News

News

Buffalo Bills Announce Support For Gay-Only Football League

There’s good news for those who like watching sport based solely on athletes’ sexuality – as the National Gay Flag Football League (NGFFL) has expanded to Buffalo. 

The NGFFL was launched in 2002, and currently comprises of more than 200 teams in 25 leagues across the United States and Canada.

Each year, every team competes for the “Gay Bowl”, with this year’s edition set to be held in Austin, TX, from October 31 – November 3.

NGFFL Commissioner Joel Horton said he was “thrilled to bring inclusive flag football to Buffalo with the support of the Buffalo Bills”, even though teams are capped at a 20% heterosexual limit.

The New York Giants, New England Patriots, New York Jets, Miami Dolphins, Arizona Cardinals, Chicago Bears, Washington Commanders, and the Seattle Seahawks have also previously expressed support for the league.

“We are excited to join the NFL and other Clubs across the league in their support of the NGFFL,” said Buffalo Bills Vice President of Community Impact, Michelle Roberts. “Through our sponsorship, we are looking forward to expanding the impact of the NGFFL in our community.”

Bills fans were not unanimous in their support for the announcement on Instagram.

Others noted the Bills’ appalling record in the NFL, and questioned whether a franchise which has failed to win in all four of its Super Bowl appearances had its priorities in order.

Another user questioned the inclusivity of the NGFFL.

What’s your view? Do we need a football league based on sexuality? Let us know in the comments below.

News

Death Penalty For Child Rapists Sparks Fury Among Transgender Activists

A Tennessee bill to allow the death penalty for child rapists has been criticized by LGBTQ+ activists.

Republican Gov. Bill Lee approved the legislation in May without issuing a statement which is set to go into effect on July 1, 2024. It follows a similar move by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year.

Under the new Tennessee law, state prosecutors can pursue the death penalty when an adult is convicted of aggravated rape against a child. Other punishments include life imprisonment without parole, or imprisonment for life.

After signing the bill, Gov. Lee told reporters that such crimes are “some of the most heinous that there are”.

Following the wider publication of the bill’s existence, some LGBTQ+ activists amazingly took to social media platform X to vent their dismay.

One social media user who claimed the law was “cool in theory but bad in practice” due to the unevidenced targeting of racial minorities and gay people later locked their account after coming under heavy fire from those astounded at their comments.

Nevertheless, “@stinkypissbitch” was not alone in their bizarre take.

Fortunately, most users saw sense in the legislation, noting that it would indeed affect LGBTQ+ people who committed heinous crimes as much as it would heterosexuals.

…while another presented a graph highlighting the statistics of why some demographics may be more impacted than others.

What’s your view? Should all states follow suit, or has Tennessee Gov. Lee been too extreme in passing the bill? Let us know in the comments below.

News

The Woke Reason Why There’s No “Scenic Route” Option On Google Maps

It’s official: Google Maps is now woke.

Quite how that’s possible at first glance may be a mystery. After all, the app is generally used to get you from A to B, rather than through D, E and I.

For those of us who like to travel with a little bit of time on our hands, we may want to reach our destination via a scenic route.

However, the highly requested and much-wanted feature is unlikely to be available anytime soon thanks to diversity, equality and inclusion.

Social media user @kaseyklimes, who formerly worked on Google Maps, revealed the reasoning behind the lack of a “scenic route” option on the app in a thread on X over the weekend, revealing that DEI gibberish is responsible.

“Inadvertently diverting foot traffic from low-income streets to high-income streets takes revenue and potentially tax dollars from already struggling communities and funnels it instead to richer communities,” he wrote on the platform. In other words, he’s upset that people may spend money in nicer areas if a “scenic route” option was available on the app.

Despite his desire for a scenic route option, Klimes added that the global reach of Google Maps would add a “bias” across the system compared to the current model where each street has “an equal chance” at being used to direct foot traffic.

In response to the revelations, fellow social media users were quick to vent their frustrations, with some moving towards other navigational systems such as Apple Maps instead.

Others also raised concerns over the impact on people who are directed through areas with high crime rates.

What’s your view on Google Maps? Let us know in the comments below.

News

Can You Spot The Problem With This Video?

The rainbow flags have caused a stir throughout pride month, but it seems it’s not just America’s most Woke cities which are taking part.

Rainbow roads – once reserved for Mario Kart games – are now across the country, and the responses to their critics have been controversial to say the least. So far this month, a manhunt was launched in St Petersburg, FL, after a driver performed donuts on the city’s rainbow mural, while three teenagers in Washington were arrested for a similar protest against the pride flag.

The city of Fredericton in New Brunswick, Canada, has also joined the rainbowification with the city’s X account sharing footage of a road being redecorated. However, you may notice a problem…

Yup, that’s right! The city worker – donning the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on his helmet – had no paint on the roller.

The latest attempt to virtue signal undoubtedly was met with stark criticism, forcing the city into turning off replies and “hiding”’” those who had already commented, including one who paid tribute to the aforementioned protests.

Others noted the division the symbols caused, while questioning whether it was an essential use of taxpayer funds.

They are poignant points which carry over to the United States too. Not everyone agrees with the idea of pride month, even if they are happy to accept others for who they are.

Perhaps the Fredericton video highlights the problem: such murals are nothing more than the performance known as virtue signaling, and that’s what frustrates people most.

News

“Homophobic” Road Signs Removed From Los Angeles Neighborhood

Woke extremists are celebrating after “homophobic” street signs were removed from a Los Angeles neighborhood.

And by “homophobic street signs,” I mean “street signs.”

The signs in Silver Lake were apparently put up in the 1990s to prevent gay men from hanging around a residential area following complaints from residents. They included “No Cruising” and “No U-Turns” signs which would somehow prevent homosexuals from hooking up.

Some of the “No Cruising” signs were removed in 2011, according to NBC Los Angeles. However, after Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman heard about the signs on a podcast, she collaborated with fellow Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez to remove the remainder in a “bureaucratic process” which is reported to have taken months.

“Here in Silver Lake, cruising, of course, meant something very different. It meant an opportunity for the LGBT community to try to find human connection and intimacy and to be able to express themselves in a society at the time that was not very welcoming to the LGBT community,” Soto-Martinez said.

Another Silver Lake councilmember, who goes by the name “Maebe A. Girl”, expressed surprise that the signs had not been removed despite “the history of it”.

This major step towards greater tolerance and respect for one another (just kidding) sparked widespread ridicule from users on the social media platform X.

It’s unclear how lifting a ban on U-turns will improve the lives of the local gay community, but campaigners can finally relax now that Los Angeles is a safer place.

Some also raised the question as to what would happen if the change in traffic regulations caused more accidents in the area.

Which traffic signs, if any, do you believe infringe on your civil liberties? Let us know in the comments below.

News

Would Mr. Rogers Be Canceled Today? This Resurfaced Clip Suggests So

Wokespy can reveal that beloved children’s television star Fred Rogers has a secret history of blatant transphobia and misgendering. Going viral is an unearthed clip of Mr. Rogers causing direct harm to gender-non-conforming children with a shocking tirade of heteronormative dog whistles.

And by “blatant transphobia,” “misgendering,”and a “shocking tirade of hetronormative dog whistles,” we mean “common sense.”

Watch for yourself:

In an era where seemingly no one is safe from cancel culture, how insane is it that even Mr. Rogers wouldn’t be exempt if he were alive today? (Hopefully too many liberals don’t see the above clip, or they’ll give cancelation a try regardless!)

Rogers, who would be under scrutiny for his status as a Presbyterian minister by leftists today, can be seen and heard on camera using supposedly “outdated terms and concepts” (to crazy people) as he talks directly to children. Or as a leftist might put it; using a television sound stage designed to appeal to kids through toys and an indoor trolley train, Rogers masks his bigoted gender gatekeeping behind a mild-mannered tone.

For any liberals reading this, consider this your “content warning” (for anyone out of the loop, the original term “trigger warnings” has been deemed triggering to victims of gun violence – I wish I was making this up). Here an unfiltered transcription of the biological reali—errr-transphobia their children may face if exposed to Rogers and his “neighborhood.”

Set to a musical accompaniment, the be-sweatered preacher sing-speaks the following statements:

“Boys are boys from the beginning”

“If you were born a boy you stay a boy”

“Girls are girls right from the start; if you were born a girl, you stay a girl and grow up to be a lady”

He then states, in comments that leftists would consider misogyny and binary gender-policing: “Only girls can be the mommy, and only boys can be the daddy.”

Reaction on X/Twitter was on the side of common sense – but maybe that’s just because not enough leftists had seen the video yet.

Wokespy contacted Rogers for comment, but the cemetery did not immediately return calls.


News

Minneapolis Prosecutor Thinks Conservatives Make People Fear Crime

We all know the leftist progression:

“That’s not happening.”
“That’s only happening in rare circumstances.”
“That’s happening but why is it such a big deal to you?””
“That’s happening and it’s a really good thing!”

You find its greatest concentration in blue cities like Minneapolis, where gangs of Black Lives Matter protesters attacked cars and burned buildings. And why not? The politicians in these cities watch their jurisdictions get attacked, and then they impotently bow down to demands from the bullies. Progressive mayor Jacob Frey campaigned on police reform (read: neutering law enforcement), but then got booed by shrieking crowds in 2020 when he said he didn’t want to abolish the entire police force.

Liberals never learn. Current Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party County Attorney Mary Moriarty has her Zoom game face on to talk about how those terrible conservatives are convincing people to be afraid of violence:

You’ve got to listen. Let us whet your appetite. Here’s the very first statement in the clip:

“There is a concerted effort to make people afraid of crime.”

Huh. You’d have thought that just being human was enough to make people fear getting robbed or beaten, but apparently it’s all the fault of those dastardly conservatives. Moriarty goes on to establish her woke-and-aware-white-lady cred by harping on “super predators,” a term from the 1990s that we’re all supposed to view now as a “dog whistle for racism.”

She even does the classic reversal of talking about “black youth” who are “at risk” because they’re “involved in behaviors we would wish they weren’t, but we kind of understand why they are.” Just to be clear, she’s talking about the perpetrators of violent crime as if they were the real victims. Seems to us their targets are the ones “at risk.”

X users aren’t having it. HarmlessPirateRadio takes the sarcastic approach:

User Anti-Woke Memes tells the story in a picture:

Paul here is shocked; we feel you, Paul.

Jay’V makes a serious point:

We’ll give the last world to “AC.” And it’s something everyone should take on board. The reversal of obvious truth is the surest indication that you’re dealing with untrustworthy and dangerous people.

What about you, WokeSpy readers? Which Very Bad Conservative taught you to be afraid of crime?


Scroll to Top