News

President Trump drove a stake through the heart of another racist Biden policy that gave minorities $2.75 billion solely based on their race. Under a new Trump directive, the Biden-era Digital Equity Act will cease to exist.

The bill establishes “grant programs for promoting digital equity, supporting digital inclusion activities, and building capacity for state-led efforts to increase adoption of broadband by their residents.”

“The bill also establishes the Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program for supporting efforts to achieve digital equity, promote digital inclusion, and stimulate adoption of broadband.”

It dished out $2.75 billion to support various groups, including incarcerated individuals, disabled people, and non-English speakers, who are mostly illegal aliens. It also specifically targeted individuals in a “racial or ethnic minority group.”

“I have spoken with my wonderful Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, and we agree that the Biden/Harris so-called ‘Digital Equity Act’ is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

“No more woke handouts based on race! The Digital Equity Program is a RACIST and ILLEGAL $2.5 BILLION DOLLAR giveaway. I am ending this IMMEDIATELY, and saving Taxpayers BILLIONS OF DOLLARS!”

🚨 JUST IN: Trump TERMINATES Biden's "Digital Equity Act," saving billions.

"No more woke handouts based on race! The Digital Equity Program is a RACIST and ILLEGAL $2.5 BILLION DOLLAR giveaway." pic.twitter.com/n7cRx7h420

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 8, 2025

The program was part of the 2021 Biden administration’s $1 trillion infrastructure bill, H.R. 3684, also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and included social spending and “clean energy” investments.

While the program committed over $42 billion to connecting everyone to “reliable, affordable high-speed internet,” not a single person had benefited from it by 2024.

“In 2021, the Biden Administration got $42.45 billion from Congress to deploy high-speed Internet to millions of Americans,” Brendan Carr, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman, posted on Twitter. “Years later, it has not connected even 1 person with those funds. In fact, it now says that no construction projects will even start until 2025 at earliest.”

In 2021, the Biden Administration got $42.45 billion from Congress to deploy high-speed Internet to millions of Americans.

Years later, it has not connected even 1 person with those funds. In fact, it now says that no construction projects will even start until 2025 at earliest.

— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) June 14, 2024

It remains unclear how much of the $42 billion has been committed toward the racist program. However, Trump’s timely action to stop the project before construction begins could save American taxpayers a significant amount.

Meanwhile, critics, including the enraged left, took to social media to throw a tantrum after President Trump abruptly stopped their race-based slush fund.

Bangladeshi-born Virginia state Senator Saddam Azlan Salim said his state was already planning to use the funds under Governor Youngkin’s Digital Opportunity Plan. 

Virginia already has a plan for funds under the Digital Equity Act: Governor Youngkin's Digital Opportunity Plan, to bring broadband to rural areas and even smart tech to rural farms. Too bad Trump thinks its racist and unconstitutional.@JenniferBoysko https://t.co/L80SDf3Cff pic.twitter.com/QgxPDr7S0U

— Senator Saddam Azlan Salim (@SalimVASenate) May 9, 2025

Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey also described Trump’s action as illegal and promised to fight back against it, likely because Democrats could easily get a restraining order from an activist judge.

“This illegal action will hurt our economy, our schools, our seniors, and our democracy. We will fight back against it,” posted Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey.

Congress passed the Digital Equity Act to help ensure that all Americans could participate equally in the online world. This illegal action will hurt our economy, our schools, our seniors, and our democracy. We will fight back against it. pic.twitter.com/8dy7GGbwFG

— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) May 9, 2025

Ironically, leftists were not in a hurry to connect these “underserved communities” until Trump decided to hit the brakes on the program. While they argue that ending the program would widen the digital divide across the country, a more realistic approach could address the same problems without racial discrimination.

The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into New York Attorney General Letitia James following a referral from a former federal housing official under the Trump administration, Fox News has confirmed.

A source familiar with the matter said a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia has issued subpoenas related to allegations that James misrepresented a property in Virginia as her primary residence in order to obtain more favorable loan terms.

The probe is reportedly also examining a separate claim that James inaccurately listed the number of livable units in a Brooklyn property, allegedly to secure another favorable loan.

The criminal referral was made by William Pulte, then-Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who requested that the Justice Department investigate both incidents.

According to Pulte, James claimed a single-family residence in Virginia was her primary home despite serving in public office in New York.

In the second case, she allegedly overstated the number of livable units in a multifamily property located in Brooklyn.

James’ attorney, Abbe Lowell, responded to the investigation in a statement Thursday, characterizing the claims as politically motivated and previously addressed.

“These baseless and long-discredited allegations, put to rest by my April 24 letter to the Department of Justice, are suddenly back in the news just days after President Trump publicly attacked Attorney General James,” Lowell said.

Lowell further stated, “This appears to be the political retribution President Trump threatened to exact that AG Bondi assured the Senate would not occur on her watch. If prosecutors are genuinely interested in the truth, we are prepared to meet false claims with facts.”

Following the referral, Lowell sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ, accusing President Trump of leveraging the Justice Department for political retaliation.

In the letter, Lowell cited past statements by the president targeting James and referenced public calls for accountability.

James has been a prominent legal adversary of President Trump, participating in multiple lawsuits against his administration during his first term in office.

Most notably, she led the civil case against Trump and the Trump Organization, alleging they falsified business records to receive favorable loan terms.

A judge ultimately ordered Trump to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties, although the ruling is currently under appeal.

In his letter, Lowell argued that Trump’s prior claims about a politicized Justice Department are contradicted by the current investigation.

“The stunning hypocrisy of President Trump’s complaint that the Justice Department had been ‘politicized’ and ‘weaponized’ against him is laid bare as he and others in his administration are now asking you to undertake the very same practice,” he wrote.

Lowell also addressed the specific allegations in detail.

Regarding the Virginia property, he acknowledged that James signed a power-of-attorney document suggesting the home was to be used as a primary residence, but claimed this was an error.

He added that other lender documents made clear the home was not intended to be James’ primary residence.

As for the Brooklyn property, James is accused of inflating the number of livable units to receive lower loan rates.

Lowell argued that Pulte ignored more recent documentation that listed the residence as a four-unit multifamily dwelling, instead focusing on a certificate of occupancy dated from 2001.

Please visit RVM News for more stories like this.

There’s something about Pete Buttigieg. You remember him. He’s the former Secretary of Transportation who waited weeks to show up in a small Ohio town poisoned by a toxic train derailment in 2023. And when he did show up, locals and the Internet made fun of his choice to wear upscale leather dress shoes rather than boots suited to walking around a clean-up site. 

Wounded, Buttigieg said Republicans were just hypocrites anyway who don’t know the names of discount clothing stores that real Americans shop at. “You think Tucker Carlson knows the difference between a T.J. Maxx and a Kohl’s,” he sniped during media interviews about the backlash at the time. 

But does Pete really know anything about T.J. Maxx clothing? After all, Vogue lovingly profiled him in 2019 when he was still just the mayor of South Bend, Indiana. Check out how the fashion magazine described him:

“In person, Buttigieg’s style is amiable and controlled. He speaks, like a newscaster, in lucid paragraphs, with a solid baritone and boxed-in decorum. He seems to live in white shirts and pressed slacks—it’s his dress even now, around the house—and wears his hair in the same tame coif as Mike Pence, who was elected Indiana’s governor the year he was sworn in as mayor.”

What is that “something” about Mayor Pete? It’s somewhere in the neighborhood of “inauthentic,” or “ersatz,” or “counterfeit.” You can’t escape the impression that you’re watching someone perform being normal. There’s a robotic quality to his manner, his look, and the way he carries himself. It’s like the plot of some 1950s b-grade sci-fi movie where humanoid aliens land on earth and try to blend in by saying awkward things like, “I am a normal Earth man, I assure you.”

And then there’s Chasten, his husband. The two of them look like the gay version of a Mormon-wear catalog, and they seem to be aware of it, and even revel in it. The impression from pictures of them together is that they’re trying to show a version of the buttoned-up 1950s but with gay marriage and adopted twins. 

President Donald Trump has picked up on that je-ne-sais-quoi about Pete, and remarked on it during a White House event. Trump contrasted the members of the Republican Party with the Democrats, and gave some examples (including ratchet House Rep. Jasmine Crockett) of the “talent” on the blue side of the aisle. 

In his trademark drily humorous tone, Trump noted that Buttigieg rides around on a bicycle built for two along with hubby Chasten, which Trump called “a nice, loving relationship.” But you can hear the silent giggle. 

Trump: "Democrats have Buttigeg, who rides on his bike with his husband, and Crockett. You could have them." pic.twitter.com/61VOgecLi3

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 8, 2025

Here’s what X posters had to say. 

Trump called him gay without calling him gay 😂😂

— Courtside Kev (@Courtside_Kev) May 8, 2025

Boy, did he paint a picture with that line! 😂

— David Santa Carla 🦇 (@TheOnlyDSC) May 8, 2025

Just throwing shots out for the fun of it!

— C for Curiosity (@CforCuriosity) May 8, 2025

It’s the humor that Democrats hate. Trump is genuinely funny, and they can’t stand it. 

What President has ever roasted better than Trump? 😂

— Andyskilo (@imustdecrease12) May 8, 2025

I love how he's not afraid to poke fun at them. Guess that's a refreshing change from all the seriousness we're used to!..weird

— The Little Guy That Beats the Market (@fulldeg) May 8, 2025

Trump administration officials are preparing to release the unredacted recording of Hur’s interview with Joe Biden, in which he explained how documents containing classified national secrets were piled up in his home garage.

The interview, based on transcripts released the following March, indicated that Biden had no idea how the productions got there and appeared confused.

Hur even declined to bring charges against Biden, concluding that a jury would be sympathetic to a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

The description of Biden as a frail and forgetful 81-year-old became one of the devastating blows that ended his reelection campaign.

Democrats have since blocked the release of the tapes, but they may finally see the light of day.

The interview also destroyed the media narrative that Biden had the mental stamina to serve another four years in the world’s most demanding job.

While the details of the pending release are still in flux, the Biden camp is preparing for a major confrontation.

The decision of whether to release the tapes also operates under a deadline set by a Freedom of Information Act request filed by conservative legal groups, set for May 20.

The Justice Department has been ordered by a judge to declare whether it still stands by that decision.

At the time, Biden’s administration argued that the policy would chill witnesses participating in other high-profile federal investigations.

Republicans have long sought access to the tapes, which they say further elucidate the mental decline Biden suffered from and which members of his administration covered up.

“The Hur audio will confirm what is one of the biggest cover ups in American history,” Mike Davis, an occasional advisor to President Donald Trump, told the outlet.

While House Republicans don’t appear to be part of the group pushing for the tapes’ release, Democrats at the time fought against the release of the tapes and accused the GOP of seeking to spin the audio into attack ads the following year.

As we reported in 2023, the transcript for Special Counsel Bob Hur’s interview with Biden showed the president made “car noises” before wandering off-topic about a man losing his penis and testicles.

“And the worst part was, they said I couldn’t drive it outside the driveway. It’s a long driveway. So I’d get to the bottom of the driveway, tack it up to about four grand (indiscernible) (makes car sound) (indiscernible) (laughter),” it quoted Biden.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Rawpixel.com / Shutterstock.com

A clip from a recent Glenn Beck interview with President Donald Trump went viral in late April for revealing the fascinating connection between the president, his uncle, Elon Musk, and famously tragic engineer Nikola Tesla.

“How crazy is it, that you are working with Elon Musk, today’s Tesla, and when Tesla died, it was your genius uncle that was sent to try and figure out what papers should be kept,” Beck said in what appeared to be almost an off-hand comment to Trump at the end of the interview — which was focused on Trump’s first 100 days in office.

Some of you may know this story, but we thought we’d share it with you again as we found it so fascinating ourselves. It starts with Nikola Tesla, one of the most famous yet tragic minds of the modern era. Put succinctly (and in very much colloquial terms), Tesla invented free wireless energy. The whole world could have been revolutionized, our futures sealed in prosperity thanks to his invention, but his funding was cut by the folks creating the power grid. After he died, his works were quietly shuffled away for the most part, but the useful stuff was reviewed by Trump’s uncle, John G. Trump, an electrical engineer and physicist at MIT.

The special connection Trump has with Elon Musk goes back to the OG Tesla and Trump's uncle pic.twitter.com/P2NYIOdo9n

— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) May 2, 2025

Connection To The Future …

Some hundred years or so later, Trump is working alongside “today’s Tesla,” Musk, who named one of his most famous companies “Tesla.”

To say that history repeats itself is not fair in this circumstance, as John G. Trump only reviewed Tesla’s work after the investor’s passing. Today’s Trump and Musk are working fairly closely together, but both Trump’s do share one commonality: how nice they are about the respective genius in their lives. According to Trump, his uncle wrote many glowing things about Tesla, despite him being something of a persona non grata at the time.

We all know how Trump feels about Musk and his work at the Department of Government Efficiency. At the time of writing, DOGE has saved an estimated $160,000,000 for the U.S. tax payer, which breaks down to roughly $993.79 per tax-paying individual.

Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

Have you ever wanted to take a vacation to Europe and tour some of the houses and museums that contain famous art that you’ve only seen in pictures? It’s a common desire, and if you’ve ever seen one of these with your own eyes, you know that it’s an experience you can’t duplicate with photos or virtual tours. 

For example, did you know that Vincent Van Gogh’s paintings have such thick, textured paint that the actual piece is three-dimensional? If you stand in front of the actual painting Starry Night, you can see the deep texture of the paint and brush strokes popping off the canvas. You’d never know this, and never really experience the painting, if you only knew it from online images. 

Maybe you’d like to see Michelangelo’s masterpiece statue depicting David. It’s in a gallery in Florence, a city you might want to see on its own for the glorious architecture, even if it didn’t have David and other Michelangelo masterpieces. But someone, or someones, seems to believe that world travelers visiting large cities should also have to see what they can’t escape at home, at least in the U.S. 

Resentful-looking, looming black women on cell phones. Take a look at this “artistic” statue in the plaza just outside the gallery where David is featured. 

13 ft bronze statue of a black woman on her phone built for Piazza della Signoria (Italy) pic.twitter.com/W8Fhf7WVdx

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 7, 2025

Really take a good look at marvel at the realism. The artist captured the sullen, pissed-off look on the subject’s face, the same look we all see with people like this every day at grocery stores and malls. 

It’s not just Florence. Huge statues of (mostly overweight) black women dressed in an American style are popping up in cities throughout the west. Here’s one that was put up in the Netherlands in 2023. 

Statue of a black woman was put up in The Netherlands in 2023. Thomas Price sculpture, literally depicts: “with her hands in the pockets of her baggy pants, wearing sneakers and looking proud, the statue of a young Black woman… became most photographed monument in Netherlands.” pic.twitter.com/Jf3X7Q1TEH

— Because We Live Here 🇺🇸 (@BWLH_) May 7, 2025

But wait, there are more:

Florence, Italy
Rotterdam, Netherlands
London, England
New York City, America

Let's talk about this. pic.twitter.com/3KSMmc8EoI

— Farm Girl (@SherryLuvsIdaho) May 7, 2025

One of those in the post above just got put up in Times Square in New York City.

They tear down statues of American heroes and replace them with statues of random obese black women. That’s because the Left has no historical heroes. Everyone who was born before approximately 2005 is inherently problematic.

pic.twitter.com/ypjxG1p2ZU

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) May 7, 2025

Let’s see what the Internet Public has to say about it. Naturally, someone pointed out that not liking the statue is racist.

Common White Supremacist L

— Thought Bat (@ThoughtBat) May 7, 2025

A white lady with problem glasses did the usual thing they do, lecturing the original poster on how privileged white men are, which makes the statue necessary. 

Hey Matt Matt you missed the point entirely. Art isn’t always meant to be pretty: it’s often meant to provoke, challenge, and spark dialogue.

This sculpture, as a deliberate contrast to pedestaled white male monuments already in that square, forces us to confront WHO gets to be…

— LISA 🇺🇸 🦅🗽🔥 (@Handbags4Hunger) May 7, 2025

But most people called this what it is–deliberate uglification and aggression to put black Westerners on a literal pedestal. 

If a white person made this statue, he or she would be called racist for making it ugly and obese.

— MAZE (@mazemoore) May 7, 2025

They worship the concept of being obese and black?

— AOC Parody (@ParodyAoc) May 7, 2025

This statue is a perfect example of how the LEFT divides us by elevating a generic obese Black woman over all other groups for the sake of diversity.

— SimpSlayerX (@simp_slayer_x) May 7, 2025

Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, were startled when an unidentified man rushed toward them Sunday night in South Beach, Florida.

Secret Service agents quickly intervened, pushing the man back and ensuring the couple’s safety.

The incident occurred as the former first daughter and her husband were walking toward their vehicle after a night out.

Video footage shows a disheveled man approaching Ivanka, only to be immediately intercepted by a Secret Service agent.

While the man’s intentions remain unclear, he engaged in a brief scuffle with the agent, attempting to bypass the security blockade.

The agent responded by forcefully pushing him away.

“A Secret Service agent wasn’t taking any chances last night. It appears that the agent believed a man got too close to Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump as they were leaving an event in South Beach and aggressively pushed him away,” reporter Crabtree wrote in a post on X alongside the video.

“The man then complained and appeared to grab the agent. Some Secret Service agents say this is an example of an agent getting too rough with the public, and a possible indication of worktime stress as many USSS agents details are continuing to be stretched thin with long hours, including on VP Vance’s detail,” she added.

“Yet, such an aggressive push may not be that uncommon. I, too, have been pushed forcefully aside when I thought I was minding my own business. I was up in the hall near the press gallery — and the USSS agents were clearing the way for First Lady Michelle Obama to come through before a SOTU. I was shaken up a little, but understood that the agents are on high alert on nights like those,” she said.

Watch:

“I’m also used to getting pushed and shoved from very aggressive photographers, cameramen and women on Capitol Hill and at the White House, so I sort of view it as a cost of doing business in D.C. journalism,” Crabtree concluded.

The viral video serves as a stark reminder that even members of a presidential family remain vulnerable to public confrontations.

Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner have stepped away from politics in recent years.

“I love my father very much. This time around I am choosing to prioritize my young children and the private life we are creating as a family. I do not plan to be involved in politics,” Ivanka said in early 2022.

The couple, who now reside in Florida, share three children and have focused on their family life since leaving Washington.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Trump once again shut down another media narrative by dismissing rumors about a potential third presidential bid during NBC’s Meet the Press interview with Kristen Welker. 

“The Trump organization is selling hats that say Trump 2028,” she said. “Are you seriously considering a third term, Mr. President, even though it’s prohibited by the Constitution or is this about staying politically viable?”

“I will say this: so many people want me to do it. I have never had requests so strong as that, but it’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do,” he replied.

NBC: "Are you seriously considering a third term?"

TRUMP: "It’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do…This is not something I’m looking to do. I’m looking to have 4 great years & turn it over to somebody." pic.twitter.com/TUtfUUKJWM

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 4, 2025

Tennessee Republican Congressman Andy Ogles and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon had suggested that Trump should or would seek re-election for the third time.

“I think he is going to run again in 2028 and I think he is going to win,” Bannon said. “I think we’ll have a couple of alternatives.”

And Trump himself has trolled the left about the possibility.

At President Trump’s packed 100-Day Rally in Michigan, the crowd erupts into chants of “Three! Three! Three!” calling for him to run for a third term.

Lowest approval rating my ass! pic.twitter.com/t9yonHpmKC

— Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) April 29, 2025

However, Trump dismissed that possibility by suggesting that a third re-election bid would violate the Constitution.

“I don’t know if that’s constitutional, that they’re not allowing you to do or anything else, but there are many people willing to wear the 2028 hats, but this is not something I’m looking to do.”

He also insisted that he intends to achieve his objectives during his second term and ensure that a Republican succeeds him by winning the next elections. 

“I’m looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally, a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward, but I think we’ll have four years, And I think four years is plenty of time to do something really spectacular.”

Nonetheless, Welker continued to prod the president, seemingly hoping for a gotcha moment that the far-left network would play on auto-repeat to convince Americans that Trump was a threat to democracy.

“The Constitution does prohibit it,” she said. “Some of your allies are pretty serious about this, though, Mr. President. I’ve spoken to them. They say they are coming up with potential ways obviously the biggest one would be a constitutional amendment.”

“That’s because they like the job I’m doing, and that’s a compliment,” Trump replied.

She also tried to ambush the president by asking him to name a successor, less than half a year into power. She likely hoped the president would name someone other than his Vice President, JD Vance, or fail to recognize others to sow discord within the party.

“Who do you see as your successor?” Welker asked.

“It’s far too early to say that, but I do have a vice president and typically and, JD is doing a fantastic job. I don’t want to get involved in that, I think he’s a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco is great. There are a lot of them that are great.”

During the last Meet the Press interview, Trump indicated he was “focused on the current” and was not interested in a third term.

“I’m not looking at that, but I tell you, I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which in a way is a fourth term, because the other election, the 2020 election, was totally rigged,” he said.

Nonetheless, far-left journalists continued to press the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, asking if Trump indeed seeks to run for the third time. “You guys continue to ask the president this question about a third term, and then he answers honestly and candidly with a smile, and then everybody here melts down about his answer,” she said.

.@PressSec Karoline Leavitt: "You guys continue to ask the president this question about a third term and then he answers honestly and candidly with a smile and then everybody here melts down about his answer." pic.twitter.com/3k58UFIKVU

— CSPAN (@cspan) March 31, 2025

Despite Trump’s clear answer that he does not intend to violate the Constitution, the left continues to convince Americans that there is a real possibility he would run. They even ran a poll to make it seem like he was out of step with American voters, a classic red herring tactic to divert Americans from the left’s unpopularity.

The idea of Trump running for a third term is about as popular as new Coke. Americans says "no, no, no".

-76% of voters overall are opposed
-53% of Republicans are opposed. 44% favor.
-Note, in 2021, 66% favored Trump running in 2024.

Just not a popular idea right now. pic.twitter.com/l3ttDFuQgD

— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) May 5, 2025

Hold your nose because this is a smelly story. The decline of manners, courtesy, and basic decency in America has been going on for decades and every day on social media brings a new low. If it’s not people snatching weaves and breaking furniture in Waffle House or Walmart, it’s young women in prostitute wear and young men with pants underneath their buttocks strolling down the street. 

At least in those cases there is some cloth covering the most sensitive parts of the body. Not for this lady we’re about to meet. Details about this story are light and little can be confirmed, but even the mainstream media is picking up on this story. 

It goes like this. Christina Solometo from Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, is sitting in a jail cell because of how she chose to deal with what looks like a case of road rage. Two drivers are involved. Solometo, and another driver, an unidentified woman. In the video below, Solometo said the other driver was “chasing me.” Solometo reviewed her choices for how to respond, and chose what you might call Option Number Two. 

She stopped her car, pulled her drawers down, aimed her backside at the other driver’s hood, and let loose. Be warned, the video below contains detailed footage of what Solometo ejected from her bottom all over the front of the other driver’s car. 

NEW: Pennsylvania woman arrested for launching explosive diarrhea out of her rear end on another driver's car during a road rage incident.

The family of 44-year-old Christina Solometo says there is more to the story than what you see below.

Solometo was taken into custody after… pic.twitter.com/af2ziImTN3

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 2, 2025

In the video shared by Collin Rugg, Solometo (she was identified in mainstream media reports) appears happy, almost gleeful, about her brown escapade. As the cops march her (clothed) into the paddywagon, Solometo has a smile on her face and she’s laughing. The other driver didn’t find it funny and had some choice, explicit words for Solometo. It makes you wonder whether there was some longstanding grudge between her and the other driver. 

Solometo doesn’t seem very concerned in the video about the price she’ll likely pay for taking the law–and her underwear–into her own hands. When questioned by a reporter about why she did what she did, Solometo said, “She chased me,” and “I have a sickness.” It is not clear what ailment causes sufferers to get out of their car and use another driver’s grill as a Porta-Potty. 

Solometo is charged with indecent exposure, littering on the highway, and more. 

You can imagine the reaction on X/Twitter. Here are some of the best!

You need to be POOPMAXXING. You need to be bloated. You need to always have a poop locked and loaded ready to go. You need to be able to unload at any moment. You need to be poopmaxxing.

— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) May 2, 2025

As a celiac, I find this comment to be highly hilarious and it’s making me laugh so hard I’m getting tears in my eyes. Finally, a reason for my disease. Poopmaxxing.

— That Foot Is Me (@that_foot_is_me) May 2, 2025

Oh my gosh, look at her mug shot! She’s been waiting for this. 

She's so proud lol. pic.twitter.com/FqXU5xZliQ

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 2, 2025

She looks relieved. Like she just lost 10lbs

— Night Shade ™️1️⃣0️⃣1️⃣ (@HeyyBigGuy) May 2, 2025

She’s got the support of IBS sufferers worldwide 😝

— ms hermit (@suburbanhermits) May 2, 2025

Canada doubled down on Wokeism by returning Justin Trudeau’s party, the Liberal Party of Canada, to power, ensuring that his clone Mark Carney remains as the prime minister, a decision they might soon regret. Many Canadians voted for Trudeau’s ally out of spite for President Trump after he made the generous offer inviting them to become America’s 51st state, but also threatened to impose tariffs on their products.

However, the globalist Prime Minister has unveiled a raft of left-leaning policies that threaten to damage the Canadian economy than the much-feared Trump tariffs ever could.

To achieve net zero in carbon emissions, he hinted at a proposal to punish companies that pollute the air and reward those who control their emissions, essentially carbon taxes and incentives. 

Outrageously, Carney might have pulled a fast one on Canadians, having suggested during the campaigns that he would pause the carbon taxes initiative, only to turn around and do the opposite. 

“Climate change is an existential threat. We all recognise that,” he said.

“But the converse is, if you are making investments, coming up with new technologies, changing the way you do business, all in service of reducing and eliminating that threat, you are creating value.”

Canada’s new Prime Minister, Mark Carney, warns that climate change is an existential threat, declaring that anyone not aligned with the push for net zero will face consequences.

He also proclaims that the Old World Order is finished, calling for Canada to "Build Back Better"… pic.twitter.com/vf1DG530Ud

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) March 9, 2025

While cutting emissions through innovation and improved efficiency is always welcome, sacrificing productivity to achieve the same goal is counterproductive. Europe recently suffered massive blackouts due to its reliance on green energy, which should serve as a precautionary tale for other countries, such as Canada, that are walking down the same path. 

“And what we have seen increasingly, spurred initially by the Sustainable Development Goals, accelerated by Paris, and then by social movements and governments, is societies putting tremendous value on achieving net zero,” he added.

“Companies, and those who invest in them and lend to them, and who are part of the solution, will be rewarded. Those who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem will be punished.”

Besides the financial cost of the proposed carbon taxes, the compliance burden for small companies is excruciating. Small businesses might even be required to measure and report their carbon footprints across their entire supply chain, from suppliers to end users. 

Many small businesses cannot track their emissions and might resort to paying the fines instead, resulting in increased operational costs, which are usually passed down to consumers. That is the price Canadian voters must pay for their choices at the ballot box.

Additionally, when carbon reporting is coupled with the SDGs, small businesses will be forced to work only with companies that monitor and report their carbon emissions and are working towards net zero. Since only a few net-zero companies exist, they usually charge a premium for their services, driving up production costs. Similarly, relying on a few “green” suppliers reduces competition, essentially creating green monopolies.

Carney also plans to proceed with the phased-out ban on gas cars for electric vehicles, which Canada is unable to produce to meet its demand. The net impact of these leftist climate policies is a shrinking economy and massive job losses.

Besides the climate scam, Carney has also promised to spend more on diversity and equity programs and welfare, allowing more people, including non-citizens, to continue leeching off the hardworking Canadians.