Author name: RVM News

News

RFK Jr. Announces Major New NIH Policy, Calls Out Media Malpractice After Fauci Hearing [WATCH]

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, accusing the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director of misleading the public on multiple issues, funding gain-of-function research, and contributing to the suppression of dissenting medical opinions.

Kennedy also pointed to a new National Institutes of Health policy that he said is intended to prevent federal funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in the future.

According to Kennedy, several physicians who questioned the government’s COVID-19 response faced censorship and professional consequences.

“You know there was, there were doctors like Peter McCullough and Robert Malone and Pierre Kory, who were saying from the beginning they were looking at the data and saying, yeah, this this causes myocarditis, it causes blood clots, it causes myocardial pulmonary infarctions,” Kennedy said.

He argued those doctors were punished rather than heard.

“And they were being censored, they were being vilified, marginalized, demonized, delicenced, publicly scolded by the press.”

Kennedy said the media played a central role in shaping public perception during the pandemic.

“The media malpractice is really what I think we should focus on because they were anybody who questioned Dr. Fauci was put in was like put off on an island. They were pariahs, and they were the media every day was telling us trust the experts.”

Kennedy then turned his criticism directly toward Fauci, arguing that the government’s messaging on COVID-19 repeatedly proved inaccurate.

“Well, he was the expert, and we now know he was lying about everything.”

Kennedy listed several areas where he alleged Fauci misled the public.

“He was lying about mass. He was lying about social distancing. He was lying about lockdowns. He was lying about natural immunity. He was lying about the ability of the vaccine to prevent transmission and and prevent infection.”

Kennedy also referenced Fauci’s own experience with COVID-19 after vaccination.

“He got the vaccine and he immediately got COVID 19 and then he got a pulmonary infarction.”

He further alleged that Fauci concealed information about the origins of the virus.

“He was lying about the origins from day one.”

Kennedy then explained why he believes Fauci misrepresented the issue.

“Why was he lying? Because he funded those studies at the Wuhan lab, and he funded the studies at the University of North Carolina that developed the techniques for weaponizing COVID-19.”

Kennedy said the research was later transferred to scientists in Wuhan.

“And then gave those Ralph Baric, his funded scientist at the University of North Carolina, gave those to Zachley, the scientists, the Bat Lady scientist in the Wuhan lab.”

According to Kennedy, the research involved a technique designed to alter viruses while concealing evidence of laboratory manipulation.

“And he taught her a technique that Anthony Fauci had paid him to develop, called seamless ligation, which is also called nosium.”

Kennedy described the technique as “a way of manipulating the virus to make it deadly to human beings, and then covering up the evidence of human manipulation.”

He questioned why taxpayer-funded research would support such work.

“And why would anybody spend NIH money developing that kind of technology? It’s bio weapons technology. It has nothing to do with public health. It’s the opposite. It’s the inverse of anything you would want to do with public health.”

Kennedy also alleged that the research was transferred to a Chinese military laboratory.

“Well, he’s taking. He took that and he gave it to the Chinese military lab at Wuhan.”

Concluding his remarks, Kennedy pointed to what he described as a policy change at the National Institutes of Health aimed at preventing similar research from receiving federal funding in the future.

“So these are, and as you mentioned at the beginning of this, we today NIH has now issued a policy to make sure these kind of experiments can never happen again.”

He added, “That NIH will never again pay for a dangerous gain-function experiment.”

WATCH:

News

Tulsi Exposes the Truth: Fauci’s Arrogant Silence Screams Guilt on COVID Cover-Up [WATCH]

In the wake of Dr. Anthony Fauci pleading the Fifth Amendment 111 times, former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard pointed to her earlier release of what she described as previously undisclosed communications and documents that she says detail Dr. Anthony Fauci’s involvement in intelligence assessments related to COVID-19, the virus’s origins, and U.S.-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Gabbard made the announcement on what she described as her final day serving as Director of National Intelligence, saying the document release was consistent with President Donald Trump’s transparency initiative.

“Before the COVID pandemic, Dr. Fauci, as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, provided millions in U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, work which is now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic,” Gabbard said.

She said the newly released materials were intended to reveal what she described as Fauci’s role in shaping intelligence assessments and public understanding of the pandemic.

“Now, in support of President Trump’s maximum transparency mandate, today on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents that expose exactly how Fauci worked with politicized career leadership in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about his actions, the virus’s lab leak origins, and his role in directing U.S. funding for this dangerous research that caused immeasurable harm and countless lost lives.”

According to Gabbard, the documents show that Fauci influenced intelligence community conclusions while later denying those interactions before Congress.

“Now, these documents expose Fauci’s direct role in influencing and manipulating IC assessments on COVID-19, and how Fauci lied to Congress in 2024 when, under oath, he denied knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research.”

Gabbard also said her office received testimony from multiple whistleblowers within the intelligence community.

“We also received testimony from multiple intelligence community whistleblowers who reported retaliation for challenging the intelligence community’s manipulation of intelligence on the virus’s origins, once again revealing a clear pattern of suppressing dissent, silencing critics, and burying the truth.”

She argued that Fauci’s relationships within the intelligence community enabled him to play multiple roles throughout the pandemic.

“Dr. Fauci’s close relationships with the intelligence community enabled him to assume three key roles that shield him from scrutiny.”

Gabbard alleged that Fauci funded gain-of-function research tied to pharmaceutical interests while simultaneously influencing intelligence assessments about the virus’s origin.

“First, Dr. Fauci funded dangerous gain-of-function coronavirus research linked to big pharma and their pursuit of universal vaccines worth trillions of dollars.”

She continued, “Second, Dr. Fauci was the behind-the-scenes advisor who, alongside his hand-picked so-called experts, pushed the intelligence community to endorse a natural animal origin to hide his dangerous gain-of-function research that he funded using taxpayer dollars. All of this in a deliberate attempt to cover up the truth and shift the blame and attention away from Fauci’s own actions.”

Gabbard further alleged that Fauci influenced both intelligence officials and public messaging during the pandemic.

“Third, Dr. Fauci became the nation’s pandemic pundit, and he publicly pushed lies, disinformation, and censorship using every platform available.”

She said emails included in the release showed intelligence officials regularly relied on Fauci’s recommendations.

“Now, according to hundreds of reviewed emails, which are included in this release, the intelligence community almost always incorporated Fauci’s recommendations.”

Gabbard also claimed Fauci promoted research that intelligence officials later treated as authoritative.

“He promoted a fraudulent paper, whose publication he helped prompt, as legitimate information for intelligence community consideration.”

She added that, according to the documents, “Senior analysts praised Dr. Fauci not as a policymaker, but as what they called an unbiased guide to the real coronavirus experts, while deliberately ignoring experts who might dissent from Fauci’s narratives.”

Gabbard again accused Fauci of providing false testimony before Congress.

“Now Fauci didn’t stop there; he blatantly lied to Congress under oath during his 2024 testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, denying that he ever spoke to any intelligence agency about COVID.”

She said the newly released correspondence contradicts that testimony.

“Now, the correspondence I’m releasing today directly contradicts his sworn testimony.”

Gabbard also described allegations made by intelligence community whistleblowers concerning retaliation against analysts who questioned prevailing conclusions.

“Now, we received statements from multiple whistleblowers revealing that the intelligence analysts who dared to challenge Dr. Fauci’s COVID origin conclusions faced threats of retaliation, marginalization, and many suffered career setbacks.”

She cited examples that included a contractor who “was terminated just days after coming forward to ODNI as a whistleblower” and said analysts supporting the lab leak hypothesis “were reminded by their managers that leadership would determine which analysts would be promoted and which would not.”

“The message was clear: go along, or be punished,” Gabbard said.

She also alleged that senior officials compromised whistleblower protections by removing anonymity and requiring managers or attorneys to attend meetings with whistleblowers, creating what she described as “an atmosphere of intimidation.”

Concluding her remarks, Gabbard said the pandemic’s impact warrants full public disclosure and accountability.

“The COVID pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and countless people around the world.”

She added, “Now, after years of lies and censorship and cover-ups, the American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability.”

Gabbard argued that “The tactics that were used to hide the truth are straight from the deep state playbook,” and accused “Politicized self-serving leaders like Dr. Fauci” of covering up wrongdoing, manipulating intelligence, lying to Congress, and undermining President Trump.

“It’s time you know the truth,” Gabbard said.

WATCH:

News

Newsom Affair Bombshell Exposes Kamala Harris Advice to Keep Quiet [WATCH]

Ruby Rippey, the woman at the center of Gavin Newsom’s infamous 2007 affair scandal, has now offered a detailed account of the episode that once rocked San Francisco politics and exposed the messy private conduct behind the polished Democratic brand.

In a Vanity Fair essay published Tuesday, Rippey described her affair with Newsom, who was then Mayor of San Francisco, while also revealing that Kamala Harris privately advised her to stay quiet after the scandal became public.

At the time, Rippey was married to Alex Tourk, Newsom’s campaign manager, and she worked in City Hall as the mayor’s appointments secretary.

That made the situation more than just a personal failure, no matter how hard political professionals may try to file it away as ancient history.

Rippey wrote that Harris, who was then serving as San Francisco District Attorney, gave her direct advice after the affair exploded into public view.

According to Rippey, Harris told her, “I wouldn’t say anything right now, Ruby. Just pause. More time will give you better perspective,”

That advice sounds rather familiar in the world of Democratic damage control.

When a scandal threatens the right people, the preferred strategy always seems to involve silence, time, and the hope that voters will move on before anyone asks too many questions.

The essay also revisits Rippey’s struggle with alcoholism, the collapse of her marriage, and her eventual path to sobriety.

She presents the affair as part of a darker personal period, while also raising questions about how Newsom and his circle later framed the scandal for public consumption.

Rippey took issue with Newsom’s memoir, saying it wrongly suggested that he was the one who “came clean” to her husband.

She said she had already confessed to Tourk, meaning Newsom’s version appeared to give him credit for a confession that was not his.

When Rippey later asked a Newsom adviser whether the governor “tells the truth” in the book, she said the adviser replied, “Well, we all remember things differently, don’t we, Ruby?”

That is quite a line from the political class, where convenient memory appears to be an occupational skill.

Rippey described the beginning of the affair while working in City Hall and recalled nights in hotel rooms, visits to Newsom’s Russian Hill penthouse, and private moments that blurred personal weakness with political power.

WATCH:

Her account paints a picture of proximity, status, and dysfunction inside the orbit of a rising Democratic star.

She wrote that the relationship was not simply about sex, adding, “There is sex, but it isn’t the point.”

In her telling, the deeper pull involved access to power and the feeling of being noticed by someone whose public profile was growing fast.

Rippey also reflected on the imbalance between a powerful mayor and an employee inside his administration.

Though she said she participated willingly, she later came to view the situation differently, writing that “power does not need to coerce. It only needs to exist.”

The scandal broke after Rippey sent an email confession to her husband while he was still working for Newsom.

Tourk confronted the mayor and resigned immediately, turning a private betrayal into a public crisis that City Hall could no longer manage behind closed doors.

Newsom publicly apologized during a 2007 news conference and later announced that he would seek treatment for alcohol abuse.

For a politician who would go on to become governor of California and a national Democratic figure, the affair became one of those stories his team clearly preferred to bury under layers of reinvention.

Harris’s alleged role in advising Rippey to hold her tongue adds another revealing layer.

The same political ecosystem that produced Newsom also produced Harris, and this account places both figures inside the same familiar San Francisco machine when the priority appeared to be containment.

Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to Newsom’s team and Harris’ team for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.

Perhaps silence is still the preferred playbook.

For conservatives watching California’s ruling class lecture the rest of America about morality, equity, and enlightened leadership, Rippey’s account is a reminder that the sermon often looks very different backstage.

The people who present themselves as guardians of decency have a remarkable habit of expecting everyone else to forget the fine print.

News

Horror on Illinois River as Alleged Drunk Boater Decapitates Woman in Brutal Crash [WATCH]

A horrifying crash on the Fox River in Illinois has left one woman dead, another person critically injured, and a community demanding answers after authorities say a pontoon boat operator was drunk and speeding through a no wake zone.

Richard Stevenson, 45, of Lisle, Illinois, was arrested early Sunday morning after officials say he was involved in a deadly collision between two boats Saturday afternoon near McHenry County.

According to authorities, Stevenson was charged with reckless homicide and aggravated driving under the influence after the crash, which reportedly caused catastrophic injuries to a woman on the boat that was struck.

The details are gruesome, and there is no polite way to dress them up. A woman was killed in a violent impact that witnesses say followed a day of reckless behavior on the water.

Neighbors along the Fox River told local media they had seen the pontoon speeding up and down the river before the fatal crash.

Some residents even captured video of the vessel moving at an alarming speed.

CBS News Chicago reported that neighbors said the pontoon was moving at about 70 miles per hour shortly before the collision.

That is not exactly the sort of casual weekend boating anyone expects in a no wake zone.

Trevor Morris told local media he was outside swinging his daughter when he heard the boat roar past along the river.

Another neighbor reportedly recorded video of the same pontoon just about a minute before the crash downriver around 3 p.m. Saturday.

When residents learned there had been a deadly collision, they said they were not surprised to see that same pontoon at the center of the investigation.

That reaction says plenty about what people nearby had allegedly witnessed before tragedy struck.

Two people were on the boat that was hit.

One person died, and the other was taken to the hospital in critical condition after the vessel suffered extensive damage.

CBS News Chicago reported that the person killed was a woman, although her identity had not been released as of Sunday night.

Her family is now left with the kind of loss no one should ever have to endure because someone allegedly treated a public waterway like a personal racetrack.

Authorities said Stevenson was taken into custody around 4:30 a.m. Sunday.

According to WIFR News, he was found in trees near the shoreline where his pontoon had come to rest.

Two other people who had reportedly been on the pontoon left the scene before law enforcement arrived.

Investigators will no doubt want to know exactly what they saw, what they knew, and why they left.

Stevenson was taken to Northwestern Hospital in McHenry, where testing reportedly showed a blood alcohol concentration of .200.

The legal limit in Illinois is .08.

That number is not a small mistake or a borderline reading.

If authorities are correct, it is more than twice the legal limit, which makes the alleged speeding and reckless operation of a boat even more outrageous.

Witnesses told officers that Stevenson had been drinking throughout the day while operating the pontoon on both the Chain O Lakes and the Fox River at high rates of speed.

The pattern described by witnesses paints a deeply disturbing picture.

WATCH:

Boating is supposed to be a weekend escape for families, not a guessing game over whether some intoxicated thrill seeker is about to come flying around the bend.

Normal people understand that waterways have rules because lives are at stake.

The no wake zone matters for a reason.

Families live along those banks, people fish there, people relax there, and other boaters have every right to expect basic sanity from those sharing the river.

Now prosecutors will have to sort through the evidence, including witness statements, video, toxicology results, and the aftermath of a crash that should never have happened.

Stevenson is entitled to the legal process, but the allegations are chilling.

There is also the heartbreaking reality that a woman went out on the water and never came home.

One person remains critically injured, and a family has been shattered in an instant.

If the allegations prove true, this was not some unavoidable accident caused by bad luck or rough conditions.

It was the predictable result of reckless choices, alcohol, speed, and total disregard for everyone else on the river.

For the victim’s loved ones, the criminal charges will not bring her back.

But if justice is done, the man accused in this case should never again be in a position to endanger innocent people from behind the wheel of a boat.

News

“Equity” for Whom? NYC’s Government Grocery Plan Knifes Immigrant Businesses in the Back [WATCH]

The Multicultural Business Coalition is reportedly preparing to take legal action against Zohran Mamdani over his proposal for government run grocery stores, arguing that the plan would create unfair competition against private businesses already operating on thin margins.

For small grocers, bodegas, markets, and immigrant owned shops, the concern is not hard to understand.

They pay rent, taxes, utility bills, insurance, payroll, licensing costs, and every other fee government can dream up, while politicians float taxpayer funded competitors as if the private sector is the problem.

WATCH:

According to the report, the coalition is moving toward a lawsuit that would challenge Mamdani’s grocery idea on the grounds that it would put city backed stores in direct competition with existing merchants.

That is exactly the kind of fight that tends to erupt when socialist theory leaves the college seminar room and starts trampling real livelihoods.

Mamdani has promoted the concept of government run grocery stores as part of a broader affordability agenda.

The pitch may sound charming to activists who think shelves fill themselves, but store owners know better.

WATCH:

Food retail is an unforgiving business, especially in a place where labor costs, rent, theft, regulations, and inflation are already squeezing independent operators.

Add a government subsidized rival to the block, and the playing field stops being uneven and starts looking like a political ambush.

The coalition appears ready to argue that private businesses should not be forced to compete against an entity backed by public money and political power.

One person involved in the fight warned that Mamdani “won’t be able to bully these lawyers we are going to bring in.”

That line captures the mood among business owners who have watched progressive politicians lecture them about equity while piling costs and mandates onto their backs.

The same political class that claims to champion working people often seems weirdly comfortable crushing the people who actually create jobs.

For many neighborhood merchants, the issue is also deeply personal.

These stores are not abstract economic units in a spreadsheet, they are family businesses built through long hours, personal risk, and years of grinding through a city government that rarely makes anything easier.

A government run grocery store would not have to survive the same way.

If it loses money, politicians can simply point to taxpayers, call it compassion, and demand another round of funding.

That is the fundamental unfairness at the heart of the coalition’s complaint.

Private stores have to earn every customer, cover every loss, and answer for every mistake, while a city backed operation can hide failure behind slogans and budget tricks.

Mamdani’s supporters may frame the plan as a bold answer to high grocery prices, but grocery prices did not rise because small shop owners suddenly became villains.

Inflation, supply costs, crime, regulation, and bad policy all played their part, many of them courtesy of the same political mindset now proposing more government control.

There is also the question of who decides where these stores go and how they operate.

In a city where political favoritism is practically a native language, business owners have every reason to worry that government run retail would become another tool for rewarding allies and punishing dissenters.

WATCH:

The lawsuit threat signals that the coalition does not intend to sit quietly while another progressive experiment is dropped onto the backs of working entrepreneurs.

If Mamdani wants to turn grocery shopping into a government project, he may first have to explain in court why taxpayers should fund competition against the very businesses already feeding their communities.

This is not just a fight over groceries.

It is a fight over whether government exists to protect fair rules or to shove its way into the marketplace whenever the left finds a new slogan.

News

US and Saudi Jets Pound Iran Proxies After Drone Blitz on American Forces [WATCH]

The United States and Saudi Arabia launched joint airstrikes Tuesday against Iran backed terrorist targets in Iraq, sending a very direct message to Tehran and its militia network after another round of attempted attacks on American forces.

American and Saudi fighter jets hit logistics and weapons sites used by the terrorists, according to the report, after US Central Command said Iran had tried to stage a “surprise attack” on US forces in the Middle East.

CENTCOM said the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps directed more than 30 drone attacks over the last three days.

Every one of them failed, which is not exactly the image of strength Tehran loves to sell to its useful idiots around the globe.

The command also revealed that the pressure campaign has been far larger than one bad week.

From February through April of 2026, Iranian supported militias in Iraq attempted more than 600 attacks against Americans and US facilities.

That is not diplomacy, and it is not some misunderstood regional grievance.

It is a sustained terror campaign by a regime that keeps poking the eagle and then acting shocked when the claws come out.

“The IRGC and its terrorist proxies must cease these attacks to avoid further U.S. military response.”

CENTCOM said the latest escalation included a Tuesday night missile attack from Iran, with IRGC forces firing multiple ballistic missiles at American forces in the region.

The missiles were intercepted before they could hit their targets.

The strike campaign comes at a tense moment, since mediators have been claiming that ceasefire talks involving the United States and Iran have made “significant” progress.

Funny how the mullahs always seem to discover negotiation right after their hardware starts exploding.

President Trump halted new strikes on Iran last Friday, but he has made clear that restraint is not surrender.

The president has sounded cautiously optimistic about a deal, while also warning that the military option is still very much on the table.

“You know, they wanted to talk. … we’re having good talks, so we’ll see what happens,” Trump told reporters Monday.

“I think there’s a good chance that something could happen, and if it does, good. If it doesn’t, we go back to doing what we were doing two days ago,” Trump warned.

That is the sort of language Tehran understands far better than think tank poetry or State Department hand-wringing. If talks work, fine, but if terrorists keep targeting Americans, then the response should be fast, painful and unmistakable.

WATCH:

The United States is also working with Qatar, Pakistan and Egypt as talks continue between Iran and Oman over the future of the Strait of Hormuz.

Sources told Axios and the Associated Press that the waterway remains a major focus of the current negotiations.

The strait is one of the most important maritime routes in the world, and Iran has repeatedly used threats against it as a pressure tactic.

The Trump administration position is simple enough, the waterway should remain free and open, just as it was before the war began.

Omani negotiators said Monday that efforts to create what they describe as fair management of the Strait of Hormuz with Iran are being complicated by fee proposals.

One idea would allow Iran and Oman to collect service fees for maintaining maritime security along the route.

A regional source told Axios that the arrangement would position Iran and Oman as caretakers of the strait.

Another proposal would mirror the Strait of Malacca model, where Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore collect fees tied to maintenance and management.

The problem, of course, is that Iran is not a neutral crossing guard in a reflective vest.

It is the same regime whose terror proxies just launched wave after wave of failed attacks against American forces.

For now, the message from Washington and Riyadh is sharper than any negotiating memo.

Keep sending drones, missiles and militia thugs after Americans, and the next answer may come from the sky again.

News

Smug Virginia Democrat Caught Flying Past School Bus at 104 MPH with Pathetic Excuse [WATCH]

Another Virginia Democrat has managed to turn a routine commute into a public lesson in arrogance, entitlement, and breathtaking disregard for everyone else on the road.

Fairfax County Supervisor Andres Jimenez was pulled over by a Virginia State Police trooper after allegedly blasting through a 70 MPH zone at 104 MPH.

That is not a harmless mistake, that is reckless behavior at a speed where one bad move can become a tragedy.

The worst part came from the dash camera footage, which reportedly showed Jimenez flying alongside a school bus.

Yes, a school bus, because apparently the urgent business of a Fairfax County board meeting now outranks basic concern for children.

Local ABC reporter Nick Minock described the traffic stop in plain terms.

“Video shows a Virginia State Trooper pulling over Fairfax County Supervisor Andres Jimenez for reckless driving. The video shows him driving fast next to a school bus.”

Minock also reported what Jimenez told the trooper after being stopped.

“The officer tells Jimenez he clocked him driving 104 mph in a 70. Jimenez said he wasn’t paying attention, apologized, said he was on his way to work and that the board meeting started in 20 minutes.”

That excuse is not exactly the legal defense of the century.

Being late to a meeting does not give a politician permission to treat a Virginia highway like a private speedway.

WATCH:

For ordinary Virginians, 104 MPH in a 70 MPH zone can mean serious consequences, including a reckless driving charge and major penalties.

For a well connected Democrat in deep blue Fairfax County, voters will be watching to see whether the same rules actually apply.

That is the real issue here, because Democrats love to lecture everyone else about public safety, responsibility, and protecting children.

Then one of their own gets caught screaming past a bus full of kids, and suddenly the excuses start arriving faster than the Porsche.

Jimenez is also not the first Virginia Democrat to find himself in the spotlight for driving at absurd speeds.

Jay Jones, now a major figure in Virginia Democratic politics, was previously clocked going 116 MPH in a 70 MPH zone while serving in the House of Delegates.

Jones received community service, but that punishment became a political embarrassment of its own.

Reports later found that much of that “service” involved volunteering at his own political action committee, because apparently civic duty can look a lot like campaign work when Democrats are grading their own homework.

Virginia Republicans quickly pointed to the similarity between the two cases.

Their argument is simple, if a regular citizen would face the full weight of the law, then politically connected Democrats should not get a velvet rope entrance to the accountability lounge.

Fairfax County also has another wrinkle, and his name is Steve Descano.

The county prosecutor has been hammered by Republicans over soft on crime policies, especially amid concerns that illegal aliens who commit crimes have received preferential treatment rather than firm prosecution.

Descano, a Soros funded prosecutor, has long represented the left wing experiment in criminal justice that treats criminals gently and treats public outrage as an inconvenience.

That approach has not exactly inspired confidence among families who expect the justice system to protect them.

Virginia also has a new law requiring drivers caught at certain extreme speeds to have a speed governor installed on their vehicle.

If that law applies here, the public deserves to know whether Jimenez will be treated like any other driver or quietly shuffled into the Democrat courtesy lane.

The optics could hardly be worse for a party that constantly claims everything it does is “for the kids.”

That line sounds a lot less convincing when one of its officials is accused of tearing past a school bus at 104 MPH because a meeting was starting soon.

Jimenez apologized and said he was not paying attention, according to the report.

That may explain the moment, but it does not excuse it, especially from a public official who helps make decisions for everyone else.

Voters are tired of the ruling class routine where laws are strict for taxpayers and flexible for insiders.

If Democrats want to preach accountability, they can start by applying it to their own speeding supervisors before another bus full of children ends up in the path of political privilege.

News

Carville Floats David Hogg for DNC Chair as Democrat Meltdown Gets Even Weirder [WATCH]

The Democratic National Committee is not exactly giving off the vibe of a party ready to retake America.

It looks more like a busted machine held together by donor panic, bad polling, and the same Trump obsession that helped sink Democrats in the first place.

The party apparatus is reportedly struggling with money problems, internal distrust, and state level pushback over its primary calendar.

When your national committee is putting its headquarters up as collateral to access cash, the donor class champagne circuit is clearly not paying the bills like it used to.

Into this mess steps James Carville, the veteran Democratic strategist who has never been shy about saying what his party would rather not hear.

This time, he floated a name for DNC chairman that sounds more like a parody account suggestion than a serious plan.

Carville said David Hogg, the former DNC vice chair and liberal activist, should take over the committee if current chairman Ken Martin cannot right the ship.

Yes, that David Hogg, because apparently the Democrats looked at their credibility problem and wondered how to make it louder.

Carville made the comments in a video posted to YouTube while explaining that he was recovering from hernia surgery.

Even from recovery, he still managed to diagnose the DNC in a way party insiders probably hated because it was too close to the truth.

The New York Times recently reported on turmoil surrounding Martin and the national committee, describing a chairman under pressure as the party wrestles with financial strain and internal fear.

For Democrats, this is what accountability looks like when the media finally admits the room is on fire.

Carville did not sugarcoat it, calling the DNC “dysfunctional.”

That one word may be the most honest Democratic message voters have heard in years.

“It was a story on a DNC that basically said it’s dysfunctional,” Carville said.

“It’s just difficult to do anything with it, and it’s all true. And at the end of the day, who cares?”

That is quite a statement from a man who has spent decades trying to get Democrats elected.

When even Carville sounds bored by the party structure, it tells you the problem is not just branding, messaging, or some imaginary misinformation monster hiding under the bed.

He suggested that DNC leaders might “get themselves together” and “figure out a way maybe they could be somewhat relevant, I have no idea.”

That is not exactly a ringing endorsement from one of the party’s most recognizable strategists.

Then came the part that really made jaws drop. “If David Hogg wants to take it over, I ain’t stopping you,” he continued.

“Go ahead, man, I don’t really care. And I don’t think, at the end of the day, well, they might be fine people. I know some of them are not particularly determined.”

Hogg has reportedly said he does not want the job, which may be the most sensible Democratic decision made in recent memory.

Still, the fact that his name is even being tossed around says plenty about the state of the party.

WATCH:

The Democrats have spent the period after the 2024 election doing almost everything except asking why voters rejected them.

Instead of self examination, they have doubled down on the same old routine, more rage at Trump, more lectures for working Americans, and more smug speeches from people who think slogans are a substitute for policy.

This is the party that claims to be defending democracy while its own national committee looks chaotic, broke, and consumed by internal suspicion.

They insist the American people are the problem, never the consultants, never the radical activists, and certainly never the stale leadership that keeps losing touch with normal voters.

Carville’s comments cut through the usual spin because they reveal what many Democrats privately know.

The DNC is not feared, not respected, and not driving the national conversation in any meaningful way.

WATCH:

For conservatives, the spectacle is hard to ignore.

A party that spent years calling Trump supporters chaotic now finds itself begging for relevance while debating whether a young activist should take command of the whole operation.

The irony is rich, and the lesson is obvious.

When a political party builds its identity around hating one man instead of serving the country, eventually the donors dry up, the voters wander off, and even James Carville starts asking who cares.

News

Four Arrested as Tennessee Park Mass Shooting Probe Reveals Deadly Party Gunfire

Four people have been arrested in connection with a mass shooting that left three people dead and several others injured at a park in Madison County, Tennessee, authorities announced Monday, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The Madison County Sheriff’s Office said Rodney Parker, 21, Roshod Parker, 19, Ladarius Grimes, 21, and Tomorris Person, 18, have all been taken into custody following the July 19 shooting at Savannah Williamson Park in Denmark, Tennessee.

According to investigators, Madison County Sheriff’s Office dispatchers received multiple 911 calls at approximately 10:34 a.m. on July 19 reporting gunfire at the park.

Tennessee sheriff announces 4 arrests in mass shooting investigation at Madison County park.

Four people have been arrested in connection with a fatal shooting that took place at a Tennessee park. Three people were killed in the July 19 shooting at Savannah Williamson Park in…

When first responders arrived, they found numerous victims suffering from gunshot wounds.

Two victims were pronounced dead at the scene. A third victim later died after being transported to a local hospital.

Authorities identified the three people who died as Jeremiah Forbis, Garrian Greer, and Jamarion Burns.

The sheriff’s office said a total of 12 people were either killed or injured during the shooting.

Investigators said the violence began after two vehicles- a white Nissan Altima and a silver Honda Accord- were traveling south on Neely Station Road shortly before the shooting.

According to the Madison County Sheriff’s Office, investigators determined that occupants of the Honda Accord fired multiple rounds into a crowd gathered at Savannah Williamson Park for a party. Authorities also said some people attending the gathering returned fire after the shooting began.

As the investigation continued, detectives identified Rodney Parker as the driver of the Nissan Altima. Roshod Parker was identified as a passenger in the Honda Accord, while Ladarius Grimes was identified as the Accord’s driver. Investigators identified Tomorris Person as another passenger in the Accord.

The sheriff’s office announced Monday that all four suspects have been charged with three counts each of felony murder in the perpetration of attempted first-degree murder.

WATCH:

The investigation remains ongoing as detectives continue reviewing evidence related to the incident.

The July 19 shooting resulted in one of the deadliest incidents in Madison County this year, prompting an extensive investigation by the Madison County Sheriff’s Office.

Investigators continue working to determine the full sequence of events that led to the shooting and are asking anyone with additional information to contact law enforcement.

Officials have not released the identities or conditions of the surviving victims. The sheriff’s office has not announced when the four defendants are scheduled to appear in court beyond confirming the charges filed against them.

The Madison County Sheriff’s Office said the investigation remains active.

News

Long Island Street Takeover Erupts as ATV Goons Spark Chaos and Police Chases [WATCH]

A large gathering of ATV and dirt bike riders disrupted traffic and prompted multiple police responses across three Long Island communities on Saturday, ending with three arrests and the seizure of at least 10 vehicles, according to Suffolk County police, as reported by The New York Post.

Authorities said approximately 200 riders traveled through Hauppauge, Brentwood, and Bay Shore, performing dangerous stunts on public roads and generating numerous 911 calls from residents and motorists.

The incident unfolded along major roadways and residential streets, where videos obtained by the New York Post showed large groups of ATV and dirt bike riders occupying both lanes of Route 347 in Hauppauge.

Many riders were seen wearing masks, bandanas, and sunglasses that obscured their faces.

The footage also showed riders performing wheelies and other stunts while traveling through neighborhoods.

Several people accompanying the riders appeared to be recording the activity with cell phones, which the report said may have been intended for social media.

According to the videos, the riders traveled in close proximity to one another while performing the maneuvers, with several appearing to nearly lose control or collide with other riders.

Police said the first response came after dispatchers received numerous emergency calls from residents and drivers reporting the activity.

Officers located the gathering in Hauppauge and arrested Ava Mongiello, 23, and Jahkil Arroyo, 29. Several motorcycles and ATVs were also impounded during that operation.

Investigators said many of the riders then regrouped near Motor Parkway in Brentwood before continuing toward Bay Shore.

Around 6:30 p.m., officers encountered the group again in Bay Shore after two ATVs became disabled, police said. Authorities said the riders of those vehicles fled on foot when officers approached.

Police said officers pursued one of the individuals, later identified as 22-year-old Shamir Solomon, and took him into custody after a foot chase.

According to investigators, Solomon was carrying a loaded firearm when he was arrested.

Mongiello and Arroyo were each charged with reckless driving, reckless endangerment, and unlawfully fleeing a police officer.

Suffolk County police said both were issued desk appearance tickets and released.

Solomon was charged with criminal possession of a weapon, unlawful speed contest, and reckless driving.

Authorities said the criminal possession of a weapon charge carries a potential prison sentence of up to 15 years if he is convicted.

Court records show Solomon was held overnight before appearing for arraignment in Central Islip on Sunday.

He pleaded not guilty and was released on $10,000 bail, according to the New York State court database.

The incident temporarily affected multiple communities as police worked to disperse the riders and respond to calls from the public. Authorities said at least 10 vehicles were impounded during the enforcement operation.

The investigation remains ongoing.


Scroll to Top