Author name: RVM News

California’s Blue Wall is Cracking, There is a Reckoning at Hand: Trace Gallagher [WATCH]
News

California’s Blue Wall is Cracking, There is a Reckoning at Hand: Trace Gallagher [WATCH]

/

Trace Gallagher said California’s political landscape may be shifting as Republican candidates gain visibility in a state that has been dominated by Democrats for decades.

Gallagher argued that while Democrats still maintain significant political power in California, growing voter frustration has created new challenges for the party ahead of major statewide and local races.

“There is a reckoning at hand,” Gallagher said.

According to Gallagher, Democratic control of California remains extensive, but he suggested signs of political dissatisfaction are becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

“Democrats’ command of California remains vast, but there is also no doubt the big blue monster is developing a nasty red rash, experiencing the kind of inflammation the liberal machine has not seen in years, with no remedy in sight,” Gallagher said.

Gallagher pointed to the upcoming gubernatorial race, where former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra is expected to face Republican Steve Hilton.

“Suddenly, it appears that in his run for governor, far-left Democrat Xavier Becerra will now have to fend off Republican Steve Hilton, along with Hilton’s pesky policies,” Gallagher said.

He also referenced Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and the possibility of a challenge from Spencer Pratt.

“And Mayor Bass will likely have to stand her ground against the reality of Spencer Pratt and his AI superhero status,” Gallagher said.

Gallagher argued that Democratic candidates may now find themselves defending their records in ways they have not had to do in recent election cycles.

“Not only will Becerra and Bass have to come up with policies, they’ll have to defend those policies and debate those policies,” Gallagher said.

Referencing changing political conditions, Gallagher invoked a famous Bob Dylan lyric to describe what he sees as a growing shift in voter attitudes.

“Bob Dylan would caution the times they are changing,” Gallagher said.

Gallagher noted that Democrats have controlled California’s government for roughly two decades, overseeing most major policy decisions and holding many of the state’s top elected offices.

“Common sense would remind you, Democrats have run the Golden State for two decades, controlling virtually every major office, every major decision, and when things go wrong, the buck just keeps on trucking,” Gallagher said.

He argued that voters have begun expressing frustration with the state’s direction and are increasingly demanding accountability from those in power.

“But while the buck didn’t stop here, the voters did. They stopped, got angry, and took action,” Gallagher said.

Gallagher said those voters are now looking for answers from elected officials.

“And now they want answers, but Democrats have never been good at answers,” Gallagher said.

He contended that political messaging has often replaced substantive explanations for policy outcomes.

“Why offer explanations when exaggerations tend to fill the bill?” Gallagher said.

While acknowledging the challenges Republicans face in a state that remains heavily Democratic, Gallagher suggested that changing voter sentiment could create opportunities for candidates who stay focused on their message.

“Common sense knows Republicans face big odds, but when you’re in just one letter can make win,” Gallagher said.

WATCH:

Passenger Bites Officer After Refusing to Pay for Baggage in Chaotic Plane Scuffle [WATCH]
News

Passenger Bites Officer After Refusing to Pay for Baggage in Chaotic Plane Scuffle [WATCH]

/

A flight departing from Argentina was briefly delayed on Tuesday after a passenger allegedly resisted removal from an aircraft, leading to a confrontation with police that was captured on video by multiple travelers, as reported by the New York Post.

The incident took place at Jorge Newbery Airpark in Buenos Aires and involved a passenger aboard a JetSmart flight scheduled to travel to Córdoba, Argentina.

According to reports from Jam Press, the dispute began after airline personnel determined that the woman’s carry-on luggage exceeded weight limits. Authorities said she boarded the aircraft without resolving the issue or paying the required excess baggage fee.

Video recorded by fellow passengers showed several police officers entering the aircraft and attempting to remove the woman from her seat. Footage from the incident quickly circulated online, showing a lengthy struggle between the passenger and law enforcement officers inside the cabin.

Witnesses onboard recorded portions of the confrontation as officers worked to escort the woman from the low-cost carrier’s aircraft.

According to reports, the situation escalated when the passenger physically resisted efforts to remove her from the plane. During the struggle, authorities allege that she bit a female police officer on the arm.

The footage shows officers continuing to restrain the woman as they attempted to guide her off the aircraft. Several passengers could be heard reacting to the confrontation as it unfolded.

After a prolonged struggle, officers successfully removed the passenger from the flight. Video from the scene showed some travelers applauding once she had been escorted from the aircraft.

Authorities reported that the woman suffered minor injuries during the altercation. She was later transported to the airport’s medical center, where she received treatment.

Officials said the injuries were not considered serious.

The incident caused only a brief delay to the scheduled flight. After police completed their response and removed the passenger, the JetSmart aircraft departed for Córdoba.

The woman was subsequently detained by authorities.

According to reports, federal officials in Argentina have opened an investigation into the incident. As of Thursday, no criminal charges had been announced.

Authorities have not publicly released the woman’s identity.

The confrontation is the latest in a series of airline-related disputes that have drawn attention on social media, where videos captured by passengers often spread rapidly online.

In this case, the disagreement centered on excess baggage fees before escalating into a physical confrontation that required intervention from multiple officers.

The investigation remains ongoing as Argentine authorities review the circumstances surrounding the incident, including the altercation aboard the aircraft and the alleged assault on the officer.

Officials have not indicated when a final decision regarding possible charges may be made.

Fetterman’s Break from the Left Shows How Far Democrats Have Fallen Off the Cliff
News

Fetterman’s Break from the Left Shows How Far Democrats Have Fallen Off the Cliff

/

Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has emerged as one of the most unconventional figures in the Democratic Party, finding himself increasingly at odds with fellow Democrats on issues ranging from border security to Israel and the direction of the party itself, as reported by Fox News.

The shift has been striking, given Fetterman’s political roots.

During the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, Fetterman, then serving as mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania, was an early supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ insurgent campaign against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. At the time, Fetterman described himself and Sanders as aligned politically.

In an endorsement video, Fetterman said he and Sanders “stand together as the most progressive candidates in our respective races.”

Ten years later, Fetterman remains one of Pennsylvania’s two U.S. senators, but his relationship with many Democratic activists and elected officials has become increasingly strained.

Despite voting with Democrats the overwhelming majority of the time in the Senate, Fetterman has repeatedly broken with members of his party on several high-profile issues. Those disagreements have fueled speculation about his political future and prompted discussions among some Democrats about a possible primary challenge when he next seeks re-election.

Fetterman has publicly rejected suggestions that he might switch political parties and has maintained that his core beliefs remain unchanged.

At the center of many disputes are issues where Fetterman has openly criticized positions embraced by portions of the Democratic base.

On immigration, he has emphasized the importance of border security and has criticized what he views as automatic opposition to President Donald Trump.

“The president could come out for ice cream and lazy Sundays, and my party would suddenly hate them,” Fetterman said.

He has also been among the strongest Democratic supporters of Israel following the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks.

Fetterman has gone further than simply expressing support for Israel, criticizing elements within his own party over their positions on the conflict.

He previously referred to what he described as “rot in my party standing with pro-Hamas people.”

Those comments have put him at odds with some prominent Democrats who have called for significant changes in U.S. policy toward Israel.

The divide became more visible in recent weeks as controversy surrounded Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner. While Sen. Bernie Sanders publicly defended Platner, Fetterman took a sharply different position.

Fetterman described it as “crazy” that “the guy who’s going to win the primary in Maine … has a Nazi tattoo on his chest, and that’s no problem for a lot of voters.”

Platner later responded by describing Fetterman as the “bane” of his existence.

The disagreements have unfolded as other prominent progressive figures continue to gain influence within Democratic politics.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed left-wing candidates across the country and joined Sanders on a nationwide “Fighting Oligarchy” tour. Her name has frequently surfaced in discussions about potential Democratic presidential contenders in 2028.

At the same time, debates continue inside the party over economic, environmental, and foreign policy priorities.

Supporters of Fetterman argue that his positions reflect concerns shared by many working-class voters in battleground states. Critics contend that his views increasingly diverge from those of the Democratic activist base.

The debate highlights broader questions about the Democratic Party’s future direction as leaders and activists prepare for the next presidential cycle.

For now, Fetterman remains one of the party’s most unpredictable voices — a senator who still identifies as a Democrat but who has repeatedly shown a willingness to challenge fellow Democrats on some of the most contentious issues facing the party.

Socialist Mayor Responds After Spencer Pratt Targets Seattle Homeless Policies [WATCH]
News

Socialist Mayor Responds After Spencer Pratt Targets Seattle Homeless Policies [WATCH]

/

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson addressed comments from Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt this week, acknowledging that drug addiction plays a significant role in homelessness even as she argued that housing costs remain the primary cause of the crisis, as reported by The New York Post.

The exchange began after Pratt, who is running in Los Angeles’ mayoral race, discussed homelessness during an interview several weeks ago. Pratt argued that many individuals living on the streets in Los Angeles are not originally from the city and suggested that changes to local funding policies would encourage many to leave.

“People have been bused in by scam rehabs, scam NGOs, scam homeless nonprofits,” Pratt said. “These people, when I unplug them and say, ‘We’re not taking our taxpayer money anymore,’ they’re all going to Seattle, where the mayor will welcome them.”

Pratt’s Meteoric Rise Shocks Los Angeles Mayor Race as Odds Surge Dramatically

Pratt also challenged common descriptions of the homeless population.

“Well, they’re not homeless. They’re drug addicts,” he said.

Wilson’s office did not respond to a request for comment from The California Post, but the Seattle mayor was asked about Pratt’s remarks during a Wednesday interview with FOX13 Seattle.

The exchange began with a light moment as the reporter referenced Pratt and noted that he may survive California’s primary election. An audience member could be heard cheering when Pratt’s name was mentioned.

“Yeah, golly, was that a cheer?” Wilson asked before laughing.

While declining to directly engage with Pratt’s criticism, Wilson responded to the broader issues raised by the discussion.

“I’m not going to respond to him, but I will respond to you all,” Wilson said.

The mayor reiterated her view that housing affordability remains the central factor behind homelessness.

“What is driving homelessness is housing costs. There is a very, very clear correlation between housing costs and homelessness,” she said.

Later in the interview, however, Wilson acknowledged that substance abuse cannot be separated from the conversation. Seattle has faced ongoing challenges involving open-air drug use and addiction issues in several parts of the city, and the topic was raised again by the interviewer.

“That does not mean that drugs are not a factor. They absolutely are a factor,” Wilson said.

She expanded on that point by describing how addiction and homelessness can reinforce one another.

“Drugs make everything worse. If you fall into homelessness, very often people become addicted to drugs once they’ve become homeless. There are a lot of reasons for that. Or if they have a light substance use disorder, that becomes a severe substance use disorder.”

Wilson also discussed Seattle’s approach to addressing homelessness, saying the city is focused on connecting shelter services with behavioral health programs, substance abuse treatment, and other support services designed to help people leave the streets.

Despite acknowledging the role of addiction, Wilson maintained that rising housing costs remain what she described as the underlying driver of homelessness.

Notably, Wilson did not directly address Pratt’s claim that Seattle would welcome homeless individuals leaving Los Angeles, nor did she respond to his suggestion that many homeless residents in Los Angeles originate from outside the area.

Pratt has pointed to findings cited by City Journal indicating that approximately 64 percent of people living on Los Angeles streets reported being from outside the City of Los Angeles. According to the report, 53 percent said they were from outside Los Angeles County, while nearly 40 percent reported coming from outside California.

The Los Angeles candidate has also proposed establishing rehabilitation facilities on federal land as part of his homelessness strategy. Pratt previously told CNN that the concept is already “in the works” and said he has met with 30 “literal billionaires” regarding funding for the project.

Pratt remains one of three major candidates seeking to advance from California’s primary election as vote counting continues.

Marine Veteran Takes Down Armed Teen Mob During Failed Maryland Carjacking [WATCH]
News

Marine Veteran Takes Down Armed Teen Mob During Failed Maryland Carjacking [WATCH]

/

A Marine Corps veteran in Maryland is being credited with helping stop an attempted armed carjacking after surveillance video showed him fighting back against four hooded teenagers who allegedly targeted him while he was working on his truck, as reported by The New York Post.

The incident occurred around 4:45 p.m. Tuesday in Oxon Hill, Maryland, roughly 10 miles outside Washington, D.C. The confrontation was captured on surveillance footage later shared online by the victim, Jheyco Borda.

According to the video, Borda was standing near the bed of his truck when four teenagers approached him. The group quickly surrounded him, and one suspect, described as wearing a red, white, and blue sweatshirt, allegedly pulled out a handgun and demanded Borda’s truck keys and cellphone.

What appeared to be a routine criminal encounter quickly turned into a struggle when Borda seized what he later described as a split-second opportunity to act.

Surveillance footage shows Borda grabbing the armed suspect and wrestling for control of the weapon. As the confrontation intensified, two of the suspects fled down the street while another remained near the truck.

The situation changed further when Borda’s brother ran from a nearby home to assist.

During the struggle, a gunshot was fired. No injuries were reported.

Working together, the brothers managed to gain control of the situation. Borda continued grappling with the armed suspect while his brother pursued another member of the group. Within moments, the pair had subdued the suspects and held them until officers with the Prince George’s County Police Department arrived on the scene.

Authorities ultimately took all four suspects into custody.

After the incident, Borda credited his military background for helping him remain calm and react decisively under pressure.

“Once a Marine, always a Marine,” Borda told Fox 5.

“It took me just one split second. We went to training for the Marines, and that came out right at the moment.”

The veteran said he was thankful the situation did not end more tragically. He noted that several loved ones who are frequently around the truck were not present during the attempted carjacking.

According to Borda, his children were not in the vehicle, nor was his dog Sky, who often rides in the truck. He also expressed relief that no members of his family were injured during the confrontation.

Although no one was hurt, the truck sustained damage during the struggle. Borda said the round fired during the altercation passed through the bed of the vehicle, leaving behind damage he estimates will cost approximately $2,000 to repair.

He added that his insurance provider will not cover the repairs.

Following the arrests, Borda said accountability should extend beyond those directly involved in the attempted robbery.

He told Fox 5 that both the teenagers and their parents should be held responsible for what occurred.

Alongside the surveillance footage posted to social media, Borda also issued a warning to others in the community.

“Be careful and be aware of your surroundings,” he wrote.

The incident comes amid ongoing concerns about violent vehicle thefts and armed robberies in communities surrounding the Washington metropolitan area. In this case, however, police say the suspects encountered a Marine veteran who relied on his training, instincts, and assistance from his brother to prevent the alleged carjacking from succeeding.

Prince George’s County police have not publicly released the identities of the four suspects.

Cornell Boots Radical Student After President Cornered Over Israel Debate [WATCH]
News

Cornell Boots Radical Student After President Cornered Over Israel Debate [WATCH]

/

A Cornell University activist has been banned from campus events for one year after university officials concluded that he participated in a confrontation that followed the school’s president to his vehicle after an Israel-Palestinian debate on campus, as reported by The New York Post.

Aiden Vallecillo, who graduated from Cornell in May, was designated persona non grata by university police on May 28, according to reports from WBNG. The sanction stems from an April 30 incident in Ithaca, New York, when a group of students surrounded Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff in a parking lot following a debate hosted by the Cornell Political Union.

The event had been co-sponsored by Cornell Progressives, Cornellians for Israel, and Students for Justice in Palestine.

According to the university, Vallecillo was among a group of students who followed Kotlikoff as he left the debate and walked toward his vehicle. Video of the incident circulated online and showed students filming the university president while demanding answers to questions about campus policies and free speech issues.

Vallecillo was notified of the restriction five days after graduation while at his off-campus apartment.

“I think that they deliberately timed this to be at a point where students are off campus, where people are thinking about recent graduation, about post-grad plans and not about kind of how to support their fellow students,” Vallecillo told WBNG. “They’ve done it at a time when national media attention has also died off.”

Vallecillo argued that the university was punishing him for exercising free speech after Kotlikoff declined to answer questions from students following the event.

Cornell officials, however, reached a different conclusion after reviewing the incident.

“The Committee has found that the actions taken by these individuals on April 30th, which included following President Kotlikoff from an evening event into a parking lot and impeding his ability to leave, are inconsistent with university policies governing expressive activity and our standards for respectful conduct, safety, and the prohibition of intimidation,” Cornell’s Board of Trustees said in its findings.

The confrontation occurred after what Kotlikoff later described as a productive and respectful debate.

Kotlikoff, who became Cornell’s president in March 2025, praised the debate itself in comments issued May 15.

“Speech only carries meaning when one can speak, and another can listen. In a community and in a democracy, any exercise of that freedom carries the responsibility to respect the same rights for others,” Kotlikoff said.

“That is why we have policies and guidelines around free expression at Cornell: to ensure that everyone’s rights are protected and that no one can shout down or silence other views. I will continue to defend those policies with every means at my disposal.”

Following the event, several students, including Vallecillo, alleged that Kotlikoff struck them with his vehicle while attempting to leave the parking lot.

Video footage from a nearby security camera and cellphone recordings showed students moving behind the president’s vehicle as he backed out of the parking space.

“Ah, you just ran over my f*cking foot,” Vallecillo shouted during one recording while pointing a camera toward the ground.

According to reports, students who claimed they were struck declined medical treatment and repeatedly refused to provide sworn statements to police investigators.

No criminal charges were filed against either the students or Kotlikoff.

Kotlikoff later said he did not realize students had positioned themselves behind his vehicle as he attempted to leave. He acknowledged that, in hindsight, he should have remained inside the vehicle and contacted law enforcement.

“Only the following afternoon did I understand that my experience would look very different in the selected video clips posted on social media and be framed in ways that I found genuinely shocking. In the moment, my goal was extricating myself from the situation safely without escalating it. In retrospect, I certainly should have remained in my car, locked it, and called the police,” Kotlikoff said.

The university’s decision closes one chapter of a controversy that drew significant attention on campus and renewed debate over free speech, protest tactics, and student conduct at one of the nation’s most prominent Ivy League institutions.

Senate Approves Massive Billion Immigration Enforcement Bill After All-Night Battle Over Trump Fund
News

Senate Approves Massive $70 Billion Immigration Enforcement Bill After All-Night Battle Over Trump Fund

/

The Senate approved a $70 billion immigration enforcement package early Friday morning, sending legislation that would fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol through the remainder of President Donald Trump’s term to the House for consideration.

The measure passed by a 52-47 vote shortly before 5 a.m. after senators spent the night working through a lengthy series of amendment votes known as a “vote-a-rama.” The legislation now heads to the House, where lawmakers are expected to take it up early next week.

While Republicans broadly support increased immigration enforcement funding, debate over a separate $1.776 billion settlement fund tied to a legal agreement involving Trump and the Internal Revenue Service delayed final passage for weeks and consumed much of Thursday’s floor action, as reported by The New York Post.

The settlement fund stems from an agreement resolving Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over the disclosure of his tax returns, which were later published by The New York Times as part of a report on his finances in September 2020.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Republican of South Dakota, said the dispute over the settlement fund significantly slowed progress on legislation that GOP leaders had hoped would remain focused on border security.

“This would have been done several hours ago if we weren’t having to deal with some of the issues around the fund,” Thune told reporters shortly before midnight Thursday.

Although Thune has criticized the settlement fund, he spent weeks encouraging Republican senators to keep the bill centered on immigration enforcement rather than attaching additional provisions that could complicate its path through the House.

The issue intensified after acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers Tuesday that the settlement fund would not move forward. Even so, several Republican senators sought legislative language that would formally prevent any future payouts.

On Wednesday, Trump added uncertainty about the settlement’s future when he told reporters the settlement was “very important” and said, “I don’t know” when asked whether it was dead or merely on hold.

“I’d have to ask the lawyers,” the president added.

One of the first major amendment votes came from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat of New York, who proposed banning the settlement fund.

That amendment failed by a 50-49 vote after remaining open for several hours. Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Jon Husted of Ohio, and Dan Sullivan of Alaska joined Democrats in supporting the proposal.

Senators later rejected an amendment from Sen. Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, that would have blocked the settlement fund and transferred the money to a Justice Department anti-fraud account.

“If Blanche says this is largely inoperative, why not use this moment to codify that?” Tillis asked. “Otherwise, you’re exposing every one of our members who are in cycle to having to deal with this between today and Election Day, and that makes no sense for something that the DOJ says they’re not moving forward with.”

Another closely watched amendment came from Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Republican of Louisiana. Cassidy proposed redirecting settlement-related funds to law enforcement officers injured during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The amendment failed by a 52-47 vote.

Cassidy argued that despite Blanche’s comments, the settlement remained active and “absolutely can be used.”

The Senate also rejected amendments that would have prohibited payments to Capitol riot defendants who injured police officers.

Schumer criticized Republicans for rejecting the proposals.

“Leaving taxpayers to rely on nothing more than a promise from Donald Trump’s personal fixer. That is not accountability. That is a permission slip,” Schumer said.

Passage of the legislation ends months of uncertainty surrounding funding for federal immigration enforcement agencies. Democrats had blocked additional funding after the January fatal shootings of two anti-ICE protesters in Minnesota by federal agents, arguing that any new money should be paired with policy changes governing immigration enforcement operations.

Among the changes sought by Democrats were stricter identification requirements for federal officers and expanded use of judicial warrants.

After the Minnesota incident, Trump agreed to separate immigration funding from a broader spending package. Negotiations between the parties failed to produce an agreement, and funding for ICE and Border Patrol lapsed in mid-February.

While Congress later approved funding for the remainder of the Department of Homeland Security at the end of April, ICE and Border Patrol continued operating without regular appropriations. The Senate’s passage of the $70 billion package now moves the issue to the House, where lawmakers will decide whether to send the measure to the president’s desk.

Trump Gives Hunter Biden’s Presidential Chances a Hilarious Review [WATCH]
News

Trump Gives Hunter Biden’s Presidential Chances a Hilarious Review [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump took aim at several Democratic figures during an Oval Office event on Thursday, using a question about Hunter Biden’s potential political future to criticize both the president’s son and a pair of Democratic Senate candidates, as reported by Red State.

Trump was speaking with reporters during an event highlighting the administration’s new coal-energy initiative when Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked about Hunter Biden’s recent social media activity and comments suggesting he could consider a presidential run in 2028.

“Hunter Biden. He’s on social media now, and he has suggested ­— maybe joking, I don’t know — that he could run for president in 2028. How would he do, Hunter Biden, in a 2028 Democratic primary?” Doocy asked.

Trump responded by questioning whether past conduct still matters in Democratic politics.

“You would think that, you know, past is something to do with winning an election, and I would say his past is not the greatest,” Trump said.

The president then compared Hunter Biden to other Democrats who have recently drawn attention on the campaign trail.

“Um, I’m not gonna say bad [things],” Trump said.

“I’m sure, you know, hey, if the guy from Maine can do well, I guess Hunter could do well, too, ’cause the guy from Maine is a basket case, and I would say worse than him is the one from Texas, that looks like Alfred E. Neuman.”

“I would say that if he can do, well, maybe Hunter can do well. I’m not sure, It would be pretty close as far as I’m concerned.”

Trump’s comments appeared to reference Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner and Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico.

The exchange came as Hunter Biden has become increasingly active on social media, where he has posted commentary about current political events and members of the Trump administration.

On June 3, Hunter Biden posted a message on X questioning Trump’s public schedule and referencing media coverage of former First Lady Jill Biden.

“Trump hasn’t made a public appearance in 8 days. This after an unscheduled visit to the hospital- because he ‘likes getting check-ups.’ Thank God Jake Tapper (or as I like to call him- the Brick Tamland of his generation) is on the case, hunting down clues in a book about my mom’s experience as First Lady four years ago.”

The post echoed claims circulating online about Trump’s public appearances. However, Trump continued making public appearances, participating in events, and speaking with reporters during the period in question.

Later in the Oval Office session, another reporter asked Trump whether he observed any signs of cognitive decline when he met with former President Joe Biden at the White House on Nov. 13, 2024.

“When you met with Joe Biden, President Joe Biden, right here in the Oval Office on November the 13th of 2024, could you detect any cognitive decline in President Biden at that time?” the reporter asked.

Trump replied that Biden appeared much the same as he had for years.

“No, not really. I mean, he was the same guy I’ve been watching for a long time,” Trump said.

“He was fine as far as I was concerned. I don’t know, something happened to him during the debate. It could have been me.”

Trump then added another remark about Biden’s political career.

“He was never the sharpest guy, you do know that, right?”

“It wasn’t like he was sharp as a tack.”

The comments marked another instance of Trump using an unrelated policy event to weigh in on political opponents and potential future rivals as attention begins to shift toward the 2028 election cycle.

Army Veteran And Sheriff Candidate Walks Free After Judge Dismisses Murder Charge In Shooting Of Daughter’s Alleged Predator [WATCH]
News

Army Veteran And Sheriff Candidate Walks Free After Judge Dismisses Murder Charge In Shooting Of Daughter’s Alleged Predator [WATCH]

/

An Arkansas judge has dismissed murder charges against an Army veteran and Republican sheriff candidate who was accused of fatally shooting a man charged with multiple sexual offenses involving his teenage daughter, as reported by Fox News.

Aaron Spencer, who is running for sheriff in Lonoke County, had been charged with second-degree murder in the October 2024 shooting death of 67-year-old Michael Fosler. On Thursday, Special Circuit Court Judge Ralph Wilson Jr. dismissed the case, citing what he described as serious misconduct involving the handling of key evidence by law enforcement.

According to court records obtained by Fox News Digital, Wilson concluded that the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of evidence from Spencer’s truck were severe enough to warrant dismissal of the criminal case.

“The Court finds that conduct by law enforcement was so egregious that dismissal of this case is warranted,” Wilson wrote in his order.

The judge acknowledged that dismissing criminal charges is rarely appropriate, describing it as “an extraordinary and extreme remedy.” However, he determined that the facts of the case justified that outcome.

The case stemmed from an incident that occurred during the early morning hours of Oct. 8, 2024, in Lonoke County. Prosecutors alleged that Spencer discovered Fosler alone with his teenage daughter inside Fosler’s pickup truck. Authorities claimed Spencer then forced the vehicle off the road before calling 911 and reporting that he had shot Fosler.

Fosler had previously been charged with numerous sexual offenses involving Spencer’s daughter and was reportedly out on bond when the shooting occurred, according to court records.

A central issue in the case involved a dash camera installed in Spencer’s truck. Defense attorneys argued that law enforcement lost an SD memory card that may have contained video footage relevant to the encounter. They further contended that authorities failed to provide documentation showing when the card disappeared or explaining the circumstances surrounding its loss.

Wilson agreed that the missing evidence significantly affected Spencer’s ability to defend himself in court.

“The loss or destruction of the internal SD memory card of the dash camera has adversely impaired the Defendant’s ability to defend himself pursuant to these defenses, and thus his right to a fair trial,” the judge wrote.

Spencer admitted to shooting Fosler but pleaded not guilty to the murder charge. His trial had been scheduled to begin on June 22.

The dismissal marks a major development in a case that has drawn significant attention across Arkansas. Earlier this year, Spencer emerged victorious in the Republican primary race for Lonoke County sheriff, defeating the incumbent officeholder.

Throughout his campaign, Spencer argued that his personal experience with the criminal justice system exposed weaknesses within local law enforcement and the courts.

“Through my own fight for justice, I have seen firsthand the failures in law enforcement and in our circuit court,” Spencer said in a campaign video. “And I refuse to stand by while others face these same failures.”

It remains unclear how the dismissal will affect Spencer’s campaign for sheriff. No immediate announcements regarding his candidacy were released following the court’s ruling.

Fox News Digital reported that requests for comment were sent to the Lonoke County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Office, and Spencer’s defense team. No responses had been reported at the time of publication.

New Evidence Shakes Carnival Cruise Murder Case as DNA From Unknown Minor Adds Twist [WATCH]
News

New Evidence Shakes Carnival Cruise Murder Case as DNA From Unknown Minor Adds Twist [WATCH]

/

Federal prosecutors handling the murder of 18-year-old Anna Kepner aboard a Carnival cruise ship now face a wild new complication.

Investigators recently revealed that DNA from an unidentified male minor was also recovered during the probe, igniting renewed debate and speculation about what really happened aboard the Carnival Horizon last November.

According to a newly unsealed transcript of a 145-page detention hearing, the FBI obtained DNA from this mystery boy, who allegedly had sex with Kepner during the voyage.

The revelation came as prosecutors continued building their case against Kepner’s stepbrother, 16-year-old Timothy Hudson, accused of sexually assaulting and murdering her during the cruise.

Kepner was discovered dead in the cabin she shared with Hudson and her younger brother as the ship sailed from Cozumel to Miami.

Officials claim that key forensic evidence points directly to Hudson, but this new DNA twist threatens to muddy the waters.

It presents the defense with a potential avenue to challenge the government’s timeline and evidence handling.

Prosecutors asserted that two separate vaginal swabs collected from Kepner’s autopsy contained male DNA, one testing positive for sperm.

That prompted federal authorities to order DNA samples from both Hudson and the second minor who reportedly had intercourse with the victim.

Forensics later concluded that Hudson’s DNA was overwhelmingly consistent with the genetic material found, while the other boy was excluded as a possible contributor.

Prosecutors told the court that one DNA sample was calculated to be one hundred twenty sextillion times more likely to have come from Hudson rather than an unknown man.

Another swab, without sperm but positive for male DNA, was said to be 1.2 septillion times more likely to include Hudson.

Those astronomical figures, investigators said, left very little room for coincidence.

Still, Hudson’s defense did not back down.

His lawyer pushed the FBI agent on whether the medical examiner could determine the time between intercourse and death or prove the same person was responsible for both acts.

The agent admitted he did not believe such a clear determination had been made.

That response gave the defense ammunition to argue that prosecutors may be making leaps without direct proof.

WATCH:

The defense also hinted that the sexual contact involving the out-of-state teenager could become a central question for the jury, especially if it shows other interactions with Kepner shortly before her death.

They emphasized that proximity and DNA alone do not prove murder, and that investigators must fully account for every contact she had while aboard the ship.

Federal prosecutors countered that all evidence continues to indicate Hudson played a central role.

They presented a collection of surveillance footage, digital data, and cabin access records that together paint a troubling picture.

According to the government, Kepner was last seen entering her cabin around 7:38 p.m. on November 6 and was never spotted leaving.

Video later showed Hudson exiting at intervals consistent with when she likely died.

Investigators said Hudson’s phone data revealed movements consistent with the time frame of the murder and destruction of evidence.

Kepner’s own phone was later found smashed and discarded in a trash bin along what prosecutors described as Hudson’s trail through the ship.

The government is also said to possess footage that helped pin down that sequence of events.

Despite the evidence, the presiding judge stated that while probable cause existed for the charges, he would not go so far as to call the case overwhelming.

He said the evidence made for “a much closer call” and left open the possibility that multiple defenses could be raised once the trial begins.

That cautious statement has fueled talk that the prosecution may face a tougher fight than first assumed.

Outrage spread on social media when Hudson was allowed to remain free pending trial, with critics arguing that someone accused of such heinous acts should not be walking the streets.

Friends and relatives of Kepner voiced their frustration, saying their family has been through a nightmare that only keeps getting worse.

Kepner’s father previously told reporters that he found his daughter’s body shoved under the bed inside their cabin, calling the memory “too painful to relive again.”

The case has gained national attention, not only for its grotesque details but also for how it exposes the chaotic inner workings of cruise ship investigations.

Federal authorities have jurisdiction, but the setting complicates every step of evidence gathering, jurisdiction, and chain of custody.

The result is often an investigative maze that leaves families devastated and the public demanding answers.

Hudson faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.

His defense team continues to challenge the validity and timing of the evidence, seeking to build reasonable doubt around when and how the fatal assault occurred.

Prosecutors, for their part, remain confident that the combination of DNA, video evidence, and digital tracking will hold firm in court.

The trial is expected to begin in September, and all sides are bracing for a sensational courtroom battle.

For now, the headline-grabbing revelation of another male’s DNA on the victim has only deepened the mystery of what truly happened aboard the Carnival Horizon.

The government may think it has its suspect, but the defense appears ready to fight every inch of the way as this disturbing case pushes forward.


Scroll to Top