Author name: LifeZette

News

Mamdani’s Judiciary Panel Sparks Fury After Stunning Jewish Lawyer Omission [WATCH]

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani has managed to find yet another controversy, which at this point is starting to look less like bad luck and more like a governing style.

The latest uproar centers on his newly announced advisory committee for judicial nominations, and critics say the panel is missing a rather obvious part of the city it is supposed to represent.

Mamdani has already drawn heavy criticism for a parade of radical statements and policy ideas.

He wrongly suggested he might have some power to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, floated a messy pied à terre tax plan, and pushed his government grocery scheme that would use taxpayer money to open stores, then use more taxpayer money to sell staples below market prices.

Now the mayor is facing questions over his 18-member Mayor’s Advisory Committee on the Judiciary.

The group is supposed to help advise him on judicial nominations, a task that carries real weight in a city where the courts touch everything from crime to housing to business disputes.

The problem, according to several Jewish legal organizations, is that the committee appears to include no Jewish members.

In New York City, where Jews make up roughly 10 percent of the population and are deeply represented in the legal profession, that omission did not exactly pass unnoticed.

Some estimates place Jewish lawyers at between 35 and 50 percent of the New York City legal community.

WATCH:

In other words, assembling a judiciary advisory panel in New York without a single Jewish attorney, former judge, or legal professional is not just an oversight critics are willing to shrug off.

“Your recent announcement of appointees to the Mayor’s Advisory Committee on the Judiciary has left us deeply disappointed,” read a joint letter from the leaders of the Queens Brandeis Association, Jewish Lawyers Guild, the Brooklyn Brandeis Society and the Bronx County Jewish Bar Association.

The groups did not dance around the issue. “Not a single Jewish attorney, former judge or legal professional was appointed to a committee your administration described as one that would be ‘truly reflective of New York City,’” the letter continued.

That line cuts directly at Mamdani’s preferred branding.

WATCH:

The mayor and his allies love to talk about representation and inclusion, right up until the people asking to be included are inconvenient for the left wing narrative.

One rejected candidate, attorney Arthur Leventhal, reportedly said a Mamdani spokesperson claimed he was passed over because his firm had represented Ghislaine Maxwell on an appeal issue.

Leventhal noted that this is what defense attorneys do and said he hoped the lack of Jewish members was “not intentional.”

The letter from Jewish legal leaders also placed the committee dispute in a broader context.

They said the decision “follows a troubling pattern that has left many Jewish New Yorkers feeling increasingly marginalized” after Mamdani rejected the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism and omitted Jewish neighborhoods from a map of immigrant enclaves in the city.

That is not a small complaint in a city already dealing with rising antisemitic incidents and growing hostility from the radical left toward Israel.

Mamdani’s own rhetoric has only added fuel to the fire, especially with his attacks on Netanyahu and his posture toward Israel.

Mamdani previously released a video calling Netanyahu a “war criminal” and saying “we can examine every tool we have to defend the humanity and dignity of all people.”

Two days later, two men were stabbed, including a Jewish man wearing a yarmulke, and the suspect allegedly yelled, “Allahu akbar.”

No responsible person should claim one political video caused one criminal attack without evidence.

Still, in a city where public rhetoric matters, leaders do not get to pretend their words float harmlessly into the air while tensions are already boiling.

The ADL also called out the situation, adding to the pressure on Mamdani.

For a mayor who promised a government reflecting New York City, leaving Jewish legal professionals off a judiciary advisory panel has become a glaring political problem.

The mayor’s defenders may try to explain it away as coincidence, process, or some bureaucratic mishap.

But many New Yorkers are looking at the full picture and seeing the same pattern again, radical politics first, everyone else later.

Mamdani’s socialist agenda was already alarming enough for taxpayers, business owners, and anyone who prefers grocery stores run by grocers instead of City Hall dreamers.

Now his judicial advisory controversy has added another question for New Yorkers, who exactly counts in this administration’s version of representation.

News

NYC Shops Busted for Allegedly Letting EBT Cards Buy Drugs Outside SNAP Rules [WATCH]

New York City store clerks are now under scrutiny after an O’Keefe Media Group investigation accused multiple shops of allowing customers to use Electronic Benefit Transfer cards to buy Kratom, a drug like herbal product that is not covered under the federal food stamp program.

According to the report, James O’Keefe and his team recorded store workers allegedly processing purchases of Kratom with cards tied to government benefits.

If accurate, it is another ugly peek inside a welfare system that taxpayers are constantly told is tightly managed.

Kratom is commonly sold in powders, capsules, and liquid extracts.

Supporters often market it as an energy booster or pain relief option, while the Mayo Clinic has warned that people who use it can place themselves at greater risk of addiction.

Federal rules are not exactly mysterious here. SNAP and EBT benefits are supposed to be limited to eligible food items, not drugs, alcohol, tobacco, or whatever questionable product a corner shop wants to slide across the counter.

OMG reported that its undercover journalists went into several stores and watched clerks allegedly attempt to process Kratom purchases by selecting “EBT Food” or “EBT cash.”

That is not a clerical typo. That is exactly the kind of loophole hunting that makes working Americans wonder who is minding the store.

The outlet also said it called the number on the back of a New York EBT card for clarification.

“A call to the number on the back of a NY EBT card produced further clarification. A representative stated that EBT cards cannot be used to purchase any drugs. However, the same representative acknowledged that once cash is withdrawn from an EBT account via an ATM or terminal, the funds can be spent without restriction,” the report stated.

That admission is the kind of bureaucratic fine print that turns reform talk into a necessity.

The card cannot be used for drugs, but once the money is pulled out as cash, the government apparently throws up its hands and wishes everyone the best.

O’Keefe confronted one clerk over the alleged transaction, and she reportedly asked him for proof.

He then produced a receipt showing the purchase had been run as “Benefit: Food.”

The report said employees denied wrongdoing when confronted.

“When confronted, store employees denied processing the transactions. One location closed its door on our undercover journalists. Our investigation notes that even the attempt to accept SNAP benefits for ineligible items constitutes a crime under New York Penal Law,” OMG stated.

WATCH:

The accusations land at a time when national attention on EBT and SNAP abuse is already growing.

Americans keep hearing that fraud is rare, yet the stories keep arriving like clockwork from one state after another.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has said SNAP is full of “fraud and abuse and corruption” and needs serious reform.

She reviewed data from 29 states and reportedly found EBT cards carrying balances of more than 10,000 dollars, cards left unused for years, and benefits issued to people who did not exist.

That is not a rounding error.

That is a flashing red light for a program spending massive sums of taxpayer money every single day while politicians lecture voters about compassion and pretend accountability is somehow cruel.

Rollins has said nutrition programs at the Department of Agriculture spend about 400 million dollars in taxpayer funds each day.

When that much money is flowing through a government program, the public has every right to demand clean books, strict enforcement, and consequences for abuse.

Vice President JD Vance’s Task Force to Eliminate Fraud has also been working on efforts to address systemic SNAP problems.

The question is whether Washington will finally treat welfare fraud like a real issue instead of a public relations inconvenience.

The Kratom angle adds another layer of concern.

Police in Florida recently said two adults were arrested after the death of a toddler was attributed to her consumption of Kratom pills, a grim reminder that this is not just a harmless checkout line controversy.

If the OMG findings hold up, New York officials should not shrug and move on.

Taxpayers did not sign up to bankroll drug purchases through a program sold to the public as food assistance for needy families.

News

Bernie Moreno Crushes ‘Piece of Sh*t’ Fauci After Stunning Fifth Amendment Dodge [WATCH]

Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio is not backing away from his blistering criticism of Dr. Anthony Fauci after the former COVID czar appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday.

Fauci, the former NIAID director and the public face of America’s chaotic pandemic response, was called to testify under subpoena before a committee chaired by Senator Rand Paul.

For many Americans who lived through mandates, school closures, ruined businesses, and government lectures, the hearing was long overdue.

The session, titled “Testimony of Anthony Fauci,” began Wednesday morning in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.

It followed Paul’s release of what has been described as Fauci’s Diary Package, a collection that raised fresh questions about Fauci’s fixation on fame while the country was staggering under the weight of the pandemic.

Moreno used his time to say what millions of Americans have been thinking for years, especially those who watched bureaucrats gain power while ordinary citizens lost livelihoods.

His confrontation with Fauci quickly became one of the most explosive moments of the hearing.

The Ohio Republican hammered Fauci over what he viewed as narcissistic conduct during a national crisis.

While families were burying loved ones and small businesses were being crushed, Fauci was treated by the corporate press like a medical celebrity instead of a government official who owed the public serious answers.

“Here I am sitting in front of you six years later, saying, who the f**k do you think you were for doing that?!” Moreno asked Fauci.

“It is a total disgrace what you did to this country, and if my Democrat colleagues are standing there defending you, I hope the voters, the United States of America, watch the clips of every one of you doting on a guy who is more interested in being a celebrity than saving American people,” he added.

WATCH:

That moment alone would have been enough to dominate the day, but Moreno was not finished.

After leaving the hearing, he was approached by The Gateway Pundit’s Alicia Powe, who pressed him on one of the most obvious questions hanging over the entire spectacle.

Powe wanted to know why Fauci was now refusing to answer questions after previously testifying multiple times without the same level of silence.

For a man who spent years appearing on television, issuing sweeping guidance, and scolding Americans from the safety of government authority, the sudden caution did not go unnoticed.

“Senator Bernie Moreno, why do you suspect Anthony Fauci is pleading the fifth after testifying (so many times) before?” she asked.

Moreno did not offer a polished Washington answer or hide behind committee jargon. “Because he’s a piece of sh*t,” Moreno quips.

WATCH:

That blunt response instantly captured the mood of many Americans who believe Fauci has dodged accountability for too long.

The ruling class may clutch its pearls, but plenty of regular voters are far more interested in answers than in polite theater.

Fauci’s decision to rely on the Fifth Amendment during questioning is certain to fuel more scrutiny.

Democrats and their media allies may try to frame it as routine legal caution, but conservatives see something far more revealing from a man who never seemed shy when cameras were rolling and friendly hosts were tossing soft questions.

The hearing also put Democrats in an uncomfortable position, since several of them continued defending Fauci despite years of public frustration over pandemic policy.

That defense will not be easy to explain to parents, workers, churchgoers, and small business owners who remember exactly how heavy the government boot felt.

Moreno’s message was raw, direct, and impossible to miss.

Fauci may still have admirers in the permanent bureaucracy and legacy media, but in the court of public opinion, the patience of the American people has worn painfully thin.

News

Ted Cruz Demands Fauci Face Jail for Cowardly Fifth Amendment Dodge Over 100 Times [WATCH]

Sen. Ted Cruz is not letting Washington’s favorite pandemic bureaucrat slip quietly into retirement sainthood.

After Anthony Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right more than 100 times before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the Texas Republican said it is time for contempt charges, a perjury prosecution, and jail.

Fauci served as a former White House Covid adviser and longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

To millions of Americans, he became the face of lockdowns, school closures, mandates, and smug lectures from a federal class that rarely pays for its own mistakes.

“Years from now, they’ll look back and say, ‘What collective madness overtook this country?’” Cruz told Fox News Digital.

Cruz accused Fauci of treating Congress and ordinary Americans with contempt while presenting himself for years as the final authority on the virus.

“I think Anthony Fauci has had contempt for Congress and contempt for the American people for decades,” he said.

“His diary shows that he deliberately lied to the American people over and over and over again.”

The explosive hearing came after Committee Chairman Rand Paul announced he would seek contempt charges against Fauci.

The former pandemic adviser refused to answer questions throughout the session, leaning repeatedly on the Fifth Amendment to avoid self incrimination.

The spectacle was not exactly the confident victory lap Fauci’s defenders in corporate media spent years preparing.

Instead, the man they once treated like a secular pope sat under subpoena and went silent.

“Dr. Fauci ought to think about what it says about the end of his career, that what he will be remembered for the most is pleading the Fifth more than 100 times,” Cruz said.

Then Cruz delivered the line that cut straight through the usual Washington fog.

“He’s been the most damaging bureaucrat in the history of America.”

The fight between Fauci and Senate Republicans is not new.

Cruz, Paul, and other lawmakers have pressed him for years over Covid origins, federal funding, shifting public statements, and whether the American people were fed a tidy official story while inconvenient facts were shoved under the rug.

At the center of Cruz’s argument are Fauci’s private diary entries, which Republicans say expose serious contradictions between what Fauci considered behind closed doors and what he told the public.

“In his diary, he wrote early on that it was clear that the COVID virus did not come from the wet market in Wuhan, and then he turned around and said exactly the opposite thing on national television,” Cruz said.

The released diary material reportedly showed Fauci weighing possibilities that he later downplayed in public.

One entry indicated that scientists considered a deliberately inserted laboratory origin worthy of expert review, even as public messaging nudged Americans away from that possibility.

That matters because Washington used its preferred narrative to silence debate.

If Americans questioned the wet market line or suspected a laboratory connection, the expert class told them to sit down, stop reading, and trust the people with the credentials.

Cruz also pointed to the school shutdowns, one of the most damaging chapters of the pandemic response.

He said Fauci privately claimed credit for persuading officials in New York and California to close schools, while publicly distancing himself from that disaster.

“In his diary, he brags about convincing Democrats in New York and California to shut schools down, and yet he goes on TV and says, ‘Oh, I wasn’t for shutdowns,’” Cruz said.

Fauci had repeatedly claimed in public interviews and testimony that he “did not close the schools.”

That contradiction is exactly why Senate Republicans are demanding accountability instead of another round of soft interviews, glossy profiles, and applause from the same people who cheered every restriction.

“The school shutdowns, which Fauci bragged that he was responsible for, may well be the single most destructive public policy step we’ve seen in decades. That learning loss will stick with those kids the rest of their lives when they’re 90 years old.”

“They will still be suffering the consequences of Anthony Fauci’s corrupt and dishonest shutdowns.”

WATCH:

Those shutdowns left children behind academically, socially, and emotionally while teachers unions and Democratic governors treated classrooms like bargaining chips.

Parents saw the damage in real time, even as cable news experts insisted the grownups in Washington had everything under control.

A man who demanded trust from the nation for years cannot now expect the public to shrug when he refuses to answer basic questions under oath.

Paul’s contempt push now puts the Senate on the record.

Cruz is making clear that the era of polite grumbling over pandemic abuses should be replaced by real consequences for the officials who misled the country.

For conservatives, this hearing was never simply about one doctor.

It was about whether unelected bureaucrats can mislead Congress, manipulate public fear, wreck livelihoods, damage children, and then skate away because the credentialed class calls it science.

News

Florida vs. Fauci: AG Opens Probe After COVID ‘Expert’ Suddenly Loses His Voice Under Oath [WATCH]

Dr. Anthony Fauci may have walked into Congress with a presidential pardon in his pocket, but that apparently did not buy him a clean getaway.

Florida is now stepping into the fight, and the Sunshine State does not seem interested in pretending the COVID years were just one big bureaucratic oops.

After Fauci appeared before Congress on Wednesday and declined to answer questions by invoking the Fifth Amendment, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced that his office is launching an investigation. For a man long treated by the corporate press as untouchable, the moment had a very different feel.

“Fauci’s lack of candor to Congress is unbelievable,” Uthmeier wrote on social media.

“My office is launching an investigation into Dr. Fauci. It’s past time we get the truth of what happened during COVID.”

That statement came after Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, faced another round of scrutiny from lawmakers.

Instead of clearing the air, he leaned on constitutional protection, which tends to raise eyebrows when the public was told for years to trust every word from the public health throne.

Former President Joe Biden gave Fauci a full and unconditional pardon on the final day of his term.

The pardon covered any offenses Fauci may have “committed or taken part in” connected to his government roles from Jan. 1, 2014, through Jan. 19, 2025.

That pardon may protect Fauci from federal prosecution, but it does not block state prosecutors from asking their own questions.

That distinction matters, especially in a state like Florida, where leaders pushed back harder than most against the lockdown regime.

The legal path may not be simple.

Fauci was a federal employee shaping national policy, which means any state criminal case would face serious hurdles before it ever reached a courtroom.

Still, Florida could explore whether pandemic restrictions created grounds for civil claims tied to damaged businesses, closed classrooms, and government decisions that crushed ordinary Americans.

WATCH:

Millions of families remember very clearly who paid the price while elites issued lectures from comfortable offices.

Governor Ron DeSantis became one of the most visible opponents of lockdown policies, and Florida moved faster than many states to restore normal life.

That history gives Uthmeier’s investigation a sharper edge, because Florida was not exactly eager to bow before the public health bureaucracy.

The latest pressure on Fauci follows the release of more than 1,000 pages from his pandemic diary by Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky.

WATCH:

Paul has argued that those writings show a gap between Fauci’s private thinking and the public health decisions he promoted.

That is not a small accusation.

If Fauci privately understood one thing while publicly pushing another, Americans have every right to demand answers, especially after livelihoods, childhoods, churches, and community life were disrupted on a massive scale.

Congress has questioned Fauci before, but the diary added fresh fuel to the fire.

Lawmakers are now looking at his personal written thoughts, not just his polished testimony and media friendly sound bites.

There is also the possibility that the Senate could move to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress.

WATCH:

Such a finding can carry the possibility of jail time, although whether Washington has the appetite to pursue that is another question entirely.

For years, conservatives were mocked for asking basic questions about mandates, school closures, lab origins, and the power handed to public health officials.

Now the same establishment that demanded blind trust seems a little less eager to talk under oath.

Biden’s pardon looked like an attempt to slam the federal door shut before anyone could dig too deeply.

But Florida’s move shows that a presidential pardon is not the same thing as public vindication.

Fauci may not face state criminal charges in the end, and any civil route would take time.

But the larger point is already clear, the questions are not going away just because Biden tried to wrap his favorite pandemic official in legal bubble wrap.

For the Americans who lost businesses, watched their children fall behind, and were treated like villains for questioning the narrative, this investigation is long overdue.

Fauci is not out of the woods, and Florida just made sure everyone knows it.

News

Hero Teen Lifeguard Reveals Fierce Vow During Terrifying Ocean Rescue [WATCH]

A rookie California lifeguard is getting national attention for the kind of raw courage that cannot be taught in a committee hearing or polished up by a public relations consultant.

Ryder Williams, a 16-year-old lifeguard in his first season with California State Parks, is being hailed after charging into dangerous surf at Seabright State Beach in Santa Cruz to save 10-year-old Nathaniel Rai.

The rescue unfolded Saturday as heavy crowds packed the beach and treacherous waves pounded the shoreline.

Officials said Williams had already been busy making safety contacts from Tower 2 because the water was volatile and the beach was crowded.

Then Nathaniel lost his footing in ankle deep water.

In seconds, the boy was swept into deeper surf, where powerful waves turned an ordinary beach day into a life threatening emergency.

Williams did not hesitate.

He later told his father, retired firefighter Shane Williams, exactly what was going through his mind as the ocean hammered him and the child.

“I wasn’t going to let go of that kid.”

That is not the language of a kid looking for applause.

That is the language of responsibility, duty, and courage, three words that still mean something outside the bubble of elite politics and excuse making.

“He was going to drown, and I wasn’t going to let that happen,” Williams told his father after the rescue, according to the account now drawing praise across the country.

WATCH:

In his first public statement since the incident, Williams described the split second actions he took after spotting Nathaniel in trouble.

His account was calm, direct, and frankly more composed than what Americans hear from plenty of adults in positions of power.

“I radioed it in, threw my radio and sunglasses at the base of my tower as I ran toward the kid. I put my fins on my wrist, popped my buoy and entered the water to get ahold of the child,” Williams said.

Once in the water, the situation only grew more dangerous.

The waves were not simply pushing against them, they were crashing over them again and again as Williams fought to keep the child alive.

“Due to the volatility of the water, I was unable to tube up the victim,” Williams said, explaining that the boy had gone limp while the surf battered them.

Fellow lifeguard Aaron Bohnen eventually reached Williams and Nathaniel after several more waves slammed into the pair.

While bystanders tried to help, Williams yelled for them to get back to shore, a decision that likely prevented the emergency from spiraling into an even larger rescue.

That detail matters.

Real leadership is not just rushing toward danger, it is keeping everyone else from making a deadly situation worse.

After Williams and Bohnen brought Nathaniel safely back onto the beach, the young lifeguard retrieved medical equipment so the boy could be assessed.

The child was returned safely to his family, which is the only outcome that mattered to Williams.

Then came the part that says everything about this teenager. After saving a child from violent surf, Williams climbed back into his tower and finished the rest of his shift.

President Trump has praised Williams and plans to invite him to the White House to receive a high civilian honor.

WATCH:

The story has struck a nerve because it is simple and powerful.

A boy was in danger, a young lifeguard saw it, and he acted without waiting for permission, applause, or a camera crew.

“I’m grateful to have had the opportunity to return the child to his family safely,” Williams said.

“This is my job and I love what I do.”

That humility is part of why the rescue has captured so much attention.

Williams is not presenting himself as a celebrity or chasing some dramatic speech, he is treating heroism as part of the job.

America could use more of that mindset. Less whining, fewer excuses, and more people willing to run toward the problem when others are frozen in place.

For Nathaniel Rai and his family, the stakes were not political or abstract.

They were personal, terrifying, and real, and a 16 year old lifeguard met the moment.

Williams may be young, but his actions showed a level of grit and responsibility that deserves every bit of the praise coming his way.

On a dangerous California beach, he made one decision, held on, and brought a child home alive.

News

Trump Gives a Surprising Response to Fauci Pleading the 5th 111 Times [WATCH]

President Trump weighed in Wednesday after Dr. Anthony Fauci delivered a spectacle on Capitol Hill that looked less like accountability and more like a master class in self preservation.

Fauci appeared before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, where Senate Republicans pressed him over the COVID pandemic, his shifting claims, and the long list of statements Americans were told to accept without question.

Instead of clearing the air, Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right 111 times.

That is quite a performance from the man the left spent years treating like a lab coat version of Mount Rushmore.

Senator Rand Paul announced that the committee is expected to vote next week on holding Fauci in contempt.

Paul also suggested Fauci’s repeated refusal to answer may not have been legally proper under the circumstances.

Trump was asked at the White House whether Fauci should be held in contempt.

He did not directly call for punishment, but he made clear he remembers exactly what dealing with Fauci was like.

“Well, I watched the whole thing today, but more importantly, I was a part of the whole Fauci. I inherited Fauci. He was here from the 1980s, so I had him for a period of time, and I disagreed with him on a lot,” Trump said.

Trump added that “I would have had to close down the whole country if I listened to him.”

That line alone captures the divide between the bureaucratic panic machine and the Americans who still had bills to pay.

“I went the Federalist way, which is basically let the governors decide, and generally speaking, the Republican governors did very well.

The Democrat governors did not very well,” Trump continued.

The president also reminded the press that Fauci’s guidance was anything but steady.

One day masks were unnecessary, then came the era where the public health crowd seemed ready to wrap everyone in cloth from head to toe.

“But Fauci wanted to have nobody wearing masks, if you remember, and then everybody had to wear five masks, as many masks as you could get. I mean, made a lot of mistakes, and he wasn’t a big factor for me. He was a very big factor for Biden, and if you remember, even though we were sort of prime time in terms of that whole disaster of COVID, far people died fewer in the Trump administration than in the Biden administration.”

Then came the wrinkle that had conservatives raising eyebrows.

Lindell TV’s Cara Castronuova asked Trump whether the Justice Department should revisit Joe Biden’s auto pen pardons and challenge whether they were legitimate.

Trump, who previously declared documents, executive orders, and contracts signed by Biden’s auto pen to be “null, void, and of no further force or effect,” sounded far more cautious this time.

He described the pardon power as “the most powerful thing a president has.”

“So, he was pardoned by Biden, and I respect that. I know how powerful it is,” Trump said.

WATCH:

That answer landed with a thud among those who want a full accounting of the COVID years.

If Biden’s auto pen operation deserves scrutiny, Fauci’s pardon would seem like one of the first places to start looking.

Trump did leave the door open slightly, noting there may be questions about whether the person operating the auto pen knew what was being approved.

“Maybe there’s something on the auto pen. Other than that, the power of pardon is very powerful.”

Later, Trump was asked why Fauci refused to answer questions even though he had a pardon.

His answer was simple, and it pointed right at the legal choreography surrounding the hearing.

“Look, I’ve never been a big fan of Fauci. Why he did that was very simple. His lawyer told him to,” Trump said.

“I don’t know if he would have been better off not doing it. There were a lot of questions that I guess he could have answered, and some maybe he didn’t feel comfortable answering, but his lawyer told him to do that.”

For millions of Americans, that will not be good enough.

They remember the mandates, the school closures, the censored doctors, and the smug lectures from the same expert class that now suddenly discovers silence when accountability comes calling.

News

DCCC Chair Dodges DSA Denunciation While Claiming Democrats Are United [WATCH]

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Rep. Suzan DelBene tried to steer clear of a growing headache for her party on Tuesday, after being asked whether Democratic leaders should denounce the Democratic Socialists of America platform.

Appearing on CNN’s “Inside Politics,” DelBene did what seasoned party operatives often do when the left flank gets too loud for comfort.

She changed the subject to affordability and insisted Democrats are united, which is a neat trick when the question is about socialists pushing ideas that sound like they were drafted in a faculty lounge after midnight.

Guest host Manu Raju put the issue directly in front of her by playing remarks from Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who has been increasingly willing to say the quiet part out loud about his own party’s radical wing.

Fetterman criticized democratic socialist positions of “abolish the Senate, … abolish the presidency, abolish the border, abolish prison, and the presidency.”

He also argued that Democratic leaders should call out those ideas instead of pretending they are just harmless chatter in deep blue enclaves.

Raju then asked DelBene the obvious question: “So, Congresswoman, should you call out the democratic socialists and police your kind of ranks and repudiate the platform of the Democratic Socialists of America?”

DelBene responded by shrinking the issue geographically, as if radical ideology becomes less radical when it is confined to a few safely liberal zip codes.

“First of all, I think you’re talking about some races in bright blue districts in a few parts of the country. The folks in Iowa who want representatives to stand up for them aren’t interested in who is running for election in New York City.”

That answer may satisfy consultants who live by polling crosstabs, but it does not actually answer the question.

Voters in Iowa, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia might be very interested in whether the party seeking control of Congress is willing to draw a bright line against the abolish everything crowd.

Raju pressed again, asking, “But what about Democratic leaders? Should you guys repudiate it?”

That was the moment for a clean answer, but clean answers are apparently in short supply when the activist left is listening.

DelBene continued, “The path to the majority is through these swing districts across the country. And having candidates who are talking about the issues that matter, who are focused on the issues they hear from their communities, is what makes the difference. And so, absolutely, we are united in making sure that we’re addressing the number one issue we hear from folks across the country. Families are struggling, affordability is the top issue. Housing, food, healthcare, childcare, energy costs, rising gas prices. We need a Congress that’s going to stand up for people across the country. That’s our priority, and that’s what we’re going to do when we have the gavels. And we will have gavels in November.”

WATCH:

There it was, the affordability pivot.

Asked about democratic socialists who want to abolish borders and other basic structures of government, the DCCC chair turned to gas prices, childcare, housing, and gavels.

Nobody doubts that families are struggling with costs.

The problem for Democrats is that many of those same families also remember years of liberal spending, regulatory overreach, energy hostility, border chaos, and the usual Washington lecture circuit insisting that everything was fine.

DelBene’s claim that Democrats are “united” on affordability is also a convenient way to avoid saying what they are not united against.

If the party cannot clearly repudiate a platform that entertains abolishing the border, voters are allowed to wonder what exactly the moderates are moderating.

Fetterman’s comments landed because they tapped into a real political liability for Democrats.

The activist left may dominate online spaces, city politics, and campus style debates, but its wish list becomes a massive burden when candidates have to face normal voters who want safe streets, secure borders, affordable groceries, and functioning government.

Republicans will almost certainly seize on DelBene’s nonanswer as part of a broader argument that Democrats are afraid of their own base.

That message writes itself when party leaders treat socialism like a local zoning dispute instead of an ideological infection spreading through their ranks.

DelBene wants the conversation to be about swing districts, but swing district voters often have strong radar for political evasion.

They know when a candidate is answering a question, and they know when a party boss is trying to hustle them past the uncomfortable part.

The exchange offered a preview of the Democratic strategy heading into November.

Talk about affordability, accuse Republicans of not caring, and hope nobody asks too many questions about the radicals standing just off camera.

That might work on CNN for a few minutes.

It is much harder to pull off when voters start asking why a party that wants the gavels cannot even bring itself to plainly reject the people calling to abolish the border.

News

Texas Dem Candidate James Talarico Accidentally Proves He Needs a Basic Economics Lesson [WATCH]

Texas Democrat James Talarico appears eager to audition for the Senate by taking a swing at capitalism, and judging by his latest remarks, he may want to start with a basic economics textbook before heading back to the microphone.

At a Tuesday campaign rally, Talarico told supporters that trickle down economics is not a theory, but theft, then claimed wealthy Americans “have been stealing the wealth that we all created. It’s why everything sucks right now. It’s why people are so angry.”

WATCH:

That is the kind of line that plays well in a room full of activists who think slogans are substitutes for math.

It is also the kind of line that reveals just how casually the modern left blames private success for problems created by government failure.

The theory Talarico attacked is rooted in the idea that policies helping businesses and investors, including lower taxes and lighter regulation, can spur growth, hiring, investment, and consumer activity.

Conservatives can argue over the finer points, but pretending wealth creation itself is theft is not serious economic analysis.

It is campaign theater dressed up as populism. Democrats have found that if they say the word theft loudly enough, they can distract voters from who actually reaches into their pockets every payday.

After all, who takes money from workers before they even see the full fruit of their labor.

It is not some local business owner sending armed agents to your house because you failed to satisfy a bureaucrat.

Government does that. Federal, state, and local authorities take a cut of nearly everything Americans earn, buy, own, sell, inherit, or try to build, and then politicians act shocked when families feel squeezed.

The left loves to portray capitalism as a villain lurking in a top hat, but the average American knows the real shakedown comes with official forms, penalties, fees, and deadlines.

Miss a tax payment and see how quickly the friendly face of government turns into a collection machine.

Civil asset forfeiture is one of the ugliest examples. Law enforcement agencies have seized money, vehicles, and homes from Americans accused of no crime, often without an arrest or conviction, and getting that property back can become a legal nightmare.

Since 2000, agencies have reportedly collected at least 82 billion dollars at the federal level and another 25 billion dollars at state and local levels through that practice.

If Talarico wants to talk about theft, he might start there instead of scolding people who built businesses and signed paychecks.

Property taxes are another fine example of government calling permanent rent by a more polite name.

Americans can spend decades paying off a home, only to learn that ownership still comes with annual tribute to local officials who can take the property if the bill is not paid.

Yes, private lenders can foreclose when borrowers fail to meet terms they voluntarily accepted.

But nobody voluntarily signs up for being taxed forever on land and a house they supposedly own outright.

None of this means corporations are saints or that every wealthy person is noble.

Conservatives do not need to pretend that private markets are perfect in order to recognize that government power is far more coercive and far less accountable.

Talarico’s argument relies on an old progressive trick, blame capitalism for the damage caused by political meddling, reckless spending, inflationary policy, regulation, taxation, and bureaucratic arrogance. Then offer voters more of the same medicine that helped make them sick.

Americans are angry because groceries cost more, housing is punishingly expensive, wages feel stretched, and the ruling class keeps lecturing them about fairness while Washington spends money it does not have.

That anger is real, but Democrats keep trying to aim it at job creators instead of the political machine.

If Talarico wants to run as another Democrat who thinks prosperity is suspicious and government control is compassion, he is free to do so.

Voters are also free to notice that his answer to economic pain seems to be more resentment, more government, and fewer people who understand how wealth is actually created.

News

‘We Are Going to Beat the F**king Sh*t Out of Them’: Trump [WATCH]

President Donald Trump delivered a blunt warning Wednesday after Iran launched a surprise overnight missile strike targeting American forces in Jordan, making clear that Tehran’s latest act of aggression would not be brushed aside with diplomatic throat clearing.

Speaking to Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst, Trump said the United States would respond with force after Iranian ballistic missiles were fired at the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base and the headquarters of United States Central Command in Jordan.

“We’ll be hitting them hard,” Trump said of Iran. “They’re going to get a beating.”

The attack was claimed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, according to a statement carried by Iran’s state run IRNA news agency.

That detail matters, because Tehran loves hiding behind proxies until the bill comes due.

United States Central Command said all incoming Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted.

Jordan’s military said five Iranian missiles were intercepted and destroyed, and there were no immediate reports of casualties or damage.

Trump said American personnel on the ground had only minutes to react as the missiles came in.

He said he reviewed video of United States forces calling out coordinates in real time while intercepting the incoming threat.

That performance appears to have prevented what could have been a far bloodier outcome.

It also served as a reminder that American troops are still sitting in the crosshairs of a regime that has spent decades exporting terror while pretending to be a normal government.

The strike comes after the Army identified two victims killed in an attack on a Jordan air base, with Trump previously warning that Iran would pay “many times over.”

For a regime used to testing weak Western leaders, the tone from Washington is now considerably different.

Trump also addressed overnight United States and Saudi strikes against Iran backed Shiite militia logistics and weapons sites in eastern Iraq.

The military said the strikes followed alleged drone attacks on Saudi Arabia.

WATCH:

The Saudi Defense Ministry said it “does not seek escalation but will respond to any aggression.”

That is the kind of message Iran’s clerical rulers understand far better than another round of empty international statements.

Trump told Fox News the United States and Saudi strikes in Iraq were coordinated with the Iraqi government.

He described the militias as a “cancer on the world” and said more warnings against Iranian proxies were being considered.

That description will not win applause at a faculty lounge seminar, but it is hard to argue with the substance.

Iran’s proxy network has destabilized Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and beyond while Democrats and foreign policy mandarins keep rediscovering the magical thinking of appeasement.

The broader regional picture is heating up quickly.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused Iran of flying Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps personnel into Yemen as the Houthi threat escalates, further tying Tehran to a web of violence stretching across the Middle East.

Iran’s leadership has long relied on a familiar playbook. Attack through militias, deny responsibility when convenient, celebrate destruction at home, and then complain about escalation when someone finally fires back.

Trump is signaling that this game may be reaching its expiration date.

His message was not wrapped in think tank jargon, but it was direct enough for the mullahs to understand.

Still, the president said talks with Iran will continue.

“We’re going to let them keep talking,” he said.

That line reflects a familiar Trump approach, keep the door open, but do not let talks become a shield for terror.

There is a difference between diplomacy backed by strength and diplomacy used as a sleeping pill for the American people.

Iran’s overnight missile strike also raises fresh questions for Congress about force protection, deterrence, and the security of United States installations across the region.

Lawmakers will likely press the Pentagon for details on the timing of the attack, the intelligence picture before launch, and the readiness of regional air defenses.

For now, the most important fact is that American and allied forces appear to have stopped the missiles before they could kill more United States personnel.

That outcome is a credit to the troops who performed under pressure while the world was asleep.

Tehran gambled that it could fire on American forces and control the consequences.

Trump’s warning suggests the regime may soon learn, once again, that poking the eagle is a very expensive hobby.


Scroll to Top