News

News

New Questions Swirl Around Mitch McConnell, Classified Briefings, and Capitol Silence [WATCH]

Independent journalist Desirée Townsend is raising questions about the continued hospitalization of Sen. Mitch McConnell following what she described as a serious medical emergency on June 14, arguing that the situation exposes broader concerns about congressional procedures, national security, and the lack of a constitutional mechanism for addressing incapacitated members of Congress.

In a video recorded outside George Washington University Hospital, Townsend said McConnell had remained hospitalized for three weeks following the incident.

“Desiree Townsend here again outside of George Washington University Hospital, as we mark week three of the hospitalization of Senator Mitch McConnell, following the june 14 medical emergency,” Townsend said.

She pointed to Capitol Hill Police vehicles outside the hospital as an indication that she believed the senator remained there.

“As you can see behind me, the Capitol Hill police vehicles, these black vehicles, are still parked outside the hospital here, an indication that he is likely also still here,” she said.

Townsend said the story gained national attention after she released EMS dispatch audio that she said documented the senator’s medical emergency.

“So, after I first released the dispatch audio indicating that he was found unconscious and was given CPR for cardiac arrest, this story finally gained national attention,” Townsend said.

She argued that the public has not fully considered the implications of the situation.

“However, I don’t think many Americans fully appreciate the seriousness of what may be at stake following Senator McConnell’s medical emergency three weeks ago, or how Congress’s lack of a constitutional mechanism to remove members for incapacity could have broader implications for the nation’s governance, and most importantly, national security,” Townsend said.

Townsend also questioned an earlier public statement from Senate Majority Leader John Thune regarding McConnell’s condition.

“This incredibly odd story also involves Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who stated to Politico that he had spoken with McConnell the day after his hospitalization, and that he quote sounded good, end quote,” Townsend said.

According to Townsend, that statement affected media coverage during the early days following McConnell’s hospitalization.

“Now, this statement threw off the press for nearly two weeks, placating the public until I released the EMS dispatch audio showing the seriousness of this medical emergency,” she said.

Townsend added that, to her knowledge, McConnell had not spoken publicly with other members of Congress since entering the hospital.

“Now, given that Senator McConnell is still here in the hospital three weeks later, and as far as I know, he has not spoken with any other members of Congress. Now puts this initial remark by Leader Thune into question,” Townsend said.

She acknowledged there could be another explanation for Thune’s comments.

“And look, he could have just been attempting to give Senator McConnell his privacy, but the better response could have been, I have not heard anything, or I don’t know,” she said.

Townsend then shifted her focus to former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, McConnell’s wife.

“And this story gets even odder after I reported a couple days ago of a press release documenting that McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, met with the Vice President of China three days after his hospitalization,” Townsend said.

She emphasized that her concerns were not centered on the trip itself but on the timing and Chao’s status as a private citizen.

“And to be clear, the issue is not merely that Elaine Chao went to China, the issue is she is a private citizen, she is, she, she holds no official government position. She’s married to a sitting US senator who reportedly had a major medical emergency, and now she’s meeting with one of China’s highest-ranking officials three days later,” Townsend said.

She continued, “All while the American public and possibly senior US government officials in the Trump administration, as well as members of Congress, lacked clear information about his condition.”

Townsend said she believes such a meeting carries broader significance.

“So let me be clear about this. A meeting with China’s Vice President is not casual, even if this was preplanned. It signals Beijing views her as someone politically meaningful, yet she has no current role in the US government,” she said.

Townsend then posed several questions regarding the meeting.

“So, why is she having these meaningful meetings with top government officials in China? Did she potentially carry messages to the CCP? Did she discuss US policy, or is she being treated as a back channel to nonpublic information, including her husband’s health condition?” Townsend asked.

She also discussed McConnell’s access to classified information as a sitting senator.

“Like every sitting member of Congress, Senator McConnell has access to highly classified closed-door intelligence briefings on matters impacting US national security,” Townsend said.

She noted that such briefings can include military operations and defense appropriations, adding that those responsibilities are significant given McConnell’s position on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Townsend then questioned what safeguards exist if a member of Congress is unable to independently perform official duties.

“Now, if Senator McConnell potentially lacks the mental capacity and independent ability to perform his duty sitting as a US senator, could classified information have been accessed, discussed, or even recorded by individuals hypothetically operating his office behind the scenes?” Townsend asked.

She continued, “More broadly, what safeguards exist to protect classified information when a member of Congress is no longer capable of independently carrying out the office responsibilities?”

Townsend concluded by returning to Chao’s reported meeting in China.

“Lastly, what information, if any, did Elaine Chao carry with her to meet with the Vice President of the People’s Republic of China, Hank, on june 17, 2020-six three days after her husband, Mitch McConnell, reportedly went into cardiac arrest?” Townsend said.

WATCH:

News

Rep Jasmine Crockett Declares America Owes Black Women ‘Everything’ During July 4 Rant [WATCH]

Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas is making waves again after declaring that America “owes Black women everything” during the Independence Day weekend celebration in New Orleans.

The controversial congresswoman spoke at the Essence Festival of Black Culture, using the nation’s 250th birthday as a springboard to deliver one of her signature grievance-laced speeches.

Crockett told interviewer Sherri Shepherd that there is “no preparation” for the criticism she faces as a public figure, arguing that it reflects a long pattern of disrespect toward Black women across the country.

Critics listened in disbelief as the congresswoman turned a national holiday meant to unite Americans into yet another lecture about perceived injustice.

“When it comes to answering the question of what America owes Black women, the answer is everything,” Crockett declared from the festival stage.

She went on to describe Black women as “the backbone of the Democratic Party,” claiming they always do the “labor” but are the first “targets of any harm.”

Her speech drew a quick and sharp response online.

The clip spread across social media, where users blasted Crockett for hijacking Independence Day to push racial politics instead of celebrating the freedoms that unite all Americans.

“I thought the point of Independence Day was to celebrate America, not any particular group,” one user wrote bluntly.

Another commenter observed, “Democracy is not hanging by a thread. That’s insane.”

Others dismissed Crockett’s rhetoric as self-centered and divisive, with one frustrated viewer writing, “Your skin color doesn’t make you special.”

Crockett continued, ignoring the predictable fallout.

“This Fourth of July, I say celebrate a Black woman that you know, because whether it’s an invention that she made, or whether it’s the very democracy that still hangs by a thread right now, there is a Black woman to thank for her contributions,” she said.

The line, meant as another applause getter for the audience, encapsulated the kind of victim-centered messaging critics say has overtaken the modern Democratic Party.

WATCH:

The Essence Festival itself, an event sponsored by Essence magazine, brands itself as a celebration of Black culture, commerce, and community.

This year’s lineup included major celebrities like rapper Cardi B and even a guest appearance from former first lady Michelle Obama.

The gathering has long been a favored stage for Democrats seeking to reinforce their hold over a critical segment of their voter base.

But Crockett’s latest remarks landed awkwardly, coming during the very weekend Americans reflected on independence, sacrifice, and the shared ideals that shaped the nation.

Instead of finding common ground, she reignited one of the left’s most predictable talking points: that everything good in America was built on the backs of the oppressed and that the country remains in their debt.

Crockett, known for her combative style during House hearings, has built a reputation for generating controversy.

She previously went viral after calling herself “one of the 535 most powerful people” in the country, a statement that critics said displayed the same self-importance she showed this weekend in New Orleans.

This latest controversy also arrives as Crockett’s time in Congress nears its end.

Facing a newly redrawn, more conservative district, she decided not to seek re-election.

Instead, she made a failed bid for the U.S. Senate, losing the Democratic primary to state Rep. James Talarico, who pitched himself as a more moderate choice for general election voters in Texas.

For many observers, her departure will mark the exit of one of the party’s most theatrical but least effective voices.

Some conservatives have suggested that Crockett’s pattern of provocative statements has less to do with substance and more to do with securing future media attention or a pundit gig once she leaves office.

“Thank God in six months she’ll be gone,” one social media user quipped after watching her July Fourth comments spread across the internet.

For a congresswoman who has spent most of her short career picking fights on the Hill and in the news cycle, Crockett’s remarks summed up the grievance politics that have worn thin with many Americans.

On a day meant to celebrate national pride, she chose instead to fan the flames of division, telling millions of patriotic citizens that the country they cherish owes yet another invoice.

It was a moment that spoke volumes about today’s Democratic Party, a movement increasingly driven by racial and identity politics instead of economic and cultural unity.

While Crockett’s comments will likely earn her applause among the far left, they fit perfectly into the same script many voters say they are tired of hearing.

As America enters its 250th year, most citizens were focused on fireworks, family, and patriotism.

Jasmine Crockett, however, was focused on grievance and self-glorification.

Her speech reminded voters exactly why Texans, and likely many others, are eager for a change of leadership that looks outward instead of inward, and thanks the entire nation, rather than demanding the nation thank them.

News

Erika Kirk Leaves Court In Tears As Witness Recalls Horrifying Moment Charlie Kirk Was Shot [WATCH]

The courtroom fell silent Monday as testimony described the violent final moments of conservative leader Charlie Kirk, the Turning Point USA founder whose influence reached young patriots across the country.

His widow, Erika Kirk, could not bear the details and quietly exited the courtroom, joined by her in-laws and other grieving relatives.

Officer Chris Bagley, a former campus police officer from Utah Valley University, gave heartbreaking testimony recalling the moment last September when a rifle shot shattered what was supposed to be a routine campus event.

He said he heard the crack of the shot and saw Charlie Kirk collapse before him, sending shock through the crowd.

As the testimony unfolded, emotions spilled over among those seated in the courtroom.

Charlie’s mother, Kathryn Kirk, clutched a tissue and bowed her head as she listened.

Her quiet tears were a stark contrast to the sterile court setting that offered little comfort for those reliving a devastating loss.

Across the room sat 23-year-old Robinson, the accused shooter.

He appeared calm and detached, his hands shackled to a waist chain, dressed in a grey suit that could not hide the gravity of his situation.

Observers noted that he occasionally took notes but otherwise showed little emotion.

The hearing, presided over by Judge Tony Graf, will determine whether the evidence against Robinson is strong enough to move forward to a full trial.

The judge reminded those present that anyone who left the courtroom would be permitted to return when court reconvened, an small courtesy in what has already been a long and emotional process for the Kirk family.

Many who have followed Charlie Kirk’s career know that he was more than a conservative voice.

He was an unapologetic advocate for free speech, American exceptionalism, and the defense of traditional values on college campuses across the country.

His sudden death left a permanent scar on the movement he helped energize.

The witness testimony painted a vivid picture of the tragedy.

Bagley described what began as a day filled with enthusiasm and young energy quickly dissolving into chaos and terror.

He recalled running toward the stage as Kirk fell, while panicked students rushed for cover. The incident, he said, will haunt him for the rest of his life.

Family members in the pews struggled to maintain composure as photographs of the event were displayed as evidence.

Prosecutors sought to show how the weapon was positioned and how security failed to detect the rifle before the shooting occurred.

The room was heavy with emotion as each image replayed the nightmare in agonizing detail.

Throughout the day, supporters of the Kirk family filled the benches, many of them young conservatives who credited Charlie with inspiring them to stand up for their beliefs.

Some wore Turning Point USA pins and quietly prayed while the proceedings unfolded.

Outside the courtroom, security was tight as reporters and spectators gathered.

Many shared notes about the timeline of the case and the long road ahead for the prosecution, which intends to establish the intent behind the shooting.

Defense attorneys spoke sparingly but hinted at future arguments focusing on mental health evaluations.

Inside, Erika Kirk’s brief exit captured the raw pain and disbelief that still lingers nearly a year after her husband’s murder.

WATCH:

Those close to her say she has drawn strength from faith and support from the Turning Point community, yet the weight of reliving the day remains overwhelming.

Judge Graf adjourned the session with a reminder that further witness testimony will be heard throughout the week.

The proceedings are expected to include forensic experts and eyewitnesses who can help piece together the exact sequence of the attack.

For the family, each day in court feels like reopening a wound that never healed.

The public nature of the hearing has drawn national attention, not only because of Kirk’s stature but also because of the growing concern over safety at conservative events where tensions with activists have escalated in recent years.

Many conservatives see this tragedy as a somber warning about the hostile climate toward right-leaning voices on campuses dominated by liberal ideology.

As the hearing continues, questions remain about why stronger protective measures were not in place at an event featuring one of the most recognized speakers in the conservative movement.

Turning Point USA, now under interim leadership, has called for new security protocols to protect speakers at future events.

For now, Erika Kirk continues to navigate grief in public view while ensuring that her husband’s voice and legacy are not silenced by the violence that ended his life.

Those present in the courtroom Monday witnessed not only a legal process but a painful reminder of what happens when political hatred crosses the line into tragedy.

News

Chuck Todd Melts Down Over Trump’s Patriotic Fourth of July Celebration [WATCH]

Chuck Todd has done it again, proving that outrage is his favorite American pastime.

The former Meet the Press moderator took to his podcast to air out his grievances over what he considers a national tragedy.

His complaint?

That President Donald Trump supposedly “ruined” America’s 250th birthday celebration. Yes, in Todd’s world, a patriotic bash filled with fireworks and fighters is somehow an assault on democracy itself.

Todd, ever the drama king, lamented on his Chuck ToddCast that he felt “betrayed as an American” by Trump’s Fourth of July festivities.

He spoke as if the Republic itself had fallen because the President dared to make Independence Day exciting again.

It was a performance worthy of an Emmy, if the category were “Most Outraged Journalist Pretending To Be Neutral.”

The event Todd is so furious about included the UFC “Freedom 250” fights held at the White House.

That’s right. Mixed martial arts celebrated alongside American independence.

For normal Americans, that probably sounded like a great time.

But for Todd, it was “a cage on the White House lawn, a national birthday turned into his own personal political rally.”

To him, celebrating freedom with muscle, grit, and pride is apparently a grave sin.

He went further, declaring that Trump had “ruined the American brand” and “sullied” the nation’s reputation.

WATCH:

You’d think the President had canceled July Fourth altogether and replaced it with a parade for Marx.

Todd’s meltdown was more revealing of liberal fragility than any supposed abuse of patriotism on Trump’s part.

Todd did offer one shred of hope to his disillusioned listeners, suggesting that maybe, just maybe, Americans could “make up for this soured celebration” at the nation’s 275th birthday in 2051.

It was an unintentionally hilarious moment.

Apparently, the media’s plan for national healing now requires a 25-year waiting period.

The reality is this: the sideshow isn’t Trump’s party planning. It’s the left’s refusal to join the celebration of this country.

Democrats in several states skipped the American State Fair, governors refused to send delegations, and activists vandalized the Reflecting Pool and the National Mall after complaining about “optics.”

Then they had the nerve to accuse Trump of being unpatriotic.

Polls have already shown that Democrats are increasingly uncomfortable expressing pride in America, and Todd’s tantrum fits neatly into that narrative.

When you can’t stand your own country, it’s easier to project your disappointment onto the people who still love it.

Chuck Todd’s fury is really contempt for the flag cloaked as indignation toward Trump.

Remember back in the Biden years, when the left was perfectly content to watch Independence Hall bathed in red light while the President accused half the nation of being fascists?

No media lectures about dividing the country then.

No calls for national healing.

Todd didn’t show up shaking his fists over that grotesque display.

But Trump invites Americans to celebrate freedom, and suddenly the press paints it as authoritarian theater.

This pattern has grown old. Every time Trump does something patriotic, Democrats clutch their pearls.

Every time they feel alienated by pride in America, they blame Trump for driving a wedge.

It is never about policy or principle with them. It is always about control of the narrative.

Chuck Todd’s gripe isn’t really about a speech or a cage on the lawn. It’s about who is commanding America’s attention.

He sees a President who has reignited national pride, and he cannot stand that the crowd cheers louder for Trump than for his media tribe.

The left likes to claim moral ownership of patriotism while despising those who live it out loud.

Had Kamala Harris or Joe Biden still been in the White House, you can bet that the press would have called any large-scale celebration a “historic moment of unity.”

They would have hailed the UFC fighters as symbols of American toughness and diversity.

But with Trump back in office, even fireworks are grounds for panic.

Todd’s teary declaration that Trump “stole” America’s birthday says more about his own ego than about patriotism.

It was never stolen.

The fireworks still went off.

The songs still played.

The crowds still wanted to celebrate this country.

The only people who felt robbed were those whose entire identity depends on being miserable that Donald Trump still commands the stage.

In the end, Chuck Todd’s outrage is just another example of the left’s endless quest to find offense where there is pride.

They cannot join Americans in celebration because genuine love of country exposes how hollow their own cynicism has become.

That’s why Todd’s next therapy session with the flag might have to wait until 2051, when he hopes we will all “make it up.”

For the rest of America, though, the Fourth of July was a roaring success, no matter how many journalists needed a fainting couch after watching it unfold.

News

Real America Watches in Horror as Black Teens Turn July 4th into Beat-a-Cop Fest in SC [WATCH]

A female police officer was assaulted by a crowd while responding to reports of gunfire during a permitted Independence Day block party in North Charleston, South Carolina, according to the North Charleston Police Department.

The incident occurred Saturday evening in the Chicora-Cherokee community during what authorities described as a neighborhood block party that had been approved by the City of North Charleston ahead of the July 4 holiday.

The North Charleston Police Department addressed the incident in a statement posted on the CRIMEWATCH platform after video of the confrontation circulated widely online.

“A neighborhood block party had been permitted by the city of North Charleston in advance of the holiday,” the department said.

“Earlier that day, police leadership met with event organizers to discuss the event, including traffic and parking plans to ensure emergency vehicles could safely access the area if needed.”

According to police, the situation changed later that evening.

“At approximately 8:30 p.m., officers began receiving reports of gunfire and individuals firing fireworks toward passing vehicles. Officers responded immediately and were informed by attendees that several people had begun discharging firearms,” the department said.

Police said officers recovered multiple weapons during their response.

“Multiple firearms and a makeshift spear were recovered,” the department stated, adding that two female officers were injured after being physically assaulted.

Video of the incident shows one female officer being knocked to the ground by two individuals during the confrontation.

As she struggles with a male suspect, another woman approaches and strikes the officer with what appears to be a stick.

The footage also shows additional officers rushing to assist.

Two officers are seen pulling suspects away from the injured officer.

During the struggle, one officer deploys a Taser before taking down a man who appeared to have placed the female officer in a headlock.

The officer is then seen driving his knee into the suspect’s chest while attempting to gain control of the situation.

At least two people are shown being taken into custody at the scene.

WATCH:

The video was first published by the Carolina Courier Substack.

According to the Carolina Courier, authorities made multiple arrests during the incident and continue to investigate.

“North Charleston Police tell The Carolina Courier that multiple arrests in connection with the incident were made on site, with investigators working to identify additional suspects for interrogation and arrest,” the outlet reported.

The publication also reported that law enforcement agencies sought additional assistance during several Independence Day incidents.

“According to law enforcement sources, both North Charleston and Charleston City made requests for mutual aid from neighboring jurisdictions during several incidents over the Independence Day holiday,” the Carolina Courier reported.

WATCH:

Police have not released the identities of those arrested or announced what charges they may face. Authorities also have not disclosed the extent of the injuries suffered by the two female officers during the confrontation.

The incident occurred as officers responded to reports involving both gunfire and fireworks being directed at passing vehicles, according to the department’s statement.

Investigators continue reviewing evidence from the scene while working to identify additional individuals believed to have participated in the assault.

The North Charleston Police Department has not announced whether further arrests have been made since the initial response, but officials indicated that efforts to identify additional suspects remain ongoing.

The investigation remains active as authorities continue gathering evidence related to the events that unfolded during the July 4 gathering.

News

Graham Platner’s Senate Bid Implodes As Sexual Assault Allegation Surfaces [WATCH]

The Senate race in Maine just took a dramatic turn, and not in a way Democrats were hoping for.

Their scandal soaked nominee Graham Platner is now facing a serious sexual assault allegation that threatens to wipe out his campaign completely.

A 41 year old Maine woman named Jenny Racicot has accused Platner of forcing himself on her after entering her home intoxicated five years ago.

POLITICO reported that Racicot gave multiple interviews and provided supporting materials, including emails with her therapist and messages warning another woman about Platner long before he decided to run for office.

“I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me,” Racicot said.

“I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, ‘This is no longer my choice.’”

Her vivid account leaves little doubt about how traumatic that night was for her.

Racicot said she initially stayed silent during earlier reporting about Platner because she could not face being branded a rape victim.

At the same time, she admitted she struggled with a moral conflict between supporting Platner’s left wing politics and condemning what she says he did to her.

“I just want the truth out there. I just want people to have a whole scope of who he is as a person,” she said.

WATCH:

Platner quickly fired back denying the claim and calling it “troubling, serious, and false.”

He stated, “Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically untrue.”

That familiar phrasing is now being met with increasing cynicism among voters tired of hearing it from embattled Democratic candidates.

Platner also tried to sound noble by saying he was “reflecting on the best path forward for the state that I love, the people that I love, the movement I belong to, and the goal of defeating Susan Collins.”

WATCH:

Translation: his campaign may be circling the drain.

When politicians start waxing poetic about “the movement,” it usually means the exit door is in sight.

Observers across Maine have noticed signs of retreat.

Platner has already postponed several campaign appearances including town halls in Augusta and Gorham and deleted an event listing in Sanford.

Campaign insiders admit privately that staff morale is rock bottom.

When your candidate is dodging both voters and reporters, it is never a good sign.

Democrats are reportedly panicking because they have only until July 13 to officially replace him on the ballot.

That leaves precious little time to mount a credible rescue mission.

The polls were already shifting away from Platner before this allegation hit, thanks to previous stories about his personal conduct and questionable financial entanglements.

This latest revelation could be the nail in the coffin.

The scandal has also put national Democrats in an awkward position.

After years of lecturing the country about believing all women, they now find themselves defending one of their own against a woman’s detailed allegations.

The hypocrisy is glaring. Some party operatives are already leaking that Platner will likely “reassess his viability” which is code for dropping out.

Maine conservatives are not surprised. For months they have been pointing out the growing pattern of misconduct and arrogance in Platner’s public and private life.

The left has treated him as their next big hope to unseat long serving Republican Senator Susan Collins, but those hopes are evaporating fast.

No amount of campaign spin can erase what looks like serious credibility issues.

Political veterans are also questioning whether the Democratic Party vetting process in Maine has completely broken down.

Platner’s earlier scandals should have prompted party leaders to move on long ago.

Instead, they doubled down and are now paying the political price.

Even liberal media outlets like POLITICO are no longer able to ignore the snowballing controversies.

The bigger story may be how Democrats nationwide respond when one of their own is accused.

When the accused is a conservative, they scream for immediate resignation.

When the accused is someone pushing their progressive agenda, it suddenly becomes a matter for further reflection.

Voters see that double standard as clearly as ever.

Regardless of how this plays out, Platner’s path forward looks bleak.

A candidate mired in serious personal scandal cannot credibly promise to represent the people of Maine.

The Democrat party’s obsession with power over principles is on full display, and if nothing changes soon, Susan Collins may have little trouble holding her seat.

For a party that claimed to champion women’s voices, this latest episode is a painful reminder of its selective outrage.

Once again, Democrats find themselves eating their own words, and Maine voters are left questioning just who the real moral leaders are.

News

Fed Study Ties Biden Border Crisis to Soaring Home and Rent Prices [WATCH]

A newly released working paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas concludes that the recent increase in unauthorized immigrant workers coincided with higher home prices and rental costs across U.S. metropolitan areas, prompting reactions from Trump administration officials and renewed discussion about the impact of immigration on the nation’s housing market, as reported by KRCR.

The preliminary research examined housing and labor market data during the period from 2021 through 2024, which the paper describes as an “unprecedented boom in unauthorized immigration.”

According to the economists who authored the paper, unauthorized immigrant worker flows accounted for approximately 30% of employment growth, about 30% of home price growth, and roughly 20% of rent growth in the average metropolitan area included in the analysis.

The paper focuses on the relationship between unauthorized immigrant worker flows and housing demand while analyzing trends in metro areas throughout the country.

The authors also cautioned that the document is a preliminary draft and does not represent the official views of either the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.

Former acting ICE Director Jonathan Fahey said the findings reflected what many Americans had already experienced in the housing market.

“Because we know the rents and home prices went up because of illegal immigration, and that’s really just common sense. You bring in over ten million people, they didn’t bring any homes with them, prices are going to rise,” Fahey told Fox Business.

The working paper quickly drew attention from officials in the Trump administration after its publication.

According to the report, President Donald Trump shared the study, as did White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Bill Pulte, Director of Federal Housing and acting Director of National Intelligence.

Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner also commented on the report, arguing that increased competition for housing contributed to higher prices.

“For years, hardworking Americans had to compete with millions of illegal aliens for housing. Of course, that raised prices,” Turner wrote in part.

The release of the Federal Reserve working paper follows HUD’s December report titled “Worst Case Housing Needs 2025.”

According to that report, the foreign-born population of the United States increased by more than six million people during the same period, which HUD described as the largest increase over that timeframe in U.S. history.

Turner also pointed to housing conditions in states including New York and California while discussing the earlier HUD findings.

“There’s no coincidence when you have unfettered access for illegals to come into your city, to come into your state, that you’re going to have these problems with illegal immigration. 100% of the use of rental growth in New York and California is due to illegal aliens coming into our country,” Turner told Fox Business in December after the report was released.

The Federal Reserve paper examined how unauthorized immigrant worker flows may have affected both labor markets and housing markets during the study period.

Researchers estimated that the impact extended beyond employment to measurable increases in both home values and rental prices across metropolitan areas.

Although the paper has generated significant public discussion, the authors emphasized that it remains a working paper subject to further review.

They specifically noted that the analysis is preliminary and should not be interpreted as an official policy position of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System.

The report has become part of the broader national debate over housing affordability, immigration policy, and the factors contributing to rising home prices and rents in communities across the United States.

News

Blue State Busted For Paying Fake Daycares That Have Zero Kids [WATCH]

An investigation into Washington state’s childcare subsidy program has raised new questions about oversight after several daycare providers receiving taxpayer funding were found to have few or no children enrolled, according to reporting by The Center Square.

The report examined multiple daycare operations receiving public subsidies and found cases in which providers continued to receive substantial taxpayer payments despite little evidence of active childcare services.

The findings have renewed attention on how Washington monitors the distribution of childcare assistance and whether additional enforcement is needed to prevent improper payments.

According to The Center Square, many Washington daycare providers receive significant taxpayer subsidies through state programs.

During its investigation, the publication reported finding several providers with few, if any, children and at least one location that residents said had never operated as a daycare despite receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in public funding.

The report stated:

“Many Washington state daycare providers receive large taxpayer subsidies, but an investigation by The Center Square found several that had few, if any, children and at least one establishment that received hundreds of thousands of dollars despite residents at the listed address indicating it was not a daycare.”

The publication also reported that state officials responsible for overseeing the childcare subsidy program have publicly maintained that there is no widespread issue with improper payments.

According to the report, no state official has announced a formal investigation or statewide enforcement effort, although lawmakers approved reforms during the last legislative session.

One example highlighted by The Center Square involved a property in West Seattle.

According to fiscal.wa.gov, the location received more than $229,000 over a nine-month period between July 2025 and March 2026.

When a reporter visited the address, the resident reportedly denied that a daycare was operating there.

The exchange was reported as follows:

“Is there a daycare operated from here?” a reporter from The Center Square asked.

“No,” the person who answered the door responded.

The resident also said there had never been a daycare at the address.

The investigation further reported that some daycare providers were receiving more than $20,000 per month in taxpayer-funded childcare payments despite no children being evident at those locations.

The reporting also prompted a response from Washington Attorney General Nick Brown.

Brown encouraged anyone who believed a daycare provider was being threatened or harassed by reporters to contact authorities or the state’s Hate Crimes & Bias Incident Hotline.

His Dec. 30, 2025, press release stated:

“Showing up on someone’s porch, threatening, or harassing them isn’t an investigation. Neither is filming minors who may be in the home. This is unsafe and potentially dangerous behavior. I encourage anyone experiencing threats or harassment to either contact local law enforcement or our office’s Hate Crimes & Bias Incident Hotline.”

The Center Square argued that examining businesses receiving taxpayer funds is a legitimate part of investigative reporting and questioned why publicly funded daycare providers would not be subject to public scrutiny regarding the use of those funds.

The investigation comes as public assistance programs across the country continue to receive increased attention over fraud prevention and financial oversight.

Federal and state authorities have previously pursued cases involving Medicare, Medicaid, COVID-19 relief funding, food assistance programs, and childcare subsidies.

The Center Square’s findings place Washington among several states where questions have been raised regarding oversight of taxpayer-funded childcare programs.

As of the reporting cited in the investigation, state lawmakers had enacted certain reforms, but no statewide crackdown or formal investigation into the providers identified by the publication had been announced.

News

Socialist Mayor Katie Wilson Under Fire as Chinatown Turns Into ‘Human Dumping Ground’ During World Cup Spotlight [WATCH]

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson faced renewed criticism from residents and business owners in the city’s Chinatown-International District (CID) ahead of the U.S. men’s FIFA World Cup match against Belgium on Monday, as community members held demonstrations over crime, homelessness, and open-air drug activity, as reported by Fox News.

Residents and local advocates say the neighborhood has not experienced the same economic benefits as other parts of Seattle despite the influx of visitors attending World Cup events.

Businesses in the CID and neighboring Little Saigon reported reduced customer traffic even though the district is located less than a mile from Lumen Field, where tournament matches have been played.

According to local television station KIRO 7, some business owners believe safety concerns have discouraged visitors from spending time in the neighborhood, leading to declining sales during one of Seattle’s busiest tourism periods.

As crowds gathered for World Cup festivities, protesters assembled near the stadium to voice their concerns about conditions in the CID and to criticize the city’s response.

Among those speaking was Chinatown advocate Gary Lee, who accused the mayor of failing to protect the neighborhood.

“Wilson claims to be an advocate for marginalized communities of color, but all she did was turn the CID into a human dumping ground, and we’ve had enough,” Lee said during a rally, according to KIRO 7.

Lee also described the contrast between the CID and other popular areas of Seattle that have seen increased activity during the tournament.

“When I look at the TV, I see that the waterfront is jampacked, Pioneer Square is jampacked. When I go over to Chinatown, it’s just like dead.”

“I hate to say it, but it feels like a ghost town,” he said of the CID.

Fox News Digital reported that it contacted Wilson’s office for comment but did not receive a response before publication.

Wilson has previously addressed concerns about directing visitors beyond Seattle’s downtown core.

“We’ve definitely seen, like, a lot of energy was put into trying to make sure that as visitors are coming, they are, you know, venturing out of that downtown corridor,” Wilson said when residents raised concerns about conditions in the neighborhood.

In a statement provided to KIRO 7, the mayor’s office acknowledged ongoing public safety issues in the district.

“Crime and disorder issues in the CID have gone unaddressed for far too long. We continue to work with the CID community to address their concerns and ensure it is a safe, active, and vibrant neighborhood.”

Community activist and former Seattle City Council member Tanya Woo also expressed concern about the area’s economic performance during the World Cup.

According to Fox 13 Seattle, Woo said many businesses in the district have experienced sales declines ranging from 10% to 20%.

Woo encouraged residents to help attract visitors by inviting fans to explore the neighborhood before and after matches.

“Many businesses in the Chinatown-International District are reporting sales declines compared to this time last year. Although thousands of FIFA fans are coming to Seattle, our neighborhood has largely become a rideshare pickup and drop-off zone,” she wrote.

In a separate post, Woo added, “Seattle’s Chinatown International District should be benefiting from the FIFA World Cup, not being left behind.”

Seattle has served as one of the host cities for the FIFA World Cup and welcomed several tournament matches, including Monday’s contest between the United States and Belgium.

While fan zones and downtown attractions have drawn large crowds, business owners in the CID continue to urge visitors to spend time in their neighborhood as city officials work to address long-standing concerns about crime and public disorder.

The demonstrations highlighted continuing frustration among some residents and merchants, who argue that increased international attention on Seattle during the World Cup has not translated into increased business for the Chinatown-International District.

News

Chaos Erupts as BJ’s Wholesale Roof Collapses in New Jersey Storm [WATCH]

A partial roof collapse at a BJ’s Wholesale Club in Ocean Township, New Jersey, sent water rushing into the store Monday morning as severe storms moved through the area, narrowly missing shoppers and prompting a large emergency response, according to The New York Post.

According to the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office, the incident occurred at approximately 11:16 a.m. while customers and employees were inside the warehouse.

Surveillance footage captured the moment part of the roof gave way over the bakery section, releasing a large volume of water that pushed store displays across the floor.

Video from inside the store showed an older man browsing in the bakery area moments before the collapse.

He avoided the falling debris and moved out of the area as water poured into the building and wooden display fixtures shifted across the floor.

Authorities said 27 people were inside the store when the roof partially collapsed.

Two individuals became partially trapped during the incident but were able to free themselves and safely leave the building before emergency crews completed their search.

Officials reported that no injuries resulted from the collapse.

Emergency responders arrived as heavy rain continued to impact Ocean Township and surrounding communities.

Flooding was reported on local streets while first responders worked to secure the store and confirm that everyone inside had been safely evacuated.

The Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office said drones and K-9 teams were deployed to assist in searching the building to ensure no one remained inside following the collapse.

The incident occurred during a period of intense rainfall that affected portions of New Jersey on Monday morning.

The severe weather created hazardous conditions throughout the township while emergency personnel responded to weather-related calls.

BJ’s Wholesale Club did not immediately respond to a request for comment following the incident.

Monmouth County Sheriff Shaun Golden praised the coordinated response by emergency personnel after the building was evacuated.

“This incident is another reminder of how quickly severe weather can create dangerous and unpredictable conditions,” Golden said in a statement.

“We commend all first responders who worked with urgency under challenging circumstances. Despite the ongoing flooding and severe weather affecting our communities, all worked seamlessly together to ensure everyone was safely accounted for. Their dedication and teamwork exemplify the very best of public safety.”

Officials have not released information regarding what portion of the roof failed or whether the collapse was directly caused by the heavy rainfall.

The building remained the focus of emergency operations while authorities assessed the structure following the incident.

The dramatic surveillance footage highlighted how quickly conditions changed inside the warehouse, with water rapidly flooding the affected area after the roof gave way.

Despite the extent of the damage inside the store, all 27 occupants were accounted for, and no injuries were reported.

The incident serves as another example of the hazards severe weather can create for businesses and shoppers, particularly during periods of intense rainfall that can place significant stress on commercial buildings and create dangerous conditions with little warning.


Scroll to Top