Author name: Common Defense

III Armored Corps Shifts to New Western Hemisphere Command
News

III Armored Corps Shifts to New Western Hemisphere Command

/

The Army has quietly transferred III Armored Corps to the recently established Western Hemisphere Command, marking another step in the service’s sweeping organizational overhaul. The administrative change took effect immediately after Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll issued the order last month.

This is the second time within roughly a year that III Armored Corps has been placed beneath a different higher headquarters. Late last year, the Army assigned the corps to Army Europe and Africa after closing Army Forces Command as part of its broader restructuring effort.

An Army official confirmed the latest transfer to Task and Purpose last week. According to the official, the decision is primarily administrative and will not require troops or their families to complete Permanent Change of Station moves.

The reassignment also does not alter the force posture of III Armored Corps. Its units, missions, readiness obligations and operational capabilities remain in place even though the headquarters overseeing the corps has changed.

Based at Fort Hood, Texas, III Armored Corps commands some of the Army’s most recognizable and combat capable formations. Those units include the 1st Armored Division, the 1st Cavalry Division and the 1st Infantry Division.

The corps brings substantial armored, mechanized and command capabilities to any regional headquarters assigned to manage it. That makes its administrative placement significant for planning purposes, even if soldiers are not immediately packing bags or moving equipment.

The Army previously transferred III Armored Corps to Army Europe and Africa as leaders reorganized how the service divides responsibility across the globe. Under that approach, major combat formations were placed beneath regional Army commands rather than the centralized structure long maintained by Army Forces Command.

Army Forces Command officially closed in December. Its disappearance represented a major institutional change because the organization had overseen the readiness and deployment of a large share of the Army’s conventional forces.

Other formations were shifted during the same restructuring campaign. I Corps, for example, was assigned to Army Pacific, aligning that headquarters more directly with a region central to American military planning and deterrence efforts.

In place of Army Forces Command, the service created Western Hemisphere Command as a four star headquarters. A spokesperson for the new organization said last year that the revised arrangement would “reduce overhead and modernize the Army’s structure.”

The Army has also closed Army North and Army South in recent months, folding their responsibilities into Western Hemisphere Command. That consolidation gives the new headquarters a wider portfolio covering Army activities and planning across the hemisphere.

Moving III Armored Corps under Western Hemisphere Command therefore places a powerful conventional headquarters inside the Army organization responsible for the American homeland and surrounding region. While the immediate effect is bureaucratic, the move could simplify command relationships and give the new headquarters access to seasoned operational planners.

The transfer comes amid additional leadership changes affecting both III Armored Corps and Army Europe and Africa. In late July, the War Department nominated III Armored Corps commander Lt. Gen. Kevin Admiral to take command of Army Europe and Africa.

Admiral is set to replace Gen. Chris Donahue, who departed the European post in June. The nomination connects the latest headquarters shuffle with a larger period of transition for Army leadership, regional commands and global force management.

At the same time, several large planned deployments of American soldiers to Europe were canceled in May. The War Department has also launched a fresh review of the United States force posture on the continent, and that review could produce further changes to troop levels, missions and basing arrangements.

For now, the Army is presenting the III Armored Corps transfer as an administrative adjustment rather than a change in combat readiness or strategic posture. Still, repeatedly moving one of the service’s premier corps headquarters shows that the Army’s command map remains very much under construction.

The practical test will be whether this streamlined regional structure improves readiness and cuts redundant bureaucracy without confusing chains of command. Soldiers tend to care less about organizational charts than clear missions, working equipment and competent leadership, a reality Army planners would be wise to remember.

III Armored Corps will continue operating from Fort Hood while its divisions carry on with existing missions and training requirements. The headquarters name above it has changed again, but the Army’s heavy formations remain expected to be ready when the nation calls.

Lockheed Martin Unveils Strigo Missile Storefront to Slash Fielding Time
News

Lockheed Martin Unveils Strigo Missile Storefront to Slash Fielding Time

/

Lockheed Martin unveiled Strigo on Monday, launching a modular family of missile and sensor hardware built to move critical weapons technology from the drawing board into the field at a much faster pace.

The effort includes a dedicated product center intended to give military customers quicker access to mature or nearly mature systems.

The Strigo portfolio covers radio frequency sensors, missile datalinks and seeker technologies.

Each component is built around a common baseline architecture, allowing engineers to adapt existing hardware instead of starting every new requirement from scratch.

According to Lockheed, that shared foundation can support several mission sets, including air defense, missile defense and air to surface strikes.

The concept gives customers room to reconfigure hardware as threats, targets and operational demands change.

Lockheed describes the Strigo Product Center as a storefront for “ready-now and near-ready” equipment that can be tailored to specific customer requirements.

In plain English, the company wants proven parts waiting on the shelf before military planners come knocking.

That approach could reduce the time and expense involved in developing new weapons, especially when compared with traditional programs that can spend years trapped in studies, redesigns and paperwork.

Lockheed also said modularity should lower life cycle costs, although it did not provide estimated savings or specific dollar figures.

The company has invested $250 million of its own money in the product center so far. That is a substantial corporate bet on faster production at a time when the United States needs deeper munitions stockpiles and a more responsive industrial base.

The center was established less than two years ago, but Lockheed said it has already carried multiple concepts from initial design through testing.

Company officials claim the operation can turn an early sketch into a tested solution within months rather than years.

In some cases, the product center can have components available before the military formally requests them. That could give the Army and other services more options when urgent battlefield needs emerge and lengthy procurement schedules are simply not good enough.

Stacy Kubicek, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin Sensors and Global Sustainment, said early research is central to the center’s strategy.

She said the model allows Lockheed to “test and deploy new solutions at unprecedented speed,” rather than waiting for every detail of a future requirement.

Kubicek added, “That’s how we turn ‘what if’ into ‘what’s next’ faster than ever before.” It is a polished corporate line, but the underlying objective is serious because American troops need weapons on launchers, not promises buried inside another decade of PowerPoint slides.

Lockheed said technology from the Strigo family contributed to the Increment 2 seeker package for the Army’s Precision Strike Missile.

The Precision Strike Missile is replacing the aging Army Tactical Missile System and is expected to provide greater reach and improved targeting capability.

The Increment 2 seeker places a sensor in the missile’s nose that can locate and track a target during the final phase of flight.

That capability is especially important against moving or relocatable targets that may not remain where intelligence first spotted them.

Lockheed conducted the first flight of Increment 2 in March, with the missile traveling 350 kilometers, or more than 217 miles. The flight gathered performance data, although the company did not report an intercept or provide extensive details about the test results.

Strigo is also part of a broader Lockheed campaign to show it can produce weapons faster and at lower cost. In March, the company opened a Rapid Fielding Center that combines prototype construction and early production runs under one roof as part of wider factory expansion and modernization plans.

In July, Lockheed introduced the PAC 3 ACE, a Patriot interceptor the company says will cost less than half as much as the PAC 3 MSE.

Those efforts support the Pentagon’s Arsenal of Freedom push to expand the American munitions industrial base after years of slow production and dangerously thin inventories.

For all the confident language, Lockheed’s announcement left several major questions unanswered.

The company did not disclose the Strigo Product Center’s location, workforce size, organizational structure, contracts, customers or firm delivery schedules beyond its reference to the Precision Strike Missile.

That lack of detail means Strigo will ultimately be judged by hardware delivered, tests completed and production capacity added.

Still, a modular storefront backed by $250 million offers a promising answer to an old procurement problem: getting useful weapons into American hands before the threat has already changed.

Battle Tested USS Thomas Hudner Returns Home After Caribbean Blockade and Iran War
News

Battle Tested USS Thomas Hudner Returns Home After Caribbean Blockade and Iran War

/

The USS Thomas Hudner returned to Naval Station Mayport, Florida, this weekend after a demanding deployment lasting more than eight months.

The Arleigh Burke class destroyer and its 300 sailors came home after supporting major American combat operations across two critical regions.

The warship departed Mayport on Dec. 1 and initially sailed south toward the Caribbean. There, it joined a sizable American naval force assembled as Washington tightened pressure on the Venezuelan regime.

American ships enforced the blockade of Venezuela by pursuing and seizing oil tankers attempting to move through the region. Those operations preceded the January 2026 strike on Caracas that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

The Thomas Hudner did not remain in the Caribbean for long. In February, the Navy shifted the destroyer and several other vessels to the Middle East, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford.

Once inside the Fifth Fleet area of responsibility, the Thomas Hudner joined the opening strikes of Operation Epic Fury, the Pentagon’s name for the war against Iran.

The guided missile destroyer launched several Tomahawk land attack missiles at Iranian targets during the conflict’s first month.

By early summer, the destroyer was operating in the Red Sea before moving back into the eastern Mediterranean. From there, the battle tested ship finally began the welcome journey home to Florida.

“I just can’t say enough about how amazing this crew is, all 300 of them, true American Patriots. We’ve been gone for nine months, a long time, and pulling in this morning here to Mayport to see our friends and family is just surreal and the best feeling in the world,” Cmdr. David Cook said.

That homecoming capped a deployment filled with real world missions rather than ceremonial cruising and polished talking points.

The crew conducted blockade operations, supported a regime capture mission, and fired precision weapons during a major regional war.

Arleigh Burke class destroyers remain essential to American naval power because they can conduct air defense, strike missions, maritime security, and fleet protection. When trouble erupts, these heavily armed ships are routinely among the first assets sent toward it.

The Thomas Hudner has become particularly familiar with high stakes deployments and dangerous waters. Several American destroyers remain positioned around the Red Sea and Arabian Sea as combat operations involving Iran continue.

This latest Middle East mission marked the second time in recent years that the Thomas Hudner participated in fighting connected to Iran.

Last summer, the ship deployed as American forces worked to destroy Iranian missiles aimed at Israel during the 12 Day War.

During that operation, the destroyer coordinated with American ground based air defense systems to counter the Iranian threat.

The mission demonstrated how naval and land forces can work together to defend allies and deny Tehran an easy path to escalation.

The ship also served in the United States Central Command area beginning in late 2023. It became one of the first Navy vessels to engage Houthi militants in the Red Sea, intercepting drones and missiles launched toward commercial shipping near Yemen.

Those exchanges grew into roughly a year and a half of fighting as the Houthis repeatedly threatened merchant vessels and international sea lanes.

The Thomas Hudner’s role placed its sailors near the front edge of a campaign critical to protecting global commerce and freedom of navigation.

As the Iran war continued through two ceasefires, renewed fighting, and another American blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, some ships with lengthy deployments started heading home. The Gerald R. Ford returned to Norfolk, Virginia, in May after also operating in the Caribbean and Middle East.

The Ford and its carrier strike group received the Presidential Unit Citation for their performance during the extended deployment.

Meanwhile, the United States continues maintaining substantial naval power near the Middle East, anchored by the carriers USS Abraham Lincoln and USS George H.W. Bush.

For the Thomas Hudner’s sailors, however, the immediate mission is reunion with families after months spent in contested waters.

They returned with a record that reflects exactly what American sea power is supposed to deliver: presence, precision, endurance, and decisive force when ordered.

Iran Threatens Gulf Catastrophe: Stop US Strikes or Face Devastating Attacks
News

Iran Threatens Gulf Catastrophe: Stop US Strikes or Face Devastating Attacks

/

Iran has launched a coordinated diplomatic pressure campaign against Gulf governments, threatening devastating attacks on their critical infrastructure unless they convince President Donald Trump to halt US military strikes.

Tehran is effectively holding regional energy and water systems hostage while dressing the threat up as diplomacy.

According to a senior Iranian official, the threatened targets include oil fields, refineries, electricity grids, water facilities, transportation networks and other strategic assets belonging to Washington’s closest Arab partners.

Such attacks could destabilize Gulf economies and send shock waves through global energy markets.

The warnings followed Trump’s July 28 threat to strike Iran’s energy network and infrastructure. Iranian leaders responded by contacting neighboring governments and making clear that another US operation could produce destruction far beyond Iran’s borders.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi reportedly spoke with his counterparts in Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, along with Pakistan’s army chief.

Two senior Iranian officials, two Gulf sources and a regional diplomat described the conversations anonymously because of their sensitivity.

Araqchi pressed America’s Gulf partners to use their influence with Trump and discourage renewed military action.

According to the diplomat, his message remained consistent: “We’re ready to retaliate, but finding a diplomatic solution is the best way to avoid wider escalation and destruction across the region.”

Another Gulf source described Tehran’s message in considerably blunter terms. “The Iranian warning was unequivocal: if America targeted Iran’s infrastructure, they would retaliate by striking Gulf energy facilities and other regional targets,” the source said.

The campaign shows how Iran intends to exploit the Gulf’s economic vulnerabilities as leverage against Washington.

Rather than limiting retaliation to US forces, Tehran is threatening civilian infrastructure that provides power, water, transportation and economic security to millions of people.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman subsequently spoke with Trump and urged him to delay military action, seek a ceasefire and return to negotiations, according to the regional diplomat and Gulf sources.

The outreach reflected Riyadh’s concern that an expanding conflict could expose the kingdom’s infrastructure to Iranian missiles and drones.

The warning reportedly applied to every Gulf government, although Iran primarily delivered it through Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Qatar, Oman and Saudi Arabia have encouraged Washington to reopen negotiations after Tehran warned that more US strikes could “turn the region into a fireball.”

On Aug. 2, Trump said he had agreed to cancel the planned attack “subject to being able to rapidly make a deal”. The president’s position preserved the threat of overwhelming force while leaving Tehran a narrow opportunity to abandon escalation and accept a negotiated outcome.

“Saudi Arabia believes further escalation will only bring more destruction,” the first Gulf source said. “That is why it urged Trump to give diplomacy a chance.”

Riyadh, however, is not offering Tehran a free pass to bomb Saudi territory. A second Gulf source said the kingdom warned that any attack would trigger a military response, making clear that diplomacy should not be confused with weakness.

Ali Shihabi, a Saudi analyst close to the Royal Court, said Saudi leaders do not believe uncontrolled escalation will produce Washington’s desired result.

“The Kingdom believes a combination of proportionate military responses and sustained pressure on Iran in the Strait of Hormuz offers the strongest path toward a practical diplomatic settlement,” Shihabi said.

Iran’s clerical regime has repeatedly demanded the closure of US military bases across the Gulf and called on Arab states to stop sharing intelligence with Washington.

Tehran claims that such intelligence has helped enable attacks against Iranian targets, but its answer is the familiar one: threats, coercion and regional blackmail.

“They still remember Saudi Arabia’s Aramco,” the Iranian official said, referring to the September 2019 attacks on the Abqaiq and Khurais facilities.

Those drone and missile strikes temporarily eliminated more than half of Saudi crude production and revealed serious weaknesses in Gulf energy defenses.

“The enemy continues to threaten Iranian infrastructure.

If Iran suffers damage, it will inflict far greater damage in return,” the official added. The alleged target list includes refineries and power grids, suggesting Tehran is prepared to inflict widespread economic and civilian disruption.

Iran believes Trump must choose between a larger regional conflict and a settlement Tehran could portray as survival or victory. Yet the president’s willingness to pause an attack does not erase the military pressure facing Iran or the ability of US forces to resume operations rapidly.

One regional diplomat said political optics remain a major barrier to reaching an agreement.

“The United States wants something it can present as proof that it won the war,” the diplomat said, while Tehran remains equally determined to avoid admitting that American pressure forced it back to the table.

Navy Ousts Drone Program Chief Just Eight Months Into Tenure
News

Navy Ousts Drone Program Chief Just Eight Months Into Tenure

/

The Navy removed Rebecca J. Gassler from her post overseeing robotic and autonomous systems on Wednesday, abruptly ending her tenure only eight months after she was appointed in December 2025.

The leadership change comes as the service pushes to repair an acquisition system criticized for moving too slowly and scattering responsibility across too many offices.

Gassler had served as the Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Robotic and Autonomous Systems.

Her dismissal was announced alongside a broader restructuring intended to put one official clearly in charge of unmanned systems acquisition and delivery.

The Navy established a new Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager for Robotic and Autonomous Systems as part of that overhaul.

According to the service memo, the office is supposed to correct “years of fragmented requirements, resourcing, and acquisition practices that dispersed accountability, complicated industry engagement, and slowed delivery to the warfighter.”

Christopher Miller was selected to serve as the acting direct reporting portfolio manager.

He will also assume Gassler’s previous responsibilities as the portfolio acquisition executive for robotic and autonomous systems.

Miller will report directly to William Toti, who is performing the duties of the under secretary of the Navy.

That reporting arrangement is designed to reduce bureaucratic distance between program decisions and senior Navy leadership.

“We are at an inflection point in naval warfare, and the Department has been approaching robotic and autonomous systems through arcane processes that do not deliver capabilities at the speed our Sailors and Marines need,” Toti said.

His assessment was blunt, but hardly surprising to anyone who has watched the military acquisition bureaucracy turn urgency into paperwork.

“Secretary Cao has directed us to replace that model with clear accountability, faster decisions, and a relentless focus on the warfighter,” Toti continued.

That direction reflects a growing recognition that unmanned vessels and autonomous platforms cannot remain trapped in a procurement maze while China rapidly expands its maritime power.

The personnel change also arrives while the robotic and autonomous systems organization faces scrutiny from two federal lawsuits.

Those cases followed the Navy’s decision to revise the acquisition framework for its medium unmanned surface vessel effort twice within roughly two years.

Blue Water Autonomy and Saildrone filed separate lawsuits in federal court on July 14 after they were excluded from the Navy’s latest unmanned surface vessel acquisition program. Both companies contend that the service mishandled the process and failed to follow its own stated requirements.

The disputed competition involves the Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel Family of Systems program.

These vessels are expected to play an increasingly important role in surveillance, communications, logistics and combat operations across contested waters.

Blue Water Autonomy described the Navy’s decision to eliminate the company from consideration for the request for prototype proposal as “capricious.” The company also argued that the move was not “in accordance with statute or regulation.”

Those legal challenges place additional pressure on Navy leaders to prove that the new management structure can produce fair competitions, clear requirements and usable systems.

Industry cannot efficiently build what the fleet needs when acquisition officials repeatedly rewrite the rules or leave responsibility spread across a collection of bureaucratic silos.

Gassler was the first official to hold the portfolio acquisition executive position after the Navy created the role in December.

That earlier reform was itself intended to streamline acquisitions and accelerate purchases of drones and autonomous vehicles for sailors and Marines.

Her removal after only eight months suggests Navy leadership concluded that another structural correction was necessary.

The service did not provide a detailed public explanation addressing whether the decision was tied directly to her performance, the lawsuits or the troubled acquisition framework.

Gassler also served as deputy director for Project Overmatch, a position she had held since joining the Senior Executive Service in October 2024.

In that role, she worked with the Navy, the joint force, coalition members and allied partners to design, develop and field the Naval Operational Architecture.

Project Overmatch is central to the Navy’s effort to connect ships, aircraft, sensors, weapons and commanders across a contested battlespace. That mission overlaps with autonomous warfare because unmanned platforms are only as effective as the networks, command systems and data architecture supporting them.

The creation of the new direct reporting position signals that Navy leadership wants fewer excuses and a much shorter path from requirement to deployment.

For the fleet, the real test will not be another organizational chart, but whether Miller can deliver reliable autonomous capabilities before America’s adversaries gain an even larger operational advantage.

Modern naval warfare is moving toward distributed fleets, artificial intelligence and unmanned systems at a pace Washington’s old acquisition culture has struggled to match.

Replacing “arcane processes” with actual accountability is overdue, and sailors and Marines will be watching closely to see whether this shakeup produces hardware rather than another wave of memos.

Air Force Robot Rescues C-17 with Part No Vendor Would Build
News

Air Force Robot Rescues C-17 with Part No Vendor Would Build

/

A C-17 Globemaster III once expected to remain grounded for as long as two years is flying again after the Air Force manufactured an unavailable replacement part with robotic technology.

The recovery returned a mission essential airlifter to service while proving that American engineering can overcome a supply chain dead end.

The aircraft, tail number 01 0194, belongs to the 445th Airlift Wing at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.

It was parked overnight at Perot Field Fort Worth Alliance Airport in Texas when violent weather tore through the area on March 4, 2025.

Severe storms and microbursts reaching 80 miles per hour sent two privately owned Bombardier Challenger jets sliding into the military transport.

Video recorded that morning showed one business jet lodged beneath the wing of the much larger C-17.

The same storm system damaged numerous aircraft at airports across the Dallas and Fort Worth metroplex.

For the Air Force, however, the collision threatened to remove one of the wing’s nine mission essential C-17s from duty for an extended period.

The impact damaged the aircraft’s left side door, fuselage and nose section.

Its crew managed to fly the wounded transport home with the landing gear extended and a temporary nose panel that was qualified by Boeing and approved by the Air Force.

Once the aircraft returned to Ohio, maintainers repaired the damaged door and fuselage.

Their work then hit a serious obstacle when inspectors determined that the left nose panel could not be salvaged and would have to be replaced.

Boeing searched for a supplier, but no vendor was willing to create specialized tooling for a single replacement panel, according to the Air Force. Apparently, keeping a strategic airlifter operational was not enough to make a one item production run attractive to the usual supply chain.

An unsuccessful attempt to repair the original panel made the problem even more urgent.

Without another solution, the C-17 faced roughly one year in storage followed by another year of repair work, an unacceptable loss of capacity for a wing with only nine essential aircraft.

The 445th Airlift Wing brought the problem to the Air Force Rapid Sustainment Office at Wright Patterson.

The office, part of the Life Cycle Management Center, specializes in finding practical ways to manufacture components that conventional suppliers cannot or will not provide.

Engineers identified the nose panel as a strong candidate for incremental sheet forming, commonly called ISF.

With that process, a robot follows a programmed digital path and gradually presses a flat sheet of metal into the required shape.

Unlike traditional manufacturing methods, ISF does not require a dedicated mold or expensive tooling for each component.

That distinction made it ideal for producing one highly specialized panel without waiting for a reluctant vendor to decide the project was worth the trouble.

Working alongside the University of Dayton Research Institute, the team started production in January 2026.

The digital manufacturing approach transformed an otherwise unobtainable component from a supply chain nightmare into a manageable engineering challenge.

Boeing personnel and maintainers from the 445th Airlift Wing installed the completed panel in July.

On July 30, tail number 01-0194 returned to the sky, nearly 17 months after the Texas storm battered the aircraft.

“This is a tremendous win for our maintenance group,” Col. Karen Gharst, the 445th Maintenance Group commander, said in a statement. “Using the ISF technology to rapidly produce an otherwise unobtainable part allowed us to avoid a prolonged work stoppage.”

The flight marked the first time an incrementally formed component had flown aboard an Air Force aircraft.

More importantly, it demonstrated that robotic manufacturing can restore critical military equipment when aging production lines and hesitant vendors fail to deliver.

Boeing shut down C-17 production in 2015, but the Air Force expects the Globemaster fleet to remain in service into the 2070s.

That long horizon means maintainers will increasingly confront scarce components, retired tooling and suppliers unwilling to accept small orders.

The Rapid Sustainment Office is already applying its expertise to components for the KC-135 and F-15. If those efforts succeed, the C-17 nose panel will be more than an impressive repair story because it will provide a blueprint for keeping proven American aircraft ready for decades to come.

Special Operations Command Seeks Powerful 10 Pound 5.56mm Machine Gun
News

Special Operations Command Seeks Powerful 10 Pound 5.56mm Machine Gun

/

United States Special Operations Command is hunting for a radically lighter machine gun that weighs about 10 pounds and fires standard 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition.

The proposed Flyweight Assault Machine Gun is intended to give elite operators serious suppressive fire without forcing them to haul another battlefield anchor.

Navy Cmdr. Joe Vermette, a spokesperson for the command, confirmed that the weapon would replace the Mk 46.

That special operations version of the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon has served for roughly 30 years, making the search a substantial modernization effort rather than another Pentagon science project.

“The goal is to replace the MK46 while integrating advancements in material, manufacturing, and technology to provide the operators with a technically superior weapon system that will allow an operator to effectively shoot, maneuver, and lay down suppressive fire,” Vermette said.

That combination of mobility and sustained fire is especially important for special operators, who routinely carry weapons, ammunition, communications equipment, armor, medical gear, and other mission essentials.

Shaving pounds from a primary weapon can translate directly into greater speed, endurance, or additional ammunition when the shooting starts.

SOCOM expects to award a contract for the new machine gun late next year, according to Vermette. If testing proceeds as planned, the command intends to begin fielding the Flyweight Assault Machine Gun during fiscal year 2028.

The War Zone first reported in May that SOCOM was seeking a new lightweight machine gun for special operations forces.

A Navy contract opportunity posted in June later provided a clearer picture of the performance standards the command expects industry to meet.

Under those requirements, the weapon can be no longer than 39 inches, although that ceiling could eventually shrink to 35 inches.

It must also provide an effective range of at least 500 meters against area targets, giving operators useful reach despite the compact design and lightweight frame.

The solicitation calls for a “quick-change barrel” that can be replaced within 30 seconds or less. It also requires a collapsible buttstock and “no stoppages in extreme cold and heat,” because elite troops do not get to choose pleasant weather before going to work.

Recoil must be controlled well enough for operators to engage targets at the weapon’s maximum effective range during both daytime and nighttime missions.

The gun must also work with SOCOM’s Visual Augmentation Systems and Weapon Accessories, ensuring compatibility with the specialized optics and equipment already used across the force.

Delivering all of that in a weapon weighing approximately 10 pounds will be no small engineering task. Machine guns must survive heat, vibration, sustained firing, rough handling, and filthy battlefield conditions, all while remaining reliable enough that an operator can trust the weapon when a mission turns ugly.

The Flyweight program is only one part of SOCOM’s broader effort to modernize its machine gun inventory. Vermette said the command is separately pursuing the Lightweight Machine Gun Medium, chambered in .338 Norma Magnum, and the Light Machine Gun Assault, chambered in 7.62mm NATO.

Those programs would provide special operators with multiple levels of firepower tailored to different missions.

The 5.56mm weapon emphasizes mobility, the 7.62mm platform provides greater power, and the .338 Norma Magnum option is meant to extend machine gun reach and battlefield authority.

SOCOM is also preparing to place a new rifle into operators’ hands. Vermette said in May that the command expected to begin fielding the MK24 Mid Range Gas Gun Assault during the current fiscal year as a replacement for the MK17 SCAR H Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle Heavy.

The MK24 includes a “quick-change swappable barrel” that allows the rifle to fire both 7.62mm NATO and 6.5mm Creedmoor ammunition.

That flexibility gives operators another tool for adapting weapon configuration to mission distance, ammunition requirements, and expected threats.

For troops who already count every ounce before stepping outside the wire, a capable 10 pound machine gun could be a major improvement.

If manufacturers can meet SOCOM’s demanding reliability, range, recoil, and durability standards, America’s special operators may soon carry lighter weapons without surrendering the suppressive fire their missions demand.

Boeing Scores First Production Contract for Jet Powered JDAM with Cruise Missile Reach
News

Boeing Scores First Production Contract for Jet Powered JDAM with Cruise Missile Reach

/

The United States Air Force has committed $75 million for the initial production of a jet powered guided bomb capable of flying more than 300 nautical miles, Boeing announced Wednesday.

The award moves the ambitious weapon from testing toward operational inventory.

Boeing’s BSU 111 B Payload Delivery Unit combines deployable wings with a turbojet engine to transform a 500 pound Joint Direct Attack Munition into a much longer range strike weapon.

The resulting GBU 75 offers the reach of a cruise missile while building upon the proven JDAM family.

The company has invested nearly $100 million of its own money in the program, signaling substantial confidence in both the technology and expected military demand.

That private investment also helped move development forward before the government committed to the first production batch.

“Scaling production of the GBU-75 will provide the fleet with an affordable, sustainable solution designed to eliminate long-range land and sea-based threats to U.S. and international forces,” said Bob Ciesla, vice president of Boeing Precision Engagement Systems.

The BSU 111 B represents the latest major improvement to a weapon family that has steadily gained range and flexibility.

Early JDAM tail kits allowed conventional gravity bombs to steer toward targets roughly 15 nautical miles away.

A later wing kit extended that reach to about 40 nautical miles. Now, a Kratos designed TDI J85 turbojet engine pushes the weapon beyond 300 nautical miles, placing a dramatically larger target area within striking distance.

That range matters because modern enemy air defenses make close approaches increasingly dangerous for American aircraft and crews.

A bomb that can travel hundreds of miles gives pilots more room to attack while staying farther from hostile missiles, radar systems, and fighter patrols.

The GBU 75 is not limited to conventional land targets. Boeing is also developing the QuickStrike Long Range mining variant, which combines the propulsion package with a bomb equipped with a sensor designed to detect and track ships.

Boeing has released concepts showing large numbers of these weapons loaded aboard Air Force bombers.

The Air Force has not announced a purchase for that particular configuration, but the concept points toward massed, lower cost strike options against land and maritime threats.

The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center at Hill Air Force Base in Utah purchases JDAM weapons for both the Air Force and the United States Navy. The first production GBU 75 weapons are slated to go to the Navy.

Navy Super Hornets demonstrated the weapon over the Point Mugu Sea Range off California in April.

During the April 1 test, the weapon separated cleanly, started its engine, remained airborne for 34 minutes, and landed within meters of its intended target.

A second test on April 3 added altitude changes and maneuvering to further challenge the system.

Each weapon traveled roughly 200 nautical miles, demonstrating meaningful range while also validating controlled flight under more demanding conditions.

“As Naval Air Forces in theater continue to rely heavily on JDAM systems, the program recognizes a critical need to provide the fleet with greater standoff range,” Navy Precision Strike Weapons program manager Capt. Sarah Abbott said.

“This new capability allows pilots to engage targets from significantly safer distances, maintaining a tactical advantage in contested environments.”

One major advantage is that the military does not need to create an entirely new weapons ecosystem.

Navy budget documents describe JDAM LR as a modification of the baseline program using existing production lines, guidance equipment, and support infrastructure.

According to Boeing, any aircraft already capable of dropping a conventional JDAM can carry the new version without modification. That compatibility could reduce integration headaches, training demands, and additional costs that frequently bog down new weapons programs in bureaucratic quicksand.

The award had not appeared in the Pentagon’s daily contract announcements as of Aug. 5. It is an undefinitized action, which means Boeing began work before the government and company finished negotiating the final price.

The Government Accountability Office has repeatedly warned that such arrangements can carry financial risk because contractors receive reimbursement for allowable costs. Boeing did not disclose how many weapons the $75 million will purchase, the cost of each GBU 75, or when deliveries will begin.

Even with those unanswered contracting questions, the operational logic is clear. The GBU 75 could give American naval aviation a powerful new way to strike distant land and maritime threats without forcing pilots to fly straight into the enemy’s engagement zone.

Senator Launches Push to End VA Clawbacks from Disabled Veterans
News

Senator Launches Push to End VA Clawbacks from Disabled Veterans

/

An Arizona senator is renewing a push to stop the Department of Veterans Affairs from clawing back military separation pay from disabled veterans, sometimes decades after they left active duty.

The proposal targets a practice that can suddenly wipe out disability checks veterans rely upon for housing, transportation, food, and medical expenses.

Sen. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat, introduced legislation Thursday that would bar the VA from collecting voluntary or involuntary separation pay from veterans approved for disability compensation. Gallego is a former Marine who served in the Iraq War.

The bill would also protect veterans who later qualify for military retirement pay from being forced to repay more money than they actually received.

Those veterans would remit the net separation payment placed in their pockets, rather than the larger gross amount calculated before taxes.

Gallego previously introduced similar legislation in the House alongside Rep. Gus Bilirakis, a Florida Republican. That proposal stalled in committee, leaving the government’s collection machinery running while veterans continued receiving unpleasant notices.

The senator argues that disability compensation and separation payments exist for fundamentally different purposes. Disability compensation functions much like workers compensation, while separation pay recognizes “time served” and serves as a force management tool for the War Department.

“It is ridiculous to claw back money from a veteran who has put life and limb on the line, just because later in life they qualify for disability benefits,” Gallego said in a statement.

For veterans blindsided years later, ridiculous may be putting it politely.

Between 2013 and 2023, the VA recovered $2.44 billion in separation payments and bonuses from 112,834 veterans. The department points to federal law prohibiting disability compensation for veterans who received covered separation payments unless that money is repaid.

The VA has been required to recover these funds since the 1940s, while the War Department must warn departing service members that future recoupment is possible. Yet veterans still report receiving surprise collection letters many years, and occasionally several decades, after leaving uniform.

One retired Air Force officer received $30,000 in separation pay in 1990, only to receive a VA letter in 2024 announcing that his entire disability check would be withheld until repayment was complete.

The sudden action placed him at risk of losing both his living quarters and his vehicle.

“I fail to comprehend how or why they intend to cut me off for several months without even negotiating a lesser but [survivable] monthly contribution. I also fail to understand why it took 34 years for VA to come up with this [scheme]. Why now?” retired Air Force Maj. Raymond Thomas, 75, told Military.com.

Current law permits the VA to withhold monthly disability compensation from veterans who previously received readjustment pay, severance payments, special separation benefits, or voluntary or involuntary separation pay. In some cases, the government can seize the entire disability check until the claimed balance is satisfied.

The recoupment campaign reached its recent peak in 2018, when 17,066 veterans repaid more than $396 million.

Those numbers illustrate how an obscure policy can produce a very real financial hammer for military families already managing service connected disabilities.

Gallego’s Restore Veterans Compensation Act would also reduce the collection rate for military retirees who remain subject to repayment. Instead of taking 40% of their checks, the VA would be limited to collecting 25%, easing the monthly financial blow.

Disabled American Veterans supported the earlier Gallego and Bilirakis proposal in 2022.

The organization said withholding disability compensation because a former service member received a separation benefit “must end.”

Sen. James Risch, an Idaho Republican, introduced a separate measure Wednesday called the Veterans Earned Benefits Access Act.

His bill would preserve the VA’s ability to collect separation pay but cap monthly withholding at 25% of a veteran’s disability compensation.

“My [bill] ensures that veterans can receive the disability benefits they need while repaying their separation pay,” Risch said in a release. Either proposal would offer more predictability than the current system, which can take every dollar from a veteran’s disability check with little regard for immediate consequences.

The competing bills take different approaches, but both recognize that disabled veterans should not be financially ambushed by Washington’s decades old bookkeeping.

Congress now has another opportunity to replace bureaucratic shock treatment with a policy that respects service, disability, and basic fairness.

VA Restores Phones and Rideshare Lifelines for Homeless Vets
News

VA Restores Phones and Rideshare Lifelines for Homeless Vets

/

The Department of Veterans Affairs is restoring practical assistance that can help homeless veterans remain connected to doctors, housing officials, employers and family members.

Under a newly announced rule, eligible veterans may receive smartphones, tablets, disposable phones, service plans and transportation support.

For veterans living on the street, losing contact with an outreach worker can mean losing a housing opportunity or missing a critical medical appointment. A simple phone and a ride can make the difference between entering a program and remaining stranded outside it.

“It’s not uncommon for veterans to be qualified into programs, but then for the outreach worker to struggle to find them for weeks,” said Kathryn Monet, CEO of the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans.

“That is a big and seemingly preventable struggle. Surely there should be a way if we can find people to get them the benefits that they’re entitled to.”

The new rule restores benefits previously offered through a COVID era program. Veterans qualify when they would be “unable to maintain contact” with VA services without the assistance, ensuring resources are directed toward those who genuinely need help staying connected.

The authority comes from the Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act. The broad law addresses VA health care, benefits and support programs, including services for veterans who do not have permanent housing.

The law also permits the VA to provide basic items needed for “safety and survival,” including food, clothing and blankets. According to the notice, these services and resources will remain available to eligible veterans through Sept. 30, 2027.

Transportation assistance may also be provided “as necessary” through public transit vouchers or contracted rideshare companies such as Uber and Lyft. The goal is to help homeless veterans reach medical appointments, court hearings, grocery stores, legal service meetings and housing placement appointments.

The rideshare component has already proved its value on a large scale. During the pandemic, more than 44,000 veterans used the program for 494,000 rides, demonstrating that transportation is not some minor convenience when veterans are trying to rebuild stable lives.

Monet said the new law gives the VA the same flexible authority and funding that had been available during the pandemic.

She said it “took way too long” to restore resources that coalition officials believe address “logistical problems that stand between a veteran and available housing,” including transportation to appointments and reliable communication with landlords.

“It really is an authority that was designed to close some of the gaps that you see when you’re out doing outreach to veterans,” Monet said. Those gaps can look small from inside a federal office, but they become enormous for someone without a car, an address or a working telephone.

There is no single homelessness figure accepted by every veterans advocate, although federal data provide a useful national picture.

The latest Department of Housing and Urban Development point in time count identified 32,495 homeless veterans on one night in January 2025.

The National Coalition for Homeless Veterans noted that the figure was the lowest recorded since 2009.

Even so, veterans represented about 5 percent of all adults experiencing homelessness that night, roughly matching their share of the overall United States population.

The VA reported permanently housing 51,936 veterans nationwide during calendar year 2025.

That progress matters, but the remaining numbers show why officials cannot afford to let basic communication and transportation failures block veterans from housing that is already available.

Phones can also become lifesaving equipment during hurricanes, floods, wildfires and sudden weather events. Emergency alerts that most Americans take for granted may never reach an unsheltered veteran who has no television, dependable internet connection or permanent address.

“In a hurricane, when you have a cell phone, you get an alert saying ‘The weather’s gonna change, go inside.’ Or you see it on the TV. But if you’re an unsheltered veteran and you’re out in a ravine in Arizona, you might not know that the weather’s gonna change, and the water can be really detrimental,” Monet said.

“There are some basic common sense things, but there are also these other extremes when you think about the weather disasters and what it really means to be able to be in touch with the world around you.”

After years of bureaucratic delay, restoring these tools gives outreach teams a better chance to connect veterans with the assistance they earned through service.


Scroll to Top