News

Brandon Gill Drops a Massive Truth Bomb On America’s Immigration Situation [WATCH]
News

Brandon Gill Drops a Massive Truth Bomb On America’s Immigration Situation [WATCH]

/

Rep. Brandon Gill argued that mass migration has become one of the primary forces affecting the U.S. economy, contending that both illegal immigration and large-scale legal immigration are placing financial pressure on American workers through lower wages, higher housing costs and increased health care expenses.

Speaking during a recent interview, Gill said immigration is connected to many of the economic challenges facing Americans today.

“Mass migration being one of the biggest things.”

Gill urged listeners to consider the economic impact of adding millions of new arrivals to the country over a relatively short period of time.

“Ask yourself, whenever you flood this country with millions of people, primarily illegal, but also a large-scale legal immigration in certain areas, what does that do?”

According to Gill, one consequence is increased competition in the labor market that, in his view, suppresses wages while simultaneously increasing the cost of living.

“That suppresses wages while at the same time driving up the price of rent and the price of housing.”

He argued that American workers are affected from multiple directions at once.

“So you’re getting hit on both fronts.”

Gill also contended that the increased number of migrants entering the workforce makes it more difficult for American citizens to secure employment.

“These are also the same people who are coming in and taking American jobs, making it harder to find work.”

Beyond employment and housing, Gill said he believes mass migration has contributed to rising medical expenses and insurance premiums.

“They’re the they’re the reason why whenever you go to the hospital and you realize your your doctor bill or your insurance bill is insane, you realize it’s because we have millions of people from all over the Third World that have been let into our country and we’re subsidizing their health care and your insurance prices are paying for that.”

Gill argued that taxpayers ultimately bear the financial burden of providing services to millions of new arrivals, which he believes places additional strain on government resources and private health insurance systems.

He said the cumulative effect of those policies is felt across multiple sectors of the economy, including employment, housing and health care, leaving American families facing higher costs and greater financial pressure.

According to Gill, the issues he identified are interconnected rather than isolated challenges.

He argued that immigration policy has broad economic consequences that extend well beyond border security and directly affect the daily lives of working Americans.

Gill maintained that the trends he described have contributed to increasing costs for households while reducing economic opportunities for U.S. citizens.

He said the combination of lower wages, more expensive housing and rising medical costs represents a pattern that policymakers should address.

While discussing the issue, Gill emphasized that he believes immigration policy sits at the center of many of the economic concerns Americans raise.

“I mean, you can go on and on and on, but that’s what I think that it all does go back to mass migration.”

WATCH:

Throughout his remarks, Gill argued that both illegal immigration and certain forms of large-scale legal immigration have had significant economic consequences.

He maintained that policies allowing millions of migrants to enter the country have increased competition for jobs, raised housing costs and contributed to higher health care expenses, concluding that mass migration is a driving factor behind many of the affordability challenges facing American families.

Dem Insider ‘The Party Is in Crisis, and It Has Been for a Long, Long Time’ [WATCH]
News

Dem Insider ‘The Party Is in Crisis, and It Has Been for a Long, Long Time’ [WATCH]

/

Attorney John Morgan argued that the Democratic Party is facing an identity crisis over socialism, while Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany suggested the party’s direction could become clearer during the 2028 presidential election if Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez enters the race.

During a discussion on Fox News, Morgan said he believes the Democratic Party has struggled for years with competing ideological factions.

“The Democratic Party is in a crisis, and it has been for a long, long time. Who are we? Are we Democrats? Are we socialists?”

Morgan said he takes politicians at their word when they identify themselves as socialists and questioned why supporters of socialism point to the ideology despite what he views as its historical record.

“When they put the name socialist at the end of it, I believed them when they said that. I didn’t believe that it was anything but that.”

He continued by pointing to Cuba and Venezuela as examples he believes demonstrate socialism’s failures.

“And what I don’t understand is why can’t anybody, anyone find a socialist government that ever worked? The past is the best predictor of the future, and for me sitting here in Florida, all I got to do is look down at Cuba, 47 years ago, look down at Venezuela. And the question for all of the Democratic Socialists is this: Tell me one place that it’s worked! And nobody can give me that answer.”

McEnany agreed with Morgan’s challenge.

“It’s a great question.”

Morgan expanded on his argument, saying he believes socialism historically progresses toward communism.

“Because the past does predict the future, and nobody seems to be giving us just one country, just one, where it’s worked. And what it usually works to be is it converts from socialism to communism. It is It is the gateway drug to communism.”

McEnany responded by asking whether the Democratic Party could reverse what she characterized as its movement toward socialism.

“It’s an empirical question with a definite answer: socialism does not work. You point that out. You left the party. Look, you are of the the Bill Clinton wing of the party, the the sane wing of the party, if you will. So, do you think there’s a way for the Democratic Party to find their way out of this? Is it a coalition of Democrats that come together? Is it a certain 2028 nominee? Is there a way for your former party to emerge from the abyss of socialism?”

Morgan replied that he believes both major political parties now contain competing ideological factions.

“They’re going to have trouble, but, you know, look, it happened in the Republican Party. The Republican Party is two parties: it’s RINOs and MAGA. The Democratic Party is now two parties: it’s Bill Clinton Democrats and me—I was on his finance committee, had dinner with him this year in Florida—and then it’s the socialist.”

He added that he sees four distinct political movements operating within America’s two-party system.

“There are actually four parties in America, and those four parties are part of two parties.”

Morgan also expressed concern about the long-term direction of the country.

“But I don’t see a future. I mean, look, James Carville, I was with him at the Kentucky Derby this year, I’m worried he’s going to have a stroke, he’s so upset about what’s going on. But the genie is out of the bottle, and everybody knows what it is, and it’s catching on. And it worries me to death, because the greatness of our country came from capitalism where everybody has a chance at a great result.”

He continued by saying he worries about America’s future.

“And the the thing that bothers me also is this is the greatest country, the greatest civilization in the history of the world. But we’re only 250 years old and could could this crash down? Could could that could that happen? That worries me a great deal.”

McEnany then shifted the discussion to the 2028 presidential race, arguing that it could become a defining moment for the Democratic Party.

“These are the kind of questions that need to be asked. And it it strikes me that 2028 is really the crossroads moment. Look, this is a midterm election year. You have people in different states, different ideologies. But when we look at 2028, AOC, she does hail from the socialist wing of the party. She’s trying to distance herself from that a bit and hedge. But she was asked point blank, Are you running in 2028? Listen to what she said.”

A video clip then showed Ocasio-Cortez responding to a question about a possible presidential campaign.

“I haven’t ruled out the possibility and I’m very humbled to the tremendous amount of support out there. I think that we have a responsibility to remain focused on the midterms and not on our individual aspirations or plans.”

After the clip, McEnany offered her own assessment.

“I mean, I think she’s running. What what does that do to the party? Should she run?”

Morgan said he also believes Ocasio-Cortez is preparing for a presidential bid.

“Well, I think she’s running. And listen, because the field is so broad, she could she could win.”

He noted, however, that he believes South Carolina’s position as the first Democratic primary could present a challenge.

“The The good thing for the Democrats is the first primary is in South Carolina. She will not win the primary in South Carolina, but she’s very formidable, she is very talented, she has pizzazz, and she’s harnessed this energy.”

Morgan concluded by arguing that political movements often draw support from different forms of envy and resentment, comparing current political trends to historical examples in Cuba and Venezuela.

“What’s going on here in a in a quick brief way to tell it is there’s two types of envy: there’s benign envy where you’re kind of like, I want to be that guy, I want to be that gal, and then there is malicious envy, that which is, I want to take it from you. And some of these politicians are using malicious envy to harness that energy to give them the base. And listen, malicious envy happened in Cuba, malicious envy happened in Venezuela, and to a certain degree, Donald Trump was a genius because he felt the malicious envy or anger on in the Republican Party which was reverse discrimination. White people felt that they were being discriminated against, and they were mad about it. And he harnessed that anger. That same anger is being harnessed in a different way by the Bernie Sanders, and it’s it’s very powerful because at the end of the day, Kayleigh, when people get pushed to the very wall, they just come and take it. When Marie Antoinette said, Let them eat cake, they said, No, we’ll just cut your head off. And it can happen. And so, it worries me a great deal.”

WATCH:

Dearborn’s Muslim Police Chief Brands Christians ‘Outside Agitators,’ Begs Locals to Stay Home [WATCH]
News

Dearborn’s Muslim Police Chief Brands Christians ‘Outside Agitators,’ Begs Locals to Stay Home [WATCH]

/

Dearborn officials are bracing for a combustible city council meeting on Tuesday, August 18, as residents and outside activists prepare to descend on the Michigan city.

Police Chief Issa Shahin is urging locals to avoid the gathering entirely, a remarkable request when citizens are supposed to have open access to their government.

The planned demonstration includes activists organizing a “Christian Crusader March” intended to “Stop Islamification.”

Whatever city officials think about the message, demonstrators retain the same First Amendment rights that liberal activists routinely invoke whenever they occupy streets, disrupt meetings, or harass public officials.

Shahin said people and organizations from outside Dearborn may travel to the meeting and attempt to provoke a public confrontation.

The department plans an increased police presence and says it has coordinated with state and federal authorities on a comprehensive security operation.

“Individuals and groups from outside our community may come to the Dearborn City Council meeting on Tuesday, August 18th. We’ve been monitoring the situation closely and coordinating with our state and federal partners. We have a plan in place, and you will see an enhanced presence of police officers. But here’s my direct ask of our residents: Please stay home. These groups that are coming here are coming for one reason, and that’s to provoke a reaction and generate attention. If nobody shows up to react, they have nothing. The most powerful thing that this community can do is refuse to give them an audience.”

WATCH:

That appeal reveals how tense the atmosphere has become in Dearborn, a city that now stands at the center of a national argument about immigration, religious influence, assimilation, and free expression.

Officials clearly fear that competing groups could turn a routine council meeting into a national spectacle.

Yet telling residents to stay home also raises an obvious question about who gets to participate in local government.

Americans should not be frightened away from public meetings simply because officials expect criticism, controversy, or raised voices from people carrying an unwelcome political message.

Dearborn is majority Arab and heavily Muslim, and Islamic calls to prayer can be heard outdoors across parts of the city.

Those cultural changes have attracted growing national attention, especially as residents and activists question whether city leaders apply the same standards to Christians, Muslims, and political dissenters.

Mayor Abdullah Hammoud previously told Christian resident Ted Barham that he was “not welcome” during a contentious exchange connected to a city council meeting.

That episode strengthened concerns among conservatives that local leaders have little patience for Christian critics who challenge Dearborn’s political direction.

The city has also hosted processions featuring pro Hezbollah and Iran linked imagery.

Monitoring organizations said flags associated with groups designated as terrorist organizations by the United States appeared during a recent Arbaeen procession, adding another layer of controversy that the national press would apparently rather treat as background noise.

Activist Jake Lang was attacked during that massive procession only weeks before the anticipated council confrontation.

The incident intensified warnings that public tensions in Dearborn are not imaginary, even if establishment media outlets prefer scolding outside critics instead of examining what has been happening inside the city.

Dearborn previously drew widespread attention during an April 2024 Al Quds Day gathering where participants chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.”

Such rhetoric would dominate national coverage for days if it emerged from a conservative gathering, but the usual media outrage machine somehow found a lower gear.

Police have a legitimate duty to prevent violence, keep rival groups separated, and protect every peaceful participant.

That responsibility includes protecting demonstrators whose views city leaders, local residents, or federal officials may strongly dislike, because constitutional rights do not disappear when the message becomes inconvenient.

Shahin appears convinced that outside activists want viral footage of angry confrontations, and he may be correct about their desire for attention.

Still, the surest way to create suspicion is for government officials to discourage ordinary residents from witnessing public business while an enormous security presence surrounds city hall.

Tuesday’s meeting will test whether Dearborn can handle sharp criticism without chaos, censorship, or selective enforcement.

Americans will be watching closely to see whether officials defend peaceful speech or simply manage the optics while hoping concerned citizens remain quietly at home.

JD Vance Task Force Exposes Shocking Fraud Across Child Gender Medicine Industry [WATCH]
News

JD Vance Task Force Exposes Shocking Fraud Across Child Gender Medicine Industry [WATCH]

/

Vice President JD Vance has sent a newly released Department of Health and Human Services report to the Justice Department, seeking review of possible federal law violations connected to pediatric gender medicine and questionable insurance billing.

The findings paint an alarming picture of medical institutions turning vulnerable children into lucrative customers.

The report, titled “Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of ‘Gender Medicine,’” examines coding practices involving puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, and surgical procedures provided to minors.

Its conclusions raise serious questions about whether providers manipulated diagnoses to secure insurance payments.

According to HHS materials, more than 225 hospitals and health systems created pediatric gender programs.

Insurance claims collected nationwide between 2015 and 2025 identified roughly $50 million in puberty blocker claims billed under the diagnosis of “endocrine disorder, unspecified.”

Another nearly $11 million involved claims for patients between 13 and 17 that used a precocious puberty diagnosis.

The report notes that such a diagnosis is generally inappropriate for patients older than 13, making those billing patterns especially ripe for investigation.

All payer claims data also showed nearly $120 million in billed charges since 2019 for procedures and treatments involving minors.

Those claims included more than 5,500 surgical procedures and approximately 8,500 courses of hormones or puberty blockers.

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. referred a specific group of suspicious claims to the HHS Inspector General.

Those cases included puberty blocker claims paired with unspecified endocrine diagnoses but lacking codes for gender dysphoria or precocious puberty among patients from 9 through 17.

Investigators also flagged claims using precocious puberty codes for teenagers from 13 through 17.

Other concerns involved same day cross sex hormone prescriptions in states that restrict such treatment for minors, along with billing patterns involving affiliated medical providers.

The report relied on peer reviewed research, hospital records, whistleblower testimony, insurance claims analysis, and interviews with patients and parents.

That broad collection of evidence suggests this was not merely a paperwork mix up that can be dismissed with bureaucratic excuses.

The financial incentives identified in the report are staggering.

While average annual health care expenses for a minor are about $3,000, treatment pathways involving these interventions can climb to $75,000 without surgery and nearly $170,000 when surgery is included.

WATCH:

Those treatment tracks can also generate continuing revenue through prescriptions, monitoring, and follow up care that may last for years.

For large hospital systems, that means children can become long term revenue streams while insurers and taxpayers are left holding the bill.

In a letter to Attorney General Todd Blanche, Vance highlighted evidence suggesting that unspecified endocrine diagnoses were being used far beyond their legitimate medical purpose.

He wrote, “One study showed that only about 4.7 percent of patients diagnosed with ‘endocrine disorder, unspecified,’ had that actual condition.

Another notes a 30 percent increase in the number of endocrine disorder diagnoses, despite it being unlikely that there has been a substantial increase in pediatric endocrine disorders.”

Vance argued that providers who intentionally coded treatments incorrectly to obtain coverage should face criminal consequences.

He made clear that deliberate fraud against Medicaid or private insurers should not result in a mild reprimand from some hospital compliance office, but could warrant prison.

The vice president also called for justice against hospitals and providers that participated in harmful procedures involving children.

WATCH:

His referral gives federal investigators an opening to determine whether ideological medicine was supported by fraudulent billing, potentially at enormous public expense.

The action follows the Trump administration’s decision to end federal Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program funding for these procedures on minors.

Kennedy and other HHS officials have said the findings demand deeper scrutiny of financial incentives, billing practices, patient safety, and program integrity.

The Justice Department had not publicly commented on the referral at the time of the report.

Still, Vance has placed the evidence directly before federal prosecutors, and hospitals involved in these billing patterns may soon discover that creative coding carries consequences beyond another government audit.

Trump Secretly Swaps Planes via Catering Truck After Iranian Threats, Reports Say
News

Trump Secretly Swaps Planes via Catering Truck After Iranian Threats, Reports Say

/

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he secretly changed aircraft in Turkey last month under instructions from the Secret Service. The extraordinary security maneuver followed reported concerns about an Iranian assassination threat targeting the president.

The covert transfer unfolded after a NATO summit in Ankara, according to reports from The Washington Post and other American media outlets. Trump was reportedly moved from Air Force One inside a catering truck before boarding a smaller military aircraft for the trip to Britain.

The White House did not disclose the aircraft change when it occurred, allowing the operation to remain secret until the Post reported it Monday. The deception was apparently designed to conceal which plane was actually carrying the commander in chief.

Some media commentators questioned whether the maneuver exposed aides and journalists remaining aboard the presumed presidential aircraft to added danger. Trump, however, argued that the smaller military plane carrying him may have faced the greater threat.

“I think actually the plane that I flew on was at greater risk,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday. “I think it was at greater risk because that would be the plane I think that they would be more likely to go for.”

Trump was joined during the clandestine transfer by a small group of trusted White House aides. Deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino, executive assistant Natalie Harp and Oval Office operations director Walt Nauta reportedly traveled with him inside the catering truck.

Several additional aides with less prominent public profiles also participated, according to the Post. No Cabinet officials accompanied Trump during the switch, suggesting the Secret Service kept the operation tightly controlled and limited knowledge of the president’s actual movements.

The unusual method quickly inspired the predictable parade of social media memes depicting Trump hiding inside a catering vehicle. Yet slipping a president past a possible assassination plot is serious business, regardless of how loudly the online peanut gallery laughs.

Trump said the decision belonged to the professionals assigned to protect him, not to White House image makers or political advisers. “Well, it’s only up to Secret Service. I just follow what they’d like to do, so I go by Secret Service and the military,” Trump said.

The president also treated the reported danger with characteristic bluntness, noting that threats are hardly unusual in his position. “I guess there was a threat out there. I didn’t really ask too much about it. I get a lot of threats,” Trump said.

At the time, the White House publicly indicated that Trump would fly from Turkey to Britain aboard Air Force One. According to the Post, he boarded that aircraft and then quietly exited moments later through the catering truck before moving to the alternate military plane.

That sequence gave security personnel a plausible decoy while shielding the president’s actual departure. It also highlights the complicated balance between presidential protection, operational secrecy and the safety of personnel traveling as part of the broader White House delegation.

Trump had arrived in Ankara aboard a newly renovated jet donated by Qatar for use by the United States. Before leaving Turkey, however, he unexpectedly announced that he would depart aboard an older Air Force One aircraft, prompting questions about security surrounding the newer plane.

The NATO visit marked the first international trip involving the renovated aircraft. Its rapid upgrades had already generated scrutiny over cost and security, particularly as tensions with Iran intensified near Turkey’s eastern border.

Iranian threats against Trump and former members of his administration have remained a persistent national security concern. Against that backdrop, the Secret Service operation appears less like political theater and more like a calculated attempt to complicate any hostile surveillance or targeting plan.

The episode also demonstrates why presidential travel details are frequently concealed until movements are complete. Critics can argue over optics afterward, but security teams facing a credible foreign threat do not have the luxury of designing operations around social media approval.

Trump’s willingness to follow the Secret Service and military plan allowed the deception to proceed without public disruption. Whatever the precise level of danger, quietly changing planes through a catering truck was an unconventional move built around one essential objective: getting the president safely to Britain.

Lauren Boebert’s Son Tyler Accepts Plea Deal in Child Abuse Case
News

Lauren Boebert’s Son Tyler Accepts Plea Deal in Child Abuse Case

/

Tyler Boebert, the son of Rep. Lauren Boebert, has accepted a plea agreement in a child abuse case that could result in a short jail sentence and supervised probation, according to court documents obtained by TMZ.

The agreement was offered by the Weld County District Attorney’s Office and calls for Tyler to plead guilty to charges of child abuse and negligence without injury.

Under the proposed agreement, prosecutors are asking the court to impose a maximum sentence of 30 days in jail, followed by 12 months of supervised probation.

The deal also requires Tyler to complete a parenting program.

The case stems from allegations involving Tyler’s child and incidents that authorities say occurred while the child was under his care.

According to the court documents, authorities initially became involved after the child was found wandering around a neighborhood in July 2025.

Prosecutors later alleged that another incident had taken place about a month earlier.

In that earlier incident, prosecutors said the child was left unattended before a neighbor discovered the child. The court documents describe the child as “wandering around” while wearing only a diaper.

The allegations led to charges of child abuse and negligence without injury against Tyler.

Before prosecutors disclosed the second alleged incident, Lauren Boebert publicly defended her son and said he had been working to improve his life and his role as a father.

“Tyler has been doing a great job getting his life on track as a father and citizen over the past year.”

The Colorado congresswoman also addressed the circumstances surrounding the July 2025 incident.

“Unfortunately, this event stems from a miscommunication on monitoring my young grandson that recently led to him getting out of our house.”

The case involving Tyler has also included a separate set of criminal allegations.

According to the report, Tyler was arrested over the weekend on charges related to child sexual exploitation.

Authorities said those allegations stem from a video Tyler recorded when he was 18 involving his then-girlfriend, who was reportedly only weeks away from turning 18 at the time.

The woman later contacted police after the recording was circulated to third parties, according to the report.

The separate arrest adds another legal matter to the situation surrounding Tyler, although the plea agreement described in the court documents concerns the child abuse and negligence case.

The proposed resolution in that case does not call for a lengthy prison sentence.

Instead, prosecutors recommended a jail term capped at 30 days along with a year of supervised probation and completion of a parenting program.

The final sentence will be determined by the court.

Lauren Boebert, a Republican who represents Colorado in Congress, has remained publicly involved in defending her family amid the legal proceedings involving her son.

The child abuse case has received attention because of Tyler’s connection to the congresswoman and because prosecutors later brought forward allegations involving a second incident that was not initially part of the public account of the case.

The plea agreement now gives the court a proposed path toward resolving the child abuse and negligence charges without a lengthy trial.

The allegations remain separate from the charges connected to the video involving Tyler and his former girlfriend.

Those charges arose from a different investigation and were reported after the child abuse case was already underway.

For the child abuse case, Tyler’s guilty plea means the dispute over those charges will move into the sentencing phase.

Prosecutors are seeking no more than 30 days behind bars, 12 months of supervised probation, and completion of the parenting program.

The court will ultimately decide whether to accept the proposed sentencing terms.

The case remains a matter of public attention because of Lauren Boebert’s prominent political position and the multiple legal issues involving her son.

The latest development, however, is the plea agreement addressing the child abuse and negligence allegations involving his child.

Mississippi Broadens Death Penalty to Cover Sexual Battery of Young Children
News

Mississippi Broadens Death Penalty to Cover Sexual Battery of Young Children

/

A Mississippi law allowing the death penalty for certain child sexual battery convictions took effect July 1, as reported by Fox News.

Senate Bill 2821 created the offense of “capital sexual battery” for qualifying cases involving victims younger than 12 and defendants 18 or older.

A death sentence is not automatic after conviction. Prosecutors must seek it, and jurors must unanimously find at least two aggravating factors beyond a reasonable doubt.

At least eight of the 12 jurors must recommend death.

If the jury does not reach that threshold, the defendant receives life in prison without parole.

Tom Homan Puts Dem Leaders On Notice: ‘Get The Hell Out Of The Way’ | Fines-Prison [WATCH]
State Sen. Jeremy England, the bill’s author, said the measure targets the most serious crimes against children.

“That is a crime that, I think, shocks the conscience, certainly. Those are the worst types of crimes against the most innocent of our citizens here in Mississippi,” England said, according to WLBT.

The law expands Mississippi’s death penalty beyond its previous focus on murder convictions.

Critics argue the possibility of an execution could discourage some children from reporting abuse, particularly when the accused is someone they know.

Abraham Bonowitz, executive director of Death Penalty Action, said he previously supported capital punishment but now believes life imprisonment is sufficient.

“There is no need for executions when we can throw away the key,” Bonowitz said.

Bonowitz also questioned whether children would be willing to testify against relatives or other people they know if an execution could result.

“Most of those kinds of crimes are by people that the child knows, and you’re asking a child to then testify against a relative and try to get them executed,” he said.

15 Arrested In Major Child Sex Trafficking Sting In Alabama

Supporters of the law argue that prosecutors should have the option of seeking the maximum punishment in the most serious cases involving children.

Senate Bill 2821 took effect July 1, 2026. Any death sentence imposed under the law is subject to review by the Mississippi Supreme Court.

The law applies only to qualifying offenses and establishes multiple requirements before capital punishment can be imposed.

Fellow Democrat Roasts Francesca Hong After Loss with Brutal Thanksgiving Taunt
News

Fellow Democrat Roasts Francesca Hong After Loss with Brutal Thanksgiving Taunt

/

Francesca Hong’s narrow defeat in Wisconsin’s Democratic gubernatorial primary has sparked reactions from Democrats, Republicans, and political commentators, with some focusing on the progressive candidate’s controversial campaign history and others warning that her strong performance should concern Republicans, as reported by Fox News.

Hong, a Wisconsin state lawmaker from Madison and member of the Democratic Socialists of America, lost the primary this week to Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley.

Crowley defeated Hong by a razor-thin margin after polling had indicated Hong was the apparent favorite heading into the contest.

Hong’s campaign attracted national attention during the race, particularly as Democratic socialist candidates have gained prominence in several states.

Among the issues that followed Hong throughout the campaign were past comments about Thanksgiving and positions involving the U.S. Senate and law enforcement.

Hong previously faced criticism over remarks interpreted as supporting efforts to “cancel” Thanksgiving. She also had to address past calls involving the abolition of the U.S. Senate and police.

After Hong’s defeat, Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., used one of those controversies to needle the defeated candidate.

“Let’s just say it’s a day of Thanksgiving.”

The comment was included in a statement Suozzi sent to CNN following the primary results.

Hong’s loss also prompted criticism from Democratic strategist Anna Greenberg, who questioned whether the candidate had the broader political support necessary for a statewide campaign.

“was a bad candidate without national support,” Greenberg told CNN, adding, “Candidate quality matters!!”

Other political observers argued that Hong’s campaign demonstrated the difficulties faced by Democratic Socialists attempting to move from heavily Democratic urban areas into broader statewide elections.

Tim Graham of the Media Research Center suggested that Hong’s national media appearances may have created additional problems for the campaign, particularly because they forced her to address controversial past statements.

“Some commentators thought she might not have lost if she hadn’t granted interviews to national media outlets at the end, where she had to explain hating Thanksgiving. But if a few minutes of interviews sinks your entire campaign, how talented were you?” Graham told Fox News Digital.

Graham also criticized national media coverage of Democratic Socialist candidates, arguing that major broadcast networks had been slow to pay attention to the movement.

“The broadcast networks have been extremely slow to notice the DSA candidates in all of these states. They ignored Graham Platner and his Nazi tattoo for months on end. They ignored Hong until about a week before the primary.”

Graham continued:

“It feels like she treated these national interviews as a step toward the general election, not a reason to get fired in the primary,” he added. “It’s always funny that the definition of a ‘moderate’ Democrat is anyone who can celebrate Thanksgiving and deplore 9/11.”

While some observers treated Hong’s defeat as evidence that voters rejected a more progressive Democratic agenda, former Trump official Theo Wold offered a different interpretation.

Wold argued that Republicans should pay close attention to how close Hong came to winning the nomination.

“Any Republican who thinks the DSA wave has crested or that DSA candidates can’t win outside of urban areas isn’t paying attention. The correct way to understand last night’s results is that a radical Leftist, with policy views more akin to Trotsky than Jimmy Carter, nearly prevailed in one of the nation’s most closely watched swing states,” he told Fox News Digital.

Wold also argued that Hong’s political positions had support among some voters, while contending that her campaign lacked sufficient backing from working-class voters.

“Hong’s radical views, like those of AOC or Ilhan Omar, are persuasive to a large number of voters, especially naturalized foreign nationals. What Hong lacked was nearly any support from working-class Americans.”

He added:

“The pattern is always the same. DSA candidates run on a platform that they say is for the working class, and then get firmly rejected by actual working-class voters. Because it turns out, socialism is a luxury belief for wealthy, college-educated liberals that people who work with their hands can’t afford,” he added. “The working-class communities I grew up in just want to work a good job and live a good life. They don’t want a politician telling them we need to cancel Thanksgiving or that a Master’s Degree means an expert can organize other people’s lives better.”

Hong conceded the primary to Crowley this week and said she would support him in the general election. Crowley will face Republican Tom Tiffany.

The November contest will carry additional significance for Republicans, who are seeking to win the Wisconsin governor’s race for the first time since 2014.

Hong’s campaign and the reaction to her defeat have therefore become part of a larger discussion about the Democratic Party’s direction, the influence of the Democratic Socialists of America and whether candidates associated with the progressive left can win statewide elections in closely contested states.

The primary result also showed that Hong’s candidacy remained competitive despite the controversy surrounding several of her past statements. While she ultimately fell short against Crowley, the narrow margin has led political figures on both sides to draw different conclusions about what the result means heading into the general election.

Hong’s campaign was contacted for comment, according to Fox News Digital.

Stephen Miller Torches AOC for Laughing Off Woke Ruin and Deadly Consequences [WATCH]
News

Stephen Miller Torches AOC for Laughing Off Woke Ruin and Deadly Consequences [WATCH]

/

White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller criticized Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after the New York Democrat appeared to make light of the so-called “woke” era during a recent interview with ABC News correspondent Jon Karl, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Miller addressed the controversy Wednesday afternoon during an appearance on The Will Cain Show, arguing that Americans should not simply laugh off the political and social consequences associated with policies promoted by the progressive left during that period.

Ocasio-Cortez, widely known as AOC, has been a prominent figure on the Democratic Party’s progressive wing.

Her conversation with Karl has drawn attention as Democrats consider how to position themselves heading into the 2028 presidential campaign.

According to the original report, Ocasio-Cortez discussed the earlier “Woke 1” period during the interview.

Miller took issue with what he viewed as an attempt to treat that period as a subject for humor rather than a time when Americans faced serious problems involving crime, drugs, and public safety.

Miller delivered his criticism in blunt terms.

“Sorry, your husband was m*rdered. Sorry, your mom was killed. Sorry, your loved ones are 6 feet under the ground now. We’re going to have a good laugh about that. It’s sickening. It’s disgusting!”

He continued by listing several problems that he associates with what he called woke ideology.

“The so-called WOKE ideology…a historic increase in shootings, dead bodies, drug overdoses, gangs run AMUCK, citizens living in fear, public spaces seated to violent, thuggish, armed robbers. That was the policy. We’re all going to have a good laugh about that!”

Miller’s comments centered on whether political leaders should be held accountable for policies they previously supported, particularly when those policies involved criminal justice, policing and public safety.

The disagreement comes as Ocasio-Cortez’s national profile remains high and speculation about possible Democratic presidential contenders for 2028 continues.

The original report characterized her interview with Karl as part of an effort to prepare for a potential presidential campaign.

The report also referenced other portions of Ocasio-Cortez’s interview, including discussions involving the Democratic Socialists of America and political commentator Hasan Piker.

Those portions have separately generated criticism from conservatives.

Miller’s appearance gave Republicans another opportunity to argue that voters should remember the political decisions and debates of the previous several years rather than treating them as settled history.

The debate over the “woke” label itself has evolved. Some Democrats have moved away from terminology and positions associated with the movement, while Republicans continue to use the term when discussing crime, policing, drug abuse, and other issues they believe were mishandled under progressive leadership.

The political stakes are significant because Ocasio-Cortez has remained one of the Democratic Party’s most recognizable progressive voices.

Any potential presidential campaign would put renewed attention on her past positions and statements.

Miller, meanwhile, has become one of the Trump administration’s most prominent public defenders.

His criticism of Ocasio-Cortez reflects the broader Republican argument that voters should judge political movements by their results rather than by how quickly politicians try to rename or move beyond them.

Eric Daugherty also highlighted Miller’s remarks in a social-media post, writing:

HOLY CRAP! Stephen Miller just went berserk on people like AOC, LAUGHING OFF the dangers of woke.

The exchange between Miller and Ocasio-Cortez is likely to remain part of the broader political debate heading toward 2028, particularly as both parties attempt to define their records on crime, public safety and government policy.

For Republicans, Miller’s message was straightforward: changing the language surrounding a political era does not necessarily erase the arguments and consequences associated with it.

Democrats, including Ocasio-Cortez, face their own decisions about which parts of that history to defend, explain, or leave behind.

The disagreement also illustrates how the political battles of the past decade continue to shape the next presidential cycle.

With 2028 already entering political discussions, neither side appears eager to surrender the argument over what the country learned from the years that came before.

DoorDash Mother Left with Skull Fractures After Savage Bat Attack [WATCH]
News

DoorDash Mother Left with Skull Fractures After Savage Bat Attack [WATCH]

/

A North Carolina mother of three is recovering from a serious brain injury after authorities say a man followed her to a DoorDash delivery location and attacked her with a bat, as reported by Fox News.

Christen Phillips was making a delivery in Jacksonville, North Carolina, on Aug. 1 when the confrontation began, according to the Onslow County Sheriff’s Office.

Phillips said she had been stopped at an intersection waiting for the vehicle ahead of her to move.

She honked her horn to alert the driver, identified by investigators as Stanley Shockley, 44, to move forward.

According to the sheriff’s office, the vehicle moved out of Phillips’ way before allegedly following her to the location where she was scheduled to deliver food.

Phillips completed the delivery and was returning to her vehicle when Shockley allegedly got out and attacked her before fleeing the area.

“He came around to my door with a small wooden bat or baton and beat me in the head and face with it,” Phillips said in a social media post.

Phillips said she did not remember the attack itself.

“I don’t remember it at all. I woke up an unverified amount of time later,” she said.

Despite her injuries, Phillips was able to drive herself to a nearby hospital. She has since undergone several days of surgeries while recovering from the attack.

Her suspected attacker was arrested Monday, according to the Onslow County Sheriff’s Office.

Shockley, 44, is facing a charge of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury, according to records.

The case drew attention because the alleged attack happened during a routine food delivery and in broad daylight.

Investigators said Shockley followed Phillips after she honked her horn at him, ultimately confronting her after she reached the delivery location.

Onslow County Sheriff Chris Thomas said investigators relied on tips and evidence while working to identify a suspect.

“We understand the public does not see what goes into every investigation, and a case like this can make citizens uneasy. We appreciate the number of tips and leads the public provided us. Our detectives follow every lead, carefully work through the evidence, and continue to pursue answers even when the investigation presents challenges. Their hard work ultimately led them to identify a suspect and make an arrest.”

The sheriff’s office confirmed Shockley’s arrest in connection with the Aug. 1 incident.

DoorDash also responded to the attack and said the company would continue assisting investigators.

“What this Dasher went through is horrific, and we’re relieved she’s safe and on the road to recovery. We’re grateful to law enforcement for making an arrest and will continue to assist their investigation in any way we can,” a DoorDash spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

Phillips’ recovery continues as the criminal case moves forward. The investigation remains with the Onslow County Sheriff’s Office, which said detectives continue working through the evidence surrounding the alleged attack.


Scroll to Top