News

News

‘Straight from the Deep State Playbook’: Tulsi Gabbard Releases Fauci Bombs on Her Last Day as DNI [WATCH]

On her final day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard dropped what might be the most explosive truth bomb in recent memory.

Gabbard accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of funneling millions of taxpayer dollars into the Wuhan Institute of Virology and misleading both Congress and the American public about it.

According to Gabbard, the so-called doctor was not only aware of risky gain of function research but was an active supporter who manipulated intelligence surrounding the origin of COVID to protect himself and his political allies.

Gabbard’s statement came directly through her official X account, where she said she was revealing never-before-seen communications that laid bare Fauci’s role in funding dangerous experiments in China.

“Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab,” she posted.

That message came with attached documents from classified reviews that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence later confirmed had been declassified in alignment with President Trump’s push for transparency.

According to the ODNI, Fauci directed US grant money toward gain-of-function experiments involving bat coronaviruses, research now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that unleashed the pandemic on the world.

In a stunning twist, the office even alleged that career bureaucrats within the intelligence apparatus collaborated with Fauci to suppress information about the true source of the virus and to manipulate intelligence assessments that pointed toward a lab origin.

For years, anyone suggesting a lab leak was derided as a conspiracy theorist while corporate media obediently carried water for Fauci and the political establishment. Now, Gabbard’s release throws a wrench into that narrative.

“This is straight from the deep state playbook,” Gabbard declared, accusing Fauci of using his position to shield himself and his colleagues from accountability while lying to Congress under oath.

Gabbard’s message reflected growing anger among conservatives who have long suspected collusion between the scientific bureaucracy and Washington insiders.

She directly blamed Fauci for misleading both lawmakers and the American public while undermining President Trump’s efforts to hold Beijing accountable.

“The COVID 19 pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and for countless people around the world. After years of lies, censorship, and cover ups, the American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,” Gabbard said.

WATCH:

The documents, Gabbard revealed, were the result of a yearlong declassification review that she initiated to deliver on Trump’s promise of greater transparency inside the intelligence community.

That review uncovered a series of internal communications allegedly involving Fauci and members of the NIH in which the dangers of gain of function experiments were acknowledged but downplayed to the public.

While critics of Gabbard tried to dismiss the announcement as politically timed, the ODNI’s support of her claims added significant weight.

The agency said Fauci’s funding streams were tracked through various health research channels that ended up financing controversial virus manipulation work at the Wuhan lab.

These findings appear to directly contradict Fauci’s sworn testimony before Congress when he claimed that no gain of function work was supported by US funds.

Conservative lawmakers immediately seized on the revelations, calling for renewed hearings and possible criminal referrals for perjury.

Senator Rand Paul, who famously grilled Fauci during Senate hearings, posted that Gabbard’s disclosures confirm everything he and others had warned about.

The lawmaker renewed his call for a full investigation into Fauci’s conduct.

The timing of Gabbard’s move was no accident. She is set to step down as Director of National Intelligence on June 30, with Bill Pulte stepping in as Acting DNI while continuing his duties at the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Before her departure, Gabbard made clear that her aim was not political theater but a long overdue reckoning with what she describes as systemic corruption inside the highest levels of government.

Gabbard’s release represents another setback for the entrenched bureaucrats who spent years attacking anyone daring to question the official COVID storyline.

The revelation that taxpayer money might have fueled dangerous research in Communist China only strengthens the case for a full review of the American public health establishment.

Whether Fauci faces criminal charges will depend on Congress and the Department of Justice, but one thing is clear.

The carefully crafted narrative that presented Fauci as a selfless scientific savior has begun to collapse under the weight of troubling evidence.

Gabbard’s bold act may be just the beginning of a new phase in the fight for accountability.

For many Americans, the pandemic is not just a public health memory but a reminder of how the government can abuse secrecy and manipulate facts for political ends.

By exposing what she calls the deep state’s protection racket, Tulsi Gabbard may have cracked open the door to long awaited truth about the origins of a global tragedy.

News

Oil Armada Surges Through Strait Of Hormuz After Trump Strikes Peace Accord With Iran [WATCH]

Shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz showed signs of recovery Thursday after the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending hostilities and reopening one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes, as reported by Trending Politics News.

According to MarineTraffic and other vessel-tracking data, at least 10 commercial ships were observed transiting the strait on the morning following the agreement, with additional vessels reportedly heading toward the region.

The increase marks a noticeable improvement from the sharply reduced traffic levels seen during months of conflict that disrupted shipping through the critical waterway.

The memorandum of understanding was signed by President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

The agreement includes provisions for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping and establishes a framework for additional negotiations over the coming weeks.

U.S. officials said they expect shipping activity to increase gradually as commercial operators regain confidence in the route. Traffic reportedly began rising shortly after the agreement was finalized.

Iranian officials also indicated that maritime traffic would resume under controlled conditions, with vessels directed to travel along designated routes and during specified time periods to address security concerns.

The Strait of Hormuz is considered one of the world’s most strategically important waterways. Before the conflict began in late February, the passage typically handled between 100 and 135 vessels per day.

The route serves as a major transit point for global energy markets, carrying approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies.

That traffic collapsed after hostilities escalated. Data from early March showed tanker movements declining by roughly 94% on some days.

Overall shipping activity fell by more than 70% during the early stages of the conflict and remained at extremely low levels for months.

During several recent weeks, vessel traffic frequently fell into the single digits per day and occasionally approached zero.

Ship-tracking services reported that only dozens of vessels successfully passed through the strait over multi-week periods, a fraction of normal activity.

By late April and throughout much of May, daily transit figures often remained near zero, highlighting the severe disruption to international shipping and energy markets.

While Thursday’s increase in vessel traffic represents a significant development, industry analysts and government officials cautioned that a full recovery will likely take time.

Shipping companies continue to evaluate security conditions, insurance costs, and logistical challenges created by months of disruptions.

Officials and industry observers estimate that daily vessel traffic could increase to between 25 and 50 ships in the near future if current conditions remain stable.

Additional growth is expected in the coming weeks as commercial operators gradually resume regular routes through the waterway.

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is one element of the broader agreement reached between Washington and Tehran.

In addition to restoring maritime access, the memorandum includes provisions addressing ceasefire implementation across related conflict zones and outlines initial steps toward sanctions relief and reconstruction assistance.

The agreement also establishes a 60-day negotiating period during which both sides are expected to pursue discussions on a more comprehensive long-term arrangement.

For global energy markets and international shipping companies, the return of commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is being closely watched as an early indicator of whether stability can return to one of the world’s most important trade corridors.

Main Story, News

Dan Bongino Nukes Joe Kent’s Story: “Completely Fabricated Bullsh*t” on Trump Assassination Plot [WATCH]

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino sharply disputed claims made by Joe Kent regarding the investigation into Thomas Crooks and the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, accusing Kent of misrepresenting what investigators were told and what evidence was examined.

Bongino addressed Kent’s comments during a lengthy response in which he said he wanted to set the record straight regarding allegations that federal agencies failed to fully investigate potential foreign connections or withheld information from other officials.

“I just want this on the record, in case something happens. This is what happened yesterday,” Bongino said.

Bongino said he had known Kent professionally and had previously worked with him while Kent served in national security roles.

“This was Joe Kent, who was a friend of mine at one point. This is really sad to see the former NCTC National Counterterrorism Center director, I had worked with Joe Kent many times,” Bongino said.

According to Bongino, he personally offered Kent multiple opportunities to receive briefings regarding the investigation.

“I personally showed up at NCTC headquarters and told you I’d give you a full briefing, and your people do not lie,” Bongino said.

Kent, however, argued that questions remained unanswered about Crooks’ digital footprint and possible foreign connections.

“Tucker was talking about in that clip that he came across through an investigative journalist that was working for Tucker. He came across Thomas Crook’s online profile,” Kent said.

Kent said concerns arose because investigators had initially characterized Crooks as having a limited online presence.

“That’s significant, because for quite some time, almost a year, we were told that Crooks was kind of an enigma. He didn’t have much of an online persona,” Kent said.

Kent explained that after returning to government service, he sought access to Crooks’ electronic devices to determine whether any foreign connections existed.

“When I asked the FBI, in my official capacity, when we came back into the administration. I said, ‘Hey, can we get our hands on crooks’ phones, computers, et cetera, because we want to see if there was any foreign linkage,” Kent said.

Kent said he was initially told investigators could not access the devices.

“I was told at the time initially that we couldn’t get into Crooks’ devices,” Kent said.

According to Kent, investigators later reported that they had successfully accessed the devices but found nothing significant.

“And then the FBI came back and said, actually, we got into them, and there’s just nothing there,” Kent said.

Kent argued that intelligence officials should still have been allowed to independently review the material.

“I said, ‘Okay, well, if there’s nothing there, you should still let us see what’s inside them, so that we can determine if there is any foreign nexus here.’ We were, we didn’t get access to them,” Kent said.

Bongino forcefully rejected that account.

“Okay, everything he said there about what he was allowed into and what what he was not allowed into is just completely fabricated bullshit,” Bongino said.

Kent responded, “It’s a data point.”

Bongino said investigators had already reviewed the matters Kent raised and had offered to brief him.

“Of course, it’s a data point. We had already looked at that stuff. I was at NCTC headquarters with him in his conference room,” Bongino said.

“There were multiple witnesses to this, where I told you we’ll brief you on every single question you just brought up, the Norwegian, the devices, the alleged foreign connections,” Bongino added.

Kent also claimed the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General encountered obstacles while investigating the Butler incident.

“The DHS Inspector General started looking into a lot of the details of what took place on the ground, he himself was also blocked,” Kent said.

Bongino disputed that assertion as well.

“The DHS IG office was blocked. They were in my office, in the Deputy Director Conference Room, in the management floor, in JH J Edgar Hoover, the Hoover Building, they actually showed up for a briefing and said no such thing,” Bongino said.

Bongino maintained that all available devices were examined and that investigators found no foreign links connected to Crooks.

“This was all investigated, everything he’s saying, the digital files, all of it. There were no devices we did not look at. We did not find a foreign connection in the phone. We have all the phones in the digital devices,” Bongino said.

He concluded by calling the allegations baseless and accusing critics of advancing a false narrative.

“These allegations are total nonsense,” Bongino said.

WATCH:

News

After UK Grooming Gang Report, Brandon Gill Demands We Draw the Line in America [WATCH]

Rep. Brandon Gill said the United States must confront questions about cultural compatibility and immigration before future generations are forced to deal with consequences that he believes are already becoming visible in some communities across the country.

Gill made the remarks while discussing broader concerns about immigration, cultural integration, and the preservation of what he described as core American values. He argued that policymakers should recognize differences among cultures and consider how those differences interact with American institutions and traditions.

“The Trump administration, I believe, recognizes these basic truths that not all cultures are equal, and not all cultures are equally compatible with our way of life or our governing system,” Gill said.

Gill said the issue is not limited to developments overseas and warned that the United States faces its own challenges related to cultural change.

“But we’ve got a problem in the United States as well, and that’s something that we’re going to have to deal with now, because if we don’t, our children and our grandchildren are going to be dealing with it,” Gill said.

He pointed to changes he says are taking place in parts of Texas, specifically the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area.

“And you’ve seen what’s happened in the DFW metroplex, where you’ve seen mass Islamic migration transforming communities right here in places that you wouldn’t otherwise expect,” Gill said.

Gill argued that failing to address the issue now could lead to broader cultural changes in the future.

“And again, this is something that, if we don’t stop now, it’s going to be my daughter and daughters across the country who are going to be going to public schools wearing burkas, and that’s the kind of stuff that we want to stop,” Gill said.

According to Gill, conservatives should focus on preserving the values and institutions that shaped the country and the society they grew up in.

“We want to recognize that our job is to protect and preserve, conserve as conservatives. We should want to conserve the America that we got to grow up in,” Gill said.

Gill said he believes immigration policy should take into account cultural differences and whether incoming populations share similar views on fundamental civic principles.

“And you do not do that by bringing in cultures who have very different ideas about freedom of speech, religion, separation of church and state, the dignity of women, the role of women in public life,” Gill said.

He added that differing views on social and religious issues can have significant consequences for a society.

“Who have very different conceptions about how Muslims and non-Muslims interact, and those different ideas matter,” Gill said.

Gill argued that debates about immigration and assimilation are ultimately debates about the future character of the country and the values that will guide future generations.

Throughout his remarks, Gill emphasized the importance of protecting what he sees as foundational American principles, including free speech, religious liberty, the separation of church and state, and the role of women in public life. He said those principles should remain central considerations as the nation addresses immigration and cultural issues in the years ahead.

“And that this is a good example of that,” Gill said.

WATCH:

News

Here’s Why Jennifer Newsom’s Charity Compensation Is Raising Red Flags [WATCH]

Questions surrounding the finances of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Newsom, continue to draw attention as federal investigators reportedly examine matters connected to the governor’s financial affairs.

During an interview, Katie Pavlich spoke with journalist Josh Boswell about his investigation into Jennifer Newsom’s charity and the financial questions that led him to examine the organization more closely.

“What made you look into Newsom’s wife in the first place, and what did you find?” Pavlich asked.

Boswell said longstanding questions surrounding the Newsoms’ finances prompted his review.

“Well, there are just always a lot of questions that seem to be swirling around the nuisance, and their finances have been for years, and so I thought, you know, this is a man who clearly is going to be running for president. This is worth looking at, you know, what their finances are, what the shape of them are,” Boswell said.

According to Boswell, his review of Jennifer Newsom’s charitable organization revealed compensation levels that stood out compared with similar nonprofits.

“And so when I had a look at Jennifer Newsom’s charity, I found that she was paying herself since 2012 $3.7 million and this is a lot of money when you look at the amount that the charity brings in, it’s sort of one to 1.7 million a year, and she’s paying up to a third of that to herself and her own company $300,000 a year,” Boswell said.

Boswell said he compared the compensation figures to other charities of similar size and found the payments ranked unusually high.

“Now that is, I did a bit of data analysis, looking at what charities that size usually pay their executives, and she was in the top 5% of all charities in the nation for pay,” Boswell said.

Pavlich then turned to the reported Department of Justice investigation, noting that officials have not publicly discussed specific details.

“So, DOJ, of course, Triton doesn’t comment on the specifics of this, we’ve really only heard from Gavin Newsom claiming this investigation is targeting them, even though, as we mentioned, it started in 2022 in his orbit. Do you think that the charity is the reason DOJ might be investigating her?” Pavlich asked.

Boswell said there are several areas that investigators could potentially examine.

“There’s a whole bunch of reasons, potentially. There are a lot of questions around their finances, so the charity could be one of them,” Boswell said.

He noted that nonprofit executives can legally receive substantial compensation but suggested donor relationships could draw scrutiny.

“Now it is legal for a charity to pay whatever they want to their executives, but one of the issues they might be looking at is who are the donors to the charity that are financing that pay. What kind of relationships do they have with the California government that Newsom is in charge of?” Boswell said.

Boswell also pointed to what he described as discrepancies between reported income and expenses.

“There’s also, if you look at his income, and he’s released at least partly to journalists in closed-door viewing sessions, his tax returns, and if you look at that, his income, it’s about 1.2 to 1.4 million a year, and it just doesn’t add up for all of his expenses,” Boswell said.

He cited mortgage payments and living expenses as examples.

“He’s got massive mortgages, $625,000 in mortgage payments, and he’s got at least a million dollars in living expenses, and the two just don’t add up. I would be interested in that if I were an IRS investigator,” Boswell said.

Boswell also highlighted questions involving a Sacramento property purchase.

“One other thing to look at here is the way that his property transactions are structured lead to a lot of questions. When he bought his $3.7 million Sacramento estate, it was done through an LLC, but that LLC doesn’t seem to have appeared on his tax returns,” Boswell said.

According to Boswell, the structure of the transaction raises additional questions that have yet to be fully addressed.

“There’s all kinds of questions why he would do it that way, and he hasn’t answered those satisfactorily. So, if I’m IRS, I’m looking at that too, thinking maybe there’s an issue here. We’ve yet to see what the actual details are, of course,” Boswell said.

WATCH:

News

“Not Hard to Find Fraud”: JD Vance Torches Corrupt New York Medicaid Machine [WATCH]

Vice President J.D. Vance said the Trump administration is intensifying its efforts to combat government fraud, arguing that taxpayer dollars have too often been diverted away from their intended purposes and into the hands of bad actors.

Speaking about the administration’s anti-fraud initiative, Vance said the federal government has long struggled with fraud and abuse, a problem he believes has been enabled by elected officials and government leaders.

“Your government, your leadership, and too many, your congressmen have allowed the government to rip you off and give your money to fraudsters,” Vance said.

Vance, who leads the administration’s fraud task force, said identifying fraud is not difficult, though eliminating it remains a major challenge.

“Just yesterday, we announced something. You know, I’m the leader of the fraud task force, and I.. and people ask me, is it hard to find fraud, and I’ll tell them it’s not hard to find fraud in the US federal government. Unfortunately, it’s hard to root it out, it’s hard to fight against it, but it is not hard to find fraud,” Vance said.

As an example, Vance pointed to a recently announced Department of Justice lawsuit involving New York’s Medicaid program.

“Just yesterday we announced a Department of Justice lawsuit against the state Medicaid director of this state?” Vance said.

According to Vance, the lawsuit alleges that a bidding process was manipulated in a way that allowed fraudulent actors to access taxpayer funds.

“So, here’s what the state Medicaid director in New York would do: facilitated fraud by using a sham bidding process. This person was actually inviting fraudulent bidders to come in and take advantage of your tax dollars, so that we could send it to fraudsters instead of you, and that’s disgraceful,” Vance said.

Vance argued that government officials should focus on preventing fraud rather than enabling it.

“You do not want your government facilitating fraud, you want your government fighting against fraud,” Vance said.

Vance also praised Michael Petrie, saying the two share a commitment to protecting taxpayer dollars and improving government accountability.

“And one of the things, and one of the things that I love about Michael Petrie is that he cares about this fraud issue just as much as I do,” Vance said.

Vance described that approach as rooted in a traditional view of government responsibility.

“He happens to believe in an old-fashioned good government concept that when you pay your taxes, it ought to go to the services and the national security needs that it’s meant to go towards,” Vance said.

Vance repeatedly stressed that public funds should serve citizens in need rather than enrich individuals who exploit government programs.

“It shouldn’t go to fraudsters. It shouldn’t go to fraudsters who take advantage of your tax dollars. It shouldn’t go to fraudsters who will literally steal money out of the Medicaid fund in order to enrich themselves. It shouldn’t go to people who would steal food out of the mouths of poor children. It should go to the people who need it,” Vance said.

The vice president also emphasized what he described as the generosity of the American people and their willingness to support those facing hardship.

“One of the things I love about our country, ladies and gentlemen, is that we are generous people,” Vance said.

“When we see a kid who can’t afford food, sometimes my family growing up would benefit from these programs. When we see a kid who can’t afford food, we say, you know what, we’re going to help you. When we see a person who has a treatable illness but can’t afford medical care, you say, you wouldn’t. You know what, we’re going to help you,” Vance said.

Vance argued that fraudsters abuse that generosity by diverting resources intended for vulnerable Americans.

“Whether it’s the Medicaid program or a local charity, you know what these fraudsters are doing. They are taking advantage of American generosity to enrich themselves,” Vance said.

He concluded by saying the administration intends to continue prosecuting those involved in fraud and protecting taxpayer funds.

“And we need somebody who’s going to put them in jail and protect your money, and that’s exactly what we’re doing under the administration,” Vance said.

WATCH:

News

Trump’s Labor Team Just Exposed $135 Billion Biden Fraud Bomb [WATCH]

A senior Labor Department official said the Trump administration is pursuing aggressive anti-fraud measures after what he described as one of the largest thefts of taxpayer money in American history involving unemployment insurance payments distributed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The comments came during an exchange between Benny Johnson and Deputy Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling, who discussed the scale of unemployment insurance fraud and the administration’s efforts to prevent similar abuses in the future.

“Employment insurance fraud, massive vector of fraud in the country. How are you going to be solving this?” Johnson asked.

Sonderling began by highlighting President Donald Trump’s creation of a federal anti-fraud initiative and Vice President J.D. Vance’s leadership role in the effort.

“Yeah, well, let’s take a step back. And first, we need to thank President Trump for establishing the task force on fraud at the White House and appointing our great Vice President JD Vance to leading it,” Sonderling said.

According to Sonderling, the administration has coordinated efforts across federal agencies to identify fraud and protect taxpayer dollars.

“They’ve put such tremendous efforts across all agencies to really root out fraud and root out fraud, particularly in government programs that gives out your hard-earned taxpayers dollars to individuals,” Sonderling said.

Sonderling said the Labor Department’s focus centers on unemployment insurance programs that expanded dramatically during the pandemic.

“So, the Department of Labor’s role in this is related to unemployment insurance, and with unemployment insurance, we need to take a step back. During COVID, $900 billion was given out to help people get back on their feet, to help people deal with some of the job losses related to COVID,” Sonderling said.

However, he said a significant portion of those funds was lost to fraud during the Biden administration.

“But during the Biden administration, 135 billion of that money was stolen by fraud. So, think about the scale of that. 135 billion is one of the largest taxpayer thefts in history,” Sonderling said.

He described widespread abuse involving payments issued to individuals who did not qualify for benefits.

“And when you look about that, how rampant the fraud was across the country. It was related to paying people who were in prison, who obviously aren’t able to work, paying people who were under 14, three year olds, seven year olds getting unemployment insurance,” Sonderling said.

Sonderling questioned how such payments were able to occur and attributed the problem to inadequate safeguards and oversight.

“And you know, how did that happen? It was a lack of controls, it was states just turning a blind eye and letting this money flow,” Sonderling said.

According to Sonderling, the administration’s anti-fraud task force is now focused on preventing a repeat of those problems by implementing stronger protections throughout the system.

“So, with the Vice President’s task force, it’s really making sure that never happens again,” Sonderling said.

He added that the administration is pursuing substantial reforms aimed at protecting taxpayer funds and strengthening oversight of federal benefit programs.

“And we’re taking some really extraordinary measures to ensure that never happens,” Sonderling said.

WATCH:

The administration has made fraud prevention a major focus, with officials arguing that tighter controls, improved verification systems, and coordinated oversight are necessary to prevent future losses and ensure government assistance reaches eligible recipients.

News

Vance Torches Israeli Officials Trashing Trump: “Wake Up and Smell Reality” [WATCH]

Vice President JD Vance came out swinging this week, firing a direct shot at Israeli officials who have been openly critical of President Trump and his Iran memorandum of understanding.

At a Thursday press briefing, Vance made it clear that Israel’s cabinet might want to rethink biting the hand that feeds them, especially when that hand belongs to the only world leader still firmly on their side.

The dust-up follows reports from Axios claiming that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is outraged over the memorandum of understanding’s ceasefire clause involving Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

According to the report, Netanyahu’s government has no intention of withdrawing troops from Lebanon, viewing the clause as a constraint on Israel’s military freedom.

In short, he’s refusing to play ball.

Trump has already expressed sharp criticism of Israel’s recent strikes in Beirut, Lebanon, which he says nearly derailed the delicate diplomatic deal with Iran.

“You don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they’re not all Hezbollah, that I can tell you,” Trump said while condemning the reckless military actions.

Trump added that he was furious when Israel attacked Beirut only two hours before the agreement was set to be signed.

“It wasn’t like in the southern side, and you know, it was in Beirut. I did not like that. I let him know that I didn’t like it, not at all,” he said, noting that this kind of aggression puts everything on the line.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, the media circus was quick to pounce on the Trump administration, feeding talking points that painted the deal as a sellout to Iran and Hezbollah.

Not surprisingly, liberal networks and Israeli outlets sympathetic to Netanyahu went into a frenzy.

One Channel 14 host even hurled an antisemitic insult at Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, accusing them of financial betrayal.

It was the sort of cheap media stunt that is par for the course these days.

Even some conservative pundits chimed in with criticism, including Fox News host Mark Levin, who blasted the idea that Israel should stay tied to the deal.

He accused Trump of caving to Iran, missing the bigger picture that Trump’s diplomacy has been strengthening America’s influence, not weakening it.

Vance, however, was not going to let that kind of talk go unchallenged.

Responding to a question from The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson, he made a fiery defense of both Trump and American generosity toward Israel.

“Over the last three months, two-thirds of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars,” Vance noted pointedly.

He said that reports of Netanyahu “fuming” do not match any of his own conversations with the Israeli leader but hinted that some messages might be different behind closed doors.

That comment alone spoke volumes about the behind-the-scenes tension between Washington and Jerusalem.

Then came the moment that turned heads nationwide.

Vance declared, “Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time, and he happens to be the head of state of the world’s superpower. If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world.”

His message was sharp and unapologetic.

Israel’s internal critics need to stop seeing Trump as an adversary and start realizing that without the United States, Israel would be far more isolated on the global stage.

Vance’s criticism went straight to the heart of the matter: gratitude and realism.

Vance did not stop there. He reminded reporters that many of the weapons keeping Israel safe are courtesy of American taxpayers, not Israeli coffers.

“The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump, and anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the President of the United States needs to wake up and smell the reality of the situation that country is in,” Vance said.

That comment alone made it clear he was not entertaining the idea that Trump had done anything but stand firmly with Israel.

Conradson pressed further about whether Netanyahu’s fuming could torpedo the deal, but Vance brushed aside speculation.

“I don’t want to get into hypotheticals that could torpedo the deal because I think the president’s expectation is that all of our friends, the Israelis, the Arabs in the region, we’re going to work together and actually see this deal to completion,” Vance explained.

WATCH:

His measured yet cutting remarks showed that the administration is walking a tightrope between holding allies accountable and keeping a fragile peace intact.

The Israeli government may want to consider that a fight with Washington would be the last thing it can afford right now.

It was a moment that captured the Trump-Vance administration’s blunt style of diplomacy.

No backroom whispers.

No polished talking points. Just an American leader making it abundantly clear that loyalty cuts both ways.

Vance’s mic drop moment will likely reverberate across both Jerusalem and Capitol Hill, reminding allies everywhere that respect is not optional when America is footing the bill.

News

JD Vance Calls His ‘Childless Cat Ladies’ Quip Dumb But Says Liberals Missed the Real Message [WATCH]

Vice President JD Vance said this week that his widely discussed “childless cat ladies” comment from 2021 distracted from the broader point he was attempting to make about family life and public policy in America, as reported by Fox News.

Speaking on the “Hang Out with Sean Hannity” podcast, Vance reflected on the remark that drew national attention during his rise in politics and acknowledged that the wording overshadowed the message he intended to convey.

“I mean, it was dumb, because it offended so many people, they didn’t actually listen to the point,” Vance said.

He explained that the reaction to the comment prevented many people from considering the larger argument he was trying to make.

“The point that I was making is like, when a politician, a political leader, when a media figure speaks, you’re trying to illuminate and trying to make people think. It pissed so many people off that it turned off the thinking part of their brain,” he added.

The comment originated during a 2021 interview in which Vance criticized Democratic leadership and referred to the country being run by “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”

At the time, Vance specifically mentioned then-Vice President Kamala Harris, then-Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as examples of political figures he believed were influencing the direction of the Democratic Party.

The remark quickly became a political flashpoint and generated criticism from liberal activists, media figures, and Democratic supporters. Harris is the stepmother of two children, while Buttigieg welcomed twins later in 2021.

Among those who publicly reacted was singer Taylor Swift, who later endorsed Harris for president and described herself as a “Childless Cat Lady.”

During his conversation with Hannity, Vance said his original point centered on what he believes is a growing cultural hostility toward families raising children.

According to the vice president, family life often receives less consideration in public policy debates than it should.

Vance cited personal experiences raising children and said he believes parents frequently encounter negative attitudes in everyday situations.

“You see how people scoff at young moms on an airplane, or I’ve seen this in a number of different ways. It’s hard at this point to take, even with all of the benefits that we have being vice president, it’s kind of a pain to take three kids to a restaurant,” he said.

Vance then noted the challenges his family expects to face as it grows.

“It’s [going to] be a lot harder to take four kids to a restaurant.”

The vice president and his wife, Usha Vance, are raising their children while balancing the demands of public office. Vance argued that having more leaders with firsthand experience raising young children could lead to different policy decisions.

As an example, he pointed to COVID-era mask requirements for children and questioned decisions made during the later stages of the pandemic.

“Why did we keep on masking toddlers? Like, I’m not saying two months into it. A year and a half into the pandemic, when we knew it was affecting their developmental, their learning, their language. Why do we do it?” Vance asked.

He then offered what he believes was the underlying issue.

“Because we didn’t have the perspective of young parents in our country’s leadership.”

The comments come as Vance continues to discuss family policy, parenting, and cultural issues that have become recurring themes in his public appearances.

While the “childless cat ladies” remark remains one of the most frequently cited statements from his early political career, Vance said the controversy surrounding it prevented many people from focusing on the larger concerns he was attempting to raise about family life and public policy in the United States.

News

Knicks Break NBA Tradition as First Champions to Visit Trump White House [WATCH]

The New York Knicks will become the first NBA championship team to visit the White House during President Donald Trump’s current term after accepting an invitation following their NBA Finals victory, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The Knicks ended a 53-year championship drought on Saturday night by defeating the San Antonio Spurs in Game 5 of the NBA Finals to capture the Larry O’Brien Trophy.

The championship marked the franchise’s first NBA title since 1973 and capped a season that returned the team to the top of the league after decades without a championship.

Team owner James Dolan confirmed this week that the organization has accepted an invitation from the White House, and plans are underway for the visit.

Speaking during an interview on WFAN, Dolan said, “We just did receive an invitation from the White House, which we accepted.”

While details regarding the timing and logistics are still being worked out, Dolan made clear that the team intends to participate in the traditional championship visit.

“We still have to figure out the details, et cetera, but yes, of course. Look, I invited the president to come down for the game. He is a friend. I’ve known him for 30 years, and I’m very proud to bring the team to the White House.”

The announcement comes just days after President Trump attended Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden. The appearance marked the first time a sitting president had attended an NBA Finals game.

As Trump arrived at the arena, chants of “USA! USA! USA!” echoed throughout Madison Square Garden.

The upcoming White House visit will mark a notable moment in the relationship between championship NBA teams and the White House.

During both of Trump’s presidential terms, visits by NBA champions have often become a source of controversy or have not occurred at all.

In 2017, Trump withdrew a White House invitation to the Golden State Warriors after star guard Stephen Curry and other members of the team expressed reluctance about attending.

The following years brought similar situations. In 2018 and 2019, the Warriors and the Toronto Raptors either declined invitations or were not invited to visit the White House.

In 2020, the Los Angeles Lakers won the NBA championship during the COVID-19 pandemic and did not make a White House visit.

The tradition resumed under former president Joe Biden. The Milwaukee Bucks visited the White House in 2021 after winning the NBA title. The Golden State Warriors followed with a White House visit in 2022.

The Denver Nuggets, who won the NBA championship in 2023, declined a White House visit, citing scheduling issues. In 2024, the Boston Celtics visited  Biden following their championship season.

After Trump returned to office in 2025, the Oklahoma City Thunder chose not to make a White House visit after winning the NBA title, also citing a timing issue.

That left a gap in the traditional championship celebration until the Knicks accepted the invitation this week.

The upcoming visit will make New York the first NBA championship team to appear at the Trump White House during his current administration.

It also restores a long-standing sports tradition that has often become intertwined with political disagreements in recent years.

For the Knicks, the White House trip will serve as another milestone in a championship season that ended one of the longest title droughts in franchise history and delivered the organization’s first NBA championship in more than five decades.


Scroll to Top