Author name: LifeZette

Hasan Piker Grotesquely Mocks Charlie Kirk While Wearing Notorious Dictator Costume [WATCH]
News

Hasan Piker Grotesquely Mocks Charlie Kirk While Wearing Notorious Dictator Costume [WATCH]

/

Hasan Piker took political tastelessness to a particularly ugly place during a performance in which he mocked Charlie Kirk’s death while dressed as Chairman Mao.

The spectacle paired juvenile provocation with the imagery of one of history’s most notorious communist rulers.

During the appearance, Piker sang “We Are Charlie Kirk,” a gospel style number that was presumably created through artificial intelligence.

The choice was not merely bizarre; it turned the death of a conservative activist into material for entertainment and online applause.

That is the modern radical left in miniature.

Dress up as an authoritarian communist, sneer at a dead political opponent, add a synthetic song, and wait for the algorithm to deliver attention from an audience trained to mistake cruelty for courage.

Piker’s Chairman Mao costume added a grim layer to the routine.

WATCH:

Mao’s rule was associated with mass repression, famine, ideological persecution, and human suffering on a staggering scale, yet communist imagery remains fashionable in corners of the American left.

Conservatives have heard endless lectures about dangerous rhetoric, civility, and the supposed moral obligations of public figures.

Those lectures tend to evaporate quickly when a prominent voice on the left finds a conservative death useful as a prop.

The gospel styling also sharpened the mockery.

Religious music carries themes of faith, mourning, redemption, and community, but here that tradition was apparently repurposed for a sneering performance aimed at Kirk and those grieving him.

No elaborate theory is needed to understand what happened.

The point was provocation, and the target was a conservative figure whose politics made him fair game in a media culture that often excuses excess when it moves in the approved ideological direction.

Had a conservative entertainer staged a comparable routine about the death of a major progressive activist, the outrage machinery would already be roaring.

Sponsors would face pressure, platforms would be questioned, and solemn commentators would warn that democracy itself had entered another crisis.

When the ugliness comes from the left, however, the usual guardians of decorum often discover nuance.

Suddenly the public is told to consider satire, performance art, edgy humor, or context, as though basic decency requires an advanced seminar before it can be recognized.

The use of an apparently artificial intelligence generated song makes the episode feel even more hollow.

There was no insight on display, only technological novelty wrapped around contempt and presented as if shock value were a substitute for wit.

Free speech protects Piker’s right to stage an offensive spectacle, but it also protects the public’s right to call it morally bankrupt.

WATCH:

The answer is not censorship; it is honest scrutiny without the protective padding so often granted to left wing provocateurs.

Piker has built his public profile through combative political commentary and a style designed to command attention.

This performance fit that formula, but it also exposed the moral emptiness behind a politics that preaches compassion while celebrating the humiliation of ideological enemies.

Kirk was not treated as a person in the routine, but as a symbol to be ridiculed.

That dehumanizing instinct is precisely what left leaning institutions claim to oppose, right up until the chosen target stands on the right.

The establishment press should not need a party registration test to decide whether mocking death is grotesque.

Yet Americans have watched standards bend so often that the double standard is no longer hidden; it is practically part of the business model.

Independent outlets matter because these episodes deserve direct description rather than a cloud of excuses.

Readers can see the Chairman Mao costume, hear the bizarre song, and judge whether the performance reflects serious political commentary or simply another bout of ideological rot.

Piker may have intended to shock, amuse, or energize his audience, and he certainly succeeded in drawing attention.

What he actually delivered was a bleak portrait of online radicalism, where communist cosplay and contempt for the dead can pass for content.

Teachers Union Calls for Target Boycott Because They Didn’t Push Her ICE Narrative as Students Struggle [WATCH]
News

Teachers Union Calls for Target Boycott Because They Didn’t Push Her ICE Narrative as Students Struggle [WATCH]

/

American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten is promoting a nationwide boycott of Target because the retailer has not condemned federal immigration enforcement in Minnesota.

The campaign arrives as parents prepare for another expensive school season and students continue struggling with reading and mathematics.

Rather than concentrating union muscle on classroom performance, Weingarten wants members and families to punish a major retailer for refusing to adopt the union’s position on ICE.

Apparently, selling notebooks and pencils now requires a formal immigration manifesto.

“We gave Target ample time to stand with the communities in which they operate and help their neighbors, but its silence about federal immigration abuses has been deafening,” Weingarten said in a statement.

The union launched its campaign after sending letters to Target CEO Michael Fiddelke in February and March.

Weingarten also promoted the AFT’s “Shop Smart, Not Target” website, which directs families toward alternative stores for school supplies.

The AFT’s March resolution explicitly described the effort as a boycott and called on its 1.8 million members, their families, and political allies to avoid Target.

WATCH:

The pressure campaign is supposed to continue until the company publicly sides with union leaders in the Twin Cities.

The Department of Homeland Security rejected the union’s description of ICE operations and defended the agency’s legal authority.

“ICE enforces federal immigration laws, protects public safety, and conducts enforcement pursuant to federal laws and applicable agency policies. Target is not a sensitive location,” an ICE spokesperson said.

DHS also denied that immigration agents are targeting schools or children.

The agency said officers conduct targeted operations against people who are in the country unlawfully, including dangerous offenders who might attempt to use sensitive locations to avoid arrest.

“This is just another false narrative to try and demonize our brave ICE law enforcement, who are facing a 1,300% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats,” the spokesperson said.

The agency maintained that people placed into removal proceedings receive due process before final orders are carried out.

DHS blamed escalating threats against officers partly on activists and politicians who portray routine immigration enforcement as a campaign of terror.

The boycott is also drawing questions about the union’s financial influence over Target.

Corey DeAngelis, a Heritage Foundation research fellow, argued that AFT members’ pension funds own 6.79 million shares of the retailer, creating potential fiduciary concerns.

“This partisan war on Target smells like a breach of fiduciary duty given that AFT members’ pension funds own 6.79 million shares of Target stock, which Weingarten has already leveraged to pressure the company into opposing ICE,” DeAngelis said.

DeAngelis called for the Department of Justice to investigate whether union leaders are using pension assets and political pressure to force companies into supporting their agenda.

He also said encouraging educators and families to avoid Target was not an appropriate use of union resources or influence.

Federal scrutiny was already being requested before the latest boycott promotion.

Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri asked the Labor Department in July to examine whether AFT officials coordinated with retirement plan fiduciaries to use members’ assets for political purposes.

House lawmakers have separately demanded information about reports that union dues helped finance Weingarten’s book, “Why Fascists Fear Teachers,” while she received royalties.

Those questions add another layer to concerns about whether union resources are serving educators or advancing the political brand of union leadership.

Sonja Shaw, a candidate for California superintendent of public instruction and president of the Chino Valley Unified School District board, said labor leaders are prioritizing power while students fall behind.

California assessments showed only 48.8% of students met or exceeded English language arts standards, while just 37.3% did so in mathematics.

“Teachers’ unions are supposed to fight for teachers. Instead, union leadership has become a political machine obsessed with money, power and influence while our children continue to fall behind,” Shaw said.

“In California, more than half our students are not proficient in basic reading and math.”

Teachers spend an average of $895 of their own money each year on classroom supplies, according to a 2025 teacher spending survey.

Yet the AFT is using the shopping season to stage an immigration protest instead of addressing why educators face those costs or why so many children remain academically unprepared.

Target and the AFT did not immediately respond to requests for further comment.

For families watching prices, test scores, and classroom quality, the episode offers another example of a teachers union acting like a political organization first and an education advocate somewhere far down the list.

El Sayed Attacks Vance’s Marriage After Sharia Criticism Triggers Meltdown [WATCH]
News

El Sayed Attacks Vance’s Marriage After Sharia Criticism Triggers Meltdown [WATCH]

/

Michigan Democrat Abdul El Sayed lashed out at Vice President JD Vance and dragged his marriage into the fight after Vance criticized the Senate candidate’s past defense of Sharia law.

The exchange quickly became another revealing moment in Michigan’s closely watched Senate contest.

Vance raised the issue while speaking to American workers, recalling El Sayed’s claim that criticism of Sharia law was rooted in white supremacy.

The vice president contrasted that position with the Democratic Party his grandfather knew.

Vance said, “I’d love to go back in time and tell my Papaw that there’s a man who claims to stand for working people who says not only should we have Sharia law, but if you criticize it you’re a white supremacist. That’s not my Papaw’s Democrat Party, my friends,”

Rather than directly explaining his position on Sharia law, El Sayed fired back with a personal jab involving Vance’s wife.

It was the familiar political maneuver of changing the subject when the original subject becomes inconvenient.

“So do we think JD is taking Usha with him back in time to meet Papaw, or no…” El Sayed wrote Saturday on social media.

WATCH:

The comment pointedly brought Vance’s marriage and family into a debate about El Sayed’s own publicly stated religious views.

Usha Vance and her family are Hindu, not Muslim, and there is no basis for suggesting they would seek to impose Sharia law on Americans.

That rather obvious fact made El Sayed’s attack look less like a serious rebuttal and more like an attempt to manufacture outrage.

The episode was not the first time El Sayed had targeted Vance’s wife and family.

Breitbart News reported in May that the Democrat refused to apologize for previous remarks described as vile, leaving voters to judge whether personal family attacks are now central to his campaign strategy.

El Sayed’s own record remains relevant because his campaign has confirmed that he follows Sharia law in his personal life.

Resurfaced comments from 2009 showed him describing that practice as a lifelong “obligation,” a detail voters may reasonably consider when evaluating his public positions.

During a later interview, El Sayed accused Vance and President Donald Trump of questioning his American identity.

He again shifted the dispute away from his comments about Sharia law and toward accusations involving race, religion, and belonging.

“He’s painting this picture of going back in time to talk to his Papaw, about me. Now why is he pointing to me? Why is Donald Trump pointing to me? They’re pointing to me to try and say somehow I’m less of an American than they are. What does that have to do with? I don’t know, the color of my skin, how I pray? But the confusing thing about it is that he thinks there are some people who are more American than others because they can point to their Papaw who was here earlier.”

El Sayed then invoked Vance’s relationship with Usha’s parents, claiming the vice president was implying they were somehow less American.

WATCH:

Yet Vance’s remarks focused on El Sayed’s political argument about Sharia criticism, not the citizenship or patriotism of Usha’s family.

That distinction matters, especially when a candidate is seeking one of the most powerful offices in the federal government.

Asking about a Senate nominee’s prior statements is not an attack on his identity, no matter how eagerly Democrats reach for that familiar shield.

Vance’s underlying point was plainly political and cultural.

He argued that traditional working class Democrats would not recognize a party in which criticism of Sharia law could be branded white supremacy, particularly when many Americans hold deep concerns about religious law influencing public government.

El Sayed’s response offered plenty of indignation but little clarification about where he believes personal religious obligation should end and American civil law should begin.

Instead, he targeted Vance’s marriage and cast himself as a victim, a routine that may excite progressive activists but leaves the central question unanswered.

The clash arrives as Michigan’s Senate race remains highly competitive.

A recent AARP survey found Republican nominee Mike Rogers and El Sayed virtually tied in the general election, meaning exchanges like this could shape how undecided voters view each candidate’s judgment and temperament.

Michigan voters now have a clear contrast before them.

Vance challenged El Sayed’s record, while El Sayed responded by invoking race, religion, and Vance’s family rather than giving a straightforward answer about his own words.

Young Pilot Makes Stunning Sea Landing Off Florida Beach and Walks Away Unhurt [WATCH]
News

Young Pilot Makes Stunning Sea Landing Off Florida Beach and Walks Away Unhurt [WATCH]

/

A 23 year old pilot delivered a remarkable display of calm and skill Saturday morning, guiding her disabled twin engine plane into the Atlantic Ocean just off a crowded Florida beach and escaping without injury.

Faith Tenkley was flying her family’s Piper PA30 near Boca Raton when mechanical problems turned a routine trip into a dangerous emergency.

Instead of panicking, she avoided buildings, paddleboarders, and beach visitors before placing the aircraft in an open stretch of water.

Tenkley had departed from Fort Myers and planned to travel roughly 150 miles to collect her parents in the Bahamas.

She was alone aboard the aircraft when trouble reportedly began about 15 miles from Boca Raton.

The sudden sight of a low-flying plane left people along the beach staring in disbelief.

“One second I’m spraying sunscreen on my kid. The next I’m looking up and saying, ‘Is that supposed to be happening?’” beachgoer Maria Marks told WPBF.

Tenkley initially considered making an emergency landing at the airport in Boca Raton.

That option became far more dangerous after she discovered that the landing gear was not functioning properly and one of the two engines was no longer working.

The plane had also recently been refueled, raising fears that a hard runway landing could ignite a fire.

With few good choices available, Tenkley decided that a controlled landing in the ocean offered the best chance of avoiding a far worse outcome.

At about 9:40 in the morning, she brought the aircraft toward the shoreline and searched for a clear patch of water.

Video posted online showed the plane moving past nearby buildings and people on paddleboards as stunned beachgoers watched from the sand.

Witnesses described a remarkably controlled approach rather than a chaotic plunge.

Alexis Arizzi, who watched from a boat and alerted the Coast Guard, said the plane made a “slow descent” and then “delicately landed” on the water.

That careful approach proved crucial because the beach and surrounding water were busy at the time.

Tenkley managed to keep the damaged aircraft away from bystanders, a feat that reflected sharp judgment under the sort of pressure most people never encounter.

Rescuers moved almost immediately once the plane touched the Atlantic.

A lifeguard reached the aircraft within about one minute, and a fire rescue boat from Boca Raton Ocean Rescue arrived close behind to assist.

Tenkley emerged from the plane apparently unharmed before the aircraft began sinking into the water.

WATCH:

Boca Raton police said no injuries were reported, though she was transported to a local hospital as a precaution following the dramatic landing.

The young aviator has held her pilot license for four years, experience that clearly mattered when the flight went wrong.

Her response showed the value of training, discipline, and keeping a level head when machinery decides to ruin an otherwise ordinary Saturday.

Another pilot who witnessed the aftermath praised Tenkley for continuing to control the aircraft through the final moment.

“The most important part they teach you in emergency support or anything is to fly the airplane all the way down. Based on the fact that it’s all in one piece … it seems like the pilot did that,” the unidentified pilot said.

The aircraft was indeed largely intact after reaching the water, powerful evidence that Tenkley never surrendered control.

She faced engine trouble, failed landing gear, a full fuel load, crowded surroundings, and almost no margin for error, yet still managed to protect herself and everyone nearby.

For beachgoers, the morning provided a scene that looked more like a movie stunt than real life.

For Tenkley, it became a serious test of aviation skill, and she passed it with uncommon composure while emergency crews completed a swift and effective rescue.

Texas Judge Crushes Karmelo Anthony’s Bid for New Trial [WATCH]
News

Texas Judge Crushes Karmelo Anthony’s Bid for New Trial [WATCH]

/

A Texas judge on Saturday rejected Karmelo Anthony’s attempt to secure a new trial in the fatal stabbing of 17 year old Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet.

The ruling leaves Anthony’s murder conviction and 35 year prison sentence intact.

Judge Michael Chitty issued a brief order after a two day hearing near Dallas, saying he had reviewed the evidence and arguments presented.

He offered no extended explanation, delivering a blunt setback to a defense seeking to reopen a nationally watched case.

Anthony, now 19, was convicted of murder in June for killing Metcalf during the April 2025 meet in Frisco, a Dallas suburb.

The confrontation between athletes from different high schools quickly became a national flashpoint, fueled by social media and racial commentary.

Defense attorney Russell Wilson promptly said an appeal would follow. “Our commitment to our client has not changed,” Wilson said.

“We will continue to advocate vigorously on his behalf through every lawful avenue available.”

The retrial request focused heavily on a private understanding between prosecutors and Anthony’s trial lawyers concerning damaging character evidence about both teenagers.

Both camps had agreed not to introduce material that could further inflame a proceeding already surrounded by racial tensions, online fury, harassment, and death threats.

Anthony is Black and Metcalf was white, a fact repeatedly amplified across social media after the killing.

Yet attorneys for both the prosecution and defense told jurors that race was not the issue, and the case itself turned on the confrontation, the knife, and the fatal wound.

Defense lawyers argued that fears prosecutors might abandon the evidence agreement arose as Anthony prepared to testify.

They said a heated dispute between the legal teams forced a sudden change in strategy, leading Anthony not to take the stand, a decision they later cited as grounds for another trial.

WATCH:

Prosecutor Bill Wirskye defended the original proceeding as fair during this week’s hearing.

The state maintained that the defense received a lawful trial and that disagreement over strategy after a conviction does not automatically entitle a defendant to a second bite at the apple.

After Chitty’s ruling, Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis welcomed the result. “We respect, and expected, the court’s decision denying the motion for a new trial,” Willis said.

“The jury’s guilty verdict stands, and we remain confident in the process. Every defendant has the right to appeal, and our thoughts and prayers remain with the Metcalf family in the painful wake of last week’s hearing.”

The defense also challenged the strict courtroom rules imposed by trial judge John Roach, claiming those restrictions limited public access.

Anthony’s lawyers sought Roach’s recusal as well, pointing to a posttrial television interview in which he openly agreed with the verdict reached by the jury.

“Whatever they say, they got it right,” Roach said of the jurors’ decision.

Roach argued that his courtroom controls were necessary to protect a fair trial, while prosecutors said his conduct provided no legitimate basis to erase the conviction.

Jurors rejected Anthony’s claim that he acted in self defense during the encounter in the bleachers.

WATCH:

Witnesses testified that Anthony sat beneath a tent belonging to Metcalf’s team and was repeatedly told by Metcalf and others to leave, setting off an argument that escalated.

Prosecutors told the jury that Anthony provoked the confrontation, and multiple witnesses identified him as the aggressor.

According to a police report, Anthony reached into a bag during the dispute and warned, “Touch me and see what happens,” a statement that carried obvious weight in the state’s case.

Witnesses said Metcalf then pushed Anthony, who drew a knife and stabbed the teenager in the chest.

That sequence proved fatal to the self defense theory, with jurors concluding that the response was murder rather than a legally justified effort to ward off danger.

The killing unfolded on a rainy spring day as several school teams gathered for competition, turning an ordinary athletic event into a scene of horror.

The resulting case brought intense attention and ugly harassment for both families, but the legal question remained narrow, whether Anthony unlawfully killed Metcalf.

For now, the jury’s verdict stands, Chitty has refused to reset the courtroom clock, and Anthony remains sentenced to 35 years.

His lawyers can press their appeal, but their first major effort to undo the conviction has been firmly denied.

JD Vance Torches Senate RINOs: “End the Filibuster Before Democrats End America” [WATCH]
News

JD Vance Torches Senate RINOs: “End the Filibuster Before Democrats End America” [WATCH]

/

Vice President JD Vance called on Senate Republicans to eliminate the filibuster, arguing that preserving the procedural rule now would not stop Democrats from abolishing it the next time they gain sufficient power in Washington.

Vance said he has attempted to understand the argument from Republicans who want to preserve the filibuster, but he does not believe their expectation of future cooperation from Democrats is realistic.

“I try to understand their position as well as I can. What they say, and I think they genuinely believe this, I don’t know how, but I think they genuinely believe that if they protect the filibuster for the next couple of years, then let’s say the Democrats take over in four years, the Democrats are going to return the favor and protect the filibuster when they’re in power.”

Vance immediately questioned that assumption.

“I don’t know how anybody believes that.”

The vice president pointed to former Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin as examples of Democrats who resisted efforts to eliminate the filibuster while serving in the Senate.

“We have to remember that if you go back to Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, by the way, two very good public servants, moderate Democrats, I disagreed with them on a lot of issues, but they did protect the filibuster.”

Vance argued that their willingness to preserve the rule did not earn them support from Democratic leadership.

“And what happened to them? Were they promoted by the Democratic Party? No, they were destroyed by Chuck Schumer and the Senate Democrats.”

According to Vance, their experiences sent a broader warning to Democratic senators who might resist party leadership on the issue in the future.

“They sent a message that if you ever dare to stand against the national Senate Democrat leadership, we are going to destroy your career, and that means the filibuster has to go away.”

Vance said there could still be individual Democratic senators willing to preserve the filibuster, but he argued that Democratic leadership would prevent them from doing so.

“I guarantee you, even if there are some good Democrats in the Senate who would preserve the filibuster, you know, to sort of show good faith to their Republican colleagues, they’re never going to be allowed to do it by the Senate leadership.”

He said Republicans should recognize what he considers the political reality surrounding the rule.

“The politics of it are obvious. Senate Democrats are going to destroy the filibuster.”

Vance then outlined what he believes Democrats would pursue if they eliminated the filibuster after regaining control.

“And by the way, they’re not going to do it to protect American election integrity, they’re going to do it to add Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C. as states.”

He also argued that Democrats would use the change to alter election policy.

“They’re going to do it to further weaken election integrity.”

Vance directed his criticism specifically toward the smaller group of Senate Republicans who remain committed to keeping the filibuster.

“And this is what I think that, again, it’s not the majority of the Senate GOP, but a few senators have got to wake up to the reality that the Democrats are going to blow up the filibuster and try to destroy the country, pack the Supreme Court.”

The vice president concluded that Republicans should act first rather than preserve a procedural rule that he believes Democrats will eventually eliminate themselves.

“We need to end the filibuster to save American elections.”

Vance characterized that approach as both a practical political decision and a matter of national interest.

“It’s the smart and also the patriotic thing to do.”

WATCH:

Scott Bessent’s ‘Secret Plan’ Quietly Flips the Script on the Global Elites [WATCH]
News

Scott Bessent’s ‘Secret Plan’ Quietly Flips the Script on the Global Elites [WATCH]

/

Barbara Boyd argued that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Vice President JD Vance are pursuing an economic strategy centered on expanding American production, rebuilding manufacturing, and growing the economy faster than the national debt.

Boyd opened her remarks by pointing to concerns surrounding the nation’s debt and financial markets.

“The $40 trillion U.S. debt and what’s being called a bond market explosion are the hottest news in the financial press. It looks to me like creating a financial panic is the next phase of the plan to destroy President Trump ahead of the midterms. But Scott Bessent has a secret plan to crush the speculators. Here’s Bessent talking about the debt on Thursday.”

Bessent addressed the size of the debt while pointing to the administration’s efforts on the federal deficit.

“The $40 trillion is a big number, and remember, we did not get here in a day; we were left with a mess. The Biden administration had the highest deficit-to-GDP in history when we weren’t at war or weren’t in a recession. For 2025, we brought it down by more than a percent.”

Boyd then highlighted comments from Vance about the administration’s strategy.

“And here’s J.D. Vance Thursday talking about what he called Scott Bessent’s discrete plan to deal with it.”

Vance said the objective is to produce economic growth that exceeds the growth of the debt.

“The other thing is that Scott Bessent, the amazing Treasury Secretary, he has had a very discrete plan, of course supported by the President of the United States, to get the United States to a point where our economy is growing faster than our debt, and if you look, we are on track. So even though the debt is too high, even though we inherited this debt bomb from the Biden administration, we actually do have a plan to get the economy growing faster than the debt, and that’s the most important thing.”

Boyd described the approach as drawing heavily from Alexander Hamilton’s economic ideas, with an emphasis on directing credit toward productive activity rather than relying solely on spending reductions or tax increases.

“Now, Scott Bessent’s secret plan to deal with the debt and inflation is as old as Alexander Hamilton.”

She argued that credit used to expand production, infrastructure and technological development can increase the amount of goods available in the economy.

“Issuing credit for productive purposes through a sovereign wealth fund, special government funds, or the banking system is non-inflationary and even deflationary.”

Bessent similarly emphasized domestic productive capacity while discussing the country’s economic security.

“That our strength, in other words, is derived from what we can build. For the nation that cannot produce what it needs is not truly secure, and the nation that reduces its economics to consumption is not truly prosperous.”

He identified several industries he considers central to future American power.

“Instead, as Hamilton put it, it is essential to enlarge the sphere of our domestic commerce because economic security begins at home. It begins with the capacity to build, invent, finance, and scale the industries that will define the next century. Among them: semiconductors, AI, quantum computing, advanced manufacturing, shipbuilding, critical minerals, and pharmaceuticals, to name only a few.”

Bessent added that those industries have implications beyond ordinary commercial activity.

“More than sectors of the economy, these are sources of our national power, and America must lead in each of them.”

Boyd argued that the strategy provides an alternative to dealing with debt primarily through austerity or higher taxation.

“The models being used by Wall Street and London don’t have a box for how does an economy grow out of its own debt. They only have boxes for spending less or taxing more. So when Bessent proposes a third option, growing the productive base until the debt shrinks next to it, their spreadsheet just doesn’t compute it.”

She connected that approach to Hamilton’s policies following the Revolutionary War, describing an economic system in which government credit supported production, infrastructure and new industries.

Boyd then turned to Vance’s recent appearance in his hometown of Middletown, Ohio, where the vice president criticized decades of free-trade policies.

“They said it was irrational, sentimental, old-fashioned to want to preserve the things that make the United States of America special. What we really needed, they said, was to compete and have complete market integration with every nation in the third world, places where you could pay wages at pennies on the dollar, but didn’t have to give your workers healthcare or good benefits in the process.”

Vance said Americans who supported tariffs or tighter immigration policies were dismissed by supporters of that economic model.

“And anytime somebody dared to put an obstacle in front of that set of ideas, anytime they said, you know what, we need to put tariffs or tough immigration policies to stop that, those people were called backwards. They were called wrong.”

Vance also connected the decline of manufacturing employment with social problems experienced by communities such as Middletown.

“Economists have measured the ways in which the opioid crisis exploded in the very locations where jobs were shipped overseas.”

He continued:

“The open borders demanded by those same people brought some innocent people. Of course, it did. But we also know that it brought a lot of cartels. It brought the fentanyl trade, and it left us with millions of orphan children being raised by aggrieved grandparents.”

Vance then delivered a sharp assessment of those he blamed for the economic policies.

“Now the blood of these men and women, these so-called deaths of despair, I’m sure you’ve heard that phrase, but it’s almost too abstract for me, because the blood of those people, in my view, it pools at the feet of those who would sell out their country for a cheap bottom line.”

He concluded the portion highlighted by Boyd with an announcement involving manufacturing investment in Middletown.

“And that brings me to why I’m here today, because we’re not just here to talk about the celebration and the good news and the numbers. We’re here to announce that Cleveland-Cliffs is making today, right here in Middletown, Ohio, a $1 billion investment in transformational manufacturing right here in our home.”

Boyd said the investment represents the type of productive expansion at the center of the administration’s economic strategy. She argued that Bessent and Vance are pursuing a model that ties national economic strength to domestic manufacturing, technological development and increased productive capacity.

“If the vice president keeps giving these kinds of speeches and the president and Scott Bessent keep implementing Hamilton’s policies, the midterms will be theirs. Getting this message out widely will make that victory possible. That’s our job at Promethean Action.”

WATCH:

Musk Money vs. Marxist Madness: Elon Poised to Supercharge GOP Turnout in 2026 [WATCH]
News

Musk Money vs. Marxist Madness: Elon Poised to Supercharge GOP Turnout in 2026 [WATCH]

/

Elon Musk is preparing to put serious financial muscle behind Republican candidates as the midterm elections approach, with reported plans to spend as much as $200 million nationwide.

If that figure holds, Democrats will be staring at another enormous Republican advantage when they can least afford it.

Wired reported that the wealthy technology entrepreneur intends to support Republican candidates through major voter turnout operations.

Among those expected to benefit is Ken Paxton, a prominent conservative figure who has repeatedly challenged the left and the Washington establishment.

Musk used a similar political strategy during the 2024 election cycle, when his operation focused heavily on voter registration and participation in competitive states.

That effort included a daily $1 million giveaway designed to encourage registration among voters in crucial battlegrounds.

This time, the scale could be far larger.

Musk reportedly spent approximately $70 million through his political action committee to support President Donald Trump and Republican candidates further down the ballot during the 2024 campaign.

Musk also campaigned on the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative centered on cutting waste, shrinking bureaucracy, and forcing Washington to account for how it spends taxpayer money.

That message naturally appealed to voters tired of watching federal agencies burn through cash with little accountability.

A possible $200 million commitment would nearly triple the amount Musk reportedly deployed during the previous cycle.

It would also give Republican campaigns additional resources for advertising, voter contacts, field operations, registration drives, and election day turnout efforts.

The news arrives as Republicans already enjoy a commanding financial position over their Democrat rivals.

The Republican National Committee holds a reported $115 million cash on hand advantage over the Democratic National Committee as the election rapidly approaches.

The DNC, meanwhile, is reportedly carrying more debt than available capital with only 73 days remaining before voters head to the polls.

That is not exactly the financial picture party leaders want while attempting to defend vulnerable candidates across several competitive states.

Republicans have also continued breaking fundraising records, providing further evidence that conservative voters remain energized.

While liberal activists dominate social media outrage cycles, Republican donors appear focused on the less glamorous but far more useful business of winning elections.

Money alone never guarantees victory, of course, but it can dramatically expand the number of races a party can seriously contest.

A massive Musk funded turnout campaign could force Democrats to spend precious resources defending districts they once assumed were safe.

WATCH:

Republicans have also gained momentum in the fight over congressional maps.

Favorable developments involving the Voting Rights Act, combined with the rejection of Virginia’s illegal redraw, have strengthened the party’s position heading into the midterms.

Those developments could create more favorable terrain for Republican candidates while limiting the benefits Democrats hoped to gain through redistricting.

The left has long treated map drawing as noble reform when Democrats benefit and an attack on democracy when Republicans do the same.

Some public polling has shown signs of Democrat strength, but those advantages could narrow once Republican spending begins flooding targeted races.

Early surveys often capture public mood before campaigns fully activate their advertising, organizing, and turnout machinery.

Musk’s involvement could be particularly important among voters who are skeptical of traditional political institutions but receptive to arguments about free speech, government waste, economic growth, and bureaucratic overreach.

His ability to attract attention also ensures that every major spending decision will generate extensive national coverage.

Democrats now face a Republican Party with growing financial reserves, improving electoral maps, and a potential $200 million boost from one of the world’s wealthiest entrepreneurs.

That combination is enough to make liberal campaign strategists reach for the antacids long before election night arrives.

Canada Picks China Over America, Trump Says ‘Enough’ and Drops the Hammer [WATCH]
News

Canada Picks China Over America, Trump Says ‘Enough’ and Drops the Hammer [WATCH]

/

Canada walked away from what President Donald Trump’s top trade official called “the best deal,” and the price is now arriving at the border.

New 50 percent tariffs have taken effect on roughly $20 billion worth of Canadian imports after negotiations between Washington and Ottawa collapsed.

United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said no additional talks are currently scheduled.

His message was blunt: The Trump administration offered Canada relief on politically sensitive products, but Canadian leaders chose to protect their barriers against American goods.

“Our interest is in protecting American workers and protecting American supply chains. We’ve been offering to bring the Canadians along on that path, really to cut the tariffs on them on steel, on autos, even lumber, things that are sensitive for them,” Greer said Saturday.

The administration has framed its trade strategy around returning production to the United States, strengthening domestic supply chains, and defending workers who have watched factories and jobs disappear.

Canada was invited to cooperate with that agenda rather than fight it.

“And they’ve always had the best deal, and they still would have an even better deal, but they didn’t want that,” Greer added.

Ottawa apparently decided preserving its barriers was worth risking a bruising confrontation with its largest trading partner.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney suspended negotiations late Friday and accused Washington of making “unfair” changes to the proposed terms at the last minute.

He also announced that Canada would answer the new American tariffs with retaliation of its own.

Carney said Canada would match the United States “dollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses.”

That posture may play well with Canadian nationalists, but retaliating against the world’s largest economy carries consequences that no amount of chest thumping can erase.

“We have recognised from the beginning that America has changed, and that we will not return to our old relationship,” Carney said.

His statement acknowledged the obvious reality that Trump has rejected the old system of accepting trade arrangements that disadvantage American producers.

“Our government understood, before many, that America is altering all its trade relationships. Putting tariffs on its closest allies and charging for access to its vast market.”

Carney presented Canada’s retaliation as a defense of national independence, even though the dispute began with Ottawa refusing terms that Greer says would have reduced tariffs on key Canadian industries.

The prime minister insisted his government would not allow another country to chart Canada’s economic future.

“Canada has what the world wants. And we will not allow any nation to determine our future.”

“We will set our own course to keep building Canada strong for all,” Carney added.

Washington, however, is also setting its own course, and Trump was elected in part to stop foreign governments from treating access to American consumers as an automatic entitlement.

Asked whether negotiations could restart soon, Greer said it was “hard to say.”

With no meetings on the calendar, the administration is preparing measures intended to answer Canada’s retaliatory move rather than rushing back to the table.

“We don’t have new talks planned with the Canadians. We’re moving forward with measures that respond to Canadian retaliation,” Greer said.

Greer also placed Canada in some striking company by noting how few nations have directly retaliated against Trump’s effort to restore American production.

“Remember, as President Trump has introduced a trade policy to reshore American production and protect American jobs, two countries have retaliated against the United States, the People’s Republic of China and Canada,” he added.

WATCH:

The wider tariff battle is also producing legal and economic crosscurrents at home.

Twenty five states have sued to block separate tariff measures, while Trump has waived duties on 300,000 tons of ground beef for 90 days, showing the White House is willing to make targeted adjustments when American consumers and supply needs demand flexibility.

For Canada, the immediate problem is less complicated.

Its government rejected an offer that could have eased pressure on steel, automobiles, and lumber, then escalated by threatening matching tariffs against the United States.

WATCH:

Trump’s trade team is now moving ahead without Ottawa, leaving Carney to explain why protecting Canadian barriers was more important than preserving favorable access to the American market.

Canada wanted to set its own course, and Washington is making sure it pays the fare.

Karoline Leavitt Reveals Major MAGA Move, Vows Americans Will Keep Seeing Her [WATCH]
News

Karoline Leavitt Reveals Major MAGA Move, Vows Americans Will Keep Seeing Her [WATCH]

/

Karoline Leavitt may be leaving the White House briefing room, but she is not leaving President Donald Trump’s political operation.

The outgoing press secretary announced Friday that she will join MAGA Inc., the powerful super PAC supporting Trump and Republican candidates.

Leavitt revealed the move while speaking with reporters outside Air Force One on Friday evening.

She did not disclose her coming title, though the organization and its mission are already familiar territory for one of Trump’s most effective public defenders.

Before joining Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, Leavitt served as a spokesperson for MAGA Inc.

Her return places a battle-tested communicator inside a political organization preparing to spend heavily during the approaching November midterm elections.

“You guys will still see me all the time,” she told reporters.

That promise should reassure Trump supporters while likely causing a few groans in liberal newsrooms where Leavitt’s direct answers and sharp rebuttals regularly spoiled the preferred narrative.

Leavitt is scheduled to step down as White House press secretary at the end of August.

WATCH:

She previously explained that she wanted more time with her young and growing family, a decision that will change her daily responsibilities without removing her from the broader Trump movement.

MAGA Inc., a super PAC aligned with Trump and the Republican Party, has reportedly amassed more than $350 million ahead of the midterm elections.

That enormous reserve gives the organization considerable political firepower as Republicans fight to advance Trump’s agenda and protect congressional majorities.

Friday evening’s flight aboard Air Force One was also expected to be Leavitt’s final official trip as press secretary.

She traveled to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, where Trump held a rally supporting Sen. Darline Graham, a Republican seeking a full term in the seat previously held by her late brother.

Leavitt and her husband, Nicholas Riccio, have two young children.

Their son was born in July 2024, while their daughter arrived in May of this year, giving Leavitt understandable reasons to seek a role with different demands than the relentless White House press schedule.

Riccio is a New Hampshire real estate developer and investor whose portfolio includes both commercial and residential properties.

The family considerations surrounding Leavitt’s departure have not weakened her commitment to the political fight that made her a nationally recognized conservative voice.

Trump said Leavitt would continue working with the White House as one of his “top advisers” and would remain an “influential voice within the Republican Party.”

Leavitt likewise made clear that her “fight” against the Democratic Party would continue after she formally vacates the podium.

The White House has not yet announced who will replace Leavitt.

She returned from maternity leave in the middle of July, then decided to leave the demanding position permanently as speculation quickly began over who could possibly follow her performance.

Among the names reportedly under consideration are conservative CNN commentator Scott Jennings and Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

Both would bring strong communication credentials to a role requiring daily combat with a press corps that rarely hides its hostility toward Trump.

Trump suggested that qualified applicants are hardly in short supply.

“I will tell you this, and Karoline will tell you this,” Trump told reporters Friday, “I have never seen so many job applications in my life.”

WATCH:

Choosing Leavitt’s replacement may still prove difficult because she established a distinctive presence behind the White House podium.

She was willing to challenge veteran reporters directly, expose loaded questions, and push back when media outlets dressed partisan talking points up as objective journalism.

Leavitt became the youngest White House press secretary in American history when she assumed the position at age 27 at the beginning of Trump’s second administration.

Her confidence, preparation, and willingness to go toe to toe with seasoned correspondents quickly made her a favorite among Trump’s grassroots supporters.

Her move to MAGA Inc. ensures that the administration is not losing her voice, only deploying it in a different arena.

Democrats hoping her White House exit meant a quieter political future are out of luck, because Leavitt appears ready to remain visible and fully engaged in the coming electoral fight.


Scroll to Top