News

Johnson and Shirley Expose Massive Minnesota Fraud Funnel Sending Tax Dollars to Somali Terrorists [WATCH]
News

Johnson and Shirley Expose Massive Minnesota Fraud Funnel Sending Tax Dollars to Somali Terrorists [WATCH]

/

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and investigative journalist Nick Shirley have pulled back the curtain on a shocking operation that funneled millions of taxpayer dollars from Minnesota straight into the hands of Islamic terrorists in Somalia.

What began as an inquiry into government waste has now revealed a disturbing financial pipeline connecting American welfare fraud to international terrorism.

During a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on government fraud, Johnson pressed Shirley on how deep the problem really runs.

The senator noted that as much as seven hundred million dollars in cash had flowed out of the Minneapolis airport to African countries over time.

His concern was straightforward and deeply alarming, as he asked, “Have either of you gentlemen kind of investigated the foreign sourcing or an organization of a lot of this fraud? I mean, we’re opening up to foreign governments to fund their own operations.”

WATCH:

Shirley confirmed Johnson’s worst suspicions, explaining, “It’s been proven that a lot of the money in suitcases that left Minnesota went back into the hands of people inside Somalia.”

This was not a baseless claim.

Multiple reports have revealed that welfare fraud schemes in Minnesota and other blue states have been exploited not only for personal enrichment but also to finance terror groups like Al-Shabaab.

This is not just about theft of taxpayer money.

It is about the federal government’s failure to monitor how welfare dollars are distributed.

The fraud mechanisms have been so loose and unregulated that entire criminal networks have been able to manipulate the system like a personal ATM.

As Shirley pointed out, daycare fraud schemes in New York have reached such absurd levels that nobody even knows who actually owns many of the facilities collecting taxpayer checks.

The Minnesota scandal was exposed after investigators discovered that massive amounts of welfare funds were being laundered through fake or fraudulent childcare and food assistance programs.

When reporters and law enforcement began to dig deeper, the true motive behind some of these operations came to light: supporting extremist groups overseas.

One confidential source described the situation bluntly, saying, “The largest funder of Al-Shabaab is the Minnesota taxpayer.”

It is difficult to imagine a more disgraceful slap in the face to working Americans.

Citizens across the nation squeeze every dollar to pay taxes, believing their money is going toward schools, infrastructure, or national defense.

Instead, the welfare bureaucracy in one of the most liberal states has been exploited by terrorist sympathizers who view the system as a cash cow.

Meanwhile, federal agencies under left leaning state leadership have done little to stop it.

Under the Trump administration, warnings were issued to multiple states that such abuses would no longer be tolerated.

The administration even threatened to cut off federal funding for welfare programs in states that refused to tighten their fraud prevention protocols.

Predictably, some governors and state lawmakers screamed political discrimination rather than taking responsibility for their massive oversight failures.

The fact that this scandal has spiraled into potential terrorism financing raises serious questions about national security.

If hijacked welfare programs can operate freely enough to send hundreds of millions of dollars across international borders, what else is slipping through the cracks?

The federal bureaucracy has expanded endlessly, yet oversight seems weaker than ever.

Johnson’s willingness to drag this issue into the spotlight, despite predictable resistance from the political establishment and the media, demonstrates exactly why conservatives continue to trust him.

He has been relentless about chasing down the corruption that festers within the maze of Washington spending and state level welfare graft.

Every added layer of bureaucracy becomes another door for fraudsters to walk through.

Shirley’s investigative reporting has exposed what many conservatives have warned about for years.

Government programs designed under the guise of compassion and inclusion often become ripe targets for manipulation, with taxpayer money never reaching people truly in need.

When fraud rings redirect those funds to foreign extremists, the problem stops being a domestic welfare issue and becomes a matter of national defense.

The Minnesota fraud network is only one case among what many believe will turn out to be an even broader national pattern.

Johnson made it clear he intends to press for further investigations and potential policy changes.

Americans deserve to know exactly how their tax dollars are being handled, and just as importantly, where they are ultimately going.

The next time Democrats in Congress lecture about fairness and social justice, they might want to explain why money meant to feed American families has ended up bankrolling Al-Shabaab militants another continent away.

Conservatives are right to demand not just oversight but consequences for the bureaucrats who turned a blind eye while taxpayers unknowingly subsidized terrorism.

This scandal has ripped the mask off the welfare state and revealed what lies beneath when big government meets big corruption.

Dem Rep Jahana Hayes Claims Teaching Colonialism in Healthcare Is Vital for Doctors [WATCH]
News

Dem Rep Jahana Hayes Claims Teaching Colonialism in Healthcare Is Vital for Doctors [WATCH]

/

Representative Jahana Hayes of Connecticut took to the witness chair this week to defend diversity, equity, and inclusion programs inside America’s medical schools.

During a House Education and Commerce Committee hearing, she declared that teaching “colonialism in healthcare” is not optional but essential training for future physicians. In her view, diagnosing old political sins is the cure for modern disparities.

Hayes made the argument after medical school leaders from the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of California at San Francisco appeared unable to answer her question about how they teach colonialism in their medical programs.

That answer left her “incredibly disappointed.” She seemed far more concerned about ideological curriculum details than with whether doctors can competently perform surgery or diagnose illness.

She insisted that “teaching colonialism directly addresses the systemic roots of healthcare inequities.”

According to Hayes, it also “exposes how historic power structures dictate who receives quality care.”

She said that ensuring future doctors study this topic would help them identify biases in the healthcare system.

It is another reminder that for Democrats, political ideology now trumps practical training, even in critical fields like medicine.

The Congresswoman also scolded California medical deans for not promptly invoking the Black Panther Party as “central to healthcare discussions.”

WATCH:

To Hayes, a radical political group from the 1960s apparently deserves a loud place in twenty first century medical education.

One cannot help but ask what that has to do with anatomy, pathology, or pharmacology.

The hearing itself was called to investigate whether DEI programs are undermining educational standards in medical schools.

Lawmakers requested testimony from several academic leaders amid growing concern that identity politics may be reshaping admissions, instruction, and even grading practices.

Critics say these programs often elevate ideology above merit and distract students from actual science.

Federal watchdogs are paying attention.

Just last month, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division launched fifteen new investigations into medical schools to determine whether their admissions methods are illegally discriminating against applicants.

The Supreme Court’s decision against race based admissions has put universities on notice.

Medical schools, long shielded by progressive rhetoric, are now being forced into compliance.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon, who heads the Civil Rights Division, left no doubt that this Justice Department intends to act.

She said, “Many of America’s top medical schools appear more concerned about the demographics of their incoming classes than training students to succeed in the profession.”

Dhillon added that the Department will “protect American students from discriminatory and illegal preferences in admissions, especially in professions as critical as medicine, where quality of training should be the top priority.”

Her position echoes what many parents, students, and practicing physicians have been saying quietly for years.

Across the country, patients do not want doctors who can deliver political lectures.

They want doctors who can deliver babies, diagnose diseases, and save lives.

Yet far too many schools are forcing students into seminars on oppression theory rather than laboratories and clinics.

While progressives like Hayes claim that DEI reduces health disparities, evidence shows that turning medical education into a sociology class only erodes trust in the profession.

When ideology replaces rigorous scientific method, standards drop. When standards drop, patient outcomes eventually suffer.

Conservatives argue that excellence, not equity quotas, is the best path to fairness in medicine.

The spectacle of a sitting member of Congress berating deans for failing to teach colonialism reveals how entrenched the left’s new orthodoxy has become.

It is not enough to graduate competent doctors; they must also be fluent in the political catechism of the moment.

Hayes’ comments echo the far left’s obsession with labeling every institution as structurally racist.

Medicine is simply the next frontier in their march through American life.

Medical training once focused on precision, discipline, and ethics.

Today it is riddled with courses that sound more like grievance studies than clinical practice.

The House hearing exposed just how deep the ideological capture has gone inside elite schools.

Every hour spent teaching about perceived colonial structures is an hour not spent on anatomy, pharmacology, or surgical technique.

Republicans on the committee have signaled that the fight is far from over.

They intend to pursue legislative remedies that ensure merit based admissions and evidence based instruction remain the foundation of all medical schools receiving federal funds.

For now, though, Democrats like Hayes continue to defend the transformation of medicine into another arm of social activism.

Voters will have to decide whether ideology or ability should define the next generation of American doctors.

USS Sampson Accidentally Dumps 2,000 Gallons of Diesel Fuel Into Seattle Harbor
News

USS Sampson Accidentally Dumps 2,000 Gallons of Diesel Fuel Into Seattle Harbor

/

A guided missile destroyer stationed in Seattle accidentally released thousands of gallons of diesel fuel into local waters this week, prompting an urgent response from military and environmental crews.

The USS Sampson, an Arleigh Burke-class Aegis destroyer, was undergoing routine defueling operations at the Vigor Shipyard on Harbor Island when the incident occurred Monday.

According to the War Department, around 2,000 gallons of diesel escaped into Elliott Bay. Earlier estimates placed the spill at closer to 5,000 gallons, but recalculations later lowered that figure. Either way, it was a serious breach that raised eyebrows in both military and environmental circles.

Containment procedures were fortunately already in place before the spill happened.

The Navy had pre-positioned oil containment booms around the vessel — standard protocol for such work — which helped keep the contamination localized. That decision likely prevented a much broader environmental headache for the city of Seattle.

“The Navy is working with shipyard contractors and spill response partners to resolve this quickly and responsibly,” the Navy said in an official statement. Crews have been working on a 24-hour schedule to recover as much of the diesel as possible. By Tuesday evening, officials reported that most of the escaped fuel had been recovered.

A combination of three portable skimmers, a skimmer boat, and oil-absorbent pads were deployed to soak up the diesel from the surface of the harbor. The containment boom and absorbent barriers will remain in place until experts confirm that all recoverable fuel has been eliminated and the destroyer is safely moved into dry dock.

The Washington State Department of Ecology confirmed that cleanup operations are continuing in coordination with the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy environmental units. According to the department, the containment measures were functioning as expected and significantly limited the environmental damage.

However, the Coast Guard’s initial review determined that the U.S. Navy was at fault for the spill. That finding will undoubtedly be part of the investigation now underway to determine whether procedural failures or mechanical issues led to the release. It’s a reminder that even the world’s most powerful military fleet occasionally faces human and technical error.

Despite the accident, this isn’t the USS Sampson’s first brush with operational scrutiny. The destroyer had just returned to its home port of Naval Base San Diego last September after completing a deployment in the Caribbean. The ship supported U.S. Southern Command’s counter-narcotics mission before being replaced by its sister ship, the USS Stockdale.

Engineers familiar with Arleigh Burke-class destroyers point out that defueling operations can be particularly delicate due to the fuel volume and complex pumping systems involved. Even a minor equipment malfunction can lead to an unplanned discharge — and when working with thousands of gallons of diesel, “minor” isn’t the right word.

For Seattle, the incident also hit a nerve with local officials who have long complained about the risks of military and industrial operations near the city’s shoreline. Yet, as some military advocates noted, the Navy’s quick and comprehensive response to contain and recover the spill showed the professionalism embedded within the service’s operational protocols.

While environmental activists were predictably quick to criticize the Navy, those familiar with maritime operations recognized the event as an operational accident rather than systemic negligence. Given the immediate reaction and recovery efforts, the long-term environmental impact is expected to be minimal.

Officials say that once all fuel traces are cleared and inspections complete, the vessel will resume its maintenance schedule before returning to operational readiness. No injuries or security concerns were reported, and harbor traffic around Harbor Island proceeded without disruption.

The spill might not rise to the level of an international incident, but it is a blunt reminder that every operation carries risks, even in port. As investigations continue, the Navy’s transparency and rapid recovery effort will be key to reassuring both the public and Congress that the fleet holds itself accountable.

Under the leadership of War Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Department of War has placed renewed emphasis on maintenance discipline and accountability throughout the fleet. This incident will likely fuel further discussions about risk management, repair discipline, and the importance of maintaining America’s naval readiness while protecting its home waters.

Despite Seattle’s political theatrics, the reality is simple — the Navy confronted an operational error, moved fast to correct it, and is cleaning up its mess.

That’s what professional militaries do. The USS Sampson will soon be back on duty, and the mission to project American power at sea will continue, mistakes and all.

Posobiec Shreds Leftist Peddling Lies About Attempted Charlie Kirk Assassination [WATCH]
News

Posobiec Shreds Leftist Peddling Lies About Attempted Charlie Kirk Assassination [WATCH]

/

A heated exchange over the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk unfolded Tuesday night on Piers Morgan Uncensored, as commentator Jack Posobiec challenged claims made by Wajahat Ali and Brian Tyler-Cohen regarding the motive behind the killing, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The discussion came after prosecutors presented evidence in court linking Tyler Robinson to Kirk’s assassination. Robinson has been charged in the case.

During the debate, Ali argued that the available evidence suggested Robinson was politically motivated from the political right.

“Most likely, Tyler Robinson was radicalized,” Ali said. “Here is a white man with a gun; he had his own grievance, and he shot and killed Charlie Kirk.”

Ali also referenced reports that Robinson admitted responsibility for the killing and argued the incident reflected internal divisions within the conservative movement.

“This is an entire political movement in real time that is eating itself,” Ali said. “Candace Owens came from MAGA. MAGA is now turning on MAGA.”

He continued, “If there’s any self-reflection and any decency, which there isn’t, they would sit back and say, huh, maybe, just maybe, we shouldn’t have spread these insane conspiracy theories.”

Posobiec rejected that characterization, arguing that evidence presented in the investigation pointed in a different direction.

He said some media figures, including late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, had incorrectly suggested the suspect was connected to the political right while overlooking other evidence recovered during the investigation.

According to Posobiec, investigators recovered shell casings at the crime scene bearing phrases associated with the political left, including “fascist catch” and “bella ciao.”

“People who falsely claimed that it was a groyper, that it was a member of the right, Jimmy Kimmel spread that on nighttime news,” Posobiec said.

“This was big news. There was a huge push about it. This was big news. There were headlines about it. We debated it on the show.”

Posobiec argued that critics were ignoring evidence that he said suggested a left-wing political motive.

“Notice that you seem to have skipped over the radical left, which we now know absolutely was responsible for this,” Posobiec said.

“And we even knew that before we had the identification of Tyler Robinson, because we had the etchings on the bullets.”

“Hey, fascist catch. Bella Ciao, the Antifa anthem. All of that evidence was out there, but you seem to have missed it,” he added.

Ali responded by accusing Posobiec of reinforcing the point he had been making throughout the discussion.

“Yeah, so you’re literally doing what I accused you of doing,” Ali said. “So thank you for proving.”

Posobiec answered that he was relying on the available evidence.

“The courage of following the evidence?” Posobiec replied.

The debate continued as Ali argued that the controversy reflected divisions within the conservative movement.

“This is the movement that you have created, and this is the movement now that is eating itself,” Ali said.

Posobiec rejected that claim and responded by blaming political violence on individuals aligned with Ali’s political views.

“The movement that you are part of killed Charlie,” Posobiec said.

He continued, “You seem more upset about me simply being here talking than people who agree with your politics, murdering people, one at a campus, one in her own kitchen.”

Ali replied, “I’m perfectly fine condemning violent extremism on all sides.”

Brian Tyler-Cohen also participated in the discussion and argued that Kirk had been appropriately labeled a fascist based on his conduct.

The exchange highlighted sharply different interpretations of the evidence surrounding Robinson’s alleged motive and the broader political implications following Kirk’s assassination.

Robinson remains charged in the case as the legal proceedings continue.

Pentagon Launches Testosterone Check Program to Boost Warrior Readiness
News

Pentagon Launches Testosterone Check Program to Boost Warrior Readiness

/

War Secretary Pete Hegseth is once again shaking things up at the War Department, this time with a new policy aimed squarely at troop health and combat effectiveness.

Starting this year, troops aged 30 and older will undergo annual testosterone screenings as part of their routine health assessments.

The announcement came directly from Hegseth in a social media video on Wednesday, with his signature no-nonsense approach that has marked his tenure leading the nation’s military machine.

Hegseth said the new program is about giving troops every physical edge they can get in a demanding, often unforgiving profession. “We want to make sure every warfighter has the right testosterone levels to operate at your absolute best,” he declared.

Troops under 30 may also opt for the screenings voluntarily.

The move follows years of growing concern about declining testosterone levels among American men, especially those in physically and mentally taxing professions such as the armed forces.

Multiple studies since the 1990s have shown a measurable drop in testosterone among young men, signaling what some researchers describe as a generational hormonal decline.

Hegseth pointed out that this biological shift matters a great deal when it comes to maintaining an aggressive and ready fighting force. Testosterone affects everything from strength and endurance to confidence and focus—traits no nation’s military can afford to lose.

In his words, it’s about “keeping America’s edge on the battlefield and the warrior’s spirit sharp.”

The link between stress, operational tempo, and low testosterone is no secret among military doctors. Years of high stress, combat deployments, poor sleep, and mental strain have all been shown to lower testosterone levels, often compounding other health challenges faced by service members.

The Department of Veterans Affairs already offers evaluation and treatment protocols for low testosterone, including hormone replacement therapy, but the War Department’s new screening effort marks the first time the active-duty force will be systematically checked.

The initiative’s roots trace back to congressional action. In 2024, lawmakers inserted a provision into the fiscal year 2025 national defense bill mandating a detailed briefing on the military’s approach to testosterone deficiency. Many saw this as long overdue, given mounting anecdotal evidence from elite operators and career service members struggling with unexplained fatigue, emotional flatness, and reduced drive.

Special operations veterans, in particular, have been outspoken about the need for greater recognition of hormonal decline as a legitimate readiness concern. Some have even formed nonprofits and clinics catering specifically to veterans dealing with what’s now known as “Operator Syndrome.”

The term refers to a cluster of physical and psychological symptoms—many rooted in hormonal imbalance—that emerged among operators after years of extreme stress and deployment cycles.

For Hegseth, the testosterone screening initiative fits neatly into his broader philosophy of restoring strength, focus, and warrior culture to the U.S. military. Throughout his time in leadership, he’s pushed to strip away political distractions and bureaucratic nonsense, replacing them with priorities that directly enhance lethality and survivability.

“The modern battlefield is brutal and unrelenting,” Hegseth reminded viewers.

“By addressing these health markers early, we keep our troops at the leading edge of lethality and readiness—and give them the same level of support they give this nation: the absolute best.”

Unlike the defense czars of the past who obsessed over diversity quotas and woke training sessions, Hegseth’s War Department is steering hard back to fundamentals. This initiative sends a message: America’s military will no longer ignore issues that directly affect performance and combat capability.

Medical experts within and outside the armed forces note that testosterone deficits can also drive sleep issues, depression, lethargy, and poor motivation, which can quietly degrade a unit’s operational effectiveness.

By catching these issues early, Hegseth’s program could prove every bit as impactful as physical conditioning or weapons qualification when it comes to keeping troops mission-ready.

Some in the media will no doubt twist the program as “controversial,” but Hegseth’s move is arguably one of the most practical morale and readiness boosters in years.

When the commander of a special forces unit finds half his men struggling with fatigue and stress chemistry, that’s not vanity—it’s science.

The rollout of this program underscores the administration’s commitment to warrior wellness and lethality.

Under President Trump’s leadership and War Secretary Hegseth’s guidance, the military is realigning priorities toward battle readiness, masculine strength, and operational dominance—the core ingredients of victory.

In short, the Pentagon isn’t just testing testosterone levels. It’s testing whether America still has the resolve to keep its fighters strong, proud, and prepared to win.

WATCH BELOW:

Walz Doubles Down After Trump Team Deports His Pardoned Child Rapist [WATCH]
News

Walz Doubles Down After Trump Team Deports His Pardoned Child Rapist [WATCH]

/

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz defended his decision after the Trump administration deported an illegal migrant whose criminal conviction had been pardoned by the Minnesota Board of Pardons last month, prompting renewed debate over immigration enforcement and executive clemency, as reported by The New York Post.

Walz commented Tuesday after Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the legal status of Tou Lue Vang, a 42-year-old native of Laos, had been revoked before he was removed from the United States.

“Did that make us any safer? Did that make the children that are left behind any more stable?” Walz asked, according to KTTC.

He continued, “Did it improve the idea that we can’t all be judged by our worst day? And I want to be very clear, these are horrific crimes. They often are.”

The Department of Homeland Security announced Friday that Vang had been deported after his legal status was terminated.

In a statement, the White House confirmed Rubio’s action and defended the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.

“Under President Trump, criminal illegal aliens who rape children will be found, arrested, and removed—and Democrat politicians will not stand in the way,” the statement read.

According to DHS, Vang entered the United States in 1994 and was granted legal status during the Clinton administration.

In 2006, he was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a 10-year-old girl after repeated assaults that prosecutors said occurred between 2002 and 2004.

DHS said Vang later claimed during a police interview that his actions were “a cultural thing” and argued that the child victim shared responsibility for what occurred.

Following his conviction, a Department of Justice immigration judge issued a final order of removal in October 2006.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested Vang on Dec. 10, 2025. A judge in the District of Minnesota later ordered his release from ICE custody in February 2026.

On June 10, the Minnesota Board of Pardons granted Vang a pardon. The board consists of Walz, Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie E. Hudson, and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

During the pardon hearing, Vang accepted responsibility for his crime.

“What I did was wrong. It was a serious crime. She was a child,” Vang told the board.

He also appealed to the board on behalf of his family.

“If I am sent away, we lose everything. My children will lose their home, and they will lose their education. They will grow up without a father.”

According to KTTC, the victim submitted a letter stating that she had forgiven Vang for his actions.

During the hearing, Walz stated, “Just remember, both were minors,” according to the Daily Mail.

After Vang’s removal from the United States, DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis criticized the decision to pardon him.

“ICE deported Tou Vang, an illegal alien convicted child rapist. This monster repeatedly sexually assaulted a 10-year-old girl,” Bis said.

She added, “Tim Walz pardoned this sex criminal in an attempt to allow him to remain in our country.”

“These are the criminal illegal aliens he and sanctuary politicians are protecting. We will always put the safety of the American people first.”

The deportation has drawn national attention as the Trump administration continues to emphasize the removal of criminal illegal immigrants, while Walz’s comments and the Minnesota pardon have generated renewed scrutiny over the state’s clemency process.

Inmate Ran Brazen VA Scam From Behind Bars Targeting Sick Veterans and Their Families
News

Inmate Ran Brazen VA Scam From Behind Bars Targeting Sick Veterans and Their Families

/

A Washington state inmate pulled off a disgusting and deeply personal con against some of this nation’s most vulnerable heroes, using nothing more than a jail phone and a twisted sense of deceit.

Federal prosecutors say Darryl Lamont Young, 41, ran an elaborate scam from inside King County Jail, making dozens of calls to VA medical centers across the country, pretending to be a legitimate employee. His goal wasn’t patriotism or penance—it was exploitation.

Authorities confirmed that Young used these calls to trick VA staff into revealing the identities and personal details of seriously ill veterans under care, veterans who sacrificed for the flag while this con artist preyed on their suffering.

Once Young obtained the family contact information of the ailing veterans, he and his accomplice, Aqeelah Ngiesha Williams, 29, moved in for the kill. They called relatives pretending to be VA officials offering COVID-era relief payments. What they really wanted were bank details—and what they took was money meant for food, medicine, and dignity.

According to the Justice Department, Young executed this despicable plan more than 60 times between late 2021 and early 2023, ultimately stealing about $8,900. His four-day trial ended with a conviction on 14 counts of aggravated identity theft and wire fraud. Williams was found guilty on 12 similar counts.

“While they did not get a huge amount of money with this scheme, the harm they caused to those already suffering a health crisis is deserving of federal prosecution,” said U.S. Attorney Gorman in a Department of Justice statement. That’s putting it mildly.

This wasn’t some high-tech cybercrime operation. It was old-fashioned scamming, but with a twist of cold-hearted precision. Jail calls in King County are free, and the local VA medical center didn’t receive any notification that the incoming caller was an inmate. That loophole handed Young the anonymity he needed to pose as “Jason in bed control” or “Travis” in “patient registration” at the VA.

Posing as a fellow employee, Young convinced VA staff to transfer him to out-of-state hospitals, where he continued his impersonations. Those hospitals, unaware of the jail origin of the call, treated him as one of their own and complied with his requests.

As the Justice Department pointed out, Young had served in the military himself, giving him valuable insight into VA protocols and operations. This knowledge made the ruse tragically effective.

After obtaining personal details, Williams helped facilitate follow-up calls to the veterans’ family members. Together they would play the parts convincingly, promising a COVID-related “relief payment” for the sick veteran and asking for financial details to process it. Once the information was secured, they siphoned off the funds, conveniently depositing the stolen cash straight into Young’s commissary account.

What’s most infuriating is how easily bureaucratic negligence allowed an inmate to call federal medical institutions without alerting staff to the source of the call. For a government known for its surveillance excesses, it somehow failed to monitor its own sanctioned phone systems effectively.

It’s not simply the theft of dollars that disgusts—it’s the betrayal. Every veteran deserves trust, respect, and the assurance that the systems designed to care for them aren’t being weaponized by criminals hiding behind an orange jumpsuit.

Federal prosecutors got their convictions. But the underlying scandal is that it took more than a year and over 60 successful cons before the system caught up. That’s not vigilance, it’s complacency.

One can’t help but wonder what Secretary of War Pete Hegseth—himself a fierce advocate for accountability inside veterans’ systems—thinks of these embarrassing operational failures. If Washington wants to stop scams like this, it should start by cutting through layers of red tape and demanding real accountability across the War Department’s cooperative agencies.

The betrayal of America’s sick and wounded warriors is the lowest of the low, but this case shows what’s possible when unchecked access meets government incompetence. It should serve as a wake-up call that vigilance is not optional; it’s a duty.

As Young awaits his final sentencing, veterans and their families are left asking the same question they’ve been asking for years: who’s really watching the guardians?

Schiff Tries to Grill AG Nominee Todd Blanche and Gets Schooled on Live TV [WATCH]
News

Schiff Tries to Grill AG Nominee Todd Blanche and Gets Schooled on Live TV [WATCH]

/

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche forcefully defended his record Wednesday during a Senate confirmation hearing after Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., questioned his handling of matters related to former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s classified documents investigation, as reported by Red State.

The exchange occurred during Blanche’s appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee as lawmakers considered his nomination to serve as attorney general.

Blanche has served as acting attorney general since April, following the departure of Pam Bondi.

One of the hearing’s most contentious moments came when Schiff questioned Blanche about Volume II of former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, which concerns the classified documents investigation involving President Donald Trump.

Schiff argued that Blanche should have supported releasing the report and suggested that withholding it presented a conflict of interest because Blanche had previously represented Trump.

“You’ve also refused to release Volume II of the Special Counsel’s report. That was an investigation into the Mar-a-Lago documents case. How is that not an abundant conflict of interest? Refusing to release to the public an investigative report of an investigation into your client?” Schiff asked.

Blanche began responding by noting that decisions regarding the report had involved the courts.

“I am not a judge, a federal judge —”

Schiff interrupted before Blanche could finish.

“No, no, no, no, no. The department’s position under you, Mr. Blanche, the department’s position under you, Mr. Blanche, was to not release the report. But if you went into court asking them to release it, it would be released by now. So how is that not a patent conflict of interest?”

Blanche rejected Schiff’s characterization of the timeline, stating that the decisions Schiff referenced occurred before Blanche assumed his current position.

“What you’re saying happens to not be true. I did not do that. What you’re talking about happened before.”

Schiff then asked Blanche whether he supported releasing Volume II of the report.

“So do you support the release of Volume II?”

Blanche responded that he did not, while also emphasizing that he had recused himself from matters involving the case.

“No, I don’t — but I’m recused and had nothing to do with that case. You can’t accuse me of violating my ethical rules and then lie about what I did.”

The classified documents report became the subject of multiple court proceedings after U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon blocked its release on several occasions.

The hearing also included broader disagreements between Schiff and Blanche over Justice Department personnel decisions and actions taken by the Trump administration.

According to the hearing, the two exchanged views on the dismissal of federal prosecutors, as well as President Donald Trump’s pardons of numerous January 6 defendants.

Blanche defended his conduct throughout the hearing and repeatedly disputed Schiff’s assertions regarding his involvement in decisions surrounding the classified documents investigation.

The exchange marked one of several heated moments during Wednesday’s confirmation hearing, as Democratic senators pressed Blanche on his prior legal representation of Trump and his leadership of the Justice Department.

Blanche maintained that ethical rules required him to recuse himself from matters involving his former client and argued that Schiff’s accusations incorrectly attributed actions to him that occurred before he became acting attorney general.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is continuing its consideration of Blanche’s nomination as lawmakers weigh whether to advance him for a full Senate confirmation vote.

Canadian Karen Arrested After Slapping Teen Wearing Trump and ICE Pants on Jersey Boardwalk [WATCH]
News

Canadian Karen Arrested After Slapping Teen Wearing Trump and ICE Pants on Jersey Boardwalk [WATCH]

/

A Canadian woman living in New Jersey is facing serious charges after she allegedly attacked a teenage girl simply for wearing patriotic clothing featuring the names Trump and ICE.

The incident unfolded on the Point Pleasant Beach boardwalk during the Fourth of July weekend, and now the alleged assailant has found herself behind bars and in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Authorities identified the woman as Kaitlyn E. Tracey, age thirty three, who was reportedly filming a group of teens before confronting them over their clothing choices.

According to a report from NJ.com, Tracey allegedly slapped the victim across her face and body, an act that police described as unprovoked and aggressive.

The patriotic messaging on the girl’s clothing seems to have been the spark that set Tracey off, which says plenty about today’s climate of political intolerance against conservatives.

Police say surveillance footage backs up the teenage victim’s account of what happened.

The video allegedly shows Tracey striking the young girl once on the body and again on the face before fleeing the scene.

Officers launched an investigation shortly afterward, which led to Tracey’s arrest days later.

It is another example of how heated political emotions can boil over when tolerance is preached but rarely practiced.

Tracey now faces a mountain of charges including endangering the welfare of a child, simple assault, harassment, and obstruction.

For anyone keeping score, she managed to rack up quite the list over what appears to be nothing more than a show of patriotic pride from a teenager on a family outing.

Law enforcement noted that she is a Canadian citizen who came to the United States in 2024 using a passport.

When asked for comment, her attorney, Francis Hodgsen, had nothing to say.

But her husband did.

He appeared in a tearful social media video pleading for sympathy after his wife was detained by ICE. In his words, “Yesterday July 13, my wife was detained by ICE and brought to Delaney Hall in North New Jersey.”

WATCH:

The irony of an anti ICE outburst ending with an ICE detention practically writes itself.

ICE has confirmed through its official detainee locator that Tracey is being held at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark.

That facility has seen plenty of protest activity from the same kind of activists who rail against immigration enforcement while benefiting from the very laws they despise.

When Fox News Digital reached out to ICE for further comment, officials did not immediately respond.

The confrontation reportedly began on July 3, right as crowds gathered for Independence Day celebrations on the Jersey Shore.

Witnesses told officers that Tracey became visibly agitated after spotting the wording on the teens’ brightly colored sweatpants.

It was a simple patriotic outfit featuring the words Trump and ICE in red, white, and blue.

To most Americans celebrating the holiday, it would have blended right in.

But to Tracey, who seemed determined to make a statement, it triggered a physical altercation.

This sort of political hostility directed at anyone who supports Trump or respects law enforcement has become increasingly common in Democrat-run areas.

Conservatives can wear a hat, shirt, or sticker and immediately become a target for harassment from self proclaimed activists who cannot seem to coexist with people who think differently.

The case of Kaitlyn Tracey is a textbook example.

What makes this particular case even more inflamed is that it involves a minor.

Police confirmed that the victim was a juvenile, making the charges far more serious.

Endangering the welfare of a child is not some petty offense.

It shows premeditated recklessness that the justice system will likely treat harshly.

The fact that Tracey is not an American citizen only deepens the legal complications.

The story might sound absurd, but it fits neatly into a pattern of hostility the left often directs toward Trump supporters.

Whether it is restaurant staff refusing service to conservatives, college students physically silencing peers, or attacks like this one, intolerance is alive and well in the same ranks that claim to champion empathy and inclusion.

When the message does not fit their worldview, the response is anger or, in this case, assault.

Point Pleasant Beach police have not released additional information about the victim, citing her age, but they confirmed the investigation remains active.

Prosecutors are expected to review the evidence, including video footage, before the case moves forward.

Community members who witnessed the event were reportedly left stunned that something so trivial could lead to a violent encounter.

While the left continues to shout about hate crimes, a young conservative teenager cannot even walk down a boardwalk in New Jersey wearing an expression of support for a president without being physically attacked.

What happened to tolerance and free expression?

The answer, as it often is, depends on who is wearing what.

As ICE continues to hold Tracey, one thing is clear. Actions have consequences.

Mocking and hitting a child for wearing clothing with patriotic symbols is not “protest,” it is criminal behavior.

And for once, the activist who claimed to oppose ICE will get a closer look at the immigration system from inside the very center she jeered.

Hirono Mocked After Bizarre Question to Trump AG Nominee Todd Blanche Sparks Outrage Online [WATCH]
News

Hirono Mocked After Bizarre Question to Trump AG Nominee Todd Blanche Sparks Outrage Online [WATCH]

/

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday quickly became the focus of criticism after Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, opened her questioning with a series of inquiries about personal misconduct, prompting a sharp response from the White House and widespread reaction on social media, as reported by Fox News.

Blanche appeared before the committee as lawmakers considered his nomination. During her allotted time, Hirono began by asking whether he had ever engaged in inappropriate personal conduct or misconduct during his adult life.

Blanche answered each question with the same response.

“No, senator,” he said.

Hirono then asked whether Blanche had ever faced disciplinary action or entered into any settlement related to that type of conduct.

Again, Blanche replied, “No, senator.”

The White House’s Rapid Response account quickly criticized Hirono’s line of questioning on X.

“Low IQ @maziehirono begins her questioning of @DAGToddBlanche —an esteemed professional with an honorable record in public service—by asking, ‘Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors?’ What a joke,” the account posted.

Hirono has used similar opening questions during previous Senate confirmation hearings. She asked Interior Secretary Doug Burgum comparable questions during his confirmation hearing last year.

According to the report, Hirono first adopted the practice in 2018 following the rise of the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements.

She initially used the questions during the confirmation hearing of judicial nominee Kurt Engelhardt during President Donald Trump’s first administration.

The exchange with Blanche quickly spread across social media, where a number of conservative organizations and commentators criticized Hirono’s approach.

“Raise your hand if you’re tired of @maziehirono’s favorite Senate Judiciary line of questioning,” the Republican National Lawyers Association wrote on X.

Right Line News Chief Content Officer Eric Daugherty also commented on the hearing.

“The White House is RIPPING deranged Sen. Mazie Hirono (D) for demanding AG Todd Blanche answer, ‘have you ever made unwanted requests for s*xual favors’ BLANCHE: ‘…no, senator..,’” Daugherty wrote on X.

He followed with another post that read, “WTF? What a stupid thing to ask out of nowhere.”

Another social media user wrote, “She does it to EVERYONE, SHE IS ABSOLUTELY NUTS.”

Hirono has previously explained why she asks similar questions of nominees appearing before the Senate.

In a 2018 post on X, she wrote that she was “asking nominees to our courts, under oath, whether or not they have a history of sexual assault or harassment.”

She also wrote, “Like in other industries, our judges are in positions of power & #TimesUp.”

The questions have become a recurring feature of Hirono’s participation in confirmation hearings and have repeatedly generated criticism from Republicans and conservative commentators, who argue the inquiries are inappropriate when directed at nominees without public allegations of misconduct.

Wednesday’s hearing continued that pattern, with Blanche firmly denying any history of misconduct and answering each question directly.

The exchange became one of the most widely discussed moments of the hearing, drawing immediate responses from the White House, legal organizations, political commentators, and social media users.

Blanche’s nomination now moves forward as the Senate Judiciary Committee continues its consideration of his confirmation, while the opening exchange with Hirono is likely to remain one of the most closely watched moments from Wednesday’s proceedings.


Scroll to Top