News

Democratic Socialist Set to Take Over DC Mayorship Sparks Showdown With Trump [WATCH]
News

Democratic Socialist Set to Take Over DC Mayorship Sparks Showdown With Trump [WATCH]

/

Democratic socialist candidate Janeese Lewis George appeared headed toward victory in Washington, D.C.’s mayoral race Tuesday night, positioning her to become the city’s next mayor and potentially setting up clashes with the Trump administration over crime, immigration enforcement, and federal involvement in the nation’s capital, as reported by Trending Politics News.

With votes still being counted under the city’s new ranked-choice voting system, Lewis George held a substantial lead over her closest competitor, Kenyan McDuffie. At the time results were being reported, Lewis George led by approximately 53% to 37%.

Because Washington, D.C., heavily favors Democratic candidates and no significant opposition is expected in the general election, her Democratic nomination is widely viewed as putting her on track to secure the mayor’s office.

The race follows the decision by outgoing Mayor Muriel Bowser not to seek another term. Bowser’s departure ended a lengthy tenure that often saw her balancing progressive priorities with cooperation on federal initiatives.

Under President Donald Trump, Washington has become a focal point for efforts to increase immigration enforcement, reduce crime, and improve federal properties throughout the city.

Bowser worked with the administration on several initiatives, particularly when federal resources were provided to support the Metropolitan Police Department.

Lewis George has frequently criticized Bowser’s leadership, especially regarding cooperation with Trump administration policies on crime and immigration enforcement.

President Trump recently warned that a Lewis George victory could create challenges for the city and suggested the federal government could take a more direct role if necessary.

“I wouldn’t like it,” Trump said of a potential Lewis George victory. “And maybe we take back Washington, run it on the federal basis. We won’t put up with it. We’re not going to lose our businesses.”

Lewis George’s rise has drawn comparisons to democratic socialist candidates who have gained influence in major cities and congressional districts.

Reports previously indicated that advisers close to Lewis George were studying the campaign model used by New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whose campaign challenged the Democratic establishment and pushed policy debates further left.

Lewis George openly identifies as a democratic socialist and has promoted policies including social housing initiatives, increases to the minimum wage, and removing what she has described as military-style equipment from police departments.

In 2022, Lewis George introduced legislation known as the “Green New Deal for Housing,” which proposed authorizing the D.C. government to acquire properties and convert them into social housing.

“Housing is too essential to leave solely to the private market,” Lewis George said in 2022.

Questions surrounding policing have also remained a major issue in the campaign.

Lewis George was first elected to the D.C. Council in 2020 during the period of nationwide demonstrations following the death of George Floyd.

During that campaign, she advocated reducing police funding, limiting police presence in schools, rejecting endorsements from police unions, and eliminating cash bail.

She also participated in the June 2020 “Fund Care, Not Cops!” rally organized by the Democratic Socialists of America.

Since launching her mayoral campaign, Lewis George has distanced herself from earlier calls to defund police. Her current platform states support for law enforcement and does not reference previous pledges to reduce police funding.

Crime reduction has been a major priority for President Trump’s administration in Washington.

Last August, Trump announced a temporary federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed National Guard troops to assist city law enforcement efforts.

At the time, Trump described the operation as “a historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor, and worse.”

While federal control of the department later ended, National Guard personnel remain deployed in the city. Former Police Chief Pamela Smith praised the federal assistance, citing staffing shortages within the department.

Bowser initially opposed the federal intervention but later expressed appreciation for the additional resources after crime rates declined.

The Trump administration also increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity in Washington, coordinating enforcement efforts with local and federal law enforcement agencies.

Lewis George strongly opposed those actions and criticized cooperation with federal authorities.

“I have been horrified and outraged by the conduct perpetrated by federal law enforcement officers, including ICE agents, targeting our most vulnerable neighbors – especially unhoused and undocumented residents who are simply trying to live their lives,” Lewis George wrote in August.

As discussion continued over the possibility of further federal involvement in city affairs, Lewis George argued that Washington residents wanted leadership willing to challenge the administration.

“We are not going to get ICE off our streets or protect Home Rule by fearing this President,” Lewis George said in a post to X. “Threatening DC because you do not like how our residents vote is an attack on democracy itself.”

If current vote margins hold through the ranked-choice counting process, Lewis George will become Washington’s next mayor and inherit a city that remains at the center of the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape the nation’s capital.

Army Finally Nabs Fugitive Soldier After Three Decades on the Run
News

Army Finally Nabs Fugitive Soldier After Three Decades on the Run

/

After nearly thirty years of running from justice, the Army’s most wanted fugitive, former Staff Sgt. Jesse Bussey, is finally back on U.S. soil—and behind bars where he belongs.

The long hunt came to an end when U.S. Marshals, led by Army veteran and acting U.S. Marshal Nick Ricigliano, tracked the deserter down in Spain. For Ricigliano, it was a career-defining moment that brought long-awaited justice to Bussey’s victims and closure to one of the Army’s most infamous cold cases.

Bussey’s story reads like something out of a spy thriller, except this one comes with real heroes and real scars. Back in 1996, Bussey fled from an Army base in Germany just as he was about to face a court-martial for attacking multiple women in his unit.

He was later convicted in absentia on charges of rape, indecent assault, and desertion. The court sentenced him to sixteen years, stripped him of rank, and issued a dishonorable discharge, but Bussey had already slipped into Europe, vanishing for decades.

When Ricigliano received the case in 2019, Bussey had a twenty-three-year lead. Most investigators might have considered it a hopeless chase, but Ricigliano wasn’t built that way.

A battle-tested veteran and relentless marshal, he pieced together scraps of evidence, old personnel files, and long-forgotten tips to rebuild the fugitive’s trail. He and Senior Inspector Kevin Kamrowski used every tool available—from modern databases to old-fashioned legwork—to bring Bussey down.

The Marshals began interviewing old comrades, acquaintances, and victims linked to Bussey. Through these interviews, they discovered Bussey’s bizarre post-Army journey, which included a stint in the French Foreign Legion.

Investigators believe he joined around 1999 or 2000, living under assumed identities and operating inside a military force notorious for its secrecy and toughness.

Ricigliano said Bussey’s time in the Legion left him physically battered and emotionally drained.

Bussey had told Marshals after his capture that the Legion’s training was brutally unforgiving and that he left because he didn’t want to fight “pocket wars in Africa.”

The Legion, he said, made no secret of its purpose: “You’re here to die for France so that Frenchmen don’t have to die.”

Following his discharge from the Legion, Bussey apparently drifted across Europe, eventually ending up homeless on the streets of Paris.

He later surfaced in Spain under the alias “David Osuji,” a name he used to convince others he was of African origin. By this point, nearly a generation had passed since his crimes—proof that time didn’t erase accountability.

In 2024, the big break came. Ricigliano’s partner Kamrowski received a tip about a man teaching at the Málaga English Academy.

Something about the story didn’t add up. “I really like this tip, and this is the one we’re going to drill down on,” Kamrowski said, trusting his instincts. After digging deeper, the Marshals identified the mysterious teacher as none other than Jesse Bussey.

With positive identification secured by September 2024, U.S. officials began coordinating with Spanish authorities to arrest the fugitive.

It took over a year of patient diplomacy before a Spanish judge issued a formal warrant in November 2025. Bussey fought extradition for months, but the law—patient and persistent—finally caught up.

On June 8, 2026, the Army’s most wanted fugitive landed back in the United States at Newark Airport, escorted by U.S. Marshals. From there, he was transferred to the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

After thirty years of hiding, lying, and running, Bussey’s long evasion had finally ended in shackles.

At 69 years old, Bussey is a frail reflection of the soldier he once was. Ricigliano admitted feeling a mixture of surprise and grim satisfaction when he saw the fugitive face-to-face for the first time. “I was a bit taken aback by how much he had aged,” he said.

“I suppose 30 years of waiting for that knock on the door had taken a physical as well as mental toll.”

Still, Ricigliano’s focus wasn’t on sympathy. His mission was about something far more important—justice for Bussey’s victims, many of whom have carried their trauma in silence for decades. Delivering the news of Bussey’s capture to them, he said, was a moment of profound satisfaction.

“It’s an incredible feeling,” Ricigliano said. “You feel like you are actually contributing to ensuring that the victims get justice.”

The case demonstrates not only the tenacity of U.S. law enforcement but also the resilience of America’s military justice system, even decades later.

The War Department and federal agencies worked hand-in-hand with international partners to close the loop. It’s a reminder that while fugitives can hide, the long arm of American justice keeps reaching.

Justice took time in this case—three long decades—but justice came nonetheless. A soldier who once deserted the flag will now spend the rest of his days beneath its shadow. That’s exactly how it should be.

Air Force Rolls Out New Faith-Based Insignia for Chaplains and Maternity Uniform Guidance
News

Air Force Rolls Out New Faith-Based Insignia for Chaplains and Maternity Uniform Guidance

/

The U.S. Air Force is implementing a pair of long-anticipated uniform updates — one reinforcing the faith-first identity of military chaplains and another offering more practical uniform options for expectant servicewomen.

Both moves signal cultural adjustments in the force under new direction from the War Department and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

According to a notice released Wednesday, chaplains in the Air Force must now wear the chaplain insignia on their Operational Camouflage Pattern uniforms instead of officer rank insignia.

It’s a change that aligns with March guidance issued across the Department of War to better reflect a chaplain’s primary duty as a spiritual leader rather than a commissioned officer.

The memo, dated June 15, clarified that all Air Force chaplains must comply within 30 days. An Air Force spokesperson confirmed its authenticity after it circulated on the unofficial Air Force Facebook page “Air Force amn/nco/snco.”

The online chatter quickly spread, as service members discussed the new look and the deeper implications behind it.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who announced the change in March, said plainly that “A chaplain is first and foremost a chaplain and an officer second. This change is a visual representation of that fact.”

Hegseth’s words echoed a principle often emphasized by faith leaders in the ranks — that spiritual authority transcends rank and bureaucracy.

Previously, Air Force chaplains would wear both their officer rank insignia and a small symbol of their faith. The new rule simplifies that, giving chaplains one clear identifier: the insignia of their calling, not their pay grade.

The update applies to camouflage uniforms, patrol caps, tactical caps, and outer garments, though not the service dress uniform.

Customs and courtesies remain unchanged: chaplains will still be addressed and saluted according to their rank, even if the insignia itself will no longer be visible on their combat wear.

U.S. Military Chaplaincy Celebrates 250 Years of Faith, Service, and Support
Chaplain (Capt.) Jonathan Dawson, 436th Airlift Wing chaplain, speaks during a service recording April 25, 2020, at Chapel 1 on Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. The recordings are created during the week and aired on Sunday due to COVID-19 restrictions. The recordings allow the chapel to provide services while ensuring people’s safety. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christopher Quail)

The change brings the Air Force in line with the U.S. Navy, which last week confirmed that its chaplains would drop rank insignias as well.

The Department of War guidance is expected to expand to all services, including the Army and Marine Corps, though they have yet to issue formal updates mirroring the policy.

For reserve and Air National Guard chaplains, the memo gives a 60-day compliance window. The directive warns that “instances of non-compliance require justification, corrective action plans, and will be reported monthly to the Chief of Chaplains until full compliance is achieved.”

While the chaplain policy emphasizes faith, the Air Force’s second uniform update speaks to practicality.

Pregnant airmen will soon have the option to wear a new maternity wrap dress. It’s authorized as a mess dress, semi-formal, and Class A uniform, with mandatory wear beginning in July 2030.

This move updates outdated uniform options for female personnel, replacing decades-old designs that were uncomfortable and out of step with modern fit standards.

According to the official release, a metal engraved name tag will accompany the Class A configuration, though mess and semi-formal versions will not require one.

The dress will soon be stocked across U.S. Army and Air Force Exchange Service stores, both stateside and abroad, by the end of summer.

The wrap dress, though practical and arguably long overdue, also signals the Air Force’s continued investment in retaining women servicemembers through improved equipment and uniform design.

U.S. Military Chaplaincy Celebrates 250 Years of Faith, Service, and Support

It’s a pragmatic change rather than a political one, aiming to better accommodate women who serve while pregnant without sacrificing professionalism or comfort.

Notably, the Space Force guardians are excluded from this update — they’ll continue wearing the Air Force jumper until their own maternity uniform arrives in 2027.

That design is still in the prototype phase, part of the growing effort to establish a unique look for the youngest branch in the U.S. military.

Critics of the broader Pentagon modernization effort have claimed the military’s emphasis on uniforms and social issues distracts from readiness.

However, Hegseth’s leadership has so far balanced practical updates like these while sharpening focus on warfighting priorities, returning the Department of War to a mindset of strength, faith, and mission execution.

For many in the chaplain corps, the removal of rank insignia is a visible reminder that their calling isn’t bound by bureaucracy but by faith and service.

As one Air Force chaplain privately noted, “This policy finally matches what we’ve always been — servants of faith, not rank.”

From faith-first chaplain uniforms to maternity wrap dresses, the Air Force is executing orders that both honor tradition and address real needs across the force. It’s a blend of purpose and practicality — and exactly the kind of balance the American military needs in today’s unpredictable world.

Chicago Man Charged After Anti-Trump Cross Burning Protest in Grant Park [WATCH]
News

Chicago Man Charged After Anti-Trump Cross Burning Protest in Grant Park [WATCH]

/

A 21-year-old man who publicly admitted to burning a cross in Chicago’s Grant Park earlier this month has been charged with multiple offenses, including a felony hate crime, according to authorities.

Chicago police announced on June 17 that Merlin Lu faces a felony hate crime charge in connection with the June 9 incident, during which investigators say he erected a cross in Grant Park and set it on fire.

In addition to the hate crime allegation, Lu has been charged with felony arson and felony criminal damage to property. He also faces several misdemeanor counts, including reckless conduct and disorderly conduct.

Police said Lu was taken into custody on Monday following an investigation involving multiple law enforcement agencies.

Authorities credited the FBI, Illinois State Police, University of Chicago Police, and the Great Lakes Regional Fugitive Task Force with assisting in the case.

The cross-burning incident drew significant attention after images and video circulated online showing the structure burning in one of Chicago’s most recognizable public spaces. Investigators subsequently worked to identify the individual responsible.

Days after the incident, Lu spoke with NBC 5 Investigates reporter Chuck Goudie in an exclusive interview and acknowledged his role in the event.

During that interview, Lu said he intentionally set the cross on fire as a protest against President Donald Trump.

According to Lu’s statements, the demonstration included a red hat placed on top of the cross. He told NBC 5 Investigates that the hat was part of the protest message he intended to convey.

The incident quickly generated public debate and drew scrutiny from law enforcement officials.

Cross burnings have long been associated with intimidation and racial hostility in the United States, leading authorities to examine whether the circumstances surrounding the Grant Park event warranted hate crime charges.

Chicago police have not publicly released additional details regarding the evidence that led to the filing of the hate crime count.

However, prosecutors moved forward with the charge after reviewing the results of the investigation conducted by local, state, and federal authorities.

Grant Park, located in downtown Chicago, is one of the city’s most heavily visited public spaces and frequently serves as a location for civic events, demonstrations, and public gatherings.

The June 9 incident occurred in a highly visible area, drawing attention from both residents and visitors.

The case remains active as it proceeds through the court system. Authorities have not announced a trial date.

Lu’s admission during the NBC Chicago interview became a central element of public discussion surrounding the case, particularly because he openly acknowledged carrying out the act and described it as a political protest directed at President Trump.

Chicago police said the charges stem from the June 9 cross-burning incident and the resulting investigation conducted by the participating agencies.

The felony hate crime charge is among the most serious counts filed against Lu and could carry substantial legal consequences if he is convicted.

LGBTQ Teacher Fired After Forcing Girls to Kiss Each Other in Class Assignment Scandal [WATCH]
News

LGBTQ Teacher Fired After Forcing Girls to Kiss Each Other in Class Assignment Scandal [WATCH]

/

A Denver teacher is out of a job after allegedly pushing students into kissing one another during language class skits.

The teacher, 50 year old Jennifer Honka, was formally dismissed after an internal investigation by the district and an independent review found that she pressured female students to engage in same sex kisses as part of graded classroom performances.

The scandal erupted inside Northeast Early College, a school within the Denver Public Schools system, where Honka taught French Language and Culture for eight years.

Known for previously receiving top teaching evaluations, she is now accused of ignoring professional boundaries in pursuit of woke classroom theatrics that made students uncomfortable.

According to the independent review, which CBS Colorado obtained, Honka designed “skits” with kissing scenes and insisted students participate as written.

One student described being “very uncomfortable and did not know what to do,” yet said she went along with the direction and kissed another student.

Those assigned to act out the scenes were almost always of the same sex, raising obvious concerns among parents and colleagues.

Board members voted unanimously to fire Honka during a closed door meeting on May 20.

Their decision was final, with no public debate and no dissenting votes.

The official justification for her dismissal cited “incompetence and neglect of duty,” though the true nature of the case went far beyond paperwork.

WATCH:

The review found that Honka pushed certain themes inside her classroom that had nothing to do with the French language lessons she was supposed to teach.

Students told investigators that Honka often used class time to talk about her LGBTQ activism and identity.

Some even claimed she made a habit of selecting female students to act out romantic roles in her instructional skits, while rarely assigning male students to do the same.

One student said she was given a failing grade when she declined to take part in a kissing scene.

The class assignments themselves carried suggestive titles like “The Neighbors Saw Everything” and “The Boring Kiss,” each containing three separate kiss cues.

A chilling account from one student described a posted rule that read, “The answer is always yes,” a slogan Honka allegedly emphasized repeatedly to steer students toward compliance.

Colleagues were disturbed when multiple students approached them to share what was happening behind Honka’s classroom door.

An English teacher reported that one female student appeared “upset and defeated” after being told she had to kiss three girls during class skits.

It was only after that teacher went to the administration that police and district officials became involved.

Despite the overwhelming number of complaints, Honka tried to defend herself by saying students had “options.”

She claimed she permitted “blowing kisses” or “fist bumps” if pupils were uncomfortable.

Yet multiple students insisted that those so called options never affected grades.

Several stated clearly that refusing to participate resulted in lower scores, creating pressure to go along.

The district referred the incident to police, though investigators have not yet filed criminal charges.

Parents, however, are demanding to know why it took so long for the district to respond and why such inappropriate material found its way into a middle school class in the first place.

Denver Public Schools has provided few details beyond confirming the vote and the firing.

Many parents see this as yet another example of how liberal ideology and activist instruction have replaced solid academics in public education.

Instead of teaching grammar and vocabulary, students were being roped into behavior that would get any adult fired instantly in any other environment.

Classroom activism disguised as “cultural education” has no place in American schools, and conservative parents across the country are taking note.

Adding to the disgust, this is not the first time a teacher has crossed that line.

Only months earlier in Las Vegas, another teacher named Rasheda Rose faced two felony child abuse charges after encouraging middle schoolers to kiss during a classroom game.

The fact that such incidents are becoming more common points to a deeper cultural and moral problem inside public education systems dominated by progressive ideology.

The district appears eager to move past the story, but the community should not. Children are owed real education, not indoctrination.

Parents have every right to demand transparency, accountability, and common sense from public officials.

When teachers forget their role and begin engaging in social experimentation, it is up to school boards to act swiftly.

In this case, the board made the right choice by showing Honka the door, though that decision came far too late to erase what students were subjected to.

It should not take viral news coverage for school systems to recognize boundaries.

The uncomfortable truth is that today’s public schools are becoming ground zero for cultural politics at the expense of children.

Denver’s latest scandal is proof that the trust between parents and public education has been severely tested, and unless schools return to traditional teaching values, it may not recover.

Epstein’s Jail Notes Destroy Another Leftist Narrative About His Relationship with Trump [WATCH]
News

Epstein’s Jail Notes Destroy Another Leftist Narrative About His Relationship with Trump [WATCH]

/

For years, the establishment press has strained every nerve trying to connect Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.

They have recycled every rumor, twisted every redaction, and ignored every inconvenient fact.

But the latest reporting from The New York Times Magazine, of all places, has backfired in spectacular fashion.

Buried in its thousands of words is an admission that Epstein was not a Trump ally at all, but in fact obsessed with trying to find dirt on him, only to come up empty-handed.

The Times, which never misses a chance to cast Trump in the worst possible light, published a massive deep dive into Epstein’s final days behind bars.

The supposed point was to examine whether Epstein’s death was truly a suicide.

The left hoped, as always, that something damning about Trump might surface along the way.

Instead, what emerged was evidence that Epstein desperately wanted to hurt Trump.

The notes the Times obtained made that abundantly clear.

In handwritten pages discovered from Epstein’s time in jail, the disgraced financier struggled to think of anything incriminating to offer prosecutors about Trump.

His scribbles were petty, speculative insults rather than revelations of any real connection.

Epstein scrawled phrases like “Trump is a total con artist, smoke and mirrors” and “Never had money.”

That hardly sounds like the words of a close friend, and it certainly is not evidence of shared wrongdoing.

The Times itself even noted that Epstein’s attorneys were considering a deal with federal prosecutors that would involve turning over information useful in other cases.

Epstein apparently fixated on Trump as a potential bargaining chip.

But he found nothing of value.

The man who counted the world’s powerful among his friends could not conjure even a shred of real dirt on the one man the left insists must be guilty of everything.

If anything, Epstein’s ramblings demonstrate how little of substance ever tied Trump to his orbit.

The two moved in the same wealthy Palm Beach circles decades ago, as many socialites did.

When news broke that Epstein was facing criminal charges for sex trafficking, Trump praised the investigation and cut ties completely.

There was no collaboration, no friendship, and nothing to hide.

That truth, of course, runs directly against the left’s narrative.

Democrats and their media allies have spent years trying to reinvent Epstein’s relationship with Trump into a political weapon.

It did not matter that Epstein’s actual political allies included Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

The left’s obsession has always been about guilt by imagination, not evidence.

WATCH:

Yet now even the New York Times, likely without meaning to, has confirmed that the Epstein story does not implicate Trump.

Instead, it highlights how twisted the media obsession has become.

Epstein’s own writings portray a vindictive man searching for leverage, not a trusted confidant covering up for a powerful friend.

The liberal press cannot avoid admitting the facts, even when those facts rip holes in its preferred story.

Ironically, while the Times did confirm that Epstein tried and failed to smear Trump, its lengthy article was less convincing on the question of how Epstein died.

The newspaper described an absurd series of “coincidences” inside the Manhattan jail, missing rounds by guards, failed cameras, sloppy evidence collection, and contradictory autopsy findings.

The writers eventually waved those away as a sad collection of human error.

That explanation would draw laughs if it were not so serious.

Even so, in one of its few measured moments, the report admitted that the Epstein death mystery might never be solved.

It called the entire saga a “perfect petri dish for conspiracy theories,” which is quite the understatement.

For years, both sides of the political divide have speculated about exactly how a man with so many high-level connections was able to die alone in a cell under supposedly tight supervision.

Still, the most striking revelation is not about how Epstein died but about what he failed to do while alive. He desperately wanted something, anything, to barter against his sentence.

He tried to dredge up information on Trump and could find nothing beyond shallow insults.

For a man known to manipulate those around him, even through fear or blackmail, that failure speaks volumes.

It is unlikely the Times meant to vindicate Trump in any way.

The publication has made a career of spreading anti-Trump insinuation.

But facts can be stubborn things. Once those notes surfaced, the conclusion became unavoidable.

Epstein may have wanted to harm Trump politically, but he had no ammunition.

The story liberals hoped would confirm Trump’s guilt has only reinforced his innocence.

Just as predictable, left wing commentators have glossed over this revelation, pretending the Epstein notes are insignificant.

But the truth is that their favorite narrative has collapsed under the weight of genuine evidence.

The more the left tries to connect Trump to Epstein, the clearer it becomes that the connection never existed.

What remains is a glaring example of how the mainstream press, in its blind hatred for Trump, keeps helping his case instead.

Scott Jennings Drops Truth Bomb on CNN: Democrats Only Love America When They’re in Charge [WATCH]
News

Scott Jennings Drops Truth Bomb on CNN: Democrats Only Love America When They’re in Charge [WATCH]

/

CNN political commentator Scott Jennings sent shockwaves through the liberal echo chamber when he unveiled polling data that simply confirmed what most conservatives have known for years.

Democrats’ love for America evaporates the second they lose control. Jennings used fresh Gallup data to make the point that the left’s patriotism is as shallow as their economic talking points.

During a recent CNN panel, Jennings pointed to a Gallup poll showing that just 36 percent of Democrats say they are extremely or very proud to be American, a massive drop from 62 percent only a year ago.

Meanwhile, Republicans, who generally love their country whether they win or lose, continued to show overwhelming pride.

Ninety-two percent of Republicans said they are proud to be Americans, a number that has stayed high for decades.

Jennings looked across the studio at his liberal counterparts and laid it out plainly.

“You have to love your country, whether or not you lost the last election,” he said.

“I love America. Most Republicans love America. Ninety percent are very proud to be Americans. They’re proud of living in this country.”

The contrast could not be clearer.

Conservatives love the country for what it stands for, not for who sits in the Oval Office.

The Gallup results are not a one off.

The only other time Democrats’ pride dipped below a majority was in 2020, when President Trump was at the helm in his first term.

In other words, when Democrats are out of power, they pout.

When they have the reins, they suddenly rediscover patriotism, but only for as long as it suits their political goals.

Jennings went on to highlight a particularly telling example of this attitude.

He referenced far left Hollywood actor Robert DeNiro, who recently declared he does not love America anymore while bashing President Trump as a “racist, misogynist, xenophobic tyrant.”

The irony was not lost on viewers watching a millionaire celebrity denounce the very country that made him rich and famous.

De Niro took his rant a step further, comparing love of country to the self delusion of an abused spouse. Jennings did not mince words in response.

“Unfortunately, I think Mr. De Niro’s comments are pretty indicative of a majority of Democrats who can’t seem to find that attitude inside them to love your country even though you lost the last election,” he said.

He added, “Loving America, being a patriot for America, feeling good about America shouldn’t be dictated by whether you won or lost. When I hear DeNiro, I hear him saying, ‘I can only love America if we win every election from here on out.’ That’s a rather fascist statement.”

Even the other panelists could not easily counter the numbers or the logic.

One analyst on the panel backed Jennings up with more historical context.

“Gallup polling data from 25 years ago says Republicans were 90 percent proud or extremely proud to be Americans. Democrats were 87 percent. Today, Republicans are slightly higher at 92 percent, while Democrats have plummeted to 36 percent. Robert DeNiro’s views are not out of step with the median Democrat.”

WATCH:

That snapshot alone tells the story of a party that has lost touch with the idea of national pride.

Jennings took the conversation further on his podcast.

He pointed to another survey from NBC News showing that overall, only 56 percent of Americans feel extremely or very proud to be American.

When the data is broken down by party, 90 percent of Republicans say they are proud, compared to a dismal 29 percent of Democrats.

“The Democratic Party hates America,” Jennings declared.

“And according to Robert DeNiro, it’s because they lost an election.”

The generational results are equally alarming.

Among those over 65 years old, a strong 75 percent say they are proud to be American.

That number drops to just 36 percent among those aged 18 to 34.

The left may be training a generation to despise their own country through academia, pop culture, and the nonstop grievances of identity politics.

Conservatives see that trend as a direct threat to the nation’s future.

Jennings’ straightforward message on a liberal network stood out in a media landscape that often excuses the left’s disdain for America.

He made it clear that the difference between the parties runs deeper than policies.

It is about the fundamental question of whether one actually values the country that guarantees freedom, opportunity, and equality before the law.

For Republicans, that answer is easy.

Their pride in America is not conditional.

Whether the government is in liberal hands or conservative control, they still stand for the flag and believe in the country’s promise.

For too many Democrats and their Hollywood idols, love of country seems to come with an expiration date set to their next election loss.

Jennings managed to make the simplest point of all, one that used to be considered common sense.

WATCH:

Real patriotism is not about power, it is about principle.

The poll only proves what the American right already knows.

One side loves the nation that gave them freedom.

The other, only when it serves their politics.

Elon Musk Calls for Jail Time for UK Politicians Over Grooming Gang Cover Ups [WATCH]
News

Elon Musk Calls for Jail Time for UK Politicians Over Grooming Gang Cover Ups [WATCH]

/

Elon Musk is not mincing words when it comes to Britain’s grooming gang scandal.

The tech trillionaire has demanded that politicians who “turned a blind eye” to the systemic abuse of thousands of young girls be sent to prison.

His comments came after British MP Rupert Lowe released a citizen-funded independent report exposing decades of government failure to confront what has become one of the darkest stains on modern Britain.

“The politicians who turned a blind eye to the Rape of Britain must go to prison,” Musk wrote on X, joining a growing chorus of voices demanding genuine accountability rather than empty apologies.

Musk’s post reignited anger across the UK, where the public has long suspected that political correctness and fear of offending certain communities helped protect grooming networks from exposure.

Lowe’s 200-page report, authored by barrister Graham Smith, accuses public authorities of enabling the abuse through either active or passive complicity.

WATCH:

Funded by over 23,000 ordinary donors who raised more than one million dollars, the so-called “Rape of Britain” inquiry reflects a complete breakdown in public trust toward official institutions that failed countless victims.

Lowe’s report names areas like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oxford, and Oldham as the centers of the scandal, describing years of horrific abuse, rape, and trafficking.

According to the report, organized grooming gangs were allowed to operate freely even when residents and whistleblowers sounded the alarm.

British officials allegedly chose silence rather than face accusations of racism because many perpetrators were of Pakistani Muslim heritage.

The report argues that this deliberate cowardice allowed predators to continue abusing teenage girls while bureaucrats hid behind diversity platitudes.

Among its recommendations, the Lowe report calls for lifetime sentences for organized child rape, the deportation of foreign-born offenders, a specialized prosecutorial unit to target group exploitation crimes, and new laws enabling private citizens to directly prosecute negligent officials.

“If they fail to take the necessary steps, we will deploy private prosecutions to obtain justice at last,” Lowe wrote.

The report also estimates that the total number of victims across the UK could reach 250,000 when regional data are extrapolated.

Though that figure has not been verified, the sheer magnitude of the possible abuse has shocked the nation.

For years, survivors accused police and local authorities of covering up cases to avoid hurting “community relations.”

Musk’s fiery demand for political prison sentences has now placed that culture of avoidance back under the microscope.

A separate government-commissioned audit, led by Baroness Louise Casey, acknowledged that authorities often refused to record the ethnicity of perpetrators out of fear of “racism” accusations.

Her findings confirmed what many already knew: data were missing because officials deliberately wanted to avoid the ethnic question.

Even within that limited data, three police areas showed disproportionate numbers of offenders from Asian backgrounds involved in group sexual exploitation.

The British establishment has launched yet another official investigation to reassure the public.

The newly announced statutory national inquiry into grooming gangs was created in April 2026 and is supposed to have legal powers to hold institutions accountable.

The Home Office called the scandal “one of the darkest moments in our history” while promising “no hiding place” for those responsible.

But survivors and campaigners are skeptical, saying they have heard that line before.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Parliament that over 800 previously closed cases have been reopened, with more expected.

Yet critics say the same government that turned away from victims for years should not be trusted to investigate itself.

They argue that the citizen-funded effort, not the state inquiry, reflects the real moral authority of the public.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has dismissed accusations about his past role in the scandal as “lies and misinformation.”

He continues to defend his time as director of public prosecutions, claiming he toughened the approach to child sexual exploitation.

But grassroots anger suggests that Britons are tired of being told to forget what happened while bureaucrats fight over wording in reports.

Emma Schubart of the Henry Jackson Society said the government cannot simply shrug off Lowe’s findings.

“While some of its headline figures rely on extrapolation, it raises questions about grooming gangs, institutional failures, and offender demographics that cannot simply be ignored,” she told Fox News Digital.

Even the Trump administration has criticized Britain’s handling of the scandal.

The US State Department described the mass abuse as “unspeakable” and warned that British institutions had lost their credibility by refusing for years to confront the truth.

Rupert Lowe has compared the government’s official inquiry to other infamous British cover ups, warning it could turn into a never-ending process that delays accountability.

“The public will not tolerate another establishment whitewash,” he said at a press briefing.

Musk appears to agree.

His blunt demand for prison time suggests an impatience shared by millions of ordinary citizens who want justice, not more committees, excuses, or virtue signaling.

The grooming gang scandal has become more than a legal matter; it reflects a national moral collapse.

Ordinary people funded an entire inquiry because their own leaders would not.

And now, thanks to Elon Musk shining a bright spotlight on the issue, the pressure on the British political class is higher than ever.

Whether the ruling elite like it or not, the days of silence on this atrocity may finally be over.

FBI Raids Soros Funded Ohio Voter Group in Explosive Fraud Investigation [WATCH]
News

FBI Raids Soros Funded Ohio Voter Group in Explosive Fraud Investigation [WATCH]

/

Another organization tied to George Soros has found itself in the middle of a federal fraud investigation, and this time, the feds are not waiting around.

The FBI reportedly executed search warrants on June 11 at the headquarters of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative, a Soros-backed nonprofit that works hand in hand with Democrats on voter mobilization efforts in the Buckeye State.

Agents interviewed staff across Ohio, seized electronic devices, and issued subpoenas as part of what sources describe as a broad federal investigation into potential fraud.

The Department of Justice and FBI have been tight-lipped, refusing to discuss case details, but multiple sources confirmed to CBS News that the probe involves allegations of fraud connected to the organization’s operations.

The Ohio Organizing Collaborative, or OOC, has been touted by the left as a grassroots “voting rights” group.

In reality, it operates as an arm of the state’s Democrat machine, focusing its heavy spending on ballot initiatives, voter registration drives, and issue advocacy that overwhelmingly benefits progressive causes.

Federal records show just how much liberal cash flows into this group.

Tax filings reveal that the OOC pulled in more than ten million dollars in revenue during 2024 alone, with major funding from some of the most powerful left-wing organizations in the country.

The Soros family’s Foundation to Promote Open Society poured nearly two million dollars into the organization between 2019 and 2020, while the Open Society Action Fund added two more million in later years.

Additional funding came from groups such as the New Venture Fund and the Tides Foundation, both central cogs in the Democrat donor network.

Labor giants like the American Federation of Teachers and the Service Employees International Union also sent money their way, apparently forgetting that their members probably joined unions to improve wages, not to bankroll Democrat political machines.

Federal agents’ sudden interest in the group is setting off alarm bells across the left, which is already screaming that the DOJ and FBI are somehow targeting voting rights.

But the government has reminded reporters that all search warrants are signed by a judge and that no one under investigation gets to see the affidavit until after an indictment is issued.

That means whatever evidence exists, it was convincing enough to convince a judge to authorize a sweeping search.

WATCH:

Liberals claim this is a partisan witch hunt. Yet the OOC has faced scrutiny before for questionable voter registration efforts and political activity that may cross the line for tax-exempt nonprofits.

The pattern is familiar: liberal “community organizations” that present themselves as champions of democracy but somehow end up deeply entangled in partisan operations.

The irony, of course, is that the same Democrats who insist elections are perfectly “secure” recoil when investigators start looking into groups suspected of manipulating voter registrations or ballot access.

If the OOC truly did nothing wrong, the investigation will show that.

If not, the American people deserve to know exactly what was happening behind that curtain of “voting rights” slogans.

The presence of Soros funding should surprise no one.

For decades, Soros has used his vast wealth to influence political outcomes through donations to prosecutors, political operations, and organizations that push progressive ideology under the guise of social justice.

His network operates like a shadow infrastructure of the Democratic Party, flooding local and state campaigns with outside money and activism designed to reshape elections and law enforcement policies.

Yet those who raise concerns about this influence are labeled conspiracy theorists by the same media outlets now forced to report that a Soros-backed group has been raided by the FBI.

Funny how that works.

When conservative organizations get a surprise visit from federal agents, the left cheers.

When the shoe is on the other foot, it is suddenly an attack on democracy.

The truth is, Americans have every right to ask hard questions about how voter mobilization nonprofits operate and whether they are adhering to the law.

Investigations like this may finally reveal the deep ties between powerful Democrat donors, organized labor, and so-called nonprofit election machines working to tilt outcomes.

For now, no charges have been announced. But DOJ involvement at this scale suggests serious issues under the surface.

If the allegations prove true, it will confirm what conservatives have long suspected: the left has built a multimillion-dollar shadow system aimed not at protecting the vote, but manipulating it.

Either way, one fact is clear. Something is rotten in Ohio’s “voting rights” industry, and this time, the spotlight is coming from the same FBI that so often seems to look the other way when the left is involved.

Maybe, just maybe, they finally stumbled onto a target too obvious to ignore.

Inside Peter Thiel’s Private Power Circle Where Elites Whisper About Sex, Cults, and Global Chaos [WATCH]
News

Inside Peter Thiel’s Private Power Circle Where Elites Whisper About Sex, Cults, and Global Chaos [WATCH]

/

Billionaire investor and PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel is once again making headlines, and not just for his sharp political instincts or eye for future technology.

A leaked report claims Thiel has quietly hosted an invite-only circle of elites who meet in luxury to discuss topics that sound more like a dystopian novel than a business retreat.

The group, called “Dialog,” supposedly draws together the top brass of Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and government to muse about sex, cult building, and even how World War III might unfold.

According to documents obtained by Wired, Dialog has operated as a private gathering for years under Thiel’s direction, promising anonymity and discretion to participants.

Those promises apparently failed when a cache of internal files surfaced, revealing that the group’s exclusive meetings have included intimate surveys, matchmaker-style networking games, and secret briefings on everything from artificial intelligence to nuclear conflict.

Attendees at this year’s scheduled retreat outside Dublin were promised an eclectic mix of programming that reads like a parody of technocratic elitism.

The agenda allegedly featured sessions titled “How’s Your Sex Life,” “Build a Cult,” and “Navigating WWIII.”

Each talk, Wired reported, was framed as an exploration of personal development and global crises through the eyes of those who believe they can reshape civilization.

The same leaked records show that Dialog doubles as a matchmaking service of sorts.

Members could indicate whether they were “looking for love” and join an internal social network designed to build what organizers promoted as “meaningful connections for exceptional people.”

It seems even the wealthiest elites know that big ideas feel more profound when paired with candlelight and champagne.

The amateur philosopher vibe did not stop there.

Participants filled out questionnaires listing their so called talents which ranged from “funhouse construction” to “compassion and existential dread.” They also participated in prediction exercises, forecasting the economic and spiritual shocks that might come with advancing artificial intelligence.

Many warned of mass unemployment, digital terrorism, and even a coming “religious revival” triggered by humanity’s struggle to find meaning in an AI dominated world.

Naturally, the leaked database also exposed the star power. Wired claims the list includes major political names such as Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Jim Himes, as well as Palantir co founder Joe Lonsdale.

If accurate, the list stretches across political lines and professions, showing a rare mix of power brokers who prefer quiet influence to open debate.

For 2026, Dialog reportedly logged 222 confirmed guests.

Attendees were sorted into categories such as “active member” and “guest,” a subtle reminder that even among elites there are inner circles within inner circles.

The planned summit runs August 12 through August 16 and appears set to continue despite the media glare.

The gathering’s focus on nuclear threats, AI warfare, and the fate of human civilization mirrors Thiel’s long held fascination with existential risk.

The German born entrepreneur has spent decades using his fortune to back futuristic ventures and ideological experiments.

Critics have long accused him of playing philosopher king with technology as his temple. Admirers argue that at least someone is thinking seriously about civilization beyond next quarter’s profits.

In recent months, Thiel reportedly moved his family to Buenos Aires, partly out of concern over unstable global politics, taxes, and fears of what he once called “AI driven collapse.”

He previously secured citizenship in New Zealand, a country beloved by doomsday minded millionaires for its isolation.

Reports say he has explored additional second citizenships as possible escape routes should the global order come crashing down.

For someone whose company Palantir built its fortune analyzing data for national security agencies, Thiel seems oddly fond of privacy.

Yet the Wired report paints a picture of conversations that blend Silicon Valley idealism, libertarian paranoia, and social experimentation in equal measure.

It is the kind of club where brainstorming about faith, apocalypse, and romance happens over catered dinners rather than coffee shop debates.

Thiel has spent years warning against globalist overreach, arguing that elites could someday weaponize fear of crises to centralize power in the hands of a “one world” government.

It is ironic, to say the least, that Wired now describes him hosting a quiet network of the very kind of powerful individuals he warns against.

Whether Dialog is a brilliant salon for future planning or a private sandbox for self importance is a matter of perspective.

Neither Thiel nor the other boldface names mentioned responded to Wired’s questions, and The New York Post has likewise sought comment.

Those absent responses may be the clearest signal that this club truly values its secrecy above all else.

For the rest of us, the glimpses inside suggest the familiar pattern of the jet set elite.

They claim to discuss saving humanity while quietly preparing to bail out at the first sign of trouble.

If nothing else, Dialog proves that even in circles built on cutting edge tech and ultra wealth, the oldest motivations remain, power, influence, and a place at the table when the world starts to burn.


Scroll to Top