News

News

BB Gun Rampage: Man Arrested After Firing at Nude Cyclists in Los Angeles Circus Ride [WATCH]

A man was arrested Saturday in downtown Los Angeles after authorities said he allegedly fired a BB gun at participants taking part in the annual World Naked Bike Ride, leaving two people with minor injuries, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

According to reports, the suspect was taken into custody on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon involving a BB gun, along with additional charges that have not been specified.

Authorities said two victims suffered lacerations during the incident.

Video from the scene showed police arresting a man dressed in black following the reported shooting.

The incident occurred during Los Angeles’ annual World Naked Bike Ride, an event that organizers hold each year during the summer months.

Participants ride through city streets in various states of undress to promote cyclist safety and raise awareness of climate-related issues.

According to ABC 7, two separate rides were held in Los Angeles on Saturday at different times. Each route covered nearly 10 miles through the city.

The event drew hundreds of participants and spectators throughout downtown Los Angeles.

The New York Post reported that cyclists gathered in a parking area in Little Tokyo before beginning their ride through the city.

Participants used body paint in place of traditional cycling clothing, while police escorts helped manage traffic as riders traveled along routes lined with onlookers.

Organizers describe the ride as both a demonstration for bicycle safety and a protest highlighting environmental concerns and automobile dependence.

Although participants ride with little or no clothing, the event operates under guidelines intended to distinguish it from sexually explicit conduct.

According to reports, organizers prohibit lewd or sexually explicit exposure and characterize the event as an exercise in public expression and advocacy rather than entertainment.

California law has long presented questions regarding public nudity in certain organized events, and the World Naked Bike Ride has continued operating within that legal framework under established event guidelines.

Authorities have not released additional information regarding what led to the alleged BB gun shooting or whether the suspect knew any of the participants.

Police have also not disclosed the identities of either the suspect or the two injured individuals.

The victims’ injuries were reported as lacerations, and no life-threatening injuries were announced.

Law enforcement officers remained at the scene while investigators gathered evidence and interviewed witnesses.

The investigation remains ongoing, and officials have not released further details regarding the additional charges the suspect may face.

The annual World Naked Bike Ride has been held in cities around the world for years, with organizers promoting the event as a campaign for bicycle safety, environmental awareness, and public advocacy.

Los Angeles is among several U.S. cities that host the event each summer.

Authorities have not indicated whether the incident will affect future rides or related events.

News

Navy’s 20-Year Assault Case Archive Exposes Systemic Failures and Bureaucratic Cover

A government release of two decades worth of assault and misconduct files aboard Military Sealift Command ships has cast a harsh light on how the system has repeatedly failed those who trusted it most.

For 20 years, from 2000 to 2022, 116 Naval Criminal Investigative Service cases were opened into shipboard sexual assaults and misconduct.

Only five of them resulted in any court action, either military or civilian. The rest—more than a hundred cases—fizzled out quietly into administrative nothingness or were dismissed outright.

The Maritime Legal Aid Foundation pried this information loose through a formal records request, and now the public can finally see what should never have been hidden: a staggering, bureaucratic black hole where accountability goes to die.

This new searchable database doesn’t just present disturbing case details, it reveals just how hard it has been for sailors, cadets, and civilian mariners to get justice in an environment that floats in legal limbo between uniformed military authority and civilian law.

U.S. Court Halts War Department from Removing Transgender Troops, But Ban Still Stands

Some of the cases are almost too absurd to believe. In 2018, a government-contractor engineer on the hospital ship USNS *Mercy* decided to “just whip it out” at a passing Navy helicopter crew.

NCIS concluded no law technically applied, so the punishment amounted to a laughable 30-day suspension. It’s galling that such acts can happen aboard a U.S. military vessel with little consequence.

In another case a year later, a college student serving as a Merchant Marine midshipman on the USNS *Richard E. Byrd* reported repeated unwanted touching by a navigator.

Prosecutors declined to pursue it, and while the accused denied wrongdoing, the entire incident was shelved. No disciplinary clarity, no institutional accountability, and no closure for the young man trying to serve and learn.

Other files ride the edge of misconduct definitions, like one crew member who felt harassed during a “friendly” fitness assist.

But buried deeper in the archive are horrifying accounts: a 2016 case where a woman reported being grabbed, groped, and bitten by another civilian on the USS Mt. Whitney, only for the Department of Justice to decline prosecution.

The file suggests ship command “was considering” taking action, but there’s no indication it ever did. “Considering” is a bureaucrat’s way of saying “we ignored it.”

Ryan Melogy, founder of the Maritime Legal Aid Foundation and architect of the new database, says none of this shocks him. The records merely confirm what he’s long known: that victims often have no advocate, no lawyer, and no presence in the process. “You’re trapped,” Melogy told reporters.

“You get assaulted in not only where you live, but where you’re working… It’s like there’s nobody.” NCIS, he argues, tends to interrogate the accuser just as aggressively as the suspect, turning victims into problems to be managed rather than people seeking justice.

Senate Backs Probe Into Biden Admin’s Use of JAG Officers in Immigration Courts
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced a proposal mandating the U.S. Comptroller General to carry out an investigation into how JAGs were reassigned to civilian jobs. (Naoto Anazawa/U.S. Air Force)

One major case Melogy now handles involves engineer Elsie Dominguez, who alleges she was violently raped in 2021 by her ship’s civilian captain on the USNS Carson City.

The captain gave up his license, but faces no criminal charges. Disturbingly, Dominguez was told her only course of action was a worker’s compensation claim through the Department of Labor because the assault occurred “in the performance of her duties.”

It’s bureaucratic doublespeak that neatly excuses criminal behavior behind red tape and paperwork.

Melogy hopes the new online archive will at least force sunlight onto these shady corners of naval bureaucracy, making it harder for future cases to evaporate into silence.

He notes that many of these victims are young cadets serving aboard ships as part of their maritime education—vulnerable, inexperienced, and often completely unaware of what avenues for help even exist. Without legal counsel or centralized oversight, they’re adrift in a system that’s supposed to protect them.

One 2013 case gained brief local news attention when a Navy reservist was caught secretly recording female cadets through ventilation holes in their cabin doors.

He ultimately received probation in 2016. That kind of punishment is common across the database—light, administrative, and designed to quietly move problems away rather than confront them.

The Department of War clearly has structural gaps when contractors and civilians serve alongside uniformed members but operate under separate jurisdictional umbrellas.

Navy Officer Pleads Guilty to Killing Wife in Japanese Hotel, Faces 23 Years in Prison
A gavel rests on the judge’s bench in the courtroom of the 39th Air Base Wing legal office at Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, Nov. 14, 2019.

That mix of military authority and civilian immunity leaves nobody clearly responsible. It’s the kind of bureaucratic confusion career functionaries thrive in and victims suffer from.

For the Navy, this release is more than an embarrassment—it’s a moral reckoning. We’re talking about American ships sailing under the national flag, carrying both sailors and civilians, yet the system governing conduct aboard them has failed to deliver basic justice.

The Biden-era bureaucracy may prefer quiet settlements and non-criminal resolutions, but sunlight is not partisan. The truth comes out eventually.

In an era when public trust in institutions is crumbling, the Maritime Legal Aid Foundation’s action cuts through the fog. It took civilians doing the government’s job to finally bring transparency.

Melogy says the hope is simple: “You never know what could happen when you take these kinds of files and bring them out, and let people look at them.”

The files are out now, and the public is looking. What happens next will tell us whether America’s naval leadership has the courage to clean its own decks—or whether this archive becomes just another pile of ignored paperwork in the swamp.

News

Five-Day Search Ends With Recovery of Missing Kentucky Teen’s Body [WATCH]

The body of a Kentucky teenager who disappeared during a boating outing on Grayson Lake has been recovered following an extensive five-day search, while the man operating the pontoon boat has been charged with boating under the influence, as reported by Fox News.

The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources confirmed that the body of Marly Kinney, 19, of Ashland, was recovered from Grayson Lake at approximately 3:45 p.m. Sunday.

Kinney had been missing since Wednesday afternoon after disappearing during a gathering aboard a rented pontoon boat with at least 10 friends in Carter County.

According to investigators, Kinney was last seen around 4 p.m. on Wednesday after going overboard to use the bathroom. Authorities said those aboard the boat did not immediately realize she was missing.

After she was reported missing, multiple agencies launched an extensive search of Grayson Lake and the surrounding area.

The search involved the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Kentucky State Police, and local emergency responders.

Search crews used sonar equipment, thermal detectors, helicopters, K-9 teams, heat-seeking devices, underwater drones, and other specialized resources during the operation. More than 50 volunteers also joined the search despite periods of rain that slowed rescue efforts.

Authorities have not disclosed how Kinney’s body was ultimately located.

The investigation began on Wednesday after Cameron Conley, 23, notified staff at Grayson Lake Marina that Kinney was no longer aboard his pontoon boat and that he was unable to find her.

Kentucky State Police responded to assist with both the search and the investigation.

According to court records previously obtained by FOX 56, troopers detected the odor of alcohol on Conley’s breath after arriving at the marina.

Authorities said Conley admitted he had been drinking and agreed to submit to a breath test.

Officials reported that his blood alcohol content measured 0.137%, nearly twice Kentucky’s legal limit for operating a boat. A second breath test administered approximately 20 minutes later registered 0.135%.

Kentucky State Police also reported that the responding trooper observed Conley’s eyes were bloodshot and glassy while conducting the investigation.

Conley was arrested on a charge of boating under the influence and transported to the Carter County Detention Center. He has since been released.

Authorities have not announced any additional charges in connection with Kinney’s death.

The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources said Kinney’s family has been notified.

Her body was transported to the Kentucky State Medical Examiner’s Office in Frankfort, where officials will determine the cause of death.

Officials said the investigation into the circumstances surrounding her disappearance remains active.

Following confirmation that Kinney had been found, Smokin’ J’s Rib and Brewhouse in Ashland, where she worked, announced it would close temporarily so employees could mourn her loss.

“The Smoking J’s Family is saddened by the loss of one of our own, Marly Kinney,” the restaurant said in a Facebook statement.

“Marly was a model employee loved by all, always with a friendly smile and a kind word. She was loved by her fellow coworkers and friends, many who have been volunteering over these last few days,” the statement continued.

“Our love and prayers go out to Marly’s family and friends through this tragic loss.”

Earlier during the search, Kinney’s family released a statement thanking law enforcement officers, first responders, volunteers, and everyone involved in the effort to locate the missing teenager.

Authorities said anyone with information related to Kinney’s disappearance or the investigation is encouraged to contact Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Law Enforcement at 800-25-ALERT (25378) or Kentucky State Police Post 14 at 606-928-6421.

News

DOJ Examines Sen. Ruben Gallego’s Campaign Spending on Super Bowl Tickets and Disney Trips

The Department of Justice has opened an investigation into Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., over campaign spending tied to luxury outings and family travel that were paid for with campaign donations, according to reports confirmed by the New York Post.

The investigation centers on potential campaign finance violations and follows a whistleblower complaint originating in Southern California. Axios first reported the existence of the federal investigation.

News of the DOJ probe emerged only hours after the Senate Ethics Committee rejected a complaint against Gallego that alleged campaign finance violations and sexual misconduct.

A spokesperson for Gallego criticized the investigation in a statement provided to Axios.

“[President] Trump is targeting Senator Gallego while the most weaponized Department of Justice in history is turning a blind eye to Trump’s unprecedented corruption,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson added, “It’s the least surprising news of the week that this comes immediately after the Senate Ethics Committee cleared Senator Gallego of right-wing smears pushed by the administration.”

Gallego has denied violating campaign finance laws.

The scrutiny follows reporting last week by Politico detailing campaign expenditures that included Super Bowl tickets, family travel, childcare expenses, and other trips funded through campaign accounts.

According to Politico, Gallego used a joint campaign committee known as the “Swallego Victory Fund,” created with former Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., in October 2022, to attend Super Bowl LVII in Arizona with his wife in 2023.

The fundraising committee reportedly hosted an event during the Super Bowl and spent more than $37,000 on game tickets and meals connected to the event.

Federal Election Commission records cited in the report also show that Gallego spent approximately $18,000 from campaign and political action committee funds on childcare beginning in 2019.

Among those expenses was a $400 payment to his mother-in-law for babysitting services.

Gallego addressed those childcare expenditures last week in a post on X, noting that “the FEC has stated that childcare may be reimbursed.”

Campaign finance records also show spending connected to family trips to Walt Disney World in Florida and Disneyland in California, where Gallego participated in political action committee retreats.

According to the records, lodging for the Disneyland trip totaled nearly $1,500, excluding airfare.

Additional campaign-funded travel listed in disclosure records included trips with family members to St. Barts, Miami, and Chicago.

Politico also cited an unnamed source familiar with Gallego’s campaign spending.

“He just spends his campaign account like it’s his personal slush fund,” the source said.

“He’s using campaign cash to live a luxury lifestyle.”

The DOJ investigation stems from a whistleblower complaint filed in Southern California alleging potential campaign finance violations.

Federal authorities have not publicly disclosed additional details regarding the scope of the investigation or whether any charges are being considered.

Neither the Department of Justice nor Gallego’s Senate office immediately responded to requests for comment from the New York Post following reports that the investigation had been launched.

Gallego, who represents Arizona in the U.S. Senate, has consistently maintained that his campaign expenditures complied with applicable election laws and regulations.

The Justice Department investigation now places additional attention on campaign spending that has already received scrutiny following recent reports detailing expenditures for sporting events, travel, childcare, and political fundraising activities.

At this stage, no criminal charges have been announced, and the investigation remains ongoing.

News

California No-Kill Rescue Faces Investigation After Discovery of More Than 100 Dogs Buried [WATCH]

An investigation into a Northern California animal rescue has uncovered the remains of more than 100 dogs buried on the property, prompting an ongoing criminal investigation involving local, state, and federal authorities, as reported by Fox News.

The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office announced that investigators recovered the remains of 117 dogs and 21 canine skulls at Miranda’s Rescue Animal Sanctuary in Fortuna after launching an investigation earlier this year.

According to the sheriff’s office, the investigation began in April after authorities received a tip alleging animal abuse, animal cruelty, fraud, and conspiracy at the rescue organization.

Last week, investigators announced that two excavation sites on the property yielded 117 intact canine remains. Authorities also discovered 21 canine skulls, hundreds of additional bones, and six loose microchips at another nearby dig site.

Officials said they continue reviewing the recovered microchip information along with other evidence collected during the investigation.

The sheriff’s office said the recovered dogs were found in various stages of decomposition.

Investigators conducted on-site X-rays of 70 of the dogs, with many showing evidence of bullet fragments. According to preliminary findings by forensic veterinarians, many of the animals examined appeared to have died from gunshot wounds.

“Most of the dogs recovered were microchipped. Analysts are currently reviewing the data obtained from the microchips and are working to identify the dogs associated with those chips.

All items were collected as evidence and will undergo further examination as part of the ongoing investigation,” the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office said.

During the investigation, authorities also identified what they believe was an area inside a barn where many of the dogs may have been killed.

Investigators recovered more than 600 dog collars from that location.

Officials said records show that at least 918 dogs had been transferred to Miranda’s Rescue Animal Sanctuary since January 2025. Investigators have confirmed only 116 adoptions during that period.

Authorities located 71 live dogs on the property during the investigation, leaving more than 700 dogs currently unaccounted for based on available records.

Sheriff William Honsal said investigators are continuing to process evidence and interview witnesses as the case develops.

“This investigation is just getting started,” Honsal said.

“There is a tremendous amount of data to process, witnesses to interview, and evidence to examine. The Major Crimes Division is laser-focused on this case and will continue working with our state and federal partners to examine every lead.”

Fox News Digital reported that it contacted Miranda’s Rescue Animal Sanctuary seeking comment.

The organization’s founder and owner, Shannon Miranda, responded to the allegations in a statement published on the rescue’s website on June 18.

“For more than 30 years, I have devoted my life to rescuing and caring for animals through Miranda’s Rescue. Recent media coverage and online commentary have presented an incomplete and, in some cases, inaccurate picture of our work. I want to share the facts and provide context so the public can better understand our work and the difficult decisions we sometimes must make,” the statement reads.

Miranda acknowledged that animals have been euthanized at the rescue, but said those decisions were made only under limited circumstances.

He stated that euthanasia occurred only “when an animal is suffering from a terminal condition or when it poses a serious, ongoing danger to people or other animals.”

Miranda also described two specific incidents that he said led to euthanasia decisions.

“In one case, a dog named Zora arrived heavily sedated, later killed a feral cat during a walk with a prospective adopter, then broke free and attacked another dog,” Miranda said.

“In another case, a dog transferred to us became fixated on a stroller carrying a baby, lunged at it, and attacked it before staff intervened. In both situations, given the observed behavior and the risks to staff, volunteers, visitors, and other animals, I made the difficult decision to euthanize the dogs.”

Authorities have not announced any arrests or filed criminal charges in connection with the investigation.

The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office said reviewing the evidence will require considerable time because of the complexity of the case and the volume of material investigators continue to examine.

News

Dave Portnoy Teases NYC Mayor Run to Take on Socialist Mamdani and the DSA [WATCH]

Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy said he is considering a run for mayor of New York City, citing concerns about the growing influence of Democratic Socialists of America and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Portnoy discussed the possibility during an appearance on Jesse Watters Primetime on Fox News, where he said recent political developments in New York have prompted him to think about entering public office.

His comments come as Mamdani and other Democratic Socialist-backed candidates have received increased national attention following a series of primary victories in New York and elsewhere.

Portnoy, who built Barstool Sports into a national media company, has become increasingly vocal about political issues in recent months, particularly those involving New York City.

According to Yahoo News, Portnoy has criticized Mamdani for “hogging the spotlight” after the New York Knicks won the franchise’s first NBA championship in 53 years.

The report also noted that Portnoy has publicly criticized some of Mamdani’s political endorsements.

During his interview with Fox News, Portnoy said the political climate in New York has led him to consider mounting a campaign.

“I’m losing my mind on what’s happening right now, especially in New York,” Portnoy said.

When asked about the possibility of challenging Mamdani, Portnoy acknowledged that he does not know whether he could win.

“Can I win here? I have no idea,” he said of running against Mamdani. “I don’t know the demographics, whether they get enough votes.”

Despite that uncertainty, Portnoy said he believes he has built significant support in New York City through his work over the years.

“There’s a lot of people who like me in New York City. I know that I’ve done a lot of good in New York City when I wasn’t thinking about politics, whether it’s the Barstool Fund, pizza places.”

Portnoy also contrasted his professional background with that of many elected officials.

“So it wasn’t for show. I’ve had a real job. I’ve done real things, unlike these clown politicians who have never had a job and never been in the real world for a day.”

The Barstool Sports founder did not announce an official campaign or provide a timetable for making a decision. Instead, he presented the possibility as something he is actively considering while evaluating the political landscape in New York City.

Portnoy has become one of the country’s most recognizable media personalities since launching Barstool Sports.

In addition to sports coverage, he has drawn attention for charitable efforts through the Barstool Fund and for his popular pizza review videos, which have featured hundreds of restaurants across the country, including many in New York City.

His remarks come as discussions surrounding the Democratic Socialists of America and the direction of New York politics continue following recent primary elections.

Several victories by DSA-backed candidates have sparked debate over the ideological direction of Democratic politics in the city.

While Portnoy has not formally entered the race, his comments on Fox News placed him among the public figures who have expressed interest in challenging the city’s current political leadership.

Whether he ultimately files to run remains to be seen, but his remarks underscore the heightened attention surrounding New York City’s political landscape following this year’s primary elections.

News

John Fetterman Explodes at “The Dirtbag Left” as Socialist Victories Shake Democrats [WATCH]

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., is again criticizing members of his own party, saying recent victories by far-left candidates reflect what he believes is a growing shift within the Democratic Party toward socialism, as reported by Fox News.

Speaking Sunday evening, Fetterman reacted to several high-profile primary wins by progressive candidates, including members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), describing the results as evidence that the party has continued moving left.

“Big night for the dirtbag left,” Fetterman said while discussing New York’s recent primary elections, where two DSA-backed candidates secured victories.

He continued, “I’ve said the party is becoming an orgy of socialism. Clearly anti-America, anti-Western Civilization.”

Fetterman’s remarks come after a series of primary elections that have drawn national attention and intensified debate over the direction of the Democratic Party.

Among the races receiving attention was the Democratic Senate primary in Maine, where Graham Platner won the nomination despite facing scrutiny during the campaign.

Platner attracted controversy after denying knowledge of the meaning behind a tattoo linked to Nazi imagery, making off-color comments about race, and referring to himself as a “communist” in a deleted Reddit post.

In New York, Democratic Socialists of America candidates Claire Valdez and Darializa Avila-Chevalier both won Democratic primaries.

Valdez campaigned on proposals that included abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and advancing climate policies modeled after the Green New Deal.

Avila-Chevalier defeated incumbent Rep. Adriano Espillat, D-N.Y., who serves as chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Both candidates received support from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who has described himself as a socialist.

The victories have prompted criticism from Republicans, who argue the results illustrate the Democratic Party’s continued movement toward progressive policies.

Fetterman has emerged as one of the few Democratic senators publicly criticizing the party’s left flank following the elections.

During his comments, the Pennsylvania senator said some Democratic lawmakers have declined to criticize proposals advanced by progressive candidates.

“I mean, you look at some of the things that people have said. Abolish prison, abolish the border, abolish ICE, I mean these crazy people — I have colleagues in my caucus that refuse to even call this out,” Fetterman said.

His criticism extended beyond the New York races to developments in Maine.

“Between P-hustle in Maine and some of the other winners in New York, they should form their own party and run on all the things that they’ve had to delete on social media,” Fetterman said, referring to Platner.

He concluded, “That’s where our party has moved.”

Fetterman has repeatedly voiced concern in recent months about the Democratic Party’s ideological direction, particularly following a series of victories by socialist and progressive candidates in Democratic primaries.

His latest comments follow continued debate within the party over issues including immigration, law enforcement, climate policy, and the role of government.

The victories by DSA-backed candidates in New York, along with Platner’s Senate primary win in Maine, have become focal points in that discussion.

The Pennsylvania senator’s criticism also highlights an ongoing divide between moderates and the party’s progressive wing as Democrats prepare for future elections.

While many Democratic leaders have emphasized maintaining a broad coalition within the party, Fetterman argued that some of the candidates emerging from recent primaries represent positions that he believes many Democrats have been unwilling to publicly challenge.

News

Trump Erupts on Senate RINOs Over SAVE Act After Supreme Court Mail Ballot Setback [WATCH]

President Donald Trump wasted no time blasting Senate Republicans he accused of dragging their feet after a major Supreme Court ruling that weakens election integrity across the states.

The decision allows ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward to be counted, and conservatives say it is yet another crack in the foundation of fair and timely elections.

The 5-to-4 decision in Watson v. RNC declared that federal Election Day laws do not prevent states from counting ballots that trickle in long after polls close, as long as those ballots comply with state law.

For anyone wondering why election night has turned into election month in places like California, this ruling just made it official.

Trump reacted instantly by turning up the volume on his push for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, known as the SAVE America Act, which requires voters to provide proof of citizenship to register and show valid identification when voting.

He argued the legislation is now absolutely critical to preserve the integrity of American elections in light of this latest judicial setback.

“There is only one reason to oppose it, cheating,” Trump wrote, as he publicly called out the Senate’s chronic inertia.

He named names too, putting RINOs Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, Bill Cassidy, and Mitch McConnell on notice.

To Trump, their reluctance is not political caution but an outright surrender.

Versions of the SAVE Act have already cleared the House three times, yet it remains stuck in the Senate.

Majority Leader John Thune claims he lacks the votes to secure passage, or to remove the procedural roadblock known as the filibuster.

Conservative frustration is reaching the boiling point as the Senate keeps the bill buried.

Calling the Supreme Court’s ruling a “tremendous loss,” Trump said it only emboldens states that already stretch Election Day into Election Season.

His prescription is straightforward.

“All voters must show photo identification. All voters must show proof of citizenship. No mail-in ballots except for illness, disability, military deployment, or travel.”

It is hardly controversial unless you are looking to manipulate the system.

Activist judges have not made Trump’s mission easier.

Liberal jurists have repeatedly blocked even modest election integrity efforts at the state level.

As one headline from RedState put it, an Obama-appointed judge once again “thwarted Trump’s mail ballot crackdown,” proving that courtrooms have become battlegrounds for basic common sense.

Representative Byron Donalds, one of Trump’s strongest allies in the House, unloaded on both parties for letting the SAVE America Act gather dust.

His words were blunt and accurate: “The Senate sucks.” Many conservatives agree, pointing to gridlock as the greatest threat to confidence in government today.

Trump insists America cannot afford any more half measures or excuses.

The left will always claim voter ID is “discriminatory,” but with more than eighty percent of Americans in favor of it, that tired argument no longer holds.

The truth is uncomfortable for Democrats: without loose procedures and endless mail ballots, their electoral power dries up fast.

The president again sounded the alarm that the battle over election laws is bigger than one bill or one court ruling.

He warned that a “powerful Communist movement” is gaining strength within the country, more dangerous than anything seen since the major wars of the past century.

Whether rhetorical or not, it was a reminder that Trump sees this fight as a matter of national survival.

He closed his statement with another direct appeal to those Republican senators refusing to stand firm.

“There can be no more excuses,” he declared.

To him, opposition to voter ID means one thing only, cheating.

WATCH:

That clear framing may explain why his supporters trust his instincts on election integrity more than anyone else’s.

Polls continue to show overwhelming bipartisan support for requiring identification to vote.

Yet the establishment still wobbles under pressure from the media and the left.

Ordinary Americans who must show ID for everything from flying to buying cold medicine cannot fathom why proving citizenship at the ballot box should be the one exception.

At the core of this debate is a simple question of accountability.

Should the United States, the greatest democracy in history, ensure that only citizens cast ballots, or should it tolerate chaos to keep peace with activists and lawyers? Trump’s answer has never wavered, and millions of voters feel the same way.

As patriotic Americans see their confidence in elections slipping, Trump’s defiance continues to resonate.

The Supreme Court may have invited confusion, but the call for secure voting grows louder.

If Republican senators want to avoid sharing blame with Biden Democrats when the next mess unfolds, they might want to stop hiding behind procedure and start defending the people who sent them to Washington.

News

Socialist Candidate Says US Invited 9/11 and Promises Free Everything With No Consequences [WATCH]

A Democratic Socialist candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for Colorado’s 1st Congressional District is drawing attention for comments on U.S. foreign policy, healthcare, housing, taxes, and other issues ahead of Tuesday’s primary election, as reported by The Post Millennial.

Melat Kiros, a 29-year-old Ethiopian-born Democratic Socialist, discussed her platform during a recent interview, where she advocated for Medicare for All, federally funded social housing, a national high-speed rail system, and changes to the federal tax code. She also addressed questions about the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and U.S. foreign policy.

The race comes after several Democratic Socialist candidates secured primary victories in New York City during June, bringing renewed attention to the influence of the Democratic Socialists of America within Democratic politics.

During the interview, Kiros was asked whether she believed “that the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America were the inevitable consequence of American foreign policy,” with the interviewer noting that she had previously described the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel as “an inevitable consequence for Israel based on its action.”

Kiros responded, “Inevitable in the sense that we destabilized a lot of the Middle East. That forced people to believe that another act of violence was the only response, and again, just like I said before, our responsibility is to getting rid of those conditions.”

The interviewer also asked how she would appeal to Democratic primary voters who do not identify as socialists.

Kiros argued that elements of socialism already exist in the United States through taxpayer-funded institutions.

“What I’m calling for is the same security that we have in those institutions to be in our healthcare, to be in our access to nutritional food, to be in making sure that we have universal child care and universal elder care,” she said.

She also discussed the impact artificial intelligence could have on employment, saying the country is moving toward an era in which AI will affect workers.

“We need to make sure that people’s basic needs are protected, and that’s only through programs that would be socialist,” Kiros said.

Among her policy proposals, Kiros called for “housing-first measures” that would establish “social housing” and for the federal government to finance construction of a nationwide high-speed rail system.

Healthcare was another major focus of the interview.

Kiros said she believes the Democratic Party’s most achievable goal over the next several years is passing “Medicare for all.”

“I sincerely believe that the last thing Democrats did to meaningfully help working families was Obamacare,” she said, describing it as “a band-aid for a system that has now still hemorrhaging.”

She added, “Medicare for all is something that would meaningfully make real relief for working families in this country,” expressing hope that Democrats would approve a universal healthcare package if they regain unified control of the federal government.

Kiros also defended a single-payer healthcare system.

“Single payer actually pays for itself,” she said.

“I think there’s a misconception that the health care is free, and that’s not what’s happening.”

She continued, “You’re just cutting out the middlemen that are frankly just making a profit off of people being sick, and when you have Medicare being the most efficient health insurance program in the country compared to all of the other private health insurance companies, this is the most common sense thing to do.”

Kiros further claimed that “every other developed wealthy nation in the country” has adopted such a system and said it is estimated to save “thousands of dollars for taxpayers and to save $2 trillion for the government over 10 years.”

In addition to healthcare, Kiros proposed revising the federal tax code, arguing that “ultra billionaires and trillionaires” are not paying “their fair share.”

She said the federal poverty line should account for housing and health insurance costs in addition to food expenses, advocated raising the federal minimum wage to approximately $21 per hour, and called for creating a new tax bracket for the “ultra-wealthy.”

The interview also included questions about her personal financial circumstances.

Kiros discussed her experiences as a renter in Denver and said she has struggled to stretch her paycheck.

The interviewer challenged that characterization, stating, “knowing financial struggle by choice. You were a corporate attorney who’s going to get a PhD.

I have no doubt that you’re having trouble making ends meet when you step out of that world, but you kind of chose to step out of that world.”

Kiros replied that it was a “fair assessment,” but said, “I did grow up with the same struggle,” explaining that she immigrated to the United States as a baby and watched her parents work multiple jobs.

She also referenced her previous employment at the law firm Sidley Austin.

“After getting fired from that law firm, it was definitely clear that no other law firm of that caliber was going to hire me either, and I did make the choice to go to a PhD program to do the work that actually mattered to me,” she said.

Kiros was dismissed from Sidley Austin in 2023, shortly after the October 7 attack, after publishing a letter on Medium criticizing the firm’s decision to sign an open letter urging law school deans to address antisemitism on their campuses.

News

Blue State Power Grab Collapses After Colorado Supreme Court Rejects Gerrymander Scheme [WATCH]

Colorado’s Supreme Court has thrown a wrench into a massive Democrat-led attempt to rewrite the state’s political map in their favor.

In a stinging rebuke, justices rejected five proposed ballot measures that would have upended the redistricting process and effectively guaranteed a long-term liberal stronghold in Congress.

The Colorado court’s ruling was more than a setback for progressives. It signaled that the judiciary will not rubber-stamp partisan power plays disguised as election reform.

Three of the five measures would have given Democrats total dominance over the state’s congressional landscape, while two competing proposals favored Republicans slightly more than the current map.

At the heart of the matter were proposals that tried to merge two sweeping changes under one roof.

They would have both rewritten the rules governing redistricting and simultaneously approved new district maps.

That maneuver ran squarely into Colorado’s constitutional “single subject” requirement, which prevents ballot measures from combining unrelated issues.

Justice Richard Gabriel, writing for the majority, made it clear that the court saw right through the ploy.

“To conclude otherwise and to allow initiative proponents to proceed with interlocking measures like those at issue here would allow proponents to achieve indirectly what they could not achieve directly,” he wrote in the opinion.

The message was unmistakable.

Sneaking partisan maps past voters through legal loopholes will not fly.

WATCH:

This push for mid-decade redistricting came as Democrats across the country have been scrambling to claw back power by redrawing congressional lines before the 2030 census.

California and other blue states have led the charge to squeeze out more Democrat-leaning districts, while Republicans in Texas and other red states have used every legal tool to defend their own turf.

The Colorado case started with five proposals aimed at the 2026 general election ballot.

Some would have stripped power from the state’s independent redistricting commission.

Others tried to fast-track new partisan maps that would last through the 2030 election cycle.

One plan would have given Democrats a seven-to-one advantage in congressional seats.

The Republican alternative offered a five-to-three tilt to the GOP.

In both cases, the state’s highest court said no.

The justices ruled that trying to tie sweeping structural changes in the redistricting process to specific partisan outcomes violated the constitution.

Chief Justice Monica Marquez, writing for another majority opinion, described the scheme plainly.

“Temporarily allowing mid-decade redistricting is not merely the means to implement or effectuate the initiatives’ central purpose of adopting a specific new congressional district map for the 2028 and 2030 election cycles,” she wrote.

Marquez added that authorizing mid-decade redistricting would represent a “seismic shift” in Colorado’s governing process.

Voters might support altering the timing or structure of redistricting, she noted, without endorsing any single partisan map.

That distinction was crucial, and the court saw through attempts to blur the line.

Justice Gabriel followed the same logic when examining the “interlocking” measures, striking down an effort to separate but connect multiple ballot initiatives.

He explained that making one proposal contingent on another is the same as rolling them into a single, unconstitutional package.

In simple terms, the justices made sure partisans could not play games with the law by rearranging the paperwork.

This decision means that Colorado’s independent redistricting commission will stay intact, and the current congressional map will remain in place through the next round of elections.

That greatly frustrates Democrats who had hoped to redraw lines to secure power through ballot manipulation rather than through winning debates and elections.

The court’s ruling arrives in the middle of a broader national tug-of-war over political maps.

Several blue states have been aggressively exploring ways to reshape their congressional districts mid-decade, often under the guise of “equity” or “fair representation.”

Conservatives view these moves as nothing more than a bid to lock in liberal rule.

At the same time, Republican-led states have also been taking action, but many have done so within the clear bounds of their constitutions.

In Virginia, for instance, voters backed a similar amendment favoring Democrats, but the state Supreme Court promptly struck it down.

The Colorado ruling fits that same model of judicial restraint and constitutional fidelity.

For the left, this is a painful defeat.

For conservatives, it is a badly needed reminder that state constitutions still matter and that even liberal-leaning courts can occasionally put the brakes on endless power grabs.

While Democrats hoped to quietly build a national advantage through redrawing borders, the Colorado justices reminded everyone that such games come with limits.

The takeaway is simple. If you want to change how redistricting works in Colorado, you will have to play by the rules.

Manipulative ballot bundling is off the table, and the independent commission stands as the voter-approved safeguard it was meant to be.

That is a victory not for one party, but for voters who value an honest process.

It may not be what Colorado Democrats envisioned, but it serves as a warning to activists everywhere who think they can hack the system through clever legal engineering.

The law, it turns out, still means something.

And this time, the courts made sure of it.


Scroll to Top