Joy Reid suffered a meltdown after President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis toured a newly-constructed immigration detention facility in the Everglades.
The former MSNBC host described the facility as a “concentration camp” for “rounding up brown people.”
This week, Reid accused DeSantis of building a facility to imprison Latinos, claiming that innocent people would be indiscriminately targeted due to their race.
“He took the comfy couch hosts on a tour of the concentration camp that he’s building in Florida in order to round up people—brown people—and throw them in a camp because he doesn’t want them in Florida,” Reid fumed. “Anybody who is perceived or looks Latino is afraid to go to work.”
Dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz” by both critics and supporters, the facility was unveiled in a remote, swampy region near the former Dade-Collier Airport. The center can hold up to 5,000 detainees and is already housing roughly 3,000. Immigration judges are stationed on-site to expedite deportation hearings within 48 hours.
Watch:
Hilarious. @thereidout Joy Reid says @RonDeSantis just created a “concentration camp” for brown people in the Everglades.
She’s of course referring to Alligator Alcatraz.
Hey Joy, last time I checked, the ovens at Auschwitz didn’t have Air Condition.
President Donald Trump referred to New York City mayoral nominee and State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani as a “100% communist lunatic” during an appearance on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo in late June. The comment drew immediate responses from media outlets and fact-checking organizations, several of which labeled the statement as “false.”
Fact-checkers from outlets including PolitiFact and Al Jazeera asserted that Mamdani is a democratic socialist, not a communist, and dismissed Trump’s remarks as inaccurate. However, in the days following Trump’s comments, closer analysis of Mamdani’s affiliations, public statements, and policy positions has led to renewed questions about how distinct his views are from traditional communist doctrine.
“He’s a communist… a pure communist,” President Trump said in the Fox News interview.
“Let’s say this, if he does get in, I’m going to be president, and he’s going to have to do the right thing. They’re not getting any money. He’s got to do the right thing.”
Trump on Mamdani: "He's a pure communist. I think he admits it … If he does get in, I'm gonna be president and he's gonna have to the right thing or they're not getting any money. He's gotta do the right thing." https://t.co/QQbrnNjfPBpic.twitter.com/uwVwXClF5U
Mamdani, who represents New York’s 36th Assembly District in Queens, is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), an organization that advocates for a range of policies that include universal public housing, socialized healthcare, and eliminating profit motives from key sectors of the economy.
While the DSA does not label itself as a communist group, its platform draws from ideological frameworks with Marxist and Trotskyist roots. According to the DSA’s published materials, the group supports “democratic control over the economy,” “worker ownership,” and the dismantling of structures it considers “profit-driven exploitation.” Mamdani has publicly supported and sponsored legislation that aligns with these goals, including:
– Rent cancellation and eviction bans during states of emergency – Creation of publicly owned grocery stores in underserved communities – Elimination of the 421-a tax incentive for private real estate developers – Expansion of fare-free public transportation – Proposals to transfer housing and public goods to state control
In public statements and posts on social media, Mamdani has frequently referred to landlords as “exploitative,” called for the end of private profit in housing, and described capitalism as “structurally violent.”
A resurfaced video clip from 2021 shows Mamdani stating that “the end goal is to seize the means of production,” a phrase historically associated with communist economic theory. Critics argue that these positions, along with Mamdani’s alignment with the DSA, reflect an ideological framework that closely resembles communism, regardless of how Mamdani identifies himself.
This is not terrible AI, it's a real message from the current frontrunner for NYC Mayor to his socialist comrades.
"The end goal of seizing the means of production."
Trump’s remarks, they contend, reflect a broader concern over the policy direction and rhetoric embraced by some figures on the left. Despite that, media outlets have pushed back, focusing their fact-checking primarily on definitions.
PolitiFact’s analysis emphasized that Mamdani has not openly declared himself a communist and has not called for the abolition of all private property or representative democracy. Their assessment categorized Trump’s comment as “false” on the grounds that it misrepresents Mamdani’s declared political affiliation.
The dispute centers less on party membership and more on ideology. While Mamdani does not belong to a formal communist party, his policy goals — including public ownership, the elimination of private profit in essential services, and wealth redistribution — mirror concepts found in Marxist economics.
President Trump’s remarks have brought national attention to Mamdani’s candidacy in the aftermath of his surprise win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. Mamdani’s campaign has continued to promote a platform focused on housing, transit, and labor reforms. As the general election approaches, scrutiny of his ideology and the broader implications for Democratic Party politics remains ongoing.
HHS Secretary RFK Jr. announced the Trump administration will cut off funding to GAVI, a Bill Gates-backed global vaccine alliance, until it takes steps to “re-earn the public’s trust.” Kennedy criticized the global vaccine group in a pre-recorded speech shown at a GAVI meeting, citing its actions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kennedy says the organization:
Pushed “social media companies to silence dissenting views” and “stifle free speech.”
Made “questionable recommendations” such as “encouraging pregnant women to receive COVID-19 vaccines.”
Watch:
RFK Jr. just froze U.S. funding to GAVI, the vaccine group cofounded by Bill Gates!
GAVI is the global vaccine alliance pushing mass vaccination with billions from the U.S. and deep ties to the WHO.
RFK’s demanding they stop censoring questions and start measuring real health… pic.twitter.com/3V773GdYhk
— End Tribalism in Politics (@EndTribalism) June 25, 2025
RFK Jr. also singled out GAVI’s promotion of the DTP vaccine in developing countries, noting that girls who receive it are up to 10 times more likely to die from all causes within their first six months of life, according to major peer-reviewed studies. The DTP vaccine is no longer used in the developed world.
However, GAVI responded in a statement saying it “continues to have full confidence” in the DTP vaccine.
The numbers: The United States contributes roughly $300 million annually to GAVI, according to The National Pulse. According to NPR, the international agency — established in 2000 — says it has played a role in vaccinating 1.1 billion children against a long list of potentially debilitating diseases, from polio to malaria to mpox to measles. It claims credit for saving 20 million lives. Global health experts say GAVI is instrumental in getting vaccinations to lower-resource countries, providing funding to buy vaccines and support for disease outbreak responses.
The U.S. has been one of the largest donors to GAVI, funding about 13% of the agency’s budget. Under the Biden administration, the U.S. pledged $2.53 billion starting in September 2022 through the year 2030. Of that amount, $880 million has so far been dispersed.
In a statement, GAVI said the organization’s “utmost concern is the safety and health of children” and rejected Kennedy’s accusations that it was not following scientific data on vaccines.
The statement said: “Any decision made by Gavi with regards to its vaccine portfolio is made in alignment with recommendations by WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), a group of independent experts that reviews all available data through a rigorous, transparent, and independent process. This ensures Gavi investments are grounded in the best available science and public health priorities.”
Actress and comedian Rosie O’Donnell said this week that she relocated to Ireland due to the impact President Donald Trump’s first term had on her mental health. Speaking with Chris Cuomo on his podcast, O’Donnell described the move as an act of “self-preservation,” citing depression, alcohol use, and public encounters that left her feeling unsafe in the United States.
O’Donnell has been an outspoken critic of President Trump for years, frequently clashing with him publicly. During the interview, she said the national political climate and public reaction to Trump’s presidency left her disillusioned and emotionally distressed.
“I was very, very depressed. I was overeating. I was overdrinking,” O’Donnell told Cuomo. “It hurt my heart that America believed the lies about him. And then it broke my heart to be in a business that creates and sells those lies for profit.”
Rosie O’Donnell, who self-deported to Ireland after Trump won, says she was very depressed and was overeating and over drinking after Trump was first elected
O’Donnell said her decision to leave the U.S. was motivated by a desire to protect her mental well-being. She described the move to Ireland as a personal reset, offering an environment where she felt distanced from what she described as the pressures of American celebrity culture and political hostility.
“When I got here, I noticed right away there was a different culture about celebrity. They’re not lauded in Ireland. They’re not thought of as better than anyone else,” O’Donnell said. “Coming home here felt like coming home.”
She also described a series of negative interactions in public following Trump’s election in 2016, saying those moments contributed to her desire to leave the country. O’Donnell recounted an incident involving her child, who is autistic. “People in CVS saying to me and my autistic 12-year-old, ‘Hey, Rosie, Trump won. Ha ha.’
One cursed at us,” she said. “I find myself feeling safe,” she added. “There’s no MAGA support here.”
O’Donnell did not specify when exactly she moved to Ireland, but described the transition as one that provided emotional relief. She did not indicate whether the move is permanent, though she characterized it as a necessary change for her and her family. The comments come as O’Donnell continues to remain active in media and entertainment. She did not directly reference any upcoming projects during the podcast episode, instead focusing on the emotional toll she said the political climate had taken on her during and after President Trump’s time in office.
President Trump has not publicly responded to O’Donnell’s latest remarks. The two have had a history of public feuds dating back to his business and television career, prior to his election as President. The interview with Cuomo marks O’Donnell’s first detailed public explanation of her move to Ireland and the personal reasons behind it.
Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) publicly addressed federal charges filed against her during an interview with MSNBC’s Jen Psaki this week, as reported by The Gateway Pundit. McIver is facing up to 17 years in prison in connection with an alleged assault involving federal law enforcement officers at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in New Jersey. The charges stem from an incident during a congressional visit to the detention center, where McIver allegedly interfered with federal officers and resisted their commands.
Yesterday, LaMonica McIver (D-NJ and wearing a red blazer) appeared to interfere with officers at an ICE facility in Newark.
According to federal prosecutors, McIver is charged with three counts of forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers. “I never thought I would be facing charges as a sitting congresswoman,” McIver said in the Wednesday interview. “It’s a scary situation, too, because I’m thinking of my mom.” She added that her mother was present during her legal proceedings and had been significantly stressed by the situation.
McIver, a first-term Democrat representing New Jersey, stated that the charges arose from a visit to the ICE facility that she claims was part of a congressional oversight role. She said the potential sentence weighs heavily on her and her family. “When they’re saying that you’re going to face 17 years in prison, I’m thinking about my daughter, who’s 9 years old. I’m thinking about my husband, my family,” McIver said. “And it’s like, ‘Oh, my God, this is awful.’”
Federal prosecutors allege that McIver physically engaged with federal officers at the facility, prompting the charges. The exact details of the altercation have not been fully disclosed by either party, but officials confirmed that the investigation remains active.
Look, I never thought I'd be facing charges as a sitting congresswoman, but l'm not going to stop doing my job.
The Department of Justice has not commented further on the pending case. McIver has not entered a plea at this time, and it remains unclear whether the case will proceed to trial. The arrest and potential sentencing have drawn national attention, given McIver’s status as an elected federal official. It is unusual for a sitting member of Congress to face such serious criminal charges stemming from a physical altercation with law enforcement. The incident took place during an anti-ICE rally at the facility. McIver has not publicly confirmed whether her visit was tied directly to the protest, but sources familiar with the investigation say the congresswoman was among several individuals demonstrating against ICE operations at the time.
/1🚨BREAKING — America First Legal just SUED the University of Michigan and the Michigan Law Review Association for illegal racial discrimination. pic.twitter.com/rOI6iTfWJf
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) June 19, 2025
The University of Michigan is facing a federal lawsuit alleging its law school publication discriminates against straight white men. Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences filed the federal antidiscrimination lawsuit on Wednesday in the Eastern District of Michigan against the Michigan Law Review and its editors, as well as the university and its Board of Regents, MLive reports.
The voluntary membership organization contends the law review uses a “holistic review” process that prioritizes women, minorities, gay, lesbian or transgender students over straight white and Asian men with better writing scores and grades.
The lawsuit is backed by America First Legal, a nonprofit legal firm founded by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, which argues the “anti-American scheme corrupts legal education and undermines equal justice under the law.”
“No American should ever face discrimination based on their race. Yet, despite clear law on point prohibiting such discrimination and numerous Supreme Court decisions, racial discrimination continues to be pervasive throughout academia,” Gene Hamilton, AFL President, said in a statement.
“AFL will not tolerate this unconstitutional discrimination at the University of Michigan and is taking decisive action to restore meritocracy and protect American values.”
AFL contends UM, which is subsidized by tax dollars, “brazenly defies Title VI, the Equal Protection Clause, and (federal law), employing secretive selection committees to enforce diversity quotas and discriminatory citation policies that favor ‘underrepresented’ authors while penalizing white scholars, including underrepresented Republicans and Protestant Christians.”
“Until recently, membership on the Law Review was an academic honor reserved for students who were selected on account of their first-year grades and their performance on a writing competition,” according to the lawsuit.
“But left-wing students and affirmative-action devotees at the University of Michigan Law School were unhappy with the demographic makeup produced by merit-based selection,” it continued.
“So the Michigan Law Review, with the approval and acquiescence of the University of Michigan general counsel’s office, has implemented a corrupt and illegal scheme of race and sex preferences to select its student members.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her husband, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported significant financial gains in 2024, with new congressional financial disclosures revealing that the couple earned between $7.8 million and $42.5 million over the course of the year.
Their total net worth could now reach as high as $413 million. This marks a substantial increase from 2023, when disclosures indicated the couple’s net worth could be as high as $370 million.
BREAKING: Pelosi did it 👑
She officially finishes 2024 up 54% and beat out Inverse Cramer for the top portfolio on Autopilot
— Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker ♟ (@PelosiTracker_) January 2, 2025
Because lawmakers are only required to disclose broad ranges for assets and income, the exact total remains uncertain. Market analytics firm Quiver Quantitative, which tracks stock transactions and estimates real-time valuations, pegged the Pelosis’ net worth at $257 million in 2024—up $26 million from the previous year. That figure does not include valuations for various other holdings, including a Napa Valley winery, a Bay Area Italian restaurant, and a stake in a political data and consulting firm.
A large portion of the couple’s financial success has come from stock trades made in Paul Pelosi’s name.
The former House Speaker has long been scrutinized for her husband’s trades, with Rep. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) even introducing legislation bearing her name aimed at banning congressional stock trading.
Cast your mind back to a time you remember prior to the past decade. Go back to 2000, perhaps. Imagine yourself, and the world, as you were then. Now imagine that a mother told you, in public, that her child had a serious medical need for a dangerous, experimental treatment. That treatment was the only way her child had a chance of surviving.
And then imagine you asked what sickness the child had, and the mother told you that her “daughter” had been “born in the wrong body.” That child was really her son, you see, but God made a mistake. In preparation for a “gender confirming surgery” at 13 years old that would cut off the girl’s breasts, mom was prepping her “son” by dressing the child in breast-constricting compression bands, and forcing everyone around her to say that her daughter was actually a boy.
How would you have reacted? You would have been dumbfounded at first, thinking this must be an elaborate prank. Surely no sane person could seriously suggest a sex change for a 13 year old girl? No mother would really consent to a mastectomy on her healthy daughter. And then, you would call the police, and child protective services would remove the girl from her abusive mother’s custody.
That’s what would have happened in the normal world of 25 years ago. But today, parents who do not want to have their children poisoned with “puberty blockers”, or mutilated by a surgeon, are in danger of losing custody of those kids. Yes, that is correct. Today, not subjecting your child to mutilating procedures is considered “abuse” so long as the teachers, social workers, and doctors around the family have all decided the child is “really trans.”
That’s the world we live in now. And it explains how politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren feel comfortable saying things in public that would have gotten her investigated for child abuse just a few years ago. The rabidly liberal Democrat from Massachusetts isn’t just known for pretending to be an American Indian in order to be admitted to Harvard is on Twitter acting the part of the witch in Hansel and Gretel. She is furious that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state legislatures have the right to ban the child-mutilation scam called “gender-affirming care.”
That’s right. Warren is angry that the court upheld laws that protect children from Frankenstein medical experiments that maim them for life while pretending that it changes their sex. That’s our world in 2025. Take a look. Warren is like a ravening beast, gnashing her teeth in fury that some children might escape the knife. Like all conscience-free narcissists, she grotesquely positions herself as a “protector” of children’s health.
Trans kids suffer when they don't get medically-necessary care. This is a brazen political decision by the Supreme Court.
My heart is with trans kids and their loved ones. I won’t stop fighting to make sure they can be exactly who they are. https://t.co/XnvM0MMVlA
It’s not actually medically necessary care. I had my breasts removed for no medical reason. They were a physically healthy part of my body. I was also an adult, at least, whereas the minors you refer to cannot consent.
During an appearance on The Don Lemon Show, Griffin told Lemon to prepare for a “tin foil hat” moment. “Are you ready for a tin-foil hat moment?” Griffin asked Lemon.
“I am just going to be bold and say this. You know, you can take issue with this all you want. I do not think he won in a free and fair election. How do you like that, lefties? Yeah, I said it,” the comedian ranted. “I’m Kathy Griffin, and I do not think Trump won in a free and fair election. I believe there was tampering. I don’t know if it was the Elon connection? I don’t know if it was just a few good old boys in the South,” she continued. “I know I’ll take heat for this and people will say I am crazy, but I have been called crazy before.”
Lemon asked Griffin whether her theory was based on anything concrete or just a “gut feeling.”
“My gut is telling me that something was up with them,” Griffin replied. “You’re not far off. I won’t say that I disagree with you. I’m an evidence person. I would like to see the evidence.”
Ironically, Griffin previously attacked Trump supporters for questioning the 2020 election. “It’s heartbreaking when they accuse me of being in a cult because I’m vaccinated and think the 2020 election was free and fair,” the comedian wrote in an August 2021 X post. “They do NOT like either of those positions.”
In the same year, Griffin accused the Trump family of sowing doubt in American elections by questioning the results. “And Jr, Eric, Kimberly and all the folks in Trump orbit who millions and millions of people actually listen to and believe regarding nonexistent voter fraud. I mean, they ALL used this lie to shatter people’s belief in a free and fair election,” she said.
In March 2024, Griffin admitted she was taken into a psych ward after the backlash over her 2017 severed-head stunt played a major role in the decline of her mental health. *“Six years I was out of work because of that ***. There, I said what it was, all because of a picture!” she shouted, arms waving. “A picture I took making fun of the president!”
Dutch Bros Coffee has officially announced the relocation of its corporate headquarters from Grants Pass, Oregon, to Phoenix, Arizona. The decision follows a phased transition that began last year and now results in a complete shift of the company’s executive operations out of the Pacific Northwest.
I grew up in Grants Pass before moving to Portland almost 20 years ago. Dutch Bros began in Grants Pass and started moving its corporate presence to AZ a few years ago. Oregon had time and opportunity to retain Dutch Bros and make Oregon an appealing home for HQ but failed. pic.twitter.com/k6gbOKFS1t
The company confirmed the move this week, stating that consolidating operations in Phoenix would provide both functional and cultural benefits as Dutch Bros prepares for its next phase of national growth. “Over the past several months, we have seen the functional and cultural advantages of having more of our field support roles working together in one place,” the company said in a statement to the Portland Business Journal.
Starbucks is brewing trouble.
Long lines. Slipping experience. Flat stock.
Enter Dutch Bros: a rising fan-favorite with a stock that outpaced $SBUX last fall.
“To support the next phase of Dutch Bros’ growth, we’re relocating additional roles to our new Phoenix office and making strategic changes to the structure of several teams. Bringing more people together will allow us to better serve our customers and crews across the country. With these changes, the Phoenix office will become our official HQ.”
Dutch Bros grew from a single cart in Grants Pass to a $12 billion brand. Now, it’s leaving Oregon for a more business-friendly climate in Arizona. This is what happens when the Democrat leaders in this state refuse to acknowledge their policy failures and change course.
— Oregon Senate Republicans (@ORSenateGOP) June 12, 2025
The move comes after Dutch Bros had already spent millions relocating parts of its workforce to Arizona in 2023.
While the company framed the relocation in terms of growth and operational efficiency, elected officials and residents in Oregon are pointing to broader concerns with the state’s economic environment. “Dutch Bros has been a fixture in our community for a long time,” said Oregon State Senator Noah Robinson, a Republican representing parts of Josephine County, where Grants Pass is located.
“In general, Oregon is not a friendly business environment.”
Robinson also cited local issues such as homelessness and crime in the Grants Pass area, saying these challenges may have played a role in the company’s decision. Other Republican lawmakers echoed those concerns, blaming the state’s regulatory and tax policies for contributing to a climate that encourages companies to leave.
Dutch Bros is leaving Oregon because our state has become a hostile environment for businesses. This is happening more and more, and no one in Salem seems to care. If we don’t turn this around soon, Dutch Bros won’t be the only homegrown business that leaves. #ORPol#ORLegpic.twitter.com/ML1JiFZhq5
Dutch Bros now joins a growing list of businesses that have opted to move their headquarters or operations out of traditionally blue states in recent years. The company’s departure leaves Nike as one of Oregon’s remaining corporate heavyweights. Meanwhile, the economic impacts of losing a major employer like Dutch Bros are expected to be felt throughout the Grants Pass region, where the company has long served as a prominent local presence.
Dutch Bros, which began in Oregon in the 1990s as a small drive-thru coffee operation, has since grown into a publicly traded company with hundreds of locations across the United States. The brand is particularly well-known among younger consumers and coffee enthusiasts who favor its energetic service style and specialty drinks. While the company has not publicly cited any single factor as the cause for the relocation, the growing trend of corporate migration from high-tax, high-regulation states has drawn attention from both political analysts and business leaders.
Liberal Policies from the Oregon Democrats causes Dutch Bros Coffee To Move its HQ to Arizona!
The local media is already running cover for the Dems. Here’s why Dutch is really leaving! pic.twitter.com/mAzvcUIjBB
Arizona, by contrast, has promoted itself as a more favorable environment for business growth and expansion, boasting lower taxes and fewer regulatory hurdles. As of now, Dutch Bros has not indicated whether it plans to maintain any operations or facilities in Oregon beyond local retail locations. The company’s new headquarters in Phoenix will serve as the central hub for its executive team and support staff going forward.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
