News

News

Have You Been Watching the Iran Story Wrong? Globalists Panic as Big Picture Emerges [WATCH]

Political commentator Susan Kokinda argued that the Trump administration has launched a long-term strategy designed to reshape the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East by weakening Iran’s economic leverage, expanding American energy production and encouraging regional nations to pursue independent security and economic partnerships.

During a recent presentation, Kokinda said the administration’s approach extends far beyond the day-to-day headlines surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

“Yesterday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered a message to the government of Iran and to the world.”

She then played remarks from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlining the administration’s economic pressure campaign.

“At the president’s orders, we have raised the level even again, and watch this space for more announcements coming next week, because we are going to apply measures like have never been seen in the history of economic isolation on a country.”

According to Kokinda, those comments reflect a strategy that has been under development for years.

“That is an execution of a policy that has been years in the making. And a week earlier, Bessent told you what it was.”

She then referenced another statement from Bessent regarding the future of the Strait of Hormuz.

“Strait is never going back to the way it was, because the Iranians have used or tried to use it as a choke point. What we are going to see over the next two years, the Strait’s going to become irrelevant. It is going to become just another body of water.”

Kokinda argued the objective extends beyond Iran itself.

“This isn’t just about Iran. It’s about the end of a British choke point that’s been used as a weapon in service of a policy which has kept the region in flames for decades.”

She also criticized what she described as media coverage focused on short-term developments.

“Now, if you’re living in your social media feeds, you’re probably getting whiplash. The straits are open, the straits are closed. America is winning, America is losing. That’s not the story. It’s a distraction from the real one.”

According to Kokinda, the larger geopolitical changes began decades ago.

“The real story is much bigger, and it didn’t start 6 months ago. It started 50 years ago, and last month, a Lebanese diplomat blew the lid off that story.”

Turning to energy policy, Kokinda highlighted comments from Energy Secretary Chris Wright during an interview with Fox News anchor Bret Baier.

Baier asked:

“So you’re saying that because of the U.S. military escorts and because some of these ships go dark going through the strait, that those numbers of these tracking agencies are not accurate.”

Wright replied:

“Exactly. Exactly. They’re they’re trying the best they can, but almost all of these ships have their AIS their transponders are off, so they’re dark. They’re under escort, and it’s so it’s a different shipping operation than we had before the conflict. But it’s 8 or 9 million barrels a day on a running average are going through the strait, plus you’ve got to add the 6 million barrels a day that are being diverted via pipelines, and all and those pipelines are being expanded as well.”

Kokinda said those figures differ from some public estimates.

“So the real gap is 5 to 6 million barrels, not the 15 million the doomsday commentators keep repeating.”

She also highlighted Wright’s broader strategic assessment.

“But their ability to cause difficulties are declining. Our ability to escort and bring products out of that region is growing. They they have they they have sort of one one card, and it’s shrinking in size.”

Kokinda summarized that point by saying:

“One shrinking card. That’s not a choke point anymore.”

She later returned to Bessent’s economic strategy.

“But the situation on the ground in Hormuz is just one flank in the overall strategy.”

Quoting Bessent again, she highlighted the administration’s financial pressure campaign.

“And we’ve been going after, as you said, their bank accounts, crypto wallets, assets around the world, cut- cutting off payments into both the leadership and the regime and the government itself.”

Kokinda argued those measures have been accompanied by expanded domestic energy production, pipeline construction and what she described as renewed support for nuclear power.

The presentation then shifted to a recent forum hosted by Chatham House, where Lebanese presidential adviser Jean Aziz discussed Lebanon’s recent history.

Aziz stated:

“Brown telephoned his secretary only for the latter to tell him, Forget about it. I found the solution. I will hand Lebanon to Hafez al-Assad, and the Israelis are in agreement. And, of course, the man was utterly mistaken. In the wake of that episode, Lebanon lived through half a century, since 1976 till now, it’s a half a century of wars, battles, and instability, which ended by entangling Syria, Israel, Europe, the States, and above all, the IRGC regime of Tehran in a bloody quagmire.”

Kokinda argued the remarks represented a significant public criticism of past regional policies.

She later quoted Aziz again describing current relations with the United States.

“…a fundamental international change embodied in Western, and particularly American, attention to Lebanon on attention at once serious and practical, and one congruent with our reading of the true nature of the crisis and the feasible solutions.”

The discussion also highlighted comments from Qatari official Majed al-Ansari regarding regional diplomacy.

“Gaza is a good example of this. How did we get to the 20-Point Plan? We got to the 20-Point Plan because eight countries from the Arab and Muslim world came together, went to President Trump with a clear plan, put their weight behind it, went to Cairo, went to Sharm El Sheikh, signed the deal, and are still continuing to work on a resolution. It was not delusional. It was not ambitious. It was very practical. And right now, while we are looking at a very severe humanitarian crisis in in Gaza, we are still pushing for a practical, possible solution to the humanitarian crisis over there. We’re looking through the the lens of countries in the region, rather than just waiting for somebody extra-regionally to come in and solve our crisis for us.”

Kokinda argued that approach reflects a broader movement toward regional cooperation rather than dependence on outside powers.

She concluded by referencing remarks President Donald Trump made during a Board of Peace meeting.

“And I said, Steve, how would you like to be Henry Kissinger Jr. that doesn’t leak? And he said, Are you a leaker, Steve? No. He didn’t even know what the word meant, and it’s true. I always say Henry Kissinger, who was one of the great leakers of all time, by the way. Richard Nixon said to him, Henry, Henry, who’s leaking all this stuff? I don’t know, Mr. President. It was Henry.”

WATCH:

According to Kokinda, the administration’s economic sanctions, energy policies and regional diplomatic initiatives together represent what she views as a broader effort to replace decades-old geopolitical arrangements with a framework centered on economic sovereignty, regional cooperation and independent development.

News

Haley Stevens Presses El Sayed to Cut Hasan Piker Ties After Bruising Primary [WATCH]

Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., is urging Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed to distance himself from streamer Hasan Piker as the two Democrats move beyond their primary contest and toward the November general election, as reported by Fox News.

Stevens made the comments on “The Sunday Briefing” after losing the Democratic Senate primary to El-Sayed.

Although she has said she remains committed to the Democratic Party and is backing the party’s nominee, Stevens maintained her concerns about El-Sayed’s association with Piker.

“It certainly makes sense to get rid of this Hasan Piker affiliation,” Stevens said.

She also argued that Democrats’ positions on healthcare, democracy and Black-owned businesses were preferable to those of Republican nominee Mike Rogers, who is set to face El-Sayed in the general election.

The comments came after Stevens was asked whether El-Sayed had done anything beyond winning the primary to address concerns among groups that had supported her campaign.

The groups mentioned included Jewish voters, Black voters, and Reagan-era Democrats.

Stevens pointed to her own performance with those constituencies during the primary and described herself as a Zionist Democrat.

She also argued that the Democratic Party should have room for voters and communities with differing political backgrounds.

“I came really close [to winning the primary], and I’m still a Democrat. I’m still out here talking about my views and values. I want the people who share my views and values to feel safe and to feel heard in the [Democratic Party].”

El-Sayed defeated Stevens in the Democratic primary earlier this month. The result placed him at the center of a general election campaign for a Senate seat being vacated by retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters.

The primary campaign had featured significant differences between Stevens and El-Sayed, with the latter running as a progressive candidate.

El-Sayed’s campaign also drew attention because of his association with Piker, a prominent online political streamer.

On Aug. 3, El-Sayed and Piker were photographed talking at a Detroit party for content creators supporting El-Sayed’s campaign.

The image was taken after El-Sayed’s primary victory and became part of the discussion surrounding his relationship with the streamer.

Stevens had previously criticized Piker during the primary campaign. Following the election, she continued to argue that El-Sayed should shift his focus toward Michigan voters as he prepares for the general election.

The Senate contest is considered an important race for both parties because Michigan is a closely contested state and the seat is open following Peters’ retirement.

Republicans are seeking to retain their Senate majority, while Democrats are attempting to regain control of the chamber.

El-Sayed will face Republican Mike Rogers on Nov. 3. Rogers, a former congressman, is seeking the Senate seat after previously running for the chamber in Michigan in 2024.

A Fox News poll cited in the report showed Rogers leading El-Sayed by four percentage points in the general election matchup.

The poll also indicated that El-Sayed was receiving less support among Black voters, women, and suburban voters than former Vice President Kamala Harris received in Michigan during the 2024 presidential election.

The Michigan race is expected to receive significant national attention because of its potential effect on Senate control.

With Peters retiring, both parties have an opportunity to compete for the open seat rather than defending an incumbent.

El-Sayed’s primary victory also followed a campaign in which he received support from progressive figures and organizations.

His victory over Stevens demonstrated his ability to consolidate enough Democratic primary voters to secure the nomination, but the general election will involve a broader electorate.

Stevens’ decision to continue supporting the Democratic nominee while publicly calling for a change in his association with Piker illustrates the challenge facing the party after a competitive primary.

She has said she remains a Democrat and wants voters who share her political views to feel represented within the party.

For El-Sayed, the next phase of the campaign will involve appealing to voters beyond the Democratic primary electorate while defending his positions and political relationships.

The Senate candidates are scheduled to meet in the Nov. 3 general election, with the outcome potentially affecting the balance of power in Washington.

News

Alaska Democrat Scrambles to Escape Kamala Harris Fundraising Embrace [WATCH]

Former U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Alaska, is distancing her campaign from a recent fundraising email associated with former Vice President Kamala Harris, as reported by Trending Politics News.

The email was distributed by Harris’ Fight for the People PAC ahead of Alaska’s Aug. 18 nonpartisan primary.

It referenced Peltola’s Senate campaign against Republican incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan and asked supporters to make a joint contribution benefiting both Peltola’s campaign and Harris’ political organization.

“Alaska is a must-win Senate seat for Democrats to retake control of the Senate,” the email stated.

It then asked recipients to “help Mary Peltola get the support she needs” by splitting a contribution between Peltola and the Fight for the People PAC.

The fundraising message continued by emphasizing Peltola’s role in the Democratic effort to regain control of the Senate.

“So if there’s anyone who can flip Alaska and secure the Senate majority for Democrats – it’s Mary. But she cannot do it alone,” the email said.

“When we all stand behind Mary, we can give her the boost she needs to overcome their spending and organize across Alaska.”

Recipients were asked to “contribute $10 or whatever you can afford.” The message was signed with “Kamala Harris.”

Peltola’s campaign subsequently said it had not authorized the fundraising email and that campaign officials were unaware of it before it was distributed.

“Mary isn’t seeking endorsements from anyone from the Lower 48 — her focus is and always will be Alaska. That’s why she’s proud to have the endorsement of the American Federation of Government Employees, the Alaska American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, the Alaska International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1547 and more than 10,000 Alaskans who have signed up to volunteer with the campaign,” a spokesperson for Peltola’s campaign told KTUU.

The response came just days before Alaska voters were scheduled to participate in the state’s nonpartisan primary on Aug. 18.

Alaska’s election system allows the four candidates receiving the most votes in the primary to advance to the general election. The general election is conducted using ranked-choice voting.

Peltola previously represented Alaska in the U.S. House. She won the state’s at-large House seat in a 2022 special election and served one term before launching her campaign for the Senate.

Peltola and Sullivan are widely expected to advance from the primary and face each other in the general election. The contest is considered one of the more competitive Senate races of the 2026 midterm cycle.

Polling has shown a close contest between the two candidates. Recent polling aggregates have placed Peltola and Sullivan within a narrow range, with various averages showing each candidate receiving roughly 46% to 48% support.

An Alaska Survey Research poll conducted in early August 2026 showed Peltola with 51% support among likely voters and Sullivan with 49%.

Other polling has produced different results. A New York Times/Siena College survey conducted in June showed Sullivan holding a small advantage over Peltola.

The conflicting polling results underscore the competitiveness of the race as Alaska approaches its primary election.

For Peltola’s campaign, the immediate issue has been clarifying its relationship with the Harris-affiliated fundraising effort.

While the Fight for the People PAC’s message promoted Peltola’s Senate campaign and encouraged donations, Peltola’s campaign said she was not seeking endorsements from political figures outside Alaska.

The Senate race will move into its next stage following the Aug. 18 primary, when the top four candidates advance to the general election under Alaska’s election system.

The eventual contest will determine whether Sullivan retains his Senate seat or Peltola returns to Congress as Alaska’s next senator.

News

Ghanaian Migrant Arrested Three Times in Two Weeks After Oklahoma Sex Attack Spree [WATCH]

An Oklahoma man has been arrested three times in a two-week period in connection with separate allegations involving women in Oklahoma City, according to the account provided in the original report.

Jeff Kufi Asare, 26, is identified as a foreign national from Ghana. The reported incidents occurred at several locations across Oklahoma City, including Classen Boulevard, Scissortail Park and the Lake Hefner Trail.

According to the report, Asare was first arrested on Aug. 1 after police responded to a report near Northwest 23rd Street and Classen Boulevard.

Investigators allege that he pushed a woman against a bus stop window and put his hands down her pants.

A second woman also reported an encounter with Asare on Classen Boulevard that same day. According to the allegations, he approached her from behind, pulled down her pants and fled after she pushed him away.

Asare was arrested on allegations including sexual battery and indecent exposure. The report states that he was released several days later.

Five days after the first arrest, police encountered Asare again following another reported incident at Scissortail Park.

According to the allegations, Asare approached a woman from behind, touched her inappropriately several times, and began reaching into his pants.

The woman told him to leave, and he walked away. Police later located and arrested him on a sexual battery allegation.

That arrest also did not keep Asare in custody permanently.

Six days later, on Aug. 12, authorities responded to another incident involving Asare on the Lake Hefner Trail.

According to the report, he approached a woman from behind, pulled her down, and attempted to sexually assault her.

Firefighters intervened during the incident and contacted police. They remained with Asare until officers arrived, according to the account.

Asare was subsequently booked into the Oklahoma County Jail.

The report identifies the Aug. 12 charge as first-degree sexual assault and states that his bond was set at $75,000, with the district attorney’s office working to increase it.

The series of arrests has also raised questions about Asare’s previous encounters with the criminal justice system.

According to the report, Asare was born in Ghana in 1999 and is not a U.S. citizen. Earlier this year, he entered a no-contest plea to a breaking-and-entering charge in Oklahoma County.

The court subsequently issued an immigration warning.

Oklahoma County District Judge Cindy Truong had previously released Asare, according to the report.

The timeline provided in the case is notable for its frequency. The first reported incidents occurred Aug. 1, followed by another arrest Aug. 6 and the Aug. 12 arrest.

The report also states that Jeff Kufi, or Kofi, Asare has accumulated nearly two dozen arrests since 2022.

The allegations remain allegations unless and until established in court. Arrests and criminal charges do not by themselves constitute convictions, and defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Still, the sequence of arrests has placed renewed attention on the handling of repeat arrests and releases, particularly when a defendant is accused of new offenses shortly after being released from custody.

The Oklahoma County case is now moving through the criminal justice system, with Asare remaining in the Oklahoma County Jail following the Aug. 12 arrest, according to the original report.

The case also puts Asare’s immigration status into the spotlight because of his reported lack of U.S. citizenship and the immigration warning issued after his earlier Oklahoma County case.

Authorities and prosecutors will ultimately determine how the allegations proceed in court and whether additional action is warranted based on the evidence in each case.

News

Rashida Tlaib Crushed by Facts and Community Notes Over BLM Whopper [WATCH]

Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan renewed a disputed account of the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, prompting a fresh wave of criticism and a Community Note on X pointing users back to the findings of a federal investigation conducted during the Obama administration, as reported by Red State.

Tlaib posted about Brown on Friday, August 15, 2026, marking the 12th anniversary of his death.

In the post, she described Brown as having been “murdered by a police officer” and tied the case to broader claims involving racial inequality, policing and mass incarceration.

“Mike Brown should still be with us today. But 12 years ago this week, he was murdered by a police officer in Ferguson. Our fight for justice and an end to white supremacy, police violence, and mass incarceration continues. Black Lives Matter.”

Tlaib also included a photograph of Brown in a graduation cap and gown with her post.

The problem for Tlaib is that the federal government reached a different conclusion after conducting an extensive investigation into the August 9, 2014, shooting.

The Justice Department announced in March 2015 that its independent federal investigation did not find sufficient evidence to bring federal civil rights charges against Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson.

Federal investigators reviewed physical, ballistic, forensic, and crime-scene evidence, along with medical and autopsy reports, recordings, witness accounts, and other information.

Investigators also interviewed more than 100 people and canvassed hundreds of residences.

The Justice Department’s report specifically examined whether Wilson had violated federal civil rights law.

Prosecutors concluded that the evidence did not establish a federal criminal civil rights violation and therefore did not support an indictment.

The federal investigation also addressed accounts surrounding the confrontation between Brown and Wilson.

Its findings included evidence that contradicted portions of the early “hands up, don’t shoot” account that became a rallying cry during the protests that followed Brown’s death.

That history became central to the reaction to Tlaib’s post nearly a dozen years later.

X’s Community Notes added context challenging the description of Brown’s death as a murder, directing attention to the federal investigation and its findings.

The response illustrated how a claim that once circulated widely can look considerably different when compared with the government’s subsequent review of the evidence.

Radio personality Anthony Cumia also responded to Tlaib’s post, focusing on her decision to use Brown’s graduation photograph.

“Always with the graduation picture.
Why not post this one?…”

Another X user, Western Lensman, connected the renewed discussion to media coverage from the Ferguson protests.

“Tlaib still pushing this fantasy Michael Brown narrative, and the subsequent Community Note brought to mind one of the most revealing moments in modern media history. This is CNN.”

The Ferguson shooting became a major national flashpoint in 2014. Brown’s death sparked demonstrations in Ferguson and contributed to a broader national debate about policing, race, and the criminal justice system.

The Justice Department separately investigated the Ferguson Police Department and later found a pattern or practice of conduct that violated constitutional protections.

That investigation was distinct from the federal criminal civil rights inquiry into Wilson’s actions during the shooting.

That distinction is important because the Justice Department’s findings did not amount to a declaration that every aspect of policing in Ferguson was lawful.

Instead, the department conducted separate investigations and reached separate conclusions.

It found constitutional violations within the Ferguson Police Department while concluding that the evidence did not establish a federal civil rights offense by Wilson in Brown’s shooting.

Tlaib’s post nevertheless revived the political argument over Brown’s death, with critics pointing to the federal findings as evidence that describing the shooting as an established murder ignores the conclusions reached after an extensive investigation.

The debate also highlights the lasting impact of the Ferguson case. More than a decade after Brown’s death, the events remain a political reference point, particularly in arguments over policing and racial justice.

Tlaib’s decision to revisit the case on its 12th anniversary shows that the political arguments surrounding Ferguson have not disappeared.

But the federal record remains available for anyone willing to look past the slogans and examine what investigators actually concluded.

In 2015, the Obama Justice Department said the evidence did not support federal charges against Wilson. In 2026, Tlaib continues to characterize Brown’s death differently.

That disagreement, now amplified by X’s Community Notes, has once again put the competing narratives surrounding Ferguson in the spotlight.

News

California School Sued After Students Receive Qurans and Hijab Encouragement During Mosque Trip [WATCH]

A group of parents and former students is suing a California school district over a fall 2025 field trip to a mosque that allegedly included students receiving Qurans and being encouraged to wear hijabs, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The legal action involves Palo Alto High School and stems from a trip organized through the school’s Social Justice Pathway program.

The parents allege that the school presented Islam as connected to social justice work and failed to maintain appropriate religious neutrality during the outing.

The lawsuit also raises concerns about student privacy. According to the parents, photographs were taken during the trip and later posted online without parental consent.

The group bringing the lawsuit is represented by Community Members for Religious Neutrality in Public. The lawsuit names the Palo Alto High School principal and the school district as defendants.

The district has pushed back on the allegations, at least in terms of what it has been able to independently verify so far.

Palo Alto Unified School District Superintendent Jason Glass said in a statement to the San Francisco Chronicle that district officials learned about the lawsuit through media reports and had not yet been formally served.

Glass said he had reviewed the complaint but that the district could not independently verify the allegations made in it.

The parents are seeking an admission from the district that it failed to properly supervise students and violated the privacy rights of students and their parents.

The lawsuit also alleges that students were “exposed” to Zahra Billoo, executive director of the Bay Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Billoo has previously attracted attention over public comments, including statements condemning Zionists.

She rejected the lawsuit and described the legal action as “misguided,” while maintaining that participation in the mosque visit was voluntary.

“Public schools and the government have an obligation to remain neutral toward religion, but what neutrality does not mean is shielding students entirely,” Billoo said.

“The job of educators is to teach students and expose them to different worldviews. That’s what happened here.”

“One of the most important ways we combat hate is to learn about each other,” Billoo added.

“I am concerned that this group of parents not only wants to counteract that for their own children… but is attempting to intimidate schools and school districts from doing necessary work of educating the next generation.”

The dispute places competing claims about religious neutrality and public education at the center of the lawsuit.

The parents argue that the field trip crossed a line by encouraging students to participate in practices associated with Islam while presenting the religion through the school’s social justice curriculum.

Billoo, meanwhile, argues that exposing students to different religious and cultural perspectives is part of the educational mission of public schools and that students were not required to participate.

The district’s superintendent has not confirmed the parents’ allegations, emphasizing that officials could not independently verify the claims contained in the complaint.

The district also said it had learned of the lawsuit through media reports and had not yet been formally served.

The case now puts the details of the 2025 field trip, including what students were given, what activities they were encouraged to participate in, how photographs were handled and how the visit fit within the Social Justice Pathway program, under legal scrutiny.

The lawsuit will ultimately have to address whether the school district maintained religious neutrality, properly supervised students, and protected student and parental privacy during the outing.

For the parents involved, those questions are at the heart of their legal challenge to Palo Alto High School and the school district.

News

President Trump Orders Pete Hegseth to Scale Back U.S.-South Korea Military Exercises [WATCH]

President Donald Trump has instructed Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to substantially reduce U.S. participation in joint military exercises with South Korea, saying the drills are costly to American taxpayers and send what he considers an inappropriate signal to North Korea, as reported by Townhall.

Trump announced the decision Sunday, August 16, in a post on Truth Social. He said the exercises had already been scheduled and could not be canceled at this point, but he directed Hegseth to reduce their size.

Trump Shuts Down CNN’s Kaitlan Collins After Iran Question and Boots Press From Room

The president also argued that American taxpayers carry much of the financial burden associated with the exercises. His comments come as the administration continues to emphasize reducing what Trump views as unnecessary costs and reassessing long-standing U.S. military commitments.

Trump said the exercises also send a signal that is “totally inappropriate and hostile” toward North Korea. He pointed to what he described as his good relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as another reason for changing the scale of the exercises.

“Based on my very good relationship with Kim Jong Un, of North Korea, I am not happy with the fact that the United States has, long ago, agreed to participate in Joint Military Exercises with South Korea. These exercises are not only costly, with much of these costs paid for by the United States of America (as usual!), but send a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile, to a Country that, as long as Donald J. Trump has been President, has been unthreatening and respectful. Therefore, and based on the fact that it is too late to cancel, I have instructed Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to substantially reduce the Joint Military Exercises! While somewhat unrelated (?), I recently asked the President of South Korea if they would like to join us in the Denuclearization of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and they said, “No thanks!”

Trump also connected his decision to a separate conversation with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung concerning the administration’s efforts to denuclearize Iran.

According to Trump, the South Korean president declined a request to participate in those efforts. Trump characterized the exchange as unrelated to the military exercises but included it in the same post announcing the reduction.

The president’s order does not call for an end to the military exercises altogether. Instead, Trump said the exercises would be substantially reduced because canceling them outright was no longer practical.

Joint military exercises between the United States and South Korea have long served as a major component of the two countries’ military cooperation.

The drills are intended to maintain readiness and coordination between American and South Korean forces on the Korean Peninsula.

Trump’s latest announcement represents another adjustment to the U.S. military posture overseas under his administration.

Rather than simply continuing established exercises because they have been conducted for years, the president is directing his defense secretary to reconsider their size and cost.

The White House announcement also places renewed attention on Trump’s relationship with Kim Jong Un.

Trump has previously pursued direct engagement with the North Korean leader, making the Korean Peninsula one of the areas where his administration has sought a different approach from previous presidents.

For South Korea, the United States remains a key military ally, and American forces have maintained a presence on the peninsula for decades.

The administration’s decision to scale back the upcoming exercises therefore represents a change in the scope of planned U.S.-South Korean military activity, even though Trump did not announce an end to the exercises themselves.

The instruction to Hegseth comes as Trump continues pressing allied nations to shoulder more responsibility for shared security arrangements and as his administration evaluates the costs associated with U.S. military commitments abroad.

For now, the exercises are expected to proceed in reduced form rather than being canceled. Trump made clear that the immediate change is intended to limit their scope while maintaining the broader U.S.-South Korean military relationship.

News

Jeffries Rejects Medicare for All and DSA Agenda as Khanna Demands Action [WATCH]

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries rejected Medicare for All legislation and distanced himself from the Democratic Socialists of America on Sunday, exposing another widening fault line inside the Democratic Party.

The split comes as progressive challengers rack up primary victories and pressure party leaders to embrace a far more radical platform.

During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” host Kristen Welker asked Jeffries whether he personally supported Medicare for All.

Jeffries answered, “No,” then said, “I haven’t cosponsored the Medicare for All legislation that has been introduced over the last several years.”

Jeffries argued that Democrats should focus on repairing the existing health care system before attempting to replace it.

“I do think we need to figure out how to fix our broken health care system and then build something better once we repair the damage that has been done,” he said.

The Democratic leader added that the current proposal was not legislation he supported in his leadership role.

He instead called for a path that would “make health care affordable for every single American,” a broad promise that leaves plenty of room for Democrats to keep debating what that actually means.

WATCH:

Congressional records complicate Jeffries’ effort to distance himself from the proposal.

He cosponsored the Medicare for All Act of 2019 and the 2021 version, but he was not among the 102 additional House cosponsors announced when Representatives Pramila Jayapal and Debbie Dingell introduced a new measure in April 2025.

The New York City DSA Healthcare Working Group previously credited its organizing campaign with helping win Jeffries’ support in 2019.

“Rep. Jeffries’ public endorsement of this legislation is the result of all these efforts and of this growing national movement,” the group declared at the time.

Even then, the socialist organization treated his support as qualified because Jeffries also backed Medicare X, a public option proposal.

That history now follows Jeffries as he tries to present Democrats as focused on affordability rather than the sweeping government takeover favored by the party’s socialist wing.

The DSA’s “Workers Deserve More!” platform ventures far beyond health care.

It calls for universal health care at no individual cost, abolishing ICE and the Senate, placing the executive and judiciary under congressional authority, redirecting police funding, and eventually abolishing police departments and prisons.

Welker also asked whether democratic socialists belong within the Democratic Party’s political tent.

Jeffries answered, “I don’t support the DSA agenda as has been articulated by the DSA itself,” while acknowledging that candidates who win Democratic nominations could still become members of his caucus.

“You’re going to have individual members who have been elected in Democratic primaries, and if they are elected in the general in November, will be part of the House Democratic Caucus,” Jeffries said.

“It’s going to be a broad caucus. There will be progressives. There will be New Dems. There will be Blue Dogs.”

WATCH:

That broad caucus is already becoming more uncomfortable for establishment leaders.

Seven incumbent House Democrats have lost primaries this cycle, including Jeffries backed Representatives Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat, who were defeated by DSA backed or affiliated candidates Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier in New York.

Representative Ro Khanna of California openly broke with Jeffries during a separate appearance on the same program.

“Medicare for All is arguably the most important priority,” Khanna said. “The case for Medicare for All has never been clearer or more urgent. Congress must pass Medicare for All.”

Khanna also demanded a House vote if Democrats retake the majority.

He cited an updated Yale analysis, prepared after his inquiry, that projected a single payer system could reduce annual national health expenditures from $5.28 trillion to $4.24 trillion, though such projections remain certain to face intense scrutiny.

WATCH:

Former MS NOW host Mehdi Hasan attacked Jeffries from the left, arguing that the leader was disconnected from Democratic voters.

“A reminder that the vast majority of Democrats across the country support Medicare for All. This man is so out of touch with his party. How is he their leader??” Hasan wrote on X.

Jeffries is trying to keep the socialist agenda at arm’s length while preserving a coalition increasingly shaped by candidates who support it.

That balancing act may satisfy Washington strategists for the moment, but voters can plainly see the party’s grassroots energy marching sharply left as its leadership scrambles to keep pace.

News

Ron Johnson Unleashes Explosive New Fauci Texts and Emails in Senate Probe [WATCH]

Senator Ron Johnson revealed additional evidence Sunday from the Senate investigation into Dr. Anthony Fauci, including a newly released text message and email tied to concerns about vaccine safety.

The Wisconsin Republican discussed the documents during an appearance on “Sunday Morning Futures” with guest host Jackie DeAngelis.

The latest disclosures arrived as Johnson and Senator Rand Paul continue reviewing records from Fauci’s phone and diary.

Johnson said investigators received the phone only a week earlier, leaving senators with a considerable amount of material still to examine.

Johnson previously warned Fauci after the former federal health official refused to participate in a private transcribed interview.

Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times, according to the senator, raising even more questions about what the longtime face of the federal Covid response does not want to discuss.

Johnson and Paul released an initial batch of messages from Fauci’s Covid era iPhone last Monday.

The senators said those records showed Fauci privately received information about miscarriages involving women vaccinated during the first trimester, even while federal officials publicly insisted there were no meaningful safety signals.

The latest material includes a January 25, 2021, message from Dr. John Mascola, who was then director of the Vaccine Research Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Mascola sent the message directly to Fauci.

“I am corrected on pregnancy studies. Initial Studies avoid vaccination in first trimester due to possible fever and higher rates of miscarriage in first trimester[.]”

That message appears to acknowledge specific concerns surrounding vaccination early in pregnancy.

Johnson now wants Mascola to answer questions directly rather than allowing another troubling federal record to disappear into Washington’s usual fog of excuses.

“I am hoping Dr. Mascola will fully cooperate by talking to us and clarifying what this text means,” Ron Johnson said.

Johnson also released an email from Dr. Janet Woodcock concerning patients who reported difficult to classify adverse events.

According to Johnson, Woodcock told Fauci that sufferers were being ignored while doctors lacked both useful guidance and a serious research effort.

“no one takes them seriously, no one knows how to treat them, and there is no effort to study this.”

Johnson said Fauci appeared hesitant to engage with Woodcock’s warning but apparently concluded that he could not simply disregard her.

That reluctance is likely to fuel more scrutiny of how Fauci and other officials handled information that did not fit the government’s preferred public narrative.

During the television interview, DeAngelis asked what would happen after Fauci declined Johnson’s request to appear voluntarily.

Johnson said the Senate was reviewing its available options while investigators continued working through the recently obtained documents.

“We are looking at our options as well, but what we are gonna continue to do is go through the documents we just received. Understand, we only got his phone a week ago. We got his diary a couple weeks ago,” Johnson said.

Johnson accused federal officials of failing at their basic responsibility to identify safety concerns and communicate them to physicians and the public.

In his telling, the bureaucracy did not merely miss isolated warning signs, it repeatedly buried inconvenient information while assuring Americans that everything was fine.

“They didn’t do their job. They didn’t take their responsibilities seriously, looking for safety signals and then passing those safety signals along to doctors, practitioners, and the public,” Johnson continued.

The senator said government officials repeatedly claimed there were no red flags and no safety signals.

He argued that Americans were denied information they needed to make personal decisions about potential risks and benefits, while mandates and official pressure continued across the country.

“They lied through their teeth to the American public, and I can’t tell you how many people died or were permanently disabled because they didn’t have that information to make the decision themselves in terms of risk benefit,” Johnson explained.

DeAngelis noted that officials presented their guidance with sweeping certainty and demanded compliance from the public.

She questioned why Fauci could not have shared the concerns reflected in the messages and emails so Americans could decide for themselves.

Johnson then turned his fire toward the press corps that spent years treating Fauci like an untouchable celebrity rather than a powerful official deserving scrutiny.

“The other question they ought to ask is why is the legacy media continuing to cover up and apologize for Anthony Fauci?” Johnson asked.

The senator also accused Fauci of being consumed with his public image, influence, and personal recognition during the pandemic.

“He’s a megalomaniacal narcissist and that’s all he was really concerned about. I mean, asking his employees to apply for awards that put over a million dollars in his pocket as he was using that power and control to scaremongering, to shut down our economy, to destroy people’s lives, to destroy people’s businesses,” Johnson said.

WATCH:

With more phone records and diary entries still under review, Johnson’s investigation appears far from finished.

Each new disclosure adds pressure for direct answers from Fauci and the officials who helped shape pandemic policy while the establishment media cheered from the sidelines.

News

Todd Blanche Crushes Kristen Welker’s Gotcha Question About Trump [WATCH]

Newly confirmed US Attorney General Todd Blanche walked onto NBC’s “Meet The Press” on Sunday and immediately faced the familiar Washington media obsession.

Rather than focus on violent crime or public safety, Kristen Welker wanted another round of hand-wringing about President Trump.

The establishment press has suddenly rediscovered its concern for the “independence of the DOJ.”

That concern always seems to surface when a Republican president wants the Justice Department to enforce the law instead of serving the political interests of Washington insiders.

Those same media voices showed little outrage when Merrick Garland’s Justice Department sent armed federal agents into President Trump’s Mar a Lago estate.

Apparently, government power only becomes troubling when Democrats no longer control the people exercising it.

Welker attempted to corner Blanche with a carefully framed question that assumed cooperation between the White House and Justice Department must be improper.

Blanche refused to accept the premise, and the expected television gotcha quickly fell apart.

“Can you pledge that the Justice Department will always act independently of the White House?” Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche.

It was the sort of question designed to produce a tidy liberal headline, not a serious discussion about constitutional authority.

Blanche was not interested in playing along with the network script.

“No, I’m not going to pledge that! And no Attorney General should ever pledge that!” Todd Blanche said.

He explained that the president was elected by the American people and has every right to establish lawful priorities for the executive branch.

“If I were to pledge I would be independent of the White House, what that means is that if President Trump says I want the Department of Justice to go after every violent criminal in this country, which is what he has said, what you’re saying to me is I just say ‘No sir, I’m not going to do it!’” he said.

That answer cut through the media’s preferred narrative.

Independence does not mean unelected officials may ignore lawful presidential directives whenever those directives come from a Republican whom the press corps dislikes.

Blanche also made clear that cooperation with the White House would not mean abandoning prosecutorial standards.

“So I will act with integrity. Our prosecutors will act with integrity. We will prosecute without fear or any sort of favor,” Blanche added.

His answer drew the obvious distinction between following lawful policy and using prosecutorial power to reward allies or punish political enemies.

“And that’s exactly what we’ve been doing and that’s what every Department of Justice should do,” he said.

For Blanche, integrity rests on equal enforcement of the law, not on performative resistance to the elected president.

Welker then tried again, shifting from institutional independence to a hypothetical ethical confrontation.

“Well, I guess big picture of the President asks you to do something that you feel crosses an ethical or legal line? Would you do it?” Welker asked Blanche.

Blanche rejected that loaded premise as well. “The President will never ask me to do something unethical or illegal or illegal. He never has.

He never will! I swore to the Constitution of the United States like every Cabinet Secretary has done…” Blanche said.

He reaffirmed both his confidence in Trump and his own constitutional oath.

WATCH:

The exchange exposed the selective standards that dominate establishment coverage of the Justice Department.

Under Democratic leadership, aggressive federal action was routinely defended as necessary, professional, and above politics, even when Trump and his supporters were the targets.

Now that Trump has returned to power, media figures want every Justice Department official to promise resistance before the administration has even issued a questionable instruction.

That is not accountability; it is partisan suspicion dressed up as solemn concern for institutions.

Blanche’s response offered no apology for carrying out the president’s lawful agenda, including the prosecution of violent criminals.

Welker went looking for a damaging sound bite, but Blanche instead delivered a blunt reminder that elections matter and executive authority belongs to the elected president.


Scroll to Top