News

JD Vance Explains the Difference Between Obama and Trump Iran Deals for the People in the Back [WATCH]
News

JD Vance Explains the Difference Between Obama and Trump Iran Deals for the People in the Back [WATCH]

/

Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that President Donald Trump’s newly announced agreement with Iran differs significantly from the nuclear deal negotiated during the administration of former President Barack Obama, as reported by Breitbart.

Vance made the remarks while speaking with reporters following the release of a Memorandum of Understanding signed by Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

The agreement was signed on Wednesday evening during a dinner event at the Palace of Versailles and is intended to establish a framework for ending the conflict between the United States and Iran while opening negotiations on a broader long-term arrangement.

After the text of the memorandum was released, Vance was asked to explain how the Trump administration’s approach differs from the Iran nuclear agreement reached during the Obama administration in 2015.

Vance argued that the two agreements begin from entirely different circumstances.

“You have to remember, in 2015 Iran had built a sophisticated nuclear weapons program with a nuclear weapon stockpile, so the perspective that we came at as the United States was, you already have a really nice nuclear program; we’re going to bribe you with American money in order to stop it,” Vance said.

“Our perspective, and where we’re coming at it, is we already destroyed your nuclear program, and so if you promise and show verifiable pathways to not rebuild it, then we are willing to give you some sanctions relief, and things like that.”

The vice president described that distinction as the most important difference between the two agreements, saying the Trump administration is negotiating from what he characterized as a position of strength.

Vance also pointed to several policy differences he said separate the current agreement from the Obama-era deal.

“Now, there are all these substantive differences as well,” he said.

“The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment; ours will not. The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material. Ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material.”

The memorandum states that Iran “shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons” and outlines a process for addressing existing enriched nuclear material under a framework to be supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The agreement says both countries will negotiate a mechanism for handling stockpiled enriched material and continue discussions regarding Iran’s nuclear energy needs as part of future talks.

The document also states that both governments intend to address nuclear issues immediately during negotiations in an effort to reach a final agreement.

Vance emphasized that the administration views the treatment of Iran’s enriched material as a major distinction from the 2015 agreement.

He also highlighted financial differences between the two arrangements.

“So, there are many differences,” Vance continued.

“The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. The deal gives them $0 of American money. So, a lot of substantive differences, but I think the most important differences are where we’re coming at it from: a position of strength, and the fact that our Gulf Coast partners love this deal.”

The memorandum establishes a framework for additional negotiations between Washington and Tehran and includes provisions related to sanctions relief, nuclear oversight, and future discussions regarding Iran’s civilian nuclear activities.

Officials from both countries are expected to continue negotiations in the coming weeks as the parties work toward a more comprehensive agreement.

FBI Swarms Los Angeles Skid Row in Explosive Voter Fraud and Bribery Probe [WATCH]
News

FBI Swarms Los Angeles Skid Row in Explosive Voter Fraud and Bribery Probe [WATCH]

/

Federal agents were seen conducting interviews on Los Angeles’ Skid Row on Thursday as part of an investigation tied to allegations of voter fraud that emerged following California’s June 2 primary election, as reported by Red State.

The investigation comes after questions were raised about voting activity connected to Los Angeles’ mayoral race, where a late surge of mail-in ballots from the Skid Row area reportedly benefited District 4 City Councilwoman and mayoral candidate Nithya Raman.

The additional ballots helped Raman move ahead of media personality Spencer Pratt and secure a position in the race’s top two, eliminating Pratt from advancing.

Spencer Pratt Shuts Down Reporter With Brutal Truth About LA’s Street Crisis

Reports following the election alleged that some homeless individuals living in the Skid Row area had been offered money in exchange for participating in voter registration activities and providing voting-related information.

According to accounts published by the California Post, federal officers arrived in downtown Los Angeles on Thursday morning and began interviewing individuals in the area.

The publication reported that approximately 20 agents participated in the operation.

Witnesses described plainclothes investigators speaking with residents throughout Skid Row and taking notes as they gathered information. Federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations were also reportedly involved in the operation.

The California Post reported that investigators were dressed in casual clothing, including jeans, sweatshirts, and baseball caps, while conducting interviews.

The U.S. Department of Justice confirmed that federal authorities were investigating a criminal matter but declined to provide additional details. The FBI similarly stated that it does not comment on ongoing investigations.

The investigation follows reporting published on June 12 alleging that homeless individuals in Los Angeles had been encouraged to cast ballots in support of either incumbent Mayor Karen Bass or Raman.

The report included interviews with individuals who claimed they had accepted payment connected to voting activities.

The latest developments also come weeks after the Department of Justice announced charges against Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, a professional signature collector involved in ballot initiative campaigns.

Federal prosecutors alleged that Armstrong paid individuals, including homeless residents living on the streets of Skid Row, to register to vote.

At the time of the indictment, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon issued a statement regarding the allegations.

“False registrations undermine Americans’ faith in elections – even more so when payoffs are involved. This Justice Department is committed to ensuring that all U.S. elections are fair and free from illegal meddling – so that all Americans can accept the results with confidence.”

The allegations surrounding Skid Row have generated additional scrutiny of election procedures in Los Angeles as vote counting and post-election reviews continue.

Questions have also been raised regarding voter registration addresses and the use of homeless shelters and temporary locations in registration records.

Election officials have not publicly announced any findings related to the allegations, and federal authorities have not released details regarding the scope of the current investigation.

As of Thursday evening, investigators had not announced any arrests connected to the Skid Row operation, nor had they disclosed whether the inquiry was focused solely on the Los Angeles mayoral race or extended to other elections conducted during the June primary.

The federal investigation remains ongoing.

Senate Targets Hegseth’s Travel Budget While Ignoring Iran School Bombing and Boat Strike Facts
News

Senate Targets Hegseth’s Travel Budget While Ignoring Iran School Bombing and Boat Strike Facts

/

The Senate is at it again, using bureaucratic games to try and hobble Secretary of War Pete Hegseth while conveniently sidestepping the real issues involving Iran and America’s ongoing global fight against terrorism and narcotics networks.

The so-called “restrictions” on Hegseth’s travel are less about fiscal responsibility and more about political theater from lawmakers who can’t stomach a strong leader executing the Commander in Chief’s agenda.

The Senate Armed Services Committee slipped a provision into its version of the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act that would gut 75 percent of Hegseth’s travel budget until he turns over unedited footage and civilian harm reports tied to operations in Iran and Latin America.

The provision passed the committee 18-9, heading now for a floor vote.

Let’s be honest—this has little to do with “oversight” and everything to do with undermining a Secretary of War who has backed President Trump’s unapologetic doctrine of peace through strength.

The same senators playing watchdog now were silent during the aimless foreign fiascos of the previous administration.

At the heart of the scuffle is the February 28 U.S. Tomahawk strike that hit a school in southern Iran on the opening day of the Iran war.

The tragic blast killed 165 people, most of them schoolgirls, according to Iranian state media. However, the situation has remained murky, with conflicting reports about who was really responsible.

President Trump, who launched the operation to neutralize Tehran’s military capabilities, made it clear that evidence suggested Iran could have obtained and launched the missile itself.

“Nobody did that on purpose. Mistakes are made. War is nasty,” Trump said, emphasizing that the incident was under investigation and urging reporters to ask Hegseth for updates.

Hegseth Returns to Capitol Hill to Defend Trump’s 2026 Defense Budget Proposal
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stands with his spouse Jennifer prior to conducting a press conference after taking part in a NATO Defense Ministerial Session at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 13, 2025. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander C. Kubitza)

Despite these clear statements, Senate Democrats and a few fence-sitters on the Republican side still jammed the NDAA with micromanaging mandates. They demanded “uncut” videos from Latin American strike missions and detailed civilian harm assessments for three previous strikes in Yemen as well.

Those Latin American operations were part of efforts by U.S. Southern Command to dismantle drug-running routes used by terrorist-linked cartels across the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

Between September 2025 and June 2026, 64 strikes were executed, killing 191 operatives tied to narco-terrorist syndicates.

The missions have saved untold lives by blocking dangerous drugs destined for American streets, but lawmakers now want to second-guess the men and women risking their lives to stop that flow.

The committee even tried slipping in another amendment that would have barred the War Department from using military funds in operations against Iran without congressional greenlight—a measure that barely failed by one vote.

The attempt was a naked power play meant to strip the Commander in Chief of operational authority and hand national security decisions to self-righteous politicians.

The History, Evolution and Healing of Military Tattoos from Sailor Jerry to Punisher Skulls
SecWar Pete Hegseth’s arm on display with tattoos that have been meaningful to his time in the service of the United States (Instagram/@PeteHegseth)

Lawmakers have also zeroed in on “Operation Absolution Resolve,” the daring January 20 mission by U.S. Special Operations Forces to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro.

They want unredacted investigative documents and certification of contractor participation in related clandestine and intelligence activities. In other words, they’re demanding to see the inner workings of highly classified missions that keep America safe, all to feed their political suspicions.

It’s worth remembering that much of this Senate pushback stems from prior media blow-ups over an alleged incident off Venezuela’s coast last year, when operators targeting drug smugglers were accused of firing on survivors.

Hegseth made the right call by limiting footage access to key House and Senate committee members rather than giving political opportunists raw material to grandstand on cable news.

Burgers, Booing, and a Bold Message: Vance and Hegseth Stand with Troops in Washington
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth meets with a National Guardsman in Union Station as part of the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Washington, Aug. 20, 2025.

Critics of the committee’s actions say the provisions could have a chilling effect on current and future operations, as commanders might hold back or hesitate knowing that their split-second battlefield decisions could end up the subject of Senate hearings and partisan speculation.

It’s another example of Washington’s obsession with optics over outcomes.

Meanwhile, the same lawmakers calling for “transparency” have shown zero urgency in investigating Iran’s war crimes or China’s deep involvement in Latin American corruption networks.

Their outrage seems carefully reserved for moments that can tarnish the Trump-Hegseth team’s record.

Hegseth’s office continues to coordinate directly with Congress on required briefings and has produced dozens of classified reports to the proper committees.

What Senate obstructionists really want isn’t information—they want control. And they can’t stand that a War Secretary who’s unapologetically patriotic runs circles around them.

Ukraine Opens Battlefield AI Data to Partners, Building a Global Edge
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visits the Army Prepositioned Stocks-2 site in Powidz, Poland, with Polish Deputy Prime Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, Feb. 15, 2025. The visit highlighted the U.S. Army’s commitment to equipping its forces with cutting-edge technology and bolstering deterrence in Eastern Europe, particularly through the V Corps’ leading role in the “Transforming in Contact” initiative.

At a time when America’s enemies grow bolder by the day and our troops are stretched thin across multiple theaters, the last thing this country needs is a politically motivated spending squeeze designed to weaken the War Department’s leadership. The men and women in uniform deserve better than partisan games and selective outrage.

Hegseth’s mission remains the same—to protect America’s interests abroad and ensure our forces never fight with one arm tied behind their back.

The Senate should stop playing watchdog and start being a partner in defense.

Apache Down Near Oman Signals Dangerous Shift in Air Combat
News

Apache Down Near Oman Signals Dangerous Shift in Air Combat

/

When an Apache attack helicopter went down off the coast of Oman after an encounter with an Iranian-made Shahed drone, it wasn’t just a tragic close call for the crew—it was a moment that revealed how modern warfare is rapidly changing.

Analysts say the incident marks a turning point in the skies, where even America’s toughest rotary-wing aircraft are finding themselves vulnerable to swarms of cheap, weaponized drones built by U.S. adversaries.

The Army confirmed that the two crew members aboard the Apache were rescued by a passing vessel hours after the crash, and thankfully both survived.

What caused the helicopter to go into the water remains unclear, but experts suspect a Shahed drone—the same type Iran has shipped in droves to Russia for use in Ukraine—may have either impacted or detonated near the aircraft.

That possibility has analysts across the military community rethinking what it means to dominate the air.

Iran’s Shahed-136 drones are not sophisticated by American standards.

They’re relatively inexpensive, often pre-programmed to fly toward fixed coordinates, and typically used to strike stationary targets. Kelly Campa from the Institute for the Study of War explained that such drones aren’t designed to take down helicopters mid-flight.

U.S. Army Apaches and Navy Seahawks Obliterate Iranian Boats Blocking the Strait of Hormuz
Army AH-64 Apache attack helicopters sunk several Iranian boats, U.S. officials said, as the first day of the operation to escort commercial ships through the Straits of Hormuz resulted in combat. U.S. Army photo.

“A Shahed hitting a helicopter is highly unusual,” she said, noting that Russia’s experimentation with guided variants makes that capability more likely there than anywhere else.

Still, suspicions that Iran—or one of its proxy groups—may be testing or modifying Shahed models to perform this kind of attack raises serious red flags for pilots in hostile airspace.

If even a rudimentary drone can jeopardize an Apache, the battlefield calculus shifts dramatically, especially in a region where Tehran is constantly probing for weakness.

Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow with the Stimson Center, suggests multiple possible scenarios for the downing.

The Apache might have collided with the drone while maneuvering for an intercept, or it could have encountered a variant rigged with a proximity fuse that exploded nearby. “The fact that both crew members survived and appear to have made a controlled water landing argues against a direct impact with the warhead,” she said.

That detail may indicate the Apache crew fought the aircraft all the way down, buying precious seconds before escape.

But beyond the specifics of how the incident unfolded, the larger question gripping military analysts is what this event reveals about the evolving nature of air power. For decades, Apaches represented the pinnacle of close air support—a flying tank capable of hunting ground targets with precision and agility.

U.S. Soldiers Saved by Navy Drone After Apache Crash Off Oman Coast
A U.S. Army AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility, Dec. 19, 2025. (U.S. Army)

Now they’re flying into a sky where cheap, unmanned weapons can punch far above their cost and threaten even the best U.S. machines.

Doug Birkey, executive director of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, called the crash a wake-up call. “This should be the last fight where we use a lot of legacy constructs and technologies,” Birkey said.

After two decades of flying relatively unchallenged during counterinsurgency campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, American pilots are suddenly facing skies crammed with drones, electronic warfare, and advanced air defenses.

He argues the military must move fast to adapt, pairing manned aircraft like the Apache with autonomous wingmen—uncrewed assets that can scout ahead, jam threats, or even absorb enemy fire.

“Could you partner that Apache with an uncrewed asset to net similar effect?” Birkey asked. In this vision, human pilots stay close enough to guide the fight but far enough to remain alive.

The Army is already taking steps in that direction, testing a pilot-optional version of the Black Hawk helicopter this year. The next evolution might combine human ingenuity with mechanical endurance—a pairing that could redefine battlefield dominance under Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s push for readiness, lethality, and innovation.

Mark Cancian, a retired Marine colonel and senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, sees the Oman incident as an extension of drone tactics tested in Ukraine.

“It was the Shahed being used as anti-helicopter,” he said. “That had happened in Ukraine. It had not happened in the Gulf.” That expansion beyond Europe shows just how rapidly adversaries are sharing technology and adapting new threat profiles.

Apache Becomes Drone Hunter as Army Tests Airburst Rounds to Take Down Drones
An AH-64E Apache prepares to engage during aerial gunnery training at Grafenwoehr Training Area, Germany, Oct. 2, 2025. Army photo by Spc. Josefina Garcia.

Apaches flying around the Strait of Hormuz have long operated as the tip of the spear against Iranian forces, often engaging small boats or intercepting drones.

Now, they may have to fly in formations, coordinate more closely with uncrewed scouts, and limit their exposure to hostile skies. In short, the rules of engagement are changing in real time.

Veteran pilots understand the stakes better than anyone. One recalled his underwater escape training, designed to prepare aircrews for crashes over water. “It was my biggest fear,” he admitted.

Darkness, disorientation, and panic are the first enemies a downed crew must fight. Still, training kicks in—and in every case, one rule remains the same: bubbles always rise.

That principle, both literal and symbolic, fits the new air war ahead. America’s warfighters will adapt, rise, and overcome.

The tools of conflict may change, but as history proves, American pilots still define courage—and even in the darkest waters off hostile shores, that spirit never sinks.

Progressive Group Goes Viral for Press Conference Stunt as They Face Internal Chaos and Cratering Donations [WATCH]
News

Progressive Group Goes Viral for Press Conference Stunt as They Face Internal Chaos and Cratering Donations [WATCH]

/

The once powerful activist group GetUp is watching its empire crumble even as it doubles down on political warfare.

The left-wing outfit that used to brag about shaping elections is now staring down financial ruin while launching a fresh attack on One Nation.

Instead of confronting its own internal chaos and cratering donations, GetUp is apparently betting that yet another anti-conservative crusade will save it.

GetUp’s latest stunt was straight out of the activist handbook.

During Senator Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club address this week, protesters interrupted the live event, unfurling a banner that accused her of hypocrisy on worker pay.

The senator, never one to be intimidated, finished her address without flinching.

WATCH:

But while the activists celebrated the disruption online, the liberal political outfit behind it was quietly drowning in red ink.

Financial records obtained by The Australian show GetUp’s funding collapse has been dramatic.

Donations fell from almost 6 million dollars last year to just over 4 million this year.

That figure is a far cry from the 12.4 million dollars the group pulled before the 2019 federal election when it was at the height of its influence.

Cash reserves have nearly vanished.

At the end of June 2025, GetUp was sitting on only 104,427 dollars compared to almost 4 million just three years earlier.

The shrinking wallet has been followed by shrinking staff.

Once employing more than 70 people, the group is now down to roughly a dozen workers after repeated redundancies.

The activist machine that once flooded electorates with glossy campaign ads against conservative MPs has been reduced to a skeleton crew.

Even its top brass are on their way out, with interim chief Paul Ferris announcing he will soon return to Stockholm.

This leadership vacuum is not new.

The group has gone through multiple shakeups since the exit of former chief executive Larissa Baldwin Roberts.

Insiders admit morale is at rock bottom, with staff passing a vote of no confidence in both the chair and deputy chair over the direction of the organization.

None of GetUp’s directors have even managed to survive longer than four years on the board, a clear sign of how much internal turmoil now defines the outfit.

Once a close ally of Labor aligned unions, GetUp has shifted entirely toward far left ideology.

Environmental and social justice activists now dominate leadership, and it shows in their priorities.

Even Labor MPs are over it. As one Labor figure bluntly told The Australian, “They’ve been overrun by activists.”

That kind of comment says plenty about just how far GetUp has drifted from being a serious political player to just another protest club.

Despite the financial freefall, GetUp insists it is ramping up operations again.

The group recently launched what it calls the “Fightback Fund,” which it claims will bankroll research, digital ads, and billboards targeting One Nation supporters.

The irony is hard to miss.

A broke activist network losing donors by the day now wants to fight a populist party that is actually growing in support.

At the heart of its new campaign is a push for sweeping “media reform.”

The plan includes abolishing the Australian Press Council and installing a new authority to “keep the press in line.”

The push is being led by David Sharaz, husband of former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

Sharaz joined GetUp recently and is already spearheading the organization’s flagship crusade against what it calls “media bias.”

Critics see this as a thinly veiled attempt by the left to silence opposing voices.

GetUp’s eagerness to meddle in elections has not faded either.

The group spent an estimated 600,000 dollars during the Farrer by election trying to stop One Nation candidate David Farley through an advertising blitz.

The campaign flopped.

But that has not stopped GetUp from bragging about taking on Pauline Hanson’s party as it gains ground in national polling.

WATCH:

One Nation recently scored 28 percent of the primary vote in a Sky News Pulse survey, a number that sent alarm bells ringing in left wing circles.

The group’s escalating antics have drawn bipartisan criticism, even from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

He told reporters that people “should be allowed” to speak at the National Press Club and “treated respectfully.”

That is rare public disapproval from a Labor leader toward a group that for years operated as a grassroots arm of the progressive movement.

One Nation did not mince words either.

A party spokesperson blasted GetUp as “Labor’s union funded attack dog against those on the conservative side of politics.”

They added that if Labor fails to denounce the vigilante activism, it “only supports this type of activism which brings with it a whole new level of security concern.”

Barnaby Joyce called the protest “really quite dangerous” during an interview on Sky News, reminding viewers that free speech does not mean mob disruption.

After years of failed campaigns, tumbling donations, and leadership in disarray, GetUp’s playbook seems to be reduced to one tired tactic: attack conservatives and hope someone still cares enough to donate.

Judging by their financial statements, that gamble is not paying off.

While One Nation’s support climbs, GetUp’s war chest and credibility keep falling further behind.

Michelle Obama Declares Her Next Chapter Is All About Herself as Costly Obama Center Opens in Chicago [WATCH]
News

Michelle Obama Declares Her Next Chapter Is All About Herself as Costly Obama Center Opens in Chicago [WATCH]

/

The long-awaited Obama Presidential Center officially opened this week in Chicago, marking the completion of a project that has been in development for more than a decade and has faced legal challenges, construction delays, and escalating costs along the way, as reported by The Post Millennial.

During an interview tied to the opening celebration, former first lady Michelle Obama and former President Barack Obama were asked by Good Morning America co-host Robin Roberts to describe the word that best defines the next chapter of their lives.

Barack Obama responded with a single word: “Fun.”

Michelle Obama gave a different answer.

“Me.”

The comment came as the Obama Presidential Center welcomed visitors for the first time following years of planning and construction. The project was initially announced in 2015 and was promoted as a major investment in Chicago’s South Side.

Located on a nearly 20-acre campus, the center includes a museum, public gathering areas, athletic facilities, gardens, and exhibits dedicated to the Obama presidency.

Supporters of the project have argued that the center will bring tourism, jobs, and economic development to surrounding neighborhoods.

However, the development has also faced significant criticism throughout its history.

Opponents challenged the project through multiple lawsuits connected to the decision to construct the center in Chicago’s Jackson Park. According to CBS reporting, portions of those legal challenges were dismissed in federal court.

The project also drew scrutiny over its budget. Initial cost projections increased substantially during development. According to CNN, the final cost of the Obama Presidential Center reached approximately $850 million.

The center’s design has also generated public debate over the years, with some critics comparing the structure’s appearance to the Death Star from the Star Wars franchise.

Despite those controversies, the center officially opened this week and is expected to attract visitors from across the United States.

Ahead of the opening, Barack Obama announced the milestone in a social media post.

“The Obama Presidential Center is finally opening! Tune in today on Obama.org starting at 11am CT as Michelle and I share what this moment means to us and celebrate with friends, family, and members of the community in Chicago,” he wrote.

The opening ceremony also included a land acknowledgement. During the event, a speaker addressed the crowd by saying, “We’d also like to take a moment to recognize the original inhabitants of the land upon which we are gathered today.

We honor the Anishinaabe, the Council of Three Fires, the Ojibwe, the Odawa, and the Potawatomi nations.”

The Obama Presidential Center has opened with the following statement:

“We’d also like to take a moment to recognize the original inhabitants of the land upon which we are gathered today.”

The opening represents the culmination of a project first unveiled more than 11 years ago.

While debates over costs, design, and the use of public parkland accompanied the center’s development, the facility has now opened its doors and begun welcoming visitors to Chicago’s South Side.

For the Obamas, the opening marks the completion of one chapter that began shortly after Barack Obama left the White House. For Michelle Obama, her description of what comes next was concise.

“Me.”

‘Straight from the Deep State Playbook’: Tulsi Gabbard Releases Fauci Bombs on Her Last Day as DNI [WATCH]
News

‘Straight from the Deep State Playbook’: Tulsi Gabbard Releases Fauci Bombs on Her Last Day as DNI [WATCH]

/

On her final day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard dropped what might be the most explosive truth bomb in recent memory.

Gabbard accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of funneling millions of taxpayer dollars into the Wuhan Institute of Virology and misleading both Congress and the American public about it.

According to Gabbard, the so-called doctor was not only aware of risky gain of function research but was an active supporter who manipulated intelligence surrounding the origin of COVID to protect himself and his political allies.

Gabbard’s statement came directly through her official X account, where she said she was revealing never-before-seen communications that laid bare Fauci’s role in funding dangerous experiments in China.

“Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab,” she posted.

That message came with attached documents from classified reviews that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence later confirmed had been declassified in alignment with President Trump’s push for transparency.

According to the ODNI, Fauci directed US grant money toward gain-of-function experiments involving bat coronaviruses, research now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that unleashed the pandemic on the world.

In a stunning twist, the office even alleged that career bureaucrats within the intelligence apparatus collaborated with Fauci to suppress information about the true source of the virus and to manipulate intelligence assessments that pointed toward a lab origin.

For years, anyone suggesting a lab leak was derided as a conspiracy theorist while corporate media obediently carried water for Fauci and the political establishment. Now, Gabbard’s release throws a wrench into that narrative.

“This is straight from the deep state playbook,” Gabbard declared, accusing Fauci of using his position to shield himself and his colleagues from accountability while lying to Congress under oath.

Gabbard’s message reflected growing anger among conservatives who have long suspected collusion between the scientific bureaucracy and Washington insiders.

She directly blamed Fauci for misleading both lawmakers and the American public while undermining President Trump’s efforts to hold Beijing accountable.

“The COVID 19 pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and for countless people around the world. After years of lies, censorship, and cover ups, the American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability,” Gabbard said.

WATCH:

The documents, Gabbard revealed, were the result of a yearlong declassification review that she initiated to deliver on Trump’s promise of greater transparency inside the intelligence community.

That review uncovered a series of internal communications allegedly involving Fauci and members of the NIH in which the dangers of gain of function experiments were acknowledged but downplayed to the public.

While critics of Gabbard tried to dismiss the announcement as politically timed, the ODNI’s support of her claims added significant weight.

The agency said Fauci’s funding streams were tracked through various health research channels that ended up financing controversial virus manipulation work at the Wuhan lab.

These findings appear to directly contradict Fauci’s sworn testimony before Congress when he claimed that no gain of function work was supported by US funds.

Conservative lawmakers immediately seized on the revelations, calling for renewed hearings and possible criminal referrals for perjury.

Senator Rand Paul, who famously grilled Fauci during Senate hearings, posted that Gabbard’s disclosures confirm everything he and others had warned about.

The lawmaker renewed his call for a full investigation into Fauci’s conduct.

The timing of Gabbard’s move was no accident. She is set to step down as Director of National Intelligence on June 30, with Bill Pulte stepping in as Acting DNI while continuing his duties at the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Before her departure, Gabbard made clear that her aim was not political theater but a long overdue reckoning with what she describes as systemic corruption inside the highest levels of government.

Gabbard’s release represents another setback for the entrenched bureaucrats who spent years attacking anyone daring to question the official COVID storyline.

The revelation that taxpayer money might have fueled dangerous research in Communist China only strengthens the case for a full review of the American public health establishment.

Whether Fauci faces criminal charges will depend on Congress and the Department of Justice, but one thing is clear.

The carefully crafted narrative that presented Fauci as a selfless scientific savior has begun to collapse under the weight of troubling evidence.

Gabbard’s bold act may be just the beginning of a new phase in the fight for accountability.

For many Americans, the pandemic is not just a public health memory but a reminder of how the government can abuse secrecy and manipulate facts for political ends.

By exposing what she calls the deep state’s protection racket, Tulsi Gabbard may have cracked open the door to long awaited truth about the origins of a global tragedy.

Oil Armada Surges Through Strait Of Hormuz After Trump Strikes Peace Accord With Iran [WATCH]
News

Oil Armada Surges Through Strait Of Hormuz After Trump Strikes Peace Accord With Iran [WATCH]

/

Shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz showed signs of recovery Thursday after the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at ending hostilities and reopening one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes, as reported by Trending Politics News.

According to MarineTraffic and other vessel-tracking data, at least 10 commercial ships were observed transiting the strait on the morning following the agreement, with additional vessels reportedly heading toward the region.

The increase marks a noticeable improvement from the sharply reduced traffic levels seen during months of conflict that disrupted shipping through the critical waterway.

The memorandum of understanding was signed by President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

The agreement includes provisions for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping and establishes a framework for additional negotiations over the coming weeks.

U.S. officials said they expect shipping activity to increase gradually as commercial operators regain confidence in the route. Traffic reportedly began rising shortly after the agreement was finalized.

Iranian officials also indicated that maritime traffic would resume under controlled conditions, with vessels directed to travel along designated routes and during specified time periods to address security concerns.

The Strait of Hormuz is considered one of the world’s most strategically important waterways. Before the conflict began in late February, the passage typically handled between 100 and 135 vessels per day.

The route serves as a major transit point for global energy markets, carrying approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil supplies.

That traffic collapsed after hostilities escalated. Data from early March showed tanker movements declining by roughly 94% on some days.

Overall shipping activity fell by more than 70% during the early stages of the conflict and remained at extremely low levels for months.

During several recent weeks, vessel traffic frequently fell into the single digits per day and occasionally approached zero.

Ship-tracking services reported that only dozens of vessels successfully passed through the strait over multi-week periods, a fraction of normal activity.

By late April and throughout much of May, daily transit figures often remained near zero, highlighting the severe disruption to international shipping and energy markets.

While Thursday’s increase in vessel traffic represents a significant development, industry analysts and government officials cautioned that a full recovery will likely take time.

Shipping companies continue to evaluate security conditions, insurance costs, and logistical challenges created by months of disruptions.

Officials and industry observers estimate that daily vessel traffic could increase to between 25 and 50 ships in the near future if current conditions remain stable.

Additional growth is expected in the coming weeks as commercial operators gradually resume regular routes through the waterway.

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is one element of the broader agreement reached between Washington and Tehran.

In addition to restoring maritime access, the memorandum includes provisions addressing ceasefire implementation across related conflict zones and outlines initial steps toward sanctions relief and reconstruction assistance.

The agreement also establishes a 60-day negotiating period during which both sides are expected to pursue discussions on a more comprehensive long-term arrangement.

For global energy markets and international shipping companies, the return of commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is being closely watched as an early indicator of whether stability can return to one of the world’s most important trade corridors.

Dan Bongino Nukes Joe Kent’s Story: “Completely Fabricated Bullsh*t” on Trump Assassination Plot [WATCH]
Main Story, News

Dan Bongino Nukes Joe Kent’s Story: “Completely Fabricated Bullsh*t” on Trump Assassination Plot [WATCH]

/

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino sharply disputed claims made by Joe Kent regarding the investigation into Thomas Crooks and the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, accusing Kent of misrepresenting what investigators were told and what evidence was examined.

Bongino addressed Kent’s comments during a lengthy response in which he said he wanted to set the record straight regarding allegations that federal agencies failed to fully investigate potential foreign connections or withheld information from other officials.

“I just want this on the record, in case something happens. This is what happened yesterday,” Bongino said.

Bongino said he had known Kent professionally and had previously worked with him while Kent served in national security roles.

“This was Joe Kent, who was a friend of mine at one point. This is really sad to see the former NCTC National Counterterrorism Center director, I had worked with Joe Kent many times,” Bongino said.

According to Bongino, he personally offered Kent multiple opportunities to receive briefings regarding the investigation.

“I personally showed up at NCTC headquarters and told you I’d give you a full briefing, and your people do not lie,” Bongino said.

Kent, however, argued that questions remained unanswered about Crooks’ digital footprint and possible foreign connections.

“Tucker was talking about in that clip that he came across through an investigative journalist that was working for Tucker. He came across Thomas Crook’s online profile,” Kent said.

Kent said concerns arose because investigators had initially characterized Crooks as having a limited online presence.

“That’s significant, because for quite some time, almost a year, we were told that Crooks was kind of an enigma. He didn’t have much of an online persona,” Kent said.

Kent explained that after returning to government service, he sought access to Crooks’ electronic devices to determine whether any foreign connections existed.

“When I asked the FBI, in my official capacity, when we came back into the administration. I said, ‘Hey, can we get our hands on crooks’ phones, computers, et cetera, because we want to see if there was any foreign linkage,” Kent said.

Kent said he was initially told investigators could not access the devices.

“I was told at the time initially that we couldn’t get into Crooks’ devices,” Kent said.

According to Kent, investigators later reported that they had successfully accessed the devices but found nothing significant.

“And then the FBI came back and said, actually, we got into them, and there’s just nothing there,” Kent said.

Kent argued that intelligence officials should still have been allowed to independently review the material.

“I said, ‘Okay, well, if there’s nothing there, you should still let us see what’s inside them, so that we can determine if there is any foreign nexus here.’ We were, we didn’t get access to them,” Kent said.

Bongino forcefully rejected that account.

“Okay, everything he said there about what he was allowed into and what what he was not allowed into is just completely fabricated bullshit,” Bongino said.

Kent responded, “It’s a data point.”

Bongino said investigators had already reviewed the matters Kent raised and had offered to brief him.

“Of course, it’s a data point. We had already looked at that stuff. I was at NCTC headquarters with him in his conference room,” Bongino said.

“There were multiple witnesses to this, where I told you we’ll brief you on every single question you just brought up, the Norwegian, the devices, the alleged foreign connections,” Bongino added.

Kent also claimed the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General encountered obstacles while investigating the Butler incident.

“The DHS Inspector General started looking into a lot of the details of what took place on the ground, he himself was also blocked,” Kent said.

Bongino disputed that assertion as well.

“The DHS IG office was blocked. They were in my office, in the Deputy Director Conference Room, in the management floor, in JH J Edgar Hoover, the Hoover Building, they actually showed up for a briefing and said no such thing,” Bongino said.

Bongino maintained that all available devices were examined and that investigators found no foreign links connected to Crooks.

“This was all investigated, everything he’s saying, the digital files, all of it. There were no devices we did not look at. We did not find a foreign connection in the phone. We have all the phones in the digital devices,” Bongino said.

He concluded by calling the allegations baseless and accusing critics of advancing a false narrative.

“These allegations are total nonsense,” Bongino said.

WATCH:

After UK Grooming Gang Report, Brandon Gill Demands We Draw the Line in America [WATCH]
News

After UK Grooming Gang Report, Brandon Gill Demands We Draw the Line in America [WATCH]

/

Rep. Brandon Gill said the United States must confront questions about cultural compatibility and immigration before future generations are forced to deal with consequences that he believes are already becoming visible in some communities across the country.

Gill made the remarks while discussing broader concerns about immigration, cultural integration, and the preservation of what he described as core American values. He argued that policymakers should recognize differences among cultures and consider how those differences interact with American institutions and traditions.

“The Trump administration, I believe, recognizes these basic truths that not all cultures are equal, and not all cultures are equally compatible with our way of life or our governing system,” Gill said.

Gill said the issue is not limited to developments overseas and warned that the United States faces its own challenges related to cultural change.

“But we’ve got a problem in the United States as well, and that’s something that we’re going to have to deal with now, because if we don’t, our children and our grandchildren are going to be dealing with it,” Gill said.

He pointed to changes he says are taking place in parts of Texas, specifically the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area.

“And you’ve seen what’s happened in the DFW metroplex, where you’ve seen mass Islamic migration transforming communities right here in places that you wouldn’t otherwise expect,” Gill said.

Gill argued that failing to address the issue now could lead to broader cultural changes in the future.

“And again, this is something that, if we don’t stop now, it’s going to be my daughter and daughters across the country who are going to be going to public schools wearing burkas, and that’s the kind of stuff that we want to stop,” Gill said.

According to Gill, conservatives should focus on preserving the values and institutions that shaped the country and the society they grew up in.

“We want to recognize that our job is to protect and preserve, conserve as conservatives. We should want to conserve the America that we got to grow up in,” Gill said.

Gill said he believes immigration policy should take into account cultural differences and whether incoming populations share similar views on fundamental civic principles.

“And you do not do that by bringing in cultures who have very different ideas about freedom of speech, religion, separation of church and state, the dignity of women, the role of women in public life,” Gill said.

He added that differing views on social and religious issues can have significant consequences for a society.

“Who have very different conceptions about how Muslims and non-Muslims interact, and those different ideas matter,” Gill said.

Gill argued that debates about immigration and assimilation are ultimately debates about the future character of the country and the values that will guide future generations.

Throughout his remarks, Gill emphasized the importance of protecting what he sees as foundational American principles, including free speech, religious liberty, the separation of church and state, and the role of women in public life. He said those principles should remain central considerations as the nation addresses immigration and cultural issues in the years ahead.

“And that this is a good example of that,” Gill said.

WATCH:


Scroll to Top