News

Stephen Miller Lays Out Just How Successful Trump Has Been in 11 Months
News

Stephen Miller Lays Out Just How Successful Trump Has Been in 11 Months

/

Stephen Miller said the past 11 months represent the most successful period in American presidential history, pointing to strong economic growth, lower energy prices, expanding exports, and major gains in technology, manufacturing, and military strength under President Donald Trump.

Miller said the administration’s results stand in sharp contrast to the conditions President Trump inherited, highlighting what he described as a historic turnaround across multiple sectors.

“The last 11 months have been the most successful 11 months in the history of the American presidency,” Miller said.

“Think about what President Trump inherited and what we have today.”

Miller cited the latest economic data as a central measure of that success, noting a stronger-than-expected growth report for the third quarter.

“We just got a blockbuster 4.3% economic growth report for Q3 for the third quarter today, smashing expectations fueled by rising consumer demand,” he said. “And here’s the key word, American exports.”

According to Miller, the United States has reversed decades of trade imbalance by becoming a major exporter rather than relying primarily on imports.

“Our whole lives. All we’ve had are imports, imports from Asia, imports from Mexico, imports from Canada,” Miller said.

“Now we’re an exporting powerhouse.”

He also emphasized sharp declines in energy costs, arguing that energy independence has been restored.

“Energy prices are down. Gas prices have been cut by almost 50% we’re an energy superpower,” Miller said.

Miller said those gains extend beyond energy, asserting that the U.S. has reclaimed its position as a global manufacturing leader.

“We’re a manufacturing superpower,” he said.

He added that technological leadership has returned after years of falling behind other nations, crediting the Trump administration with advancing next-generation industries.

“And also, very importantly, we are a technology superpower,” Miller said.

“After years of watching other countries invent the new technologies beat us in 5G under President Trump, we have a revolution in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing, and we’re bringing the semiconductor industry back to the United States.”

Miller said those developments have strengthened national security, alongside renewed military investment.

“A technology superpower, a manufacturing superpower, and most importantly of all, a military superpower,” he said.

He pointed to recent defense announcements, including new naval construction, as evidence of a rebuilt and modernized armed forces.

“You saw the announcement today about the golden dome, the golden fleet, the next generation of battleships,” Miller said.

“The announcement yesterday, sorry about how the President is making the American military the dominant, overwhelming lethal force of the 21st Century.”

Miller also highlighted domestic enforcement and public safety, saying border security and crime reduction have improved significantly.

“The border is slammed shut. Crime is plummeting. Illegals are going home, and America is for Americans,” he said.

Miller concluded by framing the administration’s record as a comprehensive achievement across the economy, security, and national identity.

“Again, you could not ask for a better Christmas list than that,” he said.

WATCH:

Democrats’ Entire Playbook of Welfare Cash for Illegal Aliens Called Out by Brandon Gill
News

Democrats’ Entire Playbook of Welfare Cash for Illegal Aliens Called Out by Brandon Gill

/

U.S. House of Representatives for Texas’s 26th Congressional District, Brandon Gill accused Democrats of operating what he described as a corrupt welfare-based patronage system that misuses American tax dollars and, in some cases, may have allowed funds to be diverted overseas to extremist groups.

Gill said recent estimates suggest taxpayer money connected to U.S. welfare programs may have been funneled to Al-Shabaab terrorists in Somalia, calling the situation a serious national concern that Democrats have failed to confront.

“There’s estimates now that this money could have been funneled to Al Shabaab terrorists in Somalia,” Gill said.

“I hope that Democrats jump on board and recognize what a severe problem this is for the American people.”

Gill argued that welfare spending has become a political tool rather than a safety net, alleging it is used to reward political allies and secure long-term voter loyalty.

“But you know, welfare for Democrats is a way of taking American tax dollars, giving it to their political allies,” he said.

“It is a patronage system. It is you vote for me, and I will take other people’s money and give it to you, and I don’t care if it’s fraudulent. I don’t care if you shouldn’t be getting it, as long as you vote for me.”

According to Gill, this approach prioritizes political power over accountability and encourages fraud within government programs.

“That’s the goal,” he said.

Gill said the consequences extend beyond individual cases of misuse, arguing that the practice damages the country’s broader social and economic foundations.

“You know, I hope that Democrats recognize how unbelievably corrupt This is, how it undermines our entire social system, our entire economic system, and gets on board,” Gill said.

“But, you know, they’ve been pretty hesitant to do that so far.”

He further accused Democrats of pursuing an immigration strategy designed to cement permanent political advantage.

“The Democrat playbook has been import as many unassimilable foreigners as they possibly can, get them on the dole and ensure that these people vote Democrat for life,” Gill said.

“That’s what we’re up against here.”

WATCH:

‘We Finally Got to See What The Communists Dreamt of Doing in This Country’: Jesse Kelly
News

‘We Finally Got to See What The Communists Dreamt of Doing in This Country’: Jesse Kelly

/

Conservative commentator Jesse Kelly said Americans should pause and reflect on how dramatically the country has changed since the end of the Biden-Harris administration, arguing that the past four years represented a low point marked by radical ideology, government overreach, and national decline.

Kelly framed his remarks as a call to remember what he described as the reality of life under Joe Biden, contrasting it with the present moment and urging Americans not to lose perspective.

“Take a moment, take a moment and just breathe in how different things are now than they were,” Kelly said.

“Do not forget how horrible it was under Joe Biden.”

Kelly argued that Biden’s presidency allowed unelected ideological figures to wield power, claiming the former president was largely absent while others directed policy.

“We finally got to see what the communists really dreamt of doing in this country with total power, because Joe Biden was a cadaver, and so we sat in the corner and Victoria Nuland and Anita Dunn and all the dirty communists in the White House, they got to basically be president for four years,” Kelly said.

He accused the Biden-Harris administration of aggressively targeting conservatives and religious Americans, citing prosecutions related to abortion activism and the January 6 investigations.

“And we watched them,” Kelly said. “We watched them throw pro life pastors in prison as fast as they could. Hunt down January six, there’s over 1000 bragging they’re going to hunt down 1000 more.”

Kelly also criticized the administration’s border policies, claiming they led to a massive influx of foreign nationals and undermined national sovereignty.

“We watched them throw open the border and fly in as many filthy foreigners into this country as they possibly could get in here,” he said.

According to Kelly, these policies were part of a broader effort to dismantle traditional American institutions and values.

“We watched as they tore through every good and decent thing in this country,” he said.

Kelly further condemned the Biden-Harris administration’s embrace of LGBTQ policies and symbolism, arguing it damaged the country’s international standing.

“We watched as they lit the White House up in rainbow colors for LGBTQ Air Force month or whatever,” Kelly said.

“The stupid thing was, we had to suffer while they stuffed trannies in every realm of the government, making us the laughing stock of the planet.”

He described the four-year period as one of deep national suffering and moral decay.

“We suffered mightily for four years while the demented demonic freaks took over the United States of America and set about their evil ways,” Kelly said.

Despite his harsh assessment of the Biden years, Kelly acknowledged that current conditions are not without problems, but said the contrast is still worth appreciating.

“So right now, things may not be going perfectly,” he said.

“I’m more than willing to admit that, but I just want to take a moment every now and then and smell the friggin roses.”

WATCH:

Scott Bessent Details Why We Will See an Economic Boom in 2026
News

Scott Bessent Details Why We Will See an Economic Boom in 2026

/

Scott Bessent said the recently passed tax bill is already reshaping the U.S. economy, driving a surge in capital investment by American businesses while delivering direct financial benefits to working families through lower taxes and higher take-home pay.

Bessent outlined what he described as the most significant elements of the legislation, emphasizing provisions that allow immediate expensing for business investments and extended incentives for factory construction.

“What we are going to see next year, that, if you think about the signature parts of the tax bill, I think that the powerful, the most powerful parts had the immediate expensing for American business, permanent for equipment, and then four or five year window for factories,” Bessent said.

He said those provisions have already triggered a major increase in capital expenditures and are expected to accelerate further as trade deals take effect.

“So we are seeing, already seeing, a CapEx boom. So 2025 was a CapEx boom. I think that is going to accelerate with all the trade deals we’ve done,” he said.

Bessent pointed to Boeing’s expansion in South Carolina as a concrete example of how the tax and trade policies are influencing corporate decisions.

“I was just about six weeks ago in my hometown of Charleston, South Carolina, Boeing, the largest employer there, is increasing their plant by 50% for the Dream liners, result of the trade deals, but it’s also part of the tax deal,” he said.

According to Bessent, the increased investment by major employers is expected to translate into job growth and higher wages for American workers.

“So we’re going to continue seeing this capex boom that turns into employment boom on the other side for working Americans,” he said.

Bessent said the legislation also reflects firm commitments made by President Donald Trump to working Americans, commitments that were treated as nonnegotiable during negotiations on Capitol Hill.

“The President I led the administration’s team up on the hill in terms of what was non negotiable for non negotiable for the President, and a lot of traditional Republicans didn’t like his campaign promises to working Americans, and the President never yielded on this,” Bessent said.

He listed several tax provisions that were preserved despite internal opposition.

“So no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans for American made cards,” he said.

Bessent noted that the bill, passed on July 4, applies retroactively, providing immediate benefits to both workers and businesses.

“So the bill was done on July 4. It’s retroactive to the beginning of the year for working Americans, retroactive to January 20 for corporates,” he said.

Bessent said the retroactive nature of the law combined with unchanged withholding levels is likely to result in unusually large tax refunds for many households.

“So working Americans. I also had the honor of being the IRS commissioner, and I can see that we’re going to have a gigantic refund year in the first quarter, because no one changed their working Americans did not change their withholding,” he said.

He predicted that many families could see substantial refunds when they file.

“So I think households could see, depending on the number of workers, $1000-$2,000 refunds,” Bessent said.

He added that once workers adjust their withholding going forward, they should see higher paychecks as well.

“They will change their withholding schedule at the beginning of the year, and they will get an automatic increase the in real wages,” he said.

Bessent said the combination of increased business investment and direct tax relief for individuals represents a powerful economic shift.

“So I think that’s going to be a very I think that’s going to be a very powerful combo of corporate and individuals,” he said.

WATCH:

Offshore Wind Projects Stopped as National Security Concerns Mount
News

Offshore Wind Projects Stopped as National Security Concerns Mount

/

Energy Secretary Doug Burgum said multiple offshore wind projects have been halted under President Donald Trump’s administration due to serious national security risks, high costs, and reliability problems, citing a newly completed classified report from the Department of War.

Burgum said the report focuses on how modern warfare has shifted toward drone-based threats and how massive offshore wind turbines can interfere with radar systems critical to detecting those threats along the East Coast.

“Well, Martha, this is a new, recently released, classified report completed by the Department of War that highlights really builds on the story you had just before this, which is Modern Warfare, is drone warfare, and the radar interference caused by these massive, gargantuan projects,” Burgum said.

He described the scale of offshore wind installations, noting that their size and movement create significant radar disruption.

“I mean understanding that a single one of these towers can be one and a half to times taller than the than the Washington Monument,” Burgum said.

“The blades themselves, the diameter the blades is bigger than the Statue of Liberty, two and a half football fields. These things are moving in 150 miles an hour.”

According to Burgum, ground-based radar systems are designed to detect movement, and offshore wind farms create blind spots that could be exploited in an attack.

“Our ground based radar is designed to pick up movement if you wanted to attack a population center on the east coast of our country, you would send a swarm of drones right through one of these wind farms,” he said. “That’s the basis of this understanding.”

Burgum said the administration has implemented a temporary pause on the projects while reviewing mitigation options, but emphasized that the concerns are substantial.

“As we said, we’ve got a 90 day pause. We’ve announced we’re happy to sit down and see if we can try to find mitigation,” Burgum said.

“But this is a real national security concern.”

He also pointed to opposition from multiple groups beyond national security officials, including fishermen, marine regulators, and environmental activists concerned about wildlife impacts.

“And as you also mentioned here, I don’t know that I’ve called these successful because we’ve got the Marine Fisheries, and the fishermen are opposed to these,” Burgum said.

“The people that love the whales are opposed to them because of the whale grounding.”

Burgum said offshore wind also fails on cost and reliability, calling it the most expensive form of energy currently being produced and dependent on foreign supply chains.

“And of course, consumers, if they understood the facts, this is the most expensive form of energy we’re producing, is offshore wind, and so it’s not reliable,” he said.

“It’s only works when the wind is blowing. It’s it is expensive, and of course, it depends on foreign suppliers, almost completely for this industry.”

He argued that a more affordable and dependable alternative already exists for the region, pointing to domestic natural gas production.

“And we have a solution in New England right there, which is natural gas from Pennsylvania,” Burgum said.

“Which would generate power five to 10 times more than all these five wind projects together.”

Burgum concluded by linking the administration’s energy approach to broader affordability goals for consumers.

“So we have a way to keep affordability into pricing for home heating and electricity in New England, just like we have in the rest of the country,” he said.

“Because President Trump’s policies are working.”

WATCH:

CBS News Blasted for One-Sided Anti-Trump ’60 Minutes’ Hit Piece
News

CBS News Blasted for One-Sided Anti-Trump ’60 Minutes’ Hit Piece

/

Media analyst Howie Kurtz criticized CBS’s “60 Minutes” over what he described as a one-sided report targeting a Trump administration policy involving Venezuelan prisoners, arguing the segment failed to include any voices defending the policy it attacked.

Kurtz said the network’s handling of the piece raised serious questions about fairness and balance, particularly given the absence of policy advocates or administration supporters in the broadcast.

“I think that CBS will have even more of a black eye if it doesn’t eventually run this story,” Kurtz said.

“But look, I watched a bootleg copy of the CBS segment, and it is totally one sided. It is totally anti Trump and the guests included beside the two Venezuelan prisoners from Human Rights Watch from the Human Rights Center at Berkeley, and nobody defending the Trump policy, not an advocate, not an activist.”

Kurtz argued that if CBS intended to present a critical report, it had an obligation to include opposing viewpoints, even if that required holding the story until such voices could be included.

“And so it seems to me that if Bari Weiss wanted to weigh in, she should have gone to one of the five screenings,” he said.

“And just briefly, rich stories get held all the time.”

He cited past newsroom practices to illustrate his point.

“Mike Wallace once called me and said that Don Hewitt, the producer, told him that his story wasn’t ready and that he needed a voice such as mine,” Kurtz said.

“I came on right at the top, just before the stopwatch.”

A Fox News anchor pressed the issue of whether journalists should delay a story to secure responses from those being criticized.

“You know, even, even if, let’s say, your boss comes to you, you’ve had trouble getting comment from the administration, which was the claim here,” the anchor said.

“Then if your boss comes to you and says, I’ve got the phone numbers of the people who have put this policy in place, which we are critical of in this piece. Wouldn’t you want to hold it off and then be able to say, okay, ask the people who put this policy in place to defend it at that point. I mean, shouldn’t you want to do that?”

Kurtz responded that while it would be preferable to have administration officials on camera, he believes the White House intentionally declined to participate and that CBS should not use that refusal as a reason to kill or reshape a story.

“Yeah, but I think the White House made a deliberate decision not to provide a guest, and I think Bari Weiss may have made too much of that,” Kurtz said.

“Because you need to. You’re sure if they can get somebody on camera, it would be it would really help the peace and maybe this will die down.”

He then referenced internal correspondence from the show’s own staff to drive home his argument.

“But the correspondent Sharon Alfonsi wrote in an internal note, if the administration’s refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, then we have effectively handed them a kill switch for any reporting they find inconvenient,” Kurtz said.

“So it gives the Trump White House veto power, in effect, simply by deciding not to play.”

The Fox News anchor agreed that administration voices should be sought whenever possible.

“Yeah, absolutely,” the anchor said.

“But if you had the opportunity to maybe appeal directly to the people who are making this policy, you’d want them on the show, right?”

Kurtz said he agreed, but added that reports indicate CBS may have excluded relevant responses that were already provided off camera.

“Absolutely, of course,” he said.

“But Axios is reporting that there were comments provided by the White House, by the State Department and homeland security, obviously not on camera, that weren’t used. If that’s true, it’s inexplicable.”

Kurtz also criticized what he said were omissions within the “60 Minutes” report itself, particularly regarding criminal histories.

“And just to look at the fairness of the piece that 60 Minutes wanted to air,” he said.

“Correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, who I just mentioned, said nearly half of the 252 Venezuelans sent to El Salvador had no criminal history, and then just dropped it. No mention of the other half who obviously do have a criminal history.”

He added that the segment also criticized a visit by Kristi Noem to a notorious prison without including any response from her.

“And the segment criticized a Kristi Noem visit to that notorious prison,” Kurtz said.

“No comment at all from her side.”

WATCH:

Federal Task Force Probes Missing Billions in LA Homeless Funds as Indictments Mount
News

Federal Task Force Probes Missing Billions in LA Homeless Funds as Indictments Mount

/

Federal investigators are examining the disappearance and misuse of billions of dollars intended to address homelessness in Los Angeles County, following revelations that large sums of taxpayer money remain unaccounted for and have allegedly been diverted for personal use.

The issue was discussed in an on-air exchange between journalist Elizabeth Vargas and U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who detailed the scope of the problem and the ongoing federal response.

According to Vargas, a massive portion of the funds sent to Los Angeles County over several years cannot be properly traced.

“Point $3 billion sent to LA County over four years is completely unaccounted for. That’s $2.3 billion that could have been used to clean up this or find housing for people who live like this,” Vargas said.

“Taxpayers have forked over 10s of millions, if not hundreds of millions, of dollars to fix it, and people are stealing it.”

Essayli said the lack of accountability surrounding homelessness spending has been a long-standing issue that went largely unchecked until recently.

“It’s unbelievable. And you know, it’s probably been going on for a very long time, but unfortunately, no one’s really looked at it until recently,” Essayli said.

“Before this position, I was in the state legislature, and we would ask a lot of questions about the billions of dollars being spent every year to solve homelessness, and we can all see with our eyes and ears that it wasn’t being solved, and the money wasn’t going to the people we needed it most.”

Essayli explained that one of his first actions after taking office as U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles was to establish a dedicated task force focused on fraud and corruption tied to homelessness funding.

“So one of the first things I did after being appointed as the US Attorney here in LA was to create the homeless fraud and corruption Task Force,” he said.

“We’re starting from the bottom up, and we began brand new investigations with the IRS and the FBI, and it’s already culminated in two separate indictments, and I can assure you that more will come.”

Vargas pointed to details from the indictments already announced, highlighting the nature of the alleged misuse.

“In the two indictments you’ve announced thus far, in one case, somebody was taking this money that was meant to build homes for the homeless and spending it on things like tickets to Coachella concert, jewelry and a Beverly Hills mansion,” Vargas said.

Essayli described the allegations as emblematic of what can happen when massive sums are distributed without strict oversight.

“It’s frankly outrageous, and this goes to show, when you hand out billions of dollars with little to no oversight, there are people out there that will take advantage,” he said.

“And that’s always been, our suspicion is that there’s been very little oversight or accountability to the individuals who receive this money.”

He said most of the funding is routed through nonprofits or developers who claim the money will be used to build housing, but federal investigators have found otherwise in the cases already charged.

“And what we saw in these just these two investigations, that’s not where the money went, and it was used to pay one individual’s American Express Bill,” Essayli said.

“In these two cases, represent over a $50 million loss, and that’s again, scratching the service surface.”

Essayli stressed that the investigation is far from over and that federal agencies are aggressively pursuing additional leads.

“We have many more investigations open that I cannot get into, but we are going to follow the money,” he said.

“We’re going to follow every dollar, and we want to make sure the money went to its intended objective, which is to assist the homeless, and if any of it was diverted for personal use or other use that wasn’t authorized, we intend to criminally prosecute those individuals.”

He detailed the breadth of the ongoing efforts.

“And like I said, we have multiple, multiple ongoing investigations. We have the IRS conducting the financial review. We have the FBI going out and conducting interviews. We’re issuing subpoenas. We’re doing search warrants. There is a lot happening that the public cannot see right now,” Essayli said.

Vargas questioned how such large-scale misuse could persist for years without detection.

“How did this go unnoticed for so long?” she asked.

Essayli attributed the lack of scrutiny to California’s political environment and the absence of meaningful checks on spending.

“This is a problem we saw in the legislature. When you have a state like California that frankly enjoys a super majority controlled by one political party, there’s very little checks and balances in the system to hold that accountability, and there’s really, again, never been any oversight,” he said.

He added that recent political changes at the federal level have altered the enforcement landscape.

“But now you have the federal government, the election was won by the opposite party, and you have an election that has consequences,” Essayli said.

“And now you have prosecutors in the federal government that are independent and are going to take an objective look.”

WATCH:

Senate Filibuster Killing Common Sense Election Security: Byron Donalds
News

Senate Filibuster Killing Common Sense Election Security: Byron Donalds

/

Rep. Byron Donalds criticized the U.S. Senate for failing to act on the SAVE Act, legislation passed by the House more than seven months ago that aims to secure federal elections by ensuring that only U.S. citizens are allowed to vote.

The issue was raised during a Newsmax segment in which host Carl Higbie questioned why the Senate has not taken up the bill, despite the House having already acted.

“235, days since the House passed the Save Act, which would secure our elections. The constitution is clear. You can provide some integration and some framework for our elections, voter ID, things like that, but the Senate is not moving on it. What is going on here?” Higbie said.

Donalds responded by placing the blame squarely on the Senate’s procedural rules and leadership, saying the chamber has become a roadblock to legislation that already has support in the House.

“The Senate doesn’t work. I’ve been very clear on this one, the filibuster is a major hurdle to getting common sense policy through both chambers of Congress here in Washington, DC, the Save act is common sense,” Donalds said.

The SAVE Act was passed by the House with the stated goal of reinforcing election integrity by clarifying that only U.S. citizens are eligible to vote in federal elections.

Donalds argued that regardless of partisan disagreements, the Senate should at least allow the legislation to come to a vote.

“It should go up for a vote. If Democrat senators want to vote it down, let them be on the record for it, but for it to not even get a vote in the Senate makes no sense,” he said.

Donalds said frustration over stalled legislation is growing on Capitol Hill, particularly among lawmakers who see House-passed bills languish indefinitely once they reach the Senate.

“And this is actually one of the big issues we’re having here on Capitol Hill. A lot of people are upset. They’re saying, Well, why isn’t Congress doing more?” Donalds said.

He explained that concerns about Senate inaction can even affect which bills House leadership chooses to bring to the floor, creating a bottleneck in the legislative process.

“I will tell you, a lot of policy ideas that are filed in the house don’t even get to the floor because leadership is concerned. I don’t agree with them, but they’re concerned about things just going to sit in the Senate and not getting any action,” Donalds said.

Despite those concerns, Donalds said the House should continue passing legislation and sending it to the Senate, forcing senators to take clear positions on key issues.

“I think we should continue to do our jobs here in the house, send bills over to the Senate, but the Senate has got to start voting for things,” he said.

Donalds specifically named election-related measures he believes should be brought up for votes, even if Democrats oppose them.

“If Democrats want to vote things down, like the Save Act, or if they want to vote down voter ID in federal elections, or if they want to vote down simple common sense, things like making sure that illegals are not counted for the purpose of setting congressional districts that should all be voted for in the United States Senate, and if Democrats vote no, let the American people see that clearly,” Donalds said.

Higbie agreed with the need to put senators on the record before closing out the segment.

“Yeah, and get them on the record like you said. Well, Congressman Byron Donalds, we appreciate it,” Higbie said.

WATCH:

Scott Adams Destroys Gavin Newsom’s 2028 Hopes Just by Reading His Resume
News

Scott Adams Destroys Gavin Newsom’s 2028 Hopes Just by Reading His Resume

/

Commentator Scott Adams delivered a sweeping critique of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, questioning how Newsom could plausibly seek the presidency given what Adams described as widespread mismanagement, regulatory overreach, and failed policies in the state.

Adams focused heavily on California’s finances, arguing that by the time of upcoming midterms, voters would have a clearer picture of what he characterized as massive losses tied to both theft and mismanagement.

“How in the world could Governor Newsom ever become president under the context of by the midterm we’re going to know a lot more about all the 100 billions of dollars that were stolen in his state, but not just stolen, also mismanaged, because it’s kind of hard to tell what is stolen was mismanaged,” Adams said. “It might end up being the same thing by the midterms.”

He pointed to California’s energy policies as another major liability, warning of dramatic increases in gas prices that he attributed almost entirely to state regulations rather than market forces.

“Some experts are saying that the cost of gas in California could reach as high as 10 to $12 per gallon, and that that cost would be almost entirely because of California mismanagement, and almost entirely because California is what I call a hoax, hoax driven government,” Adams said.

According to Adams, regulations framed as climate protections created opportunities for fraud while driving up costs for consumers.

He argued that California’s approach could not realistically affect global climate outcomes but did have concrete economic consequences.

“So the reason gas will cost so much is a variety of regulatory things that were designed to protect the climate from catastrophe,” Adams said.

“Now there was no chance it was ever going to protect the climate from catastrophe, because one state couldn’t do that anyway. But what it did do is it created this gigantic umbrella for fraud.”

Adams also cited a reported 20 percent reduction in refinery capacity, blaming excessive regulation for refinery closures.

“We got a 20% decrease in capacity when January hits because two refiners just said that we’re out. Too much regulation. We’re out,” he said.

He argued that these outcomes would make it difficult for Newsom to defend his record nationally, especially as other states do not face similar conditions.

“And you can directly tie the cost to California believing incorrectly the hoax that we were in an existential crisis that could somehow be fixed by California alone doing things that other states were not doing,” Adams said.

Adams went on to list what he described as multiple policy “hoaxes,” beginning with climate policy and extending to energy price gouging claims.

“But what Governor Newsom and other Democrats blamed the problem on was price gouging by the oil companies,” Adams said.

“Price gouging, when it was looked into, audited, there was no price gouging, found that was a hoax.”

He continued by criticizing California’s positions on border security, homelessness, and reparations.

“How about when there was a border crisis in California? What did California say? California said there’s no border crisis. Hoax number three,” Adams said.

Addressing homelessness, Adams rejected the idea that housing construction alone could solve the problem.

“There was never any chance that that would make a difference,” he said, adding that the issue involved deeper challenges beyond housing availability.

Adams also criticized reparations discussions in California.

“So we’ve got a state that’s trying to pay reparations when California never had slaves,” he said.

“None of the people lived here were victims of California slavery. It’s a complete hoax.”

He further referenced federal stimulus spending, arguing California handled pandemic-era funds differently from other states.

“So apparently, after the pandemic, there were all these stimulus funds that came from the federal government, and every other state used the government funding to pay down their debt, except California,” Adams said.

According to Adams, that decision could lead to higher payroll taxes on businesses.

“So, the result will be that the Californian businesses are going to be hit, apparently, with some enormous payroll tax to compensate For the fact that California was the only, only mismanaged state,” he said.

Adams also cited high-profile infrastructure spending, including funds allocated to a high-speed rail project that has not been completed.

“I haven’t even gotten into the, what $50 billion for the bullet train that never happened,” he said.

He concluded by suggesting Republicans may view Newsom as a vulnerable candidate and are content to wait.

“But it feels like the smartest people in the Republican Party, by now, they must have figured out that Newsom is the weakest candidate they could possibly run,” Adams said. “So I feel like the Republicans are saying, Hold. Will do Yes, wait until he gets nominated. We’ll take him out.”

WATCH:

New Bill Pushes to Cut Welfare From BOTH Legal and Illegal Immigrants: Randy Fine
News

New Bill Pushes to Cut Welfare From BOTH Legal and Illegal Immigrants: Randy Fine

/

Rep. Randy Fine is advancing legislation that would prohibit both legal and illegal immigrants from receiving welfare benefits in the United States, arguing that immigration should be rooted in freedom, opportunity, and shared American values rather than access to government assistance.

Fine outlined his position while explaining the motivation behind the bill, saying the current system incentivizes people to come to the United States for taxpayer-funded benefits rather than to contribute to the country’s economy and civic life.

“If you want to immigrate to the United States for freedom and opportunity, that’s one thing,” Fine said.

“But the problem is you’ve got too many people coming here for free stuff, which is why I’ve introduced a bill that would ban all legal immigrants from welfare, not just illegal, but legal, because you should not be coming here and then asking our children and our grandchildren to go into debt, to give you free things.”

The proposed legislation would extend existing restrictions beyond illegal aliens and apply them to legal immigrants as well, cutting off access to welfare programs.

Fine said the goal is to ensure that immigration policy does not place long-term financial burdens on future generations of Americans.

According to Fine, the bill is intended to reinforce the principle that immigration should be based on self-sufficiency and a willingness to contribute, not reliance on government aid.

“If you want free stuff, stay home,” he said.

Fine emphasized that his position is not opposed to immigration itself, but rather to what he described as abuse of the welfare system by individuals who do not share American values or intend to assimilate.

“And so if you want to come here for freedom and opportunity, if you love America, if you share our values, if you want to go to work and you want to add value, that’s a discussion that we can have,” Fine said.

He drew a sharp contrast between immigrants who seek to build a life through work and those he argues are motivated by government benefits and ideological opposition to the country.

“But if you hate America, if you want to change America, if you don’t share our values, and you don’t want to assimilate, and you’re just here to see how much free stuff you can get stay where you’re from,” Fine said.

WATCH:


Scroll to Top