News

News

Oklahoma School Which Previously Hosted Feet Licking Contests Issues Ban On Student’s American Flag

An Oklahoma high school has been slammed by conservatives after a student was told they would not be permitted to fly an American flag on his truck.

Edmond North High School, which previously came under fire for holding feet and armpit licking events in March 2024, informed the student of the ban on flying the Star Spangled Banner.

Some have claimed the move to be a breach of the student’s constitutional rights, although Edmond Public Schools’ public information officer Jeff Bardach defended the decision which covers an outright ban on flag flying.

“You can’t allow one [flag] and limit another,” he told local media. “It’s been our long-standing practice to not allow students to bring flags.”

The school has a range of policies which include bans on inappropriate language, signs, and flags on campus or at events.

“To be clear, this is not about the American flag or patriotism. Edmond Public Schools proudly displays the American flag prominently and in the proper, respectful way outside each of our buildings and in our classrooms,” Bardach added.

Social media users were outraged by the news.

Others encouraged the student to ignore the ban.

Another suggested the idea of a complete repaint of his truck.

Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters also criticized the ban. “Patriotism should never be penalized at Oklahoma schools,” he said on X. “[Edmond] has a history of prioritizing woke agendas over our history and our freedoms. We will investigate and I will act.”

News

Blasphemy Laws Back Are Back in England

What’s going on in the United Kingdom should have any American at full alert. While we overthrew the crown and broke away hundreds of years ago, the U.S. and the UK are cousins. What happens in one country often gets duplicated in another. 

Alarmingly, despite breaking from the European Union, Britain is going down the European route of ever more restrictive policing and draconian punishment against its own population while foreigners commit crimes with seeming abandon. 

The stabbing of 13 children—three of them died—at a dance class in Southport was the spark that set the tinder pile ablaze this week as riots broke out in several English towns and cities. This time, it was mostly native English people who were fed up. Their unheard frustrations about economic decline, foreigner crime, and the government’s generosity to “migrants” and stinginess to Brits boiled over. 

Police have arrested more than 1,000 people in connection with the riots, which the mainstream media characterizes—like the British government does—as “far right.” This report makes sure to get the phrase “racist attacks” right into the first few paragraphs. 

But it’s not just vandals and rioters getting put in handcuffs. It’s Brits engaging in wrongthink and wrongspeak. Take a look at these two glazed-eyed coppers walking into a man’s living room and putting him under arrest for something he posted on Facebook. We don’t know what it is, and we’re as confused as he is. 

And what is this? 

It appears to be exactly what it looks like: persecution of a native Brit by the police. How in the world does the question, “who the f*** is Allah” get an 18-month prison sentence? It’s no surprise, considering the creepy and dystopian “public service announcement” by the Crown Prosecution Service, which warns Internet users to “think before you post.”

If you’re in the mood for gaslight, be sure to watch it:

Twitter/X users are asking questions about the jailing of a man for asking an “impertinent” question that might offend delicate Muslim sensibilities.

Americans are doing their best to warn our British cousins, and our own countrymen.

Some are pointing directly at Islamism, which the UK government is terrified to do. 

We hope this guy isn’t right, but it’s looking like he might be:

What say you readers? Can the English make Britain great again? 

News

White And Asian Americans Excluded From Apple’s Entrepreneur Camp

Technological giant Apple has announced its new Entrepreneur Camp for young, aspiring developers to gain life-changing experience at its headquarters in Cupertino, CA.

However, there’s a problem – Whites and Asians need not apply.

White and Asian Americans are excluded from the program, which is tailored to “underrepresented” communities only.

“Apple Entrepreneur Camp is designed for established app-driven businesses that are ready to join our exclusive technology lab and actively engage with our alumni community,” reads the application description.

While developers are welcomed from across the globe, any start-up founders wishing to apply must be Black, Hispanic/Latinx, or Indigenous. CEOs and co-founders also qualify.

There is also a female founder in-person programming camp, although applicants are not subject to the same ethnicity requirements.

A few commenters on social media questioned the legality of Apple’s actions.

Others described the eligibility criteria as racist.

What’s your view on the controversy? Be sure to let us know in the comments below.

News

Harris Campaign Caught Editing News Article Descriptions In Google Search Results

Kamala Harris’ campaign has been using a technique in order to manipulate headlines and descriptions on Google in a bid to appear supported by mainstream media outlets.

First reported by Axios, the practice involves editing headlines within Google search ads so it appears that major publishers are in support of the Vice President and Democratic Party presidential nominee. Outlets such as NPR, the Guardian, Reuters, and CBS News are among those reportedly affected.

In one scenario where The Guardian ran a story about Harris’ views on abortion, supporting text underneath (from the Harris campaign) adds, “VP Harris is a champion for reproductive freedom and will stop Trump’s abortion bans.”

The move has caught many off guard. While permissible under Google’s own policy, the sponsored content replicates news articles in a way that means it’s not immediately evident that the text has been written by the Harris campaign.

The Guardian has stressed the need to ensure its “trusted brand was being used appropriately and with our permission,” while CNN, USA Today and NPR said they were unaware of the practice being used against them.

Google has confirmed that the impacted content is “easily distinguishable from Search results” and no policies have been broken. It also noted that the Trump campaign has refrained from the practice so far.

Many on social media were critical of the campaign tactic.

Others questioned the legitimacy of the Harris campaign.

There were also some concerns over the processes at Google.

News

Elon Musk “Dares” Former Scottish Leader To Sue Him Amid Racism Row

X CEO Elon Musk is embroiled in a major racism row with former Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf.

The bizarre feud between the world’s richest man and Scotland’s former commander-in-chief stretches back to the Black Lives Matter riots in 2020. However, the spat was reignited during the recent U.K. riots after a clip of Yousaf as then-Justice Secretary was reshared on social media.

Yousaf, who was the first ethnic minority leader of a devolved government in the United Kingdom, listed a number of high-ranking professions in a speech in Scottish parliament, noting the skin color (“white”) of each position. You can see his racism for yourself below:

In October 2023, Musk declared Yousaf to be a “blatant racist,” while the then-First Minister said racists were “foaming at the mouth” at his existence, before calling on the X CEO to “tackle racism and hatred that goes unchecked on the social media platform he owns.”

Amid the recent riots, the rivalry flared again. Yousaf described Musk as “one of the most dangerous men on the planet” after he suggested that civil war in the U.K. was “inevitable”.

“Elon Musk is a dangerous race baiter who must be held to account for his actions,” he wrote on X. “I can’t think what it is that upsets him so much about a Brown, Muslim, progressive politician? But his billions won’t stop me calling out his support for the far right.”

Musk responded by stating Yousaf was “obviously super racist against white people”. Describing the Scot as a “scumbag”, Musk “dared” Yousaf to sue him.

Many on social media offered their support for the entrepreneur.

Another user likened the dispute to the rumored fight between Musk and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

News

Whoops! Leftist Accidentally Criticizes Kamala Harris Rally For Covering Empty Seats

In the absence of policy announcements or face-to-face interviews with the media, Kamala Harris’ supporters have resorted to comparing attendance figures at her own and rival Donald Trump’s campaign rallies.

So far, their efforts have ranged from outright ridiculous to obvious falsities. A 3,000-strong rally – less than the average attendance at a Minor League Baseball game – began the Harris campaign, while recent weeks have shifted to attacking the numbers attending Trump’s own events.

Left-wing activist William LeGate tried a similar trick on Saturday, August 10, when he hit out at the use of a black screen to cover up empty seats at an indoor arena.

“Trump has “ordered” his team to literally *cover up* entire levels of venues he’s unable to fill with black cloths – to make it appear as if there aren’t thousands of empty seats,” he wrote on social media.

There was one problem with his claim, however, as Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg pointed out:

LeGate apparently didn’t see the Harris sign in the photo he posted.

Here’s a video from that Harris rally:

That’s right, the rally he criticized was in fact Vice President Harris’ in Arizona – a key swing state on the path to 270 Electoral College votes.

Needless to say, he deleted the post shortly after being called out, and his criticism reserved for Trump was not repeated.

Nevertheless, the post was shared by Collin Rugg soon after it was deleted.

LeGate later admitted the mistake and said he had been “misinformed,” which he embarrassingly tried to spin as a positive.

However, his lack of criticism for the Vice President did not go unnoticed.

News

Video: Illegals Tell Investigators They’re Registered to Vote

The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project collaborated with Muckracker.com to shine light on the problem of illegal aliens being registered to vote – a real problem that Democrats have long denied because they want to continue benefitting from it.

In a video posted on X, Mike Howell, Executive Director of the Heritage Oversight Project, has urged Americans to “declare independence from foreigners deciding our elections.”

“The evidence you are about to see relates to illegal aliens being registered to vote,” Oversight Project Director Mike Howell opens the video. “This is a problem national in scale. The United States of America is for Americans, and our elections only should be decided by them.”

Out of the 41 people surveyed, four admitted they were non-citizens registered to vote. While 41 is too small a sample to extrapolate from nationally, it would imply that about 10% of illegals are registered to vote if we were to. 

You can see their report for yourself below:

News

Biden Treasury Secretary Claims National Debt In a “Reasonable Place”

For decades both parties have opted to kick the can down the road indefinitely when it came to the national debt problem, only ever pretending to care about it – but now the Biden-Harris administration is denying that there is one at all.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who infamously described Bidenflation as “transitory” (and then had to apologize for it) is out with some even more questionable economic arguments. 

According to CNBC: “Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the swelling national debt is manageable as long as it stays around where it is relative to the rest of the economy. ‘If the debt is stabilized relative to the size of the economy, we’re in a reasonable place,’ she told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin. ‘The way I look at it is that we should be looking at the real interest cost of the debt. That’s really what the burden is.'”

The public share of the national debt as a share of GDP is running at about 97% but is expected to soon top 100% at current spending rates. In other words, the national debt is on track to eclipse the size of the entire U.S. economy’s annual output.

Just this fiscal year alone (starting October 1, 2023), interest costs on the national debt have exceeded $600 billion, which is more than the government spent on healthcare of defense, and four times its education expenditures. In the entirety of the 2023 fiscal year, interest costs were $659 billion.

With the exception of the beginning of the pandemic and other years of the Biden presidency, the prior all-time-high for interest spending on the national debt was $468 billion in 1996 (in inflation adjusted 2024 dollars). Nearly 80% of personal income tax revenue is now going towards servicing interest on the national debt.

Yellen touted President Joe Biden’s plans to supposedly manage the situation he exacerbated by biblical proportions. “In the budget the president presented for this coming fiscal year he proposes $3 trillion of deficit reduction over the next decade,” she said. “That’s sufficient to basically keep the debt to income ratio stable, and this interest burden would be stabilized.”

The budget deficit for 2024 is running at $1.2 trillion with four months left in the fiscal year. In 2023, the shortfall totaled $1.7 trillion.

Hilariously, Biden has claimed to reduce the deficit.

While you probably don’t need to be reminded; anytime anyone hears the words “Biden” and “deficit reduction” they should be skeptical. Two years into the Biden presidency the national debt has surged by $4 trillion – yet if you listened to Biden you’d be believing that it went down by $1.7 trillion, a bogus claim he’s repeated on numerous occasions.

There is an appearance of truth to the claim if one doesn’t dive deeper into the figures; the budget deficit fell from $2.8 trillion to $1.4 trillion from fiscal year 2021-2022 for instance, accounting for most of the claimed $1.7 trillion reduction. However, in that same time period there was a $1.45 trillion drop in spending (104% of the deficit reduction) due to COVID programs either shrinking or expiring. And those are programs that would shrink or expire even if Trump were still in office, so it’s hardly anything Biden can take credit for, as he didn’t actually do anything. 

Similarly, the Biden administration has pointed to the deficit of $2.8 trillion in fiscal year 2021 as being $360 billion lower than the $3.1 trillion deficit in Trump’s last year in office. But again, the deficit was supposed to decline by more if Biden had done nothing. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the deficit would’ve declined by $870 billion if the Biden administration didn’t implement any new policies and Trump’s remained in place. Or in other words, Biden contributed a disguised net $510 billion to the deficit that year.

Every single time the Biden administration has made claims about reducing the debt or deficit they’ve been lying with statistics – and it seems unlikely they’d start telling the truth now.

News

British Justice Secretary Promises 500 Prison Spaces for Right-Wing Protesters Despite Previous Overcrowding Fears

Speaking from experience, the United Kingdom is a desperate place at the moment.

The hope and optimism after the election of a new Labour government on July 4 has quickly faded away. Just one month after the polls closed, the country has witnessed riots not seen on British streets for 13 years.

It’s sad, more than anything else. Few people watch the news to become so infuriated that they decide to take their anger out on a pastry shop. Instead, they are saddened that the actions of politicians and the mainstream media has fueled the fan of frustrations among vocal minorities on either side of the political spectrum.

Just days after his electoral victory, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to release prisoners 40% of the way through their sentence (assuming, of course, they were eligible for parole). He deemed this to be a necessary step given “overcrowding” within the British prison system.

Yet, as the political elite have changed to a “tough on crime” stance to bring an end to the protests against mass immigration and migrant crime, prison spaces are suddenly becoming available.

On social media, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood shared a Guadian article stating an extra 500 prison places would become available to accommodate convicted rioters.

The political approach of finding solutions only in times of exceptional – or selective demand is incredibly frustrating. It only raises questions as to why reducing minimum prison sentences, thus potentially releasing murderers, rapists, and pedophiles early, was initially prioritized over creating additional prison spaces.

Of course, threats from politicians can only infuriate further. It’s a dangerous route…

…one which some will deem Orwellian.

News

The Guardian Newspaper Says “Two-Tier Policing” Is a Myth Following Years of Making That Exact Claim

The riots in the United Kingdom have brought the concept of two-tier policing into the limelight once again as the government seems more concerned in targeting those protesting against the consequences of mass immigration than actual criminals.

As we reported earlier, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised a crackdown on rioters with “standing armies” of police officers and 24-hour turnarounds in the courts. His focus, however, on right-wing rioters has leant itself to the nickname “two-tier Keir.”

When it was Brits rioting over the death of George Floyd, a man who didn’t even live on the same continent as them, Starmer said “Like you, I was shocked and angered at the killing of George Floyd, and the response of President Trump and the US authorities to the peaceful protesters, to people rightly demanding justice, has been an affront to humanity. This week has shined a spotlight on the racism, discrimination and the injustice experienced by those from black and minority ethnic communities in the US, the UK, and across the world. Martin Luther King said ‘injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Yet when it was Brits protesting the violent consequences of mass migration, he sung a completely different tune, stating; “I utterly condemn the far-right thuggery we’ve seen this weekend. Be in no doubt, those that have participated in this violence will face the full force of the law. The police will be making arrests. Individuals will be held on remand, charges will follow, and convictions will follow. I guarantee you will regret taking part in this disorder, whether directly, or those whipping up this action online and then running away themselves. This is not a protest, it is organized, violent thuggery, and it has no place on our streets or online.

One of the U.K.’s most left-wing newspapers, the Guardian, recently published an article in which claimed this “two-tier policing” against right-wing protesters was a “myth.” Thanks to the power of X, the article was soon “community noted” with articles from their own publication arguing that there’s two-tiered policing in the world.

“The Guardian have [sic] been telling people about two-tier policing based on race and sexuality for decades,” the note said.

One article included in the note, from January 2024, reported claims by a senior figure that policing was “institutionally racist” in the UK.

Another article from a month prior noted a study which “supports the idea that the patterns of ethnic disproportionality evident in the UK Home Office statistics cannot be explained solely or even primarily at the level of individual officer behavior or psychology because they are an outcome of an interaction between structural and institutional racism.”

A third article discusses a 300-page report claiming to find institutional misogyny, racism and homophobia persist within the London Metropolitan police.

In other words, they’re fine with the concept of two-tiered policing, but only when they can try to claim it’s in a way that serves their political ideology.

Others questioned the reliability of using the Guardian as a source.


Scroll to Top