Author name: LifeZette

News

RFK Jr. Exposes Fauci Diary Bombshell That Should Infuriate Every American [WATCH]

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went on “The Ingraham Angle” Monday night and dropped another grenade into the long overdue reckoning over Dr. Anthony Fauci and the COVID years.

Kennedy, now serving as HHS secretary, said Fauci took the COVID vaccine in a highly public setting, then months later suffered what Kennedy described as a “pulmonary infarction.”

According to Kennedy, the public was never told. That is not a small detail when the same public health machine was busy scolding Americans, threatening livelihoods, and treating vaccine skepticism like a thought crime.

Kennedy told Laura Ingraham that Fauci misled the country on nearly every major pandemic fight.

“He lied about masks. He lied about the social distancing. He lied about the transmission, and he lied about natural immunity,” he said.

Then Kennedy added another charge that should raise eyebrows across the country.

“He lied about the capacity, as you just said, of the vaccine to prevent infection.”

The allegation centers on Fauci diary material released by Sen. Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican who has been one of the few lawmakers willing to keep pulling on this thread while Washington would prefer everyone move along.

Paul released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci private diary entries ahead of Fauci Senate testimony.

Those pages have reopened questions about what Fauci knew, what he experienced personally, and what he decided the American people did not need to know.

Peter McCullough, writing on his Focal Points site, said internal records showed that on June 19, 2021, Fauci was dealing with an acute “pulmonary infarct” associated with a pulmonary embolism and was started on Eliquis, a blood thinner.

“Crucially, this health emergency occurred just months after his primary vaccination series,” McCullough wrote.

“Yet Fauci was not transparent with the public.”

To be clear, the diary entry itself does not state that Fauci pulmonary infarct was caused by the COVID vaccine.

Kennedy and McCullough are pointing to the timing and to the fact that pulmonary embolism and infarct were listed by federal health agencies among rare expected adverse events.

That distinction matters, but so does the larger issue.

If the man who became the face of pandemic medicine suffered a serious medical event after vaccination, while Americans were being told to shut up and comply, transparency was not optional.

Instead, the picture Kennedy paints is one of privilege for the ruling class and lectures for everyone else.

Fauci allegedly received top medical attention while millions of ordinary Americans were told their questions were dangerous.

A circulating image of a June 19, 2021 diary entry, labeled as released by Chairman Rand Paul, reportedly shows Fauci describing a pulmonary infarct found on a CT scan and a recommendation to begin anticoagulation with Eliquis.

The version posted publicly on Paul Senate website is redacted, while an unredacted image has spread widely online.

That alone guarantees more scrutiny, because Americans have seen enough redactions to know they usually hide the parts that matter most.

Kennedy said the diary entries reveal something powerful because they come from Fauci own writing.

“There’s something very dramatic, even for me, I’ve seen him (Fauci) write it in his own journal,” Kennedy said.

He described the entries as Fauci “Confessing to (you know) being wrong to lying about all this stuff.”

That is a stunning accusation, and it lands because so many pandemic era claims have aged about as well as a cloth mask in a rainstorm.

The country was told masks were science, distancing was science, school closures were science, and vaccine mandates were science.

Then the goalposts moved, the explanations changed, and the same experts demanded applause.

Fauci was not some background bureaucrat during all of this. He was the face on television, the voice from the podium, and the man treated by corporate media like a saint in a lab coat.

His guidance helped destroy small businesses, wreck children education, separate families, and keep loved ones apart in their final days.

Americans were told that questioning any of it was selfish, ignorant, or worse.

Now his own diary entries are raising fresh questions about what he disclosed and what he kept quiet.

WATCH:

Those questions deserve answers under oath, not another media cleanup operation from the same crowd that spent years protecting him.

Rand Paul has been right to keep pressing.

The American people paid for the agencies, endured the mandates, suffered the consequences, and deserve the truth without another layer of bureaucratic fog.

News

Biden Classified Docs Story Implodes as Ghostwriter Tapes Expose Memory Mess [WATCH]

Former President Joe Biden’s carefully protected classified documents narrative just took another hit, and this one comes with audio.

Recordings from his interviews with memoir ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer, gathered during special counsel Robert Hur’s investigation, have now been released to the public.

The tapes come after a long legal fight by Biden’s attorneys to keep them sealed.

After months of resistance, the Biden team dropped its lawsuit seeking to block release, and a judge accepted that dismissal Monday.

The push to obtain the material came from Mike Howell, formerly of the Heritage Foundation and now with the Oversight Project.

Howell pursued the recordings and transcripts for more than two years through public records requests, arguing voters had a right to hear what Hur relied on.

The Oversight Project then published hours of Biden’s 2016 and 2017 conversations with Zwonitzer, who helped write “Promise Me, Dad.”

The audio shows Biden pausing often, speaking slowly, and struggling to recall names, dates, and events.

That matters because Hur’s report described Biden’s conversations as “painfully slow” and said he was “struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”

The tapes appear to back up that description in uncomfortable detail.

Oversight Project Vice President of Litigation Jeff Clark told Fox News Digital, “Joe Biden didn’t want these tapes to come out. But now they have.”

He added, “There is no joy in Bidenville today.”

Clark also said, “Robert Hur’s and Merrick Garland’s decision to give Biden a free pass for keeping and disclosing classified information must now be reexamined.”

That is exactly the question hanging over this whole episode, especially after years of Democrats pretending classified document rules only apply to their political enemies.

Hur investigated Biden’s handling of classified materials from his time as vice president under Barack Obama and as a U.S. senator from Delaware.

He declined to pursue criminal charges, saying prosecutors could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Biden willfully retained or disclosed the material.

Hur also wrote, “Mr. Biden’s memory was significantly limited, both during his recorded interviews with the ghostwriter in 2017 and in his interview with our office in 2023.”

That line was widely discussed when the report came out, but hearing the recordings gives it a sharper edge.

In one recording, Biden warned Zwonitzer while discussing a 2014 Situation Room meeting, “Some of this may be classified, so be careful.”

He then added, “I’m not sure. It isn’t marked classified, but….” That is not exactly the kind of casual aside that inspires confidence.

Another clip from April 24, 2017, shows Biden struggling to remember two economic advisers.

“I’ll think of his name,” Biden said, before adding, “I should write the names down because I keep forgetting them.”

Zwonitzer eventually supplied the name Alan Krueger after a long pause. For a man who spent decades selling himself as the smartest foreign policy adult in the room, the moment is not flattering.

The same day, Biden appeared unable to recall where he had been on a particular date.

He later remembered attending a memorial service for a fallen service member, but the name still escaped him.

Biden also circled back to a meeting with Ron Klain, saying, “But at any rate, back to there was I had a meeting with Ron Klain, and I don’t know when.”

WATCH:

The audio also captures him trying to place a lunch with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.

“When he, when he came to me and I’ll get the date. Remind me when did Summers come to me to have lunch to it was when I was thinking about running.”

Later, Biden said, “Here’s what happened, before I forget. Don’t mind my train of thought. He also pledged to support me in 2016.”

The political problem for Biden and his defenders is obvious.

For years, Americans were told concerns about his mental sharpness were cheap shots, right wing noise, or edited clips, yet here are recordings from before his presidency showing the very issues critics raised.

WATCH:

The public now has more than spin to review, and the Biden classified documents story looks a lot less tidy than the establishment wanted voters to believe.

News

McConnell Drops Another Proof of Life Photo as Senate Absence Fuels Frenzy [WATCH]

Senator Mitch McConnell resurfaced Monday with a new photo meant to calm questions about his health after a 44 day absence from the Senate.

In Washington, where the ruling class often treats basic transparency like a state secret, the picture did more than answer questions.

The image showed McConnell smiling from a rehab bed alongside his wife, Elaine Chao.

It was clearly intended to project calm, even as the Kentucky Republican has been missing from the Senate during a stretch when voters deserve to know who is actually doing the job.

A statement from the Capitol’s Office of Attending Physician tried to put the matter to rest.

“Senator McConnell continues his recovery from a fall at home in June,” the statement said.

The office added more details about his rehabilitation, saying doctors have been checking on him daily.

“OAP physicians visit with the Senator every day, discussing all aspects of his rehabilitation care. Since his discharge from hospital care, he has maintained a strenuous course of physical therapy and rehabilitation, including multiple sessions a day designed to rebuild strength and reduce the risk of future falls. His bout with childhood polio continues to be a significant factor in his mobility,” the statement read.

McConnell also confirmed he will not attend this year’s Fancy Farm picnic, a major Kentucky political tradition.

For a senator who has spent decades as one of the most powerful figures in Republican politics, missing such an event only adds fuel to the conversation.

The latest photo follows an earlier “proof of life” image released this month as speculation grew around McConnell’s extended disappearance from public view.

The timing and lack of regular public updates created a vacuum, and Washington being Washington, that vacuum was quickly filled with whispers.

Last week, rumors circulated that McConnell was “brain dead” and being kept alive by machines.

The new medical statement pushed back on those claims and said he had not suffered a heart attack or stroke.

WAATCH:

McConnell, now 84 years old, said his hospitalization followed a fall at home.

“My doctors have confirmed that I didn’t break any bones or suffer a concussion. I didn’t have a heart attack or a stroke. I don’t have any tumors or hemorrhages. But I was briefly unconscious and was taken to the hospital. While receiving excellent care over the past several weeks, I’ve also had to deal with a mild case of pneumonia,” McConnell said.

That explanation is more detailed than what the public initially received, but it also raises the obvious question.

Why does it take weeks of rumors before voters get a fuller picture of what is happening with one of the most senior officials in the country?

The Office of the Attending Physician also noted that McConnell’s recent health challenges are not isolated.

“Senator McConnell has experienced several falls throughout the year that have been attributed to his post polio condition. He was admitted to the hospital four weeks ago after falling at home and sustaining minor injuries,” the statement said.

McConnell’s health has been a growing concern for some time, especially after prior public episodes in which he appeared to freeze while speaking to reporters.

The political class may prefer to politely look away, but voters across the country are increasingly tired of being told not to believe their own eyes.

The Senate is not a ceremonial retirement lounge.

It is where major decisions on spending, judges, national security, and the future of the country are supposed to be made by people who are present, alert, and accountable.

Republican voters have watched the old guard cling to power while grassroots conservatives ask for fresh leadership and actual transparency.

That frustration is not going away because a carefully staged photo lands online.

For now, McConnell’s team wants the public to see a recovering senator, not a sidelined power broker whose absence has become impossible to ignore.

The photo may quiet some of the wilder rumors, but it will not end the larger debate over age, accountability, and whether Washington’s permanent political class knows when it is time to step aside.

News

Explosive Records Expose China Blackmail Push Against the Biden Family [WATCH]

Donald Trump warned voters during the 2020 campaign that China knew plenty about the Biden family business machine, and that Beijing could use that knowledge as leverage over Joe Biden.

The political class sneered, the legacy press did its usual eye roll, and anyone asking obvious questions was shoved into the conspiracy corner.

Now, newly discussed records are making that old media performance look even worse.

Emmy winning investigative reporter Catherine Herridge has been digging through declassified material tied to China and its 2020 election influence operation, and what she found should have set off alarm bells across every serious newsroom in America.

Herridge told Katie Pavlich on Katie Pavlich Tonight on NewsNation that the records reference blackmail by China connected to the Biden family.

That is not a small detail, and it certainly is not the kind of thing the press can wave away with another lazy lecture about misinformation.

“I found these records which are talking about blackmail by China,” Herridge said.

“It was for President Biden’s daily brief. I can conclude, I think, that it was probably about targeting his family.”

That is about as direct as it gets.

The records were not some random internet rumor, and they were not buried in a dark basement guarded by a dragon, despite how hard the corporate press may pretend otherwise.

Herridge made clear that the issue was available to anyone willing to look.

“I think in the media or legacy media, there was kind of a willful blindness,” Herridge said.

“They didn’t want to look at the records. All you had to do was spend a couple of hours.”

WATCH:

A couple of hours.

That is apparently too much effort for the same media crowd that had endless energy for Russia hysteria, anonymous leaks, and breathless panels about every anti Trump narrative that wandered through Washington.

The revelations follow Trump’s primetime address to the nation, where he highlighted newly declassified intelligence about China allegedly acquiring 220 million American voter files.

He also described how career officials inside the intelligence community worked to bury the seriousness of that operation from senior leaders, including Trump himself.

Herridge has since connected those concerns to broader questions about what was happening inside the federal bureaucracy during the 2020 campaign.

She pointed to an instant message from senior FBI counterintelligence official Nikki Floris that Herridge described as evidence of a “shadow government” inside the bureau.

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin told Herridge that in August 2020, around the same time the Chinese influence operation was being suppressed, Floris gave him and Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa a defensive briefing.

Johnson believes that briefing was presented as being about Russia, but was really meant to steer the senators away from the Hunter Biden laptop and prepare the ground for calling it disinformation.

That matters because the laptop was not a minor campaign sideshow.

It contained material raising serious questions about the Biden family’s foreign dealings, including the kind of connections and money trails that responsible journalists once claimed to care about.

Instead, Americans got the usual establishment routine.

Big Tech throttled the story, media outlets dismissed it, intelligence veterans helped frame it as foreign trickery, and the same crowd now demanding trust from the public acted shocked when Americans stopped believing them.

Herridge also spoke with a senior member of former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s investigations team.

According to that account, some officials inside the intelligence community believed they knew better than Trump and needed to manage what he saw.

“They had to save President Trump from his own instincts, from his own tendencies,” Herridge said.

She described a bureaucracy invested in preserving a “globalist view,” whether that meant minimizing China’s threat or labeling the Biden laptop as “Russian disinformation”.

WATCH:

That is the central scandal here.

It is not only that China may have had leverage connected to the Biden family, although that alone should be enough to trigger a serious national reckoning.

The deeper problem is that people entrusted with protecting the country appear to have decided what the public was allowed to know.

They picked narratives, protected institutions, and treated voters like a nuisance to be managed.

For years, Americans were told concerns about Hunter Biden, foreign cash, and China’s possible leverage over Joe Biden were wild right wing fantasies.

The evidence keeps marching in the opposite direction, and the smug fact checkers are looking more ridiculous by the day.

Trump said Biden was compromised, and the record now gives that warning a lot more weight than the press ever admitted.

Washington owes Americans real answers about what China knew, who buried it, and how much national security was put at risk while the guardians of democracy were busy guarding Democrats.

News

ICE Launches Sweeping New York City Enforcement Blitz as Crackdown Expands [WATCH]

Federal immigration officers have launched a major enforcement operation in New York City, beginning in Queens on Monday and expanding across other parts of the metropolitan area on Tuesday, according to sources who spoke with NewsNation.

The move marks a significant escalation in immigration enforcement in one of the nation’s most prominent sanctuary friendly strongholds, where local leaders have spent years making life harder for federal officers and easier for illegal aliens.

The operation comes more than a month after White House border czar Tom Homan warned that more immigration enforcement resources were headed to New York City.

Last week, Homan said ICE would be increasing its presence after an alleged attack on a federal building.

Homan made clear that the operation was already in the works before that incident, but he argued the attack showed the rising hostility aimed at federal immigration officers.

That hostility has not appeared out of thin air, despite what the professional excuse makers on the left would like voters to believe.

“There’s just another example of someone attacking ICE because of the constant mismessaging and vilification of the men and women of ICE,” Homan told reporters last week.

According to NewsNation, the operation is being handled by federal officers already assigned to the New York field office.

Sources said ICE has not yet brought in agents from other locations, meaning this is not some mystery invasion cooked up in a fever dream on cable news.

The enforcement push is reportedly focused on illegal aliens and other noncitizens who were released after local jails and prisons refused to honor ICE detainers.

In plain English, federal immigration authorities asked for these individuals to be held for transfer, and local officials let them walk back into the community instead.

That is the sanctuary city shell game in action. Local politicians posture about compassion, then regular citizens are left to deal with the consequences when dangerous policies collide with reality.

New York’s Protect Our Courts Act generally blocks ICE from making civil immigration arrests while people are traveling to, attending, or leaving state courthouses.

The law has become another barrier in a growing maze of restrictions that make federal immigration enforcement more difficult in a city already drowning in migrant related chaos.

Even with those restrictions, sources told NewsNation that the operation could lead to collateral arrests.

That means officers may detain people who were not the original targets if they are encountered during the operation and are found to be in the country illegally.

Homan has repeatedly said that anyone in the United States illegally remains subject to immigration enforcement, even if that person was not initially listed as a target by the Department of Homeland Security.

That is not radical.

That is called enforcing the law, a concept that seems to baffle more than a few blue city officials.

For weeks, Homan has indicated that ICE would expand operations in New York City, though he declined to provide a specific timeline.

He has also sharply criticized New York leaders after Gov. Kathy Hochul signed legislation limiting cooperation between state and local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities inside local jails.

Hochul signed that legislation at the end of May, further cementing the state’s resistance to federal immigration enforcement.

WATCH:

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson declined to confirm whether Monday’s operation had started, citing operational security.

The spokesperson did offer a broader statement about the agency’s mission.

“ICE agents uphold our nation’s immigration laws in all 50 states, seven days a week, 24 hours a day,” the spokesperson said.

That message will not sit well with the sanctuary crowd, but it is exactly what many Americans have been demanding.

After years of open border madness, catch and release politics, and local governments thumbing their noses at federal detainers, voters are watching to see whether Washington is finally serious.

New York officials can keep pretending that obstruction is virtue, but ICE appears to be moving forward anyway.

If local leaders will not help enforce immigration law, federal officers are making clear they are prepared to do the job themselves.

News

CIA Whistleblower Says Intel Shadow Government is Blocking Trump and Shielding China [WATCH]

A former senior CIA operations officer is now putting words to what millions of Americans have suspected for years, that unelected intelligence officials have been quietly treating themselves as the real power in Washington.

James Erdman III, speaking with investigative journalist Catherine Herridge, described a culture inside the intelligence community where career officials see themselves as the “adults in the room.”

That phrase always seems to show up right before the voters are told their choices need adult supervision.

Herridge displayed papers marked “DRAFT” and referenced an email reportedly tied to FBI Foreign Interference Task Force Lead Nikki Floris.

The message allegedly stated, “I am basically running a shadow government inside the FBI right now.”

Herridge then asked the obvious question. “Is there a shadow government?”

“There’s certainly people who believe that they are the adults in the room, and they’re here to make sure that the political leaders that are in charge, we can’t let them do anything too crazy. We’re here to make sure we temper their worst tendencies,” Erdman replies.

“I think that in effect, what you have are people who act as a shadow government, whether they know they’re doing it or not.”

WATCH:

That answer should chill anyone who still believes elections are supposed to mean something.

Erdman is not some random commentator yelling into the void, he is a former senior CIA operations officer describing how powerful bureaucrats can quietly resist the elected commander in chief.

According to Erdman, that resistance showed up in multiple ways during President Trump’s time in office.

He pointed to opposition inside the system to Trump’s election integrity efforts and to attempts to shape or soften what made it into the President’s Daily Brief, especially when the subject was China.

That is not a minor paperwork dispute.

The President’s Daily Brief is supposed to give the president the clearest intelligence picture available, not a curated narrative from officials who think Trump cannot be trusted with facts they find politically inconvenient.

Erdman said there was hesitancy in the system when it came to confronting China while Trump was in office.

Given the Washington establishment’s long record of treating Beijing like an investment partner instead of a hostile communist regime, that claim lands with a lot more weight than the usual media fact check crowd will want to admit.

The China angle also brings to mind retired Army General Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

According to the book “Peril,” Milley privately assured Chinese General Li Zuocheng near the end of Trump’s first term that the United States would not strike China without advance warning from him.

“General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time,” Milley purportedly said.

“It’s not going to be a surprise.”

For normal Americans, that sounds less like steady leadership and more like a bureaucratic class deciding it can freelance foreign policy when it dislikes the man elected by the country.

In any sane capital, that kind of conduct would trigger serious accountability, not cable news praise and book tour rehabilitation.

Erdman also defended then Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, saying she was one of the few officials willing to pursue real intelligence community reform in line with Trump’s directives.

“I think she’s (Gabbard) the only one who actually conducted IC reform and did exactly what President Trump was asking her to do,” he said.

WATCH:

That matters because the permanent class in Washington does not fear speeches, press conferences, or strongly worded letters.

It fears reform, exposure, and losing the ability to bury information until it is politically safe.

The election interference issue only makes the story more explosive.

Newly declassified documents and recent statements from Trump have pointed to Chinese Communist Party access to personal data connected to roughly 220 million American voters.

Trump has alleged that intelligence collected by the FBI in 2020 was buried by rogue officials, and that it included claims about China trying to manufacture illegal ballots for Joe Biden.

“Raw intelligence obtained by the FBI in 2020, yet buried by rogue bureaucrats, stated that China’s activities even included an attempt to manufacture illegal ballots for Joe Biden,” Trump said.

He also cited the alleged FBI message at the center of this growing scandal.

“Another official inside the FBI wrote that she was running a ‘shadow government’ to keep intelligence about China’s election meddling from becoming known.”

The media will do what it always does when the deep state gets caught with its hand in the machinery.

It will pretend the story is too complicated, too old, too partisan, or too dangerous for ordinary Americans to understand.

But the issue is painfully simple.

If unelected officials inside the intelligence community are blocking, massaging, burying, or slow walking intelligence because they dislike the president voters chose, then the constitutional order is being replaced by bureaucratic veto power.

Erdman’s account does not sound like a theory anymore.

It sounds like a warning from inside the walls, and Washington’s permanent class is not going to enjoy the sunlight.

News

‘Hit List’: Mamdani Doxxes Wealthy NYC Property Owners in Tax Grab Database [WATCH]

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s City Hall has taken its class warfare act from campaign slogan to searchable database, publishing the names and addresses of New York City property owners who could be hit by the state’s new second home tax.

The city Department of Finance uploaded a list that claims to identify unoccupied, nonprimary residences across the five boroughs valued above $1 million.

It includes the full names and addresses of the owners, effectively putting thousands of wealthy New Yorkers on public display for the sin of owning property in a city that already taxes nearly everything that moves.

The database follows a widely mocked post from Mamdani on X, where the mayor warned affluent residents to “check your mailbox when you’re back in the five boroughs, because you’ve got mail,” referring to notification letters headed their way.

“The best city in the world deserves the best parks, libraries, and schools in the world. That’s only possible when we all pay our fair share,” Mamdani wrote Thursday.

That phrase, fair share, has become the left’s favorite magic spell.

Somehow it always translates to government taking more money, spending more money, and then acting shocked when taxpayers start looking for the exits.

Mamdani, a self styled socialist favorite of the progressive crowd, has long supported the second home tax approved by Gov. Kathy Hochul and Albany Democrats.

The levy targets city residences that are not used as primary homes, a policy sold as a way to squeeze revenue from wealthy owners who supposedly are not contributing enough.

Critics have warned the tax could hammer property values and chill investment in a market already burdened by sky high costs, red tape, and political hostility toward owners.

In other words, Albany Democrats may once again discover that punishing success does not magically create prosperity.

City Hall claims the tax could bring in about $500 million a year for the Big Apple budget.

Democratic City Comptroller Mark Levine’s office has offered a less rosy estimate, placing the figure closer to $340 million to $380 million, with the possibility that revenue could shrink over time.

That is the part progressives never like to discuss.

When government builds budgets around soaking a targeted group, that group tends to adapt, relocate, sell, or stop investing.

Mamdani has made clear that this is not a one time money hunt.

Earlier this year, he threatened to raise city property taxes by a staggering 9.5% unless he was allowed to tax the rich to help close a budget hole first pegged at $12 billion and later revised down to $5.4 billion.

That little revision alone should make taxpayers nervous.

If City Hall can misjudge a budget gap by billions, perhaps handing politicians another pile of cash is not the grand civic solution they pretend it is.

The mayor is now moving forward with his broader campaign promise to pull more money from rich New Yorkers to fund a sweeping redistribution agenda.

The problem for regular families is that these schemes rarely stop with penthouses, vacation apartments, and people with names in glossy magazines.

WATCH:

According to the report, even the middle class is not safe from the expensive wish list Mamdani wants to finance.

Since taking office, he has backed roughly $23 billion in taxes, a number that ought to send a shiver through anyone still trying to afford rent, groceries, insurance, or a mortgage in New York.

The Post also reported that Mamdani is pushing a months long pressure campaign for even more state tax hikes, including measures aimed at city property owners.

That means the second home tax may be less of a finish line and more of a preview.

Publishing a searchable database with names and addresses raises obvious privacy concerns, especially in a city where political rhetoric against the wealthy has become increasingly aggressive.

It is one thing to debate tax policy, but quite another to put a public target list online and dress it up as fiscal fairness.

For the left, though, this is the governing model.

Identify a villain, publish the receipts, demand more money, and call anyone who objects greedy.

New York’s leaders insist they are protecting parks, libraries, and schools.

Yet residents have heard these promises for decades while city government grows larger, services remain uneven, and taxpayers are told the next tax hike will finally fix everything.

Mamdani’s database is a blunt message to property owners that City Hall knows where they are and wants a bigger cut.

For a city already struggling to keep taxpayers, businesses, and families from fleeing, that is quite a gamble.

The political class may cheer another tax on the wealthy today.

Tomorrow, when the bill spreads wider and the revenue fails to match the sales pitch, ordinary New Yorkers will be left wondering how yet another progressive experiment became their problem.

News

Democrat Infighting Explodes as Bernie Sanders Turns on Party Bosses [WATCH]

Sen. Bernie Sanders defended the progressive wing of the Democratic Party during an interview with CBS News’ Margaret Brennan, pushing back on criticism from longtime Democratic strategist Rahm Emanuel and arguing that voters across the country are rejecting the party’s establishment.

The exchange centered on Emanuel’s contention that progressive messaging is hurting Democrats politically. Brennan asked Sanders to respond to Emanuel’s criticism.

“He’s saying those are losing messages that are going to hurt the party overall,” Brennan said. “How do you respond?”

Sanders dismissed Emanuel’s position and suggested it reflects the priorities of Democratic insiders rather than rank-and-file voters.

“That is what that is what Rahm Emanuel is saying, who no doubt has the support of millions of working class people,” Sanders said.

He acknowledged ongoing ideological divisions within the Democratic Party.

“Look, this is an argument. There’s no debate. There is a strong division within the Democratic Party,” Sanders said.

According to Sanders, the divide is between party leaders he says rely on wealthy donors and a growing progressive movement seeking major policy changes.

“You have an establishment like Rahm Emanuel, who are dependent on billionaire campaign contributors and want to maintain the status quo,” Sanders said. “Then you have a progressive movement.”

Sanders argued that recent political developments demonstrate growing support for progressive candidates and policies in several states.

“What is getting these guys nervous is we are winning all over this country,” he said. “It’s not only Mamdani in New York City, is in New Jersey. It’s in Ohio. It’s in Colorado.”

He contended that dissatisfaction extends beyond Democratic voters and includes frustration with both major political parties.

“People are sick and tired of the Rahm Emanuels, and the Democratic establishment and the Republican establishment,” Sanders said.

Sanders said many Americans are asking why the United States has not adopted a universal healthcare system similar to those in other developed nations.

“They are asking simple questions, Margaret,” Sanders said. “Why, in God’s name, are we the only major country on earth not to guarantee health care to all people as a human right?”

He continued, “Pretty simple question. Canada does it. Europe does it. Somehow we can’t do it.”

Sanders also pointed to wealth inequality, citing businessman Elon Musk as an example.

“Why do we have an economy in which one man, Mr. Musk, owns more wealth than the bottom half of American society?” Sanders asked.

He also questioned whether future generations will enjoy the same economic opportunities as previous ones.

“Why do the economists tell us that in the richest country in the history of the world, our kids will likely have a lower standard of living than their parents?”

Sanders argued that growing economic frustration is fueling demands for sweeping political and economic reforms.

“The American people are tired of a rigged economy, a corrupt campaign, finance system,” Sanders said.

He concluded by arguing that voters are seeking fundamental change rather than preserving existing political leadership.

“They want real change,” Sanders said. “They don’t want Rahm Emanuel and the establishment maintaining the status quo.”

WATCH:

News

Top DSA Marxist Says the Quiet Part Out Loud, Reveals Plans to Wipe Out America’s Institutions [WATCH]

The Democratic Socialists of America are not exactly hiding the ball anymore.

In a Fox News interview, DSA co chair Megan Romer acknowledged that the group’s platform includes abolishing borders, granting amnesty to illegal immigrants, and eliminating prisons.

That is not a conservative fever dream or some overheated campaign ad.

That is the agenda, stated plainly, from one of the people helping steer the socialist movement now trying to drag the Democratic Party even farther left.

Romer said the DSA platform also calls for defunding the Pentagon, abolishing the Senate, replacing the presidency and the Supreme Court, and abolishing United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

For a movement that loves to lecture America about democracy, it sure seems eager to tear down nearly every institution voters still recognize.

The border plank alone should make every sane American stop and take notice.

Open borders and mass amnesty are not immigration policy, they are an invitation to erase national sovereignty and reward lawbreaking on a grand scale.

For years, conservatives have warned that the activist left does not merely want softer immigration laws.

It wants a country where borders are treated as offensive, enforcement is treated as cruelty, and citizenship becomes little more than a paperwork inconvenience.

Now the DSA is saying the quiet part out loud.

Abolish borders, abolish ICE, and hand amnesty to illegal aliens, then expect working families to smile while communities absorb the cost.

The prison plank is just as revealing. Abolishing prisons may sound fashionable in faculty lounges and activist meetings, but in the real world, criminals do not vanish because progressives change the vocabulary.

Families dealing with rising crime, repeat offenders, and soft on crime prosecutors have already seen what happens when ideology outruns common sense.

The DSA response is apparently to go even further and remove the very institutions designed to separate dangerous people from the public.

Then there is the Pentagon.

Defunding America’s military while hostile regimes are testing the limits of American resolve is not brave or visionary, it is reckless.

China, Russia, Iran, and every terrorist network on earth would love nothing more than a weakened Pentagon and a political class too busy chanting slogans to defend the country.

The DSA platform would make America less secure while pretending moral superiority is a defense strategy.

The call to abolish the Senate is another window into the movement’s mindset.

When institutions stand in the way of radical goals, the answer is not persuasion, compromise, or winning over voters, it is demolition.

That same attitude appears in the desire to replace the presidency and Supreme Court.

The left has spent years raging at the Court when it refuses to rubber stamp progressive priorities, and the socialist answer is apparently to scrap the structure rather than respect constitutional limits.

WATCH:

This is the difference between reform and radicalism.

Reformers try to improve systems, radicals try to raze them and hope something better magically rises from the rubble.

The problem for Democrats is that the DSA is not some distant campus club with no relevance to real politics.

Its ideas keep moving into the bloodstream of the modern left, especially in deep blue cities where the activist class sets the tone and elected Democrats scramble to keep up.

That is why these admissions matter.

The platform is not simply a wish list, it is a preview of what the left’s loudest faction believes government should become.

Republicans would be foolish not to make voters hear every word of it.

In swing districts and working class communities, there is no great hunger for open borders, abolished prisons, a gutted military, and a constitutional system tossed into the shredder.

The DSA may dress its agenda in activist language, but the substance is brutally clear.

Tear down the border, empty the prisons, defund national defense, dismantle key institutions, and call it progress.

Most Americans still believe a country should have borders, laws, courts, a military, and consequences for crime.

If that now counts as extremism to the socialist left, then the political contrast for the next election just became very easy to explain.

News

Fauci Diary Exposes Cozy Media Ties, Trump Tensions and Celebrity Fixation [WATCH]

Newly released diary entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci are giving Americans a rare look behind the curtain at the man who became the government face of the COVID 19 era, complete with media chatter, celebrity encounters and internal White House drama.

The records were released by Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul, R Ky., just days before Fauci is set to testify before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee after being subpoenaed by Paul.

The diary details Fauci’s daily role during the pandemic through meetings, calls and personal notes, showing how quickly public health policy turned into a mix of politics, television management and celebrity culture.

For Americans who remember the lockdown years, the entries add another layer to a familiar story.

WATCH:

The experts lectured the country about sacrifice while Washington insiders and media favorites appeared to orbit one another quite comfortably.

Early entries show Fauci describing a warmer relationship with President Donald Trump than many might expect.

Fauci wrote that Trump repeatedly sent questions his way during White House meetings and called him “the smartest person in the world.”

Trump also told Fauci, “We are counting on you,” according to the diary.

Fauci later wrote that Trump appeared “enamored” with him as his national profile exploded during the pandemic.

That relationship did not stay smooth as the pandemic dragged on.

Fauci’s notes describe mounting friction inside the White House, especially with then White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Fauci wrote that Meadows threatened to keep him off television and pushed him to soften his public messaging.

In one entry, Fauci described Meadows as “screaming” over comments Fauci had made in public.

The diary paints then White House communications director Alyssa Farah in a much more favorable light from Fauci’s perspective.

In a May 2020 entry, Fauci said Farah admitted White House staff had been “holding me back” and that the situation had “gotten out of hand.”

According to Fauci, Farah promised to begin approving his television requests again.

In Washington, access to a camera can apparently become its own form of oxygen.

Other communications figures did not fare as well in Fauci’s private notes.

Fauci took sharp aim at then HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Michael Caputo, accusing him in crude terms of publicly backing his media appearances while privately blocking them.

The diary also shows how deeply television journalists figured into Fauci’s pandemic world.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper appears repeatedly in the entries through calls, texts and even dinners at Tapper’s Washington home.

Fauci wrote that Tapper privately checked whether a CNN interview had caused trouble for him with the White House.

When The Atlantic’s Peter Nicholas suggested Fauci had been “humiliated” over a canceled Tapper interview,

Fauci responded with a blunt and vulgar dismissal in his notes.

CNN’s Dana Bash also appears in the diary after Fauci’s heated exchange with Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio.

Fauci wrote that Bash texted him that he was “a better man” and relayed that Wolf Blitzer joked nobody would have blamed him for telling Jordan off.

The next day, Fauci said Bash texted him again, this time pointing him to a Vanity Fair headline mocking Jordan’s performance at the hearing.

The cozy media club always seems to know when to send flowers and when to sharpen knives.

The entries also include billionaire Oracle co founder Larry Ellison, who became part of White House discussions about using Oracle technology during the pandemic. Fauci described Ellison as “a bit of a loose cannon.”

Then there is the celebrity parade. Julia Roberts hosted Fauci on Instagram Live, sent him flowers and later presented him with an award, while Anna Wintour, Trevor Noah, Steph Curry, Sean Penn, Matt Damon and Lil Wayne all show up in the broader Fauci orbit.

The diary reads at moments less like a public health record and more like a guest list for the political class during crisis mode.

Americans were told to stay home, stay quiet and trust the science, while the science was apparently fielding celebrity messages.

The final notable cameo comes from the 2022 Kennedy Center Honors.

Fauci wrote that he hugged Hunter Biden, who joked the internet “would explode” if someone photographed them together because they were both “being attacked by the far right GOP.”

Paul’s release lands as Fauci prepares for another round of scrutiny on Capitol Hill.

For many conservatives, the diary will only fuel questions about whether pandemic leadership was driven by sober public health judgment, political instincts or a taste for fame.

The country is still living with the consequences of decisions made during those years.

Fauci’s own words now offer a revealing glimpse into the power circles, media friendships and celebrity fascination surrounding one of the most controversial government figures of the pandemic.

WATCH:


Scroll to Top