Author name: LifeZette

Uncategorized

Hakeem Jeffries Faces Scrutiny on Cover-Up of Biden’s Cognitive Issues

/

As Joe Biden prepares to leave office on Monday, allegations of a years-long effort to obscure his cognitive decline have resurfaced, raising questions about the role of Democratic leaders and the media in shaping public perception.

Among those facing criticism is House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), who appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday and was pressed about his past statements supporting Biden’s re-election bid.

During the interview, host Kristen Welker confronted Jeffries with a clip from February 2024 in which he described Biden as “definitely the strongest candidate to defeat Donald Trump.”

Welker then asked directly, “What do you say to Americans who believe you and other top Democrats misled them?”

Jeffries responded by emphasizing Biden’s role as the incumbent at the time, stating, “Well, Joe Biden was the incumbent president at the time. He was the candidate at the time. And I supported him at the time. And that was the right thing to do based on the incumbent president making the decision that he was going to run. Obviously things changed in late June and early July.”

He added, “But I think what’s most important at this moment is not for us to look backwards, but to look forward, solve problems for hard-working American taxpayers, and get things done. That’s what the American people want to happen.”

Welker pushed further, asking whether Jeffries and other Democrats had a responsibility to be more transparent about Biden’s condition.

Jeffries avoided addressing the question directly, instead pivoting to Biden’s accomplishments.

“What I saw behind closed doors was a president who was working hard to get things done to deliver for the American people on infrastructure, on driving down the high price of life-saving prescription drugs, on bringing domestic manufacturing jobs back home to the United States of America,” Jeffries said.

He continued, “It’s important to understand that President Biden inherited three different catastrophes on Day One: a democracy catastrophe, a public health catastrophe, and an economic catastrophe, all at the same time, and worked hard to put America in the strongest possible position moving forward.”

Critics argue that Democratic leaders and media outlets played an active role in downplaying or dismissing concerns about Biden’s cognitive abilities, prioritizing political interests over transparency.

The issue has been described by some as one of the most significant political scandals in recent history.

Over the years, multiple instances of Biden’s public gaffes and misstatements fueled speculation about his mental fitness.

Despite this, media outlets largely avoided in-depth coverage, and Democratic leaders repeatedly dismissed concerns as unfounded.

As Biden’s tenure comes to an end, some lawmakers and political analysts believe the lack of transparency has damaged public trust.

The perception of a coordinated effort to shield the president’s vulnerabilities has left many questioning the credibility of those involved.

With Biden stepping down and Trump set to take office again, the fallout from this controversy could have long-term implications for the Democratic Party and its relationship with the media.

For many Americans, the scandal has reinforced skepticism about the motives of political and media elites.

While Jeffries emphasized moving forward during his interview, calls for accountability and transparency continue to grow.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government, Uncategorized

Kristi Noem Schools Senator Andy Kim on Border Security, Leaves Him Red-Faced

/

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, nominated by President Trump as Homeland Security Secretary, faced the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Friday morning for her confirmation hearing.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, what unfolded was not only a testament to her poise and knowledge but also an embarrassing display of unpreparedness from Senator Andy Kim (D-N.J.).

Noem, who has served as governor since 2019 and previously represented South Dakota in the U.S. House of Representatives, handled the hearing with professionalism. However, Senator Kim’s questioning revealed a shocking lack of understanding about border security and constitutional authority.

Kim began by citing the appointment of Tom Homan as President Trump’s Border Czar and asked Noem, “Who’s in charge of the nation’s borders?”

A question so elementary it hardly required a response. Without hesitation, Noem clarified that under the U.S. Constitution, the President holds ultimate authority over national security, including border management.

Kim sheepishly admitted that her response aligned with what he expected but claimed he was “confused” because of Homan’s role.

Noem patiently explained that while Homan has been tasked with overseeing enforcement, she, Homan, and other officials work under the President’s directives.

Her clear, concise response underscored Kim’s lack of preparation. The moment was a stark reminder of the gaps in understanding among some Democratic lawmakers regarding basic governmental functions.

The exchange didn’t end there. Kim launched into a lengthy monologue expressing concern that Homan’s role might overshadow Noem’s responsibilities. Remaining composed, Noem reassured him that she had no issues collaborating with Homan under President Trump’s leadership.

Her response once again highlighted her competence and understanding of the role, leaving Kim visibly flustered.

For New Jerseyans, this display from Senator Kim might give pause. If this level of confusion and lack of preparation is what they can expect over the next six years, the Garden State may be in for a rough ride.

Read More at LifeZette

Congress

Nancy Mace to Crockett: “Want to Take It Outside?” After Heated Insult

/

A heated confrontation unfolded between Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) during a House Oversight Committee meeting on Tuesday.

The clash, centered on civil rights and issues related to transgender policies, quickly escalated into a verbal sparring match that garnered significant attention both in and outside Congress.

The disagreement began when Crockett mocked Mace’s efforts to address concerns about biological men in women’s restrooms and sports.

“I can see that somebody’s [Mace’s] campaign coffers really are struggling right now,” Crockett quipped. “So she’s gonna keep saying trans, trans, trans, so that people will feel threatened.”

Crockett’s remarks were accompanied by a dismissive tone, as she added, “And child, listen.”

The comment sparked an immediate and fiery response from Mace. “I am no child! Do not call me a child!” Mace exclaimed. “I am no child. Don’t even start. I am a grown woman. I am 47 years old.”

The South Carolina congresswoman continued to rebuff Crockett’s remarks, adding, “You will not do that. I am not a child. If you want to take it outside, we can do that.”

The tense exchange prompted Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) to request that Mace’s comments be stricken from the record.

However, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) dismissed the request, characterizing the remark as a suggestion to settle the discussion over “a cup of coffee, or maybe a beer” outside the halls of Congress.

Watch the video:

The confrontation did not end in the committee room.

Both Mace and Crockett took to X (formerly Twitter) to continue their war of words.

Crockett accused Mace of having “threatened to physically fight me,” while Mace countered with the retort, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.”

During the hearing, Crockett also dismissed concerns about biological men in women’s locker rooms as a “fantasy” and accused her Republican colleague of wanting “to be dramatic.”

Mace, a survivor of sexual assault, expressed strong disapproval of Crockett’s comments, calling them dismissive of legitimate concerns.

This is not the first time Mace has been involved in contentious interactions.

Last month, Capitol Police arrested a transgender rights advocate who physically assaulted her.

Mace, who sustained minor injuries requiring medical attention, was vocal in her response, stating, “Your tr*ns violence and threats on my life will only make me double down. FAFO.”

The suspect, 33-year-old James McIntyre of Illinois, was charged with assaulting a government official.

Crockett, meanwhile, has gained a reputation for provocative comments.

At a House Oversight Committee hearing earlier this month, she accused Republicans of using minorities to secure congressional seats for white lawmakers.

In a separate instance, she went viral for a racially charged tirade about “the white man.”

Additionally, Crockett faced criticism during a hearing about border issues when she attempted to demean Donald Trump’s incoming border czar, Tom Homan. Homan responded bluntly, saying, “I don’t know who this lady is. Apparently, she’s not real smart.”

The fiery exchanges between Mace and Crockett highlight the growing tensions in Congress over contentious social and political issues.

With both lawmakers unyielding in their positions, this incident serves as a stark example of the increasingly polarized environment in Washington.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government

Resurfaced Clip Confirms Trump’s Warning About Newsom and Wildfires

/

Los Angeles County is grappling with devastating wildfires that have displaced tens of thousands of residents and left vast swathes of land in ashes.

As the blazes rage out of control, a video of former President Donald Trump criticizing California’s fire management policies has resurfaced, drawing renewed attention to his remarks.

The clip, from Trump’s appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast three months ago, highlights his sharp critique of California’s environmental regulations and forest maintenance strategies.

Trump’s podcast discussion focused on what he sees as California’s failure to address critical issues like water management and forest upkeep. “They said, ‘We have no water,’” Trump stated in the interview.

“I said, do you have a drought? ‘No, we don’t have a drought.’ I said, why do you have no water? ‘Because the water isn’t allowed to flow down.’ It’s got a natural flow from Canada all the way up north, more water than they could ever use. And in order to protect a tiny little fish, the water up north gets routed into the Pacific Ocean. Millions and millions of gallons of water gets poured.”

The “tiny little fish” referenced by Trump is the delta smelt, a species native to California waterways and a central figure in the state’s environmental regulations.

Trump criticized these policies, arguing that they prioritize the fish over the safety and welfare of California residents. “I could have water for all of that land, water for your forests,” he said. “You know your forests are dry as a bone.”

He further suggested that simple measures like clearing deadfall and raking leaves could significantly reduce wildfire damage.

Trump’s long-standing criticism of California’s fire management policies also includes comments on forest maintenance.

“They’re not allowed to rake their forests because you’re not allowed to touch it,” he said during the podcast. “And all they have to do is clean their forest, meaning rake it up, get rid of the leaves, you know, leaves that are sitting there for five years.”

Currently, three major wildfires in Los Angeles County—affecting areas such as Pacific Palisades, Sylmar, and Pasadena—have forced the evacuation of over 30,000 residents and left 200,000 without power. Fire officials report zero percent containment, with the powerful Santa Ana winds continuing to fuel the flames.

Governor Gavin Newsom has declared a state of emergency, warning that conditions could worsen in the coming days.

Trump doubled down on his criticism of California’s policies on Truth Social, specifically targeting Governor Newsom. “Governor Gavin Newscum refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water, from excess rain and snow melt from the North, to flow daily into many parts of California, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way,” Trump wrote. He accused Newsom of prioritizing the delta smelt over Californians’ safety, stating, “He wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt… but didn’t care about the people of California. Now the ultimate price is being paid.”

While experts acknowledge that California’s wildfire challenges are multifaceted, including factors like climate change and urban sprawl, Trump’s remarks have gained traction as residents grapple with the fallout of the current crisis.

Firefighters continue to struggle against the infernos, which are exacerbated by the state’s prolonged water shortages and years of forest mismanagement.

The wildfires in Los Angeles County underscore the dire need for systemic change in California’s environmental and resource management strategies.

Trump’s critique, though polarizing, raises questions about whether longstanding policies have contributed to the recurring devastation faced by Californians each wildfire season.

As the flames continue to spread, so too does the debate over the state’s preparedness and priorities.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government

Adam Schiff Can’t Wait to Launch Another Trump Impeachment Push

/

Donald Trump is set to become the 47th president of the United States on January 20, 2025, following his victory in both the Electoral College and the popular vote.

While his return to the White House marks a significant political shift, it also sets the stage for potential renewed battles with his opponents, particularly from the Democratic Party.

For Republicans, retaking the Senate was critical for advancing Trump’s agenda and creating a legislative firewall against Democratic opposition.

The GOP’s success in securing Senate control offers a smoother path for Trump’s policies to gain traction, while also providing a defense against potential impeachment efforts. In a worst-case scenario where Kamala Harris had won the presidency, a Republican-controlled Senate would have been essential to prevent what conservatives often describe as “left-wing lunacy.”

With Trump’s victory, however, Republicans see an opportunity to push forward his policy agenda without the gridlock experienced during his first term.

Even before Trump’s inauguration, Democrats have made it clear they will closely scrutinize his administration’s actions. Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), who played a prominent role in Trump’s first impeachment trial, signaled his party’s readiness to challenge Trump again if necessary. “If he abuses his office, we will vigorously push back, fight back, stand up to him as we had to do during his first term in office,” Schiff stated.

For Democrats, the definition of “abusing his office” has often been a point of contention.

Critics argue that opposition to Trump during his first term frequently revolved around ordinary executive actions that were portrayed as extralegal offenses.

With Trump returning to the presidency, similar conflicts are anticipated. Unlike his first term, Trump enters office with a clearer mandate. His dual victories in the Electoral College and the popular vote represent a significant accomplishment and demonstrate widespread support across the country. This could strengthen his position as he seeks to implement his agenda.

Over the years, efforts to undermine Trump through legal challenges and investigations—often referred to by his supporters as “lawfare”—have largely failed to derail his political momentum.

The culmination of these efforts reached a point where even some liberals expressed frustration with Attorney General Merrick Garland, reflecting dissatisfaction within Democratic ranks.

As Trump prepares to take office, the nation faces ongoing political fatigue. The divisive rhetoric and partisan battles that defined much of his first term have left many Americans weary of anti-Trump controversies. Whether his second term will see a continuation of these dynamics or a shift toward governance remains to be seen. For now, Trump and his supporters view his return to the presidency as a validation of his leadership and a rejection of the tactics employed by his opponents.

Democrats, however, are expected to remain vigilant and ready to challenge his administration at every turn.

Read More at LifeZette

Border

Trump’s Border Czar Reveals Controversial Plans Likely to Fuel Weekly Media Backlash

/

Tom Homan, tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to serve as his border czar, has announced plans to take a tough and transparent approach to immigration enforcement.

Speaking at a fundraiser in Naples, Florida, on Sunday evening, Homan detailed his strategy for tackling illegal immigration, including weekly White House briefings to update the public on arrests and deportations.

Homan, a former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), will assume his new role when Trump is inaugurated on January 20.

He emphasized his commitment to enforcing immigration laws “without apology” and keeping voters informed about the administration’s progress. “There needs to be a weekly White House press briefing on exactly who we’re arresting and who we’re saving, who we are putting in jail, who we are deporting, so the American people know we’re true to our word,” Homan stated.

He stressed the importance of transparency and indicated that his background as a Fox News commentator made him well-suited for the task.

Homan also pledged to end the controversial “catch-and-release” policy, under which asylum seekers are released pending court appearances due to insufficient detention capacity. “It will be sad. It will be controversial. It will be emotional,” Homan acknowledged, anticipating media backlash.

Homan outlined three priorities given to him by Trump: securing the southern border, launching a large-scale deportation program, and locating 300,000 undocumented children who have gone missing within the United States.

Addressing logistical challenges, Homan noted that scaling up deportation operations would require additional resources. “We have limited facilities, but we’re gonna do everything we can with what we have,” he said.

He called on Congress to act quickly on funding, suggesting that $86 billion would be a strong starting point to cover the costs of beds and operations.

Homan explained the complexities involved in deportation, particularly for individuals from countries reluctant to accept their nationals. “Say someone is illegal. Let’s say he’s a criminal. He’s convicted of murder, originally from El Salvador,” he said. “I can’t put him on an airplane on day one. You gotta detain him long enough to get travel documents, get landing rights. El Salvador has to admit that it’s their national. That takes a few days to a few weeks. So I need beds.”

Homan revealed that discussions are already underway to find alternative destinations for migrants from countries unwilling to repatriate them.

While declining to name specific countries, he confirmed that negotiations had begun ahead of Trump’s inauguration.

Reports have previously mentioned Turks and Caicos, Panama, and Grenada as potential destinations, though some nations, including the Bahamas, have ruled out such agreements.

Guatemala has expressed tentative openness to housing deportees, according to Reuters.

Homan noted that this approach mirrors efforts in other nations, such as the United Kingdom’s deal with Rwanda to house refugees.

However, such plans often face legal challenges, as demonstrated by the American Civil Liberties Union’s opposition to a similar Trump-era proposal in 2019.

Homan pointed to the November elections as evidence that voters support stricter immigration enforcement.

A recent J.L. Partners poll for DailyMail.com found that the border crisis ranked as the second most important issue for voters, trailing only inflation.

As Homan prepares to take on his new role, he remains focused on implementing what Trump has called the “largest deportation in history.”

With Congress now under pressure to allocate resources for these initiatives, the success of the plan may hinge on swift legislative action. “This is what the American people want,” Homan said. “Give us the money we need, and we’ll get it done.”

Read More at LifeZette

Cancel Culture

Nikki Glaser Skewers Hollywood Elites at Golden Globes

/

Comedian Nikki Glaser took the stage at the Golden Globes on Sunday night, delivering a sharp monologue that skewered Hollywood’s elite, high-profile scandals, and even political endorsements.

The event took place at the Beverly Hilton in Beverly Hills, where Glaser’s opening remarks set the tone for a night of humor mixed with pointed commentary.

Glaser began by addressing the star-studded audience with a playful jab at their influence, particularly in politics. “I am not here to roast you tonight,” she said. “How could I, really? You’re all so famous, so talented, so powerful. I mean, you could really do anything … I mean, except tell the country who to vote for.”

The comment appeared to reference Hollywood celebrities who publicly supported Kamala Harris and other political figures.

Glaser’s quip drew laughter from the crowd while highlighting the often-debated impact of celebrity endorsements on public opinion.

In a more controversial moment, Glaser took aim at Sean “Diddy” Combs, referencing his ongoing sexual trafficking scandal. While discussing the film Challengers, she remarked, “That movie was more sexually charged than ‘. I’m upset too. The after-party’s not going to be as good this year. But we have to move on! Stanley Tucci’s freak-off just doesn’t have the same ring to it.”

The joke elicited mixed reactions, underscoring the tension surrounding the high-profile allegations against Combs.

Glaser didn’t spare NBC’s streaming platform, Peacock, from her comedic critique.

Highlighting the challenges streaming services face in gaining visibility, she joked about Eddie Redmayne’s nomination for his role in The Day of the Jackal.

“It’s about a top-secret elite sniper that no one can find, because he’s on Peacock,” Glaser quipped, earning laughs from the audience and pointing to the platform’s struggles to stand out in the crowded streaming market.

The comedian also turned her attention to Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson’s business ventures.

Ahead of introducing Johnson as a presenter, Glaser poked fun at celebrities using their fame to launch products, particularly tequila brands.

“Remember: the point of being nominated isn’t to win an award. No, the point of being nominated is to make a tequila brand so popular that you never have to make art again,” she said.

Johnson, known for his Teremana tequila brand, took the joke in stride as he took the stage shortly after.

Glaser’s monologue at the Golden Globes blended humor with social commentary, touching on Hollywood’s influence, scandals, and commercial endeavors.

Her sharp remarks set the stage for a night that celebrated the best in television and film while reflecting the challenges and controversies surrounding the entertainment industry.

The Golden Globes, one of Hollywood’s most anticipated annual events, continues to serve as a platform for both celebration and satire, with comedians like Glaser delivering humor that resonates well beyond the awards show stage.

Read More at LifeZette

Economics, Uncategorized

Biden’s Last Act: Cementing Offshore Drilling Ban Before Trump Takes Over

/

As President Joe Biden prepares to exit the Oval Office, his administration is reportedly gearing up to deliver a final parting gift to environmental activists—one that could deal a lasting blow to American energy independence.

According to Bloomberg News, Biden plans to impose restrictions on offshore oil and gas drilling, potentially handcuffing President-elect Donald Trump’s efforts to reinvigorate the U.S. energy sector, as reported by The Daily Caller.

Bloomberg’s sources indicate Biden’s executive order would permanently ban new lease sales for oil and gas drilling across certain areas of the outer continental shelf. While specific regions remain unconfirmed, whispers suggest coastal California and parts of the Gulf of Mexico may be targeted.

If enacted, the move would align with the demands of deep-pocketed environmental groups and progressive lawmakers eager to cement Biden’s legacy as a climate warrior.

This maneuver, however, directly counters Trump’s pledge to “unleash American energy dominance.” Biden’s potential restrictions could make it exceedingly difficult for the next administration to roll back, thanks to legal provisions allowing presidents to protect federal waters without granting clear authority to reverse such designations.

In typical fashion, the Biden administration is attempting to tie Trump’s hands, prioritizing its ideological agenda over the practical needs of hardworking Americans.

Beyond offshore drilling, Biden’s lame-duck administration has been sprinting to finalize an array of green policies. Just last year, it issued the most restrictive five-year offshore leasing schedule in U.S. history, further throttling domestic energy development.

Recent actions include blocking oil and gas development in Nevada’s Ruby Mountains for the next 20 years and doling out massive taxpayer-funded loans to green energy firms—moves that seem more focused on appeasing the environmentalist elite than addressing the nation’s economic realities.

These late-term policies are a continuation of the administration’s broader climate crusade, which has hampered America’s energy independence and economic resilience. For average Americans, the consequences are clear: higher energy costs, increased dependence on foreign oil, and diminished economic opportunities in energy-rich regions of the country.

While the White House declined to comment on these developments, the timing of this move raises eyebrows. With just days left in office, Biden’s push to enshrine radical environmental policies smacks of a desperate attempt to solidify his legacy—even if it means leaving everyday Americans to pay the price.

Read More at LifeZette

Election

Cuomo Says He Felt Satisfaction Over Kamala’s Loss Due to Trump Shooting Reaction From the Left

/

Chris Cuomo, host of The Chris Cuomo Project and NewsNation anchor, didn’t hold back on his criticism of left-wing reactions to the July assassination attempt against President-elect Donald Trump.

During a recent episode of his show, Cuomo expressed both disgust and what he described as “satisfaction” over the political fallout Vice President Kamala Harris faced in November, attributing it to the left’s appalling response to Trump’s near-death experience, as reported by The Daily Caller.

The incident occurred during a Trump rally in Butler Township, Pennsylvania, where a gunman fired at the President-elect, striking him in the ear.

Despite the gravity of the situation—an assassination attempt on a U.S. leader—many left-leaning commentators minimized the attack. Some even claimed Trump was hit by teleprompter glass rather than a bullet.

Cuomo didn’t mince words, directing his outrage at those who dismissed the seriousness of the attempt:

“What I found completely appalling and outrageous was how unimpressed lefties were by Trump getting shot in the head and how many of you would say, ‘Will you stop saying he got shot in the head? It just nicked his ear.’ Once again, to my earlier point: fuck you. You get nicked in the ear by a bullet and tell me that it’s ‘No big deal. I’m good. I’m good.’ Nah, nah. That’s crazy.”

Cuomo highlighted what he saw as hypocrisy, pointing out that if a similar attack had been made on Harris, the media and the left would have been consumed with outrage for days. He continued:

“If that had happened to Harris, you guys would have talked about it for three days nonstop about how we’re in Helter Skelter mode or whatever it is. And then you go and call me a bigot for saying that. This is why you lost the election. That’s exactly why you lost the election.”

The failed assassination attempt wasn’t without consequence. One attendee, former volunteer fire chief Corey Comperatore, was tragically killed. Two others, 57-year-old David Dutch and 74-year-old James Copenhaver, were injured.

Yet, despite the tragedy, some on the left propagated conspiracy theories that the incident was staged. According to a Morning Consult poll, a third of President Joe Biden’s supporters entertained the possibility that the attempt wasn’t genuine.

Cuomo didn’t stop there. He addressed a second assassination attempt on Trump in September, when a man armed with a semi-automatic rifle targeted the President-elect at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach. Secret Service agents thwarted the attack before shots were fired.

Cuomo revealed he personally reached out to Trump after the incident:

“I reached out to Trump. I wanted to just say, ‘Listen, I’m really sorry that this is going on and it’s being dealt with this way.’ Not because I’m in favor of his politics or what he says—I criticize him all the time. That’s my job, and he deserves it. But he doesn’t deserve this.”

While Cuomo’s politics often differ from Trump’s, his condemnation of the left’s reaction was clear: their callousness crossed a line, and it didn’t go unnoticed by voters.

Read More at LifeZette

Big Government

Virginia Man Arrested for Largest Homemade Explosives Seizure in FBI History

/

Federal agents arrested 36-year-old Brad Spafford earlier this month after raiding his Virginia property and discovering what they claim is the largest collection of homemade explosives ever seized in FBI history.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, one of the chilling details of the investigation is Spafford’s alleged use of images of Joe Biden for target practice, a fact that federal agents say underscores his dangerous intent.

The FBI’s search of Spafford’s sprawling 20-acre estate revealed over 150 improvised explosive devices, including pipe bombs labeled as “lethal.”

The discovery followed an investigation that initially stemmed from a minor firearms violation—Spafford’s alleged possession of an unregistered short-barrel rifle.

Court records and a sworn affidavit paint a troubling picture. According to an FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force agent, Spafford sustained severe injuries, including disfigured fingers, from a July 4, 2021, explosion while working with homemade explosives.

A confidential human source (CHS) informed federal authorities that Spafford’s activities had escalated over time. The source alleged that Spafford was “stockpiling weapons and ammunition” and preparing for an unnamed event.

The affidavit states, “The CHS observed SPAFFORD’s hand both before and after the event and saw that several fingers were missing after the event.”

Spafford reportedly told the CHS that he manufactured approximately 50 rounds of ammunition daily and had assembled a “go box” packed with supplies, weapons, and medical kits for rapid deployment.

Photographic evidence provided to the FBI showed the box included rifles, ammunition, Tyvek suits, food, and water.

According to court filings, Spafford refused to register his short-barrel rifles, citing his opposition to federal registration laws. The affidavit noted that Spafford had informed the CHS in 2023 of his intent to move “hundred-pound boxes of ammunition” to his property, adding that he aspired to accumulate 10,000 rounds of ammunition.

The ATF confirmed that Spafford lacked the necessary tax stamps and licenses for his firearms and explosives, further solidifying the case against him. Federal agents also identified a photograph of a rifle in Spafford’s “go box” as a likely unregistered short-barrel rifle, based on its barrel length.

On October 19, 2024, Spafford allegedly admitted to the CHS that he owned an unregistered short-barrel rifle, explicitly stating his opposition to federal firearms regulations.

Federal law defines a short-barrel rifle as one with a barrel shorter than 16 inches, a violation that Spafford allegedly flaunted.

Spafford now faces multiple charges, including illegal possession of explosive materials, unregistered firearms, and other related offenses. Federal authorities are calling him a “clear and present danger,” with one FBI agent labeling him an “extreme danger to the community.”

The case highlights ongoing concerns about domestic extremism and illegal firearms, with the Biden administration’s policies likely to become a focal point in the public discourse surrounding such incidents.

Read More at LifeZette


Subscribe Form

© 2025 WokeSpy All Rights Reserved

Scroll to Top