Author name: RVM News

Mamdani Claims Democrats Lost Touch With Working Class While Pushing Socialist Agenda
News

Mamdani Claims Democrats Lost Touch With Working Class While Pushing Socialist Agenda

/

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he believes the Democratic Party has drifted away from its traditional focus on working-class Americans, arguing that voters are primarily concerned with everyday economic issues such as housing costs, rent, fuel prices, and groceries, as reported by Fox News.

Mamdani made the comments during a June 1 interview with MSNBC host Eugene Daniels on “MS NOW,” where he discussed the direction of the Democratic Party and the issues he believes matter most to voters.

During the interview, Mamdani said Americans want elected officials to address practical concerns affecting their daily lives.

According to the mayor, voters are looking for solutions related to rent, housing affordability, gasoline prices, and the cost of groceries.

“We have to have answers to that. And that’s what we’re trying to show,” Mamdani said.

Daniels then asked whether the Democratic Party leadership understands those concerns.

“Do you think the leadership of the Democratic Party understands that?” Daniels asked.

Mamdani responded by arguing that the party has moved away from a focus on working people.

“I think that the party as a whole has lost its focus on working people. And I’m hopeful that we start to develop that,” Mamdani said.

The mayor pointed to earlier Democratic political traditions as an example of the direction he believes the party should pursue.

“You know, you look at the four freedoms, you look at the real core of the New Deal, there was a moment when this party was unabashed about its focus on working people. And I’m excited to bring it back there,” he said.

Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist, was elected mayor of New York City in 2025 as the Democratic nominee. Since taking office, he has frequently emphasized economic issues and policies aimed at affordability and public services.

His latest comments come as Democrats continue debating how to appeal to voters who have expressed concerns about inflation, housing costs, and broader economic challenges.

The remarks also reflect a broader discussion within the party about messaging and priorities heading into future elections.

Some Democrats have argued that economic concerns should take center stage, while others have emphasized social and cultural issues alongside economic policy.

Mamdani has consistently described his political philosophy as democratic socialism and has indicated that his approach to governing will reflect those views.

During his inauguration speech on January 1, 2026, he made that position clear.

“I was elected as a democratic socialist, and I will govern as a democratic socialist,” Mamdani declared.

The New York mayor has attracted national attention since taking office, particularly because of his progressive policy positions and his willingness to challenge elements of the Democratic Party’s leadership and direction.

His latest comments add to an ongoing conversation among Democrats about how the party can reconnect with voters concerned about the cost of living and economic opportunity.

Whether party leaders embrace that approach remains to be seen, but Mamdani’s message was clear: he believes Democrats must place greater emphasis on the concerns of working people if they hope to strengthen their connection with voters in the years ahead.

Trump Slams ‘Crooked’ California Election Chaos As GOP Voices Outrage Over Suspicious Vote Swings
News

Trump Slams ‘Crooked’ California Election Chaos As GOP Voices Outrage Over Suspicious Vote Swings

/

President Donald Trump sharply criticized California’s election process over the weekend as vote totals continued to change days after polls closed, affecting several high-profile Republican candidates in statewide and local races, as reported by The New York Post.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump questioned the pace of California’s vote counting and suggested Republican candidates were being disadvantaged as additional ballots were processed.

“Has anybody been watching the CROOKED Election going on in California,” Trump wrote Sunday.

The president continued, “Two great Republican Candidates are being cheated, and so is America, which, if the Dumocrats are able to fulfill their mission, great trouble and consternation will follow.”

“Watch this ‘Election’ closely!!!”

Trump later shared a post from Rep. Abe Hamadeh, who argued that California was “incapable of running free and fair elections consistent with our Constitution.”

The criticism comes as results in several major California races remain unsettled nearly a week after Election Day.

One of the most closely watched contests is the Los Angeles mayoral race, where former reality television personality Spencer Pratt has slipped from second place into third as additional ballots have been counted.

According to updated results, far-left Democratic candidate Nithya Raman moved ahead of Pratt five days after polls closed.

While Decision Desk HQ projected Raman would secure the second runoff position, the Associated Press had not officially called the race at the time of reporting.

Reacting to the projection, Trump posted, “No way this could have happened. Rigged Election!”

Pratt held an 8.1-point advantage over Raman on election night. However, successive ballot updates steadily narrowed the gap before eventually placing Raman ahead.

The shift represented a swing of more than 43,000 votes between the two candidates since election night.

Prediction market data from Polymarket indicated Raman had a 99 percent chance of advancing to the runoff, while Pratt’s chances stood at 1 percent.

Incumbent Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass had already secured a spot in the November runoff after receiving 34.7 percent of the vote with approximately 83 percent of ballots counted.

Raman’s campaign told KNBC it was encouraged by the updated results. Pratt responded to a social media post highlighting the vote shift by referencing an article from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

“A net swing of more than 43,000 votes since Tuesday… 43,000, huh? Where have I seen that number before?” Pratt wrote.

“Probably nothing.”

The article Pratt referenced discussed a Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority estimate that 43,699 people experience homelessness on any given night in Los Angeles.

California election officials note that vote counting often extends well beyond Election Day because counties must verify signatures, process millions of vote-by-mail ballots, and conduct audits before results are certified.

Under state law, county election officials have up to 30 days following an election to complete the canvass, count valid ballots, and perform post-election reviews. Ballots mailed by Election Day remain valid if received by June 9.

Counties must submit final results to the California Secretary of State by July 3, with certification scheduled one week later.

The slow pace has also drawn criticism in the governor’s race.

Republican candidate Steve Hilton has repeatedly criticized California’s election process while waiting for final results in his contest.

“The world is laughing at our inability to count votes in a timely manner. Where is Gavin Newsom?” Hilton wrote on X.

“The snail-like pace of the vote counting process in California is just another example of the incompetence and uselessness of the state government.”

Hilton also criticized Democratic candidate Xavier Becerra, who has already secured a place in November’s election.

“If he was in charge of the Olympics the 100 meters would take 6 days!” Hilton wrote.

Despite the delays, Hilton told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures” that he remains “very confident” he will finish among the top two candidates and advance to the general election.

At the time of reporting, Hilton held a 4.4-point lead over billionaire Democrat Tom Steyer with approximately 72 percent of ballots counted statewide.

As California election officials continue processing ballots, several of the state’s most significant races remain under close scrutiny from both parties.

Graham Platner Melts Down After Fetterman Dares Him To Release His Own Texts [WATCH]
News

Graham Platner Melts Down After Fetterman Dares Him To Release His Own Texts [WATCH]

/

Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner is facing renewed scrutiny after Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) publicly challenged him to release alleged messages that have become a growing issue in Maine’s closely watched Senate race, as reported by Red State.

Fetterman has emerged as one of Platner’s most outspoken critics within the Democratic Party.

The Pennsylvania senator recently called on Platner to release alleged text conversations with women that were reportedly revealed by a former Platner campaign operative.

During remarks on the controversy, Fetterman challenged Platner to make the communications public.

“Let me make a deal. I’ll tell P-Hustle, I’ll wear a suit every day, if he releases all those texts and messages that he’s had,” Fetterman said.

According to reports, “P-Hustle” was the account name Platner reportedly used on Kik.

Fetterman continued his challenge by saying, “You can prove [to] America… what’s [in] these conversations. Can P-Hustle prove how old these people are?”

The senator also criticized Platner over a series of past controversies, saying the candidate had made so many offensive remarks that “it’s hard to keep up with it.”

Over the weekend, Fetterman further commented on the situation and raised the possibility that explicit images could exist among the communications.

Platner responded publicly but did not indicate that he would release the alleged messages.

“John Fetterman seems to genuinely think that the reason no one likes him is because he refuses to wear a suit,” Platner wrote.

He continued, “It’s not the hoodie, dude. It’s because you’ve become a stooge for AIPAC and the Republican party.”

The exchange added another chapter to a campaign that has already drawn attention over allegations involving Platner’s conduct, reported comments about women, and criticism surrounding a tattoo that has previously generated controversy.

The latest dispute comes as polling suggests the Maine Senate race may be becoming increasingly competitive.

A survey conducted by Republican polling firm Fabrizio, Lee & Associates on behalf of the pro-Collins Pine Tree Results PAC found incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Platner tied at 46 percent among likely voters.

The remaining 8 percent of respondents were undecided. Politico first reported the results.

Pollsters Tony Fabrizio, David Lee, and Travis Tunis argued that the race has become more competitive as more information about Platner has become public.

“It is clear that the more voters learn about Platner, the more they find they don’t like him, making the Senate race HIGHLY competitive,” the pollsters wrote.

“Senator Collins and her allies need to muster the resources to keep the pressure on Platner as the Democrat money machine tries to salvage Platner’s candidacy.”

The survey also found a significant increase in unfavorable views of Platner. According to the poll, 49 percent of respondents viewed him unfavorably, compared to 29 percent in January.

The poll found that 40 percent held a favorable view of the candidate, while just 4 percent said they had never heard of him.

In addition, 59 percent of respondents said reports concerning Platner’s Kik activity made them less likely to support him, while 33 percent said the reports would not affect their vote.

The polling was conducted before publication of a subsequent New York Times report concerning allegations of abusive behavior. Political observers noted that internal surveys often favor the candidate or organization sponsoring them.

However, Collins has historically outperformed public polling. In her previous three Senate races, polling reportedly underestimated her support by eight, eight, and 12 percentage points.

With the race now appearing tied and scrutiny surrounding Platner continuing to grow, both parties are expected to closely monitor how voters respond in the months ahead.

Israel Hits Back Hard After Failed Iranian Missile Attack [WATCH]
News

Israel Hits Back Hard After Failed Iranian Missile Attack [WATCH]

/

Israel launched retaliatory air strikes against Iranian military targets after the Islamic Republic fired multiple ballistic missiles toward the Jewish state, according to reports released Sunday, as reported by Townhall.

The strikes came after Iran launched a wave of ballistic missiles that triggered warning alerts across northern Israel. Israeli air defense systems intercepted all of the missiles, preventing them from reaching their intended targets.

According to reports, the missiles were launched by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, commonly known as the IRGC. Israeli officials responded by authorizing military action against missile facilities and military bases inside Iran.

The retaliatory operation marked the latest escalation in the long-running confrontation between Israel and the Iranian regime, which has repeatedly been accused by Israeli leaders of supporting terrorist organizations and threatening regional stability.

Before the Israeli response took place, reports from Axios and CBS indicated that President Donald Trump had contacted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and urged him to delay military action in order to preserve ongoing diplomatic efforts.

According to those reports, Trump requested that Netanyahu refrain from immediately responding to the missile attack while negotiations continued.

Netanyahu reportedly resisted the request at first but later offered what was described as a “pseudo-agreement.”

The discussions highlighted the delicate balance between military retaliation and diplomatic negotiations as both countries weighed their next steps following the missile barrage.

Shortly after the reports surfaced, Trump addressed the situation in remarks to the Financial Times.

According to the publication, Trump stated that “he calls the shots” on U.S. and Israeli action against Iran and indicated that negotiations would continue despite the missile attack.

The president’s comments suggested that the administration remained committed to pursuing a diplomatic resolution even as tensions increased following the Iranian strike.

It remains unclear whether Trump later approved or supported Israel’s decision to proceed with retaliatory air strikes after his initial conversation with Netanyahu.

Neither the White House nor Israeli officials immediately provided additional details regarding the extent of coordination between Washington and Jerusalem before the strikes were launched.

The Israeli operation reportedly focused on missile-related infrastructure and military facilities connected to Iran’s defense apparatus.

The exchange underscores continuing tensions between Israel and Iran, which have repeatedly engaged in military and diplomatic confrontations in recent years.

The latest missile attack and subsequent Israeli response add another chapter to an already volatile relationship between the two countries.

As of Sunday night, officials had not released further details regarding damage assessments or any additional military actions that may follow.

The situation remains fluid as both governments monitor developments and evaluate their next moves amid continued international attention.

Graduation Chaos Erupts in California as Cops Clash With Parents and Students [WATCH]
News

Graduation Chaos Erupts in California as Cops Clash With Parents and Students [WATCH]

/

A California high school graduation ceremony ended on a turbulent note Thursday night after a dispute between two young men escalated into a confrontation involving family members, graduates, and police officers, resulting in four arrests, as reported by The New York Post.

The incident occurred following Kerman High School’s graduation ceremony in Kerman, California. According to reports, the disturbance began in a parking lot after an argument broke out between a graduating senior and another teenage boy.

Authorities said the senior was already on probation and was detained before the situation had a chance to grow into something larger. However, police say emotions quickly took over as relatives and others became involved.

“It should have stopped there, but at some point, they had family members, emotions are high, decided to insert themselves into that situation,” Kerman Police Lieutenant Wil Barcoma said.

What began as a disagreement between two individuals soon drew a crowd. Video from the scene showed officers attempting to regain control as people gathered around the confrontation.

During the struggle, a woman identified as the senior’s mother was knocked to the ground. Footage showed her falling and rolling on the pavement before bystanders stepped in to assist her.

Police said a teenage girl became involved during the incident and allegedly struck an officer while resisting arrest.

As officers worked to restore order, several people were taken into custody. Authorities ultimately arrested four individuals connected to the disturbance.

The graduating senior and the other boy involved in the original dispute were both charged with challenging to fight. In addition, police charged the senior with violating court orders and obstruction.

The senior’s mother was charged with resisting a police officer.

For many students, the disturbance overshadowed what was supposed to be a memorable celebration marking the end of their high school years.

“I don’t think that that’s a way that I would want to remember my graduation,” graduate Joban Hans told local media.

“If you have like a, sorta beef, just handle it elsewhere. Maybe not at a graduation.”

The Kerman incident was not the only graduation-related disturbance reported in California’s Central Valley last week.

Another graduation ceremony in the region also ended with multiple arrests after a separate fight broke out. Authorities arrested six people following that confrontation.

Among those arrested was graduating senior Adam Velasquez, 19. According to family members, another graduate allegedly made remarks about his late brother, which they said sparked the altercation.

Authorities arrested Jonathan Melena Garcia, 19, Nicholas Perez, 18, and Andrew Velasquez, 20, on allegations related to disturbing the peace.

Mariano Malena Garcia, 22, was arrested on obstruction charges. Sabrena Marie Chavez was later arrested on a battery charge in connection with the incident.

Both graduation ceremonies were intended to celebrate students reaching an important milestone.

Instead, law enforcement officers spent part of the evening responding to disturbances that led to multiple arrests and left some graduates saying the incidents distracted from what should have been a positive occasion.

Investigations into both incidents remain ongoing.

Home Intruder Armed with Shotgun Fatally Shot by Armed California Homeowner [WATCH]
News

Home Intruder Armed with Shotgun Fatally Shot by Armed California Homeowner [WATCH]

/

A California homeowner survived a late-night exchange of gunfire with an armed intruder Friday after authorities say the suspect entered the residence carrying a shotgun and opened fire during a confrontation, as reported by Breitbart.

According to the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office, the incident occurred in San Jacinto, California, on the night of June 6. Deputies responded to reports of gunfire at a residence shortly after 10:20 p.m.

Investigators said the homeowner was not inside the residence when the incident began. According to information provided by authorities, the homeowner had been visiting a neighboring home when he heard screams and gunfire coming from his own property.

After hearing the disturbance, the homeowner rushed back to his residence to determine what was happening. Upon entering the home, he encountered a man whom authorities identified as an alleged intruder. The suspect was reportedly armed with a shotgun.

Authorities said the homeowner then armed himself and confronted the suspect inside the residence. The encounter quickly escalated into a gunfight.

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office described the confrontation in a statement released after the shooting.

“During the confrontation, the suspect fired multiple rounds at the homeowner. The homeowner returned fire, striking the suspect,” the sheriff’s office said.

Deputies said the exchange of gunfire occurred inside the home and ended when the suspect was hit by the homeowner’s return fire.

Emergency personnel responded to the scene, but the suspect was pronounced dead at the residence.

Authorities said the homeowner was not injured during the incident.

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office has not publicly released the identity of the deceased suspect. Officials also have not announced whether any additional suspects may have been involved.

The shooting remains under investigation as detectives work to determine the full sequence of events that led to the deadly encounter.

The case adds to a growing number of incidents nationwide in which homeowners have been forced to confront armed suspects inside their residences.

In this instance, investigators said the homeowner encountered an individual allegedly carrying a shotgun and exchanged gunfire after the suspect opened fire.

Law enforcement officials have not indicated that any charges are expected against the homeowner. Based on the sheriff’s office account, authorities said the homeowner returned fire after the suspect allegedly fired multiple rounds during the confrontation.

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Office continues to investigate the circumstances surrounding the break-in and shooting. Additional information is expected to be released as the investigation progresses.

Trump Drops the Mic, Crushes it as He Walks Out Of Fiery, Crooked NBC Interview [WATCH]
News

Trump Drops the Mic, Crushes it as He Walks Out Of Fiery, Crooked NBC Interview [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump abruptly ended a tense interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker on Sunday after he accused major networks of being crooked and tired of their one-sided coverage.

The testy exchange unfolded during a taping of Meet the Press in Wisconsin, where Trump pressed his case on election integrity, the weaponization of government, and what he described as the corrupt behavior of mainstream journalists.

Welker repeatedly interrupted Trump and pushed back on his statements about the 2020 election, vote counting in California, and his proposed 1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund.

The interview started firm but professional, then quickly spiraled into confrontation as Trump refused to yield to Welker’s combative tone.

“You’re a one sided crooked network,” Trump told Welker before abruptly ending the interview.

“Sorry. Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough. Thank you, darling. Have a good time.”

The exchange began to disintegrate when Welker questioned whether Trump was abandoning the anti-weaponization fund proposal.

The President reminded her that Americans had been harmed by the Biden administration’s misuse of power, and he vowed to keep fighting for those victims.

“People have been hurt so badly by radical left lunatics that worked for the Biden administration and Sleepy Joe,” Trump said.

“They’re vicious. They’re violent, what they did to people. And of course, they went after me more than anybody else.”

Despite those remarks, Welker pressed on, asking point blank if Trump was backing off the fund.

Trump clarified that he still supported the concept and many Republicans agreed with him, but that it required approval to move forward.

“If it was up to me, I’d pay them the kind of money that they deserve,” he said.

“So me, personally, I think the weaponization fund is a great idea, and so do many other Republicans. You have to get it approved.”

The NBC host then turned the focus back to Trump’s election fraud claims, challenging him to produce evidence.

Trump fired back that the media had ignored overwhelming proof and that the networks themselves were part of the cover up.

“There’s a lot of evidence,” he insisted.

“Listen to me. There’s tremendous evidence. There’s nothing but evidence.”

Tensions escalated as Trump connected his allegations of fraud to the drawn-out vote counting in California, which often takes weeks to finalize results.

“The election was rigged,” he said.

“It was a dirty election. And it’s happening again right now in California.”

At that point, Trump let loose on what he called the “crooked press,” declaring that journalists had destroyed American trust.

“Your elections are crooked, and you’re crooked, and Meet the Press is crooked. And so is ABC and CBS and CNN,” Trump told a visibly flustered Welker.

The NBC host tried to salvage the conversation, reminding Trump that her crew had traveled to Wisconsin specifically for the sit-down.

“Mr. President, please, I traveled all the way to Wisconsin,” she pleaded.

But Trump waved her off, saying, “I sat in the rain with you for an hour, on and off in the rain, and I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press because a country can never be great with a dishonest press.”

WATCH:

Trump’s refusal to tolerate the hostile questioning drew sharp contrasts with how Democrats are usually treated on similar programs.

While left-wing politicians get soft interviews filled with nods and safe questions, Trump’s sit-down once again showcased how aggressively the corporate press goes after conservatives.

It was the latest clash in Trump’s long battle with mainstream media, which he has repeatedly described as the enemy of the people.

NBC had apparently hoped to pin the president into backtracking or disowning parts of his agenda, but Trump walked out on his own terms, leaving no doubt about who was really in control of the narrative.

Conservatives watching the interview saw it as a textbook example of media bias.

For many, Welker’s tone and constant interruptions reflected the exact arrogance that has driven public trust in journalism to historic lows.

Even some neutral commentators noted that Welker’s tone came across as prosecutorial rather than conversational.

Trump’s feud with the political press shows no sign of cooling.

He continues to hammer both the mainstream media and the Biden administration for what he calls a coordinated campaign to silence dissent, spin narratives, and protect the ruling class.

His Wisconsin exchange with Welker may have been brief, but for millions of Americans fed up with the media, it was another glimpse of a man unwilling to bow to the establishment.

Schmitt Shreds Dem Senator Hirono for Pushing Fear Over Deportation Bill Protecting Taxpayers [WATCH]
News

Schmitt Shreds Dem Senator Hirono for Pushing Fear Over Deportation Bill Protecting Taxpayers [WATCH]

/

Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri did not mince words during a fiery Senate Judiciary Committee hearing when Democrat Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii tried to paint the Stop Citizen Abuse and Misrepresentation Act as an attack on immigrants.

The measure, known as the SCAM Act, aims to hold accountable those who defraud taxpayers or commit serious crimes after becoming naturalized citizens.

Hirono called the proposal “undemocratic” and accused conservatives of targeting immigrant communities, a claim that immediately drew Schmitt’s rebuke.

Hirono, the only naturalized citizen on the committee, claimed that the bill would create “second class citizenship” and open the door for discrimination.

“I am horrified by the implication that naturalized citizens basically get second-class citizenship,” she said.

She went further by insisting that such a proposal was “undemocratic” and “un-American.”

Her remarks framed the bill as a veiled attempt to punish immigrants, even those who are U.S. citizens.

Schmitt, clearly unimpressed with the accusation, fired back with force.

He reminded the committee that American taxpayers have been consistently victimized by individuals who come to the United States with the intent to game the system.

“You have nothing but fear mongering here,” Schmitt told Hirono.

He called out her attempt to conflate the prosecution of criminals with the persecution of innocent citizens, saying that the bill targets those who commit fraud or violent crime, nothing more.

The Missouri Republican explained that the legislation does not discriminate by race or origin but by conduct.

“If you do those things to the American people, if you take advantage of taxpayers, if you commit a terrorist act, if you commit wholesale welfare fraud, within 10 years, you’re damn right we’re deporting you,” Schmitt declared.

His straightforward response drew plenty of attention because it cut through the emotional language that Hirono used to stir outrage.

He continued, insisting that people who come to America and then exploit its generosity deserve removal.

“If you are convicted in a court of law of these crimes, absolutely we should not only convict you, but we should deport you. Gone. And if you think that’s some sort of negative assertion toward me, I’ll take it. I love it,” Schmitt said.

WATCH:

His remarks made clear that he is unapologetic about prioritizing American citizens over those who defraud the system.

Schmitt’s blunt talk has already resonated with many conservatives who are fed up with Democrats running interference for bad actors.

Instead of standing with law-abiding citizens, liberals like Hirono seem determined to play the victim narrative every time immigration reform or enforcement comes up.

Schmitt’s approach cuts through the emotional grandstanding and brings the discussion back to protecting taxpayers and restoring honesty in the system.

A Fox News report on the heated exchange described the SCAM Act as a “denaturalization bill,” but Schmitt made clear that the goal is not mass denaturalization.

Rather, it is to ensure that citizenship is not used as a shield for those who commit serious crimes against the country that welcomed them.

Critics on the left, however, continue to push the false idea that any enforcement against naturalized citizens is inherently xenophobic.

Meanwhile, public opinion seems to be drifting away from Hirono’s position.

A recent national survey found that many voters increasingly view government fraud and the misuse of taxpayer dollars as major causes of rising costs for families.

The Trump administration’s previous anti-fraud initiatives, according to data cited by Fox, uncovered billions in improper payments.

Those recovered funds alone, as Schmitt’s defenders note, could have gone a long way toward balancing the federal budget.

Yet Democrats are still slow to acknowledge that fraud and welfare abuse among some immigrants are real and costly problems.

Schmitt doubled down on his message after the hearing.

On social media Friday, he wrote, “Deportations are a great affordability policy for America. Biden’s mass migration flooded the housing market, flooded the labor market, crushed wages, drove up rents, and then acted confused when young Americans couldn’t afford a home. Deportations can reverse it.”

His remark laid out a populist economic argument that appeals to voters nervous about the flood of illegal labor and strained communities.

The Missouri senator’s focus on middle-class affordability connects immigration enforcement with economic fairness, something Republican voters increasingly see as linked.

When citizens are competing for jobs, housing, and social benefits against those who entered illegally or committed crimes, the left’s open-border policies become hard to defend.

Schmitt’s fiery exchange with Hirono stands as another clear example of the widening gap between party priorities.

Where conservatives want to secure the nation and protect resources for lawful citizens, Democrats seem more concerned about protecting the feelings of potential lawbreakers.

In today’s Washington, that contrast could not be more obvious.

As voters gear up for the next election cycle, Schmitt’s unapologetic stance could prove politically powerful.

His message of accountability and fairness continues to break through the noise of political theater, and that is exactly what many citizens want from their representatives.

Steve Hilton Slams California’s Election Chaos, Promises to End Mail In Voting Scam [WATCH]
News

Steve Hilton Slams California’s Election Chaos, Promises to End Mail In Voting Scam [WATCH]

/

California Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton is not mincing words about the state’s election system.

He called it a “total joke” and vowed to bring the corruption to an end, promising to scrap the mail-in voting scam that Democrats have turned into their favorite election hustle.

Speaking to supporters after yet another round of delayed vote counting, Hilton made it clear he has had enough of California’s “rigged” process.

He pointed out that California’s endless counting period, sometimes stretching for weeks, would be laughable if it were not so serious.

“India counts over 640 million votes in a day,” he said.

“California cannot count less than 10 million votes in a month. Thanks to the Democrats in charge, we have become a national and an international laughing stock.”

Hilton explained that even with this mess, he is confident his campaign will land in the top two after all votes are eventually counted.

But he made it clear that change is desperately needed.

“This shambles is absolutely shameful for our state,” he said.

“Change is coming.”

The former Fox News host has built his campaign on restoring accountability, and election integrity is now front and center.

He pointed to Ventura County’s decision to delay updates for a full week after election day as a perfect example of the dysfunction.

“And then, when you dig into what is actually happening here, you see the reason,” Hilton said, arguing that Democrats rely on drawn-out processes to manipulate results in their favor.

Hilton laid out a simple three step plan to clean up California’s elections.

First, every mail in ballot must be received by election day, not days or weeks after.

Second, ballots should only be mailed to voters who request them, ending the mass distribution to every name on the faulty voter rolls.

And third, ballots should be counted prior to election day, as is done in Florida, so Californians are not left waiting for weeks.

“It should not take a month to find out who won a race,” Hilton said, calling the current backlog “completely ridiculous.”

He added that California has no excuse for lagging so far behind other states that manage to run secure and transparent elections.

Hilton also appeared on Fox News with Laura Ingraham to discuss new revelations from USPS whistleblowers.

The allegations claim that California is “indiscriminately counting mail-in ballots without verifying the date they were sent.”

Hilton did not hold back.

“It’s insane,” he told Ingraham.

“This election system is just another monument to their uselessness, another version of high-speed rail.”

WATCH:

As of Saturday morning, more than three million ballots remained uncounted across California.

Former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra was projected to advance to the runoff, while Hilton’s lead over Democrat Tom Steyer continued to narrow to about 340,000 votes.

The slow drip of newly counted ballots, most of them arriving after election day, is once again benefiting Democrats statewide.

In Los Angeles, Democratic City Councilwoman Nithya Raman surged after a late-night vote dump, while hundreds of thousands of ballots remain yet to be tallied.

The situation has only fueled growing suspicion that California’s counting process is designed to secure Democrat victories through endless ballot additions.

Meanwhile, federal law enforcement is starting to take notice.

First Assistant US Attorney Bill Essayli announced Friday that his office is conducting “multiple election fraud investigations” with the FBI, alongside a “comprehensive audit” of California’s voter rolls in coordination with the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.

US Attorney Robert Renner was also spotted in person at LA County’s ballot processing center, asking pointed questions about procedures.

The presence of federal investigators suggests there may finally be consequences for California’s chronic election fiascos.

Hilton’s criticism taps into widespread frustration among Californians who have watched the state’s elections spiral into chaos since the adoption of universal mail-in voting.

The system was marketed as a convenience but quickly evolved into a loophole factory for fraud, incompetence, and manipulation.

Many conservative voters see mail-in voting as the heart of a deliberate scheme to tilt outcomes.

Ballots arrive mysteriously, signatures go unchecked, and counts continue for weeks until Democrats inch ahead.

It is a familiar story, and Hilton’s promise to clean it up is resonating with voters tired of being ignored.

Despite the slow count, Hilton remains defiant.

“There is nothing we are seeing that changes our assessment that we will be in the top two once all the votes are counted,” he said confidently.

His campaign is betting that Californians are ready for an end to bureaucratic decay and liberal control.

For years, California’s elections have symbolized the failures of progressive policies.

What should be a simple, transparent process has become a never-ending circus managed by incompetents.

Steve Hilton’s bold stand against the mail-in voting chaos may mark the beginning of a new fight for accountability in the Golden State.

Spencer Pratt’s Mom Takes Reporter to School Over Spencer’s Lack of Political Experience [WATCH]
News

Spencer Pratt’s Mom Takes Reporter to School Over Spencer’s Lack of Political Experience [WATCH]

/

Commentator Larry O’Connor criticized arguments that Spencer Pratt is unqualified for public office because he lacks political experience, pointing to comments made by Pratt’s mother and drawing comparisons to President Donald Trump’s rise to office.

O’Connor began by highlighting an exchange in which a reporter questioned Janet Pratt about her son’s qualifications to lead a city.

“Spencer Pratt’s mom was confronted with the accusation that Spencer Pratt has no political experience. Yeah, take that, Spencer Pratt’s mom,” O’Connor said.

During the exchange, the reporter asked Janet Pratt about concerns surrounding her son’s lack of government experience.

“What would you say to them? Spencer has no political experience now to take over a city,” the reporter asked.

Janet Pratt responded by pointing to the performance of current political leaders and the impact of recent disasters in her community.

“Well, look who had political experience, and look what she didn’t do. She allowed our town to burn down both of our homes, all of our friends’ homes, our neighbors’ home. My neighbor across the street burned alive in her house,” Janet Pratt said.

The reporter then asked whether she believed her son could successfully lead and improve the city.

“Do you firmly believe Spencer can get the job done and change a city that he says needs to be saved,” the reporter asked.

“Absolutely yes. He has the drive and the brains…” Janet Pratt replied.

O’Connor said the exchange reflected a broader debate over whether political experience is the most important qualification for elected office.

“Yeah, and by the way, I’m just so distressed by this narrative that you have to be some sort of, of, you know, genius, and, and, and, and have decades of political experience to be able to manage a city’s affairs,” O’Connor said.

He argued that leadership and problem-solving skills can be developed outside government and suggested that local civic roles can involve significant responsibilities.

“I would argue that in some cases it takes more effort, more political acumen, and more character to sit on a homeowners association board and deal with the stuff they have to deal with than it does to be a mayor of a city,” O’Connor said.

O’Connor also criticized what he described as an elitist view of politics that favors career politicians.

“This fake and destructive elitist notion that only the chosen few who have, who have great resumes and and great experience running for lower office and and handling other elected official political jobs that only they are capable of being the mayor of a city or being a congressman, oh, it’s this bull,” O’Connor said.

He pointed to President Trump as an example of someone who entered politics without holding elected office.

“And it’s reinforced by people in the media, and they do it as a former reality TV star, and you can’t do that. Guess who else was a former reality TV star? Donald Trump,” O’Connor said.

O’Connor contrasted Trump’s record with that of former President Joe Biden, who spent decades in public office before becoming president.

“Joe Biden, you could argue, was the most experienced man ever to take the reins of the presidency and sit in the Oval Office,” O’Connor said.

He cited border security as an example, arguing that experience alone does not guarantee successful leadership.

“How do you do with that border? You remember, said, ‘Wow, it’s very hard. You know, it’s very hard to protect the border, you know. You can’t just come in there and build a wall and then just, you know, lock down the border. That’s impossible. It can’t be done. Donald Trump, with no real political experience, did it in three months, me a freaking break,” O’Connor said.

Returning to Janet Pratt’s comments, O’Connor argued that voters should focus on results rather than résumés.

“And what do you say that he has no political experience? Well, the person who had a lot of political experience let my across the street neighbor die in a fire. She was burned to death. She was consumed by a fire, thanks to all of her experience,” O’Connor said.

O’Connor concluded by arguing that extensive political experience is not always an asset.

“So, you know what? Maybe it’s time to look. You’re right, Karen Bass has a lot of experience, all the wrong kind of experience,” O’Connor said.

WATCH:


Scroll to Top