Author name: LifeZette

Francesca Hong Threatens Force and Fury Against ICE in Wisconsin [WATCH]
News

Francesca Hong Threatens Force and Fury Against ICE in Wisconsin [WATCH]

/

Wisconsin Democrat Francesca Hong is making it painfully clear what kind of governor she would be if voters hand her the keys in November.

Her message on immigration is not subtle, not moderate, and not remotely reassuring for anyone who believes laws should actually be enforced.

Hong has vowed to block ICE from operating in Wisconsin, which would effectively turn the state into another magnet for illegal aliens. That means more pressure on taxpayers, more strain on communities, and more danger for citizens who expect their leaders to protect them first.

Then came the line that should make every voter sit up straight. Hong did not merely promise to oppose federal immigration enforcement through policy or legal channels.

“And I assure you, I will be fighting to protect every single Wisconsinite because I’m the only candidate in this race who will meet ICE with the force and fury required to keep us all safe,” Hong said.

WATCH:

There it is in her own words.

When a candidate talks about meeting federal law enforcement with “force and fury,” people are allowed to ask exactly what she means and just how far she is willing to go.

ICE agents are not roaming villains from some left wing fever dream.

They are federal officers tasked with enforcing immigration law, removing illegal aliens, and dealing with criminal offenders who should not be in the country in the first place.

For years, Democrats have tried to turn ICE into a cartoon enemy because the agency represents something the left increasingly despises, consequences.

The open borders crowd does not want immigration law enforced because enforcement wrecks the whole sanctuary fantasy.

Hong is leaning hard into that same radical script.

She is not presenting herself as someone who wants a careful debate over state and federal authority.

She is presenting herself as someone ready to confront ICE with the kind of rhetoric that sounds more like agitation than governance.

Wisconsin voters should understand what comes with this posture.

A sanctuary state does not just send a symbolic message to Washington.

It sends a very real signal to illegal aliens, criminal networks, and activist groups that the governor has their back against federal immigration officers.

Meanwhile, ordinary families are expected to pretend this is compassion.

The same political class that lectures everyone about public safety now cheers candidates who want to obstruct the people removing dangerous illegal aliens from American communities.

This is the modern Democratic immigration position stripped of all the consultant polish.

They want the benefits of lawlessness while dodging responsibility for the consequences.

If crime rises, they blame Republicans.

If schools and hospitals are overwhelmed, they demand more money.

If ICE tries to do its job, they scream about oppression.

Hong may attempt to soften her words as the campaign heats up.

That is how these things usually go once the clip starts traveling beyond the activist bubble.

First comes the applause line, then comes the clean up operation.

But voters should believe what they heard the first time.

Candidates reveal themselves when they are speaking to friendly crowds, and Hong made clear that her enemy is not illegal immigration.

Her enemy is the federal agency trying to stop it.

The deeper problem is that this attitude is no longer fringe inside the Democratic Party.

From city councils to statehouses, the left keeps pushing the idea that immigration enforcement is illegitimate while expecting citizens to accept whatever chaos follows.

That hostility toward law enforcement does not stop with ICE.

Once politicians convince their supporters that certain officers are enemies, threats and obstruction become easier to justify.

We have seen this pattern before, and it never ends with more order or more safety.

Conservatives should not let the left hide behind vague language about community protection.

Protecting Wisconsin means protecting the citizens, workers, families, and lawful residents who live there.

It does not mean turning the state into a shield for people who broke immigration law.

Hong’s remarks are a warning flare. Wisconsin can choose a governor who respects law enforcement and public safety, or it can gamble on a candidate promising “force and fury” against ICE.

That should not be a hard call for anyone still living in reality.

Dem Candidate Arrested After Starting Fight, Getting Knocked Out in Wild Beach Scene [WATCH]
News

Dem Candidate Arrested After Starting Fight, Getting Knocked Out in Wild Beach Scene [WATCH]

/

Democratic congressional candidate Kirill Basin was arrested Saturday following an altercation at Keawakapu Beach in South Kihei, Hawaii, resulting in multiple felony charges and a $1 million bail.

Basin, 40, is running for Congress in Hawaii against incumbent U.S. Rep. Jill Tokuda.

The incident occurred at Keawakapu Beach in South Kihei, a census-designated place in Maui County located on the leeward, or south, side of Maui between Maʻalaea and Wailea.

Video of the confrontation circulated online following the incident, showing Basin engaged in a heated exchange with a group of people on the beach.

During the encounter, Basin can be heard repeatedly challenging those around him.

“What you gonna do? What you gonna do?” Basin said.

The confrontation escalated moments later when another man struck Basin with a single punch, knocking him unconscious.

The video shows Basin collapsing to the sand after the blow.

Authorities later arrested Basin in connection with the incident.

According to the information provided, Basin was charged with two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening.

Following his arrest, bail was set at $1 million.

The charges come as Basin campaigns for Hawaii’s congressional seat currently held by Democratic Rep. Jill Tokuda.

The incident unfolded at Keawakapu Beach, a popular shoreline that stretches between Kihei and Wailea on the island of Maui.

South Kihei is known as a residential and resort community along Maui’s southern coastline.

Basin’s arrest immediately drew attention because it involved an active congressional candidate during an election cycle.

Video recordings of the altercation quickly spread online, with viewers focusing on the verbal confrontation that preceded the physical exchange.

The footage captures Basin confronting individuals on the beach before repeatedly asking, “What you gonna do? What you gonna do?”

Moments later, another individual responded with a single punch that ended the confrontation.

WATCH:

Following the incident, law enforcement officers took Basin into custody.

Prosecutors charged him with two counts of first-degree terroristic threatening, and the court established bail at $1 million.

Basin’s campaign has centered on reform and government accountability.

According to his campaign website, he offers Hawaii voters “real accountability.”

The arrest now places the Democratic candidate’s congressional campaign under new scrutiny as legal proceedings move forward.

Basin entered the race seeking to unseat Tokuda, who currently represents Hawaii’s 2nd Congressional District.

The district includes all of the state’s islands outside the urban core of Honolulu, including Maui, where Saturday’s incident occurred.

Dick Durbin Defends Fauci Like a Cult Leader Protecting His High Priest [WATCH]
News

Dick Durbin Defends Fauci Like a Cult Leader Protecting His High Priest [WATCH]

/

Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois took to the Senate floor this week to deliver a full blown tribute to Anthony Fauci, even after Fauci pleaded the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times before a Senate panel.

Durbin portrayed Fauci as a national treasure who has been mistreated by Republicans, a familiar routine from Democrats whenever one of their favored bureaucrats faces actual questions.

“Dr. Fauci is an example of American excellence, a brilliant scientific mind, and yet the Republican Party has chosen to make this doctor, who saved countless lives, a political target,” Durbin said.

That glowing defense came after Fauci appeared before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, where he refused to answer questions about his role during the pandemic, his public statements, and contradictions found in his personal diary.

The diary, released by Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, has raised fresh scrutiny because it reportedly showed Fauci acknowledging that scientists believed the virus likely came from a lab leak, even as that possibility was publicly mocked and dismissed.

Durbin, however, chose to focus not on Fauci’s silence under questioning, but on the supposedly cruel treatment of a longtime Washington medical power broker.

“Last week, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs subpoenaed Dr. Fauci in front of Congress for a hearing, with the express goal of humiliating and vilifying him,” Durbin complained.

The Democrat then accused Republicans of mistreating Fauci during the hearing, framing basic accountability as some sort of grave Senate offense.

“For nearly three hours, my Republican colleagues berated, cursed, and insulted a man who has dedicated his life to protecting the health of American families. This behavior is below the dignity of the Senate,” he said.

That is rich coming from the party that spent years lecturing Americans, shutting down dissent, and treating parents, workers, and small business owners like public health criminals for daring to ask questions.

Durbin also claimed the hearing was a political spectacle rather than a serious inquiry, even though Fauci’s pandemic record remains one of the most consequential and disputed chapters in recent American government.

“Put simply, it was an embarrassment,” Durbin said, before accusing Republicans of chasing what he called “COVID conspiracy theories.”

The problem for Durbin is that many of the questions once dismissed as fringe are now part of the public record, including serious concerns about the origins of the virus and the shifting guidance that defined the pandemic years.

Durbin insisted Republicans were trying to “try and tear down a man who’s devoted his entire life to lifting others up,” and added that Fauci “deserves an apology for the way he was treated by my colleagues.”

“And the American people deserve better than the pitiful display we saw in the Senate last Wednesday,” Durbin added.

WATCH:

Republicans see it very differently, especially after Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly despite receiving a pardon that Chairman Rand Paul said removed the basis for such a refusal.

“The chairman has denied your assertion of privilege and directed you to answer, but you nonetheless refuse and stand on privilege despite the existence of the pardon,” Paul said during the hearing.

“The committee will have to consider after this hearing what appropriate action should be taken against you for the failure to testify after being directed to do so,” Paul added.

Paul has now announced that the committee will vote Thursday morning on a resolution to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress.

“Dr. Fauci appeared under subpoena and invoked the Fifth Amendment to refuse answering questions,” Paul said in a statement.

“During the hearing, I ruled that the Fifth Amendment did not apply because of the pardon, and that Fauci had waived any remaining privilege by giving opening testimony. I ordered him to answer and warned him about contempt, yet he still refused.”

Paul’s conclusion was blunt and direct.

“That is obstruction of a congressional investigation. The Committee will act accordingly.”

For Democrats, Fauci remains a secular saint of the pandemic era, shielded from scrutiny no matter how many questions pile up around his statements, his emails, his diary, and his testimony.

For millions of Americans who lived through mandates, closures, censorship, and endless lectures from experts who kept changing their story, Durbin’s demand for an apology lands like another insult from Washington’s protected class.

This is the Real Terrorist Threat to Americans | Hint: It’s Not White Supremacy [WATCH]
News

This is the Real Terrorist Threat to Americans | Hint: It’s Not White Supremacy [WATCH]

/

Sebastian Gorka said U.S. counterterrorism efforts should be centered on what he described as the country’s current security threats rather than political considerations, arguing that federal authorities must adapt to the changing landscape of domestic and international violence.

Speaking about national security priorities, Gorka said his approach is to remove politics from counterterrorism policy and instead concentrate resources on organizations and individuals he believes present the greatest danger today.

“So we’re taking politics out of counterterrorism, and what we are focusing on is real threats, cartels under Stephen Miller, jihadists under our directorate, and then the anti-left-wing threat,” Gorka said.

He argued that recent research supports his assessment, pointing to a report published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Gorka emphasized that he does not view the organization as politically aligned with the conservative movement.

“Because sadly, CSIS, the Center for Security and International Studies, it’s not a MAGA outfit. Okay, that is a Democrat think tank, and they literally just published an extensive report saying the empirical facts are pretty clear.”

According to Gorka, the report concluded that while right-wing terrorism continues to exist, left-wing terrorism has become the more significant form of political violence in the United States.

“We may have some right-wing terrorists in America, but left-wing terrorism is the ascendant form of violence,” he said.

Gorka then pointed to several high-profile attacks that he believes illustrate the current threat environment.

Referring to President Donald Trump, he argued that multiple attempts have been made on the president’s life.

“How many left-wing terrorists have tried to kill my boss, President Trump?” Gorka asked.

He also cited the 2017 shooting that seriously wounded then-House Majority Whip Steve Scalise during a congressional baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia.

“Look at Steve Scalise, almost killed, shot in the hip by a Bernie Sanders campaign volunteer at a baseball game not far from where we’re sitting,” Gorka said.

Gorka also referenced the death of Charlie Kirk, describing it as another example of what he believes is the current trend in politically motivated violence.

“Or our friend, my friend Charlie Kirk, killed live on camera by somebody who likewise was a left-wing terrorist.”

Throughout his remarks, Gorka argued that counterterrorism priorities should evolve over time rather than remain fixed on threats that were more prominent decades ago.

He contrasted today’s security environment with that of the 1990s, when he said right-wing militia groups were viewed as a more pressing concern by law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

“If we were back in the 1990s and I was the terrorism chief for for the present back then, yeah, I’d be concentrating on militias. I’d be looking at right wing potential terrorists,” Gorka said.

He maintained, however, that the security landscape has changed significantly and requires a different strategy.

“But we’re not in the 1990 s. It’s 2026, and I have to look at the real threat.”

Gorka concluded by reiterating what he believes should be the three primary areas of focus for U.S. counterterrorism efforts moving forward.

“The real threat is jihadis, cartels, and left wing violence.”

WATCH:

His comments came during a broader discussion about national security and domestic terrorism, where he argued that law enforcement and intelligence agencies should prioritize what he described as present-day threats rather than relying on strategies designed for an earlier era.

Gorka said that effective counterterrorism policy depends on assessing current conditions and directing government resources toward the dangers he believes are most relevant today.

Greg Gutfeld Just Dropped a Truth Bomb on the State of the Democrat Party [WATCH]
News

Greg Gutfeld Just Dropped a Truth Bomb on the State of the Democrat Party [WATCH]

/

Greg Gutfeld did not dance around the obvious on The Five.

He took the modern Democrat Party, stripped away the slogans, and pointed straight at the rot underneath.

“If you don’t value your values enough to protect them, the people you attract, the radicals, they value it, and they will take over,” Gutfeld said.

That single line explains years of Democrat decay better than a thousand consultant memos ever could.

The party that once pretended to represent working families now bends the knee to the loudest activists in the room.

Weak leadership made the opening, and the Democratic Socialists of America happily marched through it.

Gutfeld laid out the cultural wreckage that followed.

“How did we get Drag Queen Story Hour? Do you ever think about that? How did that happen? How is it that city blocks can be taken over, or that we actually tolerated looting, or there’s violence in subways and airplanes? Felons are rarely incarcerated,” he said.

That is not a random list of grievances. It is a map of what happens when a political party decides that order, decency, and accountability are somehow oppressive concepts.

For years, Democrats treated normal Americans like bigots for wanting safe streets, sane schools, and public spaces that do not feel like social experiments run by angry graduate students.

Then they acted shocked when radicals noticed there was nobody guarding the gate.

“This is what happens when you no longer fight for your values, because then the structure starts falling apart,” Gutfeld said.

And fall apart it has, one surrender at a time.

The left did not wake up one morning and suddenly become unrecognizable.

Democrats made bargain after bargain with radicals because those radicals were useful, loud, and willing to do the dirty work of intimidating anyone who disagreed.

Then came the predictable result.

The activists stopped being a tool and became the management.

Gutfeld also put his finger on why the DSA has gained so much traction inside the Democrat ecosystem. “It’s because the DSA has the purest moral expression of the Democrats’ personality,” he said.

That is the part Democrat strategists would rather not discuss on cable news panels.

The DSA is not some alien force that invaded a healthy party, it is the clearest version of what Democrats have been rewarding for years.

“What are their values? They don’t talk about it anymore,” Gutfeld added.

Exactly right, because once a party trades real values for fashionable slogans, there is not much left to say.

Family, faith, order, and personal responsibility used to be considered basic building blocks of society.

On the left, they are now treated as suspicious relics unless they can be repackaged for a campaign ad in a swing district.

Democrats will embrace nearly anything if it earns applause from the right social circles.

If mutilating children under the banner of gender ideology is praised as compassion, many of them will nod along rather than risk being called names.

The same pattern drives their soft approach to crime.

They oppose tough penalties because activists told them law enforcement is inherently racist, and suddenly the rights of victims become an afterthought.

That is how a party loses its spine. It begins caring more about the approval of left wing tastemakers than the truth staring ordinary Americans in the face.

Gutfeld also noted the sudden panic among old guard Democrats who are realizing what they helped create.

“They are starting to realize that this charismatic force will harm you once the trust is secured. But by then, it’ll be too late,” he said.

WATCH:

The warning is simple.

When you invite radicals in because they energize your base, do not act surprised when they eventually demand the keys.

The Democrat Party wanted the heat, the slogans, the protests, and the street theater.

Now it is stuck with a movement that does not respect limits and has no interest in being managed by political fossils like James Carville.

Gutfeld’s point was bigger than drag shows, looting, subway chaos, or criminal leniency.

Those are symptoms of a party that stopped defending moral standards and started apologizing for them.

Values do not disappear by accident.

They are abandoned through cowardice, one concession at a time, until the radicals are no longer outside the party complaining, they are inside running the show.

The Democrats Have a Major Primary Problem, The Math is Unforgiving [WATCH]
News

The Democrats Have a Major Primary Problem, The Math is Unforgiving [WATCH]

/

Former Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said the Democratic Party’s ongoing primary battles in Michigan and Wisconsin represent more than routine election contests, arguing they expose a broader struggle over the party’s identity and direction heading into the midterm elections.

Priebus made the comments during a discussion with Fox News hosts Bill Hemmer and Dana Perino, where the three examined the Democratic primaries in two key swing states and the growing influence of candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America and other progressive movements.

Priebus predicted that the nomination contests in both states would remain competitive for an extended period because, in his view, the candidates generating the most enthusiasm are not necessarily those appealing to moderate voters.

“Primaries will take very long, whether it be in Michigan or Wisconsin,” Priebus said.

He argued that voters who favor more traditional Democratic candidates may find themselves at odds with the activists driving the primary electorate.

“I mean, I know that people who are normal would rather see Haley Stevens win, or someone normal would rather see a guy like David Crowley, the county executive Milwaukee. But normal isn’t winning. What’s winning is middle finger politics.”

According to Priebus, the primary contests have become a debate between competing views of the country rather than simply a contest between individual candidates.

“It is a more of a debate, in my opinion, about two different visions of America: people who see America through a lens of good and hope, and people who see America through a lens of grievance, complaints, flaws,” he said. “That’s the big difference in all of these candidates.”

Priebus also questioned why Democratic Party leaders continue allowing candidates whose views differ from the party’s traditional platform to compete under the Democratic banner.

“The second thing here is what I don’t understand: is this is not a silly debate among candidates. This is a debate over, as your previous reporter said, the future of the Democrat Party. Where do they want to go?” Priebus said.

He argued that many of the candidates now emerging from Democratic primaries are promoting agendas separate from the party’s historical platform.

“And the reality is, these people in the Democrat Party, they don’t have. They’re not adhering to the platform of the party. They’ve got their own platform. They’ve got a different party.”

Priebus noted that political parties are private organizations and said they have broad authority over how they select their nominees.

“So, to me, the biggest oddity of this whole thing is why the DNC and the state parties would allow people who don’t agree with their platform to take over their party,” he said.

“These are private political organizations. They do not have to adhere to the state laws as to who their nominees will be, their members get to choose. They can do a convention. They can do. They can have a vote at their executive committee.”

Although he acknowledged the procedural discussion might not interest every viewer, Priebus maintained that party leaders have the ability to prevent ideological opponents from becoming their nominees.

“So I don’t want to bore you all with with this part of the debate. But the reality is, a private organization, the Republican Party, Democrat Party, they get to choose their candidates. They do not have to allow people who don’t agree with their platform to take over their party. It’s crazy.”

Hemmer then turned the discussion to recent Democratic politics in Michigan and Wisconsin.

“Well, six years ago, Michigan ended Bernie Sanders’ primary run. That that was it when they went up there and Joe Biden went head to head with him,” Hemmer said.

He also referenced Dana Perino’s recent interview with a Democratic socialist candidate for Wisconsin governor before introducing clips from that conversation.

Perino had challenged the candidate about previous positions, asking, “It’s going to be very easy for people to put up on the board and say, ‘You said abolish the Senate, defund the police, abolish the police, and why should they not believe that you would want to do that? That you would try to do that if you became governor?'”

Hemmer then quoted the candidate’s response: “I believe that people can evolve. We need Trump voters from previous elections who now would like to vote for me, who have a sign in their yard.”

Hemmer followed by highlighting an earlier social media post written during the COVID-19 pandemic that read: “Thanksgiving canceled. It should have done it in 1621. It takes a worldwide pandemic for us to realize we should stop celebrating colonialism and the original superspreader event that killed Indigenous folks, F-O-L-X, clever, and women.”

Turning back to Priebus, Hemmer asked how those positions would be received in Wisconsin.

Priebus responded that the debate illustrates what he sees as a broader political problem for Democrats.

“Well, I’ll be in Wisconsin later today. Here’s the deal. Number one, you’re showing what’s happening to the Democrat Party. They’re getting on the wrong side of normal.”

He argued that winning statewide elections in Wisconsin and Michigan depends on attracting a relatively small group of swing voters.

“When you’re on the wrong side of normal, you can’t win 4% of swing voters in places like Wisconsin or Michigan,” he said.

Priebus also described what he sees as a divide within Wisconsin Democrats, contrasting Madison’s liberal electorate with Democratic voters in Milwaukee.

“Wisconsin, like Michigan, is divided into two parts of the Democrat Party. Number one is in Madison, which is highly educated, you know, wealthy, and and and people who you know are very very liberal, and then you’ve got Democrats in Milwaukee, which are you know African American. They care about safety. That these are important issues.”

He argued that issues surrounding policing and other controversies could hurt Democratic candidates in a general election while still helping them secure the nomination.

“So how does it play out? It gets them on the wrong side of normal, and there’s only 4% of the public that are in play in Wisconsin and Michigan. I think it hurts them in a general, but they’ll launch to a primary victory, and it’ll be a real barn burner.”

Priebus concluded by predicting that President Donald Trump would remain an influential figure in both battleground states.

“And what Trump does will matter because those 4% swing voters in Wisconsin and Michigan they like Trump he’s won in Michigan Wisconsin so he will play a big role here in these swing states.”

WATCH:

Assassination Attempt?: Armed Suspect Filmed Trump Golf Security as Weapons and Armor Stash Surface [WATCH]
News

Assassination Attempt?: Armed Suspect Filmed Trump Golf Security as Weapons and Armor Stash Surface [WATCH]

/

Federal authorities say an armed California man was scouting President Trump’s golf club before the president’s scheduled visit, and what investigators later found was not exactly a harmless sightseeing kit.

Jeanine John Taele, 38, of Downey, was charged in a federal criminal complaint after his arrest at Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles in Rancho Palos Verdes.

Prosecutors say the case centers on possession of an unregistered rifle with a shortened barrel.

The felony charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in federal prison, a reminder that federal agents are not treating this as some routine security mix up.

When a man shows up around a presidential site with weapons, armor and strange explanations, law enforcement tends to pay attention.

According to court papers, federal agents were conducting security sweeps ahead of Trump’s August 4 visit when they first spotted Taele on July 31.

He was allegedly walking around the golf course wearing an earpiece while taking photos and videos of security planning activity.

That is the sort of behavior that tends to make trained security personnel stop and ask questions, especially after prior attempts on President Trump’s life.

The left may love pretending threats around Trump are just overheated political chatter, but agents on the ground do not have the luxury of media spin.

Authorities say Taele returned to the club on Saturday, and staff alerted law enforcement.

He allegedly approached federal agents and claimed he worked for the State Department and had been assigned to a security detail.

Investigators say that claim was false. Taele also allegedly admitted that he had a loaded firearm inside his pickup truck parked at the club.

Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputies responded and discovered that Taele had an outstanding El Segundo warrant connected to a robbery case.

Deputies also found a 16 round magazine loaded with hollow point ammunition in his pocket, according to the complaint.

A search of his pickup truck allegedly turned up a loaded 9mm pistol with a round in the chamber.

Investigators also found another loaded magazine filled with hollow point ammunition, binoculars and a badge marked “security protection agent.”

The case widened the next day when investigators searched Taele’s home on Sunday.

Authorities say they seized an illegally modified AR style rifle that was never registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record.

They also recovered additional firearms, ammunition, large capacity magazines, body armor, an earpiece, two radio signal devices and notebooks containing statements investigators described as concerning.

WATCH:

That is not the profile of a man who merely took a wrong turn near a golf course.

“While we are still investigating the motives of this individual, we are thankful he was apprehended before the President’s visit,” First Assistant US Attorney Bill Essayli said.

“Federal and local law enforcement stepped in early and prevented what could have been a dangerous situation from occurring.”

FBI Los Angeles Assistant Director in Charge Patrick Grandy said Taele’s actions “raised serious red flags” just days before Trump’s arrival.

“There is no room for error, particularly in light of previous attempts on President Trump’s life,” Grandy said.

Essayli later posted on X that investigators were still working to determine Taele’s motives.

He credited the FBI, Secret Service, ATF and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department for stepping in before Trump arrived and preventing “a potentially dangerous situation.”

Taele is also facing firearms charges and a 2025 robbery case in Los Angeles Superior Court, where he was granted 250000 dollars bail.

He is expected to make his initial appearance in federal court after being transferred into federal custody.

The FBI, Secret Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department are investigating.

A federal criminal complaint contains allegations only, and Taele is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

Ex NYC Mayor Eric Adams Gets Roasted by Wisconsin Crowd Over AI Data Center [WATCH]
News

Ex NYC Mayor Eric Adams Gets Roasted by Wisconsin Crowd Over AI Data Center [WATCH]

/

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams took his traveling pitchman routine to Wisconsin, and the locals did not exactly roll out the red carpet.

A newly surfaced video shows Adams getting booed, heckled, and shouted down during a Saturday meeting in Wisconsin Rapids, where he attempted to sell residents on a proposed artificial intelligence data center.

The scene was ugly, awkward, and very much on brand for Adams, whose political career after City Hall has become a strange blend of salesmanship, scandal residue, and public confusion.

As Adams introduced himself to the crowd, his name drew a blast of boos from attendees who were clearly not interested in being charmed by the former mayor of America’s most chaotic blue city.

“You belong in prison!” one attendee shouted, a blunt reference to Adams’ federal corruption case, which was controversially dismissed before he left office.

That line seemed to set the tone for the rest of the meeting, where residents treated Adams less like a respected civic figure and more like an unwanted salesman who wandered into the wrong town hall.

Adams was appearing on behalf of PNK Group, an industrial engineering and construction company seeking to build a data center on 209 acres along the Wisconsin River.

The proposed site was once home to a paper mill that closed in 2020, taking about 900 local jobs with it and leaving the community understandably sensitive to big promises from outside interests.

PNK has reportedly said the project could create between 50 and 150 permanent jobs, but the company has not publicly identified who would occupy the building.

For many residents, that did not appear to be enough, especially when the pitch came from Adams, a Democrat whose own tenure in New York was marked by scandals, theatrics, and a talent for making headlines for all the wrong reasons.

“Whether we like it or not, folks, data centers are going to be here,” Adams told the crowd.

That argument landed with all the grace of a campaign speech at a tax revolt, as attendees fired back with anger about water, land use, and why this project should be dropped into their backyard.

“Get out of here! Put it in your backyard!,” one resident spouted off.

“You’re here to steal our water!” another yelled.

“How many bribes did you pay in this town?” yet another shouted.

Adams tried to pivot into a more personal appeal, telling a story about artificial intelligence helping a friend receive a breast cancer diagnosis.

But even that attempt at humanizing the issue failed to quiet the room, with one skeptical attendee asking, “Is this story true?”

WATCH:

That question was especially brutal given Adams’ long history of odd public tales, including one about a childhood pet rat named “Mickey,” which became part of his famously bizarre political folklore.

Since leaving Gracie Mansion, Adams has managed to keep the headlines coming, becoming an Albanian citizen, appearing in strange Chinese AI videos, and watching close adviser Frank Carone get hit with a corruption indictment of his own.

He has also launched a new life as a business development consultant, pitching products and services ranging from green rebar to fire retardant.

Adams recently bragged to The Real Deal about his portfolio and claimed an 80 percent close rate while helping companies sell everything from cleaning services to health monitoring technology.

That sales record apparently did not impress Wisconsin Rapids, where the former mayor’s big city swagger met small town skepticism and a room full of people who were not buying the glossy tech pitch.

After Hell Gate reported on the chaotic meeting, Adams spokesman Todd Shapiro argued the video did not tell the whole story.

“A short video clip cannot accurately portray an event that lasted much longer,” Shapiro said.

“It omits the many attendees who approached Mayor Adams afterward to thank him, ask questions, and express appreciation for his willingness to engage directly with the community. Reasonable people can have different views on individual projects, but the facts are clear: AI is transforming the global economy, and data centers are the infrastructure that powers it.”

PNK representatives also defended Adams’ role, saying he had been brought in to assist with local outreach.

“We have retained him on a paid consulting basis to advise us on community engagement strategy and best practices,” the reps said.

“His experience is valuable as we work to engage openly and constructively with the communities where we are evaluating future projects.”

The company may see Adams as a seasoned communicator, but the Wisconsin crowd seemed to see something else entirely, a former big city mayor with political baggage trying to sell a massive project they do not trust.

For Adams, it was another reminder that leaving office does not erase the reputation voters remember, especially when the next act involves telling skeptical citizens that a mysterious data center is simply the future coming to town.

Socialist Francesca Hong Flails on CNN Over Resurfaced Cancel Thanksgiving Post [WATCH]
News

Socialist Francesca Hong Flails on CNN Over Resurfaced Cancel Thanksgiving Post [WATCH]

/

Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Francesca Hong found herself in an uncomfortable national spotlight Monday night after CNN pressed her on an old social media post calling for Americans to cancel Thanksgiving.

Hong, a democratic socialist and the current leader in the Democratic primary race, appeared on “The Source with Kaitlan Collins” as her past comments about one of America’s most cherished holidays resurfaced online.

CNN host Kaitlan Collins did not exactly have to dig deep to find the obvious question.

“Do you still believe that Thanksgiving should be canceled?” Collins asked.

Hong began with a softer answer, leaning on her background in food and hospitality.

“I’m a chef, and one of the first meals that I made that was for the community when I was 16 [years old] was a Thanksgiving meal,” Hong said.

She continued by trying to cast herself as someone who values gathering and conversation.

“I always think my hospitality background in owning a restaurant for seven, eight years, that bringing folks around the table to share conversation and build community is always a good thing.”

That would have been a fine place to stop, but this is progressive politics, where even turkey and stuffing apparently need an ideological struggle session.

Hong then pivoted right back into the familiar left wing critique of the holiday.

“But Thanksgiving is also a time that’s incredibly painful for many people in our communities,” Hong continued.

She tried to smooth out the political damage by suggesting her views had shifted.

“And so I think there, I wanted to make sure that people understood that there are multiple views, but views can evolve.”

Then came the campaign pitch.

“And the position that I’m running for right now, and I think my background as a chef will actually help me become a better governor that’s able to bring more people to the table,” she concluded.

WATCH:

The problem for Hong is that the resurfaced post was not some vague academic musing.

In November 2020, she wrote, ” Cancel Thanksgiving . Should have done this in 1621,” according to prior reporting.

She added, “If it takes a worldwide pandemic for us to realize we should stop celebrating colonialism and the original superspreader event that killed indigenous folx [sic] and women, so be it,” referring to smallpox and its deadly impact on many indigenous Americans.

The use of “folx” is often treated on the left as a signal of inclusivity toward LGBTQ people and other groups.

For many normal voters, it reads like another reminder that progressive politicians spend far too much time trapped in activist vocabulary workshops.

Hong’s campaign later tried to clean up the mess in a statement to Fox News Digital. “No, she does not want to ‘cancel’ Thanksgiving.”

That denial may be convenient now, but voters are allowed to notice when a politician says one thing online, deletes it, and then suddenly discovers moderation when a camera is rolling.

Conservatives on X wasted little time mocking the answer. “[W]ord salad that would make Kamala [Harris] envious,” Libs of TikTok wrote.

The Thanksgiving controversy is not the only resurfaced social media moment causing headaches for Hong.

In a 2019 post, she described being “on the verge of [an] anxiety attack” while eating at a popular fast food restaurant with her son.

Hong is endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America and has attracted support from national progressive figures, including Hasan Piker, Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, and Rep. Ro Khanna of California.

She also shares policy ground with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, another socialist darling of the activist class.

That may thrill the online left, but Wisconsin voters may have a few questions before handing over the governor’s office.

The episode gives Republicans an easy opening in a state where cultural issues, kitchen table concerns, and law and order politics remain deeply potent.

If Democrats nominate a socialist who once wanted to cancel Thanksgiving, the campaign ads practically write themselves.

Hong may claim she wants to bring people to the table now.

The trouble is that her own record suggests she once wanted to flip the whole Thanksgiving table over, then lecture everyone about colonialism while the mashed potatoes got cold.

On CNN: Biden COVID Response Coordinator Finally Admits What ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Knew for Years [WATCH]
News

On CNN: Biden COVID Response Coordinator Finally Admits What ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Knew for Years [WATCH]

/

Dr. Ashish Jha, who served as the Biden White House COVID response coordinator, has now said out loud what plenty of Americans were mocked for considering years ago.

In a Sunday interview on CNN, Jha acknowledged that he believes COVID most likely began with a lab leak.

That is quite a turn from the early pandemic script, when media outlets, public health officials, and social media censors treated the lab leak theory like forbidden thought.

Funny how yesterday’s conspiracy theory keeps becoming today’s reluctant admission.

WATCH:

CNN anchor Dana Bash raised Jha’s recent social media activity, including his agreement with a long post from commentator Jamie Metzl arguing that COVID originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Jha did not run from it.

“This is going to surprise some people. You know, when I went into the White House, my view was, ‘This was almost surely a natural outbreak, maybe a lab leak,’” he said.

“Based on information I learned and based on information I‘ve seen, I have come to conclude that it is more likely to have been a lab leak.”

That was not some random internet commentator speaking from a basement.

That was a former senior Biden pandemic official admitting that the evidence shifted him toward the theory many elites worked overtime to bury.

Jha made clear that American officials still do not have full certainty, largely because China has never exactly been famous for transparency.

He added, “I‘m not suggesting I know for sure, but I‘m saying my best assessment is that it probably was a lab leak.”

Bash seemed to recognize the significance of the moment.

“That is definitely news to hear that from you for sure,” she replied.

“And shows that we‘re just, we‘re still learning, which is really important.”

Jha later posted a clip of the exchange on X and tried to clarify his view.

He wrote, “no one in America knows for sure,” while adding, “Based on strong circumstantial evidence I’ve seen, I think lab leak is much more likely.”

He also stressed that he was not claiming the virus was engineered or released on purpose.

His view, as he framed it, is that an accidental lab leak is the most likely explanation based on what he has seen.

WATCH:

The admission lands years after major media outlets dismissed the lab leak theory as fringe, debunked, or politically motivated.

CNN, MS NOW, The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR, and others spent the early pandemic period treating skepticism about China and Wuhan as if it were a moral failing.

NPR offered one of the cleaner examples of institutional overconfidence.

In April 2020, the taxpayer funded outlet published pieces on consecutive days dismissing the possibility of a lab accident, including one headline that told readers scientists had debunked the idea.

That was never journalism’s finest hour. It was a herd of credentialed hall monitors confusing consensus management with fact finding.

The wider COVID era produced a credibility disaster that still hangs over public health, media, and government.

Americans watched officials demand trust while changing guidance, shutting down debate, and treating ordinary questions as dangerous misinformation.

Social media companies also restricted discussion of some COVID claims under misinformation policies, while the Biden administration later faced a major First Amendment fight over pressure placed on platforms.

Under a settlement, the Office of the Surgeon General, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are barred for ten years from threatening or coercing platforms to suppress protected speech.

That part matters because the lab leak debate was never just about science.

It was about who gets to ask questions in America when the political class has already decided what the approved answer must be.

Jon Stewart captured the absurdity during a now famous exchange with Stephen Colbert, mocking the refusal to see the obvious coincidence in Wuhan.

“Oh my God, there’s a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China. What do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask, the Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab. The disease is the same name as the lab! That’s just a little too weird, don’t you think?”

Stewart went on, “Then they ask the scientists, ‘Wait a minute, you work at the Wuhan respiratory coronavirus lab, how did this happen?’ And they’re like, ‘A penguin kissed a turtle?’”

“‘Oh my God, there’s been an outbreak of chocolaty goodness near Hershey, Penn. What do you think happened?’ I don’t know, maybe a steam shovel mated with a cocoa bean. Or it’s the f**ing chocolate factory! Maybe that’s it!”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top