News

News

Trump Disappoints the Left, Rejects Third Term Bid, Promises Four Great Years of Something Spectacular

Trump once again shut down another media narrative by dismissing rumors about a potential third presidential bid during NBC’s Meet the Press interview with Kristen Welker. 

“The Trump organization is selling hats that say Trump 2028,” she said. “Are you seriously considering a third term, Mr. President, even though it’s prohibited by the Constitution or is this about staying politically viable?”

“I will say this: so many people want me to do it. I have never had requests so strong as that, but it’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do,” he replied.

Tennessee Republican Congressman Andy Ogles and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon had suggested that Trump should or would seek re-election for the third time.

“I think he is going to run again in 2028 and I think he is going to win,” Bannon said. “I think we’ll have a couple of alternatives.”

And Trump himself has trolled the left about the possibility.

However, Trump dismissed that possibility by suggesting that a third re-election bid would violate the Constitution.

“I don’t know if that’s constitutional, that they’re not allowing you to do or anything else, but there are many people willing to wear the 2028 hats, but this is not something I’m looking to do.”

He also insisted that he intends to achieve his objectives during his second term and ensure that a Republican succeeds him by winning the next elections. 

“I’m looking to have four great years and turn it over to somebody, ideally, a great Republican, a great Republican to carry it forward, but I think we’ll have four years, And I think four years is plenty of time to do something really spectacular.”

Nonetheless, Welker continued to prod the president, seemingly hoping for a gotcha moment that the far-left network would play on auto-repeat to convince Americans that Trump was a threat to democracy.

“The Constitution does prohibit it,” she said. “Some of your allies are pretty serious about this, though, Mr. President. I’ve spoken to them. They say they are coming up with potential ways obviously the biggest one would be a constitutional amendment.”

“That’s because they like the job I’m doing, and that’s a compliment,” Trump replied.

She also tried to ambush the president by asking him to name a successor, less than half a year into power. She likely hoped the president would name someone other than his Vice President, JD Vance, or fail to recognize others to sow discord within the party.

“Who do you see as your successor?” Welker asked.

“It’s far too early to say that, but I do have a vice president and typically and, JD is doing a fantastic job. I don’t want to get involved in that, I think he’s a fantastic, brilliant guy. Marco is great. There are a lot of them that are great.”

During the last Meet the Press interview, Trump indicated he was “focused on the current” and was not interested in a third term.

“I’m not looking at that, but I tell you, I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which in a way is a fourth term, because the other election, the 2020 election, was totally rigged,” he said.

Nonetheless, far-left journalists continued to press the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, asking if Trump indeed seeks to run for the third time. “You guys continue to ask the president this question about a third term, and then he answers honestly and candidly with a smile, and then everybody here melts down about his answer,” she said.

Despite Trump’s clear answer that he does not intend to violate the Constitution, the left continues to convince Americans that there is a real possibility he would run. They even ran a poll to make it seem like he was out of step with American voters, a classic red herring tactic to divert Americans from the left’s unpopularity.

News

Pennsylvania Woman Uses Motorists Car as Porta-Potty And She’s Not Sorry

Hold your nose because this is a smelly story. The decline of manners, courtesy, and basic decency in America has been going on for decades and every day on social media brings a new low. If it’s not people snatching weaves and breaking furniture in Waffle House or Walmart, it’s young women in prostitute wear and young men with pants underneath their buttocks strolling down the street. 

At least in those cases there is some cloth covering the most sensitive parts of the body. Not for this lady we’re about to meet. Details about this story are light and little can be confirmed, but even the mainstream media is picking up on this story. 

It goes like this. Christina Solometo from Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, is sitting in a jail cell because of how she chose to deal with what looks like a case of road rage. Two drivers are involved. Solometo, and another driver, an unidentified woman. In the video below, Solometo said the other driver was “chasing me.” Solometo reviewed her choices for how to respond, and chose what you might call Option Number Two. 

She stopped her car, pulled her drawers down, aimed her backside at the other driver’s hood, and let loose. Be warned, the video below contains detailed footage of what Solometo ejected from her bottom all over the front of the other driver’s car. 

In the video shared by Collin Rugg, Solometo (she was identified in mainstream media reports) appears happy, almost gleeful, about her brown escapade. As the cops march her (clothed) into the paddywagon, Solometo has a smile on her face and she’s laughing. The other driver didn’t find it funny and had some choice, explicit words for Solometo. It makes you wonder whether there was some longstanding grudge between her and the other driver. 

Solometo doesn’t seem very concerned in the video about the price she’ll likely pay for taking the law–and her underwear–into her own hands. When questioned by a reporter about why she did what she did, Solometo said, “She chased me,” and “I have a sickness.” It is not clear what ailment causes sufferers to get out of their car and use another driver’s grill as a Porta-Potty. 

Solometo is charged with indecent exposure, littering on the highway, and more. 

You can imagine the reaction on X/Twitter. Here are some of the best!

Oh my gosh, look at her mug shot! She’s been waiting for this. 

News

“Will be Punished”: Consequences Arrive Early for Canadian Voters after Doubling Down on Wokeism

Canada doubled down on Wokeism by returning Justin Trudeau’s party, the Liberal Party of Canada, to power, ensuring that his clone Mark Carney remains as the prime minister, a decision they might soon regret. Many Canadians voted for Trudeau’s ally out of spite for President Trump after he made the generous offer inviting them to become America’s 51st state, but also threatened to impose tariffs on their products.

However, the globalist Prime Minister has unveiled a raft of left-leaning policies that threaten to damage the Canadian economy than the much-feared Trump tariffs ever could.

To achieve net zero in carbon emissions, he hinted at a proposal to punish companies that pollute the air and reward those who control their emissions, essentially carbon taxes and incentives. 

Outrageously, Carney might have pulled a fast one on Canadians, having suggested during the campaigns that he would pause the carbon taxes initiative, only to turn around and do the opposite. 

“Climate change is an existential threat. We all recognise that,” he said.

“But the converse is, if you are making investments, coming up with new technologies, changing the way you do business, all in service of reducing and eliminating that threat, you are creating value.”

While cutting emissions through innovation and improved efficiency is always welcome, sacrificing productivity to achieve the same goal is counterproductive. Europe recently suffered massive blackouts due to its reliance on green energy, which should serve as a precautionary tale for other countries, such as Canada, that are walking down the same path. 

“And what we have seen increasingly, spurred initially by the Sustainable Development Goals, accelerated by Paris, and then by social movements and governments, is societies putting tremendous value on achieving net zero,” he added.

“Companies, and those who invest in them and lend to them, and who are part of the solution, will be rewarded. Those who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem will be punished.”

Besides the financial cost of the proposed carbon taxes, the compliance burden for small companies is excruciating. Small businesses might even be required to measure and report their carbon footprints across their entire supply chain, from suppliers to end users. 

Many small businesses cannot track their emissions and might resort to paying the fines instead, resulting in increased operational costs, which are usually passed down to consumers. That is the price Canadian voters must pay for their choices at the ballot box.

Additionally, when carbon reporting is coupled with the SDGs, small businesses will be forced to work only with companies that monitor and report their carbon emissions and are working towards net zero. Since only a few net-zero companies exist, they usually charge a premium for their services, driving up production costs. Similarly, relying on a few “green” suppliers reduces competition, essentially creating green monopolies.

Carney also plans to proceed with the phased-out ban on gas cars for electric vehicles, which Canada is unable to produce to meet its demand. The net impact of these leftist climate policies is a shrinking economy and massive job losses.

Besides the climate scam, Carney has also promised to spend more on diversity and equity programs and welfare, allowing more people, including non-citizens, to continue leeching off the hardworking Canadians.

News

Judge Orders the Release of Transgender Alleged Tesla Vandal

A federal judge has ordered the release of the alleged Tesla dealership in Kansas City, Missouri, alleged transgender arsonist, citing strong community ties.

According to KMBC News, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jessica Hedges ordered the release of Owen McIntire, 19, after agreeing with his lawyers that he has no criminal record and has “strong ties to his community in Missouri.” 

The alleged Tesla dealership vandal’s lawyer also cited his “medical and mental health needs.” McIntire reportedly suffers from numerous psychosocial and developmental conditions, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), depression, and gender dysphoria. The biological male who identifies as a woman is also allegedly on the autism spectrum, raising questions as to whether he was an easy pickings for the radical left ideology that exploits the most vulnerable.

Recently, the United Kingdom ordered that all transgender teens be screened for autism and mental health before being subjected to irreversible medical and surgical mutilation.

“He also receives gender-affirming medical care, which began in March of this year and is likely to be interrupted or terminated entirely if he remains in pretrial detention,” the judge stated. “This care, along with mental health support, is integral to his wellbeing. By moving back home with his parents, he will have access to the care providers who are familiar with him and his specific needs.”

However, the Department of Justice fought to keep McIntire behind bars due to public safety concerns and the likelihood of him facing terrorism-related charges.

Meanwhile, McIntire faces federal charges of “a single count of unlawful possession of an unregistered destructive device, and one count of malicious damage by fire of any property used in interstate commerce.” These charges should send a strong message to other would-be Tesla vandals that they will bear personal responsibility for their politically motivated actions.

“Let me be extremely clear to anyone who still wants to firebomb a Tesla property: you will not evade us,” Attorney General Pam Bondi warned. “You will be arrested. You will be prosecuted. You will spend decades behind bars. It is not worth it.”

According to a criminal complaint, McIntire used an incendiary device, namely a Molotov cocktail, on one parked Cybertruck valued at between $105,485 and $107,485. However, the ensuing blaze spread to another parked Cybertruck and two charging stations, each valued at roughly $550. One of the incendiary devices that the alleged Tesla vandal threw refused to ignite, suggesting that the damage would have been more significant.

Meanwhile, the suspected Tesla vandal will live with his parents in home confinement under strict monitoring, including electronic monitoring.

In a separate incident, a US federal grand jury in Arizona indicted a 35-year-old man for allegedly setting Tesla vehicles ablaze. He reportedly poured gas on a dealership and three Tesla vehicles, destroying one Cybertruck. 

The suspected Tesla vandal was also caught allegedly carrying a hand-drawn map identifying local Tesla dealerships, suggesting that he was planning more attacks before his arrest. He faces between five and 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000. 

News

Virginia Giuffre’s Father: My Daughter Wasn’t Suicidal

Virginia Giuffre’s Father: My Daughter Wasn’t Suicidal

The father of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew sexual abuse victim Virginia Giuffre, who died last week from a reported suicide, believes his daughter did not take her own life and is now demanding a full investigation.

Giuffre herself previously stated that she was not suicidal, and her lawyer also believes that to be the case.

As we reported, Virginia’s lawyer, Karrie Louden, who was among the first at the house after Virginia’s body was found, told The Sun Online: “We’ve got big question marks over it.”

Giuffre was also involved in a collision incident just weeks before her death, later posting on Instagram that she had been hit by a bus in Australia and had just days to live.

Weeks later, she was dead.

Now Giuffre’s father has spoken out, saying he does not buy that narrative.

“My daughter was a fighter,” Roberts told TMZ.

“She was speaking out against some of the most powerful people in the world, and now we’re supposed to believe she just gave up?”

“I don’t buy it. The police need to dig deeper—much deeper,” Roberts added.

As Giuffre’s lawyer, Karrie Louden, stated, “Until the evidence is in, we’re just, you know, drawing conclusions,” adding, “Officially, the police told me nothing. They didn’t even confirm that she was dead. That’s how little information the police have provided to me.”

“This has been a complete shock to all of us. If any of us had thought she’s going to commit suicide, of course we would have taken more steps, put her into a clinic or got her some more help,” the attorney emphasised.

Watch:

Another Epstein victim, Juliette Rose Bryant, also believes Giuffre didn’t commit suicide and admitted she is now in fear for her own life.

“I am not suicidal, and I never, ever will be. I also do not do any drugs,” Bryant said, noting that other Epstein victims have been found dead in suspicious circumstances and urging, “We all know about the Clinton body count.”

As we reported earlier, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, chairwoman of the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, has mounted pressure on Attorney General Pam Bondi to release the full Epstein file in light of the deaths.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

News

Another Trump Victory: Walmart Announces Buy “American-Made” Initiative

The Trump administration continues to record remarkable progress in bringing back manufacturing despite the media-driven hysteria about the economy. Coinciding with Trump’s 100 days in office celebrations, retail giant Walmart announced a new buy American-made campaign dubbed “Grow With US.” 

The program, which aims to help small businesses, according to Axios, will make it “easier for U.S.-based entrepreneurs to navigate the complexities of retail and bring their products to a national stage.”

“We anticipate thousands of small businesses will take advantage of these free resources over the coming years,” John Furner, Walmart U.S. president and CEO, told Axios.

“Walmart has a long history of investing in U.S. manufacturing. Since Sam Walton first launched a ‘Buy American’ initiative in 1985, we have been committed to sourcing and selling products that support American jobs,” states the retail giant.

Since March 2021, the company has incrementally invested in a $350 billion fund to promote products made, grown, or assembled in the U.S. The initiative aims to create roughly 750,000 jobs within ten years.

In the 1980s, Walmart’s founder Sam Walton was concerned about losing customers due to factories and small businesses closing. He therefore aimed to boost domestic production by embedding the “Buy America” motto into the company’s corporate culture. Before Americans were taught to hate their country by liberals, the company’s products proudly displayed the “American made” labels. 

In the 1990s, many companies started shifting their production abroad, primarily to China. Since then, the company has resorted to importing most of its products from the communist nation, and the “Buy American” initiative became nothing more than a passing comment on corporate pages. 

Nonetheless, Walmart claims that more than “two-thirds of our total product spend on items made, grown or assembled in the United States” and that small businesses account for over 60% of its US suppliers.  It also claims that eligible small businesses can apply for financial support via Walmart’s Early Payment Program. Companies can also pitch already completed products for consideration.

“In addition to Grow with US, we recently announced that applications for our annual Open Call event will open June 24, 2025. Open Call offers U.S.-based small and medium-sized businesses the chance to pitch their shelf-ready products — made, grown, or assembled in the United States — directly to Walmart and Sam’s Club merchants,” the company stated.

Meanwhile, Walmart’s “Grow with US” initiative coincided with rumors that online retail giant Amazon would display tariff costs. However, the company denied those allegations after the Trump administration described the initiative as a hostile political act. 

“This is a hostile and political act by Amazon,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. “Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration allowed inflation to reach the highest level in 40 years?”

The alleged hostile act resulted in Amazon shares dropping by 2% in anticipation of the e-commerce giant’s collision with the Trump administration. However, the company’s spox tried to soften the blow by claiming that the plan was only under consideration by the ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store but was never approved.

“The team that runs our ultra low cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products,” Amazon spokeswoman Rachael Lighty told USA TODAY. “This was never approved and is not going to happen.”

News

Complicit? California Democrats Send Another Child Sex Trafficking Bill Into Oblivion – LGBTQ Concerns Raised

The Democrat-dominated California legislature is reluctant to pass a bill to protect children under 18 years from sex trafficking. Introduced by Sacramento Democrat Assemblywoman Maggy Krell, Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) aims to protect children under 18 years from sex solicitation and child trafficking.

“I want to solve two problems with this bill: One, we have to create more resources for victims like Julie and the thousands of other victims who are being trafficked,” the Assemblywoman explained. “And two: we have to crack down on the men who are buying them for sex. That’s what Assembly Bill 379 does. 

“It creates a law that allows law enforcement to intervene, when men are out on the prowl trying to buy victims for sex. It also makes it chargeable as a felony when those victims are under 18 years old.”

In 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 1414 into law, making it a felony to solicit sex from children under the age of 16. However, soliciting or purchasing sex from 16- and 17-year-old children was a wobbler, allowing prosecutors to charge it as a misdemeanor or felony.

Introduced by Bakersfield Republican state Senator Shannon Grove and Assemblywoman Krell, SB 1414 aimed to make it a felony to solicit sex from all children under the age of 18. According to Krell, banning solicitation across the board would help to protect children from sex trafficking, which hinges on the ability to purchase sex from minors without serious consequences.

Nonetheless, California Democrats neutered the bill, capping the age at 15 years and below for felony charges to apply. Additionally, they attempted to kill it by sending it to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Although he did not make any effort to impose stricter penalties for all solicitations below 18 years, California Governor Gavin Newsom intervened and helped push the bipartisan bill forward until it became law.

Given the obvious shortcomings of SB 1414, Assemblywoman Krell introduced Assembly Bill 379 (AB 379) to make it a crime to solicit or purchase sex from children under 18. 

However, AB 379 faces the same fate as SB 1414 after Democrats sent it to the Assembly Public Safety Committee to gather dust. Additionally, in due consideration of the looming deadline, the bill was dropped from the Committee’s agenda, further delaying it indefinitely. 

Some committee members, such as Assembly Majority Whip Mark González have raised concerns that the bill would disproportionately affect the LGBTQ community and people of color. Once again, Democrats will likely prioritize perceived implications on the LGBTQ community and ignore the plight of child sex trafficking victims.

Meanwhile, Assemblywoman Krell’s work in fighting child sex trafficking is undeniable, regardless of her political affiliations. She has prosecuted child sex predators, demanded tougher sentences, and consistently raised alarm over child sex trafficking in California, which her fellow party members are seemingly uninterested in stopping.

“We’re still seeing throughout California girls being sold for commercial sex, seeing a lot of teenagers. Creeps in cars lining up to buy teenagers. We need to do more to address demand,” she said in support of the bill.

This time, it remains to be seen if Gov. Newsom will use his influence to revive the bill out of genuine concern or simply for political grandstanding.

News

California Bill to End the Epidemic of Trans-Identifying Male Rapists in Female Prisons Shot Down by Democrats

On April 29, 2025, the California legislature shot down a bill prohibiting trans-identifying men with a history of sexual violence from being housed in women’s correctional facilities. 

The Golden State allows prisoners to be incarcerated in correctional facilities matching their preferred gender identity after passing the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act, or SB132, in 2021. Other states with similar laws are Maine, New York, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington.  

However, safety concerns for biological women have persisted, prompting state Sen. Shannon Grove to introduce SB311. If it passed, the law would’ve required the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to provide a secure facility to house transgender-identifying men in women’s prisons to protect the security needs of biological women.

Additionally, it would’ve ban biological men who identify as women and are registered sex offenders from being housed in women’s facilities.

“Any inmate convicted of an offense for which they are required to register pursuant to Section 290, except for biological women at birth, shall be ineligible for housing at a women’s prison.”

Currently, California law requires the CDCR to consider each transgender inmate’s request for transfer to a female facility. Such transfer requests do not consider the inmate’s sexual violence history, whether they have intact male genitalia, or have undergone gender transition procedures. 

About 898 transgender-identifying men have requested to be transferred to women’s facilities, of which 45 have been effected, while 208 are still pending.

Meanwhile, the CDCR is aware of potential intimate relations between transgender-identifying male prisoners and their biological counterparts and distributes condoms in prison.

Similarly, it is aware that biological female inmates are afraid of potential sexual violence from transgender-identifying male counterparts. Physical violence and other forms of degrading and demeaning attacks on biological female inmates by transgender inmates have been widely reported.

Over one quarter of inmates have experienced such incidents, including sexual assaults by biological male inmates who identify as women, while two-thirds are afraid for their safety. 

Several high-profile cases of sexual assault by trans-identifying individuals have been reported in California and other states. 

In 2024, Tremaine Carroll, a six-foot-tall biological man who identifies as a woman was accused of raping two inmates one of whom became pregnant and also attempting to intimidate a witness to stop them from testifying. Carroll had been transferred to the Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) in Chowchilla in 2021 when SB132 became law. 

Ironically, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) used him as proof that trans-identifying men were not a threat to the safety of biological female inmates. While the case is still ongoing, he was eventually transferred to the Salinas Valley State Prison male facility under California’s Three Strikes Law.

Female inmate Krystal Gonzalez, who was sexually trafficked at 13, was also allegedly repeatedly raped by a transgender detainee and reportedly faced a disciplinary action when she reported the incident. 

Seemingly, SB311 could fail to pass as California Democrats prioritize the convenience of transgender individuals over the safety of biological women. 

News

Study: Life-Threatening Complications From Mifepristone Abortion Pill 22 Times Higher Than Reported

Pro-choice advocates, the media, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have presented the abortion pill mifepristone as a safe and effective method for terminating an unwanted pregnancy. However, it turns out that they were not telling Americans the whole story. 

For over two decades, pro-life activists have sounded the alarm over life-threatening symptoms associated with the abortion pill. Nonetheless, the FDA, which is legally required to acknowledge those concerns, has seemingly refused to act. The FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has categorically stated that he has no intention of taking action.

However, a new analysis of the abortion pill-related medical insurance claims shows that the risk of users developing life-threatening complications after use was 22 times higher than the FDA and the abortion pill Mifeprex manufacturer, Danco Laboratories, reported.

The Ethics and Public Policy Center made the shocking discovery after analyzing Medicaid, TRICARE, Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and private medical insurance claims data. It discovered that between 2017 and 2023, approximately 692,873 women received 865,727 mifepristone prescriptions.

However, 10.9% or 94,605 of those prescriptions resulted in potentially life-threatening or serious adverse events, such as emergency room visits (4.7%), hemorrhage (3.3%), surgical abortion (2.8%), infection (1.3%), sepsis (0.1%), and other non-specific complications (5.68%) for women who had used the Kill Pill within 45 days. When adjusted for some women who suffer from “adverse events in multiple categories,” the rate of mifepristone-related complications was 10.93%. That rate is almost 22 times higher than the FDA’s reported 0.5%. 

Additionally, the observation window of 45 days was conservative at best since some complications occur as late as 72 days.

“This study is the statistical equivalent of a category 5 hurricane hitting the prevailing narrative of the abortion industry,” warned the Ethics and Public Policy Center President Ryan Anderson. “It reveals, based on real-world data, the shocking number of women who suffer serious medical consequences because of the abortion pill.”

The FDA arrived at its figure, which was crucial in approving the abortion pill, after analyzing ten clinical trials involving 30,966 women. However, the test subjects were hand-selected, pre-screened, “generally healthy women,” thus potentially not reflective of the general female population. 

Additionally, the tests used potentially outdate methods, and some were carried out outside the United States. Similarly, the EPPC study claims that the Kill Pill prescribers are not mandated to report adverse events unless the patient dies.

“The women in our dataset receive (or fail to receive) pre- and post-abortion healthcare of the real-world quality that prevails in the U.S. today, not the carefully controlled regimen of care that ordinarily prevails in a clinical trial,” the study blasted the FDA’s findings.

The Obama administration relaxed the requirements for obtaining the abortion pill by reducing the number of doctor visits, even allowing non-licensed individuals to prescribe the abortion pill. According to the study, a woman can receive the pill after “one telehealth visit” with any “approved healthcare provider” who does not necessarily have to be a physician. 

When Biden took over, he relaxed prescription requirements, allowing women to receive the pill by mail. Similarly, the administration cleared the way for independent pharmacies, such as Walgreens and CVS, to dispense the abortion pill, allowing women to “self-administer drugs obtained from a mail-order pharmacy,” the study notes.

News

Democrats Visit Anti-Israel Protester in ICE’s “Harrowing” Detention Like “Nazi Concentration Camps”

Democrats continue to disrespect Americans by siding with illegal immigrants and with people who hate our values and do not respect our laws. 

On Tuesday, April 22, a group of democrats visited the pro-Hamas protesters they claim are “unlawfully held in harrowing conditions.” 

Ironically, numerous American hostages remain hostage in Gaza under actual harrowing conditions, but you never see the same outrage from these democrats.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), and Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) were among the group of five Democrats who visited the anti-Israeli protesters, Mahmoud Khalil and Rumeysa Ozturk, whom Pressley described as her “constituent” despite both being foreign-born citizens who cannot vote in American elections. 

Out-of-state Democrats Reps. Troy Carter (LA) and Bennie Thompson (MS) also joined the delegation to show solidarity with the anti-Israeli protesters.

Born to Palestinian parents in Syria, Khalil, 30, a Columbia University alumnus, was arrested on March 9, 2025, by immigration officials coordinating with the State Department while leading anti-Israeli protests at the institution. 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) accused him of involvement in pro-Hamas activities. Khalil who has barely condemned the kidnapping of American citizens by Hamas, compared the detention conditions to “Nazi concentration camp.” 

“I feel ashamed to compare my conditions in ICE detention with Nazi concentration camps, yet, some aspects of Frankl’s experience resonate,” he wrote.

Even Hamas hostages who were held in underground tunnels, almost starved, witnessed and underwent physical and mental abuse, and were forced to participate in Hamas propaganda videos, had more respect for Nazi concentration camps victims and would not casually compare themselves. 

It’s mind-boggling that a foreigner, who is accorded the privilege of being in the country and attend an elite government-funded university, and still enjoys every civil right in the books, even meeting politicians, could compare himself to  Frankl, who was not guaranteed the next meal or even being alive the next second.

“Khalil led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization,” DHS tweeted.

Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan warned anti-Israel protesters that, unlike under the Biden administration, they could no longer get away with spreading terrorist propaganda while destroying government property.

“You can’t go and call for the annihilation of Israel and take over a college campus and take over a college building and destroy government property. You can’t hand out literature supporting a terrorist organization.”

He also noted that a visa or resident alien status were privileges that hinged on the holders’ ability to respect the laws of the country. 

“They’re not going to get away with it under the Trump administration. When you come to this country, either on a visa or you become a resident alien, that’s a privilege. But with that privilege comes certain rules. You can’t violate [the] law.”

Turkish-born Ozturk was arrested at Massachusetts’ Tufts University while engaging in anti-Israel activism. He also co-authored an anti-Israeli op-ed piece calling for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against the Jewish state. 

According to the seemingly leftist Anti-Defamation League (ADL), BDS advocates for Palestine’s right to self-determination while denying Israel’s right to exist. Even leftist Soros-backed American Jewish Committee acknowledges that while BDS advocates for “peaceful” resistance, the movement leadership wishes for the elimination of the Jewish state. Even Harvard, which is tangled in lawfare against Trump and allows anti-Israeli protests, somehow accommodates the perception that BDS is anti-Semitic.


Scroll to Top