Author name: RVM News

President Trump Unveils Historic Midterm Convention to Energize GOP for 2026 [WATCH]
News

President Trump Unveils Historic Midterm Convention to Energize GOP for 2026 [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump has once again proven that he is not content to play by Washington’s tired old rules.

On Tuesday, the forty-fifth president announced what he called the first-ever Republican midterm convention, a two-day event set for September in Dallas, Texas, designed to fire up conservatives ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, as reported by Trending Politics News.

In a Truth Social post that immediately set the political world buzzing, Trump described the event as a “Historic Event” unlike anything in Republican Party history.

He said it would showcase not only the accomplishments of his America First administration but also the bright future of a reinvigorated GOP that continues to win the hearts of working Americans.

“BIG NEWS! For the first time ever, the Republican Party will hold a MIDTERM CONVENTION,” Trump wrote.

“It will be in Dallas, Texas, one of my favorite places in the world. It will be fantastic! It has never been done before, and will be a truly Historic Event.”

That is classic Trump flair: bold, optimistic, and unapologetically forward-looking.

The President said the convention will center around what he’s calling “The Great American Comeback,” celebrating his focus on energy independence, job growth, border security, and restoring the American Dream.

Trump laid out a list of achievements under his leadership that he says embody the country’s direction under an America First agenda.

“NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY, STRONGER BORDERS, SAFEST EVER COMMUNITIES, LOWER COSTS AND REAL AFFORDABILITY, MORE JOBS, AMERICAN ENERGY DOMINANCE, AND SO MUCH MORE!” he declared.

The announcement showcased his knack for turning even a simple party gathering into a national movement. For Trump, the midterm convention is not just about ballot boxes; it is about pride in country and proof that conservative principles deliver results.

Trump also highlighted strong progress on foreign policy and energy, two areas where his administration consistently drew sharp contrast with Washington’s globalist class.

“Oil Prices are dropping sharply, even as we denuclearize Iran,” he wrote. “We are delivering on the promises that politicians talked about for decades, but never got done.”

That message will surely resonate with working Americans watching their energy bills rise under the current administration’s green agenda.

The Dallas event will reportedly bring together a wide swath of Americans who exemplify the country’s entrepreneurial and patriotic spirit.

Trump announced that business leaders, innovators, manufacturers, first responders, and job creators will take part, all representing a country that thrives when its people are empowered rather than burdened by bureaucrats in Washington.

“At the Event, we will have hardworking Americans, our Great Innovators, Entrepreneurs, Manufacturers, First Responders, and Job Creators who are powering our Nation’s Golden Age, and proving that America’s best days are still ahead of us,” Trump said.

And in vintage Trump fashion, he promised that this would not be a typical political snooze fest.

“We will also have lots of Great Entertainment. It will be a RALLY like none other!” he wrote, signaling that the convention will combine celebration, patriotism, and the high energy that defined his campaign rallies.

As Republicans look toward 2026, Trump’s Dallas gathering will likely serve as both a pep rally and a unifying strategy session.

With control of Congress at stake, and Democrats struggling under the weight of unpopular policies, the timing could not be better for the GOP to harness Trump’s unmatched ability to mobilize voters across working-class America.

Midterms are traditionally a referendum on the sitting president’s administration, and if current trends hold, that does not bode well for Democrats.

Trump’s plan to make the midterms a showcase for American revival could spell major trouble for the left.

Trump also tied the event to the coming semiquincentennial celebration, reminding Americans that the country’s 250th birthday is near.

“America’s 250th Birthday is approaching, and together, we are building the foundation for the NEXT 250 YEARS of American Greatness,” he wrote.

“Dallas will take center stage on September 9th and 10th as we celebrate our Nation, our achievements, and our bright future.”

He closed with his trademark optimism. “THE GOLDEN AGE OF AMERICA HAS ONLY JUST BEGUN!” It is hard to miss the symbolism.

Trump wants conservatives to see themselves not as a party of resistance to decline but as the movement that drives the next chapter of American greatness.

The Republican National Committee is expected to release more details in the coming weeks, including the venue, ticketing, and a lineup of speakers.

Given Trump’s influence and knack for spectacle, Dallas is shaping up to be ground zero for the next conservative surge and a loud declaration that the Republican Party is not done winning.

Oversight Project Urges ICE To Expel Pregnant Illegal Immigrants After SCOTUS Citizenship Decision [WATCH]
News

Oversight Project Urges ICE To Expel Pregnant Illegal Immigrants After SCOTUS Citizenship Decision [WATCH]

/

The Oversight Project wasted no time weighing in after the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on birthright citizenship sent shockwaves through Washington, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The group made it clear that if an illegal immigrant is pregnant or has already given birth on American soil, they should be deported along with their entire family, “regardless of ill-gotten citizenship of that child.”

That statement, blunt and unapologetic, leaves no room for the kind of political dance most bureaucrats prefer.

The message is simple: illegal entry has consequences, and giving birth in the United States should not serve as a golden ticket to stay.

The Supreme Court’s ruling marked the most significant development on the issue of birthright citizenship in decades.

The Court decided that children born to parents in the country illegally do not automatically receive United States citizenship.

That decision undercuts years of liberal judicial activism that stretched the Fourteenth Amendment beyond its original intent.

For years, progressives have used the birthright loophole to expand illegal immigration.

The promise that any child born here would be a citizen encouraged so-called birth tourism and a shadow policy of anchor babies who tether entire families to American soil.

Conservatives have long warned about the dangerous incentives such policies create, yet Washington elites repeatedly ignored them.

The Oversight Project’s call for action could reignite the debate about ICE enforcement under an administration already accused of being soft on illegal immigration.

With record numbers of crossings at the southern border, critics argue that deportation policy must reflect the seriousness of the crisis.

Saying “come one, come all” to those who cross illegally and plan to give birth in American hospitals only strains the system even more.

The group’s statement cuts through the political noise and puts the responsibility squarely on federal law enforcement. If the law means anything, ICE should carry out deportations swiftly and without apology.

Activists on the left have already called the statement cruel and inhumane, conveniently forgetting that immigration law exists to protect national sovereignty, not to bend to emotional appeals.

The Oversight Project’s stance echoes a growing frustration among voters who see the border crisis as a deliberate policy failure.

Washington bureaucrats and open borders advocates have long treated enforcement as optional, turning the immigration system into a chaotic mess.

The Supreme Court ruling and reactions like this one reveal how fed-up Americans are with that double standard.

For decades, taxpayer-funded benefits have gone to anchor families who entered illegally, burdening schools, healthcare systems, and public welfare.

When citizens complain, they are accused of lacking compassion. Yet, it is not compassion to reward lawbreaking. The left’s fixation on feelings over law and order has left communities struggling to maintain control.

Now, with this renewed focus on fair enforcement, ICE faces a crucial test of its integrity. Will it act on the Court’s decision or continue to back away under political pressure from the White House and its allies?

Many conservatives are watching closely, expecting leadership that values the rule of law over activist outrage.

Supporters of strict enforcement argue that taking real action will discourage future waves of illegal migration.

If migrants know that giving birth in the United States no longer guarantees citizenship or protection, they may reconsider the dangerous trek through cartel-controlled territories.

Dismantling false incentives can save lives and restore the integrity of the border.

Meanwhile, liberal lawmakers are already drafting responses aimed at undermining the Court’s decision.

Expect emotional speeches about “innocent children” and “family separation” to dominate cable news as Democrats search for a political edge before the next election.

The Oversight Project’s statement, however, signals that not every organization will be bullied into silence by media hysteria.

Conservatives across the nation are rallying around the idea that national borders matter. They see this as a moment to reclaim the principle that American citizenship carries weight, value, and responsibility.

Every sovereign country has the right to decide who belongs within its borders; pretending otherwise turns law into suggestion.

Regardless of how heated the rhetoric becomes, the Oversight Project’s consistency stands out. It refuses to blur the moral lines that separate lawful immigration from criminal trespass.

To many Americans, that kind of clarity feels like a breath of fresh air after years of Washington doublespeak. The debate is far from over, but the message is unmistakable: the United States must start enforcing its laws without apology.

Jill Biden’s Memoir Tanks After Flashy Launch And Phony Bestseller Hype [WATCH]
News

Jill Biden’s Memoir Tanks After Flashy Launch And Phony Bestseller Hype [WATCH]

/

Jill Biden’s new memoir arrived with all the showmanship and marketing magic that the Biden political brand has come to rely on.

Gallery Books released View from the East Wing on June 2 as the first lady’s classy retelling of life in the White House. It was billed as her heartfelt inside story, complete with reflections on family, teaching, and her husband’s political rise and fall, as reported by PJ Media.

The book shot to the top of the New York Times Hardcover Nonfiction list on June 21, giving the Biden family one last moment to bask in borrowed glory.

But like a campaign built on slogans rather than substance, the shine did not last long. By June 28, it slipped to number three, and by July 5, it was gone entirely.

The self-styled portrait of resilience turned into a case study in inflated momentum and rapid collapse.

The key detail many missed was the small dagger printed beside that original “No. 1” spot. The symbol appears when bulk sales influence the ranking, and that little mark tells a much larger story.

In the publishing world, bulk orders are used to pad early sales during author tours and corporate events, which can make a book appear more successful than it really is. Jill Biden’s debut carried that mark from day one.

Industry insiders admit that large orders come with the territory for political celebrities. Stores hosting events buy hundreds of copies for attendees.

Technically, those orders count as genuine sales, but they often say more about marketing coordination than public demand. It is not fraud, just carefully orchestrated optics. And that has always been the Biden family specialty.

According to the New York Post, by the week ending June 20, the book sold just over three thousand print copies that week and had barely crossed twenty-nine thousand total U.S. sales

. Those numbers are nothing to brag about for a figure of her stature, given the White House platform and glowing media coverage she received. Even so, the Times list credited her with a supposed bestseller title, albeit one that vanished as fast as it appeared.

The broader theme is familiar. The Biden world has long expected Americans to buy into the appearance of momentum rather than confront the visible signs of decline.

They told voters not to believe their eyes when Hunter’s laptop story broke, they asked the public to trust government agencies that claimed the president was fit, and they sold one press-conference smile after another as proof of leadership.

Jill Biden’s book mirrored the pattern perfectly.

Her memoir includes an emotional retelling of that disastrous June 27 debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Jill describes being frightened, thinking her husband might be having a stroke.

It is a startling admission and a deeply human moment, yet it also confirms everything millions of Americans already saw. The weakness, confusion, and fading awareness were not Republican talking points; they were the reason she panicked.

She may have intended the story to show vulnerability and love, but it instead underscored the uncomfortable truth that the Biden inner circle knew their patriarch was in decline.

And yet they pressed forward until the public collapse forced their hand. Within a month, Joe Biden was out of the race, leaving behind a legacy of managed narratives and misplaced loyalty.

Critics have pointed out that Jill Biden’s personal fear might have extended beyond her husband’s health. The luxurious life of the White House, constant media attention, and access to influence can change anyone’s outlook.

Losing all that power, after years in Washington comfort, is not something many willingly surrender. Her book feels like both an explanation and a farewell tour packaged in hardback.

Publishing experts tried to downplay the flop, saying bulk purchases tied to her promotional events explained the early boost. One analyst even insisted it was “not a complete flop” since the memoir lingered briefly on the USA Today list after leaving the Times rankings.

That may be true, but the numbers do not lie. The real public, outside the bubble of media cheerleaders, simply did not buy what she was selling.

Like so many political memoirs before it, View from the East Wing tried to recast failure as courage. It dressed up the collapsing image of the Biden family as devoted public servants battling through adversity.

It was the same story we have heard since 2020, just told from another wing of the same fading mansion.

Once the bulk orders cleared and the public got to vote with their wallets, the verdict came quickly. The bestseller status evaporated, the press moved on, and another piece of the Biden image machine crumbled.

In a fitting twist, her book vanished almost as quickly as her husband’s campaign.

For a family that has built its reputation on managing appearances and controlling narratives, the disappearance of Jill Biden’s bestseller feels poetic.

All the daggers, headlines, and talking points cannot hide the truth that America has moved on. The gloss faded, the sales fell, and even the New York Times symbol told the tale: the stage act is over, and the crowd has left the theater.

Massachusetts Town Warns Residents to Remove American Flags in Latest Woke Meltdown [WATCH]
News

Massachusetts Town Warns Residents to Remove American Flags in Latest Woke Meltdown [WATCH]

/

Just when you think the Left in Massachusetts cannot climb any higher on the crazy ladder, the town of Newbury decides to pick a fight with patriotism itself.

Residents of Plum Island recently received letters warning them to take down their American flags because they might annoy some local shorebirds.

Yes, you read that correctly, the town is worried the sight of Old Glory might disturb the delicate feelings of plovers.

As Red State reported, the letter from the town of Newbury explained that “activities intended to deter protected shorebirds from utilizing suitable habitat may be viewed as harassment or disruption of normal feeding, nesting, or migratory behavior.”

It warned residents that doing something so dangerous as flying a flag could violate the federal Endangered Species Act and carry “significant regulatory and financial penalties.”

Nothing says freedom like government bureaucrats telling citizens their patriotism could result in a fine.

The residents of Plum Island were understandably furious. This was just another example of the nanny state’s obsession with controlling every inch of private property and crushing any visible sign of traditional American values.

It seems that for the Left, the birds’ feelings always come before the rights of taxpayers.

Thankfully, the Pacific Legal Foundation stepped in to defend common sense. The nonprofit law firm, which takes on cases involving individual liberty and property rights, sent its own response to Newbury officials on behalf of resident Marc Sarkady.

Their letter demanded that the town explain exactly what legal authority justified threatening homeowners over flags. It also noted that the letter provided no statute, regulation, or court precedent that supported this overreach.

In other words, the town was acting like a petty tyrant, hoping no one would call them out.

The law firm made it clear that flying decorations or celebrating America on private property is not a federal crime, no matter how sensitive a handful of birds may be. When the word got out, Newbury’s bureaucrats scrambled to backpedal.

Town Administrator Tracy Blais tried to walk the whole thing back with a weak explanation that fooled no one.

She claimed, “The letter merely recited provisions of the law, and the Town is not asserting any threat or legal liability, merely reminding property owners that they live in a very special place which comes along with certain responsibilities.”

She then insisted the town was not claiming any power it did not have. That’s an interesting way of saying, “Please stop being mad at us.”

The truth is that the letter came across as hostile and condescending, not as a friendly neighborhood reminder. It read like the work of mini dictators eager to boss around their residents under the guise of environmental virtue.

Local journalist Tom Shattuck of The Maine Wire reported that plenty of American flags were still waving proudly throughout the island.

He even asked if the town showed the same passion for enforcing rules against Pride flags during Pride Month. No answer was provided, and we all know why.

This latest attempt to shame Americans for loving their country fits perfectly into a pattern we have seen across the nation.

From homeowners’ associations in California banning flags to bureaucratic snitches in Massachusetts, the Left’s obsession with policing patriotism is out of control.

These people fold under the weight of their own ideology, prioritizing virtue signaling over common sense and freedom.

It is telling that the same crowd that never misses a chance to fly every flag under the rainbow loses their minds when the Stars and Stripes appear. Ordinary Americans see right through it.

They know this kind of nonsense has nothing to do with plovers or wildlife protection and everything to do with suppressing national pride.

The idea that a fluttering piece of fabric could disrupt a bird’s day is as laughable as it is insulting.

The backlash in Newbury has been swift and satisfying. Residents are holding their ground, showing that they refuse to surrender their basic rights to overzealous bureaucrats.

The Left can try to police patriotism all they want, but real Americans are not playing their game.

As we near our nation’s 250th birthday, the people determined to destroy the American spirit are revealing themselves more clearly than ever.

They can whine about endangered birds all they want. Americans will celebrate this milestone and proudly fly their flags, plovers or no plovers. And the more these local tyrants and woke busybodies fuss about it, the higher those flags will fly.

There is something deeply ironic about supposedly progressive towns like Newbury claiming to defend the natural world from “disruption” while disrupting their own residents’ fundamental freedoms.

The truth is simple. You cannot claim to care about liberty while issuing threats for waving the very symbol of it.

If the Left’s mission is to extinguish every sign of national pride, they are in for disappointment. From Massachusetts to California, people are tired of being told what they can celebrate, what they can say, and what they can display on their own property.

The American flag has survived wars, protests, and storms. It will outlast the bureaucrats of Newbury as well.

Moreno’s Power Move: Make Democrats Vote Against Their Own Hero on Birthright Citizenship [WATCH]
News

Moreno’s Power Move: Make Democrats Vote Against Their Own Hero on Birthright Citizenship [WATCH]

/

Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, announced that he plans to reintroduce legislation based on former Sen. Harry Reid’s Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993, saying the proposal would address birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants while making broader changes to immigration policy, as reported by Breitbart.

Moreno made the announcement in a post on X after sharing a report highlighting Reid’s legislation from more than three decades ago.

Responding to a post by Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, Moreno said he intends to bring back what he described as the “exact bill” introduced by the late Nevada Democrat.

“I will reintroduce this exact bill when I return to DC,” Moreno wrote. “Let’s see how today’s DC Democrats will vote when offered the ideas of the Democrat party that used to love this country and the American people!”

According to a press release from Moreno’s office, the legislation will be introduced as the Immigration Stabilization Act of 2026 and will closely follow the framework of Reid’s 1993 proposal.

The measure would make several changes to current immigration law, including reducing legal immigration levels, placing limits on refugee admissions, clarifying birthright citizenship standards, increasing border security resources, and establishing new penalties for non-citizen voting.

Under the proposal, legal immigration would be reduced by restructuring family-based visa categories while setting employment-based immigrant visas to zero.

The legislation would also shift family-based immigration preferences toward parents of adult U.S. citizens.

The bill would also cap annual refugee admissions at 50,000 and require the president to allocate those admissions to applicants with what the legislation describes as the greatest humanitarian need.

One of the proposal’s most significant provisions addresses birthright citizenship.

According to Moreno’s office, the legislation would clarify “that birthright citizenship does not apply to children born in the U.S. to mothers who are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents and who remain subject to a foreign country’s jurisdiction.”

The legislation also includes election-related provisions.

If enacted, it would make it “a federal crime for non-citizens to vote in any federal, state, or local election and nullifies those votes.”

The proposal further calls for expanding border enforcement by increasing the number of Border Patrol agents and imposing user fees on border crossings to help finance enforcement efforts.

A dedicated Border Control Trust Fund would also be established to finance additional Border Patrol personnel, technology, and physical barriers along the border.

Moreno’s announcement follows the Supreme Court’s recent ruling rejecting President Donald Trump’s effort to reform birthright citizenship through executive action.

Although the Court ruled against the administration’s policy, Breitbart News reported that Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that Congress could still address the issue through legislation.

According to Breitbart News, “The decision was 6 to 3 against Trump, but Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued that Trump and other politicians can change the rule via legislation.”

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority, “Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land.’ We keep that promise today.”

In announcing the legislation, Moreno contrasted Reid’s earlier immigration positions with those of today’s Democratic Party.

“Before far-left radicals took over the Democrat Party, their leader, Harry Reid, introduced a great bill to end birthright citizenship, ensure no illegals could vote, and crack down on employers who abuse illegal labor,” Moreno said in a statement, adding that it was “a great bill.”

The legislation is expected to be introduced after Moreno returns to Washington, where lawmakers are expected to continue debating immigration policy following the Supreme Court’s decision.

Florida Woman Mauled to Death by Giant Alligator as Boyfriend Fought Desperately to Save Her [WATCH]
News

Florida Woman Mauled to Death by Giant Alligator as Boyfriend Fought Desperately to Save Her [WATCH]

/

A Florida woman who was killed during an alligator attack while swimming with her boyfriend over the weekend is being remembered through photos and social media posts that reflected her love of the outdoors and adventurous lifestyle, as reported by The New York Post.

Brittany Clark, 31, died after an alligator attacked her Sunday in the Econlockhatchee River at Little Big Econ State Forest, according to Florida wildlife officials.

Photos released following the incident show Clark smiling in a red slip dress just months before the tragedy.

Her social media accounts also documented her interest in outdoor activities, motorcycles, firearms, and music festivals.

According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Clark and her boyfriend had been hiking before deciding to stop and swim in the river.

“They were hiking, and they just stopped to swim,” Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission spokesperson Chad Weber told reporters during a Monday press conference.

Authorities said the attack occurred while Clark was in approximately three feet of water.

“She was bitten on both of her arms,” Weber said.

“The boyfriend was the one that made the phone call. He was trying to get her from the alligator’s mouth, and on the way to the hospital, she did pass away from her injuries.”

Clark’s boyfriend, identified by the Daily Mail as Chance Allison, attempted to rescue her during the attack before calling 911.

Emergency dispatch audio captured the urgency of the situation as those at the scene sought immediate medical assistance.

A woman on the call described Clark’s condition as “horrible,” saying, “one of her arms is completely off, and the other one is like attached barely.”

Another caller pleaded for emergency responders to arrive quickly.

“Bad, real bad, please, hurry… she’s losing a lot of blood… we need to stop the blood,” the caller said.

Clark was transported for medical treatment but died from her injuries while en route to the hospital, according to Weber.

Following the attack, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission officers located the alligator believed to have been involved.

Officials later euthanized the animal and retained its head as evidence as part of the investigation.

Clark’s social media accounts painted the picture of someone who spent much of her free time outdoors. Friends and followers saw frequent posts featuring hiking, motorcycles, firearms, and travel, along with photos from music festivals.

She reportedly worked for several years as a dozer operator while also enjoying raves and outdoor recreation outside of work.

One Instagram post reflected her enthusiasm for music festivals and included the caption: “Physically I’m at work headbanging in my dozer, but mentally I never left Tinker Field.”

Clark also regularly shared photographs of her pets, motorcycles, and firearms, highlighting hobbies that extended well beyond her professional career.

The attack has drawn renewed attention to safety around Florida’s rivers and waterways, where alligators are commonly found throughout the state.

Little Big Econ State Forest, where the incident occurred, is a popular destination for hiking, paddling, and other outdoor recreation.

Florida wildlife officials have not announced any additional enforcement actions beyond removing the alligator believed to have been involved in the fatal attack.

The investigation into the incident remains under the direction of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.

DeLauro Meltdown: Purple Haired Democrat Screams at OMB Director Over Trump Budget Cuts [WATCH]
News

DeLauro Meltdown: Purple Haired Democrat Screams at OMB Director Over Trump Budget Cuts [WATCH]

/

A House Appropriations Committee hearing turned contentious Tuesday as Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., repeatedly confronted Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought over the Trump administration’s spending priorities, foreign aid reductions, and grant review process, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The exchange came as lawmakers examined the administration’s budget proposals for fiscal year 2027.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration released its proposed budget, which includes a 40 percent increase to the $1 trillion defense budget approved by Congress last year, along with a 10 percent reduction in non-defense spending.

During her allotted questioning time, DeLauro accused the administration of failing to carry out spending laws as Congress intended and challenged Vought over reports that political appointees were reviewing federal grants.

“I think you made clear, Director, that you are not going to really carry out the spending laws as Congress intended, and that really is very, very troubling,” DeLauro said.

She argued that grant reviews had contributed to delays at agencies, including the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

“We’ve already seen OMB implementing political review of grants,” she said. “It’s led to massive delays at NSF, the NIH — NIH has had about a 34% decrease in new awards in 2026 compared to what they’ve done in the past.”

DeLauro continued by claiming additional political reviews were occurring at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Office of Extramural Research.

“There have been cases where people are still awaiting approval, and political appointees have really denied the award going forward,” she said before asking, “What can you do to address it? Where is the holdup? And, quite frankly, how would requiring a political appointee to approve every single grant improve government efficiency?”

Vought responded by defending the administration’s review process and said oversight of taxpayer dollars requires evaluating how agencies intend to spend appropriated funds.

“Congresswoman, one of the things I heard constantly when we were considering the rescissions package last year, of which you all opposed, but one of the things I heard was, why wouldn’t you just eliminate just the small things that you have concerns with, and not actually take the number down lower,” Vought said.

“The way that we do that, the way that we provide good oversight of federal dollars, is to be able to assess and review how the agencies intend to spend the money, and that takes time. You don’t do that in the middle of a 30-day period after you pass the appropriation.”

DeLauro responded that the committee had not received the spending plans it expected to review.

“With all due respect, Mr. Director, my heavens, we haven’t seen spend plans,” she said. “That has been one of the biggest, one of the big problems, this committee hasn’t even seen spend plans that we’re supposed to, you know, get.”

She argued the proposed review process would allow political appointees to evaluate grants rather than relying solely on scientific merit.

When Vought attempted to explain the administration’s approach, he began with, “Can I give you an analogy? An analogy is that when I do the budget for the president, do you think I don’t rely on the career staff? It has a political responsibility for the line item.”

DeLauro interrupted, saying she had only seconds remaining.

“It is about political appointees making the decision, not people based on the evidence,” she said.

Referencing research projects at Yale University, DeLauro added, “Don’t tell me that these are — they do not meet the government’s priorities or the president’s priorities. Is it not to deal with Tourette’s syndrome, to deal with OCD, is not about somebody wasting money! This is science.”

She concluded her remarks by saying, “It’s reviewed as it has been over 75 years, when these awards have been made, and you are all in the business of reversing that and putting all of these grants through a political lens and someone’s political ideology, it’s wrong, and we’re not going to let it happen. I yield back.”

As Vought began responding, he said, “I would just say that there was an election. The president was put in charge of the executive branch—”

DeLauro interrupted again before he could finish.

“The Constitution says that the appropriations process has is the power of the purse. You are ignoring that,” she said. “You flout the constitution every single day, and you have been doing it for the last year and a half, and we again are not going to continue to allow that to happen!”

She concluded by adding, “No president has the right to just violate the United States Constitution, and no member of this committee does that, but the administration is doing it regularly!”

Ogles Declares War on Birth Tourism With Bold New Bill to Protect American Citizenship [WATCH]
News

Ogles Declares War on Birth Tourism With Bold New Bill to Protect American Citizenship [WATCH]

/

Congressional Republicans are moving quickly to respond after the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship, with Rep. Andy Ogles introducing legislation aimed at preventing what supporters describe as abuse of the nation’s immigration system, as reported by Townhall.

Ogles, a Republican from Tennessee, announced the Anchors Away Act on June 30, saying the legislation would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prevent pregnant women from entering the United States when their purpose is to give birth so their child can obtain U.S. citizenship.

The proposal comes as conservatives in Congress look for legislative alternatives following the court’s decision against Trump’s executive action.

The president has urged lawmakers to move rapidly to place the policy into federal law after the executive order was invalidated.

In announcing the measure on social media, Ogles sharply criticized the Supreme Court’s ruling.

“SCOTUS betrayed America,” Ogles wrote. “It’s time to bar pregnant foreigners from coming to this country. We are being colonized.”

He concluded the post with the phrase, “Anchors Away!”

In a separate statement posted the same day, Ogles expanded on his criticism of the court’s decision.

“Today’s United States Supreme Court decision is not only a betrayal of American sovereignty, but a direct attack on our national security.”

According to Ogles, the current interpretation of birthright citizenship creates long-term national security concerns.

“Because of birthright citizenship, foreigners are being born on our soil, groomed by communists and globalists, and embedded into our…” he wrote in the post announcing the legislation.

The Anchors Away Act would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the admission of pregnant women seeking entry into the United States for the purpose of giving birth so their child can acquire American citizenship.

The proposal received support from conservative commentators shortly after its introduction.

“Andy Ogles is the man,” Shawn Farash wrote on X.

“Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Another conservative commentator, RBe, also endorsed the legislation, posting simply, “This.”

Ogles later outlined his reasoning in comments to Townhall, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling diminished the value of American citizenship.

“Today, the Supreme Court cheapened the most valuable thing on planet Earth: U.S. citizenship,” Ogles told Townhall.

“Not only is birthright citizenship clearly not in the U.S. Constitution, but this broken system has allowed foreign nationals to take advantage of our country, our benefits, and our generosity. These foreigners have embedded themselves into our society and are being trained by foreign governments to corrupt our culture.”

He concluded by saying, “I refuse to let these anchor babies colonize our country. Save our sovereignty. Anchors away!”

Ogles’ legislation is one of several efforts now underway among some of the most conservative members of Congress following the Supreme Court’s decision.

Sen. Eric Schmitt has announced similar legislation addressing birthright citizenship and said he also plans to pursue a constitutional amendment designed to settle the citizenship issue permanently.

Meanwhile, President Trump has called on Congress to act quickly to codify the policies contained in his executive order into federal law after the Supreme Court rejected the administration’s approach.

The renewed legislative push signals that congressional Republicans intend to keep birthright citizenship at the forefront of the immigration debate as lawmakers consider whether statutory changes or a constitutional amendment will ultimately be needed to alter current citizenship policy.

Inmates Seize Control of North Carolina Jail, Hold Guards Hostage for Nine Terrifying Hours [WATCH]
News

Inmates Seize Control of North Carolina Jail, Hold Guards Hostage for Nine Terrifying Hours [WATCH]

/

Authorities are investigating after inmates at a regional jail in eastern North Carolina overpowered correctional officers, took hostages, and seized control of the facility for approximately nine hours before law enforcement regained control, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The incident unfolded Monday at the Bertie-Martin Regional Jail in Windsor, North Carolina, where officials said inmates overtook the facility after overpowering guards.

Authorities have not disclosed how many inmates participated in the takeover, but officials said only three correctional officers were on duty overseeing 88 inmates when the incident began.

According to officials, the situation started at approximately 5 a.m. and continued until about 2 p.m.

The prolonged standoff prompted a large law enforcement response involving local, state, and federal agencies.

The FBI’s Charlotte field office announced at approximately 2 p.m. Eastern that the incident had been resolved.

Specialized tactical units, including FBI SWAT, the FBI Hostage Rescue Team, and the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, responded to assist with ending the hostage situation.

Following the operation, video from the scene showed buses transporting inmates from the Bertie-Martin Regional Jail to other detention facilities.

Officials said no inmates remain housed at the jail following the incident.

During a news conference after the standoff ended, Bertie County Sheriff Tyrone Ruffin confirmed that authorities had successfully resolved the situation.

“I am relieved to report that the situation concluded safely around 2:00 pm today with minimum injuries,” Ruffin said.

While officials indicated that the incident ended without widespread injuries, authorities have not released additional information regarding those who were injured or the extent of their injuries.

Ruffin said investigators are now focused on determining exactly how inmates were able to gain control of the facility.

“Now that the incident has concluded, the investigation into what occurred and how it happened is just beginning. The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations and the Federal Bureau of Investigations will be conducting interviews and investigations with all parties that are involved in the coming days,” he said.

The sheriff added that investigators expect the inquiry to continue for “several days.”

Authorities have not released details regarding what triggered the disturbance or identified the inmates believed to have participated.

Officials also have not announced whether criminal charges will be filed in connection with the takeover.

During the news conference, Ruffin said the jail sustained damage during the tactical response.

He explained that deputies responded shortly after the incident began early Monday morning, but were unable to immediately enter the facility because inmates had already taken control.

Law enforcement agencies remained on scene for several hours while specialized teams worked to safely resolve the hostage situation.

Officials have not released information regarding the identities of the hostages or how many correctional officers or staff members were held during the incident.

The Bertie-Martin Regional Jail serves Bertie and Martin counties in northeastern North Carolina.

The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation and the FBI are expected to continue processing evidence, interviewing witnesses, and reviewing the events that led to the takeover.

Authorities have not announced when the facility may reopen or when inmates could be returned.

The investigation remains ongoing.

BB Gun Rampage: Man Arrested After Firing at Nude Cyclists in Los Angeles Circus Ride [WATCH]
News

BB Gun Rampage: Man Arrested After Firing at Nude Cyclists in Los Angeles Circus Ride [WATCH]

/

A man was arrested Saturday in downtown Los Angeles after authorities said he allegedly fired a BB gun at participants taking part in the annual World Naked Bike Ride, leaving two people with minor injuries, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

According to reports, the suspect was taken into custody on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon involving a BB gun, along with additional charges that have not been specified.

Authorities said two victims suffered lacerations during the incident.

Video from the scene showed police arresting a man dressed in black following the reported shooting.

The incident occurred during Los Angeles’ annual World Naked Bike Ride, an event that organizers hold each year during the summer months.

Participants ride through city streets in various states of undress to promote cyclist safety and raise awareness of climate-related issues.

According to ABC 7, two separate rides were held in Los Angeles on Saturday at different times. Each route covered nearly 10 miles through the city.

The event drew hundreds of participants and spectators throughout downtown Los Angeles.

The New York Post reported that cyclists gathered in a parking area in Little Tokyo before beginning their ride through the city.

Participants used body paint in place of traditional cycling clothing, while police escorts helped manage traffic as riders traveled along routes lined with onlookers.

Organizers describe the ride as both a demonstration for bicycle safety and a protest highlighting environmental concerns and automobile dependence.

Although participants ride with little or no clothing, the event operates under guidelines intended to distinguish it from sexually explicit conduct.

According to reports, organizers prohibit lewd or sexually explicit exposure and characterize the event as an exercise in public expression and advocacy rather than entertainment.

California law has long presented questions regarding public nudity in certain organized events, and the World Naked Bike Ride has continued operating within that legal framework under established event guidelines.

Authorities have not released additional information regarding what led to the alleged BB gun shooting or whether the suspect knew any of the participants.

Police have also not disclosed the identities of either the suspect or the two injured individuals.

The victims’ injuries were reported as lacerations, and no life-threatening injuries were announced.

Law enforcement officers remained at the scene while investigators gathered evidence and interviewed witnesses.

The investigation remains ongoing, and officials have not released further details regarding the additional charges the suspect may face.

The annual World Naked Bike Ride has been held in cities around the world for years, with organizers promoting the event as a campaign for bicycle safety, environmental awareness, and public advocacy.

Los Angeles is among several U.S. cities that host the event each summer.

Authorities have not indicated whether the incident will affect future rides or related events.


Scroll to Top