News

Kash Patel Does What Bush, Obama, and Biden Wouldn’t [WATCH]
News

Kash Patel Does What Bush, Obama, and Biden Wouldn’t [WATCH]

/

FBI Director Kash Patel said investigators uncovered evidence of financial misconduct involving the Southern Poverty Law Center after following money flows tied to the organization, responding to allegations outlined in a superseding indictment announced this week.

During an exchange with Kayleigh McEnany, the discussion focused on allegations involving individuals identified as informants and claims that donor funds were used to support activities connected to hate groups.

“As this was taking place this week, there was also a superseding indictment announced for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the SPLC,” McEnany said.

McEnany described several allegations included in the indictment.

“The allegations are shocking in it. I want to pull some of them up. These F 31 and F 32 these are informants, as the SPLC calls them. In other words, people working at hate groups,” McEnany said.

According to McEnany, investigators alleged that SPLC funds were used to reimburse materials connected to cross-burning events.

“What they found was the SPLC reimbursed for wood and fuel used in cross burning events,” McEnany said.

She also referenced allegations involving payments to an individual convicted of cross burning.

“They also secretly paid an individual who was taking donor money and who was convicted of cross burning,” McEnany said.

McEnany further highlighted allegations involving an informant who allegedly embezzled donor funds while maintaining a relationship with an SPLC employee.

“And on top of that, the SPLC had an informant who was taking in over 1.2 million in donors’ money, who was dating an employee at SPLC while raising funds for the hate group, this is astonishing. You guys found this. This has been going on for years,” McEnany said.

Patel said investigators focused on tracing financial transactions rather than building a case around predetermined conclusions.

“Look, we did something that other administrations refused to do. We followed the money, and Kaylee, you know why we follow the money? Because money doesn’t lie, and we don’t reverse engineer these investigations and prosecutions,” Patel said.

Patel said the investigation followed financial records connected to the organization and led to evidence presented to a grand jury.

“We follow the money, we followed it through the SPLC,” Patel said.

Patel also criticized media coverage of the investigation, saying some outlets objected to federal scrutiny of the organization.

“And just think of the irony here, and Kaylee, you know this better than anyone else. The mainstream media exploded on us when we dared to go after, quote unquote, the SPLC and the saviors of civil liberties,” Patel said.

Patel argued that the financial evidence uncovered by investigators contradicted the organization’s public image.

“Well, look at what the money says, not what I say. Look at what the grand jury said. The money from this organization was directly funding the hate groups they were supposedly going after, like you said, paying for wood for cross burnings, paying for roads, paying for informants,” Patel said.

He alleged that the activity amounted to a broader fraud and embezzlement scheme.

“They intentionally set them into motion to then ignite these hate groups that they were supposedly defending America from, creating a huge fraud and embezzlement campaign,” Patel said.

Patel emphasized that the investigation remains ongoing and said additional scrutiny is expected.

“And these indictments and these investigations, which we are speaking through publicly, are very much in the beginning stages. We’re going to continue this investigation,” Patel said.

Patel concluded by saying that anyone found to have engaged in criminal activity would be held accountable.

“And know everyone that was involved in this offensive conduct, criminal conduct, is going to be brought to justice, because we’re going to follow the money, and the money never lies. And that’s what pisses off the American mainstream media the most. It’s because we caught them at their epicenter of fraud and deceit when they told the American public they were supposedly standing up for minorities and racial division,” Patel said.

WATCH:

McDonald’s Rolls Out AI Order Takers in Drive Thru Test Stores [WATCH]
News

McDonald’s Rolls Out AI Order Takers in Drive Thru Test Stores [WATCH]

/

McDonalds is taking another step into the corporate future with artificial intelligence now beginning to take drive thru orders.

The fast-food giant is experimenting with a brand-new automated voice system designed to replace human employees at the speaker.

The company is openly testing the technology at a handful of locations and boasts that it has already processed more than one million transactions.

According to a statement from the company, the AI program achieved an impressive 90 percent success rate in taking orders without needing a human to step in.

For a corporation looking to cut costs and speed up service, that number sounds like a dream.

For employees already stretched thin and concerned about job security, it probably feels more like a warning siren.

The testing is currently running at five McDonald’s drive-thru locations.

The company has not said exactly where, but insiders note that major cities have been the early proving grounds for automation trials.

It is little surprise, since urban locations tend to have the highest labor costs and the biggest push from activists demanding wage hikes.

Every time government policy or union pressure drives up the cost of employing actual workers, corporations answer by investing in machines.

While McDonald’s promotes this as innovation, it is just as much a reaction to progressive economic policy.

When the left insists on a fifteen-dollar minimum wage, businesses look for ways to make the math work. AI never needs a paycheck, a lunch break, or a day off.

Executives claim the new system is designed to improve efficiency and accuracy.

However, customers may be forgiven for wondering whether a robot can handle the nuance of a complex order.

One can imagine the chaos of a family rolling up at dinner time while a synthetic voice tries to decipher who wanted extra pickles and who asked for a straw.

Despite those concerns, McDonalds is already reporting positive data.

A 90 percent accuracy rate means only one in ten orders still requires a human to intervene.

For a pilot program, that is impressive.

But for anyone who prefers a friendly voice with their morning coffee, the future may feel a bit colder.

AI in customer service is not new, but it is accelerating quickly.

From corporate call centers to fast food counters, machines are replacing human interaction piece by piece.

The promise is always convenience and consistency.

The quiet reality is fewer entry level jobs for young workers and fewer personal connections in everyday life.

Critics are already sounding alarms about what this means for the workforce.

Entry level service jobs have long been a gateway for students, retirees, and those needing flexible hours. As automation expands, those opportunities begin to shrink.

It is not a coincidence that the companies most eager for automation are also the ones that face the heaviest pressure from the political left on wage and staffing issues.

Still, McDonalds is framing this as forward thinking.

Company leaders see a chance to modernize and stay competitive as tech savvy generations expect faster service.

There is also the public relations spin of embracing artificial intelligence as part of a broader innovation strategy.

They talk about “efficiency” and “user experience,” but they do not mention the workers being replaced by algorithms.

The drive thru experience has long been an American cultural ritual.

For decades, McDonalds symbolized quick service and cheerful simplicity.

Now, instead of a smiling local teenager, customers are likely to be greeted by a digital voice powered by code.

It is progress in the corporate sense of the word, not necessarily in the human one.

WATCH:

While the company celebrates its technical milestone, customers and employees alike are left to wonder what happens next.

Will every location soon adopt this technology?

Will McDonalds expect diners to embrace robot service as the new normal?

The test program’s early success suggests that full rollout may only be a matter of time.

The message is clear.

When government regulations, activist wage demands, and rising costs collide, the consequence is not just higher prices.

It is the replacement of people by machines.

McDonalds is proudly showing the nation what that future looks like from behind the glowing menu board.

Talarico Scrambles To Convince Texans He Eats Meat After Old Vegan Pledge Resurfaces [WATCH]
News

Talarico Scrambles To Convince Texans He Eats Meat After Old Vegan Pledge Resurfaces [WATCH]

/

Democrat Senate hopeful James Talarico is sweating through an image crisis that could only happen to a left-wing true believer running in Texas.

The Austin area progressive, now the party’s nominee for the United States Senate, has found himself in an awkward position after his own past campaign video resurfaced, revealing his public pride in having run what he called a “meat-free” campaign.

In the clip from 2022, Talarico declared that cutting meat consumption was “existential” for humanity.

WATCH:

That did not sit well with voters in the state that practically defines barbecue and boasts the largest cattle population in America.

After the footage went viral, the Democrats’ team went into full damage control, scrambling to hide any trace of his old vegan crusade.

Talarico’s strategists know they are stuck with a candidate who once bragged about promoting vegan products and now must sell himself as a regular guy who appreciates brisket and ribs.

With the general election looming and Attorney General Ken Paxton standing in his path, Democrats appear to see this as a five-alarm political emergency.

Talarico has spent the past week bouncing from one campaign appearance to another in what looks a lot like a culinary redemption tour.

His most widely mocked stunt came when he scheduled a photo-friendly stop outside a Texas barbecue restaurant.

One reporter covering the appearance said the candidate “wanted us to see him eat BBQ inside” as he performed for the cameras.

It was less of a meal than a media survival strategy.

Political observers could not help but laugh at the spectacle of a liberal activist forcing down pulled pork in front of a crowd just to disprove lingering questions about his dietary habits.

It all has the desperation of a candidate who knows his original message is political cyanide in a state famous for beef.

Even liberal outlets have admitted the effort looks clumsy, with one writer noting that the more Talarico tries to prove he is not vegan, the more voters think about the fact that he once was.

The controversy grew after social media users began to repost clips from his earlier campaign in which Talarico celebrated what he called “a plant based movement that will change the world.”

He also claimed that meat consumption was tied to climate catastrophe.

Republicans immediately pounced, labeling Talarico a textbook example of out of touch liberal elitism.

Many pointed out that anyone preaching against meat in Texas is a politician begging to lose.

Talarico’s allies have tried to change the narrative by attacking his critics instead of defending his record.

His campaign spokesperson accused conservatives of pushing “baseless distractions” and said Talarico’s focus is on “working families, not food fights.”

WATCH:

The problem for them is that images of the candidate preaching vegan virtue and then scarfing ribs for show have already burned into voters’ minds.

In politics, authenticity counts more than talking points, and this fiasco makes Talarico look like anything but authentic.

Even some Democrats privately admit the optics are terrible.

Running on green energy and gender politics is one thing, they note, but telling Texans to eat tofu instead of steak is political suicide.

Many remember how candidate Beto O’Rourke became a national punchline for his liberal posturing, and they now fear Talarico may become the sequel that no one asked for.

For a party struggling to connect with rural voters, this kind of imagery is the last thing they needed.

The broader embarrassment also hints at the growing divide inside the Democratic Party itself.

Urban progressives treat every lifestyle choice like a moral crusade, while everyday Americans simply want politicians who understand their culture.

The fact that a Senate candidate even has to stage a public meat eating event shows how far removed the left has drifted from the people it claims to represent.

Meanwhile, Republicans are relishing the show.

Texas conservatives have been sharing side by side clips of Talarico’s vegan sermon next to his new barbecue act.

They are already preparing campaign ads highlighting what they call the “phony Texan” image Democrats are trying to construct.

It is the perfect storm of hypocrisy and comedy rolled into one.

Some commentators have compared the drama to John Kerry’s infamous hunting photo years ago when he clumsily tried to prove his rugged side.

Voters can smell insincerity from miles away, and once that impression takes root, no amount of brisket can fix it.

By the time election day arrives, Talarico’s most famous political moment may not be a speech or a policy plan but a desperate plate of barbecue.

Texas voters have seen plenty of political wannabes roll through the state trying to wear cowboy boots and talk about freedom.

Few have been quite as willing to reinvent themselves overnight as James Talarico.

His journey from vegan virtue signaler to self declared carnivore is the kind of flip flop that defines the modern Democratic Party.

For Texans who value authenticity and tradition, this episode speaks louder than any campaign slogan ever could.

Teen Takeover Chaos Forces Ohio Church to Cancel Festival After Massive Brawls and 11 Arrests [WATCH]
News

Teen Takeover Chaos Forces Ohio Church to Cancel Festival After Massive Brawls and 11 Arrests [WATCH]

/

A church festival in Columbus, Ohio turned into a nightmare Friday evening when hundreds of teenagers flooded the grounds, leading to violent fights, vandalism, and theft that ended with police making 11 arrests.

What was meant to be a wholesome community event hosted by St. Catharine Catholic Church quickly descended into chaos that local officials described as completely unacceptable.

Videos circulating online show a mob of teenagers cheering and recording as multiple fights erupted on church property.

In one clip, two young women can be seen trading punches while onlookers egged them on instead of trying to intervene or call for help.

Police officers rushed to the scene to separate those involved, while the crowd continued to jeer and record the confrontation on their phones.

Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther tried to strike a serious tone after the incident, calling the behavior “unacceptable” and saying that neighborhood events should be family-friendly.

But the statement did little to calm residents who were stunned that such a violent disturbance could break out at a church gathering.

Bexley Mayor Ben Kessler said several local businesses also suffered “criminal mischief” during the same time period.

One young attendee bravely spoke out against the behavior, saying she was embarrassed by what happened.

“As a teen, I am really embarrassed that you guys are out here acting like this,” she said.

“We came out here to have fun. We can never do anything right. You guys always act up, and this is completely embarrassing.”

Her words captured what many in the community were thinking as they watched what should have been a safe Friday night event turn into a small riot.

WATCH:

After the disaster, St. Catharine Catholic Church announced it was canceling the rest of FunFest 2026, apologizing to neighbors and parishioners.

The church released a statement saying, “The safety and well-being of our parishioners and surrounding community must always remain our highest priority.”

The parish also expressed gratitude that no one had been seriously hurt.

According to police, the violence began around 7 p.m., with reports of large fights breaking out among groups of teens.

Witnesses claimed to hear possible gunshots, though police later confirmed there was no evidence of a firearm.

As the chaos spread, reports came in of teens robbing a nearby CVS and vandalizing property, including destruction to a display of watermelons outside a local grocery store.

Bexley Mayor Kessler said between 500 and 800 teenagers swarmed the event, though he stressed most were not violent.

Still, the sheer size of the crowd overwhelmed security, with over 100 police cruisers eventually responding from both Columbus and Bexley departments to regain order.

Officers were forced to shut down the event entirely, leading to a messy dispersal as young people scrambled for rides home and traffic clogged surrounding streets.

Kessler later posted on social media that the city immediately closed the event once the brawls erupted.

He acknowledged that the closure created additional confusion as families and teens tried to leave all at once.

Crime reports continued to pour in during the same timeframe, including theft and vandalism.

Authorities are still investigating how the mob gathered so quickly and what role social media might have played in spreading word of the so-called “teen takeover.”

Residents expressed frustration that a peaceful community was suddenly flooded with violence.

Many blamed weak discipline and a culture that glorifies chaos on social media.

Others pointed out that law enforcement is stretched thin and often limited in their ability to respond before these mobs grow out of control.

The church’s cancellation was met with both sadness and relief as people recognized safety had to come first.

The city of Columbus has not given specifics about future measures, but community leaders are calling for tighter security and limits on unaccompanied minors at future events.

Parents across the area have also been urged to monitor their children’s activities more closely, especially as so-called teen takeover events have grown more common across the country in recent months.

The disturbing trend of large youth mobs disrupting public events has spread to numerous cities.

Left-leaning leaders often tiptoe around the issue, focusing on “community understanding” instead of law enforcement.

But ordinary citizens can see the truth. These incidents reflect a breakdown of respect, accountability, and the basic moral standards that once kept public gatherings peaceful.

For now, the focus remains on restoring order and rebuilding trust in the community.

St. Catharine Church says it is praying for everyone affected and remains thankful no one suffered major injuries.

Still, neighbors are left wondering how long their peace will last before another social media flash mob decides to turn a local church fundraiser into yet another scene of mayhem.

‘F**k You, First of All’: Boebert Blasts Reporter Over Affair with Thomas Massie Allegation [WATCH]
News

‘F**k You, First of All’: Boebert Blasts Reporter Over Affair with Thomas Massie Allegation [WATCH]

/

Rep Lauren Boebert has never been shy about saying exactly what is on her mind, and her latest response to a nosy reporter proved it again.

As she exited the Capitol, a Fox News Digital reporter asked about rumors tying her name to Rep Thomas Massie, a Kentucky congressman and recurring critic of Donald Trump.

Boebert’s answer could not have been clearer.

“Fuck you, first of all,” Boebert snapped before walking on, in footage that has since exploded online.

The reporter’s question came after a conversation about President Trump’s ongoing campaign to push out weak Republicans who undercut his agenda.

The Colorado congresswoman had been discussing Massie’s failed primary and how Trump’s endorsements have reshaped the party’s future.

“I think most of the folks that have lost their primaries, they were backfiring on the GOP agenda, Cassidy, Cornyn,” Boebert said.

“I mean, obviously Thomas Massie is the only one that I’m a little sad about.”

Everything changed once the reporter decided to pivot the discussion toward tabloid territory. That is when the fiery exchange began.

The question that drew Boebert’s blunt remark referenced allegations from Cynthia West, a former congressional staffer who previously worked for Rep Victoria Spartz of Indiana.

West claimed that Massie bragged about a sexual encounter with Boebert not long after his wife’s death.

She also accused Massie of trying to buy her silence with a five thousand dollar offer to drop a wrongful termination lawsuit against Spartz, who has been described as an ally of Massie.

Those accusations surfaced just a week before Kentucky voters sent Massie packing in the May 19 Republican primary, a result that some observers credited to Trump’s open campaign against him.

The president had labeled Massie “the worst Republican congressman in history,” a title that clearly stuck in the minds of primary voters.

But Boebert was not willing to indulge what she dismissed as garbage.

“If you’re gonna bring me into this, like, the sexist stuff is like out of control. So there’s your clickbait that you were looking for,” she told the reporter.

WATCH:

Her sharp refusal reflects her growing frustration with the kind of character attacks that have become routine for outspoken conservative women.

Instead of addressing policy or voting records, the left and many in the media seem to fixate on gossip, innuendo, and personal smears.

The congresswoman made it clear that she has no patience for questions about the private behavior of others.

“I don’t want to talk about anybody’s exes and their crazy shit that they do,” Boebert said as she walked away, putting an end to the exchange.

Video of the moment quickly spread across social media, earning both applause from supporters who admire her willingness to fight back and outrage from critics who claimed she should have handled it differently.

But to many conservatives, Boebert’s defiance only highlighted the double standard in the press.

A Republican woman who pushes back is labeled “unhinged,” while Democrats who lash out at reporters are praised for “speaking their truth.”

The controversy surrounding Massie has only added to the story’s intensity.

West’s claims have not been substantiated by evidence, and neither Boebert nor Massie has confirmed anything of the kind.

For Boebert, the entire episode seems designed to distract from her record in Washington and the battles that actually matter to voters in Colorado’s Third District.

Boebert has built her brand on saying what others are too timid to say, whether she is calling out Washington insiders or challenging anti-Trump Republicans in her own ranks.

That unapologetic approach has earned her both deep loyalty from grassroots conservatives and endless attacks from political opponents who fear her authenticity.

Even in this latest dustup, Boebert’s response resonates with her base.

They see a representative who refuses to allow a sensationalist reporter to define her narrative.

In a town where too many politicians cower at controversy, she met it head-on and walked away unfazed.

Whatever one thinks about her choice of words, few can deny that Lauren Boebert speaks the language of frustration shared by millions of Americans sick of a media machine more interested in headlines than honesty.

Washington might clutch its pearls, but out in the heartland, plenty of voters probably heard her words and thought, “Finally, someone said it.”

Deranged Protester Mocks Charlie Kirk Assassination During Erika’s Turning Point USA Summit [WATCH]
News

Deranged Protester Mocks Charlie Kirk Assassination During Erika’s Turning Point USA Summit [WATCH]

/

A disturbing scene unfolded at the Turning Point USA Women’s Leadership Summit in San Antonio when a protester decided to don a grotesque papier mache mask resembling the late Charlie Kirk and re-enact his assassination.

The tasteless act targeted Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, who was hosting the event as the new CEO of the organization her husband founded.

The left-wing agitator’s repulsive stunt brought gasps from attendees and applause from fellow protesters who seemed thrilled to celebrate a conservative’s murder.

The protester collapsed to the ground while the mob shouted that Kirk “deserved to die.”

It was a spectacle so vile that it left many wondering how far the radical left will go in its hatred of anyone who stands for faith, family, and freedom.

The outrage took place outside the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter, where hundreds of young women gathered to learn leadership skills rooted in conservative values.

Video circulated on social media showing the sick display, with one man on a megaphone screaming that the conference attendees were “protecting pedophiles” and “protecting Nazis.”

This kind of rhetoric has become a signature of today’s militant left, where name calling replaces reason and violence becomes the tool of “activism.”

Inside the venue, things were no better.

A heckler interrupted Erika Kirk’s remarks, shouting that she “protects pedophiles” before being escorted out. Instead of responding with anger, Kirk displayed the grace her husband was known for.

She calmly told the woman, “It’s important to remember that happiness comes and goes, and I pray that you find it.”

WATCH:

Kirk later told attendees that moments like these remind her of her husband’s unshakable faith.

She said that duty to faithfulness gives life meaning and that even in dark times, believers must pray for their enemies.

“You pray for those that persecute you,” she told the crowd, receiving a standing ovation.

The timing of the protest made the spectacle even more chilling.

Just days before the summit, authorities arrested 26 year old Jacob Wenske for allegedly making terroristic threats against Erika Kirk and the event.

Police confirmed he is facing two felony counts connected to bomb threats that aimed to cancel the conservative conference altogether.

Even under threat, Erika Kirk refused to back down.

She forged ahead with the summit, embodying the resilience and fortitude that has made Turning Point USA a target of the left for years.

Her leadership proved that conservatives will not cower to intimidation no matter how extreme or vile their opponents become.

The protest’s shock value drew sharp condemnation online from conservative commentators and everyday Americans alike.

Many pointed out that had the victim been a left wing activist, the outrage from mainstream media and politicians would have been deafening.

Instead, the disgusting stunt was largely ignored beyond conservative news circles.

This double standard is nothing new.

The establishment media has routinely downplayed threats and violence directed at conservatives while turning minor incidents on the left into national causes.

Erika Kirk’s quiet grace and the attendees’ determination to press on showed how the conservative movement continues to overcome hatred through faith and moral strength rather than mob tactics.

Several attendees later described the atmosphere as both sorrowful and empowering.

There was sadness for the cruelty directed at Charlie’s widow, but also pride in seeing her stand tall in the face of evil.

Her husband’s vision of raising a generation of unapologetic conservatives remains alive and well, no matter how much the radical left tries to shame or silence it.

The San Antonio police maintained a heavy presence throughout the weekend to secure the event grounds.

Despite online threats and the public stunt outside, the summit concluded without further incident.

Attendees left inspired by Erika Kirk’s courage and the reminder that freedom often demands faith and fearlessness.

For many conservatives watching across the nation, the grotesque mock assassination was not just an attack on one family but a symbol of the moral decay engulfing political discourse.

What unfolded in San Antonio made clear that the hatred toward conservative voices is not diminishing.

Yet it also reminded supporters of Turning Point USA that their resolve must never waver, even when the other side reveals just how far gone its conscience truly is.

Democrat Nithya Raman Closing In On Spencer Pratt After Controversial LA Ballot Dump [WATCH]
News

Democrat Nithya Raman Closing In On Spencer Pratt After Controversial LA Ballot Dump [WATCH]

/

Another suspicious ballot drop in the Los Angeles mayor race has suddenly put far left councilwoman Nithya Raman within a single point of political outsider Spencer Pratt.

With roughly 200,000 ballots still left to be counted, Pratt’s once solid lead has almost evaporated.

Observers across California are calling out what they see as glaring irregularities, as county officials continue counting ballots that arrived long after election day.

It seems California’s mail-in voting free-for-all has once again tilted the scales in favor of Democrats.

Karen Bass, the current mayor, already secured her place in the November runoff.

The remaining question is who will join her.

Pratt, a conservative-leaning personality who stunned the political establishment with a bold campaign focused on cleaning up crime and holding corrupt city institutions accountable, was expected to hold his second-place easily.

But in the latest count, his lead has shrunk to just 7,494 votes.

Raman received a surge of late-counted votes, effectively doubling Pratt’s totals in the latest report with 23,514 new votes compared to his 10,336.

WATCH:

Just a day earlier, Pratt had been ahead by nearly 21,000 votes.

Few voters trust that such dramatic swings can happen without help from the Democrat machine that dominates Los Angeles.

Adding to the outrage is the fact that the state continues counting mail in ballots received after election day.

Critics argue this practice opens the door for manipulation since there is no clear chain of custody for ballots that trickle in well after the polls close.

It also delays results for weeks, often shifting momentum toward Democrats as new batches conveniently appear.

NBC’s Steve Kornacki even admitted what was coming during his election night coverage.

He pointed out that Pratt’s strong showing came from early ballots and in person votes, while the late remaining mail ballots would likely lean heavily toward the Democrats.

In his own words, those ballots could make up as much as a third of the total vote.

WATCH:

What a coincidence that every late arriving batch seems to break almost entirely for the left.

Federal prosecutors may finally be taking notice.

First Assistant US Attorney Bill Essayli announced that his office is now engaged in multiple election fraud investigations alongside the FBI.

On Friday he even posted a dedicated email tip line, urging Californians to report suspicious activities related to the vote count.

Assistant US Attorney Robert Renner was also spotted at the Los Angeles ballot processing center observing operations.

Spencer Pratt publicly commented on the situation, expressing disbelief at how votes are being handled and counted.

He demanded transparency, echoing growing frustration across the state. Many Californians are tired of being told to trust a process that seems designed to delay, confuse, and conveniently benefit one side.

California gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, who has earned a wide following as a reformer and a Trump endorsed Republican, also ripped into the state’s broken system.

He called the current mail in voting scheme “absolutely shameful for our state” and said California had become a “national and international laughing stock.”

He noted that India, a nation of over a billion people, can count 640 million votes in a single day, yet California cannot count less than 10 million in a month.

Hilton vowed to end limitless mail voting, reinstate a strict requirement that ballots arrive by election day, and allow early counting of verified mail votes so that totals can be reported swiftly and accurately.

It was a common sense proposal that quickly gained traction among conservatives who are fed up with the endless waiting games and mysterious late ballot dumps that always seem to break left.

What is happening in Los Angeles is being watched closely nationwide.

The city has become a symbol of what unchecked progressive governance produces: rising crime, homelessness, skyrocketing costs, and now election chaos.

Many voters who crossed party lines to back Pratt are openly questioning whether their vote even counts in a jurisdiction where the system seems rigged from start to finish.

The Gateway Pundit has been covering these suspicious developments with on the ground reports and data analysis.

For nearly two decades the outlet has exposed bureaucratic misconduct and collapsing faith in the process.

As legacy media outlets in California shrug off the irregularities, independent reporters continue to dig up what establishment journalists refuse to touch.

Whether Pratt holds onto his runoff spot or becomes yet another victim of late ballot manipulation remains to be seen.

One thing is certain, trust in California’s elections is at rock bottom, and each suspicious ballot dump only deepens the skepticism.

The people of Los Angeles deserve better than a system stacked in favor of the Democrat ruling class.

Trump Drops the Mic, Crushes it as He Walks Out Of Fiery, Crooked NBC Interview [WATCH]
News

Trump Drops the Mic, Crushes it as He Walks Out Of Fiery, Crooked NBC Interview [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump abruptly ended a tense interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker on Sunday after he accused major networks of being crooked and tired of their one-sided coverage.

The testy exchange unfolded during a taping of Meet the Press in Wisconsin, where Trump pressed his case on election integrity, the weaponization of government, and what he described as the corrupt behavior of mainstream journalists.

Welker repeatedly interrupted Trump and pushed back on his statements about the 2020 election, vote counting in California, and his proposed 1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund.

The interview started firm but professional, then quickly spiraled into confrontation as Trump refused to yield to Welker’s combative tone.

“You’re a one sided crooked network,” Trump told Welker before abruptly ending the interview.

“Sorry. Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough. Thank you, darling. Have a good time.”

The exchange began to disintegrate when Welker questioned whether Trump was abandoning the anti-weaponization fund proposal.

The President reminded her that Americans had been harmed by the Biden administration’s misuse of power, and he vowed to keep fighting for those victims.

“People have been hurt so badly by radical left lunatics that worked for the Biden administration and Sleepy Joe,” Trump said.

“They’re vicious. They’re violent, what they did to people. And of course, they went after me more than anybody else.”

Despite those remarks, Welker pressed on, asking point blank if Trump was backing off the fund.

Trump clarified that he still supported the concept and many Republicans agreed with him, but that it required approval to move forward.

“If it was up to me, I’d pay them the kind of money that they deserve,” he said.

“So me, personally, I think the weaponization fund is a great idea, and so do many other Republicans. You have to get it approved.”

The NBC host then turned the focus back to Trump’s election fraud claims, challenging him to produce evidence.

Trump fired back that the media had ignored overwhelming proof and that the networks themselves were part of the cover up.

“There’s a lot of evidence,” he insisted.

“Listen to me. There’s tremendous evidence. There’s nothing but evidence.”

Tensions escalated as Trump connected his allegations of fraud to the drawn-out vote counting in California, which often takes weeks to finalize results.

“The election was rigged,” he said.

“It was a dirty election. And it’s happening again right now in California.”

At that point, Trump let loose on what he called the “crooked press,” declaring that journalists had destroyed American trust.

“Your elections are crooked, and you’re crooked, and Meet the Press is crooked. And so is ABC and CBS and CNN,” Trump told a visibly flustered Welker.

The NBC host tried to salvage the conversation, reminding Trump that her crew had traveled to Wisconsin specifically for the sit-down.

“Mr. President, please, I traveled all the way to Wisconsin,” she pleaded.

But Trump waved her off, saying, “I sat in the rain with you for an hour, on and off in the rain, and I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press because a country can never be great with a dishonest press.”

WATCH:

Trump’s refusal to tolerate the hostile questioning drew sharp contrasts with how Democrats are usually treated on similar programs.

While left-wing politicians get soft interviews filled with nods and safe questions, Trump’s sit-down once again showcased how aggressively the corporate press goes after conservatives.

It was the latest clash in Trump’s long battle with mainstream media, which he has repeatedly described as the enemy of the people.

NBC had apparently hoped to pin the president into backtracking or disowning parts of his agenda, but Trump walked out on his own terms, leaving no doubt about who was really in control of the narrative.

Conservatives watching the interview saw it as a textbook example of media bias.

For many, Welker’s tone and constant interruptions reflected the exact arrogance that has driven public trust in journalism to historic lows.

Even some neutral commentators noted that Welker’s tone came across as prosecutorial rather than conversational.

Trump’s feud with the political press shows no sign of cooling.

He continues to hammer both the mainstream media and the Biden administration for what he calls a coordinated campaign to silence dissent, spin narratives, and protect the ruling class.

His Wisconsin exchange with Welker may have been brief, but for millions of Americans fed up with the media, it was another glimpse of a man unwilling to bow to the establishment.

House Committee Votes to Restore ‘Department of War’ and Reinstate Base Names
News

House Committee Votes to Restore ‘Department of War’ and Reinstate Base Names

/

=In a charged late-night session that blended revisionist politics with a dash of common sense, the House Armed Services Committee narrowly voted to reinstate the Naming Commission’s recommendations and to officially rename the Pentagon’s bureaucracy to its original and far more honest title: the Department of War.

The amendment, introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas, passed alongside a separate measure from Democrat Marilyn Strickland of Washington that reimposes woke-era base renamings.

The vote split nearly down the middle, 29 to 27, exposing a sharp divide over whether America should continue erasing its own history or start reclaiming the strength and symbolism of the Armed Forces.

Strickland argued that President Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth ignored Congress by revising base names to honor new heroes with the same last names as former Confederate officers.

The Trump administration, however, maintained that honoring modern Medal of Honor recipients like Fitz Lee—an African American Buffalo Soldier—was a far better reflection of the true American spirit than anything concocted by D.C.’s cultural commissars.

“The administration used the same stunt the commission rejected—finding new service members that share the same last name as the Confederate traitors,” Strickland claimed, airing grievances that somehow honoring heroic troops is offensive.

A few Republicans, including Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, threw their support behind Strickland’s measure. Bacon said he was following the precedent set in 2020 when Democrats and Republicans jointly pushed through the original renaming legislation, overriding Trump’s veto.

“We did it right then, and the Secretary came in here and put his thumb in our eye,” Bacon said, suggesting that President Trump’s corrective actions wounded the committee’s pride more than the nation’s heritage.

On the other side, conservatives pushed back hard against what they called historical purging.

Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas reminded his colleagues that judging centuries-old figures through the moral lens of modern politics is foolish and destructive. “Are we going to rename this city next? Where does it end?” Fallon asked pointedly.

Rep. John McGuire of Virginia sided with Trump and Hegseth, calling their approach a “reasonable balance.” McGuire underscored that America’s military tradition must face its history honestly, not erase it. “Our history should be taught, not erased,” he said.

Strickland’s amendment revives all the commission’s politically correct designations—Fort Liberty for Fort Bragg, Fort Cavazos for Fort Hood, Fort Moore for Fort Benning, and so on—highlighting how bureaucrats believe new names can somehow cleanse history’s complexity.

The measure also renames Fort Gordon after Medal of Honor recipients Master Sgt. Gary Gordon and Sgt. First Class Randall Shughart, heroes of Mogadishu.

While Democrats lauded the symbolic nature of these changes, the bigger story came with Rep. Ronny Jackson’s bold amendment to officially rename the Pentagon’s sprawling bureaucracy as the Department of War.

“This name reflects the determination and resolve of our brave men and women of the U.S. military who aggressively fight to secure our national interests,” Jackson said. “Our military does much more than defend the homeland.”

Jackson’s measure is more than semantics—it restores honesty to the language of national defense. America does not maintain a military to “defend feelings.”

It fights wars, deters enemies, and destroys threats. President Trump recognized that when he issued an executive order in 2025 to bring back the title Department of War, signaling that peace comes through strength, not appeasement.

Predictably, the Left scoffed. Committee ranking member Adam Smith dismissed the change as “making no frickin’ difference whatsoever” and complained about the supposed expense of updating signage and letterheads. Typical Beltway logic—more concerned about office stationery than strategic clarity.

Historically, the Department of War was created in 1789 by President George Washington and existed until 1947 when President Harry Truman, in the name of bureaucratic consolidation, replaced it with “Defense.” Ever since, America’s warfighting spirit has been papered over with buzzwords and acronyms, while adversaries from Russia to China have faced no such identity crisis.

The committee also tackled another policy—banning hate symbols such as swastikas and nooses across all branches, including tattoos and personal equipment.

Conservatives generally supported that move as long as it didn’t morph into yet another social engineering crusade.

Officials clarified that the new policy aims to reaffirm, not dilute, the moral integrity of the military community.

Coast Guard representatives even had to reassert last year that classifying Nazi imagery as “potentially divisive” was a misunderstanding. Welcome to 2024, where bureaucrats need memos to explain that Nazi symbols are bad.

In the end, the night encapsulated everything about Congress in the Trump era—Democrats obsessed with virtue signaling, establishment Republicans torn between principle and optics, and sharp conservatives pushing a return to unapologetic American resolve.

Whether or not the full Congress approves these amendments, the message is clear: the Trump-Hegseth vision of a stronger, prouder, and more honest military identity is taking hold.

The words “Department of War” are back on Capitol Hill’s lips—and that alone signals America is done pretending that peace comes cheap.

Pentagon Tech Chief Warns AI Firms: Stop Ignoring Weaponization Risks
News

Pentagon Tech Chief Warns AI Firms: Stop Ignoring Weaponization Risks

/

America’s top tech leader in the War Department is letting Silicon Valley know it’s time to get serious about national security.

Emil Michael, the undersecretary for research and engineering, didn’t mince words when he said AI companies have a duty to stop pretending their creations are neutral tools.

Some of these systems, he warned, are potential “cyber weapons” — and companies can’t keep shrugging off the responsibility that comes with unleashing them.

Speaking at the Washington Post’s inaugural Building America Summit, Michael made clear that the Pentagon won’t sit back while private tech firms chase profits and ignore the national security consequences of their innovations.

He pointed directly at Anthropic’s new AI system, named Mythos, as one of those risky models sitting at the edge between innovation and catastrophe.

“These companies have a responsibility to ensure that their weapons, what they call weaponization potential of these models, to be careful and thoughtful about what they’re doing,” Michael said.

His point: AI isn’t just about fun apps or clever chatbots — it’s already part of the global battlefield, whether companies like it or not.

His comments come in the wake of President Donald Trump’s latest executive order on AI, which pushes innovation while reminding the tech giants that national defense takes precedence over their corporate virtue signaling.

The order creates a new “AI cybersecurity clearinghouse” where AI companies can voluntarily let the government scan their software for vulnerabilities before release. It’s voluntary, for now — but the message is loud and clear.

Michael noted that firms with “weaponization capability” should allow government experts to spend 30 days examining their systems.

Such evaluation could expose security gaps in critical U.S. infrastructure like power grids, water systems, and hospitals — the exact places America’s enemies would target if those AI tools fell into the wrong hands.

“I think they’ve all agreed and think it’s a good idea to do that,” Michael explained.

“I give all the companies, OpenAI, even Anthropic, and Google credit for sort of agreeing that was a smart thing to do.” It’s a rare thing these days to see massive tech players actually align with the Pentagon’s sense of duty — but apparently even Silicon Valley knows it can’t afford to get on the wrong side of President Trump’s national security revival.

One company that remains a thorn in the Pentagon’s side is Anthropic. The firm has been left out of several major defense partnerships after refusing to allow unrestricted access to its Claude models for military applications.

Anthropic even sued the Trump administration after being labeled a supply chain risk — a move that only deepened the perception that the company prioritizes ideology over American security.

Now, Anthropic’s new product, Mythos, is drawing fire from cybersecurity experts who see it as a hacker’s dream tool.

The company itself bragged that the system can “find ways to exploit vulnerabilities” in software, essentially advertising the fact that their model can be weaponized by any adversary with a keyboard.

Critics inside the intelligence and defense communities are warning that selling such technology without guardrails is an open invitation to foreign cyberattacks.

Meanwhile, the War Department isn’t sitting idle. AI has already been deeply integrated across the department’s operations, from intelligence analysis to logistics optimization.

“Six months ago, only about 80,000 federal employees were AI users each month. Now, there are 1.5 million,” Michael said. The government, he added, has “raced” to push AI deeper into daily workflows to gain major advantages in efficiency, intelligence, and warfighting readiness.

By year’s end, Michael expects that three-quarters of the entire department will be using AI systems in their duties. “We’ve integrated all the biggest AI companies over the last few months,” he said, adding that this surge in adoption means “we’re, in one year, going to make progress more than the five years before it.”

The push marks another step in President Trump’s ongoing effort to accelerate modernization inside America’s national security infrastructure.

Under War Secretary Pete Hegseth and leaders like Michael, the Department of War is rebuilding a culture that emphasizes strength through innovation — not bureaucratic red tape. The goal isn’t just technological advancement; it’s deterrence through superiority.

Michael’s call for corporate accountability in AI development reflects a broader understanding that warfare now extends far beyond physical battlefields.

Cyber capabilities, machine learning, and automation are now weapons of equal — if not greater — strategic value. If private companies aren’t responsible, the consequences could be disastrous, both for them and for the nation they rely on to keep them free to operate.

The Pentagon’s warning should not be ignored. The next generation of American defense will depend on how well AI is harnessed — and how securely it’s built.

The companies that take that duty seriously will find themselves on the winning team. Those that don’t may find themselves locked out of the future of national defense entirely.


Scroll to Top