Author name: LifeZette

News

Dem Strategist Waves White Flag on Voter ID While Party Clings to Shady Elections [WATCH]

A Fox News panel discussed growing public support for voter identification requirements, arguing that election integrity measures remain essential as lawmakers continue debating the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act.

Host Harris Faulkner opened the segment by reacting to comments from Democratic strategist James Carville, who recently urged Democrats to stop opposing voter ID requirements.

“Is he okay?” Faulkner asked. She noted that Carville was telling Democrats “to give up the fight over voter ID,” adding that he believes it is “a terrible hill to die on for Democrats.”

Faulkner pointed to new Fox News polling showing broad support for voter identification requirements.

“New Fox polling shows voters overwhelmingly support ID requirements for when you vote,” she said. “Roughly eight in 10 said photo ID should be required to prove U.S. citizenship before registering to vote or casting a ballot.”

She also highlighted scrutiny surrounding Sen. Rick Blumenthal after records allegedly showed an illegal immigrant whose release he had supported was registered to vote in Connecticut.

“The local GOP posted the receipts online,” Faulkner said, explaining that “a request came in from a Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles, and a day later, an illegal alien was an active registered voter in West Hartford.”

Faulkner noted that Fox News contacted Blumenthal’s office for comment.

“Fox News reached out to Blumenthal’s office twice for comment,” she said. “We’re still waiting to hear back. I wonder why they’re not jumping at it. Come on, where’s your comment?”

Lara Trump, former co-chair of the Republican National Committee, said election integrity efforts were a major focus during the 2024 election.

“This stuff really matters,” Trump said. “As the former co-chair of the RNC, I will tell you that in 2024 we worked so hard to ensure that we had free, fair, and transparent elections.”

She argued that many voters entered the election with concerns following the 2020 election.

“A lot of voters who leaving 2020 felt very disenfranchised and like their vote wasn’t going to even count if they came out,” Trump said.

Using Bucks County, Pennsylvania, as an example, she said voters who waited several hours deserved confidence that their ballots would be counted.

“They need to know that if you go and wait in line in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, where by the way in 2024 you had three and four hour long lines, their vote is actually going to be cast and be counted.”

Trump also rejected claims that voter fraud and mail ballots are not significant concerns.

“For those people out there who try to claim that oh well we don’t really have a lot of voter fraud or the mail ballots aren’t a problem, there are so many problems with them,” she said.

She cited an example involving a deceased cat.

“Cody Timms was a cat who was dead for 12 years and in Georgia received a mail ballot in the 2020 election,” Trump said, adding, “This stuff legitimately matters.”

Trump criticized Democratic lawmakers who oppose the SAVE Act.

“It is so shocking that you have sitting legislators who are all on the Democrat side of the aisle who refuse to pass the Save America Act-it is vital for the future of our country.”

Faulkner jokingly responded, “Your example-I thought you were going to say New Jersey… but you named Cody the cat.”

Trump corrected her, saying, “Cody Thames.”

Faulkner then asked why Democrats continue opposing voter ID requirements.

David Webb argued that confidence in elections is just as important as election outcomes.

“It’s really just about keeping the faith or keeping the lack of faith in the system going,” Webb said.

He added that “the real disenfranchisement is when somebody doesn’t trust the system.”

Webb argued that diminished public confidence discourages participation.

“We already have low voter turnout,” he said, “and if you keep that going and you coalesce your base, you get Mamdani in New York when the opposition doesn’t show up or doesn’t exist.”

Kaylee McGhee said Republicans also bear responsibility if they fail to support election integrity legislation.

“It doesn’t even matter whether Democrats oppose voter ID when we have Republicans on our own side who also refuse to do what needs to be done and pass the Save America Act,” McGhee said.

She argued Democrats benefit from existing election laws in states such as California.

“They benefit from a shady election process,” McGhee said, pointing to “legalized ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots to literally every single person in the state, whether they are legal or illegal.”

She suggested Carville’s comments reflect concern that political dynamics may be changing.

“I think he’s waging a battle because he knows that perhaps these things that have long benefited establishment Democrats are now going to be used by the insurgent left against those very same Democrats.”

Faulkner then asked why McGhee had criticized Republicans.

Trump responded, “Because we have some Republicans who have not voted to pass the Save America Act as well, and I think it’s outrageous.”

She added, “Every person who is elected to our U.S. Congress should want free, fair, and transparent elections,” concluding that “the Republicans really ought to be ashamed of themselves.”

Donna Rotunno said Carville’s comments reflect overwhelming public support for voter ID.

“I think James Carville’s looking at this. This is not a hill to die on,” Rotunno said.

She argued that Americans routinely present identification in everyday life.

“American people know that no matter where you go, you are showing an ID,” she said. “They’re saying, ‘Why wouldn’t I show an ID to go and vote?'”

Rotunno said opposition to voter ID has become increasingly difficult to defend.

“I think that James knows that this is a problem for them,” she said. “Now he’s saying you better pivot on this because this could be a downfall here for the Democrats.”

She concluded by arguing that every legal vote should count.

“Every American’s vote should count,” Rotunno said. “It doesn’t matter if there’s one that is an illegal vote, right? One is too many. We shouldn’t have any.”

Recalling her own experience, Rotunno added, “My own grandmother got a ballot after she died, so forget about Cody the cat. I saw it happen.”

WATCH:

News

Gavin Newsom’s Newest Scheme: Turning California Media Into His PR Department [WATCH]

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new grant program for news organizations is drawing criticism from journalists and media watchdogs who argue the initiative could blur the line between independent reporting and government-backed media.

Daily Signal California correspondent Angelina Delfin reported that the controversy centers on a new program offering grants of up to $250,000 to qualifying California news organizations producing what the state describes as fact-based reporting.

“Governor Newsom is essentially paying for good press with your tax dollars,” Delfin said, noting that the assessment came from independent journalist Nick Shirley.

“That’s what independent journalist Nick Shirley told the Daily Signal when asked about Governor Gavin Newsom’s new grant program for California newsrooms.”

Delfin explained that Newsom recently announced the California Civic Media Program, a public-private partnership with Google that will invest directly in California news outlets.

“Newsom announced a new initiative that will award grants of up to $250,000 to eligible California news organizations producing what the state describes as fact-based reporting,” she said.

According to Delfin, the announcement has prompted concerns over whether elected officials should play any role in distributing taxpayer-backed funding to media organizations.

“But critics argue the program raises a fundamental question: Should politicians have any role in deciding which news organizations receive taxpayer-backed funding?”

Delfin said those concerns have been heightened by Newsom’s public criticism of investigative journalist Nick Shirley, whose reporting has focused on alleged government misconduct.

“Those concerns are amplified by Newsom’s treatment of journalists like Nick Shirley, whose reporting has exposed alleged government failures earlier this year.”

She noted that Shirley “helped expose more than 170 million dollars in alleged California hospice fraud,” and previously “drew national attention for uncovering daycare fraud in Minnesota.”

Rather than praising those investigations, Delfin said Newsom criticized Shirley publicly.

“Newsom publicly mocked Shirley on social media.”

According to Delfin, critics see a contradiction between Newsom’s criticism of an investigative reporter and his administration’s effort to provide taxpayer-supported grants to other media organizations.

“Critics argue that contrast is difficult to ignore a governor who publicly ridicules an investigative journalist while simultaneously launching a taxpayer-supported program to fund other news organizations.”

Delfin also highlighted criticism from Will Swaim, president of the California Policy Center, who questioned whether government funding is compatible with an independent press.

“Will Swaim, president of the California Policy Center, told the Daily Signal that government funding fundamentally changes the role of the press.”

She noted that Swaim, who has worked in publishing since 1990, said he has never accepted government funding for his publications.

Delfin added that Swaim also criticized California’s agreement with Google after Newsom supported legislation that would have required large technology companies to compensate publishers for their content.

“Swaim’s argument is this: Once a newsroom accepts government money, it ceases to be truly independent.”

The Daily Signal contacted Newsom’s office for comment, according to Delfin.

“The Daily Signal reached out to Governor Gavin Newsom’s press office for comment, but did not receive a response.”

Delfin said questions have also emerged over who will ultimately determine which organizations receive the grants.

“Beyond the funding itself, critics have also questioned who will ultimately decide which news organizations receive taxpayer-backed grants.”

She noted that applications will be administered by the James B. McClatchy Foundation but said some observers have raised concerns about the organization’s neutrality.

“According to the program’s website, applications are independently administered by the James B. McClatchy Foundation.”

However, Delfin pointed to language featured on the foundation’s website.

“On its homepage, the foundation features a statement titled ‘Standing United for Immigrant Justice and Dignity,’ condemning recent ICE raids and calling on civic leaders, institutions, and allies across California to quote reject complicity.”

She added, “Not exactly the nonpartisan grant administrator you’d hope for.”

Delfin concluded by noting that the first grant recipients are expected to be announced in the fall of 2026.

“The first round of grant recipients will be announced in the fall of 2026,” she said.

“Until then, Californians will have to wait and see whether journalists like Nick Shirley, who built their reputations by exposing government failures, would have the same opportunity to receive taxpayer funds as the news organizations ultimately selected.”

WATCH:

News

The Permanent Government: Insider Reveals How Intel Chiefs Played Gatekeeper With the Truth [WATCH]

Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge said a senior member of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s investigative team described what the official believes was a pattern within the U.S. intelligence community that affected how information reached policymakers and President Donald Trump.

Herridge said she has spent the past week speaking with a high-ranking member of Gabbard’s investigative unit, known as the DIG, about its ongoing work.

“In the last week, I’ve been speaking with a very senior member of Director Gabbard’s investigations team, known as the Dig,” Herridge said.

According to Herridge, the official described a mindset that allegedly existed among some intelligence personnel during Trump’s first administration.

“What they told me is that they did see a pattern where there was a sense or a feeling in the intelligence community that they just knew better,” she said.

Herridge said the official claimed some intelligence officials believed they needed to intervene because they viewed the president’s instincts as misguided.

“They had to save President Trump from his own instincts, from his own tendencies,” Herridge said.

She added that the source also described what was characterized as a broader ideological perspective within parts of the intelligence bureaucracy.

“There was very much a globalist view, and they had to preserve a globalist view,” Herridge said.

According to Herridge, the official cited multiple examples of how that alleged mindset influenced the handling of intelligence.

“So whether it was downplaying or suppressing intelligence about the threat from China,” she said, “whether it was giving a pass and calling the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation,” the same pattern was evident.

Herridge said the source believes those actions reflected more than isolated decisions.

“There was this level of a bureaucracy, a kind of conspiracy that was making decisions about the kind of information that should be reaching policymakers and ultimately the commander in chief,” she said.

WATCH:

Herridge’s comments summarized what she said she was told by a senior member of Gabbard’s investigative team regarding its findings.

According to Herridge, the official described an intelligence bureaucracy that allegedly influenced the flow of information reaching senior government leaders based on what the source characterized as institutional judgments rather than allowing intelligence to reach policymakers without those internal decisions.

News

Far Left Melts Down Over Subpoenas in Singham China Cash Probe [WATCH]

The House Ways and Means Committee has opened a serious front in the fight over foreign influence, and the far left is reacting exactly as expected.

Instead of answering basic questions about money, documents and China linked influence, the usual activist class is screaming about persecution.

At the center of the storm is Marxist tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham, who has poured roughly $39 million into three nonprofit groups now facing congressional subpoenas.

Singham left the United States years ago and now lives in China, which somehow does not seem to bother the crowd that sees fascism behind every Republican press release.

The subpoenas went to BreakThrough News, the People’s Forum Inc. and Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

The committee says the groups failed to produce “a single responsive document” after earlier requests for information.

BreakThrough News operates as a media outlet within the broader network, while the People’s Forum serves as a New York activist and political education hub.

Tricontinental provides the ideological polish, describing its work as rooted in “national liberation Marxism.”

Once Fox News Digital reported the subpoenas, the online defense machine lit up.

Hasan Piker, the livestream influencer beloved by the socialist internet, called the subpoenas “the McCarthy trials”.

WATCH:

CodePink figure Medea Benjamin also jumped in after BreakThrough News host Rania Khalek asked supporters for money and backup.

Benjamin called the subpoenas a “terrible attack on independent journalism,” then added, “We stand with you!!!”

That would be more convincing if the network were not tied to figures and organizations that routinely praise or defend communist regimes.

Benjamin helped found CodePink with Jodie Evans, who married Singham in 2017, the same year he sold ThoughtWorks for an estimated $785 million.

Piker, Benjamin and Evans also traveled to Cuba in March to show support for the island’s communist government.

Fox News Digital previously reported that the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is examining whether the trip violated U.S. sanctions rules.

The irony is rich, even by leftist standards.

People who cheer governments in Cuba and China, where dissent and independent media face real repression, are now acting like congressional document requests are the end of the First Amendment.

BreakThrough News is based at the People’s Forum address on W. 37th Street in Manhattan.

The outlet produces protest coverage, political messaging and activist media that often tracks closely with the priorities of the broader Singham backed network.

The People’s Forum organizes demonstrations and programs, while affiliated groups have been seen distributing printed protest signs at rallies.

Tricontinental, led by Vijay Prashad, provides Marxist research and has hosted international events, including a Shanghai conference where Singham praised the “new world order” associated with the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping.

Federal scrutiny is not limited to Capitol Hill.

Fox News Digital reported that U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton in the Southern District of New York has launched a grand jury investigation into alleged wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering and other financial misconduct tied to Singham’s financing of these organizations.

The State Department also named the People’s Forum and CodePink as “fellow travelers” in Cuba’s foreign influence campaign to promote communism.

WATCH:

For normal Americans, that is not exactly the kind of company one keeps by accident.

The rapid response from the left followed a familiar pattern.

The People’s Forum rolled out a petition and fundraising appeal, asking for tax deductible donations to cover legal expenses and organizing work.

Khalek then urged supporters to “sign, share, donate” and promoted a petition titled “Tell Congress: Drop the Witch Hunt Against BreakThrough News!”

She also wrote, “We’re not going anywhere. We’re going to fight this assault on our journalism. The only rights we have are the ones we’re willing to defend.”

Tax filings show Khalek received $101,449 in 2024 and $108,160 in 2023 for “consulting.”

She hosts “Dispatches” and also cohosts “The Freedom Side” for the outlet.

The campaign quickly spread beyond the usual domestic socialist circles.

Iranian regime friendly voices and left wing international activists echoed the same persecution line, despite Iran ranking near the bottom of the world for press freedom.

The committee says the real concern is the financial structure behind the activism.

Investigators allege money moved through shell companies and donor advised funds before reaching tax exempt groups, a setup that can hide original sources “by design, obscure the original source of the contribution.”

Fox News Digital previously documented $278 million flowing from Singham into six core nonprofits across a wider international network.

Congress is now focused on about $39 million that allegedly reached BreakThrough News, the People’s Forum and Tricontinental, and the left is melting down because someone finally asked to see the receipts.

News

Hochul Orders New York Police to Cut ICE Ties as Sanctuary Chaos Spreads [WATCH]

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is demanding that twelve police departments in the state end their cooperation agreements with Immigration and Customs Enforcement by August 25, a move that puts local officers squarely in the middle of another political fight over illegal immigration.

The order targets arrangements between local police agencies and ICE, agreements that allow departments to assist federal immigration authorities.

For communities already dealing with crime, budget pressure, and the strain of migrant arrivals, Albany has now added another command from the top.

Hochul framed the demand as a matter of law and public safety, insisting that local police should not be used to help enforce federal civil immigration rules.

Her message was blunt and unmistakably aimed at shutting down cooperation with ICE.

“Nobody is above the law. In New York, we will not tolerate the diversion of local resources for federal civil immigration enforcement at the expense of public safety.”

That argument may sound neat in a press release, but many New Yorkers are likely to hear something very different.

At a time when illegal immigration has overwhelmed services and tested patience across the state, Hochul is telling police departments to pull back from federal immigration enforcement.

The deadline gives the twelve departments until August 25 to end the agreements.

That leaves local officials with a clear choice between complying with Albany or continuing cooperation with the federal agency tasked with enforcing immigration law.

For years, Democrats have tried to have it both ways on immigration.

They claim they support secure communities, then move to block the very tools that help identify and remove people who are in the country illegally and may have run afoul of the law.

Hochul is presenting the issue as a defense of local resources, but the politics are hard to miss.

The left has made ICE a favorite villain, and blue state leaders often seem more interested in scoring points against federal immigration enforcement than answering residents who want order restored.

Local police departments are not border patrol agencies, and no serious person claims they are.

But cooperation agreements with ICE can help ensure that information is shared and that dangerous individuals do not simply slip through bureaucratic cracks.

The governor’s demand also raises a basic question for taxpayers.

If local law enforcement encounters someone who is wanted by ICE, why should Albany make it harder for officers to coordinate with federal authorities whose job is immigration enforcement?

New York has already seen the consequences of soft policies wrapped in moral language.

WATCH:

Sanctuary style thinking sounds compassionate in elite political circles, but ordinary families are the ones left dealing with crowded shelters, rising costs, and public safety concerns.

The phrase public safety does a lot of work in Hochul’s statement.

Yet for many residents, public safety means police being able to work with every lawful agency available when there is a threat, not being told to ignore federal partners because the politics are inconvenient.

This is the same state leadership class that often lectures Americans about the rule of law.

Now, when it comes to immigration enforcement, the message appears to be that federal law should take a back seat to Albany’s preferred political narrative.

The August 25 deadline will test how much room local departments still have to make practical decisions for their own communities.

New Yorkers who are tired of excuses will be watching closely, because public safety is not supposed to be a campaign slogan.

News

Ilhan Omar’s Sister Exposed, Tied to Explosive USAID Linked Fraud Web [WATCH]

One of Minnesota’s largest public corruption scandals is back in the spotlight, and once again, the orbit around Rep. Ilhan Omar is proving remarkably crowded.

A Daily Wire investigation has raised fresh questions about Omar’s sister, Sahra Noor, and her alleged proximity to figures tied to the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme, a case federal prosecutors have described as a historic theft from taxpayers.

The scandal involved fake meal claims, shell entities, and millions in federal funds that were supposed to feed children.

Instead, according to prosecutors, the money helped bankroll luxury homes, real estate deals, and the kind of political embarrassment Democrats usually prefer to bury under a committee calendar.

The Daily Wire reported that Noor used the address of a woman with business connections to multiple people convicted in the Feeding Our Future case.

That detail has attracted new attention as Minnesota lawmakers continue reviewing possible links between Omar and the scandal.

The Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee has been examining Omar’s potential ties, according to the report.

Democrats blocked a subpoena in May that would have required Omar to turn over records, which is one way to keep the sunlight away from the paperwork.

Public records cited by The Daily Wire show that Noor has been involved with several Minneapolis area organizations, including People’s Center Clinics & Services in the city’s Somali neighborhood.

The federally qualified health center reportedly received a controversial $2 million earmark while Omar was serving in the Minnesota Legislature.

Noor later founded Grit Partners Consulting, a firm that claims it “has secured more than $20 million in funding for health initiatives” and has “consulted on projects backed by” USAID, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Gavi, and the World Bank.

That kind of resume sounds impressive, until the address trail starts getting interesting.

According to incorporation records, Grit Partners was registered at a home on Hyacinth Avenue in Lakeville, Minnesota.

The Daily Wire reported that the residence and the woman living there connect to at least three people convicted in the Feeding Our Future scandal.

The home is occupied by Mashah Ahmed Ali and his wife, Ister Ahmed Afraa, also known as Ismahan Ahmed Afraa.

State incorporation records show Afraa launched Sunrise Business Center Inc. with Hanna Marekegn.

Marekegn pleaded guilty to wire fraud in 2022 after admitting she stole $7 million through the Feeding Our Future operation.

Prosecutors said she falsely claimed to be serving 4,000 children per day while using proceeds to purchase a mansion.

During court testimony, Marekegn also admitted that she falsely accused state officials of racism to discourage scrutiny.

In other words, the left’s favorite shield was allegedly used to keep investigators away from a taxpayer funded feeding frenzy.

Afraa also incorporated Sunshine Care Center MN Inc., using the same business address as Sunrise Business Center.

Marekegn listed Sunshine Care Center as her employer on LinkedIn, according to the report.

The Daily Wire further reported that Afraa had ties to Aimee Bock, the former Feeding Our Future leader sentenced to 41 years in prison.

Minnesota Department of Health records listed Bock as the point of contact for Sunshine Care Center LLC.

The same Hyacinth Avenue address was used to register Diversity Childcare Center LLC, which also listed Bock as its point of contact.

State investigative documents cited by The Daily Wire say Bock told investigators the head of Sunshine Care Center MN was introduced to Feeding Our Future by Sahra Nur, a major figure later sentenced to four years in prison.

Afraa also served as CEO of Aflah Property Inc., which operated from Nur’s home on Fordham Court NE.

State records show Afraa was hit with a $30,000 state tax lien in April 2025 that listed the Fordham Court address.

Court filings cited by The Daily Wire describe Nur’s home as a central location in the Feeding Our Future operation.

At least 17 companies were registered there, many of which prosecutors said were used to fraudulently bill the government or launder proceeds.

Nur owned S & S Catering, which claimed it served more than 8 million meals.

Prosecutors alleged the company supplied fake invoices that allowed Feeding Our Future sites to seek reimbursements, resulting in more than $12 million in federal payments.

WATCH:

The Fordham Court address was also used for groups including Academy for Youth Excellence, which prosecutors alleged fraudulently obtained $3.5 million in federal funds.

Golis Properties LLC was also housed there, and prosecutors said it stole $3.9 million from taxpayers while using $2.5 million to buy an entire block on East Lake Street.

The Daily Wire reported that Afraa later bought property across from a building seized by the federal government after officials alleged it had been purchased with fraud proceeds.

For ordinary Americans paying grocery bills and taxes, that is the kind of detail that tends to stick.

Questions surrounding Omar’s family have followed the Minnesota Democrat for years.

She has long faced scrutiny over reports related to her past marriage to a Somali man critics alleged was her brother, an allegation Omar has denied.

The report also found that Noor has relocated to Africa and that members of Omar’s family have become involved with the Somali government.

Breitbart separately reported that Noor left People’s Center, moved to Kenya, and that Grit Partners performed Africa based work funded by the now defunct USAID.

Noor has not been charged in the Feeding Our Future case based on the information cited in the report.

Still, the web of addresses, business filings, federal funding, convicted fraudsters, and blocked subpoenas gives taxpayers plenty of reasons to demand answers.

News

Steve Hilton Drops a Brilliant Campaign Ad That Humiliates California’s Democrat Machine [WATCH]

Every now and then, a political campaign produces an ad that does more than fill airtime.

It lands like a punch, sticks in the mind, and reminds voters that politics can still have some energy left in the tank.

Most campaign ads are not built that way.

They are usually sterile, overmanaged, and so painfully cautious that they seem designed by a committee terrified of its own shadow.

California Republican Steve Hilton appears to have skipped that tired playbook.

His new gubernatorial campaign ad goes big, loud, strange, and remarkably effective, which is exactly what a Republican needs in a state run into the ground by the Democrat machine.

The ad leans heavily into AI generated visuals, but not in the usual awkward way that makes viewers wonder whether a laptop had a nervous breakdown.

This one is cinematic, sharp, funny, and packed with a message that normal Californians will understand immediately.

The spot opens with the Machine, a massive dystopian monster that looks like it crawled out of the wreckage of every failed Sacramento policy.

Hilton, or an AI version of him, goes to war with it before the ad shifts to very real scenes of homelessness, chaos, and sky high gas prices.

That contrast is the point.

The monster may be animated, but the misery it represents is very real for Californians paying the bills, dodging encampments, and watching the political class congratulate itself for ruining paradise.

The ad then takes aim at the familiar cast of California power brokers.

Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris sit with oversized swamp creatures labeled “Chamber of Commerce,” “Non Profits,” and “Government Unions” as the ruling class waits for the machine to pick its next puppet.

Newsom delivers one of the ad’s nastiest and funniest lines about the governor’s office, saying, “I’d do it forever, but it’s my turn to be president,” which prompts a shocked reaction from the Kamala character.

The joke works because it is barely satire at this point.

Then comes the machine’s selection, Xavier Becerra. Newsom responds, ” The Biden guy ? Who lost all those kids?” while Kamala objects, “It can’t be right. Run it again.”

The machine keeps producing the same answer, again and again.

Eventually, robot minions bring Becerra into the room, where Newsom tells him, “As long as you submit to the machine, you have to do nothing.”

Becerra grins and asks, “Nothing?”

Then he adds, “I can do that.”

It is brutal, simple, and exactly the kind of political mockery Republicans too often avoid because some consultant in loafers thinks voters prefer beige messaging.

From there, the ad turns into a full rebellion fantasy.

Hilton leads ordinary Californians against the Machine, while the Democrat figures look increasingly panicked as their usual system of insiders, unions, nonprofits, donors, and bureaucrats faces open defiance.

The final battle puts Hilton against the Machine in giant robot form, holding the California flag.

At one point, Kamala asks, “Can we get Swalwell back?” which is a savage little punchline in a state where Democrats have no shortage of political punchlines.

That is why the ad works.

It does not merely say California is broken, it shows the machine that broke it, then dares voters to imagine smashing it.

Republicans looking for a campaign model should pay attention.

WATCH:

Voters are tired of soft focus ads about values while their cities decay, their utility bills climb, and their leaders flee upward to national ambitions after leaving wreckage behind.

Hilton still faces a steep climb, because California Democrats have built a political fortress with public money, loyal institutions, activist networks, and a media class that treats Republican momentum like an unexplained weather event.

Nobody should pretend this will be easy.

But the ad signals that Hilton understands the battlefield better than most.

He is not just running against a candidate, he is running against a ruling system that thinks voters should accept decline as the price of enlightened governance.

The Democrats will fight hard to keep the governor’s office in their hands, especially if Becerra is their chosen vehicle.

But Hilton is showing that Republicans can fight with creativity, humor, and a clear message that speaks to people who are sick of being managed by failures.

For a party that needs to compete in hostile territory, this is the kind of ad that cuts through the noise.

It is flashy, memorable, and refreshingly unsentimental about the people who turned California into a warning label for the rest of America.

News

Trump Torches Press at Correspondents Dinner Over Full Blown Trump Derangement Syndrome [WATCH]

President Donald Trump walked into the White House Correspondents Dinner on Friday night and did what the political press corps always fears most.

He made them the punchline in their own room.

The annual gathering of Washington media insiders, politicians, lobbyists, and camera hungry celebrities is usually treated like a sacred civic ritual by the same people who insist they are speaking truth to power.

Trump treated it more like an overdue roast of the people who have spent years treating him like the villain in their favorite cable news drama.

After establishment reporters spent part of the evening congratulating one another for coverage aimed squarely at Trump, the president took the stage and immediately turned the spotlight back on them.

The mood shifted fast, because the guest of honor was not there to flatter the room.

“This place is the really largest group of Trump derangement syndrome people ever put together at one time, I suspect,” the president said at one point.

That line landed because it hit the obvious nerve.

For years, much of the corporate press has behaved less like a neutral watchdog and more like a therapy circle with press credentials.

Trump did not limit himself to the media, either.

He brought Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr into the act with a joke about the dinner menu that had the room laughing and wincing at the same time.

“I hope everyone finally got to enjoy their entire, very delicious beef tenderloin; It’s very special beef. And I want you all to know that Bobby Kennedy, who is right here, personally ran over the cow in his car and he cut it up, and he brought it here for you to eat tonight, so it’s very fresh,” Trump said.

Then he kept going, pulling Kennedy’s wife, Cheryl Hines, into the bit as well.

“And Bobby also suggested an appetizer featuring his favorite cut of male raccoon roadkill, but we drew the line at that, Cheryl,” Trump added, roping Kennedy’s wife, Cheryl Hines, into the joke.

WATCH:

The president also took aim at CNN personalities Anderson Cooper and Kaitlan Collins, two figures who have become fixtures in the media ecosystem that feeds on Trump coverage while pretending to be above it.

Trump’s dig at Cooper was wrapped in a strange sort of backhanded nostalgia.

“I like Anderson actually because he’s covered me well for many years, then he went bad as soon as I went for politics… I did so many interviews with him, and he was great. But you know he’s got a little different persuasion than me, in many ways actually,” he said of Cooper.

WATCH:

Collins got a sharper jab, with Trump comparing her to transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney in a crack tied to the Bud Light controversy. For a press corps that lectures America daily about sensitivity while dishing out sanctimony by the truckload, it was exactly the kind of joke designed to make the room squirm.

“I thought Kaitlan had really made it big with a major new sponsorship, but then I informed her that it wasn’t her on the Bud Light can, it was Dylan Mulvaney,” he said.

WATCH:

The dinner once again showed the strange relationship between Trump and the media class.

They scold him, mock him, obsess over him, profit from him, and then act shocked when he returns fire in person.

Trump closed by teasing the crowd with a mock announcement about running again, putting on a Trump 2028 hat as he spoke.

The move was classic Trump theater, a perfectly timed reminder that no matter how many panels the pundits host, he still knows how to seize the room.

“I’m pleased to announce my intention to, and this is somewhat of a scoop, my intention to run for a fourth term as president of the United States,” he said while putting on a Trump 2028 hat.

WATCH:

The establishment press wanted a night of applause, awards, and insider backslapping.

Instead, it got a president willing to say out loud what millions of grassroots conservatives have been saying for years.

The press can call it mean, small, or not funny if it wants.

But judging by how loudly Trump’s jokes keep echoing through Washington, the people who claim not to care are still listening very closely.

News

Shiloh Hendrix Attorney Explodes After Verdict and Vows Appeal in Fiery Courtroom Fallout [WATCH]

The Shiloh Hendrix case ended with a split verdict, a stiff misdemeanor sentence, and an attorney who clearly had no interest in pretending the proceeding was some noble exercise in justice.

A jury found Hendrix not guilty on the misdemeanor count tied to her interaction with an 8 year old Somali boy at Roy Sutherland Playground in Soldiers Field Memorial Park in April 2025.

The conviction came only on the second count involving the adult bystander who filmed her, confronted her, and has previously faced a sex crime charge involving a minor.

Judge Christa M. Daily sentenced Hendrix to a $1,000 fine, 200 hours of community service, supervised probation, and a stayed 90 day jail term.

The case began when Hendrix was at the park with her toddler son and saw the boy taking an applesauce pouch from her diaper bag.

She allegedly used a racial slur toward the child, which became the spark for the kind of viral outrage machine that now seems to double as an unofficial arm of the modern left.

Bystander Sharmake Omar began recording Hendrix and aggressively confronted her as she tried to leave while holding her child.

In the video that spread online, Omar repeatedly demanded that she say the slur again, and she did, handing the internet mob exactly what it wanted.

Hendrix was quickly doxed, and according to reports, her entire family was threatened after the clip went viral.

Supporters rallied behind her, raising more than $850,000 on GiveSendGo as the case became another flashpoint over whether offensive words can be turned into a criminal prosecution.

Prosecutors charged Hendrix with disorderly conduct involving both the boy and the adult man who confronted her.

After four days of testimony and nearly nine hours of deliberations, the jury cleared her on the count involving the child but convicted her for her words and conduct toward the man holding the camera.

Her attorney, Karalus, did not sugarcoat his reaction after the verdict.

“I think it’s sad, I think it’s pathetic, I think it’s sick,” Karalus told reporters when asked what he thought of the outcome.

Karalus ripped the process, pointing to what he described as the absurdity of keeping a jury until 10 p.m. over a misdemeanor case while the cameraman at the center of the conviction never testified.

“It was like I was fighting the prosecutor and the judge,” he said. “It was like I was taking on two parties at the same time.”

That is the kind of statement that should make every free speech minded American sit up straight, especially when the case turns on words rather than actual violence.

Karalus also accused the boy’s father, a key witness, of lying under oath “over and over and over and over again.”

He criticized the way the court handled evidence related to a large GoFundMe campaign tied to the child’s family.

According to Karalus, the judge would not let him show the father’s GoFundMe page, which he said falsely listed the child as five years old and remained active.

Karalus unloaded on the courtroom process, saying, “this is a circus, this is monkey court, this is nuts!”

He also claimed the judge repeatedly interrupted him, yelled at him in front of the jury, blocked him from making records, and spoke over him during the trial.

WATCH:

For conservatives who have watched one speech case after another get filtered through elite outrage standards, the pattern feels painfully familiar.

Say something the regime dislikes, get dragged before the public, have your family threatened, then watch the system pretend the real problem is your language.

Karalus made clear that Hendrix intends to appeal the conviction.

He maintained throughout the case that her words, however harsh some may consider them, came during a tense confrontation after property was taken from her child’s diaper bag.

His argument was simple enough for anyone not addicted to woke legal theory.

The government should not be in the business of prosecuting offensive speech unless it crosses the narrow legal line into true fighting words, threats, or actual disorder that breaches the peace.

Instead, this case has become a glaring example of how quickly speech can be criminalized when social pressure, viral video, and courtroom discretion all point in the same direction.

Hendrix walked out acquitted on the child related count, but convicted over the interaction with the adult who chose to record, confront, and escalate.

That verdict may satisfy the outrage crowd, but Karalus has made it obvious that the legal fight is not finished.

The appeal now looms, and so does the larger question that refuses to go away.

If ugly words spoken in a chaotic park confrontation can bring this level of punishment, plenty of Americans will wonder whose speech gets targeted next.

News

Madison Protest Erupts After Activist Hijacks Police Briefing Following Fatal Knife to a Gun Fight Encounter [WATCH]

A police briefing in Madison, Wisconsin, turned into a disorderly scene after a protester took control of the microphone during an update about the fatal police shooting of Corey Durell Ruiz.

The disruption unfolded as city officials attempted to explain what investigators say happened during a violent confrontation that left one man dead and two officers injured.

Madison Police Chief John Patterson had begun addressing reporters and members of the public when demonstrators interrupted the event.

In an effort to calm tensions, Patterson said “I’ll step aside” and allowed one protester to speak before eventually resuming the briefing after the crowd quieted.

The protester immediately rejected the chief’s remarks, declaring, “We don’t want any of that talk.”

What followed was a lengthy speech condemning police, capitalism, imperialism and Zionism while accusing Patterson of participating in a system that allegedly oppressed the speaker’s family across generations.

Another demonstrator intensified the spectacle by displaying a sign reading, “Corrupt cops deserve to die too!!!”

WATCH:

The display came during a briefing intended to provide information about an active state investigation into the shooting.

According to Madison police, officers had responded Wednesday to reports of someone stealing bicycles and checking vehicle doors.

Investigators identified the suspect as thirty eight year old Corey Durell Ruiz, a homeless man with an extensive criminal record.

Police said Ruiz fled on a bicycle and rode through residential backyards while officers pursued him.

Authorities stated that officers eventually caught up with him after he either fell or was pulled from the bicycle, leading to a physical struggle in the middle of an intersection.

During that confrontation, police said Ruiz pulled out a fixed blade knife and injured one officer.

Authorities reported that officers first attempted to subdue him with a Taser, but those efforts failed before the wounded veteran officer fired his weapon.

A second officer also suffered injuries during the incident.

Officials have not yet confirmed whether that injury resulted from the knife or another aspect of the struggle.

Police said officers immediately attempted lifesaving measures before Ruiz was transported to a hospital, where he was later pronounced dead.

Four officers were involved in or witnessed the shooting, and those directly involved have been placed on administrative leave while the investigation continues.

Court records indicate Ruiz had accumulated a lengthy criminal history spanning nearly three decades.

The record included cases involving failure to pay child support, vehicle theft, bail jumping, threats against authorities, resisting an officer, theft, attempted invasion of privacy and cocaine possession.

Despite those details, city leaders emphasized accountability during the public briefing.

Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes Conway said the incident would receive a rigorous investigation and argued that fatal encounters with law enforcement should not occur.

“It does not matter who you are or what your past is, you should not lose your life as a result of an encounter with law enforcement,” Rhodes Conway said, according to The Associated Press.

Madison Common Council President Sabrina Madison voiced even stronger criticism by questioning why officers involved in fatal shootings are not immediately detained.

“My first thought is, when the officer’s walking away, why isn’t he walking away in cuffs,” Madison said, according to the AP.

“I’m angry, there’s no way around it.”

Governor Tony Evers also called for transparency and accountability as investigators review the circumstances surrounding the shooting.

The investigation is expected to examine the officers’ actions, the reported knife attack and the events leading to the deadly encounter.

The chaotic interruption highlighted the sharp divisions surrounding police use of force, even as authorities maintain that an officer had been wounded during the struggle.

For many watching, the briefing became less about official facts and more about the growing tension between activists and law enforcement in a city once again thrust into a heated national debate.


Scroll to Top