Author name: LifeZette

Elon Musk Rockets to Trillionaire Status as SpaceX Soars in Historic IPO [WATCH]
News

Elon Musk Rockets to Trillionaire Status as SpaceX Soars in Historic IPO [WATCH]

/

Elon Musk has just rewritten the history of wealth.

With SpaceX finally hitting the public markets, shares took off faster than one of the company’s Falcon rockets, instantly making Musk the first person in the world to cross the trillion-dollar net worth threshold.

Shares opened at 150 dollars each, soaring 11 percent above the 135-dollar IPO price in minutes.

The opening gave SpaceX a market value near 1.96 trillion dollars.

Within hours, investors pushed the stock toward 160 dollars, bumping the company’s worth to a staggering 2.1 trillion dollars.

By mid-afternoon, the surge continued. SpaceX shares were trading around 173 dollars, translating into a 2.3 trillion dollar valuation that vaulted the company among the top six most valuable corporations on the planet.

The message was unmistakable: SpaceX is the dominant force shaping the next frontier of technology and space innovation.

Musk, who now controls roughly 82 percent of the company, celebrated from Starbase in Texas, ringing a ceremonial bell to mark the milestone.

The trillionaire innovator called the moment a turning point for humanity, declaring that SpaceX exists to “take the fiction out of science-fiction and create an exciting, inspiring future for everyone.”

He reminded the world of his mission. “SpaceX wants to be able to take you to the moon, take you to Mars and ultimately beyond,” Musk said.

WATCH:

For him, it is never been just about rockets or satellites, but about redefining what is possible for civilization itself.

Investors clearly agreed.

The demand for SpaceX stock was out of this world, with total purchase orders topping 100 billion dollars, according to Bloomberg.

Retail investors, many of whom have been eager for years to buy into Musk’s crown jewel, piled in alongside institutional players.

The SpaceX IPO destroyed all previous records, easily surpassing Saudi Aramco’s 2019 debut, which brought in 29.4 billion dollars.

SpaceX’s listing raised far more while igniting a fresh wave of enthusiasm for American innovation.

The scale of the offering placed it among the most important financial events of the decade.

Despite nearly 5 billion dollars in losses last year, Musk’s vision continues to attract massive backing.

The company generated 18.7 billion dollars in revenue but spent heavily on new projects, including the Mars colonization program and plans for in-orbit artificial intelligence data centers.

Investors see those expenditures not as risk, but as long-term bets on the future of human expansion beyond Earth.

SpaceX’s influence extends far beyond rockets.

It owns the satellite network Starlink, the artificial intelligence venture xAI, and oversees the social platform X, making it a sprawling technology empire integrated across communications, aerospace, and AI industries.

The IPO means ordinary investors can now own a piece of that empire for the first time.

Major venture capital firms are also collecting colossal paydays.

Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest, Sequoia Capital, and Andreessen Horowitz were among early backers.

Founders Fund alone turned a 600 million dollar investment into more than 50 billion at the IPO price.

That is the kind of return that rivals the legendary early backers of Apple and Google.

Financial analysts hailed the deal as a vote of confidence in American innovation.

“A successful SpaceX IPO is a positive signal for broader investor interest in innovation and technology,” said SuRo Capital’s Evan Schlossman.

The comment reflects what free market supporters have long believed: when private industry is unshackled by government interference, true progress follows.

Wedbush analyst Dan Ives noted that SpaceX’s success will likely inspire a new generation of IPOs in artificial intelligence and advanced technologies.

“SpaceX going public is an important moment for the broader tech sector as this AI revolution and data take the next step forward,” he said.

Unlike bloated bureaucracies, these ventures are driven by vision and purpose, not paperwork and committees.

For conservatives who believe in the power of private enterprise, this moment is proof that bold ideas and hard work still define America’s best.

Musk has built his empire in the face of constant political attacks and regulatory hurdles from leftist activists hostile to risk-taking entrepreneurs.

Now, he stands as the first trillionaire in history, leading a company built on American grit, innovation, and sheer refusal to accept limits.

WATCH:

SpaceX has turned science-fiction dreams into capitalist reality.

The market has rewarded that daring spirit, and Main Street investors now share a chance to ride along.

From reusable rockets to satellites blanketing the skies, Musk’s empire is expanding the American dream beyond this planet, one launch at a time.

Rigged California: How Laws, And Ballots, Shape the Perception of Election Integrity
News

Rigged California: How Laws, And Ballots, Shape the Perception of Election Integrity

/

“Perception is reality.” This oft-cited idea, popularized in the 1980s by political strategist Lee Atwater, underscores a fundamental truth: how people interpret events shape their beliefs, actions, and trust in institutions.

In the realm of elections, few phrases capture the current divide in California better. When President Donald Trump labels the state’s elections as “rigged,” reactions split sharply. Some see outright treason warranting extreme measures. Others dismiss it as conspiracy rhetoric. Many, however, point to democratically enacted laws that have transformed voting processes, creating what critics argue is legalized opportunity for manipulation.

California’s shift toward expansive mail-in voting accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and has since become entrenched. State law now automatically sends mail-in ballots to all registered voters—approximately 23 million people. This universal system, combined with ballot harvesting, extended deadlines for ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving days later, and other provisions, prioritize access over speed and timely verification.

Proponents hail it as modernizing democracy. Critics contend it rigs outcomes by design, not through illicit counting on Election Night, but via rules that favor late-arriving ballots in a state dominated by one party. Voter turnout in many California races, such as gubernatorial or mayoral contests, hovers around 25-30% in typical off-year or primary cycles. With millions of ballots mailed regardless of whether recipients still live at listed addresses, have moved, or passed away, the system leaves substantial room for ballots to surface weeks after polls close.

California has resisted full federal scrutiny of its voter rolls for years, defending its autonomy while maintaining lists that include outdated entries. At scale, this creates vulnerabilities. An apartment complex in a transient neighborhood might receive ballots for dozens of former residents over time. Those ballots often end up in community mailboxes, where anyone could theoretically handle them.

Non-governmental organizations have registered voters at unconventional addresses, including abandoned sites. In Los Angeles, stories circulate of ballots sent to derelict gas stations or homeless encampments. Who collects and returns them remains opaque. As counting drags on for weeks—perfectly legal under current state statutes—leads can evaporate.

This pattern fuels the “rigged” perception, even absent proven widespread fraud because fraud has been made legal. The June 2026 primary has exemplified this dynamic. In the Los Angeles mayoral race, reality TV personality and conservative challenger Spencer Pratt surged early on in-person and initial counts. Yet as mail-in ballots processed over subsequent days and weeks, progressive City Council member Nithya Raman overtook him, advancing to a runoff against incumbent Karen Bass.

Trump and supporters decried the shift as evidence of manipulation, noting how late ballots disproportionately benefited certain candidates. Similar dynamics appeared in the gubernatorial primary, where Republican Steve Hilton advanced to face Democrat Xavier Becerra despite prolonged counting.

Los Angeles serves as a testing ground for progressive policies: expansive social spending, priorities favoring migrants over longtime residents, and ambitious infrastructure like the troubled high-speed rail project that has consumed billions with little progress.

Pratt’s campaign highlighted these failures—government is charitable with funds for illegal immigrants while the Palisades Fire victims, lifelong Californians, lives went up in smoke. LA officials put “Americans last” in their own city. His message resonated with voters frustrated by taxes, homelessness, and ineffective governance, even in deep-blue LA.

Though Pratt did not advance, his visibility spotlighted systemic issues. While Pratt may not have won an election, in a broader sense he won for LA, California and America, by drawing attention to the race that would otherwise have been another quiet Democratic hold.

California’s model—universal mail ballots, permissive rules, and single-party dominance—functions as an incubator. If scaled nationally, it risks entrenching one-party rule where turnout games and legal loopholes replace competitive debate. Conservatives worry their voices will be structurally marginalized. Defenders argue safeguards like signature verification and postmark rules prevent abuse, and delays reflect thoroughness, not deceit.

Ultimately, the fraud debate in California transcends individual races. It centers on whether laws engineered for maximum participation have inadvertently—or intentionally—undermined confidence. Trump’s “rigged” label resonates because the system appears engineered to produce predictable outcomes in a state where Democrats control the machinery.

Cleaning voter rolls, tightening deadlines, and ensuring real-time transparency could restore faith without restricting access. Perception remains reality for millions. And, until California addresses the structural incentives that make late surges routine and skepticism inevitable, calls of “rigged” will persist.

Spencer Pratt’s campaign, though unsuccessful in advancing, ignited a conversation about putting Americans first in their own cities. No one should be ashamed of American’s and America being first. Securing election integrity is not partisan theater—it is essential to preserving a republic where every eligible voice truly counts. Without reform, the perception of rigging will continue to erode the reality of democratic consent.

Trump Admin Yanks Tens of Millions from LA Homeless Bureaucrats After Massive Mismanagement Exposed [WATCH]
News

Trump Admin Yanks Tens of Millions from LA Homeless Bureaucrats After Massive Mismanagement Exposed [WATCH]

/

The Trump administration has slammed the brakes on federal funding for the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA, after uncovering what officials describe as a pattern of mismanagement, false reporting, and outright fraud.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development, under Deputy Secretary Andrew Hughes, confirmed the suspension as a formal investigation unfolds into the city’s main homelessness agency.

In a blistering letter to LAHSA interim CEO Gita O’Neill, Hughes outlined a litany of serious accusations.

He wrote that “information has come to light demonstrating that LAHSA may have committed violations of federal law in performing its obligations under HUD grant agreements.”

That statement alone signals the severity of the claims now facing the agency trusted to handle millions in taxpayer funds.

Hughes noted that HUD’s own Office of Inspector General had launched an investigation, suggesting that what began as administrative review has escalated into potential criminal territory.

The agency, he said, possessed evidence of repeated false statements, “irresponsible actions and failures,” and a troubling lack of any financial safeguards.

HUD found that LAHSA’s mismanagement posed a direct threat not only to the department’s interests but also to the wellbeing of Los Angeles residents living on the streets.

For years, the city has poured astronomical sums into tackling homelessness, only for the problem to worsen.

Now, HUD appears to be drawing a line, warning that pouring in more federal dollars would only compound the chaos.

According to Hughes, the department has determined that “continuing to provide additional federal funds to LAHSA is not in the public interest.”

As a result, the agency has been suspended from participating in federal housing programs until the investigation concludes.

It is a seismic blow to an organization that has long been a conduit for both city and federal aid.

WATCH:

The reprimand comes as Los Angeles County has already pulled its own funding from LAHSA, citing the same issues of mismanagement and waste.

The City of Los Angeles is reportedly debating similar action, reflecting a growing recognition that the agency has lost control of both its mission and its money.

In court testimony, one federal judge in Los Angeles even stated openly that LAHSA appeared to have committed “obvious fraud” and imposed supervision over its finances.

That kind of public rebuke from the bench shows just how far the agency’s credibility has fallen.

Hughes pointed to a particularly egregious example involving LAHSA’s former CEO, who resigned after violating federal conflict of interest rules.

The letter alleges that she directed more than two million dollars in federal funds to her husband’s employer while at the same time funneling taxpayer money to her own former employer.

Both acts appear to violate the most basic standards of public accountability.

These are not isolated missteps, according to HUD. Hughes called the behavior part of a “clear pattern,” suggesting a cultural rot inside LAHSA rather than random blunders.

What makes the revelation even more disturbing is that despite these repeated problems, the agency routinely certified to HUD that it was in compliance with federal laws and program requirements.

Hughes warned that hundreds of those certifications and statements submitted by LAHSA officials may turn out to be false.

If proven, that could mean systemic fraud on a level that could reshape how HUD oversees homelessness funds nationwide.

The agency now faces the possibility of criminal referrals, the loss of its standing as a federal partner, and a collapse in public trust.

Critics of Los Angeles’ homeless policies have long complained that the city throws money into a black hole of nonprofit bureaucracy, with little to show for it except more tents and encampments.

The alleged fraud at LAHSA seems to confirm what many residents already suspect: that the system designed to solve homelessness has instead become a money engine for administrators and consultants.

While left-leaning media outlets often rush to shield urban bureaucracies from blame, HUD’s actions represent a stark message.

The Trump administration is making clear that accountability matters, even if it means turning off the federal tap to a Democratic stronghold.

For taxpayers sick of watching waste pile up while streets fill with encampments, this probe signals that Washington is finally paying attention.

The investigation could also have national implications as other major cities face similar questions about how homelessness funds are spent.

For Los Angeles, however, the lesson is already painful. Federal officials are demanding honesty, transparency, and results, and until LAHSA can deliver all three, the cash flow has been frozen.

Feds Uncover 15000 So Called ‘Super Sponsors’ Amid Widening Child Trafficking Scandal [WATCH]
News

Feds Uncover 15000 So Called ‘Super Sponsors’ Amid Widening Child Trafficking Scandal [WATCH]

/

Federal agents have identified more than fifteen thousand individuals who have sponsored three or more unaccompanied migrant children, raising grave concerns about widespread abuse and trafficking under the Biden administration.

The revelations come as Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin sounded the alarm on what they describe as one of the most disturbing humanitarian crimes tied directly to the nation’s failed border policies.

Blanche announced indictments against three Guatemalan nationals, Maritza Azucena Cahuec Coc, Carlos Agustin Cahuec Coc, and Gladys Marina Caal Chen. All three allegedly conspired to smuggle multiple children into the United States by exploiting federal loopholes.

The three entered the country illegally and operated in northern Ohio, where they allegedly manufactured documents and manipulated the sponsorship system to traffic minors.

The Department of Justice revealed that Gladys Caal Chen herself previously entered the United States through a fraudulent sponsorship as an unaccompanied minor.

Blanche noted that her case exemplifies a much wider problem, one that federal agents have been uncovering piece by piece across the country.

He added, “This is one example, one indictment, but it is not unique. There are over 15,500 super sponsor cases that we have identified along with DHS.”

WATCH:

A separate conviction involved Guatemalan national Juan Tiul Xi, who obtained sponsorship of a child through bogus documentation and then sexually abused the minor.

The DOJ linked this abuse to the same shady sponsorship networks that have thrived amid weak immigration enforcement and political apathy in Washington.

Blanche and Mullin both laid the blame directly at the feet of the Biden administration, citing reckless immigration policies that have overwhelmed law enforcement and allowed dangerous criminals to slip through the cracks.

Mullin remarked that under Joe Biden’s open border approach, more than 450,000 unaccompanied minors have gone missing after being released into the country. Of those, only about 146,000 have been located.

“We still have nearly 300,000 missing,” Mullin said gravely.

“We’re investigating reports to where some of these kids claim that they were raped hundreds of times.”

His remarks highlighted the horrifying scale of abuse taking place as drug cartels, coyotes, and fake sponsors grow rich off human suffering.

Mullin also took aim at Democrat lawmakers who have repeatedly pushed to defund border enforcement agencies.

According to him, many of those same lawmakers obstruct investigations and promote sanctuary policies that shield child traffickers from arrest and prosecution.

The implication is clear: in the name of political correctness, the left has willingly turned a blind eye to the sexual torture of migrant children.

For years, conservative reporters have documented these disturbing cases while mainstream networks barely mention them.

Non-governmental organizations, many funded by the federal government, have been directly implicated in transporting migrant minors and handing them over to so called sponsors without proper vetting.

The silence from media elites and left wing activists suggests a complicity that goes far deeper than negligence.

Homeland Security’s latest findings paint a horrifying picture: children disappearing into the shadows of America’s broken immigration system.

Many are likely forced into labor or sex trafficking rings inside the United States. Others vanish without any record of follow up by the agencies that placed them there.

Mullin challenged Americans to put politics aside and demand accountability.

“I don’t care if you are a liberal or a conservative,” he said.

“If you can’t stand for law enforcement to go find these kids, who are you?”

WATCH:

His words reflect the moral outrage felt by millions who see this as a direct consequence of Biden’s border negligence.

Blanche echoed that determination, insisting the DOJ will continue to pursue every lead related to the 15,500 identified super sponsors.

Each one represents a potential trafficking network that has weaponized the federal sponsorship system created to protect minors.

Instead of safe haven, many of these children found themselves trapped in abuse and slavery.

Federal whistleblowers have told reporters that tracking these minors has become nearly impossible because the administration scrapped Trump era rules requiring background checks and follow up interviews.

Under Biden, the goal shifted from enforcing laws to processing arrivals as quickly as possible to move the problem out of sight. The results have been catastrophic for vulnerable children and a disgrace for the nation.

While conservatives push for strong border controls, strict vetting, and prosecution of traffickers, liberal activists remain fixated on preserving open border ideology.

That ideological blindness continues to place real human lives in danger.

The political class in Washington cannot hide from this crisis forever.

The truth is spilling out as investigators expose the trafficking rings that have flourished under federal neglect.

This scandal reveals the moral bankruptcy of an administration more interested in appeasing activist groups than protecting innocent children.

Every patriotic American, regardless of party, should demand justice.

The silence of the left speaks volumes, and history will not be kind to those who looked away.

Trump Erupts In Fury at These Two RINO Senators Stalling The SAVE America Act [WATCH]
News

Trump Erupts In Fury at These Two RINO Senators Stalling The SAVE America Act [WATCH]

/

President Trump did not mince words from the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon, slamming Mitch McConnell and Lisa Murkowski for blocking the SAVE America Act, a major Republican effort to restore election integrity and cut government waste.

The president spoke with the confidence and frustration of a man who has seen this show before, calling out long-entrenched senators who seem far more comfortable cozying up to the Washington establishment than fighting for the people who sent them there.

Independent journalist Nick Sortor caught the moment on camera as Trump went after the two Republicans for what he called a betrayal of the America First movement.

“Murkowski’s terrible. Terrible to us, terrible to the country,” Trump said, his tone unmistakably disgusted.

“Mitch McConnell is a bad guy. I thought he was lousy at his job. Lousy at his job.”

Trump reminded the crowd that McConnell had aided Democrats during his time leading the Senate.

“I disagreed with him a lot because Mitch McConnell gave so much money to Democrats,” Trump said.

“He gave them money. I had to go get the wall money from the military because that guy wouldn’t do anything.”

The president’s ire showed how tired he is of spineless leadership that buckles when the real work begins.

In no uncertain terms, Trump also ridiculed the political self-preservation game that Murkowski has perfected in Alaska.

“I’ve done so much for Murkowski,” he said.

“We have the governor right here. Governor, have I done a lot for Alaska?” That prompted Governor Mike Dunleavy to affirm, “You have been the best president for Alaska in our history, Mr. President.”

With that, Trump turned back to the senator with characteristic bluntness.

“She’s just an impediment. But she’s there. She will probably be a negative vote.”

Murkowski’s opposition to the SAVE America Act, which includes strong provisions for voter ID and funding for national defense, seems rooted in the left’s tired excuse that rural or poorer Americans somehow cannot obtain identification.

Trump was unimpressed with that line of reasoning.

“Guess what,” he said.

“Rural people are capable of doing things.”

WATCH:

He was right, of course.

Everyday Americans manage to get ID to cash checks, buy groceries, and travel.

Yet when it comes to voting, the Democrat talking points suddenly shift to helplessness.

It’s not only Democrats causing the obstruction.

The Republican old guard, represented by McConnell and Murkowski, appear more worried about protecting their fragile alliances and staying in the good graces of D.C. donors than in advancing real conservative priorities.

McConnell’s pending retirement is barely enough to cover the stench of years spent trading power instead of wielding it boldly for reform.

The president’s outrage makes sense in the context of the SAVE America Act’s importance.

This legislation aims to prevent voter fraud, enhance transparency in elections, and secure the ballot box from leftist manipulation.

For many conservatives, it represents the clearest test yet of whether the Republican Party actually believes in restoring trust in the electoral process or simply talks about it during campaign season.

Trump’s political instincts, honed over years of battling both Democrats and his own party insiders, remain sharp.

He knows what the base wants, and it is not compromise with senators who talk like conservatives in campaign ads but govern like Democrats once elected.

He also knows that Americans are tired of excuses for why simple common-sense measures like requiring ID to vote are suddenly too complicated.

Murkowski’s political career is a study in establishment survival. Alaska’s ranked-choice voting system handed her another lifeline after she lost the Republican primary in 2010.

Instead of accepting defeat, she launched a write-in campaign that prevailed, keeping her seat by defying her own party’s voters.

That stubborn streak has continued to make her a thorn in Trump’s side and a reliable lifeline for Senate moderates who hate accountability.

McConnell’s record speaks for itself as well. Under his leadership, the Senate missed opportunity after opportunity to push forward meaningful conservative reforms.

While the establishment praises him for shepherding judicial appointments, even Trump reminded everyone that he was the one who made those appointments possible by winning the presidency in the first place. Without Trump, McConnell would have had no judges at all.

Trump’s tone on Thursday carried a mix of anger and purpose.

It was the sound of a man who has fought too long to watch RINOs throw away the future out of personal pride.

He is demanding action from a Congress that still fears upsetting the swamp’s delicate equilibrium, and his base hears him loud and clear.

For average conservatives across America, the message was simple. The fight is not only against Democrats.

It is also against the weak Republicans who cave when strength is needed most.

The SAVE America Act is more than a bill; it is a litmus test for whether this Congress still represents the people or only itself.

Trump’s eruption signaled that the time for polite disagreement has passed.

With McConnell soon gone and Murkowski still clinging to the status quo, the president is making it clear that the America First agenda will move forward, with or without them.

The swamp’s grip may be strong, but Trump reminded the nation yet again that he is stronger.

And so are the Americans who stand with him.

Trump Halts Strikes On Iran And Declares Breakthrough Deal Is Sealed [WATCH]
News

Trump Halts Strikes On Iran And Declares Breakthrough Deal Is Sealed [WATCH]

/

President Donald Trump canceled planned military strikes on Iran late Thursday, telling The Post that an agreement between Washington and Tehran had been reached to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and begin nuclear negotiations.

The commander in chief called the understanding “all wrapped up,” while hinting that a formal signing could take place soon.

Trump shared the update on Truth Social, saying discussions with Iran’s top leadership had reached full approval.

“Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” he wrote.

Trump added that not only the United States, but partners across the Middle East and beyond, had backed the terms.

The deal appears to include a promise by Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and discuss the fate of its enriched uranium program.

In return, the United States would lift its blockade on Iranian ports, which was put in place two months ago after escalating missile attacks in the region.

Trump said those restrictions would remain “in full force” until the agreement was signed and implemented.

WATCH:

A U.S. official familiar with the mediation process described the emerging deal as “all-inclusive” and said it built on prior drafts brought forward by Qatar and Pakistan.

The key point of contention, that source said, was sequencing, meaning which side would act first in unlocking funds, lifting restrictions, or beginning disarmament steps.

Even as Trump celebrated progress, Secretary of State Marco Rubio reminded Congress that easing sanctions would come only if Tehran made real nuclear concessions.

“No rewards for promises,” he told reporters last week, emphasizing that Iran’s commitment must go beyond rhetoric.

Trump, meanwhile, has refused to release billions in frozen Iranian funds unless inspectors can confirm Tehran’s nuclear compliance.

Regional sources told The Post that Iran’s latest draft of the agreement was sent to mediators in Doha Wednesday night.

“The text of the agreement was completed and finalized on Wednesday evening,” one regional contact said.

They added that Qatari and Pakistani intermediaries had maintained direct communication with both Washington and Tehran to finalize details.

This apparent breakthrough came after a tense 48 hours.

WATCH:

Earlier this week, Iran downed an American Apache helicopter near the Strait of Hormuz, prompting overnight U.S. strikes on Iranian radar and missile sites.

Those retaliatory strikes lasted four hours and targeted critical military surveillance and communication systems across Iran’s southern coast.

Sources at U.S. Central Command said the precision strikes concluded by dawn and had inflicted heavy damage on Iranian defenses.

Just hours before announcing the deal, Trump had warned Iran that the United States was prepared to strike “VERY HARD TONIGHT.”

He also threatened to seize Iran’s Kharg Island, a major oil export hub that produces roughly 90 percent of the regime’s crude output.

“At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island,” he posted on Truth Social, adding that he preferred direct control over Iranian energy assets, similar to the U.S. approach in Venezuela.

In an interview with Fox and Friends, Trump remarked that he has long believed taking Kharg Island would be the cleanest way to end Iran’s leverage in the region.

“My preference has always been, take Kharg Island. My preference would be that,” he said.

He added that he doubts Americans have the stomach for a full invasion but left that possibility open depending on Iran’s cooperation.

Inside Iran, regime-aligned media were quick to push back on Trump’s claim.

Fars News Agency said no agreement had been finalized, citing an unnamed government insider.

Still, Qatari officials confirmed that discussions were ongoing at the highest levels and that implementation could begin “if final approval is granted.”

Iranian officials appear wary that the deal might face pressure from Israel, whose leaders have not publicly commented.

An Iranian source told The Post that “the Israelis and the Zionist lobby will not let him sign an agreement.”

Yet Trump has told allies he expects Israel to “go along with it” once the final arrangements are sealed. “I call the shots,” he reportedly said of Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Despite conflicting reports, markets reacted instantly to Trump’s announcement.

The Dow Jones soared nearly 800 points as investors bet that the standoff with Iran could be easing.

Energy prices fell on expectations that shipping lanes might soon reopen.

The White House described the rally as a vote of confidence in Trump’s negotiation strategy.

Trump also hinted that a signing ceremony could take place in Pakistan, praising the country’s top military leader, Field Marshal Asim Munir, for facilitating communication between Tehran and Washington.

Other options floated include Switzerland, Turkey, or Qatar, all of which have served as neutral mediators at various stages of the discussions.

For now, both sides appear to be testing each other’s seriousness.

The Iranian regime has endured punishing U.S. sanctions under Trump’s administration, while Washington has had no interest in repeating the Obama-era policy of concession without enforcement.

Trump’s approach has been simple: maximum pressure until Tehran is ready to bargain in good faith.

Whether this deal truly marks the end of confrontation or simply another chapter in a long standoff remains to be seen.

What is clear is that Trump has once again managed to pull the world back from the brink, blending toughness with negotiation to protect American interests while leaving Iran’s mullahs wondering what he might do next.

CBS Lets Father Spread False ‘All-White’ Jury Claim In Teen Murder Case Without Challenge [WATCH]
News

CBS Lets Father Spread False ‘All-White’ Jury Claim In Teen Murder Case Without Challenge [WATCH]

/

CBS News once again demonstrated why millions of Americans have written off the legacy media as hopelessly biased.

In an interview following the conviction of Karmelo Anthony, a black teenager found guilty of murdering white teen Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet, the network allowed Anthony’s father to spread a flat-out falsehood about the jury’s racial makeup, and nobody on set dared correct him.

Andrew Anthony told CBS that what stood out to him during the trial was “the all-white jury.”

That soundbite aired nationwide with no effort from CBS to clarify that the jury was not, in fact, entirely white.

Court records and local reporting show the panel had minority members among the alternates, including individuals of Asian and Indian backgrounds.

But those facts did not fit the preferred narrative, so the network simply let the misleading claim stand.

WATCH:

The case in Frisco, Texas drew intense social media attention from the moment it began.

Critics accused local authorities and jurors of bias before a single piece of evidence was ever presented.

Yet testimony and surveillance footage convinced the jury that Anthony, despite being young, acted with clear intent in the killing of Austin Metcalf.

The verdict was unanimous. Still, the left and its media allies have treated Anthony as some kind of folk hero for a “racial injustice” that does not exist.

The road to the final jury had already been controversial.

Nearly six hundred citizens were called as potential jurors.

After standard vetting, several black prospective jurors were struck, including one who openly admitted he would “have a hard time putting a brother in jail.”

The defense cried foul, arguing through a Batson challenge that prosecutors removed African American candidates due to race.

The judge disagreed, ruling that the stated reasons for dismissal were legitimate, such as personal bias, local connections, and media exposure.

Those facts were public record by the time CBS sat down with the Anthony family.

Even so, the network let Andrew Anthony’s “all-white jury” remark pass without correction or context.

The interviewer did not challenge him, did not mention that Asian and Indian jurors were present as alternates, and certainly did not note that the court had already examined and rejected claims of illegal racial exclusion.

This pattern is familiar.

The leftwing media repeatedly amplifies false stories that feed a desired racial narrative, then quietly moves on when the facts prove inconvenient.

Stories like Ferguson, Jussie Smollett, and countless “police brutality” hoaxes follow the same playbook. Once again, racial grievance sells, while truth takes a back seat.

The fallout has been ugly. Radical activists and anti-white agitators flooded social media celebrating Metcalf’s death.

One former Dallas lawmaker even suggested exhuming Metcalf’s body to “stab it again.”

The comment racked up thousands of approving reactions online. That silence from the same media figures who pretend to care about peaceful social dialogue speaks volumes.

Meanwhile, black nationalist figures such as Charleston White are openly raising money for Anthony’s appeal, promising a one million dollar war chest.

White’s rhetoric has been nothing short of vile, calling on supporters to “kill both them peckerwoods,” referring to Austin Metcalf and his twin brother Hunter.

WATCH:

CBS has yet to condemn or even report on those threats, choosing instead to highlight the Anthony family’s “grief and hope” narrative.

Andrew Anthony’s interview was a perfect example of how legacy media manufactures division.

Rather than fact checking, CBS preferred a clip that painted the justice system as racist.

The truth, that due process worked and that a violent act resulted in a lawful conviction, offers no emotional value to a newsroom conditioned to chase outrage over accuracy.

Conservatives have long warned about this. It is not just about one misleading interview.

It is about a cultural ecosystem in which mainstream outlets selectively elevate voices that advance one racial narrative while ignoring any story that challenges it.

The people who still trust CBS and its peers are being misled not by error but by deliberate editorial choice.

If facts mattered at CBS News, producers would issue a correction acknowledging the jury’s true makeup and the legitimacy of the court’s handling of jury selection.

But that would mean telling viewers that a sensational claim was false, and sensationalism, not truth, is what drives viewership. The network chose activism over integrity.

This episode serves as another reminder that Americans cannot count on the old press to report facts free of political bias.

Whenever race enters a story, the script is already written before the cameras roll. Until the public refuses to play along, expect more lies dressed up as journalism.

ActBlue CEO Pleads the 5th More Than Twenty Times During House Hearing [WATCH]
News

ActBlue CEO Pleads the 5th More Than Twenty Times During House Hearing [WATCH]

/

ActBlue’s embattled CEO Regina Wallace Jones refused to answer a single question this week during a House Administration Committee hearing focused on the Democrat fundraising giant’s alleged mishandling of foreign donations and fraudulent contributions.

Instead, she invoked her Fifth Amendment privilege 22 separate times, a move that sent shockwaves through Washington and raised even more suspicion about what exactly the left’s favorite donation machine has to hide.

The hearing, titled “Preventing Fraudulent Donations: Transparency, Verification, and Accountability,” was anything but transparent when Wallace Jones took her seat.

Republican lawmakers, armed with evidence and direct questions, pressed her over a 2023 letter she had sent to Congress that now appears filled with misleading claims about ActBlue’s practices.

Her legal counsel clearly advised her to stay silent, but her repeated refusal to respond only deepened concerns that ActBlue has knowingly facilitated illegal foreign money into American elections.

Chairman Bryan Steil led the questioning with sharp inquiries about whether Wallace Jones knowingly provided false information to Congress regarding ActBlue’s donor verification systems.

He outlined numerous examples where ActBlue allegedly accepted contributions from foreign sources and where donor information did not match real individuals, sometimes using so-called “smurfs,” whose identities are used without their knowledge.

When Steil asked if she stood by her previous sworn statements, Wallace Jones again invoked her constitutional right to remain silent.

According to reports, ActBlue has processed tens of millions of suspicious donations.

The New York Times recently quoted internal sources who revealed that up to 38 million contributions in 2024 alone may have shown signs of foreign origin.

That staggering number should alarm anyone who cares about election integrity, though Democrats at the hearing seemed content to look the other way.

Instead of grilling Wallace Jones, they used their time to attack WinRed, the Republican fundraising platform, and to criticize Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for investigating ActBlue.

Republicans on multiple committees are not letting this matter rest.

In the past week, Chairman Steil, Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, and Oversight Chairman James Comer sent letters to ActBlue’s board demanding documentation, internal communications, and testimony.

The letters allege a willful cover-up and point to potential criminal misrepresentations made to Congress.

The letters also referenced internal emails in which ActBlue’s own staff, and even its labor union, raised alarms about fraudulent donations, internal retaliation, and mass resignations.

Many former ActBlue legal and compliance staff either quit, were terminated, or went on leave in 2025—another troubling sign for a company responsible for billions in political cash flow.

When questioned by Representative Jim Jordan, Wallace Jones simply sat back and refused to answer.

Jordan pressed her on whether ActBlue weakened its fraud prevention standards after internal assessments warned that doing so would lead to more fraudulent donations.

Again, silence.

He asked directly whether she personally approved those changes to boost donations for Democrat candidates. Once more, the Fifth Amendment.

Greg Murphy of North Carolina pressed even harder, asking how much money had come from Russia or other foreign countries.

He asked bluntly if ActBlue lowered its fraud screening to help Democrats raise more money.

Wallace Jones gave no response.

Her silence was deafening.

WATCH:

The fact that not one Democrat on the committee asked a single question of the ActBlue CEO speaks volumes about the left’s priorities.

They appear far more interested in protecting their cash pipeline than protecting the integrity of U.S. elections.

Instead of demanding answers from an executive whose organization may have helped funnel foreign money into political campaigns, they went on the offensive against Republican oversight efforts.

Fox reported that Republican committee leaders accused ActBlue of refusing to release subpoenaed documents and stonewalling the investigation.

The platform is under mounting pressure as questions multiply about its “knowing and willful” acceptance of illegal contributions and its failure to verify the legitimacy of donors using third-party apps like PayPal and Venmo.

In one particularly damning allegation, internal records show that ActBlue weakened its security standards twice in 2024 despite internal warnings that the changes would make it easier for fraudulent donations to slip through.

That decision, combined with subsequent staff departures, paints a picture of an organization more concerned with political gain than compliance with the law.

Wallace Jones’s avoidance of accountability only adds fuel to the fire. Republicans on the committees are now considering next steps that could include subpoenas, contempt votes, or criminal referrals if they find that ActBlue has obstructed Congress.

Voters across the country watching the hearing saw a CEO unwilling or unable to defend her company’s actions.

As ActBlue continues to hide behind silence and legal posturing, conservative lawmakers are vowing that this will not go away.

With tens of millions of potentially tainted dollars flowing through a major political fundraising platform, Americans deserve to know the truth.

The hearing may have ended, but the political and legal fallout for ActBlue is just beginning.

Bill Gates Plays Dumb on Epstein: ‘Didn’t Fully Understand’ the Crimes, Still Met Him Anyway [WATCH]
News

Bill Gates Plays Dumb on Epstein: ‘Didn’t Fully Understand’ the Crimes, Still Met Him Anyway [WATCH]

/

Bill Gates appeared before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, where the Microsoft cofounder admitted that Jeffrey Epstein used his extramarital affairs as leverage to keep him close.

The billionaire told lawmakers that the disgraced financier knew about his marital infidelities and tried to use that information to pressure him into maintaining their association, though Gates stressed Epstein had ultimately failed.

In his prepared remarks, Gates insisted he “never witnessed nor had any indication that Epstein was engaged in ongoing criminal conduct.”

He said, “I never went to his island, his ranch, or his Florida home. I have never victimized anyone.” Gates attempted to clarify that while Epstein may have sought friendship, he had no interest in pursuing one.

Still, the testimony confirmed something most observers already suspected. Gates’ relationship with Epstein did not stem solely from the supposed philanthropic collaboration they once claimed.

The tech titan openly admitted that Epstein’s knowledge of his “unfaithful” behavior in marriage gave the convicted predator a point of pressure.

According to Gates, Epstein “sought to use information about my infidelities, in addition to many lies that he layered on top, to pressure me to reengage with him.”

Though Gates claimed Epstein’s effort failed, it was clear the threat itself was enough to leave a mark.

Few were convinced that someone as savvy as Gates, who knew Epstein’s history of sex crimes, could have failed to understand who he was dealing with.

WATCH:

Rep. Robert Garcia, a Democrat from California, called it “a theme of using his power of information against others.”

Yet that observation hardly qualifies as new. Epstein built his empire on moral compromise, blackmail, and access to elites who thought their wealth and privilege placed them beyond consequence.

When Gates arrived at the Capitol, he seemed calm, even smiling, telling reporters he hoped his testimony would help bring justice for Epstein’s victims.

Committee Chairman James Comer, a Republican from Kentucky, said he wanted to understand the depth of the connection between Gates, Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Comer made clear that no one was accusing Gates of crimes but noted that legitimate questions remain about what Gates knew and when.

WATCH:

Federal investigators have already released photos and emails showing Gates interacting with Epstein and other big names from finance and academia.

One 2011 photo showed Gates attending dinner at Epstein’s lavish Manhattan home alongside banker Jes Staley and former Harvard president Larry Summers.

Another photo showed Gates with his arm around a woman whose face was redacted in the released version.

Gates told lawmakers he first met Epstein in 2011, claiming he had been lured by promises of “billions of dollars for global health” projects funded by Epstein’s “tax and estate services” clients.

He acknowledged five meetings over a three year period until he “cut off contact” in late 2014 because there was no meaningful support from Epstein’s side.

Epstein and Gates also exchanged more than a dozen emails between 2013 and 2015, many of which included Epstein’s disturbing attempts to exploit Gates’ private life.

The Justice Department records even contained Epstein’s twisted claim that Gates sought help “to deal with the consequences of sex with Russian girls,” an accusation Gates’ representatives dismissed as “absolutely absurd and completely false.”

Still, it was strong enough for Gates to confess to his foundation staff that he had been unfaithful multiple times.

Investigative files referenced two affairs with Russian women, and divorce records later revealed that Gates faced allegations of more than twenty separate liaisons during his marriage to Melinda.

That background matters, especially given Epstein reportedly tried to use Gates’ relationship with a Russian bridge player, Mila Antonova, to pull him into a philanthropic venture that Epstein wanted to build with JP Morgan executives.

The Oversight Committee’s bipartisan investigation has been methodically uncovering the hidden links that connected wealthy elites to Epstein’s criminal operation.

Wednesday’s interview marked their fifteenth major witness session.

Both Comer and Democrat ranking member Garcia said further interviews would follow, including with prominent Epstein associates like attorney Alan Dershowitz, who has already volunteered to appear.

Dershowitz told The Post that he was willing to testify before the panel.

His involvement could shed more light on the scope of Epstein’s influence over public figures who had both money and power to lose.

The committee is also expected to call Assistant Attorney General Todd Blanche to explain the Justice Department’s recent release of nearly three million files connected to the Epstein case.

Through it all, Gates has tried to portray himself as naive and deceived, insisting he only learned the full extent of Epstein’s depravity after the fact.

Yet he met with Epstein several years after the latter’s 2008 conviction on prostitution and child exploitation charges, a choice that baffled many.

Gates told reporters earlier this year, “In retrospect, I was foolish to spend any time with him.” That admission may be true, but it was a very expensive brand of foolish.

For many Americans watching from outside the billionaire bubble, it is another reminder that the global elite often seem drawn to each other’s shadows.

They mingle in the same social circles, exchange the same favors, and believe the rules apply only to everyone else.

Gates may have escaped any legal blame, but morally, his ties to the monster he now condemns will not be forgotten.

Karen Bass’ Brother Sues Los Angeles Over Wildfire Devastation [WATCH]
News

Karen Bass’ Brother Sues Los Angeles Over Wildfire Devastation [WATCH]

/

The Los Angeles political scene has taken another bizarre turn, and this time, Mayor Karen Bass has her own family to thank.

As her reelection campaign faces new turbulence, it turns out her own brother has filed a lawsuit against the city she runs, claiming serious losses from the catastrophic 2025 wildfires that charred parts of Malibu.

Kenneth Bass and his wife, Cindy, filed suit on May 18 in Los Angeles Superior Court, joining a growing list of homeowners and business owners seeking retribution for the city’s alleged failures.

Their Malibu estate, complete with a pool, putting green, and sweeping ocean views, was declared a total loss after the fire tore through the hills this past January.

The irony is hard to miss.

While the mayor seeks another term, claiming to “rebuild” and “lead with compassion,” her own brother apparently decided the city didn’t do enough to protect him.

He is demanding a jury trial and has teamed up with more than a dozen other affected families from Malibu, Topanga, and the Palisades.

The lawsuit names the City of Los Angeles, the Department of Water and Power, Southern California Edison, and even the storied J. Paul Getty Trust among others.

The plaintiffs are alleging negligence that contributed to the spread and severity of the blaze, suggesting that critical infrastructure failures made a bad situation worse.

Court filings describe the couple’s property at 3045 Rambla Pacifico Street as a “total burn down.”

The charred remains were sold earlier this year for two million dollars, only for the couple to purchase a six million dollar mansion in Los Angeles the next month.

Not exactly the typical picture of a displaced wildfire victim, but then again, this is California’s ruling elite we’re talking about.

According to Kenneth Bass, the loss of the home left him with smoke-related injuries and emotional trauma.

That has not stopped him, however, from continuing to support his sister’s campaign.

Public records show donations and endorsements despite this painfully awkward family dynamic.

WATCH:

Political observers can only imagine what Thanksgiving at the Bass household will sound like this year.

The conversation topic “So, how’s that lawsuit against your sister’s city government going?” might be tough to avoid.

Still, in the odd logic of Los Angeles politics, Kenneth Bass seems perfectly at peace suing his sister’s administration while endorsing her leadership.

The lawsuit is one of many highlighting growing anger toward city and state leadership after multiple catastrophic fire seasons.

Governor Gavin Newsom and his network of Los Angeles progressives are facing harsh criticism for poor forest management, derelict infrastructure, and endless bureaucratic red tape that leaves both preparedness and recovery in shambles.

Wildfire victims argue that empty reservoirs, aging power lines, and political indifference have turned preventable fires into multibillion-dollar disasters.

Kenneth Bass’s suit may just be the latest symptom of a broken governance model rather than an isolated grievance.

Even as progressive leaders blame “climate change,” residents know it is the city’s mismanagement fueling disaster after disaster.

Jennifer Gray Thompson, a wildfire recovery expert, tried to frame the situation as something sad but unavoidable.

“I don’t think he has any choice. He can’t not do it because it’s his sister,” she told L.A. Material.

It is a polite way of admitting that when your liberal city collapses under the weight of its own incompetence, even your own family turns against you in court.

Meanwhile, the political fallout continues.

Bass now faces a November runoff against socialist-backed City Councilwoman Nithya Raman, who barely made the cut after mail-in ballots trickled in long past Election Day.

Voters already frustrated by rising crime, homelessness, and corruption may look at the spectacle of the mayor’s brother suing her government as the perfect symbol of a city coming apart.

In a town built on contradictions, none seem quite as fitting.

A mayor promising safety and competence cannot keep her own family safe from city-sponsored chaos.

Yet, in classic Los Angeles fashion, everyone involved will issue carefully orchestrated statements about “healing,” “accountability,” and “progress.”

The rest of us will continue shaking our heads.

As the lawsuits pile up and public faith keeps sliding, California’s ruling left finds itself trapped in a mess of its own making.

If family loyalty cannot survive the failures of liberal governance, maybe voters will finally decide they have had enough of the same tired leadership that keeps letting their state burn, both literally and figuratively.


Scroll to Top