News

Oklahoma Influencer and Husband Found Dead After Pedophilia Accusation in Apparent Murder-Suicide [WATCH]
News

Oklahoma Influencer and Husband Found Dead After Pedophilia Accusation in Apparent Murder-Suicide [WATCH]

/

An Oklahoma influencer and her husband are dead in what authorities describe as an apparent murder suicide, a chilling end that came less than two weeks after she publicly accused him of being a pedophile on TikTok, as reported by The New York Post.

Sara Gilson, 43, was found dead Thursday night inside her Collinsville, Oklahoma, home alongside her husband, Shawn Duffey, 48.

Both had apparent gunshot wounds to the head, according to Owasso law enforcement.

The case began drawing attention after Gilson posted a TikTok video using the popular “Netflix Documentary” trend, where users pretend they are sitting for a documentary about anything from absurd drama to deeply disturbing real-life events.

“Preparing for when Netflix drops a documentary about my soon-to-be ex-husband who I just found out is a pedophile,” Gilson wrote on her video.

The caption was even more blunt: “I wish I was joking #plottwist #netflix #documentary.”

Less than two weeks later, police say, the nightmare turned deadly. Around 11:15 p.m., a 911 call came in to authorities, and dispatchers heard what sounded like a woman screaming, followed by what sounded like a gunshot.

Moments after that call, Gilson’s juvenile son called 911 from a neighbor’s home. He told authorities that his stepfather, Duffey, had shot his mother.

Officers arrived at the scene at about 11:15 p.m., according to Owasso police.

What they found appears to have confirmed the worst fears of a household already surrounded by allegations, court filings, and warning signs that should make any decent person’s blood run cold.

Gilson had already been in court on June 10 seeking an emergency protective order against Duffey.

The order required him to stay 100 yards away from her and forced him out of the home, according to People.

Owasso Police said they had previously directed Gilson on how to pursue an Emergency Protective Order through the Tulsa County Courthouse after an incident the day before.

Police also said they had no reports that Duffey violated that order before the fatal shooting.

In her application for the protective order, Gilson alleged that Duffey had threatened suicide “and went on the run,” according to The Oklahoman.

That detail now reads like another flashing red light in a case full of them.

The same day Gilson received her protective order, another order was issued against Duffey on behalf of a 15-year-old girl who had been part of a youth basketball team he coached.

That order alleged Duffey assaulted the minor.

The alleged assault took place on June 9 inside an elementary school where Duffey’s traveling competitive team had rented court space while school was out of session.

Police emphasized that neither Duffey nor the team had any official affiliation with Owasso Public Schools.

Court documents obtained by The Oklahoman alleged Duffey sent the girl inappropriate messages, kissed her, touched her inappropriately, and invited her to his hotel room during a tournament.

He also allegedly offered money “to keep her quiet,” which is about as damning a detail as one can imagine.

Police said another coach witnessed the conduct during the June 9 incident, intervened immediately, and notified the girl’s guardian.

Investigators also noted that similar conduct by Duffey toward the same player had reportedly occurred over an extended period across multiple states and law enforcement jurisdictions.

Duffey fled the scene that night and had avoided police contact since then, according to authorities.

For the public, that raises the obvious question of how a man facing allegations this serious was still able to become the central figure in a deadly domestic incident days later.

Because Duffey was a member of the Osage Indian Tribe of Oklahoma and the incident happened in Indian Country, the case carried federal jurisdiction complications.

The report listed the alleged crime as Lewd Molestation of a Minor and classified it as a “Major Crime” under the Federal Major Crimes Act.

The matter was then turned over to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for review, which ended Owasso Police’s jurisdiction over the sex crime investigation.

That may be how the system works on paper, but for families caught in the middle, paper procedure does not stop bullets.

Gilson’s public accusation, the protective orders, the allegations involving a minor, and the final emergency calls now form a grim timeline.

It is a timeline that moved from online warning to courtroom action to a child fleeing for help after a fatal shooting inside his own home.

Authorities continue to describe the deaths as an apparent murder suicide.

For a community left staring at another preventable-looking tragedy, the facts already released are more than enough to show how rapidly private danger can become public horror.

The social media age can turn personal chaos into viral content in seconds, but it cannot replace swift accountability.

In this case, the warning signs were not subtle, and the ending was as brutal as it was heartbreaking.

Top DSA Marxist Says the Quiet Part Out Loud, Reveals Plans to Wipe Out America’s Institutions [WATCH]
News

Top DSA Marxist Says the Quiet Part Out Loud, Reveals Plans to Wipe Out America’s Institutions [WATCH]

/

The Democratic Socialists of America are not exactly hiding the ball anymore.

In a Fox News interview, DSA co chair Megan Romer acknowledged that the group’s platform includes abolishing borders, granting amnesty to illegal immigrants, and eliminating prisons.

That is not a conservative fever dream or some overheated campaign ad.

That is the agenda, stated plainly, from one of the people helping steer the socialist movement now trying to drag the Democratic Party even farther left.

Romer said the DSA platform also calls for defunding the Pentagon, abolishing the Senate, replacing the presidency and the Supreme Court, and abolishing United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

For a movement that loves to lecture America about democracy, it sure seems eager to tear down nearly every institution voters still recognize.

The border plank alone should make every sane American stop and take notice.

Open borders and mass amnesty are not immigration policy, they are an invitation to erase national sovereignty and reward lawbreaking on a grand scale.

For years, conservatives have warned that the activist left does not merely want softer immigration laws.

It wants a country where borders are treated as offensive, enforcement is treated as cruelty, and citizenship becomes little more than a paperwork inconvenience.

Now the DSA is saying the quiet part out loud.

Abolish borders, abolish ICE, and hand amnesty to illegal aliens, then expect working families to smile while communities absorb the cost.

The prison plank is just as revealing. Abolishing prisons may sound fashionable in faculty lounges and activist meetings, but in the real world, criminals do not vanish because progressives change the vocabulary.

Families dealing with rising crime, repeat offenders, and soft on crime prosecutors have already seen what happens when ideology outruns common sense.

The DSA response is apparently to go even further and remove the very institutions designed to separate dangerous people from the public.

Then there is the Pentagon.

Defunding America’s military while hostile regimes are testing the limits of American resolve is not brave or visionary, it is reckless.

China, Russia, Iran, and every terrorist network on earth would love nothing more than a weakened Pentagon and a political class too busy chanting slogans to defend the country.

The DSA platform would make America less secure while pretending moral superiority is a defense strategy.

The call to abolish the Senate is another window into the movement’s mindset.

When institutions stand in the way of radical goals, the answer is not persuasion, compromise, or winning over voters, it is demolition.

That same attitude appears in the desire to replace the presidency and Supreme Court.

The left has spent years raging at the Court when it refuses to rubber stamp progressive priorities, and the socialist answer is apparently to scrap the structure rather than respect constitutional limits.

WATCH:

This is the difference between reform and radicalism.

Reformers try to improve systems, radicals try to raze them and hope something better magically rises from the rubble.

The problem for Democrats is that the DSA is not some distant campus club with no relevance to real politics.

Its ideas keep moving into the bloodstream of the modern left, especially in deep blue cities where the activist class sets the tone and elected Democrats scramble to keep up.

That is why these admissions matter.

The platform is not simply a wish list, it is a preview of what the left’s loudest faction believes government should become.

Republicans would be foolish not to make voters hear every word of it.

In swing districts and working class communities, there is no great hunger for open borders, abolished prisons, a gutted military, and a constitutional system tossed into the shredder.

The DSA may dress its agenda in activist language, but the substance is brutally clear.

Tear down the border, empty the prisons, defund national defense, dismantle key institutions, and call it progress.

Most Americans still believe a country should have borders, laws, courts, a military, and consequences for crime.

If that now counts as extremism to the socialist left, then the political contrast for the next election just became very easy to explain.

Fauci Diary Exposes Cozy Media Ties, Trump Tensions and Celebrity Fixation [WATCH]
News

Fauci Diary Exposes Cozy Media Ties, Trump Tensions and Celebrity Fixation [WATCH]

/

Newly released diary entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci are giving Americans a rare look behind the curtain at the man who became the government face of the COVID 19 era, complete with media chatter, celebrity encounters and internal White House drama.

The records were released by Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul, R Ky., just days before Fauci is set to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee after being subpoenaed by Paul.

The diary details Fauci’s daily role during the pandemic through meetings, calls and personal notes, showing how quickly public health policy turned into a mix of politics, television management and celebrity culture.

For Americans who remember the lockdown years, the entries add another layer to a familiar story.

WATCH:

The experts lectured the country about sacrifice while Washington insiders and media favorites appeared to orbit one another quite comfortably.

Early entries show Fauci describing a warmer relationship with President Donald Trump than many might expect.

Fauci wrote that Trump repeatedly sent questions his way during White House meetings and called him “the smartest person in the world.”

Trump also told Fauci, “We are counting on you,” according to the diary.

Fauci later wrote that Trump appeared “enamored” with him as his national profile exploded during the pandemic.

That relationship did not stay smooth as the pandemic dragged on.

Fauci’s notes describe mounting friction inside the White House, especially with then White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Fauci wrote that Meadows threatened to keep him off television and pushed him to soften his public messaging.

In one entry, Fauci described Meadows as “screaming” over comments Fauci had made in public.

The diary paints then White House communications director Alyssa Farah in a much more favorable light from Fauci’s perspective.

In a May 2020 entry, Fauci said Farah admitted White House staff had been “holding me back” and that the situation had “gotten out of hand.”

According to Fauci, Farah promised to begin approving his television requests again.

In Washington, access to a camera can apparently become its own form of oxygen.

Other communications figures did not fare as well in Fauci’s private notes.

Fauci took sharp aim at then HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Michael Caputo, accusing him in crude terms of publicly backing his media appearances while privately blocking them.

The diary also shows how deeply television journalists figured into Fauci’s pandemic world.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper appears repeatedly in the entries through calls, texts and even dinners at Tapper’s Washington home.

Fauci wrote that Tapper privately checked whether a CNN interview had caused trouble for him with the White House.

When The Atlantic’s Peter Nicholas suggested Fauci had been “humiliated” over a canceled Tapper interview,

Fauci responded with a blunt and vulgar dismissal in his notes.

CNN’s Dana Bash also appears in the diary after Fauci’s heated exchange with Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio.

Fauci wrote that Bash texted him that he was “a better man” and relayed that Wolf Blitzer joked nobody would have blamed him for telling Jordan off.

The next day, Fauci said Bash texted him again, this time pointing him to a Vanity Fair headline mocking Jordan’s performance at the hearing.

The cozy media club always seems to know when to send flowers and when to sharpen knives.

The entries also include billionaire Oracle co founder Larry Ellison, who became part of White House discussions about using Oracle technology during the pandemic. Fauci described Ellison as “a bit of a loose cannon.”

Then there is the celebrity parade. Julia Roberts hosted Fauci on Instagram Live, sent him flowers and later presented him with an award, while Anna Wintour, Trevor Noah, Steph Curry, Sean Penn, Matt Damon and Lil Wayne all show up in the broader Fauci orbit.

The diary reads at moments less like a public health record and more like a guest list for the political class during crisis mode.

Americans were told to stay home, stay quiet and trust the science, while the science was apparently fielding celebrity messages.

The final notable cameo comes from the 2022 Kennedy Center Honors.

Fauci wrote that he hugged Hunter Biden, who joked the internet “would explode” if someone photographed them together because they were both “being attacked by the far right GOP.”

Paul’s release lands as Fauci prepares for another round of scrutiny on Capitol Hill.

For many conservatives, the diary will only fuel questions about whether pandemic leadership was driven by sober public health judgment, political instincts or a taste for fame.

The country is still living with the consequences of decisions made during those years.

Fauci’s own words now offer a revealing glimpse into the power circles, media friendships and celebrity fascination surrounding one of the most controversial government figures of the pandemic.

WATCH:

Florida Boater Convicted After Marina Drinking Buddy Dies During Violent Memorial Day Fight [WATCH]
News

Florida Boater Convicted After Marina Drinking Buddy Dies During Violent Memorial Day Fight [WATCH]

/

A Florida boating trip turned into a deadly marina nightmare after a boozy Memorial Day encounter ended with one man dead in the water and another facing life behind bars, as reported by The New York Post.

Kamal Padlowski, 52, was found guilty Thursday of first-degree murder in the death of 47-year-old Melvin Jimenez at Little Harbor Marina in Ruskin, Florida, according to the Hillsborough County State Attorney’s Office.

The case centered on a violent confrontation aboard Padlowski’s sailboat on May 25, 2024, after the two men had met only hours earlier and spent part of the holiday weekend drinking together.

Prosecutors said Padlowski shoved Jimenez during the brawl, causing him to fall backward and slam his head onto the dock.

Jimenez was left motionless on the fiberglass gangway, but instead of calling for help, Padlowski grabbed him by the ankles and dumped him into the marina water.

That decision proved central to the trial, where jurors heard the grim details of how a friendly barroom meeting spiraled into lethal violence.

Personal responsibility, as usual, arrived far too late for the man now staring at Florida State Prison.

“I didn’t know he was unconscious. I didn’t know that he had even fallen,” Padlowski said in court. “I knew he was still a threat to me, and I just wanted to get distance between us.”

Medical testimony added another brutal layer to the case. Physician and pathologist Edward Willey testified that Jimenez suffered vertebral fractures in the fall, which severed both vertebral arteries.

Willey said Jimenez would have died regardless of whether he had been thrown into the water. The state attorney’s office, however, ruled that Jimenez died from drowning.

The two men had crossed paths earlier that day at the nearby Sunset Bar and Grill, a tiki-themed spot where both were reportedly celebrating big life moments.

Jimenez had secured a contract to install security cameras with Walmart, while Padlowski had gotten engaged the day before, according to the Tampa Bay Times.

Padlowski recalled that he joked with Jimenez about ordering vodka, saying the drink was Russian and they called it “water.”

From there, the two men left the bar and took a short walk to the marina.

They spent roughly 40 minutes drinking aboard Padlowski’s docked sailboat with Padlowski’s fiancée, reportedly chatting in a friendly manner before the mood shifted.

Jimenez’s blood alcohol level was later measured at .26, more than three times the legal limit, according to the outlet.

Padlowski’s own alcohol level was not revealed, though he claimed he had consumed “two hard iced teas and maybe a shot or two of vodka.”

Whatever the exact count, this was not exactly the picture of sound judgment at sea.

Surveillance cameras captured the two men shoving each other aboard the boat before the fight moved onto the gangway, according to video obtained by 10 Tampa Bay News.

Padlowski claimed Jimenez threatened to kill him and rape his unidentified fiancée.

Padlowski argued self-defense during trial, saying Jimenez had shoved his fiancée and lunged at him.

Prosecutors pushed back, pointing to blurry surveillance footage that they said showed Padlowski punching Jimenez before grabbing his throat.

After Jimenez was dumped into the water, Padlowski remained near his boat armed with two kitchen knives until police arrived.

He first told officers he did not know where Jimenez had gone, apparently unaware that cameras had recorded the confrontation.

Jimenez’s wife, Angela Sprenger, testified against Padlowski and made clear she did not buy his version of events.

“Just unbelievable because I don’t believe a word he says. I think he is a narcissist and a murderer,” she told the court, according to 10 Tampa Bay News.

“All the things he was saying was just total lies. And to try to go after my husband’s character that way is just so awful,” she added.

Jimenez’s daughter Kimberly also addressed the court, speaking to the consequences Padlowski will now carry.

“At least he’ll get to spend the rest of his day thinking about my dad and how maybe if he was a better man and had a better character like my dad, he would have made the decisions that he did to lead to this,” she testified, according to WFLA.

A jury rejected Padlowski’s defense and found him guilty of first-degree murder. He now faces a mandatory life sentence in Florida State Prison, with sentencing scheduled for August 17.

The case leaves behind a grieving family, a marina stained by violence, and one more reminder that drunken chaos does not become self-defense just because the suspect says so after the cameras are found.

What the Air Force’s Waist Deadline Really Means for Airmen
News

What the Air Force’s Waist Deadline Really Means for Airmen

/

Airmen have until the end of the week to send the Air Force their waist to height ratio, but service officials now say the number will not count against their official fitness test score.

That distinction matters, because few things get troops asking questions faster than a mandatory body measurement with a deadline attached. In this case, the Air Force says the requirement is about building a baseline, not dropping the hammer on careers.

Active duty Air Force personnel must submit their waist to height ratio through the service’s myBodyComp app by July 31.

The deadline has been pushed through repeated reminders, which naturally led plenty of airmen to wonder whether the tape measure was about to become the newest career gatekeeper.

On Friday, the Air Force clarified that the requirement is a “one-time biometric data collection” that “establishes a baseline for the modernized Physical Fitness Readiness Program ” rather than a scored portion of the new fitness test cycle.

A July 9 memo from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs says the same thing.

That clarification came 10 days after Air Force Chief of Staff Kenneth Wilsbach told airmen about the deadline.

In that message, Wilsbach called the Waist to Height Ratio assessment “an important component of our overall fitness program and provides commanders another tool to understand the readiness and health of the force.”

So yes, the Air Force wants the data, and yes, commanders are expected to care about what it shows. But for this one time collection, the measurement will not be scored.

An Air Force spokesperson said that the “one-time Waist-to-Height Ratio measurement is intended to give Airmen a baseline as we transition out of our initial diagnostic testing period into officially testing under the new Physic Fitness Readiness Assessment.”

That statement puts the current requirement in the transition bucket, not the punishment bucket.

Air Force Launches “Culture of Fitness” Initiative to Promote Wellness and Readiness
The Department of the Air Force has launched a new initiative aimed at motivating airmen and guardians to maintain high standards of physical fitness. Here, guardians perform air squats at Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado, in September 2025. (Keefer Patterson/U.S. Space Force)

The spokesperson added, “This WHtR measurement is separate from the official PFRA, is not scored and will not drive personnel actions.”

The service also said, “Airmen moving forward will measure WHtR as part of their official PFRA.”

In plain English, airmen still need to submit the number, but this particular deadline is not supposed to trigger formal consequences.

Leave it to military bureaucracy to make a tape measurement both mandatory and officially not part of the score, because apparently that is the kind of clarity airmen get for free.

Air & Space Forces Magazine first reported that the measurement would not be scored.

The Air Force’s follow up messaging now makes clear that the service is trying to separate this initial data pull from the official fitness assessment process.

The waist to height ratio is calculated by dividing an airman’s waist measurement by height. Airmen who were already measured between March 1 and June 30 do not have to do it again, according to the Air Force.

Reserve and Air National Guard personnel have a later deadline. They must submit their waist to height ratio data by Aug. 31.

The Air Force announced its updated fitness test last year, with implementation beginning in July. The new Physical Fitness Readiness Assessment is scheduled twice a year and includes pushups, core strength events such as sit ups, and the waist to height ratio measurement.

Cardio remains part of the package as well. Airmen will complete either a two mile run or the High Aerobic Multi Shuttle Run, commonly known as the HAMR.

The broader point is readiness, which is exactly where this issue belongs. The military does not exist to run social experiments or flatter feelings, despite what the soft handed crowd often seems to think.

Still, the Air Force now has to make sure its messaging is sharper than the confusion it created. If a measurement is required, troops deserve to know whether it affects their score, their record, or their future.

For now, the answer is straightforward enough. Submit the ratio by the deadline if required, understand that this one time collection is not scored, and expect waist to height measurements to become part of the official PFRA moving forward.

John Kennedy Calmly Wrecks Margaret Brennan Over Nasty SAVE Act Gotcha [WATCH]
News

John Kennedy Calmly Wrecks Margaret Brennan Over Nasty SAVE Act Gotcha [WATCH]

/

Senator John Kennedy walked into CBS territory on Sunday and gave viewers another reminder that a calm answer can be far more devastating than a shouting match.

The Louisiana Republican appeared on “Face the Nation” with Margaret Brennan, where the conversation moved through the Saudi nuclear deal, energy prices, and the familiar topic that makes the legacy press break out in hives, election integrity.

Things sharpened when Brennan turned to the SAVE America Act, a Republican backed election reform measure that Democrats and their media allies have been busy branding as some dangerous partisan scheme.

The House passed the SAVE America Act less than two weeks ago as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, according to the original report, and Republicans have been using the reconciliation process to keep the proposal moving.

Brennan described the bill as “highly controversial, highly partisan” before trying to frame the issue as a threat to public faith in elections.

That is rich coming from the same media universe that spent years lecturing Americans about democracy while brushing aside basic concerns about voter confidence.

Her question was not exactly subtle.

She suggested Republicans would be forcing through a Republican only election policy right before the midterms and asked whether that would damage trust in the system.

Kennedy did not take the bait.

Instead, he answered in the plain spoken style that has made him one of the more effective Republican communicators in the Senate.

“No. In my opinion, for both sides to have credibility in our elections, we need to do two things:” Kennedy said.

From there, he laid out the simple argument that drives the SAVE America Act.

“Number one, you have to prove who you say you are in order to register to vote and to vote.”

That point should not be controversial in any serious country that expects citizens to trust its elections.

Americans need identification to board planes, cash checks, buy certain medicine, enter federal buildings, and in countless states, even to purchase alcohol.

Yet when Republicans say voting should require proof of identity and citizenship, the political class suddenly acts like someone suggested abolishing the Bill of Rights.

Kennedy continued with the second point, saying, “Number two, we need to go back to having an election DAY, not an election MONTH.”

That line cut straight through years of bureaucratic fog surrounding modern election administration.

For generations, Americans understood Election Day as a civic deadline, not a sprawling season of ballot chasing, mass mailing, extended counting, and legal wrangling.

The longer the process stretches, the more room there is for confusion, suspicion, and political gamesmanship.

Kennedy then summarized the purpose of the bill in terms almost any voter can understand.

“That, to me, is what the SAVE Act is all about. And I think that we can pass it and craft it in a way to survive a Byrd bath (for reconciliation).”

WATCH:

The left and its media partners prefer to dress the debate in dramatic language because the basic policy is hard to attack honestly.

Asking voters to prove they are eligible is not voter suppression, it is election protection.

Brennan’s framing revealed the usual Washington reflex.

If Democrats change voting procedures, the press calls it expanding access, but if Republicans insist on identity checks and a real Election Day, suddenly it becomes a sinister power grab.

That double standard is why Kennedy’s answer mattered.

He did not let the conversation become a lecture from a television host about alleged Republican recklessness.

Instead, he returned the discussion to the core question.

Should Americans have to prove who they are before registering and voting, and should elections have clear rules and a clear endpoint?

For ordinary citizens outside the Beltway bubble, those ideas sound less like controversy and more like common sense.

The only people who seem terrified of them are the ones who benefit from a system that leaves too much room for doubt.

Kennedy’s exchange with Brennan showed exactly why election integrity remains a major issue for conservatives.

Voters want confidence, transparency, and rules that apply before the votes are cast, not excuses after the damage is done.

The SAVE America Act will keep drawing fire from Democrats and their friends in the press, because that is what happens when Republicans touch the machinery of elections.

But Kennedy made the case with a smile, a steady voice, and a reminder that common sense still has a place in the Senate.

CBS tried to tee up a gotcha moment.

Kennedy turned it into a lesson.

Jewish Stabbing Victim Fled NYC for Florida as Mamdani Chaos Boils Over
News

Jewish Stabbing Victim Fled NYC for Florida as Mamdani Chaos Boils Over

/

A Jewish man who was stabbed on Manhattan’s Upper West Side had recently moved from New York City to Florida, reportedly at least partly because he had seen enough of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s anti Israel posture and the city’s ugly surge in antisemitism.

Moshe Yezhak Grunhaus, 50, was allegedly attacked Thursday after leaving a synagogue near Amsterdam Avenue and West 86th Street.

Police say the suspect, Raul Morales, was armed with a screwdriver and repeatedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the violent episode.

Grunhaus had already left New York for Surfside, Florida, near Miami, according to the report.

He was only back in Gotham for a few days to clear out his apartment, which is a grim little snapshot of where the city now stands.

A source told JNS that frustration with Mamdani was part of the reason Grunhaus decided to leave the city for good.

For many Jewish New Yorkers, that is not exactly a mystery wrapped in a riddle.

“It makes sense, honestly,” a neighbor who wished to remain anonymous told The Post Saturday.

“I mean, given the hatred that is being spoken by our mayor about towards the Jewish community, he’s not welcoming. He’s not encouraging people to be proud of their Judaism here, and it’s very obvious.”

The neighbor continued: “I mean, we all know what he was screaming when he attacked those people. He said, ‘Allahu Akbar So, like, are you kidding me?

Another resident was just as blunt about the climate in the city.

“I think the mayor is definitely aggravating the negative side of it. He’s saying things that he doesn’t have the authority to say. Like he wants to arrest the Prime Minister of Israel.”

That same resident added, “People who wear kippahs definitely have to be more cautious.”

In a city run by progressives who never run out of press conference language, that sentence should embarrass every official who helped create this mess.

Grunhaus had been publicly focused on antisemitism in New York, often tagging Mamdani while sharing stories from people who said they had faced anti Jewish hatred.

One post from the Israeli Consulate described a Jewish man and his family being confronted in broad daylight.

“I hope your kids die,” the June 28 repost read.

“That’s what a stranger said to Rami Feinstein and his family in broad daylight in New York. Not online. Not anonymously. In the middle of a New York street. This is what antisemitism looks like when hatred becomes acceptable, normalized and ignored.”

Grunhaus also posted about the Israelis murdered by Hamas in the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks.

In October 2025, he wrote, “Standing here @ Mount Herzl Cemetery 2 years after the October 7th massacre (Hebrew calendar, day after but first day of funerals for the nation),”

He added, “Commemorating our heroes who were the first of many to sacrifice their lives to protect our nation. Never Again!”

A month later, he posted photos of two Israeli hostages still held by Hamas.

Mamdani, asked about the issue at an unrelated Bronx event, gave the usual official response.

He said, “There’s no tolerance for bigotry,” while also acknowledging that Jewish New Yorkers remain the majority of hate crime victims across the city.

A rally organized by End Jew Hatred was planned for Sunday morning at 509 Amsterdam Avenue to “unite against hate on the Upper West Side” and call out Mamdani.

A flyer posted to X did not bother with polite political theater, declaring, “Blood is on Mamdani’s hands,”

Yitz Landes, 37, a professor at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, said Jews in the city “are on edge,” according to the report.

His mother lives in the building next door to the apartment Grunhaus was clearing out.

Like Grunhaus, Landes said he “always wear a kippa in the city. I would feel weird not to. I don’t want to give up wearing it publicly, and I hope I can continue to do it.”

Morales, described as an ex con, allegedly stabbed 57 year old Chok Sung a few blocks away before the attack on Grunhaus.

He was arraigned on two counts of attempted murder, two counts of assault and one count of attempted assault, all being prosecuted as hate crimes.

A judge ordered Morales to undergo a psychiatric evaluation, and he is due back in court on July 30.

Both victims are stable, with Sung still hospitalized and Grunhaus released Friday, while New Yorkers are left asking why basic public safety now feels like a luxury item.

Fetterman Baffled by GOP Fan Base But Rejects Lara Trump Party Switch Pitch [WATCH]
News

Fetterman Baffled by GOP Fan Base But Rejects Lara Trump Party Switch Pitch [WATCH]

/

Sen. John Fetterman is once again proving to be one of the strangest figures in today’s Democratic Party, a maverick from Pennsylvania who keeps irritating the left while earning unexpected praise from Republican voters.

During a prerecorded interview on “My View with Lara Trump” that aired Saturday, Fetterman admitted he still does not quite understand why so many Republicans seem to like him.

“I go everywhere. I do most of a lot of the shopping. And people will approach me, and it’s almost uniformly very positive,” Fetterman said.

The Pennsylvania Democrat added, “I can’t fully understand, I’ve seen polling, why I’m so popular with Republicans. I don’t really understand that, but I’m always going to treat both sides with respect.”

WATCH:

That sentence alone probably explains half of the mystery.

In a Democratic Party where calling Republicans fascists has practically become a nervous tic, basic courtesy now qualifies as political rebellion.

Fetterman stressed that he refuses to describe Republicans as Nazis or fascists, saying disagreements should be handled with respect.

Imagine that, a United States senator suggesting political opponents are not comic book villains.

His numbers with Pennsylvania voters show just how upside down the current political map has become.

A recent Quinnipiac University poll found Fetterman with a 77 percent approval rating among Republicans in the state, while Democrats gave him a 69 percent disapproval rating.

That kind of split would have been almost unthinkable a generation ago.

Today, it makes perfect sense in a party where the loudest voices seem more interested in campus protest slogans than normal working class voters.

Lara Trump told Fetterman the Republican Party would “love” to have him switch sides.

The senator, however, rejected the offer, at least for now.

“My whole family is Republican, and I think they love me,” Fetterman quipped, adding that his father was watching the interview.

He said his criticism is aimed at the most extreme forces inside his own party, not at everyday Democrats.

“My criticism is directed at the extreme, in my view, indefensible kinds of views [of] things,” Fetterman said.

He also warned about primary candidates in his party who keep moving further left on Israel and America.

“People that are winning the primaries, they are almost always anti Israel and then anti American, and they’ve been forced to delete all the outlandish things that they’ve said,” he said.

Fetterman has repeatedly broken with his party’s activist wing through his firm defense of Israel.

That stance has made him a target for the left, where support for America’s closest Middle East ally is apparently now treated as some exotic right wing habit.

He has also clashed with Democrats during government shutdown fights, refusing to simply follow the party line when he believes the left is playing games with basic governance.

For voters tired of performative outrage, that sort of bluntness has obvious appeal.

Republicans have noticed.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota and others have reportedly made overtures to Fetterman, hoping he might consider leaving the Democratic Party.

Fetterman has repeatedly said he is not switching parties.

Still, he has left himself one notable caveat, suggesting that if Democrats become aggressively hostile to Israel, that could change the equation.

That answer should make Democratic strategists a little nervous, assuming they still have time between scolding voters and chasing approval from online activists.

WATCH:

Fetterman may not be a conservative, but he has learned that the hard left has a very low tolerance for dissent.

Despite his reputation as a thorn in the side of progressives, GovTrack has ranked Fetterman as more liberal than more than a dozen Senate Democrats based on his voting record.

In other words, Republicans are not cheering him because he suddenly became Barry Goldwater.

They are responding to something simpler.

He talks like a human being, shows up in places outside the left wing media bubble, and refuses to pretend that every Republican voter is a threat to civilization.

Fetterman also complained about what he sees as a double standard inside the Democratic coalition.

Far left politicians can attack moderate Democrats all day long, but when he criticizes the extreme wing, the outrage machine starts spinning.

“There’s also been a double standard. People, whether it’s [Bernie] Sanders or other people, are allowed to criticize Democrats, but when I call out the extreme … I get the criticism like ‘why are you going on Fox?’” Fetterman said.

“I’ll have a conversation with anyone that’s going to play it straight as you and Fox has,” he added.

WATCH:

 

That is the real offense in the eyes of the modern left.

Not just that Fetterman criticizes them, but that he is willing to sit down with people they have declared off limits.

For now, Fetterman remains a Democrat, much to the disappointment of Republicans hoping for a dramatic party switch.

But his popularity with GOP voters is no mystery to anyone paying attention.

When one Democrat declines to spit venom at half the country, defends Israel without apology, and calls out the radicals in his own backyard, Americans notice.

These days, that is apparently enough to make him sound like a rebel.

Van Jones Praises Trump for Showing Up Then Rips Speech as Mean and Small [WATCH]
News

Van Jones Praises Trump for Showing Up Then Rips Speech as Mean and Small [WATCH]

/

CNN commentator Van Jones did something unusual during coverage of the rescheduled White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

He gave President Trump credit before promptly returning to familiar cable news form and tearing into the president’s speech.

The dinner had been moved from its original April 25 date after a gunman stormed the security perimeter and fired a shot in an attempt to assassinate Trump.

That ugly backdrop made the president’s decision to attend the media gala more notable than the usual Beltway cocktail circuit chatter.

CNN anchor John Berman explained that the evening’s schedule had changed.

The awards for journalists would come before Trump spoke, meaning the president would have to sit through honors given to reporters who often cover him with all the warmth of an IRS audit.

“The president was going to speak first, then the awards. So, he could have left, in theory, if he wanted to,” Berman said before turning to Jones for analysis.

Berman added, “This time, he’s going to have to sit through and watch awards being given to reporters who report on him, maybe in ways he doesn’t like. One wonders how he might feel about that.”

Jones responded with a rare moment of praise for Trump, acknowledging that the president was not ducking the room or heading for the exit. For once, even a CNN panel had to admit the obvious.

“You really do have to give President Trump credit tonight,” Jones said.

“I mean, we were saying he was going to basically do his thing and run away.”

“He’s not running away,” Jones added.

“He’s going to be there. And maybe someone will have the courage to speak up [against him]. Maybe they won’t. But he’s putting himself in harm’s way in that regard.”

That was about as generous as the moment was going to get.

After Trump delivered his remarks, which included jabs at the press and candid comments about his relationship with the media, Jones shifted hard into criticism.

“I think the worst thing you can say is that it just wasn’t funny at all,” Jones said.

“It just wasn’t funny. It was mean and small. But you can be mean and small and funny. This was mean and small and not funny.”

Jones argued that Trump missed a chance to speak to Americans facing real problems.

His complaint was that the president focused too much on himself and his adversaries rather than kitchen table issues.

“And he didn’t talk about any American besides himself and his enemies,” Jones continued.

“There are people at home who can’t figure out how to pay for gas. There are people at home who worry about their nephew who’s serving overseas.”

“There’s people at home who have real problems, who would love to see somebody reflect their reality and maybe make fun of some of their enemies, some of their problems. He missed the entire opportunity to talk to those people.”

WATCH:

Of course, the idea that the White House press dinner is suddenly sacred ground for working class policy talk may surprise Americans who know it mostly as a room full of journalists, celebrities, consultants and politicians congratulating one another.

Still, Jones framed the speech as a squandered opportunity.

The moment also came after Jones recently appeared to push back against the far left activists gaining influence inside his own party.

The longtime progressive Democrat warned that some ideas being packaged as progressivism are doing damage to Democrats.

Jones condemned Democratic Socialists of America aligned positions on Hamas, policing, prisons and borders.

“Supporting Hamas is not progressive. ‘No police, no prisons, no borders’ is not progressive. Celebrating the murder of Israeli civilians is not progressive. These ideas are REGRESSIVE,” Jones said.

WATCH:

That admission marked another notable break from the activist fringe, even if Jones remains firmly on the left.

It also showed the growing panic among Democrats who can see the party’s radical wing turning off voters outside the faculty lounge and protest encampment circuit.

So the evening delivered a strange split screen. Jones praised Trump for showing up and sitting through a room full of media elites, then blasted him for being, in his view, too harsh and not funny enough.

For Trump supporters, the spectacle likely looked simpler.

The president walked into hostile territory, took the heat, fired back at the press, and left CNN debating whether he deserved credit or condemnation.

Shotgun Maniac Shot by Cops After Queens Blast as Two Relatives Found Dead [WATCH]
News

Shotgun Maniac Shot by Cops After Queens Blast as Two Relatives Found Dead [WATCH]

/

A violent scene in Far Rockaway turned into a nightmare Saturday when police shot a shotgun armed man outside a Queens home after an explosion erupted from the residence, then found two relatives dead inside, according to police and sources.

The NYPD responded around noon to Ocean Crest Boulevard near Hartman Lane after a 911 caller reported shots fired inside the home.

What officers encountered was not some routine domestic disturbance, but the kind of chaos that reminds sane people why police still matter.

Assistant Chief Christopher McIntosh said the caller gave dispatchers a terrifying warning before officers arrived.

“The caller stated that her husband was armed and had a history with mental illness,” he said.

The woman also told 911 that her husband, identified as 33 year old Kegan Thomas, “killed them,” McIntosh said.

That chilling message set off a rapid police response to a home that had already become a deadly crime scene.

When officers arrived, the wife was outside the residence and told them she had heard gunshots.

She said “and when she walked into the room she saw a body on the bed,” McIntosh said.

According to McIntosh, the woman ran out of the building and called 911 after seeing the body.

“Additionally, she told responding officers to be careful because her husband has a shotgun,” he said.

By 12:15 p.m., the NYPD had called in its Emergency Services Unit, the specialized officers who get summoned when a bad situation has the potential to get much worse. In this case, it did exactly that.

As officers prepared to force entry into the home, McIntosh said “a large fiery explosion erupted from the house,” turning an already dangerous call into a full blown combat zone.

The cause and type of explosive remain under investigation.

Sources said the suspect then emerged from the home wearing a bulletproof vest with extra ammunition inside it.

He was also armed with a shotgun, giving officers little room for hesitation.

Police said the suspect confronted officers and refused to obey their commands.

A police source said he was shot by multiple officers after ignoring “numerous commands to drop the shotgun,” which is about as clear a warning as anyone should need.

McIntosh described the confrontation in detail.

“Officers issued numerous verbal commands for the subject to put his hands up so he could drop the weapon,” he said.

The suspect still did not comply, according to police.

“After failing to comply with repeat commands to put his hands up and still armed (with) the shotgun, officers discharged their weapons and struck the subject.”

WATCH:

Thomas was taken to Jamaica Hospital in critical condition and was undergoing surgery, sources said.

McIntosh said he has no criminal record and no mental health history with the NYPD, a detail investigators will likely continue examining as they piece together what led to the violence.

Inside the home, police found two bodies with bullet wounds, sources told The Post.

The victims were believed to be the suspect’s mother in law and sister in law.

The horror of the scene was matched only by the danger officers faced while entering it.

In a city where politicians and activist types regularly lecture police from safe rooms and press conferences, this was the real world again, a shotgun, an explosion, body armor, dead victims inside, and officers moving toward it.

“Again, it cannot be overstated that the bravery of the officers who responded today … they ran toward the danger with no hesitation,” McIntosh said.

That kind of praise was not just official boilerplate.

Investigators are still working to determine what explosive was set off inside the residence and whether the blast was deliberately triggered as officers closed in.

The crime scene left behind is expected to require careful processing, given the combination of gunfire, fire, possible explosives, and two deaths inside the home.

The NYPD shooting will be reviewed, as police involved shootings always are.

But the early account paints a stark picture, officers responded to a woman begging for help, faced an armed man in body armor after an explosion, and fired only after repeated commands were ignored.

For the neighbors in Far Rockaway, the quiet of a Saturday afternoon was shattered by gunfire, flames, and a deadly family tragedy.

For the officers who answered the call, it was another reminder that when everyone else runs out, somebody still has to go in.


Scroll to Top