Author name: LifeZette

Detective Ambushed in California Desert While Serving Search Warrant, Suspect Dead [WATCH]
News

Detective Ambushed in California Desert While Serving Search Warrant, Suspect Dead [WATCH]

/

A San Bernardino County sheriff’s detective was shot Wednesday afternoon while serving a search warrant in the high desert community of Littlerock, just east of Palmdale.

The attack triggered a major law enforcement response in a rural stretch of Los Angeles County where the quiet can turn ugly fast.

The detective, described in some reports as a San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department investigator, was hit by gunfire near East Avenue R and 130th Street.

Officials said the shooting happened at about 3:15 p.m., during the execution of a search warrant.

Because the shooting occurred in Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department is handling the investigation.

That means LASD homicide investigators are now working through the scene, the timeline, and the grim question of how a warrant service turned into gunfire.

The wounded detective was airlifted to Antelope Valley Hospital for treatment after being struck in the lower ribcage.

Authorities had not released the detective’s name, and details about the full extent of the injuries remained limited as officials worked the case.

The suspect accused of opening fire died at the scene, according to authorities.

Officials have not released the suspect’s identity or explained exactly how the suspect died, a familiar pause while investigators sort evidence before the public gets the fuller story.

Television news helicopters showed deputies and investigators spread across the desert neighborhood, with yellow tape cutting through the otherwise empty landscape.

Additional law enforcement personnel gathered outside Antelope Valley Hospital while the detective received care, a visible reminder that these incidents ripple through every badge in the region.

WATCH:

Littlerock is not downtown Los Angeles, and that is part of the point.

Once you leave the packed freeways and political theater behind, the desert opens into long roads, scattered homes, and plenty of places where criminals apparently think they can operate without much interference.

That assumption has been taking a beating lately.

Just one day earlier, Los Angeles Port Police and other agencies were involved in a major takedown of an alleged Sinaloa cartel meth operation in a remote desert area, with three suspected gang members arrested.

Two desert law enforcement operations in two days is not exactly the tourism brochure California officials like to print.

While Sacramento polishes slogans and the left lectures the rest of the country about compassion, officers are the ones walking into the ugly places where narcotics, gangs, and guns collide.

Early reports said the detective was serving a narcotics search warrant when gunfire erupted.

One scene account stated the detective was transported to a hospital and was in stable condition, while also noting that the adult male suspect was killed at the location and that no other injuries were reported.

“Thoughts with the detective and his family. Stay safe out there.”

That simple line says what decent people across California and the country are thinking.

The detective went to work, followed a warrant, and ended up being flown to a hospital because someone allegedly answered lawful authority with bullets.

This is the reality behind the polished arguments from the anti police crowd.

Search warrants do not serve themselves, cartel poison does not seize itself, and violent suspects do not politely wait for a social worker with a clipboard to explain community healing.

The high desert has long been used by smugglers, growers, gangs, and assorted lowlifes because isolation gives them room to hide.

When deputies and detectives push into those areas, they are not performing some abstract policy exercise, they are entering terrain where backup may be minutes away and danger can be instant.

The investigation will determine the sequence of events, including who fired, when, and what evidence was recovered during the warrant operation.

Those facts matter, and responsible agencies will be expected to lay them out clearly when the case permits.

What is already clear is that the law and order debate is not theoretical for the men and women sent into places like Littlerock.

While politicians posture, officers keep doing the work that civilized society requires, even when the desert answers with gunfire.

The detective’s condition will be watched closely as the investigation continues under LASD.

For now, one suspected gunman is dead, one detective is recovering, and California has another reminder that public safety collapses fast when criminals decide the law is optional.

Chris Cuomo Shrugs at Kids with COVID Vaccine Heart Damage [WATCH]
News

Chris Cuomo Shrugs at Kids with COVID Vaccine Heart Damage [WATCH]

/

Chris Cuomo has a gift for reminding Americans why CNN finally ran out of patience with him.

His latest vaccine commentary did not just flirt with arrogance, it pulled up a chair, grabbed a microphone, and tried to sell heart inflammation in children as a statistical inconvenience.

Cuomo left CNN in 2021 under the kind of cloud that usually prompts a little humility.

Naturally, humility was not on the menu, because the former prime time scold has never seemed especially burdened by self awareness.

The backstory still matters because it explains the messenger.

Cuomo was accused of advising his brother Andrew Cuomo during the sexual harassment scandal that helped end the elder Cuomo’s governorship, all while Chris was still pretending to be an independent journalist on national television.

Then came reports from the New York attorney general’s office that Chris Cuomo had allegedly used media contacts to gather information about women accusing his brother of misconduct.

Even CNN, hardly a monastery of journalistic virtue, eventually decided that was too much.

During the pandemic, Cuomo also turned his own COVID experience into televised melodrama from home.

Americans were already getting a daily fog machine of guidance from Anthony Fauci, the NIH, and the CDC, so Cuomo’s theatrical contribution fit right in with the national confusion.

Now he is back with podcast wisdom, which apparently means defending COVID shots for children by arguing that the most alarming risks were not widespread enough to bother the grown ups in charge.

That is quite a position when the subject is heart damage in kids.

On his Chris Cuomo Project podcast, Cuomo said, “The risks early on are really isolated to young males and for one potential exposure, which is myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart.” He also said, “For girls it was a fraction of that.”

Then came the part that should make every parent sit up straight. Cuomo asked, “Now, did some kids get bad cases? Did some kids get horrible [myocarditis]? Yes. Very, very, very few compared to the number of kids that had lesser symptoms or didn’t get sick and didn’t have any complications from COVID.”

He added, “It’s not even a close call.”

WATCH:

There it is, the familiar expert class shrug, wrapped in numbers, delivered with the confidence of a man who assumes your child will not be the unlucky one.

This is the same old routine from the pandemic era.

First, the risk is dismissed as rare, then when the risk becomes harder to ignore, the public is told the sacrifice was necessary for some noble greater good.

That may sound neat in a studio or basement podcast setup, but it lands differently at the kitchen table of a family whose son developed myocarditis after being told the shot was safe, responsible, and socially required.

For them, the word rare is not a comfort, it is a reminder that their child became part of the fine print.

Cuomo’s argument also leans on the idea that vaccinated children had lesser symptoms or avoided complications because they got the shot.

That claim was repeated endlessly by the same crowd that told Americans to trust the science while treating dissent like thought crime.

The inconvenient reality is that vaccinated people still caught and spread COVID.

The sweeping certainty about reduced illness, especially when comparing broad populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated people, was never as tidy as the public relations campaign made it sound.

There are still serious unanswered questions about how many men, women, and children experienced lasting complications after the vaccine rollout.

Those questions deserve scrutiny, not a Cuomo lecture about how the numbers supposedly make the damage acceptable.

No decent parent evaluates heart inflammation in children like a cable news graphic.

If even a small number of kids suffered serious harm from a medical product pushed with relentless government, media, and corporate pressure, then the public deserves answers without the smug dismissal.

The people who spent years demanding obedience now seem irritated that Americans want accountability.

Funny how the same elites who preached compassion suddenly become cold accountants when the cost is paid by someone else’s child.

Cuomo may think he is playing the voice of reason, but he is really showing how warped the pandemic establishment became.

When heart damage in children can be waved away because it affected “Very, very, very few,” the problem is not just the argument, it is the moral blindness behind it.

Mamdani Gets Brutally Booed at NYPD Staten Island Event and Bolts in Under a Minute [WATCH]
News

Mamdani Gets Brutally Booed at NYPD Staten Island Event and Bolts in Under a Minute [WATCH]

/

Mayor Zohran Mamdani learned the hard way Tuesday night that Staten Island is not exactly fertile ground for Democratic socialist theatrics.

The mayor appeared at the Midland Beach boardwalk for the NYPD’s 43rd Patrol Borough National Night Out Against Crime, where roughly 3,500 residents and families had gathered for a pro police community celebration.

What he received was not applause, civic warmth, or the usual carefully managed political reception.

He was met with loud boos, jeers, and a few profanities from a crowd that clearly had no interest in pretending.

According to the Staten Island Advance, Mamdani tried to offer remarks at the event, but his turn at the microphone was over almost as soon as it began.

The mayor managed to wish attendees a “Happy Night Out Against Crime” before he was quickly moved away from the podium.

For a politician known for soaking up attention and delivering long winded speeches, the moment was brutal.

The crowd gave him less than one minute before making it plain that his presence was not welcome.

Videos posted on social media showed residents shouting as Mamdani approached the stage.

Some could be heard yelling for him to leave, while others simply booed loudly enough to drown out the polished mayoral routine.

Plenty of Staten Islanders also used body language to send the message.

Attendees were seen turning away, refusing to engage, and flashing a “thumbs down ” as Mamdani was escorted away with a grin plastered across his face.

That grin may have been the only thing more awkward than the speech itself.

Nothing says political confidence quite like smiling through a public rejection while staff hustles you off stage.

WATCH:

The moment stood out because National Night Out Against Crime is usually a upbeat event centered on police, families, and neighborhood safety.

It is meant to celebrate cooperation between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Across New York City, officials and the NYPD hosted more than 70 events tied to the annual effort.

The gatherings are designed to promote police community partnerships and encourage safer, more connected neighborhoods.

On Staten Island, however, the event became a public reminder that law and order voters have not forgotten who stands with police and who merely shows up when cameras are rolling.

The borough has long been one of New York City’s more conservative strongholds, and Tuesday night proved it has not lost its voice.

Mamdani, a Democratic socialist, has built a political image around ideological activism and progressive branding.

That may play well in certain deep blue circles, but it did not impress a crowd gathered to back the NYPD.

The reception also contrasted sharply with the kind of stage managed applause many left wing politicians are used to receiving.

Put a radical progressive in front of ordinary residents who care about public safety, and the script can fall apart very quickly.

Despite the embarrassing rebuke, Mamdani reportedly still stopped to pose for photos with some attendees.

Politicians do love a photo op, even after being chased from the microphone by the sound of public disapproval.

The episode was a vivid snapshot of the divide between New York’s progressive political class and residents who want safe streets, respected police, and leaders who take crime seriously.

Staten Island did not whisper its verdict.

For Mamdani, the visit was supposed to be a routine public appearance at a civic event.

Instead, it became a less than one minute lesson in what happens when voters are not interested in the socialist sales pitch.

Florida AG Drops Fauci Subpoena Bombshell Over mRNA Vaccine Questions and Covid Profits [WATCH]
News

Florida AG Drops Fauci Subpoena Bombshell Over mRNA Vaccine Questions and Covid Profits [WATCH]

/

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is turning up the heat on Anthony Fauci, issuing a subpoena aimed at forcing answers about mRNA vaccines, Covid era decision making, and whether the former federal health bureaucrat personally benefited while Americans were being told to roll up their sleeves and stop asking questions.

The investigation, according to Uthmeier, is focused on obtaining records related to “what he knew, when he knew it, and his doubts about the efficacy of the vaccines.”

That is exactly the kind of question Washington spent years treating as forbidden speech.

Now Florida is asking it through legal channels, which means the familiar routine of media eye rolling and bureaucratic evasions may not be enough.

Fauci, who became the face of the federal Covid response, spent the pandemic appearing on television, shaping policy, and lecturing Americans about compliance.

Governors, school boards, corporations, and federal agencies treated his words as marching orders.

The costs were enormous.

Businesses were crushed, churches were restricted, children were masked, workers were threatened, and countless families were divided by mandates sold as settled science by the same expert class that kept changing its story.

Florida, under Republican leadership, became one of the few major states willing to challenge the national Covid consensus.

While blue state officials competed to see who could impose the most aggressive restrictions, Florida moved toward reopening and defended personal liberty.

Uthmeier’s subpoena signals that the state is not finished revisiting what happened.

WATCH:

It is not enough to shrug and pretend the country can simply move on while the people who made sweeping decisions escape serious scrutiny.

The mRNA vaccine debate remains one of the most politically charged chapters of the pandemic.

Americans were told the shots were the ticket back to normal life, only to watch mandates continue, breakthrough infections pile up, and official messaging shift in real time.

Questions about efficacy, side effects, disclosure, and financial incentives were often dismissed as conspiracy thinking by corporate media gatekeepers.

Those same gatekeepers have shown very little appetite for asking whether public officials were fully candid with the public.

The subpoena also places renewed attention on the issue of personal profit during Covid.

The pandemic created massive financial winners, including powerful pharmaceutical interests, while ordinary Americans were ordered to endure restrictions that would never touch the insulated ruling class.

If Fauci or any connected official had doubts, conflicts, or financial interests that were not properly disclosed, the public deserves to know.

That is not a fringe demand, it is basic accountability in a constitutional republic.

Predictably, defenders of the Covid establishment are likely to frame the Florida probe as political theater.

That argument would be more convincing if the same crowd had not spent years politicizing every question about lockdowns, mandates, masks, school closures, and vaccines.

The American people were told to trust the experts.

Trust, however, is not a magic shield against subpoenas, records requests, or hard questions from elected officials who still remember that government works for citizens, not the other way around.

Florida’s move is a reminder that the pandemic era is not merely a matter of old headlines.

The decisions made during that period reshaped American life, expanded government power, enriched major players, and exposed how quickly civil liberties can be treated as optional.

For millions of Americans, Fauci came to symbolize the arrogance of a bureaucracy that demanded obedience while resisting transparency.

Uthmeier’s subpoena now puts that posture to the test, and the answers could be deeply uncomfortable for the Covid ruling class.

FBI Went Rogue: How Deep State Bureaucrats Secretly Targeted Their Own Commander in Chief [WATCH]
News

FBI Went Rogue: How Deep State Bureaucrats Secretly Targeted Their Own Commander in Chief [WATCH]

/

Newly declassified White House records have pulled back the curtain on another jaw dropping chapter from the Russia saga, and once again the facts do not flatter the permanent bureaucracy that spent years treating President Donald Trump like the enemy.

The FBI opened a secret criminal investigation into Trump just days after he fired former Director James Comey in 2017, according to records released by the White House Government Transparency Task Force.

The bureau was not merely asking routine questions, it was exploring whether the sitting president of the United States might have been acting as an agent of Russia.

The case was given the codename “Oxferd Comma” and was formally opened on May 16, 2017, just one week after Comey was removed.

For Americans who remember the media frenzy that followed, the newly released paperwork reads less like sober law enforcement and more like the machinery of Washington panic kicking into gear.

“The FBI is opening a full investigation based on an articulable factual basis that reasonably indicates that President Donald J. Trump may be or has been, wittingly or unwittingly, involved in activities for or on behalf of the Government of the Russian Federation which may constitute violations of federal criminal law or threats to the national security of the United States,” the document states.

That language is extraordinary on its face.

The FBI was not investigating some obscure campaign aide in a back office, it was investigating the president himself under a theory that sounded ripped from the fever dreams of cable news panels.

“The goal of the investigation is to determine if President Trump is or was directed by, controlled by, and/or coordinated activities with, the Russian Federation in a manner constituting a threat to the national security of the United States and/or a violation of federal criminal statutes,” it added.

“In addition, this investigation will also seek to determine whether President Trump and others yet to be named obstructed and/or conspiracy to obstruct any associated FBI investigation.”

The memo was prepared inside the FBI counterintelligence division and approved by former General Counsel James Baker and former Assistant Director for Counterintelligence William Priestap.

In plain English, this was not some stray idea scribbled on a napkin by a junior agent.

Investigators cited Trump’s public comments about Comey’s firing as part of the justification for opening the case.

“This alternative explanation can be reasonably read to imply that the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation was a factor in President Trump’s decision to terminate Comey,” the memo states.

That is the kind of reasoning that should make every American pause, especially those who still believe federal power should answer to elected authority and not the other way around.

A president fired an FBI director, which presidents have constitutional authority to do, and the bureau responded by probing whether he was secretly serving Moscow.

The records also show former Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein were told the investigation had been opened.

The FBI labeled the matter a “sensitive investigative matter” and described it as “the least intrusive method” available, which is a rather polished phrase for an investigation that helped engulf a presidency.

Rosenstein appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller shortly afterward, unleashing a probe that hovered over the early Trump White House for nearly two years.

After all the leaks, breathless headlines, and liberal wish casting, Mueller did not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Years later, Special Counsel John Durham concluded that the FBI lacked sufficient grounds to open the original Crossfire Hurricane investigation into alleged Trump Russia collusion.

That finding landed with far less media hysteria than the original accusations, naturally, because corrections never get the same prime placement when Trump is the target.

The newly released records show that Oxferd Comma was closed on April 9, 2019, shortly after Mueller completed his work.

“The Special Counsel provided the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining his prosecution and declination decisions,” the closing memo states.

The declassification arrives as federal prosecutors in Fort Pierce, Florida, are reportedly examining whether officials at the FBI, Department of Justice, and intelligence agencies participated in a broader effort to violate the civil rights of Trump and his supporters through investigations allegedly lacking evidence.

If that probe moves forward, Washington may have to answer questions it has dodged for years.

WATCH:

The documents also reveal that investigators explored whether Trump could have been acting as an asset of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

That premise had already drawn doubt from within the FBI itself, including from former Deputy Assistant Director Pete Strzok.

“I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there,” Strzok wrote to FBI special counsel Lisa Page on May 19, 2017.

That one line may end up being the most revealing sentence in the entire saga.

Even inside the bureau, there was concern that the whole thing lacked substance, yet the machine rolled on anyway, leaving Trump and millions of his voters to wonder just how far powerful agencies were willing to go.

Fetterman Blasts Democrats for Boosting Hamas Loving Mao Praising Communists [WATCH]
News

Fetterman Blasts Democrats for Boosting Hamas Loving Mao Praising Communists [WATCH]

/

Sen. John Fetterman is once again saying the quiet part out loud, and this time his target is the growing socialist and communist wing inside his own Democrat Party.

The Pennsylvania Democrat sounded the alarm after a slate of far left candidates scored major wins in Michigan primaries, giving the party another reminder that its activist base is not drifting left so much as sprinting there with a red flag in hand.

In Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, Democratic Socialists of America backed Donavan McKinney narrowly defeated incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar.

Progressive Abdul El Sayed won the Democrat nomination for U.S. Senate, while progressive William Lawrence also claimed victory in the seventh District.

That kind of primary result is exactly what has conservatives warning that Democrats are no longer merely flirting with socialism.

They are handing it the microphone, the donor list, and apparently the campaign stage.

Speaking with Fox News Digital, Fetterman did not hide his concern about where the party is heading.

He singled out socialist streamer Hasan Piker, a loud online figure who has become popular among the Democrat left and influential among younger activists.

“I would never try to elevate … a communist just because [Piker] has followers on some, on Twitch, whatever that is. But overall, if you identify with a communist who praises Mao and Cuba and for these places, that should be foreign to any Democrat. Without a doubt, that’s having an impact,” Fetterman told Fox News Digital on the sidelines of the Israel on Campus Coalition conference Tuesday.

WATCH:

That is not exactly complicated.

If a political party is taking cues from people who praise Mao Zedong and excuse communist regimes, it has a problem bigger than messaging.

Piker has become a favorite voice among socialists in Democrat politics.

He has backed socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and campaigned alongside Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El Sayed as progressive candidates chase his massive online following.

The irony is rich, of course. The party that claims to defend democracy keeps finding room for figures who swoon over regimes that crush dissent, silence opposition, and leave ordinary citizens poorer and less free.

Fetterman made his remarks after addressing the Israel on Campus Coalition National Leadership Summit in Washington, D.C.

He described the direction of the Democrat Party as “troubling” and pointed to Tuesday’s primary results as another sign that the progressive flank is gaining serious influence.

That influence is showing up most clearly in the party’s increasingly hostile posture toward Israel.

Fetterman noted that activists “have turned Israel as to the ultimate litmus” and warned that major Democrats are now saying things they know are not true.

He specifically called out California Gov. Gavin Newsom, saying, “When you have Gov. Newsom describing Israel as an apartheid state. He knows better, that that’s not true.”

That is a sharp rebuke from a Democrat senator against a governor widely viewed as a future presidential hopeful.

Fetterman also said Democrats should not “pander to the fringe.”

In a sane political world, that would be obvious, but the modern Democrat Party appears to need a reminder every primary season.

This is not the first time Fetterman has ripped into the party’s radical figures.

During a CNN interview, he warned, “And a lot of the things that he has done and said during the primary were going to come back to haunt, like campaigning with a guy that loves Hamas and is very proud to stand with communist regimes.”

WATCH:

That line gets to the heart of the issue.

Democrats can pretend these are just energetic young progressives, but voters can see the banners, hear the rhetoric, and recognize the hostility toward America’s allies.

The general election will be the real test.

Socialist candidates can survive in deep blue primaries where activists dominate, but facing Republican voters and independents is a very different ballgame.

For conservatives, the spectacle is both alarming and politically revealing.

The Democrat establishment spent years insisting that socialism was just a Republican scare word, only to watch its own candidates campaign with communist sympathizers and anti Israel agitators.

Fetterman deserves credit for refusing to play along with the usual party script.

When even a Democrat senator is warning that communists and Hamas apologists are gaining influence, the country should pay attention.

The question now is whether Democrat leaders will take his warning seriously or keep pretending the fringe is just another harmless coalition partner.

Based on recent primary results, the radicals are not waiting for permission.

Mike Rogers Blasts Abdul El Sayed as a Prison Emptying Muslim Brotherhood Extremist [WATCH]
News

Mike Rogers Blasts Abdul El Sayed as a Prison Emptying Muslim Brotherhood Extremist [WATCH]

/

Michigan’s Senate race has gone from routine partisan brawl to a glaring test of how far Democrats are willing to march toward the radical edge.

Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers is making clear that voters now face a choice between sanity and the sort of left-wing agenda that usually hides behind campus slogans.

Rogers unloaded on Democrat Abdul El Sayed after El Sayed won his Michigan primary, warning that the state is being handed another dose of ideological madness.

In his view, this is not just another election about party labels or campaign ads.

Rogers described the contrast as “common sense or complete insanity,” a line that neatly captures what many Michigan voters have watched unfold under Democrat leadership.

After more than twenty years of Democrat control and influence, he argued, the state has been dragged backward while working families foot the bill.

“They’ve dropped our schools to 45th in the nation. They’ve saddled families with the highest utility rates in the Midwest. Working people are paying more, earning less, and getting left behind,” Rogers wrote.

That is the backdrop Democrats are apparently proud to run on, because their voters just elevated El Sayed over establishment Democrat Haley Stevens.

If the party wanted to reassure normal Michiganders, nominating a socialist backed by the loudest radicals in national politics was certainly an odd strategy.

Rogers did not bother pretending El Sayed is some mild mannered progressive with a few quirky ideas.

“Abdul isn’t just another liberal. He’s an extremist,” he warned, putting a bright spotlight on the record Democrats would rather decorate with soft focus campaign language.

The Republican accused El Sayed of backing policies that would make communities less safe and life more expensive.

“He wants to empty prisons and put murderers and sex offenders back on our streets,” Rogers said, while also accusing him of aligning with the Muslim Brotherhood and supporting a historic tax hike on families already stretched thin.

Rogers also said El Sayed is not offering a serious plan for Michigan’s future. “Abdul doesn’t represent a vision for the future. He’s leading a movement grounded in ideological fanaticism,” he said.

The national security angle is especially personal for Rogers, who spent years in intelligence work.

“I spent years hunting terrorists and bringing Osama bin Laden to justice. Never in a million years did I think that I would be running against someone who believes America deserved 9/11.”

That charge centers on El Sayed’s embrace of support from Hasan Piker, a left wing online personality who said, “America deserved 9/11.”

Rather than simply condemn the remark like any normal candidate seeking statewide office might do, El Sayed claimed Piker’s comments needed to be viewed in “context.”

Context is apparently the magic word Democrats use when the radical fringe says something vile and the candidate still wants the endorsement.

Michigan voters may not be as eager as the online socialist crowd to play that game.

Rogers framed the race as bigger than one Senate seat.

He warned that Michigan must decide whether it wants a future rooted in common sense or whether it will hand power to some of the most extreme voices in American politics.

El Sayed’s win also exposes a major crack inside the Democrat Party.

Socialists such as Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez of New York lined up behind him, while many backers of Stevens appear less than thrilled about the party’s sharp left turn.

Recent polling cited in the original report found that only 57 percent of Stevens supporters said they would back El Sayed in November.

That is a serious warning sign for Democrats, even if their activist base prefers chanting about revolution to doing basic political math.

WATCH:

Rogers previously told Breitbart News that El Sayed’s rise reflects a wider fight inside the Democrat Party.

“They believe that they can move the state and the country, by the way, to be more accepting of this socialism,” Rogers said.

Michigan voters are now staring at a clear choice.

They can choose Rogers and a message centered on public safety, affordability, and national security, or they can gamble on a socialist movement that seems determined to prove every conservative warning correct.

You Can’t Coexist With People Who Want You Dead: The Left’s Fantasy Alliance Exposed [WATCH]
News

You Can’t Coexist With People Who Want You Dead: The Left’s Fantasy Alliance Exposed [WATCH]

/

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and Australian broadcaster Erin Molan discussed what they described as a growing alliance between elements of the political left and Islamist extremists, arguing that both movements ultimately pursue power rather than individual liberty despite holding conflicting views on many social issues.

During the conversation, Bongino said he is frequently asked how progressive activist groups, including members of the LGBTQ community, can support or align with governments and organizations that openly oppose their rights.

He said he believes the answer was best explained by conservative author David Horowitz.

“I talk about this unholy alliance all the time. Big hat tip to David Horowitz. He wrote a book about it,” Bongino said.

He explained that many people struggle to understand what he sees as an unlikely political partnership.

“How I get this question? You probably get it yourself. Like I don’t get it. How is it that the LGBTQIA2+ whatever they keep adding on? How is it that they align with the Iranian regime, the Islamo-fanatics, and the Islamo-Nazis out there, like they would throw them off the roof.”

According to Bongino, Horowitz argued that both movements share a common objective.

“And Horowitz explains very simply: they both have one goal, which is tyranny and power. And to get that tyranny or power, they have to get something out of the way. And that something is you, people who believe in anti-tyranny and believe in individual liberty.”

Bongino said he believes the alliance is driven by a pursuit of political power rather than shared values.

“They-that’s the only reason this is all about power. But it’s very dangerous.”

Molan agreed, pointing to examples she believes demonstrate the contradiction between progressive activism and support for Islamist causes.

“Oh, it’s-it’s super dangerous,” she said.

She referenced New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s campaign appearances in LGBTQ venues, saying she believes the policies he supports conflict with the interests of many of those voters.

“And even you know when Mamdani was campaigning in gay strip clubs, and I’m watching, going, what he wants to introduce would not tolerate you for a nanosecond.”

Molan also discussed violent incidents in Europe, arguing that some activists continue calling for unity despite attacks they attribute to Islamist extremists.

“It’s the same as what we’re seeing in Berlin, and we’re seeing an Islamist terrorist driving a car into a parade, and then you’re seeing the organizers of the LGBTQ, etc. etc. etc. coming out and saying, ‘Now don’t let this divide us, and don’t let this make you hate them.'”

She questioned what it would take for supporters of those causes to reconsider the alliances they have formed.

“Well, sorry, but if that is not enough to to wake them up, what is?”

Molan also referenced demonstrations supporting Gaza, arguing that many participants overlook the treatment of LGBTQ individuals by the governments they support.

“Because I kept thinking, watching this, you know, gays for Gaza, and and just the greatest fools on planet Earth running cover for a regime that hangs them from cranes.”

She said she believes those alliances are ultimately self-destructive.

“It will take something disastrous for them to wake up and realize that the movement they’re aligning themselves with doesn’t want them.”

According to Molan, both movements are united primarily by their pursuit of political power.

“They actually don’t care. They don’t care if it ends in their own destruction. They will do anything for power. They have the same shared goal.”

She added that, in her view, those alliances would eventually collapse once one faction no longer needed the other.

“They just don’t realize that once this mob is done with the other mob, the mutual mob they hate, this mob is going to kill them too.”

Bongino agreed, saying he believes Islamist extremist organizations have never concealed their intentions.

“You know, obviously you’re correct. That’s why I enjoy your content so much,” Bongino said.

“It’s not like the Islamo fanatics are in any way cryptic about what they’re going to do to the infidels. I mean, they they openly advertise it all the time.”

He then argued that political movements focused solely on power inevitably begin targeting members of their own coalition.

“This idea that when your only end game is is power and not the advancement of individual liberty, the idea of a representative democracy and any of that, eventually you have to turn on people who you perceive to be in your own tent.”

As an example, Bongino pointed to the cancellation of individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying that criticism eventually extended beyond conservatives.

“What started to happen is even any leftist that spoke out and did not, you know, toe the company line was canceled too because they all have to cling to their power. They’re not interested in truth; they’re interested in power.”

Bongino predicted that the groups he discussed would ultimately discover their interests are incompatible.

“I think you’re right. That’s what’s going to wind up happening. Is if they do win, the LGBTQ plus and DEI folks are going to find out the hard way that their bedfellows are not fellows at all?”

Molan concluded by citing Dearborn, Michigan, and Iran as additional examples, arguing that the alliance she described cannot endure because the underlying ideologies are fundamentally incompatible.

“It won’t be. They cannot coexist. It doesn’t work,” she said.

“It is self-destruction. We are the architects of our own demise.”

She argued that the issue extends beyond political rhetoric because she believes people are embracing the ideas being promoted.

“It’s just dumb. It’s so dumb, but it’s dangerous, and that’s the issue. And that’s why voices like ours are needed, because the issue is that we can’t just say let’s put them in a box and laugh at them. People actually buy into it, and they start to believe it. And we’ve seen what can actually happen when they get too much power.”

WATCH:

‘Donald Trump Is Changing the New World Order Entirely’: Glenn Beck [WATCH]
News

‘Donald Trump Is Changing the New World Order Entirely’: Glenn Beck [WATCH]

/

Political commentator Glenn Beck argued that President Donald Trump’s economic and foreign policy agenda is designed to fundamentally reshape the global order, contending that many of the administration’s actions are part of a long-term strategy that extends well beyond individual policy decisions.

During an interview with Liz Wheeler, Beck said he believes the scope of Trump’s agenda is not yet fully appreciated and may not be understood for years.

Wheeler opened the discussion by asking, “Explain to me what you mean when you say that these are indications that President Trump is resetting the world order and the implication of that.”

Beck responded by arguing that Trump’s policies are interconnected and aimed at restructuring both the American economy and the international system.

“Donald Trump is changing the new world order entirely, and it won’t be fully understood for probably another five to 10 years,” Beck said.

He pointed to the administration’s efforts to encourage domestic investment and manufacturing, saying those initiatives are central to Trump’s long-term economic vision.

“That, on top of the, he says it’s over $20 trillion of investment. Let’s just say it’s 10 trillion, $10 trillion in building new factories here at home. So we are making things again with AI, with the rebuilding of factories, with the dominance of energy and oil.”

Beck also emphasized what he views as the importance of traditional energy production, arguing that oil and natural gas remain essential to the global economy.

“I’m sorry, gang, but the world doesn’t work without real energy, without gas, LP, and oil, with controlling the choke points, getting out of the Middle East.”

According to Beck, if those policies achieve their intended goals, they could have a historic impact on both the United States and the rest of the world.

“Hopefully, if this works, he’s completely redesigned the entire world. He has made a bigger impact than any other president, maybe since Lincoln. He becomes one of the most impactful presidents of all time.”

Beck acknowledged that the ultimate outcome remains uncertain.

“If it works, that jury is still out. But if it works, he changes the entire course of the world.”

He argued that Trump’s decisions have consistently reflected an “America First” philosophy and said he believes many news organizations fail to present the broader strategy behind those actions.

“Everything that he has done is 100% America first. The problem is nobody in the media will explain it.”

Instead, Beck said, individual policy decisions are often evaluated separately rather than as part of a larger plan.

“Nobody, everybody wants to look at everything he does as a one-off.”

Beck said his own perspective changed after spending time traveling with Trump during the presidential campaign.

“And you know what? If I hadn’t been traveling with him during the election, I don’t know if I would have seen it as quickly as I did.”

He rejected portrayals of Trump as lacking a coherent strategy.

“This guy has been thinking this through forever. People try to make him look like a bumbling idiot, and they don’t realize there is genius behind this. There is real strategy.”

According to Beck, Trump’s objective is not simply to improve short-term economic conditions but to address what he views as structural problems affecting the United States.

“He tried to fix America’s economy. What happened? The next guy comes in, destroys it all.”

Beck said Trump is attempting to solve broader issues involving international institutions, trade agreements and tariffs in an effort to create lasting economic change.

“He’s trying to fix it. So by fixing the bigger problems, the structural problems that start overseas with the WEF and all of our trade agreements and tariffs and everything else. By fixing those, he believes I can fix the economy long term.”

He concluded that success in those efforts would extend beyond the United States.

“If you can get there, we save the world, not just the nation. We save the world.”

Wheeler then asked why she believes many people fail to recognize the strategy Beck described.

“Why do you think that people don’t see the strategy?”

Beck replied that political opponents have become too focused on viewing Trump as the central adversary rather than evaluating policy on its merits.

“They’ve fallen into the trap. The enemy is Donald Trump. The enemy is the pedophile government. Whatever the enemy is, and if you make if you if you just say that’s the enemy, you can get all of these people who believe all these different things to stand together.”

He argued that supporters of the country should focus on rebuilding rather than dwelling on political grievances.

“And it’s imperative that for those of us who actually believe in the country, we don’t engage in the grievance. We engage instead on we hold these truths to be self-evident. This is what we need to fix and rebuild, not what we’re going to destroy. What we’re going to rebuild.”

WATCH:

Medicaid or Money Laundering? Personal Care ‘Jobs Program’ Exposed as Massive Fraud Machine [WATCH]
News

Medicaid or Money Laundering? Personal Care ‘Jobs Program’ Exposed as Massive Fraud Machine [WATCH]

/

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said the United States is facing a growing crisis involving personal care services and Medicaid fraud, pointing to federal data that he said shows unusual billing trends in Pennsylvania and other states.

Speaking during a presentation on healthcare fraud, Oz said the rapid growth in personal care services has raised concerns nationwide and prompted officials to closely examine enrollment figures and Medicaid spending.

“Now we’re facing a personal care services crisis around the country,” Oz said.

“The surge in enrollment of individuals in these in programs is stunning, so shocking. We have to double check our numbers. We don’t think it’s possible it is happening, but it is.”

Oz said the personal care industry has become one of the largest employment sectors in several states.

“In California, New York, the number one job in the entire state is personal care services,” he said.

“Guess what? It’s good to be home because it’s true in Pennsylvania too. 50% dramatic more people serving in the personal care services space-that’s home care-that is in retail. That’s where Pennsylvanians are going. It’s becoming a jobs program.”

According to Oz, the increase in spending has also been accompanied by significant Medicaid fraud that harms both taxpayers and patients.

“Medicaid fraud in the state is costing taxpayers for care that was never delivered, or even worse, harmful,” Oz said.

“It’s costing patients their health, their trust in a system-a system that was built in a high-trust environment, a place we all thought that we would be able to be safe.”

He questioned why anyone would exploit vulnerable Americans who depend on Medicaid services.

“Because who would steal from the poor?” Oz asked.

“As Colin outlined, many people unfortunately are doing just that, and we’re coming after them.”

Oz described the alleged fraud as a serious breach of trust between caregivers and patients.

“What we’re exposing today is a diabolical breach of trust, a violation of the sacred bond between patient and caregiver,” he said.

“It is a catastrophe that can only be dealt with in the way we’ll be outlining for the rest of this presentation.”

He then outlined several examples from cases announced that day, saying investigators uncovered instances in which Medicaid was billed for services that could not have been provided.

“Today’s defendants included an aide who billed Medicaid for care claimed to be delivered while they were in jail, or while they were being arrested, or while they weren’t in the country,” Oz said.

“The list goes on and on, one more disbelievable than the next.”

Oz also referenced allegations involving a home care agency.

“And it’s not just individuals. There’s a home care agency, two owners who are charged with billing Medicaid hundreds of fabricated clock-ins. Again, care that was never delivered at all, and we have evidence of that.”

He said CMS is focused on ensuring Medicaid dollars reach the intended recipients.

“CMS’s job is to make sure this money reaches the people who actually need it,” Oz said.

“That’s the grandmother who desperately needs this money to stay out of a long-term care facility. It could be a vet who relies on this to get help because he’s stuck in bed. All these individuals deserve our love and support, not the criminals who have hurt them.”

Oz then cited federal data that he said shows Pennsylvania stands out nationally in several Medicaid spending categories.

“We’ve reviewed Pennsylvania’s personal care billing trends. I’m going to give these numbers to you slowly because they’re really important,” he said.

“This is the federal government’s data on Pennsylvania.”

According to Oz, “Pennsylvania ranks fifth nationally in average monthly payments, both per beneficiary and per provider. That is way out there. Be number five in both those categories. More expensive that is in 45 states.”

He also pointed to the state’s billing descriptions.

“Over 96% of personal care claims here are illness unspecified. That’s how they’re titled. So we can’t track them. It doesn’t help if the U.S. attorney or the attorney general can’t possibly find the fraud because people aren’t actually telling us what they’re really doing.”

Oz said the reporting system must change to improve oversight.

“We have to change that that that history that’s evolved here into the norm.”

He added that Pennsylvania’s average payment per beneficiary exceeds $50,000.

“And finally, average payments per beneficiary more than $50,000. Think about that: 50,000 per person getting home care in the state, on average, far above what you’d ever expect. All this points to fraud.”

Oz said those findings demonstrate why cooperation across multiple government agencies is necessary.

“The cases like these are exactly why a whole government approach is so critical, and why we have to develop best practices of how to evolve this system.”

He said Medicaid Director Dan Bilman would also discuss autism care services in Pennsylvania, which Oz said have experienced unusually high spending.

“He’s going to touch on another problem that’s a big one in Pennsylvania, which is autism care services, and why they’re again not only are they off the chart in Pennsylvania, but the rest of the country.”

Oz said CMS is providing states with tools to identify suspicious billing practices and distinguish legitimate claims from fraudulent ones.

“But we are actually here to help. We’re giving you a toolkit that will allow the state to be able to tell what’s good, what’s not, what’s foul, what’s fair, so we can identify the best use of our funds.”

He concluded by linking the increase in healthcare fraud to changes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Yesterday, I was in Maine. We’re investigating home support services, just like you’re seeing here for adults in that case who have autism,” Oz said.

“Medicaid spending the top 10 providers there has dramatically increased over the last six years.”

“In fact, across the board, if you look at fraud in healthcare, all gone up in the last six years. What happened in 2020 that has catalyzed this? What has allowed this corruption to be weaponized? It’s COVID. COVID appears to have unleashed massive fraud through grifters because criminals knew the federal government would not follow up on the money that was spending out. We we told the world we were open for fraud, and they could start harpooning us with their spears.”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top