News

Rep. Jasmine Crockett: Republicans Want Black People in Chains
News

Rep. Jasmine Crockett: Republicans Want Black People in Chains

/

The story of Bre’er Rabbit comes to mind often when listening to modern politicians or social media addicts. The folk tale tells the story of a rabbit trying to escape a fox. Because the rabbit knows that he, the rabbit, can get himself out of a patch of stick briars, he tries to lure the fox into the briar patch using reverse psychology. “Oh, please, Bre’er Fox,” says the rabbit, “You can do anything to me but don’t throw me in the briar patch.”

As soon as the fox tosses the rabbit into the thorns, the rabbit wriggles out leaving the fox trapped behind. 

Is that what’s on Jasmine Crockett’s mind? The House Rep. from Texas joined the podcast Outlaws with T.S. Madison, and said she thinks conservatives want her “back in chains.” One can be forgiven for suspecting that for people like Crockett, this is really just a kinky fantasy she can’t admit to honestly. Who in their right mind actually believes that Republicans want to see American blacks re-enslaved? 

“Somehow, those that came before us managed to break loose of the physical chains, even though we still have a bunch of systemic chains that we are still kind of wrangling with,” Crockett said, using her put-on ghetto accent. Why is it put on? Because she grew up in a middle class family and never spoke like that before she made herself as the Rep. who brings da hood to da House (of Representatives). 

Fake victimhood is the name of the game on Madison’s  show, as the host, T.S. Madison, is a man who calls himself a woman. Excuse me: Madison is a “transgender woman.” 



It’s like the countless liberal white women who don the red and white modesty robes of the “handmaids” from Margaret Atwood’s dystopian tale of women forced to give birth on behalf of sterile aristocrats. The “fear” is so distant from reality that many people suspect this display of protest against “oppression” is really more about a sublimated adult kink. 

Let’s see what the Tweeting public had to say about Rep. Crockett’s “fear”:

This person gets right to it:

Tucker Carlson Interview: CIA Insider Confirms Deep State Operates Above the President
News

Tucker Carlson Interview: CIA Insider Confirms Deep State Operates Above the President

/
Tucker Carlson Interview: CIA Insider Confirms Deep State Operates Above the President

Former CIA officer turned whistleblower John Kiriakou has confirmed that the Central Intelligence Agency operates independently and often undermines U.S. Presidents.

During an appearance on The Tucker Carlson Show, Kiriakou explained how career CIA officials can effectively shape or resist presidential directives.

Kiriakou’s remarks came after he told Tucker about his experience inside the agency.

He also discussed his decision to go public in 2007 with details about the CIA’s interrogation program.

Carlson asked:

“It doesn’t sound like—so if you look at the org chart—the president controls the CIA.”

“But you’re describing a situation where the CIA kind of controls the president.”

Kiriakou responded:

“This is another problem.”

“It’s that presidents come and go every four years, every eight years.”

“But these CIA people, they’re there for 25, 30, 35 years.”

“They don’t go anywhere.”

“So if they don’t like a president or if a president orders them to do something that they don’t want to do, they just wait because they know they can wait him out, and then he’s not going to be president anymore.”

“They can continue on with whatever plan the blob or the deep state wants to implement.”

President Donald Trump signed an executive order to curtail the weaponization of federal agencies.

The order stated that federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies had abused their powers and needed reform.

Kiriakou noted Trump’s frequent use of the term “deep state.”

He added:

“Donald Trump took a lot of guff in his first term when he used on a regular basis the term ‘deep state.’”

“I argued from the very beginning, it is a deep state.”

“Maybe you don’t like the terminology.”

“You don’t have to call it the deep state.”

“You can call it the federal bureaucracy.”

“You can call it the state.”

“But the truth is that it exists.”

Carlson agreed:

“I would say by definition, you just described it, the president.”

“By the way, the elected representatives who are the instrument of the population through which they control their government are perennial.”

“They come and go.”

“The people who carry out those orders remain.”

“So, over time, they are the ones with the power.”

Kiriakou also weighed in on changes underway at the CIA.

He discussed the overhaul of internal agency structures.

Watch:

This came after CIA Director John Ratcliffe announced plans to reduce politicization within the agency.

Ratcliffe also pledged to eliminate structural inefficiencies.

In his remarks, Ratcliffe called the CIA’s operating environment:

“The most challenging national security environment in our nation’s history.”

Kiriakou revisited a controversy involving former House Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Jane Harman.

He recalled how Harman denied knowledge of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program.

Kiriakou strongly disputed her claim.

He said:

“Reporters went to her and said, ‘Hey, what about this torture program?’ She said, ‘I didn’t know anything about the torture program,’”

“She was lying.”

“I said, and I remember saying it to the New York Times.”

“I said, ‘She was in the room when it was briefed.’”

“When she was challenged, she said, ‘Oh, yeah, I remember that day.”

“But you know what? I got up, and I left early, and I left one of my aides as a notetaker, and he never briefed me,’ which is also a lie,” he added.

Kiriakou served at the CIA from 1990 to 2004.

He became publicly known in 2007 after revealing the agency’s use of waterboarding on detainees.

In 2012, he was charged under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.

He was sentenced to 30 months in prison for disclosing the identity of a covert office.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Boise Pride Event Called Off as Attendance Falls Flat Despite Online Buzz
News

Boise Pride Event Called Off as Attendance Falls Flat Despite Online Buzz

/

A Pride Month kickoff event scheduled for June 6 in Boise has been canceled after organizers cited lower-than-expected community turnout, despite apparent support expressed online.

The event, which was intended to mark the beginning of Pride Month and expand local LGBTQ+ programming, will not move forward as planned.

The event was separate from the annual Boise Pride Festival, which is held each September and typically draws thousands of attendees.

Organizers had hoped the June event would serve as a complementary celebration, aligning with national Pride Month festivities taking place in other cities during the summer.

According to a statement from Boise Pride, the cancellation was attributed to a lack of early community engagement.

“We know the desire for more Pride programming is real—we hear it constantly,” the organizers said, as reported by CBS 2 News.

“However, early buy-in from the community is essential for events outside our main festival.”

The event’s cancellation has prompted a full refund for those who had already purchased tickets.

Organizers stated they plan to use the opportunity to re-evaluate and possibly relaunch the event in a future year.

“We still believe in the idea behind the Pride Season Kickoff, and we hope to revisit it in the future,” the statement continued.

Boise Pride also called for more tangible support from local residents.

“We need real-world support for these events to happen,” the group said, emphasizing that online encouragement alone is not sufficient to sustain programming outside the September festival.

The cancellation in Boise comes amid a broader national trend of scaled-back Pride events and sponsorships.

Across the country, several Pride organizations are reporting reduced funding and participation in the wake of growing political and cultural tensions surrounding LGBTQ+ issues.

New York City Pride recently announced that it had lost approximately 25 percent of its corporate sponsorships for 2024.

According to organizers, some sponsors cited apprehensions over the potential for political backlash, particularly following moves by the Trump administration to defund and reverse Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs in federal agencies and government contracting.

Additional concern stemmed from fears of consumer pushback, similar to the response faced by Bud Light in 2023 after its controversial marketing campaign with a transgender social media personality.

That incident sparked a national boycott that affected company sales and prompted major brands to re-evaluate their involvement in Pride campaigns.

In Boise, Pride organizers stressed that the main September festival remains on schedule and will continue as planned.

They reiterated their commitment to expanding community engagement throughout the year but acknowledged that additional events will require stronger participation to be successful.

While no new date has been set for a possible future kickoff event, the group said it remains open to trying again in the future with better preparation and local involvement.

Please visit Drew Berquist.com for more stories like this.

Pride Month is Going Down—Finally
News

Pride Month is Going Down—Finally

/

Pride goeth before a fall-or does it? Looks like America is finally getting fed up with the bacchanal that’s been called “Pride Month” for about 10 years. It didn’t used to be called that, and it didn’t used to be a month. 

Back in 1969, a group of homosexuals pushed back at the police for arresting them in a New York City Bar. This riot became known as the Stonewall uprising, named after the bar at which it took place. Whatever one thinks of gays and their activism, it is objectively true that for most of the time since 1969, gays had a one-day parade that was at least ostensibly about overturning discriminatory employment and housing laws, for example. 

But since the mid 2010s, what was formerly an event for gay legal rights became a literal orgy for all the most perverse among us, gay, straight, or. . you don’t want to know. It seemed to decline when Time Magazine put a narcissistic black transvestite on its cover, proclaiming that America had reached the “Transgender Tipping Point.” Men in dresses and women with fake penises were the new civil rights frontier, we were told. 

What was “the gay pride parade” became queer/trans “Pride Month.” Formerly tame parades now featured complete nudity, gay men, trannies, and disturbed women now performed sex acts right out on the street. Some “pride” events featured inflatable kiddie pools so that users might urinate on each other. Much to be proud of. 

Corporations uniformly bowed down to the drag queen’s spike heels. Target featured “pride” products for kids, including underwear to help your budding little trans girl hide “her penis” for a nice, smooth look. Even companies like Tractor Supply had to be bullied into withdrawing from programs that supported schools and organizations that advocated for giving children sex changes!

This year, the nation has had enough. Pride celebrations are dying on the vine as their funders wake up and realize the kind of degrading perversion they’ve been funding. Activists are crying and rending their garments about being “abandoned” by companies who won’t pay for their piggy parties anymore. 

Check out all these companies that, all of a sudden, shut their pocketbooks:

Lots of people are noticing:

Juanita Broaddrick wonders if the whole thing will finally be put out to pasture:

Let’s see what commenters think:

Looks like Target just can’t entirely quit it yet either. 

And, of course, liberal cities aren’t going to give it up without a fight. 

Bill Clinton Denies Biden’s Cognitive Decline: “I Thought He Was in Good Shape”
News

Bill Clinton Denies Biden’s Cognitive Decline: “I Thought He Was in Good Shape”

/
Bill Clinton Denies Biden's Cognitive Decline: ‘I Thought He Was in Good Shape’

Former President Bill Clinton dismissed claims of President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline during an interview on “CBS Sunday Morning.”

Reporter Tracy Smith asked Clinton, “Speaking of aging, there is this book that came out talking about Joe Biden and the people around him seeing that he had cognitive and physical decline.

Did you ever have a moment with him where you thought maybe he was unfit to run for president?”

Clinton said, “No.”

Smith repeated, “No.”

Clinton continued:

“I thought he was a good president.

The only concern I thought he had to deal with was, could anybody do that job until they were 86? We’d had several long talks.

I never have seen him and walked away thinking, he can’t do this anymore. He was always on top of his briefs.”

Smith asked again, “You never saw any cognitive decline?”

Clinton said:

“No. I didn’t know anything about any of this.

I haven’t read the book.

I saw President Biden not very long ago, and I thought he was in good shape.”

Smith asked, “Why didn’t you read the book?”

Clinton replied:

“I didn’t want to because he’s not president anymore, and I think he did a good job.

And I think we are facing challenges today with our president in our history.

Some people are trying to use this as a way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.”

Watch:

Despite Clinton’s statements, some Democrats have openly acknowledged Biden’s decline.

Last month, former Obama aide and “Pod Save America” co-host Jon Lovett admitted that despite his concern over Joe Biden‘s obvious mental decline, he kept silent because he “wanted him to f**king win.”

Lovett told Jon Stewart and Jon Favreau that he held his tongue over Biden’s decline, even though it was blatantly obvious.

“I remember feeling I want to talk about this as a huge liability. To talk about this is something Joe Biden can overcome, but I’m not going to go so far as to say, ‘I think Joe Biden must drop out. He is too old to be president,’” Lovett said.

A, because I didn’t know exactly what was going on behind the scenes, but B, if Joe Biden is the candidate, I want him to fu**ng win.”

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more articles like this.

Anti-Trump DIA Employee Arrested for Leaking Top Secret Intel to Foreign Government
News

Anti-Trump DIA Employee Arrested for Leaking Top Secret Intel to Foreign Government

/

An IT specialist employed by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has been arrested for attempting to transmit classified national security information to a foreign government.

Nathan Vilas Laatsch, 28, was arrested close to the nation’s capital and is scheduled to make his initial court appearance this week.

Laatsch became a civilian employee of the DIA in 2019 and held Top Secret security clearance in the Insider Threat Division.

In March, the FBI launched an investigation after receiving a tip that an individual offered classified information to a “friendly” foreign government.

The federal employee indicated in an email that he did not “agree or align with the values of this administration” and was therefore “willing to share classified information” to which he had access, including “completed intelligence products, some unprocessed intelligence, and other assorted classified documentation.”

Following communications with an undercover FBI agent, the anti-Trump employee began transcribing classified information to a notepad at his desk.

He then repeatedly leaked classified information from his workspace.

“Laatsch subsequently confirmed to the FBI agent that he was prepared to transmit the information,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia announced in a press release.

The FBI then organized an operation in a public park where Laatsch planned to deposit the classified information for the foreign government to retrieve.

“On May 1, FBI surveillance observed Laatsch proceed to the specified location and deposit an item. Following Laatsch’s departure, the FBI retrieved the item, which was a thumb drive later found to contain a message from Laatsch and multiple typed documents, each containing information that was portion-marked up to the Secret or Top Secret levels,” prosecutors said in the press release.

“The message from Laatsch indicated that he had chosen to include ‘a decent sample size’ of classified information to ‘decently demonstrate the range of types of products’ to which he had access.”

After receiving confirmation that the package had been received, he again contacted the undercover FBI agent and asked for compensation.

The following day, Laatsch indicated that he was interested in obtaining citizenship in the unnamed country because he did not “expect[] things here to improve in the long term.”

Although he said he was “not opposed to other compensation,” he was not in a position where he needed to seek material compensation.

Additional meetings were set up by agents after Laatsch agreed to share more classified information.

On May 29, Laatsch arrived at a prearranged location in northern Virginia, where he attempted to transmit multiple classified documents to the foreign country.

FBI agents arrested Laatsch, and formal charges are forthcoming.

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Experts Share Chilling Warning About America’s Nuclear Capabilities
News

Experts Share Chilling Warning About America’s Nuclear Capabilities

/

Shutterstock / Nuclear Bomb

Experts shared terrifying warnings in May about U.S. nuclear capabilities compared to China’s rapid development.

America’s nuclear stockpiles have plummeted to levels “not seen since the 1960s,” according to CBN, while China continues to invest huge efforts in increasing their nuclear weapon capabilities to an “unprecedented” level. Some estimates suggest the U.S. has just 1,700 nuclear weapons, the newest of which is more than 35 years old. Our military has also withdrawn many of our nuclear weapons from across our Asian bases, meaning the U.S. has no nuclear option in the Pacific should China invade Taiwan.

“All of this requires urgent action,” Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Reagan administration Frank Gaffney, host of “Securing America,” told the outlet. “All of that has essentially gone over the side. I can’t tell you how frustrating it is, having experienced all of that, to see what we are hoping that nobody notices that we haven’t done a whole lot with our nuclear deterrent since I left the Pentagon.”

China, Global Threat Continues To Loom

China has tripled the size of its nuclear arsenal in the last five years, becoming the world’s fastest growing nuclear superpower. “I think that they are increasing the size of their nuclear arsenal, because they want to use it to coerce others into standing down,” China expert Gordon Change explained to CBN.

The Chinese Communist Party is said to have taken note from Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who used the threat of nuclear war to advance his operations in Ukraine, and limit Western involvement in the war. “So the Chinese saw that this actually works. I think that they will precede any invasion of Taiwan, Japan, whatever, with threats to use their nuclear weapons to get the U.S. not to come to the aid of its friends and partners,” Chang stated.

China’s mentality toward nuclear war is much different to the U.S. “They never bought this idea that Ronald Reagan, my mild and much-revered boss, famously said, which is ‘a nuclear war, can never be won and must never be fought.’ They don’t buy that. They believe nuclear war is a thing – a nuclear war is something that can be used decisively,” Gaffney mused.

Concerns of nuclear provocation were most recently raised by India and Pakistan. Though experts such as Ankit Panda felt this was also a type of nuclear blackmail (also called a nuclear deterrence, such as that used by Putin), it could be that the old methods of nuclear signaling aren’t as sufficient in their deterrence as they used to be.

What Happens Next?

Experts want the U.S. to return some of our nuclear weapons to our bases across the Pacific. Though this may face significant opposition from political leaders, it may be necessary given the growing threat of nuclear attacks from Russia, North Korea, and Iran.

But would returning nuclear weapons to these bases be provocative? Vox argued that because humanity has lived with these threats for 80 years, as of 2025, we sometimes take our peace for granted.

Several European nations are repeatedly discussing building up their nuclear arsenal, as of the last few weeks (from time of writing). South Korea is actively debating the development of a more substantial nuclear program. Vox notes how President Donald Trump has actively proposed “denuclearization” talks with Russia and China, something that experts like Chang think is unlikely to come to fruition.

International Atomic Energy Agency director general Rafael Mariano Grossi told journalists in late May that the U.S. and Iran may be in a place to come to an agreement over their nuclear capabilities. “For the moment, the jury is still out,” Grossi noted, but seemed a little lighter when adding that it is a good sign that both nations are continuing to meet on the matter.

Please visit Million Voices for more stories like this.

RFK Jr. Takes Blowtorch to Big Pharma, Announces Bold Plan to Dismantle Medical System
News

RFK Jr. Takes Blowtorch to Big Pharma, Announces Bold Plan to Dismantle Medical System

/
RFK Jr. Takes Blowtorch to Big Pharma, Announces Bold Plan to Dismantle Medical System

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his bold new plan to shift the medical system towards one that serves the people, not Big Pharma.

During a discussion with human biologist and biohacker Gary Brecka, Kennedy shared a compelling explanation for why TV news suddenly stopped criticizing the pharmaceutical industry.

Not long ago, seeing news segments questioning the safety or effectiveness of vaccines was not uncommon. However, in recent years, there has been a silence, which Kennedy says has been bought with pharmaceutical ad dollars.

Big Pharma now wants to “control the content,” RFK says.

The HHS Secretary also said Fox News founder Roger Ailes once told him 75% of his evening news ad revenue came from pharmaceutical companies.

“And they know that,” Kennedy said.

“They know they’ve got to toe the line. They’ve got to frighten us all about infectious disease.”

“They’re not giving us the real news. They’re not asking the questions they ought to be asking. There’s no skepticism,” he added.

“Twenty years ago, they used to say, ‘Yeah, there’s problems with vaccines or other drugs.’ They will never do that today.”

Watch:

“The other thing about pharmaceutical ads is the company gets a tax deduction on them. We’re paying for the ads and we’re paying for the product,” Kennedy added.

That’s right—taxpayers are getting hit twice.

Watch:

First, they are footing the bill for the drugs themselves through Medicare and other government programs.

Second, the pharmaceutical companies write off the cost of their TV ads as a business expense, reducing their tax bill.

RFK Jr. put every medical journal bought off by Big Pharma on notice, adding that “those other journals because they’re all corrupt.”

“We’re going to stop NIH scientists from publishing there,” he said.

“And we’re going to create our own journals in health in each of the institutions.”

He said that new, government-backed journals will become the “preeminent journals” in the world because they are grounded in science, not spin.

“If you get NIH funding,” Kennedy said, “it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist.”

Kennedy also added, “We’re going to end the war at FDA against alternative medicine.”

That includes stem cells, chelating drugs, vitamins, peptides—“anything that is not going to make Big Pharma rich.”

Kennedy revealed he had to travel all the way to Antigua, in the Caribbean, in order to receive stem cell treatment for his throat.

“They helped me enormously,” he said.

“But I shouldn’t have to leave the country to get them.“

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Ex-Obama Insider Breaks Silence: Biden’s Decline Was “Obvious” But Hidden for Political Gain
News

Ex-Obama Insider Breaks Silence: Biden’s Decline Was “Obvious” But Hidden for Political Gain

/
Ex-Obama Insider Breaks Silence: Biden’s Decline Was ‘Obvious’ But Hidden for Political Gain

Former Obama aide and “Pod Save America” co-host Jon Lovett admitted on Jon Stewart’s “The Weekly Show” podcast that despite his concern over Joe Biden‘s obvious mental decline, he kept silent because he *“wanted him to fking win.”***

Lovett told Stewart and Jon Favreau that he held his tongue over Biden’s decline even though it was blatantly obvious.

“I remember feeling I want to talk about this as a huge liability. To talk about this is something Joe Biden can overcome, but I’m not going to go so far as to say, ‘I think Joe Biden must drop out. He is too old to be president,’” Lovett said.

A, because I didn’t know exactly what was going on behind the scenes, but B, if Joe Biden is the candidate, I want him to fu**ng win.”*

Lovett went on to explain that speaking up would have benefited Biden’s political opponents, like Donald Trump.

However, he kept quiet to avoid “having the words we’re saying taken out of context and all of a sudden be part of the case against Joe Biden from the right — that would use any person criticizing Joe Biden from the left as a weapon against him.”

“So it was about being honest about Joe Biden’s age as a liability while knowing that if he is the nominee, I want to be clear that I thought it was important to make sure we did everything we could to reelect him,” Lovett added.

The host becomes the latest Democrat to admit he has concerns over Biden’s decline, following the release of Original Sin, a book co-authored by Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson that details the alleged cover-up surrounding Biden’s health.

Lovett is featured in Original Sin, where he and his co-hosts met with Biden at the White House on April 26, 2024.

The hosts reportedly left the meeting feeling “deeply disturbed” after discussions with Biden, describing the president’s comments as rambling and “incoherent.”

Watch:

Please visit The Daily Fetched for more stories like this.

Trump Forces South African Pres. to Watch Anti-White Violence in Front of Press
News

Trump Forces South African Pres. to Watch Anti-White Violence in Front of Press

/

Why, you’d think that American media actually wants to see white people murdered by black people. There’s no other way to explain the reaction from the legacy media, and the left, to Donald Trump’s meeting with South African president Cyril Ramaphosa. Trump invited the African leader to a meeting in the White House, and forced him to confront the reality of the state-endorsed murder of white citizens by blacks in South Africa. Trump rolled video of the violence against whites while Ramaphosa and his delegation were stuck there on camera, in the room, unable to get away. More on this below. 

Though the media would like you to think “that’s not happening,” it is happening. In the years since the apartheid government was overthrown in the 1990s, black hostility to white South Africans has grown until it’s murderous. Though they are only about 7 percent of the population, whites in South Africa own most of the farms. Recently, the South African government passed a law allowing the state to steal the farms from whites to give to blacks, under the banner of “equity.”

You wouldn’t know that white farmers are being murdered if you don’t get news from a source like X/Twitter. Why? Because the “respectable” media says it’s not true. They are in absolute lockstep, repeating the  same phrases, and denying what anyone can clearly see in South Africa if they’re willing to look.

In their usual antipatriotic way, the American media is putting out headlines to call the U.S. president a liar, and to plump for the South African president, who lies and says no such anti-white violence is occurring in his country. 

They all look like that. Every single legacy media outlet you can find online. 

Let’s take a look at the White House meeting. 

Check out how the press on site immediately tried to say the violence wasn’t happening. So angry is the American press that Trump is allowing white South African refugee families into the US, that reporters will do anything to change the subject to refugees with brown skin. Having brown skin means they are full humans, as compared to white  people. 

Then, Trump ordered the lights to be turned down and videos started to roll. 

Let’s see how Twitter/X users reacted. 

There’s always one person who thinks it’s moral to kill people because some other people who looked like them decades ago did something they don’t like. 


Scroll to Top