Author name: LifeZette

California Democrats Rally Behind Controversial Billionaire Tax as 2026 Ballot Fight Explodes [WATCH]
News

California Democrats Rally Behind Controversial Billionaire Tax as 2026 Ballot Fight Explodes [WATCH]

/

California Democrats have officially lined up behind a proposed one time wealth tax that would take up to 5 percent from billionaires, giving voters another front row seat to Sacramento’s favorite pastime, chasing money that has not fled the state yet.

The proposal will appear before Californians during the 2026 midterm election, where voters will decide whether the state should slap a special levy on its wealthiest residents.

According to The Sacramento Bee, the California Democratic Party executive board voted Sunday to support the measure.

That backing gives the proposal a major political boost from the party that already dominates the statehouse and rarely meets a tax it does not want to invite over for dinner.

The San Francisco Standard reported that Jane Natoli, a member of the party’s resolutions committee, said the first vote came up just short of the 60 percent threshold needed for ratification. It reportedly earned 59.2 percent support.

Then came a second vote, and this time the measure squeaked through with about 61.7 percent support.

Nothing says overwhelming mandate quite like trying again until the math finally cooperates.

The tight vote exposed a real split among California Democrats.

Even in one of the bluest political machines in America, not everyone is eager to put another warning sign in front of entrepreneurs, investors, and high earners.

The proposal is being promoted by the Billionaire Tax Now coalition, which has pushed the idea as a way to raise revenue from the extremely wealthy.

WATCH:

Supporters frame it as fairness, while critics see the familiar California formula of spending first, taxing later, and acting shocked when productive people pack up and leave.

U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California supports the plan. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is term limited and cannot run for another term as governor, has said he will vote against it.

Newsom’s opposition is not exactly a conversion to supply side economics.

His complaint is not that the state is targeting wealth, but that the measure directs almost all of the money into one category of state spending.

“But I’m voting no because this measure dedicates almost all of the revenue it raises to a single category of state spending,” he wrote in a June Substack post.

“So here is what I support: A national billionaires’ tax. A true minimum tax on billionaires, a modern Buffett Rule, that ensures the people at the very top pay at least the tax rate their own workers pay.”

In other words, Newsom is not rejecting the tax grab as much as shopping for a bigger one.

If California cannot keep its billionaires in place, the preferred progressive solution is apparently to nationalize the chase.

The debate comes as California continues to face scrutiny over wealth flight and taxpayer migration.

Billions in taxpayer income have already been leaving high tax states, and California remains one of the biggest examples of what happens when politicians treat success like a public utility.

Fox Business has also highlighted concerns that wealthy Californians may be shifting assets, giving away cash, or moving to blunt the impact of the proposed tax.

Altman Brothers Real Estate owner Josh Altman discussed the possibility of figures such as LeBron James facing California’s wealth tax despite moving to Philadelphia during an appearance on “Varney & Co.”

That possibility gets to the heart of the controversy. If the state can reach beyond current residency or punish accumulated wealth after people make life changes, taxpayers may decide it is safer to cut ties earlier and more completely.

California Democrats are betting that resentment politics will sell in 2026.

They know that putting the word billionaire on a ballot measure can make voters forget how often taxes aimed at the rich eventually ripple through jobs, investment, housing, and small businesses.

For conservatives, the lesson is familiar.

The left starts with a narrow target, wraps it in moral language, and insists only a tiny group will feel the hit.

Then the money is spent, the promises grow, the economy reacts, and Sacramento comes back asking for more.

California voters will now decide whether they want to reward that cycle again or send the tax collectors back to the drawing board.

Teen Says Xavier Becerra Migrant Machine Led to Sexual Abuse and Slave Labor [WATCH]
News

Teen Says Xavier Becerra Migrant Machine Led to Sexual Abuse and Slave Labor [WATCH]

/

A new video released Monday is putting former Biden Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra back under a very ugly spotlight, this time through the testimony of a young migrant woman who says the child migrant system he oversaw delivered her into abuse.

The testimony comes from Juana Rebecca Pérez Santay, who says she was only 17 when she crossed the southern border in May 2021 and entered the federal system for unaccompanied minors.

Becerra, now running against Republican Steve Hilton in the California governor race, has previously bragged about the operation and described the flow of minors through the system as an “assembly line.”

That description looks even colder in light of Santay’s account, which alleges that the very system meant to protect children instead pushed her into the hands of dangerous people.

Santay said plainly, “Xavier Becerra failed to protect us. He failed me because he didn’t protect me.”

According to her testimony, she was placed with a supposedly vetted sponsor through the Office of Refugee Resettlement, the HHS program responsible for handling unaccompanied migrant minors.

Santay, who speaks Spanish, said a social worker accompanied her onto a resettlement flight, but then abandoned her at the airport instead of making sure she safely reached the sponsor.

She said she called the number she had been given and was picked up by three men, who took her to a house where her situation quickly turned into a nightmare.

Santay said the woman running the house told her she would be working 20 hours a week making food, but the reality was far worse.

She said she was forced to work seven days a week, nearly around the clock, while being forbidden to touch the food she was preparing.

According to Santay, she was deprived of water and threatened with deportation if she dared to complain, which is exactly the kind of abuse government vetting is supposed to prevent.

“I have been sexually abused. I slept on a ceramic floor, in a room with four men who were sleeping there,” Santay said.

She also described a terrifying incident involving a drunken man who came into the house, focused on her, and attempted to sleep beside her.

Santay said the woman sponsor told her to allow it because, “he’s a drunk and he doesn’t know what he’s doing.”

Santay’s full conclusion was devastating.

“Xavier Becerra failed me because he never cared about my safety. I ended up in the hands of child traffickers, and I was almost raped. They kept me like a slave; they didn’t let me talk to my family. If he were to become governor of California, it would be horrible, because I would not want what happened to me to happen to other children.”

WATCH:

Hilton has been releasing testimony from whistleblowers and alleged victims tied to the ORR program, arguing that Becerra’s policies weakened protections and helped fuel exploitation under the respectable sounding banner of refugee resettlement.

WATCH:

One public summary of the new testimony stated, “I was sexually abused because of Xavier Becerra.”

Another line from the testimony cut through the bureaucratic fog: “They kept me like a slave. Becerra failed to protect me.”

The allegations fit into a broader conservative concern that the Biden administration treated the border crisis like a political management problem instead of a human catastrophe.

While Democrats wrapped themselves in compassion talk, real children were allegedly moved through federal channels with astonishing speed and then handed over to people who should never have been trusted with them.

That is the part Washington would rather bury under paperwork, acronyms, and the usual polished excuses from the administrative class.

But a teenage girl sleeping on a ceramic floor in a room with men is not a paperwork issue.

It is a moral failure, and if Santay’s account is accurate, it happened under the leadership of a man now asking Californians to give him even more power.

The House may be focused on removing sexual predators from its own ranks, which is a worthy mission, but accountability cannot stop at Capitol Hill.

Anyone who built or supervised a system that allegedly allowed trafficking, forced labor, and sexual abuse of minors should face hard questions before being rewarded with higher office.

Becerra wants voters to trust him with the nation’s most populous state and one of the world’s largest economies.

Before California even thinks about handing him the keys, voters deserve real answers about the children who passed through his “assembly line” and the ones who say they were broken by it.

Mamdani’s Socialist Grocery Scheme Demands ID Before New Yorkers Can Buy Dinner [WATCH]
News

Mamdani’s Socialist Grocery Scheme Demands ID Before New Yorkers Can Buy Dinner [WATCH]

/

If New Yorkers want to buy food from one of Zohran Mamdani’s proposed government run supermarkets, they may have to bring something the left suddenly finds very useful, identification.

That is the delicious little twist in Mamdani’s big socialist grocery pitch.

The same political crowd that treats voter ID like a civil rights catastrophe now seems perfectly comfortable asking people to prove who they are before buying subsidized dinner.

“So, our RFP [Request for Proposals] makes very clear that this is a program for New Yorkers to be able to put food on the table, not a program for people to be able to make a quick buck through reselling,” explains Mamdani.

“I’m going [to] pass it over to our EDC head, Jeanny Pak, to add some additional details.”

Pak, the Interim President & CEO of the New York City Economic Development Corporation, then filled in the blanks.

“Yes, if you look at our RFP for the operator, we are looking to make sure that we target New Yorkers, whether it be [through] a sort of a library card esque [system], and also, we manage who’s buying and that it’s focused on everyday New Yorkers,” Pak said.

“So, we are mindful of that, and we’re going to make sure that we have all the things in place to ensure that that does not happen.”

WATCH:

A library is a government institution.

A library card esque system is, in plain English, a government identification system.

That is what happens every single time left wing theory gets dragged out of the faculty lounge and forced to operate in the real world.

The slogans melt, the moral preening fades, and suddenly even the socialists discover that verification matters.

Mamdani wants government involved in the means of feeding people, which is not exactly a subtle political move.

Food is the perfect opening act for a socialist experiment because everyone needs it, everyone wants it cheaper, and nobody wants families going hungry.

The problem, as always, is reality. If a city run store sells groceries 30 percent below retail, ordinary families will go there, because people are not stupid and grocery bills are brutal.

That means privately owned grocery stores, many of which operate on razor thin margins, get crushed.

These are not cartoon villains sitting on piles of gold, they are local businesses trying to survive rent, payroll, crime, inflation, regulation, and the endless brilliant ideas coming out of City Hall.

Once the private stores close, the government stores expand.

Then more private stores close, then more government stores appear, and eventually the same political class that could not manage a pothole becomes the gatekeeper of your pantry.

That is not charity.

That is control wrapped in a sale sticker.

Then comes the obvious question. If groceries are being sold at a steep discount, what stops people from buying up the goods and reselling them elsewhere for a profit?

Apparently, the answer is identification. Imagine that.

When fraud threatens a leftist food scheme, proof of identity suddenly becomes common sense instead of oppression.

Mamdani’s team knows exactly what every normal voter already knows.

Systems without verification invite abuse, and people looking for a loophole will find one faster than a city bureaucrat can schedule a listening session.

Now compare that with the left’s usual sermon on voter ID.

Democrats constantly claim that voting is a sacred right, so asking for identification is somehow cruel, burdensome, or sinister.

But eating is rather important too. If identification is acceptable before someone buys subsidized food, it is more than acceptable before someone helps decide who runs the government.

They also tell Americans that poor people cannot get identification.

Yet Mamdani’s proposed program is aimed at New Yorkers who need cheaper groceries, including poor and working class residents who are being squeezed by the very policies Democrats keep selling as compassion.

They say voter ID is racist.

By that logic, a government ID requirement for food would also be racist, unless the rule only becomes bigotry when it interferes with Democrat election strategy.

WATCH:

The real lesson here is not complicated.

Mamdani and his allies understand that ID protects programs from fraud, abuse, and exploitation.

They simply object when that same protection is applied to elections.

Funny how the moral crisis disappears the moment the fraud might damage a socialist project instead of helping the Democrat machine.

For conservatives, this is a perfect little snapshot of the modern left.

They want control over food, control over business, control over access, and control over the rules, all while lecturing everyone else about freedom and fairness.

Mamdani’s grocery scheme is not just about cheaper food.

It is about the government gaining another lever over daily life, and requiring ID at the checkout counter proves the left knows exactly why verification matters.

Donna Brazile Warns Democrats Their Socialist Wave Could Wreck the Party [WATCH]
News

Donna Brazile Warns Democrats Their Socialist Wave Could Wreck the Party [WATCH]

/

Donna Brazile delivered a blunt warning to Democrats on Sunday, telling her party on ABC’s “This Week” that it had better figure out what it is before the socialist wing defines it for them.

The longtime Democratic operative, who has seen more party brawls than most cable news panels can remember, acknowledged what many in Washington already know. The left flank is not just making noise anymore, it is winning races and scaring the establishment.

George Stephanopoulos pressed Brazile about the Democratic Socialists of America and the rise of insurgent candidates in House primaries.

He also pointed to Abdul El Sayed in Michigan, noting that he is not formally a socialist but comes from the progressive wing.

Brazile tried to draw a line between the Democratic Party and the DSA, which is becoming a harder sell by the week as the party’s activist base keeps sprinting left.

“Well, first of all, George, when you look at the DSA, which is not the Democratic Party, so I had to go online to figure it out. They ran 29 candidates. They’ve lost 11. They’ve won seven. And there’s still an opportunity for them if they play their cards right, maybe to pick up three or four more seats.”

That is not exactly the kind of math that soothes nervous Democrats heading into a general election.

Seven wins by socialist aligned candidates is enough to make party consultants start pretending they always cared deeply about moderation.

Then Brazile said the quiet part out loud.

“The problem right now, George, is that the Democratic Party must define itself and make sure that we don’t get caught in this socialist wave, which is, you know, popping up here, there and everywhere.”

For Republicans, that line practically writes the campaign ads.

Democrats can call it populism, progressivism, or whatever new branding exercise their consultants cook up, but voters keep seeing a party increasingly comfortable with open borders, massive government spending, anti police rhetoric, and class warfare.

Brazile pointed to Michigan as a major test for the party and the national electorate.

“But I think Michigan is going to tell us a lot about this current electorate. We know they’re angry, they want change. And both candidates are trying not to allow the labels to define them.”

That anger is real, but Democrats are clearly wrestling over who gets to harness it.

The old guard wants to channel frustration into safe campaign slogans, while the activist left wants to remake the party into a full blown government control machine with better graphics.

Brazile noted that candidates are now running away from traditional ideological labels and reaching for the magic word of the moment.

“Miss Stevens said I’m not a moderate, I’m a populist. Mr. Abdul said I’m not a progressive, I’m a populist. They want to capture this anger and they want to see if they can ride it to the polls.”

That tells voters plenty. When every Democrat suddenly discovers populism, it usually means someone tested the word in a focus group and found it sounded less toxic than socialism.

Stephanopoulos then raised the concern among establishment Democrats that El Sayed might struggle to win in November.

Brazile responded with a dose of political reality that Democrats cannot spin away with another round of activist applause.

“Well, that young man at the end said, well, Trump won. It’s going to be difficult. He will have to unite the party.

He’s going to have to bring the establishment wing back on board to his side. And he’s going to have to, I think, do a better job of messaging for the fall in order to win swing voters. Michigan is a purple state. It’s going to be tough.”

WATCH:

That is the heart of the problem for Democrats.

Their primary voters keep rewarding candidates who speak to the party’s leftward fever, but general election voters in places like Michigan are not always eager to sign up for the revolution.

Brazile’s warning is notable because she is not some Republican strategist gleefully pointing at the wreckage.

She is a seasoned Democrat telling her own party that the socialist label is becoming a real danger, especially in competitive states where working families may want better wages and safer communities, not lectures from radicals.

The irony is rich. For years, Democrats insisted conservatives were exaggerating when they warned about socialism gaining ground inside the party.

Now Donna Brazile is on national television telling Democrats not to get swallowed by the very wave they said did not exist.

If Democrats cannot define themselves, Republicans will be more than happy to do it for them.

And with the socialist wing “popping up here, there and everywhere,” as Brazile put it, that definition may not require much creativity at all.

Alaska Fisherman Grins Beside Ravenous Grizzly in Wildly Reckless Selfie Stunt [WATCH]
News

Alaska Fisherman Grins Beside Ravenous Grizzly in Wildly Reckless Selfie Stunt [WATCH]

/

An Alaska fishing guide has gone viral after filming himself with the sort of backdrop most people would prefer to view from inside a sturdy truck.

Carter Brown smiled for the camera while a massive mother grizzly devoured salmon just feet behind him.

Brown was working as the guide on a chartered boat along a river in Soldotna when the bear appeared on the hunt.

Instead of scrambling away or pretending common sense still deserves a seat in the boat, he started recording.

The footage shows Brown looking almost absurdly calm as the grizzly moves in behind him and locks onto her meal.

Another bear can be seen farther away, turning the moment into a full Alaska wildlife show with zero admission charge.

The mother grizzly finds salmon near the boat and settles in to eat, apparently unconcerned by the human smiling nearby.

Brown, meanwhile, appears more amused than alarmed, which is either frontier toughness or a very bold relationship with danger.

“She finds a piece of salmon while foraging and eats it right next to my head!” Brown told Storyful.

“My clients were mind blown.”

WATCH:

That reaction sounds about right, since most paying customers probably expect fish, scenery, and maybe a decent story for the ride home.

They likely did not plan on watching their guide take casual selfie footage beside a hungry bear with claws built like gardening tools from a nightmare.

Brown remained shockingly steady throughout the encounter, even as the grizzly feasted within uncomfortable range.

For the average tourist, that kind of proximity would be less of a charming wilderness memory and more of a rapid review of every life choice ever made.

The veteran fisherman said moments like this are “a part of life” in that remote stretch of Alaska.

That may be true for locals, though the rest of America can be forgiven for thinking life should include a little more distance between your head and a salmon eating grizzly.

The clip has spread quickly online, with viewers marveling at both the bear and Brown.

Some focused on the grizzly’s fishing instincts, while others seemed stunned by Brown’s relaxed face, which barely suggested he was standing near one of nature’s most efficient meat processors.

Alaska has a way of reminding people that not every problem can be solved by an app, a consultant, or a government pamphlet.

Sometimes the lesson is simpler, bigger animals eat first, and smart humans remember they are visitors in the bear’s dining room.

Still, Brown’s demeanor is part of what made the footage irresistible.

He did not flinch, panic, or launch into a dramatic lecture, he simply let the camera roll while the bear handled the salmon like a professional.

The scene also delivers exactly what the internet tends to reward, danger, disbelief, and a person acting far calmer than the situation appears to warrant.

It is the kind of clip that makes office workers stare at their screens and wonder if their own lunch break needs more wilderness and fewer spreadsheets.

Of course, grizzly bears are not props, no matter how cinematic the moment looks.

A mother bear near food is not exactly a cuddly mascot, and even an experienced guide knows the difference between a close encounter and a very bad day.

Brown walked away with viral footage, stunned clients, and one of those only in Alaska stories that will be hard to top.

The bear got the salmon, the internet got the spectacle, and common sense got another reminder that it should never be left back at the dock.

Montana Teen Ropes Drowning Man from Yellowstone River in Stunning Faith Fueled Rescue [WATCH]
News

Montana Teen Ropes Drowning Man from Yellowstone River in Stunning Faith Fueled Rescue [WATCH]

/

A 14 year old Montana boy turned a family camping trip into the kind of frontier rescue story that still reminds America what grit, faith, and practical skills can do when seconds matter.

Jory Thomas was camping with his family near Greycliff on July 5 when cries for help cut through the noise along the Yellowstone River.

Most people might freeze, reach for a phone, or wait for someone else to move.

Thomas did not wait.

“We all heard, ‘Help, help,’” Thomas told KTVQ. “There’s two or three people floating down the river, one hanging on to the cooler, and he wasn’t saying anything.”

Authorities and local reports said a raft and a paddleboard had slammed into a bridge pillar, throwing four people into the water.

Three made it out, but one man was swept downstream while clinging to a cooler in a fast moving stretch of river.

“This current was pretty fast then, and he was moving pretty quickly,” Thomas said.

The teenager understood immediately that the situation was not going to fix itself.

“Only thing I could focus on was helping him get out of the water because I didn’t want to see anyone go in front of me,” he said.

That is a pretty simple moral code, and frankly, America could use more of it.

With a lariat in hand and no time for hesitation, Thomas charged through a waist deep side channel and ran along the river bank to get ahead of the drifting man.

This was not theory, training jargon, or some government brochure about safety.

It was a ranch kid with a rope, a clear head, and the will to act.

Thomas grabbed his 12 foot lariat and took his shot. He swung the rope and caught the struggling man on the first try, the sort of moment that sounds like a movie until a Montana teenager actually does it.

“First instinct I thought was try and rope him and drag him out before he gets too far down the river,” he said.

“Luckily, I caught him first try.”

The teen then pulled the man toward shore and kept him there until first responders arrived, officials said.

The rescue could have ended very differently if Thomas had not moved when he did.

“I felt pretty good afterwards that I knew he was okay and was out of the water,” Thomas said.

There was no chest thumping, no celebrity pose, and no desperate hunt for applause.

Instead, Thomas credited his faith.

“God was basically putting me in the place of all this,” he said.

“God was just telling me all of this at the time and saying, ‘Go get him, you got it, and I believe in you.’”

WATCH:

That explanation will make perfect sense to millions of Americans who still believe courage and providence are not outdated ideas.

In a culture that too often mocks faith and treats rural life like a punchline, this young man gave the country a reminder that values still matter when real danger shows up.

Thomas had been practicing with a lasso for about a year, according to The Washington Post.

Much of that practice happened on a cattle head he built in the backyard of his family ranch in Big Timber.

That detail matters. The skill that saved a life came from work, repetition, and the kind of hands on upbringing that never needed a lecture from some credentialed expert class.

The Sweet Grass County Sheriff’s Office later honored Thomas with a Certificate of Achievement, calling the rescue “heroic” in a Facebook post.

It was a fitting recognition for a young man who did not just witness trouble, but ran straight toward it.

“Jory is a strong believer of if somebody needs help, you’re going to do everything you can,” his mother, Robin Thomas, told The Washington Post.

That is not a slogan cooked up by consultants, it is a way of life.

In this case, that way of life meant a man in the Yellowstone River got to go home.

It meant a 14 year old boy showed the sort of courage adults are supposed to model.

There are plenty of stories about chaos, failure, and excuses.

This one is about a Montana teenager who heard a cry for help, trusted God, used the skill he had, and got the job done.

GOP Senator Bolts After Simple Question About Mitch McConnell Health Rumors [WATCH]
News

GOP Senator Bolts After Simple Question About Mitch McConnell Health Rumors [WATCH]

/

Sen. Mitch McConnell has been absent from Capitol Hill for weeks, and the official explanations have done little to calm the growing chatter around one of the Senate Republican Conference’s most powerful figures.

The Kentucky Republican said he suffered another fall and later contracted pneumonia, which led to hospitalization and a longer stay in rehabilitation.

That is a serious medical situation for any public official, especially one who has spent decades at the center of Senate power.

McConnell tried to ease concerns by posting a photo with his wife, Elaine Chao, the former Transportation and Labor Secretary.

But in Washington, a carefully released photo rarely settles anything, and this one did not exactly shut down the rumor mill.

The absence has now reached the point where even Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear is publicly demanding proof that McConnell is fit to serve or should resign. Of course, Democrats suddenly discovering standards for public fitness is rich, but the question is no longer confined to partisan sniping.

The latest round of fog came from Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, who offered a second hand update about McConnell’s condition.

Instead of providing clarity, her comments gave political watchers yet another reason to squint at the situation.

Capito told independent journalist Nicholas Ballasy that she was aware of the reports surrounding McConnell and that he “is recovering and is healing and is in a rehabilitation hospital.”

That much lined up with what had already been publicly known.

Then came the part that raised eyebrows.

“I talked to somebody yesterday who visited him and said that he’s clear minded, and he just needs to get stronger,” she said.

That may have been intended as reassurance, but unnamed visitors delivering medical confidence through a fellow senator is not exactly the gold standard for transparency. It is more like the Senate version of trust me, a guy told me.

Ballasy then asked Capito whether she would visit McConnell herself. She replied that she would wait “until he asks for visitors.”

That answer also sounded cautious, which is understandable on a human level, but politically it did not solve the problem.

When a senior senator has been out of sight for weeks, every carefully worded answer gets pulled apart for meaning.

The real trouble began when Ballasy followed up by asking who the mysterious visitor was.

Capito refused to identify the person, and according to the report, she moved away rather than offer more detail.

WATCH:

That is where the whole thing started to look less like a health update and more like a Senate leadership mystery wrapped in institutional muscle memory.

If McConnell is recovering well, naming a visitor or providing a more direct update would go a long way.

Instead, voters are left with a photo, a few vague descriptions, and one senator saying someone else saw him and thought he was doing fine.

For a body that loves lectures about norms, accountability, and public trust, the Senate sure gets shy when those standards point inward.

McConnell’s health has been a subject of concern before, particularly after highly visible incidents in which he froze during public appearances.

Those moments were not gossip, they were broadcast for the country to see.

Republican voters are not wrong to ask whether their leaders can fully do the job.

The party’s grass roots have spent years watching Washington protect its own while demanding endless patience from the people footing the bill.

There is no need to be cruel about illness, and nobody should root against McConnell’s recovery.

But there is also nothing improper about expecting clear answers from elected officials who wield enormous power over national policy.

The Senate is already famous for moving at a pace that makes molasses look athletic.

When the public cannot even get a straight answer about whether a former leader is fit and preparing to return, confidence does not exactly soar.

Capito says McConnell’s return is expected at the end of the August recess.

Until then, the questions will keep coming, especially when the answers sound like they were designed by a committee of lawyers, handlers, and people allergic to sunlight.

Washington insiders may think this is all just another round of uncomfortable press attention.

Regular Americans see something simpler: if a senator is well enough to serve, prove it clearly, and if not, stop treating voters like they are the problem for asking.

Democrat Sounds Alarm as ‘Democratic Socialists’ Push the Party Further Left Than Ever [WATCH]
News

Democrat Sounds Alarm as ‘Democratic Socialists’ Push the Party Further Left Than Ever [WATCH]

/

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., drew a sharp distinction between mainstream Democrats and the Democratic Socialists of America during a recent interview with Tomi Lahren, arguing that the socialist organization does not represent the Democratic Party’s values and should not be allowed to reshape its direction.

The discussion centered on the growing influence of Democratic Socialists in Democratic politics following a series of primary victories by progressive candidates and ongoing debates over the party’s future.

Lahren began by asking Gottheimer whether he believes there is significant ideological overlap between traditional Democrats and Democratic Socialists.

“I want to ask you: Do you think that there’s a lot of overlap between traditional Democrats such as yourself and the Democrat socialists that are giving the establishment a run for its money?” Lahren asked.

Gottheimer rejected the idea, saying he does not consider members of the Democratic Socialists of America to be Democrats despite their efforts to run candidates under the Democratic Party banner.

“Well, obviously, I’m a very proud, common sense Democrat, and I don’t think DSA members are Democrats,” Gottheimer responded. “They’re socialists, right?”

He said he has no objection to Democratic Socialists organizing as a separate political movement but opposed their efforts to influence the Democratic Party from within.

“And I’m all for them having their own party if they want one, but if they’re trying to take over our party, that’s unacceptable to me.”

Gottheimer argued that the group’s political philosophy differs significantly from that of mainstream Democrats.

“And their values, their ideas, and you know are certainly not in line with ours.”

According to Gottheimer, members of the Democratic Socialists of America are attempting to use the Democratic Party as a vehicle for advancing their own agenda rather than supporting the party’s leadership or platform.

“And they don’t support our leadership. They’re trying to use the Democratic Party as a vessel for their ideas.”

He also referenced statements and discussions that have taken place at Democratic Socialist gatherings, arguing they demonstrate ideological differences between the organization and the broader Democratic Party.

“And as you heard in some of these conventions, literally, they’re supporting the Communist Manifesto and Trotsky-they’re anti-American, they’re anti-cop, they don’t believe in borders, you know.”

Gottheimer maintained that, despite the attention the organization has received in recent election cycles, it represents only a small fraction of Democratic voters nationwide.

“And frankly, the good news is there’s only about 150,000 of them registered, and there’s 45 million Democrats.”

He said that disparity should make it clear that Democratic Socialists do not speak for the party as a whole.

“And so we should make it very clear that they’re not Democrats and they’re not welcome in the Democratic Party.”

WATCH:

The exchange comes as ideological divisions within the Democratic Party have become increasingly visible ahead of upcoming elections, with moderate Democrats and progressive activists continuing to debate the party’s direction on issues ranging from economic policy and policing to immigration and foreign affairs.

Gottheimer’s comments reflect the broader debate over whether Democratic Socialists should be viewed as a distinct political movement or as part of the Democratic coalition.

During the interview, he made clear that he believes the organization represents a separate ideology and should not define the future of the Democratic Party.

Hageman Moves to Crush Climate Lawsuit Grift Targeting American Energy [WATCH]
News

Hageman Moves to Crush Climate Lawsuit Grift Targeting American Energy [WATCH]

/

Rep. Harriet Hageman of Wyoming is taking aim at one of the left’s favorite political rackets, climate lawsuits dressed up as public interest litigation.

Her new bill, the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act, is designed to block activist driven legal campaigns that try to punish energy companies for alleged climate harms.

The legislation targets lawsuits from states, cities, and climate pressure groups that claim oil, gas, and energy producers should pay enormous sums for weather events, rising costs, and the usual grab bag of green talking points.

In plain English, Hageman says this is taxation by lawsuit, because the left knows many of these schemes would never survive a real vote in Congress.

“It is the Stop the Climate Shakedowns Act, and what this has to do with is there are many communities and states around the country that have … filed lawsuits against our energy companies claiming that they are responsible for climate change and the impacts of climate change, and this is an effort to try, really, it’s another way of taxation, is really what these communities are doing,” Hageman said.

That is the heart of the fight.

Instead of winning elections, persuading voters, and passing laws through constitutional channels, climate activists are using friendly courts to chase payouts and impose their agenda through litigation.

Hageman also pointed to the use of so called superfund style laws that attempt to pin the entire bill for climate policy fantasies on energy producers.

“So they’ve either adopted superfund laws claiming that producing energy has caused climate change and so those energy producers should be responsible for paying billions upon billions upon billions of dollars in fines,” she continued.

Those billions would not magically appear from some corporate vault hidden under a mountain.

Costs get passed along, and working Americans end up paying more for gasoline, electricity, food, transportation, and nearly everything else.

“The city of Boulder, Colorado, has a lawsuit pending in front of the United States Supreme Court right now against Suncorp. So the purpose of my legislation, and I filed this in conjunction with Senator Ted Cruz, is to stop these lawsuits in their tracks,” Hageman said.

WATCH:

The involvement of Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas gives the effort additional weight on Capitol Hill.

Cruz has long been one of the sharper critics of green mandates, federal overreach, and climate policies that punish energy states while rewarding activist lawyers.

The bill lands at a time when the American energy sector is already being battered by regulators, bureaucrats, and climate lobbyists who seem far more interested in control than reliability.

From natural gas restrictions to anti drilling crusades, the left’s energy agenda keeps finding new ways to make life more expensive for ordinary families.

Hageman’s argument is straightforward. If politicians want a carbon tax, they should introduce one, defend it in public, and let voters respond accordingly.

What they should not do is hide behind lawsuits and let courts impose what elected lawmakers could not pass.

That is exactly why this legislation matters. It is not merely about protecting corporations from nuisance suits, as the left will surely claim.

It is about protecting consumers, constitutional government, and the basic principle that major policy decisions belong in the legislative branch.

The climate lawsuit machine has become a convenient tool for activists who want power without accountability.

They can file lawsuits, demand settlements, generate headlines, and pressure companies, all while pretending this is somehow about saving the planet rather than extracting money and political leverage.

For conservatives, Hageman’s move is another reminder of why she has become a respected voice on the right.

She did not arrive in Washington to play along with the permanent political class.

She arrived after knocking Liz Cheney out of Congress, which still earns her a well deserved place in grassroots conservative history.

The Stop Climate Shakedowns Act is the kind of direct response many Republican voters want to see.

It names the problem, confronts the scheme, and refuses to let radical climate activists use the courts as their private tax office.

If Democrats and green groups believe their agenda is so popular, they can campaign on higher energy costs, new taxes, and more lawsuits.

Until then, Hageman is doing exactly what voters sent Republicans to Washington to do, fight back.

‘No Way. My God, No’: Joe Manchin Torches Democratic Socialist Demands as Crazy Stuff [WATCH]
News

‘No Way. My God, No’: Joe Manchin Torches Democratic Socialist Demands as Crazy Stuff [WATCH]

/

Sunday morning television still has a talent for producing political moments that tell voters more than the polished campaign ads ever could.

On CBS’s Face the Nation, former Senator Joe Manchin said out loud what plenty of Americans already know about the socialist wing of the Democratic Party.

Manchin appeared with his daughter, Americans Together CEO Heather Manchin, for an interview with host Margaret Brennan.

The conversation turned to so called democratic socialism, which is usually just old fashioned big government extremism wearing a fresh coat of marketing paint.

Brennan asked whether Heather Manchin could ever support a candidate who openly calls himself a socialist. Heather gave the obvious answer, “No.”

Manchin added his own reaction, “No way. My God, no.”

That was not exactly the answer the left likes hearing on a Sunday morning platform where bad ideas are often treated like brave new thinking.

Brennan pressed the point by asking whether good ideas could make such a candidate worth supporting.

Manchin responded, “I support the good ideas, but how could you support some of the crazy stuff they’re for? Have you seen their platform?”

That question cuts straight through the fog.

Democrats have spent years pretending the socialist faction is just a quirky youth movement with slogans, tote bags, and a bottomless appetite for other people’s money.

Manchin was not buying it. He said, “They’re for just dismantling everything that we know,” and then pointed to attacks on basic structures of government, law enforcement, and public order.

Then came the line that should be replayed in every battleground district.

Manchin said, “No police, no this, no this, no that. Are you crazy?”

He followed with another bit of common sense that somehow counts as controversial in modern Democratic politics

“We have to have police for that,” Manchin said while discussing the need for safe communities.

WATCH:

That is the heart of the issue.

The socialist left keeps treating police, prisons, national defense, and constitutional guardrails as obstacles to its grand utopian project.

Regular Americans see it differently.

They want safe streets, accountable government, secure borders, affordable groceries, and leaders who do not sound like they are auditioning for a student government revolution.

The radical wish list is not imaginary. Abolish this, defund that, eliminate the other thing, and somehow the result is supposed to be peace, fairness, and prosperity.

We have seen enough of that fantasy already.

When politicians demonize police, criminals get bolder, families get nervous, businesses flee, and the same elites who caused the mess hire private security.

Manchin also discussed why he did not pursue an independent presidential run in 2024.

Brennan noted that he had said he did not want to become a spoiler.

His answer focused on ballot access. “I couldn’t get on all 50 ballots. You put me on 50 ballots, then I have a platform, I can speak.”

Manchin added, “But I have no chance of winning because I’m only on 16 ballots or 20 ballots statewide.”

When Brennan summarized the issue, Manchin made it plain: “It’s ballot access.”

That is the built in wall facing nearly every serious third party or independent contender.

The two party system is not just cultural habit, it is reinforced by rules, money, infrastructure, and ballot hurdles that make a national run nearly impossible.

There is another obvious point Manchin did not need to dwell on.

A credible independent bid from a former Democrat could have carved votes away from the Democratic nominee and made Donald Trump’s path even clearer.

For conservatives, that would not have been a tragedy.

For Democrats, it would have been another self inflicted wound, which is practically their specialty at this point.

The larger lesson is that Manchin represents a type of Democrat that party activists seem determined to drive into extinction.

He talks about police like they matter, governing like it requires math, and socialism like it is a danger rather than a fashion trend.

If Democrats were serious about winning back working class voters, they would study why someone like Manchin still connects with people far from faculty lounges and activist conferences.

Instead, they keep flirting with the politics of Kamala Harris and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.

That is excellent news for Republicans who want to defend the America First agenda in 2026 and beyond.

The more Democrats embrace socialist demands as mainstream policy, the easier it becomes for voters to see the choice in front of them.

Manchin may not be a conservative, but on this point he landed the plane.

Calling the socialist wish list “crazy stuff” is not an insult, it is a public service.


Scroll to Top