News

News

Navy’s Pacific Powerhouse Welcomes New Commander Aboard USS John L. Canley

The United States Navy’s Expeditionary Strike Group 7 officially has a new man at the helm, and his battle-tested resume signals a continued focus on strength, readiness, and deterrence across the Pacific theater.

Rear Adm. Brian Mutty took command from Rear Adm. Tom Shultz during a ceremony aboard the expeditionary sea base USS John L. Canley off the coast of Singapore on June 15, 2026—a symbolic handoff that reinforces America’s forward-deployed muscle in one of the most strategically tense regions on Earth.

Mutty, a career warrior and former amphibious assault ship commander, now leads Task Group 76 and Task Force 78 under the 7th Fleet. These commands coordinate amphibious operations, joint training, and integrated action with U.S. allies and partners throughout the Indo-Pacific.

For Washington’s rivals like China and North Korea, this command change means the continued presence of a hard-nosed U.S. commander ready to keep the Pacific calm through strength.

“I am excited to join this exceptional team of Sailors and Marines and to build upon the culture of excellence Rear Adm. Shultz established,” Mutty said in a statement.

“I look forward to working side-by-side with the Sailors and Marines from the premier expeditionary strike group in the Pacific Fleet.” Those aren’t empty words—this fleet’s record of performance under fire and on deployment is unmatched.

The Expeditionary Strike Group 7 gives the 7th Fleet its primary amphibious warfare punch.

Its core missions include combat, humanitarian operations, and multinational training exercises that project freedom and flexibility across the Indo-Pacific.

The group’s ships—like the USS Tripoli, currently deployed under U.S. Central Command—house thousands of Marines from units like the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, giving the U.S. a rapid response capability unmatched by potential adversaries.

In fact, the Tripoli is now operating in the Arabian Sea in support of Operation Epic Fury, the ongoing war against Iran’s destabilizing arms network.

That presence, combined with the Navy’s other forward-deployed assets, sends a clear message: America’s sea power is alive, strong, and ready under President Trump’s revitalized War Department leadership team, including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Rear Adm. Tom Shultz, who assumed command in April 2025, leaves behind a record of aggressive readiness and operational success.

Under his watch, the strike group executed multiple Pacific patrols with the America and Tripoli Strike Groups, in addition to large operations like Talisman Sabre 2025 and Iron Fist 2026. His mantra was simple—our sailors and Marines are the “most important weapons systems” in the fleet.

“We are the forward-deployed expeditionary fighting force for the theater,” Shultz said before departing for his next assignment as Director of Operations at U.S. European Command in Stuttgart, Germany.

“The men and women of CTF-76 and CTF-78 are committed to maintaining peace, stability and security in the region. It is those servicemen and women, along with support from our network of allies and partners, who give us an asymmetric advantage that our adversaries cannot match.” It’s that fighting spirit that has long defined America’s maritime dominance.

Mutty, a native of Portsmouth, Virginia, brings his own record of command excellence to the role. After enlisting in 1992 and commissioning in 1995, he rose quickly through the ranks due to a blend of skill and grit that his crews have long admired.

He holds a master’s in National Security Affairs from the Naval Postgraduate School and has served in some of the Navy’s most challenging positions, from destroyer command to amphibious strike operations.

As commanding officer of the USS Essex in 2018, he oversaw the first combat deployment of the F-35B Lightning II stealth fighter—a technology that has changed the game for modern naval aviation.

Ashore, Mutty’s leadership roles at the Surface Warfare Schools Command and Integrated Air and Missile Defense Division have given him the kind of experience that matters when threats are real and the margin for error is zero.

With Mutty’s hand now on the throttle, Expeditionary Strike Group 7 is positioned to stay at the front edge of America’s deterrence posture.

That means staying agile, lethal, and ready—not bogged down in bureaucracy or appeasement games that have too often defined weak global postures in years past.

The Indo-Pacific remains the center of gravity for global competition, as China pushes its navy beyond its own coastline and North Korea continues rogue missile testing. The U.S. Navy, under commanders like Mutty, is the thin gray line that keeps that aggression in check.

If there’s one message the ceremony aboard the John L. Canley sent, it’s that America’s commitment to freedom of the seas and defense of our allies remains ironclad. These commanders don’t speak about “managing decline” or “strategic patience.”

They speak about victory, readiness, and deterrence through overwhelming firepower—ideals that fit squarely with both the Trump vision for American military supremacy and Secretary Hegseth’s relentless push for a combat-focused War Department.

Rear Adm. Mutty’s arrival marks continuity and renewed drive.

The Sailors and Marines of the 7th Fleet have a leader who knows what it takes to fight, win, and lead from the front. That’s exactly the kind of command America needs as it faces down new global threats from its adversaries.

News

Dem County Hijacks July 4th Celebration With Woke ‘Equity’ Agenda, Critics Say It’s ‘Offensive’ [WATCH]

San Diego County officials are facing criticism after internal emails and county documents revealed that the county’s America 250 Fourth of July celebration was reshaped with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements that critics say shifted the focus away from commemorating the nation’s founding, as reported by Fox News.

The event, originally proposed as a celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, is scheduled to take place at Waterfront Park in the San Diego area.

According to county planning documents and internal emails obtained by Fox News Digital, organizers also faced funding challenges after at least one sponsor declined to participate because of newly required DEI commitments.

The celebration’s program includes a tribal blessing, a land acknowledgment, and nearly two hours of community-story presentations highlighting what organizers describe as historically underserved populations.

According to an internal county “run of show” obtained by Fox News Digital, guests will first hear a “Tribal Intimate blessing welcoming to land,” followed by a “Welcoming and Land Acknowledgment” led by the event emcee.

The program then continues with a “Tribal Invocation,” the Black national anthem, the U.S. national anthem, and community-story presentations focused on local tribal communities, Latino communities, Asian American communities, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities, LGBT communities, and Black and African communities.

The event will also include music, food trucks, booths, and other cultural presentations before concluding with closing remarks and a fireworks display.

Bill Wells, mayor of the City of El Cajon in San Diego County, criticized the direction of the event and argued that the nation’s founding had been pushed aside.

“I have an alternative plan: 1. Acknowledge America and its greatness. 2. Celebrate with fireworks and the American National Anthem,” Wells posted on X alongside a copy of the planned event schedule.

In comments to Fox News Digital, Wells added, “Independence Day, especially this one, is about celebrating and honoring America. What the county of San Diego has created ignores this in favor of grievance and a sense that our country is not great or worthy of pride. That’s just offensive, especially in light of the fact that they’re using taxpayer money to do so.”

The controversy traces back to actions taken earlier this year by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors.

In February, Republican San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond introduced a proposal calling for a Fourth of July celebration commemorating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, citing the region’s longstanding connection to the nation’s defense and civic institutions.

The county’s Democratic-controlled Board of Supervisors later approved amendments directing the county’s chief administrative officer to work with the Office of Equity and Racial Justice and the county’s Tribal Liaison.

The revised motion instructed officials to include community engagement involving tribal nations, immigrant communities, LGBT communities, and other historically underserved groups.

Wells also criticized those changes on X.

“Supervisors Desmond and Anderson brought forward a 250th celebration for the whole region. The three Democrats rewrote it, tied it to the county’s ‘equity, inclusion, and racial justice goals,’ and handed planning to the Office of Equity and Racial Justice,” Wells wrote while posting copies of the amended meeting minutes.

Internal county emails reviewed by Fox News Digital also indicate that the event lost a planned $2,500 sponsorship after a prospective donor declined to complete paperwork requiring sponsors to affirm support for the county’s DEI principles and immigrant communities.

County staff members also acknowledged in internal emails that organizers remained thousands of dollars short of the funding needed for a complete stage, lighting, and sound setup.

David McIntosh, president of Club for Growth, criticized the event’s schedule.

“The official government July 4th itinerary of San Diego reads like the opening ceremony of the Democratic Socialists of America convention,” McIntosh said.

Anti-DEI activist Robby Starbuck also objected to the event’s emphasis on underserved populations.

“Democrats are essentially excluding White community members from the Fourth of July,” Starbuck contended in response to the event schedule and its equity-focused programming, describing it as “vile.”

Fox News Digital reported that it contacted San Diego County and the county’s Department of Parks and Recreation for comment regarding the criticism, but did not receive a response.

News

Mitch McConnell Found Unconscious at DC Home Before Hospitalization Sparks Health Concerns [WATCH]

Senator Mitch McConnell was reportedly discovered unconscious inside his Washington DC residence last month before being rushed to a hospital for emergency care.

The startling revelation, first reported by PunchBowl News, has stirred renewed concern over the Senate Republican leader’s health and ability to continue in office.

At eighty-four years old, the longtime Kentucky Senator is said to have been receiving what his spokesman described as “excellent care.”

Yet the circumstances of the incident remain murky, and a recently released 911 call has prompted speculation that McConnell may have suffered a heart attack.

The call audio, filed through official channels, reveals the tense moment when assistance was requested for an unresponsive individual at McConnell’s address.

While his office has not confirmed any diagnosis, the pattern of health scares involving the Republican leader is difficult to ignore.

This latest hospital visit marks the second time in just a few months that McConnell has faced a medical emergency.

His team maintains that he is stable and engaged with his duties, although not actively voting in the Senate.

“Senator McConnell is still working closely with staff on Senate business and Kentucky matters as he continues his recovery. However, he will not be voting this week,” a statement from his office announced.

Observers inside the Capitol are quietly voicing concerns over how long McConnell can realistically remain an active legislative force.

The senator has been a sharp strategist for decades, holding together the Republican conference through turbulent times.

Yet his recent string of health problems paints a picture of a leader fighting both political and physical battles.

Earlier this year, the Kentucky senator checked himself into a hospital after experiencing what his office called flu-like symptoms.

At the time, his staff described the move as an “abundance of caution.”

A spokesperson said, “After experiencing flu-like symptoms over the weekend, Senator McConnell checked himself into a local hospital for evaluation last night.”

They added that his “prognosis is positive” and that he “looks forward to returning to Senate business.”

WATCH:

In October, McConnell also fell within the Russell Senate Office Building complex, a misstep that resulted in another health setback.

In addition to these incidents, he has previously displayed what aides and the media described as “freezing episodes,” sparking questions about his long-term health and capacity to perform the grueling duties of his position.

Despite the repeated incidents, there appears to be little push within the Senate GOP for a succession conversation.

McConnell’s allies often emphasize his deep understanding of Senate procedure and his unmatched ability to navigate the machinery of Congress.

Still, other voices within conservative circles suggest it may soon be time for new leadership, especially as the country barrels into another high-stakes election season.

The Senate Republican leader has faced quiet frustration from portions of the conservative grassroots who have grown impatient with what they perceive as cautious establishment politics.

For many in the party base, McConnell’s steady but measured approach stands in contrast to the fighting spirit embodied by a growing wing of populist conservatives.

His declining health could become a trigger point in the internal debate between the party’s old guard and its more combative new generation.

Meanwhile, the mainstream press has offered oddly muted coverage of the matter, focusing more on McConnell’s legacy than the severity of the incident.

That silence contrasts sharply with the treatment of any Republican health issue that might affect power dynamics on Capitol Hill.

If this were a political figure on the left, networks would undoubtedly be broadcasting medical speculation around the clock.

As Washington continues to hum with rumors, what remains certain is that McConnell’s health will be closely watched in the coming months.

Whether this latest medical emergency forces any change in Senate leadership or operation remains to be seen.

For now, his team insists the senator is alert, in contact with his staff, and still managing key responsibilities remotely.

Republicans in the Senate are keeping their focus on blocking President Biden’s legislative agenda, battling inflationary policies, and safeguarding conservative judicial priorities.

Yet behind closed doors, there is little denying that questions about their leader’s physical stamina linger.

McConnell’s presence has long served as a symbol of steadiness during chaotic times in Washington.

But as another medical incident shakes that image, the issue no longer appears to be whether he can steer through political storms, but whether his own health can keep him at the helm long enough to do it.

News

Global Hawk Drones Shift from Guam to Tokyo, Bolstering U.S. Recon in Pacific Hot Zone

The U.S. Air Force’s decision to permanently relocate its RQ-4 Global Hawk reconnaissance drones from Guam to Yokota Air Base just outside Tokyo is being hailed by national security experts as a smart, overdue move that plants American eyes and ears firmly on the Pacific’s front lines.

The move underscores the growing significance of Japan’s role as a forward operating partner while giving U.S. commanders greater agility in monitoring hotspots like Taiwan and the South China Sea.

The shift involves three Global Hawk aircraft and roughly 150 personnel from the 4th Reconnaissance Squadron, 319th Operations Group.

Japan’s Defense and Foreign Ministries jointly announced the relocation in late May, calling it a tangible sign of the alliance’s continued strength and shared deterrence posture in the Pacific.

Though the public announcement came only recently, analysts like Ralph Cossa, former president of the Pacific Forum think tank in Hawaii, said the only surprise was that this strategic repositioning took so long.

In his words, “This sends a signal of U.S. commitment to Japan and also increases U.S. ability to respond to Taiwan contingencies.”

In other words, America’s modernization of its Pacific presence continues at full throttle.

For years, the Global Hawks have operated out of Andersen Air Force Base, Guam — a crucial but weather-beaten hub. Guam’s location places it in the crosshairs of nearly every typhoon season.

Those destructive storms aren’t just an operational inconvenience; they’re a direct threat to America’s billion-dollar hardware and mission tempo. Squadron commander Lt. Col. Adam Otten put it plainly: “It has an impact on operations. For the RQ-4, this is the right place to be.”

That argument makes sense. Typhoon Mawar in 2023, for example, battered Guam so severely that repairs dragged on for years. By basing the Global Hawks further north, the Air Force avoids repeated interruptions and ensures predictable operational readiness year-round. In tactical terms, Yokota simply makes sense.

Air Force Permanently Stations Global Hawk Recon Drones in Japan Amid Rising Pacific Tensions
Air Force Maj. Marc Nichols, 452nd Flight Test Squadron assistant director of operations, inspects an RQ-4 Global Hawk remotely piloted aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., April 6, 2020.

The Global Hawk Block 40 is a workhorse of modern intelligence gathering — capable of long-endurance, high-altitude surveillance that delivers detailed imagery and signals intelligence over vast distances.

From their new home in Tokyo, these drones can cover the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and even the South China Sea almost as effectively as they could from Guam, according to Leland Bettis of the Pacific Center for Island Security. Geography is destiny, and Tokyo now sits in the sweet spot for near-instant response.

The new positioning also complements broader reorganizations within U.S. Forces Japan.

Analysts like Grant Newsham of the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies point to a major push to transform U.S. command structure in Japan into a real warfighting command, capable of seamless coordination across air, sea, and cyber domains.

“It simplifies operations and makes them more efficient and also tends to create an important level of familiarity between all parts of the command,” Newsham said.

That operational synergy is vital, particularly with China expanding its naval presence and air patrols in the region.

Air Force Permanently Stations Global Hawk Recon Drones in Japan Amid Rising Pacific Tensions
Air Force Airman 1st Class Bryant Vides-Perlera pulls chocks beside an RQ-4 Global Hawk remotely piloted aircraft as it’s towed across the flightline at Grand Forks Air Force Base, N.D., Oct. 23, 2020.

Beijing’s aggressive posturing around Taiwan continues to raise alarms among America’s allies, and having Globally integrated ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) assets like the Global Hawks closer to the action dramatically improves situational awareness.

The drones are now stationed on Yokota’s east side, alongside the newly opened U.S. Space Force Japan headquarters and near hangars soon to host CV-22 Osprey aircraft.

That kind of joint basing isn’t just convenient — it’s a powerful symbol of unified combat capability across services. From orbit to ocean, the Pacific is under a sharper watch.

Critics in Japan who worry about safety and noise have little to stand on. The RQ-4 is not some booming jet engine tearing across the sky but a quiet, unmanned intelligence platform.

“We have very well-trained personnel that operate one of the safest airframes in the Air Force inventory,” Lt. Col. Otten assured.

Air Force Permanently Stations Global Hawk Recon Drones in Japan Amid Rising Pacific Tensions
An Air Force RQ-4B Global Hawk arrives at Yokota Air Base on May 27, 2026. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Jacob Wood.

Years of temporary deployments to Japan since 2014 have already helped calm public nerves and demonstrate the drones’ minimal impact.

From a strategic perspective, this relocation sends a clear message not only to Japan’s citizens but also to America’s adversaries.

The United States isn’t retreating or shrinking back. It’s doubling down — tightening its operational mesh across the Indo-Pacific with America’s most advanced reconnaissance technology and aligning its command structures to be faster, smarter, and closer to potential conflict zones.

For allies like Japan and Taiwan, this signals reassurance. For China, it’s a flashing warning light: the U.S. presence is growing more integrated, more permanent, and better positioned than ever before.

Drones might not win wars alone, but in this new Pacific chess match, the Global Hawks have just claimed a front-row seat.

News

Blue City Sparks Fury After Raising Somali Flag Days Before July Fourth [WATCH]

City officials in Columbus, Ohio, decided to mark Somali Independence Day by raising a foreign flag just days before America’s own Independence Day, and residents are not taking it lightly.

The ceremony, which honored the Republic of Somalia’s founding in 1960, took place outside Columbus City Hall, and almost immediately the backlash began to flood in.

Columbus may have one of the largest Somali populations in the United States, but that did not stop locals from questioning why a government building in the heart of America chose to put a foreign flag in the spotlight right before the nation’s birthday.

Critics say the timing is more than questionable.

As one resident put it online, if you cannot rally around Old Glory heading into the Fourth of July, maybe you should not be running the city.

The symbolism struck many as another example of woke leadership in blue cities putting globalism above patriotism.

The event, intended as a community celebration, has long been part of Columbus’s efforts to honor its immigrant populations.

In previous years, City Hall has been illuminated in blue, and Somali community leaders have given speeches celebrating their heritage.

But this year, the optics hit differently. With tensions over immigration, crime, and national unity already simmering, the flag raising looked like yet another tone-deaf move from Democratic city hall officials.

Local leaders defended the ceremony, calling it a gesture of inclusion and community recognition.

To them, honoring the Somali community was a way to show unity.

WATCH:

City representatives touted the Somali-American population’s economic and cultural contributions, noting that many have become business owners, students, and active participants in civic life across Central Ohio.

But critics argue that honoring a foreign nation at a government building just before Independence Day sends the wrong message.

Conservative voices online blasted Columbus leaders for pushing “diversity day” symbolism instead of emphasizing American patriotism.

Some pointed out that city leaders did not organize such a visible tribute to American veterans or first responders before the Fourth.

Social media quickly became the battleground for a familiar culture clash.

Ordinary residents voiced frustration with what they see as misplaced priorities.

“You are flying another flag days before our Independence Day. This is not unity. It is disrespect,” one commenter said.

The sentiment spread fast, and hashtags questioning the city’s leadership began trending locally.

To many observers, this incident is not isolated.

It follows a growing pattern where liberal-run cities appear more concerned with signaling international solidarity than reinforcing basic American identity.

In the minds of many conservatives, the raising of the Somali flag became a symbol of something bigger: how modern urban politics have lost touch with working-class patriotism.

Democrat-controlled cities like Columbus, Minneapolis, and Seattle have been facing growing unrest over immigration-related costs, housing issues, public safety, and strained social resources.

Against that backdrop, choosing to raise a foreign flag rather than focus exclusively on the Stars and Stripes felt to many like salt in the wound.

Even some moderates expressed confusion over why a city that belongs to American taxpayers would choose to highlight another nation’s flag right before the Fourth of July.

They pointed out that such gestures deepen a sense of division instead of unity at a time when Americans crave a return to shared pride in the nation itself.

Supporters of the Somali flag event insisted it was nothing more than cultural recognition.

They said it helps foster community ties.

Yet that defense fell flat with those who believe the Left’s obsession with intersectional gestures often ends up eroding rather than celebrating what it means to be American.

For many citizens in Columbus, the reaction is simple: you can celebrate your heritage without letting it eclipse the flag that unites everyone.

The American flag is for all citizens, regardless of background.

A foreign flag on government grounds days before Independence Day feels like a reminder that patriotism now has to compete for attention in places run by progressive politicians.

What should have been a simple summer celebration has deepened the divide between city leaders and the people they claim to serve.

In the end, the Somali flag episode has become less about the celebration of one community and more about the fading sense of national pride in cities run by Democrats.

July Fourth is supposed to bring Americans together under one banner.

In Columbus, the city managed to turn that moment into a political argument over which flag deserves to fly higher.

News

Brennan Launches Lawsuit to Stop Trump Officials From Disposing Federal Probe Records [WATCH]

Former CIA Director John Brennan has filed a federal lawsuit seeking to require the Trump administration to preserve records connected to ongoing federal investigations involving him, arguing the documents could become important if prosecutors eventually pursue criminal charges, as reported by Breitbart.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, asks a court to order the government to maintain emails, calendars, messages, and other official communications tied to the inquiries.

Brennan contends those records may be necessary to determine why the investigations were launched and whether any future prosecution would be based on evidence or political retaliation.

According to the complaint, Brennan believes preserving the records now is necessary because relevant government documents could be deleted or lost before any criminal case reaches a courtroom.

His legal team argues that maintaining the materials would ensure they remain available if questions later arise about how the investigations were conducted.

The lawsuit also cites years of public criticism directed at Brennan by President Donald Trump.

Brennan’s attorneys argue that the president’s repeated comments regarding the former intelligence official demonstrate what they describe as a longstanding effort to punish him for his tenure as CIA director and for his public criticism of Trump.

Brennan’s lawyers argue those circumstances could become significant if prosecutors ultimately decide to seek an indictment.

“To fully consider those motions, the reviewing judge would need to scrutinize the motivations of the Justice Department officials who directed, oversaw, or undertook those actions to determine whether they violated Director Brennan’s rights, and specifically whether they were motivated by a desire to vindictively prosecute him as an act of retribution,” Brennan’s lawyers wrote in the lawsuit.

In addition to requesting preservation of records, the complaint warns that government communications connected to the investigations—including emails, electronic messages, calendars, and other official records—could disappear unless a federal judge orders agencies to retain them.

Brennan’s attorneys argue that those materials may later be necessary to evaluate whether the investigations complied with legal requirements and whether they were handled appropriately.

The lawsuit names President Donald Trump and several senior administration officials as defendants.

Those named include acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, U.S. Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones, and Justice Department special counsel Joe diGenova.

The legal action follows a Department of Justice investigation that began after House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan submitted a criminal referral to the DOJ last year.

Jordan alleged that Brennan made false statements to Congress during testimony in 2023 concerning how the U.S. intelligence community prepared its assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Brennan has denied those allegations and maintains that the investigation is politically motivated.

According to the lawsuit, prosecutors initially subpoenaed witnesses to testify before a federal grand jury as part of the investigation. Those subpoenas were later withdrawn, and prosecutors instead requested that witnesses participate in voluntary interviews.

Brennan’s lawsuit seeks to ensure that all records related to the federal inquiries remain intact while the investigation continues.

His attorneys argue that preserving those documents now would protect evidence that could become relevant if criminal charges are eventually filed and if Brennan later challenges the basis for the government’s actions in court.

The case centers on whether federal agencies should be required to preserve investigative records before any criminal prosecution has been initiated.

Brennan argues that maintaining those materials is necessary to safeguard information that could be used to examine the government’s decision-making process if the investigation advances further.

News

Mamdani Tells New Yorkers to Crank Up Thermostats to 78 While People Swelter in Deadly Heat [WATCH]

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is urging residents and businesses to conserve energy as dangerous temperatures grip the Northeast and Midwest ahead of the Independence Day holiday weekend, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

On Wednesday, Mamdani asked New Yorkers to prepare for the extreme heat by creating a personal heat safety plan while also encouraging businesses to raise their thermostats to reduce strain on the city’s electrical grid.

Temperatures are expected to climb into the triple digits across parts of the Midwest and East Coast this week, with heat index values in some locations expected to reach as high as 112 degrees.

“I am asking every New Yorker to make a heat plan before the worst of this weather arrives,” Mamdani said Wednesday.

“The best protection against extreme heat is air conditioning. If you don’t have it at home, know now where you’ll go to stay cool. Check in on your neighbors, especially seniors, and if you see someone outside who appears to be in distress, call 311 so we can get help to them. This administration is using every tool we have to keep New Yorkers safe, but the strongest city is one where neighbors look out for one another.”

The mayor also called on business owners to help reduce electricity demand during the period of extreme heat.

“And to every business owner, please set your thermostats to 78 degrees to alleviate the stress on our grid,” Mamdani told New Yorkers.

The remarks came as the city expanded its response to what officials described as a historic heat wave expected to continue through the July 4 holiday weekend.

According to City Hall, Mamdani released a public service announcement encouraging residents to make a heat plan, check on family members and neighbors, and use the cooling resources available throughout all five boroughs.

City officials said the mayor convened agency leaders earlier this week to coordinate additional emergency measures designed to protect residents during the prolonged period of dangerous temperatures.

The latest actions build upon the city’s Heat Emergency Plan announced earlier in the week.

Among the expanded measures, New York City is extending operating hours at Olympic-sized and intermediate-sized outdoor pools until 8:30 p.m., allowing residents additional evening access to relief from the heat.

The city is also opening eight additional municipal buildings as cooling centers from noon until midnight between July 3 and July 5. Another 10 public library branches will serve as cooling centers throughout the holiday weekend.

Officials also announced an expansion of outreach efforts for vulnerable residents. The city is adding 150 volunteers, increasing its total street outreach workforce to more than 600 people.

In addition to asking businesses to set thermostats at 78 degrees, city officials are encouraging all New Yorkers to conserve electricity during periods of peak energy demand to help reduce stress on the power grid.

NYC Emergency Management Commissioner Christina Farrell emphasized that residents themselves can play a major role in protecting one another during the dangerous weather.

“We have deployed every resource this city has, but our most powerful tool isn’t a forecast or a cooling center. It’s a New Yorker,” Farrell said.

“The neighbor who knocks on the door, the family member who calls to check in, the stranger who stops to help. This holiday week, we are asking every New Yorker to look out for one another so that no one faces this heat alone. Visit nyc.gov/beattheheat or call 311 to find a cooling center near you and get the resources you need to beat the heat.”

The city continues to encourage residents to monitor weather conditions, locate nearby cooling centers if needed, check on elderly neighbors and relatives, and seek air-conditioned spaces during the hottest portions of the day as the heat wave continues through the Independence Day weekend.

News

Stephen Miller: ‘This Is Absolutely a Deep Knife Wound in the Heart of the American Republic’ [WATCH]

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller said he had mixed emotions following the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision on birthright citizenship, calling the ruling a significant setback while praising several other recent victories for President Donald Trump before the nation’s highest court.

Miller discussed the decision during an interview with Jesse Watters, who asked for his reaction after the ruling was released.

“Stephen Miller, so, Stephen, how did you feel when you saw the decision come down?” Watters asked.

Miller said his response was shaped by two competing thoughts.

“Well, I had two feelings. First, the fact that it was five four, so agonizingly close, just underscored that the legal community on the right and left has been so wrong for so many years, saying this is going to be a nine zero ruling against President Trump,” Miller said.

While acknowledging the narrow margin, Miller said his larger concern centered on what he believes the ruling means for the future of the country.

“The heartbreaking part of this is thinking about what it means for America over the long term. Well, the short term, in the long term,” Miller said.

Miller contrasted the birthright citizenship decision with what he described as a series of major Supreme Court victories for the Trump administration.

“Look, President Trump won some massive, unprecedented victories with the Supreme Court, like the Haitian TPS ruling, the asylum ruling, the slaughter ruling, giving him unfettered authority to terminate federal bureaucrats,” Miller said.

Despite those rulings, Miller said he believes the birthright citizenship decision represents a serious blow.

“But this is absolutely a deep knife wound in the heart of the American Republic,” Miller said.

To explain his position, Miller used an analogy involving an airplane.

“Look, Jesse, I can step tomorrow onto the deck of a 747 It does not mean that I am the pilot of that plane, I’m qualified to fly it. Just physically being on US soil does not make you a citizen or qualified to carry on are capable of executing the inheritance of this country,” Miller said.

Miller argued that current interpretations of birthright citizenship allow foreigners to obtain U.S. citizenship in a manner he believes was never intended by the Constitution.

“We have people from all over the world, from third world nations, nations that on their own would have never invented the wheel, let alone modern technology, let alone medicine, let alone air travel, and they can just come into the country, have a baby at a hospital paid for by you and me, and then that baby is automatically a citizen,” Miller said.

He continued by describing what he sees as the long-term consequences of that policy.

“That baby can sit on a jury when he turns 18 and sit in judgment of you and sit in judgment of me and sit in judgment of our loved ones. Can decide who our mayors are, our governors are, our presidents are,” Miller said.

According to Miller, citizenship loses its significance if it is automatically granted under those circumstances.

“Citizenship means nothing if it is open to everyone,” Miller said.

Miller also offered another hypothetical example.

“The idea that you can have a cruise ship filled with foreigners and they just dock at a port for an hour and someone has a baby, Jesse, the baby is an American citizen, they can vote in every election for the rest of their lives, they can be living in a foreign country and cashing welfare checks from American citizens,” Miller said.

Miller criticized the constitutional reasoning behind the ruling, arguing that the 14th Amendment does not apply in the way he believes some justices have interpreted it.

“Look, I know that some of the justices who worked on this, they think that they’re so intelligent. There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything,” Miller said.

He also argued that constitutional interpretation should not produce outcomes he believes are harmful to the nation.

“And here’s another point. Here’s a pretty good clue your constitutional interpretation is wrong. If your ruling requires you to suicide your civilization, your reading of the Constitution is wrong,” Miller said.

Miller concluded by thanking President Trump for pursuing the issue and expressing confidence that additional action could eventually bring changes to birthright citizenship.

“President Grant and the congressman in the 19th century did not want to create an automatic third world citizenship requirement for America, it’s an abomination, but let’s thank President Trump, because of President Trump’s courage and leadership. We are now on the precipice. Yes, we were dealt a setback, but because of his courage alone, we’re on the precipice as a nation of being in a position to end this travesty once and for all, and that’s what you have to fight for,” Miller said.

WATCH:

News

Woke NBC Anchor Melts Down Over Supreme Court’s Use Of The Term ‘Biological Male’ [WATCH]

NBC News anchor Craig Melvin apparently believes that the words “biological male” and “biological female” are so radioactive they require a televised trigger warning.

During a recent broadcast discussing the Supreme Court’s decision upholding state laws protecting women’s sports from transgender intrusion, Melvin issued a disclaimer so over the top it could only come from a network terrified of offending the alphabet lobby.

He solemnly told viewers that NBC was using those terms only because they came directly from the court’s ruling, as if the phrase were some kind of hate speech rather than basic scientific reality.

Melvin’s tone was one of cautious detachment, the kind a hostage might use when made to read a note at gunpoint.

He practically begged forgiveness for quoting the justices at all.

The Court’s ruling, a victory for fairness in competition and for Title IX protections, acknowledged what every honest person already knows.

Males have innate physiological advantages that make competing against females catastrophic for women’s sports.

Conservatives applauded the decision as a long overdue return to sanity, while media elites like Melvin responded as though the Supreme Court had just committed an unspeakable act of linguistic violence.

This is the same Craig Melvin who back in 2020 lectured his audience that the network could not use the word “riot” to describe the violent chaos engulfing Minneapolis after George Floyd’s death.

Despite buildings burning behind reporters, NBC stubbornly insisted on calling it “mostly peaceful protests.” That level of narrative control was breathtaking then, and now it seems NBC is applying the same logic to biology itself.

The spectacle of a national news anchor issuing a verbal purity test before uttering words that describe objective, verifiable facts says everything about the state of our press.

Any deviation from the approved ideological script sends them into immediate panic. They cannot even report a Supreme Court decision without signaling loyalty to the woke mob first.

Melvin’s disclaimer reads like a parody of media absurdity.

His carefully repeated explanation that “biological male” and “biological female” appeared in quotation marks in the decision sounded more like a plea for absolution than responsible reporting.

It was as though he was hoping activists lurking in NBC’s HR department would not come knocking after the segment.

The left’s demand that Americans ignore biological difference in the name of “inclusion” has reached comical levels.

It is not intolerance to note that male athletes possess faster muscle recovery, higher bone density, and increased lung capacity compared to females.

It is simply biology, something reporters like Melvin apparently find too terrifying to acknowledge without corporate warning labels.

More than that, the spectacle reveals how deeply woke ideology has infiltrated mainstream journalism.

The very journalists who once prided themselves on speaking truth to power now apologize for repeating facts observable to anyone with a high school education.

Their job used to be to inform the public.

Now it is to indoctrinate them.

WATCH:

Viewers remember the now infamous scene on MSNBC where reporter Ali Velshi stood before a wall of fire and insisted riots were not “generally speaking, unruly.”

The denial of reality could not have been more blatant. The same network is now denying basic biology with a straight face. Melvin and his colleagues seem determined to prove that absurdity is NBC’s most consistent product.

Perhaps the most ironic part of Melvin’s performance is that he openly admitted the phrases came from the nation’s highest court.

So NBC is not merely correcting conservatives; it is effectively correcting the Supreme Court of the United States for daring to acknowledge human biology.

That takes the arrogance of liberal media to new heights.

The idea that describing someone as a biological male should require a disclaimer tells you everything about the cultural rot consuming the corporate press.

These people fear Twitter mobs more than they respect the truth. They are so invested in ideology that accuracy has become the enemy.

Biological reality is not up for debate, regardless of how many network anchors clutch their pearls over it.

The fact remains that biology determines sex, and that fact has profound implications in sports, science, and law.

Americans know this, even if NBC pretends otherwise.

Let the woke media issue as many warnings as they want. They can tiptoe around the truth forever, but reality will not bend to their feelings.

Women’s sports deserve protection, not fantasy.

The Supreme Court recognized it.

The rest of us already knew it.

And no amount of network disclaimers can cancel the truth.

News

Kamala Harris Cozying Up To Anti Israel Leftists As She Eyes 2028 White House Run [WATCH]

Kamala Harris is once again trying to reinvent herself, and this time she is dialing up the far left.

The former vice president has been reaching out to anti-Israel progressives such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and other socialist activists as she works to secure her position at the front of the 2028 Democratic primary race.

According to Axios, Harris initiated a call to Mamdani right after hardline left wing candidates crushed establishment Democrats in the recent New York primaries.

Sources say the conversation revolved around the future of the Democratic Party and Harris’s renewed effort to appeal to the activist base that abandoned Joe Biden in 2024.

Mamdani, who is as far from a moderate as they come, said Harris congratulated him on his endorsements and success in promoting socialist victories.

“The vice president reached out to have a conversation, and we’ve had a brief conversation,” Mamdani told SiriusXM’s “The Clay Cane Show.”

“We’ve been in touch over the last few months, and I really do appreciate her outreach.”

That “outreach” appears to be part of a broader effort by Harris to charm the radical wing that nearly torpedoed the Democratic ticket two years ago.

Another activist, Abbas Alawieh, co-founder of the Uncommitted Movement that protested Biden’s support for Israel, said Harris has been aggressively contacting him as well.

Alawieh bragged on X that he had “multiple phone calls” with Harris and met her in Detroit, claiming he told her about relatives supposedly killed in Gaza by Israeli airstrikes.

He also lectured her that “American tax dollars must never be used to target civilians and destroy entire communities.”

He later encouraged her to side with “peace-loving Americans against endless wars,” language that has become code for demanding Washington abandon Israel.

It is notable that Alawieh’s Michigan district includes Dearborn, where the mayor refused to endorse Harris in 2024 and Rep. Rashida Tlaib also withheld her support.

Michigan Democrats have long been divided over Israel, and Harris appears eager to shift further left to secure any possible votes she can find.

Harris also reportedly reached out to Democratic National Committee member James Zogby, another long standing Palestinian activist.

Clearly, this is not an accident or one off call.

It is a deliberate pattern intended to show progressives she is one of them, or at least can pretend to be one of them when an election is near.

WATCH:

Just days after Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race, Harris was already trying to reset her image.

She publicly declared Israel had killed “far too many” civilians in its war against Hamas and said she “would not be silent,” a pointed rebuke coming right after Biden met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

That statement came with applause from the campus left but alarm from pro Israel Democrats who saw it as pandering to the mob.

To cover her bases, Harris also sought meetings with Uncommitted Movement figures to discuss possibly cutting off arms sales to Israel if she won the presidency.

Yet in the next breath she turned around and told Jewish voters she would “stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself.”

It is classic Harris politics, trying to play every side, saying whatever might win her the next primary or headline.

Voter data show her strategy still has serious holes.

Harris largely maintained Biden’s share of the Jewish vote from 2020 to 2024, but President Donald Trump improved dramatically among Muslim Americans, while Harris plummeted.

The Council on American Islamic Relations found that Harris captured barely 20 percent of Muslim voters in 2024, a clear signal that her political act is not convincing many.

Meanwhile, the leftward slide of the Democratic Party continues.

In the New York primary last week, anti Israel candidates backed by the Democratic Socialists of America toppled several incumbents.

DSA candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier ousted five term Rep. Adriano Espaillat in a Manhattan and Bronx district.

And in another stunning upset, Rep. Dan Goldman lost his seat to Brad Lander, a former DSA member who accused Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza.

Though unannounced, Harris currently sits atop RealClearPolitics polling averages for the 2028 primary with 27 percent support.

California Governor Gavin Newsom follows at 17 percent, with Pete Buttigieg and Alexandria Ocasio Cortez trailing behind.

When asked by Al Sharpton in April about her plans, Harris giggled, “I might. I’m thinking about it. I’ll keep you posted.”

That coy response is probably the most honest thing she has said in months. She is thinking about it, and her latest maneuver proves it.

She is trying to lock down the activist base early, even if that means sitting down with the same anti Israel crusaders who spent years torching moderates in her own party.

Whether her careful courtship of the far left will help her is another question entirely.

For many Americans, these conversations show exactly who Harris is choosing to align with, and it says plenty about what kind of administration she would run if she ever got the chance.


Scroll to Top