Author name: RVM News

News

EPA Chief Zeldin Uncovers Massive Obama-Biden Green Energy Kickback Scheme [WATCH]

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said he has made several criminal referrals after reviewing billions of dollars in Biden-era green energy grants that he alleges were routed through politically connected nonprofit groups, as reported by Just The News.

Zeldin discussed the referrals during an interview on Monday on the “John Solomon Reports” podcast, where he said his agency has canceled or stopped about $29 billion in EPA grants.

The figure includes a $2 billion grant to Power Forward Communities, a nonprofit tied to longtime Georgia Democratic election activist and failed gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams.

“It’s about self-dealing,” Zeldin told Just the News.

Zeldin said the EPA has referred several transactions to the agency’s inspector general and the Justice Department for possible prosecution or additional investigation.

“Those referrals have been made,” Zeldin said.

The EPA chief said the concerns involve pass-through organizations connected to former Obama and Biden administration officials, Democratic donors, former Cabinet members, and other high-ranking administration officials.

“As you look through all of these pass-through entities, you’re seeing so many connections to former Obama and Biden administration officials and Democratic donors, people who were former Cabinet members, other high-ranking administration officials,” Zeldin said.

Zeldin said some of the allegations trace back to funding included in the Inflation Reduction Act, which was passed when Democrats controlled Congress and the White House. He specifically pointed to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

“They included all of this funding in this so-called Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. And then they would work with these different agencies of the Biden administration to get it out to their unqualified friends. The whole thing just feels criminal,” Zeldin said. “[…] This is clearly something that falls into the category of blatant waste and abuse.”

One of the grants Zeldin has repeatedly highlighted is the Biden administration’s $2 billion award to Power Forward Communities. The money was awarded in 2024 to support “residential decarbonization,” including replacing gas furnaces and other appliances with electric alternatives.

Abrams reportedly “played a pivotal role” in establishing the group, according to Fox News. The grant later drew scrutiny after Power Forward Communities was reported to have only $100 the year before the award.

The Trump administration’s EPA announced in February 2025 that it was taking steps to recover the money as part of a broader effort to claw back funds pushed out during the closing period of the Biden administration.

Abrams, who worked for Vitalizing De Soto, a group tied to Power Forward, has denied wrongdoing. She said the grant was intended to help homeowners purchase eco-friendly appliances.

“Based on that program, a coalition of organizations – famous organizations – came together and said to the EPA, ‘if we can do this here, we can do this for millions more Americans,’” Abrams said in a 2025 MSNBC interview. “Let us invest the money of America in lowering the cost for Americans.”

Judicial Watch has sued to obtain more information about the grant.

“As the Biden administration was collapsing in 2024, it lawlessly rushed out billions in cash to left-wing interest groups in a way that encouraged fraud and abuse. The Trump EPA team should disclose and expose every single document about this massive Biden corruption scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

Zeldin’s review began in spring 2025, when the EPA said the Biden administration had moved $20 billion from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund into an account at Citibank in New York, with eight nonprofits given authority to spend the money.

The EPA asked its inspector general to investigate several transactions. According to the agency, those included former Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Director Jahi Wise, who “personally oversaw” a $5 billion grant to his previous employer; the $2 billion grant to Power Forward Communities; and a $20 million award to Young, Gifted & Green, whose CEO applied for funding while serving on the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council.

The $20 billion has been canceled, but the matter remains tied up in federal court. No major criminal prosecutions have been brought against grant recipients so far.

The EPA has said career agency officials raised concerns during the application review process about sending billions of taxpayer dollars to groups with limited financial background and political ties.

“Comments from the panel of government career staffers during the application review process highlighted concerns over handing billions of American tax dollars to these groups in addition to the lack of financial background to handle such large sums of money,” the agency wrote.

A federal judge initially blocked Zeldin’s efforts and allowed the groups to access the money. A three-judge appeals panel later sided with the EPA. The full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing the case, which could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

Zeldin said he expects that after the litigation concludes, most of the $29 billion in grants flagged and blocked by the EPA will be returned to the Treasury.

“We’re not taking money from left-wing NGOs to give them to right-wing NGOs,” Zeldin said. “This is about getting that money back to the taxpayer. This is about making sure that the money coming through an agency like EPA doesn’t have any amount of waste and abuse, that there’s a zero tolerance for it.”

News

James Talarico Scrambles to Rewrite ‘God Is Nonbinary’ Gaffe, Points Finger at Ken Paxton [WATCH]

Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico is attempting to put distance between himself and several controversial comments from his past as he campaigns against Attorney General Ken Paxton in the 2026 U.S. Senate race, as reported by The Blaze.

One statement in particular has become a focal point of criticism from Republicans and conservative commentators after resurfacing during the campaign.

During a 2021 Texas House floor and committee debate involving transgender-related issues, Talarico made comments about God and gender that continue to draw attention years later.

“God is both masculine and feminine and everything in between. God is nonbinary,” Talarico said at the time.

He continued by citing scripture while discussing transgender-identifying children.

“In Genesis 1:26, God speaks of God’s self in the plural, saying, ‘Let us make human beings in our image to be like us.’ That’s the infinite multitude of God. The masculine, the feminine, and everything in between,” Talarico said.

“Trans children are God’s children made in God’s own image. There’s nothing wrong with them. Nothing at all. They are perfect. They are beautiful, and they are sacred.”

The remarks have repeatedly resurfaced during the Senate campaign, with Paxton and other Republicans pointing to them as evidence of what they describe as Talarico’s views on gender and religion.

As the general election campaign has intensified, Talarico has offered a different explanation of the comments.

During a recent interview with CBS News correspondent Ed O’Keefe, Talarico acknowledged the statement generated controversy and said he intended to attract attention with the remark.

“I was being intentionally provocative with that statement. But what it means is that God can’t be defined by human categories. The apostle Paul in his letter to the Galatians says that in Christ there is neither male nor female,” Talarico said.

He also accused Paxton of using the comments for political purposes, saying the attorney general was “intentionally clipping [his] cringey comments to distract from his career of corruption.”

Talarico made similar comments during an interview with CNN anchor Jake Tapper.

“I understand that that comment is a little provocative. I said it on the House floor when the extremists in the Republican legislature were picking on school kids who were different. But I don’t think it’s controversial theologically. Most Christians would acknowledge that God is beyond gender,” he said.

The issue became a topic of discussion on BlazeTV’s “Pat Gray Unleashed,” where host Pat Gray and his panel criticized Talarico’s explanation and his attempt to shift blame to Paxton.

Co-host Keith Malinak questioned Talarico’s defense of the comments.

“Oh, so it’s Ken Paxton’s fault that you’re twisting the word of God?” Malinak said, later describing Talarico as “insufferable.”

The discussion also expanded to broader debates surrounding women’s sports and policies involving transgender-identifying athletes.

Gray argued that athletic competition should be organized according to biological sex and suggested alternative approaches for transgender-identifying athletes.

“If they want to play sports, let’s come up with a way to let them engage in sports. Like with their own biological gender, they could compete, or we create a separate category for trans people,” Gray said.

“But you don’t stick them against the females. It doesn’t make any sense.”

The controversy comes as the Texas Senate race continues to draw national attention, with Republicans highlighting Talarico’s previous statements while the Democratic nominee seeks to explain comments that have become a recurring issue on the campaign trail.

News

RFK Jr. Drops Hammer on Michael Bennet in Hearing: ‘They Deserve the Truth!’

A Senate Finance Committee hearing Thursday erupted into a shouting match between Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) during an exchange over mRNA vaccines, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The hearing, which drew national attention, followed a turbulent week at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Former CDC director Susan Monarez resigned after Kennedy pressed her to step down, and three additional senior officials left the agency in protest shortly afterward.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies on Jan. 29, 2025, at his Senate hearing on his nomination to be the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

The session grew heated when Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) opened by questioning Kennedy’s integrity and referencing Monarez’s claims. Kennedy dismissed the criticism and pivoted to vaccine policy, pressing senators on clinical data related to COVID-19 shots.

The most contentious exchange occurred when Kennedy questioned Bennet directly about the safety of mRNA vaccines.

“Are you saying that the mRNA vaccine has never been associated with myocarditis or pericarditis in teens? Is that what you’re trying to tell us?!” Kennedy asked.

Bennet deflected, pointing instead to Kennedy’s decision in June to remove all 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. “I am simply trying to say that the people you put on that panel after firing…” Bennet began.

Kennedy cut him off. “You are evading the question!” he shouted.

Bennet responded forcefully. “I’m asking the questions, Mr. Kennedy, on behalf of parents and schools and teachers all over the United States of America who deserve so much better than your leadership! That’s what this conversation is about!”

Kennedy fired back: “Senator, they deserve the truth, and that’s what we are going to give to them for the first time in the history of this agency!”

The clash underscored sharp partisan divides over vaccine policy and the Biden administration’s handling of health agencies before President Donald Trump appointed Kennedy to lead HHS earlier this year.

Kennedy has defended his shakeup of CDC leadership, arguing the changes were necessary to restore public trust and ensure transparency.

The Finance Committee hearing is part of ongoing oversight into HHS operations, particularly its vaccine guidance. While Democrats expressed frustration with Kennedy’s leadership, Republicans on the panel have largely supported his efforts to overhaul the agency.

The Department of Health and Human Services did not issue an additional statement following the exchange.


Scroll to Top