News

Tim Walz Fraud Scandal Explodes as 400+ MN Gov Employees Blow the Whistle
News

Tim Walz Fraud Scandal Explodes as 400+ MN Gov Employees Blow the Whistle

/

More than 400 employees at the Minnesota Department of Human Services have accused Gov. Tim Walz of ignoring repeated warnings about fraud and retaliating against staff who attempted to report the misconduct.

The allegations were posted by the Minnesota Department of Human Service Employees account on X, which states it represents more than 480 current DHS staff members.

The group wrote that Walz is “100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota.”

In the post, the employees said their attempts to alert the governor to ongoing fraud were met with pushback.

“We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response. Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports,” the statement said.

The account also claimed the governor weakened oversight mechanisms.

“In addition to retaliating against whistleblower[s], Tim Walz disempowered the Office of the Legislative Auditor, allowing agencies to disregard their audit findings and guidance.”

The allegations come as federal officials continue to prosecute what they describe as one of the largest COVID-era fraud cases in the country.

Last week, the Department of Justice announced charges against the 78th defendant tied to the Feeding Our Future scheme, which authorities say involved more than $250 million in stolen federal child nutrition funds.

More than 70 defendants have been convicted.

Many individuals charged in the scheme are members of Minnesota’s Somali community.

The New York Times reported that state and federal officials now view the Feeding Our Future case as part of a broader pattern.

According to law enforcement authorities cited by the Times, several fraud operations have expanded in parts of Minnesota’s Somali community over the past five years.

Investigators say multiple individuals created companies that billed state agencies for millions of dollars in social services that were never delivered.

City Journal published a report citing unnamed federal counterterrorism sources who claimed some stolen funds were transferred to Somalia and may have reached the group Al-Shabaab.

Walz addressed the matter at a press conference last week, saying the fraud “undermines trust in government,” and “undermines programs that are absolutely critical in improving quality of life.”

He added, “If you’re committing fraud, no matter where you come from, what you look like, what you believe, you are going to go to jail.”

The governor was questioned about the allegations Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

When asked if he takes responsibility for failing to stop the fraud, Walz said, “Well, certainly, I take responsibility for putting people in jail.”

He added that Minnesota’s status draws criminal activity.

“I will note, it’s not just Somalis. Minnesota is a generous state. Minnesota is a prosperous state, a well-run state. We’re AAA-bond rated. But that attracts criminals. Those people are going to jail. We’re doing everything we can. But to demonize an entire community on the actions of a few, it’s lazy,” he said.

President Donald Trump weighed in on the issue in a Nov. 21 Truth Social post, saying he would end temporary protected status for Somalis in Minnesota in response to “fraudulent money laundering activity.”

He wrote, “Send them back to where they came from. It’s OVER!”

 

Oregon’s Lesbian Governor Threatens to Prosecute Federal Agents for Enforcing U.S. Immigration Law
News

Oregon’s Lesbian Governor Threatens to Prosecute Federal Agents for Enforcing U.S. Immigration Law

/

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, a proud lesbian (not that it matters, but she put it in the first paragraph of her website’s about section), said the state will investigate and potentially prosecute federal agents who carry out immigration enforcement actions inside Oregon.

Governor Tina Kotek, ‘the first openly lesbian governors elected in American history.’

In a video posted to Instagram, Kotek accused the Department of Homeland Security of using improper tactics and said the state would take legal action if federal officers violated Oregon law.

In her statement, Kotek said the state supports public safety while also maintaining what she described as a welcoming environment for immigrants.

“I believe as you do, in the rule of law and keeping our community safe,” she said.

“We also believe in being a welcoming place, where our immigrant and refugee community help our state thrive. The ongoing violent actions of the federal Department of Homeland Security are unacceptable — going after Oregonians, and stoking fear in the name of ‘immigration enforcement.’”

Kotek said DHS had engaged in behavior she described as dangerous to the public.

She said the tactics used by federal officers were inconsistent with the state’s approach to law enforcement.

“Excessive force, reckless tactics,” she said, had “put bystanders and law enforcement in danger,” which she said was “not how public safety works.”

The governor said Oregon would take steps to scrutinize arrests, detentions, and other actions carried out by federal agents.

“Oregon is monitoring all ICE actions closely,” Kotek said.

“We will investigate misconduct, and if a federal officer breaks Oregon law, they will be held accountable — just like anyone else. I will not tolerate reckless, or unconstitutional behavior in our state.”

Kotek has previously criticized federal officers deployed in Oregon during periods of unrest.

In an October interview with CBS News, she accused federal agents of escalating encounters with protesters in Portland and said local law enforcement should take the lead in managing demonstrations.

“[T]his set of demonstrations that are happening are managed by local law enforcement, as they should be,” Kotek said at the time.

“People have the right to lawfully protest, but if they cross the line, they are being held accountable. If criminal activity occurs, they are being held accountable. This is what free speech looks like, and I believe the federal government can continue to do the work right here.”

Kotek’s comments come as federal immigration enforcement remains a point of conflict between state officials and the Department of Homeland Security.

Oregon has previously limited cooperation with federal immigration agencies.

Jasmine Crockett Refuses to Retract Epstein Smear Against Zeldin Despite FEC Records
News

Jasmine Crockett Refuses to Retract Epstein Smear Against Zeldin Despite FEC Records

/

Democratic Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett declined Sunday to withdraw her accusation that Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin accepted campaign contributions from Jeffrey Epstein, even after being shown that the donations she cited came from a different individual with the same name.

Crockett made the claim on the House floor on Nov. 18.

The contributions in question were not from the deceased sex offender, who died in 2019, but from a physician named Jeffrey Epstein who donated to Zeldin in 2020.

The issue resurfaced during Crockett’s appearance on MS NOW’s “The Weekend,” hosted by Jacqueline Alemany.

Alemany noted Crockett’s comments and said the congresswoman had made news by “mistakenly” accusing Zeldin and other Republicans of accepting money from the sex offender.

Crockett interrupted to state that her accusation was not accidental. Alemany then told her that Federal Election Commission data showed Zeldin and the other lawmakers identified by Crockett did not receive donations from the deceased Epstein.

“I want to give you the opportunity to amend that,” Alemany said.

“I have no amendments,” Crockett replied, again defending her original comments.

She said she did not have enough time before her floor speech to determine which Jeffrey Epstein had made the contributions.

“I had maybe 20 minutes. We researched the FEC and, because I like to speak with specificity — that’s kind of what comes with being an attorney — I made clear that there was a Jeffrey Epstein,” Crockett said.

She added that she did not have sufficient time to research the matter fully.

“They knew on the other side that I did not have time to actually pull up and actually research, especially since that particular one that Lee Zeldin got up in an uproar about was specifically out of the New York area. We know that he was out of that area and this obviously was not done post Jeffrey Epstein’s life, so I made sure that I said ‘a Jeffrey Epstein.’”

Alemany noted that the physician named Jeffrey Epstein made the donations in 2020, one year after the sex offender’s death. She then pressed Crockett further.

“But you were trying to insinuate that it was the Jeffrey Epstein,” Alemany said.

“Oh, I absolutely was insinuating that it could be possible. That is true,” Crockett responded.

She said she avoided directly naming the deceased Epstein because she could not verify the source of the donations at the time.

“But the point is, I never said that it was that specific one because I did not have the adequate time to do it. And so the Jeffrey Epstein has stepped forward and that’s not like, you know, a normal name. And I think that what would have been problematic is if I would have claimed that, say, that happened and it legitimately never happened. So ultimately, he cleared the record. I have not researched further. I’ve not talked to this doctor.”

Alemany asked Crockett to acknowledge that Zeldin did not receive money from the deceased sex offender. Crockett did not directly do so.

“I can agree that Lee Zeldin has said that he’s not received money from the Jeffrey Epstein,” she said. “Absolutely.”

Musk Reveals How He Tricked Government Fraudsters with One Simple Fix
News

Musk Reveals How He Tricked Government Fraudsters with One Simple Fix

/

Elon Musk described a series of basic financial controls he says would dramatically improve federal accountability, arguing that a small structural change could save between $100 billion and $200 billion a year.

In a detailed explanation, Musk said the approach grew out of what he called “a very interesting side quest” that exposed him to how federal money moves inside government systems.

Musk said many federal payments historically lacked the most elementary identifiers, creating conditions where oversight was not possible.

“There’s been quite a few efficiencies. I mean, some of them are very basic efficiencies, like just adding in requirements for federal payments that that any given payment must have an assigned congressional payment code and a comment field with something in it that’s more than nothing,” he said.

He added that “that trivial, trivial seeming change” likely saves “100 billion dollars, or even $200 billion a year.”

According to Musk, large numbers of federal payments had been sent “with no no congressional payment code and with nothing in the comment field,” a situation he said left auditors without information needed to verify expenditures.

He pointed to the current Department of War, noting that “if they say, like, Why can the Defense Department or now the word Department of War, why can it not pass an audit just because the information is not there? Is not there, it doesn’t have the information necessary to pass an audit does not exist, is the issue?”

Musk said the steps taken through Doge were straightforward measures any responsible institution would normally apply.

“A bunch of things Doge did were just very common sense, things that would be normal for any organization that cared about financial responsibility. That’s, that’s, that’s most of what was done, you know, and still going on, by the way, those are still happening.”

He also described the pushback that followed efforts to stop improper payments.

“It turns out, when you stop fraudulent and wasteful payments, the fraudsters don’t, you know, confess to us, they actually start yelling all sorts of nonsense that you’re stuffing essential payments to need needy people,” Musk said.

He explained that requests often arrived framed as charitable or humanitarian causes, but basic verification exposed inconsistencies.

Musk recounted examples of payment requests claiming to support overseas recipients but listing domestic wire instructions.

“It really be like, this is going to children in Africa. And I’m like, yeah. But then why are the wiring instructions for Deloitte nutrition, Washington, DC? Because that’s not Africa,” he said.

When asked to connect officials with the stated recipients, Musk said the response was “silence.”

He added, “We’re not going to send the money unless we can talk to the recipients and confirm they will actually get it.”

Musk said fraudulent organizations typically rely on emotionally appealing narratives rather than openly stating their intentions.

“Fraudsters necessarily will come up with a very, you know, sympathetic argument. They’re not going to say, give us the money for fraud,” he said.

He pointed to fabricated nonprofit efforts designed to appear legitimate.

“They’re going to start an NGO, and then, yeah, they’re going to see NGOs. It’s gonna be like, the Save the baby pandas, NGO, which of like, who doesn’t want to save the baby pandas? They’re adorable. But then there’s no, it turns out no pandas are being saved.”

Musk said that when asked to verify the activity of such groups, the organizations could not produce evidence.

“Can you send us a picture of the panda? Like, no. Okay. How do we know it’s going through the fantasy, that’s all I’m saying.”

WATCH:

Charlotte Officials Are ‘PANICKING’ as Bunkbeds Get Set Up to House Violent Criminals
News

Charlotte Officials Are ‘PANICKING’ as Bunkbeds Get Set Up to House Violent Criminals

/

The August 2025 killing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a Charlotte, North Carolina, light rail train prompted state lawmakers to pass new criminal-justice legislation aimed at repeat violent offenders.

The incident drew national attention after the attack was captured on video and the suspect’s criminal history became public.

Police identified the suspect as Decarlos Brown Jr., who had 14 prior arrests, including charges for armed robbery and assault.

He had been released without bond months earlier following a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Zarutska was killed during what authorities described as an unprovoked attack.

Court and public-safety records show Brown had faced multiple previous charges.

He had also been released in earlier cases under bond policies that allowed defendants to remain free while awaiting trial.

In this case, local officials said Brown had been released without bond following the mental-health evaluation.

The case led to renewed scrutiny of pre-trial release policies and prompted debate within the North Carolina General Assembly.

Lawmakers introduced “Iryna’s Law,” a measure that increases restrictions on release for defendants accused of certain violent crimes and repeat offenses.

The legislation passed the North Carolina House of Representatives by a vote of 82–30 and the state Senate by a vote of 28–8.

Ten Democrats voted for the bill in the House. No Democrats supported the bill in the Senate.

The statute expands the definition of “violent offenses” and places limits on when defendants can be released without bond.

It also removes the option for a written promise to appear for all criminal charges.

Under the law, defendants accused of violent offenses and certain repeat offenders will be subject to stricter pre-trial conditions.

“Iryna’s Law” also includes provisions requiring mental-health evaluations for some defendants.

During the legislative process, lawmakers added additional provisions addressing capital punishment.

A last-minute amendment introduced by Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger expedited procedures related to the death penalty.

That amendment prompted Senate Democrats to walk out before the vote.

Supporters of the legislation said the measure was designed to address public-safety concerns and close gaps in existing bail rules.

They argued that the changes would reduce the likelihood that individuals with prior serious offenses would be released without sufficient judicial review.

Opponents raised concerns about the scope of the expanded definitions and the potential impact on the state’s prison population.

Some lawmakers said the capital-punishment amendment had not gone through the usual committee process and objected to its inclusion in the final bill.

The law follows a series of high-profile cases nationwide in which defendants with prior criminal records were released pre-trial and later charged with new violent offenses.

In North Carolina, state officials said the Charlotte incident contributed to bipartisan efforts to reconsider pre-trial release standards.

Gov. Roy Cooper has not yet issued a formal statement on the implementation timeline for “Iryna’s Law.”

State agencies began preliminary planning after the bill’s passage to adjust procedures for bond hearings, risk assessments, and evaluation requirements.

Brown remains in custody in Mecklenburg County. Court records show his next hearing is scheduled later this year.

MS-13 Loving Dem Senator ‘is Now Defending Venezuelan Drug Traffickers’
News

MS-13 Loving Dem Senator ‘is Now Defending Venezuelan Drug Traffickers’

/

Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen said Sunday that President Donald Trump’s authorization of strikes against Venezuelan drug vessels could amount to a war crime, responding to questions about a report concerning a second strike on a targeted boat.

Van Hollen made the comments during an appearance on NBC’s This Week with host Jonathan Karl, who asked about a Washington Post report alleging that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered a second strike on a vessel after an initial strike left two survivors.

Karl began the exchange by asking Van Hollen for his assessment of the report.

Karl said, “So let me ask you about that Washington Post report on the — on the attack on that Venezuelan alleged drug boat. What do you make of what happened there? Do you think there was a war crime committed?”

Van Hollen said the possibility existed. “I think it’s very possible there was a war crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime, you have to accept the Trump administration’s whole construct here,” he said.

Karl clarified the point. “That we’re at war.”

Van Hollen responded, “Which is we’re in armed conflict, at war with this particular — with the drug gangs. Of course, they’ve never presented the public with the information they’ve got here. But it could be worse than that. Right? If that theory is wrong, then it’s plain murder.”

Karl then asked whether the first strike would be considered murder if the administration’s view of armed conflict did not apply. “The first strike is murder in that case?”

Van Hollen said, “That’s correct.”

Karl continued, “You’re alleging.”

Van Hollen replied, “That’s correct. Well, I’m saying that it’s either murder from the first strike, if their whole theory is wrong, and I think, you know, the weight of the legal opinion here is that they have concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even if you accept their theory than it is a war crime, and so I do believe that the secretary of Defense should be held accountable for giving those kind of orders.”

The remarks came as discussions continued about President Trump’s posture toward Venezuela and the Maduro regime.

The debate follows recent reporting and public statements that have fueled questions about potential U.S. military actions in the region.

On Saturday, Venezuelan airspace went silent after President Trump announced that it would be closed.

No further details were provided about the duration or scope of the closure, and officials have not issued additional statements on the matter.

Various reports have circulated claiming that Nicolás Maduro may have fled the country due to concerns about a possible U.S. operation.

Those reports have not been confirmed by U.S. officials or Venezuelan authorities. Information about Maduro’s whereabouts remained unverified as of the weekend, and there were no official announcements from Caracas addressing the claims.

The Washington Post report referenced by Karl has prompted questions about the chain of command and the legal framework governing U.S. actions in international waters.

The allegation that a second strike may have been ordered after survivors were identified has led to calls for additional scrutiny of the decision-making process within the Department of War.

Van Hollen’s comments represent one of the strongest public reactions from a sitting senator regarding the legality of the strike.

His remarks centered on whether the administration’s stated justification qualifies as an armed conflict under applicable legal standards, and whether actions taken under that justification comply with established rules governing the use of force.

Secretary Pete Hegseth had already issued a detailed public response to the claims raised in the Washington Post report.

Undeniable Fact: Obama Behind Years-Long Coup Against Trump, More Coming Out: Gabbard
News

Undeniable Fact: Obama Behind Years-Long Coup Against Trump, More Coming Out: Gabbard

/

Lara Trump opened her segment by asking Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to respond to comments from former President Barack Obama, who dismissed recent disclosures as meaningless.

Lara Trump said, “Director Gabbard, give me your response to what we heard from former President Obama there. He’s saying that none of this makes any sense, that this is a distraction. What do you say to that?”

Gabbard said the reaction from Obama and his allies followed a familiar pattern.

“It’s the art of deflection coming from former President Obama, as well as his friends who are still in Congress today, and Senator Warner and Congressman Jim Himes really all basically saying that exact same statement, which doesn’t actually address the issue that was revealed in great detail in the over 100 documents that we released last week, in the documents that we will be releasing later this week,” she said.

She said those records show that intelligence agencies reached a clear conclusion before and immediately after the 2016 election.

“The undeniable fact that you laid out in your introduction to this segment, is that the intelligence community had one assessment that Russia did not have the intent or capability to try to impact the outcome of the US election leading up to election day,” she said.

Gabbard added that the same assessment was made again after Donald Trump won the 2016 election.

Gabbard said the shift came only after a briefing at the National Security Council.

“It wasn’t until after that pulled President’s daily brief document that you referenced, that the principals committee was called in the National Security Council, and President Obama then directed then his Obama’s ODNI DNI James Clapper, to lead the effort to create this new intelligence community assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow attempted to influence the outcome of the US election,” she said.

She argued that none of the statements coming from Obama’s office, Democratic lawmakers, or media allies addressed the core discrepancy.

“Neither the message from President Obama’s office, neither the statements coming from Democrats in Congress today and their friends in the propaganda media. None of them are addressing this fact that there was a shift, 180 degree shift from the intelligence community’s assessment leading up to the election to the one that President Obama directed be produced after Donald Trump won the election that completely contradicted those assessments that had come previously,” she said.

Gabbard also pointed to the people who signed off on the later assessment.

“In the clip that you played, you saw John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey stated with high confidence this January intelligence community assessment that they drafted at the direction of President Obama,” she said.

She said the assessment relied on material that was already discredited.

“The fact is that they used already discredited information like the Steele dossier. They knew it was discredited at that time, yet they used it as a source for this document that they claim to have high confidence in.”

She said additional intelligence had previously been deemed unreliable.

“They used intelligence that some of these intelligence community professionals rejected previously because of the lack of credibility and the lack of the ability to vet with any kind of confidence whether or not that information or intelligence was accurate and could be used for an assessment,” Gabbard said.

She added that “a long laundry list of facts and intelligence reporting” contradicted the statements now being made by Obama’s office.

Gabbard said the documents point to a broader effort.

She said that “after Donald Trump was elected, led by President Obama, there was an effort to create an a doc, a document that would serve as a foundation for what would be a years long coup against President Trump, therefore trying to subvert the will of the American people who sent him to the White House in 2016.”

Lara Trump called the release of the documents significant.

“It’s amazing that you are now releasing all of this. And Tulsi, I have to tell you, for those of us who lived through it, thank you. I think it’s great that we’re getting this information out,” she said.

She then asked whether more disclosures were coming.

“You say there is more information. There are more documents to be released. Anything you can tell us on that?”

Gabbard said more material would be made public soon.

“We will be releasing these documents shortly in the wake of the release that we did last week, I’m very encouraged by the fact that we have whistle blowers coming forward who are intelligence community professionals who were there when this happened, and who were disgusted by it and are heartened at the possibility and the hope that the truth will see the light of day,” she said.

She said the disclosures were being forwarded to federal prosecutors.

“We are referring and have already sent all of the documents that we have currently and any others that we get in the future to the Department of Justice to bring about that accountability,” Gabbard said.

She added that the goal is to protect trust in the system: “to ensure that the integrity of our democratic republic exists, that the American people can have faith and trust that who they vote for in our elections to be elected will actually be respected by those who are leaving power.”

WATCH:

Trump Issued Maduro an Ultimatum on the Spot Before Closing Venezuela’s Airspace
News

Trump Issued Maduro an Ultimatum on the Spot Before Closing Venezuela’s Airspace

/

President Donald Trump delivered a warning to Nicolás Maduro to leave Venezuela immediately in the hours before U.S. officials declared the country’s airspace closed, according to a report from the Miami Herald.

The newspaper reported that the message was conveyed in a phone call between Washington and Caracas and included an offer of evacuation for Maduro, his wife Cilia Flores, and their son.

The offer was conditioned on Maduro agreeing to resign during the call.

U.S. officials told the outlet the discussion broke down shortly after it began.

A source said the disagreement centered on demands from Maduro.

According to the report, the first demand involved “global amnesty for any crimes he and his group had committed, and that was rejected.”

The source also told the newspaper that Maduro’s side asked to “retain control of the armed forces — similar to what happened in Nicaragua in ’91 with Violeta Chamorro. In return, they would allow free elections.”

The final sticking point involved timing, as the United States insisted on immediate resignation while Caracas refused.

Following the collapse of the conversation, Trump announced Saturday that Venezuelan airspace would be considered “closed in its entirety.”

The Herald reported that Venezuelan officials attempted to schedule another call with Washington but did not receive a response.

The developments have drawn attention from regional analysts, including former Venezuelan diplomat Vanessa Neumann.

Speaking to Fox News Digital, Neumann said the Maduro government may now face its most significant challenge so far.

“I think the operations will start imminently,” she said.

Neumann added that the airspace decision served as a signal.

“The clearing of the airspace is an indication and a very clear public warning that missiles might be coming to take out command and control infrastructure or retaliatory infrastructure,” she said.

Neumann said U.S. planning has identified potential targets in advance.

“The targets have been identified through covert operations over the last several years by people on the ground,” she said.

“So they’re well-mapped. This is a capture-or-kill scenario, but there’s a limit to how many people you can remove quickly.”

On Sunday, reporters traveling with the president aboard Air Force One asked whether the airspace announcement suggested that a strike on Venezuela was imminent.

Trump responded by saying not to “read anything into” the declaration.

Neumann said the Maduro government faces weaknesses within its own military.

“Maduro also doesn’t have that many options, and his military is very weak,” she said.

She added that going after individuals in the regime would require prioritization.

“You can’t go after 30 people simultaneously, who are spread all around, but certainly high on the list would be Maduro himself.”

Neumann said the country’s armed forces have deteriorated significantly.

“Their material is extremely old, decayed, and has not been serviced,” she said.

She noted that equipment from Russia and the United States remains in poor condition.

“They’ve got junk from the Russians. The stuff they originally had from the Americans is decades old and has not been serviced.”

Ahead of the airspace announcement, U.S. officials designated the cartel allegedly connected to elements of the Venezuelan government, the Cartel de los Soles, as a foreign terrorist organization.

Neumann said the group integrated narcotics operations into the country’s national oil company before sanctions took effect.

“This cartel turned Venezuela’s main oil company into a narcotics trafficking money laundering operation, using the company’s access to international finance, until it was sanctioned,” she said.

Neumann said the cartel used military aircraft to transport cocaine and retaliated against internal opposition.

“Jet pilots were making a lot of money off that, and they’ve tortured people. They target people, anybody who tell on them, they’re disappeared,” she said.

She added that the organization is now one of the primary narcotics suppliers to the United States and Europe.

In September, the European Parliament voted in favor of designating the cartel as a terrorist organization.

Neumann said the group has supported other entities abroad.

“The Cartel de Los Soles is also a key collaborator and financier of Hezbollah and some of the drug money has been used to fund terrorist attacks that have killed American citizens, even in the Middle East,” she said.

Neumann said the United States has expanded military and intelligence efforts targeting networks linked to Venezuela.

“The decision is President Trump’s because when he says, ‘Go’, we go. And nobody knows when he’ll say that,” she said.

Neumann added that assets have been positioned in the region.

“He has mobilized so many assets down there now. But what President Trump is doing now is long overdue.”

She cited geopolitical conditions affecting Maduro’s allies.

“Because even Maduro’s biggest backers, Russia and Iran, are both on the back foot, and China will not go that far in backing Maduro as it has bigger and broader interests throughout the region,” she said.

Neumann added that domestic conditions also pose risks for the regime. “Maduro is also weakened because his partners are weakened and have their own issues to deal with,” she said.

Neumann identified members of Maduro’s government who could be targeted.

Those individuals include Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, Diosdado Cabello, Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace, and Alexander Granko Arteaga, who oversees the country’s counter-intelligence agency, the DGCIM.

Neumann said Granko’s role within the military structure has influenced the stability of the regime.

“One of the reasons Granko is an important figure is that he’s one of the reasons why they haven’t capitulated and why there has not been a military uprising,” she said.

She said Venezuelans exhausted peaceful options. “It’s because of the brutality of the counter-intelligence that they do to their own military, and hundreds of soldiers are tortured,” she said.

“That said, the Venezuelan people have made it clear that they wanted Maduro out and fought democratically but lost.”

“They voted in elections, protested peacefully, lobbied for sanctions, and lobbied for international support,” Neumann said.

Trump Doubles Down on Calling Tim Walz ‘Severely Retarded,’ ‘Something Wrong with Him’
News

Trump Doubles Down on Calling Tim Walz ‘Severely Retarded,’ ‘Something Wrong with Him’

/

President Donald Trump reaffirmed comments he made last week in which he referred to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, the 2024 Democrat vice presidential nominee, as “severely retarded.”

The president addressed the subject Sunday while speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One during a flight from Palm Beach to Washington, DC.

A reporter asked Trump whether he stood by the term he used in his Thanksgiving post on X.

Trump replied, “Yeah, I think there’s something wrong with him. Do you have a problem with it?”

He continued, “I think there’s something wrong with him … Anybody that would allow those people into a state and pay billions of dollars out to Somalia. We gave billions of dollars to Somalia — it’s not even a country because it doesn’t function like a country. It’s got a name, but it doesn’t function like a country. Yeah, there’s something wrong with Walz.”

In his Thanksgiving post, Trump wrote that the nation’s “refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America, something that did not exist after World War II,” and cited Minnesota as an example.

He said, “As an example, hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia are completely taking over the once great State of Minnesota.

Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for ‘prey’ as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone.”

Trump continued in the same post, describing Walz and Rep. Ilhan Omar.

He wrote, “The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both, while the worst ‘Congressman/woman’ in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how ‘badly’ she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc…”

Trump also wrote that he “will permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover.”

Walz responded Sunday during public remarks.

He said it was “a badge of honor” to be insulted by the president.

The exchange comes as national debate continues over immigration policy, refugee resettlement programs, and public safety concerns cited by both state and federal officials.

The comments from Trump and Walz were the latest in a series of public statements between the president and prominent Minnesota political figures, including ongoing disputes related to immigration enforcement and state-level refugee policy.

No further statements were issued by the White House or the Minnesota governor’s office following the president’s remarks aboard Air Force One.

‘The Quiet Conquest’: Hamas Playbook Already Operating Inside U.S. Says Mosab Yousef
News

‘The Quiet Conquest’: Hamas Playbook Already Operating Inside U.S. Says Mosab Yousef

/

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of one of Hamas’s co-founders, issued a warning on Nov. 26 that Islamic extremist movements are applying the same long-term strategies in the United States that built Hamas’s power in Gaza.

Yousef, who grew up inside the organization’s early operations, posted on X that jihadis are pursuing in America the same mix of educational, religious, political, and propaganda efforts that supported Hamas’s rise.

His message came days after an Afghan immigrant was charged with gunning down two National Guardsmen in Washington, D.C., and after Zohran Mamdani won the New York mayoral election with backing from pro-Hamas elements.

An Oct. 7 attacker linked to jihadi activity was also recently found living in Louisiana.

Yousef wrote, “From the inside, it looks innocent — just kids at summer camps, families at mosques, neighbors sharing meals. But growing up in the West Bank, I saw only what few did: my father, Sheikh Hassan Yousef, wasn’t just a community leader. He was one of the architects of the Muslim Brotherhood’s project in the territories — a project that would birth Hamas. I was there in our living room when Sheikh Ahmad Yassin came from Gaza to plan with him. Not bombs. Not yet. Just schools, charities, mosques, research institutions. Building trust. Indoctrinating a generation. Waiting.”

He described that early period as the foundation for what later became large-scale violence.

According to Yousef, what appeared to be community-based institutions served as the organizational framework for the movement years before Hamas launched the type of coordinated attacks seen on Oct. 7, 2023.

That day, which he referred to as “Half a century of patient preparation detonated in one morning,” became the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust.

He said those same methods are appearing in the United States.

“That is not ancient history. It is the blueprint — and the same blueprint is already running on American soil,” he wrote.

Yousef pointed to campus organizations as one example.

He said, “Students for Justice in Palestine sounds noble, right? Same crowd, different mask. They don’t need to bomb buses here. They lobby, march, guilt-trip, invert reality: turn ‘Free Palestine’ into ‘Zionists are evil,’ turn Jews from fellow citizens into the enemy overnight. Sabotage a multi-trillion-dollar aerospace defense pact with Israel. Fool Americans into thinking Israel is a liability rather than the greatest American asset.”

He also described foreign funding. He wrote that Qatar sends money to American universities and mosques, describing what he called dual messaging by appointed religious leaders.

According to Yousef, “Same double mask: charity fronts, hugs for the cameras, while underneath they fund hate abroad and fracture you at home.”

As an example of political activity, Yousef cited Mamdani’s recent New York mayoral victory, saying, “Look at Zohran Mamdani — barely religious enough to qualify as a real Muslim Brother, but they backed him anyway. Why? Power flex. Proof that a tiny, disciplined minority can swing an American city. Next stop: Congress. Senate. Governors’ mansions. Anti-Israel bills multiply. Taxpayers are shamed daily for ‘funding genocide.’ The U.S.–Israel alliance bleeds.”

He warned that antisemitism is acting as a pathway to broader radicalization and noted support levels cited in polling.

He pointed to findings that as of October, at least 80% of Palestinians supported terrorism against Israel, and that as of March, almost half of young Americans supported Hamas against Israel.

He said extremist supporters are active in Dearborn, New York, and Washington, D.C., and wrote that both major political parties elevate figures who defend these movements.

“This is not invasion. This is erosion. They wait for the cracks — riots, recessions, scandals — then push harder. A weakened, divided America fighting itself is their entire goal,” Yousef wrote.

He ended his message with, “Because once the living room becomes the battlefield, it’s already too late.”


Scroll to Top