News

Imagine you’re at a bar at 2 pm. You’ve never been there, and you see that the bar is full of regulars who appear to know each other. They seem affable, but you know you’re the new guy, and you’re walking into their territory. It’s up to you to fit in with the crowd, not the other way around. 

The main guy doing all the talking points out the window to the parking lot. Since it’s mid-afternoon, the sun is blazing down on the cars. But he says, “Man, it’s getting darker and darker as summer comes on. By tomorrow it’s going to be impossible to find your car without a flashlight by the time 3 o’clock rolls around.” Everyone at the bar agrees, and many chip in with stories about how they stubbed their toes or twisted their ankles trying to pick their way through the darkness of full summer sun when they were kids. 

I know what you’re thinking, reader. You’re thinking you’d immediately recognize that they were all suffering from a mass delusion, and you’d leave.

Not so fast. There’s a very good chance you’d start questioning your own sanity. Is he right? Does the sun make it dark outside, and you’ve been misled your whole life? After all, everybody else at the bar agrees; what if it’s me who’s crazy? 

This is how the “reversal” or the “big lie” works. If you tell the opposite of the truth with enough conviction, and with a show of social solidarity on your side, you absolutely can convince normal, sane people to disbelieve their own eyes and start questioning their sanity. 

Transgenderism got as far as it did in society because it uses the reversal, the big lie. It brazenly claims that men are women, and acts genuinely shocked when you disagree. People are so stunned by this that they stay silent, and then, person by person, they start agreeing. 

Yesterday we brought you a story about Democrat House member Bill Keating losing his composure and shouting at committee chairman Ken Self because Self correctly referred to another lawmaker as “Mr. McBride.” He was referring to “Sarah” (nee Tim) McBride, a male representative from Delaware who wears dresses and calls himself a woman. The big reversal worked on Rep. Keating, who seemed genuinely emotionally triggered and angry that anyone could call the obvious male McBride an obvious male. He was offended and personally upset by a statement of reality. 

Today, the day after the incident, McBride is working the big lie/reversal as hard as possible. And it works on anyone who’s on the left. True to narcissistic form, he spoke at a press conference about how people who won’t call men women are “weird” and obsessed with “weird” issues. Yes, it’s brazen, and that’s why it works. 

I think a man pretending to be a woman is “weird” pic.twitter.com/hBiviXiPKL

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) March 13, 2025

Complete with valley girl vocal fry, and “on point” with au courant phrases—”I appear to live rent-free in the minds of some of my Republican colleagues”—McBride managed to reverse the truth about just who is “weird” and it got the approval of his Democrat colleagues. 

Let’s see what people on X/Twitter had to say. 

Best actor award pic.twitter.com/0YH5hoHR8v

— 🇺🇸 Emes Winster 🇺🇸 (@EmesVotes) March 13, 2025

This is where he should be, not Congress. pic.twitter.com/WYL2vUiRwJ

— L. Young (@spice229) March 13, 2025

pic.twitter.com/EHajsEu0AV

— Bubblesjim (@Bubblesjim) March 13, 2025

Hmm. Sentiment seems to be running against Tim McBride. 

It’s that simple pic.twitter.com/BvVAFQNSRx

— Gadget 🇺🇸AF (@bigmel) March 13, 2025

This one is QED. 

pic.twitter.com/WO3MHTuprj

— Andyskilo (@imustdecrease12) March 13, 2025

President Trump signed an executive order to stop the exploitation of the judicial system by radical leftists and activist judges through frivolous lawsuits. 

The Trump administration faces over 100 legal challenges challenging various executive orders and actions the president has signed and taken since he took office on January 10. Only two cases have so far been resolved, underscoring the need to improve the efficiency of the justice system overwhelmed by requests for temporary injunctions. The memo was directed to the heads of executive departments and agencies, directing them to enforce the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) for anyone seeking preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders (TRO). 

The order requires department heads to work with the Attorney General in requesting federal courts to demand a security deposit from petitioners as required by FRCP 65(c). The court can use the security deposit to cover its costs or compensate the restrained party if it determines that the injunction was wrongly issued.  Additionally, the amount must be sufficient to cover potential costs and damages if the court determines that the activists abused the judicial process to the detriment of the restrained party. Additionally, the enjoined party can argue for a higher bond, while the mover can also request a lower amount.

The executive order lamented that the activists face no consequences when their requests for frivolous injunctions were rejected. This regrettable situation encourages radical left activists to request more temporary injunctions, essentially crippling government policy. Using this tactic, activist organizations and judges insert themselves into the executive policy-making process, undermining the federal government’s democratically-issued mandate.

“This anti-democratic takeover is orchestrated by forum-shopping organizations that repeatedly bring meritless suits, used for fundraising and political grandstanding, without any repercussions when they fail,” the lawsuit stated.

The order highlighted the negative impacts of unnecessary TRO requests. It warned that taxpayers bear the cost of the litigation process and must wait for government services before the issues are resolved. The Department of Justice also dedicates substantial resources to fighting frivolous lawsuits instead of defending public safety.

“The effective administration of justice in the Federal courts depends on mechanisms that deter frivolous litigation, protect parties from unwarranted costs, and streamline judicial processes.” 

Subsequently, the security deposit ensures that taxpayers do not pay the costs of litigation or damages if activist judges wrongly issue preliminary injunctions. The risk of the injunctions being reversed should also deter activists from requesting them and judges from issuing them.

“Federal courts should hold litigants accountable for their misrepresentations and ill-granted injunctions,” the executive order stated.

Surprisingly, activist judges have repeatedly ignored the rule, which speaks volumes about the judicial process in which some of the temporary injunctions were issued.

Meanwhile, activist judges can set unreasonable low bonds to encourage their leftwing friends to file frivolous requests for temporary injunctions. However, the affected departments can request higher courts to set a reasonable amount, preventing activist judges from abusing the system.

With the threat of baseless requests being rejected outright and additional penalties imposed, enforcement of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) could reduce the number of preliminary injunction requests. 

EPA Chief Lee Zeldin has notified eight recipients of the $20 billion climate fund that their grants had been terminated. In a recently surfaced video, a source told Project Veritas that the Biden administration had rushed to disperse the funds before Trump took over.

“Now it’s how to get the money out as fast as possible before they come in … It truly feels like we’re on the Titanic or throwing gold bar off the top edge,” EPA’s special advisor Brent Efron told a Project Veritas undercover investigator. The conservative activist group termed the quick disbursements as “an insurance policy against Trump winning.”

BREAKING: @EPA Advisor Admits ‘Insurance Policy’ Against Trump is Funneling Billions to Climate Organizations, “We’re Throwing Gold Bars off the Titanic”

“It was an insurance policy against Trump winning.”

“Get the money out as fast as possible before they [Trump… pic.twitter.com/eaAihuNvAh

— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) December 3, 2024

However, Zeldin has reclaimed $20 billion awarded under Biden’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) and worked with Citibank to freeze. He also notified the impacted organizations that they would no longer receive the awarded grants.

“It is my commitment to President Trump, Congress, and you, that EPA will be an exceptional steward of your tax dollars. I’ll have it no other way!” Lee Zeldin said.

Recipients of the Biden climate slush fund included “Coalition for Green Capital, Climate United Fund, Power Forward Communities, Opportunity Finance Network, and Inclusiv and the Justice Climate Fund,” the Associated Press reported.

Zeldin bragged about making a significant discovery and keeping a very important pledge he made to the American people shortly after he was confirmed. 

“Fortunately, my awesome team at the EPA has found the gold bars. Shockingly, roughly $20 billion of your tax dollars were parked at an outside financial institution by the Biden EPA. This scheme was the first of its kind in EPA history and it was purposely designed to obligate all of the money in a rush job with reduced oversight,”

He lamented that only eight organizations were responsible for the amount and operated without transparency. Apparently, one organization known as Climate United Fund had received a whopping $7 billion. Approximately $14 billion and $6 billion were awarded to non-profit organizations implementing climate projects in disadvantaged communities.

Comparing awarding the contracts to tossing the “gold bars” off Titanic, Zeldin asserted the importance of reviewing every transaction. He promised that his agency would show responsibility by accounting for every awarded penny. In a separate post, he also warned that his organization would have “zero tolerance of any waste and abuse” of federal government funds.

“The financial agent agreement with the bank needs to be instantly terminated and the bank must immediately return all the gold bars that the Biden Administration tossed off the Titanic. EPA needs to assume responsibility of all these funds. We will review every penny that has gone out the door. I will [be] referring this matter to the inspector general’s office and will work with the Justice Department as well.”

🚨The Biden EPA tossed $20 billion of “gold bars off the Titanic”.

BIG UPDATE! We found the gold bars and they are now being recovered for you, the hardworking American taxpayer.

Here are more of the details: pic.twitter.com/DM4C0TQcpj

— Lee Zeldin (@epaleezeldin) February 13, 2025

Meanwhile, Zeldin’s latest recovery adds to the growing list of wasteful government expenditures that the Trump administration hopes to stop. The president recently directed the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Elon Musk to step up his efforts to stop government waste.

US debt clock is a website listing US debt in real time, but they recently added DOGE saving clock.

Its about to hit $200 Billion just from cutting fraud and state funding for leftist politics. pic.twitter.com/ourCLQJSy4

— Callum (@AkkadSecretary) March 12, 2025

Another media “fact check” face plant where the fact checker doesn’t have the slightest clue what he’s talking about. “OOOO b/c” is not a typo. 

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart OOOO, or Quad O, is a federal reg under the Clean Air Act.

Also, those aren’t zeroes, it’s the letter “O”. pic.twitter.com/adPkShbPHS

— Lee Zeldin (@epaleezeldin) March 13, 2025

A heated exchange erupted on CNN’s NewsNight when former South Carolina Democrat lawmaker Bakari Sellers clashed with Shark Tank investor Kevin O’Leary over federal spending cuts and education policy. The debate, which took place during Abby Phillip’s late-night panel, quickly escalated into a full-blown argument, with Sellers attempting to lecture O’Leary on economic policy—only to be met with immediate pushback. Sellers, now a political commentator, criticized recent budget cuts, particularly targeting reductions in the Departments of Education and Agriculture under President Donald Trump.

O’Leary, a longtime advocate for shrinking the federal government, argued that the cuts should go even further. As Sellers attempted to explain his perspective, he addressed O’Leary directly: “Let me just say, can I explain to you—” O’Leary, worth an estimated $400 million, immediately interrupted. “You need to explain it to me? I know how it works,” he shot back.

Sellers doubled down. “But no, you don’t.”

As Sellers seemed prepared to launch into a lengthy explanation, O’Leary cut him off again. “I do, I’ve done it multiple times,” he countered, referencing his extensive business experience. The argument intensified, with Sellers and other panelists expressing outrage at O’Leary’s stance on government spending.

“You cannot run everyday government the same way you run [the private sector]!” Sellers exclaimed.

O’Leary responded without hesitation. “This is worse than the private sector. [This is] fat dripping-with-waste government.” The cuts discussed align with President Trump’s ongoing effort to reduce federal spending, including a planned executive order to dismantle the Department of Education. The USDA cuts announced earlier in the week also fit within the administration’s broader strategy of reducing bureaucratic waste.

During the segment, O’Leary pointed to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s aggressive approach to cost-cutting, including his handling of layoffs at his companies. He argued that deeper cuts were necessary across government agencies.

“This issue is not going to go away because it’s very contentious, but when you cut in any organization, government or private, it’s very demoralizing,” O’Leary said.

“It’s traumatic, and it gets lots of bad press as we’re doing right now.”

The businessman then outlined his philosophy on budget reductions.

“But that’s why you cut 20 percent more. I think Elon is not cutting enough. Cut 20 percent more. Now get your spreadsheet out. These are the names. Whack everybody and then 20 percent more—as we do in the private sector every day and have done for 100 years. Demoralization only happens once.”

O’Leary’s comments drew backlash from the liberal panelists, particularly over his stance on education reform. When he suggested that ineffective educators are contributing to failing schools, Sellers and others pushed back, arguing that poverty and hunger were larger issues.

“My whole career was in education,” O’Leary said, attempting to clarify his point while being interrupted by other panelists.

Sellers, speaking over O’Leary, insisted on making his case but struggled to maintain control of the conversation.

“So, like… no, no, no… let me finish,” he stammered.

O’Leary, often compared to President Trump for his blunt business-minded approach, has built a career in finance and entrepreneurship. He co-founded O’Leary Funds and Softkey, the latter of which was sold to Mattel in 1999 for $3.5 billion, securing his status as a multimillionaire. In 2017, he briefly entered politics, running for leadership of Canada’s Conservative Party before dropping out due to lack of support.

He has been an outspoken critic of liberal economic policies, particularly those proposed by Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 election cycle. Following Trump’s victory, O’Leary expressed satisfaction with the outcome, stating that he was “very proud of the work I did” throughout the campaign.

Visit RVM News for more stories like this.

The White House has responded to an email from a senior USAID official ordering staffers to destroy documents at the Ronald Reagan Building on Tuesday.

The building is currently being cleared out as thousands of USAID workers have been placed on administrative leave.

In a motion filed in Washington, D.C., federal court, the unions cited an email from USAID’s acting executive director, Erica Carr, which stated:

“Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break.

The only labeling required on the burn bags are the words ‘SECRET’ and ‘USAID/(B/IO)’ in dark sharpie if possible.”

NEWS: USAID staff have been instructed to clear out classified safes and personnel docs, per an email obtained by @CBSNews.

“Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break," the email reads. pic.twitter.com/h7xS6y7Wsv

— Sara Cook (@saraecook) March 11, 2025

White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly responded by saying it was “more fake news hysteria.”

“The USAID building will soon be occupied by CBP,” Kelly said.

“This was sent to roughly three dozen employees. The documents involved were old, mostly courtesy content (content from other agencies), and the originals still exist on classified computer systems,” she added.

“More fake news hysteria!”

The USAID building will soon be occupied by CBP.

This was sent to roughly three dozen employees. The documents involved were old, mostly courtesy content (content from other agencies), and the originals still exist on classified computer systems.

More fake news hysteria! https://t.co/MLP84Mvn0t

— Anna Kelly (@AnnaKelly47) March 11, 2025

The lawsuit was brought by the American Federation of Government Employees and the American Foreign Service Association, alleging that Trump overstepped his authority by largely shuttering an independent agency established by Congress by firing employees.

On Tuesday, the plaintiffs asked U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols for a temporary restraining order to block the shredding of the documents.

They argued that the loss of vital personnel or other records could prevent USAID from resuming its operations.

The judge responded by ordering both sides to submit a status report by Wednesday morning proposing a schedule for briefs on the motion.

Nichols allowed the Trump administration to proceed with its plan to put more than 2,000 USAID employees on leave.

The Trump administration has scrapped more than 80% of USAID’s programs and fired much of its staff.

In a separate lawsuit, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration cannot refuse to spend foreign aid money appropriated by Congress, stopping short of restoring canceled contracts.

Visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

What’s going on at the soon-to-be defunct U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)? Well, lots of document shredding, but for what purpose, and whether this is standard operating procedure or an attempt to cover up malfeasance, is not clear. 

Politico reports that a “senior official” at the troubled agency sent an email to all staff instructing them to destroy “sensitive” documents. 

USAID has come under fire from the Trump administration for wasteful spending on international projects that seem to have nothing at all to do with benefiting the United States. Worse, the agency has been funding “woke” projects on transgenderism and more in foreign countries. 

Here’s just a short list of the grants the agency has disbursed to foreign countries, according to a summary from the White House:

—$1.5 million for “diversity, equity and inclusion” in Serbia

—$6 million to boost Egypt’s tourist trade

—$47,000 for a “transgender opera” mounted in Colombia

—$32,000 for what’s described as a “transgender comic book” to be published in Peru

—$2 million for sex change operations for the citizens of Guatemala

You get the picture. President Donald Trump has targeted USAID for closure,  which sparked a flurry of lawsuits by left-aligned interest groups. As of March 11, 2025, a federal court has ordered the Trump administration to pay out $671 million in USAID money owed to contractors who have already completed projects for the agency. But, it appears the courts recognize the administration’s authority to shut the agency down after making good on its back bills, and that’s exactly what Trump is doing. 

That brings us to the order from USAID officials to employees to shred documents. While the media is full of reports on this, it is not yet clear what’s going on. Is this a brazen and illegal attempt by fleeing officials to cover up misdeeds? Or, is it standard operating procedure related to sensitive or classified documents? It’s murky, but a union that apparently represents contractors working for USAID (really?) has asked federal courts to step in to stop the destruction of documents. 

According to Politico, a supervisor instructed employees by email to “Shred as many documents first, and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break.”

It will be at least one or two more days before the fog around this situation clears. Meanwhile X/Twitter users are speculating. Most seem to think it’s “extra-legal”:

“This isn't even parody. They're deleting history in real time. SPEECHLESS.”

Waitaminute…they are literally burning federal documents without authorization?

Surely this cannot be legal.

🤔 pic.twitter.com/z9ShtI1FcK

— Douglas Ritz (@douglasritz) March 11, 2025

SPOLIATION: Isn’t this a gross legal violation of Duty to Preserve Evidence or has no legal action been initiated? If not what not! There is a duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence (including electronically stored information (ESI), hard copy documents, and other…

— Ronald Ingram (@imaginician) March 12, 2025

If true, this appears illegal. Or am I missing something?

— Bitcoin Brunch ⚡️☕️ (@bitbrunchpod) March 11, 2025

This user thinks the alleged burn-order is so brazen it can’t possibly be real:

This looks SO FAKE.

Nobody would incriminate themselves by sending that ridiculous email.

— Aperture Geopolitics (@AperatureFinTek) March 11, 2025

Other users think this is probably a standard practice when an agency is closing down and it may be blown out of proportion:

Chill. pic.twitter.com/LgDwadAr0W

— K J Gillenwater (@kjgillenwater) March 11, 2025

What do you think?

Image Credit: © Jack Gruber-USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Content Services, LLC

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has identified nearly $900 million in savings after reviewing just two percent of its contracts, according to VA Secretary Doug Collins.

The findings come as part of a broader effort to eliminate wasteful spending while maintaining healthcare and benefits for American veterans.

Collins made the announcement in a video posted to his official X account, where he addressed concerns regarding potential changes at the VA.

He emphasized that the department’s ongoing reviews would not impact the quality of healthcare or benefits for veterans and their families.

“VA will always fulfill its duty to provide veterans, families, caregivers, and survivors the healthcare and benefits they have earned,” Collins stated.

“That’s a promise, and while we conduct our review, VA will continue to hire for more than 300,000 mission-critical positions to ensure healthcare and benefits for VA beneficiaries are not impacted.”

The VA, under Collins’ leadership, has launched a comprehensive review of its contracts to identify areas where spending can be reduced without affecting services for veterans.

Collins revealed that the department currently manages approximately 90,000 contracts, valued at over $67 billion.

In its initial review of just two percent of those contracts, the department identified nearly 600 non-mission critical or duplicative agreements that could be canceled.

These cancellations have resulted in nearly $900 million in savings.

The review process is part of a larger initiative aimed at ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent efficiently while improving the overall effectiveness of the VA.

Despite these cost-cutting measures, Collins assured veterans and their families that healthcare and benefit services would not be compromised. Instead, the department is working to streamline operations while continuing to expand hiring efforts.

“While we work to eliminate waste, we are also ensuring that the VA remains fully staffed in areas that directly serve our veterans,” Collins said.

The VA currently employs more than 300,000 workers across the country and is looking to fill additional positions to meet the needs of veterans.

The review of VA contracts is part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to increase efficiency across federal agencies.

President Donald Trump has made veteran care a key priority of his administration, with a focus on reducing bureaucracy, cutting waste, and improving services.

The administration’s efforts have included initiatives such as expanding veteran healthcare access, streamlining the VA’s internal processes, and increasing funding for programs that directly benefit veterans and their families.

Collins’ announcement signals a continued push to ensure that resources are being allocated effectively while maintaining the highest level of care for those who have served in the U.S. military.

As the VA continues its contract review, further savings may be identified, reinforcing the administration’s commitment to fiscal responsibility and improving services for veterans.

Visit RVM News for more articles like this.

Tucker Carlson has claimed a Republican U.S. senator has been secretly working to thwart the release of the highly anticipated files on President John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

Carlson said the individual pressured those within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to reject the nomination of another person by President Donald Trump to join his national intelligence team.

The nominee previously pushed for a full, unredacted release of the JFK files, which Carlson said was the reason behind the senator’s moves.

“You have a sitting member of the United States Senate whose main goal is to keep those files secret, and then you have to ask yourself, what is that?” Carlson told former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo during his show.

While nobody alive could be implicated in the assassination cover-up of Kennedy, Carlson said he knew who may have been attempting to do so, naming Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) of Arkansas.

“If you’re telling me that, six weeks ago, a sitting senator was attempting to keep someone out of a job to keep these files secret to protect ‘the CIA,’ I don’t believe that for a second,” Carlson declared.

Cuomo asked Carlson why he had not called Trump and asked what motivation Sen. Cotton may have for blocking his nominee.

“I haven’t. I haven’t asked,” Carlson said.

“I’d like to… I’m not sure he’ll sit down and do an interview with me.”

Watch:

Cotton fired back at Carlson, saying he “knows how to reach me” and hasn’t followed up to ask him about the secondhand story.

“This is false. I have no problem releasing the ‘JFK files.’ Had @tuckercarlson asked me, I would’ve told him,” Cotton wrote on X.

“He has texted me multiple times in recent weeks, so he knows how to reach me.”

He continued:

“I would’ve explained that I’ve never spoken to President Trump or his associates or administration officials about the files, never objected to the appointment of any person because of the files, and have complete faith that Tulsi Gabbard, John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and other officials will release the files as appropriate in accordance with President Trump’s directive.”

However, Cotton recently objected to President Trump’s decision to revoke security details for several officials from his administration, including:

• Former National Security Advisor John Bolton
• Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and his top aide Brian Hook

Cotton said Trump’s decision could have a major effect on who in the intelligence community agrees to work with him in his second administration.

“It’s also about the president being able to get good people and get good advice,” Cotton said.

“They might hesitate to do so, or they might hesitate if they’re in office to give him the advice he needs to carry out the policies that he decides upon.”

Visit Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

A new investigation by The Oversight Project, an initiative of the conservative Heritage Foundation, has raised concerns about former President Joe Biden’s frequent use of an autopen signature during his time in the White House.

The group alleges that nearly all of Biden’s signed documents throughout his presidency were executed using an autopen device, calling into question who was truly in control of the executive branch.

The Oversight Project shared its findings on X (formerly Twitter), posting examples of Biden’s autopen signature alongside a statement:

“We gathered every document we could find with Biden’s signature over the course of his presidency. All used the same autopen signature except for the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year.”

🚨WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY🚨

We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency.

All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the… https://t.co/CC3oJUkNr4 pic.twitter.com/mtNrZsALDu

— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) March 6, 2025

The organization is now pressing for answers regarding who was in control of the autopen, stating that whoever managed the device effectively controlled the presidency.

Visit LifeZette for more articles like this.

We talk about Trump Derangement Syndrome in a comical way, usually. Oh, we mean it. People who exhibit TDS really do seem deranged, but we often toss that label off laughingly. These people aren’t really crazy, are they? 

Yes, I think they are. But not “crazy” in the way we usually think of when we think of mental illness. These people are not suffering from schizophrenic hallucinations. They’re not manic depressives off their medication, blowing their life savings on a gambling or shopping binge. It’s not that kind of crazy. 

It’s worse. 

Look at the behavior of the entire Democratic Senate during Trump’s address to Congress. Every single one of them refused to stand or applaud for a 13-year-old boy with brain cancer who was honored with a membership in the Secret Service. We’ve never seen anything like this before in modern times. 

Look at the scowling leftist women bedecked in pink “for women” who voted, every last one of them, against a bill to protect girls from the invasion of privacy and the danger of being hurt by “trans girls” (boys and men) playing on their sports teams. That’s right. The “feminists” voted against protecting girls from larger, stronger boys in school sports. 

This is a kind of “crazy” that’s not normal mental illness. In my opinion, a great number of these deranged leftists have something called a Cluster B personality disorder. You know these “disorders” by common names like pathological narcissism, emotional instability (borderline personality disorder), and psychopathy. 

I think we’re seeing this kind of character disorder in the video I’m going to show below. It features a woman and a man (he wears makeup and claims to be a woman) who are lying about and publicly abusing Payton McNabb. McNabb is the young woman who was severely injured in a high school volleyball competition because a strong young man calling himself a “trans girl” was allowed to play as a girl. He spiked the ball into McNabb’s face so hard she is left with partial paralysis on her right side. 

Payton McNabb, who was paralyzed after being struck by a transgender volleyball opponent, condemned the Olympics for allowing trans boxers to fight women.

At 17, Payton was hit in the face by a spiked ball, causing brain damage and paralysis on her right side.

Payton:
👇 pic.twitter.com/bjByy5Seka

— ⚡☀️sLOVEnia 🇸🇮☀️⚡ (@occultni) August 2, 2024

Here’s the video with the woman and the “trans woman.” They target McNabb, and call her a “perpetrator” because McNabb filmed a “trans woman” barging into the ladies’ bathroom. You know, that place where men don’t belong. For her “sin,” McNabb has now been kicked out of her sorority. 

Payton McNabb herself shared the video on her X/Twitter feed. 

THIS is who Delta Zeta sided with when they kicked me out of my sorority.

They called me, the woman in the women's bathroom, the perpetrator in this scenario while calling the man the victim.

Is this a sick joke? So much for
"sisterhood", @DeltaZetaNatl pic.twitter.com/RcslUuO2Bp

— Payton McNabb (@paytonmcnabb_) March 7, 2025

Take a good look and listen to these two. The vocal fry, the mannerisms, the smirking stare into the camera by this deranged man. In my view, you’re looking at serious personality disorders in these people, and in the people who share their views. Something is desperately morally wrong with grown men putting on makeup and targeting young women for shame, and calling them “perpetrators”, because these young women are objecting to actual abuse. 

Here’s what X/Twitter users had to say:

The guy is literally saying he wouldn't had been so nice about the interaction if it were him instead of the yellow dress guy & that's one BIG reason why FEMALES are afraid of trans MEN in their bathrooms. 💯

— Cassandra Martinez (@theparkwmykids) March 7, 2025

I guarantee there is not one tomato nor woman in this graphic: pic.twitter.com/HYyrNiK2jH

— Schlerenchyma (@UnCommmonCents) March 8, 2025

Disturbing to say the least.

— X Money XRP (@TroySabrowski) March 7, 2025

These men are the ultimate expression of misogyny.

— Ebem (@Ebem06467554) March 7, 2025

Normal people have your back. And when history looks back on the perpetrators, they won’t be able to escape their evil.

— Jon (@Jon097470946325) March 7, 2025

Woke Spy readers, I usually write in a light or sarcastic tone of voice, but in this article I’m giving it to you straight. I have unfortunate personal, family, and professional experience with people who have these personality and character disorders. They are not merely and only irritating or obnoxious, they are often very dangerous. Look for the signs, and watch your back.