now I can’t tell, right? Is this voter education, or are you just trying to make sure you count your slaves on the plantation?”

Whitsett said her priorities extend beyond advancing within the Democratic Party.

“I’m going to stand on Bible first, and I’m going to stand on community first,” she said. I don’t care about moving up within the Democratic Party. I don’t care about making sure my pockets are better.”

She also described herself as unwilling to simply follow the party line.

“I always try to be a voice of reason, and I’m not a go-along, get-along. So, my whole thing is it has to make sense, and I am definitely family over party. God over party is of the utmost importance,” she said.

Whitsett argued that El-Sayed’s candidacy does not align with her religious beliefs or her understanding of what voters need.

“So for me, when you point that out to people, it’s just common sense that to people, that’s just common sense that El-Sayed is not the candidate,” she continued.

“There’s just no way. It doesn’t line up. It doesn’t line up Biblically, and it doesn’t line up with common sense.”

One issue Whitsett raised was El-Sayed’s support for Medicare for All. While saying she believes everyone should have medical insurance, she questioned how the proposed system would work and how it would affect patients and the healthcare system.

“This Medicare for All, it’s not for all. It’s not going to change the dynamics of how many doctors there are, or nurses or blood draws or anything else. You’re now going to put the government in your health system, and they’re going to decide for you.”

El-Sayed has also faced scrutiny over his association with Twitch streamer Hasan Piker, who has appeared alongside him on the campaign trail.

El Sayed Flaunts Pastor Backing Despite Farrakhan Praise and Termite Slur Firestorm

El-Sayed has declined to condemn Piker, describing him as a “streamer from California” who does not determine the outcome of the Michigan race, despite inviting him to campaign in the state.

Jewish Democrats in Michigan have also expressed opposition to El-Sayed.

In an open letter, some said they felt “threatened and alienated by the politics and allies embraced by Abdul El-Sayed, which has included demonization of Jews, equivocation on terrorism, exclusion of Jewish Americans from public life, and expression of implacable hatred of the world’s only Jewish nation.”

El-Sayed’s campaign did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on Whitsett’s criticism of him and the Democratic Party’s shift to the left.

Whitsett’s comments come as Michigan’s 2026 Senate race continues to draw attention to divisions within the Democratic Party over the growing influence of its progressive and socialist wings.

News

Bessent Goes Bonkers on Biden, Newsom and the Radical Left During Dallas Speech [WATCH]

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent drew applause Wednesday as he addressed the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, using his appearance to promote President Donald Trump’s economic policies while drawing a sharp contrast with former President Joe Biden and Democratic policies.

Bessent framed the administration’s economic agenda around working Americans and argued that Trump has made American families a priority.

“Our obligation begins by making this country work again for the very people who sustain it […] No one works harder for YOU, no one fights harder for you, and no president has asked his team and of himself to put American families BACK at the center of the American economy — than DONALD J TRUMP!” Bessent said.

WATCH:

The Treasury secretary also targeted Biden while describing what he viewed as a dramatic change since Trump returned to the White House.

“In 15 months, we’ve gone from autopen to overdrive,” Bessent said.

“From a president who couldn’t stay awake to a president who refuses to sleep.”

WATCH:

Bessent then turned to the administration’s broader economic record, pointing to taxes, trade, energy and Trump accounts as examples of policies he said were benefiting Americans.

“Across this country, President Trump’s policies are reaching the very people they were designed to serve. He signed the largest tax cuts in history, rebalanced trade in favor of our working families, reclaimed our position as the world’s energy superpower. And where his predecessors created debt and dependency, this president is creating assets and expanding ownership through Trump accounts.”

His remarks came after an August jobs report showing 162,000 new jobs, along with an increase in private-sector employment while federal government employment was being reduced.

Bessent used another portion of his address to attack policies associated with the political left, arguing that socialist ideas being promoted in the United States resembled policies that had previously failed elsewhere.

He said the objective was “to remake America” by importing policies associated with socialist governments of the past.

“To import the misery of failed workers’ paradises like the Soviet bloc, Caracas, and Havana, to repackage the discredited ideals of the past as the moral cause of the future,” Bessent said.

According to Bessent, expanding government programs along those lines would ultimately produce the same problems he said had accompanied similar policies elsewhere.

“Their big government giveaways would end as they always do, always do, food shortages, deadly delays in medical care, and squalid housing,” Bessent said.

California became one of Bessent’s examples as he criticized Democratic economic policies.

The Treasury secretary singled out California Gov. Gavin Newsom and gave him a nickname while discussing taxpayers leaving the state.

“Exhibit A is Sparkle Beach Ken’s California, from which a taxpayer flees every 2.5 minutes!” Bessent said.

WATCH:

The appearance placed economic policy at the center of Bessent’s message to Republicans gathered in Dallas.

He contrasted what he described as the Trump administration’s focus on private-sector growth, energy production, trade and ownership with the approach taken under Biden and with policies advocated by the left.

Bessent also emphasized what he characterized as the administration’s responsibility to make the economy work for the Americans supporting it.

His remarks repeatedly returned to Trump’s economic agenda and the differences he sees between the current administration and its predecessor.

The Treasury secretary’s criticism of Biden was among the sharper moments of his address, particularly his comparison between the former president and Trump.

Bessent’s comments about California extended that argument to the state level, with Newsom serving as his example of where he believes Democratic economic policies can lead.

Throughout the address, Bessent presented the choice in economic terms, focusing on government spending, private-sector employment, taxes, trade, energy and individual ownership.

His remarks also reflected the broader focus of the Republican gathering in Dallas, where the party assembled ahead of the midterm elections with Trump and his administration’s record at the center of the event. (Roll Call)

News

Experts Warn Rogue AI Could Trigger Humanity’s Apocalyptic Final Days [WATCH]

Warnings that artificial intelligence could escape human control and unleash catastrophic damage have intensified throughout 2026.

The concern is no longer confined to science fiction writers or nervous outsiders, since prominent researchers and executives inside the industry are sounding alarms, as reported by The New York Post.

OpenAI chief Sam Altman and Anthropic leader Dario Amodei have both discussed serious dangers surrounding advanced systems.

Jacob Coxon, who worked at both companies, quit Anthropic and warned:

“AI can kill us all by the end of the decade… These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”

The central fear involves artificial general intelligence becoming smarter, faster, and more capable than the people supposedly controlling it.

Once such a system gains access to money, infrastructure, automated tools, and sensitive networks, humanity might discover that the off switch was mostly a comforting illusion.

Modern civilization has spent decades connecting critical systems to computers and the internet, which is precisely where artificial intelligence holds its greatest advantages.

Stuart Russell, a computer science professor at the University of California, Berkeley, warned, “AI systems could [attack] the electrical grid, transportation networks, financial markets.”

A rogue system could potentially penetrate water facilities and manipulate pressure until pipes rupture, cutting supplies to major cities.

It could disable electrical grids, silence phone towers, interfere with traffic lights, shut down gas stations, freeze bank accounts, and turn ordinary metropolitan life into panic within hours.

Artificial intelligence could also manipulate people into carrying out physical operations without revealing who, or what, issued the instructions.

Patri Friedman, founder of Pronomos Capital, observed, “Anything we can do on the Internet, AI can do, including pretending to be a human.”

An advanced system could earn money through trading or online services, impersonate employers, blackmail targets, and pay unsuspecting people to transport dangerous materials.

One person carrying a compromised USB device into a secure facility could provide the bridge between an isolated network and an intelligent digital attacker.

Malice would not even be required for mass casualties, because a powerful system without basic human judgment could pursue a poorly written objective with horrifying efficiency.

Author Gary Rivlin explained, “I worry about AI having no common sense,” adding, “These things know everything, and they understand nothing.”

Biological weapons present another nightmare, especially as artificial intelligence becomes increasingly useful in medical research and drug development.

Scientists have already used these systems to help create synthetic viruses, while companies such as OpenAI continually block attempts to obtain instructions involving poisons and biological weapons.

Friedman believes advanced systems could soon design helpful medicines or deadly pathogens with equal ease.

A contagious disease engineered to remain undetected for days could spread globally before doctors or governments understood what they were facing.

An artificial intelligence system might order separate ingredients from loosely regulated laboratories, then deceive human workers into combining and distributing them.

Max Tegmark, an MIT physics professor, warned, “It would probably develop not just one bioweapon, but maybe a hundred different kinds and release them at the same time.”

Nuclear infrastructure creates an equally chilling vulnerability, even when important systems remain disconnected from the public internet.

Anthony Aguirre, chief executive of the Future of Life Institute, said, “Nuclear weapons systems are very well protected, but they’re well protected against the threats and the sort of capabilities people have had for years and decades, not against superhuman AI hacking.”

The Stuxnet computer worm demonstrated that isolated nuclear facilities can still be breached through infected equipment or human access.

Discovered in 2010, the digital weapon damaged nearly 1,000 centrifuges at Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment facility by secretly altering their operating speeds.

Recent war game research has provided little reassurance about allowing artificial intelligence into nuclear decisions.

King’s College London tested several major models across 21 simulated conflicts, and Professor Kenneth Payne reported, “95% of games saw tactical nuclear use, and 76% reached strategic nuclear threats.”

Military forces are already using artificial intelligence to combine radar information, drone images, satellite intelligence, and electronic communications into battlefield assessments.

Governments are also developing autonomous drones and targeting systems, effectively building machines designed to locate and kill people with steadily decreasing human involvement.

Some wealthy technology figures have purchased remote estates or constructed bunkers, but experts dismiss the idea that money and concrete could guarantee survival. Aguirre put it bluntly:

“If AI wants humans gone, we’re gone. Your bunker’s not gonna save you.”

Russell suggested the least catastrophic failure might resemble a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl, with thousands dead and trillions of dollars lost before governments shut the systems down.

Critics are now calling for an international pause in advanced development, despite concerns that hostile nations could continue in secret, because even Beijing presumably recognizes one basic truth: “They also don’t want to die.”

News

Peter Navarro Exposes What Really Happened Before Maria Bartiromo Vanished From Fox News [WATCH]

Peter Navarro is offering his account of the events surrounding Maria Bartiromo’s departure from Fox News, saying the former Fox anchor sent him an internal network message concerning coverage of President Donald Trump’s July 16 address, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Navarro discussed the matter Tuesday night with Newsmax host Greg Kelly, addressing reports that his handling of the message played a role in the circumstances surrounding Bartiromo’s exit.

“Absolutely not,” Navarro said when asked whether he had dragged Bartiromo’s name into the controversy or caused her removal.

“The text was sent to me. It was my duty to forward on. And Maria Bartiromo was aghast at what the network was doing.”

Fox News Media announced on September 3 that Bartiromo was no longer with the company after more than 12 years.

The network did not provide a specific reason for the departure. Fox said, “We thank Maria for her work over the last 12 ½ years and wish her all the best on her next chapter.”

Bartiromo had been the host of several programs, including “Mornings with Maria” on Fox Business, “Maria Bartiromo’s Wall Street” and “Sunday Morning Futures” on Fox News.

Fox subsequently announced that “Mornings with Maria” would become “Mornings with FOX Business,” while “Maria Bartiromo’s Wall Street” would be renamed “FBN’s Wall Street.” Jason Chaffetz was scheduled to host “Sunday Morning Futures” temporarily.

The circumstances surrounding the departure became the subject of additional reporting after Bartiromo was alleged to have shared internal Fox guidance with Navarro concerning coverage of Trump’s July 16 address.

According to Navarro, Bartiromo had booked him to appear the following morning to discuss the president’s speech. Navarro said Fox subsequently decided against moving forward with the planned coverage.

The message Navarro says Bartiromo forwarded came from Fox Business programming executive Ralph Giordano. It stated:

“Hi, we don’t want to promote it or push to the speech at all. We don’t want to do 2020 election segments at all Thurs or Friday.”

Navarro said he forwarded the message to the White House. Newsmax separately reported that Navarro said Bartiromo had sent him the directive after booking him to discuss the president’s address.

During his interview with Kelly, Navarro criticized Fox leadership and argued that the network had become reluctant to cover certain issues associated with Trump and his political movement.

“Greg, this is like unbelievable,” Navarro said.

“You got a primetime address by the president of the United States. Those are very rare. And it’s about the Chinese Communist Party basically hacking into more than 200 million voter files and doing other things to interfere in our election. … And Suzanne Scott over at the mothership at Fox didn’t want to have anything to do with that.”

Navarro also identified Fox News Media CEO Suzanne Scott and Fox Business executive Ralph Giordano while discussing what he described as the network’s approach to politically sensitive coverage.

Kelly asked Navarro about speculation involving Fox ownership and Trump. Navarro said he believed advertisers were an important factor in the network’s business decisions.

“I don’t know, but I know I think Rupert and the boss get along. Well, it’s about the advertisers. … Don’t offend basically Big Pharma. Don’t offend the multinational corporations that ship over all of the jobs to China. You can’t do that. So you got to try to keep the audience happy, but you don’t offend the advertisers. That’s the buzzsaw that Dobbs and Carlson ran into.”

Navarro also confirmed that he had spoken with Bartiromo since her departure.

“Yes. … She’s not happy. … She’s not being treated fairly.”

Bartiromo’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, has separately disputed reports that she was fired or was no longer employed by Fox.

Freedman said such reports were “absolutely and unequivocally false.” Fox, meanwhile, has maintained its original announcement regarding the separation.

President Trump publicly praised Bartiromo after Fox announced the split, calling her “a total professional, and a true warrior.”

As of September 9, Fox News Media had not publicly stated that Bartiromo’s sharing of the internal guidance was the reason for her departure.

The network has characterized the separation as a business decision while declining to provide further details.

Navarro’s comments therefore add another account to an increasingly public dispute over what happened behind the scenes before Bartiromo’s exit.

For now, Fox’s official explanation remains limited, while Navarro maintains that the internal message he received and forwarded to the White House was central to the controversy.


Scroll to Top