News

Stephen Miller: Gavin Newsom’s CDL Policy Gave Illegal Alien Keys to Kill
News

Stephen Miller: Gavin Newsom’s CDL Policy Gave Illegal Alien Keys to Kill

/

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden during a Fox News interview Friday, citing their policies as contributing factors in a fatal multi-vehicle crash that left three people dead.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) confirmed that Jashanpreet Singh, a 21-year-old Indian national living illegally in the United States, retained and even upgraded his commercial driver’s license (CDL) days before the deadly collision.

Singh is accused of causing the crash while allegedly under the influence of drugs.

In an appearance on “The Will Cain Show,” Miller pointed to California’s decision to grant commercial driving privileges to noncitizens as a key policy failure.

“Gavin Newsom in his state has a policy to give commercial driver’s licenses to individuals who do not know how to speak English and do not know how to drive,” Miller said.

“Those are policy choices that Gov. Newsom and his state have made. So it’s one Democrat policy choice after another.”

Miller also criticized the Biden-Harris administration’s border and immigration decisions, arguing they directly enabled Singh to remain in the country.

“This is a Democrat-caused calamity, heartbreaking calamity,” Miller told host Will Cain.

“The first crime against Americans was the Biden administration’s decision to voluntarily free and release from custody an illegal alien within hours of crossing the southern border.”

He described the period under the previous administration as one where strict enforcement helped prevent such incidents.

“Let’s go back to the unending nightmare that we lived through for four years under Biden, where single adult men in groups, in caravans, or traveling alone would show up at the border, present themselves, announce, ‘I’m here illegally. I’ve invaded your country. I demand entry,’” Miller said.

Miller said Singh entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 and was released shortly after by the Biden-Harris administration.

He added that the reversal of Trump-era immigration policies contributed to the tragedy.

“And Biden would order the border patrol at taxpayer expense to ferry them on to the destination of their choice, in this case, California − that happened in 2022. The Biden administration did one other thing. Donald Trump issued a regulation barring work permits for illegal aliens. Biden reversed that regulation, mandated work permits for illegal aliens, issued him [Singh] a work permit,” Miller said.

Police in Ontario, California, arrested Singh following the crash, which authorities said involved multiple vehicles and resulted in three fatalities.

The California Highway Patrol is leading the ongoing investigation into the collision.

Homeland Security officials confirmed Singh’s illegal entry into the United States in 2022 and his subsequent release under Biden-era border guidelines.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the state of California allowed Singh to obtain his commercial driving license under existing state law.

A Department of Transportation report released on September 26 found that more than 25 percent of commercial licenses issued to non-domiciled drivers in California were processed improperly.

Federal officials said the California Department of Motor Vehicles ignored federal directives to revoke licenses held by individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the incident could have been prevented had the state complied with the administration’s updated safety measures.

“The deadly crash in Ontario should never have happened,” Duffy said in a statement.

“California defied direct orders to revoke commercial licenses from undocumented drivers, and now three innocent lives have been lost.”

Authorities said Singh remains in custody at the San Bernardino County Jail on multiple felony counts, including gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and driving under the influence causing injury.

His next court appearance is scheduled for later this month.

Miller concluded that the tragedy reflects broader failures in border and state policy enforcement.

“This is what happens when leaders put politics above the rule of law,” he said.

Federal Prosecutor Fired After Sending Files Related to Letitia James Probe
News

Federal Prosecutor Fired After Sending Files Related to Letitia James Probe

/

A federal prosecutor in Virginia who reportedly opposed bringing bank fraud charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James has been dismissed after allegedly mishandling sensitive materials related to the case, according to an internal report.

Beth Yusi, a career attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, was terminated earlier this month.

Yusi, who joined the Department of Justice in 2010, had been based in the Norfolk office before her firing.

According to CNN, an internal email indicated Yusi allegedly forwarded investigative files containing James’ personally identifying information to her private email account.

The report stated that federal officials viewed the alleged action as a security breach involving protected case information.

Several media outlets reported that Yusi’s termination also followed internal disagreement over how to handle the bank fraud investigation involving James.

Yusi reportedly pushed back against pressure from within the Justice Department to move forward with criminal charges.

The former assistant U.S. attorney had authored an internal memorandum stating that there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for a bank fraud prosecution against James.

The case involves allegations that James made false statements to a financial institution in connection with her 2020 purchase of a property in Norfolk, Virginia.

Sources familiar with the matter told CNN that Yusi’s firing was based, at least in part, on her alleged mishandling of sensitive investigative materials.

They said the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility is reviewing her conduct.

Lindsey Halligan, interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was reportedly concerned about possible leaks of confidential case details to the press.

Halligan has overseen the prosecution of James since the investigation began.

“Ms. Yusi is a well-respected prosecutor, a leader among her peers, and a consummate professional with nearly two decades of experience,” Yusi’s attorney, Margaret Donovan, told CNN.

Donovan denied any wrongdoing by her client and disputed the claim that Yusi ever transferred protected materials outside government channels.

“She has no record of any such email and has never used her personal email account for any portion of any investigation,” Donovan said.

Letitia James appeared in federal court in Norfolk on Friday, where she pleaded not guilty to both charges against her.

The indictment, filed by Halligan’s office, accuses James of committing bank fraud and making false statements to obtain a mortgage loan for a Norfolk property.

Prosecutors allege James purchased the home in 2020 using a $109,600 loan and signed mortgage documents declaring she would be the “sole borrower to occupy and use the property.”

However, investigators say James used the residence as a rental investment instead of occupying it as required under the loan terms.

According to the indictment, James also signed a “second home rider” to qualify for more favorable mortgage conditions, saving approximately $19,000 in costs and interest.

If convicted on both counts, James faces a potential sentence of up to 60 years in prison and fines totaling as much as $2 million.

The case remains ongoing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, with pretrial motions expected to begin in the coming weeks.

Neither the Justice Department nor James’ legal team has commented further on the firing of Yusi or the allegations surrounding the handling of case files.

Trump Secures Major Legal Win Over Gavin Newsom in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
News

Trump Secures Major Legal Win Over Gavin Newsom in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

/

President Donald Trump secured another legal victory against California Governor Gavin Newsom after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear a case challenging Trump’s authority to federalize National Guard troops during unrest in Los Angeles earlier this year.

In a brief order issued October 22, the Ninth Circuit denied California’s petition for an en banc rehearing in Newsom v. Trump, effectively upholding an earlier decision that affirmed the president’s authority to take command of state National Guard forces during domestic disturbances.

The ruling allows President Trump to retain command of approximately 4,000 California National Guard troops who were federalized under his order during protests that erupted in Los Angeles following federal immigration enforcement operations in June.

The legal dispute began after violent demonstrations broke out on June 6, 2025, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carried out raids near the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles.

The operation resulted in 44 arrests and as many as 80 detentions.

The protests that followed escalated into confrontations with law enforcement, with demonstrators throwing objects at officers and damaging federal property.

The next day, President Trump invoked his authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, a statute permitting the president to call National Guard units into federal service “to protect federal personnel performing federal functions, and to protect federal property.”

The order activated 4,000 California National Guard members for a 60-day period to assist federal officers and maintain order around key federal facilities.

Governor Newsom immediately challenged the decision in court, arguing that the president had violated the law by failing to issue the order through the state governor, as required by statute.

Newsom claimed the move was unconstitutional and an overreach of executive power, asserting that the president had effectively seized state assets without proper consultation.

In August, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit rejected Newsom’s argument, holding that the president acted within his statutory and constitutional authority.

The panel found that the federal government has broad discretion to assume command of state National Guard forces during periods of domestic unrest when federal property or personnel are threatened.

The governor sought a rehearing before the full Ninth Circuit, known for its historically liberal leanings.

On October 22, the court denied that request, stating that not enough judges supported further review.

The denial leaves intact the earlier ruling, which now stands as binding precedent within the circuit.

Legal analysts say the decision could have long-term implications for the relationship between the federal government and state governors during emergencies.

The ruling reinforces the president’s authority to act unilaterally when federal operations face security threats and local leaders refuse cooperation.

By declining to revisit the case, the Ninth Circuit effectively reaffirmed the limits of state resistance during federal operations and confirmed the president’s power to mobilize state troops when national interests are at stake.

The Department of Justice hailed the outcome as a critical affirmation of executive authority, emphasizing that the president’s power to ensure the protection of federal assets remains “clear and nonnegotiable under the Constitution.”

Governor Newsom’s office has not indicated whether he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Legal experts note that while an appeal remains possible, the Supreme Court has historically deferred to executive authority in matters involving the use of military or law enforcement power during civil unrest.

For the Trump administration, the decision marks another success in its ongoing disputes with California’s Democratic leadership, solidifying the president’s ability to act decisively in situations where state cooperation is withheld.

The ruling is expected to influence future federal responses to protests or riots that threaten federal property or personnel across the country.

Scott Jennings Drops the Mic on Geraldo Rivera’s Attack on ICE Agents Wearing Masks
News

Scott Jennings Drops the Mic on Geraldo Rivera’s Attack on ICE Agents Wearing Masks

/

CNN political commentator Scott Jennings pushed back against Geraldo Rivera during a network panel discussion Thursday night, defending Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents following remarks that criticized their use of masks during operations.

The exchange began when Rivera questioned why ICE officers continue to wear masks during enforcement activity.

“Nobody wears masks. Only ICE. Only ICE,” Rivera said.

“And why is it? It’s because they are embarrassed by the job they have been tasked to do. It’s absolutely horrifying. Masks should be banned in law enforcement.”

Jennings responded by explaining that the practice is a safety measure rather than a political statement.

He pointed to recent threats and harassment directed toward ICE agents and their families, much of which he said has been fueled by online doxxing campaigns and political activism.

“Counterpoint: The reason they’re wearing masks, which, by the way, their director, Todd Lyons, is against the masks,” Jennings said.

“The reason they’re wearing them is because you have a dedicated group of people out there, and some of them, unfortunately, are Democrat political officials, who are doxxing them and their families and putting them in harm’s way. They face a thousand percent increase in violent attacks this year. These people are in harm’s way every day and they’re protecting themselves and their families.”

Jennings’ comments referenced a series of incidents across the country involving threats, physical violence, and exposure of ICE personnel identities.

Federal officials have confirmed a significant increase in assaults on agents in recent years, including multiple cases where personal addresses and family information were posted online.

One of the most serious incidents occurred in Dallas, where authorities said a man identified as Joshua Jahn opened fire on ICE agents.

Jahn reportedly struck and killed two migrant detainees before being apprehended.

The shooting, according to investigators, underscored the rising danger federal officers face as anti-ICE sentiment grows.

Jennings also noted that some elected officials and advocacy groups have publicly shared tools designed to track or report ICE activity.

Democratic Party platforms have hosted online features allowing users to submit details of immigration enforcement operations.

New York Attorney General Letitia James also introduced a reporting system encouraging residents to submit information about ICE encounters, citing “accountability” concerns.

Federal law enforcement officials have warned that such reporting mechanisms can lead to operational risks if they expose agents’ identities or ongoing investigations.

Jennings’ defense of ICE agents comes amid broader national debate over federal immigration enforcement and local resistance policies.

In many major cities, including Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles, Democratic leaders have promoted so-called “sanctuary” policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Townhall recently reported that a city alderman in Waukesha, Wisconsin, lost his job after he allegedly doxxed several men he believed to be ICE agents.

The men turned out to be local businessmen meeting for lunch. Officials said the misidentification could have led to serious consequences if private citizens had attempted to confront them.

Jennings’ comments follow months of heightened rhetoric surrounding immigration enforcement and federal authority.

ICE officials have repeatedly emphasized that anonymity measures, including the use of masks and unmarked vehicles, are intended to protect officers from retaliation, harassment, and potential violence.

Neither Rivera nor CNN management have commented further on the exchange. ICE’s leadership has not announced any changes to its current operational guidelines regarding officer identification or protective gear.

The Department of Homeland Security has not released updated statistics on recent threats to ICE agents but has acknowledged that hostility toward federal enforcement personnel has significantly increased since 2021.

Chicago Democrat Under Fire for Putting a ‘Target on ICE Agents’ Backs
News

Chicago Democrat Under Fire for Putting a ‘Target on ICE Agents’ Backs

/

Illinois State Representative Margaret Croke is facing criticism after sending an email that listed detailed information about vehicles believed to belong to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents operating in Chicago.

The email, distributed Friday under the subject line “Updated List of ICE Vehicles Seen Today,” included the make, model, color, and partial license plate numbers of several vehicles allegedly linked to ICE personnel in the area.

In the message, Croke urged recipients to report what she described as “suspicious activity” to local hotlines.

She wrote that ICE operations are “unlawful and undemocratic” and provided resources for individuals in the country illegally to contact attorneys and social service organizations.

The email also encouraged residents to “record and share” information about potential ICE vehicles in order to “protect someone from either being picked up off the street or unnecessarily and forcibly handled.”

Critics quickly denounced the move, arguing it endangered federal agents and obstructed lawful immigration enforcement.

The popular X account Libs of TikTok posted screenshots of the email, accusing Croke of “putting a target on agents’ backs” and assisting illegal aliens in avoiding arrest.

“She’s putting a target on agents’ backs and helping illegals evade arrest. This is absolutely disgraceful. CHARGE HER,” the account wrote in a post tagging the Department of Homeland Security and ICE.

Federal law prohibits disclosing personally identifying information of law enforcement officers engaged in undercover or sensitive operations.

Several former federal prosecutors and law enforcement officials have expressed concern that Croke’s email could violate those statutes.

While Croke’s office has not issued a formal statement, legal experts said such disclosures could interfere with federal operations and expose agents to potential harm.

The Department of Homeland Security has not commented publicly on whether it plans to investigate the incident.

This controversy follows similar actions in Chicago led by former Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who recently announced the creation of a nonprofit called “The ICE Accountability Project.”

The organization, according to Lightfoot, is intended to document and publicize the actions of federal immigration agents in so-called sanctuary jurisdictions.

Lightfoot, a former federal prosecutor, has defended her initiative as a transparency effort.

She said it was designed to ensure public oversight of federal immigration enforcement, which she has criticized as overly aggressive.

However, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Fox News that Lightfoot’s actions could violate federal law protecting the identities of agents.

“She will be getting a letter from us tomorrow to preserve anything she has done as well, to make sure that she’s not violating the law. It appears she is,” Bondi said.

“You cannot disclose the identity of a federal agent — where they live, anything that could harm them.”

Bondi’s office has not yet commented on whether similar legal concerns apply to Croke’s email, but she confirmed that such disclosures are being closely reviewed by federal authorities.

According to law enforcement data, incidents of threats and assaults on federal officers have sharply increased in recent years.

Officials say these attacks have grown particularly frequent in areas with “sanctuary city” policies, which limit cooperation between local police and federal immigration authorities.

Federal sources have not confirmed whether any of the vehicles listed in Croke’s email were actually connected to ICE agents.

An internal Department of Homeland Security review is expected to determine if operational security was compromised.

Hakeem Jeffries Ends Silence, Endorses Zohran Mamdani for New York City Mayor
News

Hakeem Jeffries Ends Silence, Endorses Zohran Mamdani for New York City Mayor

/

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., formally endorsed Zohran Mamdani for New York City mayor on Friday, ending months of speculation over whether the top House Democrat would back the Democratic Socialist candidate, as reported by The New York Post.

In a statement to The New York Times, Jeffries confirmed his support for Mamdani less than two weeks before the November 4 election, noting that the two share some disagreements but stressing the need for party unity.

“Zohran Mamdani has relentlessly focused on addressing the affordability crisis and explicitly committed to being a mayor for all New Yorkers, including those who do not support his candidacy,” Jeffries said.

He added that Democrats must unite in the face of what he called an “existential” threat from President Donald Trump.

Jeffries’ endorsement follows months of hesitation from Democratic leaders to embrace Mamdani, a 34-year-old New York assemblyman and member of the Democratic Socialists of America.

His unexpected primary victory in June exposed divisions within the party between the establishment and its progressive wing.

The Brooklyn congressman signaled Thursday that an endorsement was imminent. During an appearance on Rev. Al Sharpton’s radio program Keepin’ It Real, Jeffries said, “I do hope to talk to the Democratic nominee either late today or tomorrow, in advance of early voting.”

Jeffries highlighted Mamdani’s decision to retain NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch if elected, calling it “a positive step in the right direction” and “a strong step toward community trust and public safety.”

He told Bloomberg Television that Mamdani’s position showed “a willingness to work with all New Yorkers to make the city more affordable and inclusive.”

Governor Kathy Hochul followed a similar timeline before endorsing Mamdani in September.

Initially withholding her support after his primary win over former Governor Andrew Cuomo, Hochul cited shared priorities such as affordability and safety in a New York Times op-ed announcing her endorsement.

Other key Democrats have remained silent. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has not endorsed Mamdani, and Mayor Eric Adams threw his support behind Cuomo on Thursday. Sharpton, while appearing alongside Mamdani at a June rally in Harlem, has not made an official endorsement.

Republicans have seized on the endorsement to criticize Jeffries and his party’s ties to the far-left candidate. “Are there any moderate Democrats left?” New York GOP Chair Ed Cox said in a statement.

“Every elected Democrat — in New York and nationally — must answer this question: do you stand with Zohran Mamdani or do you stand with the principles upon which our republic was founded?”

Jeffries’ endorsement solidifies Mamdani’s growing backing among state and national Democratic figures as early voting begins Saturday.

FBI Director Kash Patel: We’re ‘On the Verge’ of Exposing Antifa’s Funding Network
News

FBI Director Kash Patel: We’re ‘On the Verge’ of Exposing Antifa’s Funding Network

/

FBI Director Kash Patel said Wednesday that the bureau is close to identifying the financial networks and leadership structures behind Antifa, the decentralized left-wing organization linked to multiple incidents of political violence and civil unrest across the United States.

In an interview with Just the News, Patel stated that the FBI’s investigation has uncovered indications that foreign adversaries may be supporting Antifa and similar domestic extremist groups.

“There are indications that support for anti-American radical groups is coming from America’s enemies overseas,” Patel said. “And the bureau is following the money.”

Patel, who was appointed FBI Director by President Donald Trump, said investigators are also looking into possible domestic sources of support, including U.S.-based nonprofits operating under IRS tax-exempt status.

“Look, the thing I can tell you is that money doesn’t lie, and the thing we’re doing at the FBI is following the money,” Patel explained.

“And thanks to President Trump, we now have Antifa designated, rightfully so, as a domestic terror organization. And we have had multiple investigations going on.”

According to Patel, those investigations involve tracing financial transactions, identifying intermediaries, and exposing the flow of funds that support Antifa’s organizational activities.

“We are mapping out the money,” he said, adding that the FBI is also relying on independent journalists and online investigators who have been documenting Antifa activity for several years.

Patel noted that many of these independent researchers have been providing critical intelligence to federal investigators since law enforcement officers often face challenges infiltrating Antifa’s decentralized networks.

“They’re the ones on the ground, getting us ground level intelligence, because law enforcement isn’t able to enter these spaces, and these people are brave enough to do it,” he said.

The FBI Director also revealed that the bureau has launched a new internal program focused solely on identifying and dismantling the financial infrastructure supporting Antifa.

“Tracking Antifa has become so important that we have created an entire new program and division dedicated to uncovering the money that is funding these operations,” Patel said.

Patel has spoken frequently in recent weeks about the FBI’s expanded focus on domestic extremist groups.

Last month, during an interview with Fox News, he reaffirmed that the agency is treating Antifa “like the domestic terrorists that they are.”

He said the FBI’s counterterrorism divisions are now using methods similar to those previously employed against international terrorist networks such as al-Qaeda and ISIS.

The director’s latest remarks follow a significant development in federal law enforcement’s efforts against Antifa.

Last week, a grand jury handed down a first-of-its-kind indictment charging two individuals connected to a Texas-based Antifa cell with terrorism.

The charges stem from a July attack on federal officers stationed at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility.

The indictment marked the first time the Department of Justice has brought terrorism charges specifically related to Antifa activity.

Federal prosecutors described the attack as “premeditated and politically motivated,” alleging that the suspects coordinated online with members of other Antifa-affiliated networks before targeting federal personnel.

Patel said the bureau’s continued focus on Antifa reflects a broader national security effort to address both foreign and domestic threats.

“We are dealing with an organization that is highly decentralized but strategically funded,” he said.

“Our job is to expose every layer of that system — and we’re close.”

The FBI’s expanded operations come as part of a larger counterterrorism initiative announced earlier this year under President Trump’s directive to classify Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization.

Patel said the agency’s ultimate goal is to dismantle the network’s command structure and prosecute those responsible for financing and orchestrating violent political activity across the country.

Trump Confirms Planned Visit to Gaza, Says Respect for President Key to Peace
News

Trump Confirms Planned Visit to Gaza, Says Respect for President Key to Peace

/

President Donald Trump announced that he plans to visit the Gaza Strip following the recent peace deal between Israel and Hamas, telling Time magazine that respect for the President of the United States is “the most important factor” in ensuring long-term peace in the Middle East, as reported by the New York Post.

“The most important thing,” Trump said in the interview published Thursday:

“They have to respect the president of the United States. The Middle East has to understand that.”

WASHINGTON – February 22, 2025: President Donald Trump arrives at the White House South Lawn on Marine One after his visit to CPAC.

He continued, “And they do. If you go to Qatar, if you go to Saudi Arabia, if you go to UAE, who are the three big ones, in that sense, they all respect the president, and if they’re not going to respect the president — it’s almost the president more so than the country. You understand that? If they don’t respect the president, and if the president doesn’t know what he’s doing, it could break apart. If they do respect the president, it’s going to be long-term beautiful peace.”

President Trump, who helped broker the cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas earlier this month, said he expects Saudi Arabia to officially join the Abraham Accords by the end of the year.

“They had a problem,” Trump said of Saudi Arabia.

“They had a Gaza problem and they had an Iran problem. Now they don’t have those two problems.”

The cease-fire, reached on October 10, included the release of the last 20 living Israeli hostages and the return of over two dozen sets of remains. Trump did not give a timeline for his visit to Gaza but made clear that his administration would not tolerate any violations of the agreement by Hamas.

“Nobody would mind if we went in and took [Hamas] to task” if they backtracked, Trump said.

Trump noted that securing the deal required convincing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to approve. “Bibi, you can’t fight the world,” Trump recalled telling Netanyahu.

“You can fight individual battles, but the world’s against you. And Israel is a very small place compared to the world.”

He also criticized Israel’s September 9 bombing that targeted Hamas political leaders in Qatar. “That was terrible,” Trump said, calling it “a tactical mistake.”

Still, he added, “It was so out of joint that it sort of got everybody to do what they have to do. If you took that away, we might not be talking about this subject right now.”

Trump emphasized that Israel will not be permitted to annex the West Bank. “It won’t happen because I gave my word to the Arab countries,” he warned. “Israel would lose all of its support from the United States if that happened.”

He also said he has a personal rapport with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who attended the Egypt peace summit earlier this month. Abbas, 89, has led the Palestinian Authority since 2005.

Reflecting on the negotiations, Trump said Netanyahu had been eager to continue military operations until he intervened. “I stopped him, because he would have just kept going,” Trump said.

“It could have gone on for years. It would have gone on for years. And I stopped him, and everybody came together when I stopped, it was amazing.”

FEMA Scandal Deepens — DHS Report: FEMA Workers Skipped Trump Supporters’ Homes During Disaster Relief Efforts
News

FEMA Scandal Deepens — DHS Report: FEMA Workers Skipped Trump Supporters’ Homes During Disaster Relief Efforts

/

A new report from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has revealed that Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) workers under the Biden-Harris administration systematically withheld disaster relief from homeowners who displayed support for President Donald Trump.

The report, released Tuesday, found that the discrimination was not isolated but part of a widespread pattern of politically motivated conduct spanning several years.

The allegations first surfaced in late 2024 when a whistleblower claimed FEMA workers had been directed not to provide aid to homes with Trump campaign signs following Hurricane Milton.

At the time, FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell told Congress the incident was isolated and blamed a single employee who was later fired.

The DHS investigation, however, contradicted that account, concluding that “the abuses were widespread, systematic, and occurred during multiple disasters dating back to Hurricane Ida in 2021.”

According to the report, FEMA employees under the Biden administration violated the Privacy Act of 1974 by collecting and documenting political information about disaster survivors.

Field notes cited in the investigation showed that employees recorded details about political flags, signs, and slogans and then used those indicators to decide whether to provide assistance.

In one instance, a FEMA relief worker recorded in 2024, “Trump sign, no contact per leadership,” referring to a Florida home impacted by Hurricane Milton.

Another entry from 2021, during the federal response to Hurricane Ida in Pennsylvania, described the property as having “a lot of explicit political flags, posters, etc. ‘F**k Joe Biden’ ‘MAGA 2024’ ‘Joe Biden Sucks’ ‘TRUMP 2024.’ We do not recommend anyone visiting this location.”

A third FEMA field report from Louisiana in 2021 noted, “Homeowner had sign stated … this is Trump country.”

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem called the findings disturbing, condemning the politically motivated actions that deprived Americans of federal disaster assistance.

“The federal government was withholding aid against Americans in crisis based on their political beliefs — this should horrify every American, regardless of political persuasion,” Noem said.

“For years, FEMA employees under the Biden administration intentionally delayed much-needed aid to Americans suffering from natural disasters on purely political grounds,” she continued.

“They deliberately avoided houses displaying support for President Trump and the Second Amendment, illegally collected and stored information about survivors’ political beliefs, and failed to report their malicious behavior. We will not let this stand.”

The DHS report found that the misconduct extended beyond Hurricane Milton to include earlier disasters, such as Hurricanes Ida and Ian, as well as several severe flood and wildfire responses between 2021 and 2023.

Investigators said the findings showed a pattern of discrimination that violated both federal law and FEMA’s own policies regarding neutrality in disaster relief operations.

FEMA officials did not immediately respond to the report’s release.

The agency has previously stated that all employees are required to provide aid based solely on need, without regard to political affiliation or beliefs.

Following the report’s publication, the DHS referred the case to the Department of Justice for possible criminal prosecution.

The referral focuses on potential violations of civil rights protections and federal laws governing the misuse of taxpayer-funded programs.

The investigation also called for a full review of FEMA’s disaster response protocols and mandatory retraining for all field employees to prevent similar conduct in the future.

According to DHS officials, disciplinary actions are expected against several current and former FEMA staff members found to have participated in or ignored the politically motivated directives.

The report marks the first formal acknowledgment that political bias within a federal disaster relief agency may have affected the distribution of emergency aid.

DHS said additional audits are underway to determine whether the same conduct occurred during other federal disaster responses in recent years.

Illegal Alien Freed by Biden, Licensed by Gavin Newsom, Kills Three in I-10 DUI Crash
News

Illegal Alien Freed by Biden, Licensed by Gavin Newsom, Kills Three in I-10 DUI Crash

/

A 21-year-old illegal alien from India is in custody following a deadly multi-vehicle collision in Southern California that killed three people and injured four others.

The crash occurred Tuesday, October 21, 2025, on the eastbound lanes of Interstate 10 near its interchange with Interstate 15 in Ontario, California.

Authorities identified the driver as Jashanpreet Singh, who is being held by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department on suspicion of driving under the influence causing great bodily harm and gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

According to law enforcement officials, Singh was operating a semi-truck when he sped into slow-moving traffic without braking, causing a chain-reaction collision involving multiple vehicles.

Dashcam footage from the semi-truck reportedly shows Singh failing to slow down or attempt to avoid the cars ahead before impact.

Three people were pronounced dead at the scene, while four others were transported to nearby hospitals, two of them in critical condition.

The identities of the victims have not yet been released pending notification of their families.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sources confirmed that Singh entered the United States illegally and was previously detained and released at the California border under the Biden-Harris administration in March 2022.

Singh has been living in California since that time.

ICE officials said a detainer has been filed with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department to take Singh into federal custody upon the conclusion of the criminal proceedings.

“ICE has placed a detainer request on Singh, who remains in county custody on suspicion of DUI causing great bodily injury and gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated,” a federal source confirmed. Singh has not yet been formally charged by prosecutors.

The circumstances surrounding how Singh obtained a commercial driver’s license (CDL) have drawn scrutiny.

Under California law, individuals are not required to prove legal residency to obtain a driver’s license, and that provision was expanded in September 2022 when Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1766.

AB 1766 extended the policy to allow anyone residing in California, regardless of immigration status, to obtain a state-issued ID card.

The law also permits noncitizens to apply for driver’s licenses without providing documentation of lawful residency.

A REAL ID-compliant license is typically required for CDL holders who transport goods requiring entry into federal facilities.

However, state policies under Newsom’s administration have allowed undocumented immigrants to obtain CDLs for in-state commercial driving, which critics argue has created serious safety and accountability concerns.

Law enforcement officials said it remains unclear how Singh obtained the license required to operate a semi-truck and whether it was issued under the provisions of AB 1766.

Federal authorities are reviewing the case as part of a broader inquiry into how state licensing policies intersect with federal immigration enforcement.

The deadly crash has renewed questions about California’s licensing system and its impact on road safety.

State officials have not yet commented on whether Singh held a valid CDL at the time of the crash or whether his employment status as a commercial driver was being investigated.

The San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department said the investigation remains ongoing and that additional charges may be filed pending the outcome of toxicology reports. Singh is expected to make his first court appearance later this week.

ICE officials confirmed Singh will remain in custody throughout the legal process and could face deportation proceedings following any state-level prosecution.

Federal authorities said they are coordinating with local law enforcement to ensure Singh does not evade custody before facing trial.

The collision marks one of the deadliest traffic incidents in the Inland Empire this year and has intensified debate over immigration and licensing policies in California.


Scroll to Top