Author name: LifeZette

Leftist Vandals Deface Trump’s Restored Reflecting Pool With “86 47” Threat [WATCH]
News

Leftist Vandals Deface Trump’s Restored Reflecting Pool With “86 47” Threat [WATCH]

/

A newly reopened piece of American history has already fallen victim to the left’s unending rage complex.

The Reflecting Pool near the Lincoln Memorial, freshly renovated under President Trump’s direction, has been vandalized just weeks after its reopening.

The perpetrators reportedly carved out blue sealant from the stunningly restored pool and scrawled the message “86 47.”

For anyone unsure, that is coded language to call for the elimination of the 47th president.

The restoration project was personally spearheaded by Trump after decades of mismanagement and neglect.

The Reflecting Pool, built in the 1920s, had become a murky swamp since an expensive and poorly executed Obama era renovation in 2012.

That project cost taxpayers roughly 34 million dollars, more than double what Trump’s team spent, and still resulted in constant leaks and algae buildup.

Trump’s repair effort started in April and reached completion in record time, restoring the clear, mirrorlike surface Americans and tourists once admired.

Of course, in Washington’s far left bubble, improvement and beauty under Trump’s leadership could not be tolerated.

Reports from journalist Emily Miller show one man jumping into the pool to vandalize the fresh sealant, literally carving out chunks of Trump’s handiwork.

Miller filmed police detaining the suspect while describing how he snatched equipment from National Park Service workers.

“He grabbed the hose that female National Park Service workers were using to clear the algae,” she said, as officers quickly intervened.

The United States Park Police confirmed that the incident is under investigation.

The carved phrase “86 47” caught their attention immediately, as it clearly depicts a violent political message aimed at the sitting president.

Nick Sortor, another journalist in Washington, noted that similar markings had already appeared nearby on the National Mall grass just last week, suggesting a coordinated or copycat trend among anti Trump agitators.

Authorities are treating the vandalism as a possible threat against a protected figure.

A Park Police spokesperson stated that the act involved the destruction of government property and included messages indicating violent intent.

Those who understand the broader left wing culture online know how “86” has long been shorthand for “get rid of” or worse.

The message here is not difficult to read.

What is supposed to be a peaceful and reflective symbol of American unity has now become another stage for the left’s tantrum against Trump’s return to Washington.

It is also a reminder of what happens when hatred of conservatives is allowed to spiral unchecked in liberal dominated cities.

President Trump’s renovation of this historic site was part of a broader initiative to restore national landmarks and improve Washington’s aesthetics without draining public funds.

His administration’s record on government renovation projects has consistently been faster, cheaper, and more efficient than prior administrations.

By contrast, the Obama era attempt was an engineering embarrassment that required years of fixes.

The reopening of the pool earlier this month was celebrated by visitors who marveled at the crystal clear reflection of the monument in the water.

It symbolized renewal, efficiency, and pride in American craftsmanship.

Yet within days, Trump Derangement Syndrome found a new target to deface.

What is especially revealing is the silence from major liberal outlets. The same media that eagerly reports on imaginary threats from Trump supporters suddenly loses its voice when the violence points in the other direction.

The act of carving “86 47” is not protest art, it is a threat of political violence, and the left knows it.

It is also worth noting that this is far from an isolated act.

Similar vandalism throughout the city of Washington has appeared since Trump’s return.

Anti Trump graffiti, slashed banners, and even destruction of public landscaping have increased, all while officials in the blue bubble pretend it is normal civic expression.

The suspect arrested in the Reflecting Pool vandalism could face federal charges for damaging federal property and making implied threats.

Yet given how lenient Washington prosecutors have become toward left wing activists, few are holding their breath for real justice.

Average Americans who simply attended a political rally on January 6 remain behind bars.

Meanwhile, leftist agitators openly deface national landmarks in the nation’s capital with messages of violence.

This latest act of destruction is emblematic of the modern left’s response to anything touched by Trump: attack, smear, and destroy.

The Reflecting Pool was supposed to reflect national dignity and shared history, not serve as a mirror for progressive rage.

Thanks to activists who cannot abide even a hint of Trump era success, it is now yet another exhibit in the museum of liberal hypocrisy.

Los Angeles City Council Pushes Plan to Let Noncitizens Vote [WATCH]
News

Los Angeles City Council Pushes Plan to Let Noncitizens Vote [WATCH]

/

The Los Angeles City Council has ignited fury among conservatives after approving a plan to let noncitizens vote in local elections, a move Republican leaders are calling dangerous, misguided, and flatly un-American.

The council voted to place the proposal on the November 3 general election ballot, meaning voters could soon decide whether individuals who are not U.S. citizens can have a say in city matters.

Los Angeles County Republican Party Chair Roxanne Hoge blasted the decision with sharp criticism, calling the council’s priorities “an affront to all Americans.”

In an email to The Center Square, she ridiculed the body for failing in its basic duties while trying to rewrite who gets to participate in democracy.

“Yesterday’s vote by the LA City Council, a body that cannot keep its streets clean of filth, save the lives of broken drug-addicted souls in encampments, fight fires, or stop crime, is an affront to all Americans,” Hoge declared.

Hoge, who immigrated from Jamaica and became a naturalized citizen, made clear why she views the right to vote as sacred.

“As a naturalized American citizen, the right to vote in this country’s elections is incredibly important to me,” she said.

“It is a privilege that is properly reserved for people who are either born here or love the U.S.A. enough to make a commitment to follow its laws and swear an oath to protect and defend and follow our constitution, and who then choose to register to vote.”

Her message struck a chord with many conservatives in California who see this as yet another attempt by progressives to water down the meaning of citizenship.

Hoge said granting noncitizens the power to vote would unleash confusion, weaken election integrity, and further erode public trust in a state where voters already question the fairness of the system.

“Giving noncitizens the ability to vote in our elections is a logistical nightmare that would erode trust in our already-tainted system in California and is wrong,” she added.

The controversial plan came from Councilmember Hugo Soto Martinez of District 13, a hard-left member of the Democratic Socialist caucus.

He argued the measure simply follows the lead of San Francisco, where noncitizens are allowed to vote in school board elections.

Soto Martinez said Los Angeles needs to “modernize” its laws to reflect what he calls the city’s “diverse reality.”

That means giving local voting rights to residents who have not sworn allegiance to the United States.

Soto Martinez has been clear that even if voters approve the measure, it would take time before it is implemented.

WATCH:

During a recent Rules Committee meeting, he explained that any change would need a separate ordinance passed by the council and signed by the mayor.

“This gives us the time and flexibility to get it right, to build in safeguards, to protect people’s security and to ensure any policy can withstand legal challenges,” Soto Martinez said.

Critics say his soft assurances are worthless because the premise itself undermines the rule of law.

Los Angeles, they argue, already suffers under lawless policies that encourage illegal immigration, homelessness, crime, and corruption.

To these critics, letting noncitizens vote does not make the city stronger or fairer. It simply signals that citizenship is no longer valued.

Legal experts have also predicted the proposal would face immediate challenges in court.

California’s constitution ties the right to vote to citizenship, and while local measures have occasionally tested that limit, courts have often stepped in to block the attempts.

If Los Angeles moves forward, it could ignite another high-profile battle over election integrity in blue-controlled states and cities.

The city council’s quiet push to move this onto the ballot came with little fanfare but plenty of implications.

Conservatives warn it could open the door to extending voting rights to illegal immigrants under the guise of “inclusivity.”

Meanwhile, progressives see it as a test case for expanding voting privileges nationwide, turning cities like Los Angeles into laboratories for left-wing experiments.

For Republicans, the Los Angeles move is more proof that Democrats will do whatever it takes to secure control, even if that means diluting the meaning of citizenship.

To them, this is not about inclusion but about power. Hoge’s words captured the sentiment of many who believe the vote is a betrayal of those who earned their citizenship through legal channels.

The Center Square reached out to both Soto Martinez’s office and the White House Press Office to comment on the council’s vote, but neither responded.

Perhaps that silence says enough. With Los Angeles descending further into chaos and dysfunction, voters may soon have to decide whether their city will continue down this reckless path or draw the line at defending what citizenship still means.

Hundreds of Thousands of SNAP Fraud Cases Uncovered While Blue States Block Federal Oversight [WATCH]
News

Hundreds of Thousands of SNAP Fraud Cases Uncovered While Blue States Block Federal Oversight [WATCH]

/

The Trump administration is once again proving that accountability and oversight can shake loose a lot of government rot.

The Department of Agriculture revealed that hundreds of thousands of cases of suspected fraud have been uncovered in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP.

And while red states are cooperating to clean up their systems, blue states are dragging their feet and fending off audits as if transparency were a contagious disease.

Agriculture Secretary Rollins shared the bombshell findings that came from just one year of data collection, saying that the number of fraudulent cases has stunned even the most seasoned investigators.

According to her, most red states have been willing partners in ferreting out improper use of welfare dollars.

Yet even with those layers of protection, the scale of the waste is staggering.

“Just in that data collection over the last year, we found 300,000 dead people, people using deceased individuals’ social security numbers. We found over half a million people getting more than one benefit, so getting the same benefit twice, for example,” Rollins said.

The discovery alone paints a grim picture of how deep the misuse of public funds runs, even in states that try to do things right.

The Secretary added that what might be uncovered once the federal government is finally allowed to probe welfare operations in blue states like California, New York, and Illinois could be enough to make average taxpayers’ jaws hit the floor.

“Can you imagine when we begin to partner with California, New York, Illinois, when we get that data, once we get through the litigation, what we’re going to find in those states?” she asked pointedly.

That “litigation” reference is no throwaway line. Left leaning state leaders, closely tied to sprawling welfare bureaucracies, have resisted federal oversight for years.

They dress up their obstruction in legal jargon about “states’ rights” or “privacy concerns,” while ignoring the billions of dollars that vanish through fraud every year.

The reality is simpler.

Oversight exposes failures, and nowhere do those failures multiply faster than in Democrat-run welfare machines that have turned assistance programs into political payoffs.

Rollins praised red states like Texas for taking proactive measures to protect taxpayer dollars.

“I’m from a red state. I worked in state policy. Texas has guardrails. We do more than almost every other state to make sure that there isn’t a lot of fraud. And I would argue that many of the other red states do the same,” she said.

Despite those efforts, the amount of fraud still uncovered should serve as a warning that even minimal cooperation from blue states could reveal a financial and moral disaster on a national scale.

The Secretary commended Vice President JD Vance for leading the White House Fraud Task Force, crediting his hands-on approach with driving reform across multiple agencies.

“The vice president has done a remarkable job of leading the fraud task force. And he and our other senior team has said the more fraud we can root out, the more we can protect those who really need these programs, but also protect the taxpayer and ensure that we’re doing everything we can to finally balance the budget,” Rollins explained.

The Trump administration has repeatedly made clear that stamping out fraud is not simply about saving money.

It is about fairness.

Every dollar stolen through fraud is a dollar denied to an honest family in need and another burden dumped on taxpayers who never seem to stop paying.

It also exposes the moral breakdown that comes when government becomes a substitute for personal responsibility.

Rollins cited another notable achievement, pointing out that the federal government’s footprint has shrunk to a size not seen since the 1960s.

That, she said, shows progress as the Trump team moves people from welfare to work. But she did not sugarcoat the challenge ahead.

“This fraud is a really big component of that,” she said, emphasizing that waste and abuse still threaten the success of those reforms.

WATCH:

While red states roll up their sleeves, blue states posture.

They hire more bureaucrats, form more committees, and talk about compassion while bleeding taxpayers dry.

They call every oversight proposal “cruel” or “racist” to dodge accountability.

That well worn script may satisfy progressive activists, but it does nothing to fix a program that is clearly being manipulated on a massive scale.

President Trump’s administration is focused on restoring integrity not only to the welfare system but to the very notion of government service.

A welfare program that feeds the dishonest over the needy is not an act of compassion; it is an act of political corruption.

The real cruelty lies in pretending that fraud does not exist because it makes liberal talking points sound more noble.

If the federal government finds hundreds of thousands of fraudulent cases in states that already cooperate, it is fair to ask what Democrats are so afraid of revealing.

The Trump team is betting that those answers will shock even the most cynical observers, and if the early numbers are any indication, the cleanup is about to make history.

Karmelo Anthony’s Own Words Destroy His Self-Defense Lie in Chilling Bodycam Footage [WATCH]
News

Karmelo Anthony’s Own Words Destroy His Self-Defense Lie in Chilling Bodycam Footage [WATCH]

/

Newly released court footage and 911 recordings reveal the terrifying moments that led to the shocking murder of high school athlete Austin Metcalf by fellow student Karmelo Anthony during a Texas track meet.

The crime, captured by surveillance and police body cameras, shows a chilling sequence: a brief argument, a single fatal stab, and the suspect bolting from the scene.

The Collin County Court made the evidence public following Anthony’s conviction for first-degree murder earlier this month.

The release includes multiple surveillance angles, crime scene photos, and the emergency call that documented the frantic attempts to save Metcalf’s life on April 2, 2025, at Memorial High School in Frisco, Texas.

One clip shows Anthony darting out from under the team tent, sprinting through the stands, and across the track after stabbing Metcalf.

Another video captures him casually walking by tents before the confrontation.

Minutes later, body camera footage shows police apprehending a visibly shaken Anthony, who tells officers, “He put his hands on me. I told him not to. He put his hands on me.”

Photographs from prosecutors display a blood-soaked jacket, the knife used in the fatal attack, and bloody bleachers where desperate teammates and an Army veteran tried to stop Metcalf’s bleeding.

The murder weapon, a three-and-a-half-inch folding Ozark Trail multi-tool, was not costly or sophisticated but proved deadly when wielded in anger.

Audio from the 911 call paints a chaotic scene.

A witness tells the operator that an athlete has been stabbed, adding that a veteran is applying pressure to the wound as people scream in the background.

The caller says, “There’s a lot of blood. He’s not breathing,” before reporting that the boy began gasping for air again. In the distance, a man can be heard shouting, “Stay with me, Austin! Fight through, Austin!”

Prosecutors said the stabbing happened after Metcalf and his brother spoke with Anthony at their team’s tent.

Anthony admitted to the stabbing but insisted he acted in self defense, claiming he felt physically threatened.

The jury did not buy it.

They found him guilty and Judge John Roach sentenced him to 35 years in prison.

He will not be eligible for parole until he serves at least half that time.

More images released by the court show Anthony’s hands cuffed behind his back as he sits inside a police vehicle with what looks like blood smeared across his left hand.

Another photo displays the deep chest wound that ended Metcalf’s life, measured by investigators with a forensic ruler.

Judge Roach explained that his decision to release the evidence was rooted in transparency now that the trial has concluded.

“The overwhelming focus on my ruling regarding the media in the courtroom was to protect the process, witnesses, and jury. Now that the trial is over, it is important to provide transparency,” he told Fox News Digital.

Metcalf’s father, Jeff Metcalf, had viewed the video evidence before the trial.

He told Fox News Digital that the footage reveals the truth many refused to accept.

“The video clearly shows the conversation lasted less than 10 seconds. That’s it. There was no four on one,” he said.

“He wasn’t jumped. There was no four on one. He wasn’t surrounded. Look at the video. There’s a shove and there’s a stab, and it’s over and he runs away. That’s it.”

Despite overwhelming evidence and eyewitness testimony, Anthony’s supporters continue to cry foul, claiming bias among jurors.

The outcry has done little to change the facts: an innocent teenager is dead, a convicted killer admitted what he did, and a community is left reeling from senseless violence.

Investigators say Anthony pulled the cheap knife from his backpack during the brief confrontation, plunging it once into Metcalf’s chest before running from the tent.

Police arrested him minutes later after witnesses identified him.

On the bodycam footage, one officer can be heard saying to another, “This is the alleged suspect.”

A voice that seems to be Anthony’s responds off camera, “I know how it goes. I’m not alleged. I did it.”

The case has stirred deep emotions across Collin County, particularly among parents who demand stricter supervision and better safety measures at school events.

Many are asking how a student could bring a knife onto school grounds and use it without detection.

For the Metcalf family, the release of the footage brings painful but necessary closure.

They have remained steadfast in their belief that the truth would prevail despite the noise and rumors that flooded social media after the killing.

As Jeff Metcalf said, “Now people can see for themselves exactly what happened to my son.”

The community, meanwhile, continues to mourn a teen remembered as a gifted runner and a loyal friend who had just begun finding his path in life.

Progressive Group Goes Viral for Press Conference Stunt as They Face Internal Chaos and Cratering Donations [WATCH]
News

Progressive Group Goes Viral for Press Conference Stunt as They Face Internal Chaos and Cratering Donations [WATCH]

/

The once powerful activist group GetUp is watching its empire crumble even as it doubles down on political warfare.

The left-wing outfit that used to brag about shaping elections is now staring down financial ruin while launching a fresh attack on One Nation.

Instead of confronting its own internal chaos and cratering donations, GetUp is apparently betting that yet another anti-conservative crusade will save it.

GetUp’s latest stunt was straight out of the activist handbook.

During Senator Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club address this week, protesters interrupted the live event, unfurling a banner that accused her of hypocrisy on worker pay.

The senator, never one to be intimidated, finished her address without flinching.

WATCH:

But while the activists celebrated the disruption online, the liberal political outfit behind it was quietly drowning in red ink.

Financial records obtained by The Australian show GetUp’s funding collapse has been dramatic.

Donations fell from almost 6 million dollars last year to just over 4 million this year.

That figure is a far cry from the 12.4 million dollars the group pulled before the 2019 federal election when it was at the height of its influence.

Cash reserves have nearly vanished.

At the end of June 2025, GetUp was sitting on only 104,427 dollars compared to almost 4 million just three years earlier.

The shrinking wallet has been followed by shrinking staff.

Once employing more than 70 people, the group is now down to roughly a dozen workers after repeated redundancies.

The activist machine that once flooded electorates with glossy campaign ads against conservative MPs has been reduced to a skeleton crew.

Even its top brass are on their way out, with interim chief Paul Ferris announcing he will soon return to Stockholm.

This leadership vacuum is not new.

The group has gone through multiple shakeups since the exit of former chief executive Larissa Baldwin Roberts.

Insiders admit morale is at rock bottom, with staff passing a vote of no confidence in both the chair and deputy chair over the direction of the organization.

None of GetUp’s directors have even managed to survive longer than four years on the board, a clear sign of how much internal turmoil now defines the outfit.

Once a close ally of Labor aligned unions, GetUp has shifted entirely toward far left ideology.

Environmental and social justice activists now dominate leadership, and it shows in their priorities.

Even Labor MPs are over it. As one Labor figure bluntly told The Australian, “They’ve been overrun by activists.”

That kind of comment says plenty about just how far GetUp has drifted from being a serious political player to just another protest club.

Despite the financial freefall, GetUp insists it is ramping up operations again.

The group recently launched what it calls the “Fightback Fund,” which it claims will bankroll research, digital ads, and billboards targeting One Nation supporters.

The irony is hard to miss.

A broke activist network losing donors by the day now wants to fight a populist party that is actually growing in support.

At the heart of its new campaign is a push for sweeping “media reform.”

The plan includes abolishing the Australian Press Council and installing a new authority to “keep the press in line.”

The push is being led by David Sharaz, husband of former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

Sharaz joined GetUp recently and is already spearheading the organization’s flagship crusade against what it calls “media bias.”

Critics see this as a thinly veiled attempt by the left to silence opposing voices.

GetUp’s eagerness to meddle in elections has not faded either.

The group spent an estimated 600,000 dollars during the Farrer by election trying to stop One Nation candidate David Farley through an advertising blitz.

The campaign flopped.

But that has not stopped GetUp from bragging about taking on Pauline Hanson’s party as it gains ground in national polling.

WATCH:

One Nation recently scored 28 percent of the primary vote in a Sky News Pulse survey, a number that sent alarm bells ringing in left wing circles.

The group’s escalating antics have drawn bipartisan criticism, even from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

He told reporters that people “should be allowed” to speak at the National Press Club and “treated respectfully.”

That is rare public disapproval from a Labor leader toward a group that for years operated as a grassroots arm of the progressive movement.

One Nation did not mince words either.

A party spokesperson blasted GetUp as “Labor’s union funded attack dog against those on the conservative side of politics.”

They added that if Labor fails to denounce the vigilante activism, it “only supports this type of activism which brings with it a whole new level of security concern.”

Barnaby Joyce called the protest “really quite dangerous” during an interview on Sky News, reminding viewers that free speech does not mean mob disruption.

After years of failed campaigns, tumbling donations, and leadership in disarray, GetUp’s playbook seems to be reduced to one tired tactic: attack conservatives and hope someone still cares enough to donate.

Judging by their financial statements, that gamble is not paying off.

While One Nation’s support climbs, GetUp’s war chest and credibility keep falling further behind.

‘Straight from the Deep State Playbook’: Tulsi Gabbard Releases Fauci Bombs on Her Last Day as DNI [WATCH]
News

‘Straight from the Deep State Playbook’: Tulsi Gabbard Releases Fauci Bombs on Her Last Day as DNI [WATCH]

/

On her final day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard dropped what might be the most explosive truth bomb in recent memory.

Gabbard accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of funneling millions of taxpayer dollars into the Wuhan Institute of Virology and misleading both Congress and the American public about it.

According to Gabbard, the so-called doctor was not only aware of risky gain of function research but was an active supporter who manipulated intelligence surrounding the origin of COVID to protect himself and his political allies.

Gabbard’s statement came directly through her official X account, where she said she was revealing never-before-seen communications that laid bare Fauci’s role in funding dangerous experiments in China.

“Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab,” she posted.

That message came with attached documents from classified reviews that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence later confirmed had been declassified in alignment with President Trump’s push for transparency.

According to the ODNI, Fauci directed US grant money toward gain-of-function experiments involving bat coronaviruses, research now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that unleashed the pandemic on the world.

In a stunning twist, the office even alleged that career bureaucrats within the intelligence apparatus collaborated with Fauci to suppress information about the true source of the virus and to manipulate intelligence assessments that pointed toward a lab origin.

For years, anyone suggesting a lab leak was derided as a conspiracy theorist while corporate media obediently carried water for Fauci and the political establishment. Now, Gabbard’s release throws a wrench into that narrative.

“This is straight from the deep state playbook,” Gabbard declared, accusing Fauci of using his position to shield himself and his colleagues from accountability while lying to Congress under oath.

Gabbard’s message reflected growing anger among conservatives who have long suspected collusion between the scientific bureaucracy and Washington insiders.

She directly blamed Fauci for misleading both lawmakers and the American public while undermining President Trump’s efforts to hold Beijing accountable.

“The COVID 19 pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and for countless people around the world. After years of lies, censorship, and cover ups, the American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,” Gabbard said.

WATCH:

The documents, Gabbard revealed, were the result of a yearlong declassification review that she initiated to deliver on Trump’s promise of greater transparency inside the intelligence community.

That review uncovered a series of internal communications allegedly involving Fauci and members of the NIH in which the dangers of gain of function experiments were acknowledged but downplayed to the public.

While critics of Gabbard tried to dismiss the announcement as politically timed, the ODNI’s support of her claims added significant weight.

The agency said Fauci’s funding streams were tracked through various health research channels that ended up financing controversial virus manipulation work at the Wuhan lab.

These findings appear to directly contradict Fauci’s sworn testimony before Congress when he claimed that no gain of function work was supported by US funds.

Conservative lawmakers immediately seized on the revelations, calling for renewed hearings and possible criminal referrals for perjury.

Senator Rand Paul, who famously grilled Fauci during Senate hearings, posted that Gabbard’s disclosures confirm everything he and others had warned about.

The lawmaker renewed his call for a full investigation into Fauci’s conduct.

The timing of Gabbard’s move was no accident. She is set to step down as Director of National Intelligence on June 30, with Bill Pulte stepping in as Acting DNI while continuing his duties at the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Before her departure, Gabbard made clear that her aim was not political theater but a long overdue reckoning with what she describes as systemic corruption inside the highest levels of government.

Gabbard’s release represents another setback for the entrenched bureaucrats who spent years attacking anyone daring to question the official COVID storyline.

The revelation that taxpayer money might have fueled dangerous research in Communist China only strengthens the case for a full review of the American public health establishment.

Whether Fauci faces criminal charges will depend on Congress and the Department of Justice, but one thing is clear.

The carefully crafted narrative that presented Fauci as a selfless scientific savior has begun to collapse under the weight of troubling evidence.

Gabbard’s bold act may be just the beginning of a new phase in the fight for accountability.

For many Americans, the pandemic is not just a public health memory but a reminder of how the government can abuse secrecy and manipulate facts for political ends.

By exposing what she calls the deep state’s protection racket, Tulsi Gabbard may have cracked open the door to long awaited truth about the origins of a global tragedy.

Dan Bongino Nukes Joe Kent’s Story: “Completely Fabricated Bullsh*t” on Trump Assassination Plot [WATCH]
Main Story, News

Dan Bongino Nukes Joe Kent’s Story: “Completely Fabricated Bullsh*t” on Trump Assassination Plot [WATCH]

/

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino sharply disputed claims made by Joe Kent regarding the investigation into Thomas Crooks and the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, accusing Kent of misrepresenting what investigators were told and what evidence was examined.

Bongino addressed Kent’s comments during a lengthy response in which he said he wanted to set the record straight regarding allegations that federal agencies failed to fully investigate potential foreign connections or withheld information from other officials.

“I just want this on the record, in case something happens. This is what happened yesterday,” Bongino said.

Bongino said he had known Kent professionally and had previously worked with him while Kent served in national security roles.

“This was Joe Kent, who was a friend of mine at one point. This is really sad to see the former NCTC National Counterterrorism Center director, I had worked with Joe Kent many times,” Bongino said.

According to Bongino, he personally offered Kent multiple opportunities to receive briefings regarding the investigation.

“I personally showed up at NCTC headquarters and told you I’d give you a full briefing, and your people do not lie,” Bongino said.

Kent, however, argued that questions remained unanswered about Crooks’ digital footprint and possible foreign connections.

“Tucker was talking about in that clip that he came across through an investigative journalist that was working for Tucker. He came across Thomas Crook’s online profile,” Kent said.

Kent said concerns arose because investigators had initially characterized Crooks as having a limited online presence.

“That’s significant, because for quite some time, almost a year, we were told that Crooks was kind of an enigma. He didn’t have much of an online persona,” Kent said.

Kent explained that after returning to government service, he sought access to Crooks’ electronic devices to determine whether any foreign connections existed.

“When I asked the FBI, in my official capacity, when we came back into the administration. I said, ‘Hey, can we get our hands on crooks’ phones, computers, et cetera, because we want to see if there was any foreign linkage,” Kent said.

Kent said he was initially told investigators could not access the devices.

“I was told at the time initially that we couldn’t get into Crooks’ devices,” Kent said.

According to Kent, investigators later reported that they had successfully accessed the devices but found nothing significant.

“And then the FBI came back and said, actually, we got into them, and there’s just nothing there,” Kent said.

Kent argued that intelligence officials should still have been allowed to independently review the material.

“I said, ‘Okay, well, if there’s nothing there, you should still let us see what’s inside them, so that we can determine if there is any foreign nexus here.’ We were, we didn’t get access to them,” Kent said.

Bongino forcefully rejected that account.

“Okay, everything he said there about what he was allowed into and what what he was not allowed into is just completely fabricated bullshit,” Bongino said.

Kent responded, “It’s a data point.”

Bongino said investigators had already reviewed the matters Kent raised and had offered to brief him.

“Of course, it’s a data point. We had already looked at that stuff. I was at NCTC headquarters with him in his conference room,” Bongino said.

“There were multiple witnesses to this, where I told you we’ll brief you on every single question you just brought up, the Norwegian, the devices, the alleged foreign connections,” Bongino added.

Kent also claimed the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General encountered obstacles while investigating the Butler incident.

“The DHS Inspector General started looking into a lot of the details of what took place on the ground, he himself was also blocked,” Kent said.

Bongino disputed that assertion as well.

“The DHS IG office was blocked. They were in my office, in the Deputy Director Conference Room, in the management floor, in JH J Edgar Hoover, the Hoover Building, they actually showed up for a briefing and said no such thing,” Bongino said.

Bongino maintained that all available devices were examined and that investigators found no foreign links connected to Crooks.

“This was all investigated, everything he’s saying, the digital files, all of it. There were no devices we did not look at. We did not find a foreign connection in the phone. We have all the phones in the digital devices,” Bongino said.

He concluded by calling the allegations baseless and accusing critics of advancing a false narrative.

“These allegations are total nonsense,” Bongino said.

WATCH:

After UK Grooming Gang Report, Brandon Gill Demands We Draw the Line in America [WATCH]
News

After UK Grooming Gang Report, Brandon Gill Demands We Draw the Line in America [WATCH]

/

Rep. Brandon Gill said the United States must confront questions about cultural compatibility and immigration before future generations are forced to deal with consequences that he believes are already becoming visible in some communities across the country.

Gill made the remarks while discussing broader concerns about immigration, cultural integration, and the preservation of what he described as core American values. He argued that policymakers should recognize differences among cultures and consider how those differences interact with American institutions and traditions.

“The Trump administration, I believe, recognizes these basic truths that not all cultures are equal, and not all cultures are equally compatible with our way of life or our governing system,” Gill said.

Gill said the issue is not limited to developments overseas and warned that the United States faces its own challenges related to cultural change.

“But we’ve got a problem in the United States as well, and that’s something that we’re going to have to deal with now, because if we don’t, our children and our grandchildren are going to be dealing with it,” Gill said.

He pointed to changes he says are taking place in parts of Texas, specifically the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area.

“And you’ve seen what’s happened in the DFW metroplex, where you’ve seen mass Islamic migration transforming communities right here in places that you wouldn’t otherwise expect,” Gill said.

Gill argued that failing to address the issue now could lead to broader cultural changes in the future.

“And again, this is something that, if we don’t stop now, it’s going to be my daughter and daughters across the country who are going to be going to public schools wearing burkas, and that’s the kind of stuff that we want to stop,” Gill said.

According to Gill, conservatives should focus on preserving the values and institutions that shaped the country and the society they grew up in.

“We want to recognize that our job is to protect and preserve, conserve as conservatives. We should want to conserve the America that we got to grow up in,” Gill said.

Gill said he believes immigration policy should take into account cultural differences and whether incoming populations share similar views on fundamental civic principles.

“And you do not do that by bringing in cultures who have very different ideas about freedom of speech, religion, separation of church and state, the dignity of women, the role of women in public life,” Gill said.

He added that differing views on social and religious issues can have significant consequences for a society.

“Who have very different conceptions about how Muslims and non-Muslims interact, and those different ideas matter,” Gill said.

Gill argued that debates about immigration and assimilation are ultimately debates about the future character of the country and the values that will guide future generations.

Throughout his remarks, Gill emphasized the importance of protecting what he sees as foundational American principles, including free speech, religious liberty, the separation of church and state, and the role of women in public life. He said those principles should remain central considerations as the nation addresses immigration and cultural issues in the years ahead.

“And that this is a good example of that,” Gill said.

WATCH:

Here’s Why Jennifer Newsom’s Charity Compensation Is Raising Red Flags [WATCH]
News

Here’s Why Jennifer Newsom’s Charity Compensation Is Raising Red Flags [WATCH]

/

Questions surrounding the finances of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Newsom, continue to draw attention as federal investigators reportedly examine matters connected to the governor’s financial affairs.

During an interview, Katie Pavlich spoke with journalist Josh Boswell about his investigation into Jennifer Newsom’s charity and the financial questions that led him to examine the organization more closely.

“What made you look into Newsom’s wife in the first place, and what did you find?” Pavlich asked.

Boswell said longstanding questions surrounding the Newsoms’ finances prompted his review.

“Well, there are just always a lot of questions that seem to be swirling around the nuisance, and their finances have been for years, and so I thought, you know, this is a man who clearly is going to be running for president. This is worth looking at, you know, what their finances are, what the shape of them are,” Boswell said.

According to Boswell, his review of Jennifer Newsom’s charitable organization revealed compensation levels that stood out compared with similar nonprofits.

“And so when I had a look at Jennifer Newsom’s charity, I found that she was paying herself since 2012 $3.7 million and this is a lot of money when you look at the amount that the charity brings in, it’s sort of one to 1.7 million a year, and she’s paying up to a third of that to herself and her own company $300,000 a year,” Boswell said.

Boswell said he compared the compensation figures to other charities of similar size and found the payments ranked unusually high.

“Now that is, I did a bit of data analysis, looking at what charities that size usually pay their executives, and she was in the top 5% of all charities in the nation for pay,” Boswell said.

Pavlich then turned to the reported Department of Justice investigation, noting that officials have not publicly discussed specific details.

“So, DOJ, of course, Triton doesn’t comment on the specifics of this, we’ve really only heard from Gavin Newsom claiming this investigation is targeting them, even though, as we mentioned, it started in 2022 in his orbit. Do you think that the charity is the reason DOJ might be investigating her?” Pavlich asked.

Boswell said there are several areas that investigators could potentially examine.

“There’s a whole bunch of reasons, potentially. There are a lot of questions around their finances, so the charity could be one of them,” Boswell said.

He noted that nonprofit executives can legally receive substantial compensation but suggested donor relationships could draw scrutiny.

“Now it is legal for a charity to pay whatever they want to their executives, but one of the issues they might be looking at is who are the donors to the charity that are financing that pay. What kind of relationships do they have with the California government that Newsom is in charge of?” Boswell said.

Boswell also pointed to what he described as discrepancies between reported income and expenses.

“There’s also, if you look at his income, and he’s released at least partly to journalists in closed-door viewing sessions, his tax returns, and if you look at that, his income, it’s about 1.2 to 1.4 million a year, and it just doesn’t add up for all of his expenses,” Boswell said.

He cited mortgage payments and living expenses as examples.

“He’s got massive mortgages, $625,000 in mortgage payments, and he’s got at least a million dollars in living expenses, and the two just don’t add up. I would be interested in that if I were an IRS investigator,” Boswell said.

Boswell also highlighted questions involving a Sacramento property purchase.

“One other thing to look at here is the way that his property transactions are structured lead to a lot of questions. When he bought his $3.7 million Sacramento estate, it was done through an LLC, but that LLC doesn’t seem to have appeared on his tax returns,” Boswell said.

According to Boswell, the structure of the transaction raises additional questions that have yet to be fully addressed.

“There’s all kinds of questions why he would do it that way, and he hasn’t answered those satisfactorily. So, if I’m IRS, I’m looking at that too, thinking maybe there’s an issue here. We’ve yet to see what the actual details are, of course,” Boswell said.

WATCH:

“Not Hard to Find Fraud”: JD Vance Torches Corrupt New York Medicaid Machine [WATCH]
News

“Not Hard to Find Fraud”: JD Vance Torches Corrupt New York Medicaid Machine [WATCH]

/

Vice President J.D. Vance said the Trump administration is intensifying its efforts to combat government fraud, arguing that taxpayer dollars have too often been diverted away from their intended purposes and into the hands of bad actors.

Speaking about the administration’s anti-fraud initiative, Vance said the federal government has long struggled with fraud and abuse, a problem he believes has been enabled by elected officials and government leaders.

“Your government, your leadership, and too many, your congressmen have allowed the government to rip you off and give your money to fraudsters,” Vance said.

Vance, who leads the administration’s fraud task force, said identifying fraud is not difficult, though eliminating it remains a major challenge.

“Just yesterday, we announced something. You know, I’m the leader of the fraud task force, and I.. and people ask me, is it hard to find fraud, and I’ll tell them it’s not hard to find fraud in the US federal government. Unfortunately, it’s hard to root it out, it’s hard to fight against it, but it is not hard to find fraud,” Vance said.

As an example, Vance pointed to a recently announced Department of Justice lawsuit involving New York’s Medicaid program.

“Just yesterday we announced a Department of Justice lawsuit against the state Medicaid director of this state?” Vance said.

According to Vance, the lawsuit alleges that a bidding process was manipulated in a way that allowed fraudulent actors to access taxpayer funds.

“So, here’s what the state Medicaid director in New York would do: facilitated fraud by using a sham bidding process. This person was actually inviting fraudulent bidders to come in and take advantage of your tax dollars, so that we could send it to fraudsters instead of you, and that’s disgraceful,” Vance said.

Vance argued that government officials should focus on preventing fraud rather than enabling it.

“You do not want your government facilitating fraud, you want your government fighting against fraud,” Vance said.

Vance also praised Michael Petrie, saying the two share a commitment to protecting taxpayer dollars and improving government accountability.

“And one of the things, and one of the things that I love about Michael Petrie is that he cares about this fraud issue just as much as I do,” Vance said.

Vance described that approach as rooted in a traditional view of government responsibility.

“He happens to believe in an old-fashioned good government concept that when you pay your taxes, it ought to go to the services and the national security needs that it’s meant to go towards,” Vance said.

Vance repeatedly stressed that public funds should serve citizens in need rather than enrich individuals who exploit government programs.

“It shouldn’t go to fraudsters. It shouldn’t go to fraudsters who take advantage of your tax dollars. It shouldn’t go to fraudsters who will literally steal money out of the Medicaid fund in order to enrich themselves. It shouldn’t go to people who would steal food out of the mouths of poor children. It should go to the people who need it,” Vance said.

The vice president also emphasized what he described as the generosity of the American people and their willingness to support those facing hardship.

“One of the things I love about our country, ladies and gentlemen, is that we are generous people,” Vance said.

“When we see a kid who can’t afford food, sometimes my family growing up would benefit from these programs. When we see a kid who can’t afford food, we say, you know what, we’re going to help you. When we see a person who has a treatable illness but can’t afford medical care, you say, you wouldn’t. You know what, we’re going to help you,” Vance said.

Vance argued that fraudsters abuse that generosity by diverting resources intended for vulnerable Americans.

“Whether it’s the Medicaid program or a local charity, you know what these fraudsters are doing. They are taking advantage of American generosity to enrich themselves,” Vance said.

He concluded by saying the administration intends to continue prosecuting those involved in fraud and protecting taxpayer funds.

“And we need somebody who’s going to put them in jail and protect your money, and that’s exactly what we’re doing under the administration,” Vance said.

WATCH:


Scroll to Top