Author name: RVM News

News

President Trump Unveils Freedom Haul to Put Vets Behind the Wheel and Illegal Alien Drivers on Notice [WATCH]

President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a new initiative aimed at putting American veterans behind the wheel of big rigs while moving illegal alien truck drivers off the road, as reported by Breitbart.

The plan, called “Freedom Haul,” was unveiled outside the west facade of the West Wing and fits neatly into Trump’s broader push to restore order after years of open border chaos and bureaucratic nonsense.

Under the initiative, veterans who drove heavy trucks during military service will become automatically eligible for a commercial driver’s license within two years after leaving the service.

For veterans who did not drive trucks in uniform, Trump said the government will create an expedited system to train and license them quickly, rather than trapping them in the usual maze of paperwork.

“They’re going to be given a very quick pass. We’re going to teach them. They’re going to learn,” Trump said, adding that he expects many to be ready in a matter of weeks.

“They’ll be licensed in a matter of a few weeks, I think it is. They’re going to take about three or four weeks of training,” he noted.

Trump said 34 states have already joined the effort, a sign that plenty of leaders outside the left-wing bubble understand the obvious value of putting disciplined veterans into critical transportation jobs.

The president also pointed to data showing that veteran truck drivers account for 42 percent fewer accidents, a number that should matter to anyone who cares about highway safety more than political correctness.

Veterans already make up one in ten truck drivers in America, but the administration is now looking to expand that pipeline in a major way.

For conservatives who have watched Washington shower benefits on illegal aliens while veterans get shuffled to the back of the line, the message is not exactly subtle. Trump is making clear that Americans who served the country come first.

The president also took direct aim at the dangerous consequences of allowing illegal aliens to operate massive trucks on American roadways despite obvious concerns over licensing, language, training, and accountability.

“For many years, American highways and roadways have been terrorized by unqualified illegal aliens, dangerously driving big rigs… You have to have a knowledge, you have to have a talent for it, and these people don’t have that, ” he said.

Trump argued that radical left officials at the state level have handed out commercial driver’s licenses to people who never should have received them in the first place.

He also said many illegal alien drivers do not understand English, do not care to learn it, and cannot read American road signs. That is not a small technical problem when the vehicle involved can weigh tens of thousands of pounds.

“In many cases, they’ve engaged in reckless driving that has caused many, many preventable deaths,” Trump noted, citing a deadly crash last August in Florida involving an illegal alien making an unlawful turn on a highway.

The president also cited the recent death of a Pennsylvania state trooper who was killed by an illegal alien from Haiti driving a large truck.

“Just a few weeks ago, a Pennsylvania state trooper was killed by an illegal alien from Haiti driving a semi truck. He was let in by Joe Biden and the open border policy of the Biden administration,” he added.

According to the figures cited in the announcement, illegal alien truck drivers were tied to 20 deaths in 2025. For families who lost loved ones, that is not a statistic. It is a brutal reminder that failed border policy has real victims.

In May 2025, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy signed an order enforcing English proficiency requirements for truck drivers. Trump said Thursday that his administration has already removed 24,000 drivers from the roads because they cannot speak English.

“We’ve also forced states to cancel more than 28,000 commercial drivers’ licenses unlawfully issued to illegal aliens. They were given illegally,” he added.

The Freedom Haul initiative is more than a workforce program. It is a law and order statement aimed at cleaning up an industry that leftist officials treated like another playground for their immigration experiments.

The bigger message is simple. Veterans who know discipline, responsibility, and the consequences of failure are being welcomed into a vital American industry, while illegal alien drivers who should never have been licensed are finally getting the boot.

News

Judge Lets NY Parents Walk After Baby Dies of Starvation [WATCH]

A New York court has managed to turn an already horrifying child death case into yet another public lesson in what happens when the justice system forgets the meaning of justice, as reported by The Post Millennial.

The case centers on Londyn Gonzalez, a 2-month-old baby whose brief life ended in suffering so severe that the medical examiner ruled her death a homicide by neglect.

According to the report, Londyn died from malnutrition and dehydration, the kind of words that should make every decent person stop cold.

A baby does not starve by accident in a home where adults are supposed to be feeding, protecting, and loving her.

Yet despite that grim finding, Londyn’s parents reportedly avoided jail time after a judge chose to set them free.

For many New Yorkers already exhausted by soft judges, endless excuses, and a legal culture obsessed with mercy for offenders, this case lands like a punch to the gut.

The original report described the judge as an activist judge, and frankly, it is hard to imagine a softer description for a decision this outrageous.

When a child is dead, when the medical examiner calls it homicide by neglect, and when the punishment does not involve a jail cell, ordinary citizens are right to ask who the system is actually serving.

This is not some complicated policy dispute on Capitol Hill or another staged cable news shouting match.

This is about a helpless infant who depended entirely on adults and was allegedly failed in the most basic way imaginable.

Londyn could not call police, flag down a neighbor, or plead her case before a judge.

She could only cry, weaken, and wait for care that never came.

That is why cases like this enrage working families who still believe laws are supposed to mean something.

Parents who neglect a baby to the point of death should not become beneficiaries of courtroom compassion while the child is buried and forgotten by the institutions that claim to protect the vulnerable.

The activist judging trend is not just a talking point from conservatives anymore.

It is playing out in courtrooms where criminals and abusers keep getting second chances, while victims and families are left with speeches, paperwork, and a grave.

The left loves to lecture America about compassion, usually while expanding bureaucracy and scolding everyone who disagrees with them.

But real compassion begins with defending the innocent, and there is no one more innocent than a 2-month-old baby.

The ruling in Londyn’s case sends a chilling message.

If the death of a starving infant is not enough to bring serious jail time, then the public has every reason to question the priorities of the bench.

The outrage is not about vengeance.

It is about moral order, basic accountability, and the idea that some failures are so severe that society must answer with more than a disappointed look from a judge.

One line from the original coverage captured the raw anger many readers feel:

“They got away with murder in this life, but God will judge them in the next… and their child will witness the justice.”

That sentiment is blunt, but it reflects the moral exhaustion of people watching courts treat grave wrongdoing like a paperwork problem.

Americans have seen too many cases where officials reserve their harshest energy for political opponents, parents at school board meetings, and citizens who refuse to bow to fashionable ideology.

Meanwhile, when a truly defenseless victim is gone forever, the system suddenly discovers restraint.

Londyn Gonzalez deserved more than a short life marked by hunger and dehydration.

She deserved parents who protected her, a system that noticed danger before it was too late, and a court that treated her death with the gravity it demanded.

Instead, her name now joins the heartbreaking list of children failed first by caregivers and then by institutions.

That list keeps growing, while judges and officials offer explanations that never seem to satisfy anyone outside the courthouse bubble.

This case should haunt New York leaders, though expecting that crowd to feel shame may be asking a lot.

Still, the public should not stop saying Londyn’s name or demanding answers from a justice system that appears far too comfortable letting the innocent pay the highest price.

News

Mamdani DSA Allies Pledge to Defend China as Socialist Fever Spreads [WATCH]

A cluster of Democratic Socialists of America activists has publicly lined up behind Communist China, pledging to “support” and “defend” the regime as Beijing appears to be finding a warm audience inside the political orbit of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, as reported by The New York Post.

The pledge comes through Friends of Socialist China, a London-based organization that says 952 people have signed on to “support the People’s Republic of China and to promote understanding of Chinese socialism.”

According to reporting by The Post, eleven people who identify as DSA members or members of the DSA International Committee are among the signatories. They pledged to “resolve to support, defend and build understanding of Chinese socialism.”

That is not exactly a subtle position. It is one thing for the socialist crowd to complain about rent, billionaires, and the usual villains in their political cartoon version of America.

It is another thing entirely to openly cheerlead a communist state known for censorship, repression, surveillance, and crushing dissent. But for some on the far left, that apparently counts as inspiration.

The pledge declares that “the global advance to socialism is indispensable if humanity is to survive and to flourish.” It also claims capitalism is “totally incapable of solving the problems of poverty and inequality” and is “ inextricably linked with war, empire, racism, misogyny, alienation, and environmental destruction.”

That is quite a list, and conveniently it leaves out the familiar track record of communist experiments. History has a way of getting very inconvenient when the revolutionaries start selling the brochure.

The document then asks, “Why China?” before answering its own question with the kind of ideological language that sounds like it was printed fresh from a party office.

“We support all states building or aspiring to socialism, and we favour the highest level of unity and friendship between them. We foreground China in particular because its size and level of development give it an objectively critical role in the global transition to socialism.”

The pledge also praises China as “the most prominent force pushing for the establishment of a multipolar system of international relations and a new international economic order.” It further calls China “a global leader in the struggle to avoid climate breakdown.”

Then comes the big line. “As such, the continued survival of Chinese socialism is a crucial matter not only for the Chinese people but for all humanity.”

For Americans watching the modern left drift from bad economic ideas into open admiration for authoritarian systems, none of this should feel shocking anymore. Still, the casual comfort with China among some socialist activists deserves serious attention.

The Post previously reported that the DSA launched a monthly seminar last year about “modern China and lessons for US socialists.” That series reportedly came as interest in the Chinese Communist Party was rising within the organization.

During the first seminar, participants reportedly floated the claim that China has a “strong democracy.” There was, apparently, no real focus on China’s tight restrictions on speech, political opposition, or the basic liberties Americans are still old-fashioned enough to value.

A few weeks before that seminar series began, a DSA delegation of five people traveled to Beijing to mark China’s 80th anniversary of victory against Japan. New York City DSA member Dee Knight wrote that the scene included Russian President Vladimir Putin, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

“Beijing buzzed with excitement,” Knight wrote. That sentence tells voters plenty about the mindset at work here.

Newsweek also obtained DSA meeting minutes dating back to 2021 showing members discussing repeated trips to China to meet with Chinese Communist Party officials. The conversations were reportedly framed under the banner of anti-imperialism, a favorite slogan for excusing almost anything as long as America is cast as the villain.

To be fair, not everyone inside the DSA appears thrilled about the romance with Beijing. The minutes reportedly show internal disagreement over how close the organization should get to the authoritarian communist power.

“This isn’t what I signed up for, and I imagine it’s not what a majority of members signed up for,” one outraged member of the DSA’s International Committee said during a meeting.

“There’s no way you can be a part of the organization and promote the things they’re doing.”

That dissent is notable because it suggests even some socialists understand the political and moral disaster of embracing Beijing. The problem is that the louder ideological faction seems determined to treat China not as a cautionary tale, but as a model.

The DSA did not respond to The Post’s request for comment. Silence is an interesting strategy when members of your movement are publicly pledging to defend Chinese socialism.

For voters in New York and across the country, this is not some fringe academic debate tucked away in a campus lounge. These are activists tied to a movement with growing influence in urban Democratic politics, including the political ecosystem around Mamdani.

The American left keeps insisting its socialism is friendly, democratic, and perfectly harmless. Then its activists keep admiring regimes that jail dissidents, police speech, and crush individual freedom.

At some point, voters are allowed to believe what they see. When radicals tell you their global socialist dreams run through Communist China, maybe take them seriously the first time.

News

Furious Tillis Melts Down as Trump Moves to Save Todd Blanche Nomination [WATCH]

Senator Thom Tillis did not exactly respond with statesmanlike calm after President Trump moved to keep Todd Blanche on track for Attorney General. Instead, the North Carolina Republican lashed out as Trump made clear he was not about to let Senate games bury a nominee he strongly supports, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

Trump announced Thursday that he was prepared to work around Senators John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina after they helped stall Blanche’s confirmation path. The move came after the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed a key vote that had been expected to advance Blanche’s nomination.

The committee had been scheduled to vote Thursday morning, but Chairman Chuck Grassley postponed the markup after Cornyn and Tillis demanded additional assurances from the Department of Justice. Their concern centered on language connected to restrictions involving the Trump IRS settlement.

Trump Unleashes on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins Over Iran Question, Boots Press From Room

That was enough to halt momentum, at least for the moment, and hand the anti-Trump press another Beltway process story to chew on. But Trump, who has seen this movie before, quickly signaled that he had no intention of letting two unreliable Republicans dictate the future of his Justice Department team.

The president floated the possibility of temporarily withdrawing Blanche’s nomination until Cornyn and Tillis are out of office. Blanche, Trump noted, would remain in place as acting Attorney General regardless, which rather neatly punctures the drama from the Senate obstruction crowd.

“Todd Blanche is a STAR, and everyone knows it!”

“He has the potential to go down as one of the Greatest Attorney Generals of All Time.”

“However, John Cornyn, of Texas, and Thom Tillis, of North Carolina, both of whom I refused to Endorse, and whose political careers have been ended by my action, are refusing to vote for this Great Nominee, who will remain, in any event, as Acting.”

“Remember, both Cornyn and Tillis voted for Merrick Garland, and others, too numerous to mention.”

“I have no objection to temporarily withdrawing Todd’s name, if they do not do the right thing, and putting him back after Cornyn and Tillis are out of office. President DONALD J. TRUMP”

That last point is the one that will sting the most for many conservatives. Cornyn and Tillis had no problem supporting Merrick Garland, the man who presided over one of the most politicized Justice Departments in modern memory, yet now they suddenly discover their inner gatekeepers when Trump wants Blanche confirmed.

Tillis later complained to CNN’s Manu Raju, giving the establishment press exactly the sort of quote it loves when Republicans fight Republicans. “The president’s getting bad advice. He should listen to Blanche and others who think if it’s dead, it should be rendered completely dead,” Tillis said.

That answer sounded less like a serious constitutional argument and more like a senator irritated that Trump found a way around the blockade. For voters who sent Republicans to Washington to stop the weaponized government machine, the spectacle is painfully familiar.

Tillis also went after a Trump adviser whom he claimed wanted to revive the so-called weaponization fund issue. That is rich coming from a senator whose own posture here appears tailor-made to please the same political class that spent years pretending the Biden Justice Department was perfectly normal.

Cornyn and Tillis reportedly met with Blanche on Thursday and were said to be “very near a resolution,” according to PunchBowl News. If so, that may be because Trump’s pressure campaign reminded everyone involved that grassroots conservatives are not interested in another Senate slow walk.

Blanche has been one of Trump’s most visible legal allies, and his nomination matters far beyond Washington résumé polishing. For the America First base, the Justice Department needs people who understand what was done to Trump, his supporters, and ordinary Americans caught in the crossfire of political prosecutions.

Trump’s workaround was classic Trump, direct, disruptive, and impossible for the usual Senate managers to ignore. He put Cornyn and Tillis on notice, reminded the base of their Garland votes, and made it clear Blanche would not simply be sacrificed to committee theater.

For Tillis, the angry response only confirmed why so many conservatives distrust him. When Trump pushes back against obstruction, the senator runs to the cameras and scolds the president about bad advice, which is exactly the kind of Beltway performance voters are tired of funding.

The Blanche confirmation battle is now about more than one nominee. It is about whether Senate Republicans will help Trump staff his administration with fighters or keep playing procedural games while the left laughs from the cheap seats.

News

KBJ Preaches Neutrality on Michelle Obama Podcast as Credibility Takes a Hit [WATCH]

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has developed quite a reputation, and it is not exactly one of quiet restraint from the bench.

The Biden appointee is known for sprawling questions, emotional flourishes, and opinions that often sound less like constitutional analysis and more like a graduate seminar in progressive grievance politics, as reported by Red State.

That is why her latest media moment landed with such a thud. Jackson appeared on Michelle Obama’s podcast to talk about impartiality, because apparently nobody in the room spotted the flashing irony sign.

The episode of IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson debuted Wednesday after being recorded in May. Jackson sat for more than an hour with the former first lady and her brother, offering thoughts on judging, public life, and the need to avoid looking biased.

“You really have to be focused on that.”

That was Jackson’s message on judicial neutrality, delivered while sitting across from one of the most recognizable Democratic political figures in America. The optics were not subtle, unless one is paid to pretend Washington power circles are somehow above politics.

“There are lots of limits on what judges can do, and I try to be very, very mindful and scrupulous with respect to that because, as you say, our obligation is to be unbiased in our approach.”

She added, “And, so, you have to then navigate all the sources that could make for an appearance of partiality, which you want to avoid.”

That last line is the one doing all the work here. If a justice truly wants to avoid the appearance of partiality, a warm media sit down with Michelle Obama may not be the first stop on the public relations tour.

Jackson’s defenders will no doubt insist this was just a harmless conversation. Of course they will, because the same crowd that screams about institutional norms whenever a conservative breathes near a microphone tends to discover nuance when a liberal favorite is involved.

The trouble for Jackson is that this was not happening in a vacuum. Her record on the Court has already drawn sharp criticism from colleagues who appear less than enchanted with her approach.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett previously brushed aside one of Jackson’s arguments with a stinging line that said plenty. “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself,” Barrett wrote.

Justice Samuel Alito has also taken issue with Jackson’s rhetoric, calling one dissent “baseless and insulting” and saying it “lacks restraint.” Those are not exactly glowing peer reviews from inside the marble palace.

The podcast title added another layer of absurdity. “Move Through the Hard Times With Ketanji Brown Jackson” made the justice sound like some struggling outsider rather than a lifetime power player sitting on the highest court in the land.

Let us also remember how Jackson arrived at the Court. Former President Joe Biden openly promised that his nominee would be chosen by race and gender, and Democrats then demanded the country treat the result as above political scrutiny.

Now the same justice is lecturing Americans about the importance of avoiding even the appearance of bias. It is the kind of Washington theater that would be too on the nose for parody.

Reaction online was swift and brutal. One widely shared response put it plainly: “Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can’t be real. She says it is important to be neutral as a Supreme Court justice……..while she is literally on MAJOR leftist Michelle Obama’s podcast. Make it make sense.”

That is the core problem. Jackson can insist she is scrupulous and unbiased, but public trust depends on more than polished words in a friendly studio.

A Supreme Court justice does not have to live like a monk, but judgment matters. Choosing a partisan celebrity platform while preaching neutrality is not merely awkward, it is a gift wrapped exhibit for every American who already suspects the left’s idea of impartiality means progressives get to do whatever they want.

Jackson wanted to talk about the dignity and limits of the judiciary. Instead, she reminded the country that some of Washington’s most powerful figures still cannot hear themselves over the applause of their own side.

News

Democrat Darling Bails On Governor Race as Party Fears Damaging News [WATCH]

Wisconsin Democrats watched their already messy race for governor take another hard turn Thursday, as former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes abruptly ended his campaign and left the party staring at a primary battlefield it can no longer pretend is orderly, as reported by Trending Politics News.

Barnes, once treated by Democrats as a rising star, announced his exit in a video posted to social media after a day of conversations with advisers about whether his campaign had any realistic path left.

He did not endorse a rival on his way out the door, but he conceded that it had become “very clear” who the Democratic nominee would be. That was not exactly a ringing note of confidence for the party establishment.

The timing only made the retreat more striking. Reports had already indicated that Barnes and his team were considering whether to remain in the contest while Democratic officials braced for potentially damaging media stories expected to surface Thursday.

For Francesca Hong, the Madison lawmaker and self-described democratic socialist, Barnes dropping out is a major gift. Her rise has rattled more traditional Democrats who understand that nominating a socialist may thrill activists, but general election voters are a different crowd.

Hong has rapidly become the frontrunner in the closing stretch of the primary. A Marquette Law School poll released this week showed her at 38 percent among Democratic primary voters, while Barnes sat far behind at 16 percent.

Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley received 7 percent in that same survey, while roughly one-third of Democratic voters remained undecided. Other recent polling also showed Barnes trailing Hong by double digits, which likely made the math look brutal.

The Democratic field has been coming apart for weeks, and Barnes is only the latest piece to fall. Lt. Gov. Sara Rodriguez suspended her campaign after a campaign finance scandal, adding another headache for a party that loves to lecture everyone else about ethics.

Former Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. CEO Missy Hughes also left the race. Crowley then jumped back in after securing the endorsement of Gov. Tony Evers, a move clearly designed to consolidate more moderate Democrats before Hong could fully run away with the nomination.

Instead, the Evers endorsement appears to have further split the anti-Hong vote. That left Hong in a stronger position and gave the party establishment yet another reminder that political engineering does not always work, especially when the activist left has other plans.

The presumed Republican nominee, Tom Tiffany, has already consolidated Republican support. That contrast is hard to miss, with Republicans lining up behind their candidate while Democrats scramble through scandal, suspensions, withdrawals and socialist momentum.

Moderate Democrats have been sounding alarms about what a Hong nomination could mean in November. Their concern is obvious, because Republicans would likely relish the chance to run against a candidate who proudly embraces democratic socialism in a state that is often decided by persuadable voters.

Barnes once looked like a serious contender, at least on paper. He had statewide name recognition, a familiar resume and enough goodwill inside Democratic circles to be taken seriously when the race began.

But campaigns are not won on old headlines and party affection. By the time Thursday arrived, Barnes appeared to be staring at a race where momentum had shifted, money and message were not enough, and the left flank was taking command.

His departure clears more space for Hong at precisely the moment she appears to need it least. If undecided Democratic voters continue moving her way, the party could soon find itself represented by the kind of nominee Republicans would put in fundraising emails before breakfast.

The situation also exposes a deeper problem for Democrats in Wisconsin. Their coalition is not simply divided over personalities; it is divided over whether the party should chase the socialist energy of its base or try to look normal enough to survive a statewide election.

For now, the activist wing seems to be winning. Barnes is out, the establishment lane is fractured, and Hong is positioned to benefit from a Democratic primary that has turned into a slow-motion pileup.

Wisconsin voters have seen plenty of close races, and Democrats know they cannot afford a nominee who gives Republicans an easy target. Yet that may be exactly where this race is heading, because once the left takes the wheel, the rest of the party usually discovers it is just along for the ride.

News

Kamala Harris Faces Backlash After Luxury Mansion Purchase in Predominantly White Neighborhood [WATCH]

Kamala Harris has reportedly found herself a plush new California landing spot, and the location is raising some very inconvenient questions for the party that never stops lecturing America about diversity, as reported by The Gateway Pundit.

According to reports, the former VP’s new mansion sits in Point Dume, an exclusive seaside pocket of Malibu where racial diversity appears to be about as common as a modest Democrat real estate purchase.

The property reportedly cost $8.15 million and spans roughly 4,000 square feet. It comes with ocean views, multiple wine fridges, private golf greens, and parking for five vehicles.

Not exactly the kind of setup Democrats usually describe when they are scolding working families about privilege, equity, and systemic unfairness.

The neighborhood is located inside Census tract 8004.08, according to the report. Census Bureau American Community Survey estimates from 2019 put the area at just 0.2% Black and roughly 94% White.

That detail is especially rich given Harris’ long public record of talking about race, representation, and the supposed importance of living around Black Americans.

Harris has often leaned into her experience at Howard University and the cultural meaning she attached to being surrounded by other Black students in Washington, D.C. In 2019, she described that experience to the Washington Post in sweeping personal terms.

“When you’re at (a historically Black college or university), and especially one with the size and with the history of Howard University, and also in the context of also being in D.C., which was known forever as being ‘Chocolate City,’ it just becomes about you understanding that there is a whole world of people who are like you,” Harris said.

That was the public message, anyway. The private real estate choice appears to tell a very different story.

For ordinary Americans, Democrats sell the idea that diversity must be engineered into neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and every corner of civic life. For elite Democrats, the ideal neighborhood apparently includes ocean views, golf greens, wine storage, and almost no evidence of the diversity they demand from everyone else.

This is the familiar liberal pattern: preach one thing from the stage, then buy something entirely different when the check clears.

Harris is hardly alone in this. The modern Democrat leadership class has turned moral performance into an art form while insulating itself from the consequences of its own policies.

They talk endlessly about affordable housing, then settle into wealthy enclaves. They demand open borders, then retreat behind private security and quiet coastal streets.

They rail against inequality, then acquire homes with price tags that would make middle-class voters dizzy. They lecture Americans about environmental sacrifice, then live in oversized luxury properties by the water.

Point Dume is one of those places that screams exclusivity, even if the political class would prefer a softer brochure description. The neighborhood has long been associated with wealth, privacy, and the kind of comfort most voters only see in glossy magazine spreads.

There is nothing illegal about Harris buying an expensive home in a wealthy neighborhood, of course. The issue is the hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy is the whole show.

If a Republican spent years talking about the moral necessity of diversity and then moved into a neighborhood with virtually no Black residents, the corporate media would be producing panel discussions before breakfast.

There would be solemn essays, cable news chyrons, and expert commentary about what the move revealed about hidden attitudes. Since it is Kamala Harris, expect plenty of throat-clearing and very little curiosity from the usual press corps.

The same media class that hyperventilates over every Republican neighborhood choice can suddenly discover nuance when a Democrat icon is involved. Funny how that works.

For voters who have watched Harris and her party lecture the country for years, the purchase feels like another entry in the rules for thee playbook. Diversity is a campaign slogan, but exclusivity is where the elites actually want to live.

The Point Dume mansion also arrives after Harris spent years as one of the loudest national voices in a party obsessed with identity politics. Her political brand has depended heavily on symbolic firsts, racial messaging, and moral posturing.

Yet when it came time to pick a home, the reported choice was not some vibrant model of progressive integration. It was a multimillion-dollar estate in a heavily White coastal enclave.

That contrast is why the story lands with such force. Americans are tired of being preached at by people who use virtue as a ladder, then pull it up behind them.

Kamala Harris can live where she wants, but voters are allowed to notice what her choices say. The sermon was diversity, the purchase was Point Dume, and the contradiction is impossible to miss.

News

Spain Sends Military as Illegal Alien Horde Engulfs Border Enclave, Death Toll Climbs [WATCH]

Spain is sending in its military after thousands of migrants flooded into Ceuta, the small Spanish enclave on the North African coast that has once again become a pressure point for Europe’s border crisis, as reported by Fox News.

The Spanish government said the Armed Forces will back up the Civil Guard as officials try to restore order after the sudden mass crossing from Morocco. Local leaders warned that the city could no longer manage the sheer volume of arrivals.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and Interior Minister Fernando Grande Marlaska are expected to travel to Ceuta as Madrid rushes to contain the fallout. That is usually what happens when political leaders discover that border control is not just a slogan, but the foundation of national sovereignty.

The surge is being described as one of the largest migrant waves to hit Ceuta since 2021. That year, more than 8,000 people entered the territory over two days, setting off a diplomatic fight between Spain and Morocco.

“The situation is absolute chaos,” Rachid Sbihi, who heads an association representing Spain’s Civil Guard officers in Ceuta, told The Associated Press. “It’s not possible to give precise numbers, but there are thousands of migrants crossing.”

Officials in Ceuta said at least nine people died Thursday, though they did not immediately detail the circumstances surrounding the deaths. The Associated Press reported that bodies were seen floating in the water while rescue and security operations were still underway.

https://rumble.com/v7diryu-spain-sends-military-as-illegal-alien-horde-engulfs-border-enclave-death-to.html#:~:text=%3Cscript%3E!function(r,div%22%3A%22rumble_v7bc8tm%22%7D)%3B%3C/script%3E

Video from the area showed large groups entering through the Tarajal border zone. Many migrants swam around coastal barriers separating Morocco from Spanish territory, while others arrived by boat.

Most of those seen crossing appeared to be young men, though families with women and children were also among the crowds. The scenes were another grim reminder that once a border is overwhelmed, humanitarian risk and public security problems arrive together.

Spanish officials said Morocco is cooperating with efforts to regain control of the crossing points. Spain’s Interior Ministry said Moroccan police have stopped numerous migrants attempting to enter and that both governments are working to return illegal entrants as quickly as possible.

Authorities have not named one clear cause for the sudden surge. Ceuta officials have pointed to a recent Spanish Supreme Court ruling that limits the immediate return of migrants who arrive by sea without due process.

Some migration advocates questioned whether that ruling alone could have driven thousands of people to move at once. Still, in Europe’s migration debate, even the appearance of a legal opening can travel fast, while politicians pretend incentives do not matter.

The crisis has already moved beyond Spain. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni threatened to suspend Italy’s participation in the Schengen open border arrangement with Spain, saying such a step would be necessary “to defend our borders and ensure the safety of our citizens.”

Ceuta has long been one of Europe’s most active migration flashpoints. The Spanish territory sits on Morocco’s Mediterranean coast and is viewed by many migrants from across Africa as a gateway into the European Union.

Migrants regularly try to reach Ceuta by swimming from Morocco or by climbing the heavily fortified border fence. For years, European governments have talked about compassion while frontline communities have been left to absorb the consequences.

Spain’s Interior Ministry said nearly 3,000 migrants had entered Ceuta by land or sea this year through the middle of July. This week’s crossings are expected to dramatically increase those figures and intensify demands for a firmer response.

Fox News Digital has reached out to Spain’s Embassy in Washington, the Department of Homeland Security, the Center for Immigration Studies and the Migration Policy Institute for comment. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

News

Democrats Caught Trying to Sneak Permanent Residency to TPS Invaders [WATCH]

Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) objected on the Senate floor to Democratic immigration legislation that he argued would convert temporary protected status into a pathway to permanent legal residency and citizenship, while also limiting immigration enforcement and expanding eligibility for those previously removed from the United States.

“Reserving the right to object, mr. President, I object to this mass amnesty bill,” Schmitt said as he opened his remarks.

The Missouri senator contrasted the proposal with legislation considered the previous week.

“Last week, Democrats asked the Senate to extend Haitian temporary protected status. Today, they dropped the quotation marks.”

According to Schmitt, the legislation would fundamentally change the purpose of Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

“Instead of extending temporary status, this legislation would convert temporary would convert temporary status into permanent status, green cards, permanent settlement.”

He argued that previous extensions of TPS concealed what he believes was the program’s long-term objective.

“At least the bill last week continued the same old Washington lie.”

Schmitt continued, “Today, Democrats finally admit what this scheme was always designed to be: temporary was always meant to be permanent.”

Calling the legislation “the final stage of the scam,” Schmitt described what he believes is a recurring pattern in Democratic immigration policy.

“That’s how Democrats do mass amnesty.”

He outlined what he characterized as a multi-step process.

“First, they declare an emergency, then they import hundreds of 1000s of people, they then extend the program over and over and over, then they unleash activist lawyers against anyone who tries to enforce the deadline.”

Schmitt argued that when voters elect leaders who seek stricter immigration enforcement, Democrats respond by changing the law.

“And when the American people finally elect the president to end this chaos, to end this abuse, Democrats demand mass amnesty.”

He added, “And when the American people finally elect a president who enforces the law, Democrats change the law and hand out green cards.”

According to Schmitt, the proposal would permanently transform a program originally intended for temporary humanitarian emergencies.

“That’s what this bill does. It turns a program created for temporary emergencies into a pipeline for green cards and citizenship.”

The senator also criticized provisions he said would allow individuals who had previously been removed from the United States to seek permanent residency.

“Not only for people who have temporary status, not only for people who once had TPS.”

He continued, “This bill reaches beyond our borders and allows people who were already removed from this country, to apply for permanent residency from abroad.”

Schmitt argued that such a policy would effectively reverse completed deportation cases.

“Think about how crazy that is. The law was enforced, the alien was removed, the case was closed.”

He added, “Yet Democrats want to erase the removal, reopen the border, and bring that person back with a green card.”

Schmitt also criticized what he described as a broader shift in immigration policy.

“Under the radical new democratic immigration platform deportation isn’t deportation; it’s merely an inconvenience before a green card arrives.”

He argued that the legislation would go beyond granting legal status to current recipients by reopening opportunities for those outside the country.

“This bill does not merely reward those who broke our laws and remained in our country; it reaches around the entire globe to reverse deportations and to restart mass migration.”

Schmitt also objected to provisions governing how information submitted through immigration applications could be used.

“But even that is not enough. This bill also creates an ICE blackout.”

He explained, “Information provided in these applications can’t be used for immigration enforcement.”

According to Schmitt, the proposal would also impose penalties on law enforcement officers who improperly use the information.

“The bill even threatens penalties against law enforcement who improperly properly use the information.”

He argued that the legislation would shield immigration information from enforcement agencies.

“So Democrats want to want the information we have about foreigners to be placed behind a legal shield, so it cannot be used to enforce immigration law.”

Schmitt contrasted Republican and Democratic approaches to law enforcement.

“Republicans want to handcuff illegal criminals. Democrats want to handcuff law enforcement officers, so they can’t do their jobs.”

He added, “They are not hiding the choice anymore. They will punish the officer before they punish the illegal alien.”

The senator questioned the priorities behind the legislation.

“Why are legal aliens more important to them now than protecting American citizens?”

Schmitt concluded by arguing that the proposal would prevent future administrations from ending TPS.

“Oh, but it doesn’t stop there. This bill ensures that any president, any future president can’t end TPS.”

He closed his remarks by saying the legislation overlooks the interests of American citizens.

“So what’s missing from the bill? Americans, American citizens, and the impact mass migration is having on our people.”

WATCH:

News

Kennedy Torches Dem Socialists: “History Proves They’re Morons!” [WATCH]

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) criticized what he described as the dominant faction within the Democratic Party, arguing that its policies reflect an embrace of socialism and a series of positions he believes are far outside the political mainstream.

During an interview, Kennedy said he believes the party’s progressive wing now holds significant influence, particularly in heavily Democratic areas.

“I guess it’s not a newsflash that the Graham-Platner wing of the Democratic Party is in control,” Kennedy said.

He added that the movement appears to be centered in liberal strongholds across the country.

“They seem to be concentrated in deep blue jurisdictions.”

Kennedy argued that many of the statements made by members of that faction would be viewed as extreme in much of the United States.

“They say things that would get them a psychiatric evaluation in the rest of the country.”

The Louisiana senator said he initially believed the views were the result of misinformation rather than genuine conviction.

“At first, I thought, well, these people are just misinformed, Sandra.”

Kennedy continued, “They’re the product of 50 years of high school civics being taught by football coaches.”

However, he said he later concluded that the lawmakers and activists advancing those ideas genuinely believe in them.

“But then I realize they’re serious.”

He emphasized that point by adding, “They’re serious as an aneurysm.”

Kennedy then listed several policies he associates with the Democratic Party’s progressive wing.

“They want to, I don’t know, kill all the millionaires, open all the prisons, open the borders, defund the cops, defund ICE.”

He also took aim at what he described as the movement’s embrace of socialist ideology.

“Every single one of them knows the words to the Cuban national anthem.”

Kennedy summarized his criticism by stating, “They’re all socialists.”

The senator argued that history demonstrates socialism has consistently failed when put into practice.

“Socialism, I think history has proven, is for morons.”

He encouraged listeners to examine historical examples rather than rely solely on his opinion.

“Don’t take my word for it.”

Kennedy pointed to several countries that he believes illustrate the shortcomings of socialist systems.

“Just look at Cuba and Argentina before changes there. Venezuela, China, the old USSR.”

According to Kennedy, those examples demonstrate why socialism is not an effective model for governing a nation.

He also argued that many Americans who identify as socialists do not seek to live under governments they describe as socialist elsewhere in the world.

“I notice that all of these neo-socialists they don’t they don’t want to go live in a socialist country.”

Instead, Kennedy said, they seek to implement those policies in the United States.

“They want to live here.”

WATCH:


Scroll to Top